In short
Stuff You Should Know: Selects: Seven - No, Wait, Five - Mysteries of the Art World
Podcast Overview
- Podcast Title: Stuff You Should Know
- Episode Title: Selects: Seven - No, Wait, Five - Mysteries of the Art World
- Hosts: Josh Clark and Charles W. Chuck Bryan
- Description: In this episode, the hosts delve into intriguing mysteries surrounding famous artists and their works, including Van Gogh, Caravaggio, Raphael, Vermeer, and a nod to Hitler's art aspirations.
Key Discussions
Introduction
- Josh introduces the episode as focused on art mysteries, expressing excitement about the topic.
- The episode format is reminiscent of earlier episodes featuring lists, keeping the tone light and engaging.
Featured Mysteries
- Caravaggio
- Background: Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio was a renowned Italian Baroque painter known for his dramatic use of light and shadow (chiaroscuro).
- Controversial Life: Caravaggio had a tumultuous life, including a murder charge that forced him to flee Rome.
- Mystery of Signature:
- He signed his only known work, *The Beheading of John the Baptist*, in the blood of the martyr, leading to speculation about the meaning behind the signature ("F" followed by his name).
- Theories regarding the signature's meaning include a confession or a reference to his status as a Knight of Malta.
- Vermeer
- Famous Work: *Girl with a Pearl Earring*, often called the "Mona Lisa of the North".
- Mystery of Identity:
- The girl’s identity is unknown; theories suggest she might be Vermeer’s daughter or an imaginary figure (tronie).
- The painting gained recognition only in the 20th century, raising questions about its past and Vermeer’s artistic process.
- Raphael
- Lost Masterpiece: Raphael's *Portrait of a Young Man* is considered the most important work to go missing during WWII.
- Nazi Plunder: The painting was taken during the war and has never been recovered; theories abound regarding its fate.
- Current Status: The painting remains lost, with the National Museum in Krakow housing an empty frame as a poignant reminder.
- Van Gogh
- Life and Death: Van Gogh, a tragic figure in art history, is famous for cutting off his ear and later dying at a young age.
- Mystery of Death:
- Initially believed to have died by suicide, new theories suggest he may have been accidentally shot by local boys.
- Circumstantial evidence supports this theory, including inconsistencies in his suicide account and the absence of the gun.
- Hitler's Art
- Failed Artist: Hitler aspired to be an artist but was rejected by art schools, which significantly impacted his psyche.
- Art Collection: During his regime, he plundered art from around Europe, and his own works are often seen as mediocre.
- Market for Hitler's Art: Despite his lack of success as an artist, there is a market for his works, which raises ethical questions about art forgery and collection.
Conclusion
- The episode encapsulates the mysteries intertwined with the lives and works of these artists, suggesting that the intrigue surrounding art often surpasses the artwork itself.
- The discussion ends with a teaser for future episodes, indicating a commitment to exploring art theft and recovery stories.
Key Takeaways
- Art history is riddled with mysteries that reflect broader societal issues and personal struggles of famous artists.
- The significance of identity, legacy, and interpretation plays a crucial role in understanding art.
- Historical context can reshape our perceptions of art and its creators.
Final Thoughts
- Overall, the episode serves as an engaging exploration of art mysteries, combining humor, historical insight, and speculation, making it a compelling listen for art enthusiasts and novices alike.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.
0:31app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
1:01podcast, Shell Game, on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey everybody, it's me, Josh, and for this week's Select, I've chosen our episode on art mysteries. It's a great one. Chuck and I are secretly jazzed by art history, it turns out, and this episode is the best of any we've done on the subject. It may also be the only one. At any rate, it's a good episode, and I think you'll enjoy it. So enjoy.
1:30Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.
1:40Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, and there's Charles W. Chuck Bryan over there, and Jerry's here somewhere. So this is Stuff You Should Know, the Art World edition. Yeah. You know what I just realized? We record these in twos And we just recorded the Pogs episode Right And you didn't say welcome to the Pogcast I didn't, did I? What a missed opportunity for a great dad joke That sounds like something I would skip though Even had I thought of it I don't know that I would have pulled the trigger on that Or I could see you pulling the trigger And then making fun of yourself Right I would have just been engaged in self-loathing for the rest of the podcast.
2:26Well, retroactively, I'm going to say I hope everyone enjoyed the podcast. Now let's talk about art mysteries. I love this one, man. This is great. This reminds me of a Stuff You Should Know episode from years back for some reason. Well, it's because we don't do these top lists anymore. That's part of it. You know, very famously, we used to have top tens on our old HowStuffWorks website, of which usually there were maybe seven decent entries. So we never did. I don't think we ever did a full ten on anything. Maybe somebody could probably correct us. But this one actually came in at seven. They didn't even try.
3:05And I don't even know. We may do like five of these. We haven't even figured it out yet. We'll see. We're going to play it fast and loose. I think that's another reason why it reminds me of an old Stuff You Should Know episode. Fast and loose. Yeah, Fast and Loose. First you got the Fast, then you got the Loose. But never Furious. Fast and Loose. No. Because who wants to be mad? I don't know. They should have called that series Fast and Loose. Tokyo Drift. I think I've heard it before that that series is the highest grossing movie franchise in the history of film, like worldwide. Yeah, you know what's funny is at one point we were, this was years ago, we were talking with Ludacris about doing something with the network.
3:47And I, because he's a local guy here in Atlanta. And I talked to our boss and said, what's he doing these days? Like, I haven't heard any music. And he went, he makes Fast and Furious movies. Like, that's his job now. Yeah, for sure. Because he's just getting rich off of making these movies. Like, I can't even imagine. And plus also, I mean, they're pretty, it's pretty involved movie making, I would guess. Like, I'm sure because there's so many stars involved that, you know, the shooting schedule for each one isn't necessarily, you know, a year-long endeavor or anything like that. And they probably have it down to, like, a pretty fast science by now.
4:26But, like, I would think that would eat up a pretty decent amount of your time shooting one of those films every few, you know, a couple times a, well, I guess every few years. I only saw one of those, I think. Man, I'm slowly, like, degenerating into Bob Newhart, man. Have you noticed? Oh, man, good. Yeah, you could degenerate into worse things than that. It's fantastic. But I mean, like, I'm really hitting that Newhart note these days, I've noticed. That's a great note. I love it. I've always wanted Bob Newhart as my podcasting partner, so. Well, you've... There you go. You've got it, buddy.
5:00All right, number one on the list. You want to talk a little Caravaggio? So Caravaggio is my new favorite painter. Oh, yeah? Not just because he was a scummy lowlife swordsman. Murderer. Murderer, yeah. He was a gambler. He had weapons charges against him while he was alive. He was not a good guy by any stretch of the imagination. Very troubled person is a really polite way to put it. But if you look at his art, like I had no idea. Yeah, I've seen like so many works of his art and I never pieced together that they were the same person. And then when I really started to read some criticism of his work, I'm like, oh, my God, this guy, he's considered one of the fathers of modern art.
5:51And this guy was painting at the beginning of the 17th century, the early 1600s. And just like Poggs, he burned hot and bright and fast and furious, actually, sadly. Oh, that's right. That wasn't even forced. Nice work, Bob. So Michelangelo Marisi de Caravaggio was an Italian Baroque painter. He, at one point in 1606, killed a man named Romuccio Tomassoni and said, I got to get out of here because I'm in big trouble now. And went away from Rome and fled to Malta where he had a pretty brief but, I guess, notable stay. He was only there about six months and kind of hiding out and quickly hooked up with the Knights of Malta and was briefly one of the Knights of Malta.
6:49Like for a month. Yeah, and painted one of his most famous paintings there, the oil on canvas, 12 feet by 17 feet, the beheading of John the Baptist. Yeah, it was an altar piece for the Order of St. John, also known as the Knights of Malta. They were going to, again, put this behind the altar in their church on Malta. And it was actually his little entry fee. They charged an entry fee, usually money, to their initiates. Or pogs. But they accepted this altar piece, this giant painting of St. John the Baptist being beheaded. And it was actually, I mean, as far as Caravaggio goes, especially toward the end of his life, It's actually fairly tame because there's not, you know, like jets of blood spurting out.
7:38It's a pool of blood that's being shown. He painted some really violent stuff. Yeah. And like you said, that kind of, that he was a master of light and shadow. It's called Chiriscuro. And he used it to really dramatic effect, including in that painting. And in fact, one of the other paintings that you might have seen of his, Chuck, it's called Judith Beheading Holofernes. Have you seen it? I have. So Judith, the woman who's in that painting, the woman who modeled for that, for Judith, that was the woman that he killed Renuccio Tomassoni over. Right. Did you know that? I did. Oh, you did? Okay.
8:24Well, at any rate, while he was— Because they really, in this How Stuff Works article, they called it a petty squabble, and that really doesn't tell the story. Yeah, another explanation I saw was that it was over a tennis wager. And this is real tennis, not lawn tennis. And real tennis is kind of like this kooky mix between squash and racquetball and tennis. And it's all indoors and there's like horse sheds basically involved that you can play off the roof stuff. It's really interesting stuff. And he used to play that a lot too. But so it was either over a wager or it was over this woman. Her name was, what was it?
9:06Judith. No, Felide. Felide, I believe, was the actual woman's name who modeled for Judith. So he ends up on Malta. He becomes a knight. And when he becomes this knight, he paints this altrupiece, and he signs his name in the Pool of Blood, which you're like, well, he's an artist. That seems like something an artist would do. Not Caravaggio. This is actually the first and only work of his that he ever signed, which a lot of people are like, okay, wait a minute. Let's examine this. Yeah, and it kind of took a while for it to be even very visible because it underwent some restorations over the years.
9:41And in the 1950s, they did a restoration where they really could see the signature and what it said. I don't know about for the first time, but like super clearly at least. And it said F period, dot, F Michelang, M-I-C-H-E-L-A-N-G. And then, you know, of course, everyone's like, well, what does this mean? Because there is no F in his name. It's not like his initial. is he saying, you know, hey, screw Michelangelo, myself, screw me, or I'm screwed. No, no one really said that. They thought the F, there are a couple of different theories, thought it was shorthand for frater, which means brother, because he was one of the knights, and maybe he just meant like brother Michelangelo or whatever.
10:32And then some other people said, no, maybe it means, stands for facet, F-E-C-I-T, which is Latin for did, translating basically into I did it, and it's spelled out in blood, kind of confessing to his crime. Right. So that's kind of like where the mystery comes in. Was he confessing to the crime of murdering Ranuccio Tomassoni? From what I saw most, I can't say most, but the art historians and critics that I saw basically said, no, he almost certainly wasn't doing that. For one, everybody knew that he did it. He'd already been convicted in absentia. That's what I thought. So it's not like he was confessing to it.
11:12Although you can make the case that he was confessing in the Catholic sense of the word. Do you know what I mean? Right. Like before God. Yeah, exactly. Or De Bears. That painting still hangs at St. John's Co-Cathedral in Malta too. Okay, yeah. Well, I mean, it was the altar piece. Like it was a big deal that they got their hands on it. Because he was a celebrated painter at the time already in his lifetime. But the other interpretation that he was saying F as in Frater or brother Michelangelo about himself, that's probably the likelier version because he was at the time seeking a pardon from the Pope.
11:52So he could return to Rome. And by saying, like, I'm in this holy order, I'm basically like a Catholic holy man now, a leader of the church, because the order of St. John, the Knights of Malta have inducted me. He was basically shouting it loud and proud by signing that one particular very holy painting that he did. But they said, nice try, buddy. And they kicked him out for being a, quote, foul and rotten member, end quote. So it didn't work. A month. After a month, dude, he lasted a month in the Order of St. John. And it's not like they ran around willy-nilly inducting people. Like, they basically had no idea that they had, what was Vic's last name in the shield?
12:41Vic Tabak. No, not Vic Tabak. I don't know. I didn't watch The Shield. Oh, you didn't? It was good. I rewatched like the last seven episodes the other night over a couple of nights. It still holds up actually. But anyway, they didn't realize that they had inducted him, the guy from The Shield, and they figured it out pretty quickly. So he made his way back from Malta to, I believe, Sicily on his way to Rome. And I think he actually got a pardon and got into yet another squabble, another sword fight, and sustained some wounds. and between infected wounds, they think he got a staph infection, lead poisoning, he apparently had gone rather mad from being exposed to the paints that he painted with, and then sun exposure, sunstroke on the beach in Tuscany finally killed him.
13:29And so it goes. Yes, it does. But his paintings are still just amazing. I can look at them all day, you know? Yeah, me too. I like this stuff. I do too. So that's Caravaggio. How about Vermeer? Well, I think we should take a break. Oh, gosh. And we'll be back right after this.
13:59New year, new goals, and in this economy, a better money plan is more necessary than ever. I am Matt. And I'm Joel. We are from the How to Money podcast. And every week we help you to spend smarter, save more, and make sense of what's going on out there. If you want 2026 to be the year you finally feel in control of your money, we're here to give you the tools and advice to help you make it happen. Listen to How to Money on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, I'm Dr. Priyanka Wally. And I'm Hari Kondabolu. It's a new year, and on the podcast Health Stuff, we're resetting the way we talk about our health.
14:34Which means being honest about what we know, what we don't know, and how messy it can all be. I like to sleep in late and sleep early. Is there a chronotype for that or am I just depressed? We talk to experts who share real experiences and insight. You just really need to find where it is that you can have an impact in your own life and just start doing that. We break down the topics you want to know more about. sleep, stress, mental health, and how the world around us affects our overall health. We talk about all the ways to keep your body and mind inside and out healthy. We human beings, all we want is connection.
15:13We just want to connect with each other. Health stuff is about learning, laughing, and feeling a little less alone. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey there, this is Dr. Jesse Mills, director of the Men's Clinic at UCLA Health and host of the Mailroom Podcast. Each January, guys everywhere make the same resolutions. Get stronger, work harder, fix what's broken. But what if the real work isn't physical at all? To kick off the new year, I sat down with Dr. Steve Poulter, a psychologist with over 30 years experience helping men unpack shame, anxiety, and emotional pain they were never taught to name.
15:51In a powerful two-part conversation, we discuss why men aren't emotionally bulletproof, why shame hides in plain sight, and how real strength comes from listening to yourself and to others. Guys who are toxic, they're immature, or they've got something they just haven't resolved. Once that gets resolved, then there comes empathy as in compassion. If you want this to be the year you stop powering through pain and start understanding what's underneath, listen to The Mailroom on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your favorite shows.
16:35All right. We had a great cliffhanger with Vermeer. Vermeer, the very famous Dutch artist, Johannes Vermeer, had a very famous painting, a lot of very famous paintings, but one in particular that has had a bunch of names over the years. In fact, it did not get the name Girl with a Pearl Earring until the 20th century. It was called everything from Girl with a Turban to Girl with an Earring. It had lots of different names because it was not officially titled by Vermeer nor dated even though they think it was around 1665. Yeah, he was just like this dude who lived in Delft in the Netherlands and never left his hometown and had a wife and 15 kids.
17:21Fifteen. Yeah, 15 kids. And just kind of painted, and he made probably a comparatively small number of works. I think around 36 are attributed to him. And there's a theory that as many as a fifth of those were done by his oldest daughter, Maria. But he's kind of like this enigma at the time, not just personally, but also the stuff he was painting. There was a huge movement among the Dutch painters at the time that they would paint like these, you know, horrific hellscapes or there was a lot of like obvious narrative and symbolism just all over the paintings. There was just a lot going on. Vermeer went a different way where he would almost peek in on very normal daily life and capture like these really just kind of boring or otherwise mundane moments.
18:20But he did it in a way that this guy was like the master of light. He makes Thomas Kincaid look like puke as far as like, you know, light mastery goes. So Girl with a Pearl Earring, everyone has seen it. Like I said, it's very famous. It's of a young girl, looks to be sort of like mid-teenage years, looking over her shoulder. She's wearing a dress. She's wearing that turban, very prominent earrings, large pearl earrings, and pearls factored into quite a few of his works over the years. And it's one of those paintings where the eyes follow you, supposedly, which we've talked about in one of our short stuff episodes.
18:59On Mona Lisa? I think so, yeah. It's, you know, the effect of the eyes following, which doesn't happen in all paintings with eyes. Oh, no, the Mona Lisa's eyes actually don't follow you. I think that was the big reveal of that one. Was it? Yeah. All right. So he paints this painting. And then, of course, the mystery of this one is who is this person? There's been speculation that it might be a mistress. A lot of people think it was his daughter, Maria, who would have been about 15 or 16. and, like you said, who some people believe painted about a fifth of the works attributed to him because about a fifth of his collected works aren't, I mean, this sounds mean to say, but they aren't up to snuff compared to his other works.
19:47So they sort of stand out from the rest, so they think that they may have been Maria's. Good painting still. Yeah, they're still a lot better than anything I could do. Yeah, it's not like they were stick figures, you know, out of nowhere. They're like, this Vermeer seems off. But, you know, if you've, there was a 1999 novel from Tracy Chevalier, The Girl with the Pearl Earring, and then the 2000 film adaptation starring Scarlett Johansson, who was perfectly cast. She looks, you know, quite a bit like The Girl with the Pearl Earring. But this was historical fiction. If you've seen that movie and you're like, no, she was the family's maid's assistant and love interest to Vermeer, that was just, I don't even think that was based on anything.
20:26It's just historical fiction. Yes. From what I've seen, the art critics and historians basically tend to think that there was no person that this was modeled on. It wasn't even necessarily his daughter. In fact, it was kind of a trend at the time, a painting called a tronie, which was an imaginary figure, a person who didn't actually exist. and the point was to kind of show off things like costumes and jewelry which is um ostensibly the point of that painting but the thing is the vermeer um the face that he did and the the the where the place that he put her like we were talking about how she gets compared to mona lisa she's called the mona lisa of the north mona lisa is like sitting back in the painting the girl with the pearl earring is like right in the foreground, like right.
21:20There's very little between you and her. And she's turned around and her mouth's open, which apparently was very unusual for painting a Dutch painting at the time. And it looks like she's going to say something. I guess that that is what entrances people with this, this, this image that, you know, what's she going to say? What did he capture her about to say? You know, it looks like she's turning around like, oh, and And, you know, this other thing I hadn't told you. Maybe she was an improv comedian and she was yes and. She said yes and. You never know. But this is a mystery that will never be solved, which sometimes I like those kind of mysteries when it comes to stuff like this.
21:58Yeah, and I saw that argued as well that it was like, you know, if we knew who she was, it would just – we would lose a lot of the interest in it. And we would have found out by now, I think. Yes. Yeah, and you're right. We probably won't ever know. But because of this, so like it wasn't like very well thought of or nobody really thought much of it until 1995. The National Gallery used it as the poster for their big exhibit. But since then, a lot of people have really kind of examined it. And I hadn't noticed this before, but I saw it pointed out, Chuck. If you look at the pearl earring, first of all, it's improbably large is how I saw it described.
22:34Like the ear couldn't physically hold up a pearl that size. But then secondly, it's really basically made with two brush strokes. Both of them are reflecting light. One is from the light source, and then the lower one is reflecting the light off of the collar. And it's pretty amazing that, you know, we talk about the girl with the pearl earring. This pearl itself is like kind of a cultural icon, too. And it's basically just two brush strokes, which kind of goes to show how great Vermeer was. Amazing. Have you ever seen Tim's Vermeer, the documentary? I have not. Oh, Chuck, you've got to see it.
23:13It's directed by Teller from Penn & Teller, which makes you think, like, how did he direct if he doesn't talk, you know? But he somehow did. I think he talks in private. It's about—what? That's just a bit. and it's about a guy who basically figured out that Vermeer somehow projected images that he built in real life onto a canvas and then painted them that way and he actually replicates a Vermeer like perfectly it's really just one of the better documentaries you'll ever see very cool so what do you think, on to Raphael? yeah, so the mystery here and this is one of our, this actually has a Simpson crossover as well, which is kind of fun because Raphael painted a very famous painting called Portrait of a Young Man and is largely described as one of the most famous, if not the most famous pieces of art to go missing during the plundering of great art in World War II by Hitler and the gang.
24:20And this is a crossover with the Simpsons in that in the Fighting Hellfish episode, when Grandpa Abe and Burns are stealing art. This is one of the paintings, Portrait of a Young Man. Oh, yeah. It's one of the paintings that they stole. Wow. Which shows that, you know, Simpsons writers back then at least were definitely doing their work, like their research work, because that's a nice little Easter egg, I think. Yeah, totally. Doesn't it even talk? Doesn't it say something like someone's guilty conscience or something? I don't know. Or am I making that up? I don't know. I don't remember. I mean, it's been a long time since I've seen that one, But it was one of the great episodes, I think.
24:56So the portrait of the young man, which they think was a Raphael self-portrait. And actually, we have no idea what the colors were because the only photographs we have of it were in black and white. But he used to hang in the Princess Zartorsky Museum in Poland, along with two other really important paintings. Leonardo's Lady with an Ermine, which is a goat, stoat, I can't remember, kind of a weasel-like animal. and then Rembrandt's Landscape with the Good Samaritan. And all three of those and everything else in the Prince's Zartowski Museum were swiped by the Nazis when they came to Poland and placed in the office of a guy named Hans Frank, who was the head of the government for the Nazis in Poland, right?
25:43Yeah, and they almost got these hidden away successfully. When Poland was being invaded, they knew that the art was going to be plundered. And so those three paintings were actually rescued by the prince and hidden away in a house in a place that I can't even pronounce. Sienawa? I'm not sure what that is. But they were ultimately found by the Gestapo and handed over to Frank. And Frank, you know, they were supposed to go to Hitler. Hitler was going to open a museum, the Fuhrer Museum in Linz. And Frank actually kind of kept it for a little while, hung it in his residence. And then eventually this thing went to Germany and then Austria for a little while and then back with Frank in 1945.
26:30Which seems crazy improbable that they would end up back with him. But they did. And the Allies came in to Poland, I guess, and arrested Hans Frank in 1945. and they were able to find the lady with an ermine and the landscape with the Good Samaritan, but the portrait of the young man was nowhere to be found. Yeah, they found a lot of other stuff too. Sure, they definitely did, but the three most important pieces in the Prince's Zartarsky Museum were those three, and two were recovered, one wasn't. And it's very odd to think that they were separated at any time or that it's even odder to think that two were kept together but one wasn't.
27:12And so because the portrait of the young man was not recovered and it's a Raphael, who's, you know, one of the great Italian Renaissance painters, it's considered maybe the most important piece to go missing in World War II. Yeah. And they, you know, along with, I think, over 800 other artifacts they got from him and they could not go on to question him very long because he was executed just a year later. And since then, there have been a lot of rumors about where this thing ended up. Who has it? A lot of speculation that maybe a private collector in another country has it. I think in 2012, there was a false report that it was supposedly in some bank vault.
Read the full transcript
27:54And they really don't know. It's just sort of one of those great mysteries of a disappeared painting. And my money is on a private collector probably has this thing stashed away. But you would also think that at some point somebody would talk. You would think so um and you know maybe they will eventually unless it's really stashed well some people think it was destroyed in that movie monuments men right uh they show the nazis igniting it with the flamethrower in a cave with a bunch of other art um and there you know there's a whole camp that says now this thing is it's gone forever so they did something to it because the nazis were known not just plunder but also destroy art as well which just one more reason to love them nazis Yeah, and I think this is oil on panel, so I don't think this could even be like rolled up in a tube and put under your bed or anything.
28:43Yeah, I would guess not. No, I didn't realize it was on panel, but that makes sense. But the state, the National Museum in Krakow bought the entire Princess Zartorsky collection from a private collector for 100 million euros back in 2016. And that, I know, and that included the rights to portrait of a young man in case it's ever found. and for now it's just they have the original frame hanging empty in the gallery. Yeah, it turns out that's a thing I didn't know was a thing. Empty frames in galleries. It's kind of sad. Yeah, it's sad. It's very poignant. It says, come home. Come home. We're leaving the light on for you.
29:23Come home. Just like Motel 6. That's right. I'm Tom Brokaw. We'll leave the light on for you. All right. Well, that means it's time for another break. and we'll be back right after this to talk a little bit about Van Gogh.
29:47New year, new goals, and in this economy, a better money plan is more necessary than ever. I am Matt. And I'm Joel. We are from the How to Money podcast, and every week we help you to spend smarter, save more, and make sense of what's going on out there. If you want 2026 to be the year you finally feel in control of your money, we're here to give you the tools and advice to help you make it happen. Listen to How to Money on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, I'm Dr. Priyanka Wally. And I'm Hari Kondabolu. It's a new year, and on the podcast Health Stuff, we're resetting the way we talk about our health.
30:22Which means being honest about what we know, what we don't know, and how messy it can all be. I like to sleep in late and sleep early. Is there a chronotype for that or am I just depressed? We talk to experts who share real experiences and insight. You just really need to find where it is that you can have an impact in your own life and just start doing that. We break down the topics you want to know more about. Sleep, stress, mental health, and how the world around us affects our overall health. We talk about all the ways to keep your body and mind, inside and out, healthy. We human beings, all we want is connection.
31:01We just want to connect with each other. Health stuff is about learning, laughing, and feeling a little less alone. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey there, this is Dr. Jesse Mills, director of the Men's Clinic at UCLA Health and host of the Mailroom Podcast. Each January, guys everywhere make the same resolutions. Get stronger, work harder, fix what's broken. But what if the real work isn't physical at all? To kick off the new year, I sat down with Dr. Steve Poulter, a psychologist with over 30 years' experience helping men unpack shame, anxiety, and emotional pain they were never taught to name.
31:40In a powerful two-part conversation, we discuss why men aren't emotionally bulletproof, why shame hides in plain sight, and how real strength comes from listening to yourself and to others. Guys who are toxic, they're immature, or they've got something they just haven't resolved. Once that gets resolved, then there comes empathy and some compassion. If you want this to be the year you stop powering through pain and start understanding what's underneath, listen to The Mailroom on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your favorite shows.
32:22So, Chuck, before I launch into a Saka-Go-A-type tirade onto you, is that how you accurately pronounce his name? I don't know. It was from the filmmaker who dared not speak his name. It was from a Woody Allen movie. I think it was in the most problematic movie, Manhattan, when he's with Diane Keaton and some obnoxious person says Van, or I think it's Diane Keaton says Van Gogh, and he's, you know, he's incense. He's like Van Gogh, like how pretentious. So, okay, so instead we're just going to go with Van Gogh like everybody else, right? Yeah, sure. Okay. And we can cut all that out if we don't even want to talk about Woody Allen.
33:02That's fine. Sure, sure. I hear you. So Van Gogh was most, he was just such a sad, tragic figure. I feel for this guy so much after learning more about him. We should do an entire podcast on him if you ask me. Agreed. But instead here we're going to talk about his death because there is a mystery surrounding his death. He's very famous for having cut off his ear. He definitely did that. And I had always learned that he did it to impress a sex worker who he was enamored with. And he definitely did give her his ear after he cut it off. But that's not why he cut it off. He cut it off in a fit of angst, basically, after having an argument with his friend Paul Gauguin, who he was living with in Arles in the south of France.
33:48And he said, well, I'm going to make some sort of lemonade out of this lemon I just gave myself. And he took it to his, I guess, hopeful girlfriend. And I believe she was not that impressed with it. Yeah. So he suffered from definitely depression. There is speculation that he had bipolar disorder. Yeah, I saw that too. Was, you know, just sort of long suffering as an artist. He only sold one painting before he died in 1890 at the age of 37. And the story goes is that he shot himself in the chest with a revolver. But it gets a little more complicated than that. And in what year was the book? In 2011, there was a book written called Van Gogh.
34:35colon, The Life, written by Stephen, I'm going to say Mifa. Okay. And Gregory White Smith. And it seems like they sort of launched this idea, or at least really put it in the public forefront, that he was actually killed almost certainly accidentally by one of two boys, a younger gentleman that he was hanging out with that day. Right. So here's the thing. like there's a lot of circumstantial evidence that supports that theory that he was killed by two boys. I buy it. There's also, it's also circumstantially plausible that, you know, Van Gogh died by suicide as well. But even if you take his story and start digging into it and the statements that he made, supposedly made, apparently everything we know about it comes from the owner of the inn where he rented a room's 13-year-old daughter at the time, who was a witness to all this.
35:36But even if you take what he supposedly said, it still doesn't add up. That number one, he shot himself in the chest, and most importantly, that number two, the gun that he shot himself with could never be found. And instead of actually, you know, finishing the suicide, completing the suicide, he couldn't find the gun after he shot himself in the chest and just walked back to his room where he died after suffering 20 more hours. But still to the end, claiming that he had done this himself. Even if you take all that together, it seems like, no, there's something really fishy going on here. Yeah.
36:14So this bullet misses all of his internal organs very improbably because it deflected off his rib cage. And he walked, like you said, to the doctor who they didn't have a surgeon on duty, so they couldn't remove the bullet. He lived a total of 30 hours after the shot and died of infection, got to talk with his brother, was speaking to people. So he had every opportunity to say that these two boys that I was hanging out with, that I was drinking, and I say boys, I think they were maybe late teens, early 20s. No, they were 16. Oh, okay. I saw early 20s in another thing. Oh, yeah. But, you know, hanging out, getting drunk with them.
36:57one of these boys, René Sacretin, had a gun that apparently misfired a lot and he liked playing with this thing. He liked to play cowboy, supposedly. He did. And so it all just seems, and even his statement, he said, he didn't say, I shot myself. He said, do not accuse anyone. It was I who wanted to kill myself. Yeah, which is very peculiar as well. Yeah, for sure. It's ambiguous, I think, as far as like, because the idea is that maybe he was accidentally shot. And then after he was shot, he was like, this is kind of what I wanted all along. You know, I've been heading down this road toward suicide.
37:39And then now it's just done for me. So what seems to have happened is that this gun, possibly that it wasn't actually murder or any kind of premeditated murder, more like a manslaughter where Rene and his brother Gaston were messing around and accidentally— Basically, he had seen a Wild Bill Cody Wild West show the year before and became obsessed with it. So that's what he was doing with the gun and playing cowboy. And that they had accidentally shot him with this gun that was kind of, you know, known to misfire. So the thing was that the gun was never found. Renee went back to school like right after that, which was still in the middle of summer break from what I saw.
38:27And the town seems to have circled the wagons around these boys because, you know, Van Gogh was an outsider. He was not very well thought of. He used to get really drunk and argue with the locals in the cafe and everything like basically every night. And these boys came from like a good, well-to-do family. So for many years, like, that was just the thing. Like, it just happened. And then slowly, little by little, it seems to have trickled out some support for this idea. Like, no, like, Van Gogh wasn't anywhere near this field. He said that he had shot himself in. He was actually on the road to the Secretan's house.
39:05And then finally, years later, René Secretan said that, you know, he, it probably was his gun and that Van Gogh had somehow gotten a hold of it. It seems likely that he was shot by them, whether accident or not. Yeah, and these two authors, they put forth some other circumstantial evidence, like that the bullet went in at a weird angle that would not have been the angle if you shot yourself in the chest. That his more recent works were a little more upbeat and a little more positive, and that he was not in that kind of mindset at the time. and that he had recently even written his thoughts about suicide, that he thought it was sinful and immoral.
39:50And so they sort of use all this as evidence that he would not have done it himself and that it was, you know, they believe it was an accident. His last words, very sad, were, the sadness will last forever. He spoke to his brother, which that's tough. Yeah, it is. I really do want to do an episode on him. And I think Secretan came out in the 50s even and denied it, right? Like, finally, once and for all. He did. He did, but he also said that it probably was his gun and that somehow Van Gogh had gotten it. Right, but, hey, that ain't my fault. No, but also to backpedal and be like, it probably was my gun, because that was another thing.
40:28Everybody's like, where did Van Gogh get a gun? Van Gogh didn't have a gun. No one would have given Van Gogh a gun. Right. He was the guy who got drunk every night and had cut off his ear before. That was like, no one in town would have given him a gun. And so the fact that he even admitted that it was his gun is probably as close as Rene Sercuton ever came to confessing publicly about it, you know? Yeah, and it makes sense. What he said was do not accuse anyone. Like that really seems like he's trying to cover for these kids that he didn't want to get in trouble. Yeah, because if he wanted to die but was also he didn't want to die by his own hand, like this is kind of a lucky gift in a very strange way, you know?
41:11Yeah. I'm going to that immersive Van Gogh thing in July. Where is that? It is here in Atlanta. It's at the Pullman Yards. Oh, yeah. Over in Kirkwood where they shoot like every movie in Atlanta shoots there. Right. Yeah. So, yeah, it's supposed to be pretty cool. It's very neat. Sounds neat. I mean, like, basically they just make the stars come out whenever you come in. I think so. They come sit in this yellow chair. I think that's the deal. I think you go in and you are surrounded by projected art in different ways from what I can gather. Oh, I got to check that out, man. Thanks for telling me about it.
41:50Yeah, it looks kind of cool. All right, Chuck, you want to finish out talking about Hitler? Don't you mean Hilter? Did you notice that? Is he in there as Hilter? Oh, my gosh, yes, in the headline. In the headline. Did Hilter really do these paintings? Do these paintings? Who wrote that? I feel bad, but like, did Hilter really do these paintings? That's great. Oh, yeah, he did them. Yeah, Hilter did these paintings. So we're talking not about Hilter, but about Hitler, Adolf Hitler in particular. And as everybody knows, Hitler was a frustrated artist. Yeah, big time. You know, people have made a lot of hay about how possibly the world would be a totally different place had he been accepted into the Vienna Academy of Arts.
42:40And he came, I don't want to say he came close, but he made two different attempts in one year to be accepted. And they basically looked at his stuff and said, look, man, you have the skill of a draftsman. Maybe you should go into architecture, but you're not going to be an artist. And he said, architecture? That was a direct quote. But this was a huge deal for him. I think I read in Mein Kampf, I haven't read Mein Kampf, but I read an article by somebody who read Mein Kampf and said that he said it was like a bolt from the blue and that, you know, he was pursuing this dream that his father would, like, beat him out of.
43:24Like, his father enrolled him in a technical school. He's like, no, son of mine's going to be an artist. He would beat him up whenever he brought the idea up. And so finally, after his father died, And then he nursed his ailing mother until she died. He got up the gumption to, like, go and enroll in art school. And apparently he, being Hitler, who I guess had been fairly bonkers his whole life, just knew that he was destined to become an artist. So the idea that he was rebuffed not once but twice by this Vienna school, these people were, like, the guardians of what is art and what is not. and they were telling him what you got is not.
44:04That was a huge deal to him. It was a very big deal. And it's funny, it's just now occurring to me that there was sort of a similar thing with Manson's rejection as a musician by the music industry. I never really kind of really thought of that parallel. But in 1909, Hitler is traipsing around Vienna and he is selling watercolors copied from postcards. to tourists so if you've ever traveled to europe he was one of those guys that was down by the river uh the river bank yeah in a van selling these uh and literally copied from postcards so he did that for a little while made a little bit of money because you know if you look at his art it's it's way better than i could do it's you know it's okay but yeah like modern uh and it's it's hard to tell if modern art critics like so much goes into looking at a hitler painting and reviewing it Like it's really hard to kind of separate those things.
45:03But the general thought is that he had nothing exceptional about him at all. He was the kind of artist that would sell stuff down by the river to tourists. They were fine. He was capable. But they were copycat paintings. He was copying things. He had no point of view. He did this in 1913 as well in Munich, painting Munich cityscapes and landscapes and selling them to tourists. and then in 1914 got hauled in by the police, of all things, for failing to register for the military. Yeah. And then he went down and registered, and then they gave him a physical exam, and he failed it. They said it was too weak to fire a weapon.
45:48Yeah. So they arrested him so that they could humiliate him, basically. And then when World War I came around, he enlisted, and they say, we need everybody we can get, come on in. And he actually did fight. Yeah, even Hilter. Hilter did this army thing. Right. So when he rose to power Germany, one of the things he did was he had his works collected and destroyed. I'm not exactly sure what the thinking was behind that, I guess because he knew it wasn't very good and he needed to focus on his political career rather than his artistic career or have everybody else focus on it, but to no avail. Because I saw a 1936 critic or a critic wrote in 1936 that his style was prosaic, utterly devoid of rhythm, color, feeling, or spiritualism.
46:41And this was before he, or I'm sorry, or spiritual imagination. And this was before he had really become an obvious threat. This is 1936. So even back then, even without hindsight, people thought his stuff wasn't very good. So, yeah, he had his stuff destroyed. And it was kind of a footnote for a very long time that he was an artist and no one really cared after his death. Yeah, I mean, and that was one of the major reasons that he was such an art plunderer during the war and stole as much art as he could from real famous artists and famous paintings because he had all this backstory as a failed artist.
47:23And it was interesting. I did see that like one of his major, I mean, because he wasn't an utter failure at first. He had a backer early on, I think, who was a Jewish man. Yeah, Morgenstern. Yeah, which was really interesting. And there was, I don't know, man. There's a lot of speculation about what that all meant to him. and like people try and draw parallels to like some of the paintings. I mean, some of it feels like a stretch. Definitely like the, you know, the cold streets of Munich like were painted like clearly with a future cleansing in mind to make it look like this. That's a stretch.
48:06Yeah, some of that stuff seems like a stretch, but you could definitely read into the backstory at least, I think, with some accuracy. Yeah, and even if, like, you can't necessarily suss out, like, the future from his paintings, you can make a pretty strong case that his artistic ambitions being utterly crushed had some sort of driving force or impact on his psyche at the very least. Sure. Like, that and his later political career and dictatorship did not exist in a vacuum. I don't think you can possibly make the case that they were just unrelated in any way. No, I think any sociopath, you can look at their past and see the dots connected, you know?
48:49Yeah. So like you said, there was – this kind of just was the deal for a long time. And then like anything else, like people wanting to get original Charles Manson music reels, in the late 90s, early 2000s, there was a market for Hitler's work. I think in 2009, a British auction house, someone paid$150 ,000 for 15 early sketches and watercolors, including a self-portrait. And then in 2015, some unnamed investors paid$450 ,000 for a set of watercolors. I think there were 12 or 13 that survived. Yeah, the problem is because he didn't have a style of his own, that he was copying postcards, that he didn't have any formal training, and that he lacked a lot of creativity or any creativity it seems like.
49:44It's really hard to say this is a Hitler and this is a fake. And there's developed a really enormous market of fakes. because anybody who's like a passingly good artist in watercolors of streetscapes and landscapes could drum up something and be like, this is a Hitler. And it would be really difficult to say yes, it is or no, it's not. Yeah. What kind of a garbage human do you have to be to think, I'll do Hitler forgeries and try and sell them to garbage humans that want to collect them? Yeah. And it's not like these are even fetching like$10 million a piece. We're talking like you might get$10 ,000 for it for your Hitler forgery.
50:32Unbelievable. Wow. But totally believable. So that's the mystery of the Hitler paintings. Did he do this? Yeah. Did he do those paintings? You got anything else? I got nothing else. That was a good five. I think we have committed to doing a robust episode on the Gardner Museum heist because that's a good one. and that was on this list and way underplayed. For sure. So keep an ear out for that, everybody. And since I said keep an ear out for that, I think it's time for listener mail. Yeah, I'm going to call this middle names because we had a little discussion in our John Muir episode about how Emily and I and our friends, Justin and Melissa, one night were going by our middle names as a joke.
51:21and I had the theory that you have no emotional connection to your middle name if you don't have a reaction when you hear it said out loud. And I just meant sort of the non-dominant name. It didn't necessarily mean middle names because my brother goes by his middle name. Scott is his middle name and some people do that. It's a thing. And certainly Amy does. She said, I was listening to the show and at the end you were chatting about using middle names and how you don't have an emotional connection when you hear it. I have an interesting situation that everyone, everyone in my family uses their middle names.
51:53So I've always been called Amy ever since I was born, but my first name is Helen. This causes an interesting situation at airports and doctor's appointments where they refer to me as Helen, and I always have to remember that they're talking to me. Big fan of the show, kept me curious, and my curious spirit satisfied over the last three or four years. And it's such a comfort knowing there's always another episode to listen to. Best wishes from the UK. They're always so nice. And that is from Amy. Helen Amy. Thanks, Helen Amy. We'll just call her Amy, as is customary. Yeah, because we say Helen.
52:26She's like, who? Wow, I can't wait until they read my listener mail, says Amy. If you want to be like Amy and get in touch with us for whatever reason, you can send us an email to stuffpodcast at iheartradio.com. Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app. Apple Podcasts are wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
53:01Hey, it's Joel. And Matt from HowToMoney. If your New Year's resolution is to finally get your finances in shape, we've got your back. Prices, they're still high, and the economy is all over the place. But 2026 is the year for you to get intentional and make real progress. That's right. Yeah. Each week we break down what's happening with your money, the most important issues to focus on, and the small moves that make a big difference. Kick off the year with confidence. Listen to How to Money on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, Kyle. Could you draw up a quick document with the basic business plan?
53:35Just one page as a Google Doc and send me the link. Thanks. Hey, just finished drawing up that quick one-page business plan for you. Here's the link. But there was no link. There was no business plan. I hadn't programmed Kyle to be able to do that yet. I'm Evan Ratliff here with a story of entrepreneurship in the AI age. Listen as I attempt to build a real startup run by fake people. Check out the second season of my podcast, Shell Game, on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Whether it is getting swatted or just hateful messages online, there is a lot of harm in even just reading the comments.
54:10That's cybersecurity expert Camille Stewart-Gloster on the Therapy for Black Girls podcast. Every season is a chance to grow. And the Therapy for Black Girls podcast is here to walk with you. I'm Dr. Joy Harden-Bradford, and each week we dive into real conversations that help you move with more clarity and confidence. This episode, we're breaking down what really happens to your information online and how to protect yourself with intention. Listen to Therapy for Black Girls on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human.
From the publisher
When you get a bunch of artistic types together into a community – aka, the art world – some intrigue and mystery are bound to arise. Listen in to this classic episode as Chuck and Josh cover strangeness around Van Gogh, Caravaggio, Raphael, and Vermeer – plus don’t miss Hilter!
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


