1. Podcasts
  2. Swamp Notes
  3. One year since ‘liberation day’
Swamp Notes

3 Apr 2026 · 12m · 6 chapters

Episode artwork

One year since ‘liberation day’

In short

One year after Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcement, the episode reviews how economists and markets reacted, what happened to growth, inflation, jobs, and U.S. government revenue, and the effects abroad—especially on U.S.-China trade—plus political implications.

Guests

Claire Jones, Financial Times U.S. economics editor; has tracked the tariff story closely since last April.

Key claims

Tariffs created major uncertainty (economists and markets disliked the methodology), but the feared damage to U.S. growth and inflation was less severe than expected. The tariffs delivered a fiscal boost via customs revenue, though refunds may be possible. The Fed increasingly views tariff effects as a “one-off shock,” while Iran-war commodity/supply shocks now dominate. Supreme Court rulings removed many tariffs, but economists expect tariffs in some form to persist.

Notable examples

Effective tariff rate jumped sharply (China tariffs reached roughly 135–145%, described as near a de facto embargo); Supreme Court overruled “AIPA tariffs”; Fed hesitated to cut rates despite labor-market weakening.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes.

Chapters

1:42

Reflecting on Trump's Liberation Day

Mark and Claire discuss the significance of the anniversary of Trump's tariff announcement.

“I don't know if you knew this already, but this week marks one year since U.S.”
2:18

Economic Reactions to Tariffs

Claire explains the initial economic reactions and the uncertainties caused by the tariffs.

“Claire, the days and weeks following the tariff announcement, what were some of the things that, you know, occurred to you that would need to be ironed out?”
4:22

Impact of Tariffs on U.S. Growth

Discussion on why tariffs didn't destroy U.S. growth as initially feared and their broader impact.

“For getting on for pretty much 100 years, I mean, you'd never seen a jump in the effective tariff rate like it really, and certainly not in the post-World War II period.”
6:28

Uncertain Future of Tariffs

Exploration of whether tariffs will persist and their implications for U.S. manufacturing.

“I mean, did we just not have enough time to see the tariffs have that intended goal play out?”
8:13

Global Economic Ramifications of Tariffs

Discussion on the effects of tariffs on international relations and economies, particularly regarding China.

“Listen at schwapp.com slash Washington Wise.”
11:04

Long-Term Impacts of Tariffs and Current Crises

Claire discusses the lasting impact of tariffs compared to the ongoing crises affecting the economy.

“Economically, do they matter as much as the economic shock that we're seeing caused by the war in Iran right now?”
A man walking through an airport, asking his phone a question

Ask about this episode

Get the gist, explore an idea or ask about something said.

Claude

On Swamp Notes, what are the key points of this episode?

Searching your listening

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00As a woman entrepreneur, you know that every connection counts, whether it's with your customers, your team, or your community. Spectrum Business is here to help you build those connections stronger and faster. Imagine running your business with fast, reliable, fiber-powered internet so you can stay connected to customers, employees, and vendors without having to worry. We know flexibility matters. That's why select Spectrum Business packages come with a three-year price guarantee, so you can focus on running your business. Plus, enjoy savings on internet, phone, TV, and mobile services when you can bundle.

0:36With Spectrum Business, you get more than just internet. You get support with 100 % U.S.-based customer service. Real people who understand small business, ready 24-7 to help you stay up and running. Join millions of business owners like you across America who trust Spectrum Business for reliability, speed, and support. Visit spectrum.com slash business today to get started. Restrictions apply. Services not available in all areas. Hey guys, two bits of news before today's show. First, the good news. We won an award. We were voted Best News and Politics Show at the NYC Podcast Awards. We're proud of it.

1:18And the statue is like a little microphone dressed up as the Statue of Liberty. It's pretty sweet. Now the bad news. The Swamp Notes podcast is coming to an end. We've had a great time over the past two years chatting about all the wonky stuff that goes into U.S. politics. And we want to thank you for all your support during that time. Our last show will be next Friday, April 10th.

1:42I don't know if you knew this already, but this week marks one year since U.S. President Donald Trump's Liberation Day announcement. Sweeping tariffs placed on countries across the world rocked economies everywhere. We've been covering this anniversary all week on the FT News Briefing. And so today for Swamp Notes, we wanted to share a special conversation with the FT's U.S. economics editor, Claire Jones, who's been watching seemingly every detail of this story since last April. Claire, welcome. Hi, Mark. All right. So we're recording this on April 2nd, 2026, exactly one year after Trump's comments.

2:18Claire, the days and weeks following the tariff announcement, what were some of the things that, you know, occurred to you that would need to be ironed out? And one of the things that economists seem very unhappy about, which was the way in which the tariffs were calculated, they didn't think the rationale behind the methodology made sense. They didn't think it necessarily followed the sort of paths that previous tariff policies had. And it begged a lot of questions. And one thing that economists really don't like is uncertainty. and markets don't like that either, which I think explained the rather volatile reaction we saw from stock indices and bond markets too.

3:05Claire, seemingly there had to be some economic advantage to these tariffs. It was going to bring, in theory, or it did until the Supreme Court overruled these tariffs, a lot of extra revenue for the United States government, yes? I'd say you have to be careful there. An economic advantage isn't the same thing as a fiscal advantage. But clearly there is a fiscal advantage to having these tariffs. And we did see that reflected over the course of the year in the revenue raised by the tariffs. And what would they have done? What would they have accomplished had they stuck? Well, I think they did accomplish quite a lot because that revenue was collected.

3:44And what's yet to be seen whether or not there will be refunds. So there was definitely a fiscal boost from the customs revenue collected from the tariffs. I mean, the big picture on this is that economists thought this was going to more or less destroy U.S. growth last year. And it didn't. But having said that, it also didn't do what Trump claimed it would and create an awful lot of manufacturing jobs. Why did economists think that this was going to destroy U.S. growth and why didn't it? This was pretty much the biggest change in trade policy and the world's largest economy. For getting on for pretty much 100 years, I mean, you'd never seen a jump in the effective tariff rate like it really, and certainly not in the post-World War II period.

4:41and there's quite a broad consensus among economists that tariffs are a bad thing and free trade is a good thing so the fact that these tariffs were so large and were applied in a way that economists didn't like and in a very uncertain way was something that people really thought was going to dent growth an awful lot in the US last year however you know it probably did have an impact. That's not to say the tariffs did have a good effect other than the fiscal effect. But the negative impact on the economy and the impact on inflation that some economists thought the tariffs would have was not quite as bad as a lot of people feared.

5:25And why hasn't inflation hit growth as bad as economists thought? That's a very good question of probably one that I'll take years to unpack. But you saw this reflected in the Federal Reserve's decision making. They were very reluctant earlier on in the year last year to, and over the course of the summer, to cut interest rates, even though we were seeing the labour market weakening. However, Fed officials seem pretty sure now that tariffs are what they refer to as a one-off shock. And what that means is that there has been some impact in prices. Some prices of some goods have gone up as a result of tariffs, but it hasn't seeped through into the broader economy.

6:08And there seems to be a pretty strong consensus among Fed officials now that it will be a one-off shock and that, you know, there are other things such as the soaring oil price and other economic ramifications of the Iran war that are now taking precedence over the impact of tariffs on the U.S. economy. Now, you mentioned the tariffs did not accomplish what Trump had hoped, and he might argue that it would take more time for this to roll out in order for the goal to take root, and that's to bring manufacturing back to American shores. I mean, did we just not have enough time to see the tariffs have that intended goal play out?

6:50I think there's two factors here is, one the logic behind that was always uncertain I think tariffs may be able to help in that regard but you need a strong industrial policy too if you're going to bring US manufacturing back home the other issue is if you're going to create investments in factories and you're going to create manufacturing jobs businesses want to see certainty and what we saw over the past year was tariff policies changing an awful lot. And recently, we've had the Supreme Court verdict, which has ruled that an awful lot of the tariffs that we saw introduced or announced a year ago are now no longer in place.

7:34That uncertainty for business owners, that uncertainty for economists, did everyone that I'm mentioning here breathe a collective sigh of relief when the Supreme Court struck down the AIPA tariffs? I don't think so, because the suspicion, and I think, you know we've seen some of that realised is that you know the administration if it doesn't use even without the supreme court verdict there are other ways that they can introduce tariffs and they seem very intent on doing that so the idea that the effective tariff rate is going to go down to what it was before Trump returned to office is not something that I think a lot of economists think is going to happen.

8:12I think the general view is that tariffs in some shape or form are here to stay.

8:48and portfolio. Listen at schwapp.com slash Washington Wise.

8:56So Claire, we have mostly been talking about the U.S. economy and the impacts of tariffs at home. What about abroad? You know, what kind of damage did the tariffs do to other economies? I think the big fear was what was going to happen to U.S.-China relations, because at one point, the tariffs on China went to a point where they were a de facto embargo on Chinese goods. They were like 200%, right? It was like a 200 % floated tariff right on China. I think it got up to 135, 145%. You might have to check on that. I think that was the moment that really spooked people from a global economy perspective that we saw, you know, That was basically a de facto embargo on Chinese exporters sending goods to the US.

9:48That threatened to have very big ramifications for the global economy. Luckily, those tariffs fell back quite quickly. So again, it was a story of people fearing the worst. But what resulted, while it wasn't exactly good, was a lot less bad than people had feared. Claire do you think that there are any winners from Trump's tariff policies it's a good question there probably are some out there somewhere I mean I think it did have a benefit to the U.S. fiscal situation the U.S. is running very large fiscal deficits and it wasn't a perfect solution for that but it certainly did help and you saw that reflected in how rating agencies were judging the finances of the U.S.

10:43They definitely seem to think from a fiscal perspective that tariffs were a positive thing. Also, there will have been pockets of U.S. industry that, you know, does feel on safer foot and as a result of tariff policies. Claire, we've spent the last six episodes, including this one, talking about the lasting impact of Trump's tariffs. Economically, do they matter as much as the economic shock that we're seeing caused by the war in Iran right now? I think that's an impossible question to answer because we just don't know how long the war in Iran is going to go on for. I think the shocks of a very different nature in a way, The conflict in Iran, the Iran war is a very dramatic shock to the supply of some of the world's key commodities, not only oil, but goods such as fertilizer too.

11:44The impact of tariffs may be a more slow burn scenario where there is an equal amount of damage, but it's a lot more spread over time. and the impact is a lot less dramatic in that sense. So Claire, what are some other impacts that you're looking out for? Even though from the standpoint of economists, the impact hasn't been that dramatic, I do think it really hasn't helped Trump politically in terms of how Americans see the economy. You know, we know coming into this that there were affordability pressures. We know there was a cost of living crisis. And I think tariffs have added to that sense that, you know, Trump compared with Biden has been no better on that score.

12:36And even though economists might not view the impact as dramatic or, you know, the Fed might not realise, you know, the Fed might not see the inflation impact as enduring. It is hitting Americans in the pocket at a time when they're very sensitive to the price of things. and I think it will hit Trump in the polls too, even if U.S. growth remains broadly okay. Claire Jones is the FT's U.S. economics editor. Thanks so much, Claire. No problem, Mark. Thanks for having me on.

13:14This was Swap Notes, the weekly U.S. politics show from the FT. Make sure to check out the full Liberation Day series from the FT News Briefing in the show notes. Our show is produced by Henry Larson. It was mixed by Kelly Gary. We had help this week from Sonia Hudson. Special thanks, as always, to Pierre Nicholson. I'm your host, Mark Filippino. Our executive producer is Topher Forges, and the FT's global head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. Original music by Hannes Brown. Check back next week for more U.S. political analysis from the Financial Times.

13:54What's it like running a business with Avalara? You don't wake up thinking about tax or compliance. Because it's handled. Calculating and filing. Accurately and audit defensively. Avalara. Agentic AI tax and compliance with confidence. The latest episode of the Next 5 podcast is all about fraud versus reality in the age of AI. Simon Miller at CIFAS joins me. AI has made scanning as scammers emotionally intelligent. as does Gareth Murray at Monzo. The constant arms race between the bank and the fraudster. And Uber Behagel at Verif. When one data leak happened on the internet, how many times is it sold on the dark web?

14:34Listen to the full episode of The Next Five wherever you get your podcasts. Enjoy.

From the publisher

A year ago this week, US President Donald Trump rocked the world with his so-called liberation day announcement. America’s tariff regime affected all aspects of life from the global economy to the day-to-day of average business owners. As part of a special FT News Briefing series, the FT’s US economics editor Claire Jones explains what changed, and what didn’t, because of those tariffs. 


Mentioned in this podcast:

Listen to the rest of the FT News Briefing’s Liberation Day series 

Sign up for the FT’s Swamp Notes newsletter 


Swamp Notes is hosted by Marc Filippino and produced by Henry Larson. This week’s show was mixed by Kelly Garry. Our executive producer is Topher Forhecz and the FT’s global head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. Special thanks to Pierre Nicholson. 


The FT does not use generative AI to voice its podcasts.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

More from Swamp Notes

All episodes