In short
The episode covers President Trump firing Attorney General Pam Bondi after 14 months, replacing her with Deputy AG Todd Blanche (acting). Topic includes Trump’s pressure on DOJ to prosecute political enemies, Bondi’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents, and broader concerns that DOJ norms have been broken.
Guests
Molly Jung-Fast (New York Times opinion writer; Fast Politics podcast host) and Andrew Weissman (former FBI general counsel; Mueller prosecutor; MS Now legal contributor). Later guest: Sky Perryman (CEO, Democracy Forward; filed 400+ legal actions).
Key claims
Bondi was targeted for failing to secure “wins” against Letitia James (two failed indictment attempts) and for unsuccessful/invalid DOJ actions (e.g., Raz Baraka charges dropped; Lindsay Halligan interim U.S. attorney installation invalidated). Epstein files: Bondi allegedly mishandled releases (flashy “binders” with no new info; contradictions about a client list; redaction errors; DOJ still in violation of law).
Notable examples
judges pushed back on DOJ challenges; Blanche’s CPAC remarks about ICE/polling places; Democracy Forward’s election-data litigation involving DOJ admissions about sensitive data access.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOTrump's DOJ Shakeup: Pam Bondi's Ouster
0:04 to 0:28
Discussion about Trump firing Attorney General Pam Bondi and the implications.
“Choose Power Home Remodeling and remodel how you think about remodeling.”
Trump's DOJ Shakeup: Pam Bondi's Ouster
1:00 to 3:10
Discussion about Trump firing Attorney General Pam Bondi and the implications.
“And we start tonight with a major shakeup at the Department of Justice.”
The Role of the Attorney General
3:10 to 4:58
Analyzing the pressures on Bondi and her handling of key prosecutions.
“Blanche, who was once Trump's personal lawyer, is not without controversy himself.”
Impact of Loyalty in Politics
4:58 to 6:42
Exploring how loyalty influenced Bondi's position and challenges in the DOJ.
“And I think that in this instance, that is going to be going straight for the capillaries.”
The Legacy of Bondi's Tenure
6:42 to 8:48
Discussing the legacy of Bondi's tenure and the expectations from her successor.
“You know, we're already seeing leaking, right?”
Future of the DOJ
8:48 to 14:00
A discussion on the potential changes needed for the DOJ moving forward.
“And if I can just get somebody more effective, they can sort of trample on the rule of law better than Pam Bondi did.”
Trump Fires Attorney General Pam Bondi
14:00 to 16:45
Learn about the circumstances and implications of Trump's firing of Pam Bondi.
“Donald Trump firing Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi.”
The Fallout from Bondi's Handling of Epstein Files
16:45 to 19:45
Explore the backlash and controversies surrounding Bondi's management of the Epstein files.
“Because Donald Trump, The Dow, the Dow right now is over.”
Transitioning AGs and Legal Challenges Ahead
19:45 to 21:57
Discussion on the future of the Attorney General role and legal challenges Trump faces.
“This is Todd Blanche, who made a quite revealing admission last week when he talked about what people inside the administration are actually afraid of.”
Trump's Iran Strategy and Global Isolation
21:57 to 26:18
An analysis of Trump's rhetoric and actions regarding Iran and its international implications.
“Court to his ballroom plans and so much more.”
Show all 15 chapters
Public Reaction to Trump's Iran Address
26:18 to 28:00
Examine the public and political response to Trump's recent address on Iran.
“So this is now a global energy crisis, not just something that's affecting us, although Americans are definitely feeling the pain of this.”
Episode Discussion
28:00 to 42:01
“I mean, this is his Hurricane Katrina moment, right?”
The Unorthodox DOJ Appointments and Their Consequences
42:01 to 43:51
Explore how the Trump administration's appointments at the DOJ have affected the legal system's integrity.
“One of the things that happened at the DOJ is that they tried to install a number of U.S.”
Litigation Against the Administration's Actions
43:51 to 45:05
Learn about ongoing legal actions against the administration to protect voting rights and community services.
“cases against the administration that you're bringing right now?”
Trump's Monarchical Aspirations
45:26 to 47:16
An examination of how Trump's actions convey a desire for king-like authority and control.
“A massive golden toilet placed on the National Mall just steps away from the Lincoln Memorial.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Exterior Remodels Inner Monologues. Brought to you by Power. The house looks good. Like, really good. That siding? Stunning. The roof? Elevated. Windows? I mean, wow. The process? Smooth. The neighbors? Jealous. Choose Power Home Remodeling and remodel how you think about remodeling. Schedule your free quote on windows, siding, roofing, and doors at PowerHomeRemodeling.com. Power. Our work shows. With Uber's new women preferences, women riders can request a woman driver whenever they want. Like Amy, who's traveling solo in a city she's never been to before. Or Danielle, who works night shifts at the hospital.
0:44Or Kelly and Jana, who were way overdue for a night out. Because sometimes comfort comes from having another woman with you. Request women drivers with women preferences on Uber. Learn more on the Uber app. Welcome to The Beat. I'm Melissa Murray in for Ari Melber. And we start tonight with a major shakeup at the Department of Justice. President Trump has fired Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi after just a 14-month tenure leading the DOJ. Bondi is now the second member of Trump's cabinet to be forced out in the second term. Bondi reportedly ended up in the president's crosshairs for a couple of reasons, principally her handling of the DOJ's Epstein files.
1:31We'll have more on that later. Also an issue was her failure to successfully prosecute the president's political foes. Let's take a look at how some of that played out. Trump putting extraordinary pressure on his attorney general, Pam Bondi, publicly calling on her to use the power of the Justice Department to prosecute his political enemies. Notable cases include two failed attempts to indict New York Attorney General Letitia James. Today's ruling means, at least for now, both cases will be dismissed. Federal charges have been dropped against Mayor Raz Baraka following his arrest outside an ICE facility.
2:06Bondi is the one who installed Lindsay Halligan as the interim U.S. attorney. That has been invalidated. Both Halligan and Bondi should be disbarred. Those are just some of the many cases that the DOJ has tried without success to pursue. Here are some more. Judges have pushed back in each case, saying that the challenges themselves lack legal merit. And with any government shakeup, it seems that breaking up is hard to do. Bondi reportedly did not want to leave her post at DOJ. The New York Times reports that she spent much of yesterday, making her case to stay in the cabinet. Bondi, however, released a statement saying otherwise.
2:52She wrote, quote, that she is thrilled to be moving to the private sector and will continue fighting for President Trump. Trump announced the shakeup in a Truth Social post, writing that Deputy AG Todd Blanche will serve as acting attorney general until a new AG is nominated. Blanche, who was once Trump's personal lawyer, is not without controversy himself. Last year, he conducted a much-discussed interview with Jeffrey Epstein's convicted associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. In the wake of that interview, Maxwell was transferred without explanation to a minimum security prison. Last week, Blanche was at CPAC, where we got a sense of the new acting AG's priorities.
3:38Take a listen. I represented President Trump in the Manhattan DA case and in Jack Smith's prosecutions. Why is there objection to sending ICE officers to polling places? Illegals can't vote. We see our most activist judges that we lose to every single day. There's a lot of ways that we can work within that to get some of our cases where we want them to be. MS Now reports that the president is considering a short list of candidates to replace Bondi, and the list includes EPA head Lee Zeldin, Republican Senator Eric Schmidt, and U.S. Attorney Janine Pirro, who is currently overseeing a controversial case against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
4:26Joining me now to discuss all of this is Molly Jung-Fast, New York Times opinion writer and the host of the Fast Politics podcast. Also with us is Andrew Weissman, former FBI general counsel, former Mueller prosecutor, and an MS Now legal contributor. Andrew, let's start with you. AG Pamela Jo Bondi is now out. What's your reaction? So I think there's a temptation in these kinds of stories to focus on the person who was fired. What did they do right? What did they do wrong? And I think that in this instance, that is going to be going straight for the capillaries. I think she is a symptom of what is going on in the White House and specifically the Oval Office.
5:14this Department of Justice was a plaything to Donald Trump. And moving the deck chairs around, shifting who is in charge, is not going to change the policies and practices that are so antithetical to the rule of law. So while she is out, I think that is really not the story. I think they'll I don't see them putting anyone else in who's going to adhere to the longtime values of the Department of Justice under Republican and Democratic administrations of being independent of the White House about who gets charged and who does not get charged. Molly, what's your take on this? So Andrea has basically said that the whole corpus is rotted.
6:02It doesn't matter who's at the head. What's your take? That's a fundamental indictment of the Department of Justice. From someone who knows what the Department of Justice is supposed to look like. I would say what's meaningful about this is not so much that she's gone, but how she's gone. Remember, Donald Trump made a real point in Trump 2.0 of not firing people. And he would even, Kristi Noem, was moved to a really great fake job, right? The Shields of America. Which sounded like something from the Marvel Universe. Yes. But apparently it's a real thing. Right. A real thing that they clearly made up.
6:34But, you know, so I do think it's important that this really happened. They did not move her. They just fired her. He fired her via tweet. You know, we're already seeing leaking, right? She spent yesterday. How do we know she spent yesterday begging for her job because someone leaked it? So we're already seeing leaking. And remember, one of the reasons why Trump tried not to fire people this time is because when he did last time, all he did was leak. So the fact that he has done this, done this so quickly, did not give her a fake job. Even Mike Walls got another job. So I think that is very meaningful.
7:10Look, I don't know how he gets someone Senate confirmed again. I guess he's going to have to take another senator. But the actual movement and this sort of inability to keep someone, I think that's meaningful. So, Andrew, going back to your bigger point about the rot at the DOJ, one of the reasons the president was apparently so frustrated with Bondi was that she had not done enough, in his view, to secure wins against his perceived enemies. Given that so much of her tenure was spent trying unsuccessfully to prosecute the president's perceived enemies, what's the nature of the legacy that she leaves behind?
7:47And what will her successor have to achieve going forward to live up to this president's expectations? Well, I sort of view that as the president being unwilling to look in the mirror and understand that he had unrealistic expectations, saying that, oh, she's not effective because she wasn't able to reindict and then reindict again Letitia James or to indict six members of Congress for doing the unspeakable, which is speaking the truth and doing so protected by the First Amendment. Those are not failings of the attorney general, other than the attorney general should never have approved them. But another attorney general is not going to do any better.
8:32The problem is the president, not the attorney general. I mean, obviously, the attorney general should not be subservient. They are professional. They should be saying no. But it really, to me, is the president thinking, oh, there is no such thing as a rule of law. And if I can just get somebody more effective, they can sort of trample on the rule of law better than Pam Bondi did. And I think that ignores the fact that you have grand jurors and you have judges in the system and they can push back and have pushed back on illegal practices. That's a great point, Molly. I mean, it wasn't that Pamela Jobandi didn't try to launch these prosecutions.
9:11It's that judges were like, no, that won't fly. Or jurors would say, like, we're not going to issue a bill in that case. The New York Times reports, though, that this particular attorney general was a real loyalist. According to the New York Times, Bondi was, quote, like a radio built to pick up only one channel to Mr. Trump's demands. Ms. Bondi gained and maintained her position through her attentiveness, loyalty and obedience. And that makes her uniquely vulnerable to shifts in the president's opinion. Well. I mean, what to say? Well, this is the Trump 2.0 problem, right? This is a cabinet filled with people who have their jobs because of their fealty to Trump and not much else.
9:55I think it's very hard for women to do MAGA. We've seen this again and again. This is something I think we've talked about. Yeah, because part of MAGA is this rage, is this ability like Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearings, this ability to turn a question on a questioner, to sort of be so angry. And American women, our culture has not embraced the angry woman as of yet. And MAGA is this hyper-sexualized Mar-a-Lago face, you know, a certain aesthetic, which really runs contrary to pushing back against a questioner quite that way. Well, let me push on this. It strikes me that the only two people who have yet to be ousted from this cabinet are women.
10:39And there weren't a lot of women to begin with. And there's some rumblings that maybe the third will be Tulsi Gabbard, the DNI, head of DNI. What does that say about this administration's interest in protecting and defending women, letting women have a real seat at the table, as it were? Yeah. Remember in Trump 1.0 where they couldn't they didn't have enough women and they kept bringing in like they have Ivanka. I mean, everyone here is like a non playing character except for Trump. So everybody has been sort of put in there because they're actors and that he even says that, you know, that he was impressed with Pete Hegseth because of the way he was on television.
11:18You know, these people are actors in sort of Trump's, you know, present reality, reality show presidency. it. Andrew, the DOJ has obviously much changed after Bondi's tenure. Is there any hope that this ship will write? What will need to happen, whether it's in the next attorney general's tenure or even beyond that, to make the Department of Justice the entity that we have always known it to be in both Republican and Democrat presidents past? That's a nice small question there. I mean, that is a huge, huge issue. Please answer it in one minute. Yes. So first, don't have any hope for Todd Blanche.
12:01In many ways, this is not just the firing of Pam Bondi, but it's the snubbing of Todd Blanche. I mean, the normal process would have been to elevate him and propose that he will be the next attorney general. And so essentially the sins that we've been talking about that are against her are against him. as well. And so also, I can't imagine a confirmation hearing for him because it would be very much a bloodbath and would put front and center issues like Epstein, which we'll talk about. And so another Justice Department is really going to have a hard time because once you've broken those norms, there are going to be people who really think that that's something you can do.
12:49There's going to be a lot of pressure. As we know, the Democrats are very want to say, let's look forward and not back. I am not in that camp. I think that if there have been crimes, the only way to deal with them is not to say if there are crimes and if they're serious, obviously, is not to say I'm going to look forward and ignore them because the message then is you can get away with it. We would never do that for any serious crime. And so I know that it is complicated, more complicated than this sort of minute can get into. But I do think we have to rethink the sort of Obama generation of let's just look forward and bygones will be bygones because we've seen what happens.
13:33All right. Andrew Weissman, Molly Jungfast, stay right there with me. Rest of you, we will be back in just 90 seconds.
13:46She, from the get-go, royally fouled up the release of the Jeffrey Epstein documents. And it was just such a rolling disaster all year and was handled so poorly that that was one of the biggest problems, despite her obvious loyalty and her background. We are back with the breaking news. Donald Trump firing Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi. According to the New York Times, among the reasons for Bondi's ouster is the president's dissatisfaction with her handling of the Epstein files, which, quote, has become a political liability for Mr. Trump among his supporters. Early in Bondi's tenure, she fanned expectations of bombshell revelations from the files.
14:35Take a listen. The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients? Will that really happen? It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that. Six days later, Bondi's DOJ staged this flashy stunt, handing MAGA influencers binders that were supposedly filled with new Epstein information. The stunt backfired spectacularly. The binders contained nothing new, angering the very influencers they were meant to impress. The Department of Justice that suddenly says there is no client list. There's no blackmail operation. Epstein definitively killed himself.
15:19You're not getting any more documents. Thank you. Goodbye. No more questions. You know, my reaction is, what are you talking about? They trotted us out right in front of the press pool, which I didn't appreciate. Once we looked at it, we realized we didn't have anything that anybody else didn't already have. Why am I giving more transparency than the FBI and the DOJ are giving? Bondi then went into damage control mode, signing off on a memo disclaiming the existence of an Epstein client list, reversing her previous statement. In the meantime, behind the scenes, Bondi reportedly told Trump that his name appeared in the files.
15:54The confusion and contradictions fueled a MAGA revolt. Eventually, Trump was forced to sign the Epstein Transparency Act, which required the files release. But the DOJ rollout of the files was scattershot and incompetent, failing to redact some survivors' identities while redacting information about those who the FBI once called co-conspirators. Congressman Jamie Raskin said that in the unredacted files, Trump's name appeared more than one million times. When lawmakers pressed Bondi for an explanation, she gave this now infamous response. This administration released over 3 million pages of documents, over 3 million, and Donald Trump signed that law to release all of those documents.
16:48You know why? Because Donald Trump, The Dow, the Dow right now is over. The Dow is over$50 ,000. I don't know why you're laughing. We're back with Molly Chung Fast and Andrew Weissman. Molly, what is the Dow today? I think it's not$50 ,000. But yeah, look, you see when you watch her how hard it is to do that MAGA masculine. Was it just the style thing or was there something about the Epstein files that was just especially hard for her to get her hands around? Remember, this is someone who campaigned for Florida AG on her record of combating sex trafficking. Yeah. And it's really I mean, I think that when you watch the videos of her running for reelection in 2014, she does a whole video about sex trafficking and how she's really committed to stopping it.
17:41Fast forward, when she testified in front of oversight, there were all of these Epstein survivors in the back row and she wouldn't look at them. So it is such a good example of how there's the Faustian bargain that people make when they go to work for Donald Trump. Andrew, speaking of the Faustian bargain, there's going to be a new AG in town for a while. It may be Todd Blanche who knows who it will be afterwards. words, the Epstein files show no signs of evaporating. Is any attorney general going to do what the president wants, which it seems to be, is to simply make these all go away? So, look, the Epstein files right now, the Department of Justice is in violation of the law.
18:28They were supposed to return over all of it. They are claiming privileges that the law does not allow them to claim. They have released things in, it's true, a completely incompetent way. But that's not the problem. All of this would make some sense if a new attorney general came in and we all said, oh, look, the new attorney general is competent, is now releasing all of the Epstein files, all of the ones that have not been released. But as sure as we're all three of us are sitting here, that's not going to happen. And that's because the issue here is not the Attorney General, just to beat a dead horse here, but the issue is the White House.
19:08It is true Pam Bondi and Todd Blanch were incompetent in the way it was rolled out, but the reason we do not have all of those is not the Attorney General. It is the Oval Office. And I can't believe we're going to see them under this administration. And so lashing out from the White House to the Department of Justice is not going to make the problem go away because the documents will still be under seal. Andrew, before we take the break, you made this really important point, I think, about what the way forward might look like if someone was interested in writing what has happened at DOJ. I want to play some tape.
19:45This is Todd Blanche, who made a quite revealing admission last week when he talked about what people inside the administration are actually afraid of. Take a listen. Everybody's afraid that the next administration, if we don't win, we're going to all be investigated and indicted. Think about that. This is not a third world country. This is America. And the existing administration is afraid that they're going to get indicted. Think about that. This is not a third world country. This is America. Is it off the charts to even think about the prospect of actually prosecuting individuals if they have committed crimes in the service of this president?
20:25Can I just step back for a moment and just say that Todd Blanche is saying that at a time that he sought the indictment of six members of Congress for speaking the truth, he sought the indictment of Letitia James three times. He is greenlit issuing a grand jury subpoena that was quashed by a federal judge to Jerome Powell. You could go on and on. The idea that he is saying that with no sense of irony on his part is remarkable. Now, it is fair to say that an administration has to be incredibly careful in deciding to go after people in a prior administration and not have a sort of endless cycle of tit for tat.
21:11But the answer to that is the law and the facts. And so one of the reasons you didn't see the same thing happening under the Biden administration is because they followed the law and the facts. And the reason you're seeing so much happening now and you're seeing judges, including judges appointed by Donald Trump in the first administration, pushing back is because they are either violating the law or they are not adhering to the facts or, unfortunately, both. All right. Andrew Weissman, Molly Jungfast, thank you for getting us started on this big News Night. Later in the show, I have a special guest who will talk about what it means to have Pamela J.
21:51Bondi fired and how that will impact legal challenges over the president's overreach. Also ahead, I'll get into the quadruple whammy facing Donald Trump in court, from the Supreme Court to his ballroom plans and so much more. But first, we have the brutal reaction from the right to the president's Iran speech last night.
22:19Donald Trump's rhetoric on Iran now confronts a harsh reality. This morning, hours after his primetime address defending his decision to enter into an armed conflict with Iran, the conservative National Review issued this blunt critique, quote, Trump's speech didn't make the case. The New York Times noted that the president's failure to, quote, define a clear path out of the conflict was determinative. And Wall Street also experienced volatility in both oil and stocks after the president bizarrely claimed that the Strait of Hormuz would open, quote, naturally. The Strait will open up naturally, that will resume the flowing and the gas prices will rapidly come back down.
23:09Stock prices will rapidly go back up. Many nations do not appear to share the president's confidence that the strait will open naturally. Today, diplomats from over 40 countries met to discuss a plan to reopen the strait. The AP reports that the United States did not attend. In his speech last night, President Trump also doubled down on threats to attack civilian infrastructure in Iran, a potential war crime. The president said, quote, if there is no deal, we are going to hit each and every one of their electric generating plants and, quote, we're going to bring them back to the Stone Ages where they belong.
23:53This afternoon, Trump posted a video of a strike on a major bridge near Tehran with the caption, quote, much more to follow. Just to recap, Iran's regime remains in place. Iran continues to have a stock of enriched uranium, and Iran continues to choke off access to the Strait of Hormuz. New polling shows that Americans disapprove of the president's handling of this war by a two-to-one margin. Joining me now to discuss all of this is Paul Rickoff, National security and political analyst, the host of the Independent Americans podcast and the founder and CEO of Independent Veterans of America. Paul, help me understand, how is the Strait of Hormuz going to open naturally?
24:42How does that work? It won't. And it's not working. And I think it's the flashpoint for kind of the world's gas station. And this, I think, is maybe the most important pain point for Trump politically. Obviously, gas prices are now surging toward$5. The entire world is facing a potential energy crisis. And I think it's the epicenter of how much he screwed this whole thing up. I mean, the world can see that he has not only failed to rally the world and failed to put forward clear objectives, he's losing control of the story. I think that's where you see some desperation. Last night was a total debacle.
25:14It was a thud. It was a nothing burger. And it was very unlike Trump because he didn't really make any news. He tried to snatch the microphone and ram his rhetoric and his rationale down the country's throat. But he looked old. He looked tired. He was meandering and unfocused. It was a moment where I felt old and tired at the end of it. I mean, the only good news was it was only about 20 minutes long. Right. So by his standards, it was pretty short. But he didn't make any news on announcing ground troops, which is also some good good news. We could have seen that. Right. But I think folks who were hoping to get inspired, hoping to get moved or hoping to hear it was over, got nothing.
25:45And I would even argue that the networks should reconsider whether they give him airtime and prime time for a speech like that. But he's trying to rip back the narrative. He's trying to control the story. And the war is going sideways. The lid is off now and he can't control it. And even if he did pull out troops tomorrow and he stopped the bombing, which is what I think most of the country wanted to hear, this carnage and the violence wouldn't stop. And that's why he's totally lost control of it. Well, to your point about him losing control of the narrative, 40 plus countries met today to figure out what to do about the Strait of Hormuz, which, as you say, is a major conduit for the flow of oil throughout the world.
26:18So this is now a global energy crisis, not just something that's affecting us, although Americans are definitely feeling the pain of this. What do you make of the fact that our allies and other countries are banding together without us in order to address this problem? I think this is a new normal. I think we have to face a new normal where America is not necessarily causing the shots, calling the shots. I mean, we are. We are causing the shots. We're causing the shots and causing the shock. But we're almost being treated like a rogue nation. I mean, we were becoming more isolated by the day. He didn't attack NATO last night full throatedly like they had previewed, which I think is important because the Italians have closed airspace to American assets.
26:56The Spanish have closed American airspace, closed airspace to American. So we've become more and more isolated. I think now what we're seeing is we can't drive the rest of the world and the rest of the world can move on without us. We're seeing that Israel is going to move forward regardless of what the U.S. does. And now everyone else is suffering. So they're going to put Donald Trump in a little corner and hope that he doesn't act up. The problem is we have 50 ,000 American troops in harm's way. We've still got thousands that he could drop under the ground. There's now reporting that he wants to do an operation to insert special forces and try to secure the Iranian.
Read the full transcript
27:26But every one of his objectives that he's tried to lay out, as you as you illustrated, have all been left incomplete. So even as he continues to shift the goalpost and move the narrative, the world is calling his bluff. And I think most importantly, we're less safe. We're more isolated. We're less safe. And it's getting worse by the day. So the president was supposed to clarify why we're in Iran and what the path forward is. Did he make the case yesterday? And if he didn't, what new questions do you now have? No, he didn't clarify anything. I mean, even worse, he made it more murky. And I think that's really the problem, especially within his base where Republicans are jumping ship.
28:00I mean, this is his Hurricane Katrina moment, right? This is his Afghanistan moment for Biden, where his base is giving up. They said they've had enough. And now we've got a unifying moment where most of the country is actually united on something, opposing the Iran war. And I think the real thing we have to ask is, is he still going to try to go for Cuba? Is he still going to continue a forever war? Because it is that. It's much bigger than Iran. It's a forever war. And that's exactly the opposite of what he promised when he ran for re-election. This is not Donald the Dove. No, no. I mean, this is a 2.0 on steroids that's mangled and meandering.
28:32And most importantly, his base is pushing back and they've had enough. Everybody wanted to hear last night that he was going to stop. And he didn't stop. He said he's going further. And that's why especially conservatives are pushing back. All right. Paul Rykoff, thanks so much for joining us and breaking it down. You got it. Still ahead, Trump's big losing streak. court. Also, how Democrats plan to fight the new Trump DOJ. And wait for it, the golden throne in Washington. We're going to explain. All of that is coming up.
29:20Meow. Man, I feel like a woman. Meet Addy, the little pink pill. Addy is a prescription medicine for women under 65 with hypoactive low sexual desire disorder that's distressing to them. Addy is for low desire that happens in all situations and isn't caused by a medical condition, relationship issues, or medicines. Addy isn't for men or to enhance sexual performance. Addy can cause severe low blood pressure and fainting. Your risk is higher if you drink alcohol close to your dose. Don't take Addy if you have liver problems. Take certain medicines or allergic to any of its ingredients. Before taking Addy, tell your doctor about all the medicines you take.
29:50If you've had any mental health conditions, are pregnant, planning pregnancy, or breastfeeding. Side effects may include dizziness, nausea, tiredness, trouble sleeping, and dry mouth. Learn more at Addy.com, including important warnings. Use coupon code SXM for a$10 telemed appointment at Addy.com.
30:06Allergy season doesn't wait until you're home. It shows up in the car, at work, even at the gym. That's why Kleenex Ultra Soft Tissues have you covered. They're allergist-approved and silky soft to help prevent skin irritation. And now, new Kleenex Snap & Go lets you take your favorite skin-loving tissues anywhere. A durable, compact case with a snapshot lid, Kleenex Snap & Go keeps tissues clean and protected. So wherever allergies strike, comfort is within reach. For whatever happens next, grab Kleenex Snap & Go. This message is brought to you by Apple Card. For a limited time, when you get a new Apple Card and purchase AirPods Pro 3 at Apple, You can earn back the cost up to$250 daily cash.
30:48New AirPods Pro and up to$250 bonus daily cash back? Now that's music to my ears. Subject to credit approval. Limitations and spend requirements apply. Apple Card is issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA Salt Lake City Branch. Terms and more at apple.co slash AirPods.
31:09It's been a tough week for Donald Trump in court. He suffered what Newsweek calls a, quote, quadruple blow. That means losses on multiple fronts, from his bid for a White House ballroom to his attempt to bar funding for NPR and PBS, all losers in court. But the biggest loss came yesterday. A judge ruled that the president's January 6th speech at the Ellipse is not immune from civil claims. But it's not just the lower courts where the president has long been struggling. Yesterday, the Supreme Court justices seemed noticeably skeptical of the Trump DOJ's arguments to upend birthright citizenship.
31:54Trump himself attended oral argument. This was a first for a sitting president, and he attended alongside now fired Attorney General Pamela Joe Bondi. The chief justice scoffed at the DOJ's arguments regarding what they termed so-called birth tourism. Take a listen. We're in a new world now, as Justice Alito pointed out to, where 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who's a U.S. citizen. Well, it's a new world. It's the same Constitution. Sick burn, but it wasn't just the chief justice. In fact, all three justices who were nominated by the president also cast doubt on the administration's arguments.
32:39It's striking that in none of the debates do we have parents discussed. We have the child's citizenship. The absence is striking. You've mentioned several times the practices of other countries. I guess I'm not seeing the relevance as a legal constitutional interpretive matter. I can imagine it being messy in some applications. What if you don't know who the parents are? It's definitely tough sledding for the administration, but the case may not be a slam dunk. ACLU lawyer Cecilia Wang, who argued for the plaintiffs, also faced some tough questioning. But after the argument, she said she remains confident that the justices will leave the meaning of the 14th Amendment intact.
33:20Here she is. I come out of the court today with the thought of my parents and so many of our parents and ancestors who relied on the rule that we've had in this country for 150 years, that everyone born here is a United States citizen, all alike. And I am confident that the court is going to turn back this president's effort to radically rewrite our 14th Amendment rule of birthright citizenship. Joining me now to discuss all of this is Leah Lippman, professor of law at the University of Michigan and my co-host on the Strict Scrutiny podcast. Leah, what are the top lines from yesterday's argument?
34:07Is this a loss for the president in your view? It is definitely going to be a loss for the president. I think the only question is whether it's going to be unanimous. I think almost every justice was deeply skeptical of the administration's arguments and rightfully so, basically saying, sir, have you read the 14th Amendment? Because the first sentence says all persons born and naturalized in the United States are citizens thereof. Reading is fundamental, except when it's not. Leah, I want to go back to just the procedural posture. We heard earlier a challenge to the executive order that would have rescinded birthright citizenship last year, but it was focused primarily on jurisdictional questions, namely whether the nationwide injunction was an appropriate remedy for district courts to issue.
34:52At that time, the plaintiffs had asked the court to take up the substantive question about the scope and substance of the 14th Amendment Citizenship Clause, and the court declined to do so, even though three justices said that they should have answered it clearly at that point in time. What does it mean that the court waited to take up that substantive question now and allowed this whole question to percolate and then are now hearing it and will decide it later this term? I think people shouldn't lose sight of the fact that the only reason the justices are even entertaining these arguments and we're talking about them is because they allowed it to get this far.
35:29I think people who just dropped into the oral arguments yesterday or are reading the headlines might think, oh, this is a court that actually recognizes the rule of law and that is inclined to check the president. But that would be missing the entire broader context in which, again, they declined to take up the lawfulness of the executive order, allowed the president to begin drafting guidelines for how it could be implemented. And then they even heard oral argument rather than just issuing a few sentence opinions that says not only see the 14th Amendment, but see our 1898 opinion in Wong Kim Ark.
36:01Well, so let's push on that. I mean, like by having oral arguments, like they took an off-the-wall idea, an idea that would not have been entertained by anyone other than kooks and cranks 15 years ago, and they made it the focus of the entire nation for the last three months. And now yesterday, it's all anyone talked about. Is the court really exhibiting the kind of independence and standing up to this president that some people are arguing that they're doing? Like everyone thinks that he's going to lose and that's a win for the court. But is it really a win for all of us? I don't think it's a win for us, for the country, because the court allowed the president to politicize this key foundational constitutional principle that has structured our constitutional democracy for the better part of a century.
36:49In addition to the president and now former Attorney General Bondi being president of the argument, so is John Eastman, you know, a disgraced and disbarred lawyer for his role in the January 6th movement. And that disgraced, disbarred lawyer is actually the father of the idea that birthright citizenship does not actually protect the children of people without lawful status. So it is a crazy kook theory. Leah, when will we expect a decision from the court on this? By tradition, the court releases opinions and argued cases by the end of June. My guess is this one will take until the very end of the term, in part because it's being argued late and also because, unfortunately, I don't expect it to be unanimous, another strike against the court.
37:29All right. Leah Lippman, thanks so much for joining us tonight. Up next, I will be joined by a special guest who is currently going head to head and toe to toe with Donald Trump in court. That's after this break.
37:44Let's go, girls. So this is the little pink pill everyone's been talking about. Yep, that's Addy. Good things do come in small packages. And Addy is definitely a good thing. Not just good, it's... Ooh la la. Meow. Man, I feel like a woman. Meet Addy, the little pink pill. Addy is a prescription medicine for women under 65 with hypoactive low sexual desire disorder that's distressing to them. Addy is for low desire that happens in all situations and isn't caused by a medical condition, relationship issues, or medicines. Addy isn't for men or to enhance sexual performance. Addy can cause severe low blood pressure and fainting.
38:19Your risk is higher if you drink alcohol close to your dose. Don't take Addy if you have liver problems. Take certain medicines or are allergic to any of its ingredients. Before taking Addy, tell your doctor about all the medicines you take. If you have had any mental health conditions, are pregnant, planning pregnancy, or breastfeeding. Side effects may include dizziness, nausea, tiredness, trouble sleeping, and dry mouth. Learn more at Addy.com, including important warnings. Use coupon code SXM for a$10 telemed appointment at Addy.com. I feel like the woman. Allergy season doesn't wait until you're home.
38:46It shows up in the car, at work, even at the gym. That's why Kleenex Ultra Soft Tissues have you covered. They're allergist approved and silky soft to help prevent skin irritation. And now, new Kleenex Snap & Go lets you take your favorite skin-loving tissues anywhere. A durable, compact case with a snapshot lid, Kleenex Snap & Go keeps tissues clean and protected. So wherever allergies strike, comfort is within reach. For whatever happens next, grab Kleenex Snap and Go. This message is brought to you by Apple Card. For a limited time, when you get a new Apple Card and purchase AirPods Pro 3 at Apple, you can earn back the cost up to$250 daily cash.
39:26New AirPods Pro and up to$250 bonus daily cash back? Now that's music to my ears. Subject to credit approval. Limitations and spend requirements apply. Apple Card is issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA Salt Lake City Branch. Terms and more at apple.co slash AirPods.
39:48We now return to that breaking news from the Trump Department of Justice. Pamela Jo Bondi is out as attorney general and Todd Blanche is now the acting attorney general. Blanche inherits a DOJ that is facing hundreds of lawsuits and legal actions on many fronts, including some that are brought by my next guest. Sky Perryman is the CEO of Democracy Forward, and Democracy Forward has filed more than 400 legal actions against the Trump administration. Sky, let's get right into it. With Todd Blanche now at the head of DOJ, does your legal strategy at Democracy Forward change in any way? Not at all, because it seems like Todd Blanche is just another page out of the president's playbook.
40:33He's a Trump loyalist, was his own personal attorney, as we know, and has really been overseeing so many of the policies that we have been challenging in court. So, Skye, you've been doing this work for a long time. How is it different when the people in DOJ are these loyalists? Who are the president's former personal lawyers? Like, does it change the nature of the work in any way? Has it changed the way the DOJ operates? Like, what's the difference between 1.0 and now? It's been a big sea change. I mean, first, you have attorneys who are not always candid with the court. You have a number of instances, so many that it's become normalized, but this is really abnormal, where you have the Department of Justice making misstatements to courts showing up, not prepared, not able to even say what their clients, what the federal agencies are even doing.
41:22And so that's one thing that has been a really marked change. And we've started seeing federal judges now be quite skeptical of the Department of Justice when they appear in court, which you didn't normally see before. I think the other piece of this is that the way in which the Department of Justice is being weaponized against people. I mean, you know, the Department of Justice is there. It's there to keep us safe. That means that they do have to investigate and prosecute people, and we all support that. But now what you're seeing is the politicization of the department where this is not really about justice or law enforcement.
41:53It's about a personal vendetta. And that's what you saw with Bondi, and I think you'll see that with Blanche as well. So let's talk about that. One of the things that happened at the DOJ is that they tried to install a number of U.S. attorneys throughout the country who would press for these prosecutions of the president's perceived enemies. Those prosecutions were not successful, but it also opened the bread and butter work of those districts to real scrutiny. So, for example, if an indictment is brought by someone who is not properly appointed as U.S. attorney, the defendant can challenge it.
42:25And ultimately, the indictment and any charges could be wiped away. Can you talk a little bit about how the administration's unorthodox approach to appointing personnel and their need to appoint personnel that's loyal to the president has actually made things less safe on the ground for people in these districts? Well, of course. I mean, it's made things less safe because the justice system isn't operating the way it needs to because of these false and faulty appointments. We've also seen that it's undermine the American people's confidence in the legal profession. Confidence in institutions overall, we know, is at a low.
43:02But the judiciary and the legal profession has always been typically the institution that people have the most confidence in. And of course, people don't have confidence in this DOJ and the way it's been operating. But the other point that you highlight is one we want all Americans to understand is this president is losing far, far more than he has been winning in court. And the prosecutions, the fear mongering that we see out of the White House that we have seen out of the Department of Justice. We'll never forget some of those scenes with Pam Bondi, you know, threatening individual lawyers, threatening judges.
43:34Those haven't worked out well for the president. And so you really see the president, I think, the rubber hitting the road here with these losses mounting up in court. And he's really, I think, trying to do damage control. So for Democracy Forward, you have a full docket. What are the cases that are most occupying your attention? What are the most pressing cases against the administration that you're bringing right now? Well, you know, we are very committed to making sure that people's votes are going to count and that this president and this Department of Justice doesn't use the mechanisms of the federal government to undermine our elections.
44:05Right now, we are litigating in court where the Department of Justice itself has admitted that those team members accessed sensitive data last year. The Department of Justice was not truthful with the court about that last year, but they've since, you know, they've since come out and said it. And Doge team members had a voter data agreement with a third-party group that's involved in trying to question election results. So we are getting to the bottom of that and will be working to protect the right to vote. We also are protecting people in communities every day, in communities where the president continues to weaponize federal funding, trying to cut off essential services like child care for people.
44:43We've had a bunch of big wins on that. And then, of course, continuing to confront what we think is a rapidly accelerating autocratic playbook, the incursions on due process, on freedom of speech. I mean, all of those things we're in court on, they're going to be really important. They're really important every day, but they're quite important this year as the president, you know, continues to mount really a campaign against the American people. All right. Sky Perryman, full docket, full hearts. See you soon. Thanks so much for joining us tonight. Up next, a golden throne on the National Mall.
45:14We will discuss on the other side of this break.
45:25There's been so much news this week that you may have missed this. A massive golden toilet placed on the National Mall just steps away from the Lincoln Memorial. The plaque reads, quote, a throne fit for a king. This is a satirical art piece that was placed just days after millions of people turned out nationwide for the No Kings protest. Trump is acting like a king because he wants to be a king in both substance and style. He has renamed the Kennedy Center for himself. He's placed his signature on U.S. currency. He's added his portrait to a gold coin. He's building the so-called Arc de Trump.
46:12He's also plastering his face on federal buildings. It's a lot. Just compare Trump's vision of the presidency with former President Obama's. Take a listen. They say, we don't need him. Freedom, freedom. He's a dictator. He's a dictator. A lot of people are saying maybe we like a dictator. So the line is that I'm a dictator, but I stop crying. So a lot of people say, you know, if that's the case, I'd rather have a dictator. They say he's a horrible dictator type person. I'm a dictator. But sometimes you need a dictator. If I was a king, we'd be doing a lot more. I'm doing a lot, but I could be doing a lot more if I was a king.
46:51I am not a dictator. I'm the president. What I can do is I can make the best possible case for why we need to do the right thing. We'll leave it there. That does it for me tonight. I'm Cindy Lauper with fellow Cosentix advocate, Chef Michelle Bernstein. We'll share our experiences with plaque psoriasis, with psoriatic arthritis, and Dr. Panico will talk about the possible connection. Cosentix secukinumab is prescribed for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis 300 milligram dose and adults with active psoriatic arthritis 150 milligram dose. Don't use if you're allergic to Cosentix. Before starting, get checked for tuberculosis.
47:32An increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur, like tuberculosis or other serious bacterial, fungal, or viral infections. Some are fatal. Tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms like fevers, sweats, chills, muscle aches, or cough. Had a vaccine or planned to. Or if inflammatory bowel disease symptoms develop or worsen. Serious allergic reactions and severe eczema-like skin reactions may occur. Learn more at 1-844-COSENTICS or cosentics.com slash Cindy. you
From the publisher
April 2, 2026; 6pm; President Trump has fired Attorney General Pam Bondi after just 14 months leading the DOJ. MS NOW’s Melissa Murray reports, joined by The New York Times’ Molly Jong-Fast and former FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann. Plus, Trump is facing new heat as the endgame in Iran remains unclear.
To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
