In short
Dr. Gad Saad argues the West is “dying of kindness” via “suicidal empathy,” where empathy becomes dysregulated and is applied to wrong targets, overriding deontological limits and producing civilizational harm.
Guest background
Dr. Gad Saad is an evolutionary behavioral scientist, author of Suicidal Empathy and The Parasitic Mind, and a social-media provocateur. Host Carlo Versano is a Democrat-leaning journalist who describes a personal shift after experiences in New York City.
Key claims
Empathy should be “golden mean” (not too little, not too much). When empathy drives policy, it can misfire like OCD or cancer-like hyperactivity. Saad says credentialed expertise doesn’t prevent extremism; he cites that ISIS leaders had advanced degrees. He argues Islamism and Islam are effectively indistinguishable and that Western liberalism can’t stably coexist with Islamist ideology.
Notable examples
New York CVS locked-up goods due to non-prosecution of shoplifting; “homeless” vs “unhoused” language; satire about “inclusive” terms for rapists/pedophiles; a rape victim allegedly lying to protect Middle Eastern suspects; a woman refusing to describe an attacker to avoid jailing “black men”; prisoner exchange releasing Yahya Sinwar; Gaza/Israel debate framed as “cultural theory of mind” failure.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Concept of Suicidal Empathy
0:45 to 2:20
Discussion on Dr. Saad's concept of suicidal empathy and its implications.
“Satt, thank you so much for your time, sir.”
Empathy and Civilization
2:20 to 4:16
Exploring the balance of empathy and its impact on society.
“because if you look at all of the domestic and foreign policies that are leading the West into the abyss of infinite darkness, it all stems from dysregulated empathy.”
Consequentialism vs Deontological Ethics
4:16 to 7:10
The distinction between ethical frameworks and their implications.
“They don't have a stopping mechanism that stops the cell division.”
Examples of Suicidal Empathy in Policy
7:10 to 9:46
Discussion of real-world examples illustrating suicidal empathy in action.
“On the other hand, if you say it is okay to steal if blah, blah, blah, if the consequences, then you are falling into a consequentialist ethos, right?”
The Role of Language in Empathy
9:46 to 12:26
How language shapes perceptions of empathy and societal issues.
“I've been a professor for 32 plus years.”
Personal Experience with Education Policy
12:26 to 14:00
Carlo's personal insights on the effects of immigration on education.
“Because to not let everybody in is less empathetic from their perspective than to let them in.”
Migrants and Education Challenges
14:00 to 15:02
Discussing the challenges of integrating migrant children into schools.
“They bought the buildings and they are housing these migrants, mostly from Latin America, in these buildings.”
Reflections on Empathy and Voting
15:02 to 15:56
Examining the implications of voting for politicians based on perceived empathy.
“I enthusiastically said I want Joe Biden to come in because he's not like Trump.”
Unique Acknowledgment of Change
15:56 to 16:11
Recognizing the rarity of changing one's beliefs when presented with new evidence.
“already something that is quite unique among human beings.”
Consequences of Suicidal Empathy
16:11 to 18:49
Exploring the concept of 'suicidal empathy' through personal anecdotes and societal implications.
“Most people are never willing, irrespective of how much evidence they see, to change their anchored position.”
Show all 24 chapters
Parasitic Ideas and Their Impacts
18:49 to 22:52
Understanding the concept of parasitic ideas and their detrimental effects.
“But I will say that this was a black pill moment, as they say.”
Real-Life Example of Suicidal Empathy
22:52 to 23:32
Discussing a case that illustrates the danger of empathy taken to an extreme.
“And the cops asked her for a description.”
Israel, Gaza, and Suicidal Empathy
23:32 to 28:00
Engaging in a discussion about the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
“Can I give you a one that even beats that one, please?”
Understanding Suicidal Empathy in Conflict
28:00 to 29:49
Explore the concept of suicidal empathy and its implications in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
“And when he was released, that didn't buy them any empathy chips.”
The Nature of War and Civilian Casualties
29:50 to 31:38
Discuss the moral obligations and complexities surrounding civilian casualties in war.
“But if you recognize that there is a larger narrative at play, then maybe it was appropriate for them to drop those bombs.”
The Intractable Nature of Middle Eastern Conflict
31:39 to 33:33
Analyze the intractable issues between conflicting groups in the Middle East.
“And the reason why it's an intractable problem is because one camp doesn't believe that the other camp has a right to exist.”
Islamism vs. Islam: A Critical Examination
33:34 to 36:16
Delve into the distinctions and conflations between Islam and Islamism in societal discourse.
“But your position is essentially that Islam and Western liberal societies cannot coexist stably over time.”
The Role of Intellectuals in Ideological Conflicts
36:17 to 42:00
Explore how intellectuals shape ideologies and societal perceptions of conflict.
“So, for example, I am very much committed to my Jewish heritage, probably one of the most high profile Jews around.”
Critique of Academic Credentialism
42:00 to 43:30
Explore the absurdities of academic credentialism and postmodernist theories.
“Well, if you live in the ivory tower, you can exist in a world that is untethered to reality.”
Adjustment to Life in Mississippi
43:30 to 45:26
Discuss the transition from Canada to Mississippi and perceptions of American identity.
“You know, it was like we had to call a doctor because I think she had like an education degree.”
Reflections on Canadian Values
45:26 to 47:24
Delve into the defense of Canadian values and the implications of leaving Canada.
“And hence why it makes perfect sense for me to be the professor that is teaching about American freedom.”
Criticism of Canada's MAID Policy
47:24 to 49:10
Analyze Canada's assisted dying policy and its implications for societal ethics.
“in terms of defending Canadian values on a given Tuesday than most Canadians will do in their entire life.”
The Myth of Free Canadian Healthcare
49:10 to 51:38
Debunk the notion of free healthcare in Canada and discuss its flaws.
“This is moral decay at its finest, right?”
Optimism and Challenges for the West
51:38 to 53:48
Discuss the potential for the West to correct its course and the challenges ahead.
“I guess my follow up to that is like just how do you how do you split this baby then?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Hello, hello from Newsweek headquarters at the top of the World Trade Center in hot, humid New York City. I am Carlo Versano, and this is your weekly edition of The 1600. This country was stone cold dead. Today I'm speaking with somebody I've been really meaning to speak with for a while. I'm very excited about this. His name is Dr. Gad Saad. He's an evolutionary behavioral scientist, a self-described optimistic realist, which is something that no one's ever accused me of being, but I like that anyway. And a great social media gadfly, social media provocateur, one of the great follows on Twitter or X or whatever we're calling it these days.
0:35And Dr. Saad says that the West is dying, but dying of kindness. Not literally, of course, but according to his recent bestseller, Suicidal Empathy, he basically makes this point that the instinct of us in the West to extend sort of endless compassion to criminals, terrorists, and the ideologically hostile has become a kind of civilizational death wish among liberal societies like ours. Dr. Satt, thank you so much for your time, sir. Oh, so good to be with you. Thank you for that lovely introduction. Thank you. I'm really glad to have you. So I wrote about a version of this myself recently, which I want to get to in a minute, whereby I'm sort of like watching my own party, you know, the Democrats and my own city, New York City.
1:16Their empathy-driven policies collide with what I thought would be a relatively simple act of, you know, bureaucratic normalcy of getting my daughter into kindergarten. garden. It's not been that, and I'll explain all that why. But I wanted to bring you on because you are the man that coined this term, suicidal empathy. I guess my first question to you, sir, is this a diagnosis of what's ailing the West or just what your critics might say is a clever rebrand of an old argument dressed up as evolutionary psychology? No, it's a unique malaise of the current period. There have been previous people who've commented about how civilizations die by suicide, not by murder.
2:02And so the famous case would be the eminent British historian Arnold Toynbee, who exactly arrived at that conclusion. What is unique to my work is that I'm offering the mechanism by which today this civilization has decided to commit suicide. Now, it's not just because I'd like to couch it in evolutionary psychology, because if you look at all of the domestic and foreign policies that are leading the West into the abyss of infinite darkness, it all stems from dysregulated empathy. And if I can take maybe two or three minutes to explain the framework. Many of my detractors have wrongly argued that I am the dark, evil Jew who's trying to create a world bereft of empathy.
2:49I'm doing no such thing. As an evolutionary behavioral scientist, I fully recognize the importance of empathy for a social species. For you and I to have a meaningful conversation, I need to put myself in your mind and vice versa. That's called theory of mind or cognitive empathy. So there's nothing wrong with well-modulated empathy. but as Aristotle explained to us 2000 plus years ago via his Nicomachean ethics everything the golden mean the golden mean right yeah too little of something is not good too much of something is not good now if we apply that principle to empathy little or no empathy makes you a psychopath too much empathy the hyper activation of the empathy module in the wrong situations towards the wrong targets results in suicidal empathy so i mean i think i i totally agree with you that you know we we all would all agree i think that you need empathy to survive and to flourish as a species what would you say to somebody who might be listening to this and they're saying like okay he's just he's coining a term for just empathy that i of something i disagree with uh no because if it if that mechanism results in suboptimal consequences, then it is pathological.
4:05Look, cancer and regular cell divisions, the only thing that differentiates the two, they both divide, right? Regular cells divide, cancerous cells divide, but they are hyperactive. They don't have a stopping mechanism that stops the cell division. So it's not as though the example that I'm using here hasn't been documented in other natural phenomena. The idea that you take an adaptive process and it becomes maladaptive when it misfires is found throughout the psychiatric literature. Let me give you a concrete example. If you and I, if I had the pleasure of meeting you at one of those swanky parties in Manhattan with Malcolm Baudwell, where he explains to us that we're degenerates for actually believing that there are differences between men and women, because he is just smarter than the rest of us.
4:54So if I were to meet you at that party, And I noticed before you came up to shake my hand that you were incessantly sneezing in your hand. Well, then I've scanned the environment. I looked for potential threats. I've identified a threat. I'll go to the bathroom. And when you're not looking because I don't want to offend you, I'll wash my hands once and then I'll move on with my day. That was an adaptive process. OCD, germ contamination fear, is the maladaptive misfiring of this otherwise adaptive process because I'm stuck in an infinite loop in the bathroom. for eight hours a day washing my hands.
5:31No, that's a great way of putting it. Okay, so let's talk about some sort of like political examples here in the U.S. of suicidal empathy. The ones that come to my mind, we'll talk about my point about the kindergarten and immigration in a minute. But off the top of my head, right, I went to CVS yesterday, which has become like a humiliation ritual because you have to like buzz somebody to get your toothpaste, right? Everything is now locked up in all of the cases here in New York City. I don't know if it's like this in other parts of the country, but in New York, you cannot just go into the drugstore and buy toothpaste anymore.
6:07You have to ring a little bell, which gets some guy, you know, some college kid in the back to scutter around and unlock it for you. And the reason is because, you know, there was this big surge in shoplifting during COVID here and also because of policies that the Democrats here in New York have instituted of not prosecuting shoplifting crimes. Right. So instead of prosecuting shoplifting crimes, now they just put everything behind the plastic and regular non-shoplifting people like me have to now. It's a big production for us to go in and get toothpaste. Is there something else like that? That strikes me as suicidal empathy, right?
6:43It is. So that would be a on the on the continuum of how nefarious suicidal empathy can be. The shoplifting example would be on the lesser end. Right, it's annoying. Yeah, but let's speak about this one. In ethical systems, there's a distinction between what's called deontological ethics and consequentialist ethics. Deontological statement would be, it is never okay to steal. That's it. It's deontological. It's an absolute. It's kind of like a Kantian imperative. On the other hand, if you say it is okay to steal if blah, blah, blah, if the consequences, then you are falling into a consequentialist ethos, right?
7:23So for many things in life, we're all consequentialists. So for example, if you want to have a happy marriage, I often remind people if your spouse asks you the following question, do I look fat in those jeans? Then you better put on your consequentialist hat and perhaps lie because you actually care about the feelings of your spouse. So it makes perfect sense to be a consequentialist for many things, But there are certain foundational principles that by definition have to be deontological. Freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry, presumption of innocence, right? Thou shall not steal. Once you use a consequentialist ethos because you are suicidally empathetic to a deontological principle, you end up at the abyss of infinite lunacy.
8:12The other one I'm thinking about is, which I guess is sort of tangentially related, is just how we speak about homelessness in this country now. You know, people aren't homeless anymore. They're unhoused. And I guess, you know, again, this falls in the continuum of sort of like stupid stuff, not like big stuff. But I think it's still important. And that always grinded my gears when I heard people say that or people would say like, oh, you don't say homeless anymore. You say unhoused. You know, we don't want to stigmatize these people. But you do want to stigmatize homelessness, right? I mean, why do we want to de-stigmatize?
8:49I'm not saying that we want to stigmatize people who are homeless or who are addicts, but the idea of de-stigmatizing something like being without a home seems crazy to me. So this is part of a section in the book where I talk about linguistic empathy. Yes, exactly. Right? So I'll give you much worse examples than the homeless versus unhoused. How about minor attracted individuals for pedophiles? Because God forbid if we were to marginalize the otherwise noble pedophilic community. And that's why using my satire I came up with, we don't really want to marginalize the rapist community. That's why it's better to call them either undocumented lovemakers or altruistic sperm donors.
9:37Because again, rapists have feelings and we need to be kind. We need to create a more inclusive society. Now, I hate for people to think that, you know, it's just me being my spicy satirical self because my satire comes from the really ugly Kafkaesque reality that I see every day around me. I've been a professor for 32 plus years. This is basically standard father within the academic milieu. So there you go. Well, you know, I was going to ask you because, I mean, it wasn't – you know, there's always been this sort of like PC thing that happens when you're in college. I remember as a college student myself.
10:13But obviously the wokeism stuff has taken on a totally new level of hysteria in the world of academia. I mean I haven't been on a college campus in 20 years, so what do I know? Good for you. Yeah, to your point. Right. Duck, I'm trying to ask you what I want to ask you is like, what's the evidence against your thesis? Like, is there a policy driven by empathy that you would call successful? Well, so it depends what is the metric that we are trying to optimize. So there's and forgive me if I get professorial, I will then tie it all back together. There's a field called operations research. It's an applied mathematics field where you try to either minimize something or maximize something.
10:56So, for example, there's something called the traveling salesman problem. You have a salesman starts at city A and he has to visit these 10 cities. In what order should he visit them in order to minimize his travel costs? Right. So so when you're developing an optimization model for these types of situations, the question becomes, what is the metric that you're trying to minimize or maximize? Now, let's apply it to this kind of conversation we're having here. If universities are meant to be a place where you seek truth and defend truth, then that becomes the metric that you're trying to optimize, not trying to create people who are social activists.
11:42In other words, social activism cannot be the metric that you optimize instead of seeking the truth, right? Once you cross your wires in terms of which metric to optimize, you end up with the problems that we're seeing. So now I'm going to tie it to your question. The place where you see that your policy is wrong is if we agree on what we're trying to optimize, and then the implementation of that policy results in a downstream negative consequence of that optimization model. So example, if I'm trying to optimize the landscape of empathy, then every single individual who wishes to come to the United States should be allowed in because that is the metric.
12:28Because to not let everybody in is less empathetic from their perspective than to let them in. But if you realize that you live in the real world, not in unicornia, therefore you recognize that you can't have social welfare systems where you have open border policies. So that orgiastic empathy of having open borders results in a nefarious outcome if I'm trying to optimize certain metrics other than empathy. So that's how you navigate that. Well, so the perfect segue to the reason why I wanted to bring you on to begin with, because I had a real again, I've talked to you before. You know, I'm open about this.
13:10Like I'm a Democrat. I'm sort of like a center left, you know, sort of an old school Democrat. Not like how they are now, evidently. But I had this sort of like real epiphany this summer, because if you'll allow me to sort of get into this, because, you know, so my daughter's five years old, she's going into kindergarten right here in New York City. You're zoned for a certain school. If you want to go to a school that's not in your zone, you have to apply to be on a wait list. Right. So we're on all these wait lists. None of them are moving. The school that she was zoned for what used to be, you know, a mediocre school, but one that you would send your kid to and be OK with it.
13:50Right. Several years ago, when during this huge influx of migrants during covid, you know, during the Biden presidency, See, in my neighborhood in Brooklyn, the city moved thousands of migrants into a pair of these really big apartment complexes, right? They bought the buildings and they are housing these migrants, mostly from Latin America, in these buildings. OK, fine. I got nothing against those people, obviously. But those – the children of those migrants are now going to this school, right, because the school is in that zone. So, again, I don't have any problem with my daughter going to school with people who don't look like her, right?
14:28I wouldn't raise her in New York City if I did. But these students, generally speaking, don't speak English at home, right? So, well, in kindergarten, I think it's probably kind of important that the students all speak the same language in class. Also, when you have a school that is mostly servicing, you know, migrants and children of migrants, it's transitory by nature, right? It's transient by nature. Kids are moving. They're moving housing. Some of them, their families are getting deported. They just they just up and vanish one day. This is the thing that was sort of a black pill for me because I voted for this.
15:02Right. I voted for Joe Biden. I enthusiastically said I want Joe Biden to come in because he's not like Trump. He's you know, he's a nice guy. He's going to be he's going to be a president who has empathy. Right. I remember even thinking that in my head voting for him. I voted for whoever that our last stupid mayor was who was completely incapable of managing this influx of migrants, mostly because he was corrupt and also just like ill-fitted for the job. The federal government didn't do anything to serve all of these migrants that are now in my neighborhood, which again, fine. I don't have any problem with them.
15:36But I resent having to feel bad when I talk to other liberals in Brooklyn, other sort of like latte-sipping libs like myself, that, you know what? No, I don't actually think it's acceptable for my daughter to go to a school where most of the students don't speak English. Is that suicidal empathy? Well, so I want to give you a big kudos because the fact that you were willing to, on camera, admit that you used to believe X and now in light of incoming evidence you believe not X is already something that is quite unique among human beings. Most people are never willing, irrespective of how much evidence they see, to change their anchored position.
16:20So that's number one. The suicidal empathy that you exhibited was that you voted for Joe Biden because he is, quote, a nice guy, because he was going to not be mean and not, you know, have, you know, go against open borders. Because he doesn't remember when there was a guy who killed, a Venezuelan guy who killed and attempted to rape a jogger. He first had said that, you know, this migrant, this illegal migrant or whatever had done so. And then he went back in front of the television and apologized profusely for having used such an injurious word like illegal migrant. for an illegal migrant, because that marginalizes the illegal migrant community.
17:07So it was suicidal empathy what you felt then. It's not suicidal empathy what you feel now. But here's my, and this is not to put you on the spot. No, by all means. It often frustrates me to no end that the people who would scoff and mock my positions while I stood alone for decades on top of the mountain, warning people, will then send me the private email saying, I'm now on your side because the monster that I've been warning them about has finally come home to bite you in the ass. Until it bit you, the monster didn't exist. And Dr. Gadsad was a bigot, Islamophobe, xenophobic guy, transphobic.
17:53But once he bit you, once your daughter took a shower with a six foot eight girl with a nine inch penis named Linda, then you realize that my position was right. Now, had you stuck to deontological principles, then you wouldn't have needed reality to specifically slap you for you to come around to seeing things correctly. It's so I mean, it's I know you have kids. It's like there's something about you become a parent. And I mean, you know, the old adage is like you become more conservative, which is certainly true, by the way. But also you just become it's you almost feel like you're betraying your child in, you know, by by by putting them in these positions that are sort of outside of your control.
18:38But again, maybe they're not outside my control. Right. I mean, I I voted for this. Right. I voted for the situation in which I now find myself. But anyway, I look, what was me? I'll be I'll be fine. She'll be fine. But I will say that this was a black pill moment, as they say. And also it just you know, you bring it all together. Right. It's like it's that it's it's not her not having a kindergarten three weeks till school starts. It's going to CVS and not being able to get the toothpaste. It's, you know, dodging like a paranoid schizophrenic in the in the subway and being afraid that I might, you know, accidentally call them homeless instead of unhoused.
19:13housed, right? Like it's insanity. So are we seeing before our eyes the switch of Mr. Versano from being a hopeless progressive to actually being wedded to reality? Look, I mean, I'm not saying I'm a Republican. I did say to somebody recently, I was like, I said, I got to move out of New York City before I become a Republican. But in terms of being a A realist, yes, I mean, I think you're absolutely right, and I think you've been absolutely right about all of this. I want to ask you for a minute about your earlier book, which was called The Parasitic Mind from a few years back. So you frame postmodernism and this idea of identity politics as idea pathogens, using your words, right?
19:59And you're basically using this infectious disease metaphor. My question is, like, what makes an idea parasitic as opposed to just being wrong, right? Is there is there a, you know, a evolutionary psychology claim underneath that metaphor? Is it just like, oh, an idea I don't like is parasitic? No, very good. I could say that Toulouse is the capital of France rather than Paris. That is that is a wrong belief. It's not parasitic for something to be parasitic. it has to be detrimental to the one who is infected by the parasitic idea, right? So, for example, when a rape victim, this is a real story and I could give you many others, both covered in the parasitic mind.
20:50I think I know where you're going with this, but yeah, go ahead. So, a rape victim is stopped by the cops and they ask her, give us some identity markers of the rapist. Then her suicidal empathetic calculus says, I don't want to marginalize the community from which these men originate, which is the Middle Eastern community, because she heard them speaking in Arabic and in Farsi. And therefore, she says that they were speaking in German. So she lied to the cops. So to protect the ones who violently gang raped her, that's parasitic. That's not just a wrong idea. I could be wrong as to whether Bolivia is north or south of Peru.
21:34That's not parasitic. But it is parasitic if I'm willing to jump into the abyss of infinite lunacy in order to allow that idea to flourish. Now, let me explain how I use the neuroparasithological framework because it speaks exactly to your point. In the animal kingdom, there is a huge field of study called parasitology. That is the interaction between parasites and their hosts. So a tapeworm is a parasite, but it parasitizes your intestinal tract. A neuroparasite is one that needs to end up in your brain, altering your circuitry to your detriment to serve typically the reproductive interests of the parasite.
22:19So the classic example I give, but there's a million others, is the wood cricket. The wood cricket is an insect that detests water. It wants nothing to do with water. When it is parasitized by a hair worm, the hair worm needs the wood cricket to happily jump into water, commit suicide, because for it to complete its reproductive cycle, it has to happen in water. So that is the distinction between what you call just a regular vanilla bad idea and a parasitic idea. Your analogy about the rape victim brings to mind something similar that actually did happen here in New York City this year in which a woman was accosted on the subway by some guy.
23:04And the cops asked her for a description. She didn't give one. And then that same guy a couple of weeks later pushed some random person in the train. Guy died, had a brain hemorrhage and died. And then the New York Post, I think, called that woman and asked her, you know, do you regret that? And she was like, look, I just didn't want to put another another black man in jail. And it's like, OK, I mean, talk about suicidal empathy. Right. And I guess I'm a little empathy. Can I give you a one that even beats that one, please? OK, so super liberal, very progressive, much more enlightened than me.
23:41White progressive woman wants to put an end to the terrible stereotype that black men are ever violent. In their natural state, black men are noble and lovely because there's absolutely no evidence that we could see in reality that any black man has ever committed any violence other than when it is a reaction to white supremacy. So she decides to go to Haiti. I don't know specifically why Haiti, but she decides to go to Haiti to demonstrate that in Haiti, where all these black men live outside of the white supremacy of the United States, she could then show that they're all going to sing Kumbaya and play John Lennon's Imagine.
24:23Well, just like you were slapped in a slightly less serious version by reality, she was slapped by reality when one of these noble, peaceful black Haitian men was gang raping her violently on top of her roof. And then she tried to tell him, do you not realize that I am a BLM ally myself? I myself love Malcolm X. And that didn't stop his rape, despite the fact that she was a BLM ally. At the end of the rape, when she returned to the United States, she wrote an essay, which is referenced in my book, where she says that at the end of the day, she was very thankful for the experience of being violently raped.
25:10because it demonstrated how much this Haitian man in Port-au-Prince-Héry had internalized hate against white supremacy, that he used her body as the vehicle of his rage. And she was thankful for that. That's what suicidal empathy, Carlo. That I actually, from your book, I noted that example. I have her name here somewhere. I forget. Yeah, Alex. Amanda Kajera. Yeah. Amanda Kajera. Quite. OK. I'm going to let that one let that one lay there for a minute, Doc. I want to turn to an easier topic. Israel, Israel and Gaza. One of my least favorite things to discuss, but obviously an important issue, one in the news, one in which you've been vocal about.
25:58You are, as you noted, a Lebanese Jew. We're coming up on three years since since October 7th here. You've been very outspoken in your defense of of Israel since then. And before you've argued that, you know, again, we sort of pathologize empathy for Palestinians, which then gets weaponized against the Jewish state by bad actors on the left. I think I probably am going to disagree with you on this. I think I don't see the liberal reaction to Gaza as suicidal empathy. To me, it just looks like empathy. Right. I think most people, most normal people were horrified by what happened on October 7th.
26:35I mean, I covered that day. It was horrific. And then they're also horrified by Israel's disproportionate response to it. Tell me why you disagree with that, if you disagree with that. Right. By the way, suicidal empathy doesn't only apply to some of the misdirection of empathy towards the Palestinians and not the Jews. Even the Israelis exhibited suicidal empathy that led to October 7th. And let me give you an example. Yahya Sinwar was one of the heads of Hamas who had dedicated his life to eradicating every last Jew, including the ones that are hiding behind the tree. That comes from a famous hadith from the peaceful religion of Islam.
27:20We will go on until the end of times, until the trees say, oh, there's a Jew hiding behind me, kill him. Okay, but the killing will happen peacefully, so it is a peaceful religion. So in any case, Yahya Sinwar was in prison for life for some terroristic acts that he had committed. But then because the Israelis are very keen to do the exchange of prisoners, they'll exchange one of their prisoners for thousands of theirs. They decided to release Yahya Sinwar. Now, in the meantime, when Yahya Sinwar was in prison, he was diagnosed with a deadly brain tumor. Now, because the Israeli surgeons were adhering to the deontological principles inherent to the Hippocratic oath, they said, we don't care that he has committed his life to the extermination of Jews.
28:11We are held to a higher standard. We have to intervene. They saved his life. And when he was released, that didn't buy them any empathy chips. He said, hey, here's a great idea. I'll pay them by being one of the architects of October 7th. So suicidal empathy also applies to the Israelis in this case. Now, but to your more specific question, look, when I defend Israel, part of my defense of Israel stems from being Jewish, from having tons of family in Israel. But actually, my defense is at a much higher level, meaning that I'm defending the Western tradition of which Israel is a much greater exemplar than all of its neighbors.
Read the full transcript
28:55I'm defending the Western tradition in a very nasty area of the world. So I always tell people, your progressive friends, if your daughter decides she wants to go and do a one-year exchange program in the Middle East, will you sign her papers to go to Tel Aviv University or to Gaza University? And then most of them will squirm uncomfortably. the same ones who are going free, free Palestine, Palestine, and say, no, no, no, but for my daughter, that doesn't apply. I want her to be safe in the Jewish part, right? So, yes, you are being suicidally empathetic when you recognize, look, when the American bombers went over these two beautiful Japanese cities called Nagasaki and Hiroshima and dropped those bombs, If you look at the devastation after those bombs were dropped and you let your emotional system drive your thinking, then you're going to say this was grossly disproportionate.
30:00This was improper. The Americans are monsters. But if you recognize that there is a larger narrative at play, then maybe it was appropriate for them to drop those bombs. If the Israelis wanted to exterminate the Palestinians, it would take them a lot less time than you and I have been speaking together. The fact that they don't certainly suggests that intention matters when you are looking at these images. There's no way for them to affect this war without there being tons of buildings that are going to be dropped. If anything, many war scholars have said that the ratio of combatants to innocent civilians that have died is astoundingly good compared to other similar situations.
30:48So do I regret the death of any innocent, whether it be Palestinian or Israeli? Yes. Do I think that the Palestinians brought this upon them? Yes. Okay, well, there's a lot there. Look, I think to me it comes down to I think, you know, Israel is the dominant party. And I think that the moral obligation in a war falls on the dominant party. And I mean, I understand the point that you're making about like sort of the genocide point, like they could genocide the Palestinians if they wanted to. And they haven't. But that doesn't mean that they haven't killed tens of thousands of civilians and children.
31:24And I mean, OK, maybe that's like a better ratio than elsewhere. But again, I mean, we're three years since this war began and Hamas is still, from my understanding, in control in Gaza. Have they won the war? No, it's an intractable problem. And the reason why it's an intractable problem is because one camp doesn't believe that the other camp has a right to exist. The West, including all of your progressive friends in Manhattan, don't have what I call in suicidal empathy in the book, a cultural theory of mind. In other words, they take, for example, benevolence, kindness, compassion, tolerance, empathy, and they presume that the other camp will read those virtues in the same way.
32:16The other camp reads those as feminized weakness, feminized weakness, feminized weakness. Okay. So why am I saying all this? The problem in the Middle East has nothing to do with a piece of land. One group of people believes that canonically it is an affront to God that Jews exist there. This is not something that you have to believe me. You can do this little thing called the Google search, right? So as long, Golda Meir said it, right? if we lay down our arms, there'll be a genocide. If they lay down their arms, there will be peace. From 2005 to 2023, there was zero killed in Gaza because there was no skirmishes.
33:01But once you decide to come in and massacre 1 ,200 people, then don't do me boo-hoo-hoo when the retaliation is going to be rough. It's called life. Okay, so I want to broaden this out and talk more about Islam. I am more swayed by your position. And again, this is first of all, if anything, if I've been canceled many times in my life, this this episode might get me canceled again. Maybe that's a good thing. I don't know. But thank you for playing ball talk as somebody who's been canceled probably more times than anyone on Earth. And you're still kicking. So that's a good sign. But your position is essentially that Islam and Western liberal societies cannot coexist stably over time.
33:42and that continued immigration trends, particularly with regard to the Middle East and North Africa, risk, you know, something breaking in Europe. And I think we're actually seeing that play out now. I mean, you know, there are stories in the press now every day essentially about a, you know, a migrant coming to Europe from North Africa, from the Middle East and killing or raping or assaulting a European. I mean, that's just a fact. These stories are now almost constant. There was a question I had in there, and I lost it. I think, here's, let me back up. What evidence would change your view here?
34:21And do you see distinctions between Islamist ideology and the religious practice of, you know, hundreds of millions, probably even more than a billion Muslims who aren't, you know, just living their lives and not advocating for peace again, or for violence against nonbelievers? Zero difference between Islamism and Islam. It doesn't exist. A million different Islamic scholars have said it doesn't exist. A million different politicians, including Erdogan, most recently said it doesn't exist. There's only Islam. Islamism is a magical linguistic game that Westerners play to placate their sense of being gauche at criticizing a religion.
35:03Because we were taught that we have to be polite. We don't talk at the dinner table about politics and religion. So to criticize Islam is mean and rude. To criticize something completely different from Islam, because I've added this magical enlightened ism at the end. This is why, by the way, if you follow me on social media, I always add many more isms. So Islamism, Islamism, Islamism, Islamism, Islamism, Islamism, that's the real ideology that we have to go after. Because don't forget, I've added 19 isms after Islam. That shows you how far from Islam it is. Islam is an ideology that contains a political element and a spiritual element.
35:54The spiritual element is incredibly small compared to the political element. So to say Islamism is to say Islam. So there is no distinction. Now, the fact that Ahmad, your friend, is peaceful and he makes great curry because he comes from India and he's Muslim doesn't negate what Islam teaches. So, for example, I am very much committed to my Jewish heritage, probably one of the most high profile Jews around. Yet I do eat shrimps. shrimp is a violation of kosher law. I don't practice a more gentle form of Judaism that tolerates the eating of shrimp. I just ignore that edict. And therefore, I do what I usually refer to with Muslims, cafeteria Muslims.
36:50I'm doing cafeteria Judaism. The parts that I feel like I can do, I adhere to them. Just like me with Catholicism. Exactly. So the fact that there are hundreds of millions of Muslims that are not beheading anyone provides zero, not one millimeter. It provides zero diagnostic evidence to what Islam is. Most people in any grouping are coming on a bell curve. Some are really mean. Some are super lovely. most fall in the middle of that bell curve. This includes atheists, Jews, Muslims, Christians, Seventh-day Adventists. So the fact that you and I could probably point, and I probably could point to a lot more than you because I am from Lebanon and Arabic is my mother tongue.
37:40I've got tons of lovely Muslim friends doesn't in any way negate anything that I say about Islam. We have 1400 years of history that couldn't be any more clear. And so when you decide to ignore it, I don't mean you, I mean the West, you're doing it at your own existential perils. Keep ignoring it and then get back to me in 100 years. You reminded me of something that Sam Harris, someone I've long admired in your sort of realm of academia, heterodox thinkers. He made this point a long time ago that I thought was really salient about how when the Book of Mormon started on Broadway here in New York, like whenever that was, 20 years ago, the response from the Church of Latter-day Saints was to put ads in the playbill, right?
38:31They took out ads in the playbill. Pretty funny. And his point was, imagine if you put on a play called The Book of Islam. not only would nobody be putting ads in that playbill, you would be dead before that play was ever staged, right? The theater would be bombed before an actor ever stepped foot on it. And I still think about that. I think he wrote this like 10 years ago because it's hard to argue against that, right? Exactly right. And this is why, by the way, usually the most vociferous and effective defenders of the Western tradition are immigrants. Why? Because the immigrants have sampled from the full buffet of societies and they realize that the unique nature of the Western tradition in general and American exceptionalism in particular is exactly that.
39:27It's unique. It's not the default value. But if Carlo is born in the United States, he looks around, he thinks that everywhere is like the United States. Therefore, Carlo, and I don't mean literally you, Carlo doesn't have a cultural theory of mind. But Ayaan Hirsi Ali does. Ghat Saad does. Because we come from that world, and therefore we come here and tell you, be careful. We know that story. We know that movie. We lived it. And yet most people ignore our warnings. Right. I want to ask you a little bit about Abdul Al-Sayed, who is the Democratic candidate for—why am I blanking on him? He's the candidate for Senate in Michigan.
40:09Sorry. It's been a long day. It's been a long week. It's been a long summer. So, Doc, you argued recently that advanced degrees don't inoculate someone against extremist ideology, and you were responding to Sayed being called a, quote, radical Islamist by Tommy Tuberful, sitting senator. So you got a lot of pushback online from liberals pointing out that Syed is a Rhodes Scholar, that he's got two doctorates. And then you had a pretty what I thought was a pretty clever response, which is that, you know, the leader of ISIS had a doctorate. Right. The I think the second in command of Al Qaeda was a was a physician.
40:44I mean, Mohammed Atta, the guy who flew the plane into the building that used to stand where I'm sitting right now, I'm pretty sure he was a credentialed architect, which I always forget. I think a lot of the 9-11 hijackers had advanced degrees. My question to you is, putting aside whether Syed is a compelling candidate or would make a good senator, do you have any evidence that he is a radical Islamist in sheep's clothing? Or were you just trying to make sort of this broader point that like, oh, he has a PhD. That's not a valid argument that someone can't also be a radical. Does that make sense?
41:18Well, in that particular tweet, I was making the latter point. You're right. And by the way, to build on that point, every single parasitic idea that I cover in the parasitic mind that eventually led to suicidal empathy was spawned by a guy called Professor at the university campus. Right. Because as Orwell explained to us many decades ago, and I'm paraphrasing here using my own, you know, flowery prose, it uniquely takes intellectuals to come up with some of the dumbest ideas. But then the question is why? Well, if you live in the ivory tower, you can exist in a world that is untethered to reality.
42:10As a matter of fact, you find out that the more ridiculous your claim is, you get promoted up, you get tenure at Princeton for saying that there is no such thing as biological sex. And people go, bravo, Professor Jacques Derrida, the head of deconstructionism. Wow, what a brilliant insight, Michel Foucault. Thank you, Jacques Lacan. Right. So so and that's why, by the way, many of the applied disciplines in the universities are less likely to be parasitized. the business school, the engineering school, because you can't build bridges using postmodernist lesbian queer theory dance, right? The bridge will collapse.
42:55You can't build an economic choice model to explain consumer behavior using queer mathematics because it'll predict nothing. So because of that, because those fields are tethered to reality, they're less likely to be parasitized. But to your general question, all of those parasitic ideas were produced by people called Professor, Doctor, massive imbecile. So so the fact that this idiot in Michigan has an MD and a PhD says nothing about whether he is a radical or not. No, I mean, I agree with you. And I always I even hated this when we in the media did it with with Jill Biden. You know, it was like we had to call a doctor because I think she had like an education degree.
43:38It's like I'm not I'm not suggesting that she was some sort of radical or anything, but it was just like we do. It's credentialization or credentialism. Right. It's like we liberals in particular are obsessed with people's credentials as though that is a, you know, a mark of their of their character. Well, we could talk about that all day, Doc. I'm cognizant of your time. I want to talk to you about your your current life. You are now a visiting professor at Ole Miss, Oxford, Mississippi, grade school. You are now a—sorry, I want to make sure I got this right. You are a visiting professor specifically at the Declaration of Independence Center for the Study of American Freedom at Ole Miss.
44:18That's a mouthful. But I just want to ask you, how's the adjustment going? Has there been any culture shock? Because you were in Canada, or you are, right? Right. I'm in the process of moving right now with the family. There's many things that need to happen. It's when they say that it's one of the biggest life stressors to make a move. Boy, they were not. You know, thank you for mentioning actually the full title, as you said, the mouthful, because, look, it takes a Canadian to come down to Mississippi to be the professor teaching about American freedom. Now, why is that itself ironic? Because it demonstrates that to be an American in spirit is not to be born, dumped out of a vagina, excuse my crudeness, within the borders of the United States that magically makes you American.
45:10I am more American, despite the fact that I don't have yet the paper. I mean, I have the green card now, but I don't have yet the papers of an American citizen. I'm more American than 99 % of Americans because I internalize what the spirit of American exceptionalism is. And hence why it makes perfect sense for me to be the professor that is teaching about American freedom. And I hate to say it, most of my professor colleagues, whether they be Canadian or Americans, exhibit almost none of the ethos of what it is to be American. They define themselves by virtue of arguing that to be patriotic towards the United States is jingoism.
45:53It is nativist. It is for the provincial people. They're globalists. globalists. And here comes the Canadians saying, no, no, no, wait a second. Mississippi is gorgeous. Oxford is gorgeous. American exceptionalism is a magic of life. And so I couldn't be happier. And hopefully the visiting professorship will eventually turn into a permanent one. But thank you for asking. It's been great so far. You just you remind me of my wife there, not in your physical appearance, but in she's a Romanian immigrant. She came here, to study college 20 years ago, never left, got a job. And it's the same thing.
46:31I mean, we always joke, like, she's more American than I am, right? I'm just some lazy idiot who was born into the greatest country in the world at the greatest time in the world. And she came over here with nothing but the clothes on her back and worked her way into a career with nothing, right? So it's like, yeah, who's actually living the American dream, right? But just on this point, you cite it as a reason for your move from the Canada's to the U.S., which I know you're in the process of, Canada's tax system and their immigration policy. Do you think that leaving your own country over policies that you disagree with, like, what would you say if somebody said, like, that looks like the same abandonment of, you know, collectivism, collective responsibility that you criticize in others in the suicidal empathy thesis?
47:16Well, I mean, being Canadian doesn't make me a slave to Canada forevermore. I probably do more in terms of defending Canadian values on a given Tuesday than most Canadians will do in their entire life. So that doesn't mean that I have to become a martyr and die in Canada screaming while the Islamic jihadists rape me while the government steals all the money from my bank to demonstrate that I am a loyal defender of Canada. I've paid my dues. I've paid gigantic professional and personal costs, more than probably a thousand Canadians will in a thousand lifetimes. You don't want me in Canada? No problem.
48:01I know Mississippians who would love to have me there. Good answer, Doc. Speaking of cancer, maybe that was Freudian there. Speaking of Canada, I'm fascinated by, I mean, speaking of suicidal empathy, MAID, right, which is this medically assisted assistance in dying policy that they have there. This is another one of these things where, again, as like in my former life is just kind of like a, you know, coddled lib. I would always say to you like, yeah, like I support, you know, the legalization of assisted suicide. Like, why would I why would I not if somebody is in some sort of terminal sickness?
48:41Like, who am I to tell them that they can't take their own lives or the government shouldn't help them? I've totally changed my my feelings on this based on what I've seen out of Canada. It seems like this is a cut and dry example of suicidal empathy, right? You read these stories now about people with non-terminal diseases who are being offered help in killing themselves by the state. Sometimes people who don't even have a disease at all. They're just like sad or hopeless or depressed. This to me, I mean, this is institutional. This is moral decay at its finest, right? 100%. But since you brought up MAID within the context of the Canadian health care system, let me sort of disabuse our American listeners and viewers from this astoundingly ridiculous canard.
49:29That in Canada, because we are so empathetic and because we are so much more enlightened than the really mean southern neighbors in the United States, we have universal health care. And guess what, Carlo? It's free. Yeah. I mean, it is completely free as long as you ignore the fact that the government takes, once all the taxes are added up, they take 70 % of my income from me. If you exclude that part, it really was free. This is why also our steakhouses in Canada are free as long as you don't include the fact that I paid$200 for the meal. It was really free. This is also why when I go to the car dealership in Canada, I don't pay for the car other than paying the$60 ,000.
50:17So there is no such thing as a Canadian healthcare-free system. There are a bunch of suckers who pay for everybody else. It's called me. And by the way, I don't have Elon Musk money. So it's not as though if you were to take 70 % of my income, it has no concrete effect on my quality of life because I'm at the sliver of income where if you take 70 % of my income, I have to work 10 more years as a professor to make up for what you took 70. But it's free. It's free health care, by the way. It's also free for me if, God forbid, I have a condition that requires an intervention in three months. They will see me in two and a half years.
51:05It will be free. It'll just be that my death will be free. So it's not through direct made. It's just that because the system is so overtaxed and overburdened, what takes exactly one afternoon to complete as a medical intervention in the United States takes two and a half years in the US and the Canada, but it's free. And so this is the kind of idiotic ideas when people are misinformed that flow around in social media. It is a terrible health care system, Canada. I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy. I guess my follow up to that is like just how do you how do you split this baby then? Like, how do you create a system where you ensure that people, you know, people in rich Western societies aren't dying of preventable diseases because they can't afford, you know, insurance, but also not creating a system like Canada's where, you know, I had a cancer scare earlier this year and I got it taken care of like that because I have good insurance.
52:05If I didn't, I'd probably still be sitting around the waiting room, right? I mean, I don't know the answer to that question. And I don't either. And to our earlier point at the start of our conversation about Nicomachean ethics and the golden mean, somewhere between no empathy in health care, and I'm not saying that the U.S. has no empathy, but somewhere between that and the Canadian system is the appropriate one. Now, the way by which that would manifest itself, I can't pretend to know what it is, but it's certainly not the Canadian system. Because, again, Margaret Thatcher reminded us many decades ago that, you know, socialism is wonderful until you run out of other people's money.
52:45And so that's exactly what the health care system is. Just for you to know, and I discussed this in Chapter 7 of Suicide Empathy, the Canadian government realized about 15, 20 years ago that it was a bad idea to have the Medicare card without a visual photo of the person. Well, it turned out that the joke within the Lebanese community that I was a part of, that everybody in Lebanon, including everyone who had never been in Canada, had received free health care in Canada because when Uncle Wali was passing it around, and then the Canadian government said, oops, let's put a photo and that will stop.
53:25Well, there were billions of dollars that were stolen from taxpayers until you decided that you weren't going to be this empathetic. So that's suicidal empathy. That's a great way to end, Doc. Before I let you go, do you consider yourself an optimist about Western civilization? Like, what are our odds here? Are we going to make it through whatever sort of like hinge point, whatever fourth turning we're in the midst of? I'm going to give you an excuse me. This is not to be coy or to equivocate, but I'm going to give you the good news and the bad news. You ready? Yes. All right. So let's suppose you said earlier that you had had a health scare and I'm glad that it worked out.
54:04Let's suppose you go to see your physician and he or she says you've got this cancer that is untreatable. you've got four weeks, get your life in order. Now, that's the worst case scenario because there is no template of an intervention that can get us out of the woods. So the good news regarding the West is that there are a set of auto-corrective procedures that if we had the testicular fortitude, we could implement and we could write the shit. Here's the bad news. I see not 1%, I see 0 % evidence that much of the West is willing to implement any of the autocorrective procedures. As a matter of fact, I see a doubling and tripling down of the suicidal empathy.
54:52So the good news is it's not an intractable solution or problem. The bad news is if you tell me, if I'm your physician and you come to me and I say, you've got cancer and you go, no, no, no, there is no such thing as cancer. It's a Zionist plot. And anyways, it's the Jews. The Jews gave me cancer. Well, then we're going to die of the cancer. So that's what the West is at right now. Let's leave it there. Testicular fortitude, I'm putting that in my back pocket to use sometime. You've got some good lines, Doc. I appreciate it. Tell people where they can find your work. I know you're all over the Internet, but just give people some links.
55:31I'm everywhere. I haunt your dreams. So on X, I'm at Gadsad, G-A-D-S-A-A-D. I host a show which I've been hosting for many years now called The Sad S-A-A-D Truth, both on podcasts and on YouTube. You can get my books wherever books are sold. My latest book is Suicidal Empathy, Dying to Be Kind. Go out there, buy it. It's the mind vaccine to get us out of this conundrum. Well said. We'll put all those links in the description, Dr. Gadsad. I appreciate it, Doc. I hope I didn't get fired after this one. But no, I appreciate the conversation. It was really enlightening. And go Rebels. Go Ole Miss.
56:14It's going to be a good football season, at least, right? Yeah, indeed. Cheers.
From the publisher
Dr. Gad Saad joins The 1600 to discuss his book Suicidal Empathy and the argument that excessive compassion, when applied without limits, can undermine societies and institutions. Carlo and Gad talk immigration, crime, homelessness, Islam, Israel and Gaza, Canada's healthcare system, and whether Western civilization is equipped to correct its current course.
More from Dr. Gad Saad —
The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad: https://open.spotify.com/show/5T2wjkFxsjvuxO1SDcZh29
X: https://x.com/GadSaad?lang=en
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
