Short Stuff: Tick tock goes the Doomsday Clock

0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.

0:31app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:39Hey, and welcome to The Short Stuff. I'm Josh. There's Chuck. And we're sitting in for Jerry, who usually sits in for Dave. So, yeah, let's go. Let's go. This is, well, it's a follow-up to our Doomsday Clock episode, but it turns out we didn't do a Doomsday Clock episode. I know we've talked about this, so it might have been when we were doing videos years ago. I think it was probably in one of those. But I know for a fact the only reason I would have known about this is because of this job and you. That makes me feel good that I wasn't completely unaware that we had done an episode on doomsday clocks.

1:17Yeah, it popped up in some place. But what's the doomsday clock, Josh? So the Doomsday Clock is a metaphorical clock that is operated or overseen by the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, which was a group of scientists who had worked on the Manhattan Project. They got together and they said, we need to create a group that is going to basically keep an eye on this nuclear proliferation that's starting up. And one of the things they did in 1947 was create the Doomsday Clock. And it essentially is this – I guess it's a graphic representation of how close humanity is to self-inflicted disaster like a nuclear war.

2:02Perfectly said. Elegantly said. Thank you. Yeah. So like you said, been around since 1947. They set the time every year. It's sort of a thing where they say like, all right, the time for this year is going to be this. would they move it forward if something really went down within a year? I think they do it every year. So like in January they said it, and if like four months later, like the S goes down, they wouldn't be like, they'd be like, no, got to wait until next year. Well, I think two things would happen. Either it would be something that they would take into account the next year, yes, or the world would end and they wouldn't have anything to do anyway.

2:40Okay. Okay. But again, we're talking about it this year because there was, and, you know, we'll talk about a little bit how it's fluctuated over the years. But the reason we bring it up is because this year, January 28th, 2025, is when they moved the second hand on the clock forward to 89 seconds to midnight. Yeah. Which means it's the closest that clock has ever been to midnight since they started. Yeah, since they started or when they started in 1947, when the U.S. and Russia were starting the Cold War, creating nukes, testing nukes out in the open, underground, in space, it was seven minutes to midnight.

3:19We're now less than two minutes away from midnight because stuff is just so close to hitting the fan. And we should say that they've actually moved the clock backward. They've moved the second hand backwards further away from midnight in the past. And the furthest away it was from midnight was 1991 after the Soviet Union dissolved. It was all the way back from 17 minutes to midnight, which is, I think that's called tiki time. Yeah. It's like bust out the rum, everybody. Exactly. We're all good. We got 17 minutes. Yeah. The closest pre this time in 2025 was in 1953. It was two minutes before midnight.

4:03So we are 89 seconds till midnight and the closest previous was two minutes. So that's, you know, it's pretty drastic. And again, you know, I guess we can go ahead and mention one of the criticisms of this is that it's something that just gins up. The critics will say it's something that just gins up paranoia in people and like pushes the panic button. and what is it even doing? But what it's doing, I think it's a valuable thing because it just raises awareness every year with people. It's just another thing to kind of say, hey, like we're not headed in the right direction as humanity goes. Yeah.

4:37So the first editor of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists was Eugene Rabinowich. And Eugene Rabinowich said that the purpose of the Doomsday Clock is to, quote, frighten men into rationality. And to basically say like, hey, you know, So this stuff's out of control, people. You need to be paying attention to these things because they don't just say we're 89 seconds from midnight. See you next year. They explain what the reasoning is for moving or even not moving or moving back the second hand. And this year, being 89 seconds the closest we've ever been, they had a whole crop of issues that go well beyond the nuclear risk that was originally, the clock was originally designed to track.

5:21And I say we take a break and we come back and talk about why we're so close to midnight right now, according to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.

5:51It's being honest about what we know, what we don't know, and how messy it can all be. I like to sleep in late and sleep early. Is there a chronotype for that or am I just depressed? We talk to experts who share real experiences and insight. You just really need to find where it is that you can have an impact in your own life and just start doing that. We break down the topics you want to know more about. Sleep, stress, mental health, and how the world around us affects our overall health. We talk about all the ways to keep your body and mind, inside and out, healthy. We human beings, all we want is connection.

6:29We just want to connect with each other. Health stuff is about learning, laughing, and feeling a little less alone. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. New year, new goals, and in this economy, a better money plan is more necessary than ever. I am Matt. And I'm Joel. We are from the How to Money podcast. And every week, we help you to spend smarter, save more, and make sense of what's going on out there. If you want 2026 to be the year you finally feel in control of your money, we're here to give you the tools and advice to help you make it happen.

7:03Listen to How to Money on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

7:19All right, everyone, we're back. We're 80 seconds to midnight. Not 10 minutes to midnight like Charles Bronson was in that great movie. What was it called? 10 minutes to midnight? Yeah. You didn't see that one? No. You should check that out. It's got a couple of choice scenes. It's about a creepy serial killer that he's chasing. Oh, Bronson's not the creepy serial killer? He's being chased by a creepy dude? Charles Brunson is always the guy on the hunt for the bad guy. Have you ever seen Death Wish 3, where the group of punks is taking over the neighborhood? Yeah, all the Death Wish movies. I mean, the first one was genuinely pretty good, but they got really sort of over the top after a while.

7:59Yeah. It was good, though. It's good. You got the Death Wish, pal. This is my favorite impression to do, by the way. I can't wait till you get your Morgan Freeman down. Oh, no. I don't think so. All right. So how do we get 89 seconds to midnight? This comes direct from the Bulletin website. Some we can kind of summarize. A few of these I'm just going to read outright because it's so, like, sort of expertly put. But the first thing is the ongoing war in Ukraine and not just that but the nuclear risk therein involved in the third year of that conflict that, you know, hopefully it doesn't go that way.

8:38Maybe things are wrapping up, but at the peak of this thing, like any weird bad decision could have led to something like that happening. Yeah, same with the Middle East right now. That can spiral out of control and suck in nuclear powers against one another. That's a nuclear risk for sure. And then we're back to increasing the size of our nuclear arsenals, which is a reverse of what we were doing in the 80s and 90s where we were getting rid of them. That's not a good sign. And then one other thing, too, and this is definitely new. Countries that hadn't had nukes before were basically like, well, we're never going to have nukes because that's just not the way things are.

9:18It's changed geopolitically. And now countries are starting to think about developing their own nuclear programs where if you have more countries with more nukes, you have that much more risk. Yeah, for sure. Climate change is the next thing they have listed. And, you know, this one kind of speaks for itself. We don't need to beat a dead horse. But their take basically is that global greenhouse gas emissions are still rising. No one is doing enough to combat this. This is bringing on extreme weather and climate change events and or climate change influence events. And it's affecting people all over the world.

9:56And even if we're growing things like solar and wind, it's just not fast enough and not nearly enough to make a dent in the damage that's being done. Right. Also, there's the biological arena, as they put it. Boy, this one is very scary. That's the most mucusy arena. Yeah, but obviously coming out of COVID and with the avian flu now expanding to farm animals, to dairy products, human cases, all this stuff is very scary. And the point of this episode isn't to scare the crud out of everybody. No. But it's hard to read the stuff and not get the crud scared out of you sometimes. Yeah. Also, don't leave AI on the sidelines in their disruptive technology part.

10:43They were like, like, yes, AI. They didn't get into the existential threat that AI itself posed. They more looked at it like, hey, some militaries are starting to incorporate AI in their like battlefield decision making. Like we're a step away from AIs deciding whether to kill or not kill. And then eventually giving AIs control over our nuclear arsenals. And that's not a direction we want to be going. And then the whole thing, this is the reason why all these things that have been around for a while or have been developing for a while have been accelerated to 89 seconds from midnight because of the threat multiplier of misinformation and disinformation and conspiracy theories.

11:27Yeah, and this is the one I wanted to read a part or two from this because it just kind of speaks volumes of things. They really put it very succinctly. Spread of misinformation, disinformation, and conspiracy theories that degrade the communication ecosystem, increasingly blur the lines between truth and falsehood. And then they talk about AI making it even, you know, we've talked about deep fake video and stuff like that, like making all that stuff just so much easier. And then this final line is really, really good. The battered information landscape is also producing leaders who discount science and endeavor to suppress free speech and human rights, compromising the fact-based public discussions that are required to combat the enormous threats facing the world.

12:08So like all of the problems that we've been listing are bad enough. And then when you've got disinformation and conspiracy theories and misinformation thrown on top of that and AI exacerbating all that, that's when it's like they're moving that clock as close to midnight as they've ever been. Yeah. And the reason why is because people would be under that circumstance, they're being led away from paying attention to the stuff the doomsday clock is warring against. And that just makes it that much riskier, too, because we have to be paying attention to it, whether you like it or not. for some reason when I was researching this today, I was like, this is striking me as a little ridiculous.

12:51And I get the point of it, and I think it is noble and worthy, but there's also some real criticisms of it. And I found one piece by a guy named Steven Johnson on Lifehacker, and he interviewed Lawrence Krauss who's a physicist and a member of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists sorry the New Republic interviewed Krauss and he said it's not scientific it's a number that's arrived at by a group of people exploring each of the questions and having a huge amount of discussion and ultimately convergence on a number that number is frankly arbitrary and that's true you have to remember it's a metaphor there's no way to measure okay if we're 89 seconds from midnight right now, how much longer is the world going to last?

13:40And the big problem with it, I think, is National Geographic put it, if everything's a crisis, nothing's a crisis. So before the whole thing was created to say this one thing, nuclear proliferation, this is what we're warning about. Now you've got climate change, AI, avian flu, disinformation. It's just like being piled on. And I think it's really diluted the point and the pointedness of the whole thing. Yeah, maybe. But that's also the world we're living in right now. Yeah, but it makes it so easy to just be like, oh, well, I give up. I'm going to just go pay attention to, I don't know, flowers versus zombies.

14:23Do people play that still? I didn't know that was a thing. I think it was at some point, unless I had a fever dream. Well, you didn't have a fever dream. One thing, whether or not you agree with the Doomsday Clock or not, one thing we can I can recommend because you're too humble to is a little limited podcast series called The End of the World with Josh Clark. That way you can really learn something and take a deep dive into real existential threats that face humanity. Thanks, Chuck. I appreciate that. Holds up. Still great. I imagine I haven't gone back and listened to it again. I bet it still holds up, though.

14:58Yeah. Well, because one of the number one rules in show business is leave them wanting more. I say short stuff is out.

15:08Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.