Nobel Economist: Trump's War Driving Up Prices

31 Mar 2026 · 42 min · 14 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode argues that Trump’s war in/against Iran has threatened the Strait of Hormuz, spiking oil and gas prices, worsening markets, and raising recession risk; it also covers related political and legal fallout.

Guests (backgrounds)

  • Richard Stengel (MSNBC analyst; former Obama-era diplomat).
  • Barbara Starr (veteran Pentagon reporter; Substack author).
  • Paul Krugman (Nobel Prize–winning economist; Substack newsletter writer).
  • Andrew Weissman (former FBI general counsel; Mueller prosecutor; former federal prosecutor).
  • Sherrod Brown (former Ohio senator; running in a special Senate election).

Key claims

  • Closing/partially closing Hormuz gives Iran economic control and keeps U.S. gas/diesel high; futures shortages become physical shortages in Asia/Europe.
  • Trump is “quitting”/seeking an off-ramp while leaving allies exposed; critics say he lowered success criteria and didn’t plan for Hormuz closure.
  • Krugman: oil futures differ from physical supply; diesel and jet fuel impacts are severe; sustained closure could be “catastrophic.”
  • Weissman: Supreme Court birthright-citizenship challenge (John Eastman) is fringe and unconstitutional; DOJ settlements for Jan. 6-related lawsuits are “collusive.”
  • Brown: rallies reflect populist backlash to rigged systems and high prices.

Notable examples

Gas around $4/gallon; diesel up more than gasoline; jet fuel prices doubled; airlines canceling flights; fertilizer price surge; Pope Leo urging an off-ramp; Eastman’s birthright citizenship theory; Jan. 6 lawsuits seeking $18M+; Sherrod Brown vs. incumbent John Husted.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Trump's Impact on the Oil Market

1:03 to 3:00

Exploring how Trump's policies are affecting oil prices and market stability.

“We begin with Trump signaling a possible end to this war, but it would leave the U.S.”

Discussion with Experts: Military Strategy and Risks

3:00 to 5:47

Richard Stengel and Barbara Starr discuss the military implications of Trump's decisions.

“you should know there are over 50 ,000 U.S.”

Debate on Responsibility and Consequences

5:47 to 8:59

A discussion on who's responsible for the current situation and its implications.

“Of course, the strait was open before this Trump war started, and now it is not.”

Political Reactions and Calls for Peace

8:59 to 11:28

Reviewing political reactions and the call for peace from various sectors.

“Was the president fully briefed about the risks of all of this from the beginning?”

Paul Krugman on Oil Shortages and Economic Impact

13:09 to 14:00

Nobel economist Paul Krugman discusses the real consequences of oil shortages.

“How long can the market live with oil at that level and gas at that level?”

The Impact of War on Oil Prices

14:00 to 18:54

Learn how current conflicts affect global oil prices and its consequences.

“My, you know, up till now, you see oil prices fluctuating.”

Stock Market Reactions to Political Uncertainty

18:54 to 21:10

Understand how political events influence stock market movements and public sentiment.

“We hear a lot about how the stock market's not the entire real economy.”

Legal Challenges to Birthright Citizenship

21:10 to 28:01

Explore the implications of fringe legal theories on birthright citizenship in the U.S.

“Coming up, we will hear from a populist Democrat who has won in the middle of the country, former Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown.”

Examining Trump's Immigration Policy

28:01 to 32:25

Discussion on the implications of the Trump administration's immigration policies and their legal ramifications.

“And so it's not just saying that if someone came to the country illegally and had a child here that they shouldn't have citizenship, although the language of the Constitution is they do.”

January 6th Lawsuits and Legal Battles

32:25 to 36:00

Analysis of January 6th protesters suing law enforcement and the implications of these legal actions.

“This is about using the legal system to construct a new narrative for what happened on January 6th.”
Show all 14 chapters

Midterm Elections and Voter Sentiment

36:00 to 42:00

Insights into the GOP midterm panic and the growing public dissent against Trump and his policies.

“When we come back, the GOP midterm panic.”

Sherrod Brown on Price Struggles and Special Interests

42:00 to 43:06

Sherrod Brown discusses the impact of special interests on prices and grassroots campaigning.

“They don't see what's happened with price.”

Sherrod Brown on Price Struggles and Special Interests

43:37 to 44:12

Sherrod Brown discusses the impact of special interests on prices and grassroots campaigning.

“Not an Empower client paid or sponsored.”

Artemis Mission and Future of Space Exploration

44:34 to 45:47

Discussion about the upcoming Artemis mission and its significance for space exploration.

“Sometimes you gotta look beyond politics and beyond our planet.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00With Uber's new women preferences, women riders can request a woman driver whenever they want. Like Amy, who's traveling solo in a city she's never been to before. Or Danielle, who works night shifts at the hospital. Or Kelly and Jana, who were way overdue for a night out. Because sometimes comfort comes from having another woman with you. Request women drivers with women preferences on Uber. Learn more on the Uber app. The Second World War is the largest event in human history. A 20-part documentary series with Tom Hanks. No part of the globe was untouched. No life unchanged. Experience the ultimate account of World War II.

0:46Every single person had a story. These are the stories that make us who we are. World War II with Tom Hanks. New episode, Monday at 8. Part of History Honors 250.

0:58Paul Krugman:Only on the History Channel. Welcome to The Beat, everyone. I'm Ari Melber. We begin with Trump signaling a possible end to this war, but it would leave the U.S. and our allies in a much worse position. That aspect of this is not in debate. Indeed, U.S. policy planning from inside the Trump administration has warned about exactly the outcome Trump might leave us with. Trump mulling, abandoning what has been everyone's agreed upon reason for this region to matter, the oil, but he would abandon U.S. strength. He would leave without reopening the key straight-over moves. 20 % of the world's oil moves through the strait.

1:41Paul Krugman:Iran is blocking it, and that is a huge reason why prices are spiking. Gas now$4 a gallon. That is already having other impacts. The stock market doesn't think with just one mind, but we can show you. Amid this war and the uncertainty Trump has caused, stocks are now on pace for the worst quarter in four years. You can see the drop right there. You'd have to go back many years in a different administration to find anything like this. Some traders call it a gut punch that will become a Trump recession. Not all recessions can be cleanly blamed on the incumbent, but if this recession is a cause of this, is caused by this war, well, that's Trump.

2:23Paul Krugman:Wall Street Journal reporting about the strait that in recent days, Trump and aides assessed a mission to pry open the choke point could push the conflict beyond his timeline. And Trump now, having started the war, says maybe that's just other people's problems, telling countries to get their own oil. The president was clear this morning in his truth that there are countries around the world who ought be prepared to step up on this critical waterway as well. It's not just the United States Navy. Last time I checked, there was supposed to be a big, bad Royal Navy that could be prepared to do things like that as.

3:02Paul Krugman:So amid this obvious policy confusion, what in energy terms might be called a surrender on the very key issue in the region, there's also talk in the White House about mulling boots on the ground, having the preparedness to do that, whether that is a strategic threat or something serious. you should know there are over 50 ,000 U.S. troops in the region. I want to bring in Richard Stengel, an MSNOW analyst and a former diplomat under President Obama, and Barbara Starr, the veteran Pentagon reporter, the author of a sub-stack newsletter, Barbara Starr reports, two well-known voices on these issues.

3:37Paul Krugman:Richard, you may know the old phrase, talk softly and carry a big stick. I'm only talking softly because I'm getting over a cold. It's not a geostrategic signal, but I say that so viewers know I'm speaking softly. Only for that reason, I'll let both of your voices carry your thoughts, Richard. Well, Ari, I hope you get better. You know, Trump does the opposite. He talks loudly and carries a small stick. I mean, the stick that he's been using in Iran hasn't quite worked. I mean, one thing we know that Trump is good at is quitting. So he's looking at the problems that this has all caused him. I mean, part of what Iran's strategy here was they can't defeat the U.S.

4:25in a military sense, but they can cause so many problems for America that Trump would basically pry out and leave. I mean, the other thing that has happened, and you alluded to this, too, they've constantly lowered the bar about what qualifies as success or victory. No longer really regime change, although Trump says that has happened. No longer, you know, getting rid of the nuclear threat. You know, Mario, Marco Rubio published, you know, like half a dozen ideas about what would qualify as victory. I think number five was the Iranians need to buy much more American hummus than they are now. That was a joke, by the way.

5:05So they've actually so lowered the bar that they can declare victory and people will go, OK. But when you mentioned the Strait of Hormuz, they didn't even seem to calculate with this invasion that the Strait of Hormuz would be closed. That didn't seem to be part of their strategic planning. So he caused its closing and now he's going to leave, you know, with it only half open. That's, you know, half a victory.

5:34Paul Krugman:Barbara, your view on this and help us understand, is the U.S. worse off if we leave this region or this war and abandon the strait? Well, the Strait of Hormuz, you know, the president is suddenly making the claim, you know, that's all about other countries. They use it more than the U.S. does. It's their responsibility. Of course, the strait was open before this Trump war started, and now it is not. So he leaves it now, if he does, with Iran for the first time in economic control of the strait, possibly by seeking tolls from ships going by, even just by their decisions who to allow through, who to not.

6:17Even though the U.S. is bombing constantly at Iranian military targets, this is an asymmetric situation. A mine, a sniper, a small boat, a small attack can cripple one tanker and basically keep the strait shut. It's an international situation. International oil markets react to this. That involves the U.S., and that means U.S. gas prices are not going to come down anytime soon.

6:51Paul Krugman:Richard, there has been more pushback. I want to play some conservative voices disagreeing with the policy, maybe trying to blame the aides who allegedly talked the president into it. Take a look. I counseled as loud as possible against doing this in the first place. Just please do this. Don't nation build. As this thing goes south, we need to know exactly who talked him into it and what representations were made to convince the president that this was a good idea. Get the hell out of there. That's all we have tolerance for. That's all that will work. Richard. Well, and of course, Ari, I mean, Trump campaigned on ending the so-called endless wars in the Middle East, and now he has perhaps gotten us into one.

7:41I mean, I too would like to know who talked him into this. But at the end of the day, he's the commander of chief. He's responsible. He needs to take responsibility for the decision. He doesn't even want to take responsibility for the decision. You know, you remember, of course, the Colin Powell's Pottery Barn rule. You break it, you own it. The Trump rule is we broke it, you own it, you take care of it. That's what he's talking to with the allies now. And the other irony, and Barbara alluded to this, that Strait of Hormuz is a choke point, but Europeans buy most of their oil now from the United States of America.

8:19They used to buy most of their oil from Russia, and then we persuaded them to boycott Russian oil and buy American oil. So, you know, they're OK.

8:29Paul Krugman:Yeah, Barbara, I also want to play another piece of Fox questioning this because the president didn't explain it. He didn't go to Congress. He's looking at an off ramp. And so even though we didn't have a real war powers debate like we're supposed to under law, It would seem that the White House has a problem on the right, the left, the center, among the military veterans family community, among civilians who don't serve. It's a pretty broad opposition. Here's what Laura asked. Was the president fully briefed about the risks of all of this from the beginning? And was he then able to take it all in and understand the complexity of this, how complex it could actually get, and further possibilities of casualties or other damage, the difficulty of dealing with these people?

9:23Or was he told this would be relatively quick in and out?

9:29Paul Krugman:A lot of questions, Barbara. This is about as dovish as Fox gets towards a MAGA war. Well, I think she makes some very interesting points because what we all know is that the chairman of the Joint Chiefs briefs any president of the United States on military options before a president commits troops to action. A chairman would insist upon that. General Cain would have briefed the president on the military options on the table. The interesting question that she asks is, was the president able to take it all in? Or did he potentially just listen to his own cheerleaders, which are more, frankly, in the Hexeth camp?

10:15I think there's been a really interesting development tonight. tonight, there is a piece of video out there of Pope Leo talking to a group of journalists and clergy very much off the cuff about his concerns about the war. And Pope Leo himself uses that same phrase that he hopes Trump is looking for an off-ramp. That's a fascinating piece of information in the very careful world of Vatican diplomacy for a pope to use that very shall we say, universal common political term, if you will, which is its most reference in political circles these days, I think is fascinating. The Pope is very much coming out in recent days, very publicly, calling for peace and urging President Trump now tonight to take that road and urging President Trump by name.

11:13So that puts another mark on the wall. for the entire international community about just how serious this is all being taken.

11:25Paul Krugman:Really striking. My thanks to Barbara and Richard. We have a lot coming up. Populist Democrat Sherrod Brown is here on the midterms. How the January 6th crimes are staining. A case headed to Supreme Court by Trump tomorrow. And some great guests, Andrew Weissman and Nobel economist Paul Krugman when we're back in 90 seconds.

11:50Say you've always wanted to have a backyard oasis. Here's the thing. If you get smart with your money, you can do things like that. With Empower, you can start making the most out of your money, so you can go out and live a little. Isn't that why we work so hard to have some fun with our money? So use Empower and get good at money, so you can be a little bad. Join their 19 million customers today at Empower.com. Not an Empower client paid or sponsored. With Share My Trip from Uber, you can send your live trip location to the ones who matter most. Like Dan and Hannah, who always wait up to make sure their daughter gets back to her college dorm room.

12:22Or Tiffany, who's running late as usual, and her friends are tracking her trip to make sure she's actually on her way. Look, she's right there. She's three minutes away. Or Sam, who never goes anywhere without her roommate knowing exactly where she is. Some journeys are meant to be shared. Share your ride in real time with Share My Trip on Uber. One more way Uber is putting safety at every turn. Learn more on the Uber app. Every day as a small business owner feels like solving a puzzle. One moment you're cruising along, and the next, there's a shipping snag that has you scrambling. But here's a surprise you will like.

12:54With Progressive, small business owners save 13 % on their commercial auto insurance when they pay in full. So go ahead, surprise yourself. Get a quote in as little as 8 minutes at ProgressiveCommercial.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Discounts not available in all states or situations.

13:15How long can the market live with oil at that level and gas at that level? It's a gigantic headwind. Florida was at 412 this morning. I believe it was 290 before the war. Stocks getting hit. The transports, rails and truckers getting hit. Imagine Lyft and Uber drivers right now.

13:36Paul Krugman:That's how it looks out there. It's not getting better yet. Paul Krugman is the Nobel Prize winning economist. He writes a newsletter on Substack, Paul Krugman, where he just wrote about the oil crisis getting physical. Of course, we hope people read you. I've been reading you my whole adult life, Professor. But let's start with a preview of what you've written there for our viewers tonight who might not have read it yet. Okay. My, you know, up till now, you see oil prices fluctuating. But those are all prices of futures. They're claims on a barrel of oil, you know, next month. It's not the actual price of a barrel of oil, literally.

14:14And so far, it takes four to six weeks for oil from passing through the Strait of Hormuz to reach its major markets. So we've been living all this time. The world has been living on oil that was already in transit, has not been affected by the war. But that runs out now. Basically, the first physical shortages of oil in Asia will be starting in a day or two. The physical shortages in Europe will be starting next week. So all of a sudden, this is getting real. This is no longer financial speculation. This is an actual, you know, where is the oil? And if you try to think about what happens then, normally, you know, shortages, there's already some rationing going on in Asia, but also the price, the actual price, the actual price, you know, we're already seeing a lot of rising prices at the pump, And even more, by the way, diesel is a much bigger deal than gasoline, and people should be talking about that.

15:13But at a certain point, the price of oil has to rise enough so that people stop driving, stop doing stuff enough so that the demand for oil is reduced to the available supply, which is down a lot. And so this gets really, really ugly if we don't, even if we reopen the street in a day or two, which is not going to happen, it's still going to be ugly for a while. But it's going to get really, really ugly if this goes on for an extended period.

15:42Paul Krugman:You know, in college, the first day of a lot of courses, they try to convince everyone why it matters. Why great books matters now. Why sociology matters. You don't have to do that in econ. People have student loans. People might be trying to make a little more money than they grew up with. And with econ and gas, I want to show you just people outside dealing with this right now. Take a look. We need help with it. I mean, because we're citizens and we have to pay these prices and it's not easy. It's not easy at all. I feel like anytime something dealing with war is going on, we as the people are getting affected by it.

16:22And I don't feel like that's fair. We already have to deal with grocery store prices. Then we got to deal with the gas prices going up. It's a lot. I mean, if you're in the rat race all day and you're in your car from eight o 'clock in the morning till five in the afternoon, it's a rough life. Everything he stood for is nothing that he's doing anymore.

16:39Paul Krugman:Is this a direct consequence of Trump policy? And was it, in your view, mostly or entirely avoidable? Well, this is all Trump policy. I mean, as one of your, I think, as you may have said, I mean, this war, you know, didn't have to happen. And it's all of what's happening to the price of gasoline, to the price of diesel. Everything else is because of the war. We, you know, the straightforward moves was open. Stuff was flowing through it fine on February 27th, right? Everything was okay. You know, that we had problems with, you know, as we long have with Iran, with other countries, but we did not have a global oil shortage.

17:20So this is all one man's decisions that have brought us to this pass. And he still seems to be completely clueless about what's going on. I mean, in that Truth Social post in which he said, you know, why don't the British clear the straits? You know, the world's greatest military can't, but a second-ranked power, let's be clear, can. But also he said, and if you're not willing to be courageous and get the jet fuel, why don't you buy it from us? We have plenty. Well, do you know what's happened to the price of jet fuel? It makes what's happened to the price of gasoline look like nothing. Basically, jet fuel prices have doubled.

17:55The CEO of United Airlines has said we're canceling flights because we can't afford to fly the planes. So this is all. I mean, I've been, tomorrow in the Substack, I'll be saying that, you know, in a way,$4 a gallon gas is, that's less than half the problem. The effects on diesel fuel, which everything runs on there. Every truck runs on diesel. All of the business activity runs on diesel. And gas is up$1 a gallon. Diesel is up$1.70 a gallon. Jet fuel has doubled. The price of fertilizer for America's farms has surged because a lot of fertilizer, it turns out, was flowing through the Strait of Hormuz.

18:38So this is all really—this is the greatest shock to global energy supplies ever. It's worse than the 1970s. And it's all because of one man's decision that he wanted a war, which he doesn't want anymore.

18:54Paul Krugman:Wow. Right, which he's backing off of. We hear a lot about how the stock market's not the entire real economy. Yeah. But when you see the crash in the fourth quarter, correction or slide, you'll give us more precise wording. And a lot of traders saying part of it is this, both the real world contagion of this and the uncertainty part that markets don't like. Give us your view of that. And then what do you say to viewers who are only maybe in the markets in their retirement, if at all, and say, well, that's that's not my life. Trump seems to be worried about it for the midterms. Give us your your explanation on all that.

19:31Well, this is nasty. We're seeing, although stocks were way up today because basically they were way up because it sounds as if Trump may be preparing to surrender, which tells you something about how the war is going, right? The markets are cheering the fact that the United States team seems to be running away. But it's not clear that we can succeed in running away. I mean, I've never been a track the markets minute by minute guy. But these days I keep a window open all day, not for stocks, but for the price of crude oil. I'm looking at the price of Brent crude, which is, again, it's a futures price.

20:05It's a financial price, not the actual, not physical stuff on hand. And that price came way down today because, again, everybody's cheering that Trump appears to be surrendering, but maybe not. You know, there's a lot of U.S. boots headed for the region. No one is sure what will happen tomorrow. I would say that the current price of crude oil, and I think in stock prices, also are priced as if this is not going to last very long. It's not going to be really as bad as it should be. And when I run the numbers on what a sustained closure of the Strait of Hormuz means, it's way worse than where we are right now.

20:46And, you know, there's enormous uncertainty there. But, you know, 200-barrel oil is not unreasonable. It's not my most likely thing, but it's definitely, it does not take very much in the way of things going a bit wrong for us to get to that. And that is really quite catastrophic for the market for everything else.

21:09Paul Krugman:Really striking, Paul Krugman. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Coming up, we will hear from a populist Democrat who has won in the middle of the country, former Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown. And a Fox host warning Trump is giving up. I called Pete. I called General Cain. I called a lot of our great people. We have great people. And I said, let's talk. We got a problem in the Middle East or we can take a stop and make a little journey into the Middle East.

21:41Paul Krugman:That's Trump talking about some of this. That's the January 6 issues that are catching up with a case heading to the Supreme Court tomorrow. We have the ultimate guest for our legal preview. So you know exactly what the court's going to be doing. Andrew Weissman next.

22:03Paul Krugman:We've been covering the war in Iran, gas prices coming up. We will get to the midterms. But we're also turning right now to a legal briefing that we think you should really know about. Tomorrow the Supreme Court hears Donald Trump's completely fringe effort to tell you that what the Constitution says it doesn't really say. And there is some sort of crime and race baiting sprinkled in. The brains behind this push is a discredited lawyer, John Eastman. You might recall him from January 6th, Politico reporting. He's been pushing this theory for many years, arguing that while the current law and the Constitution are clear, he says maybe children of foreigners living permanently in the U.S.

Read the full transcript

22:43Paul Krugman:shouldn't be granted birthright citizenship. That runs directly contrary to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which says all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. are citizens of the U.S. Let me read that to you again, because there are parts of the Constitution that get a little wonky, but look on your screen. You don't need law school for this one. All persons born here are citizens here. That's what it says. Bill Barr, a very conservative Trump loyalist who ran the DOJ, cited Eastman's fringe theory that ignores this sentence and pretends the Constitution says something else as one of the reasons that he didn't believe him or find him credible when they were kind of serving together.

23:22Paul Krugman:Barr, of course, outranked him. And he was on to something because by the end of that same first Trump term, Eastman was trying to get Mike Pence to commit crimes and overthrow the election. Remember this? Did the Trump legal team ask you to prepare a memorandum regarding the vice president's role in the counting of electoral votes? Did you advise the president of the United States that the vice president could reject electors from seven states? If. Is that statement in this memo true? If. Did President Trump authorize you to discuss publicly your January 4th, 2021 conversation with him? Fifth.

24:05She will not discuss those same conversations with this committee.

24:09Paul Krugman:Fifth.

24:12Paul Krugman:That failed Eastman and others involved were disbarred. That is the ultimate ignominy for a lawyer. And yet he is the one pushing these fringe arguments heading towards the Supreme Court tomorrow. I'm joined by Andrew Weissman, former FBI general counsel, Mueller prosecutor, and former federal prosecutor. Welcome, Andrew. The link here is a way to think about it. because Eastman's embrace of this argument tomorrow was so fringed that, as I mentioned, I want to read a little more of what Bill Barr said, that Trump cited Eastman to Barr, quote, someone who had this great idea about how you could eliminate birthright citizenship.

24:52Paul Krugman:I told him that was wrong. Trump kept invoking Eastman. I asked Eastman to come over to my office and explain it to me, and he did a very good job of it. This was at a time where people were testifying about that crime spree. We all lived through it. Does it matter? And is it revealing that it's this kind of figure pushing this tomorrow? You know, it's one of those things where it could matter if there was any merit to this. But I love the way that you phrase this because, you know, I hate to go out on a limb and predict what's going to happen. But let's just say, widely, widely within the legal community, the question is, how close to 9-0 will this decision be against the administration?

25:44And it's a real sign of where we are, that something that, as you correctly said, was so fringe, is now in front of the Supreme Court. Every single judge, every single one that has had this issue, including judges appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents, have rejected it. The first judge, I believe, to hear this asked the DOJ lawyers, where were you when someone came up with this idea? Where were the lawyers in the room to say, you've got to be kidding me, This really is the kind of thing that, you know, the first year of law school, you would be able to look at this and go, that's not going to win.

26:35And so it is correct to really think about why we are here. And more than that, why would somebody want to push this idea? In other words, who are you appealing to by taking this position?

26:47Paul Krugman:So when you're going to go to part two, I'll let you speak to that. But we'll put this back up on the screen, which is part one. When it says all persons born here are citizens for a country like the United States, which was founded by immigrants and has this this policy, there's no mainstream or counter precedent that all persons born here are citizens doesn't mean what it says. I mean, some language changes over time, but this is pretty clear cut, Andrew. And then go on to your point, too, please. Sure. Well, I want to make sure people understand what the administration's saying. One of the things that they are saying is that even if your parents are legally here, let's say they are here and they have green cards and they're in graduate school, just to put it in an academic setting, so I feel comfortable.

27:38And while they're here in school studying math or law and they have a child, they're saying, no, no, no, that doesn't work because it's temporary. And so it means that even though the child is born here, that the Constitution somehow you should read into it language that does not exist. And so it's not just saying that if someone came to the country illegally and had a child here that they shouldn't have citizenship, although the language of the Constitution is they do. If you're born here, you're born here, period. It doesn't matter how your parents got here. And so this is one where I actually am viewing this very much as a litmus test for the Supreme Court justices to see what are there any justices who are going to be so and are so enamored of the Trump administration that they're willing to actually say that this position is lawful because it is one that has never, ever been accepted by any court ever.

28:49in the history of this amendment.

28:53Paul Krugman:We don't do a lot of predictions, but when I look to past cases, Thomas and Alito have been quicker to embrace losing fringe arguments, even to their own legal disrepute, for whatever their reasons are. I don't know, as you say, whether this is enticing to them. But more broadly, the Trump administration seems intent on pushing these things to send their messages even when they know it's losing. I'll also mention that the ACLU has said, I'm just looking at this note, that they view this as an effort to change the demographics of the U.S. to really get more, if they were to win it, to get more control racially, is the allegation, at least from the ACLU.

29:44Yeah, and even if they were to not prevail, because I don't think they will. I agree with the ACLU that that is a perfectly legitimate theory as to why this is happening. But even if they don't prevail, it is still signaling that kind of xenophobia and racism to appeal to some segment of their base to whom those are values that they adhere to. And so I think that is a totally fair thing to look at is why would you be pushing something? Because, you know, there's an issue about whether something is lawful or not. But secondarily, there's why would you even as a policy matter want to be doing this?

30:31it's so against what our nation stands for. And it's so different than saying, oh, if you're here and you're not a citizen and you commit a terrible crime, you should be removed from the country. That is one totally valid argument that I think everyone agrees with. It's really different to say that we're going to want to remove people who are here lawfully and have a child who, under the exact literal term of the 14th Amendment are citizens, that those people should not be here. And you really do have to hearken back to the president's remarks about what kind of country you come from, that if you essentially, if you're a sort of white Protestant, we want you.

31:17And, you know, if you're not a white Protestant, particularly if you're from a black or brown community. He has used extremely vulgar language to refer to those countries and people in a way that is so contrary to what we're supposed to stand for. Right.

31:36Paul Krugman:And it echoes and proves the critique from these massive no kings protests over the weekend that this is a king like effort to override the Constitution. No other DOJ in modern history has done something like this on a core part of the Constitution. If you had a politician who said they don't like the First Amendment. Very few have gotten the DOJ to go argue that it doesn't say what it says, or they should jail people who disagree with them. We're really in a different turf here. And the fact that he's found people at DOJ or made DOJ so partisan in that realm for what you say could be a very lopsided loss is a problem in and of itself.

32:14Paul Krugman:I want you to stick around. Andrew's here for another block. We'll be right back together.

32:24January 6th protesters are suing law enforcement agencies for more than$18 million. This is about using the legal system to construct a new narrative for what happened on January 6th.

32:40Paul Krugman:I'm back with Andrew Weissman, a prosecutor. You've worked with federal law enforcement. That's the FBI. People think of police. That's often local. In D.C., they're federal. these people were convicted of these heinous attacks we know trump pardoned them and now we have one step further which is some of them trying to sue your your reaction to this and is it important that people keep a hold of the legal facts and baseline that everything's upside down and orwellian now yeah well upside down is perfect perfect description so it's worth remembering the kinds of lawsuits that we're seeing that are, I think a term for it is collusive.

33:23It seems to be a favorite word of President Trump. You have Michael Flynn, who just received$1.25 million of taxpayer money on the ground that he was improperly charged when he initially pled guilty and was fired by Donald Trump from his job reportedly because he had lied to the vice president of the United States, Mike Pence, or the incoming vice president of the United States. Two, we have a similar lawsuit being brought by Donald Trump himself seeking tens of millions of dollars for his claim that he was improperly targeted in a court-authorized search in Mar-a-Lago, where the facts seemed very clear and he did everything he could to never have those facts come to light in a court of law.

34:17And now you have people who you can see on videotape were part of a violent protest. Now, it doesn't matter if some of the people or even all of the people who are part of that lawsuit did not themselves participate in the violence that day. The thing that they're challenging is the way that the police acted to try and sort of stem the violence that was happening that day. The thing that's so outrageous here is that type of lawsuit, the sort of, oh, the police acted with excessive force, are routinely rejected by the courts and And the Department of Justice is on the side of the police saying you need to reject these.

35:02It's very, very hard to prevail on this kind of case. And yet, and by the way, that's true for the Michael Flynn case as well. But when you have a Department of Justice that essentially is looking for a fig leaf to dole out tens of millions of dollars, that's our money. This is what can happen. And what I have said, yeah, and if there's no good faith basis for this settlement, my question is, what is the difference between a quote unquote settlement and Pam Bondi actually just stealing the money from the public risk and giving it to somebody?

35:40Paul Krugman:I got to fit in a break, but you're nailing it because Trump earlier wanted$200 million and they keep finding ways to move the goals and try to create precedent. Then, you know, on his way out, you might see him actually do this and then dare the next administration to claw it back. I mean, that's the corruption question we're facing. Andrew, on more than one topic, thank you. I mentioned I'm going to fit in a break. When we come back, the GOP midterm panic. That's next.

36:11There are protest signs and they were just great. They came from Minnesota and we said, oh, no, you don't. Does this ass make my country look small? No fucking way. The turd, right? And Jimmy Kimmel has higher ratings than you.

36:34Paul Krugman:just some of the mix of massive social and civic engagement with having a sense of humor even in these times colbert tipping his hat of course to some of the signs these no kings protests are a massive and historic development organizers estimate about eight million people were marching this is unified it's broad it is not strictly democratic or strictly partisan uh it is about defending American rule of law and democracy. And while this type of enthusiasm is important for voter turnout in a non-presidential year in November, the polling also shows a more broadly complete rejection of Trump that might even terrify him, as one headline puts it.

37:17Paul Krugman:71 % disapprove on these high prices, supermajority on Iran and tariffs, 61 % on jobs, Overall disapproval has hit 62. Trump is the least popular president in the history of polling of the second term. Congressional Republicans are retiring. Many seeing that as a quick exit rather than looking weak and being swept away in a blue wave they're preparing for. Some in conservative media say Trump doesn't even care. He's kind of written it off. I don't know what political price he could possibly pay. He's not running for president. If it's the midterms, I don't know if he cares that much. He is going to do what he can, but he already he understands history and knows that it's probably likely that the Republicans won't be able to hold it, even if they try.

38:09Paul Krugman:If that's what the cheerleading sounds like, what does the objective assessment sound like? We're joined by a candidate in these midterms. Ohio's own Sherrod Brown, of course, was senator there. He's running in the special Senate election that is still filling the old J.D. Vance seat because that's, of course, from the last cycle. Welcome back. We could talk about your race And what your Midwestern voters are concerned about But first, these rallies were huge, historic We did a count once that Against the larger estimates for the Tea Party rallies These aren't double or triple They're over 20 times And those got a lot of elite media attention This is happening out in the real world Your view on this weekend

39:03Paul Krugman:We lost, Senator, I think we have you muted because I don't hear you and I don't think our control room does. So bear with me. I can expect. Does that work? It does. Start from the top, please. Okay. Yeah, I mean, there were more than a hundred of these rallies around Ohio. Big city, small town, rural areas, suburbs, and people recognize the systems rigged against them. They recognize the system's more rigged than it's ever been. People that are struggling have been told by John Husted that those people don't know how to navigate the real world. He's saying that the war is going better than we expected.

39:43People rebel against that. They know this system doesn't work for them. And I see it everywhere I go. I see it talking to veterans in a little town called Jackson in Appalachia. I see it talking to farmers. I see it in Cleveland yesterday. Crowds are bigger than I've ever seen. Thousands of people are going online to contribute. People just know that people desperately want to see change in this country, and they know they want to be part of that change. And they're just out in huge numbers at every kind of event, as you point out, Ari. Yeah.

40:17Paul Krugman:You know, Trump and the Republicans have, at times, done better when things are really partisan, really divided. And yet when the conversation is about stuff that I've gotten to know you professionally over the years that you've been leading on your whole life, which is food on the table and who's looking out for you and do you have any bargaining power? I mean, it's one thing to be good at your job and another thing to work in a system that has some level of bargaining power for that rather than these giant multinational companies screwing people over even when they are working hard. And so I'm curious whether this looks more like a populist type year.

40:54Paul Krugman:And as one example, I want to show you what people are out there doing this weekend. The president's really out of touch talking about his fancy ballroom in a year when he's reaped hundreds of millions in self-dealing. Take a look. I think it'll be the finest ballroom of its kind to anywhere in the world. This is a view of the columns as they are going to be made. They're going to be hand-carved, and they're beautiful. Top of the line, there'll be Corinthian, which is considered the best, most beautiful by far. Jared? Yeah, they see that. People see that. It's what they don't see. They don't see John Husted and others fighting for lower prices.

41:44They don't see John Husted standing up for farmers when the price for fertilizer goes up, when diesel fuel, which is what they use, goes up even faster than oil prices. They just don't see help with tariffs, with what's happened to soybean markets. They don't see what's happened with price. I mean, John Husted said that struggling people don't know how to navigate the real world, whatever that means. And he said that the work ethic in this country is broken. I mean, that's why to build the kind of grassroots effort we need to beat the hundreds of millions of dollars. They spent more against me two years ago than any race in Senate history.

42:24I asked people to come to SherrodBrown.com and chip in$10 or$15 because we raise our money that way. They raise it with dark money coming from Wall Street and the oil companies and the drug companies. And that's really the fundamental difference. He was a special interest guy in Columbus. He was appointed to the Senate by the governor. Now he's a special interest guy in Washington. And we know what special interest guys do. They play the inside game. They help the president in his war, but don't do anything to stand up for people for lower prices.

42:58Paul Krugman:All really interesting, which is all we thought of you coming out of this populist weekend. Sherrod Brown, we'll be checking back with you on the way to November. Thanks for your time tonight. I want to tell viewers that the Republican just, yes, thank you. Republican just mentioned Senator Huston is, of course, the incumbent that Brown is running against. He's welcome to join us on the beat as well. We'll be right back. Say you've always wanted to have a backyard oasis. Here's the thing. If you get smart with your money, you can do things like that. With Empower, you can start making the most out of your money, so you can go out and live a little.

43:30Isn't that why we work so hard to have some fun with our money? So use Empower and get good at money, so you can be a little bad. Join their 19 million customers today at Empower.com. Not an Empower client paid or sponsored. With Share My Trip from Uber, you can send your live trip location to the ones who matter most. Like Dan and Hannah, who always wait up to make sure their daughter gets back to her college dorm room. or Tiffany who's running late as usual and her friends are tracking her trip to make sure she's actually on her way. Look, she's right there. She's three minutes away. Or Sam who never goes anywhere without her roommate knowing exactly where she is.

44:03Some journeys are meant to be shared. Share your ride in real time with Share My Trip on Uber. One more way Uber is putting safety at every turn. Learn more on the Uber app.

44:12Paul Krugman:Support for this podcast comes from Progressive, America's number one motorcycle insurer. Did you know riders who switch and save with Progressive saved nearly$200 per year? That's a whole new pair of riding gloves, and more. Quote today, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. National average 12-month savings of$197 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between October 2024 and September 2025. Potential savings will vary.

44:45Paul Krugman:Sometimes you gotta look beyond politics and beyond our planet. There will be the first flight to the moon for humanity since 1972 tomorrow. The Artemis mission set to launch from Cape Canaveral, Florida, a rocket carrying a crew to the moon and back, but it will not land. The crew is three Americans, one Canadian. The purpose of the mission, testing life support systems for future missions to that uninhabitable lunar surface. We're going to be covering it on MSNOW, and it's also a reminder, sometimes we've got to look out there at what else is going on. That does it for us. On any journey using Uber, it helps to know you're getting into the right car.

45:20Pin verification adds an extra step to make sure your ride is your ride. Before the trip begins, your app gives you a unique pin. Just tell it to your driver, and they'll enter it in their app before the ride can start. Hey, what's your pin? Mm-hmm. 2538. That way, you know you're in the right car taking the right trip, and your driver knows you're the right passenger. Make sure your ride is your ride with pin verification from Uber. One more way Uber is putting safety at every turn. Learn more on the Uber app.

From the publisher

March 31, 2026; 6pm; The Supreme Court will hear arguments on President Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship. MS NOW's Ari Melber reports and is joined by former FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann. Plus, Melber reports on the latest in the Iran war and is joined by Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman for analysis.

To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from The Beat with Ari Melber

All 321 episodes
Nobel Economist: Trump's War Driving Up PricesThe Beat with Ari Melber · 42 min
Listen in VO