In short
Podcast Episode Notes: Anthropic’s Pentagon Problems
Podcast Information Title: The Journal Hosts: Ryan Knutson and Jessica Mendoza Producers: Spotify and The Wall Street Journal Episode Title: Anthropic’s Pentagon Problems Episode Date: February 23rd
Episode Overview In this episode, the hosts discuss a conflict between Anthropic, an AI company, and the U.S. military regarding the usage of Anthropic's AI model, Claude. Despite winning a significant $200 million contract with the Pentagon, disparities in their operational philosophies have led to a standoff over the potential military applications of Claude, particularly concerning weapons development and surveillance.
Key Points
- Background on Anthropic
- Founding: Anthropic was established in 2021 by former OpenAI employees who prioritized responsible AI use.
- Philosophy: The company emphasizes AI safety, advocating for regulations and guardrails over unrestricted technological advancement.
- CEO: Dario Amadei, noted for his outspoken and quirky persona, emphasizes the need for responsible AI deployment.
- The Pentagon's AI Push
- The U.S. military is rapidly incorporating AI technologies into its operations.
- Anthropic's Claude has gained special clearance for classified operations, making it a valuable asset.
- The military aims to leverage AI for applications ranging from intelligence analysis to potential future uses in autonomous weapons.
- Contractual Tensions
- Anthropic's contract includes explicit limitations: Claude cannot be used for weapons development or domestic surveillance.
- The Pentagon's response to these limitations has been aggressive, leading to potential repercussions for Anthropic's standing as a military supplier.
- Cultural Clash
- Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth criticized "woke" AI, implying that Anthropic's approach does not align with military objectives.
- The Pentagon's assertion of needing AI tools that facilitate warfare contrasts with Anthropic's self-imposed restrictions.
- Escalation of Conflict
- Following a military operation in Venezuela, questions arose over Claude's involvement, raising alarms within Anthropic about compliance with their own usage policies.
- The Pentagon has threatened to label Anthropic as a "supply chain risk," a designation typically reserved for companies deemed to threaten national security.
- Potential Outcomes
- If designated a supply chain risk, Anthropic could lose significant business with military vendors, adversely impacting their operations and market position.
- Conversely, discontinuing collaboration with Anthropic might hinder the Pentagon's access to advanced AI technologies that are currently not available through other models.
Conclusion The conflict between Anthropic and the Pentagon exemplifies the complexities of integrating advanced AI technologies into military operations amidst differing ethical standards and operational strategies. This standoff highlights the broader implications of AI adoption within governmental frameworks and the ongoing discourse surrounding the responsible use of technology in warfare.
Further Listening
- AI Bots Have Social Media Now. It Got Weird Fast.
- Vibe Coding Could Change Everything.
- Her Client Was Deepfaked. She Says xAI Is to Blame.
Additional Resources For more insights and stories, consider subscribing to WSJ’s free What’s News newsletter and explore relevant merchandise at [WSJ Shop](https://wsjshop.com/collections/clothing).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VODefense Technology Summit Overview
0:00 to 1:53
Learn about the recent Defense Technology Summit and its focus on AI in the military.
“defense industry got together last week for a meeting in West Palm Beach.”
Anthropic's AI and Military Clashes
1:54 to 2:31
Discover the ongoing conflict between Anthropic and the Pentagon regarding AI usage.
“But this is the first salvo in what is going to be a very long, complicated battle.”
Anthropic's Founding and Philosophy
3:01 to 5:30
Understand Anthropic's origins and its commitment to AI safety and responsible use.
“That matters because ads in AI aren't like ads elsewhere.”
The Value of Military Contracts
5:31 to 7:30
Explore why military contracts are crucial for AI companies like Anthropic.
“I think policymakers do need to worry about it.”
Tensions Following Military Contract
7:31 to 10:08
Examine the rising tensions between Anthropic and the Pentagon after a significant contract.
“AI is seen as the future technology across the board, but it has so many military applications.”
Anthropic Under Pentagon Scrutiny
10:09 to 11:22
Learn about the Pentagon's review of its partnership with Anthropic amidst rising tensions.
“Transcription by CastingWords Trimphia injection is a prescription medicine for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who may benefit from taking injections or pills or phototherapy.”
Anthropic Under Pentagon Scrutiny
11:49 to 14:00
Learn about the Pentagon's review of its partnership with Anthropic amidst rising tensions.
“military ordered a strike on Venezuela and captured its president, Nicolas Maduro.”
Anthropic's Supply Chain Risk
14:00 to 16:40
Learn about the Pentagon's threat to label Anthropic as a supply chain risk and its implications.
“A spokesperson for Anthropic said the company is, quote, Committed to using frontier AI in support of U.S.”
Risks of Cutting Ties with Anthropic
16:40 to 18:09
Explore the potential consequences for the military if they stop working with Anthropic.
“So that could put them in a very tough spot for sure.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:05Amrith Ramkumar:Top names in the U.S. defense industry got together last week for a meeting in West Palm Beach. Here's our colleague Amrith Ramkumar.
0:13Jessica Mendoza:The Defense Technology Summit in Florida on Tuesday was really a gathering of some top Pentagon officials and people in the tech world. And the motivation is to embed the most advanced technology throughout the U.S. military.
0:27Amrith Ramkumar:These days, talking about tech means talking about AI. But there was one thing they were really buzzing about.
0:36Jessica Mendoza:And that was the AI company Anthropic and the use of its tools in the military. And it's the latest sort of development in this saga that's consumed a lot of Washington.
0:48Amrith Ramkumar:This saga goes back years and has to do with the way Anthropic's AI is being used.
0:55Jessica Mendoza:They are clashing with the Pentagon over how the military uses CLAWD, Anthropic's AI models. And Anthropic is trying to put up some guardrails and prevent some uses. And they've been fighting over that for many months now.
1:09Amrith Ramkumar:One of the loudest voices in the disagreement is Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
1:14Jessica Mendoza:Department of War AI will not be woke. It will work for us. We're building war-ready weapons and systems, not chatbots, for an Ivy League faculty lounge.
1:32Amrith Ramkumar:What is at stake here? Why does it matter if Anthropic and the government are on the outs?
1:38Jessica Mendoza:This fight is really about AI's use in the military and the government broadly. It's about whether the technology can be used for, in the future, autonomous weapons potentially, or for surveillance and law enforcement. And that has far-reaching consequences that will probably not be clear for a while. But this is the first salvo in what is going to be a very long, complicated battle.
2:04Amrith Ramkumar:Welcome to The Journal, our show about money, business, and power. I'm Jessica Mendoza. It's Monday, February 23rd.
2:17Amrith Ramkumar:Coming up on the show, Anthropic versus the Pentagon.
2:30Amrith Ramkumar:This episode of The Journal is presented by Intuit Enterprise Suite. If your finance team spends more time finding data than using it, if there's one entity here and one here and one here and one here, If scaling your business feels like starting over, you need the Intuit ERP. Intuit Enterprise Suite. The AI native ERP is here. From the makers of QuickBooks. Learn more at intuit.com slash ERP. This episode is brought to you by Claude from Anthropic. Anthropic just made a commitment. No ads in Claude. That matters because ads in AI aren't like ads elsewhere. On social media, they sit next to your content.
3:12Amrith Ramkumar:In AI, they could be woven into it. To keep you engaged rather than helping you think something through or getting the tough work done. See why the world's best problem solvers choose Claude as their thinking partner. Try it free at claude.ai slash the journal.
3:34Amrith Ramkumar:Anthropic was founded in 2021 after a group of former OpenAI employees decided to start an alternative.
3:41Jessica Mendoza:They are a bunch of people who got uncomfortable with the idea that OpenAI was favoring technology advancement over responsible use of the technology.
3:50Amrith Ramkumar:OpenAI has said it prioritizes AI safety. Still, Anthropic's reputation grew.
3:58Jessica Mendoza:This is just like a quirky bunch of San Francisco characters. The CEO, Dario, is known as Professor Panda. He has a chicken coop in his backyard and he has a camera on them at all times. So really, yeah, they're sort of this ragtag bunch in some ways that came out of open AI and they've now suddenly become maybe one of the most important AI developers.
4:22Amrith Ramkumar:That founding group has talked a lot about the company's focus on safety. Here's CEO Dario Amadei on 60 Minutes last year. One way to think about Anthropic is that it's a little bit trying to put bumpers or guardrails on that experiment, right?
4:39Jessica Mendoza:Anthropic has tried to brand themselves as the AI good guys. They say AI could destroy the world and is too powerful and is improving too quickly, so the government needs to do all these regulations and slow it down.
4:53Amrith Ramkumar:The company supported oversight, even if it didn't seem to be in their best interest. For instance, Anthropic has lobbied in favor of state-led AI regulation. That philosophy was a good match with the Biden administration's priorities.
5:07Jessica Mendoza:The Biden administration really did focus on AI safety, transparency, and taking steps to put some guardrails up. So when the Trump administration came in and on day one basically said, we're getting rid of all of that, Anthropic fought back, and they've basically spoken publicly about the need for guardrails.
5:25Amrith Ramkumar:Here's Dario Amadei again.
5:27Jessica Mendoza:I think we do need to be raising the alarm. I think we do need to be concerned about it. I think policymakers do need to worry about it. They're the one big AI model developer that has been fighting the Trump administration on this issue and doesn't like the Trump administration's a laissez-faire approach to AI regulation. They don't like exporting advanced AI chips to China. And they speak their mind. The CEO, Dario Amadei, is one of the only notable CEOs who has spoken out consistently against Trump in this second term.
5:58Amrith Ramkumar:At the same time, Anthropic was looking to grow its business and find new customers. And one of the most high-value customers for any AI company is the U.S. military. Anthropic had already formed a partnership with Palantir, a data analytics company that has long worked with the Department of Defense and federal law enforcement. That partnership allowed Palantir to offer Claude to Palantir customers, which laid the groundwork for Anthropik's technology to be used in defense work. And in the summer of 2025, Anthropik landed a major$200 million contract with the U.S. military. The idea was that defense operations could start using Anthropik's chatbot Claude to help with their work.
6:41Jessica Mendoza:The government is trying to embed AI everywhere it can, and Anthropik's cloud models are simply too good. They're often better at things like coding or other sorts of applications.
6:54Amrith Ramkumar:The government had also granted a special level of access to Anthropik through the company's partnership with Palantir, meaning cloud could be used in classified settings. It's the only AI model that currently has that level of clearance, and getting it takes a long time. So if Anthropix says it's really concerned with safety, it's really socially conscious, that sort of doesn't strike me as the type of place that would go for a military contract. Why did the company go down that route?
7:25Jessica Mendoza:Military contracts are an enormous deal for AI companies trying to get their foot in the door with the U.S. government. AI is seen as the future technology across the board, but it has so many military applications. People talk about autonomous drones, using it to crunch numbers more efficiently. I mean, you can really embed it throughout your operations. It could be used down the road in battle. And more importantly for these companies, it's seen as just very lucrative because the military is seen as a huge, huge customer. And if they say, we like your AI better than someone else's AI, that has immense value to shareholders.
8:01Jessica Mendoza:So for all of those reasons, it's important.
8:06Amrith Ramkumar:At the time, Anthropic noted in a press release that the partnership would, quote, dramatically improve intelligence analysis and enable officials in their decision-making processes.
8:21Amrith Ramkumar:How quickly does the culture clash between Anthropic and the Trump administration start to bubble up after this contract is signed?
8:30Jessica Mendoza:Almost immediately, the tensions started running hot. Around the same time, it's important to note that the Trump administration signed an executive order about woke AI that essentially implicitly was calling out Anthropic and others that they felt their models were too woke. And if you asked it certain questions about how many genders there were or other things like that, you would get a woke response. And Anthropic was widely seen as a main target.
8:56Amrith Ramkumar:Dario Amadei has said that the company isn't woke and that Anthropic doesn't have political motivations.
9:02Jessica Mendoza:And then right away, Anthropic and the military, there were discussions about what Claude could and couldn't be used for. And in Anthropic's terms of service, it states very clearly it cannot be used for anything related to domestic surveillance. And autonomous weapons is another red line that the company has drawn.
9:20Amrith Ramkumar:Anthropic's usage guidelines prohibit Claude from being used to facilitate violence, develop weapons, or conduct surveillance. An Anthropics spokesman said the company can't comment on, quote, whether Claude or any other AI model was used for any specific operation, classified or otherwise. He added that any use of Claude is, quote, required to comply with our usage policies, which govern how Claude can be deployed. We work closely with our partners to ensure compliance. But Anthropics' stance was about to be tested. The United States just attacked Venezuela's capital, hitting military facilities in the country.
9:59Amrith Ramkumar:President Trump ordered this operation. And tensions between Anthropik and the Defense Department would spiral into a full-blown standoff. That's next.
10:38Amrith Ramkumar:Transcription by CastingWords Trimphia injection is a prescription medicine for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who may benefit from taking injections or pills or phototherapy. With Trimphia, clearer skin is possible. In clinical trials, at least 70 % of patients saw at least 90 % clearer skin at 16 weeks. Results may vary. Trimphia is also indicated for adults with active psoriatic arthritis. Serious allergic reactions and increased risk of infections and liver problems may occur. Before a treatment, your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis. Tell your doctor if you have an infection, flu-like symptoms, or if you need a vaccine.
11:14Amrith Ramkumar:Tap this ad to learn more about Trimphia, including important safety information.
11:22Jessica Mendoza:This episode is brought to you by Verizon. Good news. Frontier is joining Verizon.
11:28Amrith Ramkumar:That's right. America's best mobile network and Frontier's lightning-fast fiber internet are coming together. And for a limited time, get Verizon's best offer ever when you bundle your plans.
Read the full transcript
11:38Jessica Mendoza:Frontier and Verizon, better together. Based on RootMetrics' best overall mobile network performance, U.S. second half 2025. All rights reserved. Your results may vary. Service availability varies. Terms apply.
11:57Amrith Ramkumar:In January, the U.S. military ordered a strike on Venezuela and captured its president, Nicolas Maduro. The Wall Street Journal has since reported that Claude was used in that operation.
12:08Jessica Mendoza:It's been very hard, as you can imagine, to unearth too many details about how these models get used. But we are told they offer some benefits, especially in the planning stages of these different missions. So yes, this is one of the first times we know that a specific model was used in an operation like this where people died. And that was on a pretty large scale. Well, afterward, people at Anthropics started asking some questions about how and why and things of that nature. And then someone at Anthropics asked someone at Palantir how Cod was used in Venezuela.
12:45Amrith Ramkumar:An Anthropics spokesman said that these were, quote, routine discussions on strictly technical matters.
12:51Jessica Mendoza:And sort of the tone of the question and the substance set off alarm bells and the Department of Defense found out.
12:58Amrith Ramkumar:And the Pentagon was quick to respond.
13:01Jessica Mendoza:Pete Hegseth, in a speech last month, he said essentially that we need AI tools that let us fight wars. Effective immediately, responsible AI at the War Department means objectively truthful AI capabilities employed securely and within the laws governing the activities of the department. We will not employ AI models that won't allow you to fight wars. And he was referring to Anthropic when he said that, we're told. So the Pentagon has sort of stayed at that spot, and they're continuing to say, like, we need every AI model that we work with to agree to be used in all lawful use cases, and that has to apply across the board.
13:44Amrith Ramkumar:The administration started considering if it would cancel its$200 million contract with Anthropic, according to Wall Street Journal reporting. A spokesman for the Pentagon said that the Defense Department's relationship with Anthropic is under review. He said, quote, Our nation requires that our partners be willing to help our warfighters win in any fight. A spokesperson for Anthropic said the company is, quote, Committed to using frontier AI in support of U.S. national security. Tomorrow, Hegseth and Amadei are meeting in what's expected to be a tense discussion of how to move forward.
14:20Amrith Ramkumar:And so where are we at in this feud as the tension mounts? How bad has it gotten?
14:28Jessica Mendoza:It's gotten pretty bad in the sense that the Pentagon has now threatened to label Anthropic a supply chain risk, which sounds pretty vague, but is actually a pretty big deal, because that's something that's usually only used for companies associated with foreign adversaries.
14:43Amrith Ramkumar:— The government typically labels a company as supply chain risk when it sees it as a potential threat to the economy or national security. The label means the company's products cannot be used for any government-related work. And naming an American company as supply chain risk is extremely unusual.
15:03Jessica Mendoza:— And if they'd go through with that, that would mean all Pentagon vendors and contractors would have to certify that they don't use Anthropics models in their government work. So if you think about that, that means Anthropics' biggest investors and customers, they would all have to say, in the context of their government work with the Pentagon, Anthropics and Claude had nothing to do with this. It's important to note, too, that Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, combating woke-ism and woke companies has been at the core of what he's tried to do in the military. And a lot of people just keep coming back to that idea that the administration feels anthropic is too woke in different settings or too liberal.
15:46Jessica Mendoza:They can't quite shake that feeling.
15:53Amrith Ramkumar:Well, let's say the government does do that if it follows through on this idea of labeling anthropic supply chain risk. What would anthropic's options be in that scenario?
16:04Jessica Mendoza:That's a really good question. I mean, it's safe to say Anthropic is in damage control mode. And if they do get designated a supply chain risk, extreme damage control mode to try to salvage something. Because again, getting cut off from the military would be a huge deal for them. They've invested a lot in trying to become the AI company or one of the few focused on national security. And it would be a big blow because then you're potentially cut off from a huge customer. Sure. So it's, I mean, they would be in a real bind. They would have to maybe take other steps, like bending a knee a little bit in a way they haven't before.
16:40Jessica Mendoza:So that could put them in a very tough spot for sure.
16:45Amrith Ramkumar:What about the Pentagon? Are there any risks for the military if they stop working with Anthropic?
16:51Jessica Mendoza:A lot of very smart people say that would be counterproductive for U.S. national security, for the goals of the administration, et cetera, et cetera. So they've made these threats, but a lot of people are looking at it and saying this would be sort of an own goal and wouldn't really benefit anyone.
17:11Jessica Mendoza:A lot of people look at this story and they think the Trump administration has Anthropic in a tough spot and is targeting them and they have a lot of leverage. But we're told if the Trump administration decided to cut Anthropic off tomorrow and the military decided to stop using Quad altogether, there would be some real problems. because CLOT, again, is the only one that's been approved to be used in classified scenarios. None of the other models have that approval yet. And it has already been embedded, so you can't really strip that out. Cutting yourself off from some of the most advanced models would not be a great strategic choice.
17:47Amrith Ramkumar:And what does this say about the moment that we're in when it comes to AI adoption, particularly in the military, but in the government more generally?
17:56Jessica Mendoza:It shows that AI adoption at the highest levels of government and at the highest levels of companies is happening very quickly. And the government's going to be using it more and more. So it sort of supports that case that the sort of AI arms race and the geopolitical implications of all of that are only accelerating.
18:34Amrith Ramkumar:That's all for today, Monday, February 23rd. The Journal is a co-production of Spotify and The Wall Street Journal. Additional reporting in this episode by Deborah Costa, Vera Bergengruen, Keech Hagee, Berber Jin, and Shalini Ramachandran. Thanks for listening. See you tomorrow.
18:55Amrith Ramkumar:Rinse knows that greatness takes time, but so does laundry. So Rinse will take your laundry and hand deliver it to your door expertly cleaned. And you can take the time pursuing your passions. Time once spent sorting and waiting, folding and queuing, now spent challenging and innovating and pushing your way to greatness. So pick up the Irish flute or those calligraphy pens or that daunting Beef Wellington recipe card and leave the laundry to us. Rinse. It's time to be great.
From the publisher
Anthropic is feuding with the U.S. military, despite their massive $200 million contract. The company says that its AI model, Claude, cannot be used for weapons development or surveillance. The Pentagon is pushing back against those limitations. WSJ's Amrith Ramkumar joins Jessica Mendoza to explain why the Department of Defense is now threatening to label Anthropic a supply chain risk.
Further Listening:
- AI Bots Have Social Media Now. It Got Weird Fast.
- Vibe Coding Could Change Everything
- Her Client Was Deepfaked. She Says xAI Is to Blame.
Sign up for WSJ’s free What’s News newsletter.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
