In short
The episode focuses on Texas politics and broader Democratic anti-corruption messaging. Main topic: Republicans worry Donald Trump’s Texas primary pick could hurt GOP odds in the Senate race, after scandal-plagued incumbent Ken Paxton won the GOP nomination over long-serving Sen. John Cornyn’s preferred candidate. Democrats argue Paxton’s legal and political baggage plus a unique Democratic challenger, James Tallarico, could flip Texas.
Key claims
Tallarico is “enthusiasm” driving more Democratic primary voters than Republicans; Paxton’s “mugshot” stems from a federal corruption case settlement and he was impeached as attorney general but acquitted; Republicans may have to spend heavily to defend Paxton, draining money from other races.
Notable examples
comparisons to Trump-backed losers Walker, Lake, and Moore; Nebraska town-hall backlash; Cook Political Report lowering GOP win odds.
Guests
Mark McKinnon (Texas political strategist; worked on George W. Bush and Ann Richards campaigns; creator of Showtime’s The Circus) and Rev. Al Sharpton (Politics Nation host; former presidential candidate; president of National Action Network). Later, Neil deGrasse Tyson (astrophysicist; author of Take Me to Your Leader) discusses UFO-related Pentagon releases and alien-life likelihood. Also featured: Rep. Jason Crow (Colorado; co-chair of an anti-corruption caucus) on ending “self-dealing” and pledges like banning stock trading and corporate PAC money.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VORepublican Concerns in Texas
1:08 to 2:30
Discussion on how Trump's influence is changing Texas politics.
“Also, Neil deGrasse Tyson on Intelligent Life Out There Somewhere.”
Ken Paxton's Controversies
2:30 to 4:00
Exploring the legal and political baggage of Ken Paxton.
“And apparently, if Trump says he wants to go with the candidate that's more likely to lose the Senate, a lot of voters are going along with that.”
Democratic Strategies
4:00 to 5:30
Analyzing the Democrats' approach to leveraging Paxton's issues.
“They thought it would have been better with, as I mentioned, the other guy.”
Republican Reactions and Dynamics
5:30 to 8:00
Examining the GOP's internal challenges and voter sentiments.
“mad, that doesn't mean they've all turned on Trump.”
Expert Insights on the Race
8:00 to 10:00
Political strategists discuss the implications of Texas races.
“And first question is obviously going to Mark.”
Challenges for the GOP
10:00 to 12:00
Addressing the difficulties faced by Republicans in upcoming elections.
“And the guy who's had all these criminal charges against him at Finn and Peach.”
Tallarico vs. Paxton: A Democratic Opportunity?
12:00 to 14:01
Debate on whether Tallarico can capitalize on Paxton's weaknesses.
“is a commissioner in Houston, Rodney Ellis.”
Texas Politics and GOP Challenges
14:01 to 15:06
Discussion on Texas political dynamics and GOP spending in the state.
“Providing the opening for Chalo Rico, the seminarian and state lawmakers become a fundraising force among Dems hungry for victory.”
Analyzing Political Personas
15:42 to 19:36
Exploration of political candidates' authenticity and public perception.
“Let's check in on the Serta counting sheep.”
Trump's Influence on GOP Candidates
19:36 to 21:16
Discussion on the lasting impact of Trump's charisma on future GOP leaders.
“mood we've been in today uh the sins of the father donald trump are apparently sometimes forgiven more by voters in red states for Trump than his mini-me's.”
Show all 18 chapters
UFOs and Government Transparency
21:16 to 23:30
Conversation with Neil deGrasse Tyson on UFOs and government disclosures.
“Up ahead, a Democrat unloading a new plan to fight the kind of corruption and just bizarre distractions we see like this going on at the White House.”
The Search for Extraterrestrial Life
23:30 to 28:00
Debate on the existence of alien life and implications of advanced civilizations.
“There are renewed questions about whether there's life beyond Earth or what the Trump Pentagon is up to, releasing a batch of documents and videos that they kind of hyped up as maybe related to UFOs.”
Exploring the Concept of Aliens
28:00 to 33:50
Discussing the implications of extraterrestrial life and its cultural representation.
“And you write, for the aliens who have reached Earth at all, we'd conclude they're more advanced than we are.”
Trump's Extravagant Plans Amid Crises
33:50 to 36:50
Examining Trump's focus on a UFC event while neglecting pressing national issues.
“But your president at the White House is erecting a 90 foot tall UFC octagon and 5000 seats in order to host a cage fight.”
The Thug Fund Controversy
36:50 to 40:00
Discussing the implications of Trump's funding for individuals involved in the January 6th incident.
“Someone who assaulted a police officer admitted their guilt, and now we're going to pay them for that?”
Congressional Efforts Against Corruption
40:00 to 42:00
Highlighting new initiatives by Congress to address corruption and restore trust.
“And I get that as using the perch, the platform, the visibility you have to draw those lines.”
Discussion on Corporate PAC Influence
42:00 to 44:29
The conversation explores the implications of corporate PAC funding on political integrity and representation.
“They will see who's doing the right thing.”
Light-hearted Closing with Congressman
44:30 to 44:45
The segment concludes on a lighter note regarding fitness and public service.
“And you have named and shamed me, Ari, so I'm hitting the gym after this.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00With Uber's new women preferences, women riders can request a woman driver whenever they want. Like Amy, who's traveling solo in a city she's never been to before. Or Danielle, who works night shifts at the hospital. Or Kelly and Jana, who were way overdue for a night out. Because sometimes comfort comes from having another woman with you. Request women drivers with women preferences on Uber. Learn more on the Uber app. Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start. Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to. Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin?
0:38Or what that clunking sound from your dryer is? With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app. Download today. Welcome to Beat. I'm Ari Melber, and we are following all of this news. Later tonight, we have a special guest, a Democrat with a plan to stop what he calls unprecedented corruption from the thug fund to the self-dealing. It's Democrats on the move. We've told you we're going to bring you those kind of stories, not just what's happening from the White House. And that's coming up tonight.
1:08Also, Neil deGrasse Tyson on Intelligent Life Out There Somewhere. His new book, Take Me to Your Leader, the Trump Pentagon dropping those UFO files. He is always a great guest to have and he's coming up live tonight. night. We begin with Republicans concerned, though, that Donald Trump is doing exactly what the Democrats want, at least in Texas, which is not a usual headline. Democrats eyeing what they see as a closer race in Texas, the possibility of turning it blue, which would be critical to their math to try to take back the Senate, all thanks to Donald Trump. Indeed, there was a headline in a conservative outlet saying this is the one time that both parties apparently agreed, if you look at the Trump side wanting the long shot candidate, the Democrats want the long shot candidate, and they agreed.
1:54It's only the Senate Republicans who are closer to the costs who are freaking out. So we have this scandal ridden Trump endorsed, very conservative candidate, Ken Paxton, who beat the long term, long time statewide ballot, John Cornyn. He's been on that ballot as a senator across over 20 years. He's been on that ballot for other statewide races. This is a sign, among other things, that even in a red MAGA place like Texas, they are the voters mad at Senate Republicans. They are not mad necessarily in the Republican primary at Trump specifically, but they ousted a longtime Republican. They're not taking orders from the Republican Party.
2:32And apparently, if Trump says he wants to go with the candidate that's more likely to lose the Senate, a lot of voters are going along with that. That itself is interesting. Meanwhile, Paxton's Democratic opponent, James Tallarico, posting the gentleman's mugshot. Paxton, we should note, did settle what was a federal corruption case against him. So legally, he went through the process long enough to get the mugshot. So it's public record. But in fairness to him, he's not in prison. He wasn't convicted. We should also note, though, that in the constitutional process in the state of Texas, which is pretty conservative, he was impeached when serving as Texas attorney general for alleged offenses that alarmed at least that largely red state.
3:12But again, in fairness, I will tell you he was ultimately acquitted. So legally, he's got the open lane to run. Politically, almost nobody, including Senate Republicans, thought that this mugshot impeached individual was their best chance. Now, Democrats also are drawing the link to other times when we see Trump seize on and support people that the party said would lose who went on to lose. Walker, Lake, Moore. If you don't remember all those names, that's because they lost. And most people don't sit around remembering the losers of campaigns. They were on the scene for a couple months, and then, despite their Trump endorsement, were not heard from again, not in federal government.
3:50Meanwhile, the Cook Political Report, which is kind of a nonpartisan Bible, because of the Trump move here and because Trump's candidate is in, they are now lowering the odds that Republicans win with Paxton. They thought it would have been better with, as I mentioned, the other guy. Meanwhile, the official Republican Senate campaign arm, which was back in Cornyn, now trying to walk back its many attacks on Paxton. The internet, though, might remember. This is the sound of Texas. And this is how it sounds under Ken Paxton.
4:32Shots fired! Shots fired! Those are just some of the memorable attacks. The Democrat Tallarico just did a newsworthy interview with Lawrence O'Donnell where they discussed Paxton's baggage. I can't tell you the number of people who come up to me at the end of these events and whisper, I'm not a Democrat, like they're in the Witness Protection Program, including a lot of people who voted for President Trump in 2024. That is the sound of a different kind of candidate. You also might remember some have called him a Colbert Democrat because he had that big newsworthy interview on Colbert, which then the government of the Trump administration basically tried to silence under abuse of FCC laws, and sometimes this happens, which ended up drawing a lot more attention, support and even online donations to Tallerico.
5:24Now, is he going to get a bigger airing and hearing now? Certainly looks like it. And that dynamic I mentioned that Republican voters are mad, that doesn't mean they've all turned on Trump. I'm only going to tell you what the numbers show. We're not getting ahead of ourselves with what's happening. But the fact that they're mad and mad at Senate Republicans and that 100 million was spent in this race shows the party is not exactly united at a minimum. Take Nebraska, a very conservative place where a Republican lawmaker was getting an earful from constituents with some backlash for the Trump agenda.
5:57Why do you continue to protect the pedophiles and Trump's DOJ as they continue to break the law? What are you going to do about the rampant corruption occurring all over the Trump administration? I have a question about Congress's approval of wars. Where are you stepping in? How much did Doge save the taxpayers? I'll fact check you. How can your morals let you fall into like with Trump?
6:29That's some of the back and forth, even in red areas where people are even holding town halls. Many Republicans have been avoiding them or carefully vetting them. And as the midterms look bad for the Republicans in the House and worse, getting worse in the Senate, although the math would still be on their side. They have 53. Trump is now saying something that you don't usually hear from an incumbent president who wants to motivate his base. Discussing the war, he says he doesn't care about the midterms. Their whole economic system is broken down. They thought they were going to outweigh me, you know, or will outweigh him.
7:05He's got the midterms. I don't care about the midterms. He doesn't care about the midterms. Now, I told you, I always try to keep the fairness in the context. Imagine it's not Trump. You could imagine a different president making a statement like that for foreign policy reasons, trying to say, hey, this other country thinks that I'm under the gun. I'm not politically at home. And if that were just foreign policy strategy, it might be smart. The problem for Donald Trump, of course, is it's not just that he's saying that in war diplomacy or ceasefire talks. He's acting like he doesn't care about the midterms because he keeps siding with candidates that his own party says are worse for the midterms.
7:45I want to bring in two wise and expert seasoned politicos, not calling anyone old, just saying we've been around the block. I could say that about people I know and like. Reverend Al Sharpton, of course, host of Politics Nation, former presidential candidate and president of the National Action Network. And first question is obviously going to Mark. Mr. McKinnon is a longtime political strategist from Texas, knows that state well, as well as national politics. Have you ever seen the Showtime show, The Circus? He created it. You might remember him from George Bush's campaigns all the way back to the statewide Texas campaign and then the presidential.
8:20As for the Paxton primary win, which is the news tonight, a perfect storm is lining up for Texas Democrats, says this experienced Republican. Welcome to you, Mark. I have questions, but first, the floor is yours. You know so much about this. What happened last night? Thank you, Ari. Well, it's fascinating. I've worked on both sides of the fence. I actually worked for George W. Bush and Ann Richards, but Ann Richards was the last Texas governor elected 35 years ago. I remember that election because I worked in it. But there hasn't been a Republican elected statewide since. So I'm the guy who every two or four years is always pushing back when the media or people call me and say, oh, I don't know.
9:01This could be the year, blue tide. and I always tap the brakes, but I think something different. You're saying Democrats have struggled there, yeah. Yeah, yeah, but there's always this notion, or there has been in recent cycles, the Beto race is a good example when he ran against Cruz, but I've always been resistant because I just know how conservative Texas is, generally speaking. But I think something's happening that's coming together that could really make this race a possible pickup for Democrats, which is astounding to me. I mean, first of all, you have an exceptional candidate in James Tallarico, really just completely unique.
9:38And I tell people who may have heard whatever they've heard about him on either side, just watch a speech. He's just got a different approach, different language. He embraces values. He can out Bible Republicans on on on faith issues. And it's really compelling. You know, but so stack that up with a candidate who couldn't be, you know, having greater baggage than Ken Paxton. And so you have like kind of a pure good, you know, pastor type of character. And the guy who's had all these criminal charges against him at Finn and Peach. So I think you stack all that up and the fact that Democrats are enthused right now.
10:13That's what happens in midterms. It's which party most enthusiastic? More Democrats voted in this primary than Republicans did in Texas. That's what really got my attention. So the Democrats are cranked up. Whatever happens on the Republican side. And Ari, I called a bunch of my Republican friends around the state today, and here's what they said. They said, I'm not yet ready to say I'm going to vote for Tallarico, but I'm absolutely not voting for Ken Paxton. Well, and that's the issue with what they call low-quality candidates, right? You get a different trend line than the state's trend line, which is still red, if a candidate is low-quality enough.
10:49And so you mentioned that race with Cruz and Beto, where Cruz won by less than three points. What does that tell us about sort of the gap and what Tallarico has to do here? And then I'll let Rev respond to you. Well, thanks. I think that's a great data point. So you look at that race in 2018, where, again, everybody said, you know, there was a shot here, Democrats, because they had a great candidate in Beto. But Beto really made some mistakes at the end of the campaign. He nationalized the campaign. And at the end of the day, you know, Republicans, these same friends that I talked to, just couldn't handle Beto's nationalizing race.
11:23I think that Tallarico learned lessons from that race. I think he'll be a better candidate than Beto was, and I think that Paxson will be a way worse candidate than Cruz. So stack that up. That's an easy three points. I would totally agree with Mark on his last statement, better candidate and worse candidate, given Tallarico and given Paxson. I think also you have to remember the environment in which we are having the elections. with people's gas prices high, with affordability out of reach for many people. A member of our National Board of National Action Network is a commissioner in Houston, Rodney Ellis.
12:03He said people are hurting. Trump people are hurting. And I think that you can clearly look at all of the reasons that a guy like Tallarico would appeal to them. And they don't have the flag in the Bible against Tallarico. It's hard to put the Bible in the hands of Paxton. So I think that you have elements there that if they're handled right, and we'll see, could lead to a Democratic. Well, it's like Kendrick Lamar said, sometimes you got to hide the Bible if God is watching in a big fight. But you're saying this is a Democrat who's not hiding the Bible. He's going to run tough and strong on his faith.
12:40That's exactly right. And he puts it out there. And it's a state that that matters. and he's contrasting with a guy that's been accused of several improprieties, including by his own wife. So it's not like I'm trying to out-God you or out-Jesus you. I'm this and you are that. And he's supported by a president who we all have questions about. But even with all that aside, with affordability and the other issues like Iran and other issues that are troubling the average Republican Texan. I think that Tallarico has a good shot. Yeah. And Mark, people watching might say, having been fatigued by the losses of Democrats you mentioned in Texas, but also what you might call Trump's resilience.
13:29You know, he's not known for his honesty or his ethics, but he gets back in the ring. And so you got viewers and voters who say, OK, well, I'm hearing the same old story. I thought it was interesting that the Wall Street Journal kind of agreed with the point you raised earlier. I'd love for you to expound on it, Mark. The journal says Trump and Democrats get Paxton. The Senate nominee, they all want it. I alluded to that earlier. But again, this is Murdoch's paper. And he says the risk for Republicans is that more moderate and indie voters will be turned off by Paxton. Providing the opening for Chalo Rico, the seminarian and state lawmakers become a fundraising force among Dems hungry for victory.
14:09Speak on that, Mark, because it overlaps with what you said. And I don't think anyone would accuse Rupert Murdoch's paper of just looking for a liberal propaganda. They seem to think this is the case. Well, yeah. I think it's just observing the obvious, which is Republicans should not have had to spend a dime in this state. If Cornyn were running and he were the nominee, they would turn all their attention to these other key races around the country. They've already spent$135 million, and they're going to have to spend millions more to try and protect Paxson, which is going to take a whole lot more money than it would have been for Corning.
14:45So even let's just say that Paxson won for some reason, and I really think that Tallarico's got a shot here. But in the best case scenario, it's going to drain millions and millions of dollars from races that Republicans could pick up because Paxson's the nominee. Yeah. I want to thank Mark McKinnon for kicking off our Texas coverage tonight. Rev stays here on one other point. We'll be back in just 90 seconds.
15:36ride with pin verification from Uber. One more way Uber is putting safety at every turn. Learn more on the Uber app. Let's check in on the Serta counting sheep. Why aren't we counted anymore?
15:46Neil deGrasse Tyson:Well, the all-new Serta Perfect Sleeper has the Q4 support system that helps relieve aches and back pain. We'll never get counted again! Uh, nope. Serta, we make the world's best mattress. Home to the Rachel Maddow Show. Morning Joe, the briefing with Jen Saki, and more voices you know and trust. MS Now is your source for news, opinion, and the world. Learn more at MS.now. We're back covering the big news out of Texas, where Democrats think they have a better chance of taking back the Senate. Reverend Sharman is here. We've talked about Tallarico, who I don't think is a full national name to all Democrats, but he's certainly gotten some money from activists, people who follow it closely.
16:28And he also got what some people call the Rogan Primary, which matters more, Joe Rogan's influential podcast based in Texas. Take a look at this moment. I do think our challenge on my side of the aisle is how do you get to that third step of feeling disillusioned, but then using that to rise and create something new? I guess all I'm pushing back on is that second step of it's always going to be this way. Right. It doesn't have to be this way. That is the key step. Right. That's because you need to run for president. We need someone who's actually a good person. Not bad. You know, to be able to in a state that clearly he's running to represent, to go to Rogan, who is probably revered, whether I agree with it or not, by people in that state and come out of the ring unscathed in and of itself, says something about his talent as a as a political person.
17:32but he also comes across sincere. And I think that that is the thing that is going to be something that a lot of voters are looking at because people can kind of sense when somebody's performative or somebody's emanating from the inside. And he comes off that way to where even a guy like Rogan had to like, kind of be delicate, how he handled them because he wasn't talking to somebody performative. Everybody knows whatever Trump is saying, even his supporters say, does he really mean that? This young man comes across like he means what he's saying, or he is saying what he is. And that goes to the wider questions in the midterms.
18:12You mentioned gas prices, economy. Those are the factors that drive it. But there's always a question of politics of whether you're fighting the last war. And people who've been change agents, Obama was a pathbreaker. So apart from even the discussion around being an unusual pathbreaking candidate, he also broke with Democrats on foreign policy, and he had a different style. And we've seen Trump, of course, whether you like it or not, broke all kinds of dishes and rules. And so you wonder if that doesn't only have to go towards entertainment. It could also go back to old school where people go, you know, whatever you think of Taro Rico, he certainly doesn't come off as a clout chasing failed reality show star.
18:51And he doesn't come off with someone that's just doing this for a personal agenda, ambition or power hunger. He just doesn't come off that way. And if Democrats have those candidates around the country, it can really be helpful. But I think just observing him, and I don't know him, I think he's done my show once or twice, but I think observing him, his persona is so opposite of Paxton that the contrast is going to be interesting when they have debates, because you're going to see one guy who's been accused of everything who just comes off like a guy that's slick and another guy that seems like a young man who knows the bible and really wants to help people now whether either side is true or not is that's how they're projecting yeah and to extend our um this biblical mood we've been in today uh the sins of the father donald trump are apparently sometimes forgiven more by voters in red states for Trump than his mini-me's.
19:52Because I showed some other people whose scandals might not have even been worse than what Trump stands accused of. But those folks, I showed Walker and Moore and others lost. No, they don't forgive others. And I think that Trump is a one-time thing, I think. And what you're seeing with Trump is the cult of personality. Well, you can't transfer cult of personality. You can't transfer charisma. So everyone that gets caught up in that storm with that charismatic cult of personality leader doesn't understand that when the storm starts coming down, they hit the ground first because people are not following them.
20:35They're following him. And it's not only going to be true in this year, it's going to be true in 28 when he has to pass it on. Can Vance or Rubio or whoever fill that gap that they energize people with their charisma? What Trump said half the time didn't make any political or policy sense. It was out of personality. Yeah. And they don't have anyone else like that. Yeah, and you're putting your finger on a bigger Republican problem, which is there's a fine line between knowing the song and sounding like you're doing karaoke. And people go, no, I'd rather hear the OG. And if you can't carry the tune, they may not get away with it the way he did.
21:13Rev Sharpton, always good to see you, sir. Always good to see you. OK, appreciate it. Up ahead, a Democrat unloading a new plan to fight the kind of corruption and just bizarre distractions we see like this going on at the White House. the president thinking about wrestling instead of fighting inflation in the war we have that top lawmaker and why is the pentagon releasing files that they say relate to ufos what's going on in this image we're actually going to talk to one of the foremost experts in the world neil degrasse tyson next and now the next chapter of the serta counting sheep hey uncle number one Why aren't we counted anymore?
21:51Let me tell you a story.
21:53Neil deGrasse Tyson:Long ago, Serta invented the Perfect Sleeper mattress. Oh, no. Oh, yes. It says the all-new Serta Perfect Sleeper with the Q4 support system has four-in-one perfectly interlinked coils that help relieve aches and back pain for perfect sleep night after night. We'll never get counted again. Uh, nope. Serta, we make the world's best mattress. Listen to your favorite MS Now shows anytime as a podcast. Enjoy new episodes of Morning Joe, Deadline White House, and The Rachel Maddow Show. Every small D Democratic muscle that we have is flexing. Plus the last word with Lawrence O'Donnell, the beat with Ari Melber, the weeknight, and more.
22:35Neil deGrasse Tyson:On the go, wherever you get your podcasts. For ad-free listening to all of your favorite shows, subscribe to MS Now Premium on Apple Podcasts.
22:53i can't seem to see your face mysterious i'm grace i'm gonna call you rocky thumbs up no that's thumbs down we do the thumbs up it's close enough uh it's close enough if you're working with an actual alien in real time that's from the new film Project Hail Mary, which gives ultimately an uplifting vision of what our first encounter with alien life could be like for humanity. And if we call that sci-fi, science fiction, right now we're going to do some sci-fact, because we have this great guest I told you about. There are renewed questions about whether there's life beyond Earth or what the Trump Pentagon is up to, releasing a batch of documents and videos that they kind of hyped up as maybe related to UFOs.
23:42There was also some testimony from civilians and military personnel. One official said they were speechless after seeing certain flying objects. There's also this 2019 clip that has unidentified objects that appear to fly over the Persian Gulf. There's a 2024 video, and people discuss this online, that shows something near Syria that appeared to go accelerate at a very fast rate. And from 2022, a cigar-shaped object that was flying, at least according to this sort of grainy video near U.S. military installations. The footage sparks at a minimum curiosity. Americans tend to believe when you poll them that aliens definitely or probably exist.
24:21Of course, that is fueled by so many of the movies that make us want to believe. Well, as mentioned, returning to the beat tonight is one of the people you would want in the entire world if you could discuss this. Neil deGrasse Tyson, an acclaimed astrophysicist. His new book is Take Me to Your Leader, Perspectives on Your First Alien Encounter. You can Google it and get it wherever books are sold. Take Me to Your Leader by our friend. Welcome back.
24:47Neil deGrasse Tyson:Thanks for having me. I have one regret about that cover. Yeah. It's just people being beamed up. There should have been a cow in there. We should have had more than just. No, just a cow. One cow. Just one cow. Yeah. That would complete the story. Starting with this this odd drop from the files from a from an administration that sometimes seems to want to be in the news or distract. We're all aware of that. You were a little skeptical of how it came out. What do we make of these files? Well, I'm not surprised by them, given the testimonies we've seen in Congress under oath of whistleblowers, former military personnel, former intelligence officers, all saying that they've got alien body parts and crash saucers and reverse engineered technologies.
Read the full transcript
25:34Neil deGrasse Tyson:So if they're saying we have it, to then have some documents that basically say the same thing, it becomes less interesting to me, given that we had high-ranking officials saying what is fundamentally the same thing. Now, what's different, of course, in recent years is you go back decades ago, the accounts of aliens were like the farmers in the back 40, revelers from the bar just let out. And so you had plausible deniability of any of those accounts. But when you have high-ranking officials talking about it, then you say, okay, let me even give them that. Okay? So from my perspective as a scientist, testimony does not count as evidence.
26:22Neil deGrasse Tyson:Evidence is evidence. So if If you've got it, bring out the alien. Is that too much to ask? Given all of these files and everything else. By the way, I would expect with a trillion dollar budget, whatever it is today, the Pentagon would investigate unknown flying objects. And of course, they would make them top secret. If it's top secret, it's not a cover up. Let's make that distinction clear. If it's secret, that's not a cover up. But your scientific lens for assessing the narrow question of whether aliens have been observable or close to our planet. On Earth, yes. Which is separate from the larger question.
27:00Neil deGrasse Tyson:Your view is what? Oh, the larger question. Anyone who studied the parameters would say, yeah, the universe is surely teeming with life. Teeming? Why not? Given the age of the universe, given that we are made of the most common ingredients in the universe, and that life got underway almost as quickly as it possibly could have in the early Earth. And our planet count of exoplanets is now rising through 6 ,000. And that's only in a tiny little area. We're still expanding that within our galaxy. To suggest that we are alone in the universe would be inexcusably egocentric or there's some hidden philosophy, be it religious or cultural, that you're ascribing to.
27:43Well, let me try to make sense of it. simply because you know i'm just a country lawyer from seattle you're making partly a mathematical argument for aliens in the universe because if the universe is that vast oh yeah and it happened once as the number goes up it's more likely than not that you think it would have happened again
28:01Neil deGrasse Tyson:none of us are in denial of the likelihood of life elsewhere in the life of any kind microbial or otherwise yes and yet that's a different question right yeah different of earth so let me read from your book because you say uh they either have this idea of oh a space alien lands in front of you, take me to your leader, what do you do? And you write, for the aliens who have reached Earth at all, we'd conclude they're more advanced than we are. Maybe you should not seek out your actual leaders, but people who have high scientific and technological expertise. I'm thinking, I'm thinking, I'm sorry, am I biased?
28:32I don't know. Exactly. As for sci-fi versus sci-fact, you write that the films have aliens looking like humans on the outside. And if they're identical on the inside, we ask what it means to think of them as alien at all. If visiting aliens never got ill or they never required medical attention, then they could easily be living and working among us, hiding in plain sight. What are you doing here other than, you know, riling us up and getting everyone excited? I'm not authorized to comment further.
28:57Neil deGrasse Tyson:No, no, no. I'm just saying the point of the book is look at how many, look at how much of our literature has been given unto imagining aliens. I mean, we have crowdsourced what aliens might be like in the guise of books and films and TV series. So by the time they actually roll out the alien, it might just be anticlimactic. I would be most surprised if they pull the alien out of the back shed and it's humanoid. That would surprise me most. Because most life on Earth does not resemble humans with whom we have DNA in common. But just to be the journalist here, your view, this book, more likely than not, it has not gotten near Earth.
29:43Neil deGrasse Tyson:What people are bringing forth as evidence, which includes a lot of testimony. You know, the I need a witness cry out in a court of law, in a courtroom, is something uttered by no scientist ever. Let me ask it differently. You know, this is you're the scientist and I'm the lawyer. you don't see sufficient primary original evidence to think that they've gotten near this planet what i'm i'm gonna say it i'm gonna make a stronger statement let every testimony be true okay until they fork up an alien we will always and forever have to say to each other do you believe in aliens right because it comes down to you do believe in the testimony of the people who say they've seen aliens.
30:28Neil deGrasse Tyson:And we don't say, do you believe in an octopus? We don't say that because you've seen an octopus. But if no one had ever seen an octopus, only a couple of dozen people, and you parade them in front of Congress, you got to believe he's got eight legs and each leg has suction cups. And it's got a huge, smart brain. It can open jars and doorknobs. And you think, okay, draw one. And they draw it. It'll be a funny drawing, right? And no one would believe it. Well, we do say, do you believe in life after love or life after Colbert? Let's take a look at your black hole science comedic moment on the final finale.
31:04I was honored to be in the last episode.
31:06Neil deGrasse Tyson:Yes. What is this? Steven, maybe I can help explain. What is it? Well, it looks to me like a textbook case of an Einstein Rosen bridge, also known as an interdimensional wormhole. Your cancellation has created a rift in the comedy variety talk continuum. And if it grows, all of late night television could be destroyed. In reality, a wormhole doesn't suck. It's just a portal you stepped through. And where'd you get green? Have you been watching too much Rick and Morty?
31:44Incredible to have you there. I know they love you, you love them. what did it feel like to do science a little bit in that moment? And what did you think of Colbert?
31:54Neil deGrasse Tyson:Just so I have a very low bar when it comes to agreeing to doing skits or showing up in a cameo. Just I'll show a little bit where I got a call from the SpongeBob people. And would I show up in a cameo? And I was Neil deBass Tyson, astrophysicist. So if an artist, capital A. So writer, producer, sculptor, if they care about science and they want to put a little extra science in and they call me, I'm there for them. I think Colbert is one of the smartest people on television. And anyone who's watched him would agree with that comment. That's not just blowing air. That's real. And so I think it'll be a loss to have him no longer on late night.
32:35Neil deGrasse Tyson:But I think he's bigger than late night. So he'll come up. He'll land on his feet, obviously. And he might create something bigger than anything that was canceled. I love that spirit. and you do think cosmically. And there is that thing that happens in politics. It happens in the rest of the earth sometimes, which is you try to suppress something powerful, it pops back up. Hence the legend of the phoenix. From the ashes. Yeah. Let me tell you something. If I had my way, we'd just have you in here every night talking about aliens and flag holes for an hour. You'll be like, what happened to the news?
33:07I'd be like, this is the version of the news.
33:09Neil deGrasse Tyson:The universe is unlimited in all it can offer a newscaster. I mean, by the amount of time the galaxies have existed, breaking news could take years. Well, but also consider that your signal is in motion, moving at the speed of light in the radio bubble that surrounds Earth. So aliens would have some access to you at some point. Not the beginning, because it's the honeymooners and Howdy Doody and other radio signals on the leading edge. But somewhere in there is an Ari Melber. Well, then if I may, I'll say, go get the book. OK, get the book. And thank you, Neil. We'll be right back. War, gas crunch, other big problems.
33:55But your president at the White House is erecting a 90 foot tall UFC octagon and 5000 seats in order to host a cage fight. This is planning for Donald Trump's 80th birthday next month. structure, quite a bit larger than the White House itself. Wealthy donors are, quote, sponsoring the event, which is another way that there is sort of a new thing that didn't otherwise exist that can use money to curry favor with Trump, whether you call that the swamp, as he did when he campaigned, or something more troubling, as I guess in the eye of the beholder. You can see the construction zone from just feet away from the other demolition site on your screen, which used to be the East Wing.
34:38I mean, this image right here reveals both the president's priorities while people pay more for gas and we're at war, and just the kind of chaotic situation you get when you don't have oversight and you don't have a Congress that has really enforced anything. So the president can just demolish buildings and put up a wrestling site and ignore other problems, and that's D.C. right now. It's not an allegory, it's what it looks like. Donald Trump has abused the levels of government, sometimes in ways that no one else thought to. For example, running an outside business while you're president is not technically illegal.
35:13But if Barack Obama wanted to keep open a law firm where he and his family and friends would get paid, they obviously would have made a lot of money. He didn't try it. And then there are other things that Democrats say may be impeachable, illegal, unconstitutional. There is now an attempt by Donald Trump to make a lot of money in the stock market in ways that has never been tried before. Whether any of that amounts to some sort of cross-legal line, we don't even know yet. We don't have all the details, but he's certainly used, and Democrats now say abused, power to pump the companies that were learned he's trading in.
35:49Go out and buy a Dell computer. They make a great product. They're not looking for any publicity. He committed to 200 Boeings. I told this to Boeing and General Electric. We're going to go the General Electric Engines, which are great. Apple, a great company. Oracle will be building a$14 billion worth of cloud computing and AI infrastructure in the kingdom. I didn't know that, David. We have to talk to your father about that. I want you to know the Trump Organization put out a statement that insists these investments are independently managed by third-party financial institutions and that they have exclusive authority over investment decisions.
36:29That is a kind of legal financial denial that doesn't address the issue of the appearance of a conflict of interest and the contrast with most other presidents. Trump also trying to funnel money from you, the taxpayer, towards criminals who helped him with efforts to overthrow the election. That is the last straw, even for some Republicans.
36:54I think it's stupid on stilts. Someone who assaulted a police officer admitted their guilt, and now we're going to pay them for that? I don't think it's an appropriate use of money. What are your thoughts about this representation fund from the president of the state? Yeah, not a big fan. I call it a payout pot for punks. The Republican senators were pissed. There were multiple senators yelling at the attorney general saying this feels like self-dealing. This feels like Trump cut a deal with himself. Republicans say they're pissed. Democrats now want to make an anti-corruption caucus that will actually do something about this beyond just Republicans claiming that they pushed back in a private meeting.
37:37Congressman Jason Crow, who's one of the new co-chairs of this effort, is here with us right after this.
37:46We showed you this image of what's going on at the White House, what many say are misplaced priorities amid a war and the gas crunch and the president getting ready for his birthday with this wrestling setup. Congressman Jason Crowe of Colorado is one of the leaders of this new end corruption caucus, trying to actually get action on some of the issues we showed you in the lead up to this, including Republicans who say, Congressman, they're pissed at the thug fund. What does your new effort do? Yeah, well, thanks for covering, Ari. What we're trying to do is draw attention to the fact that we can start right now, today, doing very simple, seemingly simple things that send a very strong message.
38:27You know, we don't have to pass a huge package of reform legislation. What leaders who want to lead by example can do is right now just start doing things. You can swear off stock trading when you're in office. You can swear off corporate PAC money for your campaigns, as I have, as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has done. And people should expect that of their elected officials. So let's lead by example. Let's just start doing this stuff, start inspiring some confidence in our system, and then we can start building up and doing bigger things, too. If the Republicans oppose the thug fund, and I played that sound, including Senate Majority Leader Thun, then why don't they stop it?
39:12Well, that's exactly my point, right? I mean, talk is cheap. There's a lot of people who talk about corruption. Let's end corruption. Let's clean up the system. Let's drain the swamp, blah, blah, blah. But there are very few people who actually walk the talk. Right. So let's let's see it. You know, do you trade stocks in office or not? Do you accept corporate PAC money in your campaigns or not? Do you post your meeting schedule on your website and make it public for your constituents to see who you're meeting with, who's coming into your office? These are things that every single member of Congress literally can do today.
39:48Just go to your constituents and tell them you're going to start doing it. We don't have to pass a law. We don't have to legislate it. We can do it. So our caucus is open for business. We welcome members to come in who are willing to make those pledges, start showing that we can do these things and clean up our system, starting with what we can do today. Right. And I get that as using the perch, the platform, the visibility you have to draw those lines. Mitch McConnell, I want to mention about this fund. The thug fund said that the top law enforcement official that's Blanche working for Trump wants a fund to pay people who assault cops.
40:27Utterly stupid, morally wrong between him and Thune and everyone else. You know, that's that's where it sort of, I guess, becomes a question of whether they're trying to get credit for saying they're against it without stopping it, which to anyone who's paying attention looks look cynical and feckless. in fairness, of course, if they get their act together and stop it soon, then this might have been, you know, making the case. What do you say to the criticism the Democrats have faced in the past that it ends up being unilateral disarmament if it is just self-policing? We've seen that in the redistricting wars.
41:01We've seen it with Russ Feingold and campaign finance, where those money and PAC issues, as you know, came up in history. And there was a real pragmatic debate among reformers and liberals who said progress isn't just saying only only people who agree with this have to do it any more than you have a Pentagon budget only funded by taxpayers who want a bigger army that you really need to get binding rules. What do you say to that counter argument? Yeah, what I say is I actually don't buy the argument at all that doing some very simple things is somehow unilaterally disarming that, you know, I have to do things that I think are distasteful and corrupt to somehow compete.
41:41You know, I don't take corporate PAC money. I've never taken corporate PAC money in my campaigns. And guess what? I raised more money than any other House member in Colorado this last quarter with small dollar donations with a grassroots campaign. So, you know, you can do it and people will will follow those who are leading. They will see who's doing the right thing. Yeah. And that will generate its own support. So I just don't sound like you're almost making on. Yeah, you're almost making argument about like, you know, you need to have a leg day at the gym if you want to be well-rounded. And you got to either do it or not, because you're saying if you don't do it, then you end up being more indebted to corporate PACs.
42:24And that might actually put more pressure on you to take positions that I don't know, in your case, you might oppose. Is that is that a fair summary? Well, I lost you on the leg day, although I appreciate a leg day just as much as anybody in the gym. It's like if you don't if you don't fortify your your fundraising like a leg day. Yeah. You won't be able to run without the corporate PACs. It was a bad analogy. I gotcha. Just to share it. it was a good try though i mean i'm always here for a leg day analogies i mean you don't want to be at a point you don't want their money go ahead yeah i don't listen i want to be able to go to my community and be like i listen i will have people come into my office and make their case and i'm going to listen to what they have to say based on the merits of the case good ideas bad ideas but i'm not going to feel like i need to listen to somebody or I need them to come in because they're writing me a corporate fact check.
43:23I just don't want to do that. And frankly, that's liberating for me, right? It takes a hell of a pressure off of me. It allows me to go to my community with a straight face and make the case. And it inspires confidence in the people that I represent. So I don't know why other members wouldn't follow suit on that because the appetite is so big. This should be one of the most bipartisan and things in America right now. This is blowback against corruption because I represent a diverse district, you know, Republicans, Democrats, independents and everyone in between. And everybody wants this, actually.
43:57Everybody who I talk to wants it. So I don't know why people don't step up. And that's the whole point behind our caucus. We're going to try to push it, you know, create a name and shame if we have to, but create the demand for it and invite people to follow. So, yeah, a big Democratic push here, which is why we wanted to give time to cover it. So on a serious note, it's important when you look at the corruption issues and we kind of talked it out, people can make up their own mind. On a lighter note, you know, you made that leg day analogy. I don't know if it's going to end up in campaign ads.
44:29We'll keep our eyes out for it, Congressman. Thanks for being here. I am due. I am due for a leg day. And you have named and shamed me, Ari, so I'm hitting the gym after this. You know, we try to have fun. We don't take ourselves too seriously. The issues you face are serious. Congressman, thank you. We'll be right back.
44:49Neil deGrasse Tyson:Listen to your favorite MS Now shows anytime as a podcast. Enjoy new episodes of Morning Joe, Deadline White House, and The Rachel Maddow Show. Every small D Democratic muscle that we have is flexing. Plus The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell, The Beat with Ari Melber, The Weeknight, and more. On the go, wherever you get your podcasts. For ad-free listening to all of your favorite shows, subscribe to MS Now Premium on Apple Podcasts.
From the publisher
May 27, 2026; 6pm; Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has won the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate. MS NOW’s Ari Melber reports on how his victory is fueling GOP fears within the party. Rev. Al Sharpton and longtime Texas-based political strategist Mark McKinnon join. Plus, acclaimed astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson joins to discuss aliens, the universe, and his new book, “Take Me to Your Reader: Perspectives on Your First Alien Encounter.”
To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
