Meta’s VP of Wearables on AI Glasses Business Model, OpenAI Poaches Apple’s AI Talent | Sep 19, 2025

19 Sep 2025 · 59 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Information's TITV - Episode Title: Meta’s VP of Wearables on AI Glasses Business Model, OpenAI Poaches Apple’s AI Talent | Sep 19, 2025

Episode Overview In this episode of The Information's TITV, host Akash Pasricha speaks with Meta's VP of Wearables, Alex Himel, regarding the company's latest smart glasses, the Meta Ray-Bans. The episode also features discussions on NVIDIA's investment in Intel, Elon Musk’s data center ambitions, and OpenAI's recruitment strategy focusing on Apple talent.

Key Segments

  1. Meta's Wearable AI Display Glasses
  2. Guest: Alex Himel (VP of Wearables at Meta)
  3. Product Launch: Discussion centered around the Meta Ray-Ban display glasses, set to be released at the end of the month.
  4. Business Model:
  5. Emphasis on delivering a strong product-market fit.
  6. Acknowledgment of the difficulty in monetizing hardware. The strategy involves:
  7. Pricing the glasses at $799, aiming for responsible business practices rather than immediate profit.
  8. Future profitability expected through software subscriptions and AI enhancements.
  9. Product Features:
  10. Ray-Ban glasses maintain aesthetic appeal even when powered off.
  11. Integration of AI capabilities as a personalized assistant, offering potential future software monetization.
  1. NVIDIA’s $5B Investment in Intel
  2. Investment Details: NVIDIA’s stake in Intel and plans for product co-design.
  3. Expert Panel Discussion:
  4. Anissa Gardizy: Clarifies the CPU-GPU relationship and implications for NVIDIA’s strategy.
  5. Aaron Ginn: Discusses the strategic significance of the investment for Intel amidst its struggles and the competitive landscape.
  6. Jay Goldberg: Raises concerns on Intel’s future and the necessity of its survival for the broader tech industry.
  1. Brent Mayo's Role in Elon Musk’s Data Center Strategy
  2. Guest: Theo Waite (Reporter)
  3. Profile of Brent Mayo: Transition from oil rig work to leading data center construction for XAI in Memphis.
  4. Controversy: Discussion on environmental impacts due to the use of natural gas turbines for powering data centers.
  5. Data Center Construction: Rapid development of XAI’s facilities, stressing the urgency in the current AI boom.
  1. OpenAI's Talent Acquisition from Apple
  2. Guest: Aaron Tilly (Reporter)
  3. Recruitment Strategy: OpenAI actively hiring hardware talent from Apple, leveraging Joni Ive’s influence to attract new engineers.
  4. Device Development Plans: Discussion of potential product ideas, including smart speakers and smart glasses, and the challenges associated with hardware development.
  5. Market Viability: Questions raised about the need for new AI devices amid existing successful technologies like smartphones.

Key Takeaways

  • Meta’s Strategy: Focus on delivering high-quality wearables that provide value and integrate AI functions, with a future focus on software revenue.
  • NVIDIA-Intel Dynamics: The investment is both a strategic move for NVIDIA and a necessary lifeline for Intel, highlighting the importance of collaboration between CPU and GPU technologies.
  • Environmental Concerns: The rapid pace of data center construction raises significant environmental questions, especially with the use of natural gas in urban settings.
  • OpenAI’s Ambitious Plans: While the potential for new AI devices exists, the necessity and market demand remain uncertain.

Conclusion The episode covers a range of topics central to the current landscape of technology innovation, particularly in wearables, data centers, and AI device development. It encapsulates the rapid pace of the tech industry and the ongoing challenges companies face in balancing innovation, profitability, and societal impact.

Additional Resources

  • Articles discussed in the episode can be accessed at The Information:
  • [Meta's New Smart Glasses](https://www.theinformation.com/briefings/meta-introduces-new-smart-glasses-display)
  • [OpenAI’s Hardware Talent Strategy](https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-raids-apple-hardware-talent-manufacturing-partners)

Tune In For more insights, join TITV every weekday at 10 am PT / 1 pm ET on platforms like YouTube, X, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:13Welcome everyone to the information's TITV. My name is Akash Pasricha. It is Friday, September 19th. It is a newsy end to a very newsy week and we have got a great lineup of guests for you today. We've got Alex Himmel, the head of Meta's wearables unit, coming on the show in just a few minutes. So do not go anywhere. That's a very exciting conversation. We're also going to break down NVIDIA's big move to invest$5 billion into Intel and then spend another$900 million to do one of those aqua hires that have become all too familiar in the land of AI. We're going to talk all about that. We've then got our Elon Musk reporter to tell us about the ex-oilman who has now become key to Elon's supercomputer ambitions.

0:55and we're going to end the show with a discussion with our Apple reporter about his story that talks about how OpenAI is going after key Apple hardware talent for its own hardware ambitions. It is a busy, busy show today, so let's get right on into our first segment. You probably know all about the Meta Ray-Bans display that the company unveiled this week. It is the first major smart glasses with a display from a big tech giant that will be going on sale to the public at the end of this month. Alex Himmel is the executive leading Meta's wearables division, which means he oversees the group that made this product.

1:32And last night, I sat down with Alex for about 25 minutes for a great conversation about how he plans to make money from this highly capital-intensive product. We also talked about whether or not he could ever see the new wristband that they've developed expanding its functionality into fitness. And I also asked him about how the company Super Intelligence Group is changing how the wearables team functions. It was a great conversation. I'm excited to play it for you. Here is my chat with Alex Himmel. Alex Himmel, welcome to TI-TV. It's great to have you. Hey, thanks for having me. I feel a little underdressed, but it's great to be here.

2:09Well, look, dress aside, I feel like, you know, my glasses are really the ones that are lacking right now. They're not as cool as yours. Thank you. These are the new Ray-Van Meta glasses. It's Generation 2. These are the blue frames, and they've got the upgraded hardware. Nice. Well, I'm excited to talk all about the glasses, and we have so much to get to. You unveiled a lot this week at MetaConnect. You know, I think people have seen the glasses by now. They've got to see some of the demos and stuff like that. And so I really want to start by diving into the business model behind the wearables group that you lead, but then also the display glasses that you unveiled.

2:49You know, I think it's pretty well understood that it's going to be difficult to make money on the hardware side of these units. And so, you know, I just want to understand from you at a high level, how do you think about the business model and making money from this product? Well, our focus right now is on just delivering a great product that finds strong product market fit that people enjoy using and increasingly find convenient and useful. You know, we started with the Ray-Ban Meta Glasses. I mean, Mark went through kind of the three principles of building glasses. But I mean, the thing about these is even if they were powered off, they're still just a good looking, comfortable pair of glasses that's either you can wear sunglasses or optical glasses.

3:32Right. And then we add functionality to it. And so similarly with the MetaRayBand display, like we're really focused on it just being something that people are finding value out of. And we're focusing on messaging and making the RayBand MetaGlasses just better with the viewfinder and things that display can deliver and increasingly AI. So that's the focus right now. Right. From a business model standpoint, you know, part of it is when you're launching a first generation device, you're pretty burdened with a lot of the investment with the research R &D investment costs just to deliver that. And so whenever you're amortizing your capital expenditures and everything else over, you know, the generation one unit volume, it'll be less good than when you hit large scale and you're right it adds up much more it adds up yeah and you know subsequent generations your yield gets better so you're throwing away less materials and um less devices that don't make it most that don't make it so that's one part of it and so we expect the economics to just get better as our manufacturing matures and we hit higher scale um and then does that mean i want to get into the second part of it but does that mean for at 800 dollars i mean will you be selling these units at a loss well we so we think uh so 7.99 for the glasses and the band together we think you know we price it there because we think that's the right price for the category and where we think it will be for running a responsible business as we're hitting scale so we feel good about the price and you know similar to all the um glasses we've made We're not trying to make a massive profit on the per unit right out of the gate.

5:11We're trying to get there with time. We're really focused on just making sure that we're meeting people with a good price and a great product. Right. Okay. So I cut you off. You were talking about you're continuing with the business model. Talk to me about the other ways to make money.

5:25So software. So at the end of the day, we're a software company. And we do expect that we will be making margins on the hardware side. you know, our line of glasses that we're not talking about, which the Arabia Meta glasses, the Oakley Meta Houstins, the Oakley Meta Vanguard, which those are extremely, the sport glasses are extremely fun if you try the slow-mo video. But I mean, those are already a responsible business just on hardware. And then we're looking to, you know, we're a software company. It's what we do. And so we expect to make a business model with software. And so AI subscriptions would be one example, and I think there'll be other ways that we'll be able to monetize with that.

6:04Once we're able to hit, once devices hit scale and we add more and more software, the AI gets better. We think there'll be good opportunities there. I want to get on to some subscriptions, but very quickly, you talked about the other devices. The Oakley's and the Ray-Ban's without the display. It sounds like those are profitable right now on a per-unit basis. Yep, they are. Let me see what I got here. I got my Oakley Meadow. Oh, shoot. Where'd they go? Well, here's the Oakley Meadow. There you go. There you go. The blue ones. I was wearing the, I was doing the Diplo Run Club last night and they were 30 people taking videos at once.

6:44I haven't done the Diplo Run Club yet, but I know that you're a big runner. And so that, that, that looked like a ton of fun. You know, I, I kind of want to get into the super intelligent side of this, but, you know, on the AI subscriptions, timeline wise, how are you thinking about when, when do you see those AI subscriptions rolling out potentially? I mean, we're going to kind of see, you know, we've rebooted in a meta. I think we're revamping the AI efforts a little bit, you know, staffed up Alexander and Nat and the MSL team. And obviously we have big expectations for the next generation of the llama model and what's able to be powered in the glasses from that.

7:21But I mean, I think of the glasses and wearables as the best delivery vehicle for AI. I mean, this is a device that can see what you see, hear what you hear, and just be a personalized assistant that helps you throughout your day. And so when that functionality is ready, you know, I think there'll be features that it'll make sense to pay for or pay for, you know, some amount of... And maybe advertising too at some point? I mean, I worked on advertising for years at Meta. And I mean, the thing about ads is it only makes sense when you have a large scale. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense to... Advertisers don't want to do custom formats that are targeted at a small number of users.

8:06And so until we're hitting... It's not even something worth talking about until we're hitting a really large scale of device users. And so we have no plans in the works right now on that, just because it's really a scale question before it's even interesting. Even like Threads doesn't have ads in it right now because it hasn't hit the scale yet. Right, right. Well, so you talked about Alexander Wang and you talked about the super intelligence group. You know, one of the things I wanted to get an understanding from you leading the wearables group is how is your team, the wearables team, working with that super intelligence group right now?

8:38We're partnering closely. So the AI that's on the glasses and the top two use cases for the glasses right now or for the RayBan Metas are using them as a Bluetooth headset for your phone and for capturing photos and videos that you would have otherwise missed. And we see an increasing amount of usage in sports scenarios. That's why we leaned into the Oakley Meta Vanguard. But AI is the third use. And we're seeing that increase. We see people doing hands-free calling. We see them doing hands-free messaging. Gene, the top AI use case is somewhat simple right now. It's just, you know, asking questions in the moment.

9:12You know, I've got a six-year-old son and he has nonstop questions for me about the world around him. And as I'm driving - Thanks for the super intelligent has to satisfy the six-year-old too. He's got really specific questions, you know, and he asked me how many people can fit in a football stadium, saying many thousands is really unsatisfying for him. And I've got to tell him the exact number that fit in Levi's Stadium. Otherwise, he will keep asking. And so we're seeing that work pretty well. And the experience, the MetAI experience on the glasses is powered by, you know, we take the models that the MSL team makes and we distill and we optimize them for the form factor that we have.

9:50You know, you want on the glasses, you want, if you just got like a long response that'd be in text, that's frustrating. So we do a lot of work to make the response shorter and more optimized for what you'd want in the glasses. So they're actually giving you the models and they're helping you sort of adjust those models, repackage them into sort of the size of model that would fit, or not fit, but that would work with the glasses, essentially. Well, in some cases, fit. So there's multiple dimensions to it. I mean, we have kind of a cascaded architecture where we have models that run on the glasses, we have them running on the phone, we have them running in the cloud.

10:26And depending on the latency requirements, depending on whether something requires a real-time lookup of information, depending on in the future, whether something will be agentic or do deep research. There's different, the architecture is, whether it's doing commands out to your glasses or the phone, I mean, it's architected pretty dynamically. But in general, the way to think about it is we're taking, one, we're partnering with them to build the underlying models, because if there are languages or domains or tasks that we want the AI to be especially great at, then we're providing data sets, providing evals.

11:03We're helping to make sure that the underlying model is great for that. Right. And so it sounds like you're working pretty closely with the group and the group is obviously, it's a newer sort of team that has come in. I wonder, has anything changed about their approach to how they've worked with the wearables team or how they've sort of adjusted of the models in the last two to three months, given the new talent? Have there been any adjustments that they've made explicitly working with you? Well, one thing is, I mean, they're, one thing I love about them is they're very bullish about wearables and the glasses that we're making.

11:39And so they brought, not saying there wasn't excitement before, but there is just a lot of excitement about see what we can do to make the wearables great. You know, Nat Friedman was on our, you know, in our advisory group for a while. He was pretty familiar with the roadmap. And when he came in, he was especially excited to figure out how to lead into wearables. But I'd say in general, they've been great partners as we expect them to be, but they've brought some new approaches to how to do model development at Beta. And some of that's spilled over into the partnerships we have just in terms of how they want to do model training, what's holding engineers back or researchers back.

12:19and just there's some things are a bit of a new approach and we've appreciated it. And what is holding engineers and researchers back right now? I'd say it's not one. That means we're just trying to maximize efficiency and productivity. Like every engineer who joins wants to have just spent all day getting a lot of stuff done. And so we're just analyzing like, hey, when you arrive, how long does it take to get set up? Do you have, you know, machines you can use to train models? Do you have like, is there, is there stuff that's in the way of just being fast and productive out of the gate? And so it's, you know, it's just a list of things trying to, trying to bang out.

12:59It's not, not dissimilar to, you know, uh, what was it over 16 years ago when I started here and it was like, Hey, it sounds like the MSL team is kind of helping the, the, you know, uh, is sort of helping the organization and maybe helping the wearables team actually to be a little more scrappy with things and sort of get things done a bit faster almost, or right out of the gate as they join. You know, the faster the models get better and the faster we're able to distill them and the smaller they get and the improvements in latency, these are all good things that we can't wait for. I mean, you know, we really think that, you know, one of the great things about the wearables that we're building is they're great for stuff other than AI right now, and they're getting increasingly good at AI.

13:41and I think that one thing you'll see in the next one to two years, I think wearables will get really competitive in the AI space and we're trying to get ready for that and make sure that we're able to compete well. How do you think about competing with Google? I'd only be speculating. I mean, I've seen the talks they've given, but I don't really... Because, I mean, the models are great. That's one of the advantages that people say that they have is that the models work really well and fundamentally a lot of these devices will end up working on the models. Gemini is definitely an impressive model.

14:21The perception stack is especially good, meaning like the visual recognition of stuff, which, yeah, that's pretty good. They've got a good model. No wearables in the market yet, so we'll see. So you're banking on the fact that you're coming in first and you're actually giving people something to work with. You know, we've, I think as, it really wasn't clear if Glasses were going to be successful. You know, a lot of companies that kind of false starts there were tried and didn't get the traction they were looking for. Us included. I think Ray-Ban Stories wasn't as successful as we had hoped. But I think we've definitely shown the most commitment to the space.

15:02You know, if you look at, you know, we launched, we've launched five devices this half between the new Ray-Ban Metaglasses, the Oakley Meta Houston, the Oakley Meta Vanguard, the Meta-Ray-Ban Display, and the Meta Neural Band. Clearly, we've had a pretty substantial commitment that is coming to market now in the space. So right now, I think we - You're not faced by the model. The models don't scare you. Well, I think our models need to get great. I think the AI needs to get great for the devices to really deliver on the vision that we and others in the industry have. And so we're focusing a lot on it, you know, partnering, we're really partnering across the company as much as we can, because that is going to be critical.

15:46And you can start to see glimmers of it where, you know, you're able to recognize an object that's in front of you. You can translate a sign that's in front of you. My favorite thing, it sounds really simple, but if I hold up a phone number, I can say, look and call this number. And it's like these small, simple things, but they add like little bits of value. throughout your day. And I think you're starting to see the potential. Let me ask you this question. What is the biggest sort of technical holdup right now from you achieving sort of your grandest visions for this product? I mean, you know, is it battery?

16:21Is it weight? Like, what is the biggest technical challenge for you right now that you wish you could just really break through? Oh, that's the thing about working on WordPress. Plus, it's not one thing. It's the balance of all these things. I mean, give us a little, like, what's, you know, on your whiteboard right now, what are the rate-limiting steps that you just really need to break through? Well, I think we showed the bookends of what we're working on. So we've got the Ray-Ban Meta Glasses. They're in the market right now. They just got better with the announcement that we had yesterday. and these you know working with SLR Exotica are partners who have a really strict definition of what it means to be an all-day wearable comfortable pair of glasses around dimensions the comfort the weight and so we had real strict limits that we just could not violate uh in these glasses and so these were basically like form factor first and then we'll put as much technology in them as we can without sacrificing the form factors.

17:23That's one bookend. I'd say the Orion prototype that we showed last year at Connect is the other bookend, where those glasses had seven pieces of custom silicon in them. The waveguides were made out of silicon carbide, which we chose as the material with the highest... That's what you want to get to there, essentially. It had a bunch of sensors, it had a bunch of silicon, it had a big 70-degree field of view display. And so the question for us roadmap wise is, you know, and we just announced a device, the, you know, Meta Ray-Ban display, which is in between there, right? So we're starting to march up.

17:59So if you had form factor first and then Ryan over here, we're starting to march up. But the, the big question for us is like each thing, it's these trade-offs. It's okay. For each of these hardware components, there's value you can add. Like for example, if we added eye tracking, sensors into these glasses, the AI would know what you were looking at, as opposed to having to guess, you know, in the, in the scene that's in front of you. But with each of them, you get form factor trade-offs. And so each of these things were kind of weighing. And so it's, you know, it's a list of things you basically take everything goes in Orion and, you know, those are the different trade-offs that we're looking at.

18:34But yeah, you know, batteries got more efficient, software got more efficient. If the displays got more efficient, meaning more power efficient to be brighter with the same size. These are all the things we're working through. I want to talk about the NeuroBand, but on that list of trade-offs, what is the hardest trade-off right now? What's number one? The display is the hardest thing to do. The display is by far the hardest thing to do. I mean, the glasses that we announced yesterday at Meadow Ray-Band display, I mean, they're 5 ,000 nits, 42 pixels per degree, which is a higher resolution than any major headset in the market.

19:08And when you put them on, there's no light leaks out. So the bystanders can't see what you're looking at or tell the display. Yeah. So fitting all that in, I can see. But it's a 20-degree binocular field of view. Accomplishing that in a 70-degree binocular, which is what Orion was, but with that form factor, I mean, that's, you know, the largest investment we have is in display. We're doing not one technology, multiple technologies, and that's definitely the hardest industry problem itself. Right. let's talk about the neuroband which is one of the coolest things that you unveiled this week so look i i thought it was uh it was uh really exciting you know i i immediately started thinking of all the things you could do with the band and so i i mean i've got a laundry list of things that i i want to get to but i mean very quickly could you ever see yourself putting a screen of some kind or attaching something else to the band oh that was the first question um i mean consider it so we so we acquired a company control labs many years ago based in new york city uh and they've been working on the surface electromyography technology the band they were developing at the time i wish i had it with me here this is enormous it looked like a cyberpunk uh thing that you find in brooklyn only but it was a research band so it had a lot of different channels it was big and they were trying to figure out if they could build machine learning models to predict the signals that you were sending for your brain to your muscles on your wrist.

20:39And they'd reached a certain level of breakthrough that we made that acquisition. We've since turned it into a much more desirable form factor. But the generation one that we did here, the whole point was, you know, it's focused on one thing, one thing only, and that is input and it's input for the glasses. And so that's where we started. there's you know we get a ton of questions for us like man i wish you could do fitness tracking it's interesting you know the question could you turn in a watch or add a little you know there's yeah you really can think of these things and you know there's no form factor we're not looking at or feature not considering but right now we're we're so focused on getting it to work with gen one and having it be great for input and there's a lot of different uh input things we want to Would you ever do, like, the way you're partnered with SRL Exotica for the glasses, would you do a partnership with Garmin, for example, for the Neural Band?

21:34Well, we did. It's funny you mentioned Garmin. We announced a partnership with Garmin yesterday. Oh, okay. I missed that. Sorry. It's not in the... So we announced it. So if you're wearing the Oakley Meta Vanguard's and you're wearing a Garmin watch, it enables auto capture. So if you're going for, so the run I went on yesterday in the Diplo Run Club, which you should check out, he's around here, it's very fun. Yeah, yeah. And you're a runner. I know you're a runner, so I know that was a lot of fun for you. But it was set up so every quarter mile, the glasses would take a short video. And then at the end of the run, we automatically stitched together in our app a reel for you that had those short videos stitched together and it overlaid your Garmin sets on it.

22:19And the Garmin watch is what creates the triggers. So you can do it at certain intervals. It would be great for a marathon or at certain speeds. So once you hit a certain speed skiing down a mountain, it'll take the video for you. But stick with me. I mean, could we see a Garmin partnership? I mean, it makes so much sense to me, though. I mean, look, I've been wearing Garmin watches for over 15 years. I'm a huge fan of the stuff they're doing. We've got, I mean, the partnership we started is they can do the, you know, make the runs more fun, more social or cycling or skiing or golfing or surfing.

22:58Glasses are waterproof. But yeah, hey, maybe there's more to do, but right now we're just really focused on getting input to work. Okay, last question for you, because I know you got to go. I really want to just ask you about how people, how you see them using the display glasses specifically. And, you know, one of the things that I've been reflecting on a little bit over the last 24 hours is March has said, you know, it allows you to be sort of in the moment, more present. You're not looking at your phone and stuff like that. And I take that point. But on the flip side, I've been thinking a lot about how this could just be more distracting for people.

23:36And what I mean by that is, you know, you put your phone away. I don't want to look at it. Okay. And meanwhile, if I have the text messages coming in my eyes, you know, he gave that story of if I'm talking to you and I don't want to get distracted texting somebody because it's rude, right? I could just do it, you know, more subtly with my, but I mean, it means that I'm not there with you. I'm not present. I'm more distracted. So how do you think about that? Well, so, I mean, you got to try the glasses. I mean, we got to get you a demo. So we got to, I mean, this will be more clear and obvious, like if you put a pair on and give it a try, but you know, it's a, it's a monocular display, which means it's on one side, it's 20 degree field of view.

24:17So it's about the size of a smartwatch right here. And it's intentionally a little bit off to the side. So it's really meant to be a glanceable display. It's not intended for long form consumption of stuff. It's, it's really not tailored for that. And we intentionally are not mirroring the note. it would be easy to do, but we're not doing it, mirroring all the notifications from your phone, because we want it to be really selective for you in terms of what comes in there. So for me, I just get WhatsApp notifications. And for me, WhatsApp is very like, it's my wife. It's like a curated list of when that comes in, I actually, like the only reason I run with a cell phone as opposed to leaving that at home is that if I do get a call from my wife, I kind of need to answer it.

25:02And so it's meant to be high signal. And so you can just really quickly, instead of like having to like look up at a watch and hit it or grab your phone out of the pocket to see if it's important. It's really like, it's such a one click non-distracting tap that it's like, it really does help you be more in the moment. And then there's an easy, there's a control center. If you swipe left, it's really easy to hit do not disturb. Yeah. But I mean, I hear me. I'm just thinking at dinner, you know, your family dinner, you're sitting with your wife or with your kids. And, you know, I don't know if the vision is to have everyone wearing the glasses, you know, maybe even your kids are wearing the glasses.

25:38But let's say the idea is that everyone will be wearing glasses in this augmented reality. I mean, would you not worry that, hey, my kids are, you know, they're eating dinner, we're talking about our day, and they're getting text messages, like, you know, and they're not with me, they're not here. yeah I mean I think there's you know different norms develop uh in different circumstances like you know right now you've got the hey if you're having a family dinner you know it's like put the phone face down or in the other room I mean similarly like the glasses have a an off switch you know if you want to just be present in it but the idea is that you know these are really intended to be great for you know when you're when you want when you when you want to be alerted if something kind of like I'm waiting for a phone call like I need to know if a message from this person comes in.

26:24And like right now at settings, we think AI will make that even better over time to learn what's high signal and what's not. You know, similar to how you've got all these AI extensions to email apps that allow you to really curate through and boost signal for stuff that's urgent and just kind of push away stuff that's not. And so like the intention of the product and the way you've designed it is to make it like low friction and quick to get high signal stuff and deal with it. But of course, like a lot of this is just going to depend on how people use it and the norms that develop over time and as similar to you with other form factors.

26:59Great. Well, Alex, it's a very cool product. Thank you so much for coming on the show and telling us more about how you're thinking about the strategy. We appreciate your time and I look forward to having you on more as you unveil more and more products. Wearables is a fascinating space. That is Alex Himmel, the VP of wearables at Meta. All right. Thanks so much for having me. Thank you. That was Alex Himmel from Meta. Okay, well, NVIDIA made some major news yesterday, announcing it is taking a$5 billion stake in Intel, and that wasn't the only big investment it is making. The company also agreed to pay$900 million to hire the chief executive at a company called Infabrica and also bring on some of their employees to tell us not just what Infabrica is, but also what this Intel deal could mean in the long run.

27:46I want to bring on a great panel for you. Anissa Gardizi is our cloud and compute reporter at The Information. Aaron Ginn is the CEO of a GPU hosting company called Hydra. And Jay Goldberg is a senior analyst at Seaport Research Partners. Thank you so much to the three of you for being here. It's a big panel for a Friday, but I am excited to get to it. Anissa, very quickly, I mean, just walk me through the brass texture. What do we need to know about the Intel deal here? Right. So NVIDIA is taking a multi-billion dollar stake in Intel, and the two companies have agreed to co-design a few product lines.

Read the full transcript

28:23I think the thing that people will be most interested in is that now instead of just offering an ARM-based CPU next to the NVIDIA GPU, NVIDIA wants a tighter integration with the x86 architecture, which is the kind of processor that Intel and AMD build. So yeah, what you need to know is that there is, NVIDIA has a large stake in Intel now, and they're working on two products. And very quickly, just for people who might not be as familiar, just explain to us the relationship between GPUs and CPUs and how they sort of relate to each other in this story here. So before AI, most data centers were filled with what you mentioned is called a CPU, Essential Processing Unit.

29:05They're the traditional workhorse of the data center and can do all kinds of typical computing tasks. but over the past two years, a lot of data center capacity has shifted to GPUs, which is the chip NVIDIA makes. And so, but you can't have a GPU work without a CPU. And so that's sort of where this Intel deal comes into play. Got it. Okay. That was the detail that I was hoping to get clarity on. Okay. So, Aaron, I want to come to you. Do you think this is a good deal for Intel? Is NVIDIA the winner? What do you think? I think at this point, probably any deal is a good deal for Intel, right? So I think what NDA is trying to do here is they're trying to figure out ways of continuing to grow their control of their production line, as well as like they do look at the steps even of the most recent acquisition.

29:55They're always trying to find ways to protect their kind of surrounding ecosystem and finding ways of increasing customer experience, reliability. because even under the previous CPU stage of, you could say, infrastructure, the end customer kind of lost control outside of the semiconductor. And so what he's trying to do is control more of that customer experience basically to be the apple of Silicon. So he's constantly trying to think of ways of assuring that the customer gets the best experience possible. And so some of the Intel stuff is to, you know, the fact that they're a struggling company, they're the one that has a legitimate boundary business in America.

30:32But the other one is that the alternative, would be AMD. And AMD has a quite robust GPU business line. And so if Intel goes under or disappears, then they have to buy the CPU that could fund the GPU that is the alternative to run their competitor. So I think it's more structured around that where they're kind of playing in their own defense here, but as well as they'd be still, as Anissi was saying, that they need CPUs to run in their HDX series and that there still is some technical limitations of ARM in the data center layer that they have to work through to get customers to move from x86, which is the Intel CPUs, into ARM.

31:13The ARM, I suspect, will continue to be the flagship of NVIDIA, but there's still going to be many years in which they need an x86 platform to continue to grow their business. Got it. Okay, well, Jay, those are some good points that Aaron brought up. What do you think? Do you agree? I don't totally agree. I think, like, first let me just say, Intel needs to survive. It's important for the industry. It's important for America. So them getting cash in the door, I think that helps. They need money to keep this going. But that's about it as far as this deal goes. I don't think there's a lot in here for Intel.

31:53It's a good deal for NVIDIA in that it gets them into Intel's sort of core cloud CPU base. In terms of absolute dollars, it's a pretty small revenue opportunity here because in most AI systems today that use GPUs, like Anissa says, every GPU cluster needs some number of CPUs attached to it, sort of 1 to 4, 1 to 8 kind of ratio. And today, NVIDIA has that CPU in their grace line of CPUs, and they're going to update that next year with Vera. And so they're in really good shape around that. But what this does is it does provide an alternative to AMD for those customers who want to use somebody else's CPU.

32:34They don't want to use an NVIDIA CPU. They don't want to be all NVIDIA, so they want some alternative. And it's going to be Intel. But I think most important, too, is this is a good deal for Intel's newest chairholder, the United States government. Jensen Huang made Donald Trump$3 billion yesterday. So not many people can say that. And I think that is part of calculus. You think that's the major calculus here in this investment? I don't know about major, but I think that is absolutely part of the calculus. Okay. Aaron, what do you think of that? I mean, I think we actually said the same thing.

33:12But there is a structural difference of adopting ARM to x86 that is quite significant. And so my firm is one of the largest buyers of the Grace series. And just remind x86 is the CPU. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's a instruction set. Yeah. Yeah. So, so, and so, you know, like the, the, the future of data center infrastructure is, is ARM. It's the most logical kind of X and X iteration. Your phone is ARM and any type of like dense computing framework generally means an ARM based on efficiency. And as well as they, it continues the same trend of which that Jensen is, wants to continue the integrated zone ecosystem together to where he is like Apple.

33:52So it shouldn't be lost. I mean, he's literally used that metaphor. So it shouldn't be lost on you that Apple uses ARM. And again, just try to buy ARM. So that is a clear trajectory where he wants to go as a company. But the x86 problem is a significant problem if you're trying to win over enterprise customers. And I was saying that this money is like nothing compared to when you have a 60 % to 70 % profit margin, depending on what quarter what you're doing, you're selling hundreds of billions of dollars a year. like this is nothing on the on the spectrum for nvidia uh but but the founding program is is is super important uh to like a america sovereignty and and to jensen himself but you know jensen has put his bag with tsmc but but as jay was saying that there is clearly political orientation here like to look past that would be silly it is it's very it's staring right in front of your face right the intel needs to be supported that's true uh and it's semi-nationalized and some weird construct that we kind of embedded this administration.

34:53And so Jensen is the most important semiconductor company in the world. So you have to find ways in which they integrate these two things. Anissa, you were on the press call last night. What did you get from that? Was there anything about the Foundry business that they said that stood out to you? Yes. There were tons of questions to Jensen and Lipboo about whether this initial deal could potentially lead to NVIDIA becoming a customer of the Intel foundry down the line. And both executives did not directly answer that question. Jensen said something about how NVIDIA is always evaluating different options, but Lipu didn't really talk about this angle.

35:35And to what both Aaron and Jay are saying, the reason that the U.S. government cares so much about Intel is for its foundry. And this deal kind of had no optimism around that aspect of an Intel-NVIDIA relationship. It sounds like they didn't even talk about it. Right. They did not talk about it. We're hopeful. We want this. Jay, we were talking yesterday. Jay, you were astounded that this was the case. It was really remarkable to me that they spent all this time, at least half the calls, half the questions at the conference yesterday were about this, and they refused to commit to using Intel as a foundry.

36:12And what really stood out for me was Lip Bhutan, the CEO of Intel, could not say a single good thing about his own Foundry process. It was Jensen from NVIDIA who actually was able to talk up, oh, Intel has this great packaging. But even LipBoot, because you couldn't say, oh, we're going to evaluate everything, but we really like our internal process. He couldn't even say that. And I mean, that to me spoke volumes. I think he's, I think I'm very concerned about it. Like Aaron was saying, we need Intel Foundry to work for the industry, for the country. And I'm very, very concerned that doesn't have a future.

36:50Aaron, I'm going to give you 30 seconds here just to give us one last thought, and then I want to go on to Infabrica. Just get your last thought here, and then we'll move on. Well, I think that the Aaron's call, the last one that the Intel CEO did, he did basically kind of talk to Asher about his foundry and said that we're only going to do things which have this really high bar of customer orders. But as anyone who works in foundry knows, that gets much more of you have to integrate yourself to the customer and work with them over a number of years to finally launch a new product and and so the intel is actually from a technical perspective a very good engineering company it has a long track record of having great innovations great advancements on the chip side so they they can do this it's but it's just structurally they they got stuck into this they don't know how to service people outside of their own company and And I think it was a mistake under Pat to just say Intel has to be its own customer.

37:49I think that that was probably the mistake. But, you know, Pat had the general right orientation, which is like this business has to continue. Right. We could find a way of accelerating this. But I think they really struggled with trying to the idea of like, can we actually do everything Gento wants us to do? Right. Right. Adisa, I want to go to you. So this deal with Enfabrica. Fabrica. And Fabrica is a company that you actually know from our top 50, what do we call it? It's the information 50 most promising startups list. Yeah, we call it TI50 here in the newsroom. But and Fabrica was, I think, if I recall, the top pick in our compute category that you put together.

38:28I want to know why they were so high on your list, because that maybe might tell us something about why NVIDIA was so eager to go after the talent? I ranked Nfabrica high on the list of computing startups last year because they were tackling one of the major problems that companies face when they put together NVIDIA GPUs. These clusters of chips are getting larger and larger and the networking between each chip and between each rack system is not advancing at the same rate. And so the founders of Enfabrica wanted to create a better network fabric. I think you can sort of get how they chose their name.

39:09A better network fabric to connect large clusters of GPUs. And so they were building a technology that was clearly destined to work potentially in NVIDIA clusters. And NVIDIA cares a lot about networking. They obviously bought Mellanox. So that's why they were high on the load last year. Jay, I feel like this relates to a conversation that we had last time on the show, which is you talking about NVIDIA wanting to sell customers the entire package. And you actually saw that as something that could hold the business back. Well, I'll say this. The fight over AI compute is now very much shaping up to be a fight around networking.

39:49If you talk to NVIDIA, off the record, they'll say one of the big performance gains advantages they have versus the competition in GPU is the fact that they have this networking stack. And then in contrast, you have their rival in this space is shipping up to Broadcom, which has a company with deep, deep networking expertise. And so this is really the battle between these two companies. The biggest front that's going to open up this year or next year is going to be around networking. And so this AquaHire, at Infabrica is important because it really is sort of one more big raising the stakes even further in this upcoming fight.

40:26Right. If I remember correctly, the CEO of Infabrica was at Broadcom. So he's definitely like a well-known person. But I will mention, I talked to some people familiar with the deal last night and they mentioned, yes, this is, we're hiring, you know, NVIDIA is hiring the CEO, but they're also hiring a very large part of the engineering team and others at the firm. So it's sort of not like one of those AI startups where you could have one person who's the main deal that you want to hire. I get the sense that a lot of people at the company are going to go to NVIDIA. Aaron, you were nodding. What were your thoughts here?

41:01Do you think it was a surprising move at all? No, I mean, they love acquirers. That's a large portion of NVIDIA's acquisitions are acquirers. and as well as if you look at their their leptin acquisition if you look at the talent of that team many of them are experts in ARM and they have like a long track record of like building out ARM frameworks so they like hiring very good highly experienced people to join the team and as well as like you know for them the payout is immense and as well as like to Nvidia it's small and so when you're at this such scale as Jay was saying that it is a battle over networking and if you actually look at the depreciation schedules of, because I operate data centers, you look at depreciation schedules for the node versus the networking, networking is about twice as long as the nodes.

41:51So it's going to stay there twice as long as the actual compute equipment itself. And so it's a much more permanent set into the actual data center, as well as implementing networking is significantly harder to do than the rest of the actual stack. Because you can slot, and you're designing when you're implementing data center, you can slot the nodes out because you got to work on them occasionally. But the networking generally just stays there. And that's all the crazy cables you see, right? The cable work is like, that's a lot of man hours to do. So it's an important part of like maintaining his position in the market is maintaining control of networking.

42:23Right. Well, look, I think we could talk a lot longer about this. And, you know, we should have more networking startups on the show is my takeaway from this. So Anissa, maybe we'll get you to go back to those companies that you picked last year on TI-50. We'll see if a couple of their CEOs will come on because it's, I mean, look, we're batting a pretty high average here with those startups doing great things. Thank you so much to the three of you for coming on. We really appreciate it. That is Anissa, Jay, and Aaron. Okay. Well, Elon Musk has a number of lieutenants helping him run his empire.

42:58And today, my colleague Theo Waite published a profile on one of the most interesting people responsible for helping Musk achieve all of his data center ambitions. Brent Mayo has gone from working on oil rigs all over the world to now being key to XAI supercomputer efforts. And he's also an important character in a pollution battle that is shaking out in the city of Memphis. Joining me now is Theo Waite, our reporter on all things Elon Musk to tell us more about this story. Welcome to the show, Theo. Great to have you back. Thanks for having me on. Okay, so now before we get into Brent Mayo, I mean, I just want to set the stage a bit.

43:34I mean, we know that data centers are a huge part of the AI story, but I think one thing that we forget is just how big of a lift constructing these data centers are and how quickly they need to come up. So can you tell us more about that? Yeah, building a data center used to be something that took many years. You know, you'd have to build a building, you'd have to wait for approvals from utilities and governments and, you know, oftentimes it could take three, four, five years to get a facility online. The AI boom has made it so that companies are doing pretty extreme things to get data centers online as quickly as possible at all costs.

44:13And XAI is pretty much the most aggressive in that way. They've gone from zero data centers to two pretty massive, supersized facilities in Memphis in less than two years called Colossus one and Colossus two. You know, as you can see on the map there, they're in pretty dense areas of a city, which makes them pretty controversial locally. You know, we did an analysis for this story and found that, you know, within a five mile radius of these data centers, there's about 20 ,000 people within a five mile radius of the first one, 150 ,000 within a five mile radius of the second one. And the reason that matters is that XAI is using natural gas turbines to power these facilities rather than waiting for a connection to the grid, which is because of, you know, the super aggressive pace that Elon has set for them to get compute online as quickly as possible.

45:15And so you talked about the pollution issue. What do natural gas turbines here have to have to do with that? How do they make that worse? So they, you know, the turbines that XAI is using are turbines that were previously, you know, used often in like fracking for the oil and gas industry where they're sitting in the middle of nowhere and you can truck in a bunch of natural gas, put it in there and get a bunch of power online way quicker than you could waiting for a hookup to the grid. But they are, you know, natural gas turbines, therefore they're emitting pollution at the same time, which is less of an issue when you're in the middle of nowhere building a fracking setup, but a much bigger issue when you're in a city.

45:56And I want to get to this person you wrote about, Brent Mayo, but do we know why they picked this particular area and why they're so close to these, I guess, more dense or urbanly dense cities and towns? I can't speak today. Sure. No, because there were buildings ready for them. The first data center is in a former appliance factory that was sitting empty and had some connections to the grid that they could eventually build on. The second one was just a warehouse in an area with a bunch of other warehouses. So they could just show up and start putting stuff in. So tell me about Brent Mayo. How does he fit into the story?

46:37So he's kind of a person that could only exist in Elon Musk's universe because his job description is incredibly fluid. Uh, he spent, you know, a lot of his career pre-Elon working in oil rigs, uh, and oil and gas engineering in the Gulf of Mexico, the Middle East all around the world. Um, then he joined SpaceX in 2022 and moved to XAI last year when the company was starting to build its first data center in Memphis. Um, he was initially kind of a behind the scenes engineering type of guy, but he's gotten a lot more public as XAI has become a big story. You know, he's constantly meeting politicians, business leaders, community leaders to try to win support for XAI in the city.

47:21And why does Musk like him specifically? What is it about Mayo that Musk has taken a liking to? Well, he's the, you know, kind of person that thrives in Musk world, which is someone that's extremely energetic that you can just kind of throw at any problem and he'll work 24-7 toward it. You know, he's all about the Musk hardcore culture where you could get a call from the boss in the middle of the night or, you know, at any hour of the day and, you know, be super gung-ho about whatever he wants you to do. And he's also, you know, a pretty personable guy. I talk to plenty of people in Memphis, you know, politicians and activists who might not necessarily agree with him, who said that, you know, he's intense, but he's, you know, somewhat charming, even if you disagree with him.

48:06And tell me about, if we just zoom out a little bit, I mean, I imagine as all of these AI companies seek to ramp up their data center efforts, it's kind of interesting to think that, I mean, Musk has this guy. I don't know, maybe Sam Altman has his own person. You know, like, I feel like these sort of industrial characters must be getting more and more, I guess, they must be becoming more and more important to this story for all of these billionaires, especially that are trying to wrap this stuff up. Yeah, I mean, XAI is an extreme example. They are, you know, being especially aggressive and fast with building data centers, but Meta and OpenAI and other companies are also using natural gas turbines now, which used to be a huge no-no for basically all of them.

48:57But when they go into a city, AWS, Google, these are companies that have huge public relations departments and government affairs people that are slick and they wear suits and that's fully their job is dealing with communities and politicians. Mayo is obviously not that. I talked to people who were in this meeting with him and the mayor of Memphis and several other prominent locals where he shows up wearing a hoodie and he's dropping F-bombs and stuff. That's not what someone from AWS is going to do. They're going to be in a suit and they're going to be very professional. And did he talk to you for the story at all?

49:37No, unfortunately. If you did have an interview with him, what would you ask him? Based on the way he talks about working for Elon and, you know, the posts on his X feed, I would say, how much sleep do you get every night and how do you have so much energy? but i i mean riff with me here for a second i mean you know strategically i i i kind of wonder you know how he might think about the supercomputer strategy that xei is building out you know uh i almost wonder you know how he's thinking about like is it just faster faster faster that is you know the the competitive advantage or i don't know i i if i had him in front of me i might ask you know how are you building this data center to be different uh i don't know those i i wonder if those are questions that you talked about with the other people in his orbit at all.

50:25No, I think those are fair questions. I mean, the long-term strategy for XAI is pretty unclear. Like, they're throwing a bunch of money and a bunch of resources at these data centers, but I don't think they fully know how they're going to power them in the long-term, like, beyond, you know, the turbines that they're setting up right now. I think there are tons of questions about the long-term strategy that I'd love to ask him. Right, great. Right. Well, Theo, thank you so much for coming on the show. And thank you for putting together that map with our graphics team, too. That was very helpful for those of us who are not familiar with that part of America.

51:02That is Theo Waite, our Elon Musk reporter at The Information. Okay. Well, OpenAI has made its hardware ambitions clear. And now a new story we published today at The Information reveals that Joni Ive is not the only Apple alumni that the company is going after hiring. OpenAI has been poaching other key hardware talent from Apple and is even talking to some of the same suppliers. I want to bring on Aaron Tilly, one of the reporters on that story, to talk more about what he's found. Aaron, welcome back to the show. It's great to have you. Hey, thanks for having me. So tell me about what you found in your reporting.

51:40Yeah, so we found that OpenAI has really been accelerating these hardware efforts. Obviously, it's on track to release an advice in the next year or so. And to do that, they've really engaged their Apple network. They hired Apple people to start this, and they're continuing to build out that team. And the network is all from Apple hardware teams. So they're really aggressively going after these folks, and it's a pretty easy job to kind of find these folks. They're very excited to move to open AI. It's an interesting opportunity. And yeah, they're finding an easy time poaching these folks. So it's been an easy sell to get them to come over.

52:28Yeah, it's been, I think from what I've spoken to folks. Because Apple's a great company to work for, I think, right? Oh yeah, it's stable. They don't lay off people like the rest of the tech world. I think it's a great place. But speaking with folks in sort of that hardware universe, I think a lot of people in hardware engineering at Apple have become a little uninspired and bored with sort of the rote work. They're doing the incremental sort of updates to the iPhones and Macs and Apple Watches. So I think this is quite exciting. this idea and i mean you know i wonder if your reporting told you anything about what kinds of hardware products open ai is trying to build because i mean there's been a lot of ideas thrown around did you did you sort of get any insight there yeah we heard a few things i mean i think primarily it it appears and and they've and in court documents they have acknowledged sort of a plan around a family of devices that they want to release.

53:39And there's a range of sort of form factors. They're looking at a smart speaker without a display. So obviously something like you could think like, you know, an Amazon Alexa-like device, smart glasses. We've heard as a talk about form factor, digital recorders. And are they going after talent that have experience building these types of products? Are they looking at it in terms of manufacturing? How are they, I guess, I'm not asking you who your sources are, but I'm asking, how do we sort of know this? Oh, I mean, I've spoken to people who've been in the lab. We have people in the supply chain, Gore-Tec in Luxshare, which are Apple suppliers, are working on these devices.

54:34So similar to like in the Apple world, there's a very, very large, complicated supply chain with a lot of folks, a lot of people in that chain. There's people now entering into and doing work with OpenAI here. Okay. You know, I want to get some sense from how important Joni Ive is to these conversations. It feels like maybe this is an easier sell because people are saying, well, look, I mean, we want to go work with a visionary. Is he a pretty big part of these discussions? Oh, for sure. Yeah. Involved very deeply in sort of the outreach and poaching, I think. And just, yeah, the draw of Johnny Ive.

55:16He is sort of the icon that brought Apple back from the brink with Steve Jobs in the late 90s. the deep partnership between those two made Apple into the companies today. And so, you know, just seeing him as that key piece of what made Apple, what used to make, you know, some of these people think what Apple used to be of Apple, he is a key part of that. Right. Talent is one side of the story. I wonder if you can talk a little bit about just how difficult it is, because a lot of companies have tried to do hardware. Of course, a lot of companies have not had Jody Ive by their side guiding them.

55:56But it doesn't strike me that this is a home run just if you can get a couple of great hardware engineers on board. I mean, we're talking a multi-year, multi-decade journey even for OpenAI. Totally, for sure. I mean, I think Silicon Valley is littered with former Apple hardware employees trying to do startups. I think it's like the trying to translate being at a big company like Apple with tons of resources surrounded by massive teams working on every element of a product to a smaller, more scrappy kind of environment. that's really difficult for a lot of folks because there's just so much that goes into hardware at every sort of layer that, you know, you just need a team that can execute is really challenging outside of Apple.

56:50So you just, there's been a lot of examples out there of sort of, yeah, Apple hardware folks with a good idea, but they just can't, they just can't bring it to life. Last question for you. You know, every great story comes with more questions and answers sometimes. What questions did this raise for you with respect to OpenAI's hardware strategy and what are you watching for? Yeah, I mean, primarily the thing I was thinking about a lot in this is, does the world need another device, especially an AI device? Like since, you know - We saw the glasses this week. I mean, you know. Yeah, I mean, since the rise of ChatGPT, there's been a lot of, you know, AI devices, the humane AI pen.

57:41Yeah, there's been, there's, there's, there's just like, none of these have shown, I think, any sort of value or our purpose for consumers and have been complete flops for reviewers and consumer demand. So I think, is Johnny Ive, is he going to show us that there is a path forward? Does the world need an AI device because I'm not convinced. I think the smartphone is a perfectly fine kind of device to interact with AI, even your Mac. I mean, most people are just typing into a Safari browser their chat GPT prompts. They don't need a device to do this stuff. So I think that's the thing I'm thinking about, like how necessary is this?

58:24Yeah, and we just had Alex Kimmel on the show just a few minutes ago. And one of the questions I asked him was about, hey, with these glasses, I mean, isn't it distracting really? You make the argument that glasses allow you to be more present. And my point to him was, I actually think it adds distractions. And so I'm actually with you. I'm with you. And so I'm curious to see what they come out with. Aaron, thank you so much for coming on the show. That is Aaron Tilly, our Apple reporter here at The Information. Well, that does it for today's show. A reminder that we are live on this stream Monday through Friday at 10 a.m.

58:59Pacific, 1 p.m. Eastern. I want to thank Amazon Web Services, who is our presenting sponsor for this production. And I want to thank you for tuning in. We really do appreciate your viewership. I am already excited for our next show on Monday. We've got a busy week planned for you, and so we will see you then. Until then, have a great weekend. Bye-bye for now.

From the publisher

Meta VP of Wearables Alex Himel talks with TITV Host Akash Pasricha about their new wearable AI display glasses. We also talk with our reporter Theo Wayt about the ex-oilman Brent Mayo who is key to Elon Musk’s data center ambitions. We discuss NVIDIA’s monumental $5B investment in Intel with our panel of experts: Anissa Gardizy, Aaron Ginn and Jay Goldberg, and we get into OpenAI poaching Apple’s hardware talent with our Reporter Aaron Tilley.

Articles discussed on this episode: 

https://www.theinformation.com/briefings/meta-introduces-new-smart-glasses-display

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/metas-ar-presence

https://www.theinformation.com/briefings/nvidia-hire-networking-startup-enfabricas-ceo-license-technology

https://www.theinformation.com/projects/the-information-50

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-raids-apple-hardware-talent-manufacturing-partners


TITV airs on YouTube, X and LinkedIn at 10AM PT / 1PM ET. Or check us out wherever you get your podcasts.


Subscribe to: 

- The Information on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@theinformation4080/?sub_confirmation=1

- The Information: https://www.theinformation.com/subscribe_h


Sign up for the AI Agenda newsletter: https://www.theinformation.com/features/ai-agenda


More from The Information's TITV

All 304 episodes
Meta’s VP of Wearables on AI Glasses Business Model, OpenAI Poaches Apple’s AI TalentThe Information's TITV · 59 min
Listen in VO