In short
Podcast Summary: Quantum Systems CEO Florian Seibel: ‘Having a dictator has advantages’
Podcast Title: Startup Europe — The Sifted Podcast Host: Amy Lewin Episode Date: [Insert Date] Guest: Florian Seibel, CEO of Quantum Systems
Episode Overview In this episode of the Sifted Podcast, host Amy Lewin interviews Florian Seibel, the CEO of Quantum Systems, a leading German defense tech company known for its military drones. The discussion covers the company’s growth, its role in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, and the future of the defense tech industry in Europe. Seibel shares insights on the challenges and opportunities in the sector, as well as the importance of innovation driven by real-world conflicts.
Key Topics Discussed
- Background of Quantum Systems
- Founding Story:
- Founded by a group of enthusiasts who started with radio-controlled models.
- Initially focused on agricultural drones before shifting to military applications.
- Growth Trajectory:
- Achieved unicorn status after raising €160 million in Series C funding.
- Employs about 700 people globally, with significant operations in Ukraine.
- Defense Tech and the Ukraine Conflict
- Impact of Ukraine War on Innovation:
- The war has accelerated technological advancements.
- Real-world application of drones is crucial, with the need for adaptations against advanced counter-drone technologies.
- Role of Drones in Modern Warfare:
- Drones provide vital aerial intelligence and can enhance military operations.
- Seibel emphasizes the shift towards unmanned technologies for future conflicts.
- Future of Defense Tech in Europe
- Long-term Planning:
- Suggests Europe learn from China’s approach to strategic planning and investment.
- Calls for increased funding and support for defense tech innovation.
- Potential Use Cases:
- Civilian applications, such as drone emergency responders, infrastructure monitoring, and agricultural advancements.
- Envisions a future dominated by unmanned systems across various sectors.
- Challenges in the Defense Sector
- Government Procurement Processes:
- Criticism of slow and cumbersome procurement practices.
- Advocates for more efficient decision-making akin to a centralized approach seen in authoritarian regimes.
- Investor Sentiment:
- Recent influx of investment in defense tech may be driven by hype rather than genuine long-term interest.
- Quantum Systems’ Strategic Direction
- Expansion Plans:
- Aims to grow the company’s footprint in global markets and diversify into maritime and land-based unmanned systems.
- Integration of Hardware and Software:
- Development of a software platform named Mosaic to integrate various unmanned systems and enhance operational capabilities.
- Stark Defense and Evolving Market Dynamics
- Spin-off of Stark Defense:
- Founded to address the need for strike capabilities in the unmanned domain, which Quantum Systems will not pursue.
- Market Competition:
- Seibel welcomes competition, believing it drives innovation and improvement within the industry.
Key Takeaways
- Innovation and Adaptation: The conflict in Ukraine has fueled innovation within the defense sector, necessitating rapid adaptations to counter new threats.
- Investment in Defense Tech: There is a growing recognition of the importance of defense tech, yet European governments must streamline procurement processes to remain competitive.
- Vision for the Future: Quantum Systems is positioning itself as a leader in unmanned technologies, seeking to expand its market presence while maintaining an agile and innovative approach.
Conclusion Florian Seibel’s insights highlight the critical intersection of technology and defense in contemporary Europe, underscoring the need for strategic investment and innovation. The conversation paints a picture of a rapidly evolving landscape where the ability to adapt and respond to real-world challenges will define the future of defense tech.
---
Listen to the full episode [here](insert-link). Produced by: Tim Smith More on Europe’s defense tech landscape at the Sifted Summit happening on October 8th and 9th.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Hello and welcome to the Sifted podcast, the show where we help you get to know the brightest and boldest people and companies in Europe's startup ecosystem. I'm Amy, Sifted's editor and your host. And today I'm joined by Florian Siebel, co-founder and co-CEO of one of Europe's most talked about defense tech companies, German autonomous drone startup Quantum Systems. Florian spent 16 years in the German armed forces as a helicopter pilot before founding Quantum Systems a decade ago. The company began making drones for agriculture before moving into dual use military drones and began to really catch investors' attention after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
0:39In May this year, it raised an€160 million Series C funding round led by London-based investor Balderton Capital, and it hit the coveted unicorn status. Today, we'll talk about the business of drones, what the next 10 years might look like for quantum systems, and how much of a pain in the arse or not it is working with governments. Florian, welcome to the show. Hi, great. Thank you for having me. Excited. It's great to have you here. I've heard a lot about you. So, Florian, before Ukraine, I think most civilians like me, and I'm sure many listeners, thought that drones were just this kind of thing that annoying teenagers played with in beautiful, natural spots to take nice pictures.
1:22But now they're obviously an incredibly important part of most armed forces operations and plans for the future. if we wind back the clock to 2015 what gave you the feeling that things were moving in this direction you know i think quantum is not a classical startup in the sense of you know four guys sit together and discuss you know what could we do how can we fund it and then how can we make a big company and scale it as fast as possible so quantum is very tech driven the founders basically what brought us into drones was flying RC models, radio-controlled models. So basically, that's what every drone is built around.
2:05The core is a radio-controlled airplane, and then you put a lot of technology and autonomy and compute power on it. But in the end, it's a flying toy. So we met over our hobby, which is flying RC models and working in the basement of our homes on technical problems that were exciting to solve, which is the combination of a helicopter and a fixed-wing airplane, which basically got us started. And then, you know, after we solved the problem, we were like, okay, is there somebody out there who needs that? So it's the other way around. And we were really struggling in the first years to find our market because it was done bottom up and not top down coming from a problem.
2:52And obviously, there are a lot of problems that we can solve with it, but it was not clear when we started. It started out of a hobby. And most of your revenue these days comes from military drones. Who are you actually selling those to and what are their primary use cases? So that's correct. I mean, right now, I would say we're a global company with roughly 700 employees across the United States. We have an office in Los Angeles. We have one in Australia. We have the headquarter here in Germany. We have about 200 people in Kiev to support our Ukraine operations. That basically gave us access to different markets and different governments around the world.
3:35So we sell to all of these countries, but of course we also do sell to Ukraine. So, you know, becoming an international drone manufacturer, drone player, go where your customers are, was essential for our success, I would say. And the plan is to increase our presence in more countries across Europe, across the world, to become the dominant drone player. And I think that's something the Western hemisphere, the Western world, what we need. I mean, when I look to China and how they're pushing robotics, I think they just had the Olympics in robotics last weekend. And there was some media attention on this here in Europe.
4:12And basically, everybody was laughing at China on, you know, how awkward and, you know, how not like humans, these robots still behave. And, you know, how stupid China is to have this competition of having Olympics of robots that play soccer. And it looks like it looks very awkward and very technical and not like humans at all. But I think we should look at it from a side of, you know, we have laughed at China many times on their automotive industry and solar industry. And then a few years later, they come back and they have outperformed us. And so I think we really have to wake up and invest heavily in topics like robotics and automation.
4:55And so this is where quantum is playing. And that's where I see my role now, not only being a European dual use drone manufacturer that is helping Ukraine to fight off Russia by providing aerial intelligence. But I see it as a broader topic now, building a category defining European champion in robotics and automation because it's clear for me that the future is unmanned. I mean, we have all these AI agents now, and eventually they will all run on great hardware that does something. And so if we do not speed up here and back this with really big money and funding, we are probably going to miss out on the next evolution on a tech trend.
5:38And so we are super happy that Baldurton, London based, as you mentioned, sees it the same way and really joined us and is backing us on becoming that category defining champion. And for anyone, I guess, who's kind of struggling to picture this future where drones and robotics and, you know, autonomous things are such a big deal. What use cases do you think these things will expand to, both civilian and military? And how big and how significant do you believe this industry is going to become? Yeah, so I think there's basically unlimited use cases. And let me try to break it up and explain you where I think this will go.
6:20I mean, we started as a company that was doing aerial intelligence in the context of precision farming. The idea was to reduce fertilizer and pesticides and water control, irrigation control by providing detailed aerial images to farmers. Did not really work out because, you know, you can do a lot with satellite data. But also we were up against some big players like Monsanto and Bayer that have zero interest that farmers reduce their fertilizer because obviously they make money selling it to the farmers. So that was not set up for success. So we went into dual use, which brought us into defense.
7:02And now the beautiful thing about being in defense is obviously we can help Ukraine and we can learn a lot from it. And we can also make some money off of it, which basically raises interest from the investors again, which allows us to invest more into research and R &D, which allows us to prepare for the markets to come once we have solved these topics that Europe is currently facing. And, you know, once the world is set up for peace again, I think we will see use cases like drone first responder, DFR in the U.S. That's, you know, how can drones help to be the first at an accident site? And, you know, the average, I think a police car takes like 11 or 22 minutes, depends on where you are in the U.S.
7:49until you have a police officer on site. So a drone could speed there within a few minutes and get a live video stream into the police car that is going on onto the scene. There are use cases, linear infrastructure, monitoring pipelines. I think we will see a revival of agriculture use cases because those are challenging topics. And those are topics we have to face in order to solve climate change. We have a growing world population. We have limited resources. So we need to optimize that. We might see drones delivering stuff, but I'm not the biggest fan of these drone cargo delivery use cases.
8:33I think we see more drones in a context of public safety and security topics. And then again, industry production, obviously, robots that help you to get your cores and household done. And so, you know, quantum started in the domain of air. We're in the process of acquiring and going into other domains, land vehicles, maritime is our topics that we're looking at. And they're all connected very closely because what you need to solve, you know, in the air is a three-dimensional problem of going from one point to the other without hitting something and navigating there. And the same as when you go underwater, right?
9:13It's just a different element, but the same rules basically apply and the same technology in a way can be used. All these systems that we operate, they all connect into one software suite that we are launching now, which we called the name Mosaic, that connects all these unmanned assets and elements. And so I cannot like to the last degree tell you what the future will look like in 10 years, but for sure I can tell you it's unmanned and we want to play a big role and part in that. So you mentioned maritime drones being like an area of focus. And I saw a job ad on your site that says you plan to have over 100 maritime experts on the team within a year.
9:56But that's also an area a bunch of your competitors are moving into, isn't it? Why is there kind of this uptick of interest in maritime drones at the moment? I mean, North Sea, we have seen how Russia is sabotaging some of these underwater sea cables and so on. So I think having maritime assets, unmanned assets, you know, even though Europe is going to spend a lot more money on defense now, definitely going into unmanned could save a lot of money because these assets tend to be less expensive. You don't have to put a crew on them and you can send them into very hostile environments where you maybe not want to send people to.
10:38Why is maritime so interesting? I think to build that dominant player and be attractive to DODs, I think we have seen a big fragmentation of the defense market and, you know, a lot of different softwares, a lot of different hardware players. We have Army, we have Air Force, we have Navy. But in the end, you know, what we should try to have is one overarching architecture that allows us to manage all of these assets. And there's no difference if it's Air Force or Marine or Army. It's the defense forces of a country, right? And I think we are missing out on optimizing that by breaking that up into different domains, which has a historical reason.
11:24Obviously, there was the cavalry that were using horses that had nothing to do with the Navy. But now we're talking about unmanned assets that have a lot in common, like we discussed before. So why not bring all of this together and optimize it? And I mean, there is no operation that is just using Air Force or Army, or it's always a combination of these forces. Okay, so as you mentioned, you're also rolling out software now, which will enable users to control a flock of drones. And I guess, as you say, maybe work across these different areas of specialism. Were there any other reasons you decided to move from being a pure hardware player into hardware and software?
12:08I think it's a logical next step. You know, we also obviously while you evolve and while you grow, you learn and you learn that, you know, we learned that hardware is very hard and it's very rewarding. But also, you know, in the end, you do not want to be the company that didn't make it because you were missing out on maybe also working on software topics. I do believe that the category you're defining, companies in the future are companies that combine great hardware with great software. I think the time of just software disrupting the world and are over, that's a strong statement. And let me explain to you why I see it like that.
12:50Look at companies like Apple or look at companies like Tesla or SpaceX or Android. role. It's all great hardware, but obviously you need also great software that connects very tightly to the hardware to optimize and get the most out of your hardware. So looking at that and seeing how we could open up also different revenue streams, not only selling hardware once, but also have subscription models and get paid for all the upgrades you do, building great hardware that is software-defined so that the hardware you deploy, you send out to your customers, is not outdated after a few months or years.
13:28You can only do that by making them software-defined. And so the logical step was, you know, if we go in different domains, why don't we make sure that we are the commanding layer and we also open it up to others, right? We are in discussion with the German government of how can we have other companies and give them access to Mosaic, not locking them out. But I think it's essential that the government is basically responsible to define that and ask for that, because I don't think it's very helpful that we have a multitude of software solutions that the customer asks that have to work together all the time seamlessly.
14:12Because then the industry will just be spending time making sure all these different software layers work together all the time. So why not have one overarching software that makes sure this works? So I understand it's the goal that say the German government might buy Mosaic as their kind of operating system for, you know, in the idle scenario, their Navy, their armed forces, their Air Force, and they would use a bunch of quantum systems drones, but they might also use ones from your competitors and they'd all plug into the same thing. Correct. And they pay a fixed fee per year so that this is open and they own basically the core of it.
14:55But I think the government is really bad in building the software themselves. We have seen it. I think that's the part of the industry. But for sure, the government should make sure that it stays open and that we connect everybody into it. And then I think they will profit a lot from it. And in the end, you know, I think competition is good. I'm not saying we should be the only hardware provider here. I think having competition, having others that challenge you, that come up with new ideas, keep you moving. I mean, and perfect example for this is Ukraine. You know, we went there three years ago, we were quite successful in the first year and year two, nothing worked because GPS was blocked, communication was impossible.
15:37Russia brought all their jammers and an electronic warfare game was stepped up. You know, Had we decided not to compete there and really give it a try by going into Ukraine, building a team on ground, having local software development, we probably would have failed. So competing and in that situation, it was competing on the battlefield even accelerates you more. But if you compete on your home market, it's good. It's good for the customer. It's good for the product. And in the end, it's good for your own company because you will evolve. You will stay agile. You have to. In other ways, you just become big and lazy.
16:15And at one point you get disrupted. And so I enjoy having competition. I've had kind of criticisms or comments at lots of events and things where people say any drone maker who doesn't have a team in Ukraine or doesn't have a kind of like presence there, you know, is just kind of not as good. Do you think that's true? And if so, what is it particularly about having a team, having Ukrainian developers that makes such a difference? I think it's a decision that if you don't take it, if you're not in Ukraine, you do not exist as a manufacturer. And there's several reasons. I mean, maybe not the most obvious one was getting stuff into Ukraine is fairly easy.
17:04They're obviously very grateful for everything that we sent them. But, you know, getting stuff out of Ukraine is much worse for updates, for maintenance. So having a team on site helps to expedite the process of repair and maintenance. That was one reason why it was a good decision to go there. The second is the mindset, the mindset of the locals. But also, you know, in year three, they work 24-7. There's no weekend in Ukraine. Obviously, you cannot run a German company. And we also have to face it that there is peace here in Germany and you cannot run quantum Germany as you can run quantum Ukraine.
17:45But what we see is that having, you know, these local employees in Kiev, they start building relations with people inside Quantum Headquarter here in Germany. And people suddenly start realizing, oh, I don't do this. So it's in the media or Florian can talk about it. I do that for a person that sits on the other end of my email. And there's a person behind it that I help. And there's a lot of travel between the two companies. We love Ukrainians coming here, engineers. We have a lot of people from Quantum that got curious and did go to Ukraine. And suddenly it becomes very personal for them to help and gives them a meaning.
18:27And we just not built the unmanned future that Florian puts out there as a vision. There's real value behind and they are very grateful for what we do. So I think that was the biggest game changer for Quantum, that the mindset of what Ukraine is facing and how they tackle it was, I think, unlocking potential here in Germany that I would have not expected. Because I think one of the problems we have in Europe is the complacency. It's all good. We go on vacation three times a year. We have flat screen TVs. We can order stuff online. It's here the next day. I mean, we kind of like really optimized ourselves.
19:06But I think it's really rewarding to have a bigger goal that you work towards than just optimizing your time off. And so, yeah, for me, I'm very grateful for what we can do there. A quick one from me. The Sifted Summit is back. This October, join a whole load of Europe's smartest founders, investors and operators, along with its very best tech journalists, for two days of expertly moderated and thought-provoking conversations and extremely valuable networking. This year, we've got hundreds of stellar speakers, including Sequoia's Luciano Alexandru, Gusto's Timo Bolt, Seedcamp's Reshma Sohoni, Granola's Chris Pedregal, and Visionary's Club's Judith Dada, and we're expecting 3 ,000 attendees.
19:51We're also launching a brand new CXO stage, which will be laser-focused on what CEOs, chief people officers, chief marketing officers, and chief financial officers want to hear about. I'm personally looking forward to taking to the stage with Borderton's Saranga Chandratulaka, perhaps one of the nicest and smartest VCs in the land, and listening to my colleague Daphne LePron-Soranger interview OpenAI's Laura Modiano about the next hot AI startups and trends. Whether you're newish to the startup world and want to get some practical advice and insights, or an old hat wanting to make some new, great connections, the Sifted Summit is where you need to be.
20:29So grab your ticket now at summit.sifted.eu. And because you're a Sifted podcast listener, use code POD20 for 20 % off.
20:40What is the lifespan of a drone? And can you give us a sense of how much does one cost at the moment? Yeah, that's a good question because, I mean, there's different categories of drone. You have the categories of FPV, first-person view drones, that are the ones that you control with the goggles, that carry explosives, that destroy stuff. And then what Quantum does is we have, they're called ISR drones, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. They're much bigger. They fly much, much longer, like three, four hours, long distances, 30, 40, 50 kilometers. And we provide basically target information for artillery or FPV operators.
21:22So those systems, they're more costly. We're talking hundreds thousands of euros versus a few thousands for the FPVs. But the lifespan of an FPV obviously is one mission. The lifespan of a quantum vector is several hundred, if not thousands of missions. So we have systems that have clocked more than a thousand missions in Ukraine. So it justifies the price of the system because when you break it down to the price per mission, obviously, it also comes down to more like in the area of$1 ,000 because they carry higher resolution sensors, more expensive data links. And obviously, they're much, much bigger and more complex to build and produce and operate.
22:04And do they reach the end of their use because they get like shot down or something or because the hardware starts, I don't know, breaking or the software becomes obsolete? so we as i said we try to update the software quite frequently we do not see a lot of losses that are related to hardware failure we do see an increasing number of losses from counter drone systems so our drones get attacked by russian counter drone systems so that's like really a dogfight we have incoming fpv drones that basically hunt our drones even though we fly very high Sometimes we do get detected. But this has started, again, another optimization game on how do we detect incoming counter drones and how do we evade them and have maneuvers that basically outperform them.
22:57So it's a constant evolve. And if you are not ready to face it and if you do not go all in on it, you will not exist in a few months anymore. So that's the big plus that Quantum got out of being the first Western drone company in Ukraine, where others just pitched to their investors that they're shipping stuff to Ukraine. But that's basically where it ends normally in a big warehouse and it does not get used. But I'm not going to talk bad about our competitors. We speak for us and increasing numbers that they're asking now for 2026 speak for themselves. So I think we're one of the few companies that really is reliable and is seen as an enhancement of their portfolio and not just another drone system that was sent to Ukraine.
23:47Because I think, to be fair and honest, you know, it's not the job of Ukraine to kind of like sort through the zoo of drones. They get provided and identify the systems that are working. That's not fair. That's a war and it's not a sandbox or a playground for Western drone companies to see what works and what doesn't. Maybe that was the case in the beginning, but those times are over, right? I mean, it's really about life or death for Ukraine and sending them equipment that does not work or just helps to satisfy your investors. It's on the back of Ukraine. That's disgusting. And what's, I mean, obviously, we all want the war to end.
24:28But what does that then mean for quantum systems? I mean, you've spoken quite powerfully about how actually being in that situation and having that, you know, real competitor being Russia to kind of keep matching with is like the most amazing kind of stimulus for innovation. How will you go about, I guess, replicating that or keeping that up when hopefully some of these conflicts end? Yeah, very good question. I think, you know, it's about security guarantees. It's about monitoring, again, borders. It's about making sure that this does not happen again, which requires, again, intelligence and surveillance, probably more than strike elements, because it's not an active war anymore.
25:10So it's more about intelligence. So I think there is a place for quantum. Also, you know, a lot of people with a lot of experience in drone operation will come back from the front lines that, you know, once they recover and there will be a lot of trauma. But I think those are people that, you know, are also going to need jobs in the drone industry and then they have relevant experience there. And we will welcome them with open doors to work with us and share their experience. And then again, you know, there's other topics coming up, Taiwan. So we're heavily in discussion with Taiwan. We're helping them prepare what hopefully will not happen, a full-scale invasion of China into Taiwan.
25:50It will also involve a lot of drones on both sides, I guess. So unfortunately, I think once Ukraine is solved, that does not mean peace will break out over the world. But as I said, we are working also on other topics like drone first responders, automation, drone in a box solutions, multi-domain software. I think Europe needs to rearm. Europe needs to become much more sovereign. And that will not be done once Ukraine is done. I think that's a task for the next decade to do so. and unmanned systems will play a pivotal role in it. And you, I mean, you mentioned this already, but you've won, you know, programs of records, these kind of contracts with governments, America, Colombia, Ukraine, Australia, Germany, Spain.
26:36What does it take to get one of those signed off? And what, I guess, improvement progress in that process have you seen over the past few years? So I think what really helps is being transparent and open what you can and what you cannot do and accomplish. I think if you would ask any of our customers, they would probably tell you it's very refreshing to see Quantum act as a player between the incumbents and legacy manufacturers and drone players. You know, we go there. We even opened in the case of Australia. We went all in. We opened up a facility. We signed a seven-year rental contract without having a contract in Australia.
27:22So no corporate legacy player would do that, right? Because from a risk mitigation strategy, legal would never sign that off, taking seven years of rental payment for a program you did not win. But the Australian customer was so impressed that they said, yeah, if they do that, they really believe in this and they believe in themselves. And finally, we got rewarded with a contract. And we have done the same in other countries. And we go there, we speak their language, we are in their time zone. And, you know, Israeli companies and U.S. companies normally don't do that, right? They just work with a local company to bring the technology into the country.
Read the full transcript
28:00But I think it's a different thing working with a company rather than build your own. And then if you build your own, you invest in your brand, you invest in building your company and making your company valuable. and not just have another bridgehead by partnering with another company. That's not our values. That's not our DNA. That's not, even though we have great partners, we tend to go there ourselves. So you're saying you don't go hand in hand with a defence prime that already has a relationship with that government, for example. We try not to do that anymore because we have burned ourselves a few times and UK was a good example.
28:41I think we made a very compelling and competitive offer, but we were not the prime. But afterwards, after we did not get selected, I think it went to Lockheed Martin and not our consortium. I learned that, you know, even though we played the biggest part in that quote, because it was about drones, the prime we went with, basically they tripled or quadrupled our price and put their name tag on it and overhead. And, you know, and in the end, we did not get selected because it was it was just not competitive anymore. And what did the prime do except cause headache and slow down things? Nothing. Obviously, they have better relations and are tied into the system.
29:23But, you know, we we try to work with local agents and now that have access. But we position quantum as quantum. Since we've changed that strategy, I think we have a win ratio of 100%, to be honest, and we have not lost a single deal since then. So do you think the government reliance on very sort of established older names or very long-term relationships with people at those companies, is that starting to become less important? How open are they to, you know, Quantum's been around for a while, but even newer defense tech companies coming up. Yeah, I mean, for us, it's now easy because we can point to some programs, hey, that we want and they want to see that, you know, governments, they try to mitigate risk.
30:14What they do not want is to give a contract to a smaller player. And then even though it's maybe the cheapest or the best overall offer in the end, maybe the startup does not make it. And then they have to explain to the politicians or to people where the money comes from why the drone program maybe failed. And rather than having that happen, they're willing to spend double or triple the money and give it to a prime just because they can say, OK, they will exist. They're too big to fail. It's expensive, yes, but everybody accepts that it's expensive. The public accepts that price is double or triple.
30:51But what they do not accept is if there's a fail. But this is, you know, we solve this somehow because we are big enough. Obviously, we have a track record. We have enough money in our pockets so that they consider us reliable and a good partner. But younger companies obviously struggle at that point still. And to some degree, I do understand that, that this is difficult. But, you know, we made it. And so others can make it as well. I think it's a mindset. It's just, you know, it's very hard in the beginning. And you just have to keep going and go and go and go. And at one point, you will win the first program.
31:29And then it's easier to win the next and the next and the next. And then the big challenge at one point probably is to not become like one of the primes because that's the end of it. Yeah. What do you make of the kind of commitments that we've seen European governments make? I mean, this week, Bloomberg was reporting the German government plans to acquire just over 8000 drones by 2029, which lots of people have said is not really very many. What do you want to see from governments? You know, they have to be more reactive. I think that number comes from very early days in Ukraine. but maybe I'm exaggerating a little bit, but probably that number is two years old and reflects, you know, Ukraine after six months.
32:11And then it took like 24 months until it was processed by the system. And then the outcome was 8 ,000. You know, today, probably the number would be 800 ,000, which is probably a better number, but it's still, the system is too slow to digest, That's, you know, the reality. And so I have no good answer to that challenge. How can we expedite, you know, these lessons learned? How can we expedite procurement? Sometimes it's very hard for me to accept that because it's so obvious that it's wrong. But then again, you also have to work with these people, with these agencies. And you cannot risk, you know, burning Quantum or my name every single time by pointing them out on LinkedIn that they're fucking it up again.
32:58So on the one hand, I have to push. On the other hand, there are also partners and customers for us, which puts me in a difficult situation today. It was easier maybe five years ago when we had not won a single POR. Obviously, then I was pushing very hard. I do not have a good answer for that. What needs to change? Obviously, a lot of things need to change in Europe for us to make it. Is that the most frustrating thing about working with governments, the pace of change, the speed of reaction? Yeah, it's very frustrating because you see how fast things are changing. You see other countries like China, they have a 10, 20, 30-year strategy and they execute on it.
33:45And here in Germany, in Europe, government changes every four or five years. The first year they're not ready to work or it just takes time until they're set up, then they can work for two years and then they're preparing to get reelected. So, you know, having a democracy is great and I would not want to miss it. But I think when it comes to procurement and overall and long term strategy, I think we need to come up with better solutions because there is that's very provocative what I'm going to say now. But, you know, having a dictator saying, OK, this is how we're going to do it has advantages in a way, because obviously you can really make things happen and just push through.
34:32So I think having the best of both of these worlds would be a good thing. You know, having having a democracy for sure, but having a democracy that has a long term strategy and that does that does not only pay into four year terms. But again, I have no answer how this could be established. I think first thing would be to change the rules in Brussels on having 26 member states. Everybody can block everybody. That slows us down. This needs a change. We need to change the rules we play by and we need to act as one continent, as one Europe that can act fast and get seen as a strong, big player. But, you know, what Trump did is he played the divide and conquer game.
35:23He talked to Germany, then to France and to Switzerland, blah, blah, blah. And finally, he got what he wanted instead of talking to Europe. So I think there's a lot of things that we really need to start working on. You've in the past maybe been a bit more outspoken on some issues than yours. Oh, I think that was very outspoken saying that there are some things in a dictatorship that may be worth looking at. Does being someone who at times often isn't afraid to say the things that maybe lots of people think but wouldn't say in public, Does that win you more friends or more enemies, maybe especially in the governments?
36:04There's a lot of people that are patting my shoulder but would not do so publicly. That is rewarding. And then I tell them, well, why don't you just comment on one of my posts? Oh, no, I cannot do that. Why can't you do that? I think we need more honesty in this world to make change happen. But this encourages me to keep going. There's nothing I'm afraid of. There's nobody that can hurt me. So what can I lose, right? I truly believe that we need change in Europe and that we cannot continue like we have done. Maybe it was a successful model the last 50 years, but to transform it, we need honesty.
36:41We need to speak up. And I think, you know, what the public, what the voters deserve is honesty by the politicians that people tell them, you know, we are facing hard times, but we can solve it. We have the brainpower. We have the financial means to do so. But I'm sick of, and so are others, I think, by not getting told the truth. And so speaking up is very rewarding for me, and people deserve that. And I think if we had more political leaders act that way, that would be a first step. So sometimes I ask myself, why don't they just say how it is? Because people actually, they can live with the truth and they deserve it.
37:25And maybe that's an angle, tell the truth all the time. And then change will happen. now. I feel like lots of the public and even lots of investors until really very recently were just not comfortable with defence as a topic, right? And we've seen, you know, for example, recently there's been a big public backlash or there was against Spotify because the founder Daniel Ek invested in Helsing, one of your main competitors, and people were like, oh no, this is a defence tech, this is terrible. What's your, I guess, message to some... Helsing? What is Helsing? putting housing to one side what's your what is your message for people who for whatever reason just sort of steering clear of defense as a topic or having quite a sort of again what i just said you know be honest and you will get rewarded if if you just jump on something because it's a hype you will not be good at it you will not be successful at it so yesterday for example i'm setting up a new company that is working the topic on supply chain and tier one.
38:29There's a lot of stuff that the unmanned industry needs, like motors and ESCs and data links and cameras and so on, which to a large degree, we're also dependent on countries outside of Europe. And so we're looking for a leadership team for that new company, because obviously I cannot and I do not want to run it. I had like hundreds of applications yesterday that were saying, well, I have been working for 19 years at that super boring company. But today I feel really like I should run a defense company. It's like, what did you do the last 19 years? I mean, how can you stand up every day, go somewhere and tell yourself, I'm really happy at that company.
39:13And then in year 19, you suddenly realize, no, I should do defense. This is just not honest. So yeah, be honest. And what do you make of the way in which European investors have really jumped on defense as a sort of trend? You know, how much of it is hype? How much of it is real conviction? Does that annoy you, frustrate you? No, no, no, it doesn't. I just ignore it. I mean, we talk to who we think are the real ones. We talk to the players that have done defense before. And those are the ones you can trust. And those are the ones that really bring value to it. I mean, for example, I did not know that Rana from Walderton, who led our last round, she actually holds a PhD.
40:02And her thesis was on unmanned systems changing warfare. She wrote that like a decade ago. and I did not know that when they were doing their due diligence on quantum but what I could really feel is she knows what she's talking about and that made it super attractive and that's why besides she's a great person why we that's why we decided to pick Balderton even though they did not give us like the highest term sheet when it came to valuation but it just felt honest how they played and what they said. And so that's how I make my decisions. And for the next round, for Quantum, there is players in that field that can do even bigger checks that have done defense before.
40:46And those are the ones that we're talking to. How soon might another round come along? You know, what I said is, you know, going into different domains, I think it's important to to have the financial firepower, but also back it with revenue. So we try to not outgrow our performance on deliveries and program of records. Just raising the valuation, I think, will backfire at one point heavily, especially when the only option you have is an IPO, because then you have to be very, very transparent on what is real revenue and what is R &D money and so on. So So quantum does real revenue. And so, you know, we doubled last year, we doubled this year, we will double next year.
41:32So doubling valuation is a fair thing because we double revenue. Just tripling revenue and asking Daniel to put in a few hundred more million on a vision just does not feel right and honest. And then we have the topic again of honesty. We need more honesty. And so, yes, probably the year does not end tomorrow. We have a few more months to go. So probably end of the year, early next year, we are ready. And talking of fundraisers, another company that you founded, another drone company you founded, Stark Defense, yesterday, Bloomberg was reporting that it's set to raise$60 million or around that much at a$500 million valuation led by Square.
42:13Why did you decide to start that company? So that was an easy one, actually, because of the feedback we got from quantum drones flying in Ukraine. The German government basically asked me in one of the meetings we had with them, hey, it's great that you're providing world-leading ISR drones, but we also think we should have the capability and the technology in Germany of having strike capabilities in the unmanned domain, talking loitering munitions here. And I said, yes, I agree. But, you know, because some of our investors have LPs that have, you know, clauses that prevent them from doing weapons and munitions, Quantum could never do it.
43:00Also, we always stated that to our employees that for us, the red line are weapons and we're not going there. Obviously, we could have changed that, but there was no intention. plus the fact that we were not allowed to do so from an investor's perspective. Yeah, the only option that was left basically had to have a spin off of quantum. That, again, honesty is important because if you're honest, you don't have a problem later, right? Because you just tell the truth and it's the truth. So having a new company and running that obviously did cause some frictions because suddenly some of the current quantum investors said, well we don't think you should do that and i said why it's not in quantum you said we don't do that in quantum you cannot do it you don't want us to do that so what do you have against having another company do it so obviously it was about you know maybe missing out and not being part of it but in the end i did not care because i i i saw the you know the the bigger picture and the bigger picture for me is that Europe, that Germany needs that kind of technology.
44:07We cannot be left behind and just be dependent on the United States and maybe Turkey and Israel that are the leading company, the leading nations when it comes to loitering munition and strike elements. What's your involvement with Stark these days? My involvement is basically I hold a board seat and I work strategically with the team and I try to guide where I can. But then again, they're on their own feet. They have to do what they have to do. And I think that's the only way how that company can grow. And obviously, they're on a great trajectory. Like you said, they have raised 60 million led by Sequoia and they will do fine.
44:51But obviously, they also do have challenges. They have to solve running a company, scaling hardware. After 18 months, being deployed and being tested in Ukraine is a huge success. But, you know, it's not going to be easy. It's always hard to run a company and scale. And could Quantum and Stark come into competition with one another in the future, do you think? Or how would you navigate that if their, you know, paths converge more? I mean, we don't do weapons. We are the leaders in ISR. We would compete if Stark were to do ISR drones. They have no intention to do so because we do have a player here that is Quantum.
45:29And if they decide to do so, great competition makes better products for everybody. Then they should build ISR drones. No, I don't see that. The market is big enough. Unmanned systems are there to stay. As I pointed out, we are already looking beyond the horizon of what robotics and automation would mean for quantum, which is drone first responders and connected technologies. And the field of weapons for Stark, also in multi-domain operations, is also big enough. There is an overlap in software. As I said, these elements will all tie into Mosaic. So we're working with Stark on tying them into Mosaic as well, because the customer wants us to do that.
46:12So that's how those two companies walk hand in hand and make each other stronger. And maybe I realize we've been talking for ages, Florian, and I could talk to you for a very long time. But maybe one final question. there's a lot of talk of Quantum Systems or Helsing or another company becoming a kind of prime of the future and maybe also a business that would become a major acquirer of lots of these other defense tech companies that are springing up. Is that the path you want for Quantum Systems or do you have a different sort of vision moving forwards? I think growing and And picking up other players that have technology that would make us better together is a logical thing.
47:01I think we need to do that at a speed and with a strategy that allows us to keep the quantum DNA and mindset. So I'm not going to spend like hundreds of millions for acquisitions because then I'd rather do it myself. But I do spend money for teams that I consider very valuable and a fit for quantum that are not too big because integrating big teams into big teams is hard. And so having smaller teams integrated into quantum has turned out to be much more effective. That's what we do. And obviously, at one point, we will be big. And the question is, how can we navigate that and stay agile and keep our DNA, like I said before?
47:44But that's the management challenge. And that's where I'm learning. You know, I'm an engineer by heart. I was not trained to be a manager and a CEO. There is no such training besides just do it and listen to your heart and have a great team and build a great team. And that's what we are doing. And then let's see where it ends up. But for sure, we are not done yet. Amazing. Thank you so much. Thank you, Amy. Pleasure. Thank you for having me. And that is all we have time for. Please keep listening every week for more interviews with the CEOs and founders of Europe's most fascinating tech businesses.
48:17And please rate, review and share this podcast if you enjoyed it. This episode was produced by Tim Smith. And for more on everything that's going on in Europe's defence tech industry, please check out the agenda for the Sifted Summit, which is happening in London on the 8th and 9th of October. Hope to see you there.
From the publisher
Germany-based defence tech Quantum Systems is one of Europe's leading makers of military drones, having completed thousands of missions in Ukraine and signed contracts with governments around the world. The company raised a €160m Series C in May 2025, hitting unicorn status, and is seeing its revenue double year on year.
On this week's episode of the Sifted Podcast, host Amy sits down with Quantum Systems’ CEO Florian Seibel to hear about what peace in Ukraine will mean for the growing defence tech industry, what the future holds for unmanned vehicles and why he thinks Europe could take a leaf out of China's book when it comes to long-term planning.
Seibel, not one to mince his words, calls out the people and investors jumping on the defence tech hype, and explains how working in a war zone and competing against enemy Russian drones has been the ultimate motivator for innovation.




