In short
Podcast Episode Notes: In A Landmark Trial, Zuckerberg Takes the Stand
Podcast Information
- Title: The Journal
- Description: A deep dive into the significant stories revolving around money, business, and power. Hosted by Ryan Knutson and Jessica Mendoza, The Journal is a collaboration between Spotify and The Wall Street Journal.
Episode Details
- Title: In A Landmark Trial, Zuckerberg Takes the Stand
- Description: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies in a historic trial questioning whether social media platforms are contributing to mental health disorders among youth. The plaintiff's case argues that platforms like Instagram are designed for addiction, challenging long-standing legal protections for tech companies.
Key Themes and Discussions
- The Nature of the Trial
- First-of-its-kind Trial: The trial represents a significant legal challenge for social media companies.
- Central Questions:
- Are social media platforms intentionally addictive?
- Do these platforms harm teenagers' mental health?
- Plaintiff's Argument: Represented by attorney Mark Lanier, the plaintiff claims that social media usage from a young age has led to serious mental health issues.
- Legal Context and Implications
- Historical Comparison to Tobacco Lawsuits: The trial draws parallels with the 1990s lawsuits against tobacco companies over health impacts.
- Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act:
- Traditionally protects platforms from liability for third-party content.
- Current lawsuits focus on product liability concerning the design and operation of social media platforms, not the content shared.
- Arguments Presented in Court
- Addictiveness of Social Media: The plaintiff argues that features like push notifications and endless scrolling are designed to keep users engaged.
- Internal Documents: The plaintiff's lawyers presented evidence suggesting that Meta executives, including Zuckerberg, were aware of the potential harms associated with features like beauty filters yet chose to retain them for user engagement.
- Testimony Highlights
- Zuckerberg's Defensive Stance:
- Acknowledged the existence of addictive features but framed it as creating value for users.
- Disagreed with characterizations that Meta prioritizes engagement over safety.
- Emphasized that changes had been made to improve user safety.
- Challenging Questions:
- Lanier confronted Zuckerberg with evidence of past company goals aimed at increasing user engagement.
- A notable moment involved a 35-foot banner displaying the plaintiff's Instagram history, illustrating the platform's pervasive influence on her life.
- Broader Implications
- Impact on Future Cases: The outcome of this trial could set a precedent for thousands of similar cases against social media companies.
- Potential Shift in Legal Accountability: If successful, this trial might pave the way for holding tech companies accountable for the design of their platforms, challenging the protections provided by Section 230.
Conclusion The trial in Los Angeles is a pivotal moment for social media companies and their accountability regarding user safety, particularly for vulnerable populations like teenagers. As the case unfolds, its implications will likely resonate throughout the tech industry and influence future legal battles surrounding social media use and mental health.
---
Further Listening
- The Battle Within Meta Over Chatbot Safety
- “The Facebook Files” from The Journal
Additional Resources
- [Get show merch here](https://wsjshop.com/collections/clothing)
- [Sign up for WSJ’s free What’s News newsletter](#)
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Landmark Trial's Impact
2:24 to 2:51
Discussion on how this trial could change the landscape of social media regulations.
“Welcome to The Journal, our show about money, business, and power.”
Understanding Section 230 and Its Implications
3:18 to 6:43
Exploration of Section 230's role in protecting social media companies from liability.
“Say you've always wanted to sneak away for a last minute long weekend in Napa.”
The Plaintiff's Background and Claims
6:43 to 8:01
Details about the plaintiff KGM and her experiences with social media.
“That's because the cases playing out right now are trying a different strategy.”
Zuckerberg's Testimony and Societal Impact
8:01 to 10:43
Insights into Zuckerberg's courtroom statements and their implications for society.
“So the plaintiff is a woman who goes by the initials KGM.”
Zuckerberg Takes the Stand
14:04 to 16:41
Zuckerberg's initial testimony in court reveals key insights into Meta's practices and policies.
“Eventually, Zuckerberg was shuttled in, surrounded by an entourage.”
The Impact of Social Media
16:41 to 19:52
Discussion on the implications of Instagram on young users, highlighted by a dramatic visual evidence presentation.
“He says people under the age of 13 are not allowed on our service.”
Legal Implications of the Trial
19:52 to 21:03
Exploration of the trial's significance for future cases and the challenges to Section 230.
“And there appeared to be some beauty filters on the plaintiff in some of these photos.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:04Meghan Bobrowsky:So it is 6.30 a.m. and it has just stopped raining. I am waiting outside a courthouse trying to get into this trial that is happening today.
0:20Ryan Knutson:Yesterday morning, our colleague Megan Bobrowski was in Los Angeles. She was there for a landmark trial and to watch testimony from a very high-profile witness.
0:31Meghan Bobrowsky:Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is supposed to testify, and Mark Zuckerberg is going to be defending himself and the actions of his company today in court.
0:45Ryan Knutson:The key questions hanging over Zuckerberg's testimony Is social media designed to be addictive? And is it harmful to teenagers? Last week, the plaintiff's attorney, Mark Lanier, spoke about the case on Fox Business.
1:02Mark Zuckerberg:We slapped a subpoena on Mark Zuckerberg on purpose because we've got documents with his name that he authored that we believe show he put profits over the safety of children.
1:14Ryan Knutson:— Lanier represents a 20-year-old woman who claims that she was harmed by social media use as a child.
1:20Mark Zuckerberg:— And we're going to put him on the stand and I'm going to grill him on it.
1:26Ryan Knutson:— Metta, which is the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, said in a statement prior to the trial's start that the plaintiff's lawyers will, quote, try to paint an intentionally misleading picture of Metta with cherry-picked quotes and snippets of conversations taken out of context.
1:44Ryan Knutson:This trial, which is being heard by a jury, is the first of its kind, and the first of thousands of similar cases that are expected to go to court in the coming years. Here's Megan again.
1:56Meghan Bobrowsky:These cases are focused on how Meta designed its apps and whether Meta designed its apps to be addictive to people. That is a new argument that we're seeing. So the outcome could fundamentally change how the company operates. This could be a very big reckoning moment for big tech, and social media might not ever look the same after this is said and done.
2:24Ryan Knutson:Welcome to The Journal, our show about money, business, and power. I'm Ryan Knudsen. It's Thursday, February 19th.
2:37Ryan Knutson:coming up on the show social media on trial
2:50Mark Zuckerberg:this episode of the journal is presented by intuit enterprise suite if your finance team spends more time finding data than using it if there's one entity here and one here and one here and one here, if scaling your business feels like starting over, you need the Intuit ERP. Intuit Enterprise Suite. The AI native ERP is here from the makers of QuickBooks. Learn more at Intuit.com slash ERP. Say you've always wanted to sneak away for a last minute long weekend in Napa. Here's the thing. If you get smart with your money, you could do things like that. With Empower, you can start making the most out of your money so you can go out and live a little.
3:30Mark Zuckerberg:Isn't that why we work so hard? To have some fun with our money, like treating yourself to a private wellness retreat or scoring incredible seats to a concert you'll never forget. So use Empower and get good at money so you can be a little bad. Join their 19 million customers today at Empower.com, not an Empower client paid or sponsored.
3:54Ryan Knutson:This lawsuit being tried in Los Angeles, and the thousands of cases like it, follow a similar script as the lawsuits that were brought against Big Tobacco in the 1990s.
4:06Mark Zuckerberg:Disagreement forced on Big Tobacco dictates changes that three or four years ago all of us would have thought impossible. And it does it against a hostile, combative, and determined enemy.
4:19Ryan Knutson:In the 90s, tobacco companies were sued by state attorneys general over the health impacts of cigarettes, and they had to pay more than$200 billion in settlements.
4:30Mark Zuckerberg:We've arrived at our final destination, and that's the destination of tobacco justice. And now our people can breathe a lot easier. This time, indeed, the people have won.
4:45Ryan Knutson:Now, in the trial where Mark Zuckerberg testified, the plaintiffs hope social media companies will face a similar reckoning. But using social media, of course, is very different from smoking cigarettes. A lot of people, including tech companies, say social media is a great way to stay connected and share information. Still, there have been questions for years about whether social media can be addictive. And over the last two decades, some researchers say they found a correlation between social media adoption and an increase in mental health issues among young people.
5:19Mark Zuckerberg:A new study has found a link between preteens' use of social media and future depression. The study was conducted by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco.
5:33Ryan Knutson:Up until now, lawsuits against social media companies have largely failed. thanks to a provision in a 1996 law known as Section 230.
5:43Meghan Bobrowsky:Section 230 is basically the stipulation at the federal level that says platforms cannot be held liable for the content on their platforms that's third-party content. And that has been proven in court time and time again that statute holds up.
6:05Ryan Knutson:Social media companies say that Section 230 is a bedrock principle holding up the entire internet. And that if it goes away, freedom of speech online would be threatened. Here's Mark Zuckerberg in 2020. Without 230, platforms could potentially be held liable for everything that people say. They'd face much greater pressure to take down more content to avoid legal risk. In the past, when Meta's been sued...
6:32Meghan Bobrowsky:Meadow will present a Section 230 argument, and the case will get dismissed. So that sort of protected them for a long time. It did not in this case.
6:44Ryan Knutson:That's because the cases playing out right now are trying a different strategy. Rather than suing over the content, they're suing over the way the platforms operate. They're arguing it's a product liability issue.
6:56Meghan Bobrowsky:— Now, what these new lawsuits take aim at is the way the apps are designed, which is Meta's responsibility, and you can sue them directly for.
7:08Ryan Knutson:— The plaintiffs allege that features like push notifications, endless scrolling, videos that autoplay, algorithms that are tailored to each user, are all designed to keep people hooked — and that teens in particular are especially vulnerable.
7:26Ryan Knutson:The idea for this approach gained traction in 2020, after Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas suggested publicly that Section 230 might not cover design choices. In the years that followed, thousands of product liability cases started being filed against social media platforms, including this one in L.A. In this case, the plaintiffs sued Meta, YouTube, TikTok, and Snapchat. Snap and TikTok settled shortly before the trial began, but are still defendants in many of the other cases. All right, let's talk about the case that's now being tried in Los Angeles. Can you tell me about the plaintiff?
8:02Meghan Bobrowsky:So the plaintiff is a woman who goes by the initials KGM. She is currently 20 years old. She was 17 years old when this lawsuit got filed. She lives in California, and the lawsuit talks about how she started using social media when she was just about 10 years old, which she's not supposed to do, but many people get around it.
8:27Ryan Knutson:KGM says her parents didn't know that she started using social media apps and that it was easy to get around the platform's safety features, which mostly prohibit kids under the age of 13 from using them. And as she did this,
8:41Meghan Bobrowsky:it coincided with a decline in her mental health. She would get push notifications all day to use these apps, and she developed a compulsion to engage with those products nonstop. Basically, the app was designed to prevent her from looking away at any cost. That's what the complaint says.
9:02Ryan Knutson:KGM's lawyers also say that features like Instagram's beauty filters, which digitally enhance a user's face, gave her body dysmorphia. During the trial, the plaintiff's lawyer submitted internal company documents from 2019 that he said show executives, including Mark Zuckerberg, knew that beauty filters could cause harm.
9:22Meghan Bobrowsky:They were temporarily banned in 2019, pending a review. Meta brought in 18 experts to take a look at this and sort of see whether it was doing harm to people and do a review of that. All 18 experts found that it was harmful. These filters were harmful to teenage girls. And so Zuckerberg and some other executives talk about it, what to do. And Zuckerberg said, basically, we didn't ultimately think there was enough harm to ban them completely, at least evidenced harm.
10:02Ryan Knutson:Meta defended the decision to bring back some of the beauty filters, saying that the company made tweaks to make them safer, like not recommending them to users.
10:13Ryan Knutson:KGM, the plaintiff, alleges that social media use as a teen also led her to struggles with suicidal thoughts, anxiety, and depression. In a statement, Metta said the full record will show a company that has consistently put teen safety ahead of growth for over a decade. Last week, Instagram CEO Adam Masseri was called to testify in KGM's trial. He said he didn't consider social media to be clinically addictive.
10:43Meghan Bobrowsky:One of the main things he did was try to draw a distinction between what is clinical addiction and what is sort of jokingly people talk about being addicted to social media. He was trying to make the point that that is different from being clinically addicted to something in the way that you are diagnosed as being addicted to something.
11:05Ryan Knutson:— Social media addiction is not an official standalone medical diagnosis. Some psychologists instead describe it as a form of behavioral addiction. The plaintiffs argue that it's clear Meta's apps are causing problems, and that Meta and other social media platforms have an economic incentive to keep users engaged. The more time they spend on their sites, the more ads they can show, and the more money they'll make.
11:34Meghan Bobrowsky:So I just walked out of the courtroom. So we've been in there all day hearing lots of testimony from Mark Zuckerberg. He was first cross-examined.
11:45Ryan Knutson:That's next.
11:59Mark Zuckerberg:This episode is brought to you by Indeed. Hiring isn't just about finding someone willing to take the job. It's about finding someone with the right skills and background who can move your business forward. And a good way to start your search is with Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It's one of the best ways to make your job post stand out and reach the candidates you're looking for faster. According to Indeed data, sponsored jobs posted directly on Indeed are 90 % more likely to report a hire than non-sponsored jobs. Plus, there's no monthly subscriptions or long-term contracts. You're only paying for results.
Read the full transcript
12:32Mark Zuckerberg:Find the candidates who check all your boxes faster with Indeed Sponsored Jobs. Listeners of this show will get a$75 sponsored job credit to help get your job the premium status it deserves at indeed.com slash journal. That's indeed.com slash journal right now. And support the show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com slash journal. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring? Do it the right way with Indeed. This episode is brought to you by Intuit. If your finance team spends more time finding data than using it, If there's one entity here and one here and one here and one here, if scaling your business feels like starting over, you need the Intuit ERP.
13:16Mark Zuckerberg:Intuit Enterprise Suite is the AI native ERP solution that's powerful, painless and proven. Learn more at Intuit.com slash ERP.
13:33Ryan Knutson:All right, Megan, you were in court yesterday listening to Mark Zuckerberg testify. Can you just set the scene for us?
13:40Meghan Bobrowsky:Yeah. So it was incredibly hectic and chaotic to even get a seat in the courtroom. There was a line of media and there is a lot of families who have lost loved ones. And they were there to support the plaintiff and also, I think, wanted to hear from Zuckerberg themselves.
14:04Ryan Knutson:Eventually, Zuckerberg was shuttled in, surrounded by an entourage.
14:08Meghan Bobrowsky:He's wearing this navy blue suit and tie, you know, head up, looking straight forward. We all go in. It's very quiet, feels very heavy in there. Court gets started a little after 9 a.m. And they call him to the witness stand immediately. He's the first witness of the day and the only witness of the day.
14:34Ryan Knutson:The plaintiff's attorney, Mark Lanier, got started. One of his first questions was about Zuckerberg's wealth and how much money his ownership stake in Meta is worth. It depends on the day, but right now it's about$200 billion. dollars. Zuckerberg responded by saying, the better that Meta does, the more money I'll be able to invest in science research. And then Lanier says, how much have you pledged to the
15:01Meghan Bobrowsky:victims of social media? To which Mark Zuckerberg says, I disagree with the characterization of that. And they just sort of go back and forth a few times about this.
15:11Ryan Knutson:Megan says a lot of the testimony was like this. Lanier would pose a question or pull up an internal document, and Zuckerberg would disagree with the premise.
15:20Meghan Bobrowsky:Zuckerberg would say, you know, you're taking this out of context, or you're mischaracterizing this, this isn't what I meant by that.
15:29Ryan Knutson:Over the course of several hours, Lanier tried to paint a picture of a company that was always trying to increase user engagement. At one point, he showed an internal meta-email from 2015, in which Zuckerberg stated his goal for the following year was to increase users' time spent by 12%.
15:46Meghan Bobrowsky:And Lanier is saying, well, you've actually had pretty explicit goals around how much time you want users to spend on the platform. To which then Zuckerberg says, well, we used to in the past, but we don't anymore.
16:01Ryan Knutson:So he sort of backtracked a little bit there. Zuckerberg testified that if users spent more time on the platform, it wasn't a sign it was addictive. It was a sign that users got more value from it.
16:13Meghan Bobrowsky:He's saying that we want to build something that has value for people. And if we do that, they're going to spend more time on the app. And that's what is driving us at the moment.
16:22Ryan Knutson:Lanier also asked about Meta's relationship with young users. He pulled out another 2015 internal Meta email that estimated that 4 million children under 13 were using Instagram. Lanier said that estimate would represent approximately 30 % of all children aged 10 to 12 in the U.S. How did Zuckerberg respond to that?
16:43Meghan Bobrowsky:He says a couple things. He says people under the age of 13 are not allowed on our service. It's really hard to identify these people when they're there because they don't have a driver's license. They don't have any form of identification. And so if we identify people under the age of 13, we'll remove them. But it's hard for us to do that. Zuckerberg would say sometimes, you know, these are documents from over 10 years ago. So he says, I can talk to you about what we do now and what our practices are now.
17:16Ryan Knutson:How much would that even really matter, though, if Meta says that it's changed now and it doesn't do certain things now? Because this case is ultimately about things that happened in the past that did have an effect on real people.
17:30Meghan Bobrowsky:Right, right. And that is sort of the point that the plaintiff's attorney was trying to make, was these things happened and Zuckerberg is trying to bring it into the present and say this is how we address it. But to your point, these are things that happened in the past.
17:50Ryan Knutson:Was Zuckerberg ever asked directly in any sense about whether Meta designs Facebook and Instagram so that people will want to spend more time on it?
17:59Meghan Bobrowsky:Yeah, they didn't get into specific features like the infinite scroll or the autoplay. What they did talk about was the beauty filters.
18:13Ryan Knutson:Zuckerberg said he was aware of the research the company commissioned showing beauty filters could be harmful, but he decided to bring it back anyway. He said, quote,
18:21Meghan Bobrowsky:I felt like the evidence wasn't clear enough to limit people's expression. And so I thought that was really interesting in that to him, a lot of these things are, and this kind of gets to the crux of the case, right, is for him, he's trying to weigh giving people freedom of speech and freedom of expression versus keeping people safe.
18:45Ryan Knutson:The beauty filter response is interesting that he's saying, I don't want to limit people's free speech, but we're going to make a choice not to recommend it. That sort of suggests that Facebook does see that its own design choices, because not recommending something is a choice that Facebook is making, that its choices can have an impact on the experience that people have on the platform.
19:09Meghan Bobrowsky:Right. Yes. And that's exactly why I thought this exchange was possibly the most important exchange of the day.
19:17Ryan Knutson:Before Lanier finished his questions, his team unspooled a 35-foot banner. It showed all of the plaintiff's Instagram posts since she was 10 years old.
19:27Meghan Bobrowsky:And they show this huge thing. It takes seven people to hold it up, and they show it to the jury and Zuckerberg. They ask him if he's seen some of the posts. He says, I've seen some. I haven't seen all of them.
19:37Ryan Knutson:What was the point they were trying to make, just to illustrate how much this has infiltrated her life? Exactly.
19:42Meghan Bobrowsky:Look how big a role this played in her life. Like, look how many. I mean, it was massive. It took, like I said, it took seven people to hold this banner up. And there appeared to be some beauty filters on the plaintiff in some of these photos.
19:59Ryan Knutson:The trial in Los Angeles is expected to continue for over a month and will be decided by 12 members of the public. Whatever happens, it'll have big implications for the thousands of other cases that are waiting to be heard next.
20:14Meghan Bobrowsky:So in this case, the plaintiff is just asking for monetary damages, but it's a bellwether in the sense that it could encourage or discourage other plaintiffs to settle, or the company to settle future cases.
20:31Ryan Knutson:If the companies are held liable in this case, what does that mean for Section 230, this shield that tech companies have relied on for so long?
20:41Meghan Bobrowsky:This is probably the most important question in my mind. If the companies are held liable for the way that they design the apps, this is a whole new frontier. They have finally found a way to get around Section 230. These plaintiffs have never been able to get around Section 230 if they are able to do this. It doesn't weaken Section 230 per se, but it provides a route through which these companies actually can be held accountable.
21:29Ryan Knutson:That's all for today. Thursday, February 19th. The Journal is a co-production of Spotify and The Wall Street Journal. Additional reporting in this episode by Aaron Mulvaney.
21:42Ryan Knutson:Thanks for listening. See you tomorrow.
21:49Mark Zuckerberg:Thought Sweetgreen was just salads? Think again. There's a new way to do Sweetgreen. Wrapped and ready. These handheld wraps pack bold flavor and 40 plus grams of protein into something hearty, satisfying, and built for life on the go. From craveable sauces to satisfying textures, they're designed to keep you going without slowing you down. So put that fork down. Try the new wraps today in app or at order.sweetgreen.com. Available at participating locations only.
From the publisher
Yesterday, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified in a first-of-its-kind trial with one central question: Are social media platforms causing mental health disorders among young people? The plaintiff argues that platforms like Instagram are designed to keep children addicted, potentially bypassing long-standing legal shields that have protected tech companies in the past. WSJ’s Meghan Bobrowsky takes us inside the courtroom for Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony and explains why this trial could impact thousands of other cases. Ryan Knutson hosts.
Further Listening:
- The Battle Within Meta Over Chatbot Safety
- “The Facebook Files’ from The Journal.
Sign up for WSJ’s free What’s News newsletter.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
