U.S. Militarism Is Destroying the Planet, According to Abby Martin

15 May 2026 · 1 h 4 min · 23 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Abby Martin argues that U.S. militarism is a major driver of climate destruction and global pollution, and that climate and anti-war movements are being kept separate. She centers her documentary Earth’s Greatest Enemy on the Pentagon’s environmental impact and on military contamination inside and outside the U.S.

Guest backgrounds

Abby Martin is a progressive independent journalist and documentarian. She runs the nonprofit media outlet The Empire Files and directed the film Earth’s Greatest Enemy, based on five years of investigations.

Key claims

The U.S. military has nearly 1,000 bases worldwide and is exempted from climate accounting under early climate agreements. Martin says the Pentagon is the world’s largest institutional polluter, citing figures like 270,000 barrels of oil per day and 55 million metric tons of CO2 annually. She argues emissions are only part of the harm because the full lifecycle (weapons manufacturing, shipping, base operations, war damage) is far larger and hard to quantify.

Notable examples

Camp Lejeune water contamination (up to a million affected; intentional dumping after tests showed toxicity; “Baby Heaven” gravesite). She also cites Gaza’s bombardment and claims it produced massive, carbon-intensive destruction. She describes a COP26 exchange where Nancy Pelosi reportedly said the military is the solution and that military missions aren’t counted.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Setting the Stage for Discussion

0:45 to 2:39

Discussion on the podcast's independence and past topics, leading to Abby Martin's introduction.

“Last week, we spoke to the apostate feminist Lisa Britton on the show about her work fighting for men and the crisis among young men in this country.”

Understanding Earth's Greatest Enemy

2:39 to 4:52

Abby Martin discusses her film about U.S. military pollution and its implications.

“I've followed your work for a long time.”

Personal Political Awakening

4:52 to 7:15

Abby reflects on her upbringing and political consciousness during the post-9/11 era.

“Well, because I remember and I've said this on the show before, but it's still such a potent memory for me because I remember 2003.”

The Shift in Public Perception

7:15 to 9:48

Discussion on the normalization of U.S. militarism and public complacency over two decades.

“It's like it's not even reading between the lines or reading the tea leaves.”

The Evolution of the Internet

9:48 to 11:44

Abby and Carlo discuss the changes in the internet and its impact on information dissemination.

“It was a completely organic, burgeoning exploration.”

Media Consolidation and Political Strategy

11:44 to 14:09

Exploration of Bannon's strategies and the consolidation of media narratives in politics.

“And that's why you have people like Alex Jones, people like Trump.”

Media Consolidation and Political Narratives

14:09 to 17:52

Explore how media consolidation impacts political narratives and free speech.

“I mean, we look back at the Telecom Act under Bill Clinton and how it just siphoned these airwaves, right?”

The Pentagon's Environmental Impact

17:52 to 22:58

Discuss the Pentagon's role as a major polluter and its implications for climate change.

“Bannon really seized on and basically pretended to be a populist.”

Camp Lejeune: A Tragic Contamination Story

22:58 to 26:02

Learn about the horrific water contamination at Camp Lejeune and its long-term effects.

“missions on paper, which is, as you pointed out, 270 ,000 barrels of oil a day.”

The Military’s Neglect of Its Own

26:02 to 28:00

Examine how the military neglects the health of its personnel and their families.

“Can you just tell everybody, explain what happened to Camp Lejeune exactly in North Carolina?”
Show all 23 chapters

Military Pollution and Environmental Impact

28:00 to 29:20

Explore the military's role in environmental contamination and its broader implications.

“And I think it just shows you this is what the military does.”

U.S. Emissions in a Global Context

29:20 to 31:50

Understand the U.S. military's emissions compared to global emissions and responsibilities.

“And if it's that bad here, you can only imagine what the hell they're putting into the dirt in our bases, countries overseas, where there are, to your point, no protections and no legal remedies at all.”

The Military's Role in Global Capitalism

31:50 to 33:54

Analyze how the U.S. military enforces global capitalist structures and their environmental consequences.

“It is a machinery that is enforcing the domination of fossil fuel.”

Green Imperialism and Political Responses

33:54 to 37:10

Discuss the flawed logic of viewing the military as a solution to climate change and the political responses encountered.

“And I think, again, this goes back to what we're talking about, awakening to this after Iraq.”

The Environmental Cost of Military Operations

37:10 to 42:07

Examine the long-term environmental costs arising from military operations and the necessity for structural change.

“and we're going to kind of talk about a market-oriented approach to the problem that the market has caused to have this infinite model of growth on a finite planet is causing us.”

The Environmental Impact of Militarism

42:07 to 44:02

Explore how militarism and war directly harm the environment and hinder renewable energy efforts.

“That's why it has all these Gulf client states around that area.”

Cognitive Dissonance and Recycling

44:02 to 46:09

Discuss the irony of environmental efforts like recycling amidst destructive military actions.

“It's about not having a military empire that dominates the planet and basically hoists up weapons contractors and oil barons as kings and queens.”

First-Hand Accounts from Gaza

46:09 to 48:25

Abby shares her transformative experiences and shocking truths from her visits to Gaza.

“Abby, I can't let you go without asking a little bit more about Israel.”

The Reality of Israeli Society

48:25 to 51:28

Abby reveals her observations about Israeli society and their perceptions towards Palestinians.

“it was really, really horrifying just how casually racist the Israelis were.”

Media, Propaganda, and Public Perception

51:28 to 55:57

Discuss how media representation influences public perception of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“You know, I've been critical of Israel for a long time.”

The Dangers of Reporting on Israel

56:05 to 57:28

Abby Martin discusses the backlash she faces for reporting on Israeli actions and the implications for journalists.

“And she was saying some of my commentary in the newsletter has been towing the line or whatever.”

Analyzing Tucker Carlson's Evolution

57:28 to 1:00:11

A deep dive into Tucker Carlson's shifting rhetoric and its impact on political discourse.

“I promised I wanted to talk to you about Tucker Carlson.”

The Role of Media in Shaping Reality

1:00:11 to 1:02:41

Discussion on how media figures like Tucker Carlson influence public perception and the underlying motives of media algorithms.

“So that was like a really bizarre thing that happened in the first term.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Hello once again from Newsweek headquarters at the top of the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan, New York City. I'm Carlo Versano and this is another edition of The 1600. This country was stone cold dead. So guys, one of the things that we're trying to do here, both on the podcast and in the newsletter, are trying to have some of these conversations that the rest of the quote unquote mainstream media is either too afraid or frankly just too bought to have to platform. One of the great things about Newsweek is we are a privately held company. This podcast is not sponsored. I don't take money from anybody except for my paycheck.

0:34So I have wide latitude to say or speak to whomever I want in pursuit of the truth, which is really all I'm interested in as a journalist. And that's rare in the corporate media landscape today, which is kind of an embarrassing thing to say as a member of said corporate media. But nonetheless, it's true. Last week, we spoke to the apostate feminist Lisa Britton on the show about her work fighting for men and the crisis among young men in this country. My guest today is a bit of a departure from that, but an equally compelling person and woman who I'm excited to speak with. She's the progressive independent journalist and documentarian Abby Martin.

1:09Abby is the brains behind the nonprofit media outlet The Empire Files, which is a great YouTube page if you haven't seen it before. And she's also the director of the new film Earth's Greatest Enemy. Abby is with me here today. Abby? Thank you so much for having me on. It's a great honor to be here. Well, I'm really excited to talk to you. So let me just put the question to you straight. Who is or what is Earth's greatest enemy? So it's a film that I just finished after five years of investigations with my team at the Empire Files, basically just trying to unpack the pollution from the arsenal of the U.S.

1:46military. You know, a lot of people that are listening to this program may not understood kind of the scale and scope of the U.S. military empire around the world. We're talking about nearly a thousand bases. Every base is a story of not only legacy contamination, but ongoing contamination of the toxic dumping and just the maintenance of these engines, not let alone the application of the weaponry itself. So the movie was supposed to be unpacking just the emissions on paper that are uncounted in these global climate treaties from U.S. militarism. And what we found was that the story is endless.

2:19It's so gargantuan because every stone unturned is yet another documentary subject. So it turned into the gargantuan topic of trying to prove the totality of global military pollution. So I have many questions about the film, which is a great documentary, and it's available online. We'll plug that in the description and a little later on in the show. But first I want to just ask you a little bit about your – you're not new to this. You've been around a while. I've followed your work for a long time. And you have sort of an interesting origin story, I guess you could say. You grew up in suburban San Francisco in the Bay Area, right?

2:55I think by your own description, sort of had like kind of an ordinary-ish suburban upbringing. Graduated high school in 2002. That's important. Well, it's important to me because I also grew up in a sort of well-to-do suburban New York upbringing. And I graduated high school the same year you did. And again, I say that that's important because that was a that was the time when I sort of that was sort of my political awakening. Those couple of years sort of from from 9-11 to and including our invasion of Iraq. That was, I think, a formative experience for a lot of elder millennials, I would argue.

3:29You know, just sort of this this realization that there is this imperial, you know, the blob really what the blob actually is. right? This military imperialism, the war exists to be fought forever, as Orwell said. Can you just talk a little bit about that period in your life? Because I remember what it was like for me, but I'm just curious what it was like for you. Absolutely. And that's really interesting that we were the same age because, you know, growing up in kind of the white flight area outside of Oakland, so 20 minutes away in a place called Pleasanton, very similar to, you know, and very pleasant, you know, very, very completely absent-minded from the externalized consequences of having a global military empire, being an empire baby, right?

4:13Didn't think about this at all. It was the Clintons. It was the 90s. It was like, you know, Francis Fukuyama. It was like, you know, all this stuff. But then 9-11 happens and it's like, oh, oh, why did this happen? How did this happen? Who hates us enough to do something like this? I mean, it was so startling and shocking. And I think it's a journey, Carlo. I mean, as you probably encountered yourself, I mean, it's a journey to unpack all of this and to understand why something like this happens. And then, of course, the journey to understand how your political establishment, the ruling class, then pivots over to another country that had nothing to do with 9-11.

4:51So it was a lot to wrap your mind around. Well, because I remember and I've said this on the show before, but it's still such a potent memory for me because I remember 2003. So I was a freshman in college again, like not you know, I just I was just sort of starting to think about this stuff, to pay attention to it. And I remember even as a dumbass freshman boy in college where I was mostly, you know, doing like, you know, playing beer pong and like chasing girls. Even I was thinking to myself, this is crazy, right? I mean, this is crazy. These people didn't attack us. What are we doing? They're manufacturing consent for this fake war, essentially.

5:26And that was really the sort of the radicalizing moment in my life and seeing the media apparatus just kind of go along with this and thinking to myself, if I as a dumb college kid can see through this, like what does that say about the rest of the country, I guess? Right. And what does it say about the political like so-called feckless opposition? I mean, I remember them covering for the Bush administration and thinking, why? It was so perplexed that there was this complicity and impunity given to these this cabal of criminals. And I think for people like us, I mean, that that was an anomaly, actually.

6:02You know, I was in San Diego State. This is one of the most militarized cities in the country. A lot of people go to their f***ing party, dude, and Mac. But I was so disgusted with how little outrage there was on campus. I mean, being surrounded by people in the ROTC just applauding the bombing of Baghdad and thinking, this is sick. This is depraved. These people did nothing to us. Why are people going along with this? But it's so strange now. We're talking about 20 years later, and the ruling class didn't even need to foment that consent. They didn't even need to manufacture anything. It's so explicitly laid bare of what their intent is.

6:39And I think that's what's so disturbing to me is what does that say when they don't even need to try? Right. Well, I mean, it's funny because it's one of the things I'm not a Trump supporter by any stretch. But one of the things I sort of appreciate about appreciate about him is this exact point. Right. Like they you know, Bush and all those guys back then. Oh, it's not about oil. It's not about oil. Right. This is about democracy or whatever they were saying. Trump, to his credit, at least in his various misadventures overseas, just straight up says, yeah, it's about the oil. That's what that's what we're here for.

7:10Just straight up, dude. Just straight up. Well, that's what, you know, to your point back 20 years ago when you were thinking how, you know, if we get this, where's the rest of the country? But I feel like now he's saying it. It's like it's not even reading between the lines or reading the tea leaves. It's literally stated by the president, the armed salesman in chief, that this is this is what they're doing it for. They're pillaging and plundering just to, you know, to make the whole world subservient under the dictates of global capital. So I mean, he said yesterday, my question now is like, what what the hell is going on here?

7:43Why are we normalizing this? I mean, Trump said literally yesterday he wants to make Venezuela the 51st state. I mean, he's not even pretending that that that that operation to black bag majoro out of his bed was anything other than to get their oil. And again, like, I mean, if we're going to do this, I guess it's better that we're not like lying about what the reasoning is. But it's still pretty crazy. It's crazy to think about 20 years ago how how different it is, I guess. Right. Yeah. And even like the European leaders, they've gotten themselves into such a weird mental gymnastic state where they've just contorted themselves into like rationalizing this while still trying to placate their populations that it's not just about oil and colonialism.

8:23It's like it's fascinating to see just the unraveling of the entire world. It does feel that way. So you started as a citizen journalist and you're one of our great citizen journalists. But you started covering Occupy, the Occupy movement, which was I guess back was probably 15 years ago now. Almost. Right. Yeah. It's interesting because, again, I was I was working in the corporate media for NBC back then. And I remember going down to Sugati Park and being like, well, this is there's something going on here. I don't know what it is, but like we should probably start covering it. There wasn't much interest there until it became, you know, until the celebrity started showing up, basically.

8:59But the Internet is what's interesting to me about looking back on that moment. And you've made this point in some some podcasts and interviews I've heard you talk about where you talk about how the Internet was a different beast. Right. Occupy and 4chan were basically on the same side right now. You know, 4chan is a bastion of basically, you know, insane far right racism. What happened to the Internet? What happened to the promise of the Internet that was the pre-algorithm Internet, I guess you could say? Yeah, where do we start? I mean just the promise of kind of this revolutionary tool that indeed is revolutionary.

9:35I mean similarly to AI, it's something that's changing our lives and changing the world as we know it. But when the Internet first started, it was completely egalitarian. There was nothing force-fed to you. We weren't handed information. It wasn't curated by tech overlords. Yeah, you found whatever was out there. It was a completely organic, burgeoning exploration. I mean, the fact that niche markets, I mean, my brother, for example, is this really subversive electronic musician, and he found his community there. What it's like, these things weren't available to us before. But because of this open marketplace of ideas, you had things that were wildly popular that you would never see today.

10:20You know, because of the fact that we all use Google as a search engine, and we don't just have that unfiltered search results that we once did. For example, Google Video had loose change or Zeitgeist were the most popular videos in the world. I remember, you know, these are conspiracy movies that were questioning mainstream narratives about 9-11, about, you know, religion, things that were completely unorthodox, but you would never, ever see those things today because the internet's very sanitized and curated. And what the problem that I have with it is as someone who's worked for foreign media, like Russia Today, Telesur, which is a Latin American conglomerate, I have been folded into the censorship, pioneered by, you know, liberals, basically trying to curate our reality from the quote-unquote basket of deplorables, the QAnoners, the truthers, the Sandy Hookers.

11:11And because of that, it's been the equivalent of like modern day book burning. I mean, a lot of this content has been completely removed from our purview on the internet, including all of my work at RT, because I was wrapped into the censorship campaign. And so that's the problem. When you sanitize the internet and curate it for the ruling class, it basically ends up omitting a lot of critique, a lot of really solid anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist critique. Those are going to fall by the wayside, and that's exactly what happened to me. And that's why you have people like Alex Jones, people like Trump.

11:48I mean, I really do pinpoint Trump's success in the information war because of the failure of the corporate media, because of the failure of the Internet to really do its due diligence and make these things seem like hidden truths that people needed to seek out and feel like they're part of some sort of club. And that's why Trump has had such a huge, enormous success pointing to things like legacy media, fake news, because indeed we have been lied to by these institutions. And so people look to someone like Trump to tell them the truth, even though it's not. They think that it's part of the truth.

12:24Well, this has always been the great paradox, tragedy, whatever you want to call it, of Trump is him being able to come in and say, and, you know, this goes back 10 years. Look, everyone else is lying to you. I'm I'm the only one who can who can speak the truth. You know, I will go out to get the deep state. I will. You know, I'm not part of the blob. I'm not part of the elites or the Epstein class now that you would call it. When meanwhile, he's out there. He's like Jeffrey Epstein's best friend. He comes into office and becomes a part of the blob. He's trying to you know, he claims to try and fight.

12:54I mean, he's launched a war on Iran after, you know, lie about saying he wasn't going to do that specific thing for his entire political career. So, yeah, I mean, it's just it's true that he was able to leverage that sort of moment, I think, better than better than any political figure, certainly of my lifetime. Right. Yeah. And going back to this kind of capturing of all of these markets that were really underground, like, for example, the conspiracy market. I mean, you had Roger Stone going out there on behalf of Trump signaling to Alex Jones' audience to all these kind of niche markets online just saying Trump's going to get to the truth of this.

13:32He's going to uncover the JFK files. He's going to release the UFO stuff. I mean, it's really – it's actually really amazing that Bannon strategy of folding in every single kind of outlier movement into this big tent, which is the complete opposite of what the liberals have done. Well, so talk more a little bit about that because Bannon, first of all, I think is an underappreciated strategist and just probably historical figure over the last 10 years. I mean his original sort of theory of just flood the zone and make it so that nobody can pay attention to anything and therefore they just kind of – people just sort of retreat and stop paying attention.

14:09That was obviously evil but brilliant. um talk a little bit more about this idea of of him expanding not just ban it but trump and all of these people being able to expand the the tent on the right whereas the the tent on the left is i don't know maybe smaller than it's ever been seems pretty small yeah and that's been the problem with uh just this whole curation and and consolidation of the media that has been just ongoing. I mean, we look back at the Telecom Act under Bill Clinton and how it just siphoned these airwaves, right? But it's still been under the guise of liberal hegemony in terms of like liberal consolidation and liberal media narratives.

14:54And so this has been particularly interesting and fascinating in the way that Bannon and Trumpism has made media consolidation and media censorship into a partisan issue where they have been victims, like the conservative martyrs of the free speech war, which really is completely false. I mean, you look at just the wide swath of media consolidation, it's 90 % right wing. But if you look at just the entire scope, it's 100 % almost capitalist and corporate subsidized. And so that's what's so fascinating and me, it's like you have two sides of the same coin. I mean, just like Chomsky always talked about, I mean, the contrite nature of just what you're able to talk about, right?

15:39And so because of these things, you're never able to talk about imperialism, capitalism. You have to go and ascend in these institutions as a believer in the system. And so you've always been cast out. You've always been cast to the periphery like me if you're trying to criticize the actual myths that underpin, you know, the nature of empire and capitalism and all that other stuff. So I think back in the day when you had people like Ron Paul, when you had Alex Jones at his heyday, back, you know, after the Iraq war, when you had a lot of these people on the same side, when you had a lot of conservatives that were decrying the Bush administration, that were decrying so-called tyranny, right, this neoconservative agenda of the blob, the people like Robert Kagan.

16:23I mean, all these people were actually seen as like a neoconservatives that were trying to drive this endless expansion of empire and imperialism. And then all of a sudden that broke up, I think, because people became much more aware that capitalism was the driver of this. I think as it became less controversial to talk about capitalism, that split became much more apparent where you had a lot of people on the right wing just saying, no, no, we're capitalists. We were actually just America firsts. We're America firsters, where we're just nationalists. And so now you have this weird folding in where it's like Israel's now to blame instead of, you know, the US.

17:03And so it's just really bizarre. But I think Bannon is a very, very interesting figure that has been completely, like you said, he hasn't been given the credit that he's deserved. He's been cast out of the Trump administration. I mean, of course, in the first Trump administration, he was much more of a noteworthy figure, putting a lot of the ideas at the forefront. But one of his biggest strategies was basically getting that disaffected Bernie voter, folding them into MAGA. And this has been highly successful. I mean, I know countless people, just not just anecdotally, but you see polling after polling of showing a lot of these people who were staunch Bernie supporters, right?

17:46Who voted Obama twice. And voted for Obama twice. And they got captured and hoodwinked into MAGA. and it's because of the collapse and the failure of this hollowed out nature of neoliberalism that Bannon really seized on and basically pretended to be a populist. I mean, but when you really unpack what does that mean? You know, he's not talking about health care for all. He's not talking about raising the minimum wage. He's just talking about globalism, populism. Really, if you really get to the center of what that is, what is Bannon actually talking about when he talks about globalism? I mean, for me, you're just talking about what should be a critique on capitalism and like the deep state power infrastructure, the bipartisan ruling class, the blob.

18:27But he just packages it as like, it's really, really fascinating. I mean, then he'll talk about multiculturalism. He'll basically just punch down to immigrants, gay people, trans people, but he'll just have the boogeyman as globalists. You never really understand who he's talking about, but it's been incredibly successful because they're the only ones talking about the corporate media in the way that it should be, where these people are lying to you. They've been lying to us for a long time. And the deep state is a real thing. If you look at this kind of, uh, it absolutely is, you know, so, so that's, so when you're talking about these things that the corporate media doesn't, you're leaving this huge, uh, vacuum, um, that it's just, you know, it's going to have millions of people feed into it and basically become right wing over it.

19:13And, you know, I look back at right at Russia Today. This is why Russia Today was so successful, because they filled a vacuum that the corporate media was failing to do when it goes back to Occupy and all of these movements highlighting actual grassroots anti-war movements, activist movements in the U.S. that were marginalized and ridiculed by the mainstream that RT was the only one giving credence to. But I mean, you could RT is Russian was Russian state media. So, I mean, you could make an argument, I suppose, that, you know, they had their own reasons for trying to sort of like foment that, right?

19:45A hundred percent. They were cynically, very cynically, exploiting a huge opening. But the thing is, because of the failure of these institutions, that's the only reason RT was successful in the first place. No, and now you're saying it's not just Bannon. I mean, you look at somebody like Nick Fuentes, who has a huge audience online, sort of talking about the same stuff. Even Tucker Carlson. Actually, Hold that thought because I want to ask you more about Tucker because I'm very fascinated by him. And I know you're a scholar. I guess I shouldn't call you a Tucker Carlson scholar. That's not fair to you.

20:16But anyway, hold that thought. I want to talk about the movie a little bit. The central claim in the film is that, like you said, the Pentagon is the world's largest institutional polluter. So it consumes nearly 270 ,000 barrels of oil a day, produces 55 million metric tons of CO2 annually. That's more than the emissions of 150 countries. Pretty insane statistic. So for people who haven't really thought about this before, who may be their climate change people and maybe they're anti-imperials, but they haven't really put these two issues together, help us understand sort of like why those numbers aren't really part of the mainstream climate conversation.

20:53To the extent there even is a mainstream climate conversation anymore. I feel like you don't even hear about it too much in the mainstream media. I know. It's so depressing. I just saw someone yesterday who wrote a book literally on how do we talk about climate change saying this is not a winning message. We should stop talking about climate change. And I'm like, oh, God, don't look up. Don't look up at the massive asteroid barreling toward her. Don't tell our kids. Don't tell our kids. Right. It's my daughter's problem in 50 years, not mine. It's absolutely insane. I mean, I remember watching An Inconvenient Truth 20 years ago.

21:22And to feel now, 20 years later, as climate change becomes so real on everyone's doorstep and to have it feel like it's less of a conversation now, less integrated in the mainstream discourse is really disheartening. I think that it all goes back to the big polluters flooding the zone, back to the Bannon strategy. You flood the zone. You never admit defeat. You go back to Roy Cohn's strategy, Trump's mentor. You never admit defeat. You always lie. You triple down on falsehoods. You triple down. And flooding the zone, I mean, look at the success of the big oil's propaganda. The fact that this is even a debatable issue as LA is on fire, as the U.S.

22:04is intentionally targeting oil infrastructure in Iran. Okay, so back during the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, when the first climate conference was held with all of these industrial nations trying to curb their carbon emissions, the U.S. military paved a way to make their military exempt. So the Pentagon carved an exemption for U.S. militarism under the guise of national security, and every other country followed suit. So it wasn't until the Paris Accords in 2015 where this was a voluntary measure. So none of this is binding. I mean, none of these climate conferences are ever binding. or anything's really on the books.

22:40It's all just voluntary. It's all just suggestive. But up until Paris, it was never even incorporated at all. And now, you know, now it's just if you want to, you can. So you're telling me that these conferences are not even counting the totality of our missions. So what are they talking about? So that's the first problem is that we're not even talking about the totality of military missions on paper, which is, as you pointed out, 270 ,000 barrels of oil a day. That amounts to 150 countries' consumption, right, or emissions, rather. But you can't really compare the Pentagon to entire countries' emissions because entire countries are providing for their populations.

23:18They have agricultural systems. They're constructing concrete. I mean, they're literally – they have people that they're supplying for. They're not just a hollowed-out parasitic corporation that's just building the next-gen weaponry to then destroy and hand off to ISIS or local police forces. So this is another problem is that the military literally acts like a corporation where it needs and necessitates its own expansion and growth. But when you extrapolate that out, Carlos, and you look at, OK, this isn't just about the oil purchases on paper. This is the life cycle of the emissions. This is the manufacturing of the weapons and the shipping of all the weapons all around the world to the thousand bases around the world.

23:57This is the U.S.-led military missions with the proxy forces with NATO, which the NATO chief just admitted was literally a front for the U.S. That's what NATO is. So if you incorporate all of those, it's at least three times higher. And that's not even including Trump's new 5 % mandate with all NATO members. This was just when the NATO membership mandate was 2%, which means that you have to spend 2 % of your GDP if you're a NATO member on U.S. weaponry. You have to buy in and basically be subservient to U.S. weapon systems. So this is where we're at. And that's not even the application of the weaponry itself.

24:37This is just to maintain the arsenal of a U.S. global military empire. Then, of course, it's the application of the weaponry. What is all this used for? War. You're blowing up mountainscapes. You're destroying oil depots. What is this going to do? It's going to have generational impacts for decades. So when we talk about U.S.-led military missions, it literally is unquantifiable because there's no way to actually quantify the damage and the destruction. I mean, look at Gaza. This was three years of continued bombardment, more than the equivalent of dropping three nuclear bombs. This is one of the most carbon-intensive materials, concrete.

Read the full transcript

25:19You're just pulverizing into toxic, abestos-laden powder going all around the world. This has no confines. This has no borders. Pollution is global. So this was the real problem, is trying to quantify this stuff and realizing how big it is. And that's not even the cleaning of the engine parts. That's not dumping the toxic waste just to make these machines mission ready to fly around in pointless patrols. I mean, when you look at that and the callous disregard to just the environment of just maintaining this stuff, it really becomes really, really shocking. Or the blowback on our own people. I mean, one of the most sort of like emotional parts of the film is you talk about what happened, the segment on Camp Lejeune.

26:05Can you just tell everybody, explain what happened to Camp Lejeune exactly in North Carolina? Yeah, Camp Lejeune was the worst water contamination event in U.S. history. It affected up to a million people. It was a story that was over 50 years ago. And so people look at it and they think, oh, you know, the military command and top brass were dumping all these toxic chemicals and toxic waste into the water wells unintentionally. Right. They didn't know any better. And this is a problem with a lot of legacy contamination with Agent Orange and nuclear radiation. You say, oh, well, they didn't know any better.

26:39That's false. They did know better. There are always safe alternatives. But even in the case of Camp Lejeune, they were dumping it intentionally for years after they knew the tests showed that the water was toxic. And so you had Marines drinking this stuff. You had them bathing their children, the babies in this stuff, pregnant women drinking it on the base. And so what that resulted in was the deaths of so many newborn babies resulting in a thousand babies who had died that you have a gravesite called Baby Heaven at this Marine Corps base. And this is something that is so unknown. You would think that this would be a completely standard thing that we learn about in textbooks, in our history books, but we don't.

27:21We don't. You know why? Because this is the modus operandi of the military. They'll lie. They'll cover it up. and then when finally you can't deny it, they'll deny the claims for decades. They'll deny them just like the burn pits, just like the first responders of the 9-11 toxic dust. They're used as cannon fodder and for propaganda purposes and then they're left to die and they're left riddled with diseases that they're never cared for. And that's what you see today, 60 years later. These people are still being denied claims. They're still dying and sickened by the toxic water and they still are left with no answers.

27:57It's absolutely horrific, these predatory law firms that are trying to capitalize on this tragedy. And I think it just shows you this is what the military does. They do this to their own. It's not their own indigenous people. It's not just indigenous people around the world with no environmental regulations. It's people here that they're killing and poisoning. I mean, it's astounding because I consider myself a fairly, you know, well-read person. I didn't know about any of this until I happened to be driving down I-95 in North Carolina a few years ago on my way to a wedding and seeing all of these billboards from those law firms on the side of the road saying, you know, if your claim was denied over Camp Lejeune water poisoning, you know, call us and being like, what's this all about?

28:42And then, you know, starting to look into it. But, yeah, I mean, no, you don't hear about it in the media. You don't hear about it in textbooks. And now you have PICAs dumping and contamination. I mean, just the fact that that was, you know, that's such an old story. But there are so many sites that are comparable to the toxic contamination that Camp Lejeune had. I mean, we interview a man named Pat Elder, who's the director of military poisons, and all he does is test the water wells and waterways coming out from domestic military installations as well as military installations abroad. And he has found that the levels of contamination are much, much higher than Camp Lejeune today across the country.

29:22And if it's that bad here, you can only imagine what the hell they're putting into the dirt in our bases, countries overseas, where there are, to your point, no protections and no legal remedies at all. So back to sort of the thesis of the film. The cynic in me would say that, look, even if you zeroed out all of the Pentagon's emissions, I mean, China emits 12 billion metric tons of CO2 a year. Would you really meaningfully change the climate trajectory that we're on? Assuming that the Pentagon was just literally shut down, all of our bases returned to the earth, what would happen? Yeah. I mean, look, we're in a globalized system, right?

30:08So you cannot look at China in a vacuum in terms of their emissions. First, you have to look at the cumulative emissions. That's a huge problem. The U.S. accounts for 25 % just from the industrial revolution. Okay. So then you look at the absorption of all the manufacturing from the West. They're manufacturing and developing our products. So that's another problem. Then you factor in, like I said, US-led military emissions. Of course, if you look at just the institution, yeah, it's absolutely insane. 270 ,000 barrels of oil per day on paper just to maintain the arsenal and to feed the oil dragon.

30:46That's a lot. That's a shit of emissions. But that's not just what we're talking about. We're talking about a global system that is enforced by the military. For the longest time, people have pointed to big agriculture, to big oil as the main polluters, and they're right. That's correct. But they have a military that enforces their domination and their systems of control. And that military is our military. It's the American military that has always been an enforcement arm for an unsustainable fossil fuel infrastructure. And it basically imposes the dictates of global capitalism at the barrel of a gun.

31:26And we see what happens if countries like Venezuela and Cuba don't bow down to the dictates. They get overthrown, black bagged, destroyed, bombed. That's what's happening. So you can't even really look at just on paper in terms of emissions and say China's worse because there's so much more to that. It's literally a machinery of death and destruction. It is a machinery that is enforcing the domination of fossil fuel. That's what's so crazy. I mean, you look at China, just a modicum of central planning. They are trying to do their best with, you know, there's plenty of critiques to go around, of course.

32:07But I'm not a Chinese citizen. I'm an American citizen and I'm living in a country that is imposing, subjugating the planet, billions of people under its boot and in my name. So yes, I think that at this point, we don't really have a choice. And I have heard people say, look, it's better that we're on top because if we weren't on top, then China or Russia would be, and it would be worse. And yes, it's really bad that we run on oil, but hey, the world doesn't run on butterflies, sweetheart. And so like, isn't it, you know, and so we need it, right? We need it. Just like this general in the movie told me, Like, you know, we have to keep we have to keep all the alternative energy systems at bay.

32:47OK, this is this is a completely like fan. This is a complete fantasy based on just falsehoods. I mean, I mean, what evidence is there that Russia or China would do the same sort of imperial conquest that we have done? What evidence is there that Russia or China would be polluting the planet in the same fashion with the same callous disregard of the environment? I mean, I had someone on the Rimpak warship tell me, Abby, you're so naive. My wife's an environmental lawyer. He's like, he's like, Russia and China don't care about the environment and they don't care about international law. We do. And I looked at him and I said, but Russia and China aren't doing this stuff.

33:26They don't, they don't traverse around the planet. Russia has like what, six bases overseas? Six bases. China has one. It's like they don't have this system. So it shows you just this kind of self-rationalization, this weird legitimization of this system, because you think that we have the ordained right, that you are chauvinist, that you think that we have the right to do this around the world. And I think that's a very, very depraved, perverse mindset. No, I agree. And I think, again, this goes back to what we're talking about, awakening to this after Iraq. And you have to sort of wonder if, you know, there's people out there, younger people, you know, in Gen Z who are looking at what's happening in Iran, in Venezuela, soon to be Cuba and are going to have sort of a similar awakening to the one we had 20, 25 years ago.

34:16Abby, I want to ask you about this moment in the film, which sort of made me laugh. You're at COP26 in Glasgow in 2021. So first of all, it's just like weird to look back at video footage from that period because like everyone's wearing their masks and you're all six feet apart as though like that was going to do anything. Anyway, Nancy Pelosi is there and you're asking her how she can justify raising the Pentagon budget, given what the military does to the climate. Walk us through that exchange. And I'm asking you today, which is funny, because Pete Hegseth, as we are speaking right now, is sitting in front of Congress asking for one point five trillion dollars for the for the new Pentagon budget.

34:54That's that's a 50 percent increase. I mean, I don't know if he's going to get that. Probably not. But what does that tell you that that that's what they're going for? Right. Yeah. Yeah. What's fascinating about the documentary and what you're talking about, I mean, the 2020 era where basically it was the Biden era. So it was it was this kind of incubation period that got us to where we are today. It's the neoliberal order that was this was the status quo. And so I'm at one of these conferences in Glasgow talking to leading politicians who are supposed to be on the forefront of of climate advocacy.

35:28Jay Inslee, for example. This is what he ran on for president. And he literally can't even answer a question if military missions should be counted or not. He just runs away from me. Nancy Pelosi says something very dystopian. She says that the military is actually the solution, that as things get worse, they will need the military as the refugee crisis becomes worsened, as the borders become more unstable. Basically just saying the quiet part out loud. that the military is going to be needed to further securitize the borders. And so what this is saying is they don't want to actually count military missions or literally count to the military, or I'm sorry, look to the military as one of the problems, as one of the drivers of climate change.

36:15They are just tacitly admitting it's too late. Even if that were true, that the military has been exacerbating this problem, the military is simply the solution. They have no creativity or ingenuity outside of that tunnel vision. Military is the solution. And you saw this repeated by every single so-called progressive politician. In fact, she, you know, I, I asked her the question, how could we take these climate conferences seriously if you're not counting military missions? And she literally fields the question to Frank Pallone, a New Jersey, uh, congressman. And he's like, we need a bigger Navy because the oceans are going to rise.

36:52I mean, it's seriously like a cartoon. It's like we're in an Acme cartoon. I mean, how do you wrap your mind around this logic? Yeah. But what it really shows you is this logic of green imperialism. It's the Elizabeth Warren solution. It's like we can't see the forest through the trees, so we're just going to double down, triple down, and we're going to kind of talk about a market-oriented approach to the problem that the market has caused to have this infinite model of growth on a finite planet is causing us. But we're just going to talk about the anxiety. I mean, I remember the panels there were so cartoonish.

37:31It was like, let's talk about climate anxiety. But they don't want to talk about the elephant in the room. Right. Now, all those UN conferences are like beyond depressing to have to sit through, having covered many. So what are the core arguments of the film is basically, you know, what we've been talking about, right? The climate movement and the anti-war movement are two sides of the same coin and that they've been sort of like kept artificially separate. What do you say to a climate advocate listening or, you know, I'm trying to think of my, you know, my parents, not even climate advocates, but sort of like my boomer parents who are, you know, very much on this side of, you know, climate activism.

38:07But they would they would argue like, look, we need to be focused on carbon policy, on renewables, EVs. And this military argument, you know, it might be true. In fact, it probably is. But it's a distraction from what is politically achievable. I don't even know what politically achievable is in this realm anymore. But talk to me a little bit about that. Yeah, and I think that's the danger, right, is this status quoism being towed and perpetuated by most of the corporate media, by the ruling class, people who are deeming this completely insane system where the wholesale slaughter of infants has been deemed normal, the fact that the U.S.

38:42and Israel has flattened the moral threshold to the fact that we don't even know how to respond. to any of these problems anymore. And so we just kind of cede to the inevitability of the worst outcome. And we compartmentalize it. And I think that's the biggest problem. We have to realize that this is not acceptable, that this is not compatible. Having a global military empire is completely uninhabitable with the future of the planet that is a sustainable, habitable place for our children. So let me explain how. So it's not just the oil purchases. It's not just the maintenance of the arsenal. I think people can look at that and justify that and say, look, we need to have a military.

39:24OK, I disagree that we need a military empire with a thousand bases around the world. But if you want to argue the existence of a huge military, several times bigger than the next five combined, fine. But what that does is basically it just commodifies nature to the point where you are degrading it. Where, you know, like, for example, I mean, the natural consequence of having this global military empire is someone like Trump, where you're saying to feed it, right, just to feed the nature of the beast. You need the oil in Venezuela. You need the oil in Iran. This has always been a bipartisan push from Democrats and Republicans.

40:03This is something that's unacceptable. This is the uniparty at work. This is the uniparty in practice. So, you know, it's been a 60 year plan to destroy all the last vestiges of independent countries so we can pillage and plunder them. That's not acceptable. OK, even if you're a liberal and care about the environment and you think that Democrats are less bad than Republicans, that is a completely insane notion and belief that we have the right to do that. And what that is doing is destroying the environment. You look at World War I, even with small armaments, there are still dead zones there from just the weapons that were used in World War I.

40:40The dead zones and superfund sites across the country, across the world, from the extractivism to, you know, for nuclear, for all of these chemical products, all of that has destroyed so much of the environment many times over. The toxic legacy contamination in Iraq. There are still kids being born today with congenital heart failure. All of every single bullet fired. 250 ,000 bullets is the conservative estimate for every single person killed in Afghanistan and Iraq. Every bullet is a toxic explosion of carcinogens, depleted uranium. That's going to be impacting people for millennia. OK, but but beyond that, beyond that, what this military is doing, it is it lives on oil.

41:27OK, you can't green a global military empire. You can't. You simply cannot. You can't hybridize Bradley fighting vehicles. You can't slap solar panels on bases and call it a day because the entire machinery, the entire apparatus of the military empire is maintaining this infrastructure to extract oil and natural gas. That's why all the bases are around the arteries of capital and oil flowing in the Middle East. That's why the U.S. has subsidized this colonial outpost of Israel in such an extreme way, because it uses it as its attack dog to tamp down on countries that are not bowing to the dictates, on countries that are oil rich.

42:07That's why it has all these Gulf client states around that area. It all goes back to the domination of oil and the necessity to to take every last drop and to control every last drop. So it goes so far beyond just the arsenal and the amount of oil that the arsenal is depleting. No, no, no. It's so far beyond that. It's the entire globe. It's the entire world system and order that is impeding our ability to have renewable energy. That's impeding our ability to have the ingenuity of creatively collaborating with countries like China and Russia to get us out of this mess, to get us out of this short-sighted insanity of warfare as the only thing.

42:52This hyper-competitive short-sighted insanity, it's collective suicide. So that's what I urge people to do. If you are an environmentalist, if you care, just like I do, about composting, I'm a militant composter, okay? But I know that my green bags that I put into my compost bin every day, It's not going to make a dent if the military is dumping 20 million pounds of toxic waste into the environment annually just in the U.S. to clean thousands of tanks that it will never use. Okay, I know that that's not going to make a dent if the U.S. has 600 Boeing Pegasuses that are flying gas stations that one flight mission is the same as me driving 100 years straight.

43:36That's not going to make a dent. So what I encourage people is you have to understand the perspective of being anti-war, being anti-empire, and basically just understanding that you cannot be an environmentalist unless you incorporate anti-imperialism in this ideology. We are not going to make a dent as environmentalists, as people who care about the future of the planet, if we don't confront this global military empire. It's not about being defenseless. It's not about not having a military. It's about not having a military empire that dominates the planet and basically hoists up weapons contractors and oil barons as kings and queens.

44:21No, you're very eloquently put. I'm just laughing because I'm thinking about this experience I had a couple weeks ago where my daughter, who's in preschool, was around Earth Day, and they were learning about recycling. And so she came home and she was like very excited to explain to me how recycling works. And I was in the middle of reporting a story about how we had just – the Americans and Israelis had just bombed these oil fields in Iran and it was like raining petroleum on Tehran. And it was just this like cognitive dissonance of like this sweet little four-year-old who's like, oh, yeah, I'm going to be able to make a difference because if you recycle the plastics and you set it apart from the papers.

45:03And that's what they're teaching them. And obviously they should. I'm not anti-recycling. But having that experience while literally watching oil come down as rain over actions that we're doing in a war of choice in Iran was just one of those moments where I'm just like, what planet am I on here? Right? No, exactly. And then you realize it was a marketing campaign. That's what recycling has always been. It was a marketing campaign by the big plastic polluters. polluters just like how the the whole concept of uh climate footprint was created by bp to to off offload their responsibility to me and you so we have to be like oh my climate footprint is though that's like a real thing i mean look the onus has always been on the consumer because we're living in capitalism and so to be a good good capitalist and good consumer we buy better and we buy right and that's going to save the planet exactly it's a joke and it's we've been hoodwinked into this system and I think people are just realizing how far gone we are and how dangerous this rhetoric has been and how much it's benefited just the big polluters all along and left us to be diseased and left to die.

46:14Abby, I can't let you go without asking a little bit more about Israel. You mentioned it. You've reported extensively on Gaza from Gaza, Palestine, going back to your first visit when you were invited, actually, I believe, by the Israeli government. And then what you what you witnessed sort of radicalized you. Can you just talk a little first of all, when was that? And just talk a little bit about what it is that you saw then. Yeah, I Gaza was is an issue very dear to my heart. I worked with several Palestinians who had lost many of their family members back during Cass led in 2009 and then 2012.

46:49And so I was always just so confused that this third rail issue that it wasn't you weren't able to talk about it, even my colleagues in alternative media. And so I had an Israeli spokesperson invite me to come see it firsthand and told me I was dead wrong about what I was saying about Israel. And so I went firsthand and holy it was much worse than I ever could have imagined. And that's on a government sponsored trip. Oh, no, no, no. This was just him being like, come, come see. Oh, no, the government definitely would not have taken me around the West Bank. Yeah, right. But no, I mean, it was incredible.

47:19I mean, When you step foot in the West Bank and the first thing I saw was a line of people walking up this huge hill and an ambulance that had police walking around it. So there was two things that were really stark right at the beginning. It was one makeshift checkpoint that were forcing Palestinians two hours out of their day to just take this unnecessary route home. And then another thing is an ambulance was stopped and they were checking the ambulance and, of course, delaying medical treatment to a Palestinian who was probably bleeding out. So very shocking right out of the gate. I mean, every day there was another war crime, another atrocity.

47:53I went to a funeral when I was there and was attacked by Israeli soldiers. And then that was just in the West Bank. I mean, no one that I had met in the West Bank, being Palestinian, had ever said anything remotely anti-Semitic, anything that was bigoted or hateful. They just said, why are they moving right up against my village? We just want to live in peace. And I was just so taken aback by just that inverted reality that I'd always heard from the media and my politicians of what Palestine was like, what Palestinians were like. They were so welcoming. And then I stepped one foot into Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, and it was just this really, really just visceral nature of hatred, bigotry, and genocidal fervor that was being espoused by Israelis.

48:40it was really, really horrifying just how casually racist the Israelis were. I mean, I would just go up to people on camera, just as I do everywhere I go, and just kind of take a snapshot of where people are at. And I just said, what do you think about the situation? Knowing that I'm an American, filming them on camera, and I mean, Jesus Christ, you should just see for yourself. Check it out on Empire Files. It was really, really, really shocking. And it was just, the writing was on the wall. I mean, I saw it back in 2016 at a time of relative calm. I knew this was a society too far gone. You know, this is a society that was so fascist, unapologetically so, that the second there was any political capital, the second that October 7th happened, I knew that they could not help themselves but to go full genocidal.

49:29But I think it was really shocking for the rest of the world to see Israelis speak for themselves because they have been hidden and shielded from us, from Western audiences. It's usually handpicked spokespeople use to placate and speak to us, but to see Israeli society unabashed, it's been really, really startling. And of course, that harsh juxtaposition to actually see what Palestinian life is really like and to see it in 4K through the genocide. It's been And it's been horrific. And to see it still ongoing with corporate media playing along as dutiful stenographers, it's been shocking to say the least.

50:07No, it has. I was watching that video that you're discussing. We'll link to it. It's really something. Again, you did this 2016, 2017. So this is years before October 7th. And you speak to these just sort of like everyday Jewish Israelis in the center of Jerusalem, and they are supportive of apartheid at best, genocide at worst. If this was what the Israeli street was saying back then, what the hell is it like now? What is the mentality there now? Yeah, I mean we see it. We see it. We see the lack of protests. We see the lack of attempts to do anything to stop this bloodletting. There's a handful of people on the streets.

50:53There's a couple hundred anti-Zionist secular Jews, and they all know each other. That's how few and far between there are. And it's not just anecdotal. We see it in polling, poll after poll. Over 90 % of Israeli Jews support this. They support the bombing of Iran. They support the starvation of babies. and they support the genocide unapologetically. And this is really, really devastating, and that's why we call for boycott divestment sanctions because we have to have some sort of external pressure campaign mounted from the outside of Israel, just like it was in South Africa apartheid. Yeah. You know, I've been critical of Israel for a long time.

51:31You've been much more critical and much more prominent in your criticisms of Israel, and you've done the legwork that I have in terms of actually going there. You know, I also covered 10-7 when it happened, a horrific, horrible attack by Hamas, you know, some of the worst videos I've ever seen in my life. And frankly, I empathize with the Israelis after that attack. But that government has been nothing short of maniacal in the years since. But my point here is the question that I'm trying to get to is I've noticed in my own reporting, in my own commentary, that there has been much less pushback when I criticize the Israeli government, specifically Netanyahu and his sort of like band of psychos, you still get you still get some people being like, oh, you know, you're being anti-Semitic or you're towing the line or you're starting to sound like Tucker Carlson or something.

52:19But it's less than it was. It's less than it was. I will I can write and have conversations now that I would not have been able to have with a mainstream media backing me even a couple of years ago. Is that just coming from someone in a more independent line of work? Do you see that as well? Or am I off base? Oh, yeah. I mean, Gaza changed the world. Yeah, Gaza changed the world. Now people understand it's the connective tissue between so many issues, and they realize it's the testing ground for the rest of the world, and they also realize it's kind of the hub of lies. It's a perfect encapsulation of everything that's wrong and everything that's good, right?

52:59It's like it's the precipice of like the abyss and hope. I mean, it's everything that's awakened humanity in the best way, but it's also just the moral abyss of how everything's collapsed in on itself. And that includes just the propaganda, the desperate, desperate propaganda where we are being told black is white and up is down. when we can see with our own eyes genocide day after day after day. So I think at this point you'd really have to be such a true believer and so invested in propping up Israel to not actually admit that it's a genocide. But I think you still have the problem where it's being pinpointed on Netanyahu as opposed to the entire society and Zionism writ large.

53:49And I think that's similarly to the problem of just kind of castigating Trump Trump as an anomaly, as a king, as an aberration. And I think it's a far deeper rot than that. Well, this is just why, you know, when people say, oh, like, obviously, I'm against anti-Semitism, I'm against all forms of hate. But, you know, people will make the point like, oh, there's been this shocking rise in anti-Semitism in the U.S. and around the world, as though it has no, as though that just sort of came out of nowhere. When in fact, right, I mean, we, People have been bombarded on their phones for the last three years with the Israelis doing things that are unconscionable.

54:30So like what do you expect is going to happen? I'm not articulating this very well. I'm sure it will still get clipped and I'll get in trouble for it. But it feels – if I'm lucky – it feels just a little bit like – back to our original point that like even though the algorithms are a disaster and have made the world worse in every way, the internet does still have that ability i think to to to to put these images in front of people in ways that you're just not going to see if you watch the nightly news or read the new york times every day right 100 i mean that's the problem with israel claiming to represent all jews i mean that's the problem with putting the star of david on uh the flag um carving the iconography of the jewish religion as part of the genocide i mean it's it's really really horrific um but then of Of course, you have organizations like the ADL basically counting every single time someone says Free Palestine or holds up a Palestinian flag as incidents of anti-Semitism.

55:26So it's really hard to even kind of pinpoint what is going on and why. But of course, I mean, when you have the so-called Jewish state committing genocide in 4K gleefully, unapologetically, and with complete impunity from the rest of the world, it's going to cause anti-Semitic, you know, an increase in anti-Semitism. And it is really horrific because it is actually making the global population, the global Jewish population much, much less safe. Well, this is exactly the point. And I was just having this conversation with a dear friend of mine who's Jewish, Zionist. I love her to death. And she was saying some of my commentary in the newsletter has been towing the line or whatever.

56:12And she's saying she was making the point that it was maybe making her and her family less safe. And I feel horrible having to think that way. I don't – I mean it's terrible. But then again, I don't believe that to be the case. And the point that I made to her was your beef is with the government of Israel, right? It's not with me. It's not with regular Americans who are sick of seeing stories of children or journalists being killed every day for doing their jobs or just living. Yeah, yeah. I remember it was called Blood Libel when it was just – it was one publication that posted all the children who had been slaughtered.

56:49And it's like, well, they are slaughtering. It's like to literally state facts is not an anti-Semitic trope and it's not blood libel. This is the truth. They killed 20 ,000 children. I wish it wasn't true, but reporting on these facts does not make it a trope. I'm sorry that Israel is doing the most horrific, heinous shit possible and imaginable. I'm sorry. I'm sorry, but we need to be angry with them and it needs to be stopped. It's not the way that it's reported on or the facts that exist. It's the fact that it's being done. Right. Before I let you go, I did. I promised I wanted to talk to you about Tucker Carlson.

57:32I don't want to talk very long. I've just I'm fascinated by this guy. I've been following his career a long time and I've been watching a lot of his his most recent content just to get a sense because I think he's going to run for president. OK, so you I'm not I'm not on an island there. So this guy was the number one cheerleader for the Iraq war back in the day. Now, to his credit, in his defense, he has apologized for that, which not a lot of these neocons or at least former neocons have done. So I actually give him a little bit of credit for at least acknowledging he was wrong about that. I mean, I'm sure it's duplicitous and I'm sure that it's for some reason that he's doing that.

58:11But when you watch him lately, he's all over the place now. He's become very pro-Islam, flirting with anti-Semitism, but open to all sorts of conspiracies. But he's also – he's putting some of these ideas that you're talking about into a – on a platform that will reach people that you, frankly, with all due respect, just won't reach. I mean he is reaching a lot of Fox News watchers or also sort of younger men particularly who may not watch Fox News. So where do you see him in sort of this ecosystem that you exist in? And can there be – can somebody like him bring value from sort of like a leftist perspective to these issues?

58:57Or is it all just cynicism and he's just doing this to A, B test what platform to run on in 2028? I think you hit it on the head right there. I think it's another Bannon trick. I look at Tucker as a good old psyop. as someone who's been rooted in conspiracy culture for many, many decades. I definitely have seen the trajectory of Tucker Carlson. I remember when he was speaking to our grandparents in his bow tie, selling the Iraq war and demeaning and disparaging left. I mean, we don't have to look back too far on actually trying to foment regime change propaganda for Venezuela, for Iran. I mean, this was not too long ago that he still was on Fox News with extremely racist, xenophobic rhetoric that, again, laid the groundwork for the entire administration's foreign policy agenda that we see today.

59:57So look, I, you know, of course, of course, I'm, of course, I want to forgive people if they, if they have a moment of awakening and reckoning. I don't necessarily think that's what happened with Tucker. I think that he's playing us all. And I think that his close friendship with Trump basically convinced a lot of people who claim that they were well-intentioned by basically failing to criticize Trump or hold him to account the entire first term, because they kept thinking that this salient strategy was going on Tucker Carlson's show and somehow talking to Trump and that they would be like talking, they'd have Trump's ear.

1:00:33So that was like a really bizarre thing that happened in the first term. But then, of course, you know, these people still took him at his word and they just think that Tucker somehow is in their corner. And this includes a lot of leftists. And I find it very alarming because if you just strip down Tucker's rhetoric about Israel, not only is it anti-Semitic coded, but it gets into a very weird territory where all of a sudden it's not about Palestinian lives. It's not about where I'm coming from, which is a critique of actual power. It just kind of folds back into nationalism and xenophobia. And that's he won't.

1:01:08He will never criticize. Well, I shouldn't say that, actually. He has criticized some elements of sort of like of the capitalist system. But it's it's always feels ancillary to the point that he's trying to make. Of course. And it's always going to fold back into the right wing. And that's the problem, is that when you have him kind of hinting to the fact that, oh, he still has Trump's ear and oh, no. oh, hey, Trump agrees with you. Like, hey, I'm going to tell Trump. I'm going to tell him. And so he still has this kind of modicum of trust and credibility where he's really, really close with the administration.

1:01:39Very close, in fact, that, hey, maybe he too can reach Trump and stop this madness. So it kind of gives you this inside baseball thing. But at the same time, does he really give a s***? Is he just a cynical snake that understands where the current's going? that he wants to capitalize on the anti-Israel rhetoric and fold it into his future presidential run. My question is, why was he at the White House when the Venezuela oil was sold off to the oil companies? Why was Tucker Carlson there applauding and celebrating Trump? That's interesting. So again, if he's this big anti-regime change, anti-interventionist guy, it seems like he was pretty comfortable with the black bagging of a sovereign leader to steal and pillage their oil right after it happened.

1:02:24So look, all of this is a game. I always think, see what you see, don't be duped. You have the richest men in the world who are curating our reality and providing us with the information that we see on social media. They're the ones basically juking the algorithm. So why is it that I don't subscribe to Tucker Carlson, but I see his face every time I go online? Why do these people want me? It's like, why do they want me to like Tucker Carlson? I always have to ask that. There's always something hidden behind what we see. And that's the intent behind the algorithm, behind the tech people, of why they are pushing this person on us.

1:03:03No, that's a great place to leave it. Abby Martin, tell people where they can watch the film. Earthsgreatestenemy.com. Check it out. Empire Files is our investigative series. and it's up there for members of YouTube, also Patreon members, but earthsgreatestenemy.com is where you can watch it on Vimeo. Check it out. Thank you so much for having me on. It was a great honor. Oh, Abby, it was so much fun. The Fearless Abby Martin. Do check out the film. It's great. It's also just very well done. It's just like, it looks really good, like aesthetically. I don't know if that means anything to you as the director.

1:03:37It means a lot. Okay, good. I enjoyed it. We'll link to all your work in the description. Abby Martin, everybody. Thank you so much. Thank you.

From the publisher

Journalist and filmmaker Abby Martin joins Carlo Versano to discuss her new film Earth's Greatest Enemy, an investigation into the U.S. military's environmental footprint. The Pentagon consumes nearly 270,000 barrels of oil a day and produces more CO2 annually than 150 countries combined, yet military emissions have been exempt from every major climate treaty since Kyoto.

The duo dig into the early-2000s political awakening shared by many elder millennials, the promise and corruption of the early internet, Steve Bannon's media strategy, and what's driving the anti-war and climate movements apart.

Watch Earth's Greatest Enemy: EarthsGreatestEnemy.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Get more Carlo by subscribing to The 1600 newsletter, with fresh columns on the latest news in your inbox every Monday through Friday: https://the-1600.beehiiv.com/ 

Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1LOS84PQRRWwDKEQ2zHYHe 

Listen on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-1600/id1860634203 

If you enjoy The 1600, consider rating us five stars on your favorite podcast platform, giving us a like or subscribing on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2a35q7eyzkfoIusBzdH4Hw

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

More from The 1600

All 82 episodes
U.S. Militarism Is Destroying the Planet, According to Abby MartinThe 1600 · 1 h 4 min
Listen in VO