In short
This episode of The Beat marks six months of the U.S.-Israel war against Iran, arguing it has failed on stated goals and worsened costs of living.
Key claims
Trump promised a short war (4–5 weeks, then “days,” then “very close to a deal”), but after six months there’s “little signs of progress.” Economists estimate the war has cost the average family $700+ in fuel prices and $1,200+ in household costs. Reported outcomes include a hardened Iranian regime, continued attacks on U.S. bases/allies, Iran’s effective control of the Strait of Hormuz, depleted U.S. Patriot missile stocks in Europe (AP), and intelligence that Putin sees the U.S. as weakened.
Notable examples
PolitiFact says Trump’s “obliterate Iran’s nuclear program” goal remains elusive.
Guests
Eugene Robinson (Pulitzer-winning columnist/MSNBC analyst), Jeff Mason (Bloomberg White House correspondent), Tom Nichols (Atlantic writer/U.S. Naval War College professor emeritus), Juanita Tolliver (MSNBC political analyst/Archival Podcast host), Teddy Schleifer (NYT reporter), Mary McCord (former federal prosecutor).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Ongoing War in Iran
1:13 to 3:06
An overview of the six-month mark of the Iran war and public sentiment.
“Major news sources marking the sixth month of the war by noting Trump's failures.”
Political Ramifications of the War
3:20 to 5:02
Discussion on how the war impacts the Republican Party and Trump’s approval ratings.
“as early voting will begin in some states in just a few short weeks.”
Mixed Messages and Strategic Failures
5:05 to 8:01
Exploration of the White House's strategy regarding Iran and economic pressures.
“And one administration official who was on the trip today did talk to a few reporters afterwards and made clear that oil, more oil is coming through the Strait of Hormuz.”
Reflections on Trump's War Strategy
8:06 to 12:01
A critical analysis of Trump's approach to the Iran war and its failures.
“We asked him that earlier, or I asked him earlier today as well.”
Tom Nichols on Iran Strategy
12:07 to 14:00
Expert Tom Nichols discusses the implications of Trump's Iran war strategy.
“Plus, a new twist in Trump's attempt to limit mail voting in the midterms.”
Analyzing the War in Iran: A Flawed Strategy
14:00 to 19:06
Learn about the missteps and implications of the U.S. approach to Iran.
“Tom, we want to give you the opportunity to take a victory lap here.”
Investigating DEI Program Impacts
20:36 to 21:34
Hear about the findings on DEI programs at the University of Michigan.
“Here's what happened when one journalist reported on DEI programs.”
Women Voters' Backlash Against Trump
21:34 to 23:04
Discuss the recent poll showing women turning on Trump and Republicans.
“Tonight, Donald Trump is weathering backlash from women, including those who voted for him.”
The Grocery Store Test: Voter Sentiment
23:04 to 27:00
Analyze how everyday costs impact voter sentiment ahead of the midterms.
“Thank you so much for coming to the table this evening.”
Trump's Campaign Strategy: A Misguided Focus
27:00 to 28:00
Examining Trump's strategy to pivot the election narrative towards his accomplishments.
“This is according to reporting in The Atlantic that they haven't heard enough about his lower fentanyl deaths, Trump bank accounts, a sealed southern border, and an increase in domestic manufacturing.”
Show all 16 chapters
Midterm Polls and Public Perception
28:00 to 28:40
Discussion on the disconnect between political realities and public sentiment as midterms approach.
“None of that makes people feel better when they're struggling to make rent.”
Midterm Polls and Public Perception
29:58 to 30:24
Discussion on the disconnect between political realities and public sentiment as midterms approach.
“Hi, I'm Daniel, founder of Pretty Litter.”
Backlash Against Big Tech and Surveillance
30:32 to 36:51
Analysis of growing public backlash against AI data centers and surveillance technologies.
“There are roughly 1 ,300 data centers in the U.S., with another 2 ,000 planned.”
Trump's Legal Challenges Over Mail-In Voting
36:51 to 39:37
Discussion on Trump's legal issues surrounding mail-in ballots and the implications for the midterms.
“Teddy Schleifer, thank you so much for joining us this Friday.”
Implications of DOJ Election Monitors
39:37 to 42:04
Examination of the controversial actions by Justice Department election monitors in Wyoming.
“And you're looking at the current court's jurisprudence on executive power, where they've generally been expansive toward Trump on matters that are framed as core executive authority issues, right?”
Election Monitors and Voting Rights
42:04 to 45:37
Learn about the role of election monitors and recent controversies surrounding their actions.
“The special ballots have to be then approved by the Postal Service before they can even upload voters' names into a portal so that they'll get those ballots.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Most ice cream is good, but not Jenny's. Jenny's ice cream is more like an obsession. What you get from over two decades of tasting and tweaking and throwing it out and starting over, chasing flavors until they feel alive. That might sound crazy, and that's because it is. Jenny's. Often imitated, never duplicated, always splendid. Everyone talks about how challenging it is to raise kids, but what about protecting them? Outlet covers, kitchen cabinet locks, baby gates, where do you even start? Well, protecting your home and auto is a great place to start. Progressive offers customized coverage options so you can be sure you have the right coverage.
0:41They're basically the baby gates of insurance. Get a quote at Progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company affiliates and other insurers. Not available in all states. Welcome to The Beat, everyone. I'm Jackie Alamany, and for Ari Melber and Tonight, we'll break down Donald Trump's new loss in the fight over male voting. We'll also show you how women are voting with their feet and running away from Trump in the midterms. And you'll hear from Darth Vader, who's been wading into the backlash against big tech. But we begin this hour with the war in Iran. Major news sources marking the sixth month of the war by noting Trump's failures.
1:17The New York Times reporting that Iran's regime stands, U.S. goals remain unmet. Reuters calling the current situation a, quote, costly stalemate. The Washington Post and Associated Press noting that Trump broke his promises of a short war. Trump vowed in March that the conflict would last only four to five weeks. Then in April claimed it would end in, quote, days, not weeks. In June, he said he was very close to having a deal. But six months in, there's little signs of progress. And Americans aren't happy. Nearly two-thirds disapprove of Trump's handling of his war of choice in Iran. Here's what voters in the key swing state of North Carolina, where Trump won in 2024, are saying.
2:03How is this war impacting your life? Well, inflation's up a bit. Things are costing a little more. Definitely has an effect and just makes it more real with people's lives being adjusted. Cost of everything is going up and stuff like that. You know, family members and stuff, you know, it takes a toll on your family. That's for sure. If we're talking about American first, then we need to do American first. And I feel like right now, as Americans, we're suffering. The numbers back them up. economists estimate that this war has cost the average American family over$700 in fuel prices and more than$1 ,200 in household costs.
2:44But throughout the six months of this war, Trump has repeatedly downplayed that economic reality. I don't think about American financial situation. I don't think about anybody. I think about one thing. We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon. That's all. This is peanuts. And I appreciate and everybody putting up with it for a little while. It won't be much longer. We don't want to have them have a nuclear weapon. So remember that when you have to pay a little bit more, you're at$4. It's OK. I mean, I'll never apologize. I did the right thing. Republicans fear that that attitude will drag them down in the midterms, as early voting will begin in some states in just a few short weeks.
3:27Joining me now is Eugene Robinson, Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and MSNOW political analyst, and Jeff Mason, Bloomberg White House correspondent, who is fresh off of the new Air Force One, just in Houston today. So we appreciate your hustle. Thank you so much for joining us. And Jeff, I believe because I was at the White House while you were shuttling back and forth across the country, and I did not hear the president make any mention of the war in Iran and this six-month anniversary that we are all watching closely today. Am I wrong about that? Did he bring it up at all? I didn't hear him talk about it either.
4:04And in fact, he didn't take questions from the pool today so that we didn't have a chance to ask him about that. But I will tell you - And he didn't take any questions on Air Force One? No, he didn't take any questions on the plane. No. Well, OK. So when you're taking a step back over the past six months, taking stock of everything that President Trump has said from February through now, do you feel like this is a story about a war or is this a cost of living story? And does it matter what voters think when they're walking into the booth in November? Well, I think I think it's both. And so to that extent, it doesn't really matter politically anyway.
4:37I mean, voters have made clear over decades that they care about their pocketbooks when they're going to the polls. And those two things are intertwined, as your introduction made clear. The president has long liked to blame inflation on his predecessor, but this is now his economy. And it's the Iran war as well as the tariffs that have led to increased prices. So that is his political albatross. That is the Republican Party's political albatross. That doesn't mean that he doesn't have other things that some voters are going to like. And one administration official who was on the trip today did talk to a few reporters afterwards and made clear that oil, more oil is coming through the Strait of Hormuz.
5:15That's something that the administration is proud of. But that doesn't mean it's where it was before the war. That is despite the threat of more economic devastation from the administration, although the specifics of that have yet to be announced. I want to get back to the albatross of it all, but first get to these pretty startling approval rating numbers, Gene. I mean, these numbers are lower than when Trump left the White House post-January 6th in 2021. I believe it is one percentage point lower. What does it say about this erosion that it is worse than an insurrection? Well, look, this second Trump administration has been an onslaught of stuff, right?
5:52And a lot of it, as Jeff said, has raised the cost of living for people and especially has really defaulted on his main promise. You know, what's supposed to be make America great again, America first? That's not what people are seeing. And I think there's disillusionment about that in addition to anger and voting enthusiasm on the part of the opposition just because he has, it's been so outrageous some of the things that he's done. But the war clearly is politically an own goal. It really is because it was a war of choice. He didn't run on this. Nobody really saw it coming. And he stuck with it.
6:45You can't just end a war by snapping your fingers. Yeah. Well, what do you feel like the strategy is from the White House here? And do you get the sense, Jeff, that anyone in the White House understands what a real world and political quandary the president has gotten himself into? I mean, are they just trying to simply lower the temperature on the conflict and make voters forget about it temporarily, despite the prices that they're seeing reflected when they go to the gas station, when they go to the grocery store, by just making sure that there's not more military action? Or is this new economic pivot to applying more pressure on the Iranians and trying to, you know, cast them into an economic subjugation?
7:32Is that a real strategy that you feel like advisors within the administration actually might work and not just be a prelude to more fighting? Well, there's again, one of the hallmarks of this war from the White House has been mixed messages. Yeah. And I think that applies to this week's strategy as well. Well, and I think that's manifested in what Secretary Bestin said at the beginning of the week with regard to an economic D-Day, because he said President Trump would be making calls to other countries who are doing business with Iran and telling them, cut it out. And I referenced that administration official earlier.
8:07We asked him that earlier, or I asked him earlier today as well. So what calls has the president made? And he said he hasn't made any. So was that either Treasury and the White House aren't on the same page or this was another step in the effort to isolate Iran, but it doesn't have a whole lot of teeth. Either way, it's a political weakness again as regards to the war and this administration. He's definitely not going to make the one call that would matter, which would be to Xi Jinping, to China. China is Iran's biggest trading partner. Well, he tried to pull the China lever a few months ago when he continued with that visit, and it didn't really get anywhere.
8:51He actually came out of it saying Xi was being a great partner. Well, exactly. And is he going to, you know, do something, take dramatic action against, say, a big Chinese bank on the eve of the summit that's planned with Xi Jinping, which, you know, Trump wants to be able to announce some sort of trade deal or whatever. I just don't see that happening. And without China, which seems to be just kind of sitting back and chuckling and enjoying this whole show. But without China on board with this this sort of, you know, divorce Iran from the world economy strategy, it doesn't work. And Jeff, I do want to mind your experience covering presidents.
9:32George H.W. Bush on the six month anniversary of the Iraq war, not exactly on the day, but a few weeks before that, made a primetime address to the nation where he made the case for why this was a war on terror, along with pushing to secure at the time, which was a massive supplemental funding request for the operations that were taking place in Iraq. in Afghanistan. George W. Bush. Sorry, George W. Bush. Is this something that you would have expected to come from President Trump or something that you understand or have heard is in the works at all? Well, I haven't heard of anything in the works.
10:14And I'm smiling a little bit because we have to remember that President Trump is just he's a nontraditional president. I remember at the very beginning of this conflict that we wondered if he would do an Oval Office address to talk about why the U.S. and Israel were going into war against Iran. He ended up just doing a video that was shared on his Truth Social account. Much, much different. So are they wanting to bring attention to this anniversary? No. Is he planning a speech of some kind? I don't think so. I mean, do you think that a speech would help his case at all? I'm not sure it would. Look, George W.
10:49Bush had a completely different situation. For one thing, there was a Congress that even when it was in Republican hands was like curious and skeptical and practiced some degree of oversight. This Congress doesn't do any of that. So he doesn't have to worry about that. And as Jeff said, I mean, Donald Trump prides himself on that being like other presidents. Yeah. And last question before we are out of time, but, you know, some of the criticisms that have come as a result of this new economic strangulation strategy that the White House says that they're going to implement is that it's effectively toothless without a defined endgame.
11:29Jeff, do you get the sense that the administration has defined the endgame? Is this, are they gunning for now the collapse of the Iranian regime, the capitulation, or some sort of compromise? Oh, I think they'd be happy with both of those endgames. But it's just that the strategy so far hasn't led to that. And whether the president was was given false or poor information at the beginning or not, he expected this to go differently. I mean, he said in the beginning he thought the Iranian people would rise up and take over their government. That didn't happen. The time frame hasn't happened. A lot hasn't happened the way he envisioned.
12:01Now, if anything, the Iranian people are worse off in this moment. Yes, they are. But coming up, Tom Nichols on the strategic failures of Trump's war with Iran and its effect on the U.S. military. Plus, a new twist in Trump's attempt to limit mail voting in the midterms. And later, the big tech billionaires and the political backlash against AI. We're going to be back in just 90 seconds.
12:27Today marked six months since Trump launched a war in Iran that he said would last four to five weeks back. But it's not just the timeline that's gone wrong. The U.S. and Israel had hoped to topple Iran's clerical leadership and replace it with a pro-Western government. Instead, they've ended up with a hardened and very radical regime. That hard-line regime is still able to launch attacks and against U.S. bases and allies, and it effectively controls the Strait of Hormuz. War is also depleting U.S. weaponry, with two officials telling the AP that Patriot missile stocks in Europe are now beyond critical.
13:04Vladimir Putin now sees the U.S. as weakened by the war. That's according to U.S. intelligence assessments. And several thousand Iranians have died, along with 18 American service members. And Trump's stated goal of obliterating Iran's nuclear program has remained elusive, as PolitiFact puts it. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. We're not going to give them a nuclear weapon. They will not have a nuclear weapon. The only thing that matters when I'm talking about Iran, they can't have a nuclear weapon. it. Joining me now is Tom Nichols, writer with The Atlantic and professor emeritus of national security affairs at the U.S.
13:43Naval War College. Exactly six months ago today, at the start of the war, Nichols wrote about Trump's, quote, enormous gamble on regime change in Iran. Quote, unfortunately, the ways that all of this can go wrong are more numerous and more likely. Tom, we want to give you the opportunity to take a victory lap here. I just can't, Jackie, because I don't want to see my country fail. But it was, you know, it wasn't a hard bet to make that this was going to go badly because the president listened to some bad advice from Netanyahu and Pete Hegseth. I think one of the things that's interesting is that we're finding that almost no one else in this administration wanted to do this because they all understood what I and other critics warned was likely.
14:39So, you know, it's just a tragedy. I mean, it really is leaving us weaker, more vulnerable, leaving us in, I think, distinct danger in Europe and in Asia. But this whole thing was premised on such a flawed belief. And it really was a kind of a faith-based concept that, you know, if we just hit the Iranian regime hard enough, it'll collapse. It's ironically the same mistake Putin made in Ukraine. And so here we are. And I don't think there's an end in sight for this. not only has it not collapsed but if anything at least the hardliners have become strengthened while the Iranian people have suffered even more but I am curious what you make of some of the I don't know if restraint is the right word but the red lines that the president has seen to have implicitly drawn by deciding to go now this new route of more economic instruments used against the regime as opposed to an all-out military campaign against them.
15:44And where you think that's coming from, and if you feel like that's good advice that he's actually getting now. Well, it would have been good advice six months ago if he decided that his new policy was going to be to put the screws to Iran. He probably should have started with an all-out economic campaign. But, you know, it's hard to sanction a country that's already under sanctions, especially when other countries, you know, as Eugene pointed out in the last segment, he's not going to call China and tell the Chinese, you know, to, I mean, that's a pretty leaky regime to begin with. I think what you're seeing here is that the president and his advisors are improvising because the president, and I remain convinced of this, he went into this war still surfing the buzz of a successful operation in Venezuela, thought that this operation was going to cover him in glory and make him a hero and make him the liberator of Venezuela.
16:40And when that, excuse me, of Iran, and when that all fell apart, he started going through other, down his checklist, you know, of, well, it's about nuclear weapons. It's about terrorism. It's about proxies. And that was a foolish move because he hasn't been able to achieve any of those either. So now I suspect I guess you can call this good advice to go this route because there's nothing left. And the red line about major military action, think about, and I think, you know, the people around him have warned him about this. Think about what that entails. I mean, are we really going to put ground troops in a pretty large country of over 90 million people?
17:19And, you know, how many troops will we commit and to do what and for how long? And I don't think anybody wants to do that. And I think the president probably doesn't want to do it either. And now they're just out of they're out of stuff. They're out of ideas. Right. And the Treasury Secretary's announcement earlier this week left much to be desired in terms of, again, the actual economic instruments they did plan to use to try to apply more pressure on the Iranians. But I'm wondering how much of this move and this announcement you feel was also a pivot that was tied to the fact that U.S. stockpiles have been diminished in recent months.
17:56Well, yeah, that's, I mean, as I said, you know, even if we were going to try one more time with a massive military effort, how do you do that when you're running out of things? We've stripped away our only carrier in Asia. We've taken weapons that were facing much more dangerous opponents in other parts of the world. You know, part of the problem is that when people like the Treasury Secretary or anybody else talks about these things. They're not really talking to the American people. They're talking through the camera to Donald Trump. And so we're not, you can't really gain any real information or any sense of strategy about what they're doing because they're not really talking to us.
18:38They're talking to him. And I suspect, again, that that was an oblique way of saying, good job, Mr. President, you're doing great. Let's go ahead with this while having to tacitly admit that, You know, what else can we do at this point? And I think we're in significant danger because of this at this point. Right. And he's talking to Natalie Harp. But Tom Nichols, thank you so much for the prescient writing. As always, thanks for joining us. And ahead, new heat on MAGA tech billionaires as the backlash to AI widens. Plus, I'll explain this. How will the people trust this city council when this city council continues to vote for surveillance technology that imprisons them?
19:23Ms. Campbell, you must work on your Jedi mind tricks.
19:30Also, Trump's DOJ suffers a bruising new courtroom loss as critics warn of a widening attack on elections. But first, a key demographic is turning on Trump and Republicans with the midterms looming. most ice cream is good but not jenny's jenny's ice cream is more like an obsession what you get from over two decades of tasting and tweaking and throwing it out and starting over chasing flavors until they feel alive that might sound crazy and that's because it is jenny's often imitated never duplicated always splendid hey what's up guys it's hayley bailey okay i need to tell you about something. I just got YouTube Premium.
20:13It's got tons of awesome features like offline downloads so I can download my favorite videos before I travel and watch them whenever I don't have Wi-Fi because we all know airplane Wi-Fi is the worst. I get ad free, I get backroom play, and there's like a ton more in there. You should try it. If you like YouTube, you'll love YouTube Premium. Try it now for two months free at youtube.com slash premium. Trial eligibility varies. Terms apply. Cancel anytime. That's a mouthful. Here's what happened when one journalist reported on DEI programs. I decided to just focus on the University of Michigan.
20:46I obtained internal documents that showed that the school had spent about a quarter of a billion dollars on DEI programs. I spent two weeks in Ann Arbor talking to everybody I could find. The unintended consequences of these programs, they had sort of left everybody dissatisfied. And this expensive machinery the school had built just imploded. If you're a journalist, you are not on anyone's team. All you're trying to do is figure out as many of the facts as you can gather. The facts are going to guide you to where the story lands. You're not taking sides. I'm Nick Confessori. I'm an investigations reporter for The New York Times.
21:24Journalists like Nick follow the facts wherever they lead. They go where news breaks, get answers firsthand, and publish what they find. That's fact-based reporting. Seek it out if you don't already.
21:42Tonight, Donald Trump is weathering backlash from women, including those who voted for him. A new poll shows that one in four women who voted for Trump now disapprove of the job he's currently doing. With the economy and cost of living ranked as the most important issues among all women in this survey, Democrats have an 18-point advantage over Republicans among women on the so-called generic congressional ballot. And among white women specifically, Democrats are ahead 47 % to 39%. Republicans won the demographic in both 2022 and 2024. All of this says many Trump voters now say that they're feeling duped.
22:23Warning sign for Republicans just over 60 days from the November midterms. I voted for Trump and every day I regret my decision. more and more. You voted for him three times. Are you disappointed? Very disappointed. Very disappointed. Why? Because the prices haven't gone down. What's happening isn't what I voted for. It isn't what I expected to happen. I'm over it, I think. Over the Trump thing. The Trump wagon. I think what Trump's doing now, I'm kind of having a look about face. Joining me now is the wonderful Juanita Tolliver, MSNOW political analyst and host of the Archival Podcast. Hello.
23:04Thank you so much for coming to the table this evening. This administration has spun so much and tried to blame Joe Biden for so much. But the one thing that he, the president, cannot beat and cannot change and cannot spin is the grocery store test. Right. Which is the most important thing, I think, going into this midterms, which is when voters walk into a grocery store, do they feel like they can manage their life, keep a little bit more in their pocket than they did before Trump returned to office? And I think I know what the answer is, but what do you think the answer is? I'm sure we agree, Jackie, that no, Donald Trump fails this grocery store test.
23:44And I'll take it one step further, not just walking and feeling good, but when they're watching that tally go up with every item that's scanned, are voters feeling anxiety? Are they feeling concerned about what's available in their accounts? Are they shuffling through multiple credit cards about thinking about how to pay this off. And so that is something that is absolutely going to trump any type of language or message, even transphobic messaging, that Republicans try to throw out to draw Republican women or women writ large back to their party. I looked at that polling that you highlighted, and I feel like when you have 50 percent of women who oppose your ICE strategy, you have two-thirds of women who are opposed to Trump's tariffs, which he continues to escalate even just recently with Canada and two thirds of people in this country rejecting the war in Iran, as you were talking about earlier.
24:36This is something that is front and center because voters, women in particular, who control a lot of household spending, are looking at Republicans asking a famous question from Janet Jackson. What have you done for me lately? In our house, it is the cost of the growing years' milk, which I think I am being punked on. But I pay almost$8 a gallon for our extremely large baby boy. But anyways, let's pull up that polling that you were messaging, that you were just reciting about the policies that most women oppose. 68 % oppose the White House ballroom, 63 % tariffs, 61 % data centers, and 51 % ICE deportations.
25:21I want to zoom in on that ballroom, too. Because here, what you have not only is just opposition from women to Trump's frivolous project, but it shows that they're opposed to things that he's spending his time and attention on instead of what matters to them. The cost that they're paying at the pump, the cost they're paying at the grocery stores, the cost they're paying for their electricity bill. Like, all of that is what they would much rather Trump and Republicans pay attention to, but they haven't. And if anything, they've made matters worse. We talked about Trump's tariffs. We talked about the war on Iran.
25:51Mentioned Republicans and Trump cutting health care tax subsidies, which raised premiums on health care. And so I think when you have this plethora of issues, it's fully reasonable for women to ask the question, why should I vote for you? And let's be real, that question isn't just for Republicans. Democrats have to make their case. I was going to put you on the spot about that. And you mentioned it, to be fair, during the break. But are these voters that are abandoning Trump? And at one point, we're probably Democrats at some point in their lives. Let's say it somewhere. Are they swinging back?
Read the full transcript
26:24I wouldn't say it's a swing, but it is an opportunity for Democrats to take all of the things that they're saying and create explicit plans and explicit commitments to these voters. They want to be courted. They want to be wooed. This isn't just, oh, I'm disaffected with Trump. Those voters, there's a sliver of them who might stay home and not engage. There's a sliver of them who are probably looking at Democrats with the same skepticism and frustration. They just want someone to deliver for them. And Democrats have to demonstrate that not only do they have the plans, but they have a strategy of unification around some ideas that can deliver for people in their pockets.
27:00Well, and while Democrats are figuring out their strategy, the strategy that the Trump campaign seems to have settled on, I want to get your opinion on, because it seems that the president has come to the conclusion that voters and the reason why he is suffering from these historically low approval ratings is because they don't know enough about his victory. victories. This is according to reporting in The Atlantic that they haven't heard enough about his lower fentanyl deaths, Trump bank accounts, a sealed southern border, and an increase in domestic manufacturing. Thusly, he has ordered his campaign to roll out a bunch of ads that praise him on these accomplishments and want Republicans to make this race, this November midterms, a referendum on him and not about specific candidates and specific issues.
27:48Do you think this is a winning message? Of course not. Because none of that makes people feel better. I was like, I'm going to listen calmly. But none of that makes people feel better when they sit down every single month to pay their bills. None of that makes people feel better when they're struggling to make rent. And I think that's why we're seeing this. What is anathema to what parties usually do when they look at the polls and see that they're in big trouble ahead of the midterms. Imagine. Ignore it. Because delusion is trademarked to Trump, his team, and now Republicans up and down the ballot.
28:20Yeah. And this quote actually from David Axelrod really stuck with me. He told The Atlantic, what we learned very quickly is you cannot jawbone people into feeling what they do not feel in their own lives. And Biden defied that to his own detriment. I mean, we're living in the upside down because now it's the inverse of Donald Trump ignoring reality. Lessons not learned. Juanita Tolliver, thank you so much for joining us and have a great weekend. Still ahead, thousands gathering in Washington today to rebuke Trump and fight for voting rights. But first, the growing midterm debate over big tech from AI data centers to new surveillance networks.
28:57If you like YouTube, you'll love YouTube Premium. Hi, I'm Sean Evans from Hot Ones, and I want to tell you about YouTube Premium. It has offline downloads, so you can watch without Wi-Fi. Background play, so you can lock your phone, and it still plays, baby. Oh, and it is completely ad-free. Yes, I said it, ad-free. Try YouTube Premium for two months free at youtube.com slash premium. Trial eligibility varies. Terms apply. Cancel any time. The most memorable gifts aren't found. They're made. Zazzle is a custom marketplace where you pick any product, a mug, a card, a tote, a phone case, and make it personal.
29:39A photo, a name, an inside joke. The kind of gift that actually fits the person. That's what 30 million customers have been coming back to Zazzle for over 20 years to find. Right now, save 25 % on your first order at Zazzle.com. That's Zazzle.com. Make it z-amazing. Hi, I'm Daniel, founder of Pretty Litter. Cats and cat owners deserve better than any old-fashioned litter. That's why I teamed up with scientists and veterinarians to create Pretty Litter. Its innovative crystal formula has superior odor control and weighs up to 80 % less than clay litter. Just one bag lasts up to a month, meaning fewer refills and less scooping.
30:17Pretty Litter even monitors health by changing colors to help detect early signs of potential illness. It's the world's smartest kitty litter. Go to prettylitter.com and use code PANDORA for 20 % off your first order.
30:32There are roughly 1 ,300 data centers in the U.S., with another 2 ,000 planned. But the data is clear. Americans don't want them. We do not want a data center in this county. The backlash against AI data centers is growing with protests from coast to coast. We need our government to crack down on these companies from steamrolling small towns. 42 % of Americans live within five miles of a data center or a proposed data center. So this is problematic.
31:09Backlash to big tech quickly becoming a dominant midterm issue, bridging the partisan divide and uniting towns against their elected leaders. One GOP pollster telling The Washington Post when asked about data centers, quote, the instant voter reaction is hell no. And it isn't just data centers. Flock cameras, AI-powered cameras that track license plates are becoming another target. The Wall Street Journal reports, Flock has 120 ,000 cameras in 49 states that capture 20 billion license plates a month. Now, Americans are destroying license plate cameras as surveillance backlash grows. Meanwhile, in San Diego, one galactic resident cleverly ridiculed the technology.
31:56The emperor is a fan of flock, and we must continue utilizing flock technologies so that we can follow and surveil the rebel scum as they move from playground to playground, from playground to pool, from pool to gymnasium, because we all know that the flock cameras are not only following the license plate readers, they are following children. They are following children in parks and gymnasiums. And we need this. I need this so I can stalk my ex-girlfriend. Joining me now is Teddy Schleifer, reporter with the New York Times and MS Now contributor. His latest article is on the big tech billionaires pouring cash into the midterms.
32:39Teddy, thank you so much for joining us. You have a lot of experience in covering sort of various iterations of this story from flock to data centers, which is Silicon Valley companies pushing and their financial backers pushing technology and this infrastructure into communities that don't want it there and then leaning on political money, sometimes from those same backers, to try to survive the backlash. I'm wondering when you are sort of straddling the worlds that you do between campaigns and Silicon Valley, are voters becoming inert to this spending or becoming at least savvier about what is being messaged to them?
33:27Yeah, I mean, if you're a defender of the AI industry, you might see the only way to get public opinion change and, you know, get more people to join Darth Vader would be with more ad spending. I mean, right now, Republicans are feeling the weight of their support from the AI industry politically. And that's why there's been pretty remarkable communications recently from Republican politicians encouraging the AI industry to spend more money. Help us get this albatross off of our necks. And that's, you know, that's one of the big things I'm thinking about over these final couple months of the midterms is, you know, this issue is really hurting Republicans, especially in states like Ohio, where John Houston, the Republican Senate nominee, has been really dogged by his support for data centers.
34:12And one of the big questions I have is, can you beat this just with more super PACs, more dark money, maybe that's the way Republicans can get out of it. I guess it is a question that has yet to be fully answered. But I wonder if there's anywhere in particular that you're looking at that is going to give us more clarity on that answer. Yeah, the Ohio race is really interesting. I mean, the AI industry has been hoping that John Houston could kind of pull this out. I mean, the Democratic nominee is the former Senator Sherrod Brown, who people may recall was buried by tech money just two years ago in the crypto industry, spent, I think,$40 million to beat him.
34:52That race is a toss-up. And I think there are Republicans right now, if you're a John Husted supporter, who would say, like, hey, this guy's being attacked as the face of data centers. You might as well spend the money to help him. The AI industry has over$80 million that they've raised for their super PACs. They've spent somewhere around half of that. So and there's more money to come, of course. I mean, like, you know, with one meeting or one decision by Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk or Jens Tawang, you know, the tech industry could marshal a couple hundred million more. And maybe that's what defenders of AI might need politically.
35:30Money that could be spent into perpetuity, essentially messaging on their behalf. But despite all of this backlash, the Trump administration has still been fairly bullish about AI technology and has sought to foster its growth. I'm wondering if there is anyone in the administration who you are aware of is thinking about the downsides of the economic aspect of the rise of AI. I mean, there is a populist wing, you know, even within the administration that has been skeptical for a while of the AI industry and thought that, you know, the U.S. was being overly concerned with economic competitiveness.
36:09Maybe Trump was overly concerned with the stock market, which, of course, is really dependent on a few AI companies. And, you know, some populists have been concerned about why are American tech companies selling chips to China and that, you know, the U.S. should be more nationalist and less kind of focused on economic growth and, you know, pumping the brakes on AI. There's also a religious component to the Trump coalition that has some kind of doubts about AI development and advancement. But yes, Trump to date has basically been, you know, encouraging this industry because he believes it's good for the stock market, because he believes it's good politics.
36:43But that may be ending sooner than we think. Especially as it continues to be a proxy for so many issues that are angering voters in this moment. Teddy Schleifer, thank you so much for joining us this Friday. We appreciate you. You bet. And up next, amid Trump's election attacks, thousands marched on Washington today in support of voting rights.
37:11Trump is again losing in court, a judge temporarily blocking his new mail-in ballot rules. Third court decision on the issue in less than a week, with the rule coming just days before the first midterm ballots are due to go out in some parts of the country. The judge writing, quote, most plaintiff states have already ordered their mail ballots. The Trump administration offers no reply to plaintiff states' assertion that compliance for the 2026 midterm elections will be impossible for many of them. The Wall Street Journal reporting that litigation is likely to move fast as the midterm elections are going to be here pretty soon, predicting that the ruling will set off a, quote, legal scramble.
37:54That's already proving true. The Trump administration swiftly appealed to that ruling today, and Trump has come under fire for what some critics are saying is attempted election meddling ahead of the midterms. Democrats preparing for this possibility by convening a task force of at least 11 senators and emphasizing that the power of legislatures as messengers and organizers able to prepare the public to act when necessary to ensure a legitimate election. Local legislators are already stepping up. Wyoming's Republican governor, speaking out about the Trump DOJ's election monitors, calling their behavior, quote, very odd, adding, quote, it was aggressive, unexpected, disruptive, certainly, didn't seem to show respect for the state.
38:42The public already acting as well. with thousands marching on Washington today in support of voting rights, speaking out against Trump's attempt to limit mail voting. The president wants to limit mail-in voting for this upcoming November midterm election. How does that make you feel? How do you think about that? It makes me ill. Yeah, I'm totally against that. He himself mailed in his ballot, so it doesn't make any sense. I think he's scared. I think he's scared of the power that people have, and I think he's scared that he's going to lose the power that he has. And so he's trying everything that he can to prevent people from using their rights and using their voices to counteract the things that he's doing.
39:28Joining me now is Mary McCord, former federal prosecutor and co-host of The Maine Justice Podcast. Mary, thank you for making time for us in your very busy day, which we'll get into in just a few minutes. But I want to get to the crux of what I think we are all watching, despite getting a little bit ahead of things, which is if this mail-in ballot ruling makes it all the way up to the Supreme Court, which it seems like it's going to. And you're looking at the current court's jurisprudence on executive power, where they've generally been expansive toward Trump on matters that are framed as core executive authority issues, right?
40:07That's national security, immigration, but have been willing to rein in things and agencies that do not have specific and explicit statutory text. Considering all that, what do you think that means for this case? So I think people need to understand that just one week ago on Friday night is when the Supreme Court stayed an injunction against the same executive order that required the Postal Service to issue a final rule about mail-in ballots. But it did not do that on the merits. It did not say we think the government wins in the sense that they should be able to demand what the envelopes look like and what the lists of voters look like and all those kind of things.
40:51It was purely on the grounds, according to the majority, with vigorous dissents. And this was, you know, this was on an emergency docket. They purely said it was the case was brought too early because it was brought before the final rule even issued. Now, the final rule had actually just issued before they did their ruling. In fact, I take it back. I think their ruling was Monday and not Friday. But at any rate, this week has been such a blur. It's all happened so fast. Now the final rule is issued. So now these new injunctions just issued by Judge Talwani in the district court are based on new filings challenging the final rule.
41:27So they can no longer avoid ruling on this if it gets to the Supreme Court by saying, you know, it's too early. They will need to look at the merits. Now, they could say it's too late. It's too late because now we're too close to the election. Right. But that would actually bode for the reverse. It would bode for keeping the injunction in place because it's too late, frankly. And this is what Judge Talwani found for the states to be able to comply. Mail-in ballots are going out in some states this week under state law. Congress hasn't authorized these kind of changes. The Constitution gives the states this power to do this, and they just won't have time to comply with these special ballots.
42:04The special ballots have to be then approved by the Postal Service before they can even upload voters' names into a portal so that they'll get those ballots. There's just not time. So if they say that it's too late, does that mean, though, that the Trump administration just refiles this in a few months for the next election? If they say it's too late for this injunction, it's too late for this new challenge, and that would mean this final rule is effective and we would see just mass scrambling to be able to get mail-in ballots out or some sort of alternative to the U.S. Postal Service. If they agree to maintain the injunction, then this injunction is only for this election, November 3rd.
42:42The administration would continue to fight about whether this rule would apply to future elections. like so many of their legal battles to be continued potentially. But I do want to ask you about this fairly shocking news of two election monitors from the Justice Department that tried to interview voters and examine voting machines in Wyoming. The GOP governor, Mark Gordon, called it aggressive, unexpected, disruptive, as we read in the lead in. I mean, what is your response to this? And are these kinds of questions outside of the scope of the voting rights law? Yeah. I mean, this is not what monitors have authority to do.
43:18I mean, monitors, first of all, should be giving notice in advance to any place that they're going to engage in monitoring. And they're there to observe. They're there just to make sure that they think that the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act are being complied with and to note anything they would see that they that would make them think that those laws are being violated. They are not there to interview people. They don't have authority to interview people. They certainly don't have authority to seize or examine voting machines. So this is I don't know whether these two were acting rogue or whether these two were acting under the direction, for example, of A.G.
43:52Harmeet Dillon or Todd Blanche or the president. I don't know. That is something that really should be examined. And before we are out of time, I do want to get an update from you on something you are working on in real time right now, which is you are at it. We're at a hearing today working, fighting to prevent Trump's 2026 birthright executive order from taking place. What what is the status of that? Yes. So I represent, along with co-counsel, the original plaintiffs in the in the Casa v. Trump case. And we have a certified class. And that class is the same as the class that was certified in another case called Barbara v.
44:32Trump, where the Supreme Court just said less than two months ago that all members of that certified class are citizens by birth. Trump administration's new executive order tries to make exceptions to that. And so what we're doing is we're going into court just as the plaintiffs in the other class did and said, we need this court to enjoin this executive order from being applied against any members of this class. This class has already been declared by the Supreme Court to be birthright citizens. The judge had a hearing on our temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction motion this morning.
45:07She's asked the plaintiffs, who we represent, to file a supplemental pleading, a supplemental complaint that specifically raises the 2026 issue, because of course the original complaints we filed were before the 2026 EO, and a very, very expedited briefing. We're filing today, the government by noon Monday, we reply by seven o 'clock Monday and p.m. and then I expect the judge to rule. Ruling we will be following closely. Mary McCord not taking Summer Fridays. Thank you so much for joining us. And still ahead, new tributes to the incomparable.
46:01That's the 9 to 5 tribute to Dolly Parton at Buckingham Palace. That does it for me this evening. Most ice cream is good, but not Jenny's. Jenny's ice cream is more like an obsession. What you get from over two decades of tasting and tweaking and throwing it out and starting over, chasing flavors until they feel alive. That might sound crazy, and that's because it is. Jenny's. Often imitated, never duplicated, always splendid.
From the publisher
Aug 28, 2026; 6pm; The war in Iran has reached the six-month mark. MS NOW’s Jackie Alemany reports and is joined by Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Eugene Robinson and Bloomberg’s Jeff Mason. Plus, Alemany reports on how a growing revolt against Big Tech could shape the upcoming midterm elections.
To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
