


23 Oct 2026 · 21m · 8 chapters

The episode reacts to new allegations involving Meghan Markle’s estranged father, Thomas Markle Sr., and asks whether this should change how the public views Meghan and her role in royal-family dysfunction.
Hosts are Vinicius Rainey and Roland Oliphant (The Telegraph). Tim is the other speaker in the discussion (not fully identified in the transcript).
Two related-but-separate stories are discussed: (1) Thomas Markle Jr. alleges he found child pornography on his father’s computer/hard drives and that it was mixed with family items; Thomas Sr. denies and says he was referred to the FBI. (2) Meghan says that in 2018 she was told by the Met about allegations of child abuse involving her father, prompting her to cut contact and not introduce him to grandchildren.
The 2018 Windsor wedding fallout (Thomas Sr. initially expected to walk Meghan down the aisle, then backed out after a heart attack); press speculation that he briefed journalists; and the episode’s contrast with Meghan/Harry’s later choices (Megxit, Oprah interview, Netflix documentary, Spare).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes.
Discussion about the shocking allegations made against Meghan's father and their implications.
“are we now having to re-evaluate her relationships with her own family?”
Analyzing Meghan's reaction to the allegations and how they affect her family relationships.
“But that's story one in the present day.”
Examination of how the media covers the Markle family and the influence on public opinion.
“In the background, there was also an allegation that Thomas Markle Sr.”
Debate on the complexities of family dynamics in the context of public scrutiny and media.
“It's best in public life to focus on the individual who's actually in the public eye.”
Discussion on Meghan's public perception and the chaos attributed to her.
“Clearly, this does put it into a different context.”
Hosts introduce their podcast and the topics they cover related to the Middle East.
“As hosts of The Telegraph's podcast Iran the Latest, it's our job to keep you up to speed on what's going on in the Middle East.”
Exploration of the complex family dynamics involving Meghan and Harry's backgrounds.
“And it's her fault that she broke up the partnership of Harry and William.”
Discussion on how recent revelations could shift opinions about Meghan.
“Well, they might have to re-evaluate the way that they handled Thomas Markle Sr.”

Get the gist, explore an idea or ask about something said.
On The Daily T, what are the key points of this episode?
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.
0:04The Telegraph.
0:09In 2010, newlyweds Debbie Cooper and Jamie Starbuck set off on a round-the-world honeymoon, but something wasn't right. We kind of started to scrutinise things a lot more. What exactly is going on here? Debbie was missing. We just looked at each other and said, so what's the next step? And it's like, police. He was a lovely little boy, but something happened to him to turn him into a monster. There's nothing off her, he just erased her. Missing Debbie, a new Bed of Lies podcast from The Telegraph. Out now. Have people got Meghan completely wrong? After shocking allegations emerge about the Duchess of Sussex's father, Thomas Markle Sr., are we now having to re-evaluate her relationships with her own family?
0:54the perception within britain has long been that megan is an agent of chaos who has injected dysfunction into the royal family and it's her fault that she broke up the partnership of harry and william she upset kate and she stole away this uh fun loving red-haired boy and took him to america right sure and what this story does is this this really challenges that narrative
1:31it. Camilla, we're all a little bit in shock, trying to process two enormous stories, which are related, but separate. So we need to establish what they are. The first is that the son of Thomas Markle Sr., who is called Thomas Markle Jr., who has been his father's carer for some time, his father has been unwell, he's had a leg amputated, alleges that he discovered a stash of child pornography at his father's house, that it was mixed in with family mementos, which is just a horrific thing. Awful, just awful and shocking. Thomas Markle Sr. has denied the allegation. Thomas Markle Jr. is standing by it.
2:19So that's one story. And just on that, Tim, it's shocking that Thomas Markle Jr. has said this, as well as the discovery being shocking. And without going into too much detail, he's basically referred his father to the FBI. he's got a local IT expert in and he's found things on computer hard drives thumbnails and then he's saying about the stash that was found it was quote old books that turned out to be full of naked little girls these are allegations they are denied but just to stress in the whole breakdown between Thomas Markle senior and his daughter Megan and they haven't spoken for years we had her half siblings Samantha Markle and Thomas Markle Jr massively briefing against her and being hugely supportive of their father so for the son to turn around and do this and say this it does merit some close consideration because this isn't the usual suspect of saying that Thomas Markle Sr's character is flawed I just want to plant that in the mind there Yeah, it is an allegation, and to repeat, Thomas Senior denies it.
3:28But that's story one in the present day. Then we hear that Meghan says that in 2018, she was told by the Metropolitan Police that an allegation had been made against her father, and that it related to the abuse of children. She then cut off all relations with her father, she says, and this explains why she didn't introduce him to his grandchildren. So I'm going to read this statement now because I think it deserves to be read in full. Just to reiterate the timeline, I break the story of Harry and Meghan being an item in 2016. Quite a lot happens between them and them getting engaged and then getting married in May 2018, including of course Prince Harry hitting out at the press for being too intrusive into Meghan's life and warning that history was in danger of repeating itself and that obviously involved journalists going both to Meghan's mother for backgrounders and to her father so just hold that thought there because it's in 2018 that she discovers this news although she's not specific about the date this is her statement from today I am deeply distressed at the news that has come to light in the last 24 hours and my thoughts are with any children who may have been harmed.
4:47In 2018 a letter was sent to the Metropolitan Police and Royalty and Specialist Protection. That letter was subsequently shared with me. It made troubling and disturbing allegations against my father and I was given assurances that these were being investigated. I hope it can now be understood that despite certain media publications distortion over the years, any distance from my father and my choice to not allow him to have contact with our children was for one reason, to protect them. I trusted that the authorities were doing the same for other families. Although the breadth of what has now been uncovered is more sickening than one could ever imagine, my sincerest hope is that justice will be fully served and that the priority remains the safety and protection of innocent children.
5:34So as you say, Tim, we've got two unrelated but related situations here where she has received a letter with disturbing allegations but we don't quite know what they are around the period where Harry and Meghan were preparing to get married at Windsor Castle. Now just from my memory of that period something odd did happen because covering the royals at the time of course there were a series of press conferences leading up to the big day so that journalists could be briefed on what was going to be happening and I distinctly remember going to a press conference at the Royal News just down the road from Telegraph HQ in Victoria around the back of Buckingham Palace to be told that Meghan absolutely would be being walked down the aisle by her father and it was explained to us that although her parents had divorced when she was a child that daughter and father had a very close relationship he had been a lighting director out in Hollywood and for a period of her teenage years she had lived with dad and not with mum and that was made very clear to us and so that's what we were preparing for in copy suddenly something changed and nobody could ever really work out why it had changed but it suddenly became apparent that the couple had fallen out with her father and that he wouldn't be walking her down the aisle subsequently he announces he can't even come to the wedding because he's had a heart attack he ends up in hospital the whole thing's a mess there's a huge amount of discussion in newspapers about why Harry and Meghan haven't flown out there or why, in fact, Harry didn't maybe send a representative from the royal family to try and smooth things over.
7:06In the background, there was also an allegation that Thomas Markle Sr. was briefing the press. And there was a famous image that appeared on the front of the Mail on Sunday of him being measured up for his wedding suit. And because it looked as if he had colluded with a paparazzo, the couple were very angry because, of course, Prince Harry has made it his mission to crack down on press intrusion. So it looked as if Thomas Markle Sr. was kind of feeding the monster that had come to attack Harry and Meghan. So the whole thing was a mess. But I must admit, this is so shocking because the Royal Press Pack, as far as I'm aware, and me personally, have never been given so much of an inkling of this being in the background.
7:48But why would you? If all she knows is that an allegation was passed on to the police, if no charges were brought, if there was no prosecution, then she really has nothing to brief people about. Although, just to come in there, yes, you're right. But let's be honest, this is a couple who haven't been shy about briefing against their nearest and dearest. I mean, the whole of that side of the family, as far as Megan's concerned, and by the way, I never went along with this. I didn't ever go and interview Samantha Markle, her half-sister, or Thomas Markle Jr., her half-brother. I personally, and I said this and I wrote it, found it very distasteful that you would have half-siblings.
8:30I think as a journalist, you know, when family members start publicly piling in, alarm bells go off and you think to yourself, hang on, there's something else going on in the background here. They weren't necessarily reliable witnesses and they hadn't seen Meghan for years and years. But we shouldn't forget that both of those half siblings regularly appeared on the airwaves to slag her off. Now, clearly now they've diverged in opinions because Samantha Markle is saying that she doesn't believe Thomas Markle Jr. And she's told the Daily Mail, there is no merit in these disgusting allegations whatsoever.
9:02And my brother is disgusting for making them up. He wants to destroy our dad. Shame on him. I think I'd offer a couple of observations. One is this is why you want to keep family away from things as much as possible, why you want to avoid comment on family conflict, because you don't know all of the truth. But also it's so painful and traumatic. It's none of your business. Yes. It's best in public life to focus on the individual who's actually in the public eye. And one thing that did always trouble me about how some in the media covered Meghan was their willingness to talk to the family. If you go into any family, you'll find people who will say, I don't like her.
9:50I don't like him. And it's for very personal reasons, some of which can be bound up with childhood traumas. And maybe we're going to see some of that when all this stuff comes out. I know, but then, Tim, the counter-narrative to that would be they have spoken about their own family in very disparaging terms. Harry and Meghan have talked about the royal family. I mean, they have levelled an accusation that's only slightly less bad than this, which is that the royal family were inherently either racist initially or unconsciously biased. So they levelled allegations against the royals. This, of course, is a lot worse, but I'm saying...
10:27I think someone asking what will the child look like is embarrassing and, as the kids say, cringe. But the thing about the allegation of looking at child sexual images against Thomas Markle Sr. is it's an allegation that blows everything out of the water. Yes, of course. It just completely changes the way you perceive the dynamic of the family. No, but my question, Tim, is sorry, just to explain myself. My question that I can't quite fathom right now is if they've had the opportunity to go on Oprah Winfrey and talk about their relationship with the royals and done a Netflix documentary and he's written a book spare.
11:07Why haven't they ever given a further explanation? and it may be because they are legally challenged in doing so but why haven't they given an explanation as to why that relationship with Thomas Markle senior irretrievably broke down rather than leaving press and public guessing because had her people or his people taken royal correspondence aside at that point where he backed out of the wedding or they wanted him to back out of the wedding and then subsequently and had a quiet word saying, listen, this is not for reporting, but you need to be aware that there are some very, very serious allegations that have surfaced about Thomas Markle Sr.
11:49And this is all quite dark and cynical. And just be careful who you're dealing with here. Then the reporters would have taken that on board, I would imagine. Would they? I think the good ones would. I think the bad ones would still have interviewed him. and if they were here what they would probably say is we are not required to share something traumatic with the world's media and we shouldn't have to be and one could say yes but the problem is you've shaped our perception of you by the amount that you want to share and that gives us the feeling that you're the kind of people who just tell us everything but actually no one ever tells everything in public life and they shouldn't be required to.
12:36And if this turns out to be something true, if it turns out to be something which has haunted the family for some time, maybe there are very good psychological reasons that they did not wish to show. But are you saying that before the media knew about this, they were wrong to have interviewed Thomas Markle Sr.? No, because that's a very good point. You cannot judge the media for not acting on the basis of something it did not know because no one told them. And I get that. And you're also absolutely right to say that it's not necessarily been the media chasing the family. The family has allegedly sought out the media.
13:13Yeah, that's right. I mean, that is right. And I think they've done that for money. And it's not the first time that people do that, and it won't be the last time. What I meant earlier is the scale of the vitriol seemed completely disproportionate. But was it... From Samantha and Thomas Markle Jr. Was it public interest? for the media to speak to the family and hear their reasons or their take on why they dislike Meghan. But that's always been the dilemma with royal reporting. Is it in the public interest or is it merely interesting to the public? But I mean, it's quite difficult for TV producers and newspaper reporters alike to have people like Thomas Markle Sr., Thomas Markle Jr.
13:55and Samantha Markle knocking at the door and say, oh, no, actually, I wouldn't like to take your version of events on why Megan is who she is. Clearly, this does put it into a different context. I just was always suspicious of them and didn't think they were reliable sources, put it that way. And I think anyone looking at them could see they were a hot mess. I think that was just obvious.
14:23Outdated technology isn't going to improve a disconnected healthcare system. Next. So what will? At Optum, we wake up every day and work for better. We call it healthy optimism. It's how we use insights and technology to help providers focus less on paperwork and more on patients. Will we fix it all overnight? No. But we'll wake up trying again and again until healthcare works as one for everyone. That's healthy optimism. Learn more at Optum.com. I'm Vinicius Rainey. And I'm Roland Oliphant. As hosts of The Telegraph's podcast Iran the Latest, it's our job to keep you up to speed on what's going on in the Middle East.
15:01Join us every day as we ask, can the US put an end to Iran's nuclear ambitions once and for all? Who will come out on top in the peace talks? Has this war damaged America's ability to take on China? And what are the long-term implications for the wider world? Search Iran the Latest and listen wherever you get your podcasts. We're also now on video. Watch us on YouTube and on The Telegraph's website.
15:29but this brings me to my second observation which is uh the issue of who the british public has blamed for the split with the royal family because that's at the heart of all of this right if there is a public interest yeah it's the fact that the family has to been divided in two over this and the perception within britain has long been that megan is an agent of chaos who has injected dysfunction into the royal family. And it's her fault that she broke up the partnership of Harry and William. She upset Kate and she stole away this fun loving red haired boy and took him to America. Right. Sure. And what this story does is this this really challenges that narrative and says maybe the dysfunction is absolutely not Meghan's fault.
16:18Maybe maybe it's something deeper and traumatic that we should have shown obviously we didn't know we didn't know we did also but but maybe we were too quick to place the blame on one individual and not think about maybe the background that shaped her and maybe that's also to suggest that most people singularly blame her and there are some but i've always maintained that prince harry was always a round peg in a square hole. He was always in the shadow of William and Kate, even though he had arguably at the time much more star quality. He was always saying to the royal powers that be, why can't I do this?
16:59And why can't we change that? And they'd always be steady as she goes, which doesn't, it didn't sit right with his mother and it doesn't sit right with him because he's a maverick. What happened was Meghan came along and simply gave that rocket fuel, but it was there already. I've always said that. This whole Meghan's Lady Macbeth narrative is wrong. Prince Harry was being pretty bloody difficult before she came on the scene because he wanted to rewrite his own royal role and that was problematic because of fears of overshadowing William and Kate. And of course it's all detailed in spare how he literally felt like the spare to the air was made to feel like it was given inferior accommodation, not allowed to have a beard and all the rest of it.
17:40So yes, I agree with that. But actually, funny enough, the dysfunctionality of Meghan's family seemed to play quite well into the dysfunctionality of Harry's family. This was a divorced woman who was marrying the son of a divorced couple who had been broken by his mother's death. She's slightly older than him. She had more life experience. She seemed like she was a ready-made royal because she'd already done work with the UN and stuff. She knew her own mind. and don't forget we also had Harry this kind of slightly loose cannon playboy prince like so people thought goodness me he needs to settle down there was almost a touch of the kind of Prince Charles's and Prince Andrew's about him we didn't want him to be on the shelf as the world's most eligible bachelor and then a mature woman who knows her own mind who has had a successful acting career and can articulate herself beautifully comes along and sweeps him off his feet so but I see what you're saying it's this idea that oh well because she comes from this very difficult family it's no wonder she's broken up another one do you mean that kind of stuff yes exactly and i and i wonder if there again are parallels with another story the jasonrd case it's a very different very tragic professor uh who ended up taking his own life um in that instance i think the media was forced into asking questions about ethics and the way that it approached a story.
19:05And I wonder if this is going to have a similar impact where a lot of royal correspondents, not saying the good ones, but the ones at the lower end of the market are going to be re-evaluating the way in which they handled Meghan. Well, they might have to re-evaluate the way that they handled Thomas Markle Sr. But whatever Thomas Markle Sr. has or hasn't done, it doesn't change the fact that Harry and Meghan still decided to Megxit in 2020, still decided to give an interview to Oprah Winfrey, still decided to do a Netflix documentary, which featured a mock curtsy to the Queen and other high profile moments.
19:46And he still decided to be highly critical of his own family in spare. I mean, these allegations add context to the breakdown of the father and daughter relationship. They don't change anything that the couple has done. And all this stuff was embarrassing and silly and it did damage to the institution, which is why it was of public interest. And Meghan remains a kooky individual who sells overpriced calendars. And we... And jam. And jam. And it's funny. And it's fine to laugh at that because it just adds to the gaiety of the nation. But what I perhaps might finish on is suggesting that these revelations do give us an opportunity to adjust our relationship with Meghan at the moment when she's returned to Britain.
20:34Doesn't it seem right at this moment to say, OK, given what we now know, let's start again? Well, I think that works both ways. And actually, when it comes to familial startings again, that's probably down to the king and Prince William, right? But I will say this. I mean... This discovery, if true, and he denies the allegations, about your own father, I mean, it's probably the worst thing you could ever find out, Tim. So on that level, I think you'd have to have a heart of stone to not have some sympathy. I mean, this is horrific. and by the way as you say even if it's an allegation even if it even if it isn't true the allegation itself having your father accused of this is a incredibly traumatic thing to happen and and one's heart has to go out to her which is why i'm saying it's up to the royal family to decide how they handle the return of the sussexes but for the media and the nation, perhaps this is a moment for us to go to Meghan, prove how good we can be as British people and say, right, the past is forgotten.
21:48Let's start over. And is there anything we can do to help? To quote Tom Bradbury, how are you? Maybe it's time to ask Meghan, how are you? Tim, we weren't expecting to speak today. So great to speak to you on this very wet and windy Friday. we're going to be back tomorrow with a Saturday special that features Jeremy Hunt and Lord Lamont two ex-chancellors talking and looking ahead of John Healy's budget next Wednesday October the 28th and then on Sunday I've got a royalty coming with Hannah Furness who is off to the Caribbean with the King and Queen
22:34Thank you.
On Friday’s episode of The Daily T, Camilla Tominey and Tim Stanley react to the news that Thomas Markle Sr, the Duchess of Sussex’s estranged father, is being investigated for allegedly possessing child abuse images.
They examine whether the Duchess’s previous behaviour and the decision to distance herself from her father is more understandable, and ask whether there is a need to reevaluate the way her relationship with her family is viewed. Our presenters also discuss the press’s relationship with the Markle family, and the fractious dynamic between the Duchess of Sussex and her two half-siblings, Samantha Markle and Thomas Markle Jr.
On Friday, Mr Markle Sr denied the allegations.
The Telegraph is the Publisher Podcast Awards' Podcast Publisher of the Year 2026
► Get more exclusive Daily T content from The Daily T+ membership! Join here
► We want to hear from you! Email us at [email protected] or find @dailytpodcast on TikTok, Instagram and X
► Sign up to our most popular newsletter, From the Editor. Look forward to receiving free-thinking comment and the day's biggest stories, every morning: telegraph.co.uk/fromtheeditor
Producer: David Levene
Senior Producer: Emma Williams
Studio Operator: Meghan Searle
Video & Social Producer: Nada Aggour
Executive Producer: Charlotte Seligman
Editor: Camilla Tominey
Highlights:
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.