

3 Jul 2026 · 15m · 5 chapters

The episode argues that AI systems are currently “hallucination-prone,” creating a verification bottleneck for scientific and mathematical discovery. It claims the fix is “formal mathematics” based on Leibniz’s 17th-century vision of a universal, mechanically checkable reasoning system.
Tudor Akeem (computer scientist) discusses AI hallucinations and formal proof verification. The episode references mathematicians Leibniz, Grigory Perelman, and Andrew Wiles.
Human bandwidth can’t verify the growing volume of AI-generated proofs; training data may bake in human biases. With proof assistants like Lean and libraries like Mathlib, AI-generated proofs can be machine-checked with certainty.
Poincaré conjecture (Perelman’s 2002 papers), Fermat’s last theorem (Wiles’ 1993 announcement and later fix with Richard Taylor), and International Math Olympiad results where automated systems solved 5 of 6 problems with no human review.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes.
Exploration of how AI's unverified claims can impact science and discovery.
“For most applications, these far-fetched inventions might be inconvenient or confusing.”
Discussion on the historical roots and effectiveness of mathematics.
“It might not look like much, but it's actually some of the oldest mathematics we have.”
Analysis of AI's growing role in solving complex mathematical problems and the implications.
“Modern AI is not just built with math, it's forged from it.”
Exploring the concept of formal mathematics and how AI can aid in achieving this vision.
“And now the question is, where does that leave us?”
Explore how AI can revolutionize mathematics by collaborating with human intuition.
“In the future, AI is not just going to be writing math papers in English for humans to read.”

Get the gist, explore an idea or ask about something said.
On TED Talks Daily, what are the key points of this episode?
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.
0:03You're listening to TED Talks Daily, where we bring you new ideas and conversations to spark your curiosity every day. I'm your host, Elise Hu. As AI becomes more intertwined in every aspect of our lives, humanity and science are facing a huge new truth problem. The tools we're increasingly relying on to accelerate discovery, such as generative AI and large language models, well, they have a habit of completely making things up. We simply don't have the human bandwidth to review all these proofs. Are we resigned to drown in a sea of unverified claims where we can't really tell truth from fiction?
0:40That was computer scientist Tudor Akeem. And yes, he's talking about AI hallucinations. For most applications, these far-fetched inventions might be inconvenient or confusing. But for science, they could be catastrophic. In this talk, he shares why he thinks a 400-year-old idea holds the fix. The German mathematician Leibniz's dream of a logical framework where errors are simply impossible. He makes the case that grounding AI in this formal mathematical verification could transform it from unreliable chatbots into rigorous partners for scientific discovery. The talk is coming up right after a short break.
1:24With no fees or minimums on checking accounts, it's no wonder the Capital One bank guy is so passionate about banking with Capital One. If he were here, he wouldn't just tell you about no fees or minimums. He'd also talk about how most Capital One cafes are open seven days a week to assist with your banking needs. Yep, even on weekends, it's pretty much all he talks about. In a good way. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See CapitalOne.com slash bank. Capital One N.A. Member FDIC.
1:58This episode is brought to you by Dell. Back to school starts now. Get long-lasting battery life on the Dell XPS laptop, powered by Series 3 Intel Core so you can work from anywhere. Now starting at$699 with exclusive student pricing starting at$599. And it's lightweight, portable, and packed with enough processing power to make multitasking a breeze. So say goodbye to distractions and hello to more free time because you finished your work faster. Complete your setup with savings on select monitors and more must-have electronics and accessories. Limited time deals and free shipping on PCs and more await you at dell.com slash deals.
2:37That's dell.com slash deals.
2:43This episode is brought to you by Walmart Business. The best leaders might tell you the work that moves an organization forward doesn't happen in spreadsheets or supply chain emails. It happens when you have the space to think big. That's the idea behind Walmart Business. It's built to take the friction out of running an organization so your team isn't losing hours to procurement logistics when they could just be focused on the problems that actually matter. With an ever-expanding business assortment, everyday low prices, and fast, reliable shipping, Walmart Business keeps your operations running smoothly.
3:17Shop online, in-store, or through the Walmart Business app. However works best for you. Simpler operations, smarter spending. It's Walmart built for your business. Sign up for a free Walmart business account at business.walmart.com.
3:38And now, our TED Talk of the day. Let's take a look at this clay tablet. It might not look like much, but it's actually some of the oldest mathematics we have. It's a 4 ,000-year-old message in a bottle from ancient Babylon, a precursor to the quadratic equation. And for four millennia, people have been doing math basically the same way. Someone will have a brilliant idea, they'll write it down, and their peers will discuss and check it. It's a process built on creativity, communication, and most importantly, trust between people. And what might seem like a humble or simple process is anything but.
4:19It's not just been successful. It's been, as the physicist Eugene Wigner famously put it, unreasonably effective. Wigner was pondering and trying to unravel a deep mystery. Why should the abstract, creative, and often bizarre ideas that spring from a mathematician's imagination so often be the perfect language with which we understand the universe? Why should the strange laws of non-Euclidean geometry, which were originally conceived of as a thought experiment in the 19th century, turn out to be the exact mathematics that Einstein needed for general relativity? Why should the esoteric math of group theory, which was originally designed to study the abstract nature of symmetry, be fundamental to understanding everything from particle physics to the patterns and crystals?
5:07Well, there's no logical reason it has to be this way. This strange connection between pure mathematical thought and the real world has actually been the invisible engine driving human progress. Every piece of technology that defines our lives was ignited with a mathematical spark. If you take the device in your phone, its brain is based on the quantum mechanics of semiconductors, and that's a theory built on linear algebra and complex numbers. The wireless signals that get data to it, they're just a concrete manifestation of Maxwell's equations. And finally, the security that protects your data online is based on number theory, which for a long time was truly considered the most pure and least applicable possible branch of mathematics.
5:59And now it safeguards trillions of dollars in the global economy. And now we come to AI. Modern AI is not just built with math, it's forged from it. A neural network is just a monumental structure of applied mathematics, and when AIs learn, they're using the tools of calculus to navigate vast landscapes of possibilities with billions of dimensions. So AI is, in its soul, a mathematical idea that's given life through computation. So we agree that math is the foundation that modern civilization is based on. But that foundation is starting to show some signs of strain. The very process of human-led discovery that's gotten us to this point is nearing a breaking point, buckling under the weight of its own success.
6:48and now AI, which is one of mathematics' greatest creations, is accelerating us towards that breaking point faster than the world's ready for. So let's just look at some evidence. Consider the Poincare conjecture. This is a legendary problem. It's a fundamental question about the nature of three-dimensional shapes originally posed in 1904. And for nearly a century, it stood as an unconquered Everest of mathematics. Until in 2002, a Russian mathematician working in isolation named Grigory Perelman posted a series of three short cryptic papers online. He didn't bother submitting them to a journal, he just put them on the internet and walked away.
7:29His fellow mathematicians had to stop what they were doing and try to decipher it. And several teams working independently of the best apologists in the world took the next four years to try to unpack the arguments, fill in the logical gaps, and eventually at the end, after they really reviewed it, declare that yes, he did it. He proved the Poincaré conjecture. But that's interesting, because it took one person to write a proof and a global multi-year intellectual mobilization to check it. And that's in the best case, when the proof is correct. Consider Andrew Wiles' proof of Fermat's last theorem.
8:09With With the electrifying announcement in 1993 in Cambridge, the world celebrated. But during the peer review process, deep in it, a single thread was found out of place in that magnificent tapestry of a proof, and when we started to pull on it, the proof started to unravel. And this wasn't a small mistake. Andrew Wiles and his collaborator, Richard Taylor, took two years of heroic secret effort to try to fix it. And that effort included some insights that Andrew Wiles said were among the most important in his life. And that's before we throw AI into the mix. Two short years ago, AI could barely solve entry-level high school math contest problems.
8:52They were very clever, but brittle. Now, in 2025, they can compete with the best of us at the International Math Olympiad, which is the premier pre-college math competition. But the interesting bit is the following. The AI might work for four hours and produce a purported solution, which takes an expert human mathematician maybe up to an hour to check. And we all know the exponential trend that AI is on. So we can expect it's not going to be one proof in an afternoon. It's going to be a thousand pretty soon. And they're not going to be attempts to solve math contest problems. they're going to be attacks on the most fundamental and important questions of the day.
9:36Whether it's the Riemann hypothesis, Navier-Stokes, or P versus NP, just to pick a few. We simply don't have the human bandwidth to review all these proofs. There's only a couple thousand mathematicians that are qualified to do it, and they already have day jobs. And it's not just a verification bottleneck. The very process by which we train these AIs is taking the data off the Internet, which is from humans, post-training them with human feedback. And so we're essentially baking in the cognitive biases and the flawed reasoning of humans into these future engines of discovery. So the conclusion is in some sense obvious.
10:13Humans are becoming the bottleneck of verification for AI. And now the question is, where does that leave us? Is this the end of the road for reliable mathematical discovery? Are we resigned to drown in a sea of unverified claims where we can't really tell truth from fiction? And are we about to squander the opportunity for AI to revolutionize math? Well, the good news is no, but it does mean it's time to upgrade the 4 ,000-year-old operating system of math and move away from the imprecise and ambiguous nature of human language and towards a language that computers can understand. The solution is formal mathematics.
10:53But before I tell you how this futuristic idea works, we should first recognize that it has a deep and fascinating history dating back to the 17th century, where a mathematician actually laid out the roadmap with stunning foresight. 400 years ago, in a Europe torn by religious and political conflict, a polymath named Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz had a vision of breathtaking ambition. He was a contemporary of Newton and a co-creator of calculus, but his dreams went far beyond that. He dreamed of something called a universal characteristic, which was a system for perfectly encoding all scientific and philosophical thought.
11:35And the system had three parts. First, you need a perfect logical language. Second, you need a grand encyclopedia written on language that contains all verified human thought. And third, and this is the masterstroke, you need a so-called engine of reason, a system of mechanical rules by which you can automatically derive new facts from that library as surely as a calculator performs arithmetic. Now, Leibniz thought this would revolutionize humanity. With a system like this, if two people had an intellectual conflict, they would resort to logic and not rhetoric to resolve it. They would simply sit down, say, calculemos, let us calculate, and get to the bottom of it.
12:21In some sense, it was meant to be a universal calculator for truth. Now, Leibniz was a bit of an optimist. He thought this would take a small group of people five years to build, and he was off by several centuries. But what I think is really remarkable is that in 2025, truly for the first time in history, it's actually possible to realize this philosopher's dream. So what do we need? Well, we need a perfect logical language. Turns out we've got it. It's called Lean. Lean is a programming language, but it's also what's known as a proof assistant. You can think of it as a programming environment for mathematical proofs, where it doesn't just give you feedback if you have a syntax error here or there, it's actually looking at the core of the mathematical argument and telling you if you have any problems anywhere in it.
13:11Great. What's the second thing we need? We need the grand encyclopedia. Well, the good news is we've got that too. It's called Mathlib. Mathlib is an open source project. It's about two million lines of code in Lean, and it covers a lot of the undergraduate and graduate math curriculum. You can think of it like a Wikipedia for proven truth where every edit is computationally certified for correctness. Okay, we've got the language, we've got the encyclopedia, what about the engine of reason? Well, we could try to have humans do it, but you've got to write a lot of lean code and the level of robotic precision you need to write a formal proof is not something that human creativity is so well suited for.
13:56And that's how we've come full circle. It turns out that AI is the key to making this whole thing work. In the future, AI is not just going to be writing math papers in English for humans to read. They're going to be writing math proofs in Lean for computers to check. And that is the fundamental key that makes it possible to use Leibniz's vision to unlock the full potential of AI in mathematics. Because when a math AI spits out a proof in Lean of, let's say, the Riemann hypothesis, we're not going to need humans to go through every single line of the proof in painstaking detail, check every single case, and understand the possibly strange and alien logic of the proof just to see if it's correct.
14:41Instead, all we're going to do is we're going to take those files, we're going to give them to a Lean compiler, and if it builds, we can know with absolute certainty it's correct. And this is what fundamentally alters our relationship with AI. AI can now become a true collaborator, one whose word we don't have to take on blind faith. We get to trade in the tedium of checking for the creative joy of discovery. Humans get to use our intuition and judgment. We ask the questions, we chart the course, we propose the brilliant conjectures, and then we delegate to AI to explore the vast oceans of logic to find the correct answer and then a computer confirms that we've gotten to the destination.
15:25And the amazing thing is that this isn't just some far-off science fiction dream. It turns out that at this year's International Math Olympiad, automated systems were able to find solutions to five of the six problems in a way that computers could check and required no human review whatsoever. And that's enough to get a gold medal level performance. So the transition's already happening. So, are humans going to be the bottleneck for math research? Well, the answer is yes, but only if we refuse to change. Only if we insist on being the only thinkers and the only checkers. But if we're able to realize this 400-year-old vision, we're not going to replace ourselves, we're going to elevate ourselves.
16:06We're going to put ourselves in the driver's seat as the explorers, the architects, and the question askers. And that means that formal mathematics is the key to this new era of discovery based on the powerful and essential partnership between human imagination and mathematical superintelligence. Thank you.
16:31That was Tutor Akeem at TED AI in San Francisco, California in 2025. If you're curious about TED's curation, visit ted.com slash curation guidelines. And that's it for today. TED Talks Daily is a podcast from TED. This episode was produced and edited by our team, Martha Estefanos, Oliver Friedman, Lucy Little, Emma Taubner, and Tansika Sungmarnivong. Additional support from Daniela Ballarezzo, Christopher Faze-Bogan, Valentina Bohanini, Banban Chang, Brian Green, and Lainey Lott. Learn more at podcasts.ted.com. I am Elise Hu. I'll be back tomorrow with a fresh idea for your feed. Thanks for listening.
17:24With no fees or minimums on checking accounts, it's no wonder the Capital One Bank guy is so passionate about banking with Capital One. If he were here, he wouldn't just tell you about no fees or minimums. He'd also talk about how most Capital One cafes are open seven days a week to assist with your banking needs. Yep, even on weekends, it's pretty much all he talks about. In a good way. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See CapitalOne.com slash bank. Capital One N.A. member FDIC. Hey, it's Paige from Giggly Squad, and I want to let you know that if you want the newest and hottest beauty products, you have to go to Sephora.
18:01I'm obsessed with the One Size Liquid Blotting Paper Spray. It's the first of its kind blotting spray that mattifies for up to eight hours. It's unreal. There's also the Summer Friday Shade Drops SPF 50, which basically lives in my bag at this point. Oh, and the Kayali Eden Plush Pear smells so good. It's sweet, warm, and addictive. Like people literally stop me and ask what perfume I'm wearing, which you know I love. So if you want the makeup, skincare, hair, and fragrance products, everyone's about to be obsessed with, shop only at Sephora. Summer is here, which means we all want to look and feel our best.
18:37A GLP-1 may be right for you. Visit orderlymeds.com to learn more about which GLP-1 you could be eligible for. Getting started is fast, easy, and happens virtually through telemedicine from licensed professionals. Check it out for yourself. Go to orderlymeds.com slash podcast. That's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Taking care of yourself feels great. Compact and medications are not FDA-approved. Eligibility required and determined by a licensed provider. Individual results may vary. See website for details.
Generative AI hallucinates, creating a truth problem that science can't afford. Computer scientist Tudor Achim thinks a 400-year-old idea holds the fix: Leibniz's dream of a logical framework where errors are simply impossible. Learn about his idea for mathematical superintelligence that would ground AI in formal verification, turning unreliable chatbots into rigorous partners for scientific discovery.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.