CBS's Top Anchor: MAGA Owners Helping Kill “60 Minutes”

2 Jun 2026 · 42 min · 20 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

This episode of The Beat (Ari Melber) covers U.S. election night primaries in several states, focusing on how Republican prospects are being hurt by Donald Trump’s controversies, messaging, and scandals. It also covers two major Washington stories: (1) a Trump DOJ proposal to create an over-$1B “fund” using taxpayer money to pay defendants/convicts (including potentially people who attacked Jan. 6 police), which a judge paused and which DOJ acting AG Todd Blanche says they will not move forward with; and (2) Trump’s pick of Bill Pulte as acting director of national intelligence, criticized as unqualified and allegedly used for partisan “hatchet” prosecutions and declassification pressure. Key examples include Ted Cruz claiming national security won’t affect midterms (Carville disputes), Trump saying “I don’t care” about elections, and Scott Pelley allegedly saying MAGA owners are “murdering 60 Minutes.”

Guests

James Carville (Democratic strategist), Democratic Rep. Glenn Ivey (questioning Blanche), and Andrew Weissman (former FBI general counsel/Mueller prosecutor).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Introduction to AI in Enterprise

0:00 to 0:30

Learn about the potential for AI in enterprise environments and user control over data.

“Is it possible for AI to work in the enterprise?”

Current Political Climate and Trump's Challenges

1:30 to 4:35

Discussion on the Republican Party's concerns regarding Trump's impact on the elections.

“James Carville, who knows his way around the primaries and the general in the midterm we're bracing for.”

Predictions for Republican Losses

4:35 to 6:28

Analysis of predictions regarding Republican losses in upcoming elections and the implications.

“It's still important that everyone make up their own mind and go vote.”

James Carville on Election Strategies

6:28 to 9:29

James Carville shares insights on electability and the importance of candidate selection for Democrats.

“Well, what I'm watching and hoping for is that Democrats elect the most electable general election candidate.”

Trump's Disengagement from Elections

9:29 to 14:00

Discussion of Trump's indifference toward electoral outcomes and its potential impact on the party.

“Whether that works, I want to play for your response.”

Bipartisan Discontent with Biden

14:00 to 15:10

Discussion on the Republican sentiment towards Biden and the political landscape.

“If you've looked at him, the White House has become a crime syndicate.”

Reporting Live from L.A.

15:10 to 18:04

Live update from Jacob Soberoff at a California polling center on election day.

“Jacob Soberoff is at a polling center in L.A., which is one of the most pivotal places we've seen with the California governor's race, among others.”

Voter Insights and Issues

18:04 to 18:36

Interviews with voters about their motivations and concerns regarding the election.

“And we'll all be a part of that special coverage with Rachel starting at 10 o 'clock on the East Coast, my friend.”

Upcoming Election Night Coverage

18:36 to 20:12

Discussion of the excitement and upcoming coverage of election night.

“I'm going to tell folks we've got a lot more coming up The official behind Trump's controversial AI Jesus image Now wants To run US intel Not a joke, serious issue We have the pushback.”

Controversial DOJ Fund Plans

20:42 to 26:58

Analysis of the Trump administration's plan to use taxpayer money for controversial funding.

“I've reported on that along with my colleagues here, and that was already a quick setback.”
Show all 20 chapters

Congressman Glenn Ivey's Insights

26:58 to 28:00

Interview with Congressman Glenn Ivey on the recent DOJ developments and their implications.

“That has been temporarily paused in court while it's under review.”

Immunity Agreements and Nepotism in Government

28:00 to 31:18

Explore the implications of immunity agreements in government and their connection to nepotism.

“The other part of this, though, is the other side of the equation, which is the immunity agreement, which never should have been agreed to.”

Tracking Primaries and National Security Concerns

31:18 to 31:53

Learn about ongoing primaries and the concern over Trump's pick for national intelligence.

“Still ahead, we'll go back live on the ground out this time to Iowa, because we're trying to keep track of all the different primaries today, and we'll be covering that for you on MSNOW all night tonight.”

The Qualifications of Trump's Intelligence Pick

31:53 to 34:29

Discuss the qualifications of Bill Pulte as Trump's controversial pick for national intelligence.

“He has no apparent national security experience.”

Concerns Over Partisan Influence in Intelligence

34:29 to 39:39

Examine the implications of having a politically motivated director in charge of national intelligence.

“I want to bring in Andrew Weissman, former FBI general counsel.”

The Attack on Journalism: Insights from Scott Pelley

39:39 to 41:23

Gain insight into the pressures facing journalism as revealed by Scott Pelley's comments on 60 Minutes.

“And that's even before if the midterms lead to more pressure.”

The Role of Journalism in Democracy

41:23 to 42:07

Reflect on the critical role of journalism in democracy and the threats it faces today.

“So, I mean, 60 Minutes is emblematic of the attack on the Fourth Estate on journalism and journalists and independent reporting.”

The Impact of Authoritarian Responses on Journalism

42:07 to 44:01

Explore the implications of authoritarian attitudes on the integrity of journalism.

“And the same thing, this is Scott Pelley's comment about you're killing 60 minutes, which is trying to do objective reporting.”

The Impact of Authoritarian Responses on Journalism

44:15 to 44:39

Explore the implications of authoritarian attitudes on the integrity of journalism.

“Choose Power Home Remodeling and remodel how you think about remodeling.”

Election Night Coverage in Iowa

44:46 to 45:49

An update on the primary night activities and the significance of Trump's endorsement.

“Now we turn to MSNOW's Alex Tabat in Des Moines, Iowa on this primary night.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Is it possible for AI to work in the enterprise? The short answer is yes. The long answer is oh yes. Users can pick the AI providers they prefer and you can decide which data is off limits, monitor all AI activity and control every detail. This is Enterprise AI from Ireland. AI at its best by keeping out the worst. Scaled for the enterprise. From Ireland. This NBA playoffs with FanDuel. You're not just watching the playoffs. You're a part of them. Steve's got the phone, opens FanDuel, and he's going for threes. Be a part of the action on FanDuel. All customers get a profit boost every NBA playoff game day.

0:4621 plus and present in select states. Opt-in required. Bonus issued is non-withdrawable profit boost tokens. Restrictions apply, including any token expiration and max wager amount. See full terms at FanDuel.com slash sportsbook. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or 1-800-MY-RESET. Welcome to The Beat, everyone. I'm Ari Melber, and we are coming on the air here on a big night for many states. You know the music. If you follow the news, you probably know it is another election day in America. And we have you covered on The Beat this hour as well as through all of our special coverage tonight on MSNOW.

1:16I'll tell you the latest. These six states have voters going to the polls. Big consequential primaries in big places. California, New Jersey, of course. Some of the most populous states we have. Montana, Iowa, New Mexico, South Dakota. We're covering them all. James Carville, who knows his way around the primaries and the general in the midterm we're bracing for. Well, James Carville's here standing by. He joins me in a moment. I do want to share the context for these elections. There are fears across the Republican Party that Donald Trump is not only going to be held accountable for what he's done for policy failures, for an open ended war, for high prices, but also for really gaffes of choice, damaging the Republican Party and its brand at a vulnerable time with scandals, vanity projects, blunders, odd statements, late night out of touch tweeting and a real rejection of people's concerns about this economy.

2:08The big story this week as well in Washington, but one that's resonated across police and military households, was Donald Trump's very controversial idea to siphon your taxpayer dollars and give it to defendants and convicts and even potentially people who'd attack police. Now the administration is trying to retreat, to back away from that over-billion-dollar fund, which could pay all kinds of people. As we've reported, it's already paused in court. It may be a situation where they know they're losing and want to get out from under it. It's also not a story that is over yet. We've told you we will cover these types of controversies without fear or favor.

2:43We will tell you what the law is. I've told you from the jump that much of this program is unprecedented and likely unlawful, but that has to be tested in court. Right now it's merely paused. And so whether this is a game where they're trying to back down from it during voting and a period of pressure or whether they're really going to drop the whole thing is an open question. Indeed, in our democracy, sometimes it depends on what happens, what you do, what the public says, the reaction, the pressure. I can tell you that the acting DOJ chief, Blanche, was before lawmakers today who have, in both parties, been very upset, concerned, even described as, quote, pissed or angry about this proposal, this program.

3:20Now, he was saying the administration will basically, in his view, not go forward with most parts of the fund. But we're not just taking his word for it, and there hasn't been a formal disillusion of the program. Trump also doubling down on these so-called revenge politics, basically trying to do the very lawfare he said he wouldn't do and put more partisan warriors in positions that could endanger you and our national security, because instead of having competent veterans or intelligence professionals. He now has what is considered one of his sort of most extreme, unqualified individuals with no intelligence credentials whatsoever appointed to lead and be acting director of national intel.

4:03In other words, someone who probably could not get a entry-level job in intelligence at that organization, at that part of the federal government, has been put in to lead it. And if it's not for his credentials, what's it for? Well, we have reporting on that. It's for the partisan brawling. Other top MAGA voices who failed to push Trump to get back focused on the things that would actually potentially help him hold on to Congress. They are now saying it's probably too late. It's going to be a Republican midterms wipeout. Now, as with all predictions, whether you like the sound of them or not, these are predictions.

4:39It's still important that everyone make up their own mind and go vote. And I like to remind you of that, especially on a night like tonight where people in some parts of the country are still voting. And these are primaries, not the midterms yet. But with that in mind, people who've been around politics a lot, who have been sympathetic to Trump and the MAGA movement, like Megyn Kelly, saying this. We assume we're going to lose the House on Team GOP. But now more and more political pundits are predicting that the Republicans are going to lose the Senate. So all the math is bad. We don't have the cards to play.

5:12It's already a quagmire. That's just some of what passes for like the baseline. That's like the premise of how it's looking among people who aren't saying that because they are, you know, rooting for Republicans to lose. Megyn Kelly, Fox News vet, very supportive of Trump for years, although she's been back and forth on those issues at times like some other Republicans. But she's saying that as a kind of a concern or a warning. And that's just in that sort of conservative space. Democrats, meanwhile, have seized on not only the macro factors, the economy, the open-ended war, which, remember, Trump promised would have been over by now.

5:50It ain't over. And they're using a lot of Trump's words against him in new attack ads. Gas. I don't think about America's financial situation. Groceries. I don't think about America's financial situation. Utilities. I don't think about America's financial situation. Trump's agenda is making everything more expensive. That's the cost of living. That is recent remarks from the president where he doesn't even pretend to say, hey, I feel your pain. I'm with you. I'm thinking about you. We're all going through this together. No, he says, I don't care. I want to bring in James Carville. We've got a slew of issues to talk about.

6:27But first, James, your view on the elections, these primaries that are unfolding right now. What are you watching? What are you thinking? Well, what I'm watching and hoping for is that Democrats elect the most electable general election candidate. And, you know, yes, that's a question that somebody is going to have to ask themselves. But in terms of like winning the House and the Senate, I'm reminded what Yogi Berra said. He is dead at the present time. At the present time, we would win. But unlike being dead, you can change. And the only way that we can change this is by nominating unelectable people.

7:07And that's always a...

7:14I mean, I lost you maybe for a second, but I got you back and I'm going to play. Here was Ted Cruz just today.

7:24Do you think that that will hold in the midterms? meaning the idea of national security, which I think is where you would argue, versus whatever you think the implication is for inflation, for the price of gas. I don't think it's going to impact the midterms material. I've seen no data that suggests that this is having a big impact on the midterms. He hasn't seen it. What's he saying? Do you buy it? No, I don't buy it. Of course I don't buy it. and nothing else but. You know, Moody's, which is a pretty high-class outfit, estimated that his stupid war has cost the average American household already$750.

8:11We're going to say when people are strapped and kind of living paycheck to paycheck that he doesn't see any evidence that's just having any effect when every congressional, it's not a congressional generic and see where the Democrats are not really up. Look, Senator Cruz is a very educated man. And he knows better than this. I don't think he'd be ashamed of himself, but he knows he's not telling the truth. And people watching that, of course, this impacts people's views. If you don't think it does, ask Kamala Harris. There's no doubt about it. Yeah, and we see this when they say, oh, well, the classic political fables, you know, the emperor has no clothes.

8:49And in the beginning of the fable, everyone's going along with it. That's what the story is about. You almost get the feeling that Trump says none of this matters, which a lot of people say is like being naked intellectually, politically to what's actually going on. And so then Cruz is sort of trying to sound like and look like the emperor. Oh, this is what they're all going to do now. They're going to say this as if Trump has the right message. Of course, as you know, and I think our viewers know because they follow politics closely, not everyone thinks about it. remembers that Trump's not on the ballot.

9:20He may not care because he doesn't care whether other House Republicans who tried to back him up every which way, whether they lose their seats. So that's part of that message. Whether that works, I want to play for your response. What we have together here, which is how often Trump is adopting that line that Cruz is echoing. Take a look.

9:41As the president said, I don't care if they're over, honestly. I really don't care. I couldn't care less. If they're over, they're over. If they're not, you know, I think they took too much time. Frankly, I think they started to get a little boring. I don't think about America's financial situation. I don't think about anybody. President Trump meeting with cabinet members at the White House, claiming he doesn't care about the midterms when it comes to Iran. I don't care about the midterms. James.

10:15Well, you know, if I were a Republican House member, Senate member, I'd be pretty, like, he doesn't care. What does that mean? It's a new message. I've never, in all my years in politics, I've never heard the leader of a political party say, I don't care if we win the election or not. It matters nothing to me. And maybe he is so self-absorbed that that's true.

10:37right that he's blurting the truth and they might be talking about it the day after the november elections again i don't like to get ahead of it um but if he says i don't care and does all these things that really show that he doesn't care uh and what these people i mean you know you've consulted for these candidates some of them spend decades trying to get these jobs that I might lose for really avoidable reasons, no?

11:01Yeah, and, you know, a political party, he doesn't care what accomplishments he has. They're very meager. Trying to give me a couple of weeks and I can come up with something. But it's very unique that a president would say, I don't care. And, you know, the other thing is something is wrong here. This guy goes to Walter Reed more than I go to the bathroom. I mean, there's something here that's just not adding up. And I'm not sure that we know what it is, but I suspect at some point we will know. And can you imagine when we have troops and we have a dangerous situation that he's bored by it? I'll tell you who's not bored are people on the general law forward that were like deployed for nine months.

11:48I guarantee you, they're not bored. I guarantee you the pilots that are flying these missions, the ships that are guarding these things, they're not bored at all. This is amazing that you'd say I'm bored about the United States' position when we have troops somewhere. I just, I can't, it's almost impossible to digest. It's just not anymore. Well, you're our reality check. When you said it, you said it very clearly. You've never seen a leader of a political party say, I don't care whether we win or lose. I mean, that that tells you something about where he's at and that he's not even willing or able to pretend otherwise the way one might if they if they had an iota of care.

12:33And the final question I have to you tonight, because, again, I don't think we should normalize this stuff. And long time beat viewers, if they go back a few years, they'll remember James Carville came on here and said he was concerned that then President Biden was operating in a manner where he might be too old for the next campaign. and you caught heck from your own party for that. And you said it on this program more than once. And so if anyone has been around the block on this and cannot be assailed for having a political angle, ironically, it might be you, a political pro James Carver, when I ask you about something that is not normal, America, the president of the United States went up late at night and wrote 47 posts, reposts, or comments in a span of 30 minutes, which breaks his prior record of 52 in six hours.

13:23And these are jokes. Some of them are hateful. Some of them are misleading. Some of them are from AI. None of them show any sort of forethought about the mighty power and platform and reach that he has. Some of them were, of course, as usual, fan-made tributes, which seems to draw his attention, whether they're made in this country or by some foreign influence campaign. He doesn't use the available resources to have the government check. He just posts willy-nilly. Is this something that should concern Americans beyond the so-called optics about what's actually going on in his mind state right now.

13:54Well, if you're not concerned by now, I don't think a 47 tweet night or whatever he does is going to concern you. If you've looked at him, the White House has become a crime syndicate. I mean, look at, reading the paper, look at the number traded in the defense industry on wars. I mean, if you are not turned off by all of this, then there's something you're just never going to be. But the good news is 65 % of the country is turned off Biden. And I don't know if we can get any more than that. And, you know, the guy lies all the time. I never think he's telling the truth. He may not care. He may be just that self-absorbed that, why do I care?

14:36I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. I don't know, Ari, but it is really, really unique. And, again, if I were a Republican Congress for the senator, I would be asking myself, what am I doing? I've worked all my life to get here. I've supported this guy. I've taken every stupid vote that he asked me to take. And now I'm walking the plank and he doesn't care. He's going to shove me off the end of it. Okay, that's fine. I mean, but you should have known that before you got involved with it. Yeah, wild. All fair points on primary night. I got reporters standing by in the field, so I'm going to bring them in.

15:11James Carville, thank you. We love seeing you. I appreciate all your perspective. Jacob Soberoff is at a polling center in L.A., which is one of the most pivotal places we've seen with the California governor's race, among others. Jacob, take it away. The biggest election jurisdiction in the nation, Los Angeles County, Ari Melber. And since I was on the air last with our friend and colleague, Nicole Wallace, the line has grown from just a couple of people. Let me just show you the end here. Sam, let's just walk around the corner real quick to stretching around the corner here at Grand Avenue and Fifth Street in downtown Los Angeles.

15:43People are fired up and they're excited about this primary election day here in Los Angeles and in California. We're picking a governor, obviously, in the state to succeed Gavin Newsom. But we're also picking a mayor here in Los Angeles. Karen Bass, the incumbent, is facing a challenge both from, and I'm sorry I left, the reality star Spencer Pratt and Nithya Rahman, city councilperson here in Los Angeles. I was just talking to you as I passed by a minute ago. You said you're a pickleball coach at the YMCA here in downtown, right? What's your name? I'm downtown YMCA. My name is Motown. And so you decided to come on over and vote today.

16:15We have a mayor's race and a governor's race. Correct me if I'm wrong. You said Javier Becerra, the former secretary of health and human services for governor and Nithya Rahman for mayor of Los Angeles. Yeah. What's on your agenda today? What brings you out to vote? Honestly, I was going to mail in vote, but I kind of messed up my mailing vote card. So I decided I'm just going to come out in person. What are the issues that I mean, that's the that's the the procedure. What about actually in practice the policies? What are the things that you're thinking about that got you out to vote today? We know the homeless situation is a crisis that just keeps on not getting better.

16:51It is. And I was going to vote for the previous mayor, but my partner brought some things to my attention. And I like what Nithya has to offer. And I started to pay attention to her a little bit more. And I'm like, yeah, we should vote for him. In this governor's race, Gavin Newsom has really been a foil for President Trump. I was saying to my colleague, Nicole Wallace, in the last hour here on MS Now, those ice raids that played out a year ago were right here on the streets of downtown Los Angeles. And Gavin Newsom was here. The mayor was standing up against him. What are you looking for in a governor of California, the fourth largest economy in the world, when Donald Trump is in the White House?

17:24I'm looking for a governor that's going to speak out against Trump, that's going to put his foot down, that's going to go against all these inhumane ice raids that are happening. It shouldn't be happening, and someone has to put a stop to it immediately. And then just on the YMCA Pickleball thing, can anyone show up and play pickleball at the Y downtown? Anyone can show up. You can get a guest pass. I'm the coach. We got a great community. Come in, have fun, learn pickleball, be a part of our community. I don't know if Ari Melberg's a big pickleball guy, but it's really nice to meet you, Ari. That's just the voice of one voter here.

17:56But as I walk back and I just show you all the way inside, it's going to be an exciting election night here in Los Angeles and throughout California. And we'll all be a part of that special coverage with Rachel starting at 10 o 'clock on the East Coast, my friend. Jacob, a couple of things. Number one, you're going to be busy. Everyone should watch all night. We've got a lot to follow. Number two, respect. But pickleball always struck me as easier tennis. Oh yeah, I'm not good at either To be honest with you So that's why I was wondering about lessons Well We could all use lessons in a lot of things Jacob, we'll be checking back in with you And keep working the lines And our thanks to you tonight I'm going to tell folks we've got a lot more coming up The official behind Trump's controversial AI Jesus image Now wants To run US intel Not a joke, serious issue We have the pushback.

18:51Andrew Weissman explaining what all that means, as well as legal views tonight. And the Trump acting attorney general claims that maybe they're backing down on parts of this controversial fund with money that could go to defendants, convicts. But there's a lot more to the story. We have a representative. We are staying on what I've told you is one of the biggest legal controversies ever. Next, 90 seconds.

19:18Hey, take a breath. You've been moving all day. Scrolling, answering, planning. But for the next few seconds, you get quiet. Now imagine warm light. A place where your shoulders finally drop and you feel like a kid again. Never lose that feeling. Never lose your splash. Visit Lauderdale.

20:10will take you to even more entertainment options. Go to visitomaha.com slash meetings to learn more. Hello, I'm Ozempic. And I'm other GLP ones, kind of like him. Are you shaking a maraca? Nope, I'm shaking the pill version of Ozempic, which no one should ever do except in ads like this. A nice disclaimer. Hey, thanks. Ask your doctor about which FDA-approved uses of the Ozempic pen or pill may be right for you. Call 1-833-OZEMPIC or visit ozempic.com to view the medication guide and learn more about Ozempic, semaglutide tablets, 9 milligrams, and Ozempic semaglutide injection, 2 milligrams. There's a pill version of Ozempic.

20:49Turning now to the other big story that has really rocked the White House and DOJ now for some time, a conflict and controversy of their own making, and one that I've told you is probably unlawful, but it requires the courts, Congress, and others these days to make sure that unlawful things don't happen. The Trump administration had put forward an unprecedented, likely unlawful system where they wanted to take over a billion dollars of your taxpayer money, not appropriated by Congress, and give it out to defendants, convicts, even potentially people who violently attacked the January 6th police officers who were defending Congress that day, which we know because they wouldn't rule that out.

21:30Now, a judge did pause it temporarily. I've reported on that along with my colleagues here, and that was already a quick setback. Now, today, DOJ acting attorney general, Blanche, was before a key committee, and this is how he puts their plans. We are not moving forward with the fund, period. Not moving forward ever. Correct. Notwithstanding what we do in those litigations and defending our rights and making sure our rights are protected, we're not moving forward with the fund. not moving forward with the fund correct that's it if those words mean what they say that they will not seize the taxpayer dollars and use this fund to hand them out that is a huge and formal retreat and in other eras of course the news and i'm part of it right a news anchor would say well he just said it to congress it's a crime to lie to congress we're going to take that as a pretty big news development.

22:26Well, these days they lie all the time. Indeed, the New York Times has a story this week about how the DOJ has been caught lying in court where there are sanctions. So whether Blanche really means it and this happens has to be pursued over time. As for the funds, some convicted January 6 rioters and convicts and even seditionists are telling PBS that the president will find a way, that there's going to be money. The whole fallout over this likely illegal plan has rocked Trump. Republicans were upset about it to the degree that they did something they don't usually do. They actually refused to help him on a vote as a first order way of saying this is bad and we might go further.

23:05Politico reported that some top leaders say that even if the fund is sort of paused right now, given the track record, it's just not enough to calm the concerns. Senate Dems are trying to force a vote to block the fund formally under the force of law. That would further strengthen the challengers in court because, remember, judges in court have already paused this thing temporarily because they need to review whether it's even legal. If on top of that, Congress actually takes action to say we didn't appropriate this, it's not legal, well, that would further strengthen the efforts to stop it in court.

23:39And we've shown you, unlike some things in the MAGA era here, pretty prominent members of both parties condemned this likely illegal fund plan. This is a corrupt deal. I think it's stupid on stilts. That is the definition, as Thomas Jefferson, I think, once said of tyranny. It's our job in the Congress, in the Senate, in the House to hold the executive branch accountable. I don't think it's an appropriate use of money. What are your thoughts about this organization fund from the president to this point? Yeah, not a big fan. I call it a payout pot for punks. It's all about weaponizing the tax dollars of the American people to support Donald Trump's private militia.

Read the full transcript

24:25So that had been the immediate growing bipartisan pushback. Now, if the DOJ does say the fund is over, that's the money part. It's not clear what would happen to another unsavory, conflicted, possibly also unlawful thing they're doing, which is that Trump sort of sued himself and then says the IRS and DOJ will agree with himself to never investigate him or his kids. Should the Trump administration try to go another direction to sort of bob and weave on this for a few weeks and then bring it back, you have to remember something that I want to show you tonight that we put together. There is no room under our constitutional order to have a president seize billions of dollars from you, the taxpayer, for any just made-up goal, in this case one a lot of people oppose, but even if it were a more popular goal, and override the sacrosanct, long-standing power of the purse that sits only with Congress.

25:26The Constitution grants Congress, not the president, the power to decide how the government spends taxpayer money. It is ultimately Congress, not the executive, that has the power of the purse. The power of the purse rests with Congress. We can take that power of the purse through appropriations. If we surrender the power of the purse, which is our most important power, there will be little check and no balance left. The founders gave us that for a reason to check an out-of-control executive branch. If the executive had unbridled power to determine how to spend the money, we would have an imperial presidency.

26:05We would indeed. Indeed, those are members of both parties on multiple issues. This is a bedrock principle. And this is America. If you have the money for something, you can get a lot done. If you don't have any money for it, whether you're a random person or the government, well, that's going to slow you down. Here, they wanted to give out money to some of the worst people you can imagine legally. That's why so many of them had faced legal consequences in the past. And I'm going to bring in one of the individuals, the congressperson who was questioning Blanche just today on this newsworthy topic and discuss this bedrock limit when we return.

26:46The Trump administration has been in really active public retreat over its controversial, possibly unlawful plan to try to seize taxpayer dollars and hand them out to defendants, ex-convicts potentially. even people who attacked police. That has been temporarily paused in court while it's under review. Members of Congress in both parties have spoken out. Today, we heard from the acting attorney general that they are backing down, but the details are not clear, nor certainly final. We have a very newsworthy guest right now, Democratic Congressman Glenn Ivey, who is on that key committee questioning Blanche today.

27:19Welcome. Thanks for having me. Great to have you. Let's start with the news as best we can get it out of your committee. And then we can also talk about the law and the ethics here. But what do you understand, Todd Blanche, to have committed to today, if anything? Well, I mean, he made a verbal commitment to not go forward with the slush fund. Ironically or oddly enough, he refused to put it in writing, even though they had put the slush fund initially in writing to lay it out to start with. So not clear on why there is such a strong opposition to that on his part and the administration's part.

27:59But it's a step in the right direction. The other part of this, though, is the other side of the equation, which is the immunity agreement, which never should have been agreed to. Sure. Can I slow you down? Let's finish. You make a point about whether they're discontinuing the program. Then there's that immunity, which holds second piece, which goes to nepotism and his family. But as you say, they started this, as most things in government must, with an actual written plan that then staff can consult and follow. And your point is that if if he were being 100 percent honest and this were over, you would expect them to then issue guidance or a statement, a letter or something to end or retract what is currently the written guidance inside the DOJ.

28:40So while you say it's the step in the right direction, what else do you think Congress should do here on that point? Well, I mean, to your point, people have already announced that they want to seek compensation out of that fund. And it's in writing that this fund will be created. One of the things that could happen is somebody files to get the money. And then you've got a scenario where you've got a written document on the one hand that says this fund is going to be created. And on the other hand, you have a verbal statement with a guy who is the acting attorney general, but not actually even the attorney general yet.

29:14And let's face it, the only word that matters in the Trump administration is Donald Trump's. So I don't think, you know, I don't think we can be real comfortable with with that alone is the commitment from the administration to retract or rescind the document that they put out there. They put it out in writing. They should rescind it in writing. And then turning to the other part that independent judge and others have questioned, which is how Trump could sue himself and potentially make a mockery of this whole system and then make a deal with himself. and you mentioned that, this claimed family immunity, the other part of the deal.

29:50What did you want to tell us about that tonight, sir? Well, I think, you know, it's beyond unusual for a scenario like this. You've got the boss telling the IRS and the Department of Justice to give him an immunity agreement that shields him. I've seen estimates in the range of$100 million of liability and members of his family, even though the government doesn't get anything exchanged for that, which is normally the only time you give an immunity agreement like that. So you've got a deal where you don't actually have parties who have the freedom to make objective and neutral decisions because Trump is one of those guys who will fire staff or administrative officials who do something he doesn't agree with.

30:33So presumably they're going to do what he says. And as one judge hinted at, there really isn't any case for controversy here. He's suing himself, basically. So I think, A, I think the whole thing is illegal. And B, I think they should strike the whole thing down, including the immunity agreement. He and his family members should not be immune from prosecution for tax fraud or any kind of tax crimes that they may have committed. Yeah. Well, Congressman, like I mentioned, you were in there today. So I think just getting your readout on what it meant, what you heard, what your committee drew out from the DOJ is important, helps us and our viewers, we believe, understand what's going on.

31:12And you've laid out where you think the pressure is going next. So I appreciate that, Congressman, for your time. Thanks. Thanks for having me. I appreciate it. Absolutely. Yes, sir. Still ahead, we'll go back live on the ground out this time to Iowa, because we're trying to keep track of all the different primaries today, and we'll be covering that for you on MSNOW all night tonight. So get comfortable. We got a big night together. Also, Trump has a unqualified pick to be in charge of U.S. intelligence. This is a national security crisis. Next.

31:53Following a big national security story, Donald Trump is announcing that a kind of partisan warrior who has been accused of misusing government power to target Democrats and misuse information, MAGA ally Bill Pulte, will be the new director of national intelligence. His current post is in housing. He has no apparent national security experience. If someone with his background submitted a resume or had their LinkedIn reviewed to work in U.S. intelligence, you wouldn't expect them to clear that early review for any job, like intelligence analyst, let alone become the director. He also is allegedly planning to stay in his current job, so he would do both.

32:34Now, Mr. Pulte has been known most not for intelligence or housing policy, but rather for using, critics say, misusing the current role to get up dirt and cook up cases against people that Trump wants indicted, many of whom, remember, were not indicted in any previous context because apparently there wasn't enough evidence to do so in a lawful manner. Take New York Attorney General Letitia James or Lisa Cook, who served in the Fed. Pulte used a kind of a hook where he had housing information to try to refer them for criminal prosecution. So he took materials that he had and made what are allegations.

33:15In the news, we tell you whether something's been proven or there's a lot of sources or not. These were just kind of broad-based allegations that he said people that Trump didn't like probably committed mortgage fraud. How convenient that it was only people that were on Trump's enemies list. He also reportedly was involved in aspects of the failed probe into Fed Chair Powell. So that's the background. This is still a big intelligence post that deals with national security in other countries, and depending on what's going on, can become more or less important if intelligence matters more. You can remember in the run-up to the Iraq war, other periods where you want a really top person working full-time, and it's still a hard job.

33:55There could be an uphill battle here as well on Senate confirmation. Well, we don't need a weaponized DNI. We need a profession, so if he's somebody in that position permanently, he's got, as you all know, a lengthy role here. My understanding is the Senate doesn't have a role in confirmation of an acting director, But I see no evidence of any qualifications for that job.

34:26No qualifications for the job. I want to bring in Andrew Weissman, former FBI general counsel. He was also top prosecutor in the Mueller probe. And as a prosecutor has, of course, worked on plenty of law enforcement, national security issues where competence, independence is paramount. We could start in so many ways. I'm just curious if you could begin with that point. Is it good or bad for U.S. national security to have someone this inexperienced who seems to be there based on his last job as a way to do a partisan war, potentially illegally, rather than the actual job? So let's leave the partisan issue to the side for the moment.

35:09And let's just, it's relevant, but let's just focus for a moment on experience. And this is what I'd like viewers to think about. You are president of the United States. You have seen for four years the presidential daily brief, day in and day out. There are serious threat streams involving people who want to harm Americans, involves what's happening here in the United States, within the homeland, and overseas. Obviously, people can remember 9-11, but there have been many terrorist attacks, both international terrorists and domestic terrorists. You see that every day. you know that the most important thing is keeping the country safe and keeping people in this country safe.

36:02And then you decide you're going to choose somebody who has no experience whatsoever in the intelligence community and in law enforcement, as far as I know. That just ask yourself, who does that? Why would you pick somebody like that and not somebody who is the most qualified, the most seasoned, and have their experience brought to bear to keep the country safe. Yeah. Mark Warner is involved in this. I want to play his reaction as well. Take a look. What appears to be his qualifications is that he was, in his housing authority job, was willing to take confidential information about mortgages and use that as a way to try to bring prosecutions against Lisa Cook on the Fed or Adam Schiff in Congress, even though the very same practices of owning two homes, half the Trump cabinet has done the same.

37:10That's a concern there from a top Intel Democrat. A semaphore reporting that Roger Stone, who's had his share of legal troubles, And we should mention you as part of the probe, you all dealt with him, investigated him, that he and other allies see Pulte's attack dog mentality as a way to wage war and ramp up declassification of sensitive information. Does that reporting concern you as well in terms of what the goal is here? That does. Roger Stone, obviously, as is his right, went to trial. He had due process, but a jury convicted him. The president, as also he has the power to do, pardoned him.

37:52But this is somebody who was convicted of multiple felonies, including lying to Congress and obstructing Congress. So you would think that that is not somebody who, if the reporting is accurate, you would want to rely on for the person who is going to be the head of the intelligence community. And so because of the lack of qualifications, it really does lead you to go to the next step, which is, well, what does this person bring to the table? And it is what you've been saying, which is that it's hard to you have to look for some qualification. And the qualification appears to be that he is a hatchet man who is willing to do things for Donald Trump that are completely inappropriate.

38:36And frankly, grand juries and judges have been rejecting the things that seem to emanate from this individual. It's notable that I don't think he is being nominated officially. In other words, this idea that he's going to be acting, which is a way around having a Senate hearing, because you are hearing people correctly pushing back. And I have to say, from my experience, when I was at the FBI dealing with the intel kidneys, they are serious bodies in the House and in the Senate. They see the threat streams. They see how dangerous this world is. And they would understand just how irresponsible it is to be putting somebody like that in this position.

39:28Right. And the abuse of this acting thing, running the government through temps, that's what it is. It's reducing everything in temps for the wrong reason, not because, oh, there's an emergency, you need a line of succession. People understand that. But this trick is clearly running out of steam in Congress. And that's even before if the midterms lead to more pressure. While I have you, your new book talks about the importance of truth in our society. The current administration has misused the government to press the public media at times in ways that may violate the First Amendment. There's quite an unusual and intense story that I want to read.

40:03It quotes Scott Pelley, who is as old school as it gets when it comes to CBS News and the MAGA ownership's pressure on 60 Minutes, which is the most watched news program in the country. This is from an internal meeting where Peli, I'm going to put this on the screen, refers to that MAGA aligned ownership, the Ellisons, who put in Barry Weiss and says that she is, quote, murdering 60 Minutes. She does not love this place. He's telling this to her installed new boss. And this is after they did some firings at 60 Minutes. He asserts she was brought in to kill it and she's been doing exactly that.

40:36She has no qualifications for her job. Addressing the New York Times vet, who was a new hire there by her, he says, you have slender qualifications for this job. The changes that she's made at the Evening News have been catastrophic. So why should we expect any of this is going to be any better? Really, if anyone has ever heard Pelly on air, you know this is for him a 10. And this is from an internal meeting. The New York Times obtained the audio that I'm reading from their reporting. Mr. Bilton, the new hire, replies, I care so deeply about this institution. Mr. Pelli says, oh, please. And on it went.

41:13Your thoughts on that rather stunning leak out of 60 Minutes and calling into question its future. So, I mean, 60 Minutes is emblematic of the attack on the Fourth Estate on journalism and journalists and independent reporting. That is the life's blood of a democracy. And it is so absolutely critical. Put together what you just said with what many people who even don't follow politics on a day in and day out basis, that they they are aware of what happened with Jimmy Kimmel. They're aware of what happened with Stephen Colbert. It's all of a piece, which is this is if you don't like the message, you kill the messenger.

42:07And the same thing, this is Scott Pelley's comment about you're killing 60 minutes, which is trying to do objective reporting. It doesn't mean you always agree with the reporting. That's what it means to be in the public eye. That's what it means to be a public official. If you can't take the heat, don't take that job. But that's what it that's what it means to do that. You know, I remember working for the FBI director, Director Mueller. And, you know, we knew day in and day out that somebody was going to be unhappy with what we were doing in one way or the other. But that's part of the job and being responsible about it and knowing that those are the people you work for.

42:47This is an entirely authoritarian response to what is supposed to be the fourth estate and journalism and what you do day in and day out, Ari. I appreciate you saying that. It's again, it's so striking and it shows the level of people that are concerned. This is not rhetoric. This is not a close call. And Mr. Pelley is serious and careful with his words, and he feels that this is killing the actual journalism they do. Important for the reasons you mentioned. Thank you, Andrew. A lot going on. We will be right back.

43:25Out on the road, it helps to have a partner like the Love's Rewards app. Download Love's Rewards and get great deals, like a free Love's coffee or fountain drink. Just buy any four, any size, and get the fifth one free. Love's Rewards. Save and earn at every turn. Terms apply. See website for details. I like things my way. My coffee, my schedule, and my treatment. So I talked to my doctor about self-injecting with the Vivgard Hytrulo Pre-Filled Syringe, which contains F-Gartigamide Alpha and Hyaluronidase QVFC. It's injected under your skin subcutaneously. It means I can inject in my space on my time.

44:00It's my treatment, my way. Visit VivgardMyWay.com. That's V-Y-V-G-A-R-T MyWay.com. and talk to your doctor about Vivgard Hattrulo. Brought to you by Argenix. Exterior Remodels, Inner Monologues. Brought to you by Power. The house looks good. Like, really good. That siding? Stunning. The roof? Elevated. Windows? I mean, wow. The process? Smooth. The neighbors? Jealous. Choose Power Home Remodeling and remodel how you think about remodeling. Schedule your free quote on windows, siding, roofing, and doors at powerhomeremodeling.com. Power, our work shows.

44:46Now we turn to MSNOW's Alex Tabat in Des Moines, Iowa on this primary night. Take it away. Well, we are here at a retirement home that's doubling as a polling center. This retirement home is home to over 300 senior citizens. There's a bingo down there. There's water aerobics over there. And right here, there are the polling booths. And in this room will be where the GOP primary is decided. And the big question surrounding the GOP primary here in Iowa is just how powerful is President Trump's endorsement? There were five major candidates in this race. There was no unclear front. There's no clear front runner up until last Friday when President Trump jumped into this race and endorsed Representative Randy Feenstra, whose campaign was floundering at that point.

45:33If Representative Randy Feenstra comes out to a commanding lead tonight as results start to come in, that'll be an indication of just how powerful President Trump's endorsement may still be in the state of Iowa. Ari. Alex, thank you. We'll be watching all of that tonight and we'll be right back. That does it for us. Keep it locked here on Election Night. The weeknight starts now. This episode is brought to you by Opel, the first over-the-counter daily birth control pill available in the U.S. Opil is FDA approved, full prescription strength and estrogen free. Plus, there's no prescription needed.

46:07Finally, the days of needing a prescription for birth control are over. Opil is available online and at most major retailers. Take control of your health and reproductive journey with Opil. Birth control in your control. Use code birth control for 25 % off your first month of Opil at opil.com.

From the publisher

June 2, 2026; 6pm; MS NOW's Ari Melber reports on growing fears within the GOP that President Trump is damaging the party with scandals and blunders. Legendary Democratic Strategist James Carville joins. Plus, CBS’s top anchor Scott Pelley says MAGA ownership is killing "60 Minutes.” Melber reports and is joined by former FBI General Counsel and former Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann.

To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from The Beat with Ari Melber

All 321 episodes
CBS's Top Anchor: MAGA Owners Helping Kill “60 Minutes”The Beat with Ari Melber · 42 min
Listen in VO