Are we entering a world without screens?

21 May 2026 · 43 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The Interface episode debates a “world without screens” via AI-enabled wearables (rumored Apple AirPods with forward cameras) and then shifts to how social media and politics are manipulated through “clipping” (paid gig workers posting short video/podcast excerpts) and synthetic polling (LLM “digital twins” replacing human respondents).

Guests

Brandi Cedrosny, senior reporter at MSNBC (described as covering people, platforms, and politics; embedded in clipping communities).

Key claims

  1. Apple may be testing AirPods with low-resolution cameras for AI vision with Siri, enabling richer voice interaction and reducing screen use.
  2. Clipping is a gig economy where campaigns pay workers (often $1–$2 per 1,000 views) to post ~40-second clips; politicians can use it to manufacture apparent popularity.
  3. Synthetic polling uses LLM “digital twins” to expand sample size cheaply (~1/10 cost), but critics warn it can amplify bias, especially on racial identity, and may distort democracy by turning machine-inferred “polls” into news.

Notable examples

Spencer Pratt clipping ads for LA mayor; Ron DeSantis clipping campaign; “Mickey Mouse” write-in appearing in synthetic polling; Cornell researcher Angelina Wang’s critique of biased bot respondents; Google policy change after a hot-dog “AI manipulation” test.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Introduction to The Interface

0:45 to 1:34

Hosts introduce the show and their first guest, Brandi Cedrosny.

“Talks to end the war have stalled, with Iran's insistence on an end to the war in Lebanon a sticking point.”

Upcoming Google I.O. Conference

1:34 to 2:30

Discussion on the upcoming Google I.O. conference and its implications.

“the show that decodes how tech is rewiring your week and your world.”

Rumors of AirPods with Cameras

2:30 to 3:40

Exploring rumors about Apple's AirPods featuring cameras.

“So if you're listening in the future, there's probably a bunch of earth-shattering tech news that we're not going to be talking about, but we'll get to that next week.”

The Future of Screen Interactions

3:40 to 5:10

Discussion on how tech may push us towards less screen interaction.

“You know, everybody's talking about like the meta Ray-Bans glasses that have the cameras in them.”

Concerns About Privacy and AI

5:10 to 6:42

Exploring privacy issues related to tech advancements and AI.

“And like with metaglasses, I just saw somebody, I was going for my morning run and, you know, I asked the park department guy, I was like, when are we turning on the water fountains?”

Historical Context of Technology Changes

6:42 to 9:36

Discussion on how technological advancements shape our interactions.

“and have a conversation with it all day if that's what you want to do.”

Skepticism Around Screenless Devices

9:36 to 12:20

Debating the feasibility and implications of a screenless world.

“But I don't know, does anybody want that?”

The Role of Voice in Future Technology

12:20 to 14:01

Discussion on how voice technology could change user interactions.

“how much of a revolution a screenless world would be.”

The Future of Device Interaction

14:01 to 16:14

Discover how upcoming technology might change our interaction with devices.

“But maybe it would open up an additional, maybe the way that this could go wrong is we're on our devices more because now you don't have to be holding them.”

Clipping Campaigns in Politics

17:55 to 28:00

Explore how clipping campaigns have influenced political campaigning today.

“So up next, Brandy's got a really great story for us here.”
Show all 19 chapters

The Nature of Viral Content

28:00 to 29:20

Explore the dynamics of what makes content go viral in today's digital landscape.

“One thing I was really excited to ask you about, Brandy, is there was a really great article about clipping in Vulture.”

Moments of Genuine Virality

29:20 to 31:00

Discuss examples of authentic viral moments amidst artificial clipping campaigns.

“or political decision to make use of this.”

The Impact of Synthetic Polling

31:00 to 32:50

Uncover the implications of using synthetic respondents in polling.

“Is there like a positive side to this, perhaps?”

Challenges of Digital Twins in Polling

32:50 to 36:10

Examine the concept of digital twins and their effectiveness in reflecting human opinions.

“And this has been going on a little while.”

Bias in Polling and Representation

36:10 to 38:30

Discuss the biases present in both real and synthetic polling and their societal impacts.

“Humans are brilliant, unique, conscious creatures.”

The Role of Polls in Political Discourse

38:30 to 41:30

Analyze how polling shapes political narratives and public perception.

“where they can't get enough data for it to accurately reflect, especially minority groups, is by definition reflected in the synthetic version of that.”

The Hot Dog Champion Experiment

42:01 to 43:39

Learn about a provocative experiment involving AI manipulation and search engines.

“Before we get out of here, I want to give a little update, and it's a victory lap.”

Google's Response to AI Manipulation

43:40 to 44:21

Discover Google's policy changes addressing AI manipulation issues following an investigation.

“Google is now saying that attempts to manipulate what AI says violate the company's rules.”

Wrap-Up and Guest Appreciation

44:22 to 44:43

Hear the hosts appreciate their guest and discuss future plans.

“I mean, I think to fix this, we need to instigate the interface tech journalist hot dog eating contest and really just settle this.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.

0:30while you drive home the Honda you've been waiting for. Honda Downtown Chicago. Right price, right now. Could ending the war in Lebanon hold the key for a deal between the United States and Iran? I'm Tristan Redman. And I'm Asma Khaled. And together we host the Global Story Podcast from the BBC. Talks to end the war have stalled, with Iran's insistence on an end to the war in Lebanon a sticking point. Why is the war in Lebanon so hard to stop? For more, listen to The Global Story on bbc.com or wherever you get your pods.

1:29on something that's fake, I think it really matters. Hello and welcome to The Interface, the show that decodes how tech is rewiring your week and your world. I'm Thomas Germain. I'm Nikki Wolfe. Unfortunately, the lovely Karen Howell can't join us today. She's a busy woman, but instead we have our very first guest, a senior reporter at MSNOW, the brilliant Brandi Cedrosny. Brandi will be taking us inside the hidden clipping industry where politicians can now pay armies of people to flood your feed with content. We'll also be looking at how the tech industry is thinking about a world without screens.

2:05And why pollsters are asking robots what they think instead of people.

2:13So first off, welcome to Brandy. Brandy, thanks for joining us. Thanks for having me. I'm excited to be here. Exciting to have you on the show. So what are we talking about? Well, before we get started, we should mention really quickly that Google's big conference, Google I.O., is today. We're recording before it happens. So if you're listening in the future, there's probably a bunch of earth-shattering tech news that we're not going to be talking about, but we'll get to that next week. But in the meantime, I want to talk about some news that leaked a couple of weeks ago at Bloomberg. It's a story from the reporter Mark Gurman about how Apple is apparently, reportedly, in the late stages of testing AirPods with cameras in them.

2:59This is a rumor, but it's, you know, a pretty compelling rumor. This guy, this reporter, usually knows what Apple is up to before they announce it. We reached out to Apple. We'll let you know in the show notes if they get back to us. But this is really interesting. So the idea here is these cameras, apparently, they're not for taking pictures, right? They're going to be providing low-resolution images. And the idea is that they'll work with AI. So you'll be walking around and Siri will be able to see the world along with you. and you'll be able to answer questions and like get directions or like what is this plant that I'm looking at or whatever it is.

3:39And the really interesting thing here is this is part of a much bigger trend that we've seen over the past couple of years where people within the tech industry are talking about pushing us towards a world where we're interacting less with screens and more using computers with our voices, right? You know, everybody's talking about like the meta Ray-Bans glasses that have the cameras in them. You guys know what I'm talking about, right? Yeah, the creepy, creepy, creepy ones. You know, some people are really alarmed by them. Some people really love them. I mean, they're selling like crazy. They keep every year, they're selling more of them.

4:12The tech is shrinking. We hear a lot about like AR, augmented reality and virtual reality, right? Where like you might have a screen like within the glasses themselves, like the newest metaglasses do that. But I think the really interesting thing here is AI provides an opportunity that wasn't possible before. where your phone or your device or whatever just can be more descriptive and you can talk to it like it's a guy. And it opens up a whole new possible way to use machines that wasn't an option before. And I think the interesting question here is like, do we think that this is something that people want?

4:53Like, is it possible? Will the tech industry be able to push us in this direction? And if so, like, what would that world be like? So we're talking about the end of screens. No, the other way to ask that question is like, one, who asked for this? And two, like, what are the unintended consequences, right? Like, that's what I always think. What harm will this hath wrought in a couple of months after its release? And like with metaglasses, I just saw somebody, I was going for my morning run and, you know, I asked the park department guy, I was like, when are we turning on the water fountains? And he had on the metaglasses.

5:24And I think like in the real world, it's so jarring. Even for me, who's like, should be like, I'm technically a tech reporter. I should be used to this. And I hate it so much. I just think that there's so much backlash. Like I'm immediately thinking like they say, okay, you're only taking pictures. But like what in the Pokemon Go are these pictures going to be used for? Right? Like what location date? Like what are they stealing from me? And, you know, what evil will it come out to? Yeah, especially when you mix it with facial recognition technology and that kind of thing. So quick question. this particular gizmo is earpods with cameras?

5:59Do we know anything about what they look like? Where are the cameras coming out and pointing forwards? Do we know anything about that? We haven't seen them, but what the reporting says is, you know, they look like traditional earpods, and apparently there's like the stem is a little bigger, and there's a camera at the end here, so you're walking around, and it can see what you're seeing, and this would allow the AI to understand the environment that you're in and you could interact with it more than if you're just talking to it. So you can already talk to ChatGPT and Google Gemini. They have like a voice feature, right?

6:40And you can walk around with them on your headphones and have a conversation with it all day if that's what you want to do. God bless you. This would be a deeper level, right? because being able to just point your head at something and ask about it would unlock new options for ways that you can interface with your computer. I see what you did the... I love talking to my phone. I don't ever type out text anymore. I always do voice notes or I just do voice to text. I'm the same way. It's such a waste of time. It's crazy. Yeah, when I'm sitting there with my thumbs like a caveman, No, no, I'm done with that.

7:20I think you guys raise a really interesting point about the cameras, right? This freaks people out. I've had this experience like going up to someone and they like turn to look at me and there's like little cameras on their face. It's kind of creepy. I think that's part of what's interesting about Apple doing this. And also we don't, we should stress, we don't know for sure that they're doing it. I mean, the fact that this reporting came out, it's pretty compelling. I think it's likely that they're testing it. And we know that Apple has been moving in this direction, right? They put out those giant, you know, goggles, the Apple Vision Pro a couple of years ago.

7:50So this is technology that they're thinking about. Apple, right, it's got its whole reputation for privacy. They certainly wouldn't want to put out a product that freaked everyone out about how Apple is now invading your personal space by filming you all the time. So I don't know what they would do, but you could imagine it being like, well, this thing never records, right? It's like ambiently taking images. It's processed on the device. We're not keeping any of the data. I'm spitballing here. I'm not saying that that would assuage all the privacy concerns. But, you know, if we could set aside the privacy stuff, it is interesting the possibilities that this would unlock.

8:32Because like, if you think about the history of technology, right, you know, there's this old saying the medium is the message, right? So the latest technology like dictates how we interact with the world, right? When cable became a thing, There were more opportunities for more cable channels. TV got a lot more specific and weird. Then when the internet became widely available, everyone started reading blogs. We switched to cell phones. Social media apps became a thing. Then everyone got a much faster internet connection on their phone. And now we can do short form video. And that's like the latest thing.

9:05If it was possible to just talk to your phone and like have a really rich experience interacting with the world, that could unlock whole new kinds of like, not just like material and content, but like ways of being like you could be on your computer all the time in a way that didn't feel like you were like looking at this little prescribed rectangle that's giving you a very specific experience that's not in your control. It could be really cool. But I don't know, does anybody want that? It sounds like the end of reading. The end of reading. That doesn't sound good. But we might already be past that point.

9:45I mostly read books in audiobook form. So yeah, I have books spoken to me much more than I read them on paper. And also people are interacting. The content people are getting from their phones right now is much more of the short-form video content. I mean, it's only kind of really dinosaurs and journalists and dinosaur journalists who are still on purely text-based social media, like Twitter and Blue Sky, by miles, are much smaller ones and skew older than stuff like TikTok. I mean, all the progression of technology really has been pushing us towards stuff where you're looking at a thing. Is it just contrary to human nature and the way that we interact with the world that we want to be looking at something?

10:33Because that's our primary sense. For the most part, I don't know. Like this might be an entirely foregone conclusion. Or it could be like a thing you have on top of your normal experience with your phone that like you interact with it less because now it's easier to just talk. But I don't know, does this, would you guys use a thing like this if it was available? It sounds cool. Yeah, no, it sounds really great. I do like a lot of outdoor activities. I do a lot of hiking and a lot of running. And so it's like, and I'm constantly like annoyed that I have to look at my phone for things. I'm sure it's something terrible will happen because of it.

11:05It'll be horrible and bad. Yeah, of course. Everything's horrible. And I think like what you said, I'm kind of obsessed with this idea of like what we're doing now is bad for us. Screens are bad for us. That's like the du jour bad for you thing. But like, you know, in the if you look at historical newspapers, they're, you know, columnists bemoaning all of the delinquent children playing chess and reading in bed and things like it's just it's what we do is sort of feed ourselves over the things that we find enjoyable. but I do think that no screens would mean less screens and I think that'd be good.

11:38The reason I'm skeptical about this is just how much of a seismic shift going away from screens would be. I mean, there is so much industry investment in screen content from the short-form video companies themselves. You know, TikTok is not going to love a move away from screens. That's a kind of shot across the bowels to all visual social media. The television and, you know, video industry, the video game industry will talk about second screen content. You get things that are marketed specifically as second screen games, TV that's designed to be watched with kind of half your brain. Like it would require, it's hard to overstate how much of a revolution a screenless world would be.

12:27and there have been attempts at this in the recent past like there have been a couple of ai products you guys remember there's this thing called the rabbit which was like a little it looked like a game boy almost oh i was wondering why you were going with that i was like this is the wrong podcast yeah no no uh it was a very wholesome device and it was like a little ai that you'd carry around and it did have a screen but like the primary way you'd interact with it was through speech or there was this thing called the humane pin that was this huge flop where it was like a thing you would pin it to your chest and you would talk to it mostly.

13:00And then it had like a little projector where you would hold up your hand and it would like project something. It was really weird. Total flop. People didn't like it. Maybe the tech just wasn't ready, but it didn't work. Also, Apple is a company that makes screens, right? Maybe the primary impetus between us, Greenwald. Yeah. But there's also, I don't know if you guys saw, there's this survey the other day and it showed that like people were scrolling less. I'm scrolling less personally. And I think that like people in my lives are scrolling. There's just, I'm not, I've seen the content. I know what it is.

13:34Like I'm bored. I think people may be bored. Apple doesn't want you to stop buying iPhones or MacBooks or, you know, we could list a whole bunch of products they have that have a screen on them. But I think it could be one of two things. Maybe it's just like, well, this is another thing you have. It doesn't replace your screen. You're still going to need it, right? You're still going to need to read documents. You're still going to be, you want to look at pictures. You want to take pictures. You want to, you know, watch videos and stuff. But maybe it would open up an additional, maybe the way that this could go wrong is we're on our devices more because now you don't have to be holding them.

14:12Or maybe, you know, it would replace some of that activity. But also it could just be, it seems like a lot of, you know, the leaders in the tech industry just seem to think that this is where things are going and they're trying to preempt it and build that feature before other people get there. It would just be nice to be able to talk to Siri the way that we all thought we would be able to when the device, when the feature was announced, right? And I could imagine this being super useful and maybe you won't be so addicted to Instagram. That'd be nice. and it's worth saying that this is already a revolution that's happened in terms of the home you know i know lots of people with an alexa lots of people with with a siri device in their house you tell it switch the lights off you tell it to turn on the alarm you tell it to order toilet paper that's already a shift that's happened so maybe this is a sort of personal carry around one of those but i was just going to say the opposite of that because i have an alexa and one-tenth of my conversations are like, no, Alexa.

15:18It's a really frustrating experience as a consumer. Yeah. But I think the idea here is that it would get smarter and it would be because it can see now they talk about technology being more embodied, right? That it like is more present in the world than it has been in the past because it can see you're walking around with it. It becomes like more like a guy who's there with you. It's like your Iron Man suit. It's like your Iron Man suit. Yeah, exactly. One way or another, it's going to start making its way into our world. Maybe it'll be something you wear on your face like glasses or headphones.

15:56Maybe it'll be something else. But it is, I think, a little preview, if not of where things are going, then of where the tech industry is going to try and take us and the experiences that you're going to be having with your devices in the near future. Yeah, expect wearable tech to be the thing that people are trying to sell you quite a lot in the near future. Yeah, yeah. Do you want it? I don't know, but it's coming. Put in the comments if you would wear AirPods with cameras on them, even if they're looking forward or if they're looking directly up your ear into your brain. Let us know in the comments.

16:32Yeah, that I would like. I got to figure out what's going on in there.

16:39From lashes for days with the Viral Liquid Lash Extensions Mascara to awakening your eyes with lift and color from the brilliant eye brightener. Thrive Cosmetics is the go-to when you want to amplify your everyday look. Plus, every product is 100 % vegan, cruelty-free, and made with clean, skin-loving ingredients that work with your skin. And for every product purchased, Thrive Cosmetics donates to help communities thrive. So every time you use your favorite Thrive Cosmetics product, you're helping communities you care about too. Amplify your everyday. Go to thrivecosmetics.com slash shine26 for an exclusive offer of 20 % off your first order.

17:16That's Thrive Cosmetics, C-A-U-S-E-M-E-T-I-C-S dot com slash shine26. Could ending the war in Lebanon hold the key for a deal between the United States and Iran? I'm Tristan Redman. And I'm Asma Khaled. And together we host the Global Story podcast from the BBC. Talks to end the war have stalled, with Iran's insistence on an end to the war in Lebanon a sticking point. Why is the war in Lebanon so hard to stop? For more, listen to The Global Story on bbc.com or wherever you get your pods.

17:55So up next, Brandy's got a really great story for us here. And I'm really excited about it because in part it's, you know, kind of the other side of something we've been talking about for a while. So a couple of weeks ago, we did a story about how this band Geese got incredibly popular. And it turned out that part of the way that that happened was the record label was paying for people to post clips of the band and act like they were just kind of naturally really excited about it. And people believe there was this organic conversation. Or more recently, we had a piece about how the AI industry was paying influencers to talk about how Chinese AI companies are scary and American AI companies are good.

18:38But this is sort of the other side of it, where instead of like tech entering the world of politics, now politics is going into tech and doing the same thing that we've been discussing. And this is kind of your beat, right? like the way that people use social media to make the public believe things, right? Yeah, I think my beat generally is a combination of people, platforms, and politics. And so how people use social media to really organize, because political movement online is real, right? Like there is a real way. That's a great, one of the great things about social media is that small marginalized groups can actually get together and make a big noise and get political power.

19:24But in these cases, I often like to see how campaigns are using the platforms. And we've seen, you know, from Obama using social media for the first time. And then in 2016, the way Trump really took over Facebook ads and just threw money into social media ads like that. And then also, you know, made the way for this organic movement of, you know, deplorables to come up, the all right to come up online with him. That was original. And now we're seeing what I think is interesting in terms of AI usage, which I know you guys have talked about before in political campaigns, but also this idea that we've seen in entertainment, that clipping, the clipping industry, how they're sort of using social media to make it look like certain candidates have this huge following or lots of interest where people are seeing their content and then serving it up in a different way to their communities or their online friends.

20:21And so what is Clipping? Really, it's a gig economy industry where you can go online as a gig worker and you can sign up for campaigns for lots of things. There was a big campaign around Justin Bieber and Coachella. It's mostly for entertainment, but now you can go on and you can sign up for a campaign And you get paid basically a dollar or two dollars generally per 1 ,000 views to take one of the videos or podcast appearances or ads and clip about 40 seconds of it. Edit it, clip it, and post it on your own social media. And then you basically turn in your receipts and say, I got this many views, and you get a small payment.

21:00It's a pretty small community, actually. I've been joining a couple of these groups. Interesting. Most people aren't making their main income this way. It's not really a get rich quick sort of scheme, but you can sign up, make a few dollars, side gig, side hustle. I'm just so interested in the fact that you embedded into these clipping communities. Can you tell us more about what that's like? Like, what are the conversations happening in there? What are the people like? Where's my money? So they're just like me. It's their hustlers. It's people just, you know, trying to make a buck. And so it's, you know, you go into Discord or you go into, I think it's WHOP or WAP.

21:42I'm not sure. But the WHOP, I think it is. Okay. You basically just say, you know, I want to be a part of this community. And you go in and then there are active campaigns that you can sort of scroll through and see what you're interested in. And then, you know, you click on a document, you get the rules for that campaign, and it tells you exactly what to do and where to do it. And then the communities themselves, the chats are really just, you know, why isn't this working for me? Where is my money? I submitted my clip. And then people talking about either what's wrong with it or what's working, sharing tips.

22:18Like one of the tips I saw yesterday was, you know, some people just clip and put it up. But the ones that really move seem to be the clips that are around 40 seconds. So the shorter ones, no, you need that, like, people to engagement time. And then also the ones that have just a teeny piece of additive content. So if you just clip and post, it's boring. So sort of tips and tricks, gig economy stuff. So yeah, I've been recently seeing a lot of Spencer Pratt ads. I'm in New York. Spencer Pratt is a former reality villain, bad boy of the hills. Now he is running for mayor because this is the world that we live in.

23:02And he's doing really, I'm sorry, mayor of L.A. And he's running for mayor of L.A. And he's doing really well in the polls. And it's hard to say, right, like whether what why he's doing well in the polls. Like partly it's because L.A. is weird and he's got a lot of weird rich friends that are giving him money. Partly. And it's because I think of this clipping campaign that he's got going because I'm seeing these clips of him everywhere. Right. These these clips. of Spencer at the debate, you know, owning Karen Bass, the current mayor. I'm seeing these ads where he is Batman, these AI ads. I'm seeing him on Joe Rogan.

23:38Like, and I have a really carefully curated algorithm. There's no reason I should be seeing all of these Spencer Pratt clips, but I am. And so I joined a couple of these clipping communities and went to check out the Spencer campaign. And so he's running a couple of clipping campaigns right now. Like one of them, his budget is$10 ,500. And basically when you think about bang for your buck, right? Like how much does a billboard cost and how many people see it? Well, if you have a$10 ,500 clipping campaign and you're paying$2 per thousand views, I'm not a mathematician because I'm a journalist, but you can get a ton of views for not that much money.

24:20And so I think it's a really, really smart way of doing it. And like, also, you know, we should talk about disclosure with Spencer Pratt's campaign. Cause I think that this is sort of the wave of politicians are always a little late to the internet, but when they do pick it up, like boy, howdy. And so I think we're going to see a lot of it in the midterms and you're going to see something on Spencer Pratt's ads that you don't see other places. So when you do look at these Spencer Pratt clipping campaigns, you'll see on the clips way down below sometimes, you'll see a disclosure from and it says this ad was paid by the Spencer Pratt campaign.

24:57And that is special. And it's only because California has a law that requires that disclosure. So we have, you know, two agencies that should be regulating this sort of thing, and it falls right in between them. So one is the Federal Trade Commission, and the Federal Trade Commission would, if they're selling a product or, you know, supporting a consumer group or something, they have to, an influencer has to disclose that. The other is the FEC, the Federal Election Commission. And if this were a television ad or a radio ad, they would have to disclose it. But because it falls somewhere in between, nobody's regulating it, even though industry groups have begged the FEC to do something, nobody's doing it.

Read the full transcript

25:39And so we're seeing it on Spencer Pratt's campaign, which is helpful because we're seeing the way that it works. But I already saw it's not necessarily a campaign yet, but at the same clipping community, there was this campaign for Ron DeSantis to post videos of his recent podcast appearance and just to basically look like a tall, capable politician, maybe for a 2028 run. I don't know. Paul's never been a strong suit. Yeah. On the Internet, no one knows you're short. But so, you know, we're already seeing sort of movement on here. And I do think that this is really the place to watch. When we were talking about this band Geese and this like, you know, kind of fake campaign behind them, there was this whole conversation where people were really outraged, where they said they called it a psyop, a psychological operation, like stuff that the CIA does to fool a populace, right?

26:31And my reaction to it was like, You could call it, you know, a psyop or you could call it marketing, right? And I feel like people have this kind of false sense of how social media works, that it's all user-generated content. So if there's a conversation happening, it's authentic. But the fact that this works means that people believe that if there's something that a lot of people are discussing on social media, they're talking about it just because they're interested in it. And I think my question is like, is this a permanent condition of just how we think that social media works because of human nature?

27:13Or is this like a transient moment? Like, will people keep finding out about this stuff and realize, oh, the social media, everything's fake. You just pay when you want a lot of people to talk about something. And then this stuff stops working. The way that people engage with social media right now and with their phones, especially like on TikTok and Instagram, the clips are the message. Like that is what people consume. And I don't think that people are aware about these clipping campaigns, especially not in politics yet. And so when they see it, like your brain is attuned to, I will sit here and watch this 30 second thing.

27:49And it's usually a really good clip, a really engaging clip. And so I think wasting that much of your democratic time or, you know, your time as a a plugged-in member of a democracy on something that's fake, I think it really matters. Like, I think people need to know. One thing I was really excited to ask you about, Brandy, is there was a really great article about clipping in Vulture. And they interviewed this marketer who, like, works in this business. And he said that at this point, nothing goes mega viral. Like, stuff becomes popular organically on its own, but nothing breaks through to become, like, the biggest thing on the internet naturally anymore.

28:29This guy was arguing that for the most part, I'm sure with some exceptions, if it's huge, if it's like breaking through into like out of social media and everyone is talking about it, then it is inherently fake at this point. It cannot be done without coordination. Do you think that's an overstatement or has it really gotten to that point? I mean, it's sort of like AI hype, right? Like this guy has a vested interest and making his product seem really imperative. So I think that there's probably a hype from that marketer. But I do think, again, I think it's just such a quick bang for your buck that if you're a person that is famous or you're a person that has campaign money, it almost seems, and it's allowed.

29:14This is allowed. It just seems like, of course you would do it. It does seem like a really smart business or political decision to make use of this. But like, I did see something go viral lately that I don't think was associated with a clipping campaign. And it was, it's several times over the last seven months. And it's been around conspiracy theories around Erica Kirk or just, you know, dunking on Erica Kirk, who's now the new CEO of Turning Point USA after her husband was assassinated, Charlie Kirk, at an event in September. But what is interesting is that during one of these pile-on periods where these clips and these jokes about Erica Kirk were going viral, Erica Kirk or someone representing Erica Kirk put out a campaign for a clipping campaign for her to put out positive things.

30:03So I think that there's still moments of virality that don't necessarily aren't aligned with this. But I do think that it shows that a clipping campaign is a way that you can combat some of that. Or if this is going viral, I also have to make something go viral. And so, you know, you react. The last thing I saw that went naturally viral, did you guys hear the Mango Chutney song? No. I cannot. This is, if you ever in my entire career hear one thing and take it away into the rest of your life, go look up the Mango Chutney song. It's the best thing I've ever seen. It's this guy, he's like beating on his body like a drum and talking about how he likes Mango Chutney.

30:43That's natural. That's the good social media. That's what I'm here for. No amount of money can get over when something really, really good happens. It's good. It restored my faith. I think maybe social media is not a bad thing. Yeah. Is there like a positive side to this, perhaps? Okay, so yes, I think so. I'm sort of, you know, we work so much with, you know, Shrimp Jesus and AI Slop, and I just look at so much garbage all the time. And it's not like these guys are Rembrandts or anything, right? Like they're, they're not making high art, but there is something nice about being in these communities and seeing people, real people work.

31:29I know, again, they're not getting paid very much, but it's just there's something there's something about seeing a little bit of human creativity in this because so often I think in this beat and in this, you know, and campaign stuff is going the other way where it's just sloppy and cheap and fast and garbage. This is a lot of those things, but at least they're real people. yeah i mean in the world where you know ai is going to kill us all right what we keep hearing you still have to pay some guy to go out and post something and talk if you want people to hear it also shrimp jesus if people haven't seen this this is from a couple years ago but for a while like on facebook in particular particular people were really really into these pictures of jesus either as a shrimp or made of shrimp that's another you should be googling that too that was pretty good.

32:20Okay, so my story this week is kind of a twin of Brandy's story. So Brandy, when you were saying that Spencer Pratt is doing surprisingly well in the polls, we may not know that as surely as we think. Because a recent trend in polling has been to bolster and in some places replace entirely its respondents of humans being asked questions for a poll with ARA LLM simulations of humans. And this has been going on a little while. It was reported this week that Gallup, one of the big and most important polling firms, was going to use only synthetic respondents in presidential polling in the next presidential election.

33:11that appears to be more of a rumor. The actual announcement on Gallup's website has been changed. So we're not entirely sure what it was at first, but it's now much more hedging its bets. And it says Gallup is exploring using synthetic respondents is what they're called. I reached out to Gallup for clarification on this. They have at times recording not got back to us, but if they do, we will put an update in the show notes. The way it works is that a polling company will create a digital twin of one of the respondents that they've been polling, and then that LLM will then be included in the results in opinion polls as if it's a real person.

33:57You get some polls that are like 50-50, human and simulated. It means that a polling sample can be much bigger. The bigger a polling sample, the more theoretically accurate the data is, right? If you have 500 people in a poll versus 5 ,000 people in a poll, the idea is that that makes it more granular and more accurate. But the question is, does that make it more accurate if half or even all of those people aren't real? Wait, what's a digital twin? All right. So a digital twin is when someone who's already being polled and they have enough information or believe they have enough information to basically clone them into an LLM version of that person who can then be included in these automated polls going forward as if they're a real person.

34:49The polling companies, a lot of people are very confident that this will make polling more accurate, that an LLM or a series of LLMs can reflect what real opinion is and make predictions based on those. There's one company that I was just listening to an interview with the CEO who claimed that they have made a poll sample of the entire population of Germany, 80 million people, and that they can hit poll every, potentially every BMW owner in Germany was the example that they gave to find market insights that BMW might then be able to make. but are those insights based on real people what happens like normal people react to things that happen in the world so you have a bunch of people who were trump supporters until very recently in a war with iran has really skewed those that those feelings so how do they input like outside forces and you know just as a reporter who's been doing this a long time people shock the heck out of me People do things for reasons that I could never have anticipated.

35:56How do you bake in the humanness of humans to that? That's the absolutely key question. And the answer is that a lot of different companies are trying. But ultimately, you can't. You can't synthesize what a human is going to do. Humans are brilliant, unique, conscious creatures. and I'm not convinced and a lot of critics of synthetic polling are not convinced that that can happen. Now, they claim that they can. And in a lot of demonstrated examples, a synthetic poll has accurately made political predictions, accurately made market predictions. These are very sophisticated models. There was a poll done with synthetic respondents for the 2024 election between Biden and Trump and one of the possible candidates that people favored that came out was Mickey Mouse.

36:53They drilled down into where in the data that came from and found several of the synthetic respondents had given the answer, I hate both candidates, so I will write in Mickey Mouse. And I got to say, that's not an implausible response that actual humans might have given in that situation. That's quite impressive. That is true. Your dad wrote in Mickey Mouse? Yeah. I mean, wow. That's pretty impressive. I don't know. It is pretty impressive. I mean, that's blown my mind, Brady. Brady, is your dad a real man or? Or has he been digitally twinned? Has he been digitally twinned? No, he's a real man.

37:38A real Florida man. That's reassuring. The model's reflecting people like that and reflecting them quite accurately. Now, as with a lot of these things, the problem really meets the road when you hit questions of racial identity, because these things have demonstrated a lean towards bias. There's a Cornell researcher called Angelina Wang who found that bot respondents in pollings not only portray marginalized groups inaccurately, but represent them as if viewed by outsiders. Quote, it's like if a bunch of white people got together and made a movie about black people and only had white writers and even white actors.

38:21This happens a lot in real polling as well as synthetic polling. But that's where the problem is. Any problem that already exists in real polling, where they can't get enough data for it to accurately reflect, especially minority groups, is by definition reflected in the synthetic version of that. It's picked up all of the problems from real polling and added a few more of its own. And can I ask, is this like the companies that are doing this, are they doing it like to save money and need fewer resources and people? Or is it like tech can do this better than we could have with real people? It's absolutely to save money.

39:01It costs about one tenth of the amount to do a synthetic poll rather than a real poll. And that amount of money is basically just the compute power. I have a broader question here, which is just about polls in general, right? There's been a lot of discussion like from political scientists over the years about how like polls have just taken this huge space in our political discourse and just in our society that like the polls become the news and there's always another poll. So there's always another thing for journalists to talk about. And we've had this shift where we're talking more about what the polls are saying than what the politicians themselves are saying and whether or not they're good candidates, which is especially problematic because polls are, you know, it's science, but it's just like a guess.

39:54And there's always problems. And it's treated as though it's fact, right? Like 73 % of, you know, XYZ people support this candidate. So, you know, this is the way the world is going when really that's, you know, a poll made a guess. But like, should we just be asking questions about how we're using polls in the first place? Yeah, I think absolutely. I mean, the fact that politics has become almost like sports coverage a lot. Who's going to win? Who's going to lose? Not what are the most important issues? Are they going to kill us all? Yeah. We saw this a lot famously in the 2016 Brexit referendum in the UK, where polling predicted a big win for the Remain in the EU campaign, that didn't turn out.

40:37The pollsters all looked like, it's like we left completely high and dry. And there was a bit of a reckoning after that of how did things go wrong? And one of the things that may have been involved there is that if someone sees these headlines of a poll saying something is going to go that way, that changes their behavior. So if all the headlines are saying the Remain campaign is going to win, a lot of people don't turn out. And there was a study by the University of Work that suggested that the effect of polling saying that it's a foregone conclusion, effectively, or polling predicting a landslide, can change turnout by as much as 8%, which is plenty to swing almost any election.

41:228 % is a landslide, right? 8 % is a landslide in and of itself in turnout. Yeah. I mean, polling is not just important. It is vital in order to understand the world, in order for people to make decisions within politics. But now we maybe are not even hearing what people think. We are hearing what machines think people think. And that means our understanding of the world may be slipping a bit. Do we need a new name? Is that even a poll at that point? That's a really good question to which I don't have an answer. We'll talk about that next week. Leave your suggestions for the new word for poll in the comments.

42:00Yeah, absolutely. Before we get out of here, I want to give a little update, and it's a victory lap. Hell yeah. So back in February, I did something incredibly stupid. I got a tip from an expert on search engines that you could trick AI tools into telling other people whatever you want. by doing something as simple as publishing one single article almost anywhere on the internet. So to see if I could test this out, people might remember if they've been listening to a show for a while that I wrote an article titled The Best Tech Journalists at Eating Hot Dogs. I ranked myself number one. I said I'd won a bunch of contests.

42:46I put Nikki somewhere down below. Of course, I'm going to be better than Nikki than anything like that. Within 24 hours, Google Gemini, the AI responses at the top of Google search and ChachiPT were telling the world that I am a hot dog champion. I think that's pretty funny, but there's something much more serious at play here, which is people are using this trick to spread information, like dismiss concerns about medical supplements was an example I saw, or give people biased advice about like what you should do to invest for retirement and which companies you should pick. This is happening on a massive scale.

43:20AI tools are very easy to manipulate. Well, now since I highlighted this problem after our investigation here, Google has just made a change to its policies. I talked to Google. They said, well, this isn't, we're not changing our policies. We're just confirming that this is a fact. Nothing is different now. But after our story, Google is now saying that attempts to manipulate what AI says violate the company's rules. And if they catch you doing this, they will, you know, punish your website, basically take you off Google, which is like taking you off the internet, which is a major step towards addressing this problem.

43:56And there's some evidence that other companies are following suit. I've got an article coming out about this on bbc.com you can check out. But in the meantime, I think that's that's kind of a nice little win for us. Are we still up there as the hot dog eaters? Or have they changed? Even as recently as a month ago, somebody sent me a screenshot where ChatGPT said that I am the tech journalist hot dog champ, which is, I think that's what I want on my tombstone. I mean, I think to fix this, we need to instigate the interface tech journalist hot dog eating contest and really just settle this. Yeah.

44:30If we make it real, that's going to confuse the AI. I'll be the referee. Hell yeah. Well, Brandy, this was great. Thanks so much for coming on the show. It was great to have you. It's my pleasure. I really had a good time. Thanks so much. We'll have to have you back. anytime.

44:47All right, we got to get out of here. But in the meantime, you can join us next week. If you're in the UK, listen to The Interface on BBC Sounds. Or if you're outside the UK, anywhere else, you can listen to our show wherever you get your podcasts or just search for The Interface podcast on YouTube. If you want to get in touch, you can send us an email at theinterface at bbc.com or follow us all on social media. Wouldn't that be fun? You can find our handles right down there in the show notes.

45:43Why is the war in Lebanon so hard to stop? For more, listen to The Global Story on bbc.com or wherever you get your pods.

From the publisher

Karen Hao’s away this week — but it’s a special episode: Thomas and Nicky welcome their first ever guest, senior reporter at MS NOW, Brandy Zadrozny, to decode the tech stories rewiring your week and your world.

First: are we heading for a world without screens? Bloomberg reports Apple is in late‑stage testing of AirPods with tiny cameras - not for selfies, but to give Siri “eyes” so it can understand what you’re looking at and respond in real time. We explore what that signals: less phone‑tapping, more ambient “AI companion” computing - and why earbuds (oddly) might be a more plausible bridge to screenless tech than headsets or smart glasses. If the interface moves from screens to always‑on assistants, what changes about attention, privacy - and who gets to shape the world you experience?

Next: the hidden clipping industry flooding your feed - now in politics. Brandy takes us inside the booming “clipping economy”: armies of freelancers paid to slice long content into viral short‑form clips and push them across TikTok, Reels and Shorts until something hits. The twist is that the tactics that built internet stars are increasingly being borrowed to build candidates - blurring what’s organic and what’s engineered. We ask who’s hiring clippers, what kinds of accounts they use, how political disclosure rules get sidestepped, and what happens when elections are fought in the attention economy.

Finally: if AI can simulate public opinion, what even counts as a poll? Pollsters and researchers are experimenting with “synthetic” respondents - AI‑generated “digital twin” voters trained on real datasets - to answer questions at speed and scale. But if headlines still say “the public thinks…”, when the truth is “the model predicts…”, are polls measuring opinion - or shaping it? In a polling era already bruised by credibility crises, we ask what trust looks like when the respondents might not be human.

We reached out to Gallup for comment and they responded: Gallup does not currently publish approval or favorability ratings for individual political figures, and we have no plans to incorporate simulated responses on that subject now or in the future. We are in the beginning phases of some exploratory research on simulated responses. Through this work, we are hoping to learn whether AI systems and emerging methods can help deepen our understanding of how humans think and behave. You can read more about our approach in our methodology blog.

We also contacted Apple for comment but did not hear from them before the release of this episode.

The Interface is your weekly guide to the tech rewiring your week and your world. Hosted by journalists Thomas Germain and Nicky Woolf (and this week, with special guest Brandy Zadrozny), each episode unpacks, week by week, how technology is shaping all our futures. No jargon. Just sharp voices debating the tech stories that matter.

New episodes drop every Thursday on BBC Sounds in the UK. Outside the UK, find us on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts — or watch the video version on YouTube (search “The Interface podcast”).

To get in touch: theinterface@bbc.com The Interface is a BBC Studios production. Producer: Natalia Rodriguez Ford Executive Editor: Philip Sellars

More from The Interface

All 22 episodes
Are we entering a world without screens?The Interface · 43 min
Listen in VO