Creators on Creators: Cleo Abram x Johnny Harris

20 Jun 2024 · 54 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The Colin and Samir Show - Episode Summary

Podcast Title

The Colin and Samir Show Description: Colin and Samir, YouTube creators and podcasters, analyze the latest news in the creator economy from a creator's perspective. New episodes are released every Monday.

Episode Title

Creators on Creators: Cleo Abram x Johnny Harris Description: This episode features a conversation between video journalists Cleo Abram and Johnny Harris. They discuss the current state of journalism amidst mass layoffs, the potential of creator-led media, and share personal insights into their work.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. The State of Journalism
  2. Mass Layoffs in Newsrooms: Beginning of 2024 saw significant layoffs in media, leading to discussions about the potential 'death' of journalism.
  3. Emerging Independent Voices: Cleo and Johnny represent a shift towards independent journalism, highlighting the importance of creator-led media.
  4. Barbell Media Ecosystem: The modern media landscape is likened to a barbell, with large successful companies (like the New York Times) on one end and smaller independent creators on the other.
  1. Concept of Independency in Journalism
  2. Defining Independence: The conversation explores what it means to be independent as a journalist, including freedom from traditional media constraints.
  3. Challenges and Opportunities: While independence allows for creative freedom, it also comes with the risks typically associated with entrepreneurship.
  1. Creator-Led Media Businesses
  2. Potential and Challenges: Both Cleo and Johnny discuss the excitement and the difficulties of running independent media businesses.
  3. Balancing Ethics and Monetization: They reflect on navigating advertisement deals while maintaining journalistic integrity.
  1. The Role of Social Media
  2. News Consumption Shift: An increasing number of people are getting news from social media, raising questions about the educational role of these platforms.
  3. Impacts on Journalism Quality: There's concern that social media may not educate audiences as effectively as traditional news sources.
  1. Collaborative Models in Journalism
  2. By Harris Model: Johnny introduces the concept of creating a collective that supports independent journalists, allowing for shared resources and risk management.
  3. The Importance of Editorial Control: The model emphasizes maintaining editorial independence while still benefiting from collective support.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Journalism as Action: Both hosts argue that journalism is defined by actions taken to uncover truth, not just by the title of 'journalist'.
  • Importance of Field Reporting: Cleo emphasizes the value of firsthand experiences and interviews, while Johnny discusses the necessity of primary source reporting.
  • Ethics in Advertising: They highlight the importance of transparency when it comes to ads in their content, ensuring audiences are informed about sponsorships.
  • Navigating the Algorithm: Both creators share their experiences with algorithmic pressures and how these shape their content creation strategies.

---

Final Thoughts This episode serves as a crucial examination of the evolving landscape of journalism, showcasing how independent creators like Cleo Abram and Johnny Harris are redefining the industry. Their dialogue encourages a re-evaluation of journalistic practices and the relationship between media and its audience in an era dominated by social media and digital platforms.

---

Additional Information

  • Future Episodes: The conversation will be featured in Volume 2 of The Publish Press Newspaper, highlighting the ongoing narrative of creator-led media.
  • Connect with The Colin and Samir Show: Listeners are encouraged to subscribe for updates and future discussions on the creator economy.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00The Colin and Samir Show is supported by Microsoft Copilot. This is something I thought I would never say, but can I share with you my favorite prompt? I mean, like when you say something like that, I have to say yes. Were you going to say no? No, but okay. Just let me hear it. So when I'm researching for a guest or I need to know a lot about a subject matter, I say, make me a podcast about. And when you do that, you're going to get a short blurb about that subject. And then in like two minutes, you're going to get a podcast. So check this out. Welcome to Co-Pilot Podcasts. Picture this, a guy working the front desk at a hotel, making lacrosse videos in his spare time, completely unaware that he's about to become one of the most influential voices in the creator economy.

0:38Today, we're diving into the remarkable story of Colin Rosenblum. Wow. Did you pay it to say that? That's crazy. That's very kind. It's crazy, but it's my favorite way to learn about a subject matter. I'm learning about so much more now that I can turn this research into like a seven-minute podcast that I can listen to just when I'm walking. Did you tell it that I worked at the front desk of a hotel? Dude, the prompt is just make me a podcast about Colin from Colin and Samir. That's it. I may be biased, but I'm on the edge of my seat. I'm hooked. So if you guys haven't checked out Copilot, check it out.

1:10Try it for your research. Try it for getting variations of your titles, your ideas. It's one of my favorite tools on the internet right now for our creativity. And now back to the show. Back in the day when people paid for news and then the internet came along and we stopped or something like that, that was actually never true. I think something that we talk about, and I think Cleo, you've said this so well, so I'm just going to steal it from you right here in front of your face. Fundamentally, we are little mini media companies. We don't just have complex reporting, but then we have to make beautiful videos.

1:43We know that many more people are getting their news from social media. And the question is, is social media capable of educating people?

1:56Today we're bringing you a conversation between Johnny Harris and Cleo Abram. It's the first of our new Creators on Creators series. And I'm joined here by Nate from the Publish Press. Nate, why are we starting with Johnny Harris and Cleo Abram for this Creators on Creators series? Yeah, so at the beginning of 2024, there was kind of this sentiment that the media industry was facing an apocalypse. You know, digital media sites like BuzzFeed News and Gawker closed down. If you remember, Sports Illustrated was accused of publishing AI-generated stories. And one report even recorded 2 ,681 layoffs in the media industry in 2023.

2:35But there are bright spots, despite all the uncertainty, starting with a pair of video journalists, Cleo Abram and Johnny Harris. and Cleo and Johnny are longtime friends. They met back when they both worked at Vox and they trade ideas and talk on the phone regularly. So in March, we called them up to get their perspective on this media apocalypse narrative. They talked about what it means to go independent as a journalist, the potential of creator-led media businesses and Johnny's love for Moss. Yeah, Johnny, we got to talk about that. What's up with the Moss obsession? You guys will hear that in this episode.

3:13I do find this all to be extremely interesting because the world of YouTube is the modernization of media. And when I look at Johnny and Cleo, I see documentarians or video essayists. And I don't come from a journalism background. So this conversation was really interesting for me to understand the concept of jumping from a Vox to independent journalism. And what does that mean to people like you, Nate, people who went to journalism school? Yeah. And I think too, just Stephen, they clearly think about this a lot. They think about the ethics of journalism. They think about selling ads and the way to go about it.

3:50So, you know, this is something that will, the conversation condensed and edited version will appear in volume two of our published press newspaper. But we thought it'd be really cool to share the entire conversation with you all. Is that the first time we're talking about the published press newspaper? I think so. Volume two? That was like a soft launch. That was soft, Nate. Yeah. I mean, come on. This is a project you've been working on for a long time. I think it's one of the coolest things we do at the Publish Press. Last year, we did our first one. We dropped it at VidCon. This year, our mailbox will be there again.

4:20Big yellow mailbox that says the Publish Press. They'll also be available for sale on presspublish.store on Friday, June 28th. I'm really proud of the team for this newspaper. It is so cool. I'm excited to share the cover with all of you. But without further ado, here's a conversation between Johnny Harris and Cleo Abram. My first prompt for you all is to talk about your work the way you normally do behind closed doors. You know, what are the considerations you think about and ask each other about when labeling yourselves journalists? I think there's a lot of people that think that journalism is a status.

4:57And it is in some countries. Like in France, you are given the status of journalists by the government and you get access to certain things. but I think something that we talk about and I think Cleo you've said this so well so I'm just going to steal it from you right here in front of your face you are a journalist if you are doing journalistic things which is actively earnestly inquiring into facts and truth about the world and trying to communicate that truth to an audience and it's like whatever wherever you do that, that is journalism. No, Johnny and I talk about this all the time. And it's fun to hear other people's reactions to how we sort of chat about these things, because it obviously impacts our careers so much.

5:42Journalism is an action. And so I think one of the things that has been tricky to think about over the last couple months, really, is sort of as it's come to a point with a lot of layoffs in journalism and more and more people having a conversation of is journalism dying? Oh my gosh, what's happening to the news? There's sort of a fever pitch that it feels to me like is happening in the conversation right now. Not to be too explainer journalist about this, but in order to consolidate my thoughts on what is happening in news, I created a little document for myself called WTF is happening in the news.

6:20And I tried to consolidate some of the data and answer some of my own questions. And the first question I was trying to answer was, is something happening to the news? And the answer seems like yes. It seems like a simple question, but the United States has been losing traditional news organizations and journalist jobs for a while now. Over the last, I would say years, but a couple months, people have been noticing more and more, there seemed to be an enormous number of layoffs in digital publications as well. So the line that was going up that seems sort of an optimistic story about journalism is now going down.

6:56And that seems really scary for good reason. The next question is, OK, so what does journalism look like right now? And people who are smarter than me have put this really beautifully. I'm thinking of Ezra in The New York Times and Derek Thompson in his podcast both talked about how the media ecosystem right now is, they call it a barbell. So there's the massive media companies that are wildly successful, primarily based on subscriptions. Basically, I'm thinking of the New York Times here. And then there are smaller organizations or individual journalists, either on their own on Substack, in very small newsrooms, or potentially on YouTube in video like us.

7:41And so both of those groups seem to be doing quite well at the moment. All of the chatter about the death of journalism seems to be primarily the hollowing out of journalism. Derek Thompson said, the death of the media seems to be more like the death of the middle, which is a quote that I liked a lot. And that's a tricky spot to be in. Johnny and I find ourselves on one end of that barbell looking at the rest of the barbell and thinking about our place on it. It is easy to look at what we do and put the platform as the main marker of what it is, which is YouTube and YouTuber. And because it's new and because it's associated with a kid in their basement making silly videos and uploading them and getting millions of views or like sort of prank videos or a million different things that were sort of the flavor of the early YouTube experience.

8:37I think a lot of, especially people who feel threatened by this new, by this change, this Halloween out, which is very scary and has major ramifications that are important to address, the way that they react to that is like, oh, YouTube, this sort of flimsy platform is taking over. When you do what we do every day, which is talk to experts and fact check things and and have a team of very skilled reporters and videographers that are making quality journalism, it doesn't look much different than what I was doing at Vox or what I do for the New York Times. It's quite different than what a traditional print reporter maybe does, or what the sort of ethic and norms around journalism has been for recent decades.

9:31But the part of the enterprise is go find factual information, communicate that to an audience who wants that information. And so in that sense, it's not being a YouTube influencer, even though we have some of the trappings of a YouTube influencer. We're on camera. We're on YouTube. And I think that that's an important distinction that we spend a lot of time talking about to our peers in the legacy world, that this is valid. And I think people are waking up to the fact that it's valid. and I hope they do. I hope they do. And I go and speak at journalism schools for that very reason, because they're starting to realize like, oh, this is actually a valid expression of the journalistic craft.

10:11Yeah. And I just want to brag about you a little bit, Johnny. Like, Johnny was extremely early to this. You were the first person I saw really doing this kind of leap from a media company that was doing excellent video journalism on YouTube, which was Vox. Vox at the time and still is doing some of the best visual storytelling in the medium. But Johnny was really the first person, you were the first person that I saw take those exact same skills and that exact same dedication to journalistic norms and beautiful craft and do the same thing on your own. And I thought I watched that for several years and thought, holy shit, if he can do that, maybe I can do that.

11:03And then I did. So Johnny, Johnny's the OG. Well, I think what's what was interesting is at that jumping point, when you jump from an institution to to solo, you start to realize what an institution is good for. And this is what's sad about the decline of a diversity of of journalistic outlets is that there when I jumped into this world, I did. I walked into the creator economy. It was it was influencers. I was getting brand deals from people who give brand deals to influencers. And I didn't have any kind of ethical guardrails that anyone was imposing. I had no editor, like a traditional sort of story editor.

11:48And I did experiment and explore and sort of test where those boundaries are. And I made stuff that maybe today I'd be like, maybe journalistically thin or whatever in that experimentation, which like luckily I feel like with time we found our voice in that way. But what it taught me was like, hey, this is the Wild West. And we have journalistic institutions that instill trust for a reason. And what happens when those institutions become untrusted or they don't have money to exist anymore? And I don't know. I don't ever when I'm talking to journalism students say like, everyone should do what I'm doing because I'm not totally sure that's the best thing for the ecosystem.

12:31Boston with the Boys is here to let you know that every college football Saturday, FanDuel is dropping profit boosts that can turn wins into bigger wins. Sounds like we should rename Saturday Booster Day. Nice! 21 plus and present in select states. Opt-in required. Bonus issued is non-withdrawable profit boost tokens. Restrictions apply, including any token expiration and max wager amount. See full terms at FanDuel.com slash sportsbook. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

13:09we talk a lot about um how everybody knows that you know viewership of television is declining and viewership of print news is declining and now potentially you know uh websites that publish news themselves are also, I know less about the traffic data there, but generally seem to be these brands of digital publications, VICE's, shutting down vice.com, etc. The thing that I think is less well understood, but unfortunately the data doesn't seem very good on this, is we know that many more people are getting their news from social media. And the question is, is social media capable of educating people in the way that the organizations that are collapsing in viewership used to educate people.

13:59Now, I have all kinds of problems with the story choice and style and all kinds of things about the way that mass media or traditional media might have done those things, but the data shows that the comparison between the information that they got on more traditional news sources versus social media is like pretty bad. So there are studies that show that if you ask people sets of very fact-based questions about what's going on in the world, folks that get their news primarily, say they get their news primarily from social media, won't answer those questions quite as well. So for us, the question is, how do you make sure that in an era where more and more people are getting their news from social media, that social media is still educating people in a way that allows them to vote.

14:51And when people are less well educated, you see an increase of corruption and a decrease in voting. So how do we prevent those things in a world where there is more and more independent journalism, but also just news being gotten from social media? I'm going to ask Cleo a question here, because I'm actually quite curious her response to this in this context, which is, I think the word independent means a lot to us. And we use this word like, yeah, we went independent. We changed into this other costume of journalism. We are now independent. And I'm curious what that means to you versus, and what's the opposite of independent and what's good about being independent?

15:35Why do we like that? I think there are two pretty different answers. One is a career answer about being a journalist and the other is an answer about the work that we make itself? I think the easier one to answer is about us and our careers. Like independent partly means we go tell whatever stories we want. We follow our own curiosity. We are independent of the constraints of the business model of a larger media company. And therefore, you know, if you decide that you want to spend two weeks in Switzerland explaining everything about cheese like you can like whatever or uh conversely um you know really dedicate yourself to a deep dive investigation of mcdonald's you you can do those things because you control your own editorial uh work and fundamentally you are free to do that um and that is awesome it's awesome the experience is awesome.

16:35Like the work that results is joyful, but also deeply obsessive. And that makes for really, really good quality journalism when you personally are just obsessed with something and keep like going for it and picking at it. And for me in my career, that's a lot of what the word independent means. You're free to do that. Then there's the other question of independent from um what exactly um if we talk about us as independent journalists and other media companies as not independent i'm i'm not totally sure that that word makes sense in that context like fundamentally we are little mini media companies are we independent of the incentives of advertising no are we independent of the incentives of platforms that we publish on that by the way every media company publishes on?

17:25No. So I'm sorry for that non-answer in the second category, but like, I have no idea. No, it's, it's, I wanted to get at that because I think there isn't a real answer. Like, I think, I think it's more that first one actually, which is being independent means that the audience gives you permission to say like, you want to be into McDonald's ice cream machines? Go for it. I'm, I will follow you because you're this indie journalist who does, you know, this and that. And then like, for my personality, that is awesome because I'm all over the place and I might, my craft is the thing that stays the same.

18:02My interests do not. Okay. Wait. So what happens, what happens as you grow? Yeah. That's the question. That's what I'm wondering. Yeah. So I'd love to hear you talk about, um, the aspirations of by Harris and what you're building and how that fits into like what is the cost of that what's the potential of that if there is an ecosystem that you're creating of independent journalists that all have some underlying root system and flower in their own different ways on top of that what do we get from that ecosystem and what does it what does it cost to grow for you wow i loved the root system thing and and i will expound on that analogy and push it toward breaking point in just a second because I'm super into roots and fungi communicating with roots.

18:52Moss. Johnny loves moss. Ask Johnny about moss. It's the best. That's my one obsession that I have not shared with the internet and maybe I never will. Sorry. You heard it here first, folks. um so so by harris is this concept that is totally um new and growing and like in this startup be flexible thing and i'm and i'm sort of expressing it in for the first time and recently it it roots from this love of independence and the freedom that i've found in being an independent journalist but with the desire to grow and have a bigger impact and so the the the middle ground of that is to what if we build a company that just has a bunch of smaller teams that are run by one individual independent journalist that is then we are building up support around them to go pursue their own fascinations and interests and craft and style.

19:47So what is the roots in this analogy? What do they share? They share, first and foremost, process. What we do is very process-intensive. Reporting and then all of the post-production. You know, we don't just have complex reporting, but then we have to make beautiful videos. And a lot of that comes down to really solid process and planning, which sounds really boring, but like that is the lifeblood of our business. It's project management, institutional knowledge that allows us to do it in a smart way. And then business, as we grow as a collective, we are able to be like, hey, we are not just one YouTube channel.

20:29We are like a group. We are a group. We can command a bigger place in the market. And then it's brain trust, brain trust and sharing and knowledge. And that thing that you miss when you leave the big institution called having an editor, wiser journalist that guide you and teach you, you now have in this sort of collective. We've already sort of started this with our new channel, Search Party. That's like the pilot of the By Harris model, which is like Sam Ellis, who is a Vox journalist, has now come under our umbrella. he owns the channel in the sense that he owns it editorially but it is a by harris channel we take all the risk on we you know sam's an employee of the company but we support him and help him in a million different ways that allows him to be on the front lines of being a creator without having to take the massive risk and that's to the j school student i would say you probably shouldn't take the massive risk to go try to start a youtube channel it's a cutthroat business.

21:26And if you're not obsessed with it and in love with it and willing to put a couple years into grinding, you know, what Cleo has been doing for the last like year and a half, then like you probably shouldn't do that. And yet is there a middle ground where someone can be a creator, have that ownership, but not have to go be an entrepreneur at the same time? Yeah. And I think crucially, it is a middle ground in the sense that, yes, there is a baseline level of you take the risk and I take a salary and healthcare, but also, or the person doing this. I, I, um, but I think the, the important differentiation that makes it different from like, you know, a media company, just starting another channel and hiring a face for it is, um, genuine editorial control but also making sure that people share in the financial upside of that yeah and I think that combo is pretty different than what at least when we were in the throes of these kinds of negotiations and going back and forth with media companies before we each launched our own channels that wasn't what was really on the table no maybe some folks will do that at media companies.

22:45The funny thing is that like, they could, but I just don't think it fits with the general ethos and the business of a lot of larger media companies. And so the wonderful thing is there's a white space here. There's a middle ground that By Harris is filling and is really making a lot of different kinds of storytelling possible. If anyone hasn't seen Search Party already, you should go check it out. It's a wonderful example of this. Like, there is nothing else like it. And that's facilitated by the root system that Johnny and Iz have built. Yeah. And it's been, it's been really cool to see what it looks like in, in, you know, or in our pilot, it's been a lot of like work to get it up and going.

23:26And yet now we have a template of like, what if we had five of these, you know, and they all shared in this, in this ethos, which the thing that does connect us all in addition to the support and the business relationships and the rev share and all of that is a dedication like a spiritual dedication to like high quality premium journalism um and that's creator driven like it can't be a faceless brand like sam even though it's search party sam is a character he's a part of the experience i think of the world in six years and i think of how much content is going to be simulators is going to be synthetic it's going to be fake it's going to be not fake it's going to be real, but it's going to be created by a metal brain that maybe a human brain at some point influenced.

24:11But like, we are moving into a world where humans will not know how something was created and who created it. And we're betting on the fact that building personal relationships with audiences as like, hey, I'm a human, I have flesh and blood, I'm here, is going to actually be more and more valuable in an AI generated world that we are moving into.

24:45I'm pretty hardcore on that point about like AI is going to take over. We need to be like the humans in the midst of all the robots. How do you feel about that as a tech optimist? Like think it's a case of slightly convergent evolution here where we both have ended up in a place where the being a proxy for the audience and being kind of a character going on a journey learning something much like any audience member can kind of imagine themselves coming to the Large Hadron Collider with me or going to Japan with you or like learning these things in real time.

25:26We're just kind of empty vessels. Like I put a lot of myself into the show. One of the episodes that come to mind for me is an episode that I did about artificial wombs that I never could have done at a media company. It's half a like deep dive explainer into the science of artificial wombs and the sort of innovation in, when I say artificial wombs, I mean a set of technologies that make it easier to have kids, whether that's, you know, IVF or saving premature babies earlier and earlier, sort of we're like working our way toward technologies in the middle there, and interviewing some of the world leading experts, especially in artificial wombs and animals.

26:09There's a deep dive into that journalism. But then there's also, I am, at the same time as I was reporting that out, I needed to get a surgery on my ovary in order to protect my ability to have kids. And that was complicated and emotionally fraught. And there's a bunch of that in the video, which ends up being there, not like just the share. It's not a vlog necessarily. It's a reason why I care about the innovation in fertility tech that I'm covering. And that mix is part opinion journalism, part explainer, and I'm really clear about where I'm coming from, and I'm really proud of that piece. But I think the ability to be a character in your own story is important.

26:58When I said convergent evolution, what I meant was, like, I think that's important because people want to connect with the person telling the story. And it's a way to relate to your audience and have them feel like they know you and to your point, develop trust. For me, that comes less out of an idea that AI is going to replace everything else anytime soon and more just because that's what I think makes for the best, most compelling story that educates people the best. Like, I think that I was able to kind of cut through a conversation about artificial wombs that was very like, oh, this is going to be the matrix.

27:36And instead, because I was just a person talking about my experience, my perspective, and then the enormous amount of research that I had done on the science here, that combo resulted in a better story, better educated people. Which is a thing, a gripe that a lot of traditional journalism has with. That's why they, I think that's another reason why it's go be an influencer. Because me running off to Japan with my camera and flying my drone looks a lot like a travel vlogger running off to Japan with his camera and his drone. And in fact, I mean, that's what I did that for a while. And like, you know, I sort of adopt a lot of those, of that sort of first person driven, informal reactions.

28:26And yet I think something that Cleo and I both share, and she just expressed it really well about her artificial room story, is like that's a very powerful mechanism for engaging somebody about a story, about a topic that maybe is really cerebral and hard to access. Now, what it doesn't account for, and this is another one of these complicated moments, is a lot of my work, and Cleo, I imagine you say the same, is founded on amazing primary source reporting. For me, I study conflict. I study conflict in geopolitics. I read the New York Times and the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal and a foreign policy magazine and a million other things where there are journalists in a country at a bureau going out to the thing and writing down the first time it's been documented.

Read the full transcript

29:14This happened. And it's like, what of those people? Like, those people need to be there for me to do my job. I can't do my job unless they're on the front lines collecting that primary source data. They are valuable. They are heroes. And, you know, I subscribe to these newspapers. right? Financial times like in print because I'm a big print guy. So that is as much as we love first person, let me take you through this journey. There has to be that information generation at the front line in order for us to do our job. I don't know, Claire, would you agree with that framing? I think sometimes folks like us are the people who bring up new information.

29:59Johnny, I think you've actually done this a lot, uncovering information yourself and being the first person to report something. I think I do that in some ways when I go look at something and interview an expert that is working on something and building something. But I think the bigger point is this is the reason why people should care about the hollowing out of local journalism. I mean, the challenge with, you know, more people, let's say, and I don't know that this is the data, but let's pretend that everybody in the United States just starts subscribing to one of the three biggest national newspapers.

30:35The issue with that is that a lot of the time what you're losing is the coverage that was holding people to account and investigating things in that local community. So the classic example is people going to hearings and city council meetings and actually reporting on what's going on. I think that's a big reason why you see a relationship between news deserts and an increase in corruption because people stop doing the primary source gathering that you were talking about, Johnny. And I think that if we snapped our fingers and lived in that world, which is, by the way, the world the trends are taking us toward.

31:16That would be a worse one for our knowledge of what's going on and our ability to create a world that we want to live in just because we have less information about what's going on in our local communities. So I think a lot of people might hear about the death of local journalism and might not understand if they are not subscribing to their local paper anymore or if they live in a big city, why should you care about that? That's the reason you should care. You're losing a lot of the primary source gathering.

31:58Yeah, I think just to specifically talk about the way that folks do those kinds of verbally read ads, This is a format that is popular among podcasts, popular among YouTubers, but there's some kind of question mark even in mass media about whether the hosts of some of these podcasts, if they're journalistic podcasts, should be reading those ads. People disagree about this. So that's the first thing to acknowledge. Like there are smart people that I respect that think very different things about what's appropriate here. Ethically, there are a couple of things that I think about. I actually did a pretend ad read before I did my ad reads.

32:36I was like, this is an example of like where you would see an ad in my future videos. Like, let's get used to this. Here's what the rules are. And in that kind of prep ad read, kind of telling the audience what to expect, I made a couple of promises that felt to me very similar to what I was taught at Vox, just applying it in a new way to an independent channel. So the first promise is you're always going to know when something is paid for. And that means that when it's not clearly marked as an ad, it's not paid for. You can't pay me to go visit your company and make a whole Huge If True episode about it.

33:13Huge If True is editorial, and then there are clearly marked ads within that episode. And then the second promise was, I'm going to be reading these ads. I'm also going to be writing these ads. So you should know that when you see something marked as an ad, the advertiser had the ability to approve what's in that ad. It's an advertisement. Like, that's what that means. But it also means that I'm not going to write something that isn't true. So for example, about my opinion or factually. So for example, I don't drink alcohol. I have no moral issue with alcohol. I just don't like it. And so I would happily work with an alcohol company.

33:50I haven't yet, but I would. I just wouldn't say, I love this alcohol, this wine. I would say, you know, my mom is a connoisseur of really good wine, and I send her this like wine of the month gift, and she says this is really, really good. That's a big, that's a difference between like me being clear about what is true for me in an advertisement, that it is clear is an advertisement, and they approved, and feels to me honest and transparent, and those are the rules for me when I do that. Then there's a different conversation about what it is like to be a journalist running a business at all. But that's a sort of messier, messier answer that we could get into.

34:35I remember when I went independent, that was actually one of my biggest stresses is like, how am I going to retain journalistic credibility if I have to do an ad? And I kind of had these fears that like Incogni and BetterHelp and NordVPN would be like all over my content and they would be like trying to like spin it and approve it and I'd have to fight back and then I got into the creator economy and I realized that there's all these brands who pour their marketing budget on a billion different videos and they hope the the creator hits their talking points and they do and then they kind of just say like cool like hopefully you know like this was worth it for us.

35:16They're not nitpicking or micromanaging. And I've never had anyone say anything about the journalism that I'm doing. And especially, you know, I cover not ad-friendly things. I cover war and politics and the most divisive and intense stuff ever. And yet we can run a business off of that because we live in a world on YouTube where it's very standard for there to be a thank you to today's sponsor and the audience is okay with that it's very clearly marked it's very clear that there's a start there's an end and then we're back to the story it's very it's it's very similar to a commercial break on it on 60 minutes or uh even like a magazine that you're going through that has an ad break the difference is that i'm saying the words but i think the end product reads a lot like the magazine with an ad space or a commercial on television.

36:15Now, I've run into some moments where the incentives have been, like, Gulf countries have a lot of money, and they want people to come cover their big new things. And as somebody who covers Gulf countries, like United Arab Emirates and Saudi and all these places, I look at those deals and say, I can't really do this, because this conflicts with, like my ability to adequately cover this. So there are some gray areas that I run into, but very rarely. The thing I actually wanted to talk more about that I think is more pernicious, more kind of subtly dangerous, is the algorithm, which is also a market-driven mechanism that trains incentives.

36:58The attention economy dynamic is actually more harmful potentially to good journalism because it incentivizes you to hook and grab and hold every single second of someone's attention now I believe that a good storyteller a good journalist should be able to earn someone's attention that is just fundamental and I don't think that we should gripe about that but as we grow and as I grow I feel the incentives of like we need to dial in our retention we need to dial in every single thing and I can feel that kind of profit maximizing mentality apply towards journalism, which can work, but there are moments where there's trade-offs there.

37:40And I'm like, do I choose the journalistic thing or do I choose the thing that's going to make the people stay along? I feel good where we land, but that is a battle that I feel like I'm constantly kind of navigating. And it's much more subtle because it's the training of data, real-time data that is constantly feeding into your brain and saying, if you would have just done this a little bit differently, then maybe you would have gotten more views and more blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I completely agree with everything you just said. And I also want to make the complicating case against people paying for news being the solution there.

38:15So the idea that people are going to pay for news, classically, we talk about that being a constraint on people's access to news, right? That's the main problem with, you know, news being behind subscription paywalls. But I think there's actually something more insidious going on here, which is when you live in a world where great journalism is primarily backed by subscribers, there are two different things going on. The first is that people are often not actually paying for the journalism itself. That's a tricky truth, and people try to talk about the back in the day when people paid for news, and then the internet came along and we stopped, or something like that.

38:55that was actually never true. And there's a lot of data about this. In fact, there's a famous thesis done by George Gallup in 1929, I think. Let me check. Yep, 1928. And what it showed that was so interesting was he was watching people, his entire thesis was watching people read newspapers, which had been something that was sort of surprising at the time because most people had assumed that the most read articles in newspapers were kind of the most important ones that were most well promoted, the front page, basically. But he watched people read newspapers, and what he discovered was that a lot of the time spent, most of the time spent watching, sorry, that most of the time spent reading the news was comics, was, you know, classifieds, was things that are much more like entertainment crossword puzzle.

39:58And so if you look at the basis of the business of the New York Times, they are the most incredible entertainment company, as well as doing some of the world's most excellent journalism. And that is what makes the business work. If you look at their success, they did have a collapse in their advertising business over the last 30 years. They replaced it with subscribers in this massive way, and they are having this incredible success. But what people are paying for fundamentally is not the isolated great journalism. It's the bundle with entertainment. And that has been true. I think the most important thing for people to know is that that has been true for 100 years.

40:35That is not new. And I think that is, we talk about the Internet as something that disrupted that. It disrupted that in the sense that it atomized news, that it wasn't like you weren't buying a newspaper anymore. But it didn't disrupt the fundamental behavior of the audience. Yeah. And I believe that at the end of the day, if you are asking people to focus their brain on something, you're inherently in a game of, I need to make something that is interesting enough that someone wants to focus their brain on it. Like the attention economy is indeed endemic to any kind of media. And yet my broader point is that the AI generated algorithmic, and by AI generated, I mean like the very, very smart technology that we built, takes that and puts it in hyperdrive.

41:28and and maybe that you know I don't totally know how in the long run what that actually means but I do know that if I were someone and even I talked to tv people about this they live in a black box they're jealous of how much data we have they make something they put it out and as long as the Netflix executives like it they put it out people will watch it but they don't have they're not confronted in real time like I published a video this morning I've checked 37 times the minute to minute data on how it's doing. I've been checking the comments. Like I've been doing that every week for the past seven years.

42:00Like my brain is, it is an extension of that algorithmic training. And that is something that I am very wary of and want to be highly mindful of all of the time, because I don't want that trade-off to occur too much. And I agree that entertainment is always going to be a part of this but I'm just wary of just how powerful it's become I know I sound like an old like fogey who's like technology these days but it I mean it can mess with you no I totally agree I think that's very self-aware

42:41my question always to Cleo is how do you think about access like everyone of cleo's videos is a field trip almost it's like this it's this and mine aren't like i sort of squirrel my way in this studio and i like make explainers by like beating on the keyboard and like cleo is like out showing the thing that she's covering and i'm curious where that impulse comes from do you have to work for that impulse to be like i'm gonna go talk to the horse's mouth i'm not gonna go like deduce it on my google i'm gonna go talk i'm just i would love to hear you talk about that. Yeah, I think it comes from a need to see the thing in order to understand how it works.

43:25If I'm explaining a complex piece of technology, a lot of the time, I don't feel like I can deduce it on my own. And so, so much of what I need to do anyway, is the background interviews with the people working at that either company or set of companies or generally in that space, or actually go interact with the technology and see it firsthand. Sometimes that's not the case. Some of my episodes are expert interviews with good visuals, sort of classic explainer style. But the ones you're right that I most enjoy are where I get to go poke the thing and see how it works. And you pulled me into this one time.

44:09You were like, Like I was just sitting, I have the Library of Congress right down the road and you were doing that ocean mapping and you were like, you go down. I've already got it all arranged. Go down and just react to these maps. I was like, cool, I get to go on a field trip. Like I should do this more often. And like that is the superpower of your work, I would say. It's lovely to hear that you feel that way because that's what I would say about your work. like you're the one going to Switzerland and Japan and you know pulling out the you know story about how the Swiss use guns and how I don't know just so much of your reporting like I'm thinking about um it's not my knee-jerk reaction but that's the difference though is I feel like your stories are anchored around like if I can get access to this thing I'm often like I don't know it's it's it's it's different it's I in fact today in a story meeting I was telling my team I was like access as a story I was like like Cleo does it like she gets access to Boston Dynamics boom there's a story like mine are often like topics first and it's like where do I need to go to like make this topic come to life who do I need to talk to but yours are like access as a story and I think that's a really powerful impulse it's a more traditional journalistic impulse to be like, I'm going to pick up the phone and talk to people and mold it around like what I find as I'm inquiring as opposed to the other way around.

45:34The conversations that you and I have all the time are like, there's like so much inner turmoil about each of these decisions because I'm trying to receive that compliment at the same time as I am thinking like, wow, it really makes my production timelines like the worst. Like it really means that I can't, I have this episode that I'm working on, but like, I can't get there until, you know, three weeks from now, which means that like, it's totally messed up. And like, all of those things, um, also feel like pretty extreme costs, but it's nice to hear that the result is something that feels good.

46:06Um, you know, I, I think that one of the things, um, that makes the work that your team does so special and is really inspiring about what independent journalism can be as a whole is the level of obsession and dedication to uncovering new information and fully wrapping yourself in a topic for a long time. Some of these that come to mind that I just think are incredible are, we've mentioned the McDonald's video already, but every time you get into a story, you have this way of getting so fully into the story that you become like your own engine and your own expert and your own like by the time you're done with a story you know so much about it um and sometimes I think for me I try and get there but like there are levels to your individual obsession that I think is what you've always been like differentiatedly great at like your ability to stay obsessed with something for a long time and result in like a magical explanation that no one else could have made.

47:21Wow. Yeah. I can, I can obsess about things and someday I want to obsess about something for like a year, but I get back to our previous conversation about feeding the algorithm. I'm not incentivized to, I'm incentivized to make more and more and more. And this year we're actually dialing back and making less, which is an interesting thing in the name of testing the bounds of like, how do we keep our, you know, barriers around the beauty of this craft, which is inquiry and curiosity. That's what drives it. That's what drives me and business, being really close to business, being really close to feedback.

47:58And I don't want to be overly trained because I think that there's something special about just going into a vacuum and just going nuts on a topic for a long time. So I'm glad that that translates.

48:20without knowing exactly what the jobs themselves are going to look like i think you can still give some pretty good advice um so the advice that i would give anybody who is coming into a pretty uncertain journalistic world is to try to find the roles whether they're something you create for yourself because you launch a YouTube channel or a sub stack or something that you find at a publication of any size is do something as close to the work that you want to be doing in the future as possible. So what I mean by that is like don't go get a prestige job where you are not doing the task every day and getting better at that task every day.

49:03Do something that allows you to practice over and over and over again, the hard skills that you feel like you're going to need 10 years after that and 10 years after that. So in my case, that involved going to night school to learn editing and animation. Now I have some folks that are even better at animating and editing than I am on my team. But I still need those hard skills in order to be able to do this in the first place, in order to be able to express the first ideas that I had in order to be able to change things and talk to them. And like those hard skills are the same things that make me able to do what I do now.

49:37Same thing for the actual technology reporting. Like know what you are talking about and work on learning those things every single day in the way that you would want to in the future. I think the trap that a lot of people fall into is that they take jobs that sound really good on paper and they're not actually doing the task that they want to get better at and so they're not actually getting better at the thing that they want to be doing in the future. So they sort of themselves into something that feels high prestige and sounds really good at a dinner party, but doesn't actually result in them improving so that they can get the next job and the next job or create something of their own.

50:13So it was a little bit of a cop out because I don't know what those jobs are going to look like. But I do think that focusing on the hard skills that you need, whether those hard skills are editing or animation or like first person, you know, exploration of hard journalistic topics by, you know, traditional reporting, all of those things, I think will help you get to where you want to go, no matter what it looks like. I mean, the hard skills thing is huge, huge for me in terms of my whole story is founded on just fixating on learning animation and Photoshop and Illustrator and all these tools that allowed for communication in something other than just words.

50:59Words are really powerful, but visuals and data can be even more powerful when paired with good words. And I really believe in that. I believe. And those skills are really accessible. I never went to a school or anything. I learned all this on just the internet. And so it's all very accessible. It takes a certain amount of dedication, but learning a hard skill, I think, is so vital. I guess the other thing I would say, and this just comes from working with those who have gone to J school and come in with habits and sort of preconceived ideas of the norms and what's acceptable to notice that you're walking into a new Wild West some with some very exciting prospects as we are living right now we're living on this wave of being able to do really exciting journalism in a very fruitful business environment and also with some big question marks and and big concerns, you know, see previous conversation.

52:00And therefore, a lot of those norms that were forged in the glory days of print journalism need to flex and change. And that doesn't mean that the core of what we do, the ethical activity that is meant to engage the public, to teach the public, and to keep people accountable, changes. but the flavor that it takes, a lot of the norms in journalism are actually just the flavor of the decade that like the old school journalists developed and that seem like they're age old and a part of journalism themselves. And I think what we're seeing is a flex in that. And I think that's great. That's just how things always work is they get updated.

52:42So come into this with an open mind as to what form and what version and what expression your journalism is going to take because it could take an expression that you've no I never thought I'd be a YouTuber who's doing like deep dive investigations into the FBI never like but that's what I do I don't think anyone could have predicted that YouTubers would be doing that you know a few years ago so be flexible be open learn hard skills and it's an exciting and kind of tumultuous time we're headed into. That was a conversation between Cleo Abram and Johnny Harris. Again, it'll be part of volume two of our upcoming Publish Press newspaper.

53:23All right. If you're at VidCon, track Nate down. He's pretty tall. You'll be able to see him. Just run him down and ask for a newspaper. Let us know. You can tweet at us. You can also tell Nate in person if you're at VidCon. But who do you want to hear next on Creators on Creators? What two creators would you want to hear talk to each other? Samir, if I have a bunch of people tracking me down and just like sprinting to tackle me at Bitcoin, I think I'll have to blame you. That's my fault. You might have to call HR. Yeah. All right. Make sure you are subscribed to The Published Press. We give you creator news three times a week, straight to your inbox.

53:56Go to thepublishedpress.com. Nate Mahana, bring you words three times a week. That we do. All right. See ya.

54:09Thank you.

From the publisher

At the beginning of 2024, mass layoffs decimated newsrooms, leading some pundits to proclaim that the media industry was facing an "extinction-level event." But there are bright spots despite the uncertainty, starting with a pair of video journalists and longtime friends: Cleo Abram and Johnny Harris.

We called up the duo to invite you into one of their conversations — on what it means to go "independent," the potential of creator-led media businesses, and Johnny's love for...moss.

This "Creators on Creators" conversation appears in Volume 2 of The Publish Press Newspaper, a full-color, 28-page print zine we're dropping on June 28th.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from The Colin and Samir Show

All 175 episodes
Creators on Creators: Cleo Abram x Johnny HarrisThe Colin and Samir Show · 54 min
Listen in VO