Congress Spars with Bondi Over Epstein Files

12 Feb 2026 · 42 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The Beat with Ari Melber: Episode Summary

Episode Title

Congress Spars with Bondi Over Epstein Files Date: February 11, 2026 Host: Ari Melber

---

Overview

In this episode, Ari Melber discusses the aftermath of a critical hearing involving Trump’s former Attorney General Pam Bondi, who faced intense scrutiny over her handling of the Epstein files. The episode highlights the charged atmosphere in Congress, as lawmakers express outrage over the perceived mishandling and redaction of documents connected to Jeffrey Epstein's case. The episode further covers the refusal of a federal grand jury to indict six Democrats on charges of seditious conspiracy, showcasing a growing resistance against Trump’s political maneuvers.

---

Key Discussions

Pam Bondi's Testimony

  • Bondi was questioned under oath about the Epstein files, resulting in a fiery and contentious exchange with Congress members.
  • The hearing revealed ongoing frustrations regarding transparency in government and accountability for survivors of Epstein's crimes.

Main Points from Bondi’s Testimony

  • Bondi's defensive stance included accusations of theatrics from Congress members and a focus on unrelated issues.
  • Lawmakers pressed Bondi on the high number of redactions in the Epstein files, questioning their legality and intentions.
  • Survivors of Epstein's abuse were present, demanding accountability from the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Redaction Controversy

  • Concerns were raised over the number of redactions in documents related to Epstein, with allegations that some redactions were used to shield powerful individuals from scrutiny.
  • Lawmakers criticized the DOJ for failing to protect the rights and interests of victims, highlighting a broader issue of governmental accountability.

Congressional Dynamics

  • The episode illustrated the partisan divide in Congress, with Democrats and some Republicans criticizing Bondi for her responses and the handling of the Epstein files.
  • Strong visuals emerged during the hearing, symbolizing the survivors' demand for justice, including shirts that read "the truth is redacted."

Broader Implications

  • Melber pointed to the implications of the testimony for ongoing investigations into Epstein's network and the accountability of the powerful individuals involved.
  • The refusal of the grand jury to indict six Democrats underscored a potential pushback against Trump’s efforts to politicize the DOJ.

---

Key Takeaways

  • The episode highlighted significant tensions between Congress and the executive branch, focusing on transparency and accountability in governance.
  • It raised critical questions about the integrity of the DOJ and its role in protecting vulnerable populations, especially survivors of abuse.
  • The refusal of the grand jury to indict indicates a significant moment in holding the executive accountable for potential overreach and politicization.

---

Featured Guests

  • Bryan Lanza (Senior Advisor for Trump’s 2024 Campaign): Joined the discussion to offer insights into the political implications of the hearings and the response from the Trump camp.
  • Professor Melissa Murray: Provided analysis on the chaotic nature of the hearing and the broader implications for democracy and accountability.

---

Conclusion The episode served as a potent reminder of the ongoing struggles for justice and transparency in the face of political maneuvering. With the intense scrutiny of Bondi and the fallout from the Epstein case, Melber effectively illustrated the challenges facing survivors of abuse and the need for accountability within powerful institutions.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Congressional Hearing on Epstein Files

1:30 to 3:09

Discussion on the implications of the Epstein files and Trump's involvement.

“The documents, of course, being the Epstein files.”

Accountability and Government Failures

3:09 to 6:48

Exploration of government accountability regarding Epstein survivors.

“Why were the redactions being, they ask, abused that way?”

Pam Bondi's Testimony Analysis

6:48 to 10:30

Analysis of Pam Bondi's testimony during the hearing and her responses.

“Many outlets, of course, as I've mentioned, and we credit and source them, have been reporting and pulling on these threads.”

The Tension in the Hearing

10:30 to 11:34

Ari discusses the heated exchanges during the congressional hearing.

“How many of Epstein's co-conspirators have you indicted?”

Investigative Pursuits and Outcomes

11:34 to 14:00

Overview of the ongoing investigations linked to the Epstein files.

“I want the record to reflect that, you know, with this anti-Semitic culture right now, she voted against a resolution condemning.”

Epstein Files: New Revelations and Political Fallout

14:00 to 15:03

Explore the latest developments regarding Epstein files and their implications for powerful figures.

“The testimony that he's given about Epstein Island only came this week.”

Introduction of Professor Murray

15:03 to 15:40

Ari introduces Professor Melissa Murray to discuss the congressional hearing and its implications.

“We're going to get into this when we return in 90 seconds.”

The Fiery Hearing with Attorney General Bondi

15:40 to 17:11

Analysis of the intense exchanges during Bondi's testimony and its implications for accountability.

“I don't think I have ever seen anything quite like this, certainly from a sitting attorney general.”

Accountability and Institutional Failures

17:11 to 19:20

Discussion on the historical lack of accountability and how it relates to current events.

“The lower bar is a lot of financial elites and others.”

Pam Bondi's Disrespect to Congressional Process

19:20 to 22:34

Examining Bondi's behavior during the hearing and its implications for democratic processes.

“She talked about the history of this, which I've been careful to emphasize.”
Show all 19 chapters

Murray's Perspective on Accountability Issues

22:34 to 23:41

Professor Murray shares insights on the ongoing accountability challenges faced by the DOJ.

“And her problem is bigger than the political kind of circus she wanted to make it.”

Trump's Legal Challenges and Democratic Guardrails

25:50 to 28:00

Discussion on Trump's attempts at selective prosecution and the role of citizen juries.

“An autogat tries to indict the opposition party for things they say, for their actual political speech.”

The Role of Citizen Juries in Justice

28:00 to 29:50

Discussion on how citizen juries are standing up to political pressures and indictments.

“And what you see in green on the tabulation we've shown you, citizen juries, they are standing up even as CEOs or elites have failed and buckled.”

Leslie Caldwell on DOJ's Actions

29:50 to 31:30

Leslie Caldwell discusses the implications of the DOJ's approach to indictments against political opponents.

“We're joined by Leslie Caldwell, who ran the Justice Department's criminal division.”

Maintaining Grand Jury Materials

31:30 to 33:30

Exploring the importance of maintaining grand jury records for future accountability.

“You want to make sure you have the evidence.”

Trump's Epstein Problem

35:40 to 40:00

Discussion on the political fallout surrounding Donald Trump and the Epstein files.

“TheSameMonday.com helping people worldwide getting work done faster and better.”

The Public Narrative and Accountability

40:00 to 42:00

Michelle Goldberg discusses how Trump's actions sever public accountability mechanisms.

“And, you know, more information becomes more jarring.”

Accountability and Impunity in Politics

42:00 to 43:06

Explore how accountability differs in political systems and the implications of Trump's influence on the Republican Party.

“I mean, I think Great Britain is a great example.”

Immigration Policy and Its Effects

43:07 to 45:05

Discuss the impact of anti-immigrant rhetoric and policies on the Republican Party and American citizens.

“You have a little database of Americans?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Pam Bondi:You know that thing where you get an amazing pair of shoes at a really great price and want to tell everyone about it? Yeah, so do we. Here at Designer Shoe Warehouse, we'll give you something to brag about. Like the latest styles from brands you love. Or the trends everyone's obsessing over. Or shoes that make you feel like, well, you. So go ahead, show off a little. Find shoes that get you at prices that get your budget. Head to your DSW store or DSW.com today. DSW, let us surprise you.

0:30Ari Melber:Close your eyes. Listen to Monday.com. Feel the sensation of an AI work platform. So flexible and intuitive, it feels like it was built just for you. Now open your eyes. Go to Monday.com. Start for free and finally breathe.

0:45Bryan Lanza:Welcome to The Beat. I'm Ari Melber. We're beginning with not only fallout from the Epstein files, but accountability under oath. This was an explosive day in Washington. the Trump Attorney General, Pam Bondi, at turns was defensive, lashing out on the attack, doing talking points, even getting personal. And for all the skepticism or cynicism in our country right now, for understandable reasons, her situation being under oath, having to discuss a topic that she spent a long time trying to dodge on, and a president who tried to fight the very law she is now tasked with carrying out, all of this speaks to how some things are still working.

1:26Bryan Lanza:She couldn't dodge the Congress forever, just as they couldn't hide the documents forever. The documents, of course, being the Epstein files. And the testimony comes as we have many serious questions. Why is Donald Trump in the files so many times, apart from being a public figure who is sometimes mentioned in articles? Why was his name redacted repeatedly? Are all the redactions on the level or not? Will the Trump official who spent years lying about his ties to Epstein and only from these files now admitted visiting Epstein Island face any accountability? And how does all of this impact the survivors who've been through, of course, more than enough, but who've also been proven right repeatedly, right about how the government has failed them, right about how this process didn't work, right about how transparency, which can be complicated, That's why we have grand jury secrecy rules and other valid ways that confidentiality matters.

2:20Bryan Lanza:But transparency can be a way to get public accountability, which they didn't get, which failed them through the other more traditional means. I mention them because not only are they, of course, the victims in this long running case, but many of them chose Epstein survivors to attend this hearing today. They asked why the redactions seemed at times to mistakenly, erroneously, or they questioned, nefariously cover up information not as intended in the law, which had narrow redaction rules, for example, protecting children or minors, which no rational person or lawyer would disagree with or has disagreed with.

2:59Bryan Lanza:But why, instead of those narrow redactions under law, why did some redactions appear to, and now lawmakers have said after reviewing them they did, hide powerful potential co-conspirators, rich and powerful men? Why were the redactions being, they ask, abused that way? That led to one key moment.

3:20Pam Bondi:Will you turn to the survivors? This is not about anybody that came before you. It is about you taking responsibility for your Department of Justice and the harm that it has done to the survivors who are standing right behind you and are waiting for you to turn to them and apologize for what your Department of Justice is.

3:43Bryan Lanza:Members get to ask the questions. The witness gets to answer in the way they want to answer. That's not accurate, Mr.

3:49Pam Bondi:Chairman. Because she doesn't like the answer. So, Mr. Chairman. Why? I have asked. And she asked Merrick Garland this. Twice. I am reclaiming my time. He sat in my chair. And when I reclaim my time, it is time. I'm not going to get in the gutter for her theatrics. The time belongs to the gentlelady. The gentlelady has 17 seconds. Thank you. You're not going to answer this question. So let me just. Chairman, I'll direct it to you. What a massive cover-up. No, I'm answering a question. Chairman, will you restore her time?

4:19Bryan Lanza:The witness is interrupted.

4:20Pam Bondi:I'm not going to get in the gutter with this woman. She's doing theatrics. And let me.

4:26Bryan Lanza:you can see the intensity of the moment with the back and forth. The Congresswoman saying, this is what the survivors deserve, and can you face them? The chair, kind of off video, you couldn't see him trying to keep some sort of order, which happens a lot in these hearings. The survivors present, and the Attorney General arguing, basically, if you can infer from her answer, that she didn't think she owed only the survivors something, that this goes back farther, that there are other parts of the government and other prior administrations that also bear accountability. Fact check, true, because this is bigger than just the last couple years.

5:00Bryan Lanza:Anyone who's followed the story knows that. And yet, even if it is true that other prior government officials also bear some blame, at least according to the lawmaker there and others who've looked at this, the question is, why can't the attorney general step up now? She is the attorney general now. Now, survivors, some were seen wearing shirts that say the truth is redacted, redacted, redacted. Epstein survivors are still waiting. Release the redacted files. This is a kind of visual cue that is recognizable from the hearing room to the Internet to the memes, because so many people across the spectrum have been outraged by the way this Trump DOJ has redacted.

5:42Bryan Lanza:A Democrat who saw some of the unredacted files has said there were over a million mentions of Trump, which is far more than in the publicly released files, which mentioned Trump a far fewer number of times. And if some of the million mentions were duplicates or, as I mentioned in fairness, references to a public person, Trump, a longtime celebrity and later a politician, there is still a huge gap in big questions. Here was Pam Bondi.

6:08Pam Bondi:I believe his name has appeared countless times in the documents that have been released. If I could finish, I'm going to read you the stat.

6:19Bryan Lanza:I just simply asked whether or not it was true that it was 1 ,000 folks who were assigned that task. Were those reports accurate?

6:30Pam Bondi:There are more than 500 attorneys and reviewers. I cannot give you an exact number.

6:38Bryan Lanza:That is the back and forth. Remember, Pam Bondi is the attorney general who said publicly and in writing there were no more files of significance. There were no more files that were proper to release. we are here over three million files later and she has been proven wrong about that by any standard take even people serving in the current government trump commerce secretary howard lutnik it is only these files which trump and bondi tried to hide that have forced him to admit that he was lying when he said he cut off contact with epstein we were reporting on this before he even was forced to admit it.

7:17Bryan Lanza:Many outlets, of course, as I've mentioned, and we credit and source them, have been reporting and pulling on these threads. He visited the Epstein Island in 2012. Epstein had already been by then a publicly convicted sex offender, which undercuts his prior claim.

7:33Pam Bondi:Attorney General Bondi, yes or no, has the Justice Department asked Secretary Lutnik about his ties to Epstein. Excuse me. Secretary Lutnik has addressed those ties himself. I'm asking you, has the Justice Department specifically asked Secretary Lutnik about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein? He has addressed those ties himself. It's true.

8:03Bryan Lanza:But when he first addressed those ties, he lied. And he held on to that lie for many years. And it's only this week after the files were forcibly pushed out under the law that he had to address it again and say he was lying and admit he visited. Bondi also was asked about Maxwell, who got that prison upgrade, which occurred after Bondi's number two, Todd Blanche, conducted a very unusual interview with Maxwell. You don't have to be an expert on any of this to wonder why someone who was serving for such heinous crimes would ever get a prison upgrade, especially right after that interview, which led many to ask whether it was causal or some sort of reward.

8:44Bryan Lanza:The Bureau of Prisons, which is under the DOJ and transferred Maxwell, reports in the end to the attorney general.

8:53Pam Bondi:Who ordered her to be transferred to the minimum security prison that she was ineligible for? Who signed off on the special privileges? Was it Mr. Blanche? Was it one of your other subordinates? So please, can you tell us who sent her there since you don't agree she should be there? I said, I do not agree she should receive special treatment. She was transferred, I learned after the fact, to the same level facility, and that is a question for the Bureau of Prisons. I was not involved in that at all. the same level of facility. I don't know why.

9:33Bryan Lanza:Fact check, less than true. Dodgy at best. Because even if Bondi was not previously involved, she is the attorney general. She remains involved by the nature of her job, unless, of course, there is some rare situation like you are formally recused from some part of BOP or DOJ. That's not the case. So she's involved right now. If she thinks this was the wrong transfer, if she thinks it looks like or constitutes any kind of reward or special treatment for this convicted sex offender, she can move her back. So it's not enough to say you didn't know back then. Otherwise, people can also ask whether they believe all this, right?

10:11Bryan Lanza:We've reported on people lying. Bondi's been caught with misstatements about the very Epstein matter before. This is not some random thing. This is the DOJ's job to oversee, detain, punish people in the Bureau of prisons. That's what the entire federal prison system is. Now, this was not specific to just that moment. Across the hearing, we saw Bondi, who may still be fighting for her job given the many problems she's faced around the Epstein files and her own misstatements, trying a sort of Trumpian effort to dodge, to deflect, to bring up unrelated issues, to say things that she thinks are positive for the Trump administration but aren't really responsive to the questions, and at times just hurling insults.

10:52Bryan Lanza:How many of Epstein's co-conspirators have you indicted? How many perpetrators are you even investigating?

11:05First, you showed it.

11:08Pam Bondi:I find it. How many have you indicted? Excuse me. I'm going to answer the question.

11:12Bryan Lanza:Answer my question.

11:13Pam Bondi:No, I'm going to answer the question the way I want to answer the question. Your theatrics are ridiculous.

11:18Bryan Lanza:the way I asked. You can let her filibuster all day long, but not on our watch. Not on our time. No way. And I told you about that, Attorney General, before you started.

11:26Pam Bondi:You don't tell me. Oh, I did tell you because we saw what you did in the Senate. A lawyer. Not even a lawyer. I'm fucking quiet. Don't yell at me. I want the record to reflect that, you know, with this anti-Semitic culture right now, she voted against a resolution condemning. Oh. Oh. I just want to be clear. Do you want to go there, Attorney General? Or do you want to go there? Are you serious? I belong to the gentleman from South Carolina. To a woman who lost her grandfather in the Holocaust. I repaid my time. I repaid my time.

12:01Bryan Lanza:And on it went. If you see clips like that, you may understand why the news isn't going to run huge parts of that hearing. Because some of it, at just the level of being able to listen to it, became heated, if not at times nonsensical. So that's enough of the hearing for this moment. I want to make sure we keep an eye on what we're learning. There were references today, and we played some of them to the question asked, what about the other co-conspirators? And there were references to Lutnick and others exposed by these files. Those things matter more than the fireworks. I want to show you what we've gleaned from the files around the time the DOJ had Epstein as an indicted defendant because they had their inner circle identified.

12:43Bryan Lanza:Only one of these individuals, as everybody just about knows by now, Maxwell has been convicted. Others, as you see here, were pursued to some degree. Brunel indicted abroad, later died. Kahn subpoenaed, Indyke subpoenaed. His assistant Groff, seen as a potential co-conspirator, according to the DOJ at the time, never indicted. And Beller, you see there. What you're looking on your screen is from the files. This is not some external observation. This is what we now learn the DOJ was pursuing at the time. And the point raised in the hearing today and by many others is how few of these people have actually been pursued.

13:23Bryan Lanza:Is that because this is as far as the facts went? That would be okay. Or is it because they were interfered with or somehow stopped by the many power games and corruption that are also redolent in the files? Now, because the names appear in the files does not mean any of them have committed any criminal wrongdoing. But that is the start of the threads we're pulling on. Here you have a much wider group of names with the same caution. The fact that they're pursued or reviewed does not mean evidence of criminal wrongdoing. And this is a partial list. But I want to show you this tonight. We've made this, again, based on the files.

13:58Bryan Lanza:Upper left, you see Lutnick. The testimony that he's given about Epstein Island only came this week. Musk has been subpoenaed for this. The files showed more information about him interacting with Epstein than he'd admitted. Acosta, you may recall, ousted from the first Trump term over that sweetheart deal with Epstein. Clinton now subpoenaed and big debates over what the Congress may or may not learn there. You go through the rest of this list. These are not all household names, but they do show that both before the full file release And now as we continue to go through it, there are consequences, investigative pursuits, information continuing to come out.

14:38Bryan Lanza:That matters as much or more than the fire in the hearings and some of the politics surrounding it. Because there is a process, however long delayed, to try to get to the bottom of the information and the accountability for the people in these files. And as you see, so many of them turn out to be rich, powerful, well-connected men. Professor Murray is here. We're going to get into this when we return in 90 seconds.

15:11Bryan Lanza:We're following that absolutely fiery hearing with Attorney General Bondi today in the Congress. And amid the fireworks, there are still important investigative questions. We have seen from the new files for the first time what the DOJ was looking at. Here it is. The first time that they actually had Epstein in a sex trafficking case. These were the inner circle figures they identified. Some of that was questioned along with the fireworks today. I want to bring in Professor Melissa Murray. Your thoughts on the heat and the light today.

15:43Pam Bondi:Well, Ari, you said it was fiery. I would say it was bonkers. I don't think I have ever seen anything quite like this, certainly from a sitting attorney general. There were times when it felt a little bit more like a housewives reunion than congressional testimony. So leaving aside the questions of accountability that were genuinely left aside by the attorney general, it was a kind of shocking display of disrespect to Congress as a coordinate branch of government, an assertion of the president as someone to whom the Congress should be obedient to, to whom Pam Bondi is clearly very loyal to. And for the American people, there was no transparency.

16:25Pam Bondi:There was no accountability here. This was not an opportunity for the public to learn what happened. This was grandstanding in its best form.

Read the full transcript

16:33Bryan Lanza:Yeah, I mean, on her side, and yet the chart I'm showing is what we also learned from the files that we didn't have. The inner circle we have up here that shows you basically, as Nadler and others were asking today, whatever happened to these leads? The wider chart I want to show comes, as you rightly point out, despite the conduct of the DOJ and the attorney general. And I'm not here to tell everyone what the proper amount of accountability is, but I can report more accountability over time as more files have come out. Upper right, Larry Summers, who's been in a Democratic administration, paid some consequence.

17:17Bryan Lanza:The lower bar is a lot of financial elites and others. Lower left, Brad Karp, a top lawyer, ousted from one part of his position to Paul Weiss. And these are early days of the many millions of files. I guess that's the question tonight. How do you contrast that slow push the survivors have made for some accountability with the way the DOJ and Bondi continue to conduct themselves?

17:39Pam Bondi:Well, I mean, this is not the first time we've seen something like this. Ari, in the wake of January 6th, we saw state bar associations moving with greater alacrity to hold the individuals who were associated with the attack on the Capitol. For example, Rudy Giuliani was disbarred. That's where we got the majority of accountability. We saw a really slow effort to bring cases, whether they were civil cases or criminal cases, in the courts. Lots of reasons for that, obviously. In the case of the president and a criminal case, the Supreme Court was a real lag on that. But this is not unusual in a circumstance like this where you have a deeply politicized Department of Justice and a president that is controlling quite a lot of it to see the accountability coming from private institutions who are beholden to other interests, not just the president.

18:33Pam Bondi:Whether it's corporate interests or shareholders, they have other things they have to account for. And that makes them move perhaps more quickly than the wheels of justice.

18:43Bryan Lanza:Yeah, and you're making sort of a broader point that's not stitched into the rules, but is how this works, what you're calling their stakeholders. It's funny because in a better working system, you'd expect the formally democracy-related parts of our system to use democracy. And that seems to be failing in all sorts of ways, rule of law. And yet you're reminding us a type of democracy or at least outside pressure lands. And we're not talking about small issues. When you talk about an insurrection like Jan 6, those consequences or this level of sex trafficking, you're talking about the truly indefensible.

19:19Bryan Lanza:I want to play a moment where Pam Bondi said several things that were true. She talked about the history of this, which I've been careful to emphasize. The DOJ has problems across multiple administrations. And then she said the Dow is up. True, but as lawyers might say, relevance. Look at this exchange.

19:42Pam Bondi:None of them, none of them ask Merrick Garland over the last four years one word about Jeffrey Epstein. How ironic is that? You know why? Because Donald Trump, the Dow, the Dow right now is over, the Dow is over$50 ,000. I don't know why you're laughing.

20:08Bryan Lanza:now professor i just want to be clear we do have transcripts here in the newsroom she says none of them ask garland do you want to know why because donald trump the dow the dow right now is over that's that's the claim so i don't think we have to spend too long parsing it it's nonsensical but in her smattering of talking points she refers to the fact that under merrick Ireland, the DOJ did not have a plan for transparency for the survivors. They did not do better release or redactions, and they did have control of the files that. So I'm curious, again, asking you to do the hard work today. Some of us just watch Pam Bondi.

20:48Bryan Lanza:You have to explain her. How should we intelligently make sense of a bucket of points, some of which are true? If you say, is this a bipartisan failure? A lot of the evidence says yes. And some of which which are irrelevant, which is how do you fix it now?

21:05Pam Bondi:Yeah, I think that point was made a million times in the course of this hearing. Like, there's a lot of blame to go around here. There are a lot of people who look the other way in a number of different administrations. This scandal goes back years and years. So again, that's clear. That's true. Everyone knows it. But right now, Pam Bondi is the Attorney General of the United States, And the buck stops with her and this administration because of everything that has happened, because it is in the ball is in their court right now. And her answer is, I mean, not simply non-responsive, just absolutely unhinged.

21:44Pam Bondi:It seemed like the point was Donald Trump has a mandate to bring the economy to some kind of peak and he's doing that. Therefore, this accountability is unnecessary. The answers that people want over these questions don't matter. And that's simply not the case. And to the point about democracy failing here and democratic institutions failing here. Sure, that's true. This was Congress, the representative of the people, holding a bipartisan hearing where on both sides of the aisle, there were critics of Pamela Jo Bondi. And instead, what we saw was the attorney general of the United States, someone who is charged with upholding the law, the chief law enforcer of this nation.

22:27Pam Bondi:And she stonewalled. She stonewalled Congress. She stonewalled the people.

22:33Bryan Lanza:yeah no i think you put it clearly and you have a measured form of also making sure people understand this isn't normal this wasn't constructive she has an obligation right now if i may be so bold as to say she's a public servant and her salary that's not bold that's the truth ari she is a public servant that's the truth and as you say that didn't come across at all. And her problem is bigger than the political kind of circus she wanted to make it. She has a problem with the survivors. She has a problem, as you mentioned, with the legal experts and community there. She has a problem that her boss, Trump, has given a lot of this process over to Todd Blanche because she was caught in too many lies, even, quote unquote, for Trump.

23:19Bryan Lanza:So she's got a lot of problems. And as you point out, this effort to kind of go nuclear DEFCON bonkers, bananas 10 may not have done what she hopes, which is to make this look like a circus. There's a lot of people who've been following the receipts. Professor, as always, thanks for being here.

23:33Pam Bondi:She's got 99 problems, but accountability ain't one.

23:40Bryan Lanza:Boom. Couldn't have said it better. Thank you, Professor. We always love Professor Murray covering the ground on more than one level. I'm going to show folks by the end of the hour, Joe Rogan hitting Trump on gaslighting for Epstein. Epstein, I should say. Ice busting, a lot of different ice problems, but they've recently been busted for how they're defying judges' orders, and we're looking at accountability on that. But a story that is incredibly important, it shows how Trump wants to be Putin in ways that are illegal, that could get people around him indicted eventually, but that today involve a huge loss.

24:15Bryan Lanza:The guardrails hold, as we've been telling you about. That story's next.

24:22Pam Bondi:at DSW we ask the important questions like what shoes are you going to wear whether you're prepping for wedding season festival season or just planning the ultimate vacay the right shoes can make or break an RSVP so own the moment you've got big plans and we've got just the shoes at the perfect price of course get ready to get ready with designer shoe warehouse Head to your DSW store or dsw.com today and let us surprise you.

24:51Ari Melber:Close your eyes. Focus. Listen to work getting done with monday.com. Relax as AI does the manual work while your teams are aligned on a single source of truth. Feel the sensation of an AI work platform. So flexible and intuitive, it feels like it was built just for you. Notice, you're limitless. Now open your eyes, go to monday.com. Start for free and finally, breathe.

25:20Pam Bondi:Busy work weeks can leave you feeling drained. Prolon's five-day fasting mimicking diet rejuvenates you at the cellular level, lets you enjoy real food, and does not require an injection. Developed at USC's Longevity Institute, Prolon supports biological age reduction, metabolism, skin health, and fat loss when combined with proper exercise and nutrition. Get 15 % off plus a$40 bonus gift when you subscribe at ProlonLife.com slash Pandora promo.

25:50Bryan Lanza:An autogat tries to indict the opposition party for things they say, for their actual political speech. We report on those stories from abroad all the time, in Putin's Russia. Tonight we're reporting on that story here, even though Trump's effort to be Putin is failing badly and in public. A federal grand jury taking the rare step in Washington of refusing to allow a case moving forward that the Trump DOJ wanted to indict not one or two, but six different Democrats all at once. This comes from a plot Trump admitted of selective prosecution where you try to target opponents. That's usually unlawful.

26:28Bryan Lanza:He wanted to indict lawmakers for their protected free speech in a video. This rebuke is a blow to Donald Trump's probably unconstitutional revenge agenda, abusing the DOJ to go after people that he doesn't like, not based on evidence, but just because he wants to. The Times notes how it was a group of ordinary citizens that just rejected this new bid by Trump to label dissent as a criminal act. Some of the targeted lawmakers speaking out today. Every American should be appalled that Donald Trump and his political goons in the Justice

27:07Pam Bondi:Department have weaponized our Justice Department. This is a victory for the Constitution of the United States.

27:14Bryan Lanza:They want to scare not just us. They want to scare the American people. I'm not going to be intimidated. No one up here is going to be intimidated. This now adds six more losses to the many failed efforts by Trump to go after his opponents. This one coming from a very controversial figure, Jeanine Pirro, who is Trump's sort of political prosecutor or operative in D.C. We don't know whether the DOJ will, having been dealt this rebuke, drop it or try another way. The pressure has been mounting on Bondi because Trump complains about her that he wants more illegal prosecutions. All of this, though, also reflects what you heard those lawmakers mention.

27:55Bryan Lanza:The embattled guardrails of American democracy are strained, but some are working. And what you see in green on the tabulation we've shown you, citizen juries, they are standing up even as CEOs or elites have failed and buckled. It was grand jurors, regular citizens, who stopped this effort to indict these six people again over free speech. Congress has largely failed under Republicans to deal with any of this. For example, if it were exposed that a president was abusing the DOJ to try to detain and imprison opponents, you could imagine the demands for a special counsel or defunding or a united front as this type of effort is going at Congress itself.

28:42Bryan Lanza:And yet most Republicans are standing by. Some are now making noise. While we've shown efforts to indict opposition members before, now on this one, Republican Tom Tillis says this is political lawfare. The attorney general in that hearing we've been covering was also grilled on it today. You replace real prosecutors with counterfeit stooges who robotically do the president's bidding.

29:09Ari Melber:You have turned the People's Department of Justice into Trump's instrument of revenge.

29:14Pam Bondi:The new presidential directive was a politically motivated attack on civil society designed to silence those who disagree with the administration. Trump orders up prosecutions like pizza, and you deliver every time. What I will say is no one is above the law. Weaponization has ended.

29:35Bryan Lanza:Fact check, false. The Trump administration has pursued more political opponents, people of the opposite party, than any administration in American history in this amount of time. DOJ vet Leslie Caldwell is here next.

29:53Bryan Lanza:We're joined by Leslie Caldwell, who ran the Justice Department's criminal division. welcome your view of these rather astounding reports that the sitting president orchestrated an attempt to get six lawmakers in the opposition party indicted and a grand jury rejected it

30:11Pam Bondi:yeah i don't even know what to say about it ari it's it's really something that i never thought i would see in the united states of america but here we go and it's not the first time so it's quite shocking um the department of justice clearly has decided that it's going to be at the beck and call of the president, regardless whether there's any evidence against people they're going to try to present indictments, as they did in this case and also in the Comey and Letitia James cases. It's really quite extraordinary and it's really quite devastating for our country, quite frankly.

30:46Bryan Lanza:Based on your knowledge of the system, the grand jury is often a fait accompli, which is why we have the ham sandwich reference. But the reason for that is supposed to be that prosecutors are very careful that they amass evidence far above the minimal standard required at that step. What is your view of how this goes from here? If they are hell-bent on pursuing this, can they try to look at other grand juries in that or other districts?

31:20Pam Bondi:They can. And this is so I can't even begin to say how different this is than what the way the grand jury normally works. Normally, if you're doing an investigation that's of any complexity or high profile individuals, such as six members of Congress or the former FBI director, you want to make sure that you dot your I's and cross your T's when you're presenting your evidence. You want to make sure you have the evidence. You want to make sure that it's going to support your case. It's going to stand up scrutiny in court. Very seldom, I don't know what the exact process used in this particular case was, but very seldom in a case of any significance do you just make one presentation to the grand jury.

31:54Pam Bondi:Generally, it'll go on for weeks, if not months, and sometimes even years while cases are presented to the grand jury. if this was just presented in a single day in an effort to indict six members of Congress in a single day of presentation, that would be really extraordinary. Normally, an indictment of, for example, a member of Congress requires significant approvals within DOJ, and maybe the attorney general can just approve it saying this is what the president wants, but that's not how the process is supposed to work. Because you're supposed to make sure that everyone is being treated fairly and equally regardless of their political party or where they are on the spectrum or whether somebody despises them or hates them or not.

32:36Pam Bondi:And I think part of the point here, honestly, is I don't think the DOJ cares whether it wins these cases. They just want to do the president's bidding. And they're not going to win these cases because they have no evidence. And juries are not going to just be bowled over into convicting somebody or even indicting somebody in the case of this matter.

32:59Bryan Lanza:Well, part of this is intimidation. We showed on our chart the evidence that some business leaders and others seem very cowed. They seem to be caving about things that they five or 10 years ago had said the opposite on. We showed some of the members of Congress here, many of whom are veterans, who said they're not afraid, they won't be intimidated. They recognize that's the effort. And they've shown courage on behalf of our country, on behalf of all of us. So I don't think there's much room to doubt that they will press on. Congressman Crowe, and this is the comparison we made here, and you citizen juries are holding up their end in green.

33:34Bryan Lanza:My last question to you, Leslie, is Congressman Crowe is demanding that the DOJ maintain all the records and materials. Do they then have that legal obligation? And how could that be used in a fair or just process in the future to review whether lines were crossed?

33:50Pam Bondi:So I don't know if there's an obligation to maintain the grand jury materials indefinitely when there's no indictment in a case, but should they ever want to bring another matter against any of these people, they really should maintain these records because they could be exculpatory, for example. my guess is that whoever the assistant u.s attorney or whoever was the presenter to the to the grand jurors may well have misinstructed them regarding the law the applicable law or there may be other omissions uh it appears that in the for example the james comey indictment there was misinstruction from the then u.s attorney about the law and about the fifth amendment and james comey's ability i think she's something like he can explain that at the appropriate time, not realizing or acknowledging that he has a right to not explain that under the Fifth Amendment.

34:39So I think there are probably errors in there.

34:42Pam Bondi:It's probably insufficient evidence, as the grand jurors apparently concluded. So I think it would be foolish not to keep it. And I think that it could surface at some future point if they ever try to do anything with this case again.

34:57Bryan Lanza:Understood. Leslie Caldwell, thank you. Always appreciate it. When we come back, we're going to show you how Donald Trump's Epstein problem is spreading on the right. Joe Rogan, mad about the lies.

35:13Pam Bondi:You know that thing where you get an amazing pair of shoes at a really great price and want to tell everyone about it? Yeah, so do we. Here at Designer Shoe Warehouse, we'll give you something to brag about. Like the latest styles from brands you love. Or the trends everyone's obsessing over. or shoes that make you feel like, well, you. So go ahead, show off a little. Find shoes that get you at prices that get your budget. Head to your DSW store or DSW.com today. DSW, let us surprise you. This is a Monday.com ad. TheSameMonday.com helping people worldwide getting work done faster and better. TheSameMonday.com designed for every team and every industry.

35:54Pam Bondi:TheSameMonday.com with built-in AI, scaling your work from day one the same monday.com that your team will actually love using the same monday.com with an easy and intuitive setup go to monday.com and try it for free yes the same monday.com busy work weeks can leave you feeling drained prolon's five-day fasting mimicking diet rejuvenates you at the cellular level lets you enjoy real food and does not require an injection developed at USC's Longevity Institute, Prolon supports biological age reduction, metabolism, skin health, and fat loss when combined with proper exercise and nutrition. Get 15 % off plus a$40 bonus gift when you subscribe at prolonlife.com slash Pandora promo.

36:41Bryan Lanza:We are in serious times in America, including intense national clashes about the role and activities of our federal government under President Trump. On this program, we've invited and heard from many members of the government, Borders are Tom Homan, Stephen Miller. We currently have requests out to many members of the administration. We are in dialogue with them so they know the door is open. And right now, continuing with that effort, we are going to hear from two different perspectives. New York Times columnist, longtime journalist Michelle Goldberg, who's an MSNOW analyst, and Brian Lanza, who worked on Donald Trump campaigns in 2016 and 2024 and is now a partner at Muir Republic Affairs.

37:19Bryan Lanza:Excuse me, Brian, hello. How are you? Hello. Great. How are you doing? Good. I just have you. I mentioned Michelle, but I have you. I wanted to start with the concern on the right about the gaslighting. As Joe Rogan puts it, misstatements by Bondi have been established. What some people call, of course, some in some cases lies. Here's Joe Rogan's concerns.

37:44Pam Bondi:Oh, FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn't running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men file show. So there you go. Oh, there you go. That's the gaslightiest gaslighting I've ever heard in my life. Well, what do they think is going on? Just a bunch of fun, a bunch of guys hanging out.

38:04Bryan Lanza:That's Rogan, who has been very supportive of many things, Donald Trump, which is relevant to his concern about about accuracy now. and we have Michelle's camera good, so I wanted to update, but she's now here and can hear you, Brian. Why does Donald Trump and Pam Bondi and the DOJ have such a problem releasing the full Epstein files, telling the truth about them? That was on display again today. And why keep someone in the cabinet who lied about going to Epstein Island and now only admits it when the files are out?

38:34Ari Melber:Well, first of all, thank you for having me. Listen, I'd say the first thing regarding Epstein, what started off as a small brush fire has turned into an inferno. You've seen these FCs files in the process of potentially taking down a government in Europe. There's certainly a test of leadership for the prime minister in the UK as a result of these things. And then the brush fire has spread transnational. Here in the US, this is more than just a drip, drip, drip. These allegations, this evidence that exists is jarring and it's shocking. It hurts the nerves. You know, I'm, you know, I'm confused myself at how sloppy this process has been.

39:13Ari Melber:I think we've heard, you know, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles talk about how this has been bundled by the Justice Department. And the result is that bundling, you know, we have been stumbling along, you know, for nearly a year. And in my view, you know, and the perspective I have, there's really no winning in this situation. There's not going to be enough information that will ever be released that will satisfy everybody. and the way this is, they've sort of self-weaponized the issue against themselves that almost at every turn, there's even more and more suspicion. And so, you know, in my view, you know, when it comes to media strategy, when it comes to times of crisis, you try to resolve these things as fast as possible and stop the drip, drip, drip.

39:54Ari Melber:I think in Trump's view, it's just in his administration view, I think they think they benefit from the opposite of just drip, drip, drip for every day. And, you know, more information becomes more jarring. Now, I will say this, There are a lot of, you know, you know, bad actors in this. The vast majority of them have actually been from the Democratic Party. You've had Larry Summers, who's had a resign from Harvard.

40:16Bryan Lanza:We showed that we had Larry, we had Larry Summers on a chart up earlier tonight. Happy to get into that. But I did want to get an answer from you. You say they bungled it. If you don't think it's good to go to Epstein Island and you don't think that's a good idea and you work for Trump, why keep someone around who went to Epstein Island and lied about it?

40:35Ari Melber:Yeah, I think the line is, the candor is the issue that ultimately Ludnik has to have with his constituency, which is the U.S. Senate. But as for, you know, him going to the island, I mean, you make it sound as if he went down with a bunch of other men. He went with his family. He went with his wife. He went with his kids. So his association with the island isn't tainted as others' association with the island is where they have these grand parties.

40:58Bryan Lanza:And then I want to get Michelle a turn, but just to drill this in the attorney general was asked about it today. You think Donald Trump is fine. It's you worked for him twice. It's fine to keep someone who went to the island under the conditions you mentioned, but lied about it up until the files busted him. You think that's fine?

41:14Ari Melber:No, listen, I think with Donald Trump, you know, I think what this administration does in these situations is they always, you know, you know, rally around the team. And because primarily because they're never going to let the media get this win of a Republican scalp of an administration scalp. So I think this administration will tolerate a lot more than previous administrations just to prove that the media is not driving the narrative, that they're driving the narrative. And I think they've proven that time after time. Let me give Michelle a turn.

41:42Bryan Lanza:Michelle, go ahead.

41:44Pam Bondi:Well, I don't think it's about the media driving the narrative. It's about the public driving the narrative. And they kind of are showing over and over again that they will not respond to public outrage. It's why we see in democracies that are still functioning. I mean, I think Great Britain is a great example. You look at the fact that the prime minister of England might have to resign. He's not in the files. He might have to resign because he appointed an ambassador who is entangled with Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, that's the kind of accountability you have in a country that still has feedback mechanisms between public outrage and government power.

42:27Pam Bondi:And what Donald Trump has done, I think, by capturing the Republican Party so effectively is severed those mechanisms. It doesn't matter what the public thinks on many of these issues. It doesn't matter. You know, I mean, the media is part of that, but the media is obviously not alone in driving this story. What Donald Trump stands for is impunity, and that's why he will protect people, you know, who kind of clearly in any other sort of an administration would be rendered unfit by, you know, put aside whatever the files show or don't show about their relationship by just the forthright lying about it.

43:07Bryan Lanza:and brian while i have you here the immigration clashes are huge uh several trump officials made false statements in trying to defend uh these tactics we have a fact check i want to show that to you you won't see ice agents rolling through the parking lots and just snatching someone up

43:34Pam Bondi:An American citizen shouldn't carry or shouldn't feel the need to carry.

43:37Bryan Lanza:Let me tell you what.

43:41Ari Melber:You have a little database of Americans? No, sir, we don't.

43:45Bryan Lanza:I can assure you there is no database that's tracking genocide citizens.

43:48Pam Bondi:Yeah. Why are you taking my information down? Because we have a nice little database.

43:54Bryan Lanza:You worked at a Trump campaign that vowed going after immigrant criminals, but not this. Have they gone too far? Should the president apologize to the Americans killed in this overreach?

44:07Ari Melber:I come from California, so I know the works of anti-immigrant rhetoric that has hurt the Republican Party. I think the policy of mass deportation of illegal aliens makes sense. I think the voters want that. I think the process of it has been sloppy. The process has been jarring when you've seen some of these videos. And it is a warning to Republicans. You don't have to look far to see the example of all Latinos. Look at California. I mean, the Republican Party was a thriving party in California prior to 187. 187, by the way, had majority support of Latinos in it when it initially passed. And then the tactics afterwards turned off people.

44:49Ari Melber:So, you know, I've certainly expressed concern to my Republican brethren that we have to be careful in this process. It's good to target illegal aliens. It's good to start with criminals. But when you get through this process of now U.S. citizens are being involved, now people are having to carry additional paperwork. I think that does have a negative effect on the policies that at some point the Latino community has supported.

45:13Bryan Lanza:Yeah, we ran over on time, so I'd love to have you both back together, frankly. and we had a little tech difficulty with Brian and Michelle. Thank you.

45:20Ari Melber:Subscribe to MSNOW Premium on Apple Podcasts for early access, ad-free listening, and bonus content to all of MSNOW's original podcasts, including the chart-topping series The Best People with Nicole Wallace, Why Is This Happening, Main Justice, and more. Plus, new episodes of all your favorite MSNOW shows ad-free and ad-free listening to all of Rachel Maddow's original series, including Rachel Maddow Presents Burn Order. Subscribe to MS Now Premium on Apple Podcasts.

From the publisher

February 11, 2026; 6pm; Trump Attorney General Pam Bondi was grilled, under oath, about the Epstein files. Plus, new signs of pushback against Trump's attempted power grabs as a federal grand jury in DC refuses to indict six Democrats on charges of seditious conspiracy. Senior Advisor for President Trump's 2024 campaign, Bryan Lanza, joins MS NOW's Ari Melber.

To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from The Beat with Ari Melber

All 321 episodes
Congress Spars with Bondi Over Epstein FilesThe Beat with Ari Melber · 42 min
Listen in VO