Bill Gates Issues AI Warning

27 Aug 2026 · 42 min · 22 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The Beat episode covers two main threads: (1) rising Republican midterm panic and Trump’s off-message behavior, and (2) Bill Gates’ AI warning plus broader AI backlash.

Guests

Josh Marshall, founder/editor of Talking Points Memo; Jason Johnson, politics professor at Morgan State University and MSNBC/MSNOW analyst; later, Emily Bazelon of The New York Times Magazine (legal/AI segment); and rapper/entrepreneur E-40 (music segment).

Key claims

House Speaker Mike Johnson is “bracing for loss” by citing historical odds; Trump’s unpopularity and inflation pressures fundraising and polling, with Texas potentially becoming competitive. Trump is portrayed as cocooned by yes-men and focused on petty actions like renaming Lake Ontario to “Lake America.” Gates argues AI risk is a top priority, industry leaders privately fear harms, and self-regulation failed in social media; he proposes protected human jobs and an AI energy/tokens tax.

Notable examples

Meta penalties and state-driven rules; AI-enabled lethal drone targeting in Ukraine; Kennedy Center name dispute involving DOJ threats.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Republican Panic Ahead of Midterms

1:20 to 4:05

Discussion on Republicans' concerns about midterm elections and polling.

“Well, the Speaker is basically admitting that they're bracing for loss and trying to put it in historical odds of the steep, steep hill they have.”

Trump's Influence and Messaging

4:05 to 6:02

Analysis of Trump's impact on the Republican Party and his current strategies.

“I don't even see him campaigning at all.”

The Republican Strategy Crisis

6:02 to 7:54

Exploration of the challenges Republicans face in the upcoming elections.

“You know, I've sort of been wondering for a while, how much is Trump worried about the midterms?”

Emerging Democratic Opportunities

7:54 to 13:31

Discussion on the shifting political landscape and possible Democratic gains.

“Well, you know who agrees with you, Josh, is the Manitoba province premier.”

Trump's Blame Game

13:31 to 14:00

Examination of Trump's tendency to blame others for Republican failures.

“So, yeah, this is a real possibility of a change in power.”

Political Blame Game

14:00 to 15:17

Discussion on the GOP's current struggles and political dynamics.

“He thinks it works to blame the R's like he did in 2015 as a rebel.”

Investigative Reporting on DEI Programs

15:28 to 16:30

A journalist's findings on the University of Michigan's DEI expenditures.

“Here's what happened when one journalist reported on DEI programs.”

White House Analysis

16:30 to 19:11

Discussion on the president's social media post and its implications for the GOP.

“Josh, take a look at this moment at the White House.”

Threats to Federal Facilities

19:11 to 21:20

Exploration of legal threats involving the Kennedy Center and Trump's name.

“And Jason comes back, so we'll get into that later.”

Court Tactics and Legal Implications

21:20 to 23:14

Discussion about the DOJ's approach regarding Trump's name and the Kennedy Center.

“They are, of course, using a very serious court proceeding to break down and invoke exactly what this is because it sounds a lot like a mafia tactic.”
Show all 22 chapters

Emily Bazelon's Insights on Legal Threats

23:14 to 25:20

Emily Bazelon discusses the seriousness of threats made by the federal government.

“There are actual sanctions and enforcement mechanisms, as you and I know, and I think plenty of viewers have heard about, with regard to the obligation to be truthful.”

Bill Gates' AI Warning

25:20 to 28:00

Bill Gates issues a warning regarding the risks associated with AI.

“When we come back, you will never believe who has joined the AI backlash and the heat on RFK.”

Bill Gates Issues AI Warning

28:00 to 28:31

Bill Gates raises concerns over the current trajectory of AI development.

“Which brings us to the news today of a major new exception to that tech chorus.”

Gates' Evolving Perspective on AI

28:31 to 29:56

Gates reflects on his past optimistic views about AI and his current concerns.

“And even dishing on what he basically says are industry leaders' private warnings about the risks that differ from what they say in public.”

AI's Impact on Education and Society

29:56 to 31:39

Discussion on AI's potential to enhance education and societal challenges.

“That was after the breakthrough chat GPT had already been publicly released.”

The Capitalist Race and AI Threats

31:39 to 33:34

Gates critiques the tech industry's focus on profits over safety and ethics.

“And they're certainly not slowing down to avoid risks that are posed to other people that they don't factor into their capitalist race.”

Proposals for AI Regulation

33:34 to 34:59

Gates calls for regulations and accountability in AI development.

“Self-regulation, the most dangerous tool ever invented.”

Balancing Innovation and Safety

34:59 to 36:28

Discussion on the need to balance technological advancements with societal safety.

“he says you can protect them under law, which is true, by the way.”

The Broader Implications of AI

36:28 to 39:50

Exploring the real-world consequences of AI deployment in various sectors.

“Today, with over 75 % of the world's PCs running on Windows, its influence is incontrovertible.”

Rock Music and MTV's Evolution

42:01 to 43:36

Explore the historical significance of rock music in MTV's identity.

“And the reason I'm tripping because I thought MTV was built on rock music.”

Income Inequality and CEO Salaries

43:37 to 45:51

Discuss the disparity in pay between CEOs and regular employees.

“I don't see how CEOs can make, what, 615 times more than the normal employee.”

E-40's New Project Announcement

45:52 to 46:53

Learn about E-40's new album and what makes it unique.

“I got it on CDs and vinyl and available on all streaming platforms.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Hey, everybody. It's Rob Lowe here. If you haven't heard, I have a podcast that's called Literally with Rob Lowe. And basically, it's conversations I've had that really make you feel like you're pulling up a chair at an intimate dinner between myself and people that I admire, like Aaron Sorkin or Tiffany Haddish, Demi Moore, Chris Pratt, Michael J. Fox. There are new episodes out every Thursday. So subscribe, please, and listen wherever you get your podcasts. Whoever says saving money is hard doesn't know that new customers who bundle and save with Progressive save hundreds. Because switching your home and auto insurance is better than cutting down on the things you love.

0:44Like those iced lattes that help you get ready to face the day. So switch your home and auto to Progressive and see if you could save. And keep sipping away. Get your quote today at Progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company affiliates and other insurers. Not available in all states. Welcome to The Beat. We have a big show. There is more and more discernible panic among Republicans about how these midterms are looking. Trump has a polling crash. The unpopular war grinds on. The high prices are getting to the point that, believe it or not, Republicans sometimes mention them in their fundraising emails, basically saying, we know how bad it is under our watch.

1:23And now I'm going to show you this. the top Republican in Congress, House Speaker Johnson, basically trying to do what we've seen happen in so many political things when you're kind of losing or before the debates, when they're always trying to work the odds. Well, the Speaker is basically admitting that they're bracing for loss and trying to put it in historical odds of the steep, steep hill they have. We have to win the midterm. Now, we have to defy history to do it. It's only happened twice in 90 years that a sitting president has picked up seats for his party in that first two year cycle. Why bring that up?

2:02I mean, you don't usually talk about the fact that what you're trying to get people to do is unlikely to happen or virtually impossible or whatever point he's going at. But remember, these folks don't want to upset the notoriously sensitive president we have in the Republican Party. They try to avoid having those scuffles. That might just be their political survival. And yet they are already looking past November, where apparently they expect a loss and looking past what might be the lame duck era of Trump and then beyond him. And so they're trying to say, hey, this will be normal if we lose. That's just the normal course of history.

2:36And so if you want a kind of a history version of a fact check, it's true. The president's party loses House seats in 20 of the past 22 midterm cycles. right? That's the off-year cycle. So if you count it that way, he is right about that factoid going all the way back to 1938. And yet there is something beyond just, oh, sometimes the incumbent usually loses, right? That's kind of the history. What we are looking at is not a normal potential correction. Even right now, regardless of what happens in November, we know that the job approval of this president is worse than most second-term presidents.

3:14Polling now shows Dems have an 18-point advantage among women. Among white women, 47 to 39, Republicans won that demographic in the last two cycles. So that's just some of the mood music, including in people who are part of the coalition. And then you have this reporting about Trump's hold in the Republican Party, basically is now a formal liability. The New York Times is just a straight objective news section analysis saying, yeah, Republicans are caught in a bind with Trump because he's so unpopular. And that message has left the pages of The New York Times and also kind of interacted with some of what you'll hear on Fox.

3:53We're 10 weeks out from today from the midterms. I think Republicans are kind of whistling past the graveyard on some of these Senate seats that they thought were safe. We got to kick it into gear over these next 10 weeks or we're looking at not only losing the House, but losing the Senate as well. Paxton in Texas. I don't even see him campaigning at all. Is he campaigning? I think there are a number of states that Republicans better get better get their act together. Get their blank together. You're listening to the sound of Fox News talking about Republicans potentially losing Texas. There's growing concern in the White House that inflation could doom Republican prospects in November.

4:26That's how Politico looks at it. You've got a new kind of revived Canada trade war that no one asked for, which is the opposite of the inflation messaging that Republicans want to give. They wanted to argue, hey, I know it's bad, but things are going to get better. They're getting better. That's hard to do when the president is picking these fights that fuel a rising cost of everything from toilet paper to the already punishing gas prices. Trump, what's he doing? Fixating on the vanity projects, naming bodies of water. This is new, he wants to sign an order here that will, he says, rename Lake Ontario to Lake America Whether anybody in the real world around that lake starts to reuse, use a different name or not Again, speaks to the limits of the powers of this lame duck sitting at his desk Worrying about renaming things instead of even pretending to do something about this economic crisis I want to bring in Josh Marshall, founder and editor of Talking Points Memo, and Jason Johnson, politics professor with Morgan State University, MSNOW analyst.

5:33Josh, you know, sometimes you'll see a headline on Facebook, and even if you have good media literacy and you kind of know that's not a factual source, you go, I wonder, is that true? I'm on the news, so I won't give a hypothetical, but sometimes you see those headlines, you go, that can't be right. That's what Donald Trump's messaging has been like all week. petty self-focus, renaming things, the kind of headlines where you'd say, oh, that's a Trump critic saying that that's what he's like. And yet that's what he's like right now, Josh. Yeah. You know, I've sort of been wondering for a while, how much is Trump worried about the midterms?

6:10Because he seems pretty worried about them. He telegraphs that he's worried, you know, kind of all of this energy. And yet what he does, he's not doing any of the things. Now, let's be clear. It's not like he could just like flip a few switches and suddenly he's winning. He's there in a bad situation for the historical reasons, all that kind of stuff. But he's not doing the things that could sort of like decrease the velocity of impact, for lack of a better word. And I think that's because over the last 20 months or so, he is just so cocooned. He's so cocooned. He is so surrounded by yes men even more than than he was in his first term.

6:49And he's older. He's older than he was in 2017. And all of those things combined, I think it's kind of both. I think he's both very worried about it. And at the same time, he just lacks the dexterity and canniness that he used to have that let him kind of pivot and kind of help himself. And I he cannot get out of that mad king mode. And I think that's why this new line kind of like the Republicans messed up, you know, he's going back 10 years or eight years, you know, whatever, to when he wasn't synonymous with the Republican Party, that the Republican Party wasn't a like an appliance that he owns and is in his kitchen or something like that.

7:36But that brings it all together because because that sort of squares the circle for him. Yes, he may not be able to help himself, but he at least knows who to blame. And that is, that's a bit of a problem for Republicans running, you know, who are actually running, because that suggests a lot of turbulence that may come up pretty soon. Well, you know who agrees with you, Josh, is the Manitoba province premier. Viewers of this program know there's not a day that goes, yeah, well, there's not a day that goes by that I don't reach to that province. I'm kidding, but we have this little scuffle with Canada, and they're known to be pretty nice.

8:15Even their politicians and diplomats definitely have a little more decorum than we do down here. But this is a clip we have from the premiere of that province. You know when like a rock band is really over the hill and you see them like in a casino playing some song from like 50 years ago, I think that's the part of Donald Trump's presidency we're at now. Josh? You know, he called it. And, you know, as many terrible things are happening in the world right now, and as much as we are collectively as a nation ambushing Canada, which has been our friend and a kind of a neighbor for so long, It's really a disgrace for the entire country, what is happening.

9:08For all that, Donald Trump has the stench of defeat about him right now. He looks pathetic, and he's even looking pathetic to people who are inclined to like him. And, you know, that's sort of a small recompense. But, you know, we can be united across the border, goofing on this ridiculous person who's living in the White House. Jason? I think we had friendly relations with Canada for a long time. I don't know if this started with Drake and Kendrick, but now it's turned into this like heated rivalry between our countries. Now people are taking shots back and forth. And that's not what we used to have to think about, right?

9:49We're used to politicians maybe being critical of our neighbors to the south, but not to the north. I think the larger issue here, and Mike Johnson exemplifies this, and Trump exemplifies this, when you're explaining you're losing, right? When Mike Johnson has to give a sixth grade history lesson to make everybody feel better, you know things are going to go badly. And Trump has been sort of preparing. He's kind of rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. It's like, well, let me name this and let me change the curtains because he's prepared for his shaggy defense. When the Republicans lose this fall, he's going to say it wasn't me.

10:18It was them. They didn't listen to me. If they had stuck closer to me, we would win. And that's what he's always done. And Ari, it's not just that it's bad for branding. It's not just that he's unpopular. This is affecting fundraising. Right. It's not just a bad economy. People don't want to give money to Republican candidates who are too closely aligned with Trump because they think they're not going to get a return on their investment. So this is a huge issue this fall. I think in some places like Texas, you're seeing Democrats begin to take advantage of it in the polls. Yeah. And you mentioned, I mean, Johnson's saying that in politics where we're used to so much bravado and overstatement and the effort to look strong and have momentum, they say power is perception.

10:57whatever those schools of thought are you can go to Kissinger 48 laws of power Robert Greene right people who are trying to look powerful they don't say and do things where someone else can kind of correct them or say no to them and and it's a lot of it is power games it's why in a lot of offices people get annoyed with the folks who seem to be obsessed with that well that's DC and so in that context Jason the Mike Johnson instead of doing that going you know we're probably going to lose because this is a situation where we lose, tells you how much he is assuming a loss. Anything could happen.

11:31And in the news, it's also important that we always tell people it's up to you. Don't think that, oh, it's all been decided, so you shouldn't participate. I think that's a big problem with certain media. But that's how he's acting. And then I want to show you J.D. Vance or whoever writes for J.D. Vance in the system. But what they put out under his name is this RNC fundraising. Amazing. You mentioned this field and it says, hey, look, if you can't give right now, don't. They drop in the auto, you know, name. Groceries cost what they cost. But then the pitch goes on. Can you answer this with the link from J.D.

12:05Vance? What does it tell you that they feel this is their best case? Because without acknowledging that, when you get it in a text or an email, Jason, and you are on the RNC list, so for whatever reason you voted for them before, you're still a candidate to be really angry without that disclaimer. It's a shame that we're 80 something days out from the election. And the first time the Republican Party can acknowledge the affordability crisis is when they're begging you for cash. Right. Like that's how bad things are for them. This is the first time they've actually acknowledged it's the case. It's like, can you lend me$5?

12:38But here's the thing, Ari. Every time you send out that kind of a message, that reminds people of how they've been getting gaslit for the last 8 to 10 months. So it makes it all the more difficult. And here's the thing. Fundraising isn't an automatic guarantee of your success in an election. But fundraising does need to be an indicator of enthusiasm. And I'll let you finish. But Jason, I've heard the price of even gaslighting has gone up. This is true. It's too expensive to gaslight anymore, right? That's literally what the Republicans are facing. So this is indicative. And I will say this. When I look at the polls in Texas, when I look at what's happening in South Carolina, there are states that are in conversation now that were not in conversation two months ago.

13:23People were not talking about Iowa two months ago. And now it's like, wait, wait, Texas might really be a thing. And then Maine might really be a thing. So, yeah, this is a real possibility of a change in power. And if we're only a week out from Labor Day, most of these attitudes are going to be locked in by next weekend. Yeah, and we showed it on Fox. I mean, when you hear, say, you know, a Democratic booster or candidate say, oh, this year, Texas is going to be different. You kind of have to measure that against the evidence. when you hear Fox News panicking about Texas, you get the feeling something's shifted.

13:55And Josh, you mentioned that Trump, to your view, seems off message. He doesn't know where he's at. He thinks it works to blame the R's like he did in 2015 as a rebel. He's not a rebel. This quote, I don't think the GOP fully grasped how badly they're effing up right now, is something he shared for whatever reason. And I'm going to show the White House response to that when we're back together in 90 seconds.

14:23Hey, everybody. It's Rob Lowe here. If you haven't heard, I have a podcast that's called Literally with Rob Lowe. And basically, it's conversations I've had that really make you feel like you're pulling up a chair at an intimate dinner between myself and people that I admire, like Aaron Sorkin or Tiffany Haddish, Demi Moore, Chris Pratt, Michael J. Fox. There are new episodes out every Thursday. So subscribe, please, and listen wherever you get your podcasts. Ever notice how life's best stories don't happen in your living room? They happen on the open road, out on the water, or parked under the stars.

15:05At Progressive, they get that you want to focus on the experience, not worry about the what-ifs. That's why they offer quality insurance designed for your ride, whether that's a boat, RV, or motorcycle. Adventure with confidence. Visit Progressive.com and see how easy it is to protect your favorite way to get away. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Not available in D.C. Prices vary based on how you buy. Here's what happened when one journalist reported on DEI programs. I decided to just focus on the University of Michigan. I obtained internal documents that showed that the school had spent about a quarter of a billion dollars on DEI programs.

15:42I spent two weeks in Ann Arbor talking to everybody I could find. The unintended consequences of these programs, they had sort of left everybody dissatisfied. And this expensive machinery the school had built just imploded. If you're a journalist, you are not on anyone's team. All you're trying to do is figure out as many of the facts as you can gather. The facts are going to guide you to where the story lands. You're not taking sides. I'm Nick Confessori. I'm an investigations reporter for The New York Times. Journalists like Nick follow the facts wherever they lead. They go where news breaks, get answers firsthand, and publish what they find.

16:21That's fact-based reporting. Seek it out if you don't already.

16:29We're back with Jason and Josh. Josh, take a look at this moment at the White House. Yesterday, the president, he amplified a post on social media that said, I don't think the GOP fully grasped how badly they're effing up right now. He has previously said that some voters don't seem to like Republicans, but they do still like him. But at this point, is the president washing his hands of Republicans in early November? President is wholeheartedly committed to helping Republicans across the board retain the majority. Josh. Yeah, I mean, you know, there's we have a piece up right now at TalkingPointsMemo.com that, you know, people know that like hot dog suit meme, right, where the guy says we're all trying to get to the bottom of who did this thing.

17:19That's kind of where Trump is now. We're all trying to get to the bottom of who did this, why we're having a hard time with the midterms. And, you know, a leader needs to seem powerful, as you were saying before. That's especially in our kind of modern performative politics. They can't seem weak. But what is even worse is when you seem ridiculous. And I think when he does this, he's seeming ridiculous because it is his brand that he owns the Republican Party. The Republican Party is merely an extension of him. So this is absurd. And they're but they're they're the Republicans are paying a price for this because, you know, if anything, they're more they are more popular than he is.

17:56Right. And normally in a situation like this, it with a semi normal president, the White House will give people a long leash like, hey, we know you've got to get some distance and like we need you next year. So it's fine. But Mike Johnson and all these people know that is not acceptable. So they don't have one of the, you know, one of the points of flexibility that at least, you know, gives you something to work with. I don't totally agree with him or something like that. So it's, you know, be glad you're not a Republican candidate for Congress. Were you doing the hot dog meme and Godfather? No, just on this one, we're working with the hot dog meme.

18:41We'll come back with the Godfather. Yeah, because when you said, well, you said ridiculous, you know, it says Johnny Fantano made me look ridiculous and a man in my position did not be made to look ridiculous. So I'm thinking of that. It's true. That's what we do around here. We mix and match. We had some shaggy from Jason earlier. Whatever it takes. I mean, Jason went with the shaggy thing and I was like, I got to get in the game here. I'm going with the hot dogs. Sure. Put some points on the board. Yeah. Josh and Jason, my thanks to both of you. And Jason comes back, so we'll get into that later.

19:14I'm going to tell folks what's coming up. You have heat on these MAGA tech billionaires. It's a story we told you we would stay on. They might rather we didn't. And I have more on that tonight. Also, Trump has a new threat that looks petty. It's probably illegal, but it is being tested in court. Our great friend Emily Bazelon from The New York Times is here next.

19:40We're reporting tonight on an extraordinary, dangerous threat that has to be taken seriously. It is about the threat to federal government facilities. And so in a different time, you might say, what is it, a terror warning? Is it a bomb threat? But this threat against federal facilities is being made by the federal government itself, by the Trump administration, quite seriously in federal court. Justice Department lawyers have now stated in a real court filing that they may try to use or abuse power to demolish the Kennedy Center if they face further legal wrangling or prevention of Trump's desire to add his name back to the building, which was previously removed and taken down in a different legal proceeding.

20:28This relates to, I guess, an effort to save face in their version of reality. You see the photo there that's covering the name at one point. This legal fight was over. Basically, another one of these loophole efforts. We've told you that while DOJ is still bound by the law and the lawyers can't just completely flout orders, they basically try to do so with these tricks and Orwellian schemes and retitling and renaming things. And so now to sidestep what was a clear order to remove Trump's name from the Kennedy Center, the entrance has been covered by a tarp as a kind of partial way to acknowledge that.

21:01Trump officials say to get the funds raised to renovate the center would be only possible if they can still get Trump's name back on it. And they've sort of brainstormed ways to do that. The group suing Trump responds, saying defendants have a not so subtly said, quote, this is a nice Kennedy Center you have here. What a shame should something happen to it. They are, of course, using a very serious court proceeding to break down and invoke exactly what this is because it sounds a lot like a mafia tactic. Nice to have a family.

21:37Yes, it is. Man should take care. See that nothing happens to you.

21:53If it talks like a gangster and sounds like a gangster, is it a gangster move? And it doesn't become automatically okay just because it's coming from the federal government as a threat to a federal government building. We're joined by Emily Bazelon from the New York Times Magazine. Your view on this very brazen threat that the government's making and the power they claim they have. It seems like if you are a lawyer for the Justice Department, there are some concessions you're just not allowed to make. President Trump wants his name on the building if he can't have it exactly the way he planned because a judge said that's not what Congress intended, went and established the Kennedy Center and named it after John F.

22:37Kennedy as a memorial to him. Well, then they're going to find another way, a workaround, like you were saying. They're going to say that the building was restored by Donald Trump and put that in the building. And they also want to name the plaza the Donald J. Trump Plaza. And the lawyers have to try to go to court with a straight face and say that these things are allowed in spite of the judge's order. And the judge was really pressing them today to explain to him why these new tactics are in line with what Congress intended when it established the Kennedy Center as a memorial to John F. Kennedy, not to Donald J.

23:13Trump. Yeah, and this is a court filing. There are actual sanctions and enforcement mechanisms, as you and I know, and I think plenty of viewers have heard about, with regard to the obligation to be truthful. So we have to take it as a truthful claim from the government that they would do this. I mean, a court could enjoin them. I suppose if they were enjoined and still trying to destroy it, people could show up and try to have direct action or civil, you know, action. But do we have to take it seriously that you take what is a public building? It's not the personal property of a temporary leader that also honors a president who was, you know, viciously assassinated in office.

23:55that they would even purport to threaten to do this. Yeah, I think we do have to take it seriously. They're already purporting to close the Kennedy Center for two years. And there just seems to be a kind of sense that any gamesmanship in the service of getting Trump's name onto the Kennedy Center is what the Justice Department is going to have to do. One of the witnesses in court today was Howard Lutnick, the Commerce Secretary. And he was saying, well, you know, we're not going to demolish it on Thursday. But, you know, making this argument that unless Trump's great prowess as the fundraiser for the Kennedy Center can be recognized, well, gee, they just won't be able to raise the money that's necessary to save it.

24:38It just all seems like a concocted veiled threat to try to move the judge to say, yeah, I guess you need to do this. The judge did not seem, though, to have a big appetite for this. Right. And we've seen, while I think it is fair to report that early on some judges did seem sort of shell-shocked by some of the early games we've reported on, there's certainly a greater awareness that giving in to any of this, especially when it's lawless or hasn't been blessed yet by the court, only invites more of it. As the late Donald Rumpfeld said, weakness is provocative. Emily, good to see you as always. Thanks so much for having me, Ari.

Read the full transcript

25:22Absolutely. When we come back, you will never believe who has joined the AI backlash and the heat on RFK. All of that's next.

25:34Hey, everybody. It's Rob Lowe here. If you haven't heard, I have a podcast that's called Literally with Rob Lowe. And basically, it's conversations I've had that really make you feel like you're pulling up a chair at an intimate dinner between myself and people that I admire, like Aaron Sorkin or Tiffany Haddish, Demi Moore, Chris Pratt, Michael J. Fox. There are new episodes out every Thursday. So subscribe, please, and listen wherever you get your podcasts. Support for this podcast comes from Progressive, America's number one boat insurer. We've all made mistakes on the water, but there's one mistake you shouldn't make, being uninsured.

26:19With Progressive Boat Insurance, you can choose coverage for most mistakes you or other boaters could make. helping you float carefree all season long. Quote today, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Number one rating based on 2024 filings with state departments of insurance. Here's what happened when one journalist reported on DEI programs. I decided to just focus on the University of Michigan. I obtained internal documents that showed that the school had spent about a quarter of a billion dollars on DEI programs. I spent two weeks in Ann Arbor talking to everybody I could find.

26:52the unintended consequences of these programs. They had sort of left everybody dissatisfied. And this expensive machinery the school had built just imploded. If you're a journalist, you are not on anyone's team. All you're trying to do is figure out as many of the facts as you can gather. The facts are going to guide you to where the story lands. You're not taking sides. I'm Nick Confessori. I'm an investigations reporter for The New York Times. Journalists like Nick follow the facts wherever they lead. They go where news breaks, get answers firsthand, and publish what they find. That's fact-based reporting.

27:30Seek it out if you don't already.

27:35This public revolt against AI is mounting. It's now shaping midterm races. Voters in both parties pushing back against data setters and this AI onslaught. Now, tech titans insist that tech will improve lives and that this future is basically inevitable, so people should just get with the program. That's a pretty common view from them, but people making money off this industry or devoting their careers to tech generally will defend it. Which brings us to the news today of a major new exception to that tech chorus. Microsoft founder, longtime tech innovator, and multibillionaire Bill Gates is out with an extensive warning about this current AI march.

28:20He released an over 5 ,000-word essay where he, based on what he knows and what's happening now, is detailing the risks and current structural capitalist problems. And even dishing on what he basically says are industry leaders' private warnings about the risks that differ from what they say in public. When a longtime AI supporter and tech icon speaks out like this, it is certainly news. The New York Times reporting on Gates' concerns in a major story in a new interview, many other outlets picked up similar headlines. They note that Gates now sees the risk of AI turning bad as the world's top priority.

28:59And Gates argues that maybe his own history in technology and being pro-innovation makes him a flawed but important messenger because even he is concerned. And if you're looking at this and say, okay, he's back in the headlines, making a big point here, and he's got that history, well, like other people who've been converted by evidence and who aren't currently conflicted, he's already made his money and he's not currently as involved as some of these other folks, that might to some ears make him more credible. Because remember, he used to be more positive about AI. And when we right here on the beat asked him to sum up basically technology's future in 2023, he was bullish.

29:44The future of technology will be amazing, profound, potentially very positive. That was after the breakthrough chat GPT had already been publicly released. Gates with his special position and Microsoft, which he used to run, is one of the funders, we should know, to open AI's chat GPT. So he'd been able to see the early prototypes. And he viewed it as potentially more revolutionary than even the personal computer, as we discussed at the time. AI is going to change jobs in a pretty dramatic way. It's going to make people more productive and help out. So yes, this is a world-changing set of advances.

30:32You know, AI didn't used to be able to read and to write, and the OpenAI Chat GPT milestone is the first time we've seen that. And so it will allow doctors to do less paperwork. It'll help teachers with homework. In areas like health and education, we have a shortage. You know, we can't tutor every child. We can't be personalized to their needs. You know, even the feedback on their homework isn't as extensive as we'd like. So the Gates Foundation has partners like Khan Academy who are already rolling out the first efforts for a personal tutor. he's discussing there what they were doing how a non-profit could use ai for goals like education including for lower income students who don't have private tutoring or for a charitable goal and that's fine if that's what some were doing but over the past three years top ai companies have been seeking hundreds of billions of dollars in a race that's all about money not those other ancillary goals.

31:40And they're certainly not slowing down to avoid risks that are posed to other people that they don't factor into their capitalist race. Now, Gates made his own billions, as mentioned. He says this kind of pressure is actually making the innovation process riskier for no good reason, that it is avoidable and that it can corrupt even what we are learning about this fast-moving tech. He says the tech industry is knowingly downplaying AI threats because there's too much money on the line, which basically indicts at least some of these current tech leaders, who, of course, are his peers, some of them his sort of mentees.

32:15Mr. Gates also saying few tech executives will publicly admit those fears. They're now saying to each other, hey, man, don't say that it's bad for us, he tells the Times, basically paraphrasing, oh, well, the next trillion dollars we're trying to raise could be impacted. And there were areas where Gates, of course, had hope. I just showed you some of our discussion, but now he writes that the same AI tool that allows people to potentially learn more than ever could also lead to people learning less, citing a survey showing heavier AI use was associated with less critical thinking. Gates notes the industry has ignored technology milestones like AI escaping the control of creators, making recipes for bioweapons that it once said should warrant more caution.

32:57They're just full speed ahead and hoping the good outweighs the bad, he says. Gates speaking out as accountability is growing for tech companies. We just reported on Facebook, the company there, Meta, paying billions in penalties. That was just this week. And they importantly agreed to some new rules forced by state lawsuits, which had not been put in place by Congress or the current Trump administration. So take this all together and consider that tells us that when it comes to child safety, at least, this self-regulation, it failed for social media companies. Gates argues we should learn from that when it comes to AI.

33:34Self-regulation, the most dangerous tool ever invented. He told the Times incredulously, they reported, quote, no thanks. And you know, I was actually just reading these new comments from Gates in the new essay, thinking about how it overlapped with what beat guest Che Comanduri told us just this week, that these obvious failures of deregulated social media are feeding the broader bipartisan push to regulate AI now, which is a new technology, right? It's different than smartphones. But to do that rather than repeat the mistakes of the smartphone era. Now, what would that regulation look like? Well, I could tell you experts have long said the federal government's got regulators for farming and trains and radio, industries that are a century old.

34:20So why not swiftly make a similar transportation department, right? you have for trains? Well, make an AI department for AI, which is already clearly more impactful and dangerous than trains, which did a lot for this country but need regulation. But tech leaders haven't faced that kind of push for real federal regulation, given their cozy relationships in Washington. Gates has some interesting proposals out in this new essay, including having a category of human jobs that we've protected. Even if theoretically they could be replaced to some degree by AI, he says you can protect them under law, which is true, by the way.

35:02We have all kinds of labor laws. He proposes a tax on the AI energy system, those expensive tokens we've heard about, as well as other types of international monitoring since this is happening in more than one country. So here we are, a mega billionaire pushing higher taxes, among other things, to confront tech. I should note, Gates is breaking with most of his peers there. Google billionaire Sergei Brin has been back in the news because he's now spending millions to try to stop California's proposed billionaire tax. Other tech billionaires, especially the ones who've gone to the right lately, they oppose almost all higher taxes on their own wealth as well as their industry.

35:37And there's also a warning here about the difference between the understandable human reaction and excitement to new dazzling technology like we've seen in the movies, breakthroughs, gadgets, a talking, walking AI robot. That can be amazing to see. And because we are human, we can allow ourselves that human reaction, that awe that we have seen in so many sci-fi accounts. But that's different than our obligation to protect our society, jobs, our local communities, and even our own humanity, rather than just letting these robots and their capitalist handmaidens take over. Gates seemed to really genuinely recount his reaction to the stunning power of ChatGPT's AI ability when he first encountered it.

36:24In fact, that's something we saw a little bit of firsthand when I actually read him from ChatGPT's AI sort of robotic product, what it generated about him. we have some newly written ai for you and maybe you can tell us how it holds up but it's from chat gpt which is part of open ai which you're behind um and this is about bill gates oh but you can fact check it at harvard gates envisioned a world where every desk harbored the potential of a computer his precocious dropout in 1975 accompanied by paul allen resulted in the birth of Microsoft. Today, with over 75 % of the world's PCs running on Windows, its influence is incontrovertible.

37:07In 1995, fewer than 1 % of the world had internet access. Microsoft's innovations, including the Windows OS and the Internet Explorer, played a pivotal role in making computing and the internet synonymous with modern life. The AI goes on to say, In an era marked by skepticism towards billionaires, Gates emerges as an enigma driven by a belief in making the world better. End quote. 1 to 10, what rating would you give of that AI work? Well, I'm biased. It sounded good to me. Actually, the facts were quite good. We are still working from time to time. The AI will make mistakes on facts. And yet, as I see the researchers probing to when that happens and why, we hope, particularly in areas like healthcare, where accuracy is so important, we hope to get rid of that.

37:54But in this case, in fact, I didn't hear anything that sounded wrong. The information sounded right. He was hopeful about the evolution. You know, in journalism, one of the reasons we talk to people and go back to them is, if they are being honest and we can put the evidence in front of them, we see what changes. Maybe we all learn together. And so, while the AI there was striking, from tech veterans like Gates now to many regular people, this initial awe is now turning to the more important and harder questions about humanity and power and justice. And let me be clear with you tonight as we say, okay, the news is talking about this AI again and showing me sci-fi movies and Bill Gates and how bad is it?

38:38Let me just tell you straight up, these are not hypothetical debates about some science fiction future. Corporations are clearly trying to make money off AI to replace human jobs now. And we are seeing AI deployed to take the most grave actions possible. The Times reporting this week about countries using AI to augment lethal killer weapons systems in the battlefield, including drones that killed three Ukrainians guided, as the Times put it, entirely by AI. So this matters even to people who might not know about it or avoid the latest tech. politics is too important to be left to politicians. That's a classic line we've heard across history when people are encouraged to get involved.

39:31Well, these vital tech debates are too impactful in our lives to be left to techies or those just getting rich off tech. So as wild as it is to say, I will say the humans are still in charge right now and humans need to step up to keep it that way. We'll be right back.

39:56We are still making time to fall back. We are back with Jason Johnson, of course, our friend on the channel, guest host of The Beat as well, and a fallback veteran, even with Kenny G. And also coming back on the show, the West Coast icon, rapper, entrepreneur, E-40, multi-platinum pioneer of the Bay Area Sound. He just made Variety's list of the greatest hip-hop execs. He's on Billboard's 50 Greatest Rappers of All Time. Let's play it.

40:49We'll see you next time. His new album, Turn My Money Over, drops tomorrow. Welcome back. Forty, how you doing? What's up? What's happening? I'm good. I'm good. We got a lot going on, but I'm glad you're here. Jason has done this, of course, many times. You get to go first. Jason, what's on your list? First person who's got to fall back is RFK Jr. He has been ruining America. Just three days ago, he has the audacity to get on stage and say, oh, Trump and I have been making America healthier, Even though this past summer we have had over 122 food recalls and the third largest recall of products in American history.

41:29People are getting sick. He's not making us healthier. All right. And if you're saying that things are going great and people are getting sick, to quote E-40, something ain't right. I would rather trust any recipe that comes out of Goon with a spoon than anything that might come out of this administration. I don't trust what they're cooking. E-40, how do you do the quote? How do you feel about it? I agree one of my fallback let me go let me well let me let me go to a fallback that I'm I just want to make sure you know Jason and I we're the nerds so whenever we run a lyric you know I just want to make sure it's cool with you but then we get your fallback too Jason need to get in the studio with the hurry up you know you know what I'm saying nah for real though you know so I'm kind of baffled by the VMAs getting rid of the rock category awards.

42:24You feel me on that part? And the reason I'm tripping because I thought MTV was built on rock music. Rock and roll. That's what I remember when I was a young mustache. And then I think the first the first like Urban song was I think it was Michael Jackson. Thriller, wasn't it? Yeah. You know? Yeah, and even that was a big deal for them. So E40, what you're saying is you're sticking up for rock and roll. You're saying the way they kind of act like, oh, something, retire something just because maybe it didn't have a big selling year. You're against that. But rock and roll, been around for many moons.

43:03I was just surprised because, you know, MTV was built on rock and roll. Yeah. Rock and roll went ahead and did their thing for MTV. Oh, for sure. And E-40, when you look at historically, I mean, we just saw some of your videos. I mean, music videos became a key way to turn people on to music. You know, in the beginning, there was this concern. Oh, you know, is this not going to work because music is auditory? But rock and roll videos, modern pop, hip hop, we grew up watching you do your thing, you know? Absolutely. Absolutely. Another fallback is... I don't see how CEOs can make, what, 615 times more than the normal employee.

43:51That's a lot. That's a lot of times more. That's a lot of skrill skrill. That's a lot. 600 times more? Y 'all might have to help me out on that one. Who can answer that? Yeah, and that inequality rate has only increased. Jason, Jason, the folks in the Trump administration now, they want to actually tax those people less because one of the reasons that number is so high is people are getting paid with stock. It's basically their salary, but they get stock and then they pay less taxes than their employees who don't get those kind of benefits, Jason. Right. And people are out here struggling, so it makes it all the more difficult.

44:33Right. I literally have conversations with people all the time who are out of work. They can't find anything. They can't find something that that makes three months rent. You know, tell me where to go to find a job where I can actually afford what I'm living right now, let alone employers who are making six, seven hundred times and still cutting back their hours. E40, did you hear that? Tell me where to go. Did you hear that one? I peeped it. I peeped it. He snuck that in there. He's pretty good. He's pretty good. I got to get him in the local. I got to get him in the local. I got to get him in the local booth, man.

45:01He got to spit on top of the popper stopper. I don't know if y 'all know what that that's the little guard and spit mean rapping, you know. popping your peas, man. You know what I mean? Yeah. That's the boy on the microphone. Because E-40, not everyone's hip to Jason. You know, people have different styles. I'll usually say, you know, as the great poet E-40 says, whether I do all the word bending ad lib in the middle, I'll say, but Jason, he just tucks it in there. Natural like an afro. That's Jason. For a bald man. Right? I'm bald too, buddy. Let's grab it. I love it. E-40, in closing, in a sentence or two, what should people know about the new project?

45:44Why should they give it a listen or pick it up? Well, first of all, the project is phenomenal. It's the first time ever in hip-hop, a quadruple CD, compacted into a digipack. I got it on a cassette. I mean, not cassette. I got it on CDs and vinyl and available on all streaming platforms. And, man, I'm talking about a body of work, 40 slaps. I call slaps, you know, just great music. You know what I mean? Trunk rattlers. You know what I mean? That's one thing about us out up top, Northern California and the West Coast. A lot of us, we love to have our muses loud in the trunk. You can hear us from a couple of blocks away.

46:30You feel me? So I just made music for my fan base, you know, and whoever else wanted to join in. I hadn't put out an album in like two to three years, and that's just not like me. I haven't put one out since last time I was on your show. You know what I mean? Yeah, sure. And, you know, so I was like, let me go ahead and give them something that they can, you know, get an ear full. That they can feel. All right, well, let me put it up on the screen in full. Yeah, right now, turning my money over. Yeah. There it is, E40. Thank you, Jason Johnson. Thank you. Turn my money over, people see it, and we will be right back.

47:29Demi Moore, Chris Pratt, Michael J. Fox. There are new episodes out every Thursday. So subscribe, please, and listen wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

Aug 27, 2026; 6pm; MS NOW’s Ari Melber reports on tech innovator and Microsoft founder Bill Gates issuing an extensive warning about the current AI boom. Plus, President Trump faces a polling crisis amid an unpopular war and high prices. Also, Jason Johnson and rapper E-40 join for the latest installment of “Fallback.”

To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from The Beat with Ari Melber

All 320 episodes
Bill Gates Issues AI WarningThe Beat with Ari Melber · 42 min
Listen in VO