In short
Podcast Notes: Stuff You Should Know - Short Stuff: Andrew Jackson's Inauguration
Episode Overview
- Title: Short Stuff: Andrew Jackson's Inauguration
- Hosts: Josh and Chuck
- Description: Exploration of the wild stories surrounding Andrew Jackson's inauguration party in 1829 and an examination of the historical accuracy of these tales.
Key Topics Discussed
Historical Context
- Andrew Jackson’s Inauguration: Took place on March 4, 1829.
- Populism: Jackson is often considered the first populist president, appealing to the "little people" and the average citizen.
- Significance of the Inauguration: Marked a shift in political power from elites to the common people.
The Inauguration Party
- Large Attendance: Estimated 20,000 people attended the White House following the inauguration.
- Initial Accounts of Chaos: Early narratives depicted a wild party where guests caused havoc.
Examination of Sources
- Margaret Bayard Smith’s Account: A key source that described chaos during the party; however, her account is viewed skeptically due to her opposition to Jackson and possible exaggeration.
- Her Description: Aimed to portray Jackson's supporters as unruly and out of place in Washington.
- Contrasting Views:
- Daniel Webster: A senator who attended; his writings did not mention significant chaos, focusing instead on the celebratory atmosphere.
- James Hamilton: Another senator who referred to it as a "regular Saturnalia," yet noted that damage was minimal.
Historians’ Perspectives
- Debate on Exaggeration: Many historians believe that while some disorder occurred, it may not have been as severe as reported.
- Cultural Impact: The exaggeration of the event reflects the political climate and opposition to Jackson’s presidency.
Modern Relevance
- Current Political Climate: Josh and Chuck relate the historical outrage politics to contemporary issues in American politics.
Key Takeaways
- The portrayal of Andrew Jackson’s inauguration party illustrates the tensions between populism and elitism in American politics.
- Accounts of historical events can be colored by the personal beliefs and biases of those recounting them.
- The significance of historical narratives continues to resonate in today's political discourse.
Conclusion The episode provides a nuanced look at Andrew Jackson's inauguration, emphasizing the importance of critical examination of historical sources and the lasting impact of populism in American politics. The discussions serve as a reminder of how public perception can be shaped by both factual occurrences and exaggerated retellings.
Listen to more episodes: For further insights on diverse topics, check out the Stuff You Should Know podcast on [iHeartRadio](https://omnystudio.com/listener).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.
0:31on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
0:38Hey, and welcome to The Short Stuff. I'm Josh, and there's Chuck, and Jerry's sitting in for Dave, and this is Short Stuff. And Chuck, I have come to really detest politics, in particular the American brand of zero-sum outrage politics that the entire nation's enmeshed in. Yeah, me too. I try not to think about it. Same. Avoid politics as much as possible. Same. So let's get started about this political history story. We're talking about Andrew Jackson and his first inauguration, or his inauguration, rather. They used to hold these in March, and his was held on March 4th, 1829. And what happened there at the Capitol was he gave a speech and did his thing.
1:23And what you should know about Andrew Jackson is he was a very populous president, some say the very first one. And people loved him. They were like, he's for the little people. And like, we want to go meet this guy on Inauguration Day. So he said, that's a great idea. George Washington held these levies at the White House, which is basically come and meet the first family on Inauguration Day. And I'm going to do the same. Big mistake. Yeah, there's a just basically a legend of Andrew Jackson's inauguration in 1829 that they basically tore the roof off the White House. they partied so hard there.
1:59Yeah. And he didn't. But that was the thing you mentioned he was a populist president. All of a sudden, because of because of him being a populist and the people who supported him, average everyday people who typically weren't into politics at all, suddenly overran Washington, D.C. in a very celebratory mood because Andrew Jackson had beaten the Washington establishment, the elites, John Quincy Adams. And now the people were truly represented in the American government as far as they were concerned. Yeah, but here's the thing. There are historians that say, hold your water there. It may not have been as wild as everyone thinks.
2:43There's a guy named Daniel Feller who was a history professor at UT, Tennessee. Go Vols. I'll even say that as a Georgia fan. And he was the editor of the papers of Andrew Jackson. So he knows a thing or two. And he's like, you know what? They talk about people, you know, wrecking the place, people coming there with muddy boots and turning over tables and punch bowls. He said, take that with a grain of salt, because all a lot of this stuff comes from the account of this woman named Margaret Baird Smith, who showed up like late to the party after this stuff had evidently happened. She was tardy to the party, tardy to the party and also did not like Andrew Jackson and his politics, so probably had a pretty heavy slant on the chaos she described.
3:21Yeah. And this is I mean, she was a good example of how the opposition to Andrew Jackson felt like they felt like they owned D.C. and Andrew Jackson and his supporters didn't really belong there. Right. And yet because Andrew Jackson had won the presidency and these like average everyday day people felt represented finally, they showed up. The question is, like, nobody's saying, like, that didn't happen. It's the degree to which it happened. And Margaret Bayard Smith's letters to her daughter in particular are essentially, like, one of a very few number of firsthand accounts. And she really did not like this and pretty much, I guess, blew it out Autoproportion is a really good way to put it.
4:11Yeah, she writes about the majesty of the people disappearing and a mob of people fighting and scrambling. And what a pity. What a pity. Yeah, she said it twice. Yeah. Yeah. And is this a How Stuff Works article? This is a Dave Ruse shorty special. I should have known because Dave mentions like you can almost hear Margaret clutching her pearls in this line. Yeah, very Dave line. Right. So you said she was targeted to the party. She showed up a little bit after three. And the reason she didn't go straight from the inauguration to the party is because she heard that there were these large crowds.
4:52The estimate that has been bandied about all these years later is that there were 20 ,000 people who showed up at the White House. That's incredible. To party. So I say we take a break and we come back and talk about what they say happened at this 20 ,000 person strong party at the White House. Let's do it.
5:26New year, new goals. And in this economy, a better money plan is more necessary than ever. I am Matt. And I'm Joel. We are from the How to Money podcast. And every week we help you to spend smarter, save more, and make sense of what's going on out there. If you want 2026 to be the year you finally feel in control of your money, we're here to give you the tools and advice to help you make it happen. Listen to How to Money on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, Kyle. Could you draw up a quick document with the basic business plan? Just one page as a Google Doc and send me the link.
5:59Thanks. Hey, just finished drawing up that quick one-page business plan for you. Here's the link. But there was no link. There was no business plan. It's not his fault. I hadn't programmed Kyle to be able to do that yet. My name is Evan Ratliff. I decided to create Kyle, my AI co-founder, after hearing a lot of stuff like this from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. There's this betting pool for the first year that there's a one-person billion-dollar company, which would have been unimaginable without AI, and now will happen. I got to thinking, could I be that one person? I'd made AI agents before for my award-winning podcast, Shell Game.
6:35This season on Shell Game, I'm trying to build a real company with a real product run by fake people. Oh, hey, Evan. Good to have you join us. I found some really interesting data on adoption rates for AI agents in small to medium businesses. Listen to Shell Game on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
7:09So we said, Chuck, before we broke, that there's about 20 ,000 people estimated to have been at the White House for Andrew Jackson's inauguration levy. That even Margaret Bayard said, or Bayard Smith said that that was probably an exaggerated number. Yeah. Yeah. She did say that there were some crazy things going on, though. Yeah. Bloody noses, several thousand dollars worth of worth of glassware broken. But here's the thing. Again, some historians think she might have been exaggerating because she was just maybe a pearl clutcher and didn't like Jackson. There was a senator from Massachusetts named Daniel Webster who was not a fan of Jackson as well.
7:51But he wrote all about this day. And he didn't mention, like, all this chaos going on. He said, you know, people have come 500 miles to see General Jackson. They really seem to think the country is rescued from some dreadful danger. And he also said a lot of people were also there to, like, aspiring political, politicos, I guess, trying to maybe get a job or get some influence. So he wrote pretty good depth about this. And he never mentioned like, you know, a party where people were getting in fights and and muddy boots and turning over tables. Yeah, it was like he didn't mention that it was it turned into the infield of the Kentucky Derby.
8:32Right. Yeah. That is really significant because he was there. And to not mention like that people were just going berserk partying at the White House and trashing the place. I think that to me says volumes about it, that it either was did it happened a little bit, but it was so insignificant that Webster didn't even think it was worth mentioning or that the whole thing was basically made up. Yeah, I mean, I get the feeling it wasn't completely made up. I bet it got a little wild. And there are also people that say, like, you know, it sounds like there were probably people that maybe stood on tables and chairs to get a better look.
9:12And like maybe a table breaks when you're doing that. But she made it sound like they just trashed the place. Right. Yeah, exactly. And that not only did they trash the place, they were it wasn't just that there were 20 ,000 people or however many people were there, that they were just rowdy. She was basically trying to portray them as, again, people who didn't belong in Washington, let alone the White House. And look, you can't even you can't you can't take these supporters of Andrew Jackson anywhere. Look at what they did. They rushed people carrying out the punch bowls to get punch and free cake.
9:45And yeah, they elbowed each other. It was like a Black Friday sale, essentially, is what Margaret Smith was describing. And again, just painting people in a very unflattering light. The problem is that was a letter to her daughter, right? So if her daughter was misled or maybe she was even trying to entertain her daughter, who knows? It would be one thing. Historians would probably still have found those letters and be talking about it. But the reason why it became such a well-known thing is that the press picked that up, too. And exactly like happens today, that exaggeration was run with to outrage people who were opponents of Andrew Jackson because that completely satisfied their opinion of those people.
10:32Yeah. Here's a bit from the New York Spectator that's pretty colorful. Here was the corpulent epicure grunting and sweating for breath The dandy wishing he had no toes The tight-laced miss fearing her person might receive some permanently deforming impulse The miser hunting for his pocketbook The courtier looking for his watch And the office seeker in an agony to reach the president Right What does that even mean? I don't know the part about the dandy wishing he had no toes I looked high and low for what that meant maybe because they were getting stepped on so much maybe that's the only thing I could think of that made any sense the one I came up with is that maybe it was in fashion to have small feet maybe I know that the Dandy Has No Toes is a pretty great record title yeah for sure one of the best ever so I guess in 1978 the Tennessee Historical Society they roll up their sleeves and they're like let's get to the bottom of this and from their research, they actually said they considered it sheer bedlam.
11:36Yeah. But they turned up another account from a senator named James Hamilton of South Carolina, who was a supporter of Jackson's. And even he said that this was a, he called it a regular Saturnalia. But he also said that most of the damage was minimal. So somewhere in between there and Margaret Bayard Smith's account, it was probably the truth. And I think it was Daniel Webster who's probably the most reliable. Yeah, I agree. But who knows? It's a fun story. It is a fun story. And we love fun history stories. And I guess Chuck Short Stuff is out? Correct.
12:17Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. It has been very dialling KYP and that's what Iоронiny was saying. Are those that werecellお願いします. Now if we catch them before, we'll give these Okey using theseог." 11.
From the publisher
Wild stories about a crazy party after Andrew Jackson's inauguration have been around since the weeks after it went down. But how wild was it really?
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.



