In short
Whether Hollywood is “over” due to generative AI, and how AI is being used (or misused) in film and media business decisions.
Guest
Devindra Hardawar, senior editor at Engadget; co-host of The Filmcast (film podcast). Background as a long-time film listener/reviewer; film student turned writer.
Key claims
- Darren Aronofsky’s AI shorts (“On This Day,” tied to Google DeepMind/“Primordial Soup”) are “unwatchable” and indistinguishable from TikTok/Instagram AI “slop,” feeling like random Sora-style scene stitching.
- Steven Soderbergh’s reported use of generative AI (for trippy imagery in a John Lennon documentary and a Spanish Civil War project) may be more tool-like and case-by-case, but AI imagery often feels “substance-less.”
- The “it’s over for Hollywood” narrative is overstated; a viral AI clip is criticized as bad filmmaking and later revealed to be human-shot with face mapping.
- GenAI training/production is ethically compromised when models are built on stolen copyrighted works; better ethics would involve licensed/self-owned training data (e.g., ILM-style).
- Major media deals (Disney/OpenAI Sora, Warner Bros acquisition) reflect FOMO and can harm art; consumers may not notice immediately.
Notable examples
- Aronofsky: Pi, Requiem for a Dream, The Fountain; AI shorts criticized.
- Soderbergh: iPhone-shot experiments; Lennon documentary; Spanish Civil War film.
- Viral “Tom Cruise/Brad Pitt” AI action clip; Mario Galaxy movie as a contrast to “slop.”
- Disney/OpenAI Sora deal reportedly collapsed due to compute costs.
- Warner Bros acquisition (Ellison/Paramount context).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOInitial Thoughts on Audience Preferences
0:00 to 0:13
Exploration of why some audiences settle for low-quality content.
“I think for some people, they just want the slop.”
Devindra's Background and Film Interests
1:06 to 1:54
Discussion about Devindra's love for film and the role of recommendations.
“Been a 404 supporter forever and have loved you guys since Motherboard.”
Darren Aronofsky's Impact on Film
1:54 to 3:08
Exploration of Aronofsky's career and influence as a filmmaker.
“But I want to start with the AI stuff first.”
Aronofsky's Artistic Journey and Current Projects
3:08 to 4:37
Insights on Aronofsky's evolution and the reception of his recent works.
“think he fits into the film canon given the whole span of his career, not just this early period that we're talking about?”
Critique of Aronofsky's AI Short Film
4:37 to 6:36
Devindra shares his thoughts on Aronofsky's AI-generated film.
“And I feel like it's on this downslope that he does this AI project.”
The Broader Use of AI in Film
6:36 to 8:04
Discussion on the use of AI across the film industry and its implications.
“of random scenes cut together to sort of create a semblance of a historical epic.”
Steven Soderbergh's Innovative Approach
8:04 to 9:20
Exploration of Soderbergh's work and his openness to using AI.
“But the other example that caught my eye is Steven Soderbergh, a very prolific director, works in a lot of genres, is kind of able to do comedies, thrillers, horror.”
Comparing Soderbergh and Aronofsky's Use of AI
9:20 to 11:48
Comparison of how both directors incorporate AI into their work.
“which he said includes generative AI in it.”
The Future of AI in Filmmaking
11:48 to 13:14
Discussion on the potential future of AI in creative industries.
“because he's very much about being hands-on and doing stuff.”
The Role of AI in Film and Gaming
14:00 to 23:51
Discussion on how AI impacts filmmaking and video game development.
“He says, my job is to deliver a good movie, period.”
Show all 29 chapters
The Importance of Artistic Vision
23:52 to 24:29
Exploration of creative storytelling in adaptations and the role of artists.
“where you're just walking through a Japanese subway and there's a Japanese film adaptation that just came out.”
The Importance of Artistic Vision
24:30 to 25:31
Exploration of creative storytelling in adaptations and the role of artists.
“I hope people actually go watch those things.”
The Importance of Artistic Vision
25:35 to 27:08
Exploration of creative storytelling in adaptations and the role of artists.
“and they often get this information from all over the internet.”
The Importance of Artistic Vision
27:23 to 28:54
Exploration of creative storytelling in adaptations and the role of artists.
“Everyone has that one section of their closet full of hoodies they don't actually wear.”
The Importance of Artistic Vision
28:58 to 29:10
Exploration of creative storytelling in adaptations and the role of artists.
Hollywood and AI: The Current Landscape
29:10 to 31:09
Explore the intersection of Hollywood and AI technology, including ethical concerns and industry reactions.
“And you can see the kind of the tunnel vision that would make them say that.”
The OpenAI and Disney Deal: What Went Wrong?
31:09 to 34:24
Examine the failed partnership between OpenAI and Disney and the implications for AI-generated content.
“Like the entire thing around the industry right now, it's pure FOMO.”
Understanding OpenAI's Technology
34:24 to 36:27
Delve into the complexities and challenges of OpenAI's technology and business model.
“on the site about how the cost of compute is really reaching a point where the AI companies can't fuck around anymore with these little tools that don't generate any revenue.”
Microsoft's AI Strategy: Risks and Reckoning
36:27 to 38:22
Analyze Microsoft's approach to AI and the potential consequences of their current strategy.
“But before that, OpenAI was like nothing.”
Industry Trends: FOMO and the Future of Content
38:22 to 41:26
Discuss the fear of missing out (FOMO) driving companies in the entertainment industry to explore AI.
“they basically issued an apology for Windows to Windows users for what they've done with Copilot and everything.”
Lessons from Quibi and Future Directions
41:26 to 42:00
Reflect on past failures like Quibi and how they inform current trends in media and technology.
“I don't think people are actually going to sit down and watch long-form content on their phones.”
The Current State of Hollywood
42:00 to 43:20
Discussion on Hollywood's challenges and the role of AI in the industry.
“I'm going to take this investment and just make this bet to make this thing.”
Warner Brothers Acquisition Discussion
43:20 to 45:48
In-depth analysis of the implications of Warner Brothers' acquisition.
“I think Disney got us scot-free because I could have seen that AI deal going badly so many ways for them.”
Home Movie Watching Habits
45:48 to 47:40
Hosts share their personal movie-watching setups and routines at home.
“most consumers don't understand how this affects their content.”
Choosing the Right TV
47:40 to 50:11
Insights on selecting the best TV options for home viewing.
“But it's also, sometimes I can watch a thing that is both applicable to my work and gadget, it because it's a movie I'll be reviewing there and a movie will be reviewing on the film cast.”
Screen Time and Kids' Movies
50:11 to 54:30
Discussion on managing children's screen time and movie selections.
“And I just feel like at some point, we're going to make that move when I feel comfortable having a TV that large there with the kids.”
Rediscovering Film Through Kids
54:30 to 56:00
Exploration of how parenting affects movie viewing experiences.
“My thing right now is like, I'm very purposeful about like the other types of movies I'm showing my kids.”
Rediscovering Miyazaki Through Kids' Eyes
56:00 to 59:40
Explore how watching films with children can change your perspective on classic movies.
“And I've watched the big canonical anime movies, but I'm definitely not that guy.”
Wrapping Up with Devindra Hardawar
59:40 to 1:00:24
A closing discussion with Devindra about supporting creators and future content.
“thank you so much for coming on thank you this is great please go listen to the film cast support their Patreon on.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00I think for some people, they just want the slop. They want the slop and they're happy with it. And that makes me sad as somebody who's been reviewing movies and games and art for so long.
0:13Hello, and welcome to the 4-4 Media Podcast, where we bring you unparalleled access to hidden worlds, both online and IRL. 4-4 Media is a journalist-founded company and needs your support. To subscribe, go to 4-4media.co. As well as bonus content every single week, subscribers also get access to additional episodes where we respond to their best comments. And they get early access to our interview series too. Gain access to that content at 44media.co. This week, we're joined by Devendra Hardwar. Devendra is a senior editor at Engadget and a co-host of The Filmcast, a podcast about film I've been listening to for about 15 years.
0:52How is that possible? We've covered the intersection of the movie industry and AI here, but Devendra lives at the intersection of AI and film. So I'm very excited to have him on. Devendra, thanks for coming on the show. Hello. So happy to be here. Been a 404 supporter forever and have loved you guys since Motherboard. So this is great. Awesome to chat. Thank you. Thank you. Really appreciate it. And again, as I said, a big, big fan of your work. Thank you. I'm a recovering film student, or I was at least studying film for two years before I realized that I don't have what it takes and decided to go and hide behind a keyboard and go into writing.
1:37But I really love movies. Try to keep up with it. Can't as much as I used to, but one way I keep up with it is listening to the film cast, picking my shots based on your guys' recommendations. We try. That's like why we exist, right? because there's just so much stuff to watch and we do try to narrow down to the best stuff. Yeah. And we'll get to that. But I want to start with the AI stuff first. And I want to do that by focusing on a couple of specific examples. The first of them is this series of short, I don't know what you would even call them, like historical fiction type AI generated videos from Darren Arnofsky.
2:19Yeah, yeah. If you were to go back to Emanuel in film school and you were to ask him like, who are the most important new directors of our time, I would definitely put Arnofsky in there. He's my guy. I've loved him forever. Yeah. Right. Yeah. I think Reckoning for a Dream, obviously, like hugely influential movie that hit film lovers like really hard at the time and then for me even more than that pi which is like tech adjacent science fiction stuff that that was really interested in pi is such a miracle everybody needs to see pi i love pi so much it just had a 4k re-release yeah very worth watching um still but i want to start by like what's your take on him before we get into like the ai project like what's your take on him as a filmmaker, where do you think he fits into the film canon given the whole span of his career, not just this early period that we're talking about?
3:16I mean, he, like, Pi came out, what was it, 99? So, that was like, I was a teenager, really into movies. The whammy of Pi and Requiem for a Dream, which is a movie I've grown not to like that much. It's very impressive, but I will not rewatch that movie. It's just a miserable experience. But the filmmaking on display there is undeniable. And then he made The Fountain, which is, I think, an incredible film. Just like an incredible, really unique science fiction epic with visuals that are just, it's like organic stuff in there. It's just a beautiful film. I thought, you know, coming up, he was one of the more important directors of the 90s and the 2000s.
3:59And he's had some misses. And now he's doing the AI stuff. And it's just kind of messy. You know, I remember the run-up to Noah, which was his first big-budget studio film. And that was a complete flop. But I still found that movie kind of interesting. Mother, the Jennifer Lawrence movie, I think is astounding. So he's hit or miss for me, but then he also did The Whale, which was just like, I don't know what you're doing here, buddy, but it's not good. It's not interesting. And that felt really disappointing. And then the AI stuff is just like the icing on the cake of disappointment right now for me.
4:37yeah i guess the only thing i would add there is like there's this trajectory where we have like a young director he does a couple of like really original striking films he gets a bigger budget he gets a bigger budget he kind of gets like an oscar run with is it the wrestler right as is yeah uh and that seems to be the peak and then there's like you know you do you do two or three flops and you get shuffled into this cage in Hollywood where you don't get to work with the biggest stars or have the biggest budget or whatever. And I feel like it's on this downslope that he does this AI project. He also did Caught Stealing, which is like a B-level crime movie set in New York.
5:22Like, why the hell are you doing this? You are above this. And yet, it's a perfectly fine crime movie, but it felt beneath him, you know? It seems like an attempt to gain momentum him again right it's like maybe you can make something a few stars in it wide appeal potentially yeah low budget potentially yeah right and then it's like oh maybe it's a hit maybe he gets a shot at a bigger thing and the ai thing it's like i think it fits into that in a sense that it is like a business decision it seems or i guess what do you make do you have you seen it yeah i've seen um it's called on this day and it's a series of like historical ai films but he's also done like a whole bunch of projects with Google DeepMind.
6:03And it seems like he's been paid by Google DeepMind to have his film studio, his primordial soup is what it's called, to produce a bunch of shorts. It just feels like Google DeepMind paid them a lot of money to do stuff with AI. And this is what we're getting. As a short film, you know, like what's your critique of it? What's your read of it as a short film. It is unwatchable. Like it is pure AI garbage. It is literally the stuff that you would expect if you type something into Sora or any of the video generation tools. It is a bunch of random scenes cut together to sort of create a semblance of a historical epic.
6:42But it's also the sort of thing you can see if you just flip on TikTok right now and see people like create AI slop. My daughter likes to watch stuff around fiction, mythology stuff. So we look up stories around Greek mythology and Egyptian mythology. And TikTok and YouTube are just filled with like AI slop depicting all these stories. On this day, it's not really any different than that. Yeah, I think the Washington stuff is indistinguishable from the stuff you're describing that we see every day on Instagram. And I can't get in his head, but I find it hard to believe that someone with such a strong visual aesthetic would look at that and be like, Like, yes, I feel good about this.
7:24Like, this is a good project that I put my name on. Yeah. And frankly, I mean, I don't know. I always hope that people will make good movies even after they make bad ones. So it's not like I'm condemning him to some jail where he's not allowed to make movies again. But it is, I find, to be like a pretty shameful episode for him personally. And I guess just like the industry more broadly. But this brings me to the other example. he's not the only person who is doing this. It's like, we've seen some of Marvel uses of AI. There's some stuff that is probably happening that we don't even know about at Visual Effects Studios and so on.
8:04But the other example that caught my eye is Steven Soderbergh, a very prolific director, works in a lot of genres, is kind of able to do comedies, thrillers, horror. Another one of those exciting directors out of the 90s too, right? Like he's a generation before Aronofsky. He's more like the Tarantino timeline, but he's a hero. Like he is a hero of mine. Like he has made some of the best films ever. And he's always like an inventive and creative director. He's always trying new things. He's one of those guys, one of the first people to like make a film with an iPhone. And it didn't always look good, but he did it.
8:41He accomplished it. And it was an interesting experiment, you know? Yeah. So, so prolific, right? It's like one of his defining features is that he does so many things in so many different ways. and he's just he's willing to experiment and try and he's not precious right you say he's from the tarantino era and he's like he's like the polar opposite of tarantino where he's very very precious about like i'm only going to make 10 movies this is it they each have to be perfect he's like whatever dude i'm an artist i'm doing stuff it's like we're going to discover things while while we're making it and i think it's like arguably in this spirit right that he has spoken recently about generative AI and using it in his project.
9:19So he has a documentary about John Lennon coming out, which he said includes generative AI in it. I believe people probably have already seen cuts of this. It's not like he came away from that experience saying, oh, this was terrible and never use it again. He also talked about, he's making a movie, I believe, about the Spanish Civil War, and he intends to use generative AI in that. I guess knowing him, seeing the Darren Arnofsky example, how are you approaching projects like that? Are you coming to it with an open mind? Are you skeptical? Are you like, I think it's morally reprehensible and I'm not going to engage with movies that use this technology.
10:08I mean, it's tough. and I feel like we just kind of have to take this on a case-by-case basis right now. The Aronofsky stuff definitely felt like a paycheck. It felt like he got a lot of money as a big name and he's also a producer on all sorts of stuff. He's a producer on National Geographic shows. He makes money putting his name on a lot of different things. It felt like his heart was not in experimenting with AI. Soderbergh sounds like, hey, this is another tool, just like the way I use the iPhone, just like the way I run and gun and do a lot of guerrilla cinematography. he's interested in AI as a tool I believe around the Lennon documentary he said it was specifically for like trippy imagery that he wanted to use it for which okay if anybody has earned the right to experiment with new technologies and new things it's Steven Soderbergh I'll give him the benefit of the doubt there I don't know if that's if like maybe he needs to try to see like maybe it's not the best tool that you could use because that seems like such a weak argument you know like you can make trippy imagery in all sorts of ways.
11:09Jim Jarmusch does it with practically no budget. You know, Soderbergh himself did it. I'm thinking of like Solaris, which is I think a great film and the imagery of that planet. That is an artistic decision that was rendered by somebody, that was created by somebody and you feel something from that. And I do feel like from what we've seen, when you watch AI-created imagery, it feels so substance-less. I don't know. It's like eating cotton candy. It's like something is sweet here, but I'm not being nourished by it. It doesn't feel good. So I wonder what that's going to look like and how he's going to use it moving forward.
11:44He strikes me as somebody who would dabble with it and not really lean too much into it because he's very much about being hands-on and doing stuff. He's often editing his own stuff. He's often being his own cinematographer. He's not somebody who wants to just give up and let AI take the wheel, which is what I think a lot of creatives want to do. And certainly a lot of what the technology people want to do. like in the AI industry or studio executives. They're like, oh yeah, this stuff can make producing movies or doing certain scenes so much easier. And for them, it's because they are so far removed from the creative process.
12:15They just want the product done quicker. They don't really care how it's done. Whereas that's not Soderbergh's point of view at all. So I haven't seen this thing yet. I haven't seen what the AI footage is. It's not great. It's not a great thing, but I'll have to see it to fully judge it. Yeah. Yeah, so it sounds like you're open to the possibility of it being good. It's not like you have some ideological position where you're like, well, I use the AI, therefore it's bad. It really depends. I think there is usefulness for AI as a tool, right? As a journalist, I don't use generative AI for... There are all those pieces about the tech journalists using Gen AI for ideation and stuff.
12:54And I'm not into any of that. But sometimes I need help with transcription. And the AI models right now can do that. And that helps. That helps with my reporting. But that's a specific tool for that one thing. I am very wary of letting Gen.AI take over our work and our thinking. And to me, that's a major thing moving forward. It's like human-centered art, human-created art, I think is going to be a really important thing. So it's great that Soderbergh is getting pushback for this because I think maybe he has not fully thought about what it means to use Gen.AI in something like this. he could do that imagery in so many other ways.
13:33This feels like a really easy experiment for him. He's not leaning fully into it. I'm more worried about stuff like Natasha Lyonne and some of her colleagues talking about making something around AI, making a fully AI project, where AI is the centerpiece of why you're making it. To me, that seems inherently soulless rather than just being a tool used in a broader project. Yeah, I have a quote here from Soderbergh in front of me. He says, my job is to deliver a good movie, period. And this tool showed up at a moment when I needed it. And then he goes on to be like, you know, it's not the solution to everything.
14:11I don't think it's the death of everything. It might be a fun phase, quote unquote, which sounds reasonable and I think reflects what you're saying. The part that I'm hung up on is I look at a ton of generative AI for my job. You know what I mean? I'm sure you do as well. when I'm scrolling social media and it's like I'm very familiar and have a sense for what is AI generated and that is because it has an aesthetic and I think that aesthetic is very bad yeah that's the part that's the part that I'm hung up on and I'm dying to see the movie in order to figure out what he thought the tool did that showed up at the right time for him and again I'm open to it being good but it's it's just hard to imagine and then again it's also sad I think for what you said, it reminds me of like an Oppenheimer.
14:59There's all these abstract visual scenes where he's imagining like quantum physics. And I forgot how they did it exactly, but I read a story about how they did it. And it was kind of like a physical process. They actually shot stuff and then manipulated. And it's such a cool, ethereal thing. And it's hard to imagine beating that. There's so many ways to do it. I mean, the silent filmmakers were doing all sorts of creative things to like create trippy visuals. But I'm thinking back to like even Aronofsky's The Fountain where that is a movie where it's depicting images in deep space. It's depicting supernovas.
15:34And they use like imagery of liquids and chemical reactions to kind of sort of like make that spatial imagery seem more trippy. Going down to something at a microscopic level to make something at a macroscopic level look interesting. That's a fascinating creative choice. And that's partially why that movie looks so good and so interesting. It's timeless. I imagine if they did that with AI today, it would just look like slop. It would just look like an overly gloss CG thing where you don't feel the sort of organic nature of how they originally made those special effects. So I think it's going to require some flops, some mistakes for these directors to learn.
16:11Soderbergh is just like a kid in a candy store. He wants to try everything, I think. To pick up on one of the things that he's saying there about it just being convenient, I suppose. This issue has come up for us in video game development, where, as you know, video game development is, at least the big budget end of things, requires so much labor and so much of it is, I don't know if I would call it rote, but it's just repetitive in the sense that generating massive amounts of 3D assets. And we haven't seen this happen yet, but one could imagine using generative AI, other AI technologies to streamline their work, make that work cheaper, less grueling, right?
17:09It's just like video game development, notoriously difficult job. And a lot of that is also true for special effects studios. Sure. Very similar work. a lot of 3D asset creation. And I'm wondering, what do you think about that implementation of AI? Do you think there's a good and ethical way to do it? I mean, the criticism, the main criticism I have against generative AI is that it is a technology that's based on stolen works. That's inherently what it is. It is OpenAI and all these companies sucking up anything that they can find, copyrighted works, whatever, if you produce something online, you are likely in that.
17:52And they have created this black box that is now spitting content back out of this. And to me, that seems like the ultimate form of like big tech hubris, right? Like they're reselling stuff that they stole from us at this point. If you can take the idea of an AI model or a transformer model and build it on stuff you are personally building, like if ILM built a model based on its own work, then you're starting to erase some of those ethical considerations. And then you can start having that conversation about like, how can we use this AI as a tool to help us work better? But it involves building that model and making sure that you're only using your content or licensed content and stuff like that.
18:32I do think we're kind of getting there. That is more of a conversation a lot of these companies are talking about right now. But just because you can do it easier does not make that content inherently better. We've seen a lot of games get in trouble for having like AI voices in there, right? and it's in there until people start noticing. They're like, oh, oh, sorry. That was a stopgap. Arc Raiders had that. A whole bunch of games recently had that. I'm looking at that game, Crimson Desert, and I'm like, the conversation around that game is like, it literally is just content. There's like no narrative.
19:03It's just like an enormous world that just seems like it's a bunch of stuff put together. There's already been traces of AI stuff in there. I feel like that's a game that's so big they probably did some more AI things, which we haven't fully discovered yet. We'll probably see more games like that, that kind of sell themselves on how big they are and how massive they are. No Man's Sky kind of had a bit of that effect too. But selling themselves on the breadth of content that they have rather than the quality of it. And for some people, that may be enough. What is funny is that No Man's Sky was a game not built using AI, but it was built on a procedural formula that essentially gave it an infinite, a very large universe.
19:42it was only when the developers were able to spend time with it and years with it and build actual content not just like send it to an AI magic box the developers did the work to make that game better now No Man's Sky is like one of the best space experiences you can have right now that took human work and human effort though yeah a common refrain I see on social media tell me if you've seen this kind of post but it's like mostly on Twitter because that is like the more AI booster-y social platform. But it'll be someone who gets their hands on C-Dance or Cling AI or something like that. And they'll post a video of like an action scene.
20:26Yeah. And they'll say it's over for Hollywood. Like the Tom Cruise Brad Pitt thing. Yeah. Perfect example. Yeah. And I think that one is good, especially because there was some sort of reaction from the industry, right? It wasn't just like the AI people and the AI boosters and people on Twitter being like, wow, this is so cool. Like there was some sort of ripples in the industry. I guess, what do you think about like it's over for Hollywood perspective? I am my bullshit meter has recently like I'm just like less afraid to call bullshit on this stuff right now. And I saw that clip and I saw people inherently freaking out.
20:56I was like, first of all, that was just a bad action clip. It was not shot well. It was not edited well. It's not choreographed well. and the people saying it's over for Hollywood was like, okay, based on what? A 12 second clip that looks kind of shitty. To me, that's not over for Hollywood. And then it came out later that that was essentially just a scene that was actually shot and actually choreographed by humans and they just like mapped the actor's faces on it. So it wasn't even purely AI there. I don't know what's going on in the AI booster's mind where they're like, this is all over for you.
21:24Look at what this generative AI search engine can build for me. Look at what this machine can do for me. And maybe that is what people want. I don't quite know. I don't even know what people do with generative AI images. Do you send it to a friend and just laugh at it and be like, isn't that funny? You spent all these resources to create these images and these movies, which have real environmental impacts, to just create a thing that you can laugh at with somebody for five seconds and you immediately forget about it. it is just so so stupid but i also don't know what audiences want right like the super mario galaxy movie came out i called it a black hole of entertainment it is like a nothing movie that tells a nothing story and very little effort went into that and i got a lot of hate from people just saying man you must not love mario you must not understand mario i'm like no i want a good movie i just want i want a movie that tries to tell a story and not just literally give you all the slop you want from Nintendo.
22:22And I think for some people, they just want the slop. They want the slop and they're happy with it. And that makes me sad as somebody who's been reviewing movies and, you know, games and art for so long. As bad as you think the Mario Galaxy movie is, you were in a theater. I assume you watched it in a theater. I was in a theater. You were in a theater. You sat there. How long is it? Is it 90 minutes? Or is it like a grueling? It's about 90 minutes. It's 90 minutes. You sat there. Your eyes were open. You absorbed the images. You were able to enjoy like the audio visual stimuli and then you walked away and you were like, that was nothing and it was very lowbrow and lowest common denominator and all that.
22:58I don't think that AI can produce anything comparable to that experience as negative as it was for you. I don't know if you would be able to bear two hours of... Not just to give cred to Illumination Studios or something where it's just like, at least you're making something, right? At least it's an ethos, which is something we like to say. Yeah, there are bad movies. I would watch a bad movie over AI slop repeated for two hours or something. And the AI boosters keep saying like, Oh yeah, movies are dead. You're going to watch this stuff. You can barely create a 30-second AI clip that is interesting to me.
23:39How are you going to turn this into an experience where people actually sit down and think about it? a good sort of like opposite reaction to the Mario Galaxy movie. The adaptation of Exit 8 just came out. And that was an indie game where you're just walking through a Japanese subway and there's a Japanese film adaptation that just came out. It's incredible. It is a great, like, reminds me of old school Aronofsky, reminds me of like Vincenzo Natali's Cube. It reminds me of like creepy independent movies that have a lot of really interesting ideas and it builds on the ideals from the game. So that is an artist.
24:13Genki Kamamura is an artist who was able to synthesize what he loved about the game and bring in other things and create this new form of art based on the game. And that feels so heartening because I saw that the week after the Mario Galaxy movie. I'm like, yeah, we can do good things. We can make a good game adaptation. Good art is still possible. I hope people actually go watch those things. Yeah, I mean, to that last point, I think something I love about Filmcast is that it is hard to keep in front of mind that people are making good things. And in fact, they're making so many good things that it's hard to watch at all.
24:47You just have to look a little bit out of the mainstream maybe in order to find it. But one reason I would recommend the show is that if you think like movies are boring or they're not making movies for you, I guarantee that they are. You just have to like look a little bit for them. And good shows too. Like I think people, a lot of people looked at something like DTF St. Louis and like this is just another, you know, white people in suburbia murder mystery thing. And no, it is like a special, unique creation because Stephen Conrad is a really interesting writer and a director. So DTF St. Louis, if you're looking for something else good to watch, that's great.
25:31This episode is sponsored by Incogni. One thing I've learned is that scammers and hackers don't need everything about you to cause problems. and they often get this information from all over the internet. Maybe they get your phone number from one site, your address from another, your email from somewhere else, and suddenly they put a patchwork together that they can have a surprisingly detailed profile of your life. That's what makes identity theft and scams so frustrating and so scary. The information often isn't stolen in one big breach. It's already scattered all over the internet and scammers just put the pieces together.
26:03That's where Incogni comes in. Incogni helps remove your personal information from the internet and reduces your overall digital footprint. They contact data brokers, people search websites, and other sites that collect and publish your personal information, and they handle the removal process on your behalf. I don't know if you've ever tried to opt out of this stuff on your own, but it's a huge pain. Incogni makes it easy, and they don't do it just once. Incogni continues monitoring and removing your information because personal data has a habit of showing backup online over time. What really makes Incogni stand out is their custom removals feature.
Read the full transcript
26:36Let's say you find a specific website, search result, or social media account that's displaying personal information about you. Instead of spending hours trying to figure out who owns the site and how to contact them, you can submit it through Incogni and their privacy team will handle the removal request for you. That's a huge difference because protecting yourself online isn't just about removing your data from huge databases. It's about taking control of your entire digital footprint. The less information available online, the less material scammers and identity thieves have to work with. Take your personal data back with Incogni.
27:09Go to incogni.com slash 404media and use code 404media to get 60 % off an annual plan. Again, that's incogni.com slash 404media and use code 404media for 60 % off an annual Incogni plan today. Everyone has that one section of their closet full of hoodies they don't actually wear. They're either too heavy, too scratchy, too warm, too thin, or they look great for about three weeks before they started stretching out. That's why I was skeptical when people kept telling me about Paka. But after wearing Paka hoodies for a while, I kind of get the hype. Paka makes outdoor and lifestyle apparel from alpaca fiber, one of the world's most sustainable and natural fibers.
27:47It's a little warm in LA right now, so I'm wearing a Paka t-shirt, which I really like. I also have Paka socks. But in the winter and fall, even in the spring, I really like their best-selling hoodie, which somehow manages to be softer than cashmere, warmer than wool, and still breathable. What's surprising the most is how versatile their hoodies and their t-shirts are. I've worn them on cool mornings, long walks, working from home, even while traveling. The hoodie doesn't feel bulky, and it seems to adapt to whatever temperature you're dealing with. It's also built for real life, thermoregulating, odor-resistant, durable, and made to last.
28:22And every hoodie is made start to finish in Peru and includes an Inca ID that's handwoven by artisans, connecting you directly to the tradition and people behind it. More than 250 ,000 people have already picked up a pack of hoodie. Again, I mean, I'm really into everything that Packa makes. I have the hoodie. I have a few different t-shirts, which have quickly become the softest and best in my closet. Everything I've gotten from them holds up really well. I really like their socks as well. So if you've been thinking about leveling up your hoodie or your t-shirt or your sock game, this is your sign.
28:54To grab your Paka hoodie, go to www.pakaapparel.com. That's www.pakaapparel.com.
29:10To the it's over for Hollywood mindset, most often that comes from people who are already invested in AI, either literally in a business sense, financially, or I don't know, ideologically, they're just big supporters of AI and they think that's the way. And you can see the kind of the tunnel vision that would make them say that. But there is pickup. And it's like, I think about Runway, which is a company that we cover that is an AI video generator. They partnered with Lionsgate, I believe. Sorry, a bit of a tangent here is you just mentioned that it would be better or more ethical if these AI video generators were working off their own training data and not stealing it from other people.
29:59And Runway, the story that we did is that they massively, like we proved that they massively stole training data from just like nobody, YouTubers that have like 100 followers, they're using them in the training data. And I believe there was some sort of story where Lionsgate was like, okay, well, we need to not do that. We need to work with our own library of movies. And they realize they don't have enough in their library to provide them with good training data in order to generate videos. So it's not clear how sustainable that business model is unless they determine legally that it's okay to steal from the internet.
30:37The point is Lionsgate, which is a real company that makes real movies, they made a deal. They think that there's something there? Do you think that is just placing a bet that they know that might not work out? Are the executive disconnected from the actual movie market in terms of what people want to see? What do you make of the fact that it's like people are making deals? It's like, we can talk about how much we think this is garbage, but it's happening. I mean, I don't think they know what those deals actually mean, right? Like the entire thing around the industry right now, it's pure FOMO.
31:12It's all FOMO. And especially it's rich people being like, Like, am I missing out? Am I losing because I'm not investing in AI? It feels similar to the whole Web3 and crypto boom and NFT boom from several years ago where Matt Damon was out there selling NFTs, like selling crypto stuff. I don't know how much they care about that right now. They got paid for it, you know? But we saw game studios and even, I think some movie studios, consider the idea of crypto stuff and what they could do there. And it just felt like fun, right? None of that led to anything useful for society or their art. It was just a thing they kind of explored.
31:48I think, have you seen the movie The Congress? It's something I keep coming back to. Isn't that the Israeli director? Yes. I have not seen that, but I'm a big fan of his earlier work. So yeah, The Congress, 2013 movie by Ari Fulman. And it's a really interesting film because it's like a weird, like partially sci-fi thing that becomes like partially animated because it's what he does. But it's about this world where artists, where the actors essentially sell their faces to this sort of like AI company. And once they license their likeness away, they cannot act anymore. It's illegal for them to act.
32:22And something happens and this leads to a whole dystopian society. But I keep thinking back to that movie and that idea because it seems like that's what we're building towards, right? Like we have seen actors sell their likenesses. James Earl Jones licensed his voice to Disney to be used as Darth Vader after his death. We're going to see more of that. Val Kilmer's likeness is going to be in a freaking movie, which was approved by his kids. We're going to see more things like that. Yeah, I think these studios want to experiment with it because they're all afraid of missing out on whatever this is.
32:56And the whole thing with Disney and OpenAI was just wild because it's like, that's the ultimate thing. That's where Disney, of all companies, is afraid of missing out on some aspect of the AI boom, that they'll sign a billion dollar deal with this company that is only a few years old. That just seems wild to me. So this is a good segue because it's like the other thing I want to talk about what I think are the two biggest stories in AI and the film industry. One of them is definitely what you mentioned about the deal between OpenAI and Disney. To recap, OpenAI launches Sora. Sora is an AI video generator.
33:33It's a good one. It's like the higher quality type of video generation. and then shortly thereafter, Disney announces that they made a deal with OpenAI. I believe the terms of the deal are like, Disney is going to give OpenAI a billion dollars, which OpenAI needs every dollar they can get because all this inference costs a ton of money that they have to keep raising money to support. And then the most baffling part of the deal to me was they out the gate said, yeah, and we'll have Sora content in Disney Plus, which is like the app that I opened to show something to my son, which I found to be insane.
34:17Now, we should say, since then, this whole thing fell apart. Sora is gone. Open AI shut it down because Jason just published a story on the site about how the cost of compute is really reaching a point where the AI companies can't fuck around anymore with these little tools that don't generate any revenue. so it's like they shut down Sora because it costs so much to let people make videos that have no value and the deal I didn't even know you could do this the deal is gone it's like they're not getting the billion dollars and they're not Disney just like the whole thing is over it was a surprise to Disney too like they were surprised it's a decision we should yeah this is important it's a decision from OpenAI it's not as if Disney said like what are we doing we need to walk away from this OpenAI said like we actually can't afford this we can't this is this is a this is a fool's errand to like make this video generation profit generating thing for us so to start with like the craziest part it's like ai generated video in the disney app i think there was also some allusion to the fact where it's like you would be able to use our characters right so it's like yeah generate your own marvel stuff what do you think what is the mentality do you think at like the biggest media company in the world where they even entertain this as an idea What came out of Sora and some of the other models is that people found, I think you guys had noticed some of this too, they rendered licensed characters already.
35:41They were doing gross, disgusting things. So I think Disney is just like, hey, they already have our stuff. They have our characters. Let's at least have some economic tie to this usage. And maybe it could be a thing that boosts viewership in Disney Plus or something. But something I've learned, having covered the technology industry for 16 years now, full time, And I'm like, a lot of these people have no idea what they're doing. No clue what they're doing. And that goes doubly for anything around OpenAI, which was the company started from like a sham idea, the sham idea of a nonprofit being created to stop evil AI from Elon Musk and a whole bunch of people.
36:21And they just kind of stumbled into this, right? It was the invention of Google's Transformer model that kind of spearheaded all of this, like launched all of these things. But before that, OpenAI was like nothing. They had nothing going on. But they were lucky enough to stumble into that idea of the transformer model. They had AI researchers. They were able to build a thing that became eventually ChatGPT. And that became a really powerful use of this particular model. They have no idea how it works. It is a black box. And this whole thing of like Microsoft and all these companies like just throwing billions of dollars at OpenAI, who has no idea really how their technology is working.
37:01They're still messing around with it. It's like when they released GPT-5 and people were mad that it didn't do some things that the earlier models did. Yeah, they didn't know. They don't know what's actually changing, even though they say some aspects of it are improved. I think we're going to see a reckoning for all these companies that have jumped on to OpenAI and all these other folks. So Disney probably got off scot-free here, right? It's a deal that just ultimately died. Didn't affect their business. they didn't have to deal with any like weird content that appeared on the Disney Plus app.
37:31Microsoft is fully in bed with OpenAI. Like their investment in OpenAI is like practically 50 % of like whatever the for-profit side of OpenAI was. Microsoft's partnership is like they're putting Copilot and everything. They're doing all this. Satya Nadella is fully on board with it. My conversations with Microsoft executives have gotten really weird over the years where I'm like, you guys are making Copilot and this AI stuff, the centerpiece of Windows 11, it's like a calculator that's wrong sometimes. If I had a calculator that was wrong, if I had an employee that just delivered bad answers sometimes, I wouldn't use it.
38:08It seems like a bad tool. And the executives just keep saying, oh, it'll get better. It'll just get better. And it's this weird thing where they're fully invested in something that they know is broken. And they're starting to feel the pain from that right now. They just have to release that. they basically issued an apology for Windows to Windows users for what they've done with Copilot and everything. They're kind of pulling back in Copilot and Windows 11. They say they're going to be a little more thoughtful about getting those features out there. But yeah, Microsoft is just so desperate. Like they missed out on so many big tech waves.
38:41They're like, we're going to be first AI. We're going to be a partner with OpenAI. We're going to make it a big thing. And it worked out for them for a little while with the initial like Bing chat launch and all the Copilot stuff. but I think ultimately it's going to hurt them. Like we're seeing in many ways, this over-reliance in AI is not helping Microsoft at all. So that is my thing. Disney, Microsoft, all these companies, it's all FOMO. They just want to get some AI partnership to feel like they're not actually missing out on this. But the reckoning is coming. Like the fact that these tools often don't work well, cost a ton of resources, are turning off users.
39:17There are so many reasons to tread more carefully here. everyone's talking about Apple being slow to AI and being bad at AI. I feel like they have a perfect response here because they're just like, they stumbled into the fact that they were a little late to it, but also maybe you shouldn't rush into this. Maybe you should be more thoughtful about how you implement these things because it matters. The minor errors Apple encountered like notification summaries, not a big deal. Copilot producing bad information for Windows users, that could affect lives, that could affect people's finances. That's a much more horrible thing to deal with, I think.
39:51So I think our regular listeners would know that I pretty much agree with all of that. But when I thought about the Disney opening idea, and I always tried to examine my blind spots and think, okay, well, let's assume these people are not stupid and it's not just FOMO. What is going on here? and i guess what really shook me is the idea that you and i look at this tom cruise and brad pitt scene and we kind of laugh and mock it and we consider ourselves movie buffs and we know movie history and like we whatever we appreciate the form and we're like this is garbage obviously this is garbage but then maybe disney which has its tendrils in all parts of the media industry is looking at the data and they're like, look, man, we're investing all this energy and paying artists and taking bets, not as much as they used to.
40:54Obviously, it's like, you know, the industry is very homogenous and Marvel and Star Wars and all that stuff. But it's like, we're trying to make stuff, right? Even if it's the Super Mario Galaxy, we're trying to make things. And it's like, we're looking at the data and it's actually people, the way they spend most of their time is they're scrolling TikTok and TikTok is full of this garbage. so it's like what are we doing like yeah yeah so i mean isn't that like a valid business decision you know what i mean it's the the kids that are wrong uh kind of perspective of on things yeah for us like we think we should think that i don't know it's i can see the business case i can see why they did it like listen i talked to you freaking remember quibi you know like i i talked to jeff katzenberg i sat down i talked to jeff katzenberg around quibi and i was grilling It was like, this seems like a bad idea.
41:43I don't think people are actually going to sit down and watch long-form content on their phones. I don't think they're going to be turning their phones. And by that point, they had gotten$2 billion in funding. Jeff Katzenberg and Meg Whitman. And they could just be like, well, we are successful. We have made money before. I'm a Hollywood titan. I'm going to take this investment and just make this bet to make this thing. Because yeah, kids are just watching stuff on their phones. Quibi barely lasted a month. you know like there are these weird wild bets out there at least Quibi was like human created content but if they had survived I'm sure they would have like tried to do the AI stuff but it's like a lot of people are taking the wrong lessons out of things and I think we see that happen time and time again we see that in Hollywood we see that in big business and in media and in everything so I would not blame these companies for like dabbling a bit in the AI stuff and seeing like what you can build around that.
42:38But I also think this is a time for a lot of companies to like really look at their strengths and look at what they can do very well and kind of double down on that because we're seeing younger viewers like Gen Z folks want to see movies in the theater. We're still seeing people show up for like event films in the theater. I don't know how the hell Barbie and Oppenheimer, how Barbenheimer happened, but that was the thing. I didn't even like Oppenheimer that much. And yet somehow that became a hit, a talkie movie about the birth of the atomic bomb. It's people in rooms talking. It made a shit ton of money.
43:11I don't know how that happened. There is hope out there for Hollywood, but they're going to bet. They're going to make these bets and it's going to look really stupid. The key is not to make too big of a bet. I think Disney got us scot-free because I could have seen that AI deal going badly so many ways for them. Let's talk about the other huge business story, which is the acquisition of Warner Brothers. initially it seemed like Netflix was going to be the buyer yeah politics the machinations of the Ellisons and and and the White House and so on that's not going to happen Paramount there was just a story today that the Warner Brothers investors or shareholders agreed to the acquisition and yeah Warner Brothers is going to at least at the moment it seems like like Paramount is going to own it I think you're a lot more plugged in like I'm assuming that you notice like what movies come out of what studios and which production companies and so on.
44:06There was a lot of panic about this. Even putting the politics of it aside, do you think like the average person who let's say streams a lot of stuff at home but maybe goes to the movies like once or twice a year, are they going to notice the impact of this at all? And if so, how? I mean, they probably won't notice. I don't think most people really follow directors or studios or things. They follow franchises, right? They'll follow actors and visible names. I think people may eventually start to notice where less interesting things are making into theaters. This is a really sad situation because when this whole thing was first announced, where Netflix seemed like the big thing, I did a lot of research around there and I talked to people in Hollywood.
44:47And I really came to the conclusion where like, this is bad. Like, this is bad no matter where we go. The Netflix thing could have been interesting, at least for the landscape of Hollywood and kind of what they're doing right now. All the Ellicens want to do is build a media empire and essentially a right-leaning conservative media empire. And they don't care about much else, right? They want to make money. I don't think they care about the art form. I don't think they care about movies. I don't think they care much about Hollywood. It's going to be a really sad state for these studios. And I don't know what they're going to do.
45:18It's just tremendously sad. At least like if it was Netflix getting Warner Brothers Discovery, that's a newer sort of tech-focused company that could be doing something interesting. I could have seen it like there's a potential where that led Netflix to taking theaters more seriously, which is a problem right now because some great releases are not making it to theaters and that's a damn shame. The theatrical stuff around Paramount and Warner Brothers, actual movie releases, it's just going to lead to like more right-leaning garbage slop. Maybe people will notice that eventually, but I think this is one of those insidious things.
45:52These things happen at the top. These mergers happen. These deals happen. most consumers don't understand how this affects their content. So it's up to the journalists and the media to shout it out. It's sad. All I can say is it's sad. And I'm worried about what this means for the future of Warner Brothers, which is such a storied studio and their whole back catalog and everything. It's not going to be in the best of hands. Yeah, I was trying to look at what they've put out because I'm not the kind of person who could tell you off the top of my head. but didn't they put up a lot of the Nolan movies?
46:24Isn't that them? Yeah. So I'm just thinking, it's just like, if you like Christopher Nolan, you know what I mean? It's like, if you like Inception or Oppenheim or whatever, it's like, that's where he lives. And I don't know, that seems, it's like, doesn't bode well for that. I'm sure he can make movies. I'm just saying, it's like the type of studio that funds that work that people think is like a pillar of like modern cinema. He had a big falling out with them, I think, because of the whole HBO same day stuff. So Oppenheimer was universal. So he kind of flipped over there. Yeah, yeah. But again, like it's that sort of thing.
46:58Artists are tied to studios. They like to work with specific studios. I'm not sure how many people are going to be excited to work for the Ellisons and, you know, the Ellison owned Warner Brothers and the Ellison owned Paramount. Yeah. So last couple of things I wanted to talk to you about, and I'm just going to indulge myself because it's something that I often wonder when I listen to you guys. You guys watch a lot of stuff. Mm-hmm. You have a full-time job. You have two kids. I often wonder how you make it happen. It's hard. Let's talk about at home, right? It's like, what is the setup? Where are you watching movies and when?
47:34It's almost always after the kids are asleep or when I have pockets of time, maybe during the workday. But it's also, sometimes I can watch a thing that is both applicable to my work and gadget, it because it's a movie I'll be reviewing there and a movie will be reviewing on the film cast. And that's, that's gold. That's like, oh man, I am producing so much content from this time. But yeah, we have a house outside of Atlanta. I'm lucky enough to have like a projector and a big projector screen in my basement. And that is my like little personal movie theater. It's nothing fancy, but it's, it looks good.
48:05And I have my surround system there. But we also have like, you know, a large TV in our family room. And that's where I watch stuff with my kids. I'm sad to say, like I do like to watch like little short form videos with my daughter because it's just like a thing we do sometimes to pass the time during bath time or whatever. And you know, that's like the minor thing. But most of what I watch happens after the kids are asleep. And thank goodness they're getting better about sleeping. But I am somebody who can like drive to the movie theater after 10 p.m., still make it through a movie and still make it back home.
48:34It was so much easier in New York where I didn't have to drive. But that's typically what I do right now. Or I'm watching a movie late at night at home. You know, I've talked about this. Sometimes you don't feel like moving if you're a parent. Bedtime is done. Bath time is done. You just feel like collapsing in your bed or whatever. I will watch stuff on my phone. I don't typically watch movies on my phone, but I watch TV shows on my phone because it's like, I don't have to move. But I can veg here and I have a decently large OLED screen inches from my eyes and I can watch a TV show and still have a full sense of how it's made and how it looks.
49:07So I watched a lot of the pit that way this year and it works for the visceral nature of the pit. You know, it's not the best viewing experience, but it's one way to do it. I'm surprised you said projector. I assume you would be an OLED guy. I would assume you would look down at projectors. I have OLED everywhere. Like, listen, I understand the differences. I report on like TV stuff and projector stuff, but I have a, it's a laser short, ultra short throw projector. So it's like one of those things that's like sits close to the wall and spits out a 120 inch image. And I'm sorry, but, For OLED, if you want over 100 inches, you're spending tens of thousands of dollars right now.
49:45TVs are getting cheaper. I'm seeing some wild deals out there right now. So if you want a mini LED, a not-so-great mini LED, but at 100 inches, you can get that between$1 ,000 and$2 ,000 right now. Older OLED sets are also coming down. So right now, we have a 65-inch mini LED in our family room, which I think is perfectly fine. Large enough for the kids. Maybe a bit too large. But I'm like, these 77-inch OLEDs are getting down to like$1 ,500, which is insane. And I just feel like at some point, we're going to make that move when I feel comfortable having a TV that large there with the kids. So that'll probably be something right now.
50:21If anybody's in the market for TV, look at slickdeals.net right now because the deals are insane. I would say go to Best Buy. I bought my first new TV in like 20 years. I had a Sony Bravia I bought in 2010. And I used it up until this year. And it was totally fine, 1080p. And then I went to Best Buy because I very much was like, okay, if I'm going to get a good TV, I'm going to get the best quality. That's what I care about. I want the best quality image I can get. I don't care about the size as much. You will. The more you sit with that TV, you will be like, I could actually fit a 77-inch in this room.
50:5277-inch TVs are actually not that large anymore. So you can make it work. You can get one for like$500. Best Buy is good if you can fit into your car. The really clutch things are like, there's so many of these deals where it's like, you get free delivery and you get free setup. and that's like the best thing because what you don't want to do is be a novice handling these massive screens which can crack really easily if you unbox them badly. When you get the install service, it's super nice. They can even wall mount it sometimes for free as part of these deals too. So I would say take advantage of those things because these things are very delicate.
51:26So the less you put your hands on it and set it up, sometimes the better. Yeah. The price of everything obviously is going up. Somehow TV is cheaper than ever. I don't understand it. Well, they're getting a new stock. The new stock of the units are coming in. So this may be the cheapest TVs are for a very long time. Who knows what's going to happen? But yeah, the old stock is being replaced right now. So I think LG and a lot of folks are trying to clear things out. Okay, that makes sense. So I guess the other thing is, speaking of kids and not having time, I have a two and a half year old and I came into parenting and screen time extremely blase.
52:05Yep. Yep. My opinion on that changed immediately. Like I grew up and we were allowed to do anything with screens. I was like, whatever, he can do everything. And then I saw how he reacted to the phone. yeah i really didn't like that we curbed that and now we are trying to like build a healthier relationship and i think it's working but i'm wondering like how how are you approaching it like when did you introduce them to full movies or did yeah did you try how are you picking stuff are you like consciously trying to like raise film fans absolutely yeah so tell me what are you doing It's all a conscious effort.
52:43I will say for parents, there are enough studies out there that screen time before 18 months, definitively not a great thing. So if you can try to avoid that, that's a good thing. Once you get to two years old, then you can start to have a little fun. And around two to three, I was like, okay, what am I going to introduce to my daughter? We're going to be her first things when it comes to media. And a lot of that ended up being Miyazaki movies. And I'll say, My Neighbor Tortoro is a perfect film for children. like perhaps the ultimate, the best kids film ever made. And the dubs are great too. So the Totoro, Kiki's Delivery Service, really fun, really great, really sweet.
53:23Ponyo on the Cliff is like a little more grating. It's not as good as like a Totoro, but it's still Mizuki. It's still fun. And then you can expand from there. And I try to avoid things that have too much violence and stuff. But my daughter has seen a bit of Nausicaa. She's seen Porco Rosso with me. I try to be really careful about how some of that stuff is. Cartoonish violence, I'm not too worried about. Realistic violence, I am like more concerned with. But the Miyazaki stuff has been a good thing to lean on. And then from there, it's just like great kids movies, great kids show that I really enjoyed.
53:57Bluey came out at the perfect time. Bluey is just like a perfect, perfect thing. Short episodes, really inventive, really creative show. I am very careful about the media I introduce my kids to. My wife is less careful. So that's how I find like, oh, mom, my son is watching Vlad and some, like these Russian kids who live in Dubai or something. I'm like, how the hell did this happen? What are we doing here? I do try to avoid that. Some of that stuff is real bad, but you can be thoughtful, especially if you're a parent who likes to watch shows, likes to watch movies and stuff. You can't be thoughtful about it.
54:30You can bring your kids into it. My thing right now is like, I'm very purposeful about like the other types of movies I'm showing my kids. So my kids really want to see some Marvel stuff, They wanted to see more superhero stuff. Like, how do I get into the MCU? Iron Man is not a great movie for kids. Maybe not the best. Like, you probably shouldn't go in chronological order. And the best introduction ended up being Spider-Man. Ended up being the Tom Holland Spider-Mans. So Homecoming was like a good one. I fast forward scary bits. I fast forward bloody bits. But my kids love Spider-Man. But I actually started, even before that, I was like, we're going to get to Raimi.
55:07If we're going to start, if we're going to go down the superhero path, we're going to, it's going to be Sam Raimi. You're going to know Sam Raimi's Spider-Man before anything else. We watched Spider-Man 1 and they loved that. And that introduced them to the idea of like sitting down and watching live action stuff more. We've watched The Princess Bride. We've watched like a lot of the classics too. I'm being very careful about it. Star Wars is the one where I'm like, how do I introduce this? Because there's so many ways in and I kind of just want to do A New Hope. But I go where the kids are interested.
55:37And right now, it's been like superhero stuff. It's been me as hockey. And it's worked out pretty well. My son was in an all-encompassing Pixar's Cars phase. Oh, man, that's rough. I've seen the movie a million times. And I could do a four-hour podcast just about the logic of the Cars universe. Logic of Cars is insane. Crazy. But it's funny. You said Totoro, that is the thing that broke the spell. I put that on. Yeah. And I've watched the big canonical anime movies, but I'm definitely not that guy. And I did not get Totoro. It's a movie made for kids. It's kid logic purely throughout. It is. It really is.
56:20And I really appreciate it. I could not appreciate it until I watched it with a child next to me. Same. It's nice for me because I'm rediscovering Miyazaki through this experience. if I may how do you literally put something on for them which by which I mean what I found to be different from my experience of watching movies as a kid and my kids experience of watching movies is how malleable the content is because it's like I grew up with like a VHS and lots of movies and I can put on whatever I wanted and all that so it's not like I didn't have access to stuff I definitely did but like when he was in the cars phase for example he even at 2 realized that initially he watched the movies and he just watched them through and then he was like you know what I really I like this part of this movie and I like that part of that movie and I know that I can pick and choose what I want because it's all on the screen and it's all you can scroll through the movies and he can pick whichever movie you want and he doesn't have an understanding or access to TikTok but it is kind of a TikTok logic of like I can immediate gratification to whatever I want immediately and I'm wondering A if you've noticed that and B it's like have you found a way to bypass that like I've seen some people and I find the idea a bit twee but it makes sense to me where people are like I have a room set up with VHS tapes for my kids.
57:57It's like, I understand that now. I understand why you would want to do that. Yeah. Yeah. That's really, I mean, that's really cute. What I've noticed is that every kid is different. Like every kid has different demands. My son has different demands than my daughter. And my daughter is the one who's seven. Watching stuff with them, a lot of it comes down to being like, hey, let's sit down. Let's take a look at this. Or if it's, they're not listening to me. Like if they don't want to like sit down, I just start watching something. Like I just start watching it while they're playing and they will like they'll start watching whatever you put on the tv and i kind of get them in and get them distracted from whatever else they're doing my daughter is an ipad kid unfortunately because she's um by like three to four like she just got really into minecraft i'm like you know of all the things to be into as a kid minecraft is kind of a really wonderful thing because it's pure creation i love minecraft i i didn't play minecraft at all.
58:48When I was like, I was not that age for it. I was like an adult by that point. But I am discovering Minecraft through my daughter and learning about it. We saw the Minecraft movie together and like kids are so spoiled. Like they can watch those clips however they want now. They have instant access to all this content. Minecraft is like something that's pure creation. My kids don't ask for specific clips, but we certainly they know we can always just rewatch a movie from the beginning. so I think they kind of treat it like VHS right rather than ask for specific scenes they're like okay we're halfway through the movie now let's start back from the beginning let's just let's just start again so that's how I ended up watching like The Incredibles and all these other things like hundreds of times like my kids are big into the Pixar stuff too for sure okay Devendra I could keep talking to you about this for many hours but we should wrap it up thank you so much for coming on thank you this is great please go listen to the film cast support their Patreon on.
59:47Highly, highly recommend it. Thank you. As a reminder, 4-4 Media is a journalist founded and supported by subscribers. If you wish to subscribe to 4-4 Media and directly support our work, please go to 4-4 Media.co. You'll get unlimited access to our articles and ad-free versions of this podcast. You'll also get to listen to the subscribers section where we talk about a bonus story each week. This podcast is made in partnership with Kaleidoscope and Alyssa Metcalf. Another way to support us is by leaving a five-star rating and review for the podcast. That stuff really helps us out. This has been 44 Media.
1:00:23I'll see you next time.
1:00:44Shade Technology is engineered to protect you from the sun's harsh rays that can burn and damage your skin. The sun is relentless, but so is our gear. Level up your summer at Columbia.com to spend more time outside and less time slathering on aloe lotion. You're welcome. Columbia. Engineered for whatever.
From the publisher
Emanuel talks to Devindra Hardawar about AI in Hollywood and the state of the movie industry.
Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code 404MEDIA at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/404media
I didn’t plan it this way, but it’s a good coincidence that my interview with Devindra Hardawar is coming out on the week that the first Star Wars movie in years is being crushed at the box office by two low budget horror movies. Something is extremely off at Hollywood, or at least the old studio executives and streamers who control most of the money that funds movies.
This week we’re joined by Devindra Hardawar. Devindra is a senior editor at Engadget and a co-host of The Filmcast, a podcast about film I’ve been listening to for 15 years. We’ve covered the intersection of the movie industry and AI here and there on 404 Media, but Devindra lives at that intersection. He’s the perfect person to talk to about AI and film, but also the state of the industry more broadly, how to fit movies into your life in the age of the infinite scroll, how to introduce kids to film, and more.
YouTube Version: https://youtu.be/imCSQkhFkoM
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
