The future of ultrafast materials and devices

5 Jun 2026 · 37 min · 18 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Ultrafast, non-equilibrium materials and devices—how measuring atomic-scale dynamics (femtosecond “snapshots” and “movies”) reveals speed/energy/reliability trade-offs and guides better solar cells, batteries, and electronics.

Guest backgrounds

Aaron Lindenberg is a Stanford professor of materials science and photon science. He was trained in physics and was inspired by structural/dynamic biology problems like hemoglobin/myoglobin studied via X-ray diffraction (Max Perutz).

Key claims

(1) Many devices rely on dynamic, non-equilibrium materials. (2) Ultra-fast X-ray tools (e.g., at SLAC) enable observing atomic motion and electronic/ion flow on femtosecond–picosecond timescales. (3) Fundamental limits link switching speed, energy dissipation, and reliability; Landauer limit sets an energy floor, but today’s devices are far above it. (4) Nanoscale randomness/stochasticity and heterogeneity mean averages can miss important dynamics. (5) AI can provide real-time feedback from diffraction data and optimize control waveforms to minimize energy.

Notable examples

hemoglobin oxygen binding as a dynamic-structure lesson; solar-cell photon absorption creating excited electrons that must be extracted before relaxing into heat; energy-barrier crossing with stochastic lattice reconstruction; AI for optimizing voltage waveforms.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Introduction to Aaron Lindenberg

0:45 to 1:09

Overview of guest Aaron Lindenberg's expertise in ultrafast materials.

“So if you want to make a device out of a material, you have to understand how electrons and ions flow through these structures.”

Understanding Materials and Their Dynamics

1:09 to 2:00

Discussion on the impact of materials in technology and the importance of dynamic materials.

“If you're enjoying the show, please share it with somebody you care about.”

The Importance of Measuring Materials

2:00 to 3:02

Insights into measurement technologies that enhance understanding of materials.

“Well, materials are literally what makes the world around us.”

Aaron’s Journey into Material Science

3:02 to 5:13

Aaron shares his origin story and how his background in physics influenced his work.

“and he studies materials at the highest speeds and in the smallest scales in order to understand how they work.”

Goals of Material Science

5:13 to 6:34

Exploration of the fundamental and applied questions in material science.

“So that was kind of how I got really excited, not just about material science, but also about kind of the dynamics of how materials move at the atomic scale.”

Advancements in Measurement Techniques

6:34 to 8:06

Discussion of new tools for measuring material dynamics at atomic scales.

“And I know that part of what's exciting in your field right now is kind of an unbelievable ability to measure and see atoms like at the atomic level.”

Understanding Fast Timescales in Materials

8:06 to 10:23

Explaining the significance of ultrafast timescales in atomic movements.

“And then more recently, and this is where I kind of started out as a grad student, really exciting new tools have been developed.”

Experimentation Techniques in Material Science

10:23 to 12:54

Insight into the experimental methods used to study materials at the atomic level.

“So on these, so let's talk about the snapshots and the actual experiments that you do.”

Fundamental Speed Limits in Electronics

12:54 to 14:00

Discussion on the speed limits of materials and their implications for technology.

“single nanocrystal, a single quantum dot in the focus of this beam and essentially taking a snapshot at the nanoscale of this evolving object.”

Understanding Speed Limits in Computing

14:00 to 16:10

Explore the theoretical developments in speed limits of computing devices.

“How fast can you, you know, we oftentimes encode a zero or a one in a device by the position of an atom within the unit cell.”
Show all 18 chapters

Energy Costs and Efficiency in Devices

16:10 to 18:48

Learn about the energy costs associated with computing devices and potential improvements.

“So, you know, a typical, you know, a typical computer, you know, might operate at gigahertz like frequencies, right?”

Trade-offs Between Speed and Energy in Technology

18:48 to 21:10

Discover the intrinsic trade-offs between speed and energy costs in computer operations.

“And actually, one other interesting point.”

Solar Cells and Their Atomic Properties

21:47 to 24:25

Examine how solar cells convert light to electricity and the importance of atomic-level processes.

“In this segment, I'm going to ask Aaron about simple things like solar cells, randomness, and how AI is helping him in his work.”

Role of Randomness in Material Efficiency

24:25 to 28:05

Understand the role of randomness and stochasticity in the efficiency of materials.

“And once it's turned into heat, now suddenly this is a form of energy that is hard to use for performing work from a thermodynamics perspective.”

Understanding Material Fluctuations

28:05 to 29:53

Learn about the complexities of material behavior at the nanoscale.

“They're fluctuating and vibrating in really kind of complex random ways.”

Heterogeneity in Materials

29:53 to 31:05

Explore the concept of heterogeneity and its implications in material science.

“it brings us to this idea as we often use the word heterogeneity.”

AI's Role in Material Research

31:05 to 32:27

Discover how AI is revolutionizing experiments in material science.

“And these images are kind of coming in at very high rates.”

Future in a Minute: Insights and Hopes

32:27 to 36:12

Get quick insights into the future of science and technology from the guest.

“Yeah, that strikes me as a good match because the optimal waveform, as you say, might be an incredibly weird looking waveform, right?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This is Stanford Engineering's The Future of Everything, and I'm your host, Russ Altman. Since we started this show eight years ago, it's become an archive of amazing and impactful work by my Stanford colleagues. Research is not something that just happens in the lab, and as you'll hear on this show, the research at Stanford can impact areas like health, technology, law, and business, and many other topics that can affect everyday life. We hope you'll tune in to learn more about how research has the potential to help your life and to help the lives of people you care about in your family and your community.

0:32At its basis, we're interested as a material scientist in understanding how materials work, in understanding where the atoms are, where the electrons are, and then at this microscopic level how this amazing complexity leads to functionality. So if you want to make a device out of a material, you have to understand how electrons and ions flow through these structures. And if you can do this, then you can start to kind of harness these kind of fundamental processes and make devices like solar cells or batteries, things like that.

1:08This is Stanford Engineering's The Future of Everything, and I'm your host, Russ Altman. If you're enjoying the show, please share it with somebody you care about. Personal recommendations are one of the best ways to spread news about the show. Today, Aaron Lindenberg will tell us that there's a fundamental trade-off in atomic processes between their speed, the energy it takes to make them go, and the reliability of their output. It's the future of ultra-fast materials. Before we get started, a reminder that we have the future in a minute. At the end of this conversation, I'll ask Aaron some quick questions.

1:42He'll give me some quick answers. It'll be the future in a minute. Before we get started, another reminder to please share the show with somebody you care about who would benefit from knowing about the future of everything.

2:00Well, materials are literally what makes the world around us. In particular, electronics, optics, batteries, power. These are key materials that fuel our technology that we all have become totally dependent on. A key idea is that these materials are often what we call non-equilibrium or dynamic. That is to say, at the atomic level, these materials change in response to processes. So for example, a proton, a ray of light, hits a material in a solar cell and it turns that dynamically into electricity. That's distinguished from equilibrium materials where they're resistant to change and actually they don't change when you give them inputs and sometimes that's a positive as well.

2:47But for most of electronics, we're looking at non-equilibrium or dynamic materials. And our ability to understand these materials has become revolutionized by our ability to measure them and look at them on ultra-fast timescales. Well, Aaron Lindenberg is a professor of material science and photon science at Stanford University, and he studies materials at the highest speeds and in the smallest scales in order to understand how they work. Aaron will tell us how these measurement technologies are enabling new understanding that promises to increase our ability to create better and better materials.

3:26So, Aaron, to start out, how did you decide to work in this area of material science, which we'll get to? Yeah, actually, my background is in physics. and actually, you know, one of, sometimes you learn, you have experiences where, you know, they kind of imprint on your brain and they kind of change how you think about things. So for me, actually in grad school, I remember really clearly actually learning about a problem in biology, actually. So this is not material science, but this was kind of what got me on this path. And it was a problem about how hemoglobin and myoglobin work and how they carry oxygen through the human body.

4:06And so this was a problem where people used these amazing techniques called X-ray diffraction to kind of make images of where the atoms were in this kind of amazingly complicated crystal. And when, so Max Perutz was the guy who kind of did this and won the Nobel Prize back in the 1960s, I think, for this. And I met Max, I met Max before he died as an undergraduate it and it was a huge thrill. Yeah. So the story, at least as I learned it, was that when he made this picture of this kind of molecule, it was so complicated and the structure was so unbelievably complex that there was no way that the oxygen atom could kind of migrate through this complex structure and bind to this central heme group.

4:51And so on the one hand, they had this idea that if you could understand the structure of something, then this would allow you to understand how it functions and all kinds of things like that. And rather, in this case, it created a mystery. And what people eventually realized was that this molecule was dynamic. It was opening up in this amazingly complex way to allow the oxygen to come in. So that was kind of how I got really excited, not just about material science, but also about kind of the dynamics of how materials move at the atomic scale. Great. That's a great origin story. And as somebody who studies biology, it's great to know that we can spawn great physics, great material sciences work.

5:33So for people who don't think about material science all the time, can you just give us like a little thumbnail sketch of what is the goals of material science and particularly from your perspective and the problems that you're working on, kind of getting us to what are the big questions that like motivate your lab? Yeah, it's it's I would say it's it's a question. There's a lot of fundamental science that goes into it, just asking really fundamental questions. And then also there are a lot of kind of really technologically relevant applied questions that come into it. At its basis, we're interested as a material scientist in understanding how materials work, in understanding where the atoms are, where the electrons are, and then at this microscopic level, how this amazing complexity leads to functionality.

6:24So if you want to make a device out of these things, out of a material, right, you have to understand how electrons and ions flow through these structures. And if you can do this, then you can start to kind of harness these kind of fundamental processes and, you know, make devices like solar cells or batteries, things like that. So that's great. And I know that part of what's exciting in your field right now is kind of an unbelievable ability to measure and see atoms like at the atomic level. You described this challenge of understanding hemoglobin, and it sounds like the technology has really advanced.

7:02And so can you paint a picture for like the kind of power tools that you now have at your disposal that enable super detailed understanding of what's going on in materials? Yeah, right. A lot of it actually, in some sense, connects to this original hemoglobin problem, right? So this was the way that Max made these measurements in the end, Max Perutz made these measurements was by using x-ray scattering approaches. So they took an X-ray beam, which is essentially a beam of light with very, very short wavelength, wavelength comparable to the spacing between atoms, and essentially bounced it off of a crystal of these things.

7:42And by measuring the diffraction pattern, which is essentially an interference effect, the beams of light kind of scatter off of each of the individual atoms and create interference effects in the same way that you see interference effects when you, you know, look at light, you know, reflecting off of a puddle on the ground or when you look at light reflecting off of a DVD or something like that. So essentially, by making these types of measurements, you could kind of work backwards and reconstruct where the individual atoms were in the structure. And then more recently, and this is where I kind of started out as a grad student, really exciting new tools have been developed.

8:24Some of them just up the road from Stanford at the SLAC National Accelerator Lab. And these are tools which allow one to do this type of experiment. but not just measure the structure, but measure the dynamics of this process, how it's changing on amazingly fast timescales. And sometimes people have the sense that these very fast timescales are things that are maybe not that important to our everyday lives, but really materials, when you zoom in on them, the atoms are moving on amazingly fast timescales, So this is great. So give us a sense, because I know a little bit about this, and it gets hard to think about things being so fast.

9:06So can you lay the landscape for somebody who doesn't think about this all the time, about exactly how fast we're doing it, maybe in comparison to other phenomenon that they might be roughly familiar with? Yeah. Yeah. One way it's oftentimes described is that, so I mentioned one femtosecond, so that's 10 to the minus 15 seconds. And so, you know, one way to think about is that one femtosecond is to one second as one second is to something like the age of the universe. so that's just one way to kind of you know appreciate it how short this time scale is it's really beyond the human mind to kind of comprehend it in some sense but nonetheless materials are moving on on these types of these types of time scales and so it's a challenge you know for the you know because in the same way that if you take a picture of something you know and the object is moving very, very, very fast, it will be blurred out and you'll get a blurry image.

10:04You know, people develop flash photography as a way to kind of get around this, right? And so this kind of illuminates the object for a very short amount of time and allows you to take a snapshot of this process. That's kind of how what we're doing in a lot of these experiments. We're kind of taking snapshots of these structures as they evolve on these very short timescales. So on these, so let's talk about the snapshots and the actual experiments that you do. So you get a piece of material that you find interesting, I guess, right? Is this a tabletop measurement device or is this a huge device?

10:38And how do you and your students and your other research collaborators, how do these experiments actually get done? And what are the readouts that you then analyze? There's a lot of different kind of approaches to this. Some of them are really tabletop type experiments where you can, you know, a single student can really get to work and in a day, you know, make a snapshot of these types of things. You know, when you start to push the length scales, when you start to really want to zoom in at the atomic scale, we tend to often make use of the larger scale facilities. So I mentioned the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

11:16this is a multiple kilometer linear accelerator that, you know, was originally built for kind of particle physics type experiments and has been kind of repurposed over the last few decades. And now it's essentially a source that allows one to create bursts of x-rays to do exactly these types of, this type of flash photography. And if I understand, you're not just taking so called still photographs, you're also making movies. So tell us how we make the movies, But more importantly, like what can we learn from a movie that you might not get from a still photo? Yeah. Yeah. So so the way essentially you make a movie in the same way that when we you know, you make a movie in, you know, that, you know, that you watch at the movie theater.

12:02Right. Essentially, it's a whole bunch of still photos put together in a way that's sequenced such that when you kind of run them from one to the next, you you turn this into a real movie that captures some dynamical process. And who are the actors in these movies? Are you looking at like an individual carbon or oxygen molecule, Adam? Or are you looking at the electrons? I mean, how fine grain are these photos? Excuse the extended analogy. sometimes we're looking at uh this this might be a crystal like in the in the example of hemoglobin this were this was many many copies you know something like 10 to the 23 copies of these kind of individual molecules all kind of locked you know together to form an overall kind of periodic crystal that you know you could see with your own eyes uh but more and more people are kind of pushing to do these measurements at the nanoscale where you might imagine you know for example a single nanocrystal, a single quantum dot in the focus of this beam and essentially taking a snapshot at the nanoscale of this evolving object.

13:08Great, great. Okay, so we have a, this gives us, I think, a really good, it took some time, but it's important to have this groundwork on what your capabilities are. And so I guess the next question is, what are the kinds of questions you ask? I know just, I'm intrigued because you've had, you've made statements about, we're looking at the fundamental speed limits for some kind of electronic or optical devices. That sounds important to me. So maybe let's start. Tell me about speed limits. Right. Yeah, this is something that has motivated us for a long time. And it's actually, again, one of these problems that is really interesting from a fundamental perspective and also, as you mentioned, has a lot of really important kind of problems in technology.

13:52So from a fundamental perspective, you know, this comes down to questions like, like, how fast can you switch a material? How fast can you, you know, we oftentimes encode a zero or a one in a device by the position of an atom within the unit cell. And so you could ask questions like, how fast can you really switch that structure, right? This defines in the end, speed limits that, you know, define how fast a computer can, can operate or how fast a device can, can function. And it turns out there's been a lot of kind of really interesting and amazing kind of theoretical developments as well over the last couple of years.

14:32Essentially, people trying to take ideas that in high school and kind of early in college, you learn thermodynamics, which is the kind of a way of thinking about processes at equilibrium. And so it's only very recently that people have been able to kind of extend those ideas to non-equilibrium processes where there's dissipation, where energy is lost in these processes. And so these types of snapshot experiments that we apply can let us get a handle on these things, visualize these processes. And then the next important step, and this is, again, where we're really excited, is kind of thinking about controlling these processes, right?

15:13So if you can see these processes in interesting ways, then you can start to think about, well, how can I engineer this process? Is there a way for me to control how I switch a material from a zero to a one state in a way that minimizes the energy cost or maximizes the speed by which it occurs? So I don't know if this is a fair question, but with respect to speed limits of things like computers, are we at a position where you can tell me that we are pushing up against it and that the last 40, 50 years of speed ups that you and I have experienced just as a human in our electronic devices, is that era coming to an end or do you see plenty of headway so that, yeah, of course there are physical limits, but we have not gotten anywhere close to them.

15:58What's the general sense? It's quite interesting. We're many, many orders of magnitude away in both speed, in both the speed limits and in the energy costs. So, you know, a typical, you know, a typical computer, you know, might operate at gigahertz like frequencies, right? That's 10 to the 9 kind of operations per second, right? And there are processes that I was talking about, you know, essentially that are related to kind of really fundamental processes and how you encode information in an information storage device where you could push this to picoseconds, 10 to the minus 12 instead of 10 to the minus 9.

16:39So that's 1 ,000 times faster right there. 1 ,000 times faster, yeah. And then energy, I mentioned, is also in some sense even more important in this age of AI and so on, right? Server farms. Server farms, right, are equivalent of a nuclear reactor in terms of energy costs, right? And so you can ask, again, this question of how much energy do you really need to make a single operation, like a single transistor? Imagine zooming into your computer and saying, well, how much energy do I really need to kind of switch that transistor? And it turns out, again, in this case, we are many, many orders of magnitude away from the kind of fundamental limits.

17:22It turns out people actually, at least for an equilibrium process, kind of understand pretty well what that kind of fundamental limit is. It's something something called the Landauer limit. And it essentially kind of encodes the kind of fundamental amount of energy you need to kind of erase a one or, you know, take a one and transition it into a zero. And it turns out that the energy costs that that we're at, you can put some numbers on these things, actually. Right. You know, people are pushing a lot, talking about something called at the AttoJoule frontier, which is where you're trying to. Yes.

17:58Atto is ATTO, right? ATTO. And it's even smaller than Pico. Even smaller than Pico, even smaller than Femto, right? This is 10 to the minus 18 joules. That's one AttoJoule. Right. And so, you know, people are there's a lot of excitement about making devices that operate with energy costs associated with that type of that type of dissipation. of dissipation. Um, and it turns out that the fundamental limits defined by the land hour limit are something like 10 to the minus 21 joules, right? So this is a Zeptojoule actually, if there's a word for you. Okay. So if I'm, if I'm, if I'm hearing you correctly, this is super good news because it means that, uh, these server farms, uh, they, they might not, I mean, it's not tomorrow.

18:41I understand that this is basic discovery and there's always time to translate it into devices and capabilities for engineers. But we have plenty of headroom. Again, just as you were talking about speed, we also have energy efficiency opportunities that indicate we should not give up on very, very low energy versions of the kinds of things that right now we have big batteries or big server farms that there's a lot of potential. That's right. And actually, one other interesting point. It turns out these things are interconnected. These ideas of speed and energy costs are really kind of interlinked in really interesting ways.

19:20Like one of the reasons why we're kind of in terms of these energy costs, not at these kind of fundamental limits, it turns out is because computers are intrinsically dynamical things like we're talking about. They're non equilibrium processes. You know, computers are not quasi static in the way that we kind of think about thermodynamics is kind of applied on an equilibrium process. And so when you try to make processes happen dynamically over very, very fast timescales, it turns out you need to put more and more energy into them to drive. And the faster you want to go, the more energy you need to dissipate.

19:57And so there's an intrinsic kind of trade-off between these things that is really interesting. So should we think of it as a speed energy trade-off? Is that basically the trade-off what's happening. Well, you sometimes call it, there's a kind of a speed kind of time uncertainty principle in some sense that kind of encodes. Okay. So that's good though, because once that trade-off, once we have it all under control, there are things that we don't need to be fast, but we need to be efficient. And there are other things like our phone calls or whatever that we need to be fast, but perhaps we would be willing to pay a price in efficiency.

20:34Exactly. That's right. And then another thing that comes up often is reliability, right? You know, when you store information, you want that to be stable. So when you save a photo of your kids and you want to go back and look at it 10 years from now, it better be there, right? It would be nice. Right. And so this aspect of reliability also is encoded in this kind of tradeoff. You can make things less reliable, but then maybe switch and operate more fast. Or you can make them more reliable, but maybe then there are more energy costs associated with them. This is the Future of Everything with Russ Altman.

21:12We'll have more with Aaron Lindenberg next.

21:29welcome back to the future of everything i'm russ altman and i'm speaking with aaron lindenberg from stanford university in the first segment we got a little tutorial on our ability to measure the atomic properties of materials with amazing technologies that give us the scale in both space and time that makes very fast processes look slow because the measurements are so fast. In this segment, I'm going to ask Aaron about simple things like solar cells, randomness, and how AI is helping him in his work. Don't forget at the end of the segment, we'll have the future in a minute where I'll ask some quick questions and get some quick answers.

22:09So Aaron, in this section, I wanted to start out with things that people are pretty familiar with batteries, solar cells. what are they to you as you look at them as a material science and what are the opportunities kind of to make to understand them better and then to make them better right yeah so like i mean think about let's take the solar cell as an example right so this is a device which takes photons light from the sun and turns it into electricity right at a fundamental level right uh and uh but if you zoom in if you if you think about you know what's really happening at the atomic scale, you know, and imagine that you have, you know, perfect resolution to see these processes as they unfold, right?

22:51Then what you actually see is something where, you know, maybe a single photon of light is absorbed in the material, silicon or whatever that material is, right? It creates an excited electron. That electron starts to move through the material. it's scattering and bouncing off of atoms within an excited means it has a lot of energy right like it has absorbed all that energy from what the light and now it is um it is not going to just sit there quietly that's right yeah and so in the end of course if you want this device to work you have to take that energy right that energy you've converted that energy from light into electronic right but now it has to make its way out and there has to be a current or a voltage that is developed, right, you know, across two leads to actually power some device, right?

23:40And so it turns out that if you want to understand the ultimate efficiencies of this process, right, like how efficient can you make a solar cell, you know, can you, can, well, the processes that come in here, the time scales and the length scales are amazingly short in time and amazingly small in length scale, right? So on picosecond timescales, this electronic energy, some of that energy is lost as this kind of hot electron kind of relaxes. If you want to kind of capture that energy, then you need to find a way to make that device. You need to find a way to extract that energy on these very short timescales.

24:22Yeah, before it basically just turns into heat. Exactly. And once it's turned into heat, now suddenly this is a form of energy that is hard to use for performing work from a thermodynamics perspective. So in the end, understanding, being able to see these processes allows one to, number one, think about find new materials, work in kind of feedback loops where you can kind of think about a whole bunch of different material systems where you've tuned the properties of the system in different ways and kind of run these kind of operando-like experiments where you kind of see the device as it operates.

25:03You measure these kind of processes at the atomic scale and you measure maybe simultaneously the operation of the solar cell, how much current is actually flowing through the device. And you can kind of start to correlate these things and use this as kind of a design principle to kind of discover new materials, to optimize the performance of the material and so on. Yes. It does remind me of your very first founding example where the oxygen was trying to get through that protein. And now you've drawn a very similar picture in my head where there's this electron and you're trying to kind of channel it with all its other fellow electrons, basically into a stream of electrons that are heading towards presumably some kind of positive charge to create the current.

25:51And I can imagine that different materials would be either better or worse at kind of allowing you to channel those electrons. So you've written about randomness. How does that – so this whole thing seems kind of random, but I think you mean random in a much more kind of theoretically manageable way. So tell me about the role of the randomness in your work. Right. Right. Actually, even taking that same example we just talked about, the solar cell, when that photon gets absorbed in the material and creates electronic excitations, you also, it turns out, drive reconstruction of the lattice. the atoms move around in complicated ways so this is again some materials this is kind of a really important process and people think even that this dynamical motion of the atoms protects and you know makes the material more efficient in interesting ways um and so this is a this is a process that involves kind of um the way the way we think about it in in material science is it's overcoming an energy barrier so there's some there's some kind of energy it's just like when you're kind of climbing a mountain, right?

27:03And there's a mountain in front of you, you kind of have to kind of, you know, try to make your way up. And it takes a lot of work, of course, to kind of overcome that barrier. In the same way at the atomic scale, there are energy costs that are associated with overcoming barriers and switching materials in that way. And this process, it turns out, has a really interesting element of randomness. Sometimes we use the word stochasticity to describe this. And the way we think about this is that the material is kind of, you know, you're maybe trying to take energy from the sun and kind of push this material over this barrier, right?

Read the full transcript

27:39But it's kind of fluctuating and it's, you know, making attempts trying to get over the barrier, but falling back. And so it turns out that at the atomic scale, at the nanoscale, these types of fluctuations become really, really important. In the same way that if you zoom in on a material at room temperature, if you can actually see what the atoms are doing, they're not just sitting there steady. They're fluctuating and vibrating in really kind of complex random ways. And so that randomness and understanding how that plays a role in the efficiency is a really important process. And it's a really challenging problem as well, because when we make these movies, like I was describing, where we kind of make snapshots of many of these processes and put them together, oftentimes we hope to do these measurements in kind of an averaging mode, where you might run the experiment many, many times and take many different snapshots and put them together.

28:42And the assumption that we make when we do those experiments, when you do those experiments, is that kind of the process is kind of always following the same trajectory every time. And this turns out to be a bad approximation. When you zoom in at the nanoscale, these materials are fluctuating. And each time you kind of run a chemical reaction, it might do something different each time. And so how to kind of capture that and deal with that is a really central. Yeah, I find that to be very intuitive, because you'd see these pictures that people take of rivers where they leave the camera on for a long time and the river looks like this beautifully smooth like flow of water but anybody who's actually watched a river in detail sees that there's all of these eddies and there's all these other motions and and what i'm hearing you say is you need to capture those uh and and now we can see why we're going back to these ultra fast movies and pictures that you're able to take because i'm get i'm gathering that it actually is within range to get these kinds of photos, so to speak, to understand that randomness and how you can kind of harness it, or at least distinguish between materials whose randomness seems to be more favorable for the application at hand versus ones that are actually fighting it too much.

29:52Right. The river example is a really good one, actually, because it also gives you, it brings us to this idea as we often use the word heterogeneity. So materials are heterogeneous in the sense that if you look at different parts of the material, different parts look different, right? There's defects, there are all kinds of kind of complexities, and you can't kind of just assume that everything is doing the same thing and everything, you know, when you make these kinds of averages, you lose information about the dynamics in the same way that a river has this amazing complexity. So in the last couple of minutes, I just wanted to ask you about AI.

30:29I also know from your work that your group does use AI. And I'm wondering, what has the impact been? Is it a significant impact or is it somewhat peripheral to the work? And what are the opportunities? Are you bullish? Yeah, I think it's a really exciting time. And there's no question that there are ways in which AI is going to play a really central role. I talked about these diffraction experiments, for example, where you bounce a beam of x-rays off of material This creates an amazingly complex pattern on a detector that we measure. And these images are kind of coming in at very high rates. It's a massive data problem just to kind of analyze these images.

31:17And so people are thinking a lot about how to use AI to kind of provide kind of real-time feedback on an experiment, right? Where you might, as you're running the experiment, get some feedback, which allows you to change some parameter as you kind of develop a new material or as you kind of build a new device. So there's a lot of excitement there. Another interesting example is in this idea of control of a process that I talked about previously. Yes. We're thinking a lot about ways in which we can, for example, we're trying to measure some device as it operates. We apply some voltage waveform, some voltage switch that switches the material.

32:02And you can think of lots of different kind of waveforms. The question is, what is the optimal one that minimizes the energy cost? like we were talking about before. I see. And so this is, again, a problem where you're searching through this massive phase space of possibilities. It's totally unobvious what the optimal kind of protocol is. And so AI, we think, can help us to kind of solve these types of engineering problems. Yeah, that strikes me as a good match because the optimal waveform, as you say, might be an incredibly weird looking waveform, right? It might not be a sine or a cosine. It's just some crazy.

32:38And that's the kind of thing that AI can patiently try different options and tune and say, okay, here's the one. It looks random, but this is the one that might work. And it complements human capabilities where we're not always the best at thinking of crazy shapes. Yep, that's exactly right. Fantastic. Well, that's great and that's exciting. And before we end our conversation, I wanted to move to our segment that we call the future in a minute. And this is just where I ask you kind of five straightforward questions and you give me kind of short answers. And I'm wondering if you're ready for the future in a minute.

33:13Let's begin. OK, let's do it. First question. What is one thing that gives you the most hope about the future? I think for me, a lot of it is about the really exciting opportunities kind of at the boundaries of fundamental and applied science. There's really exciting opportunities that can make our world a better place. And then maybe another quick answer to that, if I'm allowed, is my experience kind of working with young people on these projects. These are kind of amazingly collaborative projects. And so seeing them in action also gives me a lot of hope for the future. What's one thing you want people to walk away from this episode remembering?

33:56Probably the importance of non-equilibrium science. the importance of really seeing things at the atomic scale and how they dynamically evolve and how this is a really important problem that can affect our everyday lives. Aside from money, what is one thing that you need for your research to succeed? There's probably a few things. One is being stubborn, you know, kind of being really having the courage to kind of take on really challenging problems and not giving up in the face of experiments always fail and being able to push through these. And then the other really important aspect of doing science is about kind of the collaborative nature of it, right?

34:43And all the experiments that I talked about here involved a huge number of people and would have been impossible without this kind of collaborative atmosphere. If all goes well, what does the future look like? I think an opportunity that I would be excited about if all goes well is people thinking about problems in a scientific perspective. So if we could, you know, science and actually when I say that, I don't mean thinking about things in a cold, logical kind of way all the time, but kind of approaching problems and thinking creatively about them. Um, um, if, if, if people could approach this kind of way of thinking, uh, then I think I would be optimistic about the future.

35:31If you were starting over again and you needed to get your degree or certification in a different discipline, what would that be? There's a few things that come to mind. Um, one, maybe neuroscience. Um, I've always been excited about the brain and how this works and the complexity and actually the dynamics that underlies it. Pretty complicated material. Pretty complicated material. And then another example might be music, actually. Music is also something that's really central to my life. And actually, I think a lot about the parallels between doing science and playing in a band. There's kind of amazing collaborative types of work.

36:06You have to work with other people in ways to creatively make progress on something. Thanks to Aaron Lindenberg. That was the future of Ultra Fast Materials. Thank you for listening to the show. Your ratings and reviews help inform the community and get people on board with the future of everything. So if you haven't yet, please rate the podcast. We'd love to get a 5.0 if we deserve it. We don't want too much grade inflation. Or write a review telling us what we've done well and maybe where we could improve. We read every comment that you make and we care deeply about those. Thanks so much. Thanks for tuning into this episode.

36:45Don't forget, we have more than 300 episodes in our back catalog. So you can really spend quite a bit of time pondering the future of anything. You can connect with me on many social media, including LinkedIn, Threads, Blue Sky and Mastodon, where I'm at RB Altman or at Rustby Altman. You can also follow Stanford School of Engineering at Stanford School of Engineering or more easily at Stanford ENG.

37:16If you'd like to ask a question about this episode or a previous episode, please email us a written question or a voice memo question. We might feature it in a future episode. You can send it to thefutureofeverything at stanford.edu. All one word, the future of everything. No spaces, no underscores, no dashes. the future of everything at stanford.edu. Thanks again for tuning in. We hope you're enjoying the podcast.

From the publisher

Engineer Aaron Lindenberg is an expert in the ways atoms and electrons move through materials. He uses X-ray “flash photography” to make movies of atoms moving at ultrafast speeds to predict the fundamental limits of electronics in future consumer devices, solar cells, and AI chips. He estimates we are “many orders of magnitude away” from the physical limits of both speed and energy efficiency in our electronics. Today’s computers are at least a thousand times slower than they could be, Lindenberg tells host Russ Altman on this episode of Stanford Engineering’s The Future of Everything podcast.

Have a question for Russ? Send it our way in writing or via voice memo, and it might be featured on an upcoming episode. Please introduce yourself, let us know where you're listening from, and share your question. You can send questions to thefutureofeverything@stanford.edu.

Episode Reference Links:

Connect With Us:

Chapters:

(00:00:00) Introduction

Russ Altman introduces guest Aaron Lindenberg, a professor of Material Science & Photon Science at Stanford University.

(00:03:26) Path into Materials Science

How a biology problem inspired Lindenberg’s interest in atomic-scale dynamics.

(00:05:34) What Materials Scientists Study

Understanding how atoms, electrons, and ions create useful material properties.

(00:06:44) Seeing Atoms in Motion

How X-ray scattering and diffraction reveal atomic structure and dynamics.

(00:08:59) Femtosecond Timescales

Why ultra-fast measurements are needed to capture atomic motion.

(00:10:25) Making Atomic Movies

How researchers use snapshots to study materials as they change.

(00:13:08) Speed Limits in Materials

What determines how fast a material can switch between states.

(00:15:32) Faster and More Efficient Devices

Why electronics still have room to improve in speed and energy use.

(00:17:43) The Energy Cost of Switching

How fundamental energy limits shape future computing devices.

(00:19:10) Speed, Energy, and Reliability

The trade-offs that govern how materials perform in real devices.

(00:21:29) Solar Cells at the Atomic Scale

How materials convert light into electricity inside a solar cell.

(00:23:40) Capturing Energy Before It Becomes Heat

Why ultra-fast dynamics matter for improving solar cell efficiency.

(00:26:13) Randomness in Materials

How stochastic atomic motion affects material performance.

(00:28:20) Measuring Dynamic Complexity

Why nanoscale materials do not behave the same way every time.

(00:30:26) AI for Materials Research

How AI helps in Lindenberg's research

(00:32:56) Future In a Minute

Rapid-fire Q&A: science, collaboration, and future materials.

(00:36:13) Conclusion

 

Connect With Us:

Episode Transcripts >>> The Future of Everything Website

Connect with Russ >>> Threads / Bluesky / Mastodon

Connect with School of Engineering >>>Twitter/X / Instagram / LinkedIn / Facebook


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from The Future of Everything

All 67 episodes
The future of ultrafast materials and devicesThe Future of Everything · 37 min
Listen in VO