In short
Taste Radio Episode Notes
Episode Title
Bonus Content - Why It Pays To Treat Investment Like A Marriage Episode Description In this episode, Peter Burns from Sunrise Strategic Partners and Franklin Isacson from Coefficient Capital discuss the importance of viewing the investor-brand relationship as a marriage. They emphasize alignment in goals, expectations, and the necessity of thorough diligence in the current investment landscape.
---
Key Themes
Investor-Brand Relationship
- Marriage Analogy: The investor-brand relationship is likened to a marriage; both parties should have aligned long-term goals and mutual respect.
- Alignment is Key: Aspects like growth vs. profitability and plans for exit should be discussed upfront to avoid complications later.
Current Investment Climate
- Tough Market: The fundraising environment has become increasingly challenging, with less capital available compared to previous years.
- Changing Dynamics:
- Post-2020, many new entrants entered the CPG space due to low interest rates and high public market valuations.
- The current reset has seen hedge funds and tech investors pulling back, focusing on their core competences instead.
Notable Deals and Trends
- Discussion of the recent acquisition of Sovos Brands by Campbell's.
- The impact of premium brands like Rao’s and how their growth trajectories reflect changing consumer preferences.
---
Key Takeaways from Discussions
Acquisition Insights
- Sovos Brands Acquisition:
- The acquisition marks a significant shift in the market as it shows larger companies are actively seeking growth in premium segments.
- The brand portfolio's strength, particularly the growth of Rao’s, demonstrates potential beyond mere sauces, opening up avenues for soups and frozen meals.
Advice for Brands Seeking Investment
- Financial Health is Crucial: Brands must prioritize strong financial management and profitability over rapid growth to appeal to investors.
- Understanding of Financials: Founders should know their cash flow, margins, and how they plan to use investor funds.
The Role of Influencers
- Leveraging Influencers for Growth: Brands that effectively use influencers can experience rapid growth but need to ensure their products can sustain that interest.
- Consumer Connection: Successful brands should also prioritize creating a product that resonates with consumers beyond the initial hype generated by influencers.
---
Investor Insights
Peter Burns (Sunrise Strategic Partners)
- Focuses on the operational impact of his investment strategies.
- Advocates for the importance of understanding market dynamics and company category sizes.
- Emphasizes the need for investors to have deep knowledge and experience for effective diligence.
Franklin Isacson (Coefficient Capital)
- Highlights the importance of recognizing patterns in successful brands.
- Stresses the need for alignment in the investor-brand relationship and the importance of equitable partnerships.
---
Final Thoughts
- Navigating Challenges: Brands seeking investment in the current climate should focus on building solid fundamentals rather than chasing unsustainable growth.
- Long-term Relationship: Emphasizing the analogy of a marriage can help founders make more informed decisions about their investors, ensuring they choose partners who will support their journey toward success.
---
Conclusion This episode underscores the changing landscape of investment in the food and beverage industry, the necessity for alignment between investors and brands, and the importance of strategic financial management for sustainable growth.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00If you like what you're hearing on Taste Radio, here's something else that we think you'll enjoy. Dive even deeper into the world of natural, organic, sustainable, and healthy food with this presentation of our sister show, The Nosh Podcast. Each episode explores the news, brands, people, and trends affecting the world of packaged food. Be sure to subscribe on your listening platform of choice so that you never miss an episode. This week on The Nosh Podcast, what did the team take away from the Sovo sale? How are investors thinking about the current investment climate? and how brands need to be thinking about raising capital in 2023.
0:47Hi, everyone. I'm your host, Carol Ortenberg. On the NOSH podcast, we go inside the business of natural, organic, sustainable, and healthy food. Today, we'll discuss a saucy deal by Campbell's, and then hear from two investors that were on our Nosh Notables list about their thoughts on the current climate for investment. Joining us today are reporters, Adrian DeLuca. Hello, Carol. Hi, and Lucas Southerd. Hi-yo. Hi-yo, Lucas. And of course, our editor-in-chief, Jeff Kleinman. Feeling saucy, Carol? Always, Jeff. Always. Well, Well, to that point, last week we saw a pretty big deal in the food space with Campbell's announcing it would acquire Sovos brands, the makers of Rayo's, Michelangelo's, and Noosa.
1:34Jeff, what stood out to you about the deal? Well, a couple of things. First of all, you know, the sort of name value of Rayo's apparently has captured many people's attention. attention. And, you know, while the restaurant was not thrown in as part of the deal, I think it does reflect some of the value that people put on name brand restaurants right now. And, you know, I think you can see that as well with the other sauces that are growing really fast. What's that one called? Carbone? Yeah. And then I think there's been also some others from like Rubarosa, and I feel like I've gotten pitched a lot of sauces and pizzas by Italian restaurants.
2:22Yeah, yeah. But I mean, Reo's is a pretty old school name, and it does have a lot of significance for folks. I can remember when it was first sold to Sovos after its startup period. Michelangelo is a pretty well-known quantity in the frozen Italian specialty space. And Sovos did a really good job of putting these three or four brands together, packaging them up, getting margins up high. And it looks like Campbell's is going to have a lot of running room behind it. The price point for Rao's is really good, and it gives them sort of a premium brand to put up above its Prego at the sort of ordinary brand level.
3:14And what I think is really interesting about it is it's another big deal. We've seen some big investment by KDP in La Cologne. We've seen the Yasso deal, the Brinwood pickup of Marie's and Dean's and Mars buying Kevin's. So it feels like things are starting to loosen up just a little bit. You know, these are big brands that are getting bought by the strategics or that are having deals done with them by the strategics. It's not like they're operating at a really small level, but it does bode well in terms of a little bit of a thaw in the environment. Well, let's break that down a little further.
4:10I think that's a great overview of everything. I was curious what the team's thoughts were on what made Sovos an attractive target. Jeff, you referenced how they had put together a great group of brands. Part of that clearly was divesting from brands that weren't working for it. So they sold Birchbenders last year, which a lot of people at the time sort of hypothesized that was because that it diverged too far from the portfolio and would be hard to find an acquirer who wanted baking mixes and sauces and Italian things. Certainly NUSA is still in that position, but I think Campbell said repeatedly on the call that they're kind of seeing what happens with NUSA, but they're not going into yogurt, and that's not a long-term strategic play for them.
4:56Although there are probably people at Campbell's who do have some experience in that outer perimeter of the store, given what they did in dips a few years ago. Jeff, you're right. With Campbell's, though, they did have that experience with Bold House as well. So that is interesting that Sovos kept Noosa on board, but we'll see where that heads next. It's not like they're adding dead weight with Noosa. It's a, you know, it's not a major massive brand, but it's, you know, not something that I think it costs them a ton to run. And they can prop it up until they get rid of it. I think the other part about Sovos and Rayos in particular was seeing that expansion into other categories.
5:44So for so long, Rayos was a sauce brand under Sovos. They had expanded further into soups, pasta, frozen entrees, and it really showed that that brand could move beyond that one category. Yeah, it's always interesting, though, when you see a brand like Rayo's, which has this one really powerful element to it in sauces, get bought, whether they'll shave off those other categories that it plays in or if they'll try and do the major brand platform expansion. You can remember when Annie's was picked up by General Mills, the idea was we were going to see Annie's everywhere, and instead we now see a lot of mac and cheese getting sold.
6:35Sometimes it's just easier to support the main product in the portfolio. You just don't know. Well, it seems like they definitely want to go further into Frozen and Mills, so that may have some more sticking point. Also, in a deck they showed about the deal, they specifically called out that just like the sauce is a more premium option on Prego, the Raos, along with Pacific Foods, which they acquired a few years back, provides a sort of premium upgraded version of Campbell's and Swanson's. So we'll see, but it seems like there was at least some interest in what they expressed to investors and analysts.
7:15Yeah, I mean, I think that happened with Annie's as well. Okay, fine, Jeff. I mean, it's just, you know, there's a long way between what they say they want to do and what they're eventually able to do. Okay, fine. You got to wonder what this does for the market for carbones, though. It's got similar leadership to Rayo's. Our friend Eric Skay is driving that right now, and it's, again, a premium product. And a lot of the things that they were saying about the Rao's deal, the idea that people want to have premium at home, maybe don't want to go out to restaurants anymore, could work for Carbone's, could work for, who is it, Roberta's Pizzas are out there.
8:09Now, we've seen, who is it, Milk Bar have a little bit of trouble gaining headway as a sort of, you know, really hip restaurant brand that's gone into CPG. But, you know, sauces are nice. You get a nice margin out of a sauce. I think there's also a difference in that Milk Bar's bakeries are easier to go to and purchase something as a consumer. So you have the direct comparison of, well, this doesn't taste like what I bought. Whereas Rao's Carbone, it's really hard to score a reservation. Rao's, I don't even know if you could score a reservation given the, you know, tables they had booked for regulars.
8:50It's not like you have the authentic version to compare to. It just kind of is something that you can imagine what it's like. And if it's a great product, you say, OK, this must be like what it is to get it in the restaurant. Milk bar, a little easier to see that directly. But, you know, it is interesting, Jeff, because we haven't seen that as a discussion with a brand like Momofuku, where I'd say it's kind of in between the two. It's a little easier to get into one of those, especially some of the lower end restaurants that they've launched or fast casual, I guess I'd say, restaurants they've launched.
9:25But I'm curious to see what happens there. You raise a good point. Yeah, no, I think you made a good point there, Carol. And, you know, the thing with Momofuku is it just hasn't been in stores. You know, it's a much newer product. And it will be interesting to see if that turns into, you know, a brand that transacts. But I completely agree with you that the baked stuff is much more accessible from a consumer standpoint. The sauce is just a carrier for something else, whereas with Milk Bar, you were biting into that cookie, probably not turning it into something else. Well, I think we've unpacked a lot about Sovos.
10:12What do you guys think this says about where Campbell's itself is headed? I thought it was interesting just given, you know, over the past year or so, Campbell's moved, you know, all of their offices to New Jersey, kind of consolidated and seemed to be cleaning up the business a bit than to just, you know, go and invest in what it's outwardly claiming as a really high growth portfolio of brands. So just, you know, I think it benchmarks where some of these larger conglomerates are thinking right now and thinking about where they need to be headed. Yeah, it's almost like they're finding they need to be reaching a younger consumer and they need to be reaching where consumers are.
10:52And for these legacy brands like Campbell's, they've been around. And if anyone hears Campbell's, they first think of a canned soup. But canned soup is, in my opinion, not what it was, whereas a sauce brand is always going to be usable, especially as they call it, an ultra premium sauce. I got to say, Rails makes some good soups though, Lucas. You got to try them. Give them a chance. Similar to sauce, everyone has some canned soup in their pantry, so it's not a bad move. But I think diversifying as Kellogg's has into some of these other categories, strengthening their snacking portfolio has shown that they want to be known for more than just soup, and they also want to be reaching a certain kind of younger consumer that are reaching for a Rayos, shall we say, instead of a Prego.
11:45Campbell's has tried to restructure its business a few times now. So there's, you know, there's always a lot of addition and a lot of subtraction with these big companies. You know, you're seeing Mars do similar stuff where they add a Kevins. They start to invest more heavily in PET. These companies have so much money and so much reach from a distribution standpoint that when they see a place where they think they can get some traction, it makes sense for them to follow it a lot of the time. we've kind of touched upon it too for Campbell's that idea of creating a premium product I was looking at their deck and they have a strong salsa business in pace and they also talked about the fact that okay well we're doing this for sauces and soups we have the strong snacks business now we want to focus on salsa a little bit so they teased that there will be a new premium salsa.
12:52I don't know if it's an acquisition or launch that they're going to bring out in 2024, but that certainly is part of the business I haven't heard discussed as much. Rayo's real Italian salsa? I don't know, Jeff. Maybe, maybe. But it seemed like, according to the deck, they're launching it under the late July brand, or that was just kind of - Late July already has salsa. Oh, they do? Okay. I always just think of the chips. All I'm hearing is that Campbell's is about to be like the largest tomato purchaser of all food companies. Yeah, I think that makes sense. Now, are you calling Pace a salsa or a picante sauce?
13:29They refer to it as a salsa slash picante. So maybe it's like a sauce that they're coming out with. I can't speak to that. That could also make sense, Jeff. Maybe they just like to say salsa a lot, you know? Well, I think we've discussed salsa more than I expected today. Slash picante. Slash picante. Picante is not a product. That's a descriptor. It is. It's true. But I mean, salsa is sauce, right? Yes. The direct translation would be yes. But for the American audience, probably not. That's like I've been yelling at my family about, oh, we're having challah bread. No, you're just having bread or you're just having challah.
14:16Oh my God, this is just two grumpy old men yelling at the kids to get off their lawn. But going back to the Sovos deal, what do we think this says about the current M &A marketplace and what companies should be doing if they want to be acquired, certainly possibly in a smaller deal, but are looking for that exit down the road? They should have a half billion dollars in revenue I mean, it's hard to scale, you know, to create a real comparison between the Sovo Steel and a lot of the investment that takes place at lower levels. I think our, you know, John Craven on the Taste Radio podcast was discussing it in terms of something that's just should be encouraging for entrepreneurs.
15:07It's something that's, you know, good for the ecosystem to see these kinds of deals take place and to get talent and money back into the system. But, I mean, look, Rayo's, Michelangelo's, Nusa, those were corporate brands even before this transaction. That said, you know, I think there are probably folks who were in the mix a little bit better who can talk about it. Right, Carol? Yep, you got it, Jeff. I sat down with two of the investors who made our NOSH Notables list, Sunrise Strategic Managing Partner Peter Burns and Coefficient Capital Managing Partner Franklin Isaacson, to get their take on the current climate for capital raises and exits.
15:56Long story short, they know it's a tough time, but reflecting back on their prior experience, feel there's still much to be excited about. Well, I can't wait to hear it. Hi, guys. Peter, Franklin. Thanks so much for joining me today. Thank you for having me. Good morning, Carol. Thanks for having us. We're all in different time zones, I think. So good Friday, I guess. So to start, you guys both run very different firms. And I want to just get a quick overview about what the thesis of the firm is and the types of companies you invest in. Peter, let's kick it off with you. So Sunrise as an entity has morphed over a period of time.
16:44So our original outlook was to be more focused on smaller venture companies, anywhere between $10 million and$30 million in revenue. and as we've moved through our first investments, we're going to move in and change relative to where we invest and how we invest. So we're moving up market. We've brought a lot of operating talent into the firm, people who are experts in their field on sales, marketing, ops, finance, and moving up in market is something that we want to do and we think we have a truly value added, which is an overused word, but we think we're truly value added to most businesses in the best way possible?
17:28So Coefficient Capital is a New York-based investment firm. We invest in growing consumer companies, not just CPG, although that ends up being a lot of what we do. And we will invest at the low end a minimum check of about$5 million in companies doing, let's call it$5 to$10 million of last 12 months revenues, all the way through sort of 30,$40 million checks when brands are much bigger and perhaps more mature as well. Peter, you were previously an operator leading teams at Justin's, OneBrands. How does that impact your investment choices and how you go about managing Sunrise? Great question. It's so much into the diligence of the business, right?
18:19In terms of if you operate a business, there's a certain set of criteria that you need to understand, right? Size of category, margin, expansion, distribution, format, et cetera. It's really no different checklist than when you're investing. What we look at maybe a little bit differently is size of category is important. innovation, special sauce, IP, those things are more important relative to the investing side. But again, one of the benefits we have here is the team of people are so functionally experts in their field that when we get into the investment and the real diligence, we really have the ability to go deep and add the questions.
19:09So there's no such thing as a safe bet. I'm sure Franklin will tell you that. But hedging our bet relative to the diligence and the questions and the involvement we have just allows us to get the clearest picture that we can have on the opportunity. And if we feel comfortable with that, obviously, that's when we write our checks. So, Peter, I have to ask, what do you like better, being an investor or an operator? Are we going to see you go back to the brand side? Not really. No, my job as operator has been complete. And I have been incredibly fortunate to work with a series of founders and have had my CEO chops.
19:51And I'm checking that box, right? But I can't help myself in terms of from the investing side, I want to be involved. I like to be in the game and the connection with the founder of the business and getting all excited about where it can go. I'm never going to lose that. But I am realizing that as an operator, you control those things as CEO and as investor, you don't. I'm learning it. Not to say I won't make some mistakes along the way, but no, I'm an investor. Franklin, you have spent a long time on the investment side. How does that impact how you make deals? Is that different than Peter's perspective?
20:39I think both perspectives are really valuable, right? And it's a team decision to make an investment. And when we make investments, we call on the advice of people that have operating backgrounds as well. We very actively use our venture partners. So these are founders that we've previously invested in that are now associated with our firm. And so for the very reasons that Peter's experience is so valuable, we call on that and we ultimately make a team decision. There is a benefit to being an investor all these years in that you do start to recognize patterns, of course. So you start to find common denominators amongst certain companies that either predict success or not, as the case may be.
21:23But I think both perspectives are valuable. Well, I think that, you know, in terms of making the investment, I'm a little bit older school, right? And I think that the people side of that, you know, is important, right? The best relationships and outcomes that I've had from an operating perspective are when there's this connection with the founder and there's an alignment around outcome and roles and responsibilities. I think both of you have alluded to this, but it's one thing to select an investor who's going to write a check into your business. But for a lot of the investors on the notable list, they bring more than just that capital, you two included.
22:07There's this intangible value, be it experience or maybe for Snoop, some marketing attention. What's your advice for brands on how to evaluate if an investor is the right fit or brings the right value, particularly when it comes to each of you and what your firms bring? I think, first of all, Carol, let's just be realistic that, you know, the current fundraising environment is not easy, right? So to the founders that have multiple options, that's today rarefied air, right? To be able to be in that position. But I do think that choosing a select, choosing an investor is very much like a marriage.
22:50These, for the most part, are long-term partnerships. We all know of successes where companies sell very quickly, but for the most part, you're embarking on a decade-long relationship so many times, or longer even still. And so it is very important, to Peter's point, that there is alignment. Are you both aligned with when you want to sell the business, at which milestone, the trade-off between growth and profitability? What are you going to do about innovation and expansion and at what pace? And so making sure that alignment is there is really paramount. Again, just similar to what Peter just said.
23:27And then, you know, it is also understanding where your blind spots are, like, what are your weaknesses? And where do you need the investor to come in and complement you and your team. And it can be in anything from building out your team to international to a new sales channel. And obviously, you know, if you can find an investor that contributes to areas where you might be weaker, that's obviously ideal. Yeah, I think I think similarly along those lines, it's the upfront conversations that you need to have, you know, with with with the founders. and again, being more traditional here, the best way to do that is just face-to-face and spend time and have conversations, get to know the person personally, get to know the person professionally, walk stores, take the time, right?
24:24We certainly have to have an understanding of each other, what we're trying to do. And I have been in situations where you think you are 100 % aligned. And you get to a very critical point, to Franklin's point, you know, do we get off the bus now? Do we exit? Do we keep going? How do we grow? We want to go to club. Boy, you better make sure that you've had a lot of these conversations that take time. And you've got those things rock solid before you write a check and agree to do business with each other. Looking back over 2023, 2022, maybe even before then, certainly the climate for fundraising has changed.
25:07Franklin, you definitely alluded to this, or maybe flat out said that. How have you seen that change in terms of how you're making deals, what you're looking for? Yeah, I think it's worth spending a second on, right? So if we go back to the last reset of 08, 09, I mean, Peter and I both invested through that. Coming out of that, there really wasn't a lot of capital for growing CPG brands. There were maybe, I mean, I'd struggle to come up with 10, but let's call them 10 dedicated CPG funds, right? I remember the private equity reception at Expo West the night before the show opened with Janica and some of the early protagonists.
25:51It was basically, I don't know, 10, 12 people there having drinks and talking about what they wanted to invest in. And now there's the last one I went to. I think there were probably 300 people at that reception. So coming out of 08 or 09, there was not a lot of capital available. You had these, call it 10 consumer funds. You had definitely some family offices that were active, and that was pretty much it. And then because of low interest rates and because of all the repercussions that that had, you had all these new entrants, all these new capital providers enter the CPG space. So hedge funds who were in the business of investing in public companies found that the public market valuations were very high.
26:36And so they were investing in private markets. I mean, you saw funds like D1 and Tiger do tons of deals in our space, massive checks at massive valuations for the most part, right? You had the tech funds. So think Lightspeed and Sequoia, where, again, they felt that valuations in tech were very high and that actually CPG valuations relative to tech valuations were quite reasonable. And they were now investing in plant-based meat companies and cereal companies and all sorts of CPG businesses, right? You certainly had family offices become much more active. They were seeing their money sitting in the bank earning 0%.
27:13And they felt that investing in consumer was a great way to generate a return. And so they became incredibly active. And in addition, you had those 10 original consumer funds raise a lot more money, right? I don't know, the early consumer funds like TSG and Catterton, they're now, I don't know, $8,$10 billion funds, right? They used to be$200 million funds in 2009. And so they had all this capital to deploy, writing$100 million checks into CPG businesses. And so there's been a tremendous amount of capital that's gone into the CPG space over that period. And now interest rates have gone back up.
27:55Public market valuations have come down. And the hedge funds are saying, we are better off deploying our capital in the public markets, which is what we were designed to do. And by the way, those private investments we made, most of those didn't go so well. And so our investors are saying, stick to your knitting. The same is true for tech funds, right? Right. Their portfolios didn't do great with the reset. Their fund sizes are now smaller again. And they're being told by their investors, focus on what you're good at, which is tech. And so they're pulling out of CPG in a big way. Same is true for family offices.
28:31Right. They're now getting five, six percent investing in boring bonds. And they're maybe seeing better opportunities investing in, I don't know, commercial real estate. And they're like, you know what, that's a better risk return for us. And so a lot of that capital has left the market. I think some of the consumer funds that were raised the last few years are having, you know, in some instances are harder time raising. And so they're not raising funds that are quite as large. And so, yeah, there is less capital going into business. Now, again, the optimist in me will say there are still many more capital sources and much more capital going into CPG companies today than back in 2009, 10, 11, 12, 13.
29:12There's more money available for founders now than before, but it's certainly a big step down from what it was. And so if you're a founder and you're particularly a newer founder, maybe who's only ever experienced this abundance of capital, it certainly can feel, and it is in many ways quite tough. Yeah, it is that moment in time, right, again, and if you've been doing this long enough, the pendulum swings, and sometimes it swings violently, you know, from one end to the other. So the environment around there, I mean, if you just look at just the overall state of the state, right, you think about, you know, we sold one bar to Hershey in 2019, right?
29:55And that was, you know, pre-pandemic, pre-interest rate, pre-political disruption, domestic abroad, pre-Ukraine, labor, supply chain. I mean, I will tell you, I don't think there's ever been a tougher time than the one hopefully that we are coming out of at the moment. Knock on wood. But it's super hard. And a lot of the founders, big businesses, small businesses have said to me, well, I get it. But you guys sold this business for three and a half times net sales. And, you know, I want that valuation and it likely isn't your fault, but a lot of things have changed in the marketplace. But good businesses will be able to to go through the good times and the bad times.
Read the full transcript
30:52But I think the message I'd want to give to founders now is it's hard and you're going to have to grind. and if you don't know how to grind, you better learn fast because I'm an optimist like Franklin is too. And I would tell you that I think obviously the pendulum will swing, better times will happen, interest rates will calm down, politically we'll settle ourselves. You have to believe that or there's no point. But in the interim, you have to deal with the environment that you have today and ultimately protecting your cash financially, making sense of the money you have, what you're trying to do.
31:33Sometimes you don't have to be in the deep end of the pool swimming really, really fast. If you ask me what I would want to invest in now, I'd rather take a business that had a 10 or a 15 % growth rate versus a 30 % growth rate and was more financially responsible in terms of cash management, cash flow break, even EBITDA positive than I would. We're losing money all the time, but we're growing really fast. That kind of scares me in this particular environment, right? If you took the Justin's deal out to the street today, based on when we sold it seven years ago, the business wouldn't trade. It wouldn't trade.
32:18Clearly it wouldn't trade at the level that it did with Hormel, but that's just a function of time and the environment. So you have to be smart enough to play it to your advantage and your disadvantage. But for where we are right now, cash management, margin, all of velocity. I mean, those things, what's old is new again, right? those are critically important, right? I would sacrifice hockey stick growth personally for a combination of growth and financial acumen for sure. And I think, Carol, what's tricky for founders is if they've had investors in the past, tell them grow, grow, grow, and don't worry about your markets because we'll be there to fund it or we'll find someone else to fund it and those funders are no longer there.
33:08I think those are, you know, talking about alignment earlier, right, with your investor. I think those are the trickiest sort of situations to be in. I think a lot of brands are finding themselves in that situation. Do you have any advice for them? Mine's pretty simple. I would make sure that your financial house is in tip-top order and that you're doing everything to maximize cash. And if there are things that are more risky and you're focused on hockey stick type of growth and there's no stopping you, I'd tell you to breathe deep and focus on the fundamentals of what really matters. Now, to Franklin's point, if you've got an investor who wants to fund you till the end of time and keep going and focus on all that growth and not worry about profitability, that's one thing.
34:13But I think if you're going to be an attractive asset that ultimately wants to exit and maximize shareholder value, you have to have the growth piece well-defined and understood. And your financial piece has got to be solid. Because without that, I don't think you get to the next level. Yeah. And I would just add to that, Peter, if you have an investor who's telling you to grow, grow, grow, make sure they put their money where their mouth is. Seriously, we have it now. one of our portfolio companies where, you know, an investor came in after us and they're like, oh, gung ho is a great, but let's just put in writing or let's just do a note right now where you're putting in more money into the business to fund it because we don't want to be in a position, you know, in nine months or a year from now where we're out of cash and dependent on whatever the financial markets will bear then.
35:04I mean, this might be kind of a funny question to ask to investors, But are there other sources of capital you would recommend brands look at right now besides just traditional investment? It's interesting. The typical answer to that question would have been debt, right? Venture debt, factor financing. And two, three years ago, that was a real alternative because that money was actually free or close to free. and now we're actually seeing a lot of companies where that's come back to bite them a little bit because just to use larger numbers but say you have a 10 million dollar term loan or debt facility and you're paying market rates for that right for a loss making growing company that rate today is i don't know 12 14 percent so on 10 million now that's an extra million and a half of burn a year just to service your debt.
36:01And same is true for, I mean, factory financing is always more expensive. But there's a real cost associated with that. And in sort of choppier waters, those covenants can really be pretty daunting. I would actually answer the question a little bit differently, Carol, I would say is that if you're looking to raise money, spend time with investors that are actually dedicated to the sector and that are actively writing checks. I think some of those hedge funds, some of those tech funds, some of those family offices, some of those funds that are now much larger, they might still say they're active, right?
36:39Because no one wants to say they're not doing anything all day, right? They might say that they're active. But if you look at what have they actually done in the last 18 months, like how many checks have they actually written into companies like mine? If the answer is none or not very many, don't waste your time. spend time with dedicated consumer funds who are active, who are not fair weather friends, who understand that actually in this market, there's great deals to be done and great businesses to fund. And I think, again, it's not, it doesn't answer your question directly, Carol, but I think that's what I would focus on is spending time with groups that are actually the odds of you being the one exception, right?
37:24They're just very, very low. Yeah, and I would, again, based on size of business and cash needed, a lot of these businesses, you know, who need cash and need capital in order to do the things they want to do. The big question, again, is how are they going to use it, right? Because chances are they've had some before. They don't have any now. and what prevents that from happening again, right? And I think this is where the alignment around how are we going to grow and what are we going to do and how are we going to do it? And some of those decisions, by the way, are super hard in terms of, you know, I've had conversations with lots of different folks around, you know, we have a$40 million business that we think is going to, you know, 100 or so.
38:19and you ask the question of what are you spending on trade or marketing or what's your gna look like and in order for them to get to the next level some of those decisions would probably need to be different you can't in this environment be a 20 million dollar company with 35 people it doesn't work you can't afford to do it so a lot of the where you're going to get the cash from, I agree with Franklin, you should talk to people and make sure we're aligned. We've talked about that. But in addition to that is how are we going to spend the cash and how are we going to do it differently? Those are the real conversations to be had.
39:03Ideally, obviously, founders want to keep as much as they can for themselves. But the smart ones, I think, recognize what they've done, what they know, what they don't know, and what they don't know, they have to go out and get a solution for. And that's cash and more than likely operating experience. What about convertible notes? Because I think that's a really hot topic right now among founders and investors. What's the role they play and what is your opinion on them? I think convertible notes were always an instrument used to fund startups and they definitely have a role to play, right? It can be a way to extend the fundraise a little bit.
39:44It can be a way to not have to agree on a valuation today. It can be a way for an investor to be a little bit more senior on the cap table. I think they have their place. Again, what we typically don't love is when there's notes upon notes upon notes. At some point, you do have to price your round. Everyone needs to know how much they're going to own of a business. We're a little bit more allergic to safe notes because they tend to just, it's a little hard to know, again, how much you're actually going to own of that business by the time they convert. And so we typically don't do those. But no, I think convertible notes have always been around and I think they can be the fine instruments if you use correctly.
40:18Yeah, I would agree. And I think the big point there that Franklin mentioned is if it's notes on notes on notes and then we're getting into a situation where I do think you're kicking can down the road. But it is a vehicle that makes sense in the right environment. Though we sometimes see companies that have raised a bunch of notes in rapid sequence, and then no one has actually done any diligence on the company. There's no proper governance rights. Even for the founders, it's hard to know how much they still own or for employees to know how much they still own or how to value options. And so I think that's definitely not healthy.
40:56We've talked a lot about the changing financial climate, but also there's a change to the media and consumer engagement climate as well. There's a lot of brands that are trying to be content creators or they're working with influencers and content creators. You know, what's your advice around that to brands? And does it impact how you're thinking about the companies you invest in? It does. I mean, you cannot ignore brands like Prime doing hundreds of millions in revenue in year two or year three. You can ridicule it. You can mock it. You can say that it's silly, but you can't ignore it, right?
41:37There's something there. And so in an environment today where the cost of acquisition has gone up, right, because there's more demand for that real estate on social media and because of iOS updates, et cetera, being able to hack that CAC using a celebrity or an influencer can be a great launch strategy. And I say launch strategy because people might buy the product initially and we just, published our last latest consumer trends report where we surveyed 3000 americans and a vast majority of gen z will say they will buy pretty much whatever their favorite influencer or creator tells them to buy even if it's a category they weren't even considering making a purchase in so you can get that initial lift but then the product does need to stand on its own two feet and then you're kind of on your own either the consumer likes that product and will buy it again or they don't and they won't.
42:34And then it's just a fad and it's a flash in the pan. If the product is good, then at some point, that product can decouple from the influencer or the creator or the celebrity. And they have just then used that person to get their rocket launched. Then that launch missile falls to the side and the brand goes off. I would actually say, Carol, that you walk into a college bar and you ask people drinking Casamigos, if they know who George Clooney is, the vast majority won't even know that George Clooney is associated with Casamigos. But it was a great way to launch that tequila brand in a very crowded space.
43:15It was a great way to get that initial launch, that initial attention from distributors and retailers to get that initial revenue. But then the product was able to stand on its own two feet and ultimately also be bigger than George Clooney. Meaning at some point, if you're a creator, your brand is only going to ever be as big as your audience. You want to be able to grow beyond that, right? So you need to decouple. So to answer your question specifically, what we look for is definitely brands that are using, that have the capability to use, leverage creators, influencers, celebrities. but definitely brands that have good repeat rates can stand on their own two feet and become bigger than that initial launch partner.
44:00And I think it's not just good business, but I also think it's good for exits because the big strategics are also trying to figure this stuff out. And if they can acquire a startup that has a capability of successfully leveraging creators, that is definitely a capability that they will want to buy because Coca-Cola is also scratching their head at Prime and wondering how they can replicate a similar success. Yeah, very well said. I mean, to Franklin's point, you can't ignore the value of content and the creativity around TikTok and influencers. It's there. Less in my experience as a consumer, but clearly with Gen Z, Gen X, it's all over the place and you can't ignore it.
44:48The thing as an investor, I think that we need to watch out for is exactly what Franklin said. You know, something that goes from, in a case of Prime, of zero to$800 million. You look at that and you say, A, you can't ignore it. B, it's got scoreboard and real velocities. The question as an investor and ultimately as potentially a strategic acquirer is, is that a brand that is going to stick? Or is this a, hard to believe, a billion dollar fad? And I can tell you in beverage, there's a bunch of dead bodies that are around, went to the moon, no stopping it. And it went into the dirt soon after that.
45:38So you have to really take a look at velocities, repeat, consumer demand, what they think. And I think you're going to see some of these brands be real brands and stick and to Franklin's point, be bigger than the celebrity because of the marketplace they can drive and the opportunity. I also think there are going to be some mistakes made along the way where zero to 400 million was, oh, my gosh, and then we're going to the moon. Let's make sure that that really is the case. And that's done through diligence, a lot of consumer work, et cetera. But beverage is a great example, probably the best example of where brand content and influencer can certainly work.
46:27If you're looking at more of an established center cut business, you know, in traditional grocery that's in the condiments section whatsoever, you know, you look at brand content and TikTok and things like that, and it might be difficult to make ketchup cool. I don't know. Maybe you can. I'm going to wind this up with one last question. So both of your backgrounds and strategies might vary, but I'd say in the industry, you both kind of have reputations as kind of telling it like it is. And I think this podcast backs a lot of that up. What's made you cultivate this style as an investment professional?
47:10And, you know, how does it help you, do you think? it's interesting I think one of the things that make you successful in business is the ability to change your style right depending on the situation the person but perhaps my Dutchness just means that it's ingrained in my DNA and it's I don't really know of a different style but I think to Peter's point you know it is it is good to be a straight shooter and to be honest particularly when investing and sort of aligning on a plan and sort of what you see is what you get has always worked best for me. But I also recognize that it has these limitations.
47:49Yeah, I would agree. And, and, you know, if Franklin has Dutchness, Carol, I have the, the, the Boston side of being direct and, and, and, and, you know, cutting to the chase, so to speak. But I really think that, you know it's it's all in the delivery in terms of of how you have the conversations right and if you're consistent and you're you're being you throughout everyone you interact with and you're you're doing it in a in a way that's fact-based and data-based and experience-based I think people genuinely appreciate that perspective as opposed to walking through you know, a 10 page deck and we tell you how wonderful and great you are, right?
48:39And in a lot of those cases, founders and folks get back to you and say, look, you know, I've never really, you know, had anybody talk to me about the things that you talk to me about, right? And again, I like to do those things in person based on a lot of facts and data and research. And when you can make it less emotional and more fact-based around the things that you see and what you notice, it becomes less of a confrontation, right? So I don't know how to be anybody else. I'm trying to be less or have more of a filter, which I think I've done pretty well. I'm never going to be good at it. But if you ask me a question, I'm going to give you the answer.
49:27You may not like the answer, but the answer is going to be based on facts and data and experience. That's the only thing I know how to do. Emotionally, we can talk about a variety of different things. You love that. I hate that. Doesn't matter when it comes down to the investment side and the business side. But people, I think, who they always say, now, tell me what you really feel. And my comment back is, do you really want to know what I really feel? Because I'm going to tell you, right? I mean, I'm not going to cut their heart out, but I'm going to get to the answer of the question. And I think people respect that at the end of the day.
50:05I have all these questions for Peter now. I'm just dying to hear the unvarnished, you know, Peter Burns perspective on. Yeah. He's always so buttoned up when he's on a podcast or on stage. Right. The next podcast will be recorded in a bar. Yeah, exactly. Put a Sam Adams in my hand and get me off script and the real me will come out maybe. Who knows? Well, guys, this has been an enlightening conversation. I've taken away a lot. I'm sure brands have as well. Thank you so much for joining me today. Thank you, Carol. It's been a pleasure. Franklin, great to talk to you as always, man. Likewise, Peter.
50:40Always a pleasure. That wraps up our episode of the Nosh Podcast. We hope you'll subscribe, leave a review, and continue to tune in next week on your podcast platform of choice.
From the publisher
In this special presentation of our sister show, the NOSH Podcast, Sunrise Strategic Partners' Peter Burns and Coefficient Capital's Franklin Isacson explain why the investor-brand relationship should be treated like a marriage.




