Blanche Rescinds Anti-Weaponization Fund but Loopholes Remain

4 Aug 2026 · 1 h 30 min · 33 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode focuses on whether the Trump administration has truly ended the “anti-weaponization fund” tied to a settlement over leaked Trump tax returns, despite Todd Blanche’s documents and assurances to two Republican Senate holdouts. It also covers: Trump’s repeated threats to strike Iran and then backtracking; a major Michigan Democratic Senate primary; and allegations involving Ohio Rep. Max Miller. A pop-culture segment interviews Emmy-nominated actress Sepeta Mawafi.

Guests (backgrounds)

Jim Trustee (represented Trump in classified documents and Jan. 6 investigations; resigned in 2023). Elliot Williams (former federal prosecutor). Caitlin Collins (CNN White House reporter). Tom Dupree (former DOJ official). Maggie Haberman (NYT reporter; co-author of Regime Change). Kristen Holmes (CNN reporter at the White House). Debbie Dingell (Michigan Democratic congresswoman). Lauren Fox (CNN reporter covering Max Miller). Abby Vesoulis (investigative writer; Mother Jones). Doug and Sabrina/others are panel commentators (not fully identified in transcript).

Key claims

DOJ documents “rescinded” the fund order, but loopholes remain because the underlying settlement still exists and Trump (as a plaintiff) did not formally sign deletion. White House involvement aimed to secure Blanche’s confirmation. Trump says he didn’t sign off and “doesn’t know” if other avenues exist. Iran: critics argue Iran wants a bomb, not a deal, while allies say Iran is ready to negotiate. Michigan: Dingell argues both candidates must unite to beat likely GOP Mike Rogers. Miller: he denies abuse allegations; Trump calls him “a good person.”

Notable examples

Senators John Cornyn and Tom Tillis (Texas, North Carolina) required written reassurance. The fund’s origin: Trump’s $10B IRS/Treasury lawsuit settlement. Iran: reopening the Strait of Hormuz discussed as phase one. Miller: allegations include a gun held to his ex-wife’s head and a two-year-old’s broken collarbone investigation; Bernie Moreno calls him “a danger” to his granddaughter.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Discussion on the Anti-Weaponization Fund

0:10 to 1:08

Exploring the implications of the anti-weaponization fund's status and legal concerns.

“Lawyers are lining up to call out what they see as red flags.”

Senatorial Concerns and Trump's Response

1:08 to 3:15

Senators Cornyn and Tillis express their concerns and Trump's reactions regarding the fund.

“We're going to begin in our politics lead.”

Legal Implications of the Fund Rescission

3:15 to 5:12

Legal experts discuss the binding nature of the agreement concerning the fund.

“The settlement agreement itself, which is what matters legally here, states that this agreement may be modified only with the written agreement of the parties, plural.”

Expert Analysis on Fund's Controversy

5:12 to 10:21

Experts debate the potential future of the fund and its implications for Trump and others.

“Although it is a political difference, it could be the Trump administration saying, trust me, let's talk about it now.”

Trump's Ultimatum Regarding Iran

11:23 to 14:00

Discussion on Trump's changing stance on military action against Iran.

“on music, wherever you get your podcasts.”

Negotiations Around the Strait of Hormuz

14:00 to 15:02

Learn about ongoing negotiations related to the Strait of Hormuz and denuclearization talks regarding Iran.

“and then he steps down saying that they are coming to the negotiating table.”

Democratic Primary Dynamics in Michigan

15:02 to 18:39

Explore the dynamics of the upcoming Democratic primary in Michigan and its implications for the party.

“One of the most expensive and contentious U.S.”

Challenges for Congresswoman Debbie Dingell

18:39 to 20:23

Congresswoman Debbie Dingell discusses the challenges facing candidates in Michigan's Democratic primary and the importance of unity.

“Well, the thing is, it's not just El-Sayed versus Stevens, right?”

Max Miller's Allegations and Denials

20:23 to 21:43

Examine the serious allegations against Congressman Max Miller, including his responses and the political fallout.

“Republican Congressman Max Miller of Ohio is strongly denying accusations that he physically abused his ex-wife and two-year-old child, or that he once allegedly held a gun to his now ex-wife's head.”

The Fallout from Allegations Against Max Miller

22:07 to 28:03

Delve into the fallout from accusations against Max Miller and the implications for his political future.

“And that video prompted Senator Moreno, Miller's former father-in-law, to write on X, quote, he is a danger to my daughter and I hold my breath every minute he has custody of my granddaughter, unquote.”
Show all 33 chapters

Investigating Max Miller: Shocking Allegations

28:03 to 30:00

Learn about disturbing allegations against Congressman Max Miller, including domestic abuse claims.

“So, Abby Fasoulis, your first time here, welcome.”

Patterns of Allegations in Politics

30:00 to 33:32

Discussion on the implications of repeated allegations of domestic violence in politics.

“this is one of the things that Max Miller said in his live stream on Sunday.”

Trump's Support for Controversial Figures

33:32 to 40:31

Explore Trump's endorsement of Max Miller amid ongoing abuse allegations and political ramifications.

“Emily Moreno's lawyer also said that Congressman Miller put his hands on him.”

Rescinding the Anti-Weaponization Fund

40:31 to 42:00

Breaking news about the rescinding of the anti-weaponization fund and its implications.

“Plus, tens of thousands evacuated tonight as wildfires burn across Washington state.”

Senate Discussion on Anti-Weaponization Fund

42:00 to 43:55

Learn about the Senate's stance on the anti-weaponization fund and its implications.

“Senator John Cornyn of Texas and Senator Tom Tillis of North Carolina.”

Trump's Position on Rescinding the Fund

43:55 to 46:05

Explore Trump's response to the changes regarding the anti-weaponization fund.

“Trump was asked if he personally signed off on rescinding this anti-weaponization fund.”

Potential Revival of the Fund

46:05 to 48:28

Discuss the possible revival of the anti-weaponization fund and its legal implications.

“he was far from the only person whose taxes were leaked, but I don't know of any other settlements and exemptions that are coming to people.”

Future Political Dynamics with Todd Blanche

48:28 to 51:44

Analyze the implications of Todd Blanche's confirmation for future political confrontations.

“I guess thing number one that could stop them would be the advice of his own Justice Department lawyers, who in some circumstances could say this is not a good idea, either legally or politically.”

Reaction to Janine Pirro's Case Dismissal

51:44 to 53:31

Understand the fallout from Janine Pirro's decision to drop charges against defendants.

“And so I think the notion that they are fine is just not the case here.”

Legal Implications of the Reflecting Pool Incident

53:31 to 56:00

Examine the legal implications and responses regarding the reflecting pool incident.

“No, what happened on Friday, and thanks for having me, Jake, is that Jeanine Pirro and the U.S.”

Questionable Prosecution and Calls for Accountability

56:00 to 58:16

Learn about the questionable prosecution of Mr. Hearn and the investigation into government contractors.

“but the facts of the matter are clear and are now a matter of record before the court and before the public.”

Vaccines and Misinformation from RFK Jr.

58:16 to 59:11

A vaccine expert responds to misinformation propagated by RFK Jr. regarding vaccines and public health.

“Coming up next, one of the top vaccine experts in the United States is here to respond to the latest medical misinformation pushed by RFK Jr.”

The Debate Over Vaccines and Autism Myths

59:11 to 1:03:04

Dr. Offit discusses the numerous false claims linking vaccines to autism made by RFK Jr.

“during the interview with Dana Bash on State of the Union as questions continue over his approach to federal health policy in the midst of a measles epidemic.”

Current Health Outbreaks and Leadership Accountability

1:03:04 to 1:04:00

Discussing the significance of health outbreaks and the need for effective leadership communication.

“While I have you here, in addition to the measles epidemic, two people have now died in connection with this cyclosporiasis outbreak.”

Michigan's Crucial Senate Primary Election

1:04:00 to 1:10:00

Overview of the upcoming Senate primary in Michigan, highlighting candidates and their positions.

“As fires burn across Washington state, new CNN video shows dozens of cars lined up as people wait to be led into their neighborhoods to see whether their homes are still standing.”

Congressman Edwards' Ethics Violation

1:10:00 to 1:12:08

Discussion on the House Ethics Committee's findings against Congressman Chuck Edwards.

“Medicare and health care for everybody and no more of our money going overseas.”

Power Dynamics in Congress

1:12:08 to 1:12:56

Exploration of the inappropriate relationships and power dynamics in Congress.

“I think when you go to Congress, you get so full of yourself.”

Wisconsin Gubernatorial Race

1:12:56 to 1:14:18

Analysis of the upcoming Wisconsin gubernatorial primary and its implications.

“And I'm glad that the Ethics Committee censured it.”

Wildfire Crisis in the Pacific Northwest

1:14:18 to 1:15:09

Overview of the devastating wildfires affecting the Pacific Northwest.

“Jeanine Pirro leaving the White House after Trump slammed her for, quote, folding like an umbrella, end quote, and dropping charges against people Trump says, vandalize the reflecting pool against all evidence and fact.”

Climate Change and Wildfires

1:15:09 to 1:17:50

Former Governor Jay Inslee discusses the impact of climate change on wildfires.

“Governor, what is the biggest challenge that state and local leaders face right now when responding to a wildfire event of this magnitude?”

Oil Market Turbulence and Gas Prices

1:17:50 to 1:19:16

Discussion on the impact of the Iran war on oil prices and energy policy.

“What do these results tell you about the state of the global energy market?”

World Cup Investment Controversy

1:19:16 to 1:20:20

Details on the failed plan to involve private investors in the World Cup.

“Coming up next, the new fallout over the failed plan to run the World Cup with a group of private investors, a group that could have included Jared Kushner's brother.”

Ariana Grande's Public Hiatus

1:20:20 to 1:20:46

Announcement of Ariana Grande's step back from public life amid health concerns.

“And our pop culture lead Ariana Grande announced that she's going to be taking a step back from public life when her Eternal Sunshine tour wraps next month.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Is Trump's anti-weaponization fund actually dead? We're looking into the fine print. The lead starts right now. What's really in the deal that has the two Republican Senate holdoffs ready to sign off on Todd Blanche as Attorney General now that he gave them what they wanted, assurance in writing that the anti-weaponization fund is dead? Or is it? Lawyers are lining up to call out what they see as red flags. We'll explain. Plus, is President Trump about to fire Jeanine Pirro as the U.S. Attorney for DC? I think she choked. She folded like an umbrella. What sources tell CNN about Trump's fury after Pirro dropped charges against the Olympian accused of vandalizing the reflecting pool?

0:52And winds pushing wildfire smoke across all of Washington state. Did politics get in the way of preventing these fires?

1:07Welcome to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper. We're going to begin in our politics lead. The Justice Department now says it's controversial$1.776 billion. So-called anti-weaponization fund is officially dead. But there are legal experts reading the fine print. and they're saying, not so fast. So here's what's going on. All that has been standing between acting Attorney General Todd Blanche officially becoming the next official Attorney General were two Republican senators, John Cornett of Texas and Tom Tillis of North Carolina. Both of them oppose that anti-weaponization fund, which could have theoretically been used to pay off violent January 6 rioters and other Trump allies.

1:47The fund itself was created as part of a settlement of Trump's lawsuit for$10 billion against the IRS and the Treasury Department over the unlawful disclosure of his tax returns during the first Trump administration. Now, Senators Cornyn and Tillis warned they would not vote for Blanche's confirmation in the Judiciary Committee unless the Justice Department formally abandoned the fund in writing and clarified some other provisions of the underlying settlement. President Trump over the weekend countered by saying that if Cornyn and Tillis would not approve Todd Blanche's attorney general. He would, quote, keep Todd as acting attorney general and push hard to get the anti-weaponization bill, which takes care of those who have been so badly treated by the crooked Joe Biden and Obama administration.

2:35I get nothing, although I was treated horribly, passed. Trump was floating the idea of having this fund introduced into legislation and then passed by the House and Senate and signed into law by him. But then, late last night on Axe or Twitter, Blanche dropped two documents saying that the Justice Department has rescinded its anti-weaponization order and that, quote, this order establishes beyond any doubt that there is no fund, unquote. And this was enough to wipe away the worries of Senators Cornyn and Tillis, who now say they look forward to advancing Blanche's nomination out of the Judiciary Committee to the full Senate tomorrow.

3:14But for those taking a closer look, they say the original parties to this agreement that set up this fund, this slush fund or anti-weaponization fund, were the federal government and Donald Trump as a private individual. The settlement agreement itself, which is what matters legally here, states that this agreement may be modified only with the written agreement of the parties, plural. and the documents DOJ dropped last night are not a new agreement signed by all the parties. They're signed by the Justice Department, but not by President Trump. This is essentially political cover for Blanche as he maneuvers his way to becoming the next Attorney General.

3:57Blanche, on behalf of the federal government, already testified under oath that he considers the fund dead. Senators Cornyn and Tillis said they wanted that in writing, but these new Justice Department documents, we should note, they have no legal impact beyond what Blanche has already said under oath. Remember, Trump's the other party here. He has not signed anything. He has not agreed in any formal sense to kiss the fun goodbye. So there is a legal pathway for Trump to go back to court and say, we had a deal. We don't want to let the Justice Department out of the deal. And in fact, during Blanche's confirmation hearing, Senator Cornyn asked about this exact scenario.

4:36Just to be clear, the president of the United States, who was a plaintiff in this lawsuit, has not agreed in writing to delete the weaponization fund. And there's no guarantee that he or one of the other plaintiffs might raise that issue by way of a lawsuit, a breach of contract lawsuit in the future. Well, Senator, the plaintiffs have no power over the fund. I suppose they could bring a lawsuit and then we would litigate it. With all that wiggle room, there's no question why Senators Cornyn and Tillis wanted this reassurance in writing. The only question now is why they are agreeing to a form of writing that offers no real legal difference from where things now stand.

5:18Although it is a political difference, it could be the Trump administration saying, trust me, let's talk about it now. Right now, we have with us in studio Jim Trustee, who represented Trump during the investigations into classified documents at Mar-a-Lago and the January 6th federal probe before resigning from the team in 2023. Also with us, former federal prosecutor Elliot Williams. So, Jim, let me start with you. President Trump was asked about the fund today. Take a listen. You know, it happens to be very popular among many quarters, and I don't participate in that fund. I was certainly treated badly.

5:53I don't participate, but I thought it would be very fair for people that spent years in prison, people that were treated so badly. He clearly still believes that the fund should exist. What do you make of how binding this agreement is that Todd Blanche put out there? I think it's binding enough for a very practical reason. You know, at the end of the day, the reason this thing turned into a settlement, and there's all sorts of legitimate questions about federal jurisdiction. Is there a case in controversy? You know, all that. Right, whether Trump is negotiating with Trump, et cetera, et cetera.

6:24And you had a judge that was keen to that, and a judge who basically said, you've got two days to send me a memo explaining how there's a real case here. That's when we had the settlement. The last thing you want to do with a judge who's going to be aggressive is to come back and try to play this jujitsu of signatures and say, well, you know, I didn't sign off, just my agent, the attorney general, or the acting attorney general did. It's not going to play. I think the president knows that. I think this thing is moving over to the legislative world where it would at least have a better chance of being constitutional because they've got the power of the purse.

6:54So I don't see, you know, I know there's a lot of excitement about whether it be a breach of contract and litigation. I don't think anybody on the White House side of this from looking at it from the outside would want to litigate it with a judge who's already been very keen to the issues of this lawsuit. What do you think, Elliot? Yeah, I'll echo Jim's words. It's binding enough. That doesn't mean it's binding. But to Jim's point, this is really for the judges to sort out now. There are two federal judges who have looked at this case, one in Florida. one in Virginia that have been incredibly skeptical about everything about it from the things that we were talking about here, the president being literally on both sides of the V in the name of the case to how the fund was set up and so on.

7:30Any of the judges who look at this and see any funny business are really going to either put them on the record in a sworn declaration declaring that this thing is done or something else here. There might be more litigation ahead of us. For now, it's probably good for these senators who wanted to get to yes. But again, this is not on its face a legally binding document. There has to be more analysis by a judge on it. And you would acknowledge that President Trump can be an unpredictable client. I don't know what you're talking about, Jake. No, look, I think there's a good point that he makes out of all this.

8:03I'm not getting any of this money. This is not some sort of self-service operation. He's thinking, and I don't think he's even thinking about necessarily the bigger names. When I was down there dealing with Mar-a-Lago, you had people that were literally like maids from Peru who are being told, you're going to have to go in front of a grand jury on Friday if you don't sit down with us at the FBI. Like, there's a whole bunch of people that nobody really knows about that I think in a perfect world of some sort of settlement fund make a lot of sense because their lives were torn up. They were scared.

8:31They were embarrassed. They were dragged in the grand jury for illegitimate questions. Those folks, I think, deserve something. Here's the thing. The fact that Donald Trump's not going to see any of the money is the very problem with the fund in the first place because he was not one of the parties. The person who was the party to the settlement isn't the person who's going to get the money out of the fund. The whole thing stinks to holy heaven. So many aspects of it, including this one right here. And that's why, again, so many of the judges who have looked at this have found big problems with this fund.

9:02Well, what a plaintiff does with the settlement fund is always their discretion. They could sit there and say, I'm going to give it all to Jake Tapper. He's going to write a book about me. They can do whatever the heck they want. And there's massive settlement funds for kind of class action stuff all around the country, either corporate or governmental. So I don't think the structure is such a big problem. I think it's the process, you know, as Elliott says, of kind of self-suing, whether as the head of the IRS and the Department of Justice, whether you can do that while you're a sitting president or whether you'd have a better chance if you waited three years.

9:32But, you know, the other thing that's interesting about this, Elliott, is they could have. I mean, the biggest concern was that some of this money was going to go to people accused and convicted or who pleaded guilty to violent offenses. Sure. And no one was ever no one in the White House, not the vice president, not the president, not the attorney. Nobody was willing to say, oh, no, no, none of the violent offenders are going to get this money. So that's all. That was always one of the political issues. Yeah, it was a political issue. And the standards were vague as to who would recover. And to be clear, getting back to the question of the fund, if any of these people were treated unfairly by the government, They had every right to sue and get a settlement of their own.

10:09There is already a fund. There is already a fund through which they could recover. So the idea that you needed this nebulous fund without clear standards on who would get it that might have gone to violent people was just problematic from the beginning. And we're seeing that now. Jim Trustee, Elliot Williams, good to have you here. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Coming up next, President Trump's new ultimatum after calling off strikes against Iran yet again. As a critic, a conservative critic, calls the back and forth silly and spells out what Iran really wants in all of this. And allies urging Trump to change his tune on Republican Congressman Max Miller of Ohio after describing him earlier as a good person.

10:43Miller is accused of physically abusing his ex-wife and two-year-old daughter. Allegations he fervently denies, but allegations that are having an impact on his congressional re-election race.

10:58have I got news for your ears the podcast I am your host Michael Ian Black we're talking about the lack of bombs to drop in Iran the abundance of Trump's bombs at the White House Correspondents Dinner the best thing Lindsey Graham ever did that didn't involve a bubble wand and Mitch McConnell's latest totally real proof of life have I got news for your ears check us out on Apple Amazon on music, wherever you get your podcasts. Even better, you can watch the vodcast on Spotify. In our world-lead, President Trump facing today criticism over his cycle of threatening to strike Iran, then backing down, which we saw again over the weekend.

11:40Conservative radio host Eric Erickson today writing, quote, the president says he is going to suspend any further strikes because Iran, he assures us, might want to deal, might want to deal. We are well past silly here and into foolish Iran does not want a deal. Iran wants a bomb. And just about everyone who looks at that regime with clear eyes knows it. Everyone, it seems, except the one man whose finger is on all of this, he is beclowning himself. He looks like a coward and he is managing it at the exact moment our allies grow more and more convinced. We have started a war. We have no stomach to finish, unquote.

12:13CNN's Kristen Holmes is at the White House. Kristen, what are we hearing from Trump today on the topic? Well, it seems as though the president was convinced, or at least he says, that he was convinced not to execute this escalated military action after several phone calls, including from Gulf allies, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar, who encouraged him not only to not actually go through with this military action, but also said that Iran wanted to come to the table, that they were ready to have a discussion about the denuclearization of Iran. But this, of course, is opening the door to several questions, especially what exactly is different now that hasn't been different over the past five months.

12:53He attempted to answer that. Here's what he said when he was talking to reporters. This is at least the fifth time you've turned off airstrikes against Iran since April to negotiate. What is your message to the American people who are wondering what has changed this time? Why should it be anything? Well, you don't know. I don't know. I think we're going to maybe get something. But I want to give him every last chance before decapitation. Very tough to do what we have planned, still planned. We'll see what happens. Now, one thing is clear. President Trump is increasingly frustrated. I do want to just pull up the post that he made earlier today before he kind of waffled both being optimistic and pessimistic about diplomacy.

13:36This was a very pessimistic post where he said,

13:59Again, he has been here and down this path before where he says he's going to escalate military action. and then he steps down saying that they are coming to the negotiating table. I will remind you that last time that happened, they ended up striking U.S. forces in a surprise attack. Question quickly, have we gotten any details of whatever talks there might be? We don't know exactly who is having these conversations behind the scenes, although President Trump has alluded to it being Steve Wyckoff, Marco Rubio, J.D. Vance, Jared Kushner. But I do want to quickly point out one of the things he said was under discussion, that the first thing that would be happening, which is a phase, would be the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

14:37And then they would move on to what they would call the second phase of this denuclearization of Iran. That might sound very familiar to you, Jake, because that is exactly what the memorandum of understanding laid out, the memorandum that was essentially torn up by both sides saying it wasn't good enough to be an actual placement or beginnings of a deal. But now he's saying they're going back to that and that's what's being discussed. All right, Kristen Holmes at the White House. Thanks so much. One of the most expensive and contentious U.S. Senate Democratic primaries of 2026 is going down in Michigan tomorrow.

15:13Next, what the election could say about the larger direction of the Democratic Party.

15:23We're queuing the CNN election music for the politics lead because tomorrow, pro-U.S. Senate Democratic primary in Michigan, once again, puts establishment Democrats up against the rising progressive wing of the party as moderate Congresswoman Haley Stevens is facing off against the left-leaning Dr. Abdul El-Sayed. Let's bring in Michigan Democratic Congresswoman Debbie Dingell, who is not endorsed in this race. Congresswoman, this has been a very expensive, very aggressive campaign. In a toss-up contest like this one, do you think that whoever loses will unite their supporters to help the winner against the likely Republican nominee, former Congressman Mike Rogers?

16:06Jake, it's good to be with you. I can't wait till this primary is over tomorrow, but we have no choice. I think they both said that they would. And when you look at what's at stake in November, and let me be very clear, this is a competitive state. It's a purple state. The Republican could win. Republicans are going to pour millions of dollars into the state to try to make this a pickup state. And everybody likes to focus on the differences, but there's a lot in common. They're worried about health care, maybe a little different approach, but Republicans don't care about Americans being able to get access to health care.

16:44They're worried about Supreme Court nominees. They're worried about Medicare and Social Security and farmers. So we've all got to pull together because if we don't keep the seat in the Democratic column in November, there's very little chance that we will pick up the Senate this year. So what I wonder is who you think would have a stronger chance against former Congressman Mike Rogers, because here are the two different theories of the case. One is, this is what Dr. Abdul El-Sayed would argue, if I can paraphrase, we need to get Democrats and independents excited for voting. And the establishment Democrats haven't done that in Michigan, then haven't been able to do that, whether it's Hillary Clinton in 2016 or Kamala Harris in 2024.

17:34And that's what he would argue his campaign offers. Supporters of Congresswoman Haley Stephens would say that he has, that Al-Sayed has views that are alienating to some more moderate Democrats and independents, and thus she has a better chance of beating Mike Rogers. Who do you agree with? You know what I'm going to say to you, Jake? I hate labels. I hate them. And, you know, what am I? I mean, I could, people could put me into both of those camps because I I am the lead of Medicare for All in the House and have been working on that since I walked into the Congress. And as you know, my family before that.

18:15So I don't think that's an aggressive issue. I don't think moderns are against it. I think if you're sick, you should be able to go to the doctor when you need to go to the doctor, get the medicine that you need. And I call that a human value. So I think right now everybody's trying to pit people against each other. I think there's far more in common with everybody here. And the job of all of us is to make sure that we excite everybody and talk about the importance of getting out and voting because elections have consequences. Well, the thing is, it's not just El-Sayed versus Stevens, right? In Michigan's 13th congressional district, which is a Detroit-based seat with a majority black population, incumbent Congressman Shree Thanedar is facing a challenge from State Representative Donovan McKinney.

19:02McKinney is backed by Democratic Socialists of America, leaders and candidates. In a piece from Axios last month, House Democrats had different reactions about this challenge to Thanedar. Some said no one cares. Some said I don't think anybody would miss him at all. Someone said who. What do you think about this DSA-backed challenge to Congressman Thanedar? You know, again, I'm neutral in that race. And I think that when you're a member of Congress, it's about constituent service. It's an important part of the job. And when that candidate was thinking about running one of the most conservative members of the state legislature, who actually happens to be one of my state reps, called me and asked me to look at him.

19:47So I think, again, I hate these labels. And Republicans are going to try to use those labels, going to try to scare everybody. I heard a John James ad today that was so over the top about communism and socialism. We can't let labels define who we are. We've got to go out and talk to the voters and tell them what we are going to fight for, what we are going to deliver. And, you know, I know a lot of people voting in that race that you just talked to me about have very strong feelings. But it's based more on responsiveness, constituent service than it is a label. Michigan Democratic Congresswoman Debbie Dingell, thanks so much for joining us today.

20:27Republican Congressman Max Miller of Ohio is strongly denying accusations that he physically abused his ex-wife and two-year-old child, or that he once allegedly held a gun to his now ex-wife's head. How Miller is pushing back on the allegations and calls for him to resign.

20:45I'm Dr. Sanjay Gupta, host of the Chasing Life podcast. My guest is Dr. Dhruv Kular. He has seen firsthand the effects GOP-1s can have on addictive behaviors. Today, we're going to talk about how GOP-1s are changing us, changing us as humans. And when the cravings go away, sort of trying to figure out, is there something else that we're losing as well? People who had cravings for opioids said that those were being diminished. And so, you know, we thought about these as kind of digestive medications, maybe diabetes medications, but they're actually psychoactive medications, or so it seemed. What was so interesting about that is if you're playing with the reward system, that can have real implications for people's maladaptive behaviors, all sorts of addictions, but also a potential downside.

21:35Listen to Chasing Life, streaming now, wherever you get your podcasts.

21:43I'm not getting out of this race and I'm winning in November and I'll be back in the 120th. A defiant Ohio Republican Congressman Max Miller there urging voters to elect him a third time despite allegations that he physically abused his ex-wife Emily Moreno, the daughter of Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno, and their two-year-old daughter. In a 20-minute live stream on Sunday, Miller repeatedly denied the allegations. And that video prompted Senator Moreno, Miller's former father-in-law, to write on X, quote, he is a danger to my daughter and I hold my breath every minute he has custody of my granddaughter, unquote.

22:23CNN's Lauren Fox has followed every step of this sad story from police recordings obtained back in June to growing pressure on Miller to leave Congress. Here's Lauren with more. I just want to be clear, no court, no agency has ever substantiated any allegation of abuse against me. I'm not getting out of this race, and I'm winning in November. Ohio Republican Congressman Max Miller facing new calls to drop out. Amid allegations, he abused his ex-wife, Emily Moreno, an accusation he denies. Now, for the first time, Moreno's ex-father-in-law, Senator Bernie Moreno, is calling on Miller to step aside.

23:02writing in a statement that Miller needs, quote, psychological help and that he is, quote, a danger to my daughter. If there are any basic standards of character required to hold elected office, Max Miller fails them. He should not serve in the House of Representatives. Moreno's rebuke of Miller is playing out against the backdrop of MAGA politics in Ohio. And as CNN is learning, key Republicans are leaning on the White House to try and convince Miller to get out of the race. President Trump also weighing in from the Oval Office. It's a very sad thing. I know Max. He's a good person. I mean, I always thought he was a very good person.

Read the full transcript

23:41And I'm going to let the families figure that out. Miller once served as a senior aide to the Trump campaign and married Emily Marino at Trump National Golf Course in Bedminster, New Jersey in 2022. Two years later, Senator Bernie Marino, leaning on his close ties to Trump, won his bid for the U.S. Senate. Miller filed for divorce in 2024. In video obtained by CNN earlier this year, Emily Marino told police in the course of a now-closed investigation into their daughter's broken collarbone that she was often frightened by Miller. I was just, like, scared of him a lot, and that's why I left the house and I moved out.

24:22She also described one incident on New Year's Eve, where she alleged Miller held a gun to her head when she was changing their infant daughter. So when does the gun come into play? When I'm changing. And what does he do? Holds it on me. Holds it on you? Okay. Can you show me where he held it to you? No? Hey, it's okay. Okay, that's fine. That's fine. Like I said, that's a hard thing to talk about. No charges were ever filed, and Miller has repeatedly denied all allegations of abuse, including to CNN in an interview in June. What we're dealing with, unfortunately, is something that many families go through, Lauren, which is a very nasty divorce.

25:06And in the process, allegations get made that are completely fabricated and are not true. So you're saying this incident never happened in any form? Not at all. Miller won his primary in May with President Trump's endorsement and is slated to face off against Democratic challenger and ironworker Brian Poindexter in November. And Jake, in yet another statement, Max Miller's office is telling me that he is not getting out of this race. But just to lay out the deadline for you, Max Miller would have to get out of this race by tomorrow at the end of the day if there was going to be a special primary.

25:44Now, if he waits until August 10th, that is when party leaders in the state could choose another candidate to run for this seat. But again, that is such a narrow deadline. There aren't very many days until either of those opportunities for Miller to still get out of this race and Republicans to still have a fighting chance of keeping this seat. Lauren Fox, thanks so much. And sources tell CNN that Trump allies are pushing the president to call on Republican Congressman Max Miller to drop out of his reelection race. How President Trump is responding to those calls and the latest reporting on Miller next.

26:25And we're back with the politics lead. Sources telling CNN that top House Republicans want President Trump to urge embattled Congressman Max Miller to end his reelection bid. On Sunday, Miller vowed to stay in the race for his third term in Congress, representing Ohio's 7th Congressional District. despite allegations that he physically abused his ex-wife and their two-year-old daughter, which Miller denies, Miller's refusal to drop out, could complicate Republicans' fight to keep control of the House because, obviously, it's a district that he might not be re-elected to. Let's talk about this with our panel.

26:59Doug, a source tells CNN Trump has privately told some allies he doesn't believe Miller can win the race given the accusations. I guess there's some polling, I don't know how reliable it is, showing that his opponent, his Democratic opponent, is within the margin of error. Do you think Republicans, if they really want this, should be more vocal? 100%. And I tell you, I already emailed the Speaker's office a little while ago to say, I'm going to be real full board. This guy needs to go. He needs to go as quickly as possible. He's a problem not just in and of itself, and it's not just this series of accusations, which, by the way, pulling out a gun on somebody is a new one, I think, in our political lexicon, but it goes a long history.

27:37I have to say, he denies all this. Okay, yes. Just in the lexicon, that's a new one. Yeah, yeah. But it's also a problem. You saw Mike Turner on CBS yesterday. Fellow Ohio Republican, yeah. It's a problem for him to talk about it. He's now fighting with one of the senators, his father-in-law. So he's not going to be able to get anything done. There's not a compelling argument for him to stay. And frankly, I'd throw in Corey Mills and for my home state, Chuck Edwards, at this point as well. It's a disaster. So, Abby Fasoulis, your first time here, welcome. For those who don't know, you wrote an incredible investigative piece on Congressman Max Miller.

28:14First of all, just tell me about some of the things that you found that surprised you. You found the woman that he allegedly pushed down a stairwell in high school. I mean, there's a lot of charges that people have not found about him. Yeah, so I found a lot in going through the investigation into potential child abuse when Max Miller and Emily Marino's daughter had a broken collarbone. Ultimately, the investigation there was unsubstantiated. They couldn't prove one way or another that there was neglect or abuse happening. But within that investigation, you had Emily Marino telling detectives that Max Miller had held a gun to her head and thrown hot water at her and shoved her against a wall and said things like, Daddy's house is scary, quoting their two-year-old daughter.

29:06So the amount of allegations within that police report alone, I think, were shocking. And then just looking at the broader picture, this is a congressman who has a history of other allegations against him. Politico in 2021 reported about the staircase alleged incident in which Max Miller allegedly pushed a woman down a set of stairs. She hasn't said anything to the media. The Politico story cited three witnesses, but when I reached her for comment, she said, I really don't want to talk about this. This was a long time ago, but it's still one of the most traumatizing nights of my life. And so you have people like the girl from high school and Emily Marino.

29:50And there are allegations that he abused Stephanie Grisham as well. So to me, this represents a pattern of allegations. Yeah. And Sabrina, in I guess an attempt to clear his name, this is one of the things that Max Miller said in his live stream on Sunday. Take a listen. Only weeks later did the story of February 1st assault appear. So ask yourself, if I had assaulted her, would she had offered to cook me dinner six days later? So do you want to comment on that? I mean, I think we all are steeped enough in patterns of domestic violence or alleged domestic violence that go ahead. It's just it's so gross to say like, oh, and, you know, a few days later she made me dinner.

30:38I mean, you know, I think, like you said, there's patterns of domestic violence. I think this is incredibly disturbing. I think what Doug said totally stands. I mean, whether it's Max Miller, Cori Bush, whoever you wanted to talk about in the Republican Party, these are people that don't deserve to represent their constituents. Cori Mills. Sorry, Cori Mills. I'm so sorry. Cori Mills. Cori Mills, these are not people that are representing or doing a good service for their constituents and their districts. And I think Republicans are so afraid of losing power right now. I mean, in 2018, Sherrod Brown, when he was running, did win this district by five points.

31:13In 2024, he lost this district by two points. So it is competitive. Republicans know this. And it's just disappointing that they just want to hold on to power because they want to hold the House. So Trump previously endorsed Miller. He was asked about him today, and he said this. It's a very sad thing. I know Max. He's a good person. I mean, I always thought he was a very good person. and I'm going to let the families figure that out. But it's accusations. So Miller's ex-wife, as you noted, is not the only woman to accuse him of abuse. Former White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham, Trump's first term press secretary, was also Miller's ex-girlfriend.

31:54She detailed an abusive relationship with an unnamed White House staffer in her memoir. Later, that was identified as Max Miller. Miller also denies these allegations. Stephanie Grisham was on the lead in 2021 talking about that relationship. Take a listen. I had an ex that I dated and there was abuse in every way there. And that's something I actually told the president and the first lady about. And they did nothing. The person you're talking about, you don't name him in the book, but his name is Max Miller. He is running for Congress. And it's not just that President Trump, then President Trump, didn't do anything about it.

32:29Trump is now backing this guy for Congress. I'm not going to lie. It was like a gut punch when I saw that he endorsed him. Now, in response to Grisham's book, then Trump said that Grisham shouldn't be taken seriously because she was, quote, very angry and bitter after the breakup. So the idea that President Trump is standing by a guy accused of some horrific behavior, abusive behavior, is not new. No, it's not new. And we've seen a long pattern of this with Trump. And Trump often feels that he's the victim and subjective false allegations and so forth. But I watched that video and one bad communications, politically 101.

33:05He looked like somebody on an episode of SVU where you're like, oh, he definitely did it. This is not how you want to communicate to your constituents. It's why the best thing to do would be to drop him now so you can replace him. And ultimately, as Republicans, you know, we stood really tall against Graham Plattner on all the awful things that have been alleged about him. And he, thank God. Yeah. And they got out. Let's do the right thing on our side now at this point. Any last thoughts? Just that even this week or last week, Emily Moreno's lawyer also said that Congressman Miller put his hands on him.

33:40So that's yet another allegation of abuse by Congressman Miller. I will retweet your story out. But for those looking forward, it's Mother Jones and the author is Abby Vesoulis. Thanks, everyone, for being here. Really appreciate it. Moments ago, our eagle-eyed camera spotted Jeanine Pirro showing up at the White House. Sources tell CNN Trump's considering firing her as U.S. attorney for D.C. All about those dropped charges against the former Olympian accused of vandalizing the reflecting pool. An attorney for that Olympian coming up on The Lead. Stay with us.

34:16The Pop Culture Lead, one of the most successful, critically acclaimed series on TV right now is The Pit, which captures audiences with its raw, realistic, compelling look at life inside a busy emergency room in Pittsburgh. This one is, of course, streaming on HBO Max, and that's a sister company of CNN, we should note, but that is not why we're talking about it. We're talking about it because one of its stars is Making History. Actress Sepeta Mawafi is nominated for a primetime Emmy for Outstanding Sporting Actress in a Drama Series. It's an incredible show, as you know, but she is also the first Iranian and the first Middle Eastern actress ever nominated in the category.

34:55Joining us now is Sepeta Mawafi. Thank you so much for joining us. Your character, Dr. Al Hashimi, has such confidence, appeared to really shake things up as a newcomer on season two. and then a serious medical situation is revealed. Let's take a little quick look. They tried every anti-seizure medication, but I still had episodes every few months or so. No one's ever noticed before. They just think I'm thoughtful. Are you driving? I couldn't until laser ablation to my left temporal lobe 12 years ago. Between that and the Keppra, I've been seizure-free, cleared by neurology to drive and to work as an attending.

35:39How long between the seizure you had today and the last one? It's been well over a year. But I had two today.

35:53What's your experience been like to play this role? Oh, my gosh. It's been an immense honor, And I can't really express all the ways in which it's changed my life. First and foremost, before I even watched the show, so many of my friends and colleagues abroad who are humanitarian aid workers were huge fans of the show and insisted that I watch the show. So I did, and I fell in love like the rest of the world. And then when I was cast, I knew that I wanted to sort of pay a silent homage to these valiant health care workers who travel abroad and and sacrifice so much to go where help is needed most.

36:35So so being able to give visibility to our humanitarian aid workers, that being one part of the many layers of this character, has been a huge honor. And on top of that, getting to join this incredible show with these incredible people and, you know, tell these stories that on the surface, you know, it's a show about a hospital, but it uses that setting as a lens to explore these deeper societal issues, power, grief, who gets care, who doesn't, and who we become when these systems are under strain. So it's just been an unbelievable honor and gift. For fans, there's obviously good news. There's definitely going to be a season three.

37:17That's right. the pit. Is there anything you can share with us about season three about Dr. Al-Hashimi? Yeah, well, she's back. That's good. So that's a relief to all of us. And yeah, you'll see we're four months into the future. Robbie has gone on his sabbatical. It's his first day back. And you see that there's a different tone and temperature in the hospital. And Dr. Al-Hashimi has been working with double coverage. And she's, you know, implemented some systemic changes that are seemingly improving the people and the way things function around her. So we get to see how Robbie reacts to that and, you know, discover where it goes from there.

38:00You've spoken about the importance of representation, and now you are the very first Iranian actress ever nominated for a Supporting Actress Emmy. You're a child of refugees. Your family fled Iran in 1979. Is there a defining moment from your journey that shaped in any way the artist that you've become or helped you find your voice in a very difficult and very competitive industry? You know, it's hard for me to separate my family's experience getting to the United States as refugees, me being born into the world as a refugee from my work as an artist, whether that's in my art with, you know, these creative endeavors or as an advocate.

38:42And I'm haunted by the fact that if our reality had bent even slightly in a different direction, we would have remained a statistic. So I live in close proximity with that reality and the awareness that we have an unprecedented mass displacement crisis, that there are over 118 million people who are displaced from their homes. And that could have easily been me and my family. So I hold this privilege and fortune and I don't take it lightly. And so it's always been important for me to sort of give visibility and expand the range of human experiences through my advocacy work and through my own work as an artist.

39:25And it's something that I will do for the rest of my life. I mean, just being able to hold this space as the first Iranian, first Middle Eastern Orswana actor nominated is huge, and it's a great honor. But again, I'm constantly reminded of this luck that I've had. And many actors who are struggling in the industry don't have that luck. Many, you know, children who have bombs raining over their heads and are living in tents don't have that fortune. So I hope that this can inspire hope for all people who could potentially be in this category and might not have that fortune. Well, congratulations again, Sepad and Moafi.

40:03Appreciate it. Thank you so much. Such a pleasure. Thank you. Welcome to The Lead. I'm Jake Tepper. This hour, should we take Todd Blanche at his word that President Trump's so-called anti-weaponization fund is officially dead and will remain that way? Critics say no and that Blanche's latest declaration is smoke and mirrors to ensure that he's confirmed as attorney general and nothing else. Two of the best sourced White House reporters are here to break down what you need to know in just a moment. Plus, tens of thousands evacuated tonight as wildfires burn across Washington state. Hundreds of homes already have been destroyed to seeing local officials describe as heartbreaking.

40:42And now there are reports of missing people as the flames spread out of control. We're going to get the latest on the search and the containment efforts ahead. Also, the final hours of campaigning, one of the most important Senate primaries of the year. Will the progressive insurgent defeat the Democratic establishment candidate in Michigan? And if so, what does that mean for the party's hopes of taking back the House and the Senate in November? We're live on the campaign trail ahead. And Jeanine Pirro spotted at the White House tonight as CNN learns President Trump is considering firing her as the U.S.

41:14attorney for D.C. Earlier today, Trump said in the Oval Office that U.S. Attorney Pirro choked when she dropped charges against the former Olympian who was charged with damaging the reflecting pool. One of the attorneys for that Olympian, David Hearn, will join us live in minutes.

41:35The lead tonight, we're going to start with breaking news in our politics lead. despite President Trump playing coy earlier this afternoon. Sources tell CNN that the White House was directly involved in acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's order to formally rescind the so-called anti-weaponization fund. It's a key step for Blanche's Judiciary Committee confirmation vote set for tomorrow. That order won over the two key Republican holdouts on the Judiciary Committee, Senator John Cornyn of Texas and Senator Tom Tillis of North Carolina. Cornyn and Tillis say they got what they wanted. a, quote, legally enforceable document ending the existence of the fund and limiting President Trump's sweetheart tax immunity deal with the IRS.

42:18But here's the issue. Blanche's apparent assurances are riddled with loopholes. On the fund, Blanche rescinded a separate order that he wrote that actually created the fund under the terms of the settlement. The settlement itself, however, still exists, and the settlement could still be enforced. Cornyn knows this, too. Here he is last week. Todd Blanche can say that it's a dead letter, but the fact of the matter is he conceded that there is a settlement agreement which creates an enforceable contract. It could be revived at a later time. A Republican lawyer who applied to serve on the board of the fund posted on X this quote, can be undone after Tuesday.

43:04That's the day after Blanche's confirmation vote in the Judiciary Committee. Then, of course, another part of this all is this IRS deal that led to the initial establishment of the fund. Remember, Trump sued his own administration. Now, Cornyn wanted to limit the agreement that offers Trump and his family, members of his family, immunity from tax investigations and make it clear it only applies to past investigations against Trump and those listed in the suit. But Blanche's new order was more of a clarification rather than a modification, restating the Justice Department's interpretation of the order.

43:39Unlike the first document, Blanche didn't even bother to sign this one. Joining us now, CNN's Caitlin Collins and former DOJ official Tom Dupree. And of course, we have with us Maggie Haberman of the New York Times, co-author of the new book, Regime Change. Great to have all of you. Caitlin, let's start with you. Trump was asked if he personally signed off on rescinding this anti-weaponization fund. How did he respond and what are we learning about the scope of the White House's involvement? Well, Jake, the president said he did not sign off on what it was that Todd Blanche had agreed to with these two Republican holdouts who were holding up his nomination, of course, before that vote that is scheduled for tomorrow.

44:18though he did praise Todd Blanche inside the Oval Office and also praised this fund in and of itself, Jake, saying that it is very popular in some quarters and that he views it as a positive thing that these people, people who were convicted of crimes on January 6th could potentially get paid out by the federal government. But obviously, Jake, the one thing the White House wanted to get across the line here was Todd Blanche's confirmation as the next attorney general. And the president said this to reporters about this. I didn't look at it. All I know is that Todd Blanche is great. He's going to do a great job.

44:53Everybody knows it. And I understand there's been a sign off. But I don't know what they agreed. I think Todd Blanche agreed to reconfirm things that he's already said. And what he said was, OK, now there's no other avenues that I know about. That answer there at the end, Jake, was when the president was asked if there are other ways that these payouts could potentially happen despite Blanche rescinding the fund. He said he didn't know. Of course, critics have said today that doesn't mean that it won't actually happen. But the White House was directly involved in what Todd Blanche signed off on.

45:25Obviously, he would not make an agreement with these Republican senators that did not have the White House's blessing, even if the president was unhappy about it and still believes that the fund should be able to move forward. But really, the reason that the White House agreed to this, Jake, was because they wanted to be able to get Todd Blanche's confirmation across the line. Maggie, remind us why President Trump wants Todd Blanche to be the attorney general so badly. He could have easily just left him as acting attorney general. And also, while I have you, aren't there loopholes in all of this that you could drive a truck through?

45:58That's our understanding, Jake, and that's the reporting that my colleagues have this afternoon as to your last question about loopholes. You know, there are ways in which this fund could come back to life. There is also the separate question that you noted earlier at the top of the hour about the IRS exemption that the president, his sons, and their companies, which are an entanglement of a bunch of different LLCs, are expected to get in terms of back audits related to their taxes and the leak of the president's tax returns during his own first term. he was far from the only person whose taxes were leaked, but I don't know of any other settlements and exemptions that are coming to people.

46:38In terms of what our understanding is as to how he got here with Todd Blanche, when Jonathan Swan, my co-author for Gene Change and I, were meeting with the president for a fact-checking interview in March of this year, Pam Bondi was still the attorney general. President Trump was clearly not happy with her. We already knew he'd been criticizing her. But when we asked about his past private criticism of Todd Blanche, which was similar for not moving faster on the prosecutions that he wanted to see against his perceived enemies, he was effusive in his praise of Todd Blanche. Todd Blanche has been a loyal personal defender of the president, and it's very clear that the president expects that to continue.

47:16What that looks like going forward, we don't know, but we do know what Trump expects. Tom, you worked at the Justice Department, so reality check for us. How easy or hard would it be for this fund to be reborn? I don't think it would be terribly difficult for this fund to be reborn. I think the best way to look at this, Jake, is that this is more of a political guarantee that the fund won't come back into existence rather than a legal guarantee. Todd Blanche, I think, was very careful and deliberate in the language he used where he talked in the present tense. He said the fund is dead. That doesn't mean they couldn't try to resurrect it several weeks, several months later down the road, nor does it mean that they couldn't try to create a similar fund structured differently but that they could legitimately claim that this is not that old anti-weaponization fund that everyone was upset about, but it's something completely different.

48:07So they could try to achieve what the president has made abundantly clear he wants to see happen, but just through a different mechanism. And Tom, the president still gets this, as Maggie just referenced, this massive benefit from the IRS deal, this personal immunity from past tax issues that could spare him a hundred million dollar tax penalty, according to the New York Times. I mean, is there anything stopping every future president forever in the United States from getting the same great deal? Well, let's see. I guess thing number one that could stop them would be the advice of his own Justice Department lawyers, who in some circumstances could say this is not a good idea, either legally or politically.

48:45The other thing, Jake, that could stop them are the federal courts. Keep in mind that this current anti-weaponization fund is being challenged in several federal courts. And to be sure, the guarantee that Todd Blanche gave last night might satisfy and assuage the concerns of Senators Cornyn and Tillis. But it's also going to have to satisfy the concerns of federal judges before they get rid of these challenges to the Anti-Weaponization Fund. These judges are going to want to have binding legal assurance that this fund isn't coming back before they dismiss the case. And they are going to demand a far higher standard of proof than Senators Cornyn and Tillis.

49:23Maggie, let's look ahead to a possible scenario next year, a Democratic House majority and Attorney General Todd Blanche. That seems to me like a real recipe for confrontation. I mean, the Democrats would theoretically launch lots of investigations and Blanche would, I think it's fair to say, probably not be inclined to cooperate. right? Yeah, Jake, I think this is the major question mark hanging over what happens post November if Democrats retake control of the House and possibly the Senate, as they seem poised to do in current polling. We don't know by what margin if that does happen, but we have seen, you know, justice departments either slow walk or not comply with congressional subpoenas on very specific matters.

50:11What we haven't seen before is an entire government or major aspects of the government or elements of the government that simply don't respond to these subpoenas. And Congress does have a pretty limited recourse in what it can do. It can take a contempt of Congress vote against the attorney general. I guess I'm just not sure who adjudicates that in terms of an actual criminal complaint at that point or a criminal referral. This government, I think, just based on our reporting, is pretty willing and ready to drag things out. And as we have seen over time, that That is President Trump's tactic repeatedly.

50:47And I just want to add one note to to Caitlin's reporting earlier. That is also our reporting that there was full awareness on the part of not just the White House, but of President Trump about what the plans were to try to get Blanche over the line in terms of a compromise. Caitlin, one of the reasons this happened is because President Trump has not been friendly to senators Tillis of North Carolina and John Cornyn of Texas. They are now going along with this agreement. Are they back in Trump's good graces or no? I mean, obviously, this helps the fact that they are not holding up Todd Blanchett where he had to pull his nomination, as he was threatening to do last week.

51:27But, I mean, the president, part of, you know, the argument that was made to him here and that he believes is that they did this only because he ensured that the two of them will not be in the U.S. Senate next year with Tillis not running and with Cornyn obviously being primaried and the president supporting the challenger who beat him, Ken Paxton, in that race. And so I think the notion that they are fine is just not the case here. But, I mean, obviously going forward, they are happy that at least Todd Blanch is getting over the line. All right, Caitlin Collins, Maggie Haberman, Tom Dupree. Thanks to all of you.

51:58And of course, don't miss Caitlin on her show. The Source with Caitlin Collins. It's tonight at 9 Eastern on CNN. Is Jeanine Pirro about to get fired for admitting facts? What CNN is learning about a furious President Trump and how far he's willing to go in his insistence that the reflecting pool was vandalized and not actually just badly constructed.

52:24In our Law and Justice lead, you're looking at U.S. Attorney for D.C. Janine Pirro at the White House this afternoon. As sources tell CNN that President Trump is furious in considering firing her. Why? Well, Trump's fury comes after Pirro surprised Trump on Friday by dropping charges against several people whom Trump had claimed vandalized the reflecting pool. Listen to the president earlier this afternoon. It looked beautiful. And then they cut it and they vandalized. And we weren't necessarily thrilled with the contractor. The judge was extremely unfriendly to Janine. And frankly, I think she choked because the judge was really vicious.

53:08Instead of going after the people that did it, the judge went after her. Really disappointed with Janine Burr. She folded like an umbrella. Joining us now is Josh Kolb. He's one of the attorneys representing the former Olympian, David Hearn, whose charges were just dropped. And Josh, President Trump says that Pirro choked. Is that what happened? What happened Friday? No, what happened on Friday, and thanks for having me, Jake, is that Jeanine Pirro and the U.S. Attorney's Office of the District of Columbia admitted what at some point or another they would have to admit, which was that there was no evidentiary basis to bring this baseless case against my client and our client, Mr.

53:50Hearn. On the record now, before the court, in their motion to dismiss the indictment, is documentary evidence from the Department of Interior and now from the Department of Justice saying that in all likelihood the damage that happened at the reflecting pool was not because of vandalism and that they would not be able to prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt. The indictment should never have been brought in the first place. It was an egregious abuse of the criminal justice process. And this was the least that not only the Department of Justice could do, but it was an inevitable step here.

54:23In the filing, Pirro's office, the U.S. Attorney's Office for Washington, D.C., admits, quote, the damage was the result of a botched installation and not vandalism, as initially represented by the Department of the Interior, unquote. vote. So first of all, that's interesting that they're acknowledging the facts here. Second of all, it's interesting that Trump is mad at her for an office that manages the facts or that acknowledges the facts. But I guess what I don't understand is what President Trump would have wanted her to do. What would happen if she had just not accepted the facts as the Department of Interior put them?

55:07If they went to trial without facts to prove beyond the reasonable doubt a criminal case against a defendant, they would lose. And it would be a terribly embarrassing and damaging loss for the Department of Justice, a department that has already faced a series of embarrassing losses over the past year plus. It's important to note, Jake, that this was a rush job from the beginning. Even in the motion to dismiss itself, they acknowledge that there are obvious basic facts that were apparent to anyone watching CNN that saw all of the reporting about the likelihood that the construction work and the renovation work led to the damage at the pool.

55:50All of a sudden, the Department of Justice claims they learned about this weeks after Mr. Hearn was indicted. I don't know what President Trump will say or why he says what he says, but the facts of the matter are clear and are now a matter of record before the court and before the public. And the Department of Justice and the United States government really owe Mr. Hearn an apology. Have you decided whether you're going to file a lawsuit over this beyond just an apology? I guess that anti-weaponization fund doesn't exist anymore, at least as of this minute. but it does seem as though this was a prosecution that was questionable from the beginning.

56:29Well, we at Democracy Defenders Fund and our co-counsel, along with Mr. Hearn, are evaluating all our options to make sure that the people who did this and that these actions don't go without being held responsible. It is simply unacceptable what happened to an American like Mr. Hearn, an Olympian who represented his country, were evaluating any and all options possible. There are growing calls for an investigation into the contractors behind the reflecting pool. It was a no-bid contract, as you know. Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut is suggesting the contractors and government officials lied to a grand jury.

57:11Were there any irregularities with the grand jury proceedings? Well, Jake, in our case, we filed a motion to get the full grand jury minutes and the instructions that were given to the grand jury because we recognized and see what looked like serious misrepresentations or misconduct or something that went amiss before the grand jury in the case against Mr. Hearn. That is something that the government, we've had a back and forth with, but has not been resolved, is of deep concern to us. I can't speak specifically to Senator Blumenthal's allegations with respect to the contractor. But what is clear is that there's a tremendous amount of what looks like quite dirty corruption that's been going on around the reflecting pool, around the renovations in D.C., and that's been emanating out of the Trump White House.

58:00And these types of situations where you have botched jobs, incompetence that then lead to baseless scapegoating of innocent Americans like Mr. Hearn is simply unacceptable. And we won't stand for it. Josh Kolb, thank you so much. Appreciate your time, sir. Coming up next, one of the top vaccine experts in the United States is here to respond to the latest medical misinformation pushed by RFK Jr. The facts that you need to know ahead.

58:37You probably don't understand this because you're not a scientist. Well, you're not either. And our health lead that exchange was part of a contentious interview with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who was facing new scrutiny after making a number of claims about vaccines and autism and COVID-19 and other public health issues that were just false and have drawn pushback from scientists and medical experts. Kennedy is a longtime vaccine critic who has not had facts on his side during much of his campaign against vaccines. He tried to defend his positions during the interview with Dana Bash on State of the Union as questions continue over his approach to federal health policy in the midst of a measles epidemic.

59:20Joining us now is Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital, Philadelphia, Thanks for joining us, Dr. Offit. I want to play another clip from the interview. Take a listen. We have the highest death rate from COVID of any nation on earth. The highest death rate from COVID of any nation on earth. That's not true. That statement has been challenged by public health experts. What is the accurate picture when it comes to the U.S. COVID death rate? Well, we had a high death rate. I mean, we had 1.1 million people who died in this country. And of those who died, about 250 ,000 died because they chose willfully not to get a vaccine.

1:00:01And one of the reasons that they chose not to get a vaccine was because they were misinformed about its safety. And one of the people who misinformed about its safety was Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who in 2021 appeared in front of the Louisiana state legislator and said the COVID vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines ever made. So it's at least hypocritical that here's a man who did everything he could to discourage vaccination, who then says that we had a high death rate. Then there was this exchange about autism. Take a listen. You are wrong when you say that this issue has been studied. He's claiming that the connection, any connection between vaccines and autism, that it's never been studied.

1:00:43Your thoughts? this is like whack-a-mole with him i mean he first he says that the measles mumps rubella vaccine you know causes autism 24 studies showed that you were no more likely to get autism if you got that vaccine than if you didn't then he claimed that this this uh preservative in vaccines caused autism and he wrote a book about it called thimerosal let the science speak where the science didn't get to speak at all because nine studies had shown that wasn't true we took this preservative out of vaccines in 2000 and and the only thing that's happened in the last 25 years is the rate of autism has gone up.

1:01:15He claimed that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines cause autism. There was an excellent study out of Denmark that showed that clearly wasn't true, and he insisted that the journal that published that take it out. He has this fixed, immutable belief that vaccines cause autism, and he's wrong again and again, and he never admits that he's wrong. He did say during the interview that parents should get their children vaccinated against measles. Let's take a listen. Parents should get their children vaccinated for measles. That was after prompting by Dana Bash. But I'm wondering how significant you think that statement is, given the fact that he has pushed so much just downright quackery about vaccines for 22 years.

1:02:01We have a pretty low bar for our secretary of health and human services, don't we? I mean, here we have last year, the biggest measles epidemic we've had in more than 30 years. And this year it's worse. We've had three people die last year of measles, including two healthy little girls in West Texas who were unvaccinated. And we hadn't had a child die from measles in more than 20 years. And we're happy that here this man has said that people should get a measles vaccine. Although, remember, a week after that first child died from measles in West Texas, he went on Fox News and in an interview with Sean Hannity said the following.

1:02:34He said measles vaccine causes blindness. Measles vaccine causes deafness. Measles vaccine can kill children. Measles vaccine causes the same symptoms as measles. And then he went on to say that natural measles was a good thing because natural measles prevents cancer and heart attacks and autoimmune disease. That's who he really is. I'm sure it was really hard for him to say, get your child vaccinated for measles when he authored a book called The Measles Book, which says exactly the opposite of that. It is just insane. While I have you here, in addition to the measles epidemic, two people have now died in connection with this cyclosporiasis outbreak.

1:03:12How unusual is that, and what does that mean for this outbreak? It is pretty unusual. We're getting up to 20 ,000 cases, and I think the American public has the right to know what's going on, exactly what contact tracing is being done. but we don't hear from our Secretary of Health and Human Services about that, about the Salinella outbreak, about the Hantavirus outbreak, about people coming into this country with Ebola. You don't hear from him. The only time he's had a press conference since he's been Secretary of Health and Human Services is when he got up with President Trump and Jay Bhattacharya and Marty McCary and Dr.

1:03:46Oz and said that Tylenol, you know, taken in the first trimester of pregnancy causes autism, which also isn't true. Where is our Secretary of Health and Human Services? We need one. Dr. Paul Offit, thank you so much. As fires burn across Washington state, new CNN video shows dozens of cars lined up as people wait to be led into their neighborhoods to see whether their homes are still standing. The latest on these devastating blazes next.

1:04:17We're back with the politics lead. You know, I love that election jam. Can we have it? Thank you. Appreciate it. Tomorrow is primary day across five states, but the race that has Democrats divided truly is in Michigan. Where progressive Abdul El-Sayed, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, will face off against the establishment-backed Congresswoman Ely Stevens for the U.S. Senate Democratic nomination. CNN's Arlette Saenz is on the ground in Detroit, where Dr. El-Sayed is rallying in. Arlette, does it feel like he has the momentum? Well, Jake, Abdul El-Sayed and his team are not taking anything for granted. In fact, we are at his final event of the campaign here, which is not just a rally, but it's doubling as a canvas launch.

1:04:56They're trying to ensure that they can get as many of their supporters out to the polls tomorrow. But this is a battle within the Democratic Party that has played out over the past year in a contest that will ultimately offer a window into what the future of the Democratic Party might look like, especially in a battleground state here in Michigan. This is a real test for the progressive movement, which has seen success in recent elections in more blue areas like New York City or Denver. But now this is a very different test in a key battleground state, which has flipped between Democrats and Republicans in recent presidential elections.

1:05:31On the progressive side, you have who is a former state health official running with the backing of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. And then there is the more moderate Congresswoman Haley Stevens, who has a lot of support from establishment Democrats. She has also had more than$50 million spent on this race from outside groups, something that El-Sayed and his supporters have criticized throughout this primary. So tomorrow we'll offer a window of where Michigan voters, Democratic voters, feel the party should be going at a time when there's a lot of debate about what it means to be electable in the Democratic Party.

1:06:09Now, whoever wins this primary tomorrow will then face off against the expected Republican candidate, former Congressman Mike Rogers, in a contest that could very well determine the control of the Senate next year. Democrats would need to hold on to Michigan, plus flip four seats. And tomorrow they will have an answer about which candidate will be fighting that contest against the Republican in November. Right. All that signs in Detroit. Thank you so much. My panel is here. Chuck, I know I don't need to tell you, Michigan is a must win for Democrats if they want a chance at taking over the Senate.

1:06:44CNN's Jeff Zeleny talked with Dr. Abdul El-Sayed yesterday about what a win tomorrow means for the general election, giving all these all these hand wringing by Democrats that he's too left leaning to win in Michigan. Take a listen. How much of this is about convincing people that you can win in November? The question of can I win in November is a question that voters alone can't answer. Convincing folks like you and everybody who watches from everywhere else, I'm so sorry, it just doesn't matter. Electability is a thing that's best defined after the fact. So if and when I get elected, then you'll know I'm electable.

1:07:19What do you think? I think he brings a lot of energy. There's no doubt that this is a change electorate right now. And sure, we don't, Democrats should be fighting each other when this is probably, to your point, One of the most important seats, this one, North Carolina and Maine, are seats that we have to have if there's any chance of us taking back the Senate. And I think that there are some things that folks have said out there who think he may be too left to get elected. But this is not a presidential election when Donald Trump's bringing in a whole bunch of new people to the party. It's a midterm election where energy matters, and I think it matters in this election.

1:07:48I'll remind him, we talked about this last night, is that Rogers ran two years ago and lost, and it was a presidential election. And if we're expecting him to come back now and beat a Democrat, I think it's a heavy lift for them. And David, Mike Rogers has said he thinks he can beat either Democrat in November. He lost to Alyssa Slotkin, a pretty moderate Democrat in 2024, by just 0.3 percent. So he lost, but it was very, very narrow. It has been suggested that he would rather vote against Dr. Abdul-Sahid. I don't know that to be true, but that is what has been reported. Listen, Dr. Sayed, Abdul Sayed used to be, you know, sit here on this table with us on certain occasions.

1:08:27Very bright guy. I think he's a gifted political athlete. The problem is how he's campaigned and the people he's campaigned with, right? Kind of hard to distance yourself from Hassan Piker and some of the rhetoric that he's used to get where he is with the popularity. You know, you run so far to the left, running back to the middle is going to be tough. He's not, you know, Slotkin won, as you point out, by 0.3 % in a vote, about 5.2 million votes cast. She won by 18 ,000 votes. She won some of the counties that Trump carried. Dr. Syed's not going to win those counties, right? So where is he going to make up the vote?

1:09:00How is he going to overcome Mike Rogers? Who's a pretty steady Eddie in a state that's, you know, Michigan is not, you know, you're not running in New York City. You have Detroit, you have Dearborn. Great, there'll be big turnout. Chuck's point, you know, there's a lot of energy there. but are people on the 25th anniversary of 9-11, you know, he's going to have to really distance himself from a guy who said and campaigned with that America deserved to be attacked on 9-11. So that's the conundrum he faces. He's got this communist label, this label of folks who are really far left, you know, anti-Zionist, anti-Semitic, and yet, you know, he's going to have to paint himself as a moderate in a state that, you know, Slotkin was a part of the mod squad.

1:09:37Remember that, not the squad. She differentiated herself. She didn't want to be so far left. We should also just note that, no offense to her, but Kamala Harris was a drag on Slotkin, and Slotkin had to run like 15 points ahead. But I'm saying, that's just a testament to how talented she was as a moderate. Yeah, yeah, yeah. But the message that he's taken to folks is different. And his closing ad today was really unique. I make ads for a living. I'm not working for either one of these campaigns. But he had a closing ad today where he stood up and he's been really, really, really driving this home, which he said, money out of politics, money in your pocket.

1:10:07Medicare and health care for everybody and no more of our money going overseas. That could have been Donald Trump's message in 2016. I don't think that's too far left. So there's some breaking news that I just want to bring into the panel. The bipartisan House Ethics Committee just announced they found, quote, substantial reason to believe, unquote, that Republican Congressman Chuck Edwards of North Carolina violated House rules related to, quote, sexual harassment in hostile workplaces. The House Ethics Committee report found Edwards acted inappropriately towards two female staffers with late night personal texts and lavish gifts, including jewelry, designer purses, handguns, a KitchenAid mixer, a trip to New York City with a helicopter ride, a Broadway show.

1:10:46It goes on. The committee is recommending he be censured. It's the first time an ethics committee recommend a member of its own party be censured since 2010, meaning that the chairman of the House Ethics Committee is a Republican. What do you make of it, David? Look, I mean, there's clearly no place for this stuff, right? There's, this is like story after story. Like I'm not like handguns, purses, shows. I mean, the staffers, it's inappropriate at any workplace. Definitely should not be happening in the Congress. You know, people are sending, these are elected representatives sent there on behalf of people to do the people's work.

1:11:19And the guys live in like some sort of bizarre sugar daddy life. You know, it's not cool. And I'm glad he was censured. And I think it should be more than censured. I think he should be kicked out of Congress. Democrat or Republican, I'd say the same thing for a Democrat. So Edwards said that these relationships were, quote, professional boss subordinate relationships. I've never had a boss like that. And friendships. But there is one example that paints a different picture. This is from the report. Quote, in one instance, Edwards arranged for a birthday serenade at the woman's party and arranged for the singer to say it was from a special someone.

1:11:53Afterwards, the woman told her friend that she did not believe the congressman viewed her as just a daughter figure and that she was, quote, scared low key. These women served with Edwards since he was in the state Senate. I mean, I guess we all agree on this, but like how deluded do you have to be to think that that women on your that dating these women is appropriate and that they actually are interested in your old grim self? I think when you go to Congress, you get so full of yourself. And I see it. I'm not seeing anybody up there doing inappropriate things, but I'm just saying that they get really full of themselves.

1:12:27And it's easy to say this is unacceptable. Nobody should do this. But as we've lived through the Epstein stuff and all of the other things that come up and you have done some great reporting with Epstein survivors here of how uncomfortable you've been made felt like it's pitiful. Look, it's a power dynamic, right? Whether it's Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky, it's these members of Congress, it's Swalwell. Take your pick of who it is, right? There's there's this power dynamic. And for whatever reason, it just continues to happen. And it's got to stop. It's got to stop. It's unacceptable. And I'm glad that the Ethics Committee censured it.

1:13:00Just back to one other quick thing on the midterms. There is also this race in Wisconsin that I'm wondering what you think about. Because the frontrunner in the Wisconsin gubernatorial primary is going to put the DSA to the test in a battleground state for the first time. Because Abdul El-Sayed is progressive. He's not a member of the DSA. But Francesca Hong is a DSA candidate. She's a frontrunner, and she's facing three challengers. They're all polling in the single digits. She's probably going to win the nomination. One attendee at a standing room only campaign event for Hong told Notice today, quote, in a super, super purple state, I'm worried she's not going to catch the people on the fence.

1:13:36Are you worried? I get worried some. Mandela Barnes just dropped out this week because nobody can think they can beat her. Even if she tries to pivot, to your point, in the last 30, 90 days back to the middle, There's enough tape on her to where they will run attack ads after attack. And she still may win this thing, but I promise you, Democrats are going to have to spend money in Wisconsin. We should be spending in Texas. That's going to be a tough race. My wife's from Wisconsin, spent a lot of time in Wisconsin. She is. People forget that's a battleground state. Trump won Wisconsin. And I have made ads against Ron Johnson my entire life, and he keeps winning.

1:14:07I mean, if you watch some of her tape, like Chuck says, she's pretty far out there. Well, we'll see. It's a change electorate, as Chuck says. We'll see how much change they want. David Urban and Chuck Rocha, thank you to both of you. Always great having you. We just saw U.S. Attorney to D.C. Jeanine Pirro leaving the White House after Trump slammed her for, quote, folding like an umbrella, end quote, and dropping charges against people Trump says, vandalize the reflecting pool against all evidence and fact. It's not clear what's in that box she's holding. She was in there for about an hour. We'll tell you what we know when we come back.

1:14:44In the Pacific Northwest of the United States, devastating wildfires have forced nearly 65 ,000 people to evacuate their homes. In Spokane County, Washington, three major fires have destroyed more than 700 structures and burned more than 8 ,000 acres with 0 % containment as of now. Firefighters will get a brief break from the weather today, but hotter conditions are expected to return later this week. Joining us now, former Washington State Governor Jay Inslee. Governor, what is the biggest challenge that state and local leaders face right now when responding to a wildfire event of this magnitude?

1:15:20Well, there is I want to thank these firefighters. They've been intrepid and courageous. But there is a reality that we have to face. and that is because our grasslands and forests have become so dry and so hot as a result of the climate changing that these fires are not there's no human agency that can really contain them. This is a reality that we have to face. So the number one thing to do obviously is to preserve human life and to get people out of the way of the flames which are driven of 30, 40, 50 mile an our winds, that there's no agency, there's no plane, there's no machine, there's no courage that can solve this.

1:16:03The problem is we have to stop the climate change that is causing our grasslands and forests to become absolutely tinderboxes. You have long warned about the connection between climate change and more extreme weather. And sadly, the predictions that were being made 15, 20, 25 years ago that the, you know, the plutonium, not the plutonium, the oil and gas industry were lying about and poo-pooing. They're coming true. Is what's going on in Spokane right now an example of what you and others have been warning about? Unfortunately, that is the case. This is not a surprise to anyone who has followed this situation.

1:16:48When you have such extreme aridity and extreme winds over a prolonged period, you're going to get these fires. And this is a worldwide phenomenon. Obviously, France and Spain are burning down. California got theirs a year or two ago. Hawaii has been involved. This is a worldwide phenomenon and needs a response. But unfortunately, we have, and this is really maddening, at the moment our friends are standing in the ashes of their houses. a president who's refusing to give aid on multiple occasions to fires we've already had is in the tank with the oil and gas industry that is driving up our prices and is not lifting a finger in fact trying to stop us from getting access to cheaper energy which is solar wind and batteries driving up our costs so our houses are burning down the guy is helping these massive obscene profits of the oil and gas industry and we're left out here to dry.

1:17:43And now he's trying to pedal back. But I got to tell you, there's a lot of angry out people out here in the state of Washington and nationwide. On the matter of the oil and gas industry, on the oil market, specifically in the wake of the war with Iran, Exxon and Chevron have reported stronger than expected earnings following the recent volatility in the oil markets because of the war in Iran. What do these results tell you about the state of the global energy market? And what, if anything, consumers should expect when it comes to gas prices? Well, what we could expect that if we have a president who starts illegal unconstitutional wars that anyone with half a brain would understand was going to threaten our oil supplies and anyone with half a brain would know it was going to result in higher gas prices, to not have a recklessly, callously indifferent president who doesn't care about these higher gas prices.

1:18:34In fact, and this is quite incredible, when this started, he says, high gas prices are fine with me. We, quote, we make more money. That means the oil and gas companies, who are the people who had the mugging of Mar-a-Lago when they offered him a billion dollars, if he would just do their bidding, to prevent Americans from getting access to cleaner energy. And that's what's going on right now. So this is the war. This is a corrupt bargain between the president and the oil and gas industry. And it is a disaster in the making where he won't help people get access to clean energy. And on top of that, the oil and gas companies trying to get immunity so they aren't held accountable for this pollution.

1:19:13No, no, we need a better America. Former Democratic Governor Jay Inslee of Washington State. Thank you, sir. Appreciate it. Coming up next, the new fallout over the failed plan to run the World Cup with a group of private investors, a group that could have included Jared Kushner's brother.

1:19:32Our last lead start in our politics lead earlier today. President Trump signed an executive order establishing something called a Military Spouse Commission. The commission will provide the president with annual recommendations on policies that directly affect military families. The chair of the commission will be Pete Hegseth's wife, Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense. In our sports league, European soccer's governing body known as UEFA is threatening FIFA with legal action over the now failed plan to run the World Cup with a group of private investors led by Joshua Kushner, the brother of Jared Kushner.

1:20:08Last week, UEFA led the backlash against FIFA's plan and declared a loss of confidence in FIFA president Gianni Infantino. Early Saturday, Infantino dropped the investment proposal. And our pop culture lead Ariana Grande announced that she's going to be taking a step back from public life when her Eternal Sunshine tour wraps next month. This come as the singer and actress has faced concerns over her health and drastic weight loss seen in her latest appearances. Her representative said in a statement that she looks forward to ending her tour on a high note, both healthily and happily, after facing endless ongoing public scrutiny.

1:20:43If you ever miss an episode of the lead, you can watch the show on the CNN app. Aaron Burnett Out Front starts now.

1:21:03We'll be right back.

From the publisher

A look at what’s really in the deal that has two Republican Senate hold outs ready to sign off on Todd Blanche as attorney general. Plus, is President Trump about to fire Jeanine Pirro as the U.S. attorney for Washington DC? 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Lead with Jake Tapper

All 321 episodes
Blanche Rescinds Anti-Weaponization Fund but Loopholes RemainThe Lead with Jake Tapper · 1 h 30 min
Listen in VO