China: The rise of a science superpower

23 Aug 2026 · 49 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

BBC documentary episode arguing China has become a “science superpower,” driven by decades of state and public investment, competitive research incentives, and long-term engineering projects (space and big physics). It also warns that rapid biomedical advances raise ethical and trust concerns amid tighter international collaboration.

Guests (backgrounds)

  • Roland Pease (BBC World Service science reporter).
  • Qin Jianli (Chinese neuroscientist).
  • Yang Yangcheng (cultural historian; former particle physicist).
  • Chen Zhangli (world-leading neuroscientist; former Peking University vice president).
  • Yiu Yiu Tu (Nobel Prize-winning researcher; malaria treatment during Cultural Revolution).
  • Chen Zhenli (former Peking University administrator).
  • Yifang Wang (particle physicist; proposed JUNO neutrino experiment).
  • Linda Creminezi (particle physicist; leads US neutrino effort).
  • Andrew Jones (science journalist covering China’s space program).
  • Joy Zhang (University of Kent; studies ethics of biological research).
  • Zhilong Chou (Shanghai Jiao Tong University neuroscientist; involved in gene-therapy case discussed).

Key claims + notable examples

  • China leads by metrics (PhDs, patents, publications, Nature Index, top-cited papers).
  • Space milestone: Chang’e 6 sample return from the far side of the Moon; Tiangong station; lunar/astronomy ambitions.
  • Big science: Hefei EAST superconducting tokamak; FAST radio telescope; JUNO (underground detector under a mountain; neutrino measurements, including anti-neutrino deficit “wiggles”).
  • Ethics/trust: Mei “base editing” gene-therapy case (child died; secrecy revealed by Retraction Watch/Science); concerns about weak enforcement of ethics committees and competitive pressure.
  • International tension: US-China science collaboration declines; espionage/misconduct allegations and COVID-era suspicions.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

China's Space Superpower Ambitions

1:45 to 3:40

Exploring China's achievements in space exploration and scientific growth.

“An unmanned Chinese spacecraft touched down on the far side of the moon where no human or robot has ever ventured before.”

The Historical Context of Chinese Science

3:40 to 6:10

A look back at China's scientific development from the Mao era to present.

“It is a matter of fact that China has risen and is rising as a scientific superpower.”

Intellectual Movements and Challenges

6:10 to 8:30

Discussion of the challenges faced by Chinese scientists post-Cultural Revolution.

“And Mao himself, he believed in the power of science and technology, but in a very specific way, as science and technology, as this mass science, as a vehicle for revolution.”

Investment in Science and Technology

8:30 to 10:35

How consistent government investment has propelled China's scientific capabilities.

“Just how many died when soldiers of the Chinese army moved in on the unarmed demonstrators in a 12-hour onslaught may never be known.”

Leading Scientific Projects in China

10:35 to 13:05

Highlighting major scientific projects and their implications for global science.

“Today, you look around, everybody has multiple, multiple science nature cells.”

The Future of Chinese Scientific Endeavors

13:05 to 14:00

Discussing the future potential and ongoing scientific efforts in China.

“completion to start running next year, and the follow-up to that is already substantially designed.”

Understanding Neutrinos and Juno's Role

14:00 to 20:41

Learn about the physics of neutrinos and the ambitious Juno experiment in China.

“It's an effort that seeks to understand the origins of the universe, which was proposed by particle physicist Yifang Wang and is possible only because of China's accelerating economy.”

The Ghostly Nature of Neutrinos

20:41 to 21:03

Discover how neutrinos pass through matter unnoticed and their significance in science.

“cover of Nature, as I mentioned earlier, and simultaneously at another conference in June.”

Initial Results from Juno

21:03 to 23:22

Explore the promising early results from Juno's neutrino measurements and their implications.

“that streams out of two nearby nuclear reactors, which is hard enough in itself.”

China's Scientific Ambition and Responsibility

23:22 to 24:25

Examine the ethical implications of China's investment in scientific research.

“and I think it's actually been really good to see China putting a lot of support into particle physics.”
Show all 19 chapters

China's Scientific Ambition and Responsibility

24:34 to 24:53

Examine the ethical implications of China's investment in scientific research.

“With the new Schwab Teen Investor account, teens can gain hands-on investing experience and build positive money habits.”

The Rise of China's Science Superpower

25:36 to 28:00

Delve into the historical context and current strategies behind China's scientific achievements.

“exploring the rise of China as a science superpower.”

China's Talent Retention Strategies

28:00 to 31:04

Learn how China is attracting back its top scientific talent through programs.

“And for decades, foreign travel remained essential for talented researchers to learn from the world's best.”

China's Long-Term Space Exploration Goals

31:04 to 35:35

Discover China's ambitious plans for space exploration and its commitment to long-term projects.

“And so let's return now to where I began.”

Concerns in Genetic Medicine

35:35 to 40:02

Examine the ethical issues surrounding genetic research and a tragic case in China.

“In China, there is not quite that relationship.”

The Reckless Reputation of Chinese Bioscience

40:02 to 42:04

Understand the implications of competitive mentality in Chinese bioscience and its reputation.

“So you're talking about the significant betrayal of public trust.”

The Challenges of Ethical Research in China

42:04 to 44:20

Explore the ethical dilemmas and regulatory challenges facing Chinese bioscience.

“The best scientists are going to be competitive and you want them to have ambition.”

Political Constraints on Chinese Science

44:20 to 48:22

Understand how the political environment impacts scientific research in China.

“rapid rise of science in China has come at an interesting time with the US administration increasingly focusing on America first policies.”

A Vision for Global Scientific Collaboration

48:22 to 51:10

Discuss the potential for global scientific cooperation despite geopolitical tensions.

“And then China has indeed become a scientific and technological superpower.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.

0:30No bouncing between tabs. And best of all, no spreadsheets. Stop managing software and start managing your business with one unified system. Try for free today at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com. Ever wonder why we make the choices we do? And how to make smarter ones? Introducing Choiceology, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. Join Wharton Professor Katie Milkman, an award-winning behavioral scientist and author of the best-selling book, How to Change, as she shares true stories from Nobel laureates, authors, athletes, and everyday people about why we do the things we do and how to make better choices to help avoid costly mistakes.

1:14Each episode covers the latest research in behavioral science and dives into themes like the power of self-control, shaping your mindset for success, navigating new beginnings, and why starting over can feel so hard. Listen to choiceology at schwab.com slash podcast or wherever you listen.

1:43Since we've been on air this morning, a bit of history has been made. An unmanned Chinese spacecraft touched down on the far side of the moon where no human or robot has ever ventured before. Amongst other things, it's carrying inspiration. China's ambitions to be a space superpower have been boosted after becoming the first nation to land a spacecraft on the far side of the moon. And so just to state the obvious, five years ago, that was on the moon. Four and a half years ago. Four and a half years ago. That was on the moon. If you want to grab the world's attention, going to the moon and getting back is back in fashion.

2:1950 years after the great powers America and the Soviet Union were demonstrating their prowess with people and robots. This year, the US made its first efforts in returning with the much-highlighted Artemis II mission, which took astronauts further beyond lunar orbit than ever achieved, and Artemis IV promises a landing in coming years. But China has had robotic explorers on the Moon's surface for over a decade, and they too are in the race to put boots there. It appears to me that China has the simpler pathway to getting astronauts onto the moon and back. China has the clearer pathway. But it's a very interesting time.

3:00Watch this space. But space missions are only one symbol of national scientific ambition. And what's become clear in recent years is that China is now a force to be reckoned with in all aspects of science, from cutting-edge biology to quantum technology to the front line in AI. and, perhaps more significantly, in the kind of pure curiosity-driven research that has no obvious immediate payback. I'm Roland Pease, and in reporting on scientific breakthroughs for the BBC World Service, I've witnessed the growing strength of Chinese research that has now brought it to the brink of global dominance.

3:39And what the rest of us are to make of it is the subject for this edition of the documentary, The Rise of a Science Superpower. It is a matter of fact that China has risen and is rising as a scientific superpower. If we start with the question of who is a scientific superpower, and you're playing the numbers game, China is certainly winning. China produces more doctoral students, more patents, more publications, more publications in Nature Index, and more of the top 1 % most highly cited papers. you look everywhere. In some fields, Chinese scientists are already in lead in some particular fields.

4:20There is a lot of excitement about this experiment in the international community. And I think it's actually been really good to see China putting a lot of support into particle physics. And I think, you know, from the international particle physics community, I think this has been very, very good for us. Thoughts from some of the international experts guiding me as I try to understand how China has so rapidly become a dominating force in the world of science and where it's heading. And when Chinese neuroscientist Qin Jianli says they're already leading in some disciplines, that matches what I've been seeing as I pick through the top scientific journals in my weekly science journalism.

5:01Increasingly, I'll spot work that originated in the major Chinese universities like Tsinghua, Peking or Fudan, or one of the many institutes of the Chinese Academy of Science. And the more public face of this change is that Chang 'e 6 mission, bringing samples back from the far side of the moon, which opened the programme. It dramatically exemplifies China's fast progress since the Mao era, which is a good place to start our exploration of the country's scientific and technological ambitions. Back then, in 1970, China launched its first satellite called the East is Red, which was a kind of crude, souped-up Sputnik broadcasting patriotic songs.

5:49This was during the depths of Chairman Mao's cultural revolution, a time of intense suspicion of intellectuals. Though even then, the scientific flame never quite went out, as cultural historian and former particle physicist Yang Yang Cheng told me. So in the Mao era, of course, China was a revolutionary power. And Mao himself, he believed in the power of science and technology, but in a very specific way, as science and technology, as this mass science, as a vehicle for revolution. and he was very sceptical of elite scientists who came from a bourgeois class background. And so there were these massive political campaigns that persecuted a lot of scientists as a way to discipline them, to make them into good communists.

6:35There were still scientists like just put their heads down and trying to do research, right? Chen Zhang Li is a world-leading neuroscientist and also former vice president at Peking University. Even during the miserable time of Cultural Revolution, don't forget Professor Yiu Yiu Tu, who won Nobel Prize. Her work was done in the most miserable time of Cultural Revolution. She found one of the treatments for malaria. Yeah. So the flame, the spark has always been there. Though the fire took time to reignite after Mao's death, as Chen Jianli saw while beginning his own scientific career. Now, the first phase was slow to rebuild, right?

7:26In 1976, among the first line of reform that Deng Xiaoping and his colleagues advocated, which received very wide support in almost all walks of the society, was re-establishing higher education for the country. So I would say right after Cultural Revolution, that work started. Though this Chinese renaissance had stumbled on the way, says cultural commentator Yang Yangcheng. In China, there is a centuries-old, millennia-old tradition of intellectuals being involved with matters of governance. And this is what we saw in the 1980s among scientists, scholars, writers, any kind of intellectuals who saw themselves re-entering the national and political dialogue.

8:16And they were having these grand narratives about democracy, freedom, how to govern. But a lot of these very honourable, but in some ways naive wishes were like, of course, forcibly crushed by the Tiananmen crackdown. It's still not clear how many people were killed when Chinese troops crushed the students' demonstration in Tiananmen Square. Just how many died when soldiers of the Chinese army moved in on the unarmed demonstrators in a 12-hour onslaught may never be known. Official newspapers in Peking... But things like the reform era, basically, for the past five decades, since the late 1970s, the Chinese government has had a consistent effort in terms of investing in science and education infrastructure, investing in scientific research and educational infrastructure, in making science and technology, in the words of Lin Xiaoping, it's a production force.

9:05It's something that the government has placed immense emphasis on as central to its political legitimacy. And also very importantly, the Chinese public have great faith in science and technology. Scientists and engineers are respected, and the people believe that science and technology is this kind of power that can uplift the nation and also uplift their personal lives. And that has contributed to the buildup of a massive science and technology workforce. So I guess the question becomes almost a little bit rhetorical, right? It's not so much whether China has risen as a scientific superpower, but how could it not with this kind of consistent investment and efforts from the state and society?

9:45As a result, Chinese science is highly competitive on the international stage, and that in turn has sharpened the way the top universities measure their own success, says former Peking University Administrator Chen Zhenli. For example, the bar has been raised for researchers progressing their own careers, as measured by which prestigious international journals they get their results into. You go to Peking University, you look around, 40 years ago, if you get a publication in not science and nature, because nobody had science and nature and cell and neural, if you get, let's say, PNAS, Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA, you pretty much can be elected to the academy, almost that level, right?

10:33It's something really proud. Today, you look around, everybody has multiple, multiple science nature cells. It's not even the question we talk about. We talk about who made the most brilliant discovery, like who has this fascinating thing. By the way, this issue of Top Journal Cell, the cover stories is from a junior colleague in my same building, Dr. Wang. Guess what? the story is about it's about the circadian clock in strawberry strawberry they do have a circadian clock it's fascinating it's pure science the biorhythms of a common fruit it's and it's internationally recognized oh yeah it's the cover story and of course i would say in the future, it may be useful.

11:29Who knows? Maybe there is a time to spray pesticides, there is time to pick, I don't know. But it's just fun. Fun, for sure. But at a deeper level, this research is about an unexpected way gene circuits can regulate plant physiology. Maybe, in years to come, this will be the seed for new ideas about genetics more generally. Probably not, but maybe, and you never know without that first experiment being tried. This is normal, exploratory, pure science, the way it's been long done in top universities around the world. But this is from a Beijing university and it's internationally competitive. That's why Chen Jianli said earlier that Chinese science is now world-leading in some fields.

12:14It's what I would hope to see as evidence that research in the country is resurgent, that the missteps of the past have been corrected, that government support is working. If that sounds like a bold claim off the back of one paper about strawberries, there have been other, much bigger developments in Chinese science that have caught my eye and told me this is the time to explore this rise of this new power. Large-scale projects costing hundreds of millions of dollars and more, employing hundreds or thousands of scientists committed to decades of effort. One of the most globally significant nuclear fusion projects currently runs in Hefei in central China, east, for experimental advanced superconducting Tokamak, which has been breaking records in performance in recent years.

13:03A successor, Best, is nearing completion to start running next year, and the follow-up to that is already substantially designed. Or there's the world's largest single-dish radio telescope, fast, 500 meters side to side, which is nestled in a hollow in the mountainous Guizhou province, mapping the matter of the universe. And still other projects still keep coming online. We are going to keep running for about 30 years. It's a major engineering effort. It costs a lot of money and we'd like to use it up to the maximum we can. 300 million US dollars is the quoted price tag on the experiment I most wanted to explore for this program.

13:48Though looking at similar efforts elsewhere in the world, I wouldn't be surprised if the real cost was considerably more. Juno, the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory, is for me a particularly interesting example of the kind of pure science the Chinese government is now supporting. It's an effort that seeks to understand the origins of the universe, which was proposed by particle physicist Yifang Wang and is possible only because of China's accelerating economy. The GDP has been going up very quickly so the total amount available for science, for pure science, is also increasing dramatically fast.

14:28So indeed we have been seeing in the last 20-30 years a lot more money for science. Of course we still need to convince our funding agencies, the government, that we are the best and you should give money to me, not somebody else. But still, I think the money is actually more than there was before. So I would say a lot easier than before. If learning more and more about less and less is the aim of much research, then the physics of neutrinos, as they're chasing at Juno, is the ideal target. These are particles that have next to no mass, no electrical charge, no impact on the world around them, barely any substance.

15:12Yet their properties are intricately involved in the theory of the stuff that makes us. There's international interest in unpicking their secrets, and particle physicist Linda Creminezi leads a US effort taking its own perspective on these elusive objects. It's fundamental science, right? So you're just doing it for the sake of understanding the universe and understanding how the universe evolved and all of this. And then along the way, we find technologies and applications, but the main aim is fundamental science, yes. And so the fact that China is putting a lot of money into an experiment like Juno seems to me to point to something about their line of thinking.

15:53Absolutely. I think, you know, Juno, I'm not on Juno, but I'm a neutrino physicist. And I think Juno is an absolutely beautiful experiment. I think what we've done, we've put a lot of money and a lot of thought into how to design this. So basically, we use neutrinos coming from nuclear reactors that were already there. And then we put the experiment, the detector at about 50 kilometers at the exact distance that they needed from the reactors. and it's quite a feat to do it under 700 metres of rock because this is not an easy thing to build on the surface. But now, you know, build a big shaft and then go down and then did a big hole and then sort of slowly put it together.

16:37And they built it in such a technology in which they can measure multiple properties of the neutrinos at the same time. And so I think we really invested a lot in this very specific problem and trying to solve it. Now, I've been to the European Particle Physics Lab CERN where they discovered the Higgs and I'm familiar with the scale of these kinds of experiments. But Juno is still mind-bogglingly bold. Built in an underground cavern, excavated beneath a mountain, filled with high-tech equipment via a long tunnel. It's all very James Bond. The tunnel is about 1.3 kilometres long, and the cave is 50 metres diameter and 70 metres high.

17:21So this is something like 25 storeys of building underground. So it's almost the exact same size of the Astrid Tower. Wow. But it's underground, under a mountain, effectively. But it's underground. Exactly. And then it's filled with this extraordinary detector. So the detector is buried in a water pool and it is made of steel structure holding acrylic tank. And inside this acrylic tank, we have a special liquid to detect neutrinos. We call it the liquid scintillator. So the total volume of the liquid scintillator is about 24 ,000 cubic metres, 20 ,000 tonnes. And then we have another 45 tonnes of water to cover this acrylic tank.

18:17So this is almost like a kind of egg, as it were, this acrylic tank, which is filled with this sensitive liquid. Yes, yes. So it's a very thin share of acrylic, transparent, and of course mechanically had to be strong enough to withstand the pressure, the weight, and also the density difference between water and the liquid scintillator. And that's before you mentioned the thousands of ultra-sensitive photo detectors that envelop this assembly, catching the scintillations, the flashes of light, each time a neutrino pings one of the atoms inside. And there's the electronics to gather and process the detections.

18:58Every neutrino signal typically has about 10 ,000 photons. And these 10 ,000 photons will be measured and detected by 20 ,000 phototubes. So each phototube on average sees less than one photon. 20 ,000? 20 ,000 detectors? And they're arranged all around, is that right? Yes, fully covered the whole sphere of the critic. and each of them is a half meter diameter. When you actually got to, I don't know if there's a real turn on moment for an experiment like this, but there must be a moment when you know that now we're actually collecting scientific data. And I imagine that felt a bit special. Yes, absolutely.

19:40That was August last year. Indeed, when we started, well, let's say there are two big moments, let's say. The first big moment is November 2024, when we finish the construction and start to fill liquid into the detector. And that's a very big moment, which means that all what we can do to touch the detector is done. I mean, you cannot touch it anymore. And then when we finish the filling of the liquid scintillator starting taking data, of course, that's another big major moment. But unfortunately, the moment that we finish the completion of the liquid scintillator filling, I was not there. I was in the United States for a conference.

20:25Indeed, I immediately announced the news that we finished our feeding and detectives at work. So that was also a very special moment that we will be able to celebrate together with our colleagues internationally. And the celebrations have continued since, with the first results announced both on the front cover of Nature, as I mentioned earlier, and simultaneously at another conference in June. But first, let's dive a little deeper into neutrinos and their ghostly physics. 100 trillion of them pass through your body every second, having next to no effect, so most of us don't care. But Juno is designed to intercept tiny handfuls of the additional flux that streams out of two nearby nuclear reactors, which is hard enough in itself.

21:12Yet these ghostly particles are also shapeshifters that become additionally invisible during their journey, behaviour which might reveal secrets of the subatomic world. Subtle differences and how they vary with the neutrino's energy between what Juno sees and what the reactors produce could confirm existing theories or point to improvements that are necessary. It sounds a challenging effort for the government to gamble hundreds of millions of dollars on, yet particle physicist Linda Kremen-Naysi told me the gamble seems to be paying off. A month ago, Yvonne gave this talk, which was basically the results from Juno, I think from 100 days of data only.

21:53And the community was very much looking forward to them. And we were all very impressed with what we managed to achieve in just 100 days of running. So they showed us that they can actually see this deficit of anti-neutrinos. And what Juno does very well is measure this deficit as a function of the neutrino energy. And it also can measure there's like a sort of like a big wiggle. And And then with very, very small wiggles in investor deficit. And what we demonstrated is that we can do this. Basically, we have 100 days. We've demonstrated we can see the big wiggle and we can also start to see this small wiggle.

22:31And, you know, honestly, I actually think we were all very impressed. From what you're saying, it sounds like it wasn't just that they were getting some kind of yes or no answer. But there was a lot of detail, it sounds like, in their first measurements that promises a lot more for the future. Yes, because basically the ultimate measurement that we want to make may take something like five years or six years. But to get to that measurement, we need to demonstrate that we have understood the technology and we can get to 3 % sort of like energy resolution. So that's very, very precise, which is very, very difficult for neutrinos.

23:07And with their first measurements, they have demonstrated they are on the way there. basically. They will be able, with enough statistics, to deliver basically this measurement in a few years. There is a lot of excitement about this experiment in the international community, and I think it's actually been really good to see China putting a lot of support into particle physics. And I think, you know, from the international particle physics community, I think this has been very, very good for us. This is an experiment that will be centre stage in unpicking the secrets of the subatomic world for decades to come.

23:41And Yifang Wang told me, if a star should explode somewhere in our galaxy while it's running, a supernova, Juno will capture neutrinos generated in its burning core and reveal mysteries of one of the most violent phenomena in the universe. This is the stuff that excites me. It takes money and commitment, but it could make headlines in the future. though with superpower comes super responsibility you know for ordinary citizens if we cannot trust a well-established institutions such as in this story then who can we turn to and who can we rely on science ambition has to be counterbalanced by ethics and in part two of the documentary china struggles to shake the image of the wild east of bioscience you're listening to the documentary from the BBC World Service.

24:38With the new Schwab Teen Investor account, teens can gain hands-on investing experience and build positive money habits. It's an account co-owned by you and your teen, so you can monitor and engage with the account while your teen learns how to invest and manage money. Learn more at schwab.com. Support comes from Wise, the smart way to manage the currencies you need around the globe. Fed up with losing out to hidden fees when you send money abroad with your everyday bank? Choose the smart way. Wise. You can count on the exchange rate you'd usually find on Google. No unwelcome surprises. Plus, ditch that where's my money feeling.

25:15Most transfers arrive in under 20 seconds. Join millions saving billions on hidden fees. Be smart. Get wise. Download the Wise app today. T's and C's apply.

25:35Welcome back to the documentary from the BBC World Service with me, Roland Pease, exploring the rise of China as a science superpower. As we saw in part one, China's progress in recent decades means the country is now a world leader in science. It's been a remarkable rise. In this part of the programme, I want to look further at the reasons for the success, what are the key ideas, the strategies that underpin this steady transformation, and I also want to look at what this rise might mean for global science. As you heard earlier, it's the rise in prowess across the pure sciences being conducted in China that's, for me, particularly notable, rather than the technical achievements like electric cars or high-capacity batteries, which are more commonly highlighted.

26:24But perhaps there's a historic precedent for this misconception of what Chinese scholars can achieve. There's a perception that what ancient Chinese scientists were good at was the practical, using magnets, making gunpowder, developing printing, not the conceptual. But what British biochemist-turned-historian Joseph Needham found when he was sent to establish cooperation with scientists in pre-communist China, was a much more familiar approach to research. He was asked about his experience by the BBC many years later. What did you notice about Chinese science and the differences from the West when you got there?

27:08Well, I think the central point to make there is there wasn't any difference at all. Because when you're dealing with modern science, here you have something that's absolutely ecumenical and the same everywhere, no matter where you are, under whatever sky, the processes of modern science and the theories and the experimentation and what you can succeed in doing, it's all one thing because nature is one. But in other words, if the rules of the universe are the same everywhere and human inquisitiveness is universal, then the instinct to explore is always there. It just needs to be able to express itself, which means stability and financial support.

27:48Many of the generation Chosers Needham met left China amidst the civil war and the communist takeover, some of them going on to win Nobel Prizes while based in the United States. And for decades, foreign travel remained essential for talented researchers to learn from the world's best. It's a route Yifang Wang, leader of the neutrino experiment we just heard about, took. I think international exchange, cooperation, and all kinds of collaboration are extremely important. I myself somehow benefited greatly from this kind of experience. When I was 22, I got the chance to go abroad to study physics, Italy, Geneva, and afterwards, the United States.

Read the full transcript

28:38So I think it was extremely privileged to have the chance at the very young stage to talk to the best scientists in the world. Rebuilding science at home meant China stopping the outward flow of its top talent by making working conditions there more attractive. An important step in that direction in the 1990s was the implementation of a programme called 100 Talents, offering good salaries and substantial research funds to anyone who would like to return home. And in 2000, Dr Wang benefited from that programme when he returned from the United States. And two years later, he was given another award from China's National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars.

29:24programs like these have been central to China's effort to rebuild its science institutions. To the point, says physicist and cultural commentator Yang Yang Cheng, the best students no longer need to travel abroad as Yifeng did to get a top class education. One thing that has changed is for Chinese scientists of my generation and certainly earlier generations. The idea is you would need to leave China to receive world-class training and to really develop oneself as a scientist and also earn the credentials that would help open doors in China if one chooses to return. But I think that has been changing over the past five or 10 years, that there are now indeed opportunities to receive a world-class education, not just in terms of textbook, but really at a laboratory level to do the world-class research within China, even as a junior scholar, even as an aspiring scientist.

30:24And so that is an important development. Important indeed in building the workforce that China needs to build its status as a science superpower. For China to create and nurture a new generation of scientists, it's taken a sustained effort of at least quarter of a century. The 100 Talents programme I spoke about earlier was impressive already, but then it became the 1000 Talents programme and many other initiatives have followed to build the institutions so Chinese scientists could be confident they can conduct their top class research in their home country. It's another arm of the multi-pronged determination of the government to expand it's science space.

31:07And so let's return now to where I began. Space. A countdown, the roar of rockets, sounds the same in any language.

31:25As we said at the beginning of the programme, if you want to attract attention, then sending missions into space is a pretty guaranteed way of doing it. And China certainly is doing it. The country's space program is now regularly sending probes to land on the moon, maintaining their own permanently occupied Tiangong, or Heavenly Palace, space station with a crew of three. And it's on the brink of launching a rival to NASA's much celebrated Hubble Space Telescope. But interestingly, the China National Space Agency hasn't developed the panache for self-publicity that NASA routinely shows. So we may know less of their activities than we do of other space programmes.

32:07But science journalist Andrew Jones, who's been following their efforts closely, says he sees here also a very long-term commitment to space exploration, which goes beyond the occasional photo opportunity or rah-rah flag waving. There's evidence that China is taking a very long term approach to things like science and exploration with regards to space. So one example would be in 1992, when the size of the Chinese economy was many times smaller than it is today, they committed to building a space station. and this took 30 years to realize from testing a launch vehicle which could safely put humans into orbit to having test bed small laboratories in orbit and then actually building a modular space station and having crews of three astronauts stay there for six months at a time and do this repeatedly and similar in the lunar robotic exploration sphere they had a three-step program which was first send an orbiter to the moon then try to land on the moon and deploy a small rover and then get samples back from the moon and the way that they did the sample thing was quite telling because what they wanted to do was land on the moon and then instead of like the soviet missions send their samples directly back to earth in a return capsule what they did is they sent the samples back up into lunar orbit and they conducted a robotic rendezvous and docking with a service module and then went back to Earth.

33:39Now, the reason they went through this more complex approach was because they want to test how to get humans onto the moon and get them safely back to Earth. So every time China's doing something in space, you can see there's a long-term goal there. It can be very much an engineering-driven mission that they have with interesting science kind of bolted on as well. But China's looking to build capabilities. It has a very long-term vision for things it wants to achieve in space? I mean, the lunar mission is, in a sense, the work that's really blown me away. Because, for one thing, I think we have to appreciate that I think the Chinese, and in one instance, the Indians, are the only nations who have successfully put landers on the moon since the Soviets did in the 1970s.

34:28And they've done so with, I think, as you say, there's a lot of engineering success that's been involved in that. Yeah. So for China and India, demonstrating you can land, you can sample, you can rove on the moon was part of them building their overall space ecosystem. But what's happened in parallel is very much a global reignition of interest in the moon and just happens to be that China is in a very good position to build on what it's already done at the moon at this moment. i i'm struck by the difference that whenever nasa does anything they invite the world's press there they have 10 experts mission leaders on hand to answer questions there's a huge fandango placed around it internally in china even you know is how do they publicize this work to their own people yeah it's a very good question what we see with china is that they have a very different information environment than we do in the West.

35:31So in the West, these missions being put together by taxpayers' money, I mean, there is a level of transparency and communication which is required. In China, there is not quite that relationship. So the space program is kind of a national treasure in China, which on one hand, they want to promote and highlight just what they're achieving. At the same time, they are very sensitive to failure. So what they prefer to do is keep everything under wraps as much as possible until the point of success at which point then they can publicize everything and and show off as it were that was very much the soviet model as well wasn't it in the 60s and 70s you know hide hide the the problems yeah it's just that scientists for example would be much more open to talking explain why this is important for example but at higher levels in terms of what information is published and why.

36:29That seems to be, you know, a mismatch in terms of how much information should be out there, who is free to speak and when and so on. So it's just a very much more controlled information environment. So, yeah, there might be people higher up who are just, you know, just want to be careful with what gets put out there. There's that paradox again, this apparent reluctance to more enthusiastically trumpet these ambitious space programmes, which sits oddly with me as a science journalist, used to the sometimes over-the-top announcements made by NASA. So what's that about? There's a sense, I think, that the leaders there are buttoned up in a way their Western counterparts avoid, and also a sense it points to continuing cultural or political differences in the approach to science.

37:15And that leads to something we can't ignore if we're going to speak about China's burgeoning scientific achievements, because it does also perhaps fuel an undertone of mistrust with what goes on in Chinese institutions. Concerns about openness were fuelled only recently in another important cutting-edge branch of science, genomics and genetic medicine, where there is a lot of global competition. We learned, only last month thanks to an expose by an organisation called Retraction Watch with the global publication Science Magazine of a child who died in Shanghai following experimental gene therapy.

37:55I think this is a failure of duty of care where ambitious scientists exploited the desperation of vulnerable parents. This is Joy Zhang of the University of Kent in the UK who studies the ethics of biological research and who is shocked to read the details of the failed gene experiment while travelling in China. The case concerned a six-year-old girl being identified as Mei, meaning beautiful, to protect her and her parents' anonymity. Her cells carried a genetic error which was seriously affecting her mental development. Watching our child suffer every day is the most painful ordeal for us as parents.

38:37Her father wrote to neuroscientist Dr. Zhilong Chou at Shanghai Jiao Tong University and also associated with Xinhua Hospital in the city, top institutions with a global reputation. The parents were looking for help, but the treatment Mae received from Dr. Chou led to her death, which was kept secret until revealed by the journalists at Retraction Watch and Science. When the story broke out, I was actually traveling for conferences and my phone started to buzz. It actually all from my Chinese colleagues and friends. And some of them are not working in the life science realm, and many of them are not even academics.

39:16But they were all very surprised and shocked and quite angry about this story. And this is how I realized how deeply hurtful this case is actually to the general Chinese public. I say hurtful, because I think for everyday Chinese citizens, this is, Shanghai Jiao Chong University is very reputable, and Xinhua Hospital is a name that's very well recognized, and it's conducted by a scientist who is also a kind of public science communicator who has actively promoted public knowledge on autism. So you're talking about someone who has a very strong public profile and an institution who has a very robust reputation up to now.

40:07So you're talking about the significant betrayal of public trust. You know, for ordinary citizens, if we cannot trust a well-established institution such as in this story, then who can we turn to and who can we rely on? This is quite a reversal of the expectations of ethical behaviour that have been built in recent years in China. The approach Dr Xilong Cho used in the attempt to treat Mei is called base editing. It's an approach to altering individual letters in the genetic code, which was developed in the United States in just the last decade by Harvard biologist David Liu. It has already been successfully used to treat other genetic conditions, though not the one suffered by Mei.

40:51Cho allegedly persuaded May's parents to support his experimental programme to develop a base editing protocol for May and then to test it first in mice and monkeys which led to a paper he submitted to Nature, one of the world's most important science publications and then it was while that was being considered by the famous journal the team went on to treat May herself with disastrous consequences as her body reacted against the gene therapy. So what went wrong along the way? Joy Zhang fears that regulations that are notionally in place to protect patients in experimental procedures like this had become overridden in this highly competitive field.

41:36This is something you can see in Chiu's own narrative, how he compared himself to David Liu and how he compared his own research with David Liu's research. And I think in one of the Chinese reports, it says he has told the girl's parents that he's the only other person in the world that can command base editing as well as David Liu. And I think that that kind of competitive mentality is quite clear. I mean, it's an interesting point. The best scientists are going to be competitive and you want them to have ambition. So that's the bit which I find quite interesting. And this wouldn't apply only to China, how you encourage innovation, but at the same time, make it as safe as you can.

42:19That's right. But I think in this case, this idea of having a paper published in one of the top scientific journals, that itself is seen as way too important. And so I think this is where you see the competitiveness have disoriented the researchers, again, sense of duty of care, which should be the basis of all professional ethics. But I guess the issue for me is that Chinese bioscience did have this reputation, unfairly maybe, but for being reckless sometimes. The wild east of medical research was a phrase that was used. There has been this sort of big effort to impose ethical rules to constrain ambitious researchers and prevent these kinds of outcomes.

43:04But did the rules fail? I don't really think the rule is the problem. It is not so much about lack of rule or that the rule are not well designed. It's really about enforcement, about who can actually implement these rules. What is particularly weak in China, it is ethic committee's actual power. So it's not so much that people sitting on their ethic committee don't know about the subject or that they don't have procedure or knowledge in place to make the right decision. This is a perfect case to demonstrate that a very sound, a solid ethic committee decision has been made, yet it had no impact on the research experiment.

43:47And I think this is a chronical problem that China has faced. Reports since of a second death of a child following experimental genetic treatment for another condition will have done nothing to assuage fears about the state of regulation in China. Though, as ethicists keep repeating, there is always a degree of risk with these first-of-a-kind therapies wherever they're done. Trust is a key factor for science and if failures like these undermine public trust in the institutions that could be a hurdle to the growth of Chinese science. But trust at the international level is important too and the rapid rise of science in China has come at an interesting time with the US administration increasingly focusing on America first policies.

44:34And particularly, there's a growing suspicion of China's motives there. Several scientists, many of them Chinese heritage and some of them connected to China's Thousand Talent recruitment program, have been charged, often unsuccessfully, for alleged acts of espionage or research misconduct. That's had a chilling effect. The current American administration promotes the notion that Chinese virologists were responsible for the COVID pandemic and it has taken several measures to bar collaboration with Chinese institutions and there'd already been a sharp decline in the number of US-China science projects since a peak in 2020.

45:15China has become a science superpower and there'd been an expectation it could collaborate with the other science superpower of the USA and find answers to important questions by working together. One reason for the rise of Chinese science has been a political system that has provided long-term planning and strategic investments in projects and in people. But, says cultural commentator Yang Yang Cheng, researchers in China do still have to negotiate political restraints, even if they're different from previous decades. I wouldn't say that Chinese scientists are simply free to do their work without political constraints.

45:52The political environment is indeed strict and still tightening. However, it is different from that very ideological environment in the Mao era. And I think some of the areas that face the most political restraints in the physical and natural sciences is in terms of international collaborations. In China, one is only allowed to collaborate with international partners if the state allows you to, right? It is never like one is free to pursue it, and then the state may rein you in. I mean, there's an interesting thing that what we've noticed in trying to put this program together is that people who were talking to us a couple of years ago, who were very keen to have us visit them, are not replying to their emails right now.

46:45And there's a sense that it's very conditional, the kinds of cooperation you get. I think it comes at different levels. I think for the humanities and social sciences, of course, it has always been because the fields are seen as ideological and the Chinese state has always placed quite strict restrictions on them. But in the physical sciences that sometimes can carry an image of being somewhat technical or even apolitical, though I would dispute that it is different on a broader level is that the Chinese government has become more stringent, in some degrees also more paranoid, and that in some ways echo or mirror development here in the US in terms of international exchange and collaboration.

47:31So there is a broader restriction in terms of the exchange of people, goods and ideas across borders. So that overall tightening, of course, would be reflected in scientific research and education as well. And then there are certain fields where when you say it's conditional, right, if the Chinese government believes that international education and exchange are beneficial to the development of this field in China, then it would grant these permissions to allow certain degrees of exchange. However, if the field is seen as strategically important and opening up would bring more risks than closing it down.

48:09Then we see very tight controls. I mean, does this caution hold back what China could be doing? I think this is an interesting question because I do not like the terminology holding back. And then China has indeed become a scientific and technological superpower. It has its own domestic capacity. So if it does not exchange or collaborate as much with some of its geopolitical arrivals, for example, in the United States, does it mean that certain fields would develop slower? Maybe, maybe not. But I think what is more important than speed is the trajectory. And I think what has been happening in terms of US-China scientific and technological rivalry is that it has altered the trajectory of science and technology development, of what kind of scientific progress are being prioritised, are being pursued, and how the results are being utilised.

49:07And I think that is a more important shift rather than who is doing something faster, right? Of course, exchange is beneficial to the global scientific enterprise, but I think a lack of exchange is not simply about slowing down, but about changing trajectories. But in what direction? What has been clear is there's been a shift in the centre of gravity of where science is being done. As we've seen in this programme, through determined efforts, China has built an impressive scientific base, able to take on the hardest experiments in particle physics to challenge NASA in the 21st century space race, to compete at the frontiers of bioscience.

49:47But of course, there will be areas of research where national security for any country places limits on how scientists research their work. But outside that, will a resurgent China be fully welcomed into the international fabric of science research? Will China want to make that move? Right now it's not clear. Experience would suggest scientific progress would benefit. But maybe there's too much political suspicion for that to happen yet. But for the individual scientist eager to unpick the universe, perhaps neuroscientist Chen Jianli, who you heard in part one of the programme, can speak for them.

50:27As comfortable in a California university as a Beijing one, he feels the spirit of researchers across the world. There was a poem by a poet, a very famous one. It's called Asking a Question to Heaven, called Tianwen. He basically lists all the curious questions why there's a logic where did the world come from you know in beautiful poetry i just think for every kid there is a curious things like how the hell that works and it doesn't take a genius to feel that way it takes a bad system to kill that one no no no as long as there's a little bit of leeway the shackle is loosened a little the natural curiosity is coming up again.

51:21So I think that speaks to my hope and belief that there is a common humanity that we can still build on. And I hope the world is not coming up with a nuclear war solution, but better ones. Let's see how we can cure diseases. Let's see how we can harness the sun energy. And hopefully, but maybe I'm just too naive. You've been listening to the documentary from the BBC World Service presented by me, Roland Pease. The producer was Alex Mansfield.

From the publisher

Roland Pease explores how decades of strategic investment and diligent educational reform have brought China to the brink of global scientific dominance. As the world’s other scientific superpowers seemingly retreat from their historical high ground, how has China achieved such remarkable progress, both in applied and fundamental sciences? And what might that mean for the rest of us?

Image: A humanoid robot competes in the 1500m final at the inaugural World Humanoid Robot Games, at the National Speed Skating Oval in Beijing, China on 15 August 2025 (Credit: Tingshu Wan/Reuters)

More from The Documentary Podcast

All 509 episodes
China: The rise of a science superpowerThe Documentary Podcast · 49 min
Listen in VO