172 - Julia Chatain: Embodied Learning and Educational Technology in Mathematics and Beyond (REAIR)

20 Mar 2026 · 38 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Stanford Psychology Podcast - Episode 172 Summary

Episode Information

  • Title: Julia Chatain: Embodied Learning and Educational Technology in Mathematics and Beyond (REAIR)
  • Host: Adani
  • Guest: Dr. Julia Chatain, Senior Scientist at the Singapore-ETH Centre of ETH Zürich
  • Focus: Discussion on embodied learning, educational technology, and their applications in mathematics education.

Key Concepts

  1. Embodied Learning
  2. Definition: A learning approach that emphasizes the role of the body in cognition and learning processes.
  3. Importance: Focuses on how sensory-motor experiences influence understanding and engagement with mathematical concepts.
  1. Educational Technology (EduTech)
  2. Julia's past work involved the development of educational technology, focusing on:
  3. Mixed Reality (XR)
  4. AI-supported learning
  5. Accessibility in education.
  1. Challenges in Mathematics Education
  2. Traditional views: Mathematics often perceived as a pure and abstract field.
  3. Embodied perspective: Emphasizes the social and malleable processes influenced by sensory experiences.
  1. Research Methodology
  2. Utilizes interdisciplinary approaches, blending computer science, interaction design, and learning sciences.
  3. Involves co-designing educational tools with both students and educators.

Discussion Highlights A. Julia's Journey

  • Transitioned from a background in computer science to a focus on learning sciences during her doctoral studies.
  • Influences from experiences in both mathematics and design led to her current interdisciplinary path.

B. The Role of Gestures in Learning

  • Gestures are shown to be integral to learning, aiding in:
  • Concept representation
  • Information tracking
  • Communication
  • Emotional regulation

C. Scalability in Educational Interventions

  • Importance of creating scalable tools in education to enhance accessibility and adaptability in classrooms.
  • Use of technology to automate assessments and reduce teacher workload.

D. Teacher Perspectives

  • Concerns: Overwhelmed by workload and adapting to new technologies.
  • Optimism: Excitement about bridging gaps in understanding and easing grading processes through tech integration.

Future Directions

  1. Future Embodied Learning Technologies (FELT)
  2. A new research program focusing on creating scalable, AI-driven educational tools addressing:
  3. Math literacy
  4. Language learning
  5. Accessibility issues.
  1. Accessibility Innovations
  2. Developing tools that support learners with disabilities through embodied learning technologies, such as VR with haptic feedback.
  1. Interdisciplinary Collaboration
  2. Importance of engaging diverse expertise in research projects to enhance educational outcomes and create innovative learning tools.

Advice for Aspiring Researchers

  • Gain experience through internships and collaborative projects.
  • Cultivate coding skills and familiarize oneself with design and interaction.
  • Stay curious and explore various interests to enrich interdisciplinary perspectives.

Additional Resources

  • Julia Chatain's Website: [juliachatain.com](https://juliachatain.com/)
  • Singapore-ETH Centre: [sec.ethz.ch](https://sec.ethz.ch/)
  • Podcast Contact: stanfordpsychpodcast@gmail.com
  • Follow on Twitter: [@StanfordPsyPod](https://twitter.com/StanfordPsyPod)

Conclusion This episode sheds light on the intersection of embodied learning and educational technology, showcasing Dr. Julia Chatain's work and thoughts on transforming mathematics education through innovative, participatory, and accessible methods. The discussion emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and the future potential of scalable educational technologies.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Defining Learning Sciences

1:00 to 4:00

Dr. Chatain explains the field of learning sciences and its significance.

“Thank you so much for joining us on the podcast today, Gillian.”

Sensory-Motor Experiences in Mathematics

4:00 to 7:00

Discussion on how sensory experiences shape understanding of mathematics.

“And then we had to correct some of our approaches.”

Concrete Representations in Math Education

7:00 to 10:00

Exploration of using concrete experiences to teach abstract math concepts.

“But then we can also get more high-tech solutions.”

Innovative Tools for Learning

10:00 to 13:00

Discussion on using technology and interactive tools to enhance learning.

“So sometimes you're mimicking a certain concept, like you can imagine mimicking an angle with your hands or things like this.”

Assessing Learning Outcomes

13:00 to 14:02

Dr. Chatain discusses methods to assess learning and the role of gestures.

“Yeah, so I think there are different ways in which we talk of scalability in those kinds of projects.”

Challenges in Integrating Technology in Education

14:02 to 16:43

Explore the difficulties teachers face when adopting new educational technologies.

“And like, for example, in my research, I always look at the virtual reality version because it's quite important and it answers interesting questions in how we move.”

Teacher Optimism and Excitement for Technology

16:44 to 18:10

Discuss the positive reactions teachers have towards implementing new tech in classrooms.

“Maybe it would also be great for us to talk a little bit about things that you've heard teachers be optimistic about.”

Concrete vs Abstract Learning in Mathematics

18:11 to 21:01

Learn about the significance of using concrete examples in teaching abstract mathematical concepts.

“And I think maybe there will be also a shift about what we do in the classroom and what we do at home.”

Iterative Design Process for Educational Tools

21:02 to 22:35

Understand the iterative design process for creating effective educational technologies.

“but it actually helped me at least understand what edges and nodes are like very basic concepts.”

The Benefits of Interdisciplinary Collaboration

22:36 to 24:44

Discover how interdisciplinary teams enhance research and educational technology development.

“So you might have, I guess, like engineers, right?”
Show all 17 chapters

Exploring Causal Knowledge in Mathematics

24:45 to 27:21

Learn about a project investigating causal knowledge through virtual reality in math education.

“And one of the projects I hear you're now working on is sort of about learners building and extrapolating causal knowledge.”

Personal Journey into Education and Technology

27:22 to 28:00

Hear about the personal experiences and influences that led to a career in educational technology.

“Yeah, I think I have a bit of a less straightforward path.”

Journey into Learning Sciences

28:00 to 29:13

Explore Julia Chatain's path from software engineering to learning sciences.

“And that's where I found about the learning sciences field.”

Navigating Interdisciplinary Settings

29:13 to 31:02

Understanding the challenges and benefits of working in interdisciplinary teams.

“So, yeah, my inspiration is more like the people I met along the way.”

Exciting Future Projects

31:02 to 32:35

Discussing Julia's new initiative focusing on embodied learning technologies.

“So like staying open in those kinds of conversation, I think is quite important.”

Advice for Aspiring Researchers

32:35 to 34:56

Julia shares guidance for those looking to enter the field of educational technology.

“What do you want to share in terms of what you're doing now and what you hope to do in the coming years?”

Resources for Learning and Growth

34:56 to 35:49

Discovering valuable resources and personal initiatives for learning.

“a job now than some of my classes at uni.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Adani:Welcome back to the Stanford Psychology Podcast. I'm Adani and for this week's episode, I had the pleasure of chatting with Dr. Julia Chatain. Julia is a computer scientist and learning scientist by training and is currently a senior scientist at the Singapore ETH Center of ETH Zurich. Before that, she led the educational technology group at ETH Zurich. In this episode, we discuss primarily her recent work on embodied learning in mathematics. Much of this work was part of her dissertation at ETH Zurich, which she conducted with her joint advisors, Dr. Manu Kapoor and Dr. Bob Sumner. I have gotten to know Julia as a true interdisciplinarian.

0:39Adani:Her research involves many different topics and methods, ranging from math education and embodied cognition in humans to artificial intelligence and the use of mixed reality in industry and research. Given that, we also dive into Julia's path to where she is now and what she is currently be working on at the Singapore ETH Center and beyond. Without further ado, here's our conversation.

1:25Adani:Thank you so much for joining us on the podcast today, Gillian.

1:28Dr. Julia Chatain:And I was very happy to be here.

1:31Adani:So I think we have a lot to talk about, and I'm very excited that we get to have this conversation. You basically work at the intersection of many different fields, including more technical ones and more applied ones, which I think gives us the opportunity to touch on a whole bunch of topics. And I think it will be especially interesting for our listeners to hear how you got to the place in which you are now. But actually, what I would love to start with is some terminology. So you completed your doctorate at ETH Zurich roughly a year ago, and you worked at the Game Technology Center and the Professorship for Learning Sciences and Higher Education.

2:08Adani:So what I want to ask you is actually, what are the learning sciences exactly? And how does that relate to what you do?

2:15Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah, that's a very good question that I had to answer myself. So my background is originally more in computer science and interaction. And then in my doctorate, I did, as you mentioned, like this interdisciplinary project where I got to discover learning sciences. And so from my understanding, it's learning sciences is about understanding how people learn and the mechanisms that help people learn. And then how can we design learning activities that would trigger those mechanisms to help people learn? So, for example, we might understand that surprise is important in learning because when you're surprised about a certain phenomenon, you're going to investigate and then you're going to learn.

2:51Dr. Julia Chatain:and we study these kinds of things. And it's a bit different from educational research that would be more focused on what are the things we should teach students? Should we teach them math? Should we teach them ethics, et cetera? It's really focusing on the learning process.

3:03Adani:Yeah, so that's awesome. I just heard you mention learning or teaching math rather. And I actually looked at your dissertation, which you submitted in March, 2023. And in your abstract, you have an interesting sentence that I wanted to talk about. And it goes, although mathematics is often considered as a platonic ideal that can directly be sensed or manipulated, mathematics rather is a social and malleable process that arises from our sensory motor experiences of the world. And maybe you can just talk a little bit about what kinds of sensory motor experiences you're talking about here and why do they matter for math?

3:41Adani:Because many people might think we do math purely in our heads. Is that not the case and how so?

3:47Dr. Julia Chatain:yeah so okay before going to computer science i studied mathematics and for me i always found it something very beautiful but i noticed that some people actually have a different memory of mathematics which is a bit less enjoyable and then i start looking into yeah how people learn math and how math even came to be as a field and i think there are a few misconceptions we often have so one is that math is pure and perfect but then if you look at the history of math like very often we realized that some of the things we figured out were actually wrong. And then we had to correct some of our approaches.

4:22Dr. Julia Chatain:And you can also see, for example, how math as a discipline is heavily informed by physics as well, which is tied to the real world. But then also, if you think about, if I give you a difficult math problem to solve, the first thing you're going to do is take some paper and start drawing things on paper and start writing things. So like already you need to bring it back to the real world to start making sense of those concepts. And those representations, those drawings you will make, they will not be perfect, but they will help you make sense of the underlying concept. And then again, when we look at math as a field, we realize that many of the concepts we are thinking of, they are actually metaphors or representations of things we can experience in the real world.

4:59Dr. Julia Chatain:So for example, counting is thinking of collections of objects that you would represent in the real world. Infinity is also something that also doesn't really exist in the universe because our senses are limited and cannot comprehend gigantic objects. We have the concept of infinity quite clearly as a nutrition. And so I was quite interested of how those experiences of the world help us access some mathematical topics.

5:23Adani:So in some sense, making abstract or not directly accessible things more concrete, is that part of it? Yeah.

5:32Dr. Julia Chatain:So one part of my research was about, can we create concrete experiences and concrete in the sense of more relatable or more visual and more interactive? that would help people get the right intuition to then start building towards these more formal representations. Because I think, I don't know how it's in the US, but I know that in France, the way we approach math education is really elitist. We are teaching math for the people who wish to become mathematicians. Everybody is going to need a bit of math skills, even if they decide to do something else than mathematics for their whole life. And then I was interested in how can we teach to those people the right intuition and the right grounding so they can then start exploring those tools.

6:11And here we had several projects

6:13Dr. Julia Chatain:where we build those concrete representations of abstract concepts, for example, in graph theory or also in calculus.

6:20Adani:Yeah, that's really wonderful. So I think this kind of connects back to what you mentioned a little bit ago in one of your sentences. So you said that sometimes you may think about a math problem and you may start mapping things out like with pen and paper, right? On a piece of paper. And these are maybe in some sense at this point, archaic tools, outdated tools And so one thing I was curious about is in modern times, what kinds of things and tools can you use to make things more concrete? And what have you used in your studies?

6:49Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah, there are many ways in which we can do this. So the most simple way would be to use objects. So we could use like physical objects that represent the concept and that people manipulate. And if you look at children's toys, like to represent numbers and those little cubes, there's already the very no-tech solutions. But then we can also get more high-tech solutions. So for example, in virtual reality, you can have any sort of visual representation for mathematics, for mathematical concepts. And then you can also make them interactive by tracking the hands of the users and these kinds of things.

7:20Dr. Julia Chatain:There are also some projects in Switzerland about using robots. And then you manipulate the robots and you try to teach some concepts to the robot. And through that, you learn yourself. And then there are more like hybrid setups, augmented reality, where you still have a version of the real world and you add those digital elements on top of it. And here it's quite interesting because it's cheaper in the end that just build tons of physical objects for each of the concepts. And it's more scalable as well.

7:46Adani:So there are many things in there. One thing that I would love to unpack a bit more is if you want to help people learn, ideally we have a way of assessing that we actually helped people in some way. And so you already mentioned that there are somewhat different strands of research, like educational research or pedagogy and people having different sorts of approaches to making sense of whether something works or not. It would be wonderful if you could talk a bit about how you assess learning outcomes or learning in general in some of your studies and what that looks like.

8:20Dr. Julia Chatain:So traditionally, what we would do is, let's say we have an activity, we have a virtual reality game about mathematics and we want to see if that helps people learn. what we would do is that we would test for their abilities before. So they would solve a little math test and then we would test for their ability after. And then we would compare whether their after performance is better than the previous performance. But if you think of the kind of assessments we have for learning, so like how do we test for learning? Usually it's like a written test where you ask people to solve formulas and et cetera.

8:50Dr. Julia Chatain:And what we know from research is that when people make sense of a new concept, they can first express it in gestures, then like a little time after they can express it in speech, and much later they can express it in written form. So the way we used to assess learning right now, which is focused on the written form, is missing all the evidence of preliminary learning. So what we want to do in future research is have assessments of learning where we look at how the person is moving in an automatic manner, like using AI or something like this, and we analyze those movements. And from here, we can see whether they change in their gestures and whether there is some learning already.

9:26Dr. Julia Chatain:And that would help capturing preliminary evidence of learning and start retargeting the learning activity early on.

9:35Adani:I actually did not know that. That's the first time I heard that. And it's also the listeners can't see us gesture as we talk. But in general, as we try to communicate information and make sense of things, we use a lot of gestures. That's fascinating. So you have, yeah, sorry, go for it.

9:51Dr. Julia Chatain:Sorry, if I can just add on this, because we are using a lot of gestures. And I think one that is interesting, and we know from research, is that when we learn, we spontaneously use gestures and movements, and we use it for different reasons. So one is to represent concepts. So sometimes you're mimicking a certain concept, like you can imagine mimicking an angle with your hands or things like this. We also use it to keep track of some information. So if there's too many things to remember, you might use like your fingers to keep track of some numbers or something like this. We also use it to communicate with people so I can point at something and tell you, hey, this is something important to think about when we are looking at this concept.

10:27Dr. Julia Chatain:And super interestingly, we also use it to regulate our emotions. So let's say you're struggling to learn and you feel frustrated and then you're going to start doing some movements to calm yourself down. So there are many ways that we continuously use our bodies in learning. Another question is, how do we integrate that in the learning activity? Because if you imagine a classroom, specifically in higher education, usually you're just sitting at your table and not allowed to move. And so that's a bit one of the questions we're focusing on.

10:54Adani:So I'm probably just going to keep asking questions that are hard to answer in short. But you just mentioned sort of the way we traditionally do classrooms is people are sitting at desks. And so one question maybe is, what is an alternative to that that maybe leaves more room for things like gestures and other forms of learning or other ways of supporting learning? Is there anything you can say based on what you've done so far in terms of what could change in practice and what may be helpful in practice?

11:21Dr. Julia Chatain:I think here, I mean, there are several challenges. I see three main challenges. So one is the cultural challenge. So in some cultures, it's okay to move. And in some cultures, it's considered to be very impolite. So how do we change this mindset? Then the second thing is like many of the approaches we're exploring are technology based because it's scalable, it's adaptive, and you can do like this kind of real-time analysis. And then if you consider the workload of teachers specifically in some countries, and if you also ask them to now become like a support, I think it will be quite stressful.

11:53Dr. Julia Chatain:And then there's also the logistic component as in like the way the classrooms are set up right now. You have tables all the way. So it's hard to come in and say, now we're going to do an activity where we start moving around. And I know for during my doctoral studies, I actually went into the classroom and setting up the room by moving all the tables and et cetera. I was already like one hour of work, which again, we can't add on the shoulders of the teachers. And all of those kinds of things is we can solve them at the research level, but it's more important to solve it at the policy level. So like the governments, the Ministry of Education and those kinds of actors should have a say in this and also support this kind of changes.

12:27Dr. Julia Chatain:because otherwise it just stays as a research project and then it can actually impact real life, let's say.

12:32Adani:Right, right. And so one key word that you mentioned to me seems to be scalability, right? So if you want to do something, if you want to make a decision at a policy level that will apply to a broad range of people across a broad range of settings, you want to do things at scale. Can you maybe say more about how can we tell whether something is scalable versus not? You mentioned a bit about certain tools Having certain affordances that make them scalable, how can you tell?

13:01Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah, so I think there are different ways in which we talk of scalability in those kinds of projects. One is the amount of manual work that's necessary for making the tool accessible. So if for each exercise someone needs to spend hours designing the activity, then it's not very scalable because it takes more time preparing the activity than actually running the activity. Same like right now, when we want to assess learning and look at the gestures, right now it's still like a product for students that's looking at hours of videos and annotating those videos. And this is also not scalable. And here, there's aspects that technology can help.

13:37Dr. Julia Chatain:So we can automatically generate examples. And we have one project on this. And we can automatically assess learning. And that's also something we're looking into. So here, there's our aspect that technology can help with. But then there's also the scalability of right now, if we're being concrete, those kinds of interventions are only applied in universities where you have researchers looking at this. Now, how do we scale that to other classrooms or to students, maybe to schools that maybe have a bit less budget and cannot afford all those kinds of technologies and these kinds of things. And like, for example, in my research, I always look at the virtual reality version because it's quite important and it answers interesting questions in how we move.

14:14Dr. Julia Chatain:But then we also include like a tablet or mobile phone based version because this is more scalable in the sense that it's easier to bring into the classroom and it's cheaper. So it might not help as much, but it's also interesting to keep in mind how to design for those technological solutions. And the big issue right now is how to support the teachers. So both make them comfortable with bringing technology into the classroom, but then also give them monitoring or orchestration tools. So even if everybody is in virtual reality or on their phone, they can still have an overview of what is happening and still do their work properly, right?

14:48Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah. Yes, makes sense.

14:51Adani:Yeah. So that final point is especially interesting to me. And so as we come up with new tools or new ways of doing things, the teachers who then apply those tools also require some sort of training or like some level of familiarization with those new tools, which takes up time. And so one thing I'm curious about is what do you hear from teachers as you work with them and interact with them? What they find challenging? I know you already mentioned some things about even just setting up a room in a particular way can take up like dozens of minutes, if not hours. But how do, is there anything you can say about like how educators feel about some of the new developments?

15:27Dr. Julia Chatain:So I think there are several concerns. One is the workload. I mean, it depends on the country again, but there are many countries like, for example, in France where the teachers are overloaded. And if you say, OK, now you're going to need to learn this new tool, they don't have the time for this. And it's very stressful. I think there's also a bit about their position in the classroom because, first of all, usually the students are more comfortable with technology than the teacher. So it changes who's the expert in the classroom because the teacher might be expert in mathematics but not expert in technology when the students now are the experts and that's creating some unbalance that needs to be addressed.

16:04Dr. Julia Chatain:And then again, they are scared of losing the students. So if everybody's interacting with some technology, how do you get back the attention here? And this is more at the orchestration kind of level. There's some interesting research at EPFL in Switzerland about how to give back this agency to the teachers. So I think those are the main aspects. And in the research that we do now, we work together with teachers when we design interventions in order to make sure we solve some of those aspects. And usually you start with the teachers who are more curious about those kinds of technologies. and then you can start scaling with teachers who are a bit less comfortable.

16:39Dr. Julia Chatain:So yeah, but it's a very important thing to think about. Yeah.

Read the full transcript

16:44Adani:And it's also not always easy to make that initial connection between researchers and practitioners or educators, right? Sometimes I think, especially in broader society, there's like this perception of researchers being siloed and thinking about things in their own little ivory tower, not really bothering actually to even talk to other people about how that could be applied in practice. Maybe it would also be great for us to talk a little bit about things that you've heard teachers be optimistic about. Is there anything where you felt like educators seem particularly excited to try or implement some of the things you've been working on in your research?

17:20Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah, I think generally when they try the technologies, they're very excited about it and they really can see how this is bridging a gap that they have in their practice, specifically Even mathematics, like having those concrete interactive examples are very important to them. And in some of our studies, we noticed that how during the lecture, actually, they ask for screenshots from the activity so they can then like explicitly connect their content to the game. And this we found quite interesting because they really understood how this helps. And then they were happy that they can use this to make their part of their work a bit easier.

17:53Dr. Julia Chatain:I think there's also, it's a bit, we also had some projects where we look at making grading a bit easier for the teachers. So that I provide a first assessment of the grading and these kinds of things that would reduce their workload and give them more time for some aspects that are more crucial or their expertise is more important. So I think those are some things that they're also excited about. And I think maybe there will be also a shift about what we do in the classroom and what we do at home. So maybe you would have more interactive components in the classroom and more passive activities at home.

18:22Dr. Julia Chatain:So that this might also be some things that some teachers may be excited about and some not so much. Right.

18:29Adani:Actually, I was just thinking, we talked about abstraction or like abstractness and concreteness earlier. Would you want to tell us about one of the games that you developed or one of the tasks that you developed? You talked about learning graph theory in the R. You also talked about like literally grasping derivatives. Yeah. Is there any one of these that you think you could share a bit about?

18:51Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah. I just need to put a disclaimer in there, but in mathematics education, there's a bit of a conflict on whether we think that concreteness is helpful or not, because some people are worried that if we start with concrete examples, then people can't abstract anymore. And we have some work looking into this where we discuss what aspects of concreteness are helpful. Is it because it's specific? Is it because it's familiar? Is it because it's interactive and et cetera? So just putting this disclaimer out there. And in the examples we looked into for the graph theory topic, We were trying to find something more familiar and relatable that students could play with before going into the more formal and abstract representations.

19:29Dr. Julia Chatain:And here we had a game in virtual reality where the graph, okay, I don't know how much people know about graph, but the graph was actually represented as a pipe network. And you have, it was in, based in Switzerland. So you had a lake in a mountain and you had to bring water from the lake to a city. And this is a situation that's very easy to understand. and then people could manipulate the pipe system in order to make the maximum amount of water flow from one end to the other, which is a famous mathematical problem. And this was quite touching because in the study afterwards, we found that the students found this a more relevant thing to learn, but they also felt better prepared for the lecture, which was using formal representations.

20:07Dr. Julia Chatain:So it gave them some sort of the right intuition to start grasping the more abstract versions. And more anecdotally, there were some students who came to me at the end and they said things like, Like, oh, I never thought I could do math and now I see I can actually do it. And that was quite touching as well. And then we had another project where it was more for high school students. And we just showed them two curves. It was like the function and the derivative, but we didn't tell them that. And then we said, okay, there's a special relationship between the two curves. Now you can manipulate them and explore this relationship.

20:38Dr. Julia Chatain:And then we build the levels a bit in a smart way so that the progression is like helping them making sense of the relationship between the two curves. And here as well, it was quite interesting for them because they get to interact with the math and make sense of it in a very, maybe easier way than when they have to manipulate formal symbols.

20:56Adani:Yeah, I actually remember I was, I think I was one of the pilot participants in the graph theory study and it was really cool. I've never taken a graph theory class and I probably still don't know much about it, but it actually helped me at least understand what edges and nodes are like very basic concepts. And that's really awesome. So part of what I'm really curious about is how do you even come up with your virtual setting or physical setting and like the tasks that you make students do? What is that idea generation process like for you?

21:25Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah. So it depends on the researchers. I like to have a really like user centered approach where I speak with the teachers. I speak with the students and I also read the literature on what is known about the aspects that they struggle with. and then we do several usually like paper-based prototype where we don't implement anything or like a very dirty implementation when we try it with the students and we see what sticks and what doesn't and once we have those very quick iterations then we can invest the time making the actual tool and then usually we try to also align it with the curriculum so we see what are the learning goals for the curriculum and then we decide on how to design the levels accordingly but it's a very iterative process and I think this helps because otherwise like you you spend a lot of time implementing an intervention and it just doesn't work with the students at the end.

22:11Dr. Julia Chatain:But we have to be mindful because again, for example, teachers are very busy. So we can't ask them for hours of interviews and testing when they already have a lot of things to do. So yeah, we need to do like them, see what has already been figured out before we start asking them questions.

22:26Adani:Right. And I mean, it also sounds like for most of these projects, there's a broader team of people with like different sets of background skills as well, where there's a lot of coordination. So you might have, I guess, like engineers, right? And more so people are more focused on the, maybe the front end of design end of things. And then people who are more so concerned with the educational aspects, I guess, what is, is there something that you particularly enjoy about these interdisciplinary collaborations? Because in some sense, it's hard to do, right? So there are many moving pieces, many people involved, and you also have maybe some communication gaps.

23:01Adani:So how do you think about that? What are some of the most enjoyable parts about this to you?

23:06Dr. Julia Chatain:I think you're touching on something really important here because, and that's the case for most interdisciplinary research, where often the core team is more from one field and then we sprinkle on top some aspects from another field. And it's very hard. For example, in the kinds of things we do, we need a strong background in learning sciences. We need a strong background in computer science. We need a strong background in interaction design, also artistic background. And you need this team and you need people to work well together. And so I think, I mean, here we were very lucky that everything works fine from the beginning because all the people we had in the team were a bit interdisciplinary.

23:40Dr. Julia Chatain:So like even the artists have also a bit of technical background. So it was really easy to speak with her and make her understand the technical aspects as well. One thing I really like is that, for example, the first time I worked with a designer, I remember the first designer I worked with, he always had a very different approach to the program. He was like always purely human centered. And back then I was only a scientist and I was like, okay, but how do I make things that are useful for humans? And he really had such a different perspective that it changed my perspective from focusing on technology to focusing on the human and the experience we want to create.

24:14Dr. Julia Chatain:And then how do we use technology to get there? And I think this was very interesting. And again, I think it's also because if you work in a more interdisciplinary team, like people have different backgrounds and you need to learn how to communicate with people who use a different language, not as in the spoken language, but like different vocabulary. And through this, that also makes you understand the problem a bit better. Like at the end, we have a shared understanding that's been informed by all of those perspectives. And that's very enriching, I think, as a researcher and as a person too.

24:43Adani:So interdisciplinarity sounds like a core theme across many of the things that you do. And one of the projects I hear you're now working on is sort of about learners building and extrapolating causal knowledge. and I would love to hear a little bit about what you're looking to investigate there. Is causal knowledge different from building knowledge about mathematics or in some of these other domains and where you hope to take things with that project?

25:09Dr. Julia Chatain:Yes, I think here it's a nice collaboration with a researcher called Liz Lapido and her expertise is on causal knowledge and how by experimenting with the world we make sense of the rules and then we learn about those rules and etc. And here we were thinking, what if we have a virtual reality world that is ruled by mathematical rules? So then just by experimenting with the world, you get to know about the underlying rules. So for example, let's say you have two sets. Let's imagine two bubbles. And then you know that the set A is inside of the set B. So if I want to manipulate with the sets in a causal world, then when I would try to stretch set A, I would not be able to stretch it out of set B.

25:52Dr. Julia Chatain:And I would experience that boundary and that mathematical rule just through the interaction. When in a non-causal world, I would still be able to stretch out the set outside of the set B, but it would tell me like, oh, now the rule is broken. So that's something we would want to look into. And as part of this project, we're also looking into generating those visual and interactive representation based on the formulas. So you can input a formula and it just generates the exercise automatically that answers to the mathematical rules. And this, again, this comes with this topic of scalability we've been working before, right?

26:24Dr. Julia Chatain:So you would not have to design each and single one of those activities.

26:28Adani:So what is required for it to do well in terms of generating these automatically? How does that work?

26:35Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah, so we are exploring different approaches here. There was one great paper called PenRules that looked at constraint-based programming, a way of programming that you give it a bunch of rules and then you can generate visuals accordingly. I will not go into detail because that might be too much. But we're also looking at AI-based approaches for these kinds of things.

26:54Adani:Wonderful. And so we've circled back on this a few times now already, but you've told us about a broad range of different projects that you have been working on or are still working on. And I think for as long as I've known you or as far as I know you, you've worked on a broad range of things since your college years. And one thing that I think would be really cool for people to hear about is actually how did you get started and how did you even become interested in those things? And what would you say maybe are some of the major influences and experiences along your path that brought you to this place?

27:24Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah, I think I have a bit of a less straightforward path. I remember when I was in high school, I was passionate about math and design. And then the school told me, you have to pick, so you should do math. I was like, okay. And then I studied mathematics, but I always felt there's a part of my interest that's not really being fulfilled. and I was also quite interested in education because I noticed again how mathematics was something I really loved and then people hated it I was like maybe there's something about how we teach mathematics that we could start looking into and then later on randomly I bumped into I did a research internship where we started looking at interaction and that's when I started working with designers and that brought this as okay I want to do math but also this and apparently it's possible and then when I moved I was a software engineer at ETH and then when I was there I started discussing with researchers about doing a PhD.

28:13Dr. Julia Chatain:And that's where I found about the learning sciences field. And then I was like, oh, perfect. I can do math and design for education. That's exactly what I've been looking for all these times. But I think from when I was younger, I didn't know that something like this would exist. And I didn't know it was possible to put all of those interests that I have together to do something meaningful. So that was quite an interesting process. Yeah. And I don't think it's specifically resources that inspired me. It's more like the people I met along the way. So like in this first internship, when I met with this designer and we spent hours trying to find a common language and he was very insightful and just learning about his perspective to problem solving was very interesting.

28:52Dr. Julia Chatain:And when I started the PhD, the program I was in, it was on learning sciences, but they hired only people who are not learning scientists. So I was a computer scientist, but you had a mathematician, a chemist, a physicist, et cetera. And we all try to make sense of learning sciences together. And here again, like looking at how they approach the frame, looking at how they think about it, that was also very inspiring. So, yeah, my inspiration is more like the people I met along the way.

29:17Adani:Yeah, I think, I mean, I very much resonate with that. I think I also feel very lucky that actually my first exposure to research ever was also the group that you were a doctoral student in and the professorship for learning sciences and higher education at ETH Zurich. And I also feel like that people really are a really large part of it. So part of what I wonder about is, is a lot of it luck or are there ways for people who are looking to get more involved in areas like these? Are there ways for them to be systematic about how they get exposed to some of these topics and can set a first foot into these areas?

29:55Adani:Do you think there's anything one can do or is it mostly just maybe you'll get lucky?

30:00Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah, there's always a luck component to everything, right? But I think it depends which age group we're talking about. But I think for me, I did quite a bit of internships and projects with different teams during my college years and even before. And I feel this is a very good way to figure out whether you like this kind of topic, you like this kind of approach to looking into problems and also whether you get along with the team. So I think picking those experiences carefully might be very, very important, I would say. Right. And again, for me, being from our interdisciplinary background, I always draw more towards, I don't think I'm an expert in one thing, but I am very interested in many things.

30:37Dr. Julia Chatain:And getting exposure here in all the things you're interested in is very important. So even if you're trained, like in my case as a mathematician, like spending some time working more on the design project or these kinds of things are very helpful for interdisciplinary research, I would say. And I think also spending time to talk with people who have a different background and really be open and humble about it. understand their perspective, even if it's so different from yours. Like I know in math, we are very strict about how we approach problem and looking at more like messy and blurry approaches as a bit confusing at first, but when you work with humans, they're also a bit messy and blurry sometimes.

31:12Dr. Julia Chatain:So it makes sense, right? So like staying open in those kinds of conversation, I think is quite important. Okay. I don't know if that's a systematic solution.

31:20Adani:I mean, sorry. It was also like a cheeky question, but I think it's a really wonderful answer actually i think i remember one of the first times ever we interacted i was also a little overwhelmed with feeling oh when you're in like an interdisciplinary setting do i have to know everything about all types of things what i'm garnering from your answer is partly you can start with one thing and then keep your mind open to exploring a range of experiences and you may want to be selective about them right but there's always room to do different things even if your school tells you to focus on math rather than design or something else right i mean it's also

31:55Dr. Julia Chatain:the jobs or the fields that will exist later on. For example, I feel the thing I'm working on right now is not even something we could imagine when I had to make the big decisions about what to study. And also, I think there's space for everything. There's space for someone who's really an expert in one thing and like the decades working on this and space for people who are a bit more interested in everything and then can connect all those experts together and do the translation between all of them. So I think it's okay to be either ends of that spectrum.

32:25Adani:Yeah. So now having collected all of these different experiences and actually having built a lot of different skills, I also wanted to ask, what are you most excited to work on in the future? I hear there's a big initiative that you just joined this year. Yeah. What do you want to share in terms of what you're doing now and what you hope to do in the coming years?

32:45Dr. Julia Chatain:So right now I'm in Singapore and we are building like a five years research program on, it's called Future Embodied Learning Technologies, so FELT, which is a little pun on feeling mathematics and other topics. And here we are really looking at leveraging AI to solve some of the scalability issues I was mentioning and also bringing embodied learning technologies at scale. And here it's quite interesting because the way we build the program is starting from some actual challenges that exist out there. So for example, students who struggle with math literacy, who struggle with language learning, we're also looking at some accessibility topics.

33:22Dr. Julia Chatain:And then we are building the program from this and like defining the research question based on actual problems that exist in the real world. And this I'm quite excited about. Personally, the topics that really drive me now are accessibility. So in two ways, it's like one is, can we use this research? we have from embodiment to solve some of the accessibility problems. So for example, can we, I don't know, design a VR tool with haptic feedback so that people who have visual impairments can explore data sets or something like this. But also, as we bring more like visual and interactive tools into the classroom, how do we make sure those are accessible to all learners?

33:57Dr. Julia Chatain:So this kind of thing. And I'm also interested a bit in the more artistic end of things. So whether we can leverage those kinds of technologies to also enable creativity and artistic expression, which is something I want to push more towards as well.

34:10Adani:Yeah, that's super cool. That's such a multifaceted way of moving forward. Awesome. We talked about this a little bit, but still, I want to ask for more junior listeners thinking, oh, this sounds super cool. I want to do work along those lines or learn more about this. Do you have any places to point them to or recommendations or words?

34:31Dr. Julia Chatain:So I think no matter what your background is, I would try to get into coding a bit. Now that we have large language models and etc., coding means anything. But if you have an idea, try to make little prototypes. But the core thing, right, the coding, the visuals, the interaction, try to think of all of those things. And I feel this will teach you a lot about how to design solutions. And I feel this is very beneficial. I feel some of my personal projects were more beneficial to what I'm actually doing for a job now than some of my classes at uni. So I would recommend having both of those things.

35:01Dr. Julia Chatain:And yeah, I think stay curious and follow your interest. It might be there's a clear path that you're supposed to follow, but actually you're also interested in that other thing and you want to take this other course that's a bit more further from what you're doing. And I think this is quite rich, actually. So I would recommend following your interest a bit more.

35:18Adani:And is there a place where people can go to learn more about you and where your work is going to go?

35:25Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah, there's my personal website where I try to show some of the projects we've been working on, which is juliachaton.com. I hope there's my name written somewhere.

35:34Adani:Yeah, we'll link it as well.

35:36Dr. Julia Chatain:The French is a bit strong. And then right now I'm working at the SEC, so the Singapore ETH Center. And I want to say again something about starting your own projects. There's so many resources on the internet, so many tutorials, so many brilliant people spend time making YouTube videos to explain how to do those things. So yeah, just Google it, I would say. but yeah, I think it's worth the time and it's going to help a lot.

35:59Adani:Wonderful. Yeah, I think this is a great note to end on. Thank you so much for joining us on the podcast studio and for telling us about your exciting work and yeah, looking forward to seeing where all this goes.

36:09Dr. Julia Chatain:Yeah, thank you for having me and it was nice to chat again.

36:34Adani:Thank you so much for listening. I hope you had as much fun following this conversation as I had recording it. I first met Julia when I was a research intern at ETH Zurich in 2021, and I have learned and continue to learn a lot from her. So I'm really grateful that I got to do this episode with her many years later to discuss her intriguing interdisciplinary work and really unique journey through research. So thanks again to Julia for coming on and sharing all of that with us today. We would love to hear what you think of this episode or our podcast in general, or if you have any other suggestions for future guests or topics for the podcast.

37:12Adani:You can reach us at stanfordpsychpodcast at gmail.com. You can also connect with us on Twitter at stanfordpsychpod. Finally, if you enjoyed this podcast, please consider leaving us a review on Apple Podcasts or elsewhere so more people can find us. Thank you and hope to see you again next time.

From the publisher

Adani chats with Dr. Julia Chatain, Senior Scientist at the Singapore-ETH Centre of ETH Zürich. Julia is a computer scientist and learning scientist responsible for building a new research program, “Future Embodied Learning Technologies” (FELT), focusing on exploring AI-powered embodied learning interventions to support low-progress learners and learners with special needs, both at the cognitive and the affective levels. Before that, she led the EduTech group at ETH Zürich, conducting Research and Development of educational technology through co-design with lecturers and students, with a focus on XR, AI-supported learning, and accessibility.

In this episode, Adani and Julia discuss Julia’s recent work on embodied learning in mathematics, much of which was part of her doctoral research at ETH Zürich conducted with her advisors Prof. Manu Kapur and Prof. Robert Sumner. They also dive into her journey that led her to where she is now, and discuss what she is currently working on at the Singapore-ETH Centre and beyond!

If you found this episode interesting at all, subscribe on our Substack and consider leaving us a good rating! It just takes a second but will allow us to reach more people and make them excited about psychology.

Julia’s website: https://juliachatain.com/
Julia’s paper on Grounding Graph Theory in Embodied Concreteness with VR: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000583039
Singapore-ETH Centre’s website: https://sec.ethz.ch/
Julia’s Twitter @JuliaChatain

Adani’s website: https://www.adaniabutto.com/
Adani’s Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/adani.bsky.social

Podcast Twitter @StanfordPsyPod
Podcast Substack https://stanfordpsypod.substack.com/

Let us know what you thought of this episode, or of the podcast! :)
stanfordpsychpodcast@gmail.com 

More from Stanford Psychology Podcast

All 29 episodes
172 - Julia Chatain: Embodied Learning and Educational Technology in Mathematics and Beyond (REAIR)Stanford Psychology Podcast · 38 min
Listen in VO