How the World Became a Casino (With Natasha Schüll)

11 May 2026 · 49 min · 21 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

How gambling design moved from mechanical slot reels to computerized “virtual” reels and multi-line slots, and how the same attention-holding incentives now shape politics, music, sports apps, and prediction markets (Kalshi/Polymarket).

Guest

Natasha Schüll, NYU professor and anthropologist; author of Addiction by Design (2012), based on years of Las Vegas research with slot players, designers, and casino operators.

Key claims

Digitization “divorces what you see from the odds” by weighting outcomes (like weighting dice), enabling longer play via smaller, more continuous rewards rather than spiky wins. Multi-line slots create “false wins” (dinging wins that still net losses), keeping players in a “machine zone.” Prediction markets aren’t new—trading/investing historically resembled betting—but mobile access normalizes it.

Notable examples

virtual reels with hundreds of programmable stops; multi-line slots betting on 50–100 lines; event contracts like “Justin Bieber at Coachella” or “Meta releases Llama 5”; ads and media using betting metrics; “infinite scroll” as a parallel design.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Evolution of Slot Machines

2:49 to 3:41

Discussion on how the design of slot machines changed with technology.

“Again, it's called Addiction by Design, Machine Gambling in Las Vegas.”

The Impact of Digital Interfaces

3:41 to 7:09

Exploring how digital interfaces transformed gambling behavior.

“What that did for gamblers and what that did for casinos.”

False Wins and Psychological Effects

7:09 to 11:17

Understanding false wins in gambling and their psychological impact.

“And this really was a shift from a profit model that had to do with let's get all their money right away.”

Prediction Markets and Betting Culture

11:17 to 13:21

Examining the intertwining of prediction markets and traditional betting.

“You say, the convergence of future markets and lay betting is not caused by digital technology.”

Normalization of Gambling in Society

13:21 to 14:09

Discussion on the normalization of gambling in media and culture.

“TV for betting apps and prediction markets, what's your reaction to that?”

The Impact of Betting on News and Reality

14:09 to 16:04

Exploration of how prediction markets are reshaping our engagement with news and events.

“prediction markets as they kind of tell the news.”

Betting's Influence on Politics and Culture

16:04 to 20:43

Discussion on how betting alters civic engagement and our perception of politics and culture.

“There are these event contracts that are very linked to specific outcomes, like an election or a game.”

Understanding Gambling Addiction

20:43 to 23:29

Insights into the dual nature of self-awareness and addiction in gambling behavior.

“So I don't know that machine gamblers are so unique in terms of a spectrum of addictions in that.”

The Future of Betting Regulation

27:37 to 28:00

Speculation on the future of betting markets and potential regulatory responses.

“And that regulation will one day catch up with it.”

The Emergence of Betting Markets

28:00 to 28:45

Discussion on the growth and impact of betting markets and prediction markets.

“I get that feeling about the betting markets.”
Show all 21 chapters

Legal Challenges and Mobile Sports Betting

28:45 to 29:49

Exploration of legal cases against mobile sports betting platforms like DraftKings.

“Or is it going to be more like Vegas where we're going to let it run wild and just face the consequences?”

Regulation Perspectives on Prediction Markets

29:49 to 30:54

Insights into current regulatory stances on prediction markets and gambling.

“DraftKings and FanDuel taking this approach.”

Cultural Shift Towards Gambling

30:54 to 32:45

Discussion on the increasing prevalence of gambling in American culture.

“Are you surprised by how prevalent it seems that gambling has become in culture since you published the book?”

The Mechanics of Gambling and Technology

32:45 to 35:15

Analysis of how algorithms and design influence gambling behaviors and experiences.

“I think 90 % of the activity on CalShe, and I'm not sure what it is on Polymarket, but I think it's almost all of its U.S., like official U.S.”

Understanding Personal Connections to Gambling

35:15 to 36:37

Exploration of the personal impact of gambling and the research process involved.

“your funds run out and a lot of other kind of holding design features like that.”

The Flow State and Gambling

36:37 to 38:44

Examining the concept of flow and its relation to gambling and other activities.

“Or does it just slide up right off of you?”

Culinary Design in Casinos

38:44 to 41:15

Discussion about the intersection of food and gambling culture in Las Vegas buffets.

“And I guess there isn't anything inherently harmful about being in the machine zone, right?”

Buffets and Gambling: A Complementary Experience

41:15 to 42:00

Analyzing the relationship between buffet dining and the gambling experience.

“would just be sort of flabbergasted and watching their discomfort.”

Culinary Algorithms and Gambling Behavior

42:00 to 43:08

Explore how dining experiences are designed to influence behavior similarly to gambling.

“I spoke to the chefs and others behind the scenes, and they very meticulously lay out the food in a certain order and pattern to kind of produce certain behavior in the diners.”

Volatility and the Culture of Gambling

43:08 to 45:59

Discuss the connections between personal volatility in life and the appeal of gambling.

“There is no limit to the gambling that you can do as long as you've got credit or currency of some kind to stay in motion.”

Binge Culture and Escapism

45:59 to 47:19

Analyze how binge-watching and consuming media relates to coping with life's uncertainties.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Natasha Schüll:If you are constantly betting on this, how many times is a politician going to say a certain word or how long will they shake someone's hand? You're not really listening fully to what they are saying. You're listening for those little words. And it's like, oh, ding, ding, ding.

0:20Hello, and welcome to the 4-4 Media Podcast, where we bring you unparalleled access to hidden worlds, both online and IRL. 4-4 Media is journalist-founded and needs your support. To subscribe, go to 4-4media.co. As well as bonus content every single week, subscribers also get access to additional episodes where we respond to their best comments. And they get early access to our interview series too. Get access to that content at 4-4media.co. This week, we're joined by Natasha Shull. Natasha is a professor and anthropologist at New York University. She is also the author of a book called Addiction by Design, Machine Gambling in Las Vegas.

1:08This book was published in 2012. I stumbled into it while I was writing about social games and Facebook games while these were all the rage. And I stumbled into that book in the way that many journalists and researchers who want to study addiction and compulsive behavior that is not associated with drugs, but with technology. We all end up reading this book by Natasha because it is brilliant. Natasha basically spent years in Las Vegas talking to the people who play slot machines, the people who design slot machines, the people who design casinos, and really laid out the way that technology, specifically our phones, work today and beautifully, expertly described what she calls the zone, which is this area of behavior and brain activity where you're in this flow state of playing a game that describes a lot of the addiction that I think we all feel today to some degree.

2:26Natasha's work is always relevant, but the reason I reached out to her is we've been covering prediction markets more often on 4.4 Media, Polymarket, and Call Sheet. and this is something that she is interested in as well because it obviously feeds into her research. So I was very happy to have her on. Please check out her book if you haven't already. Again, it's called Addiction by Design, Machine Gambling in Las Vegas. I hope you enjoy our conversation.

3:03Natasha, thank you so much for being here.

3:05Natasha Schüll:Thank you for having me. I think it would be very useful for our listeners to hear a little bit about your research into slot machines that you wrote about in your fantastic book, Addiction by Design. There is so much to that book. You go into it in great detail. I highly recommend everyone read it or listen to it. There's also an audiobook. But to just give an example of how digital user interfaces and design can really change behavior and gambling behavior specifically, I was wondering if you can talk about this pivotal moment in Las Vegas and slot machine design specifically, where they changed from physical reels that are spinning in machines to more digital interfaces.

3:57What that did for gamblers and what that did for casinos. Right.

4:03Natasha Schüll:So when you had the physical reels or the analog reels, we could think about them as, there was 22 positions per reel. And so you'd have three of them spinning, and you were really constrained in terms of the mathematical outputs, or we can think about those as algorithms, by these 22 per three reel positions. So there was really only so much that you could do with that. In the 80s and then even more so in the 90s when we saw digital technologies and capabilities and computerization coming on board and being wedded to the slot machine, you saw this explosion of new possibilities for designers, particularly the designers of the math.

4:49Natasha Schüll:So each of those reels, even if you continued to see it spinning in front of you, even as it continued to be physical that you were interacting with, was actually virtual with hundreds of stops on them that you could mathematically program to. Most of those virtual stops would be mapped to blank spots on the reel. So they were heavily weighted toward the blank spots. you would see physically in front of you exactly what you saw in front of you on the physical machines. And, you know, if you imagine someone sitting for 24 hours in front of a machine, whether or not you're mathematically competent, you do get some sense of what the odds are by interacting with the symbols that are in front of you.

5:39Natasha Schüll:But what digitization did was completely divorce what you see in front of you with what the odds actually are. The easiest way to describe what virtual reels did for physical slot machines is to use the analogy of weighting the dice. So just as you would like drill silver into the corner of a die to weight it more toward one position, you were mapping most of the blank, non-paying, non-winning spots to the blank spots on the reel. That was like waiting the reels. Right. And that allows both the casinos or the designers of the machines to better design the outcome for their profit, but also for the enjoyment of the players, right?

6:28Natasha Schüll:Yes. Because you could, you know, if we think about the old one-armed bandit, the limitations that those 22 times three stops gave you also meant limitations in the kind of experiences that you could have and the kind of time you could spend there. This is why one-armed bandits most often did not have seats in front of them. They were very volatile in the sense that you would either double or triple your winnings or you would lose it all. And this would happen pretty quickly. So if you drew it on a graph, it would be very, very spiky in terms of your winnings over time. And you would quickly zero out your time.

7:10Natasha Schüll:When you had these computerized models that could be manipulated to dispense rewards at a kind of continuous pace, but small little tiny rewards over time, you were able to sort of manipulate that graph and give people much more quote unquote time on device. And this really was a shift from a profit model that had to do with let's get all their money right away. Let's fleece the consumer and then they can be on their way to let's actually let the consumer sit there much, much, much longer. Let's give them more time for their money and let's take their money much more slowly because what we see in terms of revenues is that machines that do that ultimately earn much more money from them.

8:04Natasha Schüll:So instead of that spiky graph zeroing out in time, you saw a much more slow, gradual line down to zero. And some of these machines that would dispense tiny little bits over time were so sort of relaxing in the way that they felt to play. one of the one of the designers of them drew it on a napkin for me and he pointed to that slow curve down to zero and he said we want you to recline on our math model the way you recline on a comfortable couch I guess I do have to say to to explain how this happens you do need to go beyond the three reel so the three reel virtual reel machine that was sort of the first step toward computerization and virtuality.

8:58Natasha Schüll:What gave even more possibilities and this sort of comfortable couch that you can recline on, that kind of algorithm, that depended on what's called multi-line slots. These are the slots that you will still see today in casinos or in online casinos. And basically, it's a video screen. There are no physical reels. It's a video screen with many, many symbols all over them. And typically you can bet on 50, 100 lines and you can bet pennies, right? So you put in your$5 and you're betting pennies on each line. Because there are so many lines, you're going to win back pretty often on at least one or two or three of those lines.

9:44Natasha Schüll:And guess what? It's going to say, ding, ding, ding, ding, you won on this line, but that's a net loss. So this idea of what are called false wins. So slowly taking your money, you're slowly losing. But as you're slowly losing, you're experiencing that as winning every time. So you do this research in the 90s, early 2000s, and that is long before the ubiquity of social media and mobile games and loot boxes and all this stuff but i'm sure anyone who is listening to you immediately recognizes all these incentive models from their day-to-day lives these little hits of dopamine an algorithm that is trying to solicit a certain type of behavior and time on device, a term that technologists use, social media companies use, makers of mobile devices use.

10:45And you wrote an introduction, a new introduction to your book in 2024, where you kind of talk about how relevant the book became over time and all these journalists reaching out to you, policymakers, some of the people from these companies that are actually implementing these type of designs. and it seems like we've come around full circle in a way like the philosophy was adapted into all these other industries but now but now they're now we're just like back to gambling uh and you say uh you wrote near the end of the introduction actually i want to quote this uh you mentioned kalshi at the very end kalshi being the the prediction market where like polymarket people can bet on the outcome of real world events.

11:31You say, the convergence of future markets and lay betting is not caused by digital technology. The two were intertwined from the start. Digital technology has, however, made the activity widely accessible to anyone with a mobile device, easy to perform, and designed to hold attention. I want to start with that first part. Can you talk about how future markets and lay betting were always intertwined? Because I thought of it historically, there was like a research aspect to it. And people actually use experts to bet on real world events in order to get good predictions. What do you mean by that?

12:10Natasha Schüll:I'm not a historian. But what I mean by that is that back in the early days of stock markets, which weren't necessarily even called that back in the early days, you saw those activities activities that today we identify as investing and trading as considered betting. And even some of the same laws I'm talking about, like back in England and this kind of thing. I think to anyone today, it's sort of absurd that prediction markets would say that they aren't betting in some way. I always like to say the absurdism of the claim that Calci and Polymarket, etc., etc., are not gambling rests on another absurd claim, which is that there is a big difference between things like day trading and things like gambling.

13:03Natasha Schüll:You can go to history to see that link. And for the second part of that statement, when you talk about how accessible this has become, when you see a Kevin Hart commercial for a casino app, a slot machine app, or you see commercials on TV for betting apps and prediction markets, what's your reaction to that? How do you think machine gamblers that you've talked to or people that you talked to in Vegas at the time that you were researching your book and talking to a lot of gamblers, how are they responding and receiving those ads, do you think? I imagine that they're sort of appalled. And I mean, it makes one very cynical, but there really isn't a sort of not only an explosion of gambling, but an explosion of normalized forms of gambling.

13:53Natasha Schüll:Even more shocking to me than seeing the ads by celebrities and others on TV are the increasing adoption by media of these metrics and sort of referring to prediction markets as they kind of tell the news. And we've already seen the news take the sports news, especially really taken over by mobile sports betting. And I think we're in danger of having news in general taken over by prediction markets, which is really speaks to this normalization of betting on things. This is something I wanted to ask you about. I'm not sure how to phrase it. So forgive me as I stumble through this thought. But slot machines is a form of betting that is totally abstract.

14:46There's no subject to the thing that the bet is being placed on. You can say the same for most card games, roulette tables. I think even something like the stock market or crypto, they correspond to things in the real world. But the system that you're betting on is so diffused that it's hard to connect a single bet to a single outcome. And sports betting and things like Kalshi and Polymarket, especially, it's kind of like a one-to-one. I was looking at Kalshi before this interview, and some of the bets that I saw is, what will Justin Bieber perform at Coachella on April 11, 2026? Will Meta release Llama 5 this year?

15:38How will Tyson Fury, who is an MMA fighter, say? What will he say during his final press conference? Have you thought about that at all? What is the impact of betting doing two reality, two real world events, if everything is a bet, if we're betting on everything?

15:56Natasha Schüll:Yes, I have been thinking a lot about this lately, but in a number of different ways. There are a few different kinds of bets that I can see on prediction markets. There are these event contracts that are very linked to specific outcomes, like an election or a game. And for those, I think what it does is just taking those two examples. Let's take an election as an example. it really changes the way that you orient towards not only the election, but how you are a citizen in a way. If you are constantly betting on this and checking in to see what the price is doing, you're sort of orienting to what used to be a much more civic-minded, socially -oriented decision in this granular, you know, gambling-type way.

16:55Natasha Schüll:I think that that can change maybe even how we feel about politics, especially when you get to things like attention markets and how many times is a politician going to say a certain word or how long will they shake someone's hand? You're not really listening fully to what they are saying. You're listening for those little words. And it's like, oh, ding, ding, ding. So I think it changes the way that we listen and hear. I think it could also change literally the way we listen to music instead of just listening for what do you like and what do you respond to, what songs. You're kind of vigilant if you're engaged in prediction markets.

17:40Natasha Schüll:You're very vigilant to which song is most likely to be like the pick or to rise to the top according to the population. So you're listening differently. You're not listening as a music connoisseur. you're listening as someone who's on prediction markets and has a stake in them. And then in terms of a game, it's very similar to the politics in the sense that it changes the way you are a fan. You used to place your bets and then participate in the game, supporting one side or the other. But now you have money on the game in all of these fragmented, choppy little ways. So you may be watching for tiny things.

18:25Natasha Schüll:You may be watching for what a specific player does. You may even bet against your own team because the betting becomes more important than the being a fan. So I really think having money on things and gambling, especially in these sort of granular ways, changes so much about who we are and how we are in the world. Yeah, I think it is clear from your interviews with machine gamblers that it causes a change in behavior that extends beyond just like the moment of gambling. It's just like your perspective of the world maybe shifts a little bit if you're obsessed with gambling in that way. Something I really liked about the book and something that I think we tried to do in our own reporting is the book is very respectful of gamblers.

19:15And you say that you learned so much about how all of this works from them. And it's very clear that they are very aware of what they're doing. They're not being fooled. They know the odds. They know how the machines work. You talk to a woman who got a very deep education in how they work and are constructed. And I found that to be fascinating and to be a huge benefit to your findings. And then on the other hand, despite all this awareness, gambling addiction has a higher suicide rate than other addictions. and it appears that machine gambling addiction works faster and is more of a problem from an addiction perspective than other forms of gambling.

20:11And I was wondering how are, like, those seems contradictory, like the self-awareness and the lack of control. Like, how do you reconcile that? How are both of those things possible at the same time?

20:23Natasha Schüll:I think that we sometimes talk about self-delusion with addiction in general, but I also think we understand and addicts understand addicts of all kinds. They sort of know themselves and know what's going on. And even if they have that knowledge, even if they've been through the programs, it doesn't mean that they're not going to be pulled back into it. So I don't know that machine gamblers are so unique in terms of a spectrum of addictions in that. And in terms of how to reconcile that, I mean, I don't think it's hard for any of us to understand how knowing that it's time to go to bed and stop scrolling, you know, doesn't make us stop scrolling and go to bed.

21:12Natasha Schüll:And I don't mean to trivialize addiction through that analogy. I just mean that I do believe that these behaviors, that addiction is not something completely other to who we all are. I think we're all on a spectrum somewhere, right? And I do think that every one of us, it's hard not in the contemporary world of digital media, it is hard not to have a glimpse of what gamblers call the machine zone and to understand its hook and its hold. So I think to answer that question, we just need to ask ourselves, what is that? When we know we should be doing one thing, but we're doing another. I don't have the answer.

21:55Natasha Schüll:If I had the answer to that question, I'd have it made.

22:08I realize that the best clothes are the ones you don't have to think about. The stuff you throw on because it always fits right, feels good, and somehow works for almost everything. That's basically why Quince has become a regular part of my wardrobe. They've got all the spring staples dialed in. Things like 100 % European linen shorts, which I have two pairs of, and shirts starting at just$34. And they're exactly what you want this time of year. Lightweight, breathable, comfortable, but still put together enough that you don't feel like you gave up. Their 100 % Pima cotton tees are another standout.

22:41That's what I'm wearing right now. They're incredibly soft, hold their shape and feel way more premium than basic tees usually do. I got this one and I think I've now got five more in other colors coming. And their pants, their linen pants I especially like, hit that same sweet spot too. Relaxed enough to wear every day, but polished enough that you can wear them out without feeling underdressed. What makes Quince really stand out is the pricing. They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middlemen, which means you're getting premium materials for 50 to 80 % less than similar brands.

23:13Besides this t-shirt, I've got one of their linen shirts recently and it's been in my constant rotation. I also have linen pants, which I love wearing around California. They're all super breathable, look clean, and cost way less than expected for something that feels so premium. It just makes getting dressed easier. Fewer bad purchases, fewer bad decisions. Refresh your everyday with luxury you'll actually use. Head to quince.com slash 404media for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's quince.com slash 404media for free shipping and 365 day returns.

23:47quince.com slash 404media. I'm always looking for really versatile clothes. So I'm there and throw in a backpack, wear on a flight, bring on a trip, wear to exercise, and not immediately regret because it's either too heavy, too flimsy, or too cold or hot. Something that can really make a difference between a lot of different climates and environments. That's why I've been wearing Paka, spelled P-A-K-A, pronounced Paka. Over the winter, I was wearing hoodies from Paka, which are made of alpaca fiber, which is honestly kind of wild once you feel it. It's softer than cashmere, warmer than wool, but somehow really breathable.

24:24But now that it's a bit warmer, I've been wearing their t-shirts pretty much every single day. I also picked up some socks and boxers. And what I really like about them is they are thermoregulating, odor resistant, durable, and actually hold up over time. They've really become my go-to, whether it's for hoodies, t-shirts, boxers, socks, really all the basics. And I really like that they're made from one of the world's most sustainable, natural fibers. Each item is made start to finish in Peru and comes with an Inca ID that's hand woven by artisans, which connects you directly to where it came from and the people who made it.

24:59Over 250 ,000 people have already picked one up. And after wearing mine, I completely understand why. Again, I mean, I was living in the pack of hoodie all winter. It's now a little too warm to wear it. Thankfully, it's summer. So I've switched their t-shirts and their boxers. I've been wearing them to the gym, out and about, bars, etc. So if you've been thinking about upgrading your hoodie game or your t-shirt game or your boxer game, this is probably your sign. To get your PACA hoodie or anything else, go to www.pacaapparel.com. That's www.pacaapparel.com. This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp.

25:39May is Mental Health Awareness Month. and it's a reminder that whatever you're going through, you do not have to go through it alone. And if you've followed my BetterHelp ad read mental health journey, I've talked about a couple of the different things that I've gone through and I am somebody that has diagnosed depression. The sleeplessness doesn't help, it aggravates it. And often I've found that if I've just got somebody to talk to, like a trained therapist somebody that can kind of like take that load off my shoulders just talking about the things can really help mitigate some of the worst of it doesn't always cancel all of it out but it helps a lot so you know life is a journey some days you feel good other times it feels a little overwhelming sometimes you just need someone to talk to and better help can help you find a trained professional to talk to You know, they've got quality therapists that work on according to a strict code of conduct and are fully licensed in the United States.

26:45And there are client reviews. They've got 30 ,000 therapists. It is the world's largest online therapy platform that has served over 6 million people globally. And it works with an average rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars for a live session based on over 1.7 million client reviews. so you don't have to be on this journey alone. Find support and have someone with you in therapy. Sign up and get 10 % off at betterhelp.com slash 404media. That's B-E-T-T-E-R-H-E-L-P dot com slash 404media.

27:36Reporting on technology over the past 10 years, there have been instances where, like with Uber, for example, it feels very much like we're reporting on a company that is running ahead of regulation. And that regulation will one day catch up with it. And in many cases, that is what happens. I get that feeling about the betting markets. It feels like it's a new technology. It's a new type of business. They are making as much money as they can. But eventually, another shoe will drop. There's going to be some horrible story in the news about how this has impacted people. And we'll see regulators come down on these companies.

Read the full transcript

28:29But I feel like I would have had that reaction if I was you kind of reporting on machine gambling in Vegas. And that hasn't happened, right? Like those are going strong. They're sophisticated. Do you think that we're going to see regulators intervene here? Or is it going to be more like Vegas where we're going to let it run wild and just face the consequences?

28:58Natasha Schüll:So when you're referring to it and the betting markets, you do mean prediction markets, right? Yes, yes. They wouldn't call themselves betting markets. And the other reason I asked is because what we do see, and maybe this hints to what could come with prediction markets, we do see an uptick in legal case suits that are being brought against mobile sports betting giants like DraftKings and FanDuel, sort of following in the footsteps of these product liability lawsuits that are being mounted against big tech, like the meta YouTube outcome that we just saw. So I think just in the past couple of months, there's been two big lawsuits brought against DraftKings and FanDuel taking this approach.

29:53Natasha Schüll:And I think that it isn't too many steps from that to bringing the same sort of suit against prediction markets. You'd have to modify it slightly. But I think you could sort of show how certain features, how certain technological affordances are in the legal presentation defective in that they're causing all sorts of harm and that they should be regulated. In terms of where we're at right now with prediction markets, I mean, we just had the New Jersey ruling, right, where prediction markets can continue on as they wish there and not be counted as betting. And I don't know how long that's going to hold.

30:39Natasha Schüll:To my mind, it should be and would be so easy in court to make the case that this is gambling and should be regulated as such. Not that gambling has the greatest regulations, but at least it's something. But right now, that's not even happening. So I'm not exactly sure when it will. Are you surprised by how prevalent it seems that gambling has become in culture since you published the book? Do you agree with that statement at all, that America feels more like a casino in general? Yeah, I mean, so you mentioned that my book was put out in a new edition with a preface. And in that preface, I narrated the way that my book was kind of taken up as a sort of, and the slot machine became this kind of Rosetta Stone or skeleton key for unlocking how the hold of so much emerging on the landscape of digital media from Candy Crush to the smartphone and texting.

31:47Natasha Schüll:what were some other big ones to dating apps and, you know, Tinder as a horizontal kind of slot machine, and then Robin Hood and fractional shares, like sort of like multi-line slot machines. And now we've landed in this moment when it isn't just diffusing out everywhere into all of our devices and online experiences, but those experiences are increasingly becoming gambling, like actual gambling. So we have this explosion of the mobile sports betting and the prediction markets. I did not see that coming. I saw it coming probably a little sooner than others, just because I was in touch with what's happening over in the UK, where the mobile sports app are a few years ahead of us.

32:36Natasha Schüll:And so I sort of saw that that was what was coming down the pike. And the reason I keep talking about mobile sports betting is that I think you have to talk about that when you're talking about prediction markets, especially now, because it's 90 % of what's happening on prediction markets is sports betting. I think 90 % of the activity on CalShe, and I'm not sure what it is on Polymarket, but I think it's almost all of its U.S., like official U.S. business is sports betting. But you've really got to see those two are very, very similar. And I think that the regulation, the eventual regulation discussion around them would hopefully converge.

33:21Back to the regulation question. There is regulation in gambling and there's... I actually don't notice, but I'm assuming there's specific rules about slot machines. but you talk about in the book how the makers of slot machines uh use like awareness of gambling addiction as a as a shield almost like they are transparent about the odds and that makes it seem above board but that kind of underplays the reality of like why people play how they play all the ways that they're pulled in. And just because people know the odds, it seems like transparent and fair to the gambler, even though it can cause harm and all of that.

34:08I guess when you say that, like, hopefully there's going to be some discussion of regulation, do you think that actually like curbs the behavior or it just, I don't know, normalizes it?

34:22Natasha Schüll:So I understand your question. The kind of regulation that I was talking about or that I would be hopeful for would be a kind of regulation that we don't see yet with slot machines. And it would be the kind of regulation that, just taking the slot machine example, they say, oh, you know, slot machines are so regulated. They run on random number generators and near misses only occur five times more than they would by chance alone. which is kind of, and there's a couple of other sort of trivial things. We're so transparent and fair. And you're right that by focusing on that, they completely obscure what the real problem is, which is the algorithms that are geared toward keeping you in the seat for continuous play until your funds run out and a lot of other kind of holding design features like that.

35:21Natasha Schüll:We can take the example of in social media and the recent trial of things like infinite scroll, right? The slot machine is a kind of infinite scroll, right? So should we regulate the infinite scroll? Yes, we should. That's what we should be looking at, those kinds of things. And I would hope for the same with mobile sports betting and prediction markets, both of whom are totally trying to do that move of, oh, look, we're, you know, we're putting up warnings and we're, we're putting up labels. I have a CalShe account just so that I could go on and see how these things work. And so I got a little ping a couple of weeks ago telling me CalShe, like wellness tools, or I forget, I forget exactly what they're called, but it's a suite of ways in which you can kind of regulate your own self and your time and your spending.

36:15Natasha Schüll:And it's a way of sort of, if we put that stuff out there, then we are less liable for all this other stuff we're doing to keep you there. I imagine your upcoming book will touch on it. But do you have anything to any thoughts about like how you inoculate yourself to these incentives, like being in that environment and researching it all? Do you feel the pull? And how do you push back against it? Or does it just slide up right off of you? I've never really felt the pull of gambling. And maybe that's what allowed me to kind of get so close to it. And it was also what propelled my curiosity because it seemed I really couldn't understand it and what the appeal was.

37:04Natasha Schüll:And I really wanted to understand. I think that's what gave me momentum with my many, many interviews with gamblers over the years. I've begun to interview some mobile sports bettors. have not yet really talked to anyone in the prediction market sphere. So I don't consider that I yet have researched that. I'm sort of extrapolating from what I know about slot machines and sports betting apps to prediction markets and what I see when I go on and kind of play with it myself. I feel like I'm not that at risk there. I am at risk for other kind of tedious little flow, clicky-tappy activities, which is why it was gratifying when my book was taken up mostly by journalists as a cipher for understanding all of our infinite scrolling, just to put it that way, as a culture, because that I relate to.

38:11Natasha Schüll:And I always, I think, in the back of my mind had my own penchant for becoming sort of disappearing into little repetitive continuous activities, whether it's weeding, you know, even non-digital activities, or whether it's like editing, clicking around and editing photos in Photoshop for many, many, many, many, many, many hours. You know, I thought those were just sort of my personal connections. So that's why it was gratifying that others saw a link there. Yeah. And I guess there isn't anything inherently harmful about being in the machine zone, right? You can be it in some innocuous way or some joyful way.

38:58I obviously... I came at your book from the perspective of video games. And when I read the description and theory of the machines and I was like, ah, this is like expressing a very base feeling that I have. Maybe you can like do anything too much, but there's nothing inherently wrong with like being in that space, I think.

39:18Natasha Schüll:No, I don't. I don't think so at all. Like whether it's knitting or gardening. I think, you know, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, the psychologist, has popularized this term flow. And the title of his book, Flow, the subtitle is, you know, the optimal human condition or something. And if you look at how he defines flow, every category, every criteria could apply to the slot machine or to day trading or these kinds of things. And so I had to ask myself when I was writing the book, you know, what is it then that makes the difference between, you know, let's call it good flow and then flow that is destructive and depleting.

40:06Natasha Schüll:And at the end of the day, I don't think there's that much difference in the biophysiological state itself. I think to understand the difference, we have to look outside of it to who is designing the experience, who is profiting from the experience. That really makes the difference, I think. This is very tangential to gambling, but I've seen your documentary in college, Buffet. And I was such a big fan. It was such a mind-blowing documentary. It's a short documentary. It's about buffet culture in Vegas, who's partaking in it, what happens to the food after the fact and all of that. I just kind of, if you don't mind, like a couple of questions about that.

40:54I assume that that is something you became interested in while you were researching your book and just like observing it kind of on the periphery of casinos. Is that how that came about?

41:05Natasha Schüll:That is how that came about. I mean, I was living in Las Vegas for quite a while and friends would visit and we'd go to the buffets and especially European friends would just be sort of flabbergasted and watching their discomfort. And they just didn't know how to do it. They're like, really? I leave my plates here with food and I go get more? You know, they just didn't understand it. And I came to see the buffet as this sort of little appendage to the casino that sort of plays out so much of what's going on in the casino. And of course, I couldn't make a film about slot machine gambling easily.

41:45Natasha Schüll:You can't bring cameras into casinos. etc. But you totally can bring a camera into the buffet. So I decided I'm just going to focus there. And it relates, even though it's food that we're talking about, there's definitely a design element at play there. I spoke to the chefs and others behind the scenes, and they very meticulously lay out the food in a certain order and pattern to kind of produce certain behavior in the diners. So it's sort of like a culinary example of creating an algorithm for a slot machine in a way. How are they complementary in the sense that... Is there something about gambling all day and maybe probably losing money that eating too much at a buffet would be a complimentary experience to that?

42:47Natasha Schüll:So I will answer that question. But first, I'll say what the difference, a big part of the difference is. A big part of the difference is that just as with alcohol, there's only so much food you can eat. You can eat to excess. And like one person in my movie, you can go and vomit and come back and eat more. But there's a physical limit to how much food you can eat. There is no limit to the gambling that you can do as long as you've got credit or currency of some kind to stay in motion. So that's the real difference. But in terms of the similarity, that might allow me to return to one of your earlier questions that I realized I didn't answer, which was about the sort of culture of gambling that the U.S., maybe the world in general, but certainly the U.S.

43:38Natasha Schüll:has become and what that has to do with and why that might be. I think the answer could sort of explain the appeal both of buffets and gambling and probably prediction markets, etc. And I think it is a certain, the gamblers that I spoke with, when I kind of asked them to talk about their lives and introduce themselves and then make connection between their lives and their histories and the machine zone and the draw that it held for them, they often brought up volatilities and sort of what the zeitgeist would call precarity today, just these precarious circumstances, whether it was domestic abuse or losing a job or being from a very poor family or having a child that was very sick and on and on.

44:37Natasha Schüll:And they were able to bring those sort of volatile, uncontrollable circumstances of their lives directly into conversation with the relief they got going into that repetitive zone that you find in a slot machine. I think the world today, it's been a few years, it's been like 12, 13 years since I wrote that book, but certainly where we're at as a society, politically, in terms of the climate, in terms of so many things out there, volatility abounds. And I believe Mansoor, he's the CEO of Polymarket, I believe, described the sort of volatility in his childhood politically as having a lot to do with his conception of prediction markets.

45:32Natasha Schüll:And so it's almost like a gamification of volatility. It's a way to both rehearse volatility, but you're rehearsing it in a more controlled and limited way. So it's almost like it's a way to kind of like short circuit a sense of uncontrollable precarity by acting out that volatility itself, if that makes sense. that's very well said yeah i think that makes perfect sense and i think there's also something like if the entire world or this country is becoming more like las vegas in in the way you just described where we feel precarity we feel volatility and we are somehow i don't know role playing that or coping with that by by betting and predicting uh on everything i think there is probably I don't know how to exactly identify it or express it but there's also like a buffet aspect to the culture where we go from like the precarity and the bedding coping and then soothing in some way with with food or I don't know video games or entertainment or just like switching from one extreme to to the other and I think that's definitely where we are binge culture I mean we binge yes we binge watch shows I think there is a sort of throw caution to the wind and go to this to this extreme in the face of you know all this shit no totally and yeah netflix is a buffet right like a lot of the a lot of the a lot of the stuff we get served is kind of buffet style right uh pick what you want and and gorge yourself yeah and i think that netflix autoplay was one of was one of the was one of the early sort of like or i think it was called Postplay originally, where it just, you know, so it's like no resolution.

47:23Natasha Schüll:You just go into the next one and the next one and the next one. And then it is very soothing. It sort of like holds the whole world in abeyance and it keeps everything at bay. Yeah. Okay, Natasha, thank you so much for your time. I'm looking forward to your next book. And again, I highly recommend everyone read Addiction by Design if you want to understand a lot of how you feel in the face of these technologies that we interface with every day. Thank you so much for having me. Thank you. As a reminder, 4Four Media is a journalist founded and supported by subscribers. If you wish to subscribe to 4Four Media and directly support our work, please go to 4FourMedia.co.

48:06You'll get unlimited access to our articles and an ad-free version of this podcast. you'll also listen to the subscribers only section where we talk about a bonus story each week this podcast is made in partnership with kaleidoscope another way to support us is by leaving a five-star rating and review for this podcast that stuff really helps us out this has been 4formedia we'll see you again next time

From the publisher

The logic behind Polymarket, Kalshi and sports betting apps can be traced back to the inner workings of the slot machine. 

How did we get to a point where it’s legal for anyone to bet on anything? Be it the results of a baseball game or a land war in Europe, if you have access to a credit card and a computer you can try to predict the outcome of anything that’s happening in the world and win a little bit of money if you’re right. If we know that gambling can lead to high rates gambling addiction and financial ruin, why does it seem like our culture has suddenly embraced it?

For years, anyone who has reported on our increasing addiction to technology has found their way to Natasha Natasha Dow Schüll’s book Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas. The book is an ethnography of slot machines. It is based on many interviews with the people who make them and play them, a deep investigation of how they work, and how they fit into the larger context of casinos, Las Vegas, and gambling more broadly. 

Since it was published more than a decade ago, the logic of slot machines has extended far beyond Las Vegas. Every notification on our phone, trading platforms like Robinhood, the crypto craze, and now prediction markets, can be understood through the lens of slot machine design and Schüll work. That’s why I was incredibly happy she agreed to come on the podcast this week to discuss our current gambling-obsessed culture. 

https://www.natashadowschull.org

YouTube Version: https://youtu.be/2kRAXeKhzNY

Subscribe at 404media.co
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from The 404 Media Podcast

All 164 episodes
How the World Became a Casino (With Natasha Schüll)The 404 Media Podcast · 49 min
Listen in VO