In short
Podcast Summary: Inside Oxide (Friends)
Episode Overview
- Podcast Title: The Changelog: Software Development, Open Source
- Episode Title: Inside Oxide (Friends)
- Episode Description: The podcast features Bryan Cantrill and Steve Tuck, co-founders of Oxide, discussing the unique aspects of working at Oxide during a live session at their annual conference, OxCon.
Key Themes and Discussions
Importance of Team Dynamics
- Team as a Core Value: Cantrill emphasizes that while everyone acknowledges the importance of teams, many organizations fail to act in ways that reflect this priority.
- Exceptional Teamwork: The founders believe their current team is remarkable, attributing this to their transparent hiring practices and a shared mission.
Hiring Philosophy
- Transparent Hiring Process:
- Cantrill and Tuck discuss their commitment to transparency, utilizing podcasts and written materials to attract like-minded individuals.
- They implemented a rigorous written process for hiring to minimize biases often present in traditional interviews.
- Written Evaluation: They prefer assessing candidates based on their written materials rather than oral interviews, highlighting the importance of self-awareness and communication skills.
Culture of Self-Awareness
- Meeting Recordings as a Tool: The practice of recording meetings encourages team members to reflect on their contributions and interpersonal dynamics, fostering a culture of self-awareness.
- Conflict Resolution: Cantrill mentions that the ability to revisit conversations helps in resolving misunderstandings and conflicts, as employees can see diverse perspectives.
Long-Term Vision
- Building a Lasting Company: The founders aim to create a sustainable company that remains focused on long-term goals rather than short-term gains.
- Shared Mission and Values: They believe that the pursuit of a common mission attracts individuals who align with their vision of longevity in the tech industry.
Challenges with Scaling
- Operational Complexity: The discussion touches on the complexities of scaling a hardware and software company, emphasizing the importance of solid partnerships with suppliers and manufacturers.
- Execution Over Market Risk: Cantrill asserts that the real challenge now lies in execution, having successfully reduced market risks through solid customer engagements and product delivery.
Demographics and Hiring Trends
- Absence of Younger Employees: The founders discuss the demographic makeup of their team, noting a lack of fresh graduates and emphasizing the need for experienced hires.
- Desire for a 'Farm Team': They express the aspiration to eventually create opportunities for younger talent, akin to a "farm team" for nurturing new talent in the tech sector.
Future Aspirations
- Inspiring New Company Formation: Cantrill hopes Oxide can serve as an inspiration for new companies, showcasing a different way of operating that counters negative trends in Silicon Valley.
Key Takeaways
- Team as the Heart of Success: A strong, cohesive team is critical for achieving lasting success in any organization.
- Adaptable Hiring Practices: Transparent and rigorous hiring processes can attract the right talent and foster a positive company culture.
- Focus on Long-Term Goals: Companies should prioritize long-term stability over short-term wins to build a sustainable future.
- Cultural Integrity: Maintaining a strong company culture is key to managing growth and scaling effectively.
Conclusion The episode provides an insightful look into the inner workings of Oxide, emphasizing the importance of team dynamics, self-awareness, and transparent hiring processes. As the company scales, the founders remain committed to their core values and vision, aiming to inspire others in the tech industry to adopt similar principles.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:08Welcome to Change Login Friends, your weekly talk show about going inside Oxide. We're on location at Oxide's HQ this week. Big thanks to our friends at Fly. Learn more at fly.io. Okay, let's talk.
0:28Well, friends, the news is out. Our friends over at CodeRabbit, CodeRabbit.ai, they've raised a massive Series B, and they've launched their CLI reviews tool. It is now out there. I've been playing with it. It's cool. The bottleneck is not code. the bottleneck is code review with so much code happening so many people coding now so much code being generated and so many things competing for developers time and attention to maximize code review still remains a bottleneck but not anymore code rabbit cli code reviews code reviews in your pull requests code reviews in your vs code and more teams now have a true answer to what it means to code review at scale code review at the speed of ai and code rabbit is right there for you you can learn more at coderabbit.ai we'll link up their latest blog announcing their series b and their announcement of their cli review tool again coderabbit.ai
1:37we made it we're here imagine a little warm fire you know i can almost feel the heat Yeah, exactly. Who's got the s'mores? That's right. This is a moment. I am so proud of you guys. The team you built, where you're at. I told you on the call, I'm like, we gotta milk this. And here we are. We're trying to milk it. Yeah, we're trying to milk it. We're trying to spend as much time as we can with everyone here. Well, so I gotta say, I'm really, because when we talked, and I said that you were talking about how terrific it was with the milestones we had, and I'm like, you need to meet the actual team.
2:12Yes. I did. You said that. I was like, I mean, I've met teams before. You met teams. I know. You were right. Yeah. You were right. Oh, God. No. The recording's on, right? I want to know how we got that. You're right. You're right. Exactly. That's right. And also, you were right with no, actually, you were right. You know? I just messed up. You were right. It's not that hard. It's not that I was wrong. It's that you were right. No, exactly. You were wrong. In that, I mean, I think it's like everybody understands that a team is important. No one would disagree with that. Right. No one would disagree.
2:39of course the team's important but then you look at what companies do and the way they act and it's like they don't act consistently with the idea that the team is actually everything and i mean that is i mean part of what always united steve and me is many shared values but real strong belief in teamwork yeah and the the highlights of my career have always been working on an exceptional team and we've i mean we've got we are blessed with a truly exceptional we spent the last day and a half meeting your team yeah talking hanging out undercover boss style undercover we got some really good feedback for you all like you'll see it yeah right and you all see it on eventually but we got two of one they're kind they're smart they're caring they you know accepted us right in there some are shy some are not like all the typical things of humans yeah but just very impressive like to a one so i guess the honest or the obvious question would be like how did you do that how did you do that yeah and you know it's actually not that complicated which is kind of frustrating that that more companies don't do it this way but we from the start believed we could attract an extraordinary team if we built transparently and really put a beacon out there in terms of what our mission was we one of the things that we believe was that companies were wrong to be deep stealth deep stealth made no sense to me because you're much better off explaining what you're building and why and how do we attract people who are who are drawn to the same mission so everything we did from the beginning like we did we did a podcast right and that under what i like definitely wanted to do a podcast it was fun to do but there was a method they did the madness and it was super cheap.
4:29And we, a couple of podcasting microphones and getting these pioneers of computing in, into a garage, talking about their experiences and why were we doing that? So they could act as a beacon and people would listen to that podcast being like, hey, I wanna work with people who've got that same disposition. And so from, that was very important to kind of put that beacon out there. and then once the beacon is out there then you also have to have a way of like okay so then how do we down select yeah and that's where you know we got lucky by our previous mistakes mistakes at previous stuff and Steve and I were not you know we were not 20 somethings when we started this company you know we were what I was 45 you were 41 I remember we were 42 yeah whatever it was 40s I think that was I mean one big part of it was we were deep enough in our careers to know what we wanted to do or what we didn't want to do.
5:27And then it makes it easier when you're talking to prospective employees and they're asking, what do you hope to achieve? And a lot of companies are hoping to achieve a fast start and get acquired. Or they want a quick run and then they're not talking about or planning for a longstanding company that they want to go build. And if it's the former, there's a lot of short-term decisions that are actually better for the short term that do not serve a long term that you don't intend to go build towards and i think you know what we wanted to do is we wanted to be doing this for like 40 or 50 years like the rest of our careers anyway and when you have that disposition other people that are attracted by the beacon of a big mission an idea to go do something uh and then can hear honestly and earnestly that we're trying to build a good company first and a longstanding company first.
6:23It allows for folks that are like deciding whether to leave where they've been for a period of time and actually jump in and jump in for the long term. And I'm sure you've gotten this from some of the stories of folks, you know, they got here and they're seeing like-minded folks all over the room that want to go build something, build something for a long time. So it was helpful to have a shared disposition towards building for, you know, as long as we can versus a quick short-term company. That makes a lot of sense. And then the down select, we call it down selecting, the narrowing down of the candidates.
7:01Yeah. You have this rigorous written process. Everybody talks about it, the materials. The RFD. Yeah, we've got an RFD that describes the hiring process. And that really came from hiring mistakes at previous spots. What do you mean? I mean, I made the worst hire of all time. You made the worst hire of all time? I made the worst hire of all time. Steve didn't do that. No, no, no. No, Steve didn't do that. I mean. Just in the room. Yeah, I mean, it was also like, you know, Steve, when someone else in the room has made the worst hire of all time, like, it doesn't matter if you made the second worst hire of all time.
7:33It doesn't matter. You're covered over. Yeah, and it was very helpful to have done that. And, you know, in Silicon Valley, people are often like, well, I think I've made the worst hire of all time. And I'm like, look, I will hand you the crown right now. I'm like, I'm happy to get rid of this thing. You should know that the guy that I hired presented himself under an assumed name had served time in state prison for violent felonies. And it's not what made him a bad employee. That's bad. Yeah, it's bad. And we took hiring down to the studs after that. And again, this is the benefit of having done this at kind of a previous stop of realizing that interviewing people, You mentioned this when you were talking to folks and getting different personalities.
8:18Some are shy. And so often when we do an oral exam as the way we determine whether someone joins a team, you are selecting for one aspect of a person. You're selecting for their charisma. You're selecting for their comfort with someone they've never met before. And there are so many terrific technologists that are nervous when they're talking to someone for the first time. And that you will interview and you may like, I don't know, but you read their written work. This person is extraordinary. And so we just, we believe strongly that the best way to evaluate people is them speaking from the heart in writing.
9:01And it's just very revealing in terms of what's important to people. Because ultimately what we want is we want a company that is, that we've got a shared mission, but bonded by shared values. and there are so many challenges in running a company that kind of go away. You know, if everyone is like really high performing and kind and communicative and collaborative, like there's a bunch of like problems. Not to say that like there aren't problems to go tackle, but the problems that you do need to go tackle are much easier to go tackle. One of the things that I've been, I mean, we actually, there's a degree to which, frankly, we don't, I'm a little disappointed how little interpersonal conflict we have in Oxide because I've got like a lot of flights.
9:44We have a flight right here. Working for more? We have a little bit of some drama. Maybe. Because I've got to like, no, because of some of the ways we have built things. I mean, so for example, one of the things that we've always talked about is we record every meeting. If you had something where like a meeting went really sideways and people came out of a meeting really upset, the ability for everybody to go back and re-watch themselves, re-watch the person they're arguing with, hey, can you see how, like, so this person you think drew the wrong inference and became upset. But now you can see, like, watching yourself, how they might have drawn that wrong inference.
10:22I mean, speaking for myself, I learned a lot about myself listening to past meetings that I was in, and I would go back to re-listen and re-watch them just because I thought I'd missed some content. And one of the things that I realized about myself that I guess should seem obvious, but I really had to rewatch myself to appreciate. When you're in a meeting and you have something that you want to contribute. So now your brain is keeping your little, like, I got my little morsel. Waiting for my turn. I'm waiting for my turn. I'm like, not an asshole. So I'm like waiting for my turn. And I'm keeping my little morsel warm.
10:54It is really hard to listen when you're in that mode. and so what I would do is I would re-listen to myself and someone else would make a really important point and then I would say something that it wouldn't be necessarily obvious to anyone else but it was obvious to me like no you dumbass you just missed something you thought you were listening and I would have been like self-awareness really right there's so many people who are not really that self-aware well it's hard in the moment but when you go back to it it's hard in the moment but when you go back to it you're like oh And it's like when you've built a company around that kind of introspection and self-awareness, when you do have these kind of conflicts arise, you have new tools at your disposal to go resolve them.
11:36Yeah. It's coping, right? I mean, you're teaching basic human skills here. Self-awareness, how to cope. Well, so I think— You know what I mean? Are we teaching it or are we selecting for it? Selecting for it. Because I think we can argue that we're selecting for it. Well, I think you're creating a culture that helps people do that naturally. Yeah. the recorded meetings self-awareness how did i respond coping right right well the self-awareness starts with the materials because you're having to write both like examples of your prior work and what you've done what you're proud of and then some open-ended questionnaire questions which basically are asking like when were you happiest in your career and why when were you unhappiest in your career why and know the answers to that take people to places they didn't expect when they were like oh i'm just going to throw my hat in the ring for a particular job and they'll tell us they get into it and they're like jesus christ i gotta put my pencil down and i'm just like sitting here therapy just like i'm back in that moment where i was you know i had you know my boss was telling me to let go of this person so i could promote the other person and uh all these things that were just in intentional with each other and what's really really helpful is then when we do have conflict uh you can take two people that are pitted against each other on a particular issue and you can say hey want each of you to go back and read the materials of the other person when you were like holy shit we have to hire this person and you were like god that is someone i really want to go work with and talk about like a way to resolve that tension and get someone thinking about again like all right hold on why are we here well because you remind yourself like we actually agree on a lot you may be disagreeing on this issue but i go back and read your materials like oh right right you we actually are trying to do the same thing we are actually we've got a lot in common when you all mention materials um what i've been thinking about and if i'm wrong but i feel like you expose a lot but you also take a lot away that became bias it's there's a removal process by the way that you expose this who is it what do they care about versus their their human attributes how they look the color their skin maybe even like where they're from for sure you know what what is removed from that process that's usually distractions that helps you focus on the good stuff that you should focus on i i think so i mean i i think so and it is interesting because i mean i i think that what you know one of the hiring is always going to be a challenging process right and we are always going to have and what one of the questions people have is like should i put a review in on someone that i've worked with because i like i've worked with them so i'm like i'm biased because i've worked with them it's like you should definitely put a review in on them.
14:11I know them well. Because you know them well. And we have seen it go all ways. And one of the things that we see that we where you've worked with someone, you thought they were really great. And then they apply and their materials are not good. That's the tough one. That hurts. It hurts. And it's happened to us all. And you're like, oh man, I wanted it to work out. But I know that Like, because we're so direct about, here's what you need to go do. And, like, read the RFD. Listen to the podcast episode where we tell people, like, don't put it all in the materials. Like, don't. We get people who are like, well, I'll tell you more in the interview.
14:52It's like, it's not going to be an interview. Yeah, you got to put it out there. And you've got to put it out there. But if people aren't able to do that, that's telling you something. And it's telling you something important that, like, this is not necessarily the right fit for you. And we know also, I think the other thing is like, you don't want to be too sanctimonious about it. We're not making absolutist judgments about like, we're not hiring the best. We are hiring people that are, that we think are the best fit for the roles that we're hiring for. And, you know, one of the things that we definitely have had, we actually, it's been, one of the things that's been fun about the company is we've been around for long enough.
15:25we've had people apply for the company and you read their materials, you're like, this is, I like a lot here, but this is off for this role. And then two years later, there's a role that opens up that's a better fit for them. Sometimes we've communicated to those folks that like, hey, I loved your materials, but here's why it wasn't a fit. Sometimes we haven't. And then they come in on our own, like, oh, this is like, now the time is right. So it's like, I think that like, You want to be careful about kind of this is not kind of an ordering. This is finding people that we think are the most likely to succeed at oxide.
16:05And honestly, one of the things that's been really challenging is we've got a lot of people that apply for the company that desperately want to work for the company. And it's really hard to turn someone like that away. It could be good. It could be good. It could work out. It could work out. And it's like, the problem is like, we are, we don't have, we don't have an infinite amount of resources. And we do have to make decisions. Those decisions are really hard. What you described is something I would call a velvet rope. Right? When you go into a certain club or a certain place, there's a, there's a line that says, if you pass this bar, or if you meet these guidelines, or you are a fit, come on in.
16:44But if you don't, politely. Yeah. Not now. Not now. Right? Yeah. That velvet rope is a very powerful thing in your business. Yeah, and I don't like the exclusivity of it, but that's just the reality of what we need to go do. You have a responsibility. That's right. Right? To these folks here. 100%. To do your jobs and be selective. That's right. I think we have the good fortune of now being very, very oversubscribed in almost every role. So it is tough because there will be like a great candidate and then an even better candidate that is just a better fit. And I think, you know, we are, we're obviously growing.
17:35We're expanding. We got more wrecks out there than we've ever had by a factor of two. So that helps, but it's still, we're still massively always subscribed. Well, I think actually one of the important thing on the job descriptions that we have out, We put a lot of effort into the job descriptions. We want to make sure the job descriptions... Describe the job? Describe the job. Good job. We're going to do something radical. We're going to describe the job, not make up a bunch of bullshit requirements. Yes. Yeah. No AI slop. No AI slop. Really? This is human-generated, thoughtless. Hasn't AI submit materials yet?
18:06Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah, well, so you also have people, you just want to give them the feedback, next time let an AI write this. Like, this would have been much better. Grammar check and stuff. Oh, we've gotten some real stinkers in that regard. Right. But you, and actually, I was talking to an old friend of mine, and we're talking about the process, he's like, won't work in the post-AI age. And like, well, let me describe the questions we're asking. It's like, when have you been happiest and why? Hard to AI slop that one into existence. That's so true. And when people do... It's such a personal question.
18:37It's a personal question. It requires introspection, journey. Yeah. Hard to degenerate that one. Yeah. It is hard to degenerate that one. I would say one modification we made to the materials is we asked, the last question we asked is why do you want to work for oxide? And I mean, it's an unfortunate kind of indictment of the age we live in where people are like, I want to work for oxide because it's a principled company that like you hold just like, you know, honesty and integrity and decency. And that's great. We view that as a constraint on like operation. We think that any company should have that.
19:13I think that that is great, that that resonates with you. That is nowhere near enough. That is nowhere near enough. I need to know, we need to know that the mission speaks to you, that the role speaks to you. We need to know that, and one of the things we've done is we've put more and more in our job descriptions and given people more opportunities to explore to the degree that they're a fit. We want you, we're very transparent. We want you listening to podcast episodes in the RFDs, in the repos. And the more you can do that, because you need to try it on to see if this is actually earnestly going to be a fit for me.
19:50And so one of the things we've added is not just why do you want to work for Oxide, but why this role at Oxide. And that's been really, really important. So I described some of the characters that we've met here. Adam described some of their lifestyles all around the world. One thing that I think it seems to be missing is youngsters. Yeah. Everybody is generally 30s, 40s. I would define youngsters. First of all, we made a match reference. We made a match reference that literally half the company didn't get. I saw the hands. It was the hands. Half of us got it. I would say 70 % it seemed. Got it?
20:26It was around 70%. No, no, no. It was not 70%. I saw a lot of hands. No, no, no. There were a lot of hands. Less than 50%. We had a lot of hands to go. So you're overly subscribed. You got tons of people that want to work here. You're right. You have a gluttony of riches and choice, right? At a certain point, there's a demographic that seems to be missing. It's like someone who's fresh out of college, fresh out of high school, maybe has a different perspective, maybe is first-friend that is it, but he's sort of wondering. That's a challenge. It's because we, I mean, I obviously had a job straight out of college.
20:56Straight out of school, I went to SUN. It is important that we are in an environment. I want us to be able to be in an environment for that. And we do have people who apply straight out of school. and whenever I look at someone straight out of school, I'm like, okay, this is unlikely, but let's see. And I always go into the materials with an open mind. The materials are weak. I mean, the materials are weak. And look, I say I hate the exclusivity, which may make me a hypocrite from what I'm about to say, but this is an elite team. And like, hey, I want to play Major League Baseball. I'm a good high school baseball player.
21:33It's like, all right, you want to go play Major League Baseball? that's great you're gonna go you're gonna go play d1 and then you're gonna go play maybe you're gonna play indie ball you're gonna be on the bus you're gonna be in the minors and you'll be playing major league baseball when you know when you're 25. maybe if you're bryce harper and if the bryce harper of software and cheering or the bryce harper of sales applies i think that like that the materials will show it but it's like we are not going to be so you know i i think that in the abstract i've wanted to be able to be somewhere for a stop right but as a practical matter when you're building an elite team isn't really practical.
22:07I mean, it's like we need like a minor league oxide. You know, we need like a, you know. Oh, hey, come on now. Exactly. Hey, now. I think there's... I think a farm team is a decent metaphor because don't you guys want that eventually? I know you're in a different phase now, but maybe eventually. We will eventually. And I think we have folks that, you know, just several years out of school. Right. And that work here. and I think it is just easier to know yourself and know what you want to do and be able to express that in your materials with just a few miles on the tires. Yeah, this is a very important point.
22:44A few miles on the what? A few miles on the tires. There's a big difference. That allows you to understand a little bit more of what you want so that this is not like trying on work, but this is like where you want to go really apply yourself. and I think part of it is like, you know, we have fewer submissions from folks that are earlier in their career than later in their career and I think it's, you get into the materials and you're like, this is not a trivial disagreeing. Use them all. He's shaking his head. It's not true because... Fewer materials that I see. There we go! The what? Are you the first round and he's the second round?
23:18No. He's the primary filter, right? You said that earlier. While at least off camera. Don't make it through the first round. That's right. Okay, there are many fewer quality materials, even like moderate quality materials, of folks that are very, very, very early in their career. Because it is hard to describe robust experiences that haven't happened. There's also, just as Steve said, there's a really big difference between a 22-year-old and a 25-year-old. And a 25-year-old and a 28-year-old. That prefrontal cortex is still developing, right? And so we get, you actually, we do have actually plenty of people.
23:58There are people here that are younger than you might think. And there are, I mean, certainly we've got plenty of people here that are much closer to our kids' age than they are to our age. And the, but they didn't come straight out of school. They had two years' experience, three years' experience, four years' experience. And like you look at those folks that are exceptional, the experience they had was exceptional. You know, they were in a real kill. Right. And they learned a lot in a very short period of time. They're wise beyond their years. One of the things that a lot of people have said when we ask why you work for Oxide, why you like Oxide, and this reflects in your management style, which you said is trust, your management style is trust, is they say, well, they treat us like grown-ups.
24:38They can treat me like a grown-up. And I think that's an awesome way of describing it. That being said, everyone here is a grown-up. Many other people are saying that we treat them like a grown-up. Yeah, like a grown-up. But they are grown-ups, though. Well, exactly. I mean, like... It's just nice to be recognized. I guess I did. Wow. Another intention. That's the bar? That's the bar? Is that a bunch of grown-ups getting children? I mean, I don't know. I don't know. I know. Sorry. Well, I mean, it just speaks to the experience level of people, right? Like, they're self-starters. They're motivated, right?
25:07And, of course, this goes now to where I always end up, which is, like, how long can you keep doing that? In terms of... I told you, though. As you scale. For as long as you can. As you scale. Well, look, if people are coming in. People are coming in, drawn to the mission, and especially excited about working with this exceptional team. There's a responsibility to the team around you. We've seen this all the time where folks are trying to do their best work because they feel an onus to these people around them that are doing their best work. You can't take your foot off the gas, and you don't want to because you want to show up and help your peers and help your customers.
25:42And that's infectious. And so it's like, I think as you have that in the collective, it's very hard for the next five people to come in and disrupt that. You come in and you are trying to live up to that. And so that ends up being this gravitational pull to where you can keep growing with everyone with that same disposition. And I don't know, like it's hard to imagine. Like the bigger that gets, the harder it is for the next group to tear away at that. I mean, I will say this, that like if you talk to founders where companies have lost their way, and indeed like the Brian Chesky piece that inspired Paul Graham's founders mode, they will say that culturally we lost our way.
26:21I didn't spend enough time on the culture. And I think we would say, well, you didn't write the culture down early enough, and you didn't use the culture as a lens for hiring. So the company lost its foundation. You say, like, how far can—ask the good question, like, how far can scale? No company has ever been at our size with what we have in terms of the strength of culture that we've got. I mean, there are very few other— And consistency from where we started. There are very few other companies, period, that use written materials as the primary rubric for hiring. But they're not you. and so we like we don't know like that has been so important to us to scale out it's like it would be foolish for us to say what we can or can't do because we just don't know like we were pretty concretely like when we started hiring sales a bunch of people outside the company we're like you've got to stop the materials process you cannot hire sales people even the sales people like move move very quickly there's recruiters involved like you take that long they'll be gone they'll be off the market yeah and we're like well Well, no, like that's it's a hard constraint.
27:32Like we actually are going to require someone to spend like a couple, several hours writing down their thoughts if we're going to consider them to be one of the, you know, foundational members of the sales team or the next five or the next five. And it turned out exceptional salespeople loved the process. They love describing themselves, like the curious attributes of their character in how they do research on a company before they show up to the first meeting, which is a sign of respect and allows you to get into a deeper conversation more quickly rather than, how can I hook them on some quick little, like, why this company does this?
28:11So they really enjoyed the process. And now they bring that into the sales culture for the next round of sales hiring. Do you ask that different question than you ask engineers? We do. Yeah, so what we've done is we've changed the portfolio questions. So the questionnaire is the same because we found that the questionnaire, happiest and why, unhappiest and why is universal. The portfolio questions change. And one of the things that we do is we, especially if we're hiring for a new role we've never hired before, we want to go find the person that we would love to hire that's working in that role, unhireable, because they're happy.
28:46Help us figure out what the materials should look like for this person. What are the questions we should ask if we're trying to get at curiosity and responsibility in a sales context? And lo and behold, as they start being like, okay, here's how I put the materials together. And then like six months later, they're like, hey, you have an opening over there? I might be interested. It's like, I thought you were interested. I thought you were happy. Like, well, you know, I just might be interested. Things change. Things change. And I think that the, so we do change that up. But it's interesting to look at because I think that those changes are really important.
Read the full transcript
29:20So we are asking, you know, especially for roles that our customer are facing, we want to see evidence of real customer curiosity and depth. Because, you know, it's great. We obviously wanted to build a company that employees would be proud to work for. It's great. We also want to build a company that is equally, if not more important, that customers love to buy from. We, it was very important to us from the outset that we build a company that, because we're talking about trust as a management philosophy. It's true. Trust is also a customer and market engagement philosophy. Because, you know, I was at Sun during some very, very dark years.
29:59And we had a non-competitive microprocessor. And one customer told me, he's like, you know, I got to tell you, like the products you make are not competitive right now. there are a bunch of things about Sun that are really difficult for me to deal with but I really want you guys to make it and the reason I keep you in here is because you guys never lie to me. The only ones never lie to me come in here, if your products are not the right products you'll help me find something better you always want me to succeed and I gotta tell you that also seems like a low bar, like look you guys don't lie to me Oh, I know.
30:39I think you would be surprised. But that's it. It's typically transactional. And what you want is you want, I mean, yes, like sales is about transactions, but it cannot be transactional where someone is thinking about their quarterly number. I mean, yes, you absolutely want them hitting their goals, but thinking the long game with these customer relationships. And you find that those that have played that long game and have built trust with customers have these longstanding relationships with customers. even if they went to two companies three companies and so how do you understand how they think about being not just the representative but the steward of the company with those relationships and the materials are a great place for that to take shape and uh we've and we then we've gotten great feedback from candidates they've done the materials they're like hey you know what else would be great to talk about in here.
31:31And just, again, we feel very fortunate that the founding sales team here are big believers in the process and want to carry that forward. I got to say, like, when we were first trying to hire for sales, my own conviction was kind of wavering. I'm like, Steve, is the materials process the right process for sales? And so, yes. Steve's like, emphatically, yes. We just haven't found the right people yet, and we just need to like be patient and well and also you got to do more than that like because for some roles yes we are very oversubscribed for other roles like like we got to go out and like really shake the tree and you got to be willing to go find the people and have the pre-conversations with them i mean steve and i've had many conversations with candidates like i don't know about oxide like look let me hop on the phone with you and what i want to close you on is digging further into the company to get you to the point where you're submitting materials.
32:26So we are happy to get engaged. But I will say, when we got early in the process with sales candidates, one of the things we kept seeing was these materials that were not great because it was salespeople just pounding their chest. And if you think about what they are predisposed or conditioned to be able to talk about, it is how I crushed my number, how I was the first person to close this size deal. And like, great. I mean, a lot of people are involved in closing big deals. What we want is story time. We want to hear about like, when things didn't go great, did you run towards it or run away from it?
33:04Did you, you know, how did you deal with, how do you treat your peers when you're working on a large, complex customer engagement? And it's funny because we've had candidates that have submitted materials that were just all about the headlines of success metrics, which is how folks have been trained. we had to get better at how do we ask the right questions to get them just like just the stories you tell around a campfire right about the like the scar tissue that you have with tell us those stories so where did that conviction come from he was wavering why did you believe so much that that was still the right path for sales when it was a struggle at first to find the right people like oh because it's not about sales i mean it's it's it's it has nothing to do with a particular whether it's solutions engineering, support, sales, finance.
33:55I think, again, back to folks that have shared passion, shared values, and a shared disposition about building something meaningfully with people they love working with for a long time and doing it the right way. That's what you're looking for. And then when you find that, it doesn't matter what particular team or role or anything. I mean, I think you all have started to feel that across the company. And that's where the flywheel starts to take shape. You just got like, you know, it's not about these siloed organizations where you have to do things differently because that's a certain type of animal.
34:32And then, you know, thankfully, we started to see like, holy shit, that's an incredible salesperson that loved the process. And like, just go read the materials. And that is whenever you're doing something that kind of takes conviction that's contrary, you need those early omens that like, okay, I'm not totally on the wrong path. Reinforce it. And to reinforce it. And it's like, I mean, when I say like my conviction was wavering, I mean, I don't think I needed much in the way of convincing. But it was, but it actually was extremely helpful that Steve was so emphatic because I think that we've all, I mean, for us, the proxy, especially in sales, How much of your sales is like understanding what a customer needs and then sculpting what you've got for that customer?
35:15It's like, well, we're being very explicit with you about what we need. And it's like, this is a very good proxy for a customer relationship. And if you're not reading the RFP thoroughly and you're kind of shooting your mouth off, it's like, well, you're not going to work. Then how rigorous are you going to be on the thing that you're submitting to that CIO? And you're going to be like, oh, well, I rushed through it because, you know, I was on a plane. It's like, no, what? So it gives you. And I will say that the other thing about this company is that like we, this is where you get to that trust.
35:48Like we, this company sticks it. Like we know that if someone is out there representing oxide in any capacity, sales, finance, operations, engineering, we know that they themselves are going to hold themselves to a high standard of execution. But I would say like the reason that it's reasonable to ask like how could this scale? It is easy to see how these things don't scale. Meaning like there was real investor pressure early, especially around sales hiring, where it's like, I want you hiring faster. Why aren't you hiring faster? It's probably this materials process. You know? And so you can totally imagine scenarios in which you're like, okay, there's just like too much external pressure.
36:30Yeah. you've got to relax these constraints. And that's not to say that you don't need to adjust and modify things as the company gets bigger and you are. But the foundation is so, so, so important. And sticking it out just a little longer, you get these omens. And you're like, okay, all right, actually, no, stay the course. And then you get the down the road, it's like, oh, man, what a great model. And this happens because I do, I mean, I end up reviewing a lot of materials. And you just get numb as you're reviewing materials. And then you can have a candidate that's just a bit better than the others.
37:08Like, oh, this person's great. No, no, no. I'm just like, I'm numb from these others. And then you begin to like, God, maybe this is unreasonable. Especially when it's a new role. And then you get that superlative candidate. And you're just like, oh, thank God. Thank God. All right. Yes. Yeah, it still works. There's still hope. There's still hope. So on that vein, fast forward 20 years. You guys are retiring from oxide. 20. You forget to, we're youngsters still. Okay. Fast forward 40 years. 40 years. Okay, fine. You've built a generation of computer companies. The next generation is running it.
37:43You guys are ready to hang them up. Are you still, does Oxide still do uniphone compensation? Predict it. Oh, boy. Hard to know. I genuinely, hand on heart, don't know because I just don't know. I think that we, it's easy to, I can easily go either way. I can easily be like, no, no, of course not because that generational company has to have 10 ,000 employees. I'm like, no, God, that would never work. And then I can go the other side of like, yeah, that generational company only had 500 employees, only had 600 employees. And I just don't know. What do you think, Steve? Brian doesn't know. I don't know.
38:25I think the kind of like the foundation behind uniform compensation still remains and which is what uh transparency for sure transparency is that there be tiers maybe still uniform but like tiered uniform like uniformity that does that make it non-uniform well look i'll give you an example so like we we do not have uniform construction of compensation at oxen right we have we have salespeople that are putting something in the middle where if they do not achieve their target, they make less than everyone else at the company. And if they overachieve their target, they make more than everyone else at the company.
39:07And we've definitely had open conversations about whether others are interested in putting something in the middle. It gets a little interesting when you're like, okay, well then what's my pull requests? Right, or how many soldering on a board they're soldering. Right, right. And the... But again, if we're thinking about everyone having an equally important role in the company, I think that's foundational as well. Where a lot of people are just like, oh, you can't possibly pay the same for a support engineer. Always support engineers. Support. They always get respect. They always get kicked. They're the first example.
39:46It's like, I got to kick one of these. So support, get over here. You know, I'm going to kick you. And so, look, I mean, is there a future where we want to be building folks that are earlier in their career? That's what I was thinking about. The farm team. The farm team, yeah. Look, I don't know. Don't know. But I think the things that start to, that eventually you're asking questions around are, I mean, we already hit this first, like, is it rigid in all regards? Or is it the foundation of transparency and equal weighting of value of job, which is kind of like the first two important pieces. And then sales was the first time that we broke it being completely rigid and uniform across everything, but landed on transparency and kind of equal weighting.
40:36and so yeah the things that will open the question is you know how will we address folks that are earlier in their career as we get further along and international I mean I don't know I would like to believe that that we're going to be able to hold true to the foundation of this thing regardless of international and some of the other things that will and I think The other thing that we've been told so frequently, like, oh, this doesn't scale, this doesn't scale. It's just kind of a waste of time to think about it. Yeah. Because it's like, actually, the only thing I care about is, like, does it scale to, like, the next 10 hires?
41:14And the answer to that is yes. So we've kind of figured it out. And I think that the other thing that, you know, the esprit de corps that we have here is so sacred that we, and it's not unrelated, right? Because people don't, when you, whenever you tie compensation to people's individual actions, then people will adjust their individual actions accordingly. And what you will, it's like, well, if I, if I'm doing this, like, is this what I'm on? Has this been my OKR, my MBO? Is it yes or no? And like, we want people to make the right decision. And we want them to do that when we trust them to do that in the moment.
41:59And so we don't want to lose any of that. So anything we would do that we want to be very careful about anything we would do because we don't want to lose any of what we've got. Because what we've got is lightning in a bottle. I mean, I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a team this large with this kind of breadth and this kind of depth that has this kind of a spirit of the Lord. And by the way, throughout, we've been wide open to the questions. And we would never do anything where it was, you are unable to serve your customers appropriately without X. You are going to hurt the company or put a limiter in front of where the company can go because of Y.
42:35And we've had the good fortune of like, when it comes to this topic, we have never had to compromise or make sacrifices around our customers and the growth of the business around that. And I just hope that'll be the case for a long time to come. one of the things that you said in our conversation initially brian with even doing this even being here was you wanted to capture this this special thing you have papers materials the whole process and expose it you want to kind of i think you said the word infect or something like that to other companies out there that you hope that you can be a leader in that front yes we're gonna put something out we're gonna share the inside of something that's right you'll prove it of course yeah but it's it's to be a version that you can showcase what's happened here what do you hope happens what do you hope people do that changes maybe the the goliaths the googles the whomevers you'd think though they probably won't change but maybe the next version of the fangs will be reformed one funeral at a time sure to paraphrase thomas kuhn uh the um i did that there's there's no salvation i think for those companies um i think that the you know uh jared diamond's collapse is very instructive in this regard um and you companies when when the when the culture is wrong fixing a culture is such a gargantuan amount of work that you would have and so thankless in so many regards and there are so few people that are capable of true cultural change you'd have to ask yourself why would someone do that why would someone sign up for that job and this is like look no further than than intel like intel has had a an acute deep cultural problem for for decades and the and they've got i mean really the first person in they've got their first outside ceo in their history in lip boudin and not coincidentally it's the first person who's trying to fix the culture problem it is far too late and the far too late to that company i mean good luck to them but it's like the kinds of things you need to do.
44:44I've got a big new investor. That's what that is. Oh, God. Yeah. You and me. Yeah. When's the board meeting? That's right. Do we get to go? I said, I didn't get a choice on this one. No, no. I guess I invested. Oh, I guess we invested. Yeah. Anyways. So I think that we're, that I think you kind of have to give up on. I think you can have, what I think is possible is around new company formation and inspiring a rising generation. And one of the things that, you know, I've got a lot more, I've got a lot of faith in the rising generation. I think that the, you know, maybe just from my own kids and their friends and kind of the approach that they take, I think that young people have, yes, they've got flooded with a lot of dis and misinformation, but they've also got the ability to go find, like, Really information that is a real source of truth for them in a positive way.
45:43And I think that we can be an inspiration for that new company formation. I think we can tell people there's a different way to do things. And people, and I think to a fault, have mimicked some of the bad behavior in Silicon Valley. And that bad behavior has kind of reinforced itself. A TV show? A TV show or Silicon Valley like the place, right? that you've seen, that behavior around here is degraded. And there is... Well, and I think people are just by nature moving fast, looking to copy things that are around them, pick up stuff that probably worked or sort of is the way you do things. So I think part of getting it out there is giving another little blueprint that one could follow.
46:27And even if they're not rigorously evaluating it, they're like, that seems plausible. we had also the ecosystem around new company formation so a recruiter that we used was one of the parties that was just like this materials thing is bonkers you guys are just wrong I can't work with this I can't work with this, you understand I'm working with like 50, 60 companies talking to hundreds and hundreds of candidates across these companies you'll never hire someone this way this is not how it works and it took some time and some like to get them around the bend to agree to work with us on this and kind of like kind of like work together to help them with how we operate through this process and some good feedback for us just in terms of or let's say we we landed on a good process here we go there we go and uh and uh by the end of it we uh we had a candidate come aboard that they were uh that they had worked with and uh one i would say very key moment in that path they would have a candidate that they're very hot on we would talk to them seems possible yeah this is good we have a good conversation they submit materials materials are terrible terrible terrible materials and i i mean it'd be interesting to talk to these folks but like we would send the recruiter the materials and the recruiter is a smart person yeah i mean and so like on the one hand like had yes had the conviction of their own beliefs but is it is an intelligent individual and they would read the materials and be like oh oh those are bad right well and i think it also like maybe like challenging some of your priors like actually maybe I thought that guy was really good.
48:20And you guys talked to the guy and you guys also thought he was really good. And now all of us can agree that based on the materials, it's terrible. Maybe I've been like, maybe I'm not gauging this correctly. Is that like talking versus walking though? Because like papers, the materials, I keep saying papers accidentally, the materials are kind of like walking. You can, yeah. Show me your papers. Show me your papers. You know, you can talk a lot, but can you walk? The materials is like the walk. Yes, but in the case of this recruiter, by the end of the process, they said, and we've seen this across investors, recruiters, where they are now like taking that process and begin to implement.
49:04So this particular recruiter is like, if you don't mind, I want to start kind of like educating some of our clients on this process. because I'm now seeing value in being able to get higher quality candidates further along with these engagements. So there's an example of like, we'd love that. It'd be amazing. And anywhere we can help where this helps others begin to do hiring, add elements to their hiring process that helps them get better people at work. I almost wanted to, if it's not a byproduct of how we force hiring like i know people looking for jobs like i submitted everywhere oh right yeah on email.com you kind of have to gunshot your opportunity because one you're between things you're desperate maybe it can be that situation where you got laid off and your position is not of your own doing necessarily you may have been upset about where you were at maybe you would have changed and you love oxide or whatever but it's almost like the hiring scenario is is forced to go gunshot.
50:06Let me put my, let me put who I am everywhere versus go super deep on where I truly can apply. And what you see - It's got to be both sides though. The company has to do what you all do and the candidate has to be willing to do what you ask them to do. And in particular, what you have is a lot of companies and I think it's a mistake. Companies are thinking like, well, you know, this is a lot of like tedious resume review. This is a great task for LLMs. Let's put LLMs in charge of this and let's relieve the human of having, because they only do resume review. They don't have any other materials to look at.
50:38So the cynicism that you see from JobUp, it's like, look, these guys just use the AI anyway. So what you need to do... Play the game. Play the game. Play the game. And it's like, it's basically random whether you get a... The kind of conviction from the candidate is it's random whether you get a call or not. And I don't know that they're wrong for a lot of companies. So it's like, if it's random, AI slop your resume up such that an LLM can actually identify. At some point, the LLMs are going to start writing. It's going to be like, my resume, this is not even in alien rooms. It's like, yeah, but the other LLM can read it and it's like, for whatever reason, it's selecting it.
51:15It's more efficient that way. The art is like the white space has like a... And then you scatter shot your way out there and then you get that call because it's random. And I've never seen that or I said, that is the wrong way to get a job. And I do feel that like look yes we're exos okay we've seen shitty job markets we've seen job markets way shittier than this one way shittier than this one and it's and the like yeah like what do you need to do to find a job in a shitty job market it's hard i mean i i've got total sympathy especially people that are suddenly laid off and are are scrambling but you need to figure out what you need to do next and why do you just get a job okay okay take a half a step back because you've got to find what's what is going to be if like if you truly need to like pay the bills you should like get literally any job that you can use while you're actually formulating your proper job search i used to listen to bruce williams as a kid you know like was it bruce williams was on talk net It's like AM talk radio.
52:24I'm dating myself. Even Steve is like, you are on your own, pal. No. Is this like Sally Jessie Raphael? This is before she had a day time talk show. I was thinking of a very weird turn. Before she had a day time talk show, she was an AM radio call-in kind of advice show. And I used to listen to this as a kid. And Bruce Williams gave us really good advice. People would call in, and he would call in with their financial problems. And he's like, look, if you need to find a job, what you need to go do is work the overnight shift at a convenience store. And, like, get a paycheck. And then use your days to go interview and find the right job.
53:04And this was in, like, 1982. The recession in 1982 was super, super deep. And, like, what you need to go do if you're job searching is, like, you actually need to figure out what you need to go do, what you want to go do. and you've got to then find the company, whatever it is, that is like, I want to work there. And then you've got to be like, okay, I'm going to focus my efforts on wanting to work there. And it's like, yeah, maybe that's oxide. We can't take you. But hopefully that process has sharpened you in terms of like, now these are, and you should not be spraying prey. Spraying prey. That is what everybody's doing.
53:39That's what everyone's doing. I know because we've talked to people recently, like people literally who are listeners of our show that we've recently met. We had a live show in Denver, by the way. I don't know if you knew that. We did a live show on stage, kind of like this, and we invited people out. They bought tickets. They're fans. They listened to the show. It was cool. And a few of those folks did not have employment at the time. Yeah. And they shared how challenging it is to be so skilled, to have such intention, to be great people, and have this challenge. Yeah. And, I mean, again, heart goes out to them because it's really hard.
54:14You've got your own self worth being chipped away at. And it's really hard when you've got someone who's then, that person has set their whole being on being at oxide. Right. And then, you know, I'm the one that's got to be like, no. But spray and pray is not going to, that's not the right way. I would love to keep going deep on this subject, and I'm sure we can because, you know, we're passionate about it. It's the defining, one of the many defining factors about your business. but we haven't mentioned at all where you're at yeah this is a scale moment i know there's some things we can say and can't say you share what you want yeah but can you speak to your personal feelings to being at the moment where you have to do a heck of a lot more in a month than you've done previously i mean it's it's definitely exciting to be in the situation that we had been building for and hoped for, which was struggling to catch up to fulfill demand, figuring out how we can stay in front of customer opportunities that are going to push us really, really hard, being able to not prepare ourselves to scale, but actually to go scale and supply chain and manufacturing and delivery and logistics and field service and all that stuff.
55:37Different kinds of fears and stressors. But yeah, I mean, it's exciting. It's exciting because I think we, you know, last year we were excited to get the product, you know, first year fully in commercial market into customers' hands and be able to prove out that we could ship reliably, build reliably, ship software updates every eight weeks. And last year, a year ago, we had to raise. We were very upfront about that with the team. I mean, we're not trying to get anyone to throw up in their mouth, but like, hey, folks, we run out of cash in May, June, or July, depending on which model you look at.
56:17So just FYI. And so we have to hit the milestones that we need to go raise. And that's not where we are this year. Right. We're a whole different ballgame. A whole different ballgame. It just shifts from what are the milestones to raise to what are the milestones to stay ahead of these large customers that are growing. To deliver. To deliver, to delight our customers, and to not lose track of who we are. Right. And you guys are a hardware company. You know that. Systems company. Hardware and software. I like that. Systems company. Yeah, sure. I think there you are, but we all know that. I'll just lay that up as a contrast to a pure software company.
56:59Yes, yes. Because you are not in control of every aspect of your business, supply chain, I'm thinking of specifically. Oh, sure. As a pure software company, you could just write the software and deliver it. But there are so many more moving parts that are moving around the world. Yep, undoubtedly. How much is your ability to deliver on the demand that you've found outside of your control? Oh, I think it's— Put it on a percentage score. There are things that are outside of our control, for sure. And things that happen. One thing that this team gives us the confidence in, we've had so many of those things already happen.
57:36Right. And, you know, Steve and I were talking about the things that, like, are biggest single sources of stress in the history of the company. And for Steve, rightfully, it was the SDB failure. Right? SDB failure. We had to wire payroll on Tuesday morning. It's Thursday and there's a run in the bank. That was a crisis moment. It's Friday and the bank has failed. Right. It's like we had to wire payroll on Tuesday morning. My view was, you know what? It'll be fine. It'll be fine because Janet Yellen cares about this problem, the SVD problem. We were not the only ones that had the SVD problem. Everybody had the SVD problem.
58:12Right. And it's like it will be disruptive in the short – versus some of these other issues, you can die alone. Yeah. So my biggest sources of strain were stress, were in the development, especially of our first product, where it's like, yeah, this CPU will come out on reset. We don't know why. Janet Yellen does not give a shit about that problem. Like, nobody cares about that problem. You are out here in the wilderness, and you can die. And alone, really, because you're inventing it. 100%. So on the one hand, that is scary. On the other hand, we have now hit so many of those. And we have found our way around them.
58:49that, of course, I'm like tempting the gods. You are. You did your keynote, too. You're not done with it. But I think that there are things that are out of your control. But when you have those things, you're like, okay, who do we know at this laminate? Right. But also, by the way, when you say a hardware company, then most hardware companies would have a bunch of third-party hardware in their system that they are reliant upon. So they would be like, what if we have an issue with our third-party switch or software? What if we have a firmware issue in this component? How do we go solve for that?
59:23So there you end up having 10x the surface area of supply chain problems. And because of the way that we've designed the system and taken a lot more of it first party, we've shrunk that surface area. And then with the key suppliers, being able to go deep with them and demonstrate to them that we're not treating them as a vendor, that we're just like, you know, one of four that we're going to partner with. there has been so many so much time that we've been able to punch above our weight where yes there was like a shock to the system and yet they were like oxide we got you and so i think you know we've done this in manufacturing manufacturing software taking control the build process right like a bunch of the stuff that we now which took years uh making sure we had control over um yes you're down to like inventory tariffs you know stuff like that but those are problems that can be solved by, you know, banking relationships and capital and manufacturing partners.
1:00:17And so it is good to be in the place of - We have spent a lot of time building those relationships. So one of the things that we, very strong disposition that we had, so we were at Samsung together, Samsung bought Joyant. And we thought, oh, this would be great. Like, you know, we're a little tiny Joyant and we've got these relationships with these various folks, but like Samsung must have these great relationships. What we learned is like, everyone kind of hates Samsung's guts because Samsung wants to dual source absolutely everything and cares about one metric, price, that's it. Gotcha. And what we discovered is, and we had like folks confide in us, like, look, we really like you guys.
1:00:55So we're going to like continue to talk with you. You should know that like my boss doesn't want me to spend any time with you because we always put Samsung at the back of the line. I'm like, that's, it's kind of eyeopening because you would think like, oh, dual sourcing, that makes sense for everything. And it's like, when you do that, you're sending a message that like, I actually don't value our relationship at all. And there are things where we have a true like vendor relationship. It is not a partnership relationship at all. Right. And like, you know, FedEx versus UPS. And FedEx reminds us of this whenever they toss one of our packages in the bushes.
1:01:24And, you know, it's like, they're like, oh, we actually don't have like, there's no partnership with FedEx. Yeah, exactly. But for the component choices we've made, we really sought true partnerships. How do we find, instead of like trying to dual source lowest common denominator everything, how do we pick the right partner and then go deep with that partner? And, you know, we were talking to our fan provider, San Yudanky, and they're like, San Yudanky, we had them make a very important modification to our fans to lower at 0 % PWM, lower the RPM from 5 ,000 RPM to 2 ,000 RPM because it would consume much less power, which they did.
1:02:01and they did in part because they're like, we've never encountered someone for whom like this relationship, I'm used to just getting beat up on price. That's it. And it's like, then when you build that relationship, by the way, when you need to have a pricing conversation, it's a much easier pricing conversation. They want to help you. They want to help you. And they were like, all right, look, Hey, let me be transparent with you. And like, here's what we're, you know, and we want to make sure that folks have the margin that they need, but we need to have the margin that we need. We need our customers to need the price that they need.
1:02:28But you can have those conversations that are easier to have those conversations when you actually have a solid foundation of real partnership. Yeah. And these are risks. I mean, yesterday was the sixth anniversary of Oxide. So we got to celebrate with the team. Happy birthday. Thank you. And it was fun because we got to go back and think about, like, what was going on six years ago when we had, like, a couple slides, Google slides. I think it was PowerPoint slides. And we were trying to raise money for the company. And we had been in that mode just to your question of, like, how does it feel now at this point looking forward?
1:02:58We've been in the mode of thinking about the four big risks that investors are always thinking about for companies and their evolution. There's team risk. And I think we feel pretty good that we've knocked down team risk. There's technology risk. And that was ever-present over the last, you know, certainly. I mean, there are still elements of the present. I don't know if they're still present. But we have de-risked a whole bunch of the technology risk. there is then market risk and we now have kind of crossed into where we are getting pulled by the market versus where you are trying to push yourself into the market to get pulled and push and then the fourth is capital risk and this latest fundraise was to make sure we secured our capital future combined with things that we will do with lines of credit and everything else to for a hard-working company that you have that balance right which does leave you in the privileged position, there's still plenty of risk, but it's execution risk.
1:03:56And so now, you know, we get to go focus on doing the thing in front of us that is dead ass clear. And I think that's what's exciting for the team and why, you know, we are entering this kind of next chapter for the next six years. Can you do that with the side of the team you have now? I guess it kind of comes back to the hiring process. We're growing. You are growing. You are growing. Are you actively non-AI generating new job roles. You should have seen the show of hands of people that weren't at the last one of these, people that joined in the last three months. We've got a bunch of folks that are in conversation that just couldn't quite get, we weren't quite there that would join us here.
1:04:35So yeah, no, we're adding folks as fast as we can find terrific folks. So yeah, we've got whatever, 13 open roles right now. Multiple hires. Where do you go to get that? Is there a URL? Is it Oxide? The website. The obvious URL. And again, we write those job descriptions carefully. We are, you know, one of the things that we've got a lot of vigilance is like we are not hiring recklessly. We are hiring. We are not just selecting carefully, but we're also very careful. One of the things we've just already learned, when we open a new job description, there are so many people that just want to work for Oxide.
1:05:14if we don't write that job description carefully we can get a flood of folks and it can be really hard to actually we want to be very crisp about what we're hiring for and we want to make sure it's a few people like i want to work for oxide and they kind of look at the roles they're like oh okay like this is this sort of like you know do you have any of anything else like this is not like this stuff all seems like really hard it's like well yeah yeah we actually have it's really hard to stop what we need to go to. So yes, we, and we, and we need to be very, very careful about how we expand the team.
1:05:48Um, but a part of that also is when we open up a job description, we would like to hire someone there. If we can't find someone that is worthy of this team, we will not hire someone there. We are, it's not like we're going to, well, we got to find like the best of whoever applied by Wednesday. It's like, nope. If we don't find someone that like, conversely, if we find two, three people, it's probably better that way. I'm honest. But we'll hire more than one person. And like, boy, one thing that we've done, right? Yeah. That, I mean, not that we were ever really second-guessing ourselves, but I remember a couple of times we would have a JD open and we get two really superlative people.
1:06:26Like, God, how do we decide between two supporters? Like, let's hire both of them. And we would hire both of them. That's good. Absolutely. And we have... And those were some of the best decisions. Some of the best decisions. That's right. Well, my favorite is... Why not both? Why not both? Why not both? Why not both? Let's close here because I know we're getting close on our time. We got food to eat. I think the Computer History Museum buses are taking off. Oh, yeah. Let's do it in one second then. Give me one minute of this. Yep. We're here. You got this next phase. We've been privy to some information.
1:06:56I'm not sharing it. You all share it. Give us a glimpse. What version of a glimpse can you give our audience? It's going out, what? Not this Friday, next Friday? So not this week, next week. What glimpse can you give? In terms of where we're going? Yeah, the horizon. The horizon, as you all know. What glimpse can you give us? I would say that for a long time, as Steve mentioned, certainly prospective investors thought there was a lot of market risk. We believed in our heart that there was not that market risk because of what we knew. But ultimately, you only de-risk that market risk when you have signed P.S.
1:07:35that's what you reset market risk and what i would say is where we are now we can say with absolute confidence that that market risk has been de-risked and it is interesting to watch the doubters become believers um when and we now absolutely know that market risk is off the table it is just execution so going on location to oxide as an adventure seeing everybody behind this awesome company is just breathtaking honestly a lot of great people a lot of great culture a lot of great thoughts and i swear an elite team is so hard to beat when it's oxides team it's just amazing what they're doing they are truly crossing the chasm as we speak a massive po sign a massive check for a series b and clearly it's just about execution at this point so when i say that we're fans we're fans fans of oxide and i want to say a big thank you to my good friend brian cantrell and obviously steve tuck as well but the initial call with brian and the initial vision was what set off this thing we're doing we're peeling back the layers of oxide going inside oxide these podcasts are one part of this inside oxide peak and uh it's kind of cool so we got to sit down with them obviously you heard the pod but we also got to take a film crew with us and shoot a lot of footage of oxcon and this three-day event the computer history museum the baseball game the ballers oakland ballers and just so much fun stuff we're producing a 10-minute documentary about this moment in oxides history we got some interviews coming up that are on their youtube channel a teaser coming out very soon and i can't wait for you to see what we've done it is so cool but a big thank you to brian and a big thank you to steve for trusting us to come out there and listen capture and ultimately share this story so i hope you enjoyed the show today a look inside oxide a look inside their culture what makes them tick it's good stuff i enjoyed it hope you enjoyed it too thank you to our awesome beat freak and residents break master cylinder those beats are always banging.
1:09:52Thank you to my good friend, Brian Toro, and also Austin Myers for coming along with us out there to Oakland, California. I can't wait for y 'all to see this. It's going to be epic. All right, this is it. We're done. We'll see you next week.
1:10:28Thank you.
From the publisher
Bryan Cantrill and Steve Tuck, the co-founders of Oxide, are on the pod live (to tape) from the stage at OxCon. Jerod and I were invited to Oxide's annual internal conference to meet the people and to hear the stories of what makes Oxide a truly special place to work right now. The best part was this on-stage discussion with Bryan and Steve. Enjoy!

