In short
Podcast Summary: The Big Picture - Episode: The 25 Best Movies of the Century: No. 22 - ‘Children of Men’
Episode Overview In this episode of *The Big Picture*, hosts Sean Fennessey and Amanda Dobbins continue their yearlong project of discussing the 25 best movies of the 21st century. They focus on Alfonso Cuarón’s 2006 film *Children of Men*, an apocalyptic thriller that combines emotionally powerful storytelling with masterful filmmaking.
Hosts
- Sean Fennessey
- Amanda Dobbins
- Producer: Jack Sanders
Key Themes and Discussions
Film Analysis
- *Children of Men* is set in a dystopian future (2027) characterized by global infertility and societal collapse, making it particularly relevant to contemporary issues.
- The film's emotional impact is heightened through its visual storytelling and innovative cinematography, particularly the long takes that create a sense of urgency and immersion.
- Cuarón is praised for his directorial style, with a focus on human experience amidst chaos.
Emotional and Technical Mastery
- Both hosts express awe at Cuarón's ability to blend technical prowess with deep emotional resonance, noting Owen's physical performance and the raw depiction of desperation and hope.
- The discussion highlights how the film's cinematography enhances storytelling without relying on traditional expository techniques.
Character Dynamics
- The character of Theo, played by Clive Owen, is discussed in depth as a representation of personal evolution in response to societal decay.
- Amanda notes a desire for deeper understanding of secondary characters like Luke (Chiwetel Ejiofor), exploring themes of rebellion and progress through their actions.
Cultural and Political Relevance
- The film reflects anxieties of its time (post-9/11 world) while also drawing parallels to modern issues such as immigration, governmental oppression, and societal breakdown, emphasizing its enduring relevance.
- The absence of awards recognition, especially in the Oscars, is critiqued, particularly how it failed to win any of its three nominations for Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Cinematography, and Best Film Editing.
Key Takeaways
- Masterful Filmmaking: Cuarón’s direction and the film's style are noted for their intense emotional depth and visual storytelling.
- Cultural Reflection: The film's themes are applicable to ongoing global issues and serve as a commentary on human resilience.
- Award Snubs: The hosts lament the film's lack of recognition at the Oscars despite its critical acclaim and cultural importance.
Conclusion Sean and Amanda conclude the episode with a discussion about the broader implications of *Children of Men* in cinema history, reflecting on its impact and the importance of continuing to shed light on films that challenge and inspire. They express hope for more of Cuarón’s work in the future, considering his ability to create impactful cinema.
---
*Note: This summary captures the essence of the episode, highlighting critical discussions and insights shared by the hosts regarding *Children of Men* without delving into the transcript's extensive dialogue.*
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00If you're a fan of the inner workings of Hollywood, then check out my podcast, The Town on the Ringer podcast network. My name's Matt Bellany. I'm founding partner at Puck and the writer of the What I'm Hearing newsletter. And with my show, The Town, I bring you the inside conversation about money and power in Hollywood. Every week, we've got three short episodes featuring real Hollywood insiders to tell you what people in town are actually talking about. We'll cover everything from why your favorite show was canceled overnight, which streamer is on the brink of collapse, and which executive is on the hot seat.
0:28Disney, Netflix, who's up, down, and who'll never eat lunch in this town again. Follow the town on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
0:49I'm Sean Fennessey. I'm Amanda Dobbins. And this is 25 for 25, a big picture special conversation show about our post-apocalyptic existence. our pick today is a remarkable film Alfonso Cuaron's Children of Men real roller coaster on this one so a week and a half ago I reached out to you and I said Children of Men I don't know should we make a swap I'm not sure if I want to do this and I'm I thought it was maybe because my enthusiasm for the film had dimmed but I'm wondering now if it's because I knew what lay before me if I were to revisit the movie which is a very um emotionally wrenching virtuosically made movie about a possible near future, 2027?
1:322027, but with a lot of hallmarks of the way we live now. It certainly does. This is one of the most prescient films made in recent times and one of the best. So you never lost the faith in this, though. No, but the way that I'm working through this project, which I love, I'm having such a great time. Great. Me too. Not really, but okay. Is that once a week, I hear from you in crisis mode. And you have, you know, you have a crisis of faith. Sometimes you're on a plane. Sometimes you're just, you know, in plane mode at home. Because as we've discussed, that's a spiritual plane that you can reach.
2:08It's not location-based. Yeah. And you're like, I don't know how I feel about our choice. And I, Sean, just use that as an opportunity to talk to you about cinema, which is great. And that's why we do this podcast. And frankly, this year, there hasn't been a lot of real cinema released. So you go back and forth. You share your feelings. You go up. You go down. With Children of Men, at first, you were like, I think that this is like a five-star masterpiece that maybe I don't want to rewatch. That is what I said. And I said, okay, well, do you want to do Ichimama Tambien? Do you want to put it on hold?
2:45I threw out some other selections of things that did not make it onto the list. And we bumped up Something's Gotta Give and took a little more time. And in that time, you and I both rewatched the film, which we actually hadn't done before making the long list. And then we were like, oh, shit, this is way too low. This might actually, this might be top 10. Do we want to redo the list so that we can get it? this is I was flat out blown away by this and I knew that there I remembered being blown away by it when I saw it um and probably like I've probably seen it a couple times and I remember it being perfect but I too was not expecting both the emotional and just the holy shit movies response that I had to it yeah I think the list is now getting into a um it's going to be hard to debate territory, you know, where almost everything that we pick is going to have a kind of ecstatic quality in the filmmaking or the storytelling or the acting.
3:48This movie is clearly, I think, inarguably worthy of this list. And I didn't want to rewatch it in part because I remember the first time that I saw it in theaters and the absolute pit in my stomach that it left. I've revisited a couple of times. I think I rewatched it a couple of years ago. We talked about disaster movies, and I think I had framed it as a disaster movie and some people quibbled with that take, but the idea of a worldwide infertility pandemic is a disaster. Yeah, did you do it for disaster or apocalypse? I don't recall. I sort of remember it because the apocalypse episode was a very special episode.
4:25I think that was like April 2020. Oh, okay, cool. And that was where we were emotionally and we were like really sharing a lot. Was that like clever programming in the face of a pandemic? Yeah, it was. I'm very sorry about that. Maybe it was May 2020. Maybe it was June. Okay. And it might have been tied to a movie as well. It wasn't like Bill making you guys do a Contagion rewatchables on, you know, March 3rd, 2020. That wasn't ideal. No, it wasn't. But it was weirdly fair and reasonable. And you made a note in our document about Contagion here because these two films share the same thing. Now, Children of Men is played to a kind of extreme.
5:06in the story because you can see the sort of nation states and governments and the general rules of our society completely folding in on themselves and a world falling apart in this film it is the absolute end game of destruction for if something like this were to transpire so just the details of the film so we're clear as i said it's directed by cuarone i'd like to talk about him for quite a while because he might be the world's greatest living filmmaker who has not made a movie in seven years. And so he has not been a constant source of discussion on the show since Roma, which is really when you and I started cooking on the show.
5:42We haven't had a lot of opportunities to discuss him, but he also has a writing credit on this film. There are a number of credited writers on this movie, including Timothy J. Sexton, David Arada, Mark Fergus, and Hawk Ostby. And it's based on The Children of Men by P.D. James. P.D. James, a renowned English novelist who she died about 10 years ago and I think this is really the only major film of note that is adapted from her work. She's best known for detective stories. Right. Your overlooking death comes to Pemberley but that's fine. That's on your... I mean, was that released in America? Like, I know it exists but like...
6:20It was but I think it might have been one of those like British TV specials to something. Right, right, right. That's fine. Matthew Rhys, it's a murder mystery set at the fictional home from Pride and Prejudice, for those of you not on the level. I see. Okay, so clearly this is important to you. Pemberley is where Mr. Darcy lives. And Matthew Rhys plays Mr. Darcy, I believe, in The Death Comes to Pemberley. Yeah, it was at P.D. I've read both the book and seen the film. That's very funny. I was going to say, P.D. James' her work is very Amanda-coded. Yes. And this novel is not very P.D. James.
6:54No. I think it's interesting, of course, a woman writing a kind of, sci-fi dystopian nightmare military movie or military novel that, you know, features fertility as a key subject seems notable. The movie stars Clive Owen, Claire Hope Achete, Julianne Moore, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Pam Ferris, Charlie Hunnam, and Michael Caine. It is notably as all of Cuaron's movies are shot by Emmanuel Chivo Lubezki, who is also, along with Cuaron, widely considered one of the greatest filmmakers, is arguably the greatest cinematographer in the world, give or take a Roger Deakins. And this movie, which charts basically what happens to this small pocket of rebels in the face of this infertility epidemic, which has been going on for well over 15 years.
7:46It's, I guess, 18 years is the extent. Yeah, and three months and something days. Yes, and so the film isn't just a portrait of kind of the world falling apart. It's a portrait particularly of two modes of rebellion and how to save humanity. And the way to do that is to find somebody who can give birth. And of course, they do find someone in this story who can give birth. Clive Owen is our perspective character. He is a man who was once a rebel or was once a progressive, who has kind of slipped out of the cause and is a bit lost until he is drawn back into it by his former wife, lover, who's portrayed by Julianne Moore.
8:22And then he becomes kind of an agent of change throughout this story. So you mentioned that you saw it a long time ago. You loved it. You watched it again. It could be a top 10 movie. It notes the arbitrary nature of our list. What else did you feel while you were watching the movie? I thought of your sentence of this might be like a five-star masterpiece and or, you know, conventional movie nerd wisdom that this is like a quote-unquote perfect film. It is a perfect screenplay. It is a perfect technical execution. There is a stunning amount of like capital C, like camera work, athletic filmmaking.
9:03It's most famous for the single action, single, single shot action sequences. Particularly there's a car attack, which is terrifying. And then there is a raid, like a battle sequence at the end that are filmed. You know, there's, you know, it's not like the studio. They're using a whip pin or whatever. But it is. But the effect is that you are just watching a single take of absolutely wild stuff happening. But the whole movie is that level of astonishing filmmaking and craft that works totally with the screenplay. It's not just doing it to be like, ooh, and here's our one-er. Like, ooh, here we go.
9:56Look at us use the camera. It is, it works with the story. It works beautifully to, the way that you see this world because of the way they film it with just the one camera and just following people is like, is magnificent because you can both learn everything. But as you said, it is, it's focused on a small group of people. And so the way that they establish the world, the way they do exposition, even the visual composition of what you see in a frame and how you see. And there, it's like absolutely grotesque things are happening in the background of almost every shot, but they are in the background.
10:43You mentioned Charlie Hunnam is in this movie. I don't think his face is ever close enough to the camera to actually face ID Charlie Hunnam. He may never be in focus. Yeah, exactly. Exactly. So, but that works with what the story itself, which is of like this one person who's co-opted in to try to figure out like his path and this other person's path to safety and to savior of the world. and without knowing what else is going on because at this point in the existence of the world, like all you have is what you're doing every day and then whatever like propaganda is being artfully displayed on the various televisions.
11:29So it is like the real, it is practice like form and function and all working together in a way that like is exhilarating. So the film, almost nothing that you see in the movie, this is not a POV movie. It's not through the eyes of Theo, the Clydebone character. But almost everything that you see, the sort of panorama of this world, is through his experience of the world. The thing is, is that it shows you those things, but it doesn't zero in on them. It doesn't let you sit in them because essentially this character is always on the move. A handful of times when he's sitting, when he's in the home with Michael Caine's character, This sort of like burnt out hippie who is his sort of former, you know, mentor, advisor and friend.
12:15You know, moments when they have been captured and they're, you know, the birth sequence late in the film is a sustained period of time where there's not a lot of movement. But the bulk of this film, these characters are on their feet and moving. And so even though we don't necessarily get every detail of this universe explained to us, we get the occasional kind of news report where we hear something on television or on the radio. Right. But the idea of how the refugee camps work as opposed to why they started and where they are specifically located, like we get dribs and drabs, but experientially we understand and feel everything.
12:51I think that this serves the story really well. I think when I look back on the movie, my only note is that I just wish I knew the characters a little bit better. I don't necessarily need to know Julian and Theo. I think what Clive Owen and Julianne Moore get to do and how they get to show us what was of their relationship and what they lost when their son died is enough. Every other character in the movie, I wish I understood Chiwetel Ejiofor just a little bit more. I like what he represents as a character, which is there are two sides to progress, to the idea of reaching progress. And I think the movie is sophisticated about this kind of forward action, direct action approach, which is the one he is taking, one that is violent, one that is aggressive, one that is meant to make a kind of spectacle of the rebellion versus the one that Julian and Theo ultimately portrays, which is like a humanist approach to this kind of thing.
13:46But the movie gives you a lot. Even with the Chiwetel Ejiofor character, Luke, I believe, which there's a lot of Bible running through this. There certainly is. But with a nice twist in that particular scene where the character once the baby is born um i like i i think is like absolutely like astonishing and the way that every single person in the this movie responds to the sight of this baby is like so revealing i think about the characters and the world and he has that moment where he's like sitting up by a window and just being like i'd forgotten how beautiful they are and he's so visibly moved and also just like in between just shooting, you know, out the window.
14:35But I think he does an incredible job in that. And even those few moments of this character being still so dead set on his ways, but also absolutely overcome with what is essentially like hope, you know, in corporeal form for the first time for literally every single person in the world is, I think, really beautiful and says enough about him. And then also the fact that he keeps being like, I need him, I need him. And then there's that great moment of, no, it's a girl. And then he says, I had a sister once. Like, I do kind of feel like you get moments. I guess you don't know that much about Charlie Hunnam, except like he has dreads and he's not in focus.
15:15A lot of white dreads in this. There are. Yeah. That's an interesting choice. I think, I haven't read this novel. I actually would like to give it a look because I think in novel form stories like this, characters are just deep. Right. this is a movie about images and feeling. It is not a movie about character development. And archetypes, I think.
15:38There's a Virgin Mary, Jesus. Yeah, absolutely. I know what we're drawing on here. Slavoj Zizek, the famed thinker and film fan, is a really big fan of this movie and has talked about it and written about it in the past. One of the things that he points out that I think is super interesting is there's no sex in the movie. You know, that the conception is meant to seem immaculate if not literally then figuratively. And even between former lovers like Theo and Julian, we don't see sex. Like that isn't really what this world is about. It's about survival and it's about procreation but not in the same way.
16:18And I think like removing that I think it kind of like withstands some of that religious imagery in a way. I think this is such an interesting movie for Cuaron to have chosen at this stage of his career because he's coming off of Itou Mama Tambien which he says he sees as essentially his first real movie. He had made two films before that and those films were well received and he was considered, he made three films before that they were very well received but he was starting to feel like an assignment director, somebody who would get sent screenplays and would decide whether he wanted to make them.
16:58He made one film in his native Mexico, Solo con tu parejo. He made A Little Princess and he made Great Expectations, Great Expectations, a kind of much touted film starring Gwyneth Paltrow and Ethan Hawke, adaptation of Dickens that fizzled pretty hard. And so he resets. Don't fast forward past Little Princess though. It's a good film. I haven't seen it in a very long time. I mean, he doesn't have any bad films. And what's interesting is that Solo con tu pareja and A Little Princess and Great Expectations are all very different from one another. The production designs are very different. The pacing and tone is very different.
17:34He's like a real shapeshifter filmmaker. Ituma Matambien is even more different from those films. That's like a road movie. It's a very personal movie. It's a movie about friendship, about love, about who you are really in love with, identity, sexuality, freedom, right? In the face of the encroaching structures of life. Right. And the filmmaking style of that movie is weirdly very similar, even though the kind of movie it is is very different, which is like it's a lot of handheld. It's a lot of following, a lot of sort of like follow filmmaking where your character is moving through the world and you're seeing their back and you're seeing what they're seeing very clearly.
18:13And you can see In Itoumama Tambien, which I really strongly considered pushing for in this spot because I'm very personally affected by the story in that movie. But the fact that he makes that movie then takes a Harry Potter job. Yeah. And does a good job. And it's one of the best franchise movies of the 21st century in Prisoner of Azkaban. And then it's almost like he has to cleanse out the taste of the franchise, of the paycheck that he got and makes this movie, which is just the most grim subject matter possibly imaginable. And a real cocktail of grim subject matters. I haven't read the full P.D.
18:53James novel. I read some of it. But the refugee element of this film, which is a major part of the plot in that the key, the mother figure, is a refugee and needs to be able to travel. but there are a huge amount of restrictions. And also, I mean, she's constantly in danger in Britain. And then also visually, we pass cages, we pass camps. There is the final act takes place in a camp. So that is all stuff that Cuaron added, that he used the novel as a sort of jumping off point. And the P.D. James novel, as you know, I did jumping back and forth. is, as best I could tell, kind of more class focused.
19:46And that is what peters out in the, which, you know, makes sense, a British novel. You guys are never going to get over that, apparently. I mean, we aren't either. But along with the infertility, which, you know, just becomes just the total lack of hope and a future and that there's nothing to live for. And the movie does like amazing images, you know, the empty playground and then key on the empty playground. I feel a little sick right now just thinking about it. So it brings all of that to life. And then it adds in a lot of images that we have come to have comps for in real life. And it is really pretty astonishing and upsetting and timely.
20:32If you situate the movie upon its release, it's 2006. We're engaged in international conflict in the United States of America. the P.D. James novels 1992 is when it's published. So this film in a post 9-11 world, in a Operation Iraqi Freedom universe. I mean, there are some like Abu Ghraib references in the background. There's clearly a lot of these forces, a lot of these current events are informing a lot of what Cuaron and the writers are after in terms of what they're trying to portray about. Effectively, what can happen and what like a police state can do in the face of a crisis like this, that this would send the world into a tailspin and that its citizenry would then be really vulnerable to the powers that be taking more control and creating, you know, there's these interesting images of protest in the movie that are shot through the lens of faith.
21:21You know, a lot of the protesters are sort of like, will God ever forgive us for what we have done and we are being punished for this transgression? And then there are other examples where there is just this pure sort of like, like I said, direct action, progressive citizenry that is attempting to form and use sometimes nonviolent, sometimes violent means to accomplish their goals. But the fact that it was made in 2006 and all of these events are happening and informing them doesn't foresee what's coming with the first Trump administration, with what's happening with ICE, with what's happening with literally children in cages and parental separation and all these awful things that have happened in our world in the last 10 years.
22:01But Cuaron and the writers are smart enough to know that that reality was in touching distance. Obviously, we don't live inside of children of men. That would be a gross overstatement. But there are literal details of this world that are shown in the movie that are actually happening right now. And, you know, this is usually not a very serious show. We usually like to have a lot of fun. But the movie is very chilling in the way it portrays some of these things. It's, and honestly, really, that in those images of the cages, in the recreation of some of the torture images, things do not look that different.
22:34And one of the amazing and incredibly scary parts of this film is the way it creates a dystopia that is really not that far from, you know, everything is like grimier, but it's set in London and it's like Big Ben is still there and like St. Paul's is still there and there's still a double-decker bus. and the opening shot is of the Clive Owen character, Theo, in a coffee shop where he's going to get coffee and so is everyone else. The world is going on. Exactly. It's continuing. It's the BCC instead of the BBC, I guess, but they use the chime. They get really close to that, as close as they can.
23:20It's reporting on horrors worldwide, but you know in its like very calm BBC voice so that the fact that the world is so recognizable um like in this dystopia and then also that so many of the images from the like the migrant crisis to you know torture to like militarization to all of these issues are also so recognizable from real life is, I mean, it's emotionally walloping. It's really, really messed up. And we didn't even mention the pandemic stuff, which is just like, it's like a back note. But the Theo and Julianne, who's that's Julianne Moore is named Julianne. Julianne, yeah. Their son dies and died in a flu pandemic.
24:10Yeah. Into like 2008 or something. But I mean, you know, that's what COVID was. It's like, it's just what the hell. There are a lot of scientists and futurists who have been foretelling matters like this. And, you know, it's not just to have just been prescient would not have been enough. Obviously, it's the collision of this incredible filmmaking style. Truly amazing actors being thrust into this world and being able to give performances. Like we always talk about the kind of physicality and athleticism of the filmmakers and of the camera. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Clive Bowen's performance in this movie, specifically that raid that you're talking about near the end of the film when he's been separated from Key and he's trying to find her by following the baby's cries and the camera is following him.
24:50And he is like leaping from space to space. I feel nauseous right now. He really is giving an amazing physical performance in this movie. You know, he's an actor who was like top of the billing star for a hot minute. You know, this is around the time of Closer, the Mike Nichols film. You know, coming out of the big success of Croupier, he made a couple of cool movies Did a very important Wimbledon like intro voiceover. I don't remember that, but I'll take your word for it. But he's fantastic in this movie. The other thing that I wanted to note is I think the music is so, so good. It's so good.
25:24So John Tavener composed the music and there are a ton of great needle drops. There's one that sticks out in my, well, there's two that stick out in my mind. One, as we're seeing the sort of landscape of London that is sort of burnt out and you've got protesters and you've got military and police and people trying to go about their day. You can hear in the Court of the Crimson King by King Crimson, which is sort of like dystopian 70s prog rock epic. And then the sequence when we first see Theo and Michael Caine's character seated together, they're listening. He's Michael Caine is listening to music.
25:57He cares for his wife, who it appears has Alzheimer's or is, you know, disconnected somehow. I think, I mean, they, in background in, like, newspapers, suggest that she was, like, tortured as well. Okay. Because, like, there's some headline MA5 tortures journalist or something. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And so he cares for her, grows pot in his house, and tries to while away the hours while keeping the faith for the cause. And they're listening to a song called Life in a Glass House by Radiohead, which is the last song on Amnesia. and it's a very unusual Radiohead song and features like a New Orleans brass band and it sounds like a funeral dirge.
26:37It sounds like literally Radiohead is like walking down the streets in New Orleans and Tom York is like wailing his weird Tom York wail surrounded by this huge brass band. And I've always loved that song and I've always been like this is the song you play like right before you die. So there are a handful of really clever needle drops mixed in with this sort of choral symphonic score throughout the film that toggles between doom and hope. Which is really what the movie is. The movie is a story about people who are on the precipice of disaster trying to find a reason to keep going to survive to find something else.
Read the full transcript
27:19I'm so struck by the final sequence. I guess if you haven't seen this movie we're talking about lots of detail. When they leave the building. When they finally get off of it. And it's just the reaction shot of every single person. So every single soldier observing the baby crying, which you talked about. It's unbelievable. But then leading all the way up until the rowboat. Yeah. And finding escape. Thanks to this woman who is described as a gypsy or an Arab. The immigration cop Sid, played by Peter Mullen, doesn't know. Which kind of, it's also like a little detail where it's like, I don't care what these people are or what they're about.
27:55And she effectively saves them. I mean, she is like an angel to them and takes them to safe harbor. And then they're just kind of rowing out into the nothingness, the vast nothingness of the sea, hoping to be saved. Which is what life feels like sometimes. It's a very powerful visual image. And I guess I won't spoil anything more than that. And then the final line, which you know is coming and is in some ways so classic Hollywood, like put the button on the kicker, but in the moment and after what you've been through is so lovely and emotional, which is like, I'll call my baby Dylan. It's a girl's name too.
28:38Sorry. It's an incredibly moving movie and moment. And that also is that's happening. I mean, spoiler, we're spoiling it, I guess. Turn this off. Yeah. Clive Owen is, that's it. That's like, that's his moment of release, which is like, oh God, like two parents are just crying right now. Great movie. It's a wonderful movie. And when it was released, everyone knew that it was a great movie. It was widely hailed. Yeah, but. And yet something happened. Like more critical fave. So what happened here? This is 2006. Yeah. So this is The Departed year? It is. I mean, with all respect to our number one guy and to The Departed, which is a great movie that you guys watched in Boston recently.
29:26This is a weird year. People, 2005, 2006, you know, the Oscars did not cover themselves in glory. Yeah. So this movie got three Oscar nominations. And they're three of the right kind of nominations. It got a Best Adapted Screenplay nomination. It got a Best Cinematography nomination. And it got a Best Film Editing nomination. Usually when a film has those three nominations, they're pretty likely to get Best Director and Best Picture. You know, we know this from talking about the Oscars nonstop on this show. That's true. Cuarón not nominated. No. Not nominated for Best Picture. No. No performance nominations.
30:07and not only that the film did not win any of the three prizes it was nominated for. You fucked up. Just for the sake of context you know I don't think 2006 is the worst year by any means but the nominees that year were the departed as you said the winner Babel Letters from Iwo Jima Little Miss Sunshine and The Queen. May I have some notes? What happened? Why did this happen? I don't like This movie was released on December 25th 2006. maybe it was too late and people were just too bummed out by it. I don't know. When was the Departed release? Departed was, yeah, October. It was in October, that's what I was going to say.
30:47But I feel like Letters from Iwo Jima was later in the year, right? Yeah, that was December 20th, 2006. I mean, look, I think Letters from Iwo Jima is a very good film. I think both of those, Clint, that pair of World War II films that he made are good films. I think Little Miss Sunshine was an absolute phenomenon coming out of Sundance and just ran the table for a long stretch there. Totally, I get it. It was a huge box office hit. Babel sucks and of course Inaritu is one of Cuaron's best friends and he's among with the three amigos along with Del Toro you know you and I are not the biggest Inaritu fans on the show we're gonna have to deal with that in a little while when Tom yes I didn't mean on the list I'm not putting spoiler Inaritu not on this list no no he's not on the list but I thought you meant like when Children of Men comes and we are confronted by Inaritu you know I'm not a fan of Babel and I think The Queen is a good movie, but it's not Children of Men.
31:40Yeah, no, it's not Children of Men. I like it a lot. That's a tough one. There is a great directing nominee from that year, Paul Greengrass for United 93, another movie that was sort of in the aftermath of living in 2001 and thinking about kind of, you know, obviously that's a pure docudrama recreating something that had happened. But this is a real old school Oscar travesty that this movie was not recognized in its time. I was thinking back on our list so far. So just some list notes. This is our second novel adaptation out of four. And I think we've got one Oscar total among four movies. One win.
32:19Is it just Tilda Swinton? Yes. Did Michael Clayton win anything else? I don't think so. Yeah, that's it. And I don't think The Handmaiden wasn't even nominated by an international feature. Something's got to give snubbed down the line. No, Diane Keaton was nominated for... She was nominated, but she didn't win. Yeah. did she win the globe that year? that sounds right I mean that's not surprising we do have some best picture winners on our list we have a couple but we're tracking towards you know righting wrongs I've just remembered a scene from this film that I love that when I rewatched it and it's relevant to this conversation about kind of historicizing art oh the Danny Houston scene the Danny Houston scene which is really really good and shows you one little portrait of the world inside the world that's happening in this movie.
33:07Danny Houston plays a very powerful man who is a friend of the Theo character who he goes to to get transit papers. But we see that he is living lavishly. So lavishly, in fact, that he has Guernica in his home. Yeah. And, you know, he has the David statue in his home. But he has these works of art devoid of admiration. There's no one in the world who can enjoy these works except for him. Right. Not even his son, Ed Westwick, who is like using a weird computer with his hand, you know. Again, extremely precious. Yes, exactly. Like he's basically playing Minecraft. Yes. Right. In an Argyle sweater.
33:46Yes. I find that scene to be wildly unnerving. As unnerving as any violent action sequence in the movie because he does something that I am guilty of, which is he just sort of pretends whatever's happening outside is not happening. And that compartmentalization, and putting that in the movie and showing that there are people who could make more change but won't make more change. And even the Theo character is, I mean, he is, he is, starts the movie, you know, one way and move towards another, moves towards another. And it is really the memory of his own son that impels him to do that. And this like last idea of like a tiny bit of hope.
34:25But yeah, it's, what happens when we all do that is this. Yeah, I mean, I think there's really something to that. I think there's really something to the urgency and in some ways necessity of this movie that it is kind of fearless in showing what happens if you take a back seat. Now, I can argue that celebrating art and celebrating humanity on a daily basis on podcasts is not nothing. It's a little something. It's not a lot. I think, yeah. So if you're doing it publicly, basically Danny Houston keeping Guernica in his house is as to you building your own little DVD library just for yourself. Before we started recording, I just told you I would lend it to you.
35:11That's true. I would share the great works. Why don't you open it up? Well, you'll be there Sunday, so maybe that will be the time to do it. Recommend it if you like. Like, we probably could go on and on because there is a vast history of post-apocalyptic cinema. Obviously, if you like Cuaron and Cuaron, who, you know, went on to make Gravity, which is one of the great crowd pleasers of its time. Sure. And the Oscars celebrated that one. Which felt like a bit of a too late thing. Yeah, agreed. Space is cool, but, you know, that's a good meme of Sandra Bullock. That's me at the end of every solid core class.
35:50floating in space or on the beach no on the beach but laying face down like I actually do that and then I think of that one image so you know in terms of image making it stays with me in this equation I'm dead George Clooney yeah I like Gravity when I saw Gravity in movie theaters I loved it yeah it's a movie that has not held up to rewatches the characterization is pretty minimal in that movie also gotta say 90 minutes long you're in you're out it is 90 minutes long yeah this one is under two hours thank you it feels really tight children of men. In 2018, he made Roma, a deeply personal movie about growing up in Mexico and the caregivers who he lived with that is a beautiful film that I think also kind of like hit us really in a deep place.
36:34And he hasn't made a movie and made one series for Apple called Disclaimer that I watched two and a half episodes of. I never saw, but I listened to it. I know what the twist is. Do you know what the twist is? I don't. I'm sure I heard Chris and Andy discuss it on a podcast. Yeah, that's how I learned it. I'll tell you once we're done recording. I can't even remember. We spoiled Children of Men, but we won't spoil. Disclaimer, starring Cate Blanchett. Every artist has their journey. Make another movie, bro. I'm eager for Cuaro to come back to films. I think, especially at a time like this, a person who knows how to make movies that are meant to be seen in theaters.
37:04All of his movies are, I've seen all of them since Itu Mama Tambien in theaters. I was fortunate enough to see Roma at the New York Film Festival. Yeah. And he has an extraordinary gift gift for image making and pace and tone that is almost unmatched and he can do any kind of movie and like we just need more movies from him. So I hope he makes more movies. So in addition to his movies, if you love his films, I think all of the sort of political dramas of Costa Gavris, you know, Z is the most famous for sure, but we talked about Missing on the 1982 movie draft with Tracy Letts, which is a terrific movie with Jack Lemmon and C.C.
37:47Spacek. I think State of Siege. I think The Confession. You know, most of his films in the 70s are excellent. You should seek those out if you like this movie. Blade Runner. Yeah, of course. Great call. Also a kind of prescient movie about a police state. And, you know, there's a little bit more AI robotics in that. And what Las Vegas looks like when the smog is really going. What was the Blade Runner year? Was it 2019? 2022? Blade Runner year. 80. Okay. No, that's when it was released. 2019. 2019. Okay. It's according to AI. I didn't check it. So, you know. I don't usually recommend TV, but we actually both have TV recommendations.
38:30That's true. In this list. Well, my, both of my recommendations were like, if you thought that was good, then let's try something really good. Oh, interesting. Yeah. But, you know. Oh, meaning if you, oh, if you, I see. Yeah, yeah, yeah. These are slightly lesser than. Right, but it's like, they're both successful. So if you like them, let me really blow your mind with Children of Men. I'm a fan of The Leftovers. And I think The Leftover, I don't usually recommend television on this show. I think The Leftovers is, I don't have the same, I don't hold it in the same steam that I think some of our colleagues do.
39:04I don't think it's like, you know, Mina Kimes, our friend, that's like what, I think that's her favorite show of all time. but there are certain things specifically in the second season of the show that feel very closely synced to this sense of like societal decay in the face of an inexplicable event that really resonates with me the same is true of 12 Monkeys another movie that is very wildly different in tone but feels very similar and then I just wanted to give a quick shout out to Peter Watkins Punishment Park which is completely different in style but not different in tone. 70s British film that I think people would enjoy.
39:45That's more of me recommending a movie to people that fewer people have seen than Children of Men. What are the two that you wanted to point out? Recommended if you like is the prompt. So if you thought Civil War was good, let me show you what can really happen when you do some exposition and world building that makes sense. Like a line around bang up action sequences. and it's about a group of people trying to navigate the end of the world. Very similar films. They're trying to do more than take a picture. So, you know, there's that. That's true. And then The Handmaid's Tale, which is a wildly popular TV show predicated on what happens when reproduction is the government's business in one way or another.
40:27And the world's business is large. At large. And I, you know, that show is somehow still going on or it just released another season I feel like they've eclipsed the novel at this point I think they eclipsed the novel in like season two but anyway I did watch the first season of that show I did too I'm a big Elizabeth Moss believer as am I the needle drops in that in The Handmaid's Tale were a bit much for me but again if you like that then here are some real needle drops yes the needle drops in this movie are superior yeah Children of Men is an all time classic Will We Regret placing it at 22?
41:06I don't know. Probably. We could do this whole thing with regret, but what if instead we appreciated the fact that we got to do this? I was psyched. I was driving into work today and I was like, I can't wait to talk about this movie. I've been talking a lot about it. We both almost cried. We kind of did, but we held it back. But I was also very excited to talk about a good film. I've been talking about this with the people in my life, which is really nice, and they're all like involved and they have notes and they want to, you know, I did, I had dinner with friends last night and they were like, oh, are you sure Children of Men shouldn't be top 10 as soon as I told them?
41:44So Jake, you're right. And then our friend Izzy was like, oh, you guys are getting really serious, huh? So it's, it's fun. I like the feedback. I like that people are involved. I like that we're doing this. I think next week we'll shift the tone again for a different kind of film. No less death defying. That's true. But different in tone, so it won't be that serious all the way through. I'm looking forward to continuing on while living with regret every day. Thank you. That's what you do. That is what I do. Thank you to our producer, Jack Sanders, for his work on this episode. Later this week, building the Val Kilmer Hall of Fame in honor of one of the great actors of the 90s and 2000s who recently passed.
42:28We will see you then.
42:34Thank you.
43:04Let's try the different Tic Tacs from minty-free to sweet-sweet-tic-tac. Refresh your good vibes.
From the publisher
Sean and Amanda return to continue their yearlong project of listing the 25 best movies of the 21st century so far. Today, they discuss Alfonso Cuarón’s ‘Children of Men,’ a deeply upsetting 2006 apocalyptic thriller starring Clive Owen and Julianne Moore, which features some of the most emotionally moving image-making of all time. They explore how this film altered the trajectory of Cuarón’s “shapeshifter” filmmaking career, celebrate Owen’s amazing physical performance, and revisit the Academy’s baffling decision not to honor the film with a single Academy Award.
Hosts: Sean Fennessey and Amanda Dobbins
Producer: Jack Sanders
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

