In short
The episode covers two main stories: (1) a Senate hearing on the ongoing U.S. open-ended war with Iran, including costs, casualties, lack of congressional authorization, and no clear exit strategy; and (2) fallout from Trump DOJ subpoenas targeting New York Times reporters and even their family members, with a judge temporarily halting parts of the subpoenas.
Guests
- Reverend Al Sharpton (MSNBC/MSNOW Politics Nation host; president/founder of National Action Network).
- Molly Jong-Fast (MSNBC/MSNOW analyst; New York Times contributing writer; host of Fast Politics Podcast).
- Michael Grinbaum (New York Times media correspondent; author of Empire of the Elite).
- Master P (No Limit Records founder; New Orleans native; Cash Money No Limit tour partner).
Key claims/examples
- War: $70B more requested; $37B already spent; 17 Americans dead, 100 troops injured; lawmakers challenge shifting “timeline” claims (e.g., “4–5 weeks” vs later dates).
- Ceasefire: reported options include a 10-day ceasefire to reopen the Strait or a broader U.S.-Israel campaign; experts say bombing won’t achieve total victory without ground war.
- Media subpoenas: judge halts phone-record subpoenas; reporters served Friday night after a Qatari Air Force One security story; subpoenas reportedly include spouses/mother; Times alleges intimidation/chilling effect; DOJ cites national security but details are vague.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOAnalyzing the Senate Hearing on Iran
1:15 to 8:12
Discussion on the implications of the Senate hearing regarding the Iran war.
“This is one of the most significant reviews of the ongoing open-ended war with Iran that the president did not seek Congress's authority or approval for.”
Expert Analysis on War Policies
8:12 to 14:00
Insightful commentary from guests about the war strategies and political fallout.
“What I'll tell you tonight from observing this hearing, and we're about to bring in our expert guests, is this is one of those times where the substance is also driving the politics.”
Midterms and American Sentiment
14:00 to 16:36
Understanding how the midterms are influenced by economic factors and public sentiment.
“What do you think about how that calendar is in the minds of the American people going towards the midterms?”
Trump's Wartime Presidency
17:33 to 22:48
Analyzing Trump's presidency in the context of ongoing wars and public perception.
“You said at the start of the war, it would be four or five weeks.”
Media and Legal Challenges
22:48 to 28:00
Exploring the legal challenges faced by journalists due to Trump's actions.
“We're doing a lot of fish things tonight.”
Media Ownership and Trump's Influence
28:00 to 30:38
Discussion on Trump's remarks about media ownership and its implications.
“and prominent media figures, as we can see there.”
New York Times Subpoenas and Press Freedom
30:38 to 38:22
Exploration of the New York Times' legal battle against subpoenas from the DOJ.
“And we're going to continue to report both about Air Force One and on the circumstances around the government use of prosecutorial power to intimidate the independent news media.”
RFK Jr.'s Controversies and Political Fallout
38:22 to 42:00
Discussion of RFK Jr.'s actions and their implications on public health and politics.
“That book out on paperback this week is Empire of the Elite.”
Food Business Discussions and Inflation Impact
42:00 to 46:06
Discussion on food preferences, inflation, and its effects on consumer behavior.
“I mean, I feel both ways because, of course, you got to be safe.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Exterior Remodels Inner Monologues. Brought to you by Power. The house looks good. Like, really good. That siding? Stunning. The roof? Elevated. Windows? I mean, wow. The process? Smooth. The neighbors? Jealous. Choose Power Home Remodeling and remodel how you think about remodeling. Schedule your free quote on windows, siding, roofing, and doors at PowerHomeRemodeling.com. Power. Our work shows. This is Stute calling about your overdue account balance. You owe$9 ,000,$17.86. How would you like to pay? That was the sound of Stute, the AI coworker that collects your cash for you. Stute's collecting over$200 million a month for its customers autonomously.
0:49Got cash stuck in overdue invoices? Get Stute and start collecting in days. Go to stute.ai. That's S-T-U-U-T dot A-I today. Welcome to The Beat. We are picking up exactly where MSNOW's coverage and Nicole Wallace's discussion there had just left off because we have just seen the ending of this Senate hearing with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and General Dan Cain. This is one of the most significant reviews of the ongoing open-ended war with Iran that the president did not seek Congress's authority or approval for. And yet we know he still needs Congress's money, which is, of course, at the end of the day, your money.
1:32And that's to continue this. This was Hegseth's first time there in months. He wants the money to pay for this war. It's about$70 billion more. Pentagon is, of course, doing their best. And as many experts and veterans have pointed out, the Pentagon, the military, the people actually carrying out the war do what they are told by the president. That is the system. And yet on the political side, this war that the president did not get approval for or build support for is now languishing. And you can see that in the hearing. If you've been watching MSNOW, you've probably seen some of the exchanges, which included some tough ones with Republicans.
2:11We have a budget issue here. It is an urgent budget shortfall, as some have put it. Lines of funding would run out within weeks, the Washington Post reports, and that's from the Iran war. That is just one way to describe the cost. When you get into the human cost, it's already 17 Americans dead, 100 troops injured in the last two weeks. These are real people. And I will note, having followed along with the hearing today, that many of the lawmakers in both parties discussed and paid tribute to that human cause, to the people actually fighting this war. If there was agreement on something today, it would be, of course, a tribute to those people, Americans, who are braving the war.
2:56But the second thing we saw was some unity on the idea that this is not going well. Republicans traditionally, of course, softer on that, saying it in certain ways, sometimes diplomatically, sometimes almost in the mode of excuses on behalf of Trump. But you didn't hear a lot of voices today saying that there's a clear objective, a clear plan or a clear exit path. Hegseth also, because he's under oath, had to give up a little more factual transparency than I would say he or other officials in the administration are known for. And so he said straight up something that's pretty unpopular when you think about the high prices, cost of gas, people having to change or cancel summer plans because everything's more expensive right now.
3:33He mentioned the war has already run up a tab of$37 billion. Here's some of those exchanges today. What has actually been achieved? We hear a different rationale for this war every few days. Your fallback to the Biden administration is just a very, very obvious excuse for what I think is probably, as you described, so often gross negligence. At what point do you stop asking Americans to foot the bill for a war they don't support? Well, Senator, I obviously don't agree with your characterization. I think your first strategic mistake was to not consult the American people in Congress and make a clear case for the reasons behind this war.
4:18I think the American people to deserve a definition of what it means to win in Iran. President Trump has, by any objective measure, failed to achieve his goals. Guys, we need straight answers. We need straight answers. That last voice, Republican Senator Kennedy, basically all but accusing the Pentagon and the administration of not giving straight answers today as well as in the lead-up to today. if you watch these type of hearings or their excerpts and you're watching the news, so you're probably familiar, you might have noticed that there was a seriousness, a sobriety, even at times a kind of a hardheaded kind of calm energy, if you want to put it that way, in the room, because this is not some other political thing, even by the lower standards of the MAGA era and some of the people that Trump has put in charge of major operations who still seem like they're making, you know, internet content or trolling or want to make points on social media.
5:17This was a serious hearing about a serious topic. And Secretary Hegseth, who is presiding over a very unpopular war and a lot of questions, I will say as an observer, he struck a more serious tone, at least in style, than many other Trump officials. And perhaps they know that this is only going to get worse and look worse if they do anything to minimize what I mentioned, the loss of life, the unpopularity around the country, and what are frankly bleak choices ahead. Anyone in this country who might be against the war isn't rooting for demise. They're rooting for this thing to end. But how? We are reading reports that Trump is considering two options now that his ceasefire is basically broken.
6:00One would be a new 10-day ceasefire to just reopen the strait. You'll recall that would be still trying to get back to where we started before he launched this war. Option two, reportedly, would be a massive joint military campaign with Israel to force Tehran's capitulation. Now that's Axios' reporting. The Post says U.S. intel believe that strikes are unlikely to move Iran and that it's unlikely to soften its negotiating position because of U.S. military action. Another way to say that is what commanders have said throughout and what Kane mentioned today. The United States has extraordinary bombing capabilities, but it is a matter of strategic reality and modern military history that the United States has never run a bombing campaign or an air war to total victory.
6:53That is to say, if you want to take out a major country, you end up having a ground war. That's what we had in Iraq. Very few people think that's where we should go. So option two, if it is just more and more bombs, according to, again, the current general in charge under the Trump administration, even by his testimony today, that's not going to solve this thing. Now, Republicans are worried about the blowback. Many Republicans say they're now boxed in. The Times reporting the collapse of the ceasefire presents them with a political worst-case scenario months before the midterms. Politico quotes one ex-Republican saying this whole thing has become a persistent dark cloud over the whole GOP.
7:32Here's what we were hearing recently on Fox. The clock is ticking for President Trump to get out of this war before voters head to the polls. He promised to keep us out of endless wars or unsatisfactory wars. And now he's in one. It's making a lot of Republicans nervous. It's already, as we know, unpopular. Unpopular, nervous, bracing for a rout. We began with the substance, the lives lost, the cost, the way this war was launched without congressional authorization, something that, after enough time, can become a violation of the War Powers Act and other limits on the executive's power. That's the substance.
8:13What I'll tell you tonight from observing this hearing, and we're about to bring in our expert guests, is this is one of those times where the substance is also driving the politics. Rare, I know. But the substance, the problems with no exit ramp, the problems with Donald Trump's approach to the war, the lies or mistakes he has made thus far because he said many things that aren't true about the duration and the exit and the U.S. strategic position, all of those substantive failures are now stoking a political failure for the Republican Party that may explain the very different tenor we saw in this relatively tough hearing today.
8:51I want to bring in Reverend Al Sharpton, host of Politics Nation here at MSNOW, president and founder of the National Action Network, and New York Times contributing writer and MSNOW analyst Molly Jong-Fast. Welcome to both of you. Rev, I mentioned that because we got a lot of news viewers who follow this stuff closely, and they're used to some, frankly, clownish hearings. This one was pretty serious. It had Republicans also asking some at least medium-tough questions. What does that tell us about where we're headed? It tells us that I think that the Republicans all the way up to the White House realizes they're in more serious trouble than they thought and that the performative kind of glib way of dancing through a hearing was not on the table today at all, which shows they feel the vulnerability.
9:40I mean, when you are now back with rising gas prices again and other things, they can't play with this. Their constituents are talking to them. Their candidates in midterms are talking to them. When you have a Senator Kennedy from Louisiana implying that they're not telling the whole truth, nothing but the truth, so help me God, then they know this is no time to clown. You have to really try to appear serious. The problem is that the serious stuff is damaging, no matter how they try and verbalize it or go around it. The facts are the facts and the facts speak very ill of them that had no strategy in the first place.
10:24And that I really think people forget Trump came in this war when he saw the Iranian people marching and he thought the government was going to topple. and they'd ride in and help push them over the cliff. The people already brought them there. It didn't happen. They killed the Supreme Leader. They went through all of that. It did not destabilize them. They totally underestimated and had bad intel on who they were fighting. And now they don't know what to do. Yeah. And the questioning from, say, Kennedy out to Democrat Murray, Mali was, don't tell us the war is won or Iran is boxed in completely when we can see them projecting strength.
11:08I mean, it just becomes and it has echoes of Vietnam or other times where governments, Vietnam, you had both parties over time involved in line in the country about that, Democrats and Republicans. Here it happens to be one party, it happens to be the Trump Republican White House doing it, but don't tell us that they're decimated and cowering when look at how they can project force. This was an exchange here. I want to play with Senator Murray. Take a look. On April 8th, you said, and I quote, their missile program is functionally destroyed, launchers, production facilities, and existing stockpiles depleted and decimated and almost completely ineffective.
11:50Mr. Secretary, Iran has been firing at U.S. military bases in the region and ships for the last week. How is it possible if their capabilities were, quote, functionally destroyed three months earlier, as she claimed, for them to be doing this now? Senator, Iran is at the weakest point militarily it has ever been in in the past decade. I mean, that's the problem with having a secretary of war who's also a weekend cable news anchor, is that he talks a lot. And what these Democrats did, which I think was effective, was that they brought up things he had said previously and then the contradictions that had happened since then.
12:34And there's so much public record of him saying one thing and then another and even Trump, too. But I think what's so interesting about this and so important is when you think about the Vietnam War and the regulation, the legislation that came after that, that post-Nixon anti-corruption War Powers Act that was meant to prevent something that's happened now, which is these endless wars with no buy-in from Congress. And this Congress has centered this administration on that already. Yeah. And Rev, sometimes with Trump, to fact check him, you say, oh, we got to go check the data. Military and foreign policy issues can be complicated.
13:14You got to check, oh, what is the state of the Iranian military, right? And what are the reliable sources for that? But with the lies about the timeline, all you need is a calendar. It's very easy to fact check this. We have here starting March 1st, we'll put this up, four to five weeks was the claim. March 7th, a little while. Then we got very soon. Then you got the Vietnam-esque moving of the goalposts. Actually, tough talk as long as it's necessary. April 5th, days, not weeks. Well, if you have a calendar rev, we are more than days away from April 5th now. April 15th, very soon. May, talking victory.
13:52June, close to having a deal. That deal, of course, came and went. they're at war again right now, and some say they've never really stopped being at war because the ceasefire deal didn't hold. What do you think about how that calendar is in the minds of the American people going towards the midterms? There's only one way the calendar could, in my opinion, say to the American people is that we are being misled consistently, and the more we're being misled, the more they are taking us for fools. You know, I had an old friend that had an expression of fish wouldn't get caught if they kept his mouth shut.
14:25I think that the reason that they... Never heard that one. Yeah, well, neither did Donald Trump. Because if they had not talked so much, they wouldn't be caught where they are now. They are being ensnalled by their own words, not the Democrats, not what somebody leaked. This wasn't in somebody's book. They've said it on mic, on camera, over and over again. They set different dates, different goal posts, and they were not able to reach what they announced. When you look at groceries, which fits into this, and gas, Americans' feelings, would you describe the cost of groceries as affordable or unaffordable?
15:05Now, that's one of those questions they ask, not can you afford groceries? Some people have the money for the month. They have their budget set. But a vast majority, which statistically includes a lot of Trump voters, Molly, at this juncture say they would describe it now unaffordable. Yeah. And you have gas again for over four dollars a gallon. And that is the thing is, even if you're not completely read in on the nuances of the Iran war, you have to fill up your tank with gas. And so you go to the gas station and gas is more expensive. And that is just the lived experience of voters. And we all know you cannot tell voters that their lived experience isn't real or isn't happening.
15:45And Republicans are cruising into the midterms. We're in the summer travel time and people are trying to fill up their car with gas and they can't afford it. Yeah. Really a bruising day for the administration on the Hill. Rev Al and Molly are with me. We're going to do our short break, 90 seconds, and continue with our great guests.
16:06Discover Scottsdale, Arizona, a premier destination offering unparalleled relaxation. Experience exceptional service in world-class resorts. Indulge in high-end shopping. Then explore the scenic walkability of historic Old Town. Unwind with a masterfully curated dinner alfresco. Then take in an artisanal craft cocktail at an exclusive rooftop lounge. This is luxury, blended perfectly with adventure and refinement. Start planning your vacation now at Experiencescottsdale.com. Exterior Remodels, Inner Monologues, brought to you by Power. The house looks good. Like, really good. That siding? Stunning.
16:46The roof? Elevated. Windows? I mean, wow. The process? Smooth. The neighbors? Jealous. Choose Power Home Remodeling and remodel how you think about remodeling. Schedule your free quote on windows, siding, roofing, and doors at powerhomeremodeling.com. Power. Our work shows. This is Stute calling about your overdue account balance. You owe$9 ,000,$17.86. How would you like to pay? That was the sound of Stute, the AI coworker that collects your cash for you. Stute's collecting over$200 million a month for its customers autonomously. Got cash stuck in overdue invoices? Get Stute and start collecting in days.
17:31Go to stute.ai. That's S-T-U-U-T dot A-I today.
17:42Come around, Mr. President. You said at the start of the war, it would be four or five weeks. Well, you keep betting, man. This is a far bigger job that we're doing. If you look at it, after a week and a half, not four weeks, a week and a half, two weeks, we stop them from probably. But I don't want to have the word probably. Donald Trump struggling with the timeline that hung over the difficult hearing today for Secretary Haig says, as I mentioned, questioned by Republicans, Democrats alike at times pressed on the timeline. Rev. This is Trump as a wartime president. This is not Venezuela, where whatever you want to call it, I would say in all fairness that it was an act of war, and we wouldn't look kindly on a country coming in and trying to take any of our leaders.
18:29But ultimately, the administration avoided a war. So they went in, they had an act of war, but the ensuing government kind of let it be. This is not that. We are at war, much longer than the president said, and this is him as a wartime president, your view? This is him at a wartime president that got elected saying we would not have wars, that he would not have engagements. So it's not only that he's the wartime president, it's the opposite of what he promised the American people. That's A. B is he cannot show where our interests are being served. The American people are the ones paying the higher gas prices.
19:06The American people are seeing other things increase in terms of the consumer goods and necessities they need. So, one, you told us there would not be a war. Even if I was going to adjust to you, Mr. President, because you give me a good reason, you haven't given me a good reason. And the timeline you announced keeps going further and further and further away. So how much do you expect even the most staunch Republican or MAGA person to take before they understand? I've run out of paper on these timelines and I can't afford the gas. You know, Molly, on the politics, I'd love to go big picture with you because, you know, what's interesting is we spend a lot of time looking ahead at elections.
19:51But it's very clear that we rarely know what the big issue is until right close to it or during the election. Right. The idea that a year or two out, you know. So I was thinking, you know, in 16 leading up to it, there were all sorts of different ideas. The truth is that Trump won the Electoral College and went a long way on the wall, immigration or whatever you want to call MAGA division, which a year out wasn't what either party thought that race was going to be about. 2020 ended up being about COVID. Right. And the public seeing Donald Trump as a failure on that crisis. 24, where a lot of Trump's critics thought that should have been about continuing a restoration of the post-Trump era.
20:34They wanted it to be a post-Trump era. Or that he was disqualified by his indictments and other failures. Ended up being, and there's a lot of data on this, about prices. That's what that race really boiled down to for a lot of Americans. Could the 26 midterms, instead of being about ICE or Trump or corruption or all these other things, could they end up being about this war? I mean, I think they certainly could be. And remember, the prices have to do with the war, because Donald Trump said in 2024, I'm going to make things cheaper for you. And people were like, great. I mean, that is that, you know, he once again got elected on economic populism because remember in 2016, he was like, you're being cheated.
21:21I am for you. She is for them, which was a similar message, you know, about other stuff, but a similar message in 24. So I do think that this war affects prices. And remember, we have no historical precedent for someone who runs for president on two things, right? I'm going to end foreign wars. We're not going to have any more foreign wars. And I'm going to make things cheaper. And what does he do? He immediately gets into numerous foreign wars and things because of those wars become more expensive. And let's not forget, I remember as a teenager when I started getting very active, one of the most solid presidents in the United States history that in terms of the things I cared about was Lyndon Johnson.
22:08Did the Voting Rights Act, did the Civil Rights Act, did open housing. What brought him down was the Vietnam War. And the same people that cheered him on were marching in the streets against the Vietnam War. One, because we didn't want war. And two, we didn't see what we were gaining. And every day we're seeing more and more. So it happens on either side of the party. These kinds of things could be your debacle. If Lyndon Johnson could not run again after all he did for civil rights and other things because of a war, I think that whomever the Republicans bring behind Trump is going to have a hard road to travel.
22:47It's like they always say where Rev and I grew up. Fish don't have to learn how to swim. They're born in the water. I like that one. You like that? Can we make that stick? Yes. We're doing a lot of fish things tonight. Do you have a fish aphorism for us? Fish got to swim. Birds got to fly. Something. Something. It's something. Yeah. I'll workshop it. The interesting thing about Rev's aphorism is the fish usually, I believe, opens its mouth because it thinks it's hunting. Yeah. So it's trying to get the—and then it finds out that the fly was actually— They found out they're the hunted. They're the hunted.
23:25So there's something there. That's right. Okay. Well— A warfender. Yeah. We like to learn together. Rev, Molly, thanks to both of you. We have a lot coming up in the show, including the heat on RFK Jr. and alleged election meddling. The DOJ is in crisis because several of Trump's legal demands are hitting those brick walls we've told you about. The system is under strain, but at times it is holding and working. And that brings us to a very special guest. We have seen the New York Times reporters really break a lot of key stories in ways that have upset Donald Trump. We recently had two of those authors on from the Times.
23:58Well, now he is subpoenaing not only Times reporters, but their families running into problems in court. and I have a New York Times reporter next.
24:12Discover Scottsdale, Arizona, a premier destination offering unparalleled relaxation. Experience exceptional service in world-class resorts. Indulge in high-end shopping. Then explore the scenic walkability of historic Old Town. Unwind with a masterfully curated dinner alfresco. Then take in an artisanal craft cocktail at an exclusive rooftop lounge. This is luxury. blended perfectly with adventure and refinement. Start planning your vacation now at experiencescottsdale.com. Exterior Remodels Inner Monologues, brought to you by Power. The house looks good, like really good. That siding, stunning.
24:52The roof, elevated. Windows, I mean, wow. The process, smooth. The neighbors, jealous. Choose Power Home Remodeling and remodel how you think about remodeling. Schedule your free quote on windows, siding, roofing, and doors at powerhomeremodeling.com. Power. Our work shows. This is Stute calling about your overdue account balance. You owe$9 ,000,$17.86. How would you like to pay? That was the sound of Stute, the AI coworker that collects your cash for you. Stute's collecting over$200 million a month for its customers autonomously. Got cash stuck in overdue invoices? Get Stute and start collecting in days.
25:37Go to Stute.ai. That's S-T-U-U-T.ai today.
25:49We are tracking the growing fallout and legal pushback to Donald Trump's efforts to get the DOJ to target and allegedly harass journalists and even their families. Now, a judge has temporarily halted subpoenas that were seeking New York Times reporters' phone records. The subpoenas, we've learned, also targeted spouses and the mother of one of these journalists. And that matters a lot because if there was not a valid good faith legal reason to do so, if that was rather part of an effort at collective punishment or harassing the family members, that itself could be illegal. Now, Thursday, there'll be a hearing on this.
Read the full transcript
26:27The Times says the subpoenas are a bad faith effort to intimidate the journalists and chill their ability to report on the administration. The DOJ, for its part, says that the subpoenas are about Times reports on presidential security and that they have a valid purpose. The Times reports that the subpoenas even came before the security story about Donald Trump's gifted jet. Two of the subpoenas seek records beginning on January 1st, 2026, they write, long before the events that are purportedly the basis of the Department of Justice's investigation. And the prosecutor in charge of these subpoenas, Jay Clayton, just testifying before Congress last week.
27:12Did you or anybody at the Southern District of New York have conversations with anybody at the White House or the Justice Department in Washington, D.C., before you issued those subpoenas? I can say it this way without getting into the investigation. The protocols require consultation. Did anybody in Washington, D.C. suggest to you or anybody on your team that you should issue subpoenas in this case? I'm not going to get into the details. What I can tell you is that we followed those procedures. So that is testimony about following procedures in general, and that speaks to at least some communication about this.
27:49The wider effort, though, by Donald Trump to go after critics and his perceived enemies may undercut their ability to make these subpoenas stick in court. Trump and his Justice Department targeting all kinds of media organizations and prominent media figures, as we can see there. And all of this is happening alongside major shifts in media. The Ellison family is trying to get its merger approved so it would actually take control of CNN and other properties. The effort did hit a small legal snag. We should note a federal judge has paused the merger for two weeks pursuant to states suing to try to block it entirely.
28:31And as Trump's DOJ goes after the New York Times reportedly because he didn't like their stories even when true, He's also been very public about what in any other era would be seen as itself a confession or a scandal That he views the people taking over these companies, the Ellisons getting CNN, for example As a chance to have a good owner change the editorial coverage
29:00You have some good companies bidding on it I think the people that have run CNN for the last long period of time are a disgrace. I think it's imperative that CNN be so. The fake news like CNN, like the New York Times and like others, have abused our people. Wait a minute. Be quiet. Have abused our people so badly. And you should be ashamed of yourself. CNN does such false reporting. But now they have new ownership. So maybe it'll straighten it out. I doubt it. But it's hard to straighten garbage out. it's hard to straighten garbage out. Well, that's his opinion. The new ownership he referred to have completed the deal, but it's still under this legal oversight, and now at least paused for two weeks with this review.
29:46The concern is that we have a government abusing power to change what you see and hear, to distort the very fundamental protections of the First Amendment so that you, the American public, if I may be so grandiose, can hear everything freely and make up your own mind. And against that backdrop, we have very credible allegations that the subpoenas of the New York Times, another important independent outlet, are not actually to solve crimes, which under law would be okay, but potentially may be the kind of bad faith harassment that means it's the DOJ, allegedly, and not the New York Times that might be in the wrong.
30:24We have a New York Times journalist on this big story next.
30:37We see this, though, as an attempt to intimidate the journalists and the Times itself. And we're going to continue to report both about Air Force One and on the circumstances around the government use of prosecutorial power to intimidate the independent news media. That's the view from the New York Times in this major clash with the Trump administration. And we have a special guest tonight. Michael Grinbaum is the media correspondent for the New York Times. He has reported on the Trump DOJ's dealings in this and other matters, including the subpoenas to his colleagues. He's also the author of Empire of the Elite Inside Condé Nast, the media dynasty that reshaped America, which is coming to paperback this week.
31:22Michael, you are in the role of media on media, including your own colleagues, while still trying to do it fairly. But really one of the most perfect guests we could have on this. What is going on in this case? And what does the Times need to show to beat back what to a lot of the evidence looks like harassment? So all eyes are on Thursday in the federal courthouse in Manhattan, where the judge is going to hold the first open arguments about the Times motion to quash the subpoenas. The Times has laid out in great detail that the process by which these subpoenas were issued, their argument is that it was rushed.
31:59There's actually some details in this motion that FBI agents with sidearms holstered, not drawn, but showed up in the driveways of these reporters to serve the subpoenas on a Friday night, basically 24 hours after The Times published its exclusive report on the security concerns involving Trump's new Qatari Air Force One jet. So both the speed by which the government jumped to the action of subpoenaing independent journalists as opposed to gathering a list of potential leakers within the government, taking the steps that the DOJ typically would under its own guidelines to smoke out leakers within the bureaucracy.
32:43All of that appears to have been expedited or perhaps, we'll find out soon, jumped over to go directly after these Times journalists who, by the way, many of whom Trump has insulted by name over the years. There's a lot of evidence of the president on Truth Social, in his comments himself, going after the Times, denouncing these individual reporters for the journalism that they've done about his federal government. So the Times is effectively arguing that this was the result of an enraged president who called his FBI director, by the way, directly into the White House to oversee the leak investigation.
33:22Again, about 24 hours after the article first appeared. Well, as the kids say, Nixon could never. By which I mean he didn't get this far. You know, there are tapes of him trying to hint and cajole to get the enemy, to get Haldeman to get the enemy. But you're pointing out, you know, no, you've got the actual FBI director in here doing the bidding as if he's the hatchet man. Nixon had a lot more scuffling to get there. You're covering this. You care about your colleagues. Yeah. But you cover this objectively as a journalist. I do. So this all broke. You know, the subpoenas starting being issued around 7 p.m.
33:58last Friday night, you know, by nine o 'clock. You know, we had learned about it within the newsroom and were putting up our first story. Now, I've been in touch with the Justice Department, in touch with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan. Their contention, as Jay Clayton in the earlier segment was saying, is that this is an issue of serious, significant national security, that the president at the time of this publication was flying over international airspace coming back from his trip from Turkey, and that the disclosure of this information would have created some sort of risk for not just the president, but with the press corps, with the senior administration officials who were traveling with him on the plane.
34:37They do, however, keep going back to this idea that there's a national security concern without really specifying it in too much detail. Well, and disclosure is a word for leak. If there are accurate leaks from inside the government, what the administration is effectively saying is they have leakers, they want to find them, and this is a method for that. And I want to show what they're up against in court, because Donald Trump's rants and posts, as you mentioned, may doom these subpoenas. There is law on this in the famous Supreme Court case of Brandsburg. Official harassment of the press undertaken not for purposes of law enforcement, but to disrupt a reporter's relationship with news sources would have, the court noted, no justification.
35:20In essence, if you boil it down, No harassment of newsmen will be tolerated, the court said, even while recognizing the right to do these kind of leak investigations I mentioned. And then our final slide here, and you can respond, is look at the facts in this case. Issued in this rushed 48 hours, which you mentioned, includes family members, which could be of a harassing nature. Reporting also from your paper said that Trump was enraged by the original article. And onward. So based on this, do you think that the government has a tough road of claiming this wasn't harassing? So I don't want to make too many predictions because, you know, media case law, we've seen a lot of fascinating decisions in the Trump era.
36:04And by the way, we know that juries around the country are much less sympathetic to the independent press these days. I mean, the reputation of the media has eroded. There's often, you know, defamation suits that go against news organizations. Now, in this case, we have a judge in Manhattan who's going to be assessing this. I think that The Times has laid out a pretty stunning series of procedural irregularities on the part of the DOJ. I want to say something about the family members. At first, we only knew that reporters were being compelled to testify in front of a grand jury. To your point, journalists are not inherently immune from that, from testimony.
36:43If in good faith, yeah. It turned out, and the government only disclosed this days later, that phone records had also been subpoenaed from third-party phone providers, not just for the journalists involved who wrote the stories. In one case for a journalist's mother, who is a psychotherapist in private practice. In one case, the spouse of a journalist who is in a senior role at a major law firm, potentially including sensitive, personal, professional messages in this dragnet of messages exchanged by Times journalists and their relatives. It suggests the pattern of a rushed operation. There was clumsiness.
37:23Numbers were included that were not directly tied to these journalists. And also, as The Times has argued most glaringly, even after this judge in Manhattan District Court was engaged in this case, was discussing with the parties the motion to quash the subpoenas for the grand jury. Right. The DOJ was separately going to a different judge asking that judge to put a gag order on the fact that the DOJ had subpoenaed the third party. Right. Which is secretive. It's suspicious. And again, the question which we're going to be watching on Thursday is is whether this looks more like a harassment campaign, because that runs afoul of the rules.
38:03an even slightly more organized DOJ might have planned for that. It looks like they didn't. And this goes to both the danger, but also the kind of rushed incompetence of quarterbacking this right out of the president's office, Oval Office. Michael Grinbaum, thanks for joining us here from the New York Times, very close to it. That book out on paperback this week is Empire of the Elite. We had Michael on when it first came out. If you're interested in the interesting up and down of media, that's a book to read. When we come back, we turn to RFK Jr.'s latest problem, the meddling.
38:45A lot going on, but we're still making time to fall back with two very special guests. Molly John Fast is back. She's, of course, with The New York Times and hosts Fast Politics Podcast. She has that memoir, How to Lose Your Mother, which is also out on paperback. That's a theme today. and back on the beat founder of the iconic No Limit Records is Master P you know we are about it about it and happy to have him back in New Orleans native was the first hip hop artist inducted in the Louisiana Music Hall of Fame, 14 studio albums some of them platinum and of course returned with another former beat guest Birdman in Versus yeah give it to Birdman he started that stunt you know I started that stunt Well, guess what?
39:28I was uptown, too, and I started that what, KL, it's your, uh! Your body, my body, my body. Make them say, uh. And that went so well, the two are teaming up, bringing their labels together, and going on this Cash Money No Limit tour in September. Welcome to both of you. Nice to see you again. Yes, yes. I'm happy to be here. I'm happy. Our new friendship. Yeah, it's all good. It's all love. We love seeing people make friends. You're the veteran, so we can go to you first. What's on your fallback list? So RFK Jr., besides creating a lot of chaos when it comes to vaccines and and NHS research and all sorts of carnage.
40:13And in fact, today he also you know, they're holding a they're holding grants for Medicaid and Medicare for Minnesota and for California. and probably the states are going to have to go to court. But also, he may have violated the Hatch Act by getting involved in interfering in congressional races. This is not how any of this is supposed to work. Really a good day for RFK Jr. Yeah, he's under a lot of pressure. He also has the gall to talk about meritocracy and attack DEI when John Stewart pointed out this week, he's this nepo baby. Take a look at this moment. For you, Robert Kennedy Jr., of all people, to have the balls to hop on board the anti-DEI, only meritocracy train, mother...
41:07If your name wasn't Kennedy, here's how all your job interviews would go. Says, here you are a heroin addict.
41:21who eats roadkill.
41:28Maritocracy. So that's what's going on for Kennedy. What's on your fallback list? My fallback list is the lettuce and the berries. They got a fallback. We can't even eat lettuce and berries. I mean, what's going on? This is America. We love lettuce and berries. Well, it's an RFK Jr., right? Because they're not doing the kind of surveilling of foodborne pathogens as they are supposed to. They've cut programs in that kind of thing. People are rattled about this. Yeah. Yeah. I was having some breakfast this morning and I'm looking. I'm like, they put berries on that. I don't think I want it. Right.
42:07You start thinking. I mean, I feel both ways because, of course, you got to be safe. Yeah. You know, if you're in a big city and you get an Uber, that's still a higher risk rate of an accident than you're going to be caught up in this. But it's a big deal. You're in the food business yourself. I'm going to just eat my noodles and do my chips, the ref snacks. Now, tell us about the barbie. Barbie queuing, honey. Chewing. Yeah, it's the queuing. When we try them? Yeah, I'm going to let it try. I mean, Molly, if anyone's game. I'm game, man. Oh, they're nice. They're a nice color. We got flavor. Mmm.
42:46Delicious. Go good. We getting ready for the tour. I love it. They're very. I love it. They're very sweet. They're both sweet and extremely salty. Oh, you're feeling the salt. Yeah. Oh, man. Am I feeling the salt? Oh, man. Yeah. Oh, my. They're very salty. These are a very salty chip. Now, this kind of fits. And I know the other thing on your fallback list, Molly, is how expensive it is this summer. Yes. Other items. And that was, remember, again, inflation, major issue in the 24 cycle. I think it's going to be a major issue in the midterm. And, you know, people are not being able to afford vacations.
43:22And again, this is a regulatory issue to some extent, right? Like the FIFA soccer ticket prices. These are things that can be controlled by government, especially pricing. They're calling it funflation. Do you see this? I mean, things are getting more and more expensive. We had a president who promised the opposite, you know? Yeah, I mean, it's definitely getting more and more expensive. And that's why we're constantly creating products. And I feel like another fallback for me is these corporate gatekeepers. Yeah. People out of diversifying Wall Street. Yeah, diversifying Wall Street. And we have to get back.
43:57I just went to Tulsa where Black Wall Street is and seeing that Oasis is a black owned grocery store and saying, wow, this is how we bridge the wealth gap. We need more independent thinkers, more out of the box thinkers to be able to say, hey, you know, well, let's create some more business. That way the poverty can go away. And you always had that mindset because you were an artist, but you were also running the label. Yes. Yeah. No, at the time, being able to put out Snoop Dogg, she didn't know that I was able to, you know, put out Snoop Dogg and be behind his career. But he's shooting a movie now.
44:32That's right. And I'm working on my new movie. It's called Only God Can Judge Me. It's going to be the first street and faith based movie. Respect. And faith is a big part of what you do. Yeah, I mean, in giving back. You know, we've been giving back for over 30 years. And to be able now to see my kids, my son playing for the University of Houston. And I can't wait to be able to go to his games and watch his games. Love that. You know, they're one of the top teams in the country. And Molly will tell you, only God can judge me is a Tupac rapper. Yes, of course. Featuring. Featuring. Featuring. I believe rapping forte.
45:09Yes. Yes. I am very knowledgeable about this particular subject. But you did say that. I'm running out of time, but quickly. You did say that your team, the team you coached, played against your son's team. We didn't do too good. Well, but on that note, we love you carrying it through the family. Master P coming back, Molly. Thank you. We'll be right back. Yes.
45:36Thanks for spending time with us on The Bee. We tried to cover a lot. That's our time. I'll see you tomorrow at 6 p.m. Eastern. This is Stute calling about your overdue account balance. You owe$9 ,000,$17.86. How would you like to pay? That was the sound of Stute, the AI coworker that collects your cash for you. Stute's collecting over$200 million a month for its customers autonomously. Got cash stuck in overdue invoices? Get Stute and start collecting in days. Go to stout.ai, that's S-T-U-U-T dot A-I today.
From the publisher
July 21, 2026, 6pm: MS NOW's Ari Melber reports on the latest developments in the Iran war and is joined by The New York Times' Molly Jong-Fast and Rev. Al Sharpton. Plus, Melber breaks down the growing fallout over the Trump DOJ's campaign to target journalists. The New York Times' Michael Grinbaum joins.
To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
