Top Trump Official Admits to Visiting Epstein Island

11 Feb 2026 · 42 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Beat with Ari Melber - Top Trump Official Admits to Visiting Epstein Island

Episode Details

  • Episode Title: Top Trump Official Admits to Visiting Epstein Island
  • Air Date: February 10, 2026
  • Host: Ari Melber
  • Description: The episode focuses on the renewed implications of the Epstein scandal concerning a Trump administration official's acknowledgment of visiting Epstein's private island, amidst ongoing investigations and political ramifications.

Key Themes and Discussions

Overview of the Epstein Scandal

  • The Epstein scandal resurfaces in the context of the Trump administration.
  • The episode centers around an admission made by Lutnick, Trump's Commerce Chief, regarding his visit to Epstein's Island after having denied any association for years.

Key Developments

  • Lutnick's Admission:
  • He confessed under oath to visiting Epstein's Island in 2012, contradicting previous claims of severing ties with Epstein in 2005.
  • His denial was based on public statements claiming he had no further contact with Epstein.
  • Pressure from Investigators:
  • The pressure mounted due to newly released emails that contradicted Lutnick’s prior statements.
  • This admission raises questions about the extent of deceit within the Trump administration regarding ties to Epstein.

Political Implications

  • Trump's Continued Support:
  • Despite the scandal, Trump continues to stand by Lutnick, raising concerns about accountability among high-ranking officials within the administration.
  • Congressional Reactions:
  • Senator Van Hollen confronts Lutnick about his misleading statements and the implications they carry.
  • The episode highlights bipartisan concerns regarding the handling of Epstein's connections and the lack of accountability for powerful figures.

Troubling Evidence and Allegations

  • Epstein's Practices:
  • New evidence indicates Epstein utilized surveillance methods to blackmail individuals, emphasizing the severity of the accusations against him.
  • Trump's Knowledge:
  • The episode discusses Trump's previous knowledge of Epstein's activities, contradicting his later claims of ignorance about Epstein's criminal behavior.

Investigative Journalism

  • Call for Accountability:
  • Melber urges for a thorough investigation into the Epstein files, suggesting that Congress should take more active steps to hold individuals accountable.
  • Calls for Ghislaine Maxwell to testify, highlighting the potential for Congress to grant her immunity to compel her testimony.

Conclusions and Future Outlook

  • Implications for Governance:
  • The episode underscores the need for transparency and accountability from government officials, particularly those in high positions.
  • Questions linger about the depth of Epstein's network and the complicity of powerful individuals in his operations.

Key Takeaways

  • Lutnick's admission reveals the potential for extensive deceit within the Trump administration regarding Epstein's associations.
  • The political fallout continues as Congress grapples with the implications of these revelations.
  • The episode calls into question the integrity of those in power and the necessity of investigative oversight in matters of public concern.

Final Thoughts This episode of The Beat with Ari Melber sheds light on the ongoing ramifications of the Epstein scandal and its implications for governance and accountability within the Trump administration. The discussions emphasize the importance of transparency and the responsibility of public officials to uphold the truth in their statements and actions.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Lutnick's Confession and Its Implications

1:24 to 4:00

Ari discusses Lutnick's recent confession about visiting Epstein Island and its significance.

“but we begin with really something right out of a movie plot.”

Senate Hearing and Lutnick's Defense

4:00 to 6:40

Ari details the Senate hearing where Lutnick addresses his visit to Epstein's island.

“So we know he's been lying about that for years, as mentioned, as we showed you on the timeline.”

Evidence of Epstein's Activities

6:40 to 10:00

Discussion on new evidence relating to Epstein's activities and surveillance operations.

“But why lie about that if it was just that?”

Trump's Knowledge of Epstein's Crimes

10:00 to 12:40

Ari explores Trump's past knowledge and comments on Epstein's crimes and associates.

“There's also new evidence from the files about Epstein's recording, which relates to something I'm going to quote Lutnick on, these questions about what Epstein was up to.”

Reactions and Ongoing Investigations

12:40 to 14:00

Discussion on various reactions to the Epstein files and ongoing investigations.

“Or telling the FBI Trump revealed Epstein's associate was the operative, that she was evil.”

Exploring the Epstein Files and Political Reactions

14:00 to 16:54

Discussing the evolving political landscape surrounding the Epstein case and reactions from lawmakers.

“Are we in the middle of this story after all these years?”

Investigating the Truth Behind Epstein's Network

17:48 to 26:40

Andrew Weissman discusses the need for a thorough investigation into Epstein's connections and the government's role.

“Developed at USC's Longevity Institute, Prolon supports biological age reduction, metabolism, skin health, and fat loss when combined with proper exercise and nutrition.”

Congressional Oversight of Epstein Investigations

26:40 to 28:09

A discussion on Congress's role in investigating Epstein and the failures of the DOJ.

“did a very good job of asking tough questions.”

Congressional Hearing on ICE Tactics

28:09 to 29:39

Discussion of the congressional hearing involving Trump's DHS officials and ICE actions.

“This is the first such hearing since those two killings in Minneapolis and all of the tumult and uproar across the nation around these issues.”

Human Impact of ICE Detention

29:42 to 31:36

Exploration of the harsh conditions faced by detainees in ICE facilities.

“There are more details emerging as well from inside the facilities, which under Trump have expanded both in how they operate and who they force to wait in there.”
Show all 17 chapters

Expert Insights on Immigration Enforcement

31:37 to 33:28

Experts discuss the implications and public opinion on Trump's immigration policies.

“Immigration experts say these are policy choices, many of them avoidable while still maintaining safety in the United States.”

Investigating ICE Leadership Changes

33:29 to 35:57

Analysis of the potential changes in ICE leadership and their implications.

“No, and replacing Kristi Noem with Tom Homan is such a tiny increment better.”

New Developments in Nancy Guthrie Case

36:07 to 42:00

Discussion of the search for Nancy Guthrie and analysis of related video evidence.

“We turn now to a development, including new evidence, as authorities still search for Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of today's show anchor Savannah Guthrie, who is a valued colleague for all of us.”

Show Transition

42:00 to 42:10

The show is transitioning to a new segment.

Bad Bunny's Performance Discussion

42:10 to 43:06

Analyzing Bad Bunny's impactful performance and its cultural significance.

“from Sunday's Bad Bunny heartfelt performance, and it's dominating all kinds of discussion.”

Jon Stewart's Commentary

43:06 to 43:38

Jon Stewart critiques the demands placed on entertainers to unify the nation.

“to unify this country when you only found out a few days ago that Puerto Rico is a part of it.”

Impact of Bad Bunny's Halftime Show

43:38 to 43:58

Discussing how Bad Bunny's show is set to break viewership records.

“It is now on track to be the most watched halftime show of all time, bringing a lot of people together to share something while others just, I don't know, complained about it.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Andrew Weissmann:You know that thing where you get an amazing pair of shoes at a really great price and want to tell everyone about it? Yeah, so do we. Here at Designer Shoe Warehouse, we'll give you something to brag about. Like the latest styles from brands you love. Or the trends everyone's obsessing over. Or shoes that make you feel like, well, you. So go ahead, show off a little. Find shoes that get you at prices that get your budget. Head to your DSW store or DSW.com today. DSW, let us surprise you. Close your eyes. Focus. Listen to work getting done with Monday.com. Relax as AI does the manual work, while your teams are aligned on a single source of truth.

0:44Ari Melber:Feel the sensation of an AI work platform, so flexible and intuitive, it feels like it was built just for you. Notice, you're limitless. Now open your eyes. Go to Monday.com. Start for free and finally breathe. Welcome to The Beat. I'm Ari Melber. And this Epstein scandal is rocking the Trump White House again today, this time featuring confirmed visits to the notorious Epstein Island, where the man you see on your screen, along with the president, Trump's Commerce Chief, visited a confession he made for the first time today after many years of lying about it. There are several strands this story we'll get into, but we begin with really something right out of a movie plot.

1:30Ari Melber:And we've been reporting on this. If it sounds familiar, you may remember the evidence in the timeline that we've been showing you. What you see on the timeline includes Mr. Ludnick, who had said that he cut off all contact with Epstein. All contact. Dinners in New York, emails, what have you. And you see there later, Epstein talked about blackmail. So he was accusing this man he said he'd cut off all contact with of blackmail, something that Pam Bondi and others inside DOJ say still didn't happen. And yet those three million new files that you see on the far right part of our timeline included Lutnick emailing about visiting the island, which put a lot of pressure on his public denials.

2:15Ari Melber:And today, what we've been tracking here and what so many in Congress, of course, and independent investigators and journalists have been tracking has now blown up in Mr. Lutnick's face in the White House. Lutnick confessing only now that he's under oath today. Faced with the damning emails that we've reported that we told you about that others, including the survivors, demanded be released precisely because they didn't believe people like Mr. Lutnick. who made a big show of both denying any past contact with Epstein, having cut off contact, he said, and still talking about him. And I'll show you about some of what he said because it fits into the larger question about how high this goes in the United States government.

2:53Ari Melber:These are also files and emails that President Trump has tried to hide for years. And so while there might be a kind of dramatic or some would even say purian interest in some of this, believe me, honest law enforcement prosecutors to say nothing of the survivors, care a lot about why these lies go to the top of the Trump administration, and even today, there's no accountability, apparently. Donald Trump standing by Lutnick, standing by him even as he visited the island and lied about it. There's also reports today that we discussed last night with one of the journalists who broke the story that another part of the file suggests that Trump was telling law enforcement he knew a lot about Epstein's crimes or alleged at the time of what were allegations in Florida.

3:40Ari Melber:So I'm going to show you more of that tonight. There are different strands of this, as I said, but we've zeroed in on Lutnick precisely because it's a big problem to have these kind of people exercising power when they feel whatever their motivations are, the need to lie about their history with Epstein. So he testified now today that he visited the island in 2012. So we know he's been lying about that for years, as mentioned, as we showed you on the timeline. line. Now, what's different? Well, the files are out, putting on the pressure, and lying about it today would have risked committing a perjury crime.

4:12Ari Melber:Those other lies that I'll show you were in public, not under oath. Bottom line, Lutnick is now retracting something he's lied about for many years, claiming that in 2005, he cut off ties with Epstein. And if you happen to watch this program regularly, you may recall that we've discussed this. We discussed what the evidence was amounting to. Last night on this program, I was careful to note that Lutnick had not addressed this or clarified the emails. And so while the emails suggested he went to the island, we weren't even reporting that yet as fact because it had not been fully confirmed. Now Lutnick confesses.

4:46Ari Melber:Trump White House stands by him. There are many questions remaining, including if it was an innocuous visit with his family, why go to such great lengths to hide it? Senator Van Hollen hammering Lutnick today. said you were disgusted, would never have any contact with him again.

5:04Andrew Weissmann:Did you, in fact, make the visit to Jeffrey Epstein's private island? I did have lunch with him as I was on a boat going across on a family vacation to suggest there was anything untoward about that in 2012. I don't recall why we did it, but we did. Mr. Secretary, again, as I said, there's not an indication that you yourself engaged in any wrongdoing with Jeffrey Epstein. It's the fact that you believe that you misled the country and the Congress based on your earlier statements, suggesting that you'd cut off all contact when, in fact, you had not. You realize that, you know, this visit took place after he'd been convicted, right?

5:54Ari Melber:It went on like that. The senator sort of trying to address this fairly. No one who cares about the actual facts is trying to do guilt by association. In other words, those emails regard the visit, which show that he lied about it. Only he knows why he lied about it. But that is completely separate from other material that suggests, like we showed the other day, a DOJ suspect list that suggests people were involved in, for example, the crimes. What was a sex trafficking ring? As the senator said, and I'll repeat for clarity, Mr. Lutnick's not accused of that kind of thing. But he kept lying about this in an almost dramatic fashion, which I'll show you.

6:31Ari Melber:So he says he visited the island with his family, with his wife, kids, and nanny. And as you mentioned, I should say, as Van Hollen mentioned, that's the state of play. But why lie about that if it was just that? And are we getting the whole truth now when the only thing he's admitting to, copying to, is what's caught up in the emails? Are there other meetings? Was there other help? Remember, one of the key points about why this is bigger than just a personal scandal, which people could deal with, is the amount of evidence that suggests Mr. Epstein was given special treatment, which allowed him to continue these crime sprees, which hurt all these people.

7:10Ari Melber:So now you have someone who's caught lying about this, who's in the Trump cabinet, who's part of this group of people who have ties to Epstein, who were hiding it. And this is the same guy, as I'll show you, who says Epstein was a blackmailer, which, again, the government has not confirmed or charged him for. Now, the receipts go a long way. It was 2012 when Lucknick wrote, Hi Jeff, we're landing in St. Thomas early Saturday afternoon, planning to head over to St. Bart's slash Anguilla on Monday at some point. Where are you located? Exact location for my captain. So this sounds very much like trying to go definitely do the meetup.

7:43Ari Melber:An Epstein said come Saturday or Sunday lunch, little St. James on the map behind Christmas Cove. Lucknick responds, okay, lunch on Sunday, see you then. And later an Epstein assistant sent the message to Lucknick, which included, quote, nice seeing you. This is what lawyers would call multiple corroboration contacts that suggest the meeting took place, although it's not like we have a photo or a video or that kind of record. Now, that's 2012. Lutnick claimed very publicly that the last time he actually saw Epstein was seven years earlier.

8:21Andrew Weissmann:I say to him, massage table in the middle of your house? How often do you have a massage? And he says, every day. And then he gets weirdly close to me. And he says, and the right kind of massage. Now my wife is standing here. So she looks at me and I look at her and we say, I'm sorry, we have to go and we left my wife and i decided that i will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again so strongly worded with the narrative and the story and the kind of

9:09Ari Melber:trumpian imitation style we've seen many of his top officials do where they're trying to maybe be like the boss or create content or have these sort of big stories about what is obviously a matter of public interest. The problem is he was lying. And nothing about the meeting or today's confession suggests that he got confused and forgot, but rather this was a kind of brash, big lie, a way to say, well, I definitely cut it all off. And meanwhile, he and apparently his wife, who's only in this because of him, no one's throwing a lot of stones at her publicly, did go back and see him. How many times?

9:43Ari Melber:Well, he's admitting to and denying any wrongdoing. And the White House says Trump stands by Lutnick. Of all the people who could continue to play these roles funded by you, the taxpayer, the president wants to keep on board someone who's been caught visiting Epstein Island, even if it was apparently on the records just for lunch. There's also new evidence from the files about Epstein's recording, which relates to something I'm going to quote Lutnick on, these questions about what Epstein was up to. These photos show a camera perched over a suite of bathrooms. Other photos reveal what could be a kind of elaborate long-term surveillance room because the door says, and is it truth in labeling or not, but it says 24-hour surveillance.

10:27Ari Melber:The files have new details about how Epstein had one of the people in his employ work on small hidden cameras. This was back in 2014. The aide responding, I'm installing them into Kleenex boxes now. Now, remember what we've said, these files, millions of them are voluminous. The New York Times tracked this down and did the other corroborative reporting. You can't just necessarily learn something from each random email, but there are many stories in the Times and other papers right now, and we've done our own reporting, as we've told you, pulling on these threads. The new revelations we got first here on the beat last night from Miami Herald journalist Julie K.

11:05Ari Melber:Brown recorded how in July 06, Trump called the Palm Beach police chief at the time and saying Epstein's activities with teenage girls were well known. Thank goodness you're stopping them. Everyone has known he's been doing this, which, as I've mentioned, could be a positive if you say that's a person in the community talking to law enforcement in the service of potentially stopping something bad. Of course, it's Trump who is tied back into this in many ways, socially and otherwise. We're learning this because apparently the chief told the FBI this in a 2019 interview, which would have stayed secret except for the files coming out.

11:41Ari Melber:Trump telling the chief, allegedly, at least according to his account, that he was around Epstein once when teenagers were present. Trump got the hell out of there. Again, that would sound like a good thing. And yet it also contradicts what we've seen Trump and some of his officials seem to want to do to create distance from Epstein when he became such a public, toxic national story. For example, Here was Donald Trump in 2019.

12:17Andrew Weissmann:No, I had no idea. I had no idea. I haven't spoken to him in many, many years, but I did have no idea.

12:25Ari Melber:To deny what was in a controversy, he said he had no idea. this police chief who again was talking to the FBI in 2019 would seem to be credible he knows he has to tell the truth or face legal sanction when you talk to the feds and was also someone who had credibility because he had tried to go after Epstein and was interfered with by Washington if you remember the timeline and those problems this chief says Trump also seemed to know about how it operationally worked at Maxwell who at the time might have been seen to outsiders as just a woman at Epstein's orbit that the chief remembered Trump said she was evil.

13:01Right?

13:02Ari Melber:Or telling the FBI Trump revealed Epstein's associate was the operative, that she was evil. Focus on her, he said. And so, again, we're dealt with situations here that can be complex. If a person really was trying to help law enforcement go get Epstein and Maxwell for the right reason, that could be a good thing. But why would that same person go to such lengths to publicly lie about that knowledge? And newly relevant, Trump won't even rule out a pardon for Maxwell, who, again, the FBI chief says he knew all the way back then was evil. We've heard that Maxwell is prepared to speak honestly if only glanted clemency by Trump.

13:39Ari Melber:She pled the fifth yesterday. Aware of Donald Trump ever engaging in sexual activity with an individual introduced to him by you or Jeffrey Epstein.

13:54Andrew Weissmann:I invoke my Fifth Amendment right to silence.

13:58Ari Melber:That's what it looks like. Are we in the middle of this story after all these years? Are we near the end? Or could we be something more like just past the beginning? It depends on what you've learned about it and whether you think it is an over kind of dead issue with everything solved or a lot of open strands finally coming out. Here's a Republican senator's reaction to having learned a bit more about the files.

14:24Andrew Weissmann:I've not been one of the members who has glommed onto this as an issue. I've sort of intentionally deferred to others to find out about it. But nine-year-old victims? Yes. Well, initially, my reaction to all this was, I don't care. I don't know what the big deal is. but now I see what the big deal is, and it was worth investigating, and the members of Congress that have been pushing this were not wrong.

15:09Ari Melber:That is a Republican from the very red state of Wyoming, where MAGA runs strong. So when she says she didn't want to look at it, or she deferred to others, the politics of that we all know. She may have been in a place where even acknowledging this was worth looking at, let alone a problem, including the Trump DOJ's oversight, well, that may have been hard. And now, after all this, if you want to take her to word, she is discovering it is a big deal and worth investigating. When she talks about the lawmakers who did push this, she's referring to people like Massey and Kanna from both parties. And here was Kanna after going in to look at the unredacted files.

15:46Andrew Weissmann:There were six wealthy, powerful men that the DOJ hid for no apparent reason. When Congressman Massey and I pointed this out to the Department of Justice, they acknowledged their mistake. And now they have revealed the identity of these six powerful men. Now, my question is, why did it take Thomas Massey and me going to the Justice Department to get these six men's identities to become public? And if we found six men that they were hiding in two hours, imagine how many men they are covering up for in those three million files.

16:25Ari Melber:In that sense, the people who push to get the files out are now doing the work of going through them. As I mentioned, that's Kana. We reached out from MSNOW to each of those named individuals. One, Wexner's legal representative responded saying he was told by the DOJ he was viewed as a source of information about Epstein and was not, the lawyer says viewed as a criminal target. Andrew Weissman is here on all of this when we're back in 90 seconds.

16:54Andrew Weissmann:At DSW, we ask the important questions, like what shoes are you going to wear? Whether you're prepping for wedding season, festival season, or just planning the ultimate vacay, the right shoes can make or break an RSVP. So own the moment. You've got big plans and we've got just the shoes at the perfect price, of course. Get ready to get ready with Designer Shoe Warehouse. Head to your DSW store or dsw.com today and let us surprise you. Close your eyes.

17:23Ari Melber:Listen to monday.com. Feel the sensation of an AI work platform. So flexible and intuitive, it feels like it was built just for you. Now open your eyes. Go to monday.com. Start for free and finally breathe.

17:37Andrew Weissmann:Busy work weeks can leave you feeling drained. Prolon's five-day fasting mimicking diet rejuvenates you at the cellular level, lets you enjoy real food, and does not require an injection. Developed at USC's Longevity Institute, Prolon supports biological age reduction, metabolism, skin health, and fat loss when combined with proper exercise and nutrition. Get 15 % off plus a$40 bonus gift when you subscribe at prolonlife.com slash Pandora promo.

18:08Ari Melber:We're joined by veteran prosecutor and FBI general counsel previously, Andrew Weissman, who's an MSNOW, legal analyst. Andrew, I mentioned several of these developments. I wanted to focus with you first on Lutnick because it reflects how many powerful people seem to be lying about this, even though in fairness, we discussed our reporting what is and is not alleged. Does it matter that he lied for so long? Does it matter that the president doesn't see this as any kind of issue?

18:39Andrew Weissmann:Well, let's just remember, he's a cabinet secretary. So I think that sort of answers that question. It's the public entitled to the truth from somebody who is not just in the government, who works for us, but is at that high level in the government. And this is one where, you know, I guess I'm enough of a Puritan that my view is, of course we are. And we only have ourselves to blame if we let it slide. And again, I take the reporting that he did not or there's no evidence that he did anything wrong with Mr. Epstein. I'm basing it solely on the fact that he very loudly and publicly claimed that he disassociated himself with Mr.

19:38Andrew Weissmann:Epstein. And we now know that is not true. and we're entitled to more from our public officials. And frankly, the higher up you are, the more responsible you are to be candid with the public.

19:54Ari Melber:And the big questions are whether the process as it's supposed to work, people investigate crimes, you've overseen all kinds of such projects, and then it goes forward rather than what, by the way, this administration in other contexts has been accused of, which is cherry picking what they want to attack and letting other crimes go quite dangerously in the politicization of DOJ. In that context, Pam Bondi very infamously said there was nothing else to see and no possible blackmail evidence. Lutnick, before today's admission, confession, had been talking publicly about Epstein being a blackmailer.

20:29Ari Melber:Take a look.

20:32Andrew Weissmann:That's what his M.O. was, you know, get a massage, get a massage. And what happened in that massage room, I assume, was on video. This guy was the greatest blackmailer ever. Blackmailed people. That's how he had money. Andrew? Let's just remember that with Pam Bondi and Todd Blanch saying, there's nothing to see here, that meant that they had seen and reviewed the evidence that we now, you're reporting that the evidence that they said there's nothing to see here, They, that meant, knew that what a cabinet secretary was saying about disassociating himself with Jeffrey Epstein was not true. These reporting in the files of Donald Trump saying that he was very aware in the early 2000s that Jeffrey Epstein had been engaged in this kind of conduct.

21:32Andrew Weissmann:and they knew that he had said the opposite publicly. So to me, just remember, this is news to us. It is not news to the FBI and DOJ and Pam Bondi representing and Todd Blanch representing to us that there's nothing to see here. So for everything that when you're saying this is new and look at this and this shows X, Y, and Z, just remember that is information that the government was aware of when they said, nothing to see here, we're not doing anything.

Read the full transcript

22:08Ari Melber:And so should they have looked deeper at what is described as a surveillance system, the clear efforts to create these videos? Do you think that they've released all the videos that they had? No.

22:21Andrew Weissmann:So I think there's no question they have not done enough, and I think Congress needs to pick up the slack. One of the reasons I say that is Todd Blanch, in defending his sort of softball questions for Ghislaine Maxwell said, well, just remember, we didn't have all of those emails. For instance, the emails between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell where Jeffrey Epstein says, you know, we haven't heard from Donald Trump. He's the dog that didn't bark. And she responds essentially saying, you know, I was thinking the same thing. And he said, well, I didn't have that. We didn't get that. So to me, what Congress needs to do is find out what is the nature of the investigation, what was done, what was not done.

23:03Andrew Weissmann:That, by the way, may cross Republican and Democratic administrations. So be it that this is what it means to do an impartial, unbiased investigation. But they should call prosecutors. They should call agents. To your point, they could call the staff of Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell to find out where they interviewed, what information they have. And they can immunize Ghislaine Maxwell because she has taken the fifth. And there's a way to force her to actually testify, which prosecutors know, Congress knows, they can immunize her. And that takes away her Fifth Amendment. And then she has to answer questions.

23:43Andrew Weissmann:So if Congress really wanted to know the answers to her questions, they have the tools.

23:49Ari Melber:Right. You're giving that roadmap. And that raises a question of what they're really trying to do. They have lawyers. Some of them are lawyers. I wanted to get into that with you, that roadmap of what would mean to put pressure on Maxwell. So, Andrew, let's do that. Stay with me and we'll get into that after the break.

24:11Ari Melber:We're back with Andrew Weissman. Andrew, there's been a lot of pressure on what we're going to learn out of these Epstein files. Is it more than, as I mentioned, the period interest of this or that photo? Some of that real work is happening, and that's a credit to some of the serious people involved. You write that Congress can do more than what the Republican-controlled committee did here with Maxwell. Congress can, quote, grant her a type of immunity, so she has to testify under oath. Her testimony cannot be used to prosecute her further, with an exception. She's already serving 20 years. Immunity will not reduce her current sentence.

24:45Ari Melber:This is because you argue there is more to the story than what Todd Blanch seemed to get in his unusual political meeting with her.

24:55Andrew Weissmann:Congress called her to testify. And so presumably Congress wanted the answers. And Ghislaine Maxwell asserted the Fifth Amendment. And to be clear, she has a valid Fifth Amendment. In other words, she has an absolute constitutional right to say that she refuses to answer a question that would tend to incriminate her. And I think I could understand why she would assert the Fifth. We can point out that she didn't do that when she met for two days with Todd Blanch, but she still has a right to assert the Fifth Amendment. So normally you wouldn't want to give somebody immunity because you don't want to just be, oh, I want to give immunity to someone who committed a murder or someone who committed sex trafficking.

25:39Andrew Weissmann:You want to prosecute them. You don't want to immunize them. But that's not the situation here because she has been convicted. She is doing her 20 years and nothing about affording her immunity is going to take that away. And so the way that you can force somebody who asserts the fifth to testify is to say that we will give you immunity, meaning that we will not use your answers to prosecute you further unless you lie to us. If she were to then lie, you can prosecute her for that. And that time would be actually consecutive to her current time. So if they're interested in getting the answers, and presumably that is why they called her, not to just have a performative display of her taking the fifth, which I think would be improper because it's a constitutional right you have and there's nothing wrong with asserting it.

26:34Andrew Weissmann:If they really want the answers, and I think they should, and I don't think Todd Blanch, in my view, did a very good job of asking tough questions. We also have millions of documents now to confront her with key ones to ask for questions about what happened. They should go ahead and do that. And so I really think this is one where they have yet another avenue to do justice for the victims.

27:04Ari Melber:Yeah, I think you lay that out well, and it also speaks to what has been a clear breakdown in the system. Even Republicans, many conservatives have spoken out about how DOJ failed victims and didn't pursue these leads. That's partly under Donald Trump's DOJ. So here, not unlike the Jan 6 example, you have Congress using its subpoena and lawful powers. it could do more. So it's interesting you say that. People out there can listen and make up their own mind. Thank you, Andrew. For weeks, America has been roiled by those killings in Minnesota. Now, we should tell you, the DHS under Trump has finally had an official under oath for the first time as Congress presses on that.

27:41Ari Melber:We're going to show you what happened. And later in the hour, we've been talking Bad Bunny, waiting to hear what Jon Stewart said by the end of the hour. It was a source of incredible pride.

27:54Andrew Weissmann:It's a sense of unity, of purpose, and of collective joy that we haven't felt in a long time.

28:08Ari Melber:Trump's DHS officials under oath in Congress. This is the first such hearing since those two killings in Minneapolis and all of the tumult and uproar across the nation around these issues. So this is the head of ICE, Border Patrol, and the citizens of Immigration Services testifying in the House. They face questions about these tactics, about how agents operating under Trump's aggressive policies killed these two American citizens. The acting ICE director, Todd Lyons, making claims that actually are contradicted with our observable reality. You won't see ICE agents rolling through the parking lots and just snatching someone up.

28:55Andrew Weissmann:An American citizen shouldn't carry or shouldn't feel the need to carry. Let me tell you what. You have a little database of Americans? No, sir, we don't. I can assure you there is no database that's tracking genocide citizens. Yeah, why are you taking my information down? Because we have a nice little database.

29:16Ari Melber:We couldn't show you these Trump officials just speaking, because to only do that would be to seem to reward, potentially, what they're saying under oath. Sometimes contradicting other officials, so somebody must be lying because they're saying the opposite of their own employees, and other times claiming under oath things that are flatly contradicted by the videos we've seen, sometimes taken at risk by citizens to make sure people understand what their government is doing. That's the reality of ICE. There are more details emerging as well from inside the facilities, which under Trump have expanded both in how they operate and who they force to wait in there.

29:52Ari Melber:Take an Irish man who's been held in ICE for months. He's lived in the U.S. for over 15 years. He says he had a valid work permit. He's also the spouse of an American citizen. Ask yourself if the resources, let alone the cruelty, make sense in holding someone like this for this long. We're learning more about this because despite some of the lies I just showed you, the truth is still getting out. He called into a radio show in Ireland to recount what he's living through.

30:24Andrew Weissmann:The best way I could describe it is probably like a modern day concentration camp. I've been locked in the same room now for four and a half months. I've had barely any outside time,

30:36Ari Melber:no fresh air, no sunshine. I mean, everybody's hungry, everybody's tired. The toilets, the showers, completely nasty. Very rarely cleaned. It's a nightmare down here. This is a different approach to dealing with those kind of violations. If somebody has been here and there's a dispute about their work permit, spending this much money to then put them in those kind of cruel conditions is not how immigration enforcement has been done in this country over the years. ProPublica reporting now that they've published the letters from hundreds of minors and children detained in a Texas ICE facility under Trump.

31:12Ari Melber:Here's one by Maria, described as a nine-year-old girl from Columbia, writing, I've been 113 days in detention. I miss my friends. I feel they're going to forget me. ICE used me to catch my mom, and now I'm in jail. When I arrived every night, I cried. There are hundreds more letters like that. Immigration experts say these are policy choices, many of them avoidable while still maintaining safety in the United States. We're joined by Semaphore's Margaret Carlson. Welcome.

31:51Andrew Weissmann:Thank you.

31:51Ari Melber:I mentioned what the experts say and we showed the videos. There are many ways into this story with you. I want to discuss the human side, which is what these people are being put through. children, obviously, but many other adults not accused of any violent crime or other crime, except for whether they have legal status here.

32:11Andrew Weissmann:Well, and they're not seeking to find out because these are sweeps that go on. And they know, like the little children are being used to get at the parents, and then the children get swept up in the detentions in horrible places. And even though the children are sometimes released, the trauma of it, I mean, imagine your child being just taken off. And it's like these hearings don't really tell us anything we don't know. Like, we know enough now. Those people listening at the hearing, the members of Congress, they already know this. But they're caught between two places here, which is they're still afraid of Trump, but they're beginning to be afraid of their own voters.

32:55Andrew Weissmann:and there's some peeling off. And when you see it, when you're confronted with it, they must be feeling it. And they must be. And even if they have no feelings left, they do read the polls.

33:08Ari Melber:They read the polls. They're facing an election in eight months that on the economy, on immigration, which now Trump is underwater because people are very opposed to this kind of force, at least against Americans, killing Americans, whether they're reading the children's letters or not. There doesn't seem to be anything that Trump has a plan for on this other than trying to change the topic.

33:34Andrew Weissmann:No, and replacing Kristi Noem with Tom Homan is such a tiny increment better. And in that press conference, he never apologized to the families. He never did. And the only thing he said was, well, we'll make some improvements, But then everything can be improved. So he didn't even really make that admission. There was nothing in that to give us a real idea that there was going to be dramatic change or any change. I think he just took 700 agents out of Minneapolis, but it still left a lot of agents there. So there isn't that wholesale change, which would have been an admission by Trump that it was wrong.

34:18Ari Melber:And I mentioned there's complexity in immigration enforcement, but this is so far outside of the mainstream. We're not in those debates. This isn't like a path to citizenship debate. I want to show this NPR poll. We're told we're a 50-50 country on some issues. Not on this. 65%, including a large number of people who statistically would have been pro-Trump, saying ICE has now gone too far.

34:43Andrew Weissmann:Yeah. And now those who are going to be up, Trump's not going to be up, but they are. They have to be seeing this. And so, as I said, even if they aren't feeling it, their conscience doesn't bother them. They will. And they're creatures of their own reelections. So they may do that. You know, there's one other thing about Tom Homan. Do you remember the$50 ,000 cash in the Kava bag? Kosh Patel and Todd Blanch said they did an investigation in quotations, nothing to see here. And he kind of walked away without anything. I mean, if he had to be confirmed, could he be confirmed with that? What's going on there?

35:24Ari Melber:Yeah, I think I think these are, again, points where you have to stay on. And it may be that some of these things are delayed because the Democrats are the ones who would be investigating this, if anyone in the Congress. And if they get subpoenas, then they can. And people are skeptical and cynical and say, what does it matter? Well, we just saw Epstein files and a bunch of other things come down because the laws matter and subpoenas in court still put pressure, even as Trump tries against it. So I think that you're reminding everyone that's an open issue that's got to be investigated, at least to get to the facts of it.

35:52Andrew Weissmann:Because now he's, I mean, he's totally in charge. He's more empowered. Exactly.

35:56Ari Melber:Margaret Carlson, always great to see you this time in person. Coming up, something a little bit lighter. You'll never guess what Jon Stewart had to say about MAGA tears over Bad Bunny. Next.

36:12Ari Melber:We turn now to a development, including new evidence, as authorities still search for Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of today's show anchor Savannah Guthrie, who is a valued colleague for all of us. The FBI has released newly obtained video. This is from the morning of Guthrie's disappearance. And the videos, as you see here, are from the door perspective. So you're seeing what is an unidentified individual with a backpack and a ski mask and gloves. and the individual over time tries to tamper with and obscure what was Ms. Guthrie's doorbell camera. Another video also shows the person approaching the front door at this earlier interval with their heads sort of down.

36:58Ari Melber:You can see that there. Investigators releasing images. One shows the individual with appears to be a holstered gun in the waistband. Experts have noted it's an unusual way to holster that gun in the front. The Guthrie family says that based on the images provided by the Sheriff's Department of Law Enforcement, which include, of course, the body type and a little bit of the face that's not obscured by the mask. They say they do not believe they recognize this individual. MSNOW is reporting that officials are also back in the neighborhood of Annie Guthrie, where they are searching around the area as they continue to pursue any possible leads, information, anything, as we look into the case.

37:41Ari Melber:We're joined by Rob Damico, MSNL National Security and Law Enforcement Analyst, who also has hostage negotiation experience, I should say, and has joined us for tough stories like this. First of all, welcome. Thank you. This is the kind of video that would scare anyone. We are not repeatedly playing it for no reason. We're playing it because both the family and law enforcement in one voice have said they're seeking any tip, any information that someone might have based on what they see here. It could be the hint about the individual. It could be that matching up some of this information with other things people know might jog their memory out there.

38:19Ari Melber:People can call the FBI tip line on that material we've had up on the screen throughout our coverage across the day. People might recognize an item of clothing, et cetera. What does the video show you? What investigative value is it?

38:35Andrew Weissmann:There's a few things. One, I've thought that they weren't as professional as I thought maybe in the beginning. I don't think he was prepared to cover that camera, to deal with that camera, as I thought in the beginning. So I look at it as he didn't come up with a very purposeful thing to cover up the camera. So it tells me that maybe the reconnaissance that I thought they did wasn't as detailed as I initially suspected. It talks about like he was prepared. Let's slow down on that point.

39:08Ari Melber:I'll let you continue. But you're making a distinction between, For example, we've dealt with people in criminal scenarios who might have some other background, training, or expertise. And in those scenarios, we've seen this in bank robberies. They might come in much more organized than what we see here with the plants and trying to obscure surveillance that could out them or their details. Is that the contrast you're making?

39:31Andrew Weissmann:Yes, absolutely. I do assessments where I actually test people's securities and stuff. And I know exactly how to do these things that go up. and some of the guys I work with, some on the covert military side. But there's also things that you can learn online and other such. And he just didn't seem that prepared for what he was dealing with, especially trying to get some vegetation to cover the camera.

39:54Ari Melber:Does that give you any clue or law enforcement as to whether he is a kidnapper for monetary reasons or has some other potential motive? Obviously, they look at all potential motives.

40:06Andrew Weissmann:I think you had to go in there. We haven't heard about much being stolen. I think you have to go in there with the fact that they're looking to kidnap this person. I don't think it was an opportunity that you had a woman who's 84 that wasn't very mobile. They had to have a plan in order to get her away from that house. It wasn't, I think, a robbery that went wrong, so to speak. I think it was intentional on this. He took the easy, put a mask on, wear gloves type of thing. But he also does it. The video does provide some really good things on that. Now they can compare to one. They can go, as you saw, they're going around the neighborhood, probably showing this picture just to get, hey, have you seen this jacket before?

40:54Andrew Weissmann:Have you seen someone of this size? They will probably come out tomorrow with some better measurements, height, weight type of thing. I think the facial recognition, distance eyes, I think I saw a slight mustache. His lips were exposed in one of those. He could have covered that even more. But they're also going to compare it now to all the other videos, like convenience stores that were around the area, trying to figure out if he had gone to a store or got captured on a camera in that jacket where he wasn't wearing the mask. Obviously, he put the mask on to go there. They want to get something now on a video that shows in a similar jacket or backpack to compare where someone's not wearing a mask.

41:40Andrew Weissmann:So there's a number of that.

41:42Ari Melber:Matching that as using other surveillance as a triage, and you never know what they might get, especially in a case of such widespread concern and interest. I appreciate you joining us. We're obviously all following this. people can call 1-800-CALL-FBI with the tip line. Rob Domico, thank you so much. We'll be right back.

42:09Ari Melber:As the week goes on, many are still in the glow from Sunday's Bad Bunny heartfelt performance, and it's dominating all kinds of discussion. The performer lit up the stage with dancing, culture, and history. God bless America. Sea Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia.

42:32Andrew Weissmann:The power line workers. That part right there was so beautiful because he's reminding people.

42:37Ari Melber:Esa canción celebra el respeto mucho. Seguimos aquí.

42:43Andrew Weissmann:Ahora sí.

42:49Who couldn't enjoy that?

42:51Ari Melber:take a break from daily life and politics? Well, some of the MAGA leaders. And Jon Stewart responded.

43:02Andrew Weissmann:You know, the right has a lot of balls complaining that Bad Bunny didn't do enough to unify this country when you only found out a few days ago that Puerto Rico is a part of it. Why the f... Is it the Super Bowl halftime entertainer's job to unify the country? Oh, isn't there another person whose job description is much more along those lines?

43:37Ari Melber:And as it happens, Bad Bunny did literally unify the country. It is now on track to be the most watched halftime show of all time, bringing a lot of people together to share something while others just, I don't know, complained about it. I don't get to swear as much as Jon Stewart, so that's the best I can put it. Thanks for watching. Hey everyone, it's Chris Hayes. This week on my podcast, Why Is This Happening? How to Stop Dictators.

44:02Andrew Weissmann:You have to make it clear to people who are in positions of influence, not just in government, but also maybe even in your local community, that democracy is at stake and what we do plays a role in the outcome. That's the only way that you get people

44:13Ari Melber:to actually take action. That's this week on Why Is This Happening. Search for Why Is This Happening wherever you're listening right now and follow.

From the publisher

February 10, 2026; 6pm; The Epstein scandal is rocking the Trump White House again, and this time featuring the notorious Epstein Island, where Trump's commerce chief visited, a confession he made today after years of lying. MS NOW’s Ari Melber reports. Former FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann joins.

To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from The Beat with Ari Melber

All 321 episodes
Top Trump Official Admits to Visiting Epstein IslandThe Beat with Ari Melber · 42 min
Listen in VO