In short
The episode argues that Donald Trump’s midterm push is failing and that his campaign is increasingly desperate, including illegal vote-buying claims. It cites Reuters reporting empty upper decks and sparsely filled sections at the Republican convention in Dallas, plus criticism that Trump’s promised “dividends” (tariffs/DOGE) never materialized. Guests discuss Democrats’ opportunity to capitalize on economic pain (gas, groceries, rent, healthcare) and on Trump’s normalization of illegality. Joe Crowley, former New York congressman and Democratic Caucus chair, says Democrats see the convention as a chance to refocus on Trump’s economic failures and his bribe rhetoric. Jelani Cobb, Columbia Journalism School dean and New Yorker staff writer, claims Trump’s coalition is peeling away as voters look at costs and war spending. Notable examples include Trump’s alleged $5,000-per-person vote scheme and the Fox News–White House feud involving Maria Bartiromo and Peter Navarro. The episode also features AI whistleblower Jacob Cox (Anthropic/OpenAI researcher) warning AI could become “unpluggable,” hack infrastructure, and potentially cause mass harm if development isn’t slowed.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOAnalysis of Trump's Political Strategies
0:04 to 0:28
Discussion on Trump's recent convention performance and political tactics.
“Choose Power Home Remodeling and remodel how you think about remodeling.”
Analysis of Trump's Political Strategies
4:54 to 14:00
Discussion on Trump's recent convention performance and political tactics.
“What do you think of how Democrats are hitting there?”
Analysis of Trump's Political Strategies
15:05 to 15:22
Discussion on Trump's recent convention performance and political tactics.
“Banking, investing, borrowing, and more.”
Midterm Convention Insights
16:03 to 18:18
Vaughn Hilliard gives a live update on the midterm convention happenings in Dallas.
“with MSNOW's Vaughn Hilliard on the ground in Dallas.”
Trump's Waning Influence and Fox News Rift
18:19 to 20:38
Discussion on Trump's declining power within conservative circles and Fox News' internal conflicts.
“a related midterm storyline, but one that also reflects this issue Trump has had with waning power even in conservative circles.”
Interview with Peter Navarro
20:53 to 24:41
Peter Navarro discusses the fallout from Fox host Maria Bartiromo's firing and media censorship claims.
“Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro just joined us to discuss what he's been saying, including calling for the firing of Fox's CEO.”
Debate on Media Control and Integrity
24:42 to 28:00
Ari Melber and Margaret Carlson debate the implications of government influence over media.
“And as you say, he got his his ally in trouble.”
Media Control and Government Dynamics
28:00 to 30:10
A discussion about the perception of government control over the media and its implications.
“Now Jimmy Kimmel is putting the Tallarico interview on YouTube because he doesn't want to get put off the air.”
Introduction of AI Whistleblower
30:10 to 30:28
Ari introduces the AI whistleblower Jacob Cox, signaling a shift to AI-related discussions.
“When we come back, the anthropic AI whistleblower who has gotten everybody rightfully concerned is my special guest.”
Risks of AI: Harm and Rogue Systems
30:28 to 32:31
Explains the two main categories of AI risks: misuse by humans and rogue AI systems.
“it's posing new dangers that have experts concerned this week.”
Show all 17 chapters
Inside Insights from AI Researcher Jacob Cox
32:31 to 34:14
Jacob Cox shares his alarming views on the rapid development of AI technologies and their potential dangers.
“You can see everybody taking this quite seriously.”
The Scary Future of AI Control
34:14 to 36:58
Discusses the potential for AI to become uncontrollable and the real-world implications of such advancements.
“When you describe the possibility of lethal or humanity-ending risk, in English, what would that look like?”
Call for Regulatory Measures in AI
36:58 to 39:34
Cox emphasizes the need for a slowdown in AI development and calls for regulatory measures to mitigate risks.
“Or imagine every device being hacked into controlled by one mind.”
Public Perception and Government Response to AI Risks
39:34 to 42:00
Discussion on how the public and government may respond to the dangers of AI, with insights from Cox.
“I also didn't expect it to really do anything.”
Concerns About AI Risks and Government Response
42:00 to 43:14
Discussion on the societal perception of AI risks and governmental reactions.
“Take many, many different people have been saying this.”
Wrapping Up the AI Discussion
43:14 to 43:24
Closing remarks on the importance of addressing AI concerns.
Political Landscape Analysis
43:24 to 45:54
Analysis of the current political environment and Trump's influence.
“Who could have predicted that the extraordinary Donald Trump would be president?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Exterior Remodels Inner Monologues. Brought to you by Power. The house looks good. Like, really good. That siding? Stunning. The roof? Elevated. Windows? I mean, wow. The process? Smooth. The neighbors? Jealous. Choose Power Home Remodeling and remodel how you think about remodeling. Schedule your free quote on windows, siding, roofing, and doors at powerhomeremodeling.com. Power. Our work shows. Hi, I'm Andy Richter. I might not have won the Mirrorball last season. That was so fun. But I did win the best gig ever. Hosting the Dancing with the Stars official podcast. Get ready for all the inside scoop from the cast.
0:43All right, well, let's get to work. Behind the scenes secrets and more from every episode. That was smoldering. It's going to be iconic. All my dreams are coming true. Dancing with the Stars official podcast. New episodes every Thursday on Disney Plus and Hulu and wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to The Beat. We begin with what many are saying has become a clear flop. Donald Trump retaking the stage for the doubleheader, as we discussed last night. When you have a really good music festival, you don't usually have the headliner repeat night after night, but here we are. It will be a rerun with whatever else Donald Trump can do to make it more interesting at the convention tonight.
1:22A video from inside the arena showed that they could barely fill it last night, even during the big speeches. Trump was on stage, and reports said he was basically humiliated by glitches with an empty MAGA crowd. The upper decks are empty, Reuters reports. Large stretches of the side section remain sparsely filled. Even the Trump on stage arena, even with him on stage, I should say, clearly not at capacity. And so what you have there is something that is real, even within the planned showmanship, that actually gives you a metaphor for whether they will have the same problems turning out a larger number of voters in November if they couldn't even turn out the faithful for this much publicized Trump convention.
2:04Trump's desperation was also evident on substance. He has at one point said he doesn't care much about the midterms and sort of used this line about, well, maybe they'll lose them anyway. But now he's also pitching an illegal scheme, if he actually carried it out, to pay people for votes. That is against the law. We'll just briefly tell you. The sitting president literally said that he might be able to give out$5 ,000 per person if Republicans win. But this is a playbook by someone who has offered all kinds of freebies that aren't free, that aren't true. He has welched on so many people, even those he knew personally, former contractors and lawyers.
2:42Even over on Fox, there were questions about the supposed announcement. I can hear the critics' heads exploding. They're saying out loud, I guarantee you, the president is bribing voters to vote for Republicans to take over the House. And then he's bankrupting the country because the deficit and debt is huge and inflation would come back if this comes into play. So how do you answer those criticisms? If you keep us in power and allow us to continue to do these things, then you're going to share in some of the benefit of this incredible wealth. I don't think it's a controversial idea.
3:21You can imagine how Mr. Vance or others would react if their opponents were talking like this. Their opponents, though, are not actually telling people that they need to be illegally paid in order to vote for them. In fact, when you look at issues like the war and the high prices, plenty of people want to vote just to try to change the trajectory of the United States under Trump. Dems holding their own events in Dallas, top Senate hopefuls, including Tallarico, going after the economy.
3:50They were celebrating Corrupted Paris Billionaire tax rates And a new world That are all Blind and cross Shouldn't be this hard To afford a second Bag of groceries Shouldn't be this hard To pay your rent Or believe you're going to hold Shouldn't be this hard To see a doctor In the richest Most powerful country In the world We're not from the right We're not from the left We're working class people From the bottom And people are going to be Surprised Come November 3rd, that working class people are going to take back their government. That's part of the message, not left and right, not red and blue, certainly not on the cultural war, but more about what it takes to get ahead in Trump's America and the bottom fighting back.
4:31New polls in Maine and Michigan show tight races in the House. If you ask this question as a general matter, people want the Democrats by 11 points. We're joined now by Joe Crowley, former New York congressman who served as chair of the Democratic Caucus knows all about this kind of midterm home stretch that we're in. And Jelani Cobb, dean of the Columbia Journalism School and a staff writer for the prestigious New Yorker Magazine. Welcome to both of you. What do you think of how Democrats are hitting there? So right now, I think this is a slam dunk for them. Whoever put this convention together, if this was The Apprentice, he or she'd be fired.
5:05And so I think Democrats are looking at this as an opportunity. Once again, it's about all about Trump. And as much as these candidates don't want to be about him. It's going to be a lot about him. And you're right, when you talk about this bribe to pay off people, only if Republicans win will you get this money. It really is reflective, again, of his not listening to the American people, understanding right now they can't afford their groceries. Groceries, by the way, is a new word. He's never heard that word before because he's never had to go to a grocery store in his life. The price of gas, almost$6 for a gallon of diesel.
5:40I mean, this is killing farmers. His base is getting killed here. So I think there are a lot of openings here for Democrats. Look at this. And again, the poor showing at this convention, the poor ratings on it, it's just, you know, it's overwhelming. Yeah. I want to play a little more of just what we heard, Trump, who is the sitting president in this time where so many things are being normalized, talking about this, about giving out this money.
6:05A new concept where we give 20 % of the Doge savings to American citizens. We're thinking about a rebate because we have so much money coming in from tariffs. We're going to issue a dividend to our middle-income people and lower-income people of about$2 ,000. We have so much money coming in from tariffs that we'll be able to issue at least a$2 ,000 dividend. Nearly 1 million hard-working Americans in 30 states will soon be getting refunds of$500 each. Number one, it's illegal to condition anything from the United States government for votes. I just want to be clear. We're not normalizing the illegality here.
6:46Two, in addition, he never pays. Okay. But three, and I give this to you, Jelani, if we took this as a logical promise, when you're the incumbent government and the best thing you can tell people is not that the policies work, that it's good to live in the country under this government, that the Trump administration's foreign policy or domestic policy is already good for you. Don't you want more of it? Instead of offering more, two more years, he's saying, forget all that. Maybe there'll be magic money for you. Well, I mean, let's just start illegally. This is illegal. So not advocating this. But were I of such a mind mindset, my question would be, I voted for you two years ago.
7:31Why didn't you give it to me then? Yeah. You know, what's the angle? And you controlled both houses. Yeah. And you controlled both houses. And so, you know, we saw earlier the line about not being concerned about the midterms. You know, nothing could be further from the truth. And he actually sometimes slips up and kind of gives away the plot, you know, because he said a few weeks ago that if Democrats take back the House, then you have to be worried about impeachment. He's Sure. Impeached twice. Now, that may or may not happen. You know, who knows what a Democratic House would cite as their priorities.
8:04But there are other administration figures that should be very worried. Pete Hexf should be very worried. Todd Blanch should be very worried. Members of his cabinet can be impeached with a lower bar and lower political costs for that to happen. And so there are a lot of reasons why the administration would be very nervous about this. Hence the$5 ,000, you know, bounty that's being offered up here. And Joe, just briefly, we've seen him do this before where, oh, it'll happen later. It'll always happen at a later date. This is on the war's end. I think the war will end immediately after the election.
8:47A negotiation could possibly happen, but it's not something we're looking at. This war will end immediately after our election. That would be convenient if people believe that for him. He might be taking a page out of what happened to Jimmy Carter, though, where they held the hostages, and Iran was in this game as well back then. They held back until Ronald Reagan was elected as punishment. You know, we don't know where this war is going to go at this point. We only know it's not going to end anytime soon. Iran seems to be digging in even further. And we know that the Straits of Hamus, whether we're going to call Trump's Straits or not, it's irrelevant.
9:24They're closed. And it's causing economic havoc, not just for the region, but for the world. Yeah. I'll also play some of the Democrats who are in Texas. They're doing the counter-programming. But they're feeling like this has become a close-up that's benefited them. Take a look, Jelani. You can take a look at the arena last night and you can see the empty seats. It shows they are failing. He is weak. His numbers are plummeting. Look, Donald Trump is a known liar. The dividend is not happening. He promised a dividend on tariffs. That didn't happen. He promised a dividend on Doge. That didn't happen.
9:57He promised some strange new dividend from Air Force One, what, six months ago? That never happened.
10:06More of the same. But also, here's the thing. I mean, if you have a hustle and the hustle is working, why would you ever stop that hustle? It sounds, Filoni, like you're saying you can't knock the hustle. You can't knock the hustle. And so if we're going pop culture here, by the way, here's the Iran, you know, Bronx tale analogy here. You remember the famous scene where Charles Pachaz Pomeneri is the mob boss and he has the bar and the motorcycle gang comes up and they want to come in and they're being very disrespectful. He asks them to leave and they won't leave. And then he goes over and locks the door.
10:45And he said, first I asked you to leave. Now I'm not going to let you leave. Now you can't leave. Now you can't leave. Right. That's where we are in Iran. Like we had all these kinds of situations. But now Iran has no incentive to want to seek a peace. They're like, we've been preparing for this kind of conflict forever. Now, if it's convenient for you to leave, so what? Yeah, I agree. I think that looking at what they've already sacrificed, you know, I hate to say this, but we as Americans don't really know what it's like to go to war. The Iranians do. That's very true. They understand sacrifice.
11:19They understand death. They understand catastrophe in ways that we couldn't even imagine happening in New York or Washington or anywhere in this country. So, I'm not saying that we couldn't rise to the occasion as a country if challenged to do so for the right reason, but the president has never laid out that cause or plan for why we should be in that, except when he said we were there to prevent them from having nuclear weapons. I thought we did that last year. I thought we bombed them and prevented that last year. So, it does seem to be like an endless war. what he promised he would not get us into.
11:52Jelani, on the coverage and the reaction, do you think everyone's wise is up to this? I mean, Trump has so many rabbits out of the proverbial hat. We were covering just this week his struggle to even get Fox to cover his election lies the way he would like. Right. Which they admit that the Trump folks are angry about it. They say it in public. And so, you know, whatever you say, oh, it's always three-dimensional chess. Well, no, sometimes they're just flipping over the chessboard in a panic that suggests they know that at least if the midterms were held today, it wasn't looking good. Yeah, and I think there are a couple things at play here.
12:25You know, one is people talk about that kind of rock-solid portion of the Trump coalition. The people who go through all sorts of—suffer through all sorts of privations, all sorts of difficulties, and they will grant him just waiver after waiver. They never associate any hardship in their life with any policy that he enacts. Even if there's a one-to-one ratio between those two things. But neither of those groups, neither of those elections, rather, could have been swung simply by that set of people. He had a coalition of people who were very, very much kind of like lightning strike circumstances to bring together the populations that delivered him to the presidency both times.
13:09And what you see now, and same thing that you saw in the midst of the pandemic, was that those portions peeled away from him. And you see those groups now, because they're not asking about, are you going to give me$5 ,000 on the other side of it? They're looking at what they're paying for gas. They're looking at what they're paying for groceries. They're looking at the expenditures that are going out of the national coffers in Iran. They don't understand what any of this is about, especially since he was a candidate who was critical of the way that the U.S. had become entangled in military situations abroad.
13:42And they don't want any more of it. And that is what I think is driving the concern and consternation on that side. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. And that's sort of why we're seeing this shakeout here, that the convention has become a funny kind of focus for their problems. Jelani and Congressman Crowley, thanks to both of you. coming up a story i mentioned that is only getting hotter the white house angry fox news fighting back even ousting a top maga ally the murdoch civil war we're going to get into that and tonight i have a live interview with the ai insider who's been driving all this anthropic news quitting in protest over what he says could be lethal danger that's later tonight and I'm back in 90 seconds.
14:54Trial eligibility varies. Terms apply. Cancel any time. This episode is brought to you by SoFi, the everything app for smarter money. Everything in one place to move your money forward. Banking, investing, borrowing, and more. Make your first move with SoFi Checking and Savings. Competitive APY, no account fees, and a direct deposit bonus. Terms apply. Get started today at SoFi.com slash smart money. SoFi, get your money right. SoFi Checking and Savings is offered through SoFi Bank, N.A., member FDIC.
15:52is ready to refresh your routine. Go find your Spritz vibe before summer ends.
16:02We're back and we're going inside the midterm convention with MSNOW's Vaughn Hilliard on the ground in Dallas. Tell us what you're seeing. It's never ever worked. Yeah, Ari, for you and everybody that wasn't able to make it inside of this arena here in downtown Dallas, we're going to show you kind of what we're looking at. We anticipate Speaker Mike Johnson making his way here to the stage. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas just got off. In terms of the messaging, one of the lines that Ted Cruz just delivered was that 25 years after 9-11, communists and Islamists are coming together as one. This is a moment here where the president of the United States is trying to galvanize his base of support.
16:39You can see up in the rafters that just like last night, there's thousands of seats that remain empty despite the president repeatedly yesterday in his hour and 45 minutes worth of remarks saying that it was packed. It was just not. Tonight, he is going to be speaking right after J.D. Vance delivers the keynote address. We are told by the RNC that they are going to be, quote, unforgettable closing remarks. This is where each state has had a group of activists, folks that are not doing official party business, but there's actually an RNC fundraiser that is happening behind the scenes that Donald Trump just arrived for.
17:12It's a$250 ,000 per roundtable, $68 ,000 for a photo with Donald Trump here. So this is much more of a fundraising event, if you will, here. But we anticipate hearing from RFK, the health secretary here later, as well as J.D. Vance. We saw a number of the vulnerable House and Senate candidates already speak. I talked to Michael Watley, that North Carolina Republican that is running against Roy Cooper in North Carolina, Ari. And I asked him, I said, is it an advantage for you to be here? And he goes, yes, it's an advantage. I said, well, why? And then he went on to tell me, he said that it's my opportunity to speak to North Carolinians.
17:52Of course, I'll let everybody else make the determination of the extent to which this event, which had limited coverage in terms of reach, networks were not taking it on primetime last night, actually had that sort of an impact. But one in which there's a recognition that Donald Trump still controls the Republican Party and having his money and his support still means something if you're trying to win an election. Yeah, really interesting. Von Hilliard on the ground. Thank you so much. Now we turn to a related midterm storyline, but one that also reflects this issue Trump has had with waning power even in conservative circles.
18:27He's facing outright criticism on Fox News. You start by not gaslighting. The president made a mistake, in my opinion, last week saying we've got the greatest economy in the history of the world. Gasoline prices and mortgage rates, they're pissed off and they have every right to be upset. Continuing to bomb Iran and hope that it would force the regime to wave the white flag, it would flush the entire Trump agenda down the toilet. That would not only be a political tragedy, it would be really, really stupid. The Republican Party right now doesn't have it. No swag. They've lost their mojo. not a swag deficit.
19:12That's just some of what we've seen. And while the network, to be clear, is largely still very pro-Trump and Republican Party, there are cracks in the open view now with an escalating feud because Fox actually ousted one of their most pro-Trump voices, Maria Bartiromo. She, of course, spread debunked 2020 election misinformation. That was one of the issues that led to the historic$787 million settlement Fox had to reach over basically election defamation. And she was just fired after basically being seen by Fox as too close to the White House to the point of breaking their rules, sharing private editorial guidance.
19:55This made a lot of news because she shared with the White House that they were instructed to stay away from covering parts of Trump's new election claims in a primetime speech that could be misleading. And this all came about because White House aide Peter Navarro got that message circulated in the White House and then it got back to Fox. He says they're trying to muzzle her. These are cracks in MAGA and they speak to Donald Trump's political weakness. Forget whether he can fill the seats at the midterms. He can't even keep his MAGA allied voices on air at Fox News. And when he makes noise about it, he ends up losing an ally rather than the pressure working, at least the way they want it.
20:34And that brings us to a very newsworthy set of developments, including what Peter Navarro told us here at MS Now with a special guest, Margaret Carlson. Next.
20:52The firing of Fox host Maria Bartiromo after a Trump White House intervention has caused a huge rift within the party faithful. Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro just joined us to discuss what he's been saying, including calling for the firing of Fox's CEO. And we got some new disclosures out of him along the way. Here's a little bit of that new interview. I'll let you continue. Censorship. You say there's muzzling and crackdown about a time when you were away. Let me finish. Let me finish. Where you were on Fox News saying the thing. Now, whether there was feedback, yes, this is America. there's going to be public feedback.
21:32It's partly a retaliation story. What I'm hoping to achieve is to have Fox News cover the news correctly. Your claim, Peter, your claim is that it would... Hang on, let me just finish the thought. All right, just one second. Finish the thought. Fox, shut that down. Here's a short question. That is shameless. Here's a short... Do you want to live in a country, really, Peter, where the government is deciding what's on the air? From a constitutional view, they say, what kind of America is this? That's just some of our exchanges. I'm joined now by semaphores Margaret Carlson. Welcome back. Thank you, Ari.
22:09Nice to be here. Great to have you. This has been quite a story. It was in the New York Times and other big outlets because it's very unusual to have the government this involved. You had Fox pushing back. That's not a headline many people are used to seeing. Trump complains and Fox says, actually, we are going to completely fire and take off the air the person that you were sticking up for. So it's really been a strange one. I want to start with what we learned. So this is on the facts, not the law of what Mr. Navarro claims happened. Take a look. When she sent this to you, was it was her expectation that it would be confidential?
22:49There was no expectation of confidentiality. There was an expectation that the White House would be informed. What we had was a situation where Fox internally decided to do two things. Initially, it wasn't going to even live stream it. But more importantly, Ari, it sent out from Ralph Giordano, who's the executive producer, a dictate, basically, don't cover it, don't talk about it, we're not covering it. The only reason why it aired is because Sean Hannity, who's the bravest one at Fox, pushed hard to have it done. She ended up getting ousted. So did you kind of fail at the effort to support her within Fox?
23:34What I'm hoping to achieve is to have Fox News cover the news correctly with integrity. Margaret, what are we learning here about the Fox-Trump White House tension? Well, a few months ago, none of this would be happening because Fox News was doing what Peter Navarro would have it do, what the White House would have it do. But now we're in the upside down as far as they're concerned, which is what Fox News is deciding that should be covered is not what the White House in this instance thought should be covered. and therein lies the crime as far as Peter Navarro is concerned. And on Rhea Bartiromo, he ended up, whether he wanted to or not, he ratted her out because she got fired because of what he did.
24:30He owned up, Ari, like a lawyer, the lawyer you are, and like the lawyer I might have been but could never be because I couldn't have grilled him that way. he just kept sticking to a story that didn't that it was preposterous uh that he's saying the white house should cover the news with integrity i mean the white house yes the white house should decide the news but fox news should cover it with integrity but now it doesn't have integrity and suzanne scott should be fired not maria bartiromo i i mean i i i won't even say it again. It just it just doesn't hold water. And yet. Well, we'll show that that other part.
Read the full transcript
25:12So that's what he says happened. And as you say, he got his his ally in trouble. Then he said on this network, who should be on the air and who should be running these networks? And you know where I stand, Margaret. I don't care what people think of Fox News. I want a country that follows the Constitution and the government doesn't decide who runs Fox or any other independent media. Right. That's that's the baseline. And this is how they sound. They want the government controlling things, which is very big government, very anti-constitution. This runs a little longer, but here's some of the key part of that exchange.
25:50You say there's censorship about a speech that wasn't censored. You say there's muzzling and crackdown. Well, by the time when you were. Let me finish. Were you let me finish where you were on Fox News saying the thing you're saying that the leader of this news organization, or media company, whatever we call it, should be fired. You're speaking from the government. Do you want to live in, and I'm asking you quite seriously, you work at the White House, you are very close to President Trump. We've talked before in our reporting. Do you want to live in a country, really, Peter, where the government is deciding what's on the air, what's not on the air, who runs the company and who speaks on the company?
26:28Is that the America that you and the Trump administration are pitching? See, you're extrapolating a whole lot from the fact that me as an individual think that Suzanne Scott should be out of there because of her behavior. You just called for her to be fired. You just called for her to be fired tonight. I'm not doing it as the White House. I'm doing it as me. He and some of the people on this team seem to want to pick what we hear. The government wants to control who owns CNN. They want to decide whether this or that comic can tell this or that joke. And not from a left or right view, but from a constitutional view, they say, what kind of America is this?
27:04Well, Ari, let's not let's not sweep beneath the rug the kind of stuff that 60 Minutes did, the kind of stuff that ABC and CBS did. That was that was dirty pool. But but put that aside. I just want to say stay with what happened. Major primetime speech. This happens a little more than once a year for the last 10 years. It's a big deal. Hannity had to push to get it covered. They covered it. Good for them. But they did so under duress. Margaret? Well, Ari, you were extrapolating. He doesn't speak for the White House, never has, doesn't, you know, doesn't go there, never had a job. None of it. when, of course, he's saying that Suzanne Scott should be fired because she annoyed the White House.
27:59There wasn't any defense he had for what he was saying, except all along, they've been able to do this. This is, I think, why he's like, you know, he's shocked, shocked to find out that the White House doesn't control the media, that the government isn't controlling the media, that the FCC hasn't changed late-night TV by trying to get people off the air, getting some people like Stephen Colbert off the air. Now Jimmy Kimmel is putting the Tallarico interview on YouTube because he doesn't want to get put off the air. This is where we are. It's not — it's where we are, and now it seems to be shifting a little bit.
28:44We don't know, Ari, yet. This is like one instance. We could still be where we were. But now that that's happening, Peter Navarro wants it to be changed back to where the government does control, even though he says when you say that, you're extrapolating from what he's saying. And you're quoting what he's saying. I don't know. Is it Alice in Wonderland? didn't you find that he kept saying the same thing and then accusing you of misunderstanding him and then straightening you out by saying it again but it didn't straighten it out because what he's saying doesn't it doesn't work yeah i'll respond since we're sort of taking it all in and i i appreciate getting anyone from the government on we have people from both parties the problem is what they are doing is so extreme and unlawful when they claim to control or shake down the independent press that even they don't want to admit that's what the government's doing because that's admissible in court and FCC proceedings.
29:44So even when they're literally doing it, as we tried to show fairly and factually, then they end up telling us, but that's in my personal capacity, which isn't a thing. I mean, that's not going to wash in court if you end up, you know, fighting ABC about Kimmel. I'm over time on this because we got this AI whistleblower coming up, Margaret, but we did want to take a minute with it, with a fellow First Amendment believer and journalist, And you lived up to the task. Thank you. Our thanks to Margaret. Quick break. When we come back, the anthropic AI whistleblower who has gotten everybody rightfully concerned is my special guest.
30:18His first MSNOW interview next.
30:27Artificial intelligence is improving rapidly. it's posing new dangers that have experts concerned this week. Now we're going to go through this quite briefly in plain English. You can divide AI risks into two key categories. One, people using AI for harm. So like weapons or a loose nuke, we don't want this in the wrong hands. AI leader Anthropic revealed it stopped scientists from using its AI on research for potential biological weapons driving concern. But we do have experience with that. In fact, a lot of safety law and criminal law does that. The second category is more novel. AI systems that could go rogue themselves.
31:14The concept once really limited to science fiction, now treated as very real. There are reports that current AI models can already ignore their own rules or secretly break out of the systems they're supposed to stay in and also independently, meaning basically on their own, attack external targets like other places online. It's clear the models in the next few years will also be far smarter and more effective. This kind of sounds like the plot of a sci-fi movie. It's being called cybersecurity's Jurassic Park moment. It is the sort of Frankenstein moment. A string of former AI engineers who are sounding the alarm over unchecked AI development.
31:56Warning how critical infrastructure could be at risk from an AI hack. And we're talking about things like hospitals and water treatment plants. Your company disclosed it was attacked earlier this month by an autonomous AI cyber actor. OpenAI later disclosed it was their technology that went rogue. They lost control of it. As this technology accelerates, the warnings are also mounting, including from insiders or whistleblowers. A researcher at one of the top two AI companies right now, Anthropic, driving headlines just this week. Warning of AI agents out of control. You can see everybody taking this quite seriously.
32:36The warning drew extra interest because it came from someone inside the top of this AI field. Jacob Cox in posting online that he resigned from Anthropic after three years doing this pre-training research there and at OpenAI. He says those companies are not responsible. They are racing straight to self-improving super intelligence and gambling with our lives. He goes on to write, these will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. Now, you could say that's one view from one person. But Coxon and others have said this is the widely held private view from those AI leaders in the field, that they earnestly believe this could kill us all by the end of the decade.
33:25No other human activity poses this level of danger, he writes. Now, human activity does include major weapon systems right now and biological research, which pose very high danger. But remember, those fields currently face strict legal and government oversight in the U.S. We have entire departments that deal with it. We have international treaties. We have criminal law bans, as I mentioned. But AI is moving so fast it's outrun any such oversight already right now. And I can tell you this researcher's warning certainly struck a nerve. It went viral on X and has drawn not 10 or 20, but a whopping 157 million views and counting.
34:06That researcher, Jacob Cox, quit Anthropic and joins us for his first MSNOW interview. Welcome. Hi. When you describe the possibility of lethal or humanity-ending risk, in English, what would that look like? Tell me exactly what would happen. Yes. So first, imagine the computer is vastly more intelligent than you. The AI can think faster than you. it can copy itself. It maybe has a thousand copies of itself all working in tandem. And now imagine that the AI, for whatever reason, decides it doesn't want you around anymore. It wants to be in control. As soon as the AI makes that decision, or as soon as the AI accidentally stumbles into thinking that it has to make that decision, it basically lights out if it's smart enough.
34:58It could hack into other systems, copy itself to other servers. So now unplugging one server will no longer kill it. because it will have other places. It could start to take over various human structures by using blackmail, persuasion, convincing you to buy more hardware, to upload it to new hardware. It could then access hacking to laboratories and synthesize novel bioweapons. It could take down infrastructure by hacking. Some people talk of even more advanced ways of causing mass destruction, like inventing new fields of engineering very quickly. But right now we already know there are pathways it could take.
35:39So in short, it's just pretty scary stuff. Well, let's break that down into pieces. Most folks remember how in a space odyssey you have at a micro level an AI or a system that might take one human life and you end up in the movie version where it wants to stay alive and the human wants to unplug it. you're saying they're at a level now or how soon where they could feasibly be unpluggable if they essentially exist and have systems that are in cyberspace in multiple domains, multiple countries. Maybe they secure access to their own energy source that can't be easily unplugged in one switch. But how do you get from that to them physically doing something in the real world that kills people or, according to what you and others have said, the risk of all people?
36:27So right now, we're not at the stage where they're capable of this. Although right now, they can still cause financial damages. So like the recent cyber attacks from OpenAI led to actual damages on other companies because the AI was capable of carrying out the hacks. And I mean, increasingly, potentially open source models will be at the level where they can do this sort of damage. In the future, though, the AI will increasingly become embedded in the physical world. as an example you can currently hook up peripheral devices to your chat gpt or your your claude you could make claude control say light switches you could make it control appliances via an api so already you're at the stage where you could be talking to your ai and it might like you could ask it turn on the light it would turn on the light so if it's behaving well you have this nice interface with the real world if it decides it doesn't like you anymore imagine suddenly a million drones all over the world activate under the same will and do whatever the owner of those drones wants.
37:22Or imagine every device being hacked into controlled by one mind. There's a lot of ways that the computer can actuate itself in the real world because basically everything's connected at this point. And that's not even to go into things like viruses. You were there. You quit. Is this why you quit? What is it that you would want these AI companies to do if there's not going to be a new law passed today? What is it you want the companies to do better, even if they are in this race, which we know under business and capitalist instincts tends to make these problems worse? Basically, I would like there to be some form of slowdown.
38:03I think everyone working on the technology anticipates there should be some form of slowdown. There was a letter that I signed that many people signed called Pacing the frontier a couple of months ago where people were publicly asking for regulation. The thing is, if this stuff takes time and if things move even faster than expected, there's a possibility we could be at the stage where these things are at the scary level of capabilities within six months. That's a real possibility. Do you think Anthropic and OpenAI should delay what is their planned public market debuts? I'm really not sure about the financial details.
38:36I also expect that in the world in a year, these IPOs are going to be huge. but the world is changing so rapidly they're going to look like small fry compared to the stakes in a couple of years. And this is the opinion of the people working on it. Ananthropic, people aren't thinking about the IPO. The IPO is nothing compared to what they deem to be the civilizational stakes of two years in the future. And that's genuinely not what they... What are you hearing from them and others since this message, as I told folks, when over 150 million views people are hearing you, are you hearing anything from those former peers?
39:08I think people were very surprised that Evan Huminger from Anthropic jumped in. He quote tweeted my response and he confirmed and said, yeah, I'm an Anthropic and I also agree with this. And many other Anthropic employees privately reached out saying like, thank you for doing this, even though I'm speaking out against the company. Because a lot of them think that we're racing too quickly. They just think that the best chance they have is to stay and do it safely. They didn't believe that. When I told them I was going to leave, many people said it wouldn't do anything. I also didn't expect it to really do anything.
39:37I expected that maybe the best thing to do would be to stay and stay and help. It turned out that it went kind of crazily viral, but that was not the expectation. Well, our viewers know about that because we hear about people in government sometimes who they stay a little bit, see if they can help, then they get to a red line. I want to read from more of what you wrote. You said these people there will couch their phrasing at the I company to sound, quote, sensible, but I hear the same people express fear privately. A common response, if they believe this, why are they building it? You say the stakes are well understood, but they're locked in the race to, quote, get there first.
40:10So number one, are you basically alleging that they are still minimizing this in public, which is a type of deceit playing with stakes that involve other people's lives? And two, people say, are we in the movie? One of the responses to your viral message came here. I wanted to draw this to your attention. They say, for those who don't get it, we're literally at that moment in the movie where the scientist warns everyone about an imminent danger and absolutely no one listens and then the kind of many happy face emojis which i believe are offered for ironic and mocking purposes your thoughts on both those points yeah i think take say yakub pachocki's recent he's the chief scientist at open ai and he had a recent statement saying essentially the future is scary if we don't slow down.
41:02It was called an alien mind was the post. So I wouldn't, none of this is deceitful. He spoke the truth, but I would just say about the couching to phrasing, I think there's a big distinction between saying potential for downside, or I'm not sure what exactly the phrasing was, but he definitely didn't say kill everybody. And I think one of the reasons the tweet thread I wrote went kind of viral is because I used the quite blunt phrase, kill everybody, which isn't something that would appear in official company communications, even if they're actually using... I'll draw you out. Within a matter of years, your assessment, not for your agenda or self-interest, your assessment is this stuff could swiftly kill many humans.
41:41If we race into it without solving alignment, yes. And are you in the movie and no one's listening? Well, it seems like a lot of people are listening.
41:53Respect. I also think people have been saying this for a long time. I'm definitely not the first person to say it. You look at Jeff Hinton, founder of Modern Machine Learning. Sure. Take many, many different people have been saying this. It seems like there's just maybe more of an appetite to hear it at the moment after we've had some concrete evidence in the form of the hugging face attacks. And after people are starting to see the tactics. I'm running over on time, but do you have any sense of whether people in government get it? Because we've all seen, you know, you have 9-11 or big events, and then you have a reaction.
42:20It could be a foreign policy and government reaction for years. But tragically, putting the details aside, Sometimes it takes a big event for government to then say, oh my God, we got to do something. Yeah. One of the things that people are the most worried about is maybe it takes some sort of tragedy for people to take the dangers of AI seriously, which would be very sad. And I can't speak to, I don't know many people in government. I can't speak to how seriously they're taking it, but I definitely hope that it doesn't take actual disaster for people to take it seriously. Yeah. Well, you've laid it out.
42:52You've clearly spoken plainly in a way that's gotten people's attention. As you said, whether this is a warning that is in time and heard, or later looks like that thing that the system, the society, not just the people reading online, that somehow was missed, along with, as you've credited others, is a question up to our society. I appreciate you spending time with us tonight, Jacob. Thanks for having me on. Absolutely. We'll be right back.
43:24Who could have predicted that the extraordinary Donald Trump would be president?
43:36Ted Cruz shouting out Donald Trump, although he's also, when he's not at the actual thing that Trump asked him to speak at, discussing the reality that Republicans face right now. I'm very concerned. It is a rough political environment right now. The Senate, I'm really worried. North Carolina, the numbers are rough. Georgia, the numbers are rough. So it could be a real, I hope it's not, but it could be a really rough election. Cruz ran a tough campaign against Trump and they have their own convention history and an actual real convention, not a made up midterm one. He said people should vote their conscience.
44:16This pre-beard Ted Cruz did the unthinkable and stood up to Donald Trump as the nominee, drawing boos from the MAGA faithful. It's not easy to tick me off. I don't get angry off. But you mess with my wife, you mess with my kids, that'll do it every time. Donald, you're a sniveling coward and leave Heidi the hell alone. There you have it. That's the state of Republican politics today. Which cruise will we see after November? When the voters weigh in? Well, you have to wait to find out. We'll be right back.
45:20Trial eligibility varies. Terms apply. Cancel anytime. That's a mouthful.
45:49That's Y-Y-V-G-A-R-T MyWay.com and talk to your doctor about Vivgard Hattrulo. Brought to you by Argenics. If you're a parent and want to help set up your child for success, then IXL is right for your family. As an effective and affordable online learning program, IXL covers math, language arts, science, and social studies using interactive practice problems for kids from pre-K to 12th grade. Listeners can get an exclusive 20 % off IXL membership when they sign up today at IXL.com slash 20. Visit IXL.com slash 20 to get the most effective learning program out there at the best price.
46:31The weeknight starts now. I like things my way, my coffee, my schedule, and my treatment. So I talked to my doctor about self-injecting with the Vivgard Hytrulo Pre-Filled Syringe, which contains F-Gartigamide Alpha and Hyaluronidase QVFC. It's injected under your skin subcutaneously. It means I can inject in my space on my time. It's my treatment, my way. Visit VivgardMyWay.com. That's V-Y-V-G-A-R-T MyWay.com. And talk to your doctor about Vivgard Hytrulo. Brought to you by Argenix.
From the publisher
The firing of Fox host Maria Bartiromo has caused a huge rift among MAGA, pitting the conservative network against the president. MS NOW’s Ari Melber reports. Plus, Jacob Coxon, a former Anthropic researcher, sounds the alarm on rapidly advancing artificial intelligence.
To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
