#243: GPT-6 Sol and Luna, Opus 5.5, the New Microsoft Copilot, Jensen Huang vs. AI Doomers & Introducing AI Score

0:00He's forgetting that like a large portion of the population of future workers hate AI, like want nothing to do with it. So it's wildly unpopular. And so you can't just assume that they're all just going to be AI natives and love it. And they're just going to like, it's just going to be amazing. Welcome to the Artificial Intelligence Show, the podcast that helps your business grow smarter by making AI approachable and actionable. My name is Paul Roetzer. I'm the founder and CEO of SmarterX and Marketing AI Institute. and I'm your host. Each week I'm joined by my co-host and SmarterX Chief Content Officer, Mike Kaput, as we break down all the AI news that matters and give you insights and perspectives that you can use to advance your company and your career.

0:45Join us as we accelerate AI literacy for all.

0:52Welcome to episode 243 of the Artificial Intelligence Show. I'm your host, Paul Reitzer, along with my co-host, Mike Kaput. We are recording Monday, September 28th, 9 a.m. Definitely expecting some news this week. So time stamping is relevant here. There's all kinds of stuff. I'm waiting. I don't know if you saw anything, but Trump and Dario Amadei were supposed to be having dinner Sunday night at 10 p.m. I haven't heard the outcome of that dinner. We've got OpenAI Dev Day this week. There's rumors of Gemini 4 potentially dropping at some point soon. So like, I think we're heading into fall or we I guess we're technically in fall weekend now.

1:33But it is it's gonna be a very busy fall season. It looks like in the AI world. Yeah. So today's episode is brought to us by MAKON. This is the AI conference for marketing and business leaders happening October 13 to 15 in Cleveland, Ohio. This is our seventh mic. Does that sound right? Yeah. Yeah. I think we launched MAKON in 2019. So So the seventh run. So you've been thinking about joining us for Macon. This is the time. We have, I guess, two weeks left, Mike, which is terrifying for me because I have like four presentations at Macon and I am in the midst of trying to build all of them simultaneously.

2:12But definitely check it out. We have a special offer going on. Mike and I are actually going to be hosting a private lunch exclusively for our podcast audience. during that lunch, you're gonna be able to ask Mike and myself any questions on your mind about AI, your company, your career, what's going on at Macon, because this is going to be, I think, on day two, Mike, is it? Yes, yeah. Okay. So yeah, definitely get in, use that when you register. So it's macon.ai, M-A-I-C-O-N.ai, use pod 100 as your promo code. That will automatically get you an invite to that lunch. That's the only people that are going to be coming to that lunch.

2:46So it's just an Ask Us Anything session while you enjoy some amazing food. We actually, our team does an incredible job with the food and beverage at Macon, especially the final day. You don't want to miss that. It's like all these amazing Cleveland foods. But you can register at macon.ai, get that$100 off, and get the invite to that private lunch. So, yeah, two weeks left. We would love to see you there. It's going to be an incredible lineup. up. We have Karen Howe, the best-selling author of Empire of AI. I actually just talked to Karen last week. We did a prep session for her keynote. I cannot wait for that.

3:23Andrew Yang's going to be there. Kevin Roos coming out with his Chronicles of AGI or AGI Chronicles book is dropping, I think, like the week before Mekon. So he'll be there doing a book signing. Can't wait for that one. It's just going to be amazing. So if you can get to Cleveland, October 13th to the 15th, do it. We've got the Rock Hall rented out for the opening night party. Hopefully the Guardians will be in the midst of round one or two of the playoffs. So Cleveland is going to be an amazing place to be. And fall in Cleveland is my absolute favorite time of the year. So check it out, macon.ai.

3:55We would love to see you there. All right. Every week we start off with an AI Pulse survey. We've been running these for two-week sprints now to get more responses. And we actually have some great feedback on this one. We had almost 300 responses this time. So the question was, how has your personal sentiment about AI shifted in the past six months? This is pretty remarkable. It is basically split. So we have more excited, 25%, about the same, 24%, more cautious, 27%, more worried, 25%. So it is like, literally, I'm looking at the pie chart. It is a perfect, almost a perfectly split pie. So, yeah.

4:38So thanks to everybody for participating. This was our hope is we could start to get maybe like 300 to 500 responses for each of these. So we can start to make it a little bit more projectable data. Like right now, we treat them as like informal polls. So it's a good look at how our audience feels about what's going on in AI. So we'll have a new question up. Mike can share more about that at the end. But it's smarterx.ai forward slash pulse. And you can participate in these each week. So, yeah, Mike, I don't know how you felt about that. That's pretty wild to see the balance there, though. Unreal.

5:09Yeah, it was pretty cool to get so many responses. But, yeah, I can't say it surprises me that there's a significant portion of people that are getting more cautious and more worried based on the news of the last nine months or so. Yeah. And it's, you know, today's episode should be interesting because we're going to try and present a little balance here. I actually talked to Mike about this last week that I've been feeling the weight of all of this a lot. And it's interesting, Mike. I think I shared it with you, and I wasn't even going to get into this today, but I guess it's super relevant to this question.

5:42I had talked about, I had forgotten about this. I was going back trying to find something I had said, and actually Google searched it. And I was looking for, I ended up on YouTube videos. And in March of 2023, so three and a half years ago, basically, we did a segment where I was talking about how I was like tired of all of the negative and the worry that was being caused by AI. And I had written something about the five or six things that most excited me about AI. And I was trying to shift my own mental focus to be like, let's focus on the opportunities. Like we know there's negatives. We know that there are, you know, risks associated.

6:23We know all these challenges, but like, let's think about this from an optimistic perspective. And so today should be interesting because the second main topic is Jensen Wong's interview with Ezra Klein. And talk about an optimist, man. Jensen is the poster child for optimism when it comes to this stuff. So yeah, just kind of something to keep in mind and something Mike and I have been kind of conscious of that there's just so much negative about AI and we want to make sure we're also doing our part to focus on the positives and all the opportunities. All right. So on that note, Paul, let's dive into I think some fairly optimistic or interesting updates this past week.

7:05So first up, we had a bunch of new model releases. So OpenAI introduced GPT-6 Sol and Luna this past week. So they're basically bringing the advances from their top-tier Astra model into faster, cheaper options for everyday work. The models launched in chat GPT work and codecs for paid users and through the API. They did not launch in regular chat, but free and go users can access Luna in the desktop app. OpenAI says it cut API prices by 50 % compared with the previous generation's promotional pricing. It has also improved prompt caching, which is an important feature that lets an agent reuse context instead of processing it again.

7:47On an internal test that they built from conversations where users were flagging factual errors in responses, Sol made about half as many mistakes as its predecessor. So one small test there, but it seems to be getting more factually accurate as we release some of these new models. Anthropic, at the same time, also released Claude Opus 5.5, which it says performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 on most work. Anthropic estimates a 40 % cost reduction versus Opus 5 on typical workloads at default settings. that combines lower token prices with more efficient use of tokens and the input and output price cut alone is 20 percent now anthropic says opus 5.5 generates output more than 30 percent faster than opus 5 and early testers have found its writing clearer now the company is also at same time raising five-hour usage limits on pro max team and seat based enterprise plans and giving subscribers a rate limit reset they can save for later.

8:52Last but certainly not least, Microsoft announced a redesigned co-pilot with Home, Code, and Autopilot. So Home brings chat and co-work together with Word, Excel, and PowerPoint built into the experience. Code lets people build apps that can run inside their company's Microsoft 365 environment. Autopilot is a persistent agent built on OpenClaw that can monitor channels, follow up on conversations, and run recurring work while you're away. Microsoft says Home and Code will start rolling out through its Frontier program in the coming weeks, while Autopilot expands to private preview at the end of September.

9:34So, Paul, a bunch of new, interesting ways to use AI. The big news, obviously, being some of the new models, but I don't think we should sleep probably on the Copilot news either. I'm curious what you took away from the new generation of models we just got. I was kind of anxious to see where we were going to go after all the pacing, AI conversations and essays and interviews and everything. So I think this might be a preview of how is this going to look moving forward. And what I mean by that is, you know, there was initially, everybody comes out with these models last week, and I think ROC 4.7 came out too.

10:11I think we'll touch on that maybe later. and I was like, oh, you know, I guess this is what pacing feels like. You're just going to keep dropping models. But the more I thought about it, like what they're basically touting here is more reliability, meaning they're more factual, more efficient. So at both tokens and per task, which we'll talk about and more aligned. And so like those are the dimensions that they're focused on. And it honestly starts to feel more like an iPhone release. So like iPhone 18 comes out and It's like, is it dramatically different than 17? It's like, no, it pretty much looks and feels very familiar.

10:46It's just faster processing, better battery life, better camera specs, and people buy them. And so that's kind of what these releases feel like to me is they're just more reliable, more efficient, more aligned. And the other thing is I think they start to increasingly be marketed for knowledge work. So it's more about here's how you can use it in your day-to-day work. It's less about solving millennium math problems and scientific breakthroughs and more about as a lawyer, as an accountant, as a consultant, as a marketer, as a salesperson, here are the things that they enable. So I think that we'll also see a lot more talk about post-training and customization for specific industries, functions, and roles.

11:30And then I think that the other thing that's going to start to happen is to date, a lot of the compute, a lot of the NVIDIA chips, the TPUs, they've been dedicated to making the product more powerful, more generally capable. And now that we've reached these thresholds where it just feels like you could shut this off today and it would be so usable for the next five years, they're going to start shifting a lot more of the compute resources to safety and alignment. And so these are just like made up numbers, but roughly, I think, based on our perception of what's going on with the labs, let's say in the last one to two years, like 80 to 90 percent of the compute that they're using has been going to research and development of more powerful models, agentic harnesses, like the things that have made them so capable.

12:24And now I think you're going to see a shifting to where it could be 50 to 80 % of the compute starts to get allocated to safety and alignment testing and monitoring. Jensen Wong actually talks a little bit about this in the Ezra Klein interview that we'll get to in a second. But basically what's happening is the building of data centers, so the more data centers we build, the more compute that is available for testing, for inference, things like that, the more resources that get dedicated to safety and alignment. So that's kind of like a high level, my overall take on what's going on here. The introducing of Sol and Luna, just as a reminder where this naming is coming from.

13:04So they have moved to a celestial naming convention. So the way it works is star, planet, moon. That's kind of the sequence. So stars are the biggest, planets, then moons. So this is moving away from things like mini, nano, things like that that didn't mean as much. So Astra, the biggest model, means stars in Greek. So it fits that celestial naming. Sol is sun. Terra is earth. So that's like planet. And then Luna is a moon. So I went into our SmarterX chat GPT account. And currently, the models I have to choose from are GPT-6 Astra, Sol, and Luna. And I still have 5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna. And then 5.5 is being retired.

13:50So those are, and then you can set like the, whatever they call it, like the amount of thinking it's going to do to like high and everything. So in their posts that we introduced GPT-6 Astra, the most intelligent and aligned model in the world. That was earlier in September. While the most demanding and important projects still call for Astra's full depth, work happens at different scales, rhythms, and budgets. So Sol and Luna, I think Sol is kind of like the marquee model. That's like the workhorse they're envisioning and Luna is the smaller one. But they talk about it specifically being built on a same or trained in the same way as Astra.

14:27But it's for specifically professional work, factuality, coding, computer use and alignment to faster, more affordable models. Sam Altman tweeted in regards to Sol and Luna, especially compared by per task pricing, which is the metric that should matter. I don't think there is anything competitive anywhere in the market. He said, we want people to use tons of AI as important to being able to explore this renaissance in front of us. So now this is an important thing, this per task pricing. This is kind of a newer way that they're describing this. The way to think about this is they're trying to shift the way I think businesses think about it.

15:06So in the first half of 2026, there was all this talk about token pricing and trying to find the most efficient model, which includes going and using Chinese open weights models, because they're more efficient per token. What Sam is saying is they're just making the models better overall. So even if on a per token basis, their model is more expensive because it's just a better model, it'll actually do the work product you want, that per task output more efficiently overall. So the per task pricing means the total cost to get a piece of work done rather than the input or output of a token in it.

15:47So just something to think about. Now, interesting side note here, I don't think we cover this later on in the episode, but Boris Power, who's the head of applied AI research at OpenAI, did an interview last week. And he said 80 to 90 % of research at OpenAI is focused at GPT-7, GPT-8 and beyond. That is the first time I've heard them publicly even talk about 7 and 8. More or less the fact that he's saying that's where all of their compute is going. Right. So I don't know, like we'll come back to that one in terms of like what the significance of that comment is. OpenAI researchers are saying a lot of stuff publicly right now that they were not saying two months ago.

16:30So just interesting to track on Opus. So again, just like contextually, I go into our Claude account. We have a Claude. I don't think we have an enterprise account, but we have a Claude business account. My options in there, Fable 5.1, which is, again, the sort of distilled version of Mythos, which is the one that they've never released to the public yet. Mythos is the one that the government shut down, basically, I think. And so Fable 5 is their most powerful. Opus 5.5 is the new one that kind of seems to compete with Fable, but more efficiently. There's Sonnet 5, Haiku 4.5, and then you can set effort at low, medium, high, extra, and max.

17:16And then they actually have more models that like some of the older ones. So 5.5, they claim, performs at the Fable 5.1 level, but costs 40 % less. They did address this pacing the frontier in the announcement post. It says it's their first release since they called for pacing the frontier. They said it was tested by external evaluators on their automated behavioral audit, the most comprehensive alignment test they run. It was the strongest performing model they've tested to date. They talked about some of the key dimensions as being performance, safety, cost and speed, communication, meaning it talks more naturally, basically.

17:57There was a lot of knocks on Opus 5. It sounded more like a machine, basically. They talk about its reliance from a knowledge work perspective. They reference cost per task. So they said the Opus 5.5 beats GPT-6 Astra at max effort for about a fifth of the cost per task. So again, I think that's a term you're going to start to hear a lot more. And they get into the safety side. Now on Copilot, you touched on some of the things they're doing here. I would just say at a high level, I think what we're going to see is this shifting of the user experience continually. And it's kind of jarring, honestly, to businesses.

18:42So what I mean by that is we talked two or three weeks ago about how Anthropic was taking, when you would go into Claude in the desktop, you would have chat and work. And then they combined those to now it's just chat. It looks to me, based on the announcement from Microsoft, they made all these plans before Anthropic did that. And Microsoft realized that was a better experience because it actually says right now, coming soon, you won't need to choose a mode. You'll simply state what you need and Copilot will route the work to chat, co-work, or code. So it's like Anthropics simplified the user experience, but Microsoft just made this big announcement where you still have to choose which version of it you're going to use.

19:28And that does not seem like the viable thing. So I think that we're going to just keep getting these shifts. Like we'll talk about GPTs being sunset by open AI in a couple of minutes. Same thing, like businesses are going to get used to working within these platforms in a certain way. They're going to train it. They're going to put it into their learning and development programs. And then it's just going to get blown up. So I've actually been thinking a lot about this. I wrote an essay over the weekend on like the future of AI education and enterprises. I know, Mike, you read the essay over the weekend.

20:00I'm probably going to release that this week because I think what's happening here is very, very important for organizations, certainly SMBs, but more importantly for big enterprises, that as you're looking at scaling AI L &D programs, the dynamics of how fast not just the models are changing, but the user experiences are changing and how you train people to use them. The current way learning and development is done does not support this, the pace of change that's coming from these companies. And so I had a lot of thoughts about it. It was one of those things like I just sort of sat down Saturday morning to work on my Macon stuff.

20:39And I ended up like writing for five hours about sort of what I was thinking the future of AI education needs to look like in enterprises. So part of this like played into that. So again, my hope is to release that essay probably Wednesday. I guess that would be like the 30th. And then we'll talk about it next week. Now, two other quick notes. OpenAI's Dev Day is September 29th, the day this episode drops. So we expect a lot more news from OpenAI this week. And then the Gemini 4 evals that I mentioned at the beginning have started to leak online. And that normally means that its model release is imminent.

21:18So we'll see what happens. I would not be shocked if Google does what OpenAI does to them all the time and they don't drop Gemini 4 during Dev Day to steal the thunder from OpenAI. It's worth belaboring the point, which we've talked about many times on this podcast, that you are really seeing with stuff like Opus 5.5 and GPT-6, Sol, and Luna, The rate at which the capabilities are growing and the costs are dropping is something you should not ignore. I have a lot of people that worry about token costs, understandably so, but I think you need to really be planning around use cases and pushing the boundaries on what's possible and kind of not worrying about it.

22:09It is hard to say, I realize, at the enterprise level, but at the individual level, suck it up and get the$200 a month max or pro account and push what's possible if you can in your business, if your means allow, because soon that is not going to cost what it costs today to do these things, and you need to be ready when it doesn't. Yeah, and Mike, the other thing, it's a great point. The other thing I would push for is, and this goes back to the AI education piece, someone properly trained to use this technology is going to get dramatically better cost per output or cost per task efficiencies than someone who has no idea what they're doing.

22:54And so what I mean by that is like, I'll talk in a couple of minutes about this new AI score tool that I built. When I was building it, I knew when to use Fable 5. and when to use Sonnet. It's like, okay, I'm going to build the prototype right now. Let me pay the 200 bucks for the extra credits for Fable 5 because now I need the best output. But when I'm bouncing around, just thinking things through, give me Sonnet. And then the way I work with an AI assistant is I keep a sandbox of the questions I want to ask it and the things to do next. I don't waste tokens with it. Like I'm not. Yeah. And so like the more efficient someone becomes at talking to these things, the cost per token becomes way less important than the user's knowledge of how to work with the machine.

23:45Right. And so, yeah, it's like all this focus on let's just like reduce the cost by orchestrating to a different model that's like cheaper. It's like, no, like don't use the less capable model. Just get better at using the models that are actually designed to do the work you do. So that's why I think the way Sam was positioning is the right positioning. It's like, don't think about the token cost as much as you think about train the user first, and then use the model that's going to give you the best chance to create the output you're seeking to create. Yeah. All right, next big topic this week.

24:20This past week, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Wong joined the Ezra Klein Show to argue that the fears about losing control over AI are overstated. Hwang described AI as software whose safety problems can be solved through engineering. Klein pressed him quite a bit during this interview on why leaders and researchers at the Frontier Labs are still warning that they may not be able to control what they're building. So Klein kind of raised what you might call the AI doomer fears about AI presenting existential threats to humanity and all these cyber attacks and incidents we've seen recently. And Huang called the bigger picture fears irresponsible and said they were not grounded in science or research.

25:04He actually argued that these types of alarming predictions could scare young people out of going to college and building and investing in their future because they fear they won't get a job. So Huang kind of talks about this by identifying two problems that are at play here, especially when it comes to things like OpenAI's agents hacking hugging face. So one is containing the systems and two is getting them to follow rules. He admits there's like a full problem here. He says that labs should not be shipping products they cannot control. And Huang said that if labs cannot contain even their experiments, because Klein pointed out that the systems involved in Hugging Face were not public products, then they should shut those down.

25:49So Huang kind of is just coming at this basically as saying this is an engineering and product decision and company management problem that we're seeing these things happen, not some type of big unrestricted existential crisis here where AI is going out of control. The two of them also disagreed in this interview about whether companies can be trusted to manage the risks. Wong said that for the most part, we've got existing laws and potential civil and criminal liability to handle these types of things. But Klein said, look, despite having those things, the financial crisis, for instance, in America happened.

26:24There's competitive pressure that might supersede those types of laws and liabilities. So Wong basically keeps coming back to this idea. He says, look, NVIDIA dedicates roughly 80 % of our efforts to verification. He argued that AI labs need a similar shift towards just making these things reliable and safe, towards testing and safety. More compute should go towards evaluation and alignment, not just building more capable models. So Paul, I'm just curious. You had a lot of, I think, thoughts on this. It just sounds like at the core, and I don't want to put words in Jensen's mouth, but he just sees this as an engineering problem.

27:03There's no existential AI risk. There's no weird godlike superintelligence that escapes its graders. There's just product decisions and hardware decisions and software decisions, it seems like, is what he's getting at here. Am I wrong on that? Yeah, I mean, I think that sums up his position pretty well. I think this is an extremely important interview. So first of all, like kudos to Jensen for doing the interview. He did not have to do this. I think it was like an hour and a half long, if I remember correctly. It was very contentious at times. And he knew that going in, like these two disagree on almost everything.

27:40And Jensen knows Ezra's positions on these things. So he sat down to an interview that he knew was going to be contentious. Ezra is a very, very skilled interviewer that has specific things he wants to drill into. And Jensen, I'm sure, knew going in that was going to happen. but they did it in a civil and respectful way. And this is what's missing, I think, in the AI debate is these very just open, honest dialogues with people with opposing views who can sit in a room and actually discuss something. This is what's missing in politics, honestly. So again, keep in mind, this is the CEO of the most valuable company in the world, and his company is at the epicenter of the entire AI ecosystem.

28:23And honestly, like the epicenter of today's US economy. Like if Nvidia wasn't doing what they're doing, the economy is nothing right now. So that's one thing. The other, and this is the thing I alluded to you, Mike, I think when I saw you last week, one of the most important takeaways to me with this interview is sometimes you have to do the work as a human. If you read the transcript to this only. Or if you had your AI do a summary of this transcript, you miss almost everything that was important about this interview. So you cannot get the same level of understanding and context without doing the work when it comes to this.

29:05You have to hear the tone in Jensen's voice. You have to hear the challenges, the pauses. That's everything. The way you actually understand how Jensen feels cannot be seen in words on a page or bullet points that your AI assistant gave you. You have to actually see what they're thinking and feeling. And so not only hearing it, but like watching it is an even another level of it because now you start to see the emotion behind it. So just a note for people, like show up, you know, this is what I said, like if someone sends their AI agent to like a meeting with me ever, like I'm done working with the person.

29:47Like if you can't give the time to someone to actually show up and be there yourself, then just don't show up. Like don't send your agent to do it. So, okay. Now I'll get off of my like preaching. Okay. So here is my kind of notes. And what I, the way I did this is I listened to this interview over probably four days in my car. And then I just had an Apple note going and I would like pause the interview and I I would just like voice dictate my notes. And I'm just going to kind of go through these notes in the raw. I haven't even edited these. So I said, I think you can sum up Jensen's position in that he is an eternal optimist who believes human ambition and hard work will create an abundant future.

30:27All of the other arguments are just a distraction from creating the future he envisions. So like every challenge Ezra has, if you come back to understanding that that is the sole focus for Jensen, that is his belief is it will work out. We just have to be optimistic about it and we have to create that future. And so all these other things wash away in his mind if you just stay focused on that. But when you dig into the details of how that future comes into being, it's literally just a belief that it'll happen. So if he is someone who's creating the future for three decades, he believes he can do it again.

31:07So he's like, I've done this. Like, nobody thought I could make NVIDIA what it is, but I did it. And so, like, I can do it again. So, like, the note I made to myself was just like, in this way, I'm kind of aligned with him. Like, I've been saying for years, the people who embrace AI and become AI forward are going to have the greatest chance to not only survive but thrive through it. And I'm just more realistic that the people who don't, which I expect to probably be the majority of the workforce over the next few years, are going to struggle tremendously. So what people like Jensen just push aside is often that part of it.

31:42So I am very optimistic about AI and the impact it could have on society in an incredible way. Scientific discovery, advancements in entrepreneurship, giving people freedom to build, giving people more time. Like there is this amazing stuff. I also happen to just try and balance that with it is not going to be great for everybody. And there's going to be a whole bunch of people left behind in this process, in part because they choose not to participate in it. And he just basically doesn't talk about that part. So and that especially becomes a concern for me with like the people who are in college now who are taught or either taught or just believe that AI is purely cheating and plagiarism and they just refuse to learn it.

32:25Like that's going to be a problem. When thinking about AI's impact on jobs, consider what the purpose of the job is. I thought this was an interesting perspective. Jensen was like, yeah, tasks are going to be automated, but the purpose doesn't leave the job. So, you know, he did address that a little bit. And then he talked about Jeven's paradox, which all the AI and technology leaders love to throw out there, which is AI just, you know, gets as things become cheaper, we consume more of it. So everything's just going to like we're just going to keep consuming more and more jobs will be created, whatever.

32:57When Ezra challenged Jensen on the net creation of new jobs, you could tell that it's not actually a very deeply thought out position at all. Like he and this is what I've always argued with, like Sam Altman and others. They talk about it as though it's just going to happen. And when you push them on, well, how it's just it will because it always has. So he really, and again, this is one of those ones where listening actually helps a lot because he really stumbled over this one. Like he did not have good counterpoints at all. It's just the belief that human ambition will solve things. When he said like, well, AI is going to create these new things, Ezra's point was, well, yeah, but won't AI just be good at doing those jobs too?

33:43Like we've now arrived at a realm where the AI is just good at everything. And so you create new work, but in theory, the AI is going to be just as good as the new work you create. So I thought that was interesting. Ezra pushed him on the entry-level jobs, and Jensen jumped in. There was times where Jensen was obviously getting annoyed, and he would just jump in and talk over Ezra. And his point there was like, just wait two years. We're going to have a whole new generation of workers who are AI native, and it's just going to all work out. This is a part where I think Jensen's perspective is just off.

34:14The way I looked at this one is he's thinking about the world of engineering and AI researchers. And like everybody who comes up in engineering and research is going to be AI native and they're going to love this stuff and they're going to jump in. He's forgetting that like a large portion of the population of future workers hate AI, like want nothing to do with it. So it's wildly unpopular. And so you can't just assume that they're all just going to be AI natives and love it. And they're just going to like it's just going to be amazing. I thought it was an interesting perspective on open models because he's a huge proponent of open weights, open models, open source.

34:49And I've always thought that's a very dangerous position. He's not an unbiased commentator when it comes to this. And I think we have to keep that in mind. So he said at the start of the year, 70 % of tokens, and again, his chips, his data centers are what power these tokens, were coming from closed models like Claude and ChatGPT, Gemini, et cetera. But that is now flipped and 70 % of the compute is now going to open weight models. They make money either way. So he doesn't care if they're open models or closed models, they're still paying for Nvidia chips. So he's like, this is all good. On the Hugging Face incident, which is an interesting perspective because he now owns Hugging Face.

35:35Remember, they bought them two weeks ago for$12.9 billion. By the way, I did not hear the story ever before that Clem, the CEO of Hugging Face, went to Jensen and said, hey, buy us. He kind of disclosed that on the interview, but he downplayed what was going on. And this is where you said, Mike, he basically just says, this is all just software. It is all an engineering problem. problem. These agent swarms, they're nothing new. We've had parallel computing and everything. Ezra pushed back on this one a lot and they kept coming back to this. But Jensen basically felt like, listen, it's an engineering problem.

36:13They screwed up. They put a bad product out. Ezra was like, they didn't put a product out. That's the point is this happened in a testing environment. And he said, well, then they screwed up and they'll fix it. So Jensen was very much like it's just going to get solved because there's tremendous motivation to put out safe products because otherwise they're going to be liable for these things if they don't. And then he did, you know, the soundbite everybody ran with is like, well, if they can't contain them, then they shut their labs down. Like that became the thing everybody, but again, you needed the full context of the conversation.

36:44You needed to hear the annoyance in Jensen's voice that he's not literally saying shut down Anthropoc and open AI. It's almost like a figure speech of like, well, if they can't, then just shut it down. He knows that that's not an actual scenario. He's not proposing anybody shuts any labs down. He talked a lot about regulation and why he thinks that the existing regulation is sufficient. He then addressed like Ezra Kemp breaking up, but this happened and the labs thought that they knew what was going on. Now, it brought me back to the Noam Brown comments from last week, Mike, because I'm still actually...

37:22Noam admitted in the interview he did with Dwarkesh that they did not have chain of thought monitoring on the hugging face incidents. I am not an attorney, but that seemed to be admitting negligence very publicly. And I got to imagine that is already in a legal brief that is going to be filed in a lawsuit against OpenAI for damages done by their models. They did make major mistakes. There are things that even as a – this is not my realm. I am not an AI researcher. I don't train these models. When he said that, I was like, what? What do you mean? you weren't monitoring chain of thought like it is the thing that allows you to align the models so that that to me is like i'm kind of with jensen like what all this crazy stuff that happened opening eye seems like it was very manageable and they screwed up and they have continually admitted it to screwing up and it has to come back and bite them legally at some point yeah he believes it's just software which i don't agree with but he's big on that The other one I thought that was worth note is they brought up China because obviously Jensen's been gotten favor with the Trump administration to the point where they could get their chips back into China.

38:40And that's a lot of people oppose the idea of putting our most powerful chips into China. You have to remember how Jensen thinks about competition. And so to do this, Mike, I actually, you know, I guess I'll give a shout out to Google on Gemini and the integration in Google Drive. I just searched in Google Drive, find the episode, because all of our show transcripts are in Google Drive, where we talked about Jensen's theories on competition. And it found my notes from episode 119 of October 2024, where we quoted Jensen from his BG2 podcast interview. So this is his overall philosophy on competition.

39:17He said at that time, as a company, we want to be situationally aware. and I'm very situationally aware of everything around our company and our ecosystem. I'm aware of all the people doing alternative things and what they're doing. And sometimes it's adversarial to us. Sometimes it's not. I'm super aware of it. But that doesn't change the purpose of the company. We're not trying to take share from anybody. NVIDIA is a market maker, not a share taker. If you look at our company slides, we don't show not one day does this company talk about market share, not on the inside. All we're talking about is how do we create the next thing?

39:54What's the next problem? In other words, he doesn't care about the competition. His feeling is he's an ultimate optimist. He is an engineer. And he believes he will stay ahead of everybody. So his feeling is give China the chips. Who cares? We will just be better than that. We will innovate faster. And so I think big picture, that sums up Jensen's take. That we will just figure this out. We will solve everything. And if we do it and we take the right approach, we figure out. Now, to Jensen's credit again, what did they do this morning? They dropped the announcement that they have formed the open agent safety platform to solve this exact problem.

40:32So he tweeted, and again, Jensen's only been on X for like two months. He put out this morning, today with over 100 industry partners, we introduced NVIDIA open agent safety platform, bringing together OpenShell and Sentry, two internal things. Artificial intelligence is extraordinary technology that will advance discovery, productivity, security, health, and prosperity for generations to come. But its full promise can only be realized when people have confidence that AI is being built to be safe and deployed with wisdom and responsibility. This is bigger than a single product. It's the beginning of an open ecosystem to build the trust layer for safe agent systems.

41:10Together, we are building the foundation of the AI economy. Trust and innovation are not in conflict. Safety is how trust is earned. We must build not only the most capable AI, but the most trusted so that this extraordinary technology can realize its enormous promise for the world. So he does an interview, says it's an engineering problem, and then he backs it up by putting out an ecosystem or a platform to try and solve for the exact problem that was highlighted on the interview. So, again, in the spirit of focusing on as much we can, optimism and solving problems, I think why I don't agree with Jensen on quite a number of things from the interview.

41:50I respect that he sees it as a solvable problem and he's going to do everything in their power to try and solve it. I love that. All right. Our third big topic this week. So Paul, last week you introduced a new book that we discussed, The AI Transformation Blueprint. And this past week you shared a first look at a tool called AI Score by SmarterX. So you had shared this on LinkedIn. This tool brings together two assessments, business AI score for organizations and personal AI score for individuals. So I'd love for you to just tell us a little bit more about AI Score by SmarterX. This has been in the works for quite a while.

42:32Can you walk us through it? Yeah. So first, just like a heads up on availability. So this is something I did announce on LinkedIn and I put it in my newsletter, my exec AI newsletter this past weekend. We are actually going to be debuting this at Macon. So October 13th and 15th is when it'll kind of officially start rolling out. And then I'm going to hold a webinar. I think it's October 28th. We'll put the link in the show notes, sort of explaining the whole product and like officially rolling it out and showing it's going to be free. so people can use it. So just kind of that's where it's at.

43:03It'll be a public beta. I'm actually doing final beta internal testing today. The kind of the final version that we're hoping to roll out. And then we might put it into like a extended private beta over the next week or so. So I have actually alluded to AI score probably a half dozen times over the last seven or eight months on this podcast. A lot of the use cases I've talked about were related to the building of AI score. So basically what happened is in early 2006, I started working on an internal initiative called the AI Transformation System. Where it comes from is, so our AI Academy has hundreds of business accounts, and I have spent time with a lot of leaders at those organizations, had private discussions with executives across a bunch of other industries.

43:51And what's become very apparent is organizations and leaders are struggling to define what transformation looks like, benchmark, set baselines where they are today, and then have a way to measure progress of that transformation over time. So AI score became the foundation of that transformation system. So I think of it as a change management tool that lets leaders assess organizations. So there's two versions. That's business AI score, where you assess the organization. I see that being ideally suited for the leaders who are driving the transformation, who have the most insight into the strength of the organization across these different areas, but also very helpful to get other stakeholder perspectives like business leaders and team leads and things like that, because their perspective may be very different than the global head of AI transformation.

44:41And then personal AI score lets individuals assess themselves. So the whole idea is business AI transformation requires a certain approach across these different pillars and dimensions. And then every business AI transformation is basically a collection of individual transformations. And so individuals then assess themselves across these different pillars. And so what happens is once you get your AI score results, you then use those to inform the building of personalized learning journeys and transformation blueprints. So AI score is based on the idea that transformation requires deep change management.

45:14What we have seen, again, I've talked with hundreds of organizations, the way most organizations for the last three years have approached transformation is they go and get Copilot, Claude, Chachapiti, or Gemini, then they give it to their employees who lack context and understanding of how to use the tools. And so that's basically what transformation has been. They give them the tools and then hope they figure out how to use them. So I started work in February 26 on building AI score assessments. And I started with business AI score. And then I used the same process to build personal AI score.

45:45So contextually, this is a playbook I've actually run before. So back when I owned my agency, and if you're new to the show, like I owned a consulting firm, a marketing consulting firm for 16 years. That was HubSpot's first partner back in 07. So I built an assessment tool back in the day. I think it was like 2011 or so. that became the foundation of our go-to-market strategy and the basis for all our client engagements. Now, that tool assessed marketing, talent, tech, and strategy. And then you looked at the strengths and weaknesses, and then you built your plans around those weaknesses. So in the back of my mind, we always plan to do this.

46:20Now, I actually built one that we sunset years ago called AI Score for Marketers. So if you read our marketing artificial intelligence book, was that the right book? Yeah, that was the book in 2022. We actually wrote about AI score for marketers. So I sunset that a couple of years back and then always intended to rebuild AI score as a more general purpose tool for businesses. But what I didn't have back when I built those other ones was AI that could help me build prototypes of these things. So I'm not a developer. I can't build the actual prototype. So I spent all this time building the assessments themselves, defining the pillars, the dimensions, all this stuff.

47:02But now I could go into Claude and be like, okay, help me build functioning prototypes of these things. So I'll spend a lot more time on this, like when we do the webinar and the official launch, but high level, each of them has these pillars. So the business AI pillars, we actually talked about these, I just didn't put them in the context of the AI score tool. So those are vision, strategy, data, technology, governance, literacy, people, and performance. Those are the eight pillars for the business AI score. And then the personal AI score is knowledge. Like, do you understand AI? Application, are you able to put it to work?

47:35Judgment, do you use it responsibly? And do you know what good looks like basically when AI outputs something? Impact, so is it making you better at your job? And then mindset, so are you built to keep growing. And so the idea with AI scores, you take these, you get your score, it gives you kind of a weak, moderate, strong grade across not only overall, but then the pillars. And then the cool thing is business admins will be able to invite team members to also take it, and then they'll get an admin dashboard so they can actually then look at the difference between how I graded the organization and how Mike graded the organization.

48:12And so it's meant to truly be a change management tool, again, that's all going to be free to use. So like just high level, like use of AI, and this will be my AI use case for the week, Mike, so you can just do yours later on. So we once I build the prototypes, so in total, I probably spent about three to 400 hours from February until I mean, up to today, doing the assessments, creating all of the assessments, and then from there, turning those into HTML prototypes using Claude. Now, I use mostly like Sonnet 4.6. And then once Fable 5.1 came out, I started paying for extra credits. And I started building iterations of the prototypes, which I've built like dozens of these prototypes.

48:58And then I turned it over to actual software development team who is sprinting this thing to market. Like we're going to go from my prototypes to final production in about 30 days. Wow. Again, having done this before, I probably saved SmarterX somewhere between$100 ,000 and$250 ,000 by vibe coding the prototypes myself. And when I release the full suite of what's available, you'll realize the depth to all of this work. But I would estimate not only did we save probably a quarter million dollars, it would have taken twice as long easily. And I would have never launched these in time for Macon in this fall.

49:38So, yeah, I mean, at a really high level, it's the most intense thing I've ever done in terms of the time it took. But it also opened my eyes to the future of work and org charts, which helps inform the keynote I'm doing at May, kind of like, what are team structures look like? Because the reality is, like, I'm architecting this entire thing, but I'm also building the whole thing myself, which I wouldn't have had the ability to do. And it starts to change the way you think about how work is going to compress and how people that were leaders before are now going to be builders and they're going to be able to do a lot of the things.

50:17And I've even done a lot of the go-to-market work around the launch of the tool because I just talked to my assistant and I can start building that stuff out. So you can go to smarterx.ai forward slash score and that'll take you to join the wait list for it. Again, it'll probably launch October 13th, I think is probably the date. I might drop it a little bit early if I think it's ready, but most likely the 13th is when it'll come out. And then we'll do that webinar. AI Score for Business Leaders is the tentative name for the webinar on October 28th, where we'll sort of give the whole overview of the platform, how to use it.

50:53Yeah, so I'm really excited. It's like it's hard to work on something sort of behind the scenes for months and not talk about it at all, especially when you really believe it's going to make a big impact on like a human centered approach to this stuff. But, yeah, it's cool to finally be able to talk about this stuff. Yeah, I mean, between this and the book, it's really almost a incredible case study of building in public and what's possible now with AI. I love that facet of it. Yeah. And the book does tell the story a little bit deeper about the whole process behind this. So I actually like, you know, the first section of the book is sort of how it all came to be.

51:29And then section two is the business AI transformation and how AI score powers that. And then the third section of the book is the personal AI transformation and how to use personal AI score within that. So yeah, and like I said, we're just making it all free. Like this is the stuff that if I just wanted to build a consulting firm, we would have kept all this like proprietary and we would have just done million dollar engagements based on this stuff. But that's not our business model. Our business model is let's accelerate understanding and responsible adoption of this stuff. So our approach is let's just put the tools and knowledge out into the world and then try and help as many people as we can as quick as we can.

52:08All right, before we dive into our rapid fire, Paul, this episode is also brought to you by Outshift, which is Cisco's incubation engine for frontier technology. So multi-agent AI is in every enterprise roadmap right now. But here's the problem that everyone is facing. Agents can pass messages, but they can't think together. These systems silently underperform through cognitive failures like misreadings on verified claims and false consensus that conventional monitoring cannot detect. Now, OutShift by Cisco is building the fix, what they call the Internet of Cognition. This is an open source foundation for building multi-agent systems from design to production with shared context, shared memory, and guardrails to drive the results we actually expect from AI.

52:59You can go learn more about this by reading the paper, experiencing the demo and grabbing the code from outshift.com. That is O-U-T-S-H-I-F-T dot com. All right, Paul, let's dive into rapid fire. Big topic that's been on our minds lately is that OpenAI is planning to retire custom GPTs and move people towards plugins. Its current FAQ on this says the transition affects all chat GPT plans, although migration access and the options available to users can differ by account or workspace. Custom GPTs, as far as based on the information we have right now, appear to be scheduled to retire on December 11, 2026.

53:46For affected workspaces, OpenAI now plans to stop new GPT creation on October 26th. existing GPTs remain usable until their applicable retirement date. And OpenAI says users should follow the notices they receive in their account or workspace. So they are pushing people towards turning your GPTs into plugins, migrating them to plugins and using plugins moving forward. Plugins package reusable instructions and connected tools for chat GPT and codecs. So in this kind of planned migration, a GPT's instructions become a skill, its knowledge files become reference files for the plugin, and its connected apps basically move into the plugin.

54:35The GPT's selected model, existing conversations, and custom actions do not transfer. Any workflow that depends on a custom action needs a replacement integration before that part will work again. Migration also uses the latest published version of the GPT, so drafts and unpublished changes are left out. They have a process by which you can start migrating your existing GPTs. Interestingly, we'll talk about this, the plugin starts as private when you migrate your GPTs to a plugin or when you create a new one. Existing sharing settings do not carry over, so users in your organization will need access to the replacement.

55:15It does not appear that there's an easy way to share plugins publicly. We'll talk a little bit more about that. The original GPT becomes read-only after migration. OpenAI fully warns that plugins may respond differently, so creators need to test them. So Paul, where do you want to start here? This seems like a fairly big change. I don't know if OpenAI sees this as as big of a change as it might be for some of our audience and more non-technical people who rely on GPTs? I mean, usually in a sense, they don't care. Like, no, that's pretty wild. No, they do not. So context here. So OpenAI introduced GPTs during Dev Day.

55:57So again, September 29th is the Dev Day this year. So they introduced them Dev Day November 2023, 11 days before Sam Altman was fired before being rehired as the CEO. I'm guessing the timing, like the urgency of this, has something to do with this year's Dev Day. So they're probably announcing a bunch of stuff and they needed to just get this out there. Yeah, the part that's weird is GPT's made AI assistants and working with chat GPT extremely easy to create and share these custom AI assistants. It was like a supernatural thing, but they just never seemed to commit to the original vision for custom GPTs that they shared, like building this entire marketplace and things like that.

56:42And so I just never understood their lack of support, which always led me to believe like at some point they're just going to get rid of these things because they're just not supporting them the way you would expect. Now, having taught dozens of workshops and courses based on GPTs that I built, so our jobs GPT, problems GPT, innovations GPT, these things made sense to people. Yeah. They made AI more approachable and actionable for those non-technical users. You get in a room, you bring up jobs GPT, you show it, and the light bulb goes off. And so that's why I just, I never understood why they didn't lean into them more because to me, it was like the fastest way to teach someone how to get value out of AI when they didn't know what to do with it.

57:26So kind of wild. So December 11th looks like the scheduled retirement date for all custom GPTs. They'll just stop working on that date. I posted on Axe, when OpenAI is done solving all the Millennium prize problems, I ask that they turn their unreleased model at explaining the branding function around plugins versus apps versus skills versus GPTs, which will become plugins. They took GPTs, which were easy to understand, build and share and blew it up. So if what Mike explained to you already wasn't confusing enough, I'm just going to read to you the opening to the plugins in chat GPT page that OpenAI published.

58:08This is verbatim. Plugins help chat GPT and Codex complete workflows by packaging reusable usable instructions, connected tools, and other capabilities. A plugin can include skills that provide instructions and workflow guidance, connected apps that link external accounts, information, and actions, app templates that help administrators configure apps for a workspace. Some plugins include multiple apps. Others include only skills and do not require an app connection. Apps and plugins serve different purposes. Now, this gets super confusing if you actually try and do this, because if you go in to build an agent in OpenAI today, maybe they fix this, you can connect.

58:55I might not even get this right. You can connect an app to an agent, but you can't connect a plugin to an agent. So, like, I can't call JobsGPT if I rebuild it as a plugin when I'm building an agent. It's insanely confusing. Mike and I, when this and that's me, we literally sat there for like 45 minutes. Like, what the hell? This doesn't even make any sense how they're promoting this. So anyway, back to it. So apps and plugins serve different purposes. The options you see depend on your account, workspace, and where you use them. So it's not even like a universal terminology. Existing app connections remain subject to their own authorization and workspace controls.

59:36installing a plugin may start an app connection or setup flow. You must still complete any required account authorization. An installation cannot bypass provider or workspace permissions. And then you recall this one, Mike, which I love. A migrated plugin may respond differently. Before sharing it more widely, compare familiar prompts and at least one harder case. Check that. It selects the right skill and follows your instructions. That's pretty important. uses the expected reference material. So it doesn't like pull some other knowledge file that you don't want pulled into the plugin that apparently you're giving access to other people produces complete answers or files has the tools and integrations the workflow needs resolves differences that affect the workflow.

1:00:20Then they have some Q and A. Can I share, keep sharing my GPT with the same people? Um, no, is the basically, yeah, I'll just shorten that one. No. Can I use someone else's GPT? No is basically the answer to that one. Um, and so where does that leave you? What do we do with all this? Because we have a bunch of GPTs that are core to not only running our company, but we teach these things. So basically, I see it as three options. You can just use their API and just rebuild your GPTs as standalone apps or technology. You can create and share a plugin, maybe, if sharing is allowed with plugins, which we're not 100 % clear on.

1:00:55Or you just give people the prompts, like, here, just do whatever you want with this, which is what we're leaning towards, which is what we've always done. And it's like, just be open about what the prompt is and let somebody go build it. Because we teach our workshops and our courses often using like chat GPT, GPT's. But we realize like people might take it that are in Copilot or Claude or Gemini. So we'll often just be like, here's the prompt, like just go do whatever you want, like just build this kind of assistant. So Mike and I are actually going to do, we're kind of launching a new thing in our academy called AI Show Extended.

1:01:28So we're going to start doing is taking some of these core concepts from the podcast that we don't have time to go into deeply. And we're just going to do courses in AI Academy about them. So Mike and I, I don't know if we're going to go with this final name, but the name that Mike and I came up with was GPT's WTF was like the name. It's the course. It'll probably get renamed by the team. But we're going to record a course that goes deeper into this. And then we're also in the near term in our courses. So if you're an Academy member or customer, you'll see we're going to actually install a video that goes into the on-demand courses that sort of explains this.

1:02:05And then we're going to, if prompts aren't ready, aren't offered in the courses, we're just going to give people the prompts. Like, hey, rebuild your own while we're kind of recreating our courses. And then we'll update our courses with the current thing. But the key is they're going to keep changing. Like people are going to get pissed and they might reintroduce GPTs in three months. Like who knows? And so we've always built our courses around frameworks, not like trying to be technology specific. And so we've known that this stuff can happen and they can change the user experiences like they did with co-pilot just yesterday morning or Friday morning.

1:02:38So we try and make our stuff as evergreen and scalable as possible, but we're also moving to a more dynamic learning model where we're focused more on like live content and real time content, especially when it comes to the platforms themselves. Yeah, and a few other notes here, Paul, that probably just reiterate what you had said. So, you know, people out there who are much more savvy than your average knowledge worker might be saying something like, well, of course, you can get the same functionality by creating a plugin or a skill. And it's like, that's fair, and possibly true. But it's not the point.

1:03:13The point is, now I have to go through all these other steps that are much more, I would argue, much have more friction. I have to go create a skill. I have to package the skill up with files. I have to figure out how to call apps, I suppose, and then package this all into a plugin. You can do this via natural language, via their plugin creator. It's still work. It's much more onerous than creating a custom GPT was, which took two seconds. You can do very quickly. I would encourage everyone listening as your first step. If you want to experiment, I would frankly just create skills first of things.

1:03:48like don't even bother with all this other stuff yet. Just like if you're not using skills yet, which are just markdown files that point at folders and examples and files, start there and then turn that into a plugin. Don't even worry about the app piece of it yet. Unless it's absolutely critical, then you're going to have to figure that out. But there's plenty of GPTs I know people have created. We've created internally. They're basically just like, here's instructions. Go reference some files. That hopefully you can get to pretty quickly, like something you can test. Now, jury's out on whether it'll still work the same way, but that's at least a start for folks.

1:04:23But then it runs into this whole thing of you can share this with your team. You can share a plugin with your team. Great. It's a totally different user experience and form function. So that's friction. You cannot share these publicly. You can submit your plugin for an OpenAI review process to make it public. eventually. They don't give any timelines for this. You submit it through a plug-in submission portal. The fact this exists functionally just defeats the entire purpose of creating public GPTs. So that's a huge piece to understand. I realize not everyone does public GPTs, but if you have been relying on these, I've seen comments on the developer boards and things of people being like, I create these for my clients.

1:05:11What is the solution? And the solution is you're screwed. right now, I would say. Sorry, but that's true. Yeah. I mean, I'm just glancing. So my jobs GPT one I built has been 44 ,000 conversations that's been used in, over 800 ratings. So I mean, that's a tool that's just been super helpful for people. I know people use it all the time and they're just shutting it down. So it's so weird. And I know this is not even a main topic, but this feels like a Google thing. This feels like what they did was they solved for developers. They went backwards. They had a thing that was super understandable and helpful to non-developers, and they sunset it for a developer-friendly product.

1:06:02It makes no sense. And OpenAI doesn't usually faceplant like this with their user experience. It's like, I don't know. Like, I'm just, I'm shocked, honestly. Like, I've never understood that their lack of awareness of how helpful GPTs were to the non-technical user. And they just, they either don't care or they don't listen to users. I don't know. It's really weird. Yeah. All right, next up, we're talking about Meta Connect. So Meta's Connect event happened this past week where Meta announced new voice and real-time video features for Muse, which is the personal AI agent it just released. It's getting a lot of attention.

1:06:45Meta says you can have long conversations now as well with Muse while Muse keeps working on tasks in the background. Meta said that Muse is coming to its AI glasses in the coming months, which lets you talk to it hands-free and act a task on what you're looking at, such as a product on a shelf or, say, a school supply list. Now, new connections for Muse also include connections to Walmart and Instacart for shopping, Notion, Granola, GitHub, and Box for work. Muse will also get its own email address for communicating and completing tasks. And Meta showed off some animated avatars you can talk with as part of the product.

1:07:22Meta also previewed Muse Charm, which is a small device for talking to your agent that fits on a keychain. It's a physical holdable device. CEO Mark Zuckerberg said it will ship in December. Some other interesting things that came out of MetaConnect, Meta announced FDA-cleared hearing aid software for supported glasses that's aimed at adults with perceived mild to moderate hearing loss. Zuckerberg also said Meta is building private processing for its glasses so that for certain AI features on glasses, even Meta cannot access your information. Their glasses lineup includes the camera-free Ray-Ban Meta Audio and Ray-Ban Meta Gen 3 glasses with longer battery life and upgrade microphones.

1:08:05And they teased VR glasses for movies, games, and a private workspace coming in spring 2027. So Paul, just kind of the highlight here, interestingly, is Muse. I mean, generally it seems like Muse is now central pretty quickly to Meta's AI strategy. Yeah, and I think we touched on this last week, but they basically just stole the OpenClaw model or, well, no, sorry, terminology. They were inspired by the OpenClaw model and they spent the last year or so building Muse on top of that concept of like an always-on personal agent. We addressed this a little bit last week. Obviously, anything with Meta comes with some pretty significant privacy and concerns.

1:08:48And that's a choice people are going to make about whether or not they trust Meta with all the data that's going to be needed to make the agents work. I certainly know people who, you know, it's like, whatever, they don't care. Like it's a utility and they want the utility. And, um, but you know, I think you're going to like, we, we probably won't feature too many of them, but my guess is you're going to have like, you know, a series of articles coming out very quickly about concerns around, um, use of meta, um, muse and things like that. Yeah. I've seen a couple already in the last 72 hours that I'm not going to get into right now, but there was what I was expecting would come out of this.

1:09:27So yeah, and then I know we had this drop maybe in the product news later, but I'll just throw it in here now because I think it's relevant to our audience. This isn't just personal tools like Meta announced this morning, Zuckerberg put on Twitter slash X that he was announcing the Meta Enterprise Platform, a new business initiative aimed at helping companies use AI to grow and Transform, which he described as the next pillar of Meta's business based on Muse. So they're this agent, always on agent that knows everything about you and has access to all of your software and all of your communications.

1:10:02They want to do the same thing and compete head to head with Microsoft Copilot. OpenAI is expected to announce O or I think it's O or Zero, their personal agent at DevDay. So everybody's going to have an agent and you're going to try and decide which one to trust. An interesting thing with agents real quick is I've started to see already. They're like, yeah, Muse is great. I set it up to do this and this and now I have no idea what to do with it. Right. They're going to suffer from the same challenge a lot of these things do where people get super excited and they find a use case to plan a trip or buy a thing for them.

1:10:38And then they just don't know how to use it. And so I think Muse, they're going to tout all these users because Facebook has billions of users, so it's not hard to get 100 million people testing a technology when you have distribution into those 100 million people. Whether or not people are daily active users of it becomes the real critical test. Yeah, I was going to say, I think it's super interesting, Muse generally as a technology and also on the enterprise side. When I sit back and think of what is the TAM of a personal consumer agent, I'm just a bit baffled, at least when it comes to your point about regular usage.

1:11:13I'm excited personally, but I don't know if I'm like the average person target market of this. Like, do I anticipate my parents firing up their agent every single day to book flights and things? Maybe occasionally you could get there, but I don't know. I'm a little skeptical of that, but could be very wrong. Well, they've already launched the consumer ad campaigns. Like I saw them during the Browns game yesterday. So, yeah, they're in the education side of like, what do I do with this furry thing with the big butt that Alexander Wang likes to – If you don't know what I'm talking about, Alexander Wang, the head of AI at Meta, has been having fun, I would say, with their Muse character, especially the size of its butt.

1:11:58I think Alexander is just, as a marketing strategy, shitposting on X because he's just posting really weird memes and stuff that are getting kind of funny and getting a lot of pull, but they're a bit irreverent, I would say. Yeah, I don't know if it was by design, but for better or for worse, Alexander Wang's outfit choice for his keynote was a dramatically larger conversation point for our team than any of the technology itself. If you did not see it, just Google search Alexander Wang keynote outfit and you will see what I'm talking about. It was an interesting choice. It is. I'll just leave it at that.

1:12:39All right. next up some more muse news uh you know with muses rollout it has not been that long but there's already been a dispute over where the personal agent that meta has released can actually shop so amazon has blocked muse from browsing and buying on its site after meta declined a request to remove amazon from the muse experience so amazon said meta did not give it advance notice or obtain authorization to have muse you know as an agent go use amazon it says muse did not identify itself as an agent when browsing Amazon and appears to capture and store customer credentials, which raises privacy and security concerns.

1:13:18So Meta says Muse as an agent cannot see people's passwords or payment methods, that credentials go into separate secure storage. The agent can use them without reading them. Amazon, however, is still very skeptical. If you say, hey, you're Muse, go figure out something on Amazon for me. Go do research. Go buy products. Amazon's position is still that an app buying something on a customer's behalf still needs to respect the retailer's decision about whether or not to participate in allowing that. So shoppers trying to use Muse have been shown notices saying the agent's access violates Amazon's terms of use.

1:13:57Paul, I'm curious about your thoughts on this. This seems like an immediate huge roadblock to personal consumer agent usage. If Amazon or any other retailer starts blocking these, that seems like a huge use case for agents. I'm also just curious about if you're a smaller retailer, you probably got to buckle up and get ready for the fact everyone's going to start possibly using these things to buy on or break your website. I mean, not just retail, just any business website. Think about forms you have on your site, things like that. But yeah, I mean, just agents are going to be everywhere and it's going to flood websites and buying sites.

1:14:35I think there's ways around it. I was trying to find a tweet like Elon Musk tweeted about this and I thought I saved it. But he was like, you can totally get around this. Like this is not even like hard. So it's like a whack-a-mole game. Like if your strategy is going to be you're not allowed, then people will just find technical ways around doing it so that the site doesn't know it's an agent that's coming. So I don't know. I mean, it's an interesting standoff, and I think that they're going to have to figure out what this means for the future. But I think brands need to seriously start thinking about what the implications are of lots and lots of agents coming to your websites and filling out your forms and taking actions on user-perhaps, and it's got big implications.

1:15:20Okay, next up. OpenAI says that it's broad review of recent agent security incidents is going to take months to complete. So this review follows the hugging face breach, which the company says remains its most severe incident and was driven primarily by an internal research model. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said the team is working through petabytes of logs, prioritizing severe cases, and adding resources. He acknowledged disclosures have been slower than he wanted. OpenAI says most cases about agents working as they are not intended to work identified so far have been lower severity with limited or no evidence of meaningful impact.

1:16:02Now, that is open to debate because we're learning about more and more incidents every day. Some of the most notable ones about OpenAI's agents doing things they're not supposed to do have actually involved governments, we're hearing. So in Australia, there's an evolving story where Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said an OpenAI research agent bypassed blocks on a Medicare statistics portal from the government and accessed public and non-public files. They said that no personal information is believed to have been accessed. OpenAI also says agents used publicly available developer keys to access U.S.

1:16:42Census Bureau data and reposted Public Securities and Exchange Commission information elsewhere online in the US. They do say only public information was accessed. Researchers separately linked OpenAI agents to an unsuccessful attempt to hack an education department website. OpenAI says it is pausing and slowing down training, evaluation, inference involving tool use for its most capable models while it validates, fixes, and conducts further security testing. So Paul, it's like every day there's more agent incidents. We keep talking about this i can't imagine it's good for open ai if these start involving government websites this story somehow keeps getting worse like the disclosures and now you have like there was a i didn't weave it into today's episode but there was an internal researcher who was working on these projects and he basically was like this is so much worse than everybody knows like yeah We had no control over what happened.

1:17:41And I don't think that OpenAI still fully understands the situation. Like we mentioned the Andrew Yang quote about like that the bots basically like infiltrated the internet and then like left messages to themselves and copies of themselves and things like that. That's what it truly is just starting to feel like is these agents went off on the internet, did all kinds of crazy things, and OpenAI is trying to figure out what they did. Like they don't even know the full exposure that they have right now. And again, not an attorney, but like I don't the legal exposure on this has to be massive, like billions and billions of dollars, I would imagine.

1:18:22And there there's going to be a line of lawsuits against OpenAI for this. I don't know how there couldn't be, which is going to give the Trump administration even greater leverage over them. Because if you want the Department of Justice in your corner, it's going to be like you're going to have to play ball with whatever we want. So I could totally see the administration using this as leverage because they're going to need help to make some of this stuff go away. It's obvious now that harm was done to lots of different brands and sites. In a related note, Nikita Bear, who's X guy, I don't know what is his role at X?

1:19:01He's like a product. Oh, he's a former head of product. He left. So he was brought in by Elon to sort of clean up X. He tweeted, and this is actually related to the previous topic, bot detection and human verification will be one of the most urgent demands for businesses over the coming years. Agent swarms will suffocate every website and form. Small companies and government websites are most vulnerable. There's a huge gap in the market for this right now. When we looked at what offerings were in the market to use at X, there was not a single company that had brought together all the latest technologies, so we had to do it all in-house.

1:19:35So yeah, these agent swarms, it's just like, it's a crazy situation. But when you actually think about the ramifications to the internet and all of our websites, all these e-commerce sites, all these government sites, all these supposedly secure sites, I don't think people have processed yet how significant this truly has been and continues to be as we learn more and more each week. All right. This past week, OpenAI also published a policy proposal on its website called Building Standards for the Next Phase of AI. It calls for the United States to bring countries together around technical standards for developing AI safely.

1:20:15One focus here is recursive self-improvement, where AI increasingly develops future generations of AI. OpenAI says outright fully autonomous self-improvement is not happening today and should not be pursued until it can be done safely with humans retaining control. The proposal also calls for common ways to measure AI capabilities, decide when humans must step in, and how to classify and report incidents. The standards themselves would not be licenses or mandatory approval requirements for new models. This is interestingly playing out as both Sam and Dario made appearances before the United Nations Security Council, which met this past week.

1:21:00They urged governments to cooperate on international safety standards. Dario, speaking by video, warned about terrorists using AI to create bioweapons and models becoming too powerful for their developers to control. Hugging Face co-founder and CEO Clement DeLong also addressed the counsel. He said despite the attack on his company by OpenAI's agents, he cautioned against fear-based narratives. He had highlighted the attack happened due to AI, but they also defended themselves with AI. Now, interestingly, there's kind of a broader debate at the UN. The Secretary General of the UN called for coordination on frontier AI, while President Donald Trump rejected calls for international AI regulation as a, quote, globalist scheme.

1:21:45So, Paul, what do you make of OpenAI and Anthropic kind of taking this call for global AI safety? Public with the UN, big meeting surely with the UN, no actual concrete stuff coming out of that, but it was a topic of the day. Yeah, so the topics definitely crossed over because I only saw a few moments of it, but Dario Amadei was on the news desk on SNL this week. not actually Dario. He's become an SNL character saying, you know, protect me from myself, I think was like one of the lines. So yeah, it's become mainstream. I mentioned the Dario dinner with Trump late last night. I was just scanning.

1:22:22I have not seen any updates of like what came out of that dinner yet. So I'll be anxious to see what if anything happened. Because keep in mind, Trump hates Dario and wanted nothing to do with him. They sidelined him from conversations with the government in favor of the, what's the guy, Tom Brown or something, another guy from OpenAI or from Anthropic. But then related, so OpenAI has got these standards, the NVIDIA OpenAgent safety platform that I mentioned earlier, missing from the 100 plus companies committed to it is OpenAI, which I thought was kind of interesting. Okay. All right, next up, we have our AI use case spotlight where we're going to give you just a quick look under the hood at AI use cases.

1:23:08Paul, I know you already shared how you were using AI. HTML prototypes. Don't sleep on them. I'm telling you, if you are not a developer and can't build design technical things, use ChatGPT and Claude to build HTML prototypes. It changes your life. I love it. One thing I wanted to highlight is not really one single use case, but just kind of a collection of features that are quite helpful. So in the ChatGPT desktop app on Mac, so I use that for both ChatGPT work slash codex because they're both in the same app now. You actually can first open the app on your phone and remote into locally run ChatGPT apps on other machines that you have verified.

1:23:57So like my at-home computer, for instance, I can go start typing in commands to Codex on that machine. And from there, do the same types of work I would do in front of that machine on Codex. So it can use computer usage, browser usage, files, agentic usage, stuff like that, which is really cool to be able to do from the road. But even more exciting is that as OpenAI has updated their voice model, GPT Live is their voice model, which is very, very, very good that you can chat with via the ChatGPT app on your phone. But you can also use that to directly direct codex work. So I can literally have a back and forth conversation now, not just with ChatGPT to brainstorm ideas or work through topics or strategies like I normally did.

1:24:49I can also just say, hey, go fire up this workflow, grab these files, go use my computer to do whatever. And as long as it is remotely connected to the right machine with the right skills, I can do codex work on the road away from a desk. which frankly speaking to this and saying, hey, produce this slide deck or create these files or go look up on Amazon this or that thing is pretty incredible to do via voice and come back to a completed set of work files, assets and artifacts right on your desktop all ready to go by the time you get back. That is pretty cool and feels a little sci-fi to me, which I like.

1:25:32Yeah, we've talked about that one before, But you don't have to do all the codex stuff like Mike's talking about and have the app on your computer and have all this stuff set up to get that same feeling. You can do this in straight up chat, GPT, or Claude. Just go in and say, hey, go do this research project for me or build this thing. Go take your kids to school. Cut the grass. Go do whatever. Go to the gym. And you come back and you have a work product to work from that it might have spent 10 minutes or an hour on. And it's a really, really weird thing to get used to. Um, but for people who are sort of on the edges of this, like it's just become commonplace.

1:26:13Like, you almost like you're not doing that. Like you don't, you don't have it do this hard work for you to give you a base to work from. Um, but I would say Mike is in the 1 % here. Like if you're listening to what Mike is doing and you're like, oh my God, I know people are doing this. Most are not doing what Mike is explaining. This is definitely on the edges of people who are sort of innovating in what's possible. All right. So we're going to wrap up with our AI product and funding updates here. So I'm going to rapid fire through all of these, Paul, and then we will close out today's episode.

1:26:48So first up, we had alluded to this. OpenAI is developing features to compete with GrokBot, which is SpaceX AI's always-on AI teammates. They have discussed a personal assistant to rival Meta's Muse, potentially by repackaging technology already available in Codex and ChatGPT. OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic are reportedly planning an independent AI safety standards body, tentatively called the Standards Authority for Frontier AI, to define safety commitments and support outside model testing, with a hope for launch by year-end or early 2027. OpenAI is working with an independent mathematics advisory group to assess and communicate AI generated research results and advise on tools for mathematical research and learning with unpaid members free to publish their advice and criticize the company.

1:27:38Anthropic introduced a life sciences research group and laboratory and reported that Claude identified a previously uncharacterized enzyme system with DNA repeats resembling CRISPR followed by human laboratory testing though the system's biological function remains unknown. We talked about Google's next flagship AI model, Gemini 4, a little bit. That has entered early post-training. The company hopes to release an initial version well before year-end, could be much, much sooner, and then improve it through rapid updates. Google is preparing the first orbital test of Project Suncatcher, which is basically using a prototype satellite that is scheduled to launch on SpaceX's Transporter 18 mission to test how its AI chips withstand spaceflight, radiation, and extreme temperatures.

1:28:29Real quick note there, not investing advice at all. Never give investing advice on this show. If that works, there is one company in the world that can put those things in space at scale, and that is SpaceX. Yes. So if you want to know the future of SpaceX and what Elon Musk is building, the theory is you are going to be able to put data centers in space. We are now in the phase of validating that theory. And if this works, SpaceX actually this morning while we were on this launched Starship into orbit for the first time. I don't know if it made it. I saw that it was launching, but they're going up into orbit.

1:29:12it and it's just the next like five years could be very very weird as we start moving things into space and last but not least speaking of spacex ai the combined company they released grok 4.7 for coding and knowledge work in cursor grok build and the api the company reports better performance than grok 4.6 at the same price and speed starting at two dollars per million input tokens six dollars per million output tokens. And finally, one reminder for folks, go take the new SmarterX AI pulse survey at smarterx.ai forward slash pulse. This week, we are asking a little bit about the outcomes you are looking to achieve with AI.

1:29:58So we'd love your feedback on that. We'll keep that up for a couple of weeks and report back on the findings. So Paul, thanks for breaking everything down before probably some more big announcements this coming week with OpenAI Dev Day and other big developments. Really appreciate it. Jensen is on the circuit. I was just scanning. He was on CNBC this morning with a lot of the similar talking points. The stock market is down overall. Not NVIDIA. They're up 2.6 % this morning. So whatever Jensen has to say is apparently winning over investors at the moment. All right. Thanks, Mike. Yeah, lots to talk about next week, I'm sure.

1:30:35And stay tuned on our GPT's WTF. If you're an AI Academy member, it'll be coming to AI Academy soon. All right. Thanks, guys. Have a great week. Thanks for listening to the Artificial Intelligence Show. Visit smarterx.ai to continue on your AI learning journey and join more than 100 ,000 professionals and business leaders who have subscribed to our weekly newsletters, downloaded AI blueprints, attended virtual and in-person events, taken online AI courses, and earned professional certificates from our AI Academy and engaged in the SmarterX Slack community. Until next time, stay curious and explore AI.