Judge Denies DOJ Request To Unseal Epstein Grand Jury Docs

26:10That is the kind of boilerplate language you're hearing over and over and over again. People keep saying, as the White House is saying, let's charge headlong into this. We want to lead the world in this. But when people start saying, what are you going to do about all the truckers who get put out of work? What are you going to do about all the people in law firms and in doctor's offices who get put out of work? What constraints are you willing to put on this? There are virtually no answers, Jake. not on the Hill, not in the White House, not anywhere, as people try to embrace this more and more.

26:42And what about the hallucinations that AI has? The hallucinations. This is something that I'm surprised has not been fixed. Since you and I first started talking about ChatGPT a few years ago, I asked ChatGPT just the other day, I said, Hey, you know, name the three books I've written. I've only written one. It named three books that I did not write, that do not exist, and it missed the one that I did write. Yeah. That's simple, and it's getting it wrong. So if it's making medical decisions for you or job decisions for you, do you want that? We hear about the AI being used with medical technology, but we also hear that they are making up medical studies.

27:15This can be a great thing. There's a lot of evidence. It is not great yet. All right, Tom Foreman, thanks so much. We have some breaking news just in. A House subcommittee has just voted to subpoena the U.S. Justice Department in an effort to get more information released on Jeffrey Epstein and his many crimes. We'll have more ahead on that. Plus, the report declassified and publicly released today by the Director of National Intelligence on efforts to investigate Russia's interference in the 2016 election. Why is this report coming out now? How credible is it? We'll talk about it next.

27:52Some breaking news from the U.S. Supreme Court. A win for President Trump. Let's get right to CNN's fantastic Supreme Court reporter, Joan Baskubic. Joan, what is the ruling? What's the news? Sure, Jake. This is yet another decision by the Supreme Court, the conservative majority, that endorses Donald Trump's effort to restructure the federal government and undercut the power of independent agencies. In this case, it involves the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The court has let President Trump fire three Biden appointees whose terms had not run and who had been confirmed by the Senate. What the justices said is that, for now at least, President Trump has that power, and the majority likened it to a decision that it had made earlier in the spring that affected the National Labor Relations Board, another agency that was supposed to be independent.

28:43Dissenting justices said, piece by piece, the Supreme Court is allowing Donald Trump to take apart the independence of independent agencies. Jake? All right, Joe Buscupic, thanks so much. Also in our Law and Justice lead today, in the effort of full transparency, they say, today the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, is declassifying yet another report on the 2016 election. This one from the House Intelligence Committee's majority staff. This report is dated September 18, 2020, when Democrats held the majority. They say, in this declassified report, quote, President Putin ordered conventional and cyber influence operations and that, quote, Putin's principal motivations in these operations were to undermine faith in the U.S.

29:25democratic process. Okay, no controversy there, but the report goes on to say the intelligence community assessment led by the director of the CIA ignored or selectively quoted reliable intelligence reports that challenged and in some cases undermined judgments that Putin sought to elect Trump. D.N.I. Gabbard showed up at today's White House briefing. There she went on to conclude that orders to rush reports came from the highest levels of government during the Obama years. President Obama directed an intelligence community assessment to be created to further this contrived false narrative that ultimately led to a years long coup to try to undermine President Trump's presidency.

30:09That is not what the word coup means. I want to bring in Beth Saner. She served as deputy director of national intelligence during President Trump's first term. Also with us, CNN's John Miller, who worked at the FBI under Bush and at the Office of Director of National Intelligence under Obama. Beth, we note all of the intelligence reports. Everyone notes that Russia did attempt to interfere in the 2016 election by hacking and influencing campaigns. No report, none, indicates that Russia manipulated any actual vote totals, which is important. Before your job as the number two under the Director of National Intelligence, you were director of the president's daily brief.

30:47What do you think this is all about? I was going to ask you that because you're the political guy and I'm the intel girl. But, you know, I don't understand exactly what I'm reading. When I read the report that said there was no effort to really change votes. And even if they tried, it wasn't going to work. I'm like, yeah, that's exactly what the intelligence community said. So what what Gabbard is Obama himself said that out loud after the election. Right. There's no disagreement about that. So why is this happening? Right. Why are we dredging? Why are we dredging this up? It's a rhetorical thing.

31:25And I think our vote, our viewers probably understand that there is nothing to see in these reports. This isn't about this report. This is about, you know, look over here, guys. Yeah. John, we should acknowledge that there were problems in the Russiagate investigation. There were those text messages between Page and Strzok. There was dishonest work to justify a warrant spying on a Trump advisor, Carter Page, that wasn't appropriate. Not to mention Hillary Clinton's campaign did pay for and hide their role in the creation of the Steele dossier. All of that is true, legitimate reason for people to complain.

32:00But none of that changes the intelligence community's conclusion that Russia did launch an influence and hacking campaign to interfere in the 2016 election. No, and I mean, all of that is true and stipulated. But I think what happened today is obviously there are reasons where the White House would want to distract from other things. At that point, the Wall Street Journal was already on the phone saying we're going with a story that Trump's name appears several times in the Epstein files at the FBI and so on. But let's get down to business with this, which is this report, which was by the House Intelligence Committee, says that there were 15 reports on Russian interference with the election in 2016.

32:47It cites exactly three out of the 15 as potentially problematic for analytic issues and focuses on one that was called the intelligence community assessment, a CIA-driven product that was done as a rush and not necessarily coordinated with the rest of the intelligence community sufficiently, according to these findings. things, but they are looking at analytic conclusions and talking about, well, it's from a single source, and there were other information from other sources, and that it was said to be with high confidence, but it probably should have been with medium confidence. These are the kind of quibbles that we go through in analysis, which is more of an art than a science all the time.

33:35and there is a giant body of work from the Mueller report, which is extraordinarily extensive, to the Senate version of this, which goes for thousands of pages that come to the same conclusion. So it seems to be a bit of a stretch to be standing up in the White House today calling for charges of treason and conspiracy and the jailing of former presidents and CIA directors over some analytic disagreements. It seemed to be a little bit of a smoke bomb. Yeah, not to mention, I mean, President Obama gets the same Supreme Court offered immunity that President Trump gets, no small part thanks to President Trump.

34:16Let's talk about this accusation, Beth, that it was rushed. The Obama administration had a relatively small window here after the 2016 election, before Trump's inauguration in 2017. It was widely reported that they wanted the intelligence on Russian interference campaigns shared with the American public before Trump came to office. Is it possible that some facts, as Tulsi Gabbard is suggesting, could have been ignored or selectively quoted, as this declassified House report suggests? Sure. That's what that's how this works. Right. The intelligence community makes an assessment at a point in time with the information that they have.

34:55and everyone should understand that the world moves on. And this is why the Sissy report that John talked about, that's literally like a thousand pages. She means the Senate Intelligence Committee. Yeah, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Later, after all the dust was settled, put together five volumes. Right. And it reinforced everything that the intelligence community said. And in fact, when the intelligence community said that Putin aspired to help Trump, The Sissy report said, actually, no, they didn't aspire. They actually did. They did it. They actually did. So, yeah, this is why retrospectives are not bad and people shouldn't be afraid of them.

35:41But what I don't appreciate is that these are cherry picked examples that they are quibbling angels dancing on the head of a pin. And when we have volumes of reporting, you're always going to find one report that's different. Okay, whatever. The big message here for Americans, Russia tried to interfere in our election processes with the point of undermining our confidence in our democracy. And by bringing this up again, the Trump administration is doing the work of our adversary, Russia. All right, Beth Saner, John Miller, thanks to both of you. coming up the urgent warning for one community that could be theoretically next in the path of a major flood.

36:24Stay with us. And we're back with our Earth Matters series nearly three weeks after the deadly and devastating floods in central Texas. A CNN analysis finds that other vulnerable communities are at serious risk for a similar disaster because of the new normal of extreme weather. One such place is Helen, Georgia, at the headwaters of the Chattahoochee River. CNN's Chief climate correspondent Bill Weir went there to find out why it's potentially one storm away from complete catastrophe. On a hot day in the mountains of North Georgia, few places are more inviting than the Chattahoochee River. And Tubin the Hooch on days like this makes it easy to forget that the same waterway providing so much joy can take life and property in a flash.

37:13And when the Chattahoochee turned deadly 16 years back, it changed both Georgia and Laura Belanger, one of the top hydrologists in the South. So I am in the position I'm in today because of the September 2009 floods. I was young in my career at the time and there were 10 fatalities in the state of Georgia. That left a lasting impression on me and wanting to kind of see how we could do better with our hydro services and getting those warnings out. That's what helped be a catalyst for those flash flood warnings to be included in wireless emergency alerts. Today in the tourist town of Helen, Georgia, those wireless alerts, weather radios, are the only sources of flash flood warning.

37:56Because in a place like this, sirens might confuse people to run for low ground from a tornado instead of high ground from a flash flood. It's been a long time since the water topped that 10-foot marker. It hit 12 feet back in 67. And while there have been some swift water rescues in recent weeks, most people don't remember really high water. That's the thing that struck me in Texas there. It reminded me more of covering a tsunami in Japan where children were swept away while they debated what to do because no one could imagine the worst. And when you're watching tubers here, you can't imagine that water turning deadly.

38:35It's hard to get, especially with how shallow it is at the moment, it is hard to digest what a big amount of water coming through here would look like and how it's inundated. And she is especially worried about Enchanted Valley just over the hills. The folks living in these permanent trailers sit smack dab on the Hiawassee River next to one of the flashiest river gauges in the nation. And so those are the places that keep me up at night, regardless of the amount of readiness or preparation. The fact that there are people in property that close to the river, that's what the concern is. The biggest question we get is when we see a hundred year floodplain and maybe the water level has risen to this point and someone says, oh, thank goodness, we don't have to deal with this for 99 more years.

39:21And it happens. The reality is what that means is that there's a one in 100 chance of occurrence in a given year of that happening again. Right. But that math is changing. But that math changes over time as you see flooding occur more frequently. So, Bill, you've given us this snapshot of this one town, Helen, Georgia. But this is just one of many communities in the U.S. that face this risk, right? Exactly. This is a part of this project. The CNN climate team also partnered with First Street Foundation, a nonprofit that maps flood risks in ways that FEMA doesn't. And we looked at the combination of factors that led to the tragedy in Texas, which is the flashiness, the topography that funnels water, the vulnerability over time to people's complacency, the tourists who get there as well.

40:11And we found examples from Santa Barbara, California, to the Catskills of New York City. There's one in North Carolina that's especially flashy, Nogales, Arizona, down by the border. So all different kinds of watersheds are vulnerable, but knowledge is power. And the more people know about the watersheds that they're next to, the better. All right, Bill Weir in Helen, Georgia, thank you so much. Just an avalanche of news just in the last few hours. CNN sources have now confirmed to CNN that Attorney General Panbondi did brief President Trump in May that he is among the many names mentioned in the Epstein files, which is not to say he did anything wrong, but his name is in there.

40:50A House subcommittee just voted to subpoena the Justice Department over all of this, and the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former partner for a deposition on August 11th. It is a lot, and we're covering it all next.

41:13Brought to you by Nordstrom. For 125 years, Nordstrom has been part of your story. The stylist who found the perfect outfit for your big interview. The first pair of walking shoes for your one-year-old. The tomato soup you shared with your sister at the cafe. These are the moments that make Nordstrom, Nordstrom. Big or small, we're here for all of it. Celebrating 125 years with new moments still add. Discover it all in Nordstrom stores and at Nordstrom.com. Cozy season is ahead and you'll be spending way more time inside. Is your home ready? Don't worry. With Wayfair, you can upgrade your space without breaking the bank.

41:51Score up to 70 % off during their Labor Day clearance on furniture, area rugs, mattresses, and more. Plus, surprise flash deals you can't miss. Whether it's one room or the whole house, Wayfair has pieces for every style and budget. Shop Wayfair's Labor Day clearance now through September 7th at Wayfair.com. Way fair, every style, every home. Welcome to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper. A packed hour, a slew of new details in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Just as a judge declines to release some grand jury documents from the criminal investigation, CNN has confirmed that the U.S. Attorney General, Pam Bondi, told President Trump back in May that his name was one of many in the Epstein files.

42:34We're breaking down all the developments. Plus, the man who murdered four Idaho college students was officially sentenced to life in prison today. But his motive may never be known, as he refused to speak during their hearing. We did hear from the victims, families, and friends, their emotional comments and moments. Also, the president of France, Emmanuel Macron, and his wife, Bridget, are suing right-wing podcaster and conspiracy theorist Candace Owens. The lawsuit accuses Owens of a relentless and unjustified smear campaign against the couple. the lawyer for the president and first lady of France is going to join us live ahead.

43:13We are following huge developments in three major stories. First, remember that Signal app scandal back in March? The Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, shared detailed military plans in a group chat that included a journalist accidentally. Well, sources tell CNN that the Pentagon inspector general has evidence that Hegseth's message were taken from a document that was marked classified, despite what Hegseth has said. Second, a federal judge today denied the Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury documents from the criminal probe into alleged sex trafficker and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

43:48And third, sources tell CNN that U.S. Attorney General Bondi told President Trump that his name was in the Epstein files. Let's bring in CNN's Jeff Zeleny at the White House. Jeff? Jake, we are learning this evening that the president was briefed, as you said, by his attorney general, Pam Bondi, back in May, that his name was mentioned in the Epstein files. That is what we do know. What we do not know is the context in which his name appeared. Of course, it has long been established that the president was a longtime friend of Jeffrey Epstein back in the 1990s in New York. They were featured at many parties together.

44:27Jeffrey Epstein attended one of Donald Trump's weddings, at least, and on from there. But what this does is return the questions, the unanswered questions, back to the White House. The White House, of course, has been working overtime trying to change the subject with a deflection, with a distraction. But what this shows is that Pam Bondi, the attorney general, told the president that, look, your name is mentioned in here. Of course, several other names, many, many, many other names are mentioned in these volumes of files. But it does not answer the questions that just still remain about this entire matter.

45:01Now, White House officials are telling us, look, this is not surprising. The president knew his name would be in there, but they are saying that he did nothing wrong. Of course, the president severed his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein over a real estate fight in Florida in the mid-2000s here. But what this does, again, return the conversation back to the president's name being in the files. Of course, the files have not been released. There's been an uproar over that. And many people are wondering if it is because of the Trump mentions in here. Again, we don't know the context of how many times his name appears.

45:36but we do know the president was briefed on this by his attorney general. Yeah, we should reiterate, this doesn't mean he did anything wrong. There's a lot of hearsay in investigative documents by definition, but it's sure interesting. Jeff Zeleny at the White House, thanks so much. I want to bring in Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin of Maryland. So, Congressman, just a short while ago, a House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena the Justice Department to release files related to Epstein. And House Oversight Chair James Comer, He's still going to need to sign off on this subpoena before it's issued.

46:07Do you support it? Well, of course, Congresswoman Summer Lee took the advantage of a hearing taking place to advance what the whole country is talking about, which is just getting Donald Trump and Pam Bondi to release the file. But she said we should use the subpoena power of Congress to do it. There was a bipartisan vote. The chair of the committee, Higgins, was outvoted by a coalition of all the Democrats and some of the Republicans, including Nancy Mace and even Scott Perry. And they voted to do it. So I hope Chairman Comer will show the backbone to go ahead and render that subpoena. And we'll see if we'll see if we can do it.

46:45The whole country knows that after the president has made such a big deal out of this for months and months and months, he's got to release the files that he seems to know the contents of based on that conversation with the Department of Justice and the FBI. So do you support Comer issuing a subpoena for convicted Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell for a deposition August 11th? And is she credible? I mean, she's been charged with perjury. She's a convicted felon who was helping to run that massive sex abuse ring and operation. And she's likely to lie. And that's no reason not to bring her in.

47:27If people want to hear her testimony, we can make that assessment of the credibility ourselves. just like with every other document of the more than 100 ,000 documents that Trump and Bondi had more than 1 ,000 FBI agents reviewing through the night on a 24-hour shift in order to find mentions of Donald Trump, which they were supposed to bring back to the White House. And they did, apparently, telling them that he was in there. And now, suddenly, he doesn't want the files released. All the more reason they must be released, and the public has the right to know. So Epstein's house was first graded in Palm Beach in 2005.

48:05And one of the questions I've heard from Republicans is where have Democrats been on this? That certainly now this is an opportunity to to bring attention to something that Donald Trump doesn't want attention to. But if Democrats really cared about this and I want to accept some Democrats like Debbie Wasserman Schultz from Florida, who's been active in some of these issues. But why now? Like, why not? I mean, these these victims have needed justice for 20 years. Yeah, that's the easiest question in the world. Democrats have been demanding, like Debbie Wasserman Schultz, justice for these human trafficking sex abuse victims all along, both in Florida and all over the country.

48:43We were the ones who were backing the real prosecution of Epstein. It was Donald Trump's later named Secretary of Labor, Acosta, the Republican U.S. attorney in Southern District of Florida, who threw away a 60-count federal indictment, trading in for one state charge of solicitation, and the sweetest of sweetheart contracts given to Epstein, covering up a bunch of his associates and letting him stay free during the days for 18 months and just spending the night in jail after they knew that he was raping girls and running that sex abuse operation. It was under President Biden that Maxwell was prosecuted and sentenced to 20 years in jail.

49:23So Donald Trump now has been campaigning on releasing the Epstein files. And we say, fine, let's make it bipartisan. We can all care to stop human trafficking in America. Let's just do it and stop playing these partisan games. That's about the dumbest question I've heard during this entire episode. The Democrats have been pressing for release of all of this information. And we're the ones who are, by the way, fighting Donald Trump, who's been dismantling anti-human trafficking programs throughout the government, including Department of State, Department of Justice, Department of Labor, all throughout the country and all around the world.

49:58So I hope we can turn our attention to that once we get through the Epstein thing. All right, Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin of Maryland. Thank you so much, sir. Good to see you. You bet. My political panel is here to discuss. We have with us Democratic strategist Amicia Cross, Mark Short, who was former chief of staff to the then vice president Mike Pence, and CNN's chief legal affairs correspondent Paul Arisa. Paul, let me start with you. The federal judge today denied the Justice Department's request that these pertinent grand jury transcripts be released, the ones that went into the Epstein case and the Glenn Maxwell case.

50:32Although, I guess there are still some that could be open in New York. That judge was in Florida. And that's exactly right. The Justice Department has requested evidence be unsealed from multiple grand juries. Today, this decision is related to the 2005-2007 grand juries that were paneled down in West Palm Beach, Florida. And there, the judge said, look, the Justice Department is arguing that this should be unsealed because of, quote, extensive public interest and transparency to the American public. She said that does not qualify as an exception to the default, which is that this is confidential material.

51:03So you're not going to get the material down there unless the Justice Department appeals. But there is a glimmer of hope. This has always been a long shot, but there's a glimmer of hope they might get something in New York. What we know up there is that the judge has given the Justice Department another week to come up with some more robust legal arguments for why this should be released. They've also given, though, Maxwell and any potential victims another week or so to weigh in here about what they think. This is a long shot. The default is to keep this confidential. Maxwell is expected to oppose this.

51:35Now, interestingly, her lawyers had asked to be able to review this material up in New York. That was denied today as well. Oh, interesting. Mark Short, I'm quite certain that Mike Pence's name is not in the Epstein files. But I will say, just because one's name is in any of these documents, thousands of pages, a lot of it's hearsay, a lot of it's investigative. Who knows whose names are in there? Just because somebody's name is in there doesn't mean they did anything illegal or even anything wrong. Still, it is odd that Trump's name is in there, and he was told that in May, and we're only finding this out now in July.

52:11Well, I think that was probably the least surprising news of the day, Jake. When you learn that the president who had campaigned and the vice president had said so much that they would release this, that the attorney general had, and then when they backed off it, I think most people assumed that the president's name was included in there. And she said, you don't know what the context is, but I don't think they're going to get this behind them until they actually release the files. I do think that Congressman Raskin protests a little bit too much. I mean, it was only a couple years ago the Democrats had control of the House, the Senate, and the Department of Justice.

52:38And so if they wanted to release these files, they certainly had the ability to do that themselves. I don't disagree. Amicia, House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena the Justice Department to release files related to Epstein. The Comer still has to sign off on it. What do you make of it all? Well, at this point, I think that the White House is trying to basically move the ball. He doesn't want to release the Epstein files. He knows that his name is in it. He also just wants this story to go away. And in large part, it may not be because of an actual crime being committed as much as it is guilt by association.

53:09He doesn't want he wants to be talking about anything except this. And I think that at this point, Republicans within the House, as well as Republicans in the Senate, they need to call on him to release these. But all of them need to align on this. One, because it's not going to go away. The story is not going to go away. A lot of his acolytes were the people who pushed the story to begin with. They are the ones who said drain the swamp. He is the one who is now expanding that swamp. And it looks worse and worse every day that he continues to delay. Tell me what you think about this subpoena to release the files from the Justice Department that the Oversight Committee just issued.

53:41Look, all of this is theater, right? The choreography here has been so poor. The Justice Department could have easily kicked the can down the road on this another 18 months. How could they have done that? Well, they could have done what they did with a grand jury, made those requests, delay a couple months, then go do their Maxwell Theater down at the prison in Florida another couple months, then hand it to Ed Martin to sit with and fire off some letters, then give it to you as attorney. They could have stretched this out. They have made a mess. I don't think this is going to be what gets Pam Bondi to turn over letters.

54:10We know the Justice Department of the Hill, they don't play nice. But the pressure is going to continue to be on the attorney general and President Trump to release something. Because people who really care about this, they know the information in the grand jury is just a sliver of what exists and the bulk of what exists remains under the authority of the attorney general to release. Meanwhile, on the subject of news that the Trump administration doesn't like, sources tell CNN that the Pentagon's inspector general has evidence that military plans shared by Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, on Signal, an unclassified forum and app, they were taken from a CENTCOM document marked classified at the time, even though the Pentagon has said that that's not true.

54:52Do you think if the inspector general's report comes out and basically confirms what we're reporting in the Washington Post is first reported, do you think that that will, there will be any consequences for Hexeth or no, it doesn't matter? I think we're past that, honestly, Jake. I think that, I think we're missing the point that that mission was incredibly successful. The strikes on a random incredibly successful recruitment has been up. I think that they should have admitted a mistake on that from the very beginning. They should have just admitted a mistake and would say, we're not going to do this again.

55:20We recognize the signal is not a secure communication vehicle and classified documents shouldn't be communicated that way. There's also, I mean, the White House Situation Room is there to help you have these sorts of conversations in a very classified manner. So it was a big mistake, but they should have just accepted the mistake and said, we're not going to do it again. The thing is, I don't disagree with what you're saying, forest for the trees, but not only did they say there was nothing classified, he said it under oath before Congress. Yeah, Hillary Clinton would also like a word. I mean, the past decade has been defined.

55:51The one something that unites all the parties, is sort of an inability to protect your classified information and then watching those stories be weaponized. And again, the statement under oath also could become a problem. But the idea that they're going to just sort of brush off sharing classified information on Signal, well, I believe it was just yesterday Trump was talking about Hillary Clinton's potential misuse of private server and potential mishandling of classified information. I was going to say, Mark knows this probably better than anybody from serving in the administration. This is a continuation of them not admitting to any level of wrongdoing.

56:22And for, you know, this party, the Republican Party, to have called out Hillary Clinton, I think rightfully so to a certain extent, on, you know, using a server that was not protected, you have to have that same level of upset around Pete Hexf, who many of us knew was lying when he said that it wasn't protected information to begin with. Now, what is the next move going to be? Is he going to say that this that he has the authority to declassify, which is what we heard from Donald Trump when he got raided at Mar-a-Lago with documents that he shouldn't have had? Is this going to be more of the same?

56:51And I think that with this administration, we can also probably guess that he is has used this method more than more than a few times when it comes to classified information over signal, because we know he had more than one chat. All right, thanks to one and all. Appreciate it. Coming up next, hear the emotional statements in court today in Idaho from the family and friends of the Idaho murder victims as the killer is officially sentenced to life in prison. Plus, the ruling from a judge today in that case of Kilmar Abrego-Garcia, the undocumented migrant from Maryland, the ruling that means he will stay behind bars at least for now.

57:24Those details ahead.

57:29Big news in our Law and Justice League today. Brian Koberger has now been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for the horrific murders of four young University of Idaho students in their off-campus home in 2022. Koberger declined his chance to speak before the packed courtroom today. But his victims, Madison Mogan and Kaylee Gonsalves and Kana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, they were all remembered through their families' gutting and emotional and candid victim impact statements. CNN's Jean Casares is in Boise, Idaho for this unforgettable and emotional day. The truth is you're basic.

58:08It was a morning filled with incredible emotion in an Idaho courtroom as heartbroken family members delivered victim impact statements in the sentencing hearing of Brian Koberger. I should have been having the college experience in starting to establish my future. Instead, I was forced to learn how to survive the unimaginable. Koberger, the man responsible for brutally stabbing four University of Idaho students to death in their sleep back in 2022. I had to sleep in my mom's bed because I was too terrified to close my eyes. The surviving roommate sharing the trauma they say they have endured since that tragic night.

58:50I slept in my parents' room for almost a year. I made them double lock every door, set an alarm, and still check everywhere in the room just in case someone was hiding. What he did shattered me in places I didn't know could break. And family member after family member expressing their pain. We will grow old without our only child, our bright, beautiful friend and daughter. The emotional toll you've inflicted on me is immeasurable. I live with a constant ache, with birthdays that are now memorials, with holidays that feel hollow, with empty chairs that scream louder than words ever could. And their anger.

59:32Victim Kaylee Gonzov, his father, moving the lectern to direct his comments directly to his daughter's killer, dramatically shifting the tone in the courtroom. The world's watching because of the kids, not because of you. Nobody cares about you. You're not worth the time, the effort to be remembered. In time you will be nothing but two initials forgotten to the wind, no visitors, nothing more than initials on an otherwise unmarked tombstone. Perhaps the most striking statement coming from Kaylee Goncalves' sister. You're a textbook case of insecurity disguised as control. Let me be very clear.

1:00:15Don't ever try to convince yourself you mattered just because someone finally said your name out loud. The convicted killer appeared emotionless while in court and declined to address the court when given the chance. The time has now come to end Mr. Kohlberger's 15 minutes of fame. It's time that he'd be consigned to the ignominy and isolation of perpetual incarceration. The judge not sparing his own harsh words for the killer. I'm unable to come up with anything redeeming about Mr. Koberger because his grotesque acts of evil have buried and hidden anything that might have been good or intrinsically human about him.

1:00:54Sentencing him to life in prison without the possibility of parole for all four counts of murder, plus fines and 10 years for the burglary charge. I will not attempt to speak about him further other than to simply sentence him so that he is forever removed from civilized society. And as he heads to prison, he does so with the parting words of the families he tried to silence. I see through you. You want the truth? Here's the one you'll hate the most. If you hadn't attacked them in their sleep, in the middle of the night, like a pedophile, Kayleigh would have kicked your fucking ass.

1:01:39And we just learned some brand new information, documents that we have never seen. They have not been made public, have just been made public. Zanna Kurnodal, one of the victims, she was on the floor in her bedroom. We knew that, but there was blood all over her and there was blood over objects in the room, all over the room. They believed there was a terrible struggle and her boyfriend, Ethan, was in the bed. Kaylee Gonzalez and Maddie Mogan were in bed with a pink blanket over them and Kaylee's face was unrecognizable. Her facial structure had been severely damaged. Jake? Just horrible. Just absolutely horrible.

1:02:20Gene Casares in Boise. Idaho. Thank you so much. More on our Law and Justice League now. Kilmar Abrego Garcia could stay in jail for at least another 30 days. But after that, he could become a free man while he awaits trial on human smuggling charges. That's because a federal judge in Tennessee today said federal prosecutors had not shown through clear and convincing evidence that Abrego Garcia would pose any sort of danger if he were out. He had been living in the U.S. illegally. He was deported to El Salvador despite a judge's previous order saying he could not be sent back to El Salvador. After the U.S.

1:02:51Supreme Court ordered him back, the Trump administration returned him in June and filed those human smuggling charges. France's president Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte are suing right-wing podcaster and conspiracy theorist Candace Owens for defamation. The first couple's lawyer joins me in studio next to explain exactly what the Macrons are suing Candace Owens about.

1:03:25This episode is brought to you by Nordstrom. For 125 years, Nordstrom has been part of your story. The stylist who found the perfect outfit for your big interview. The first pair of walking shoes for your one-year-old. The tomato soup you shared with your sister at the cafe. These are the moments that make Nordstrom, Nordstrom. Big or small, we're here for all of it. Celebrating 125 years with new moments still add. Discover it all in Nordstrom stores and at Nordstrom.com. Cozy season is ahead and you'll be spending way more time inside. Is your home ready? Don't worry. With Wayfair, you can upgrade your space without breaking the bank.

1:04:05Score up to 70 % off during their Labor Day clearance on furniture, area rugs, mattresses, and more. Plus, surprise flash deals you can't miss. Whether it's one room or the whole house, Wayfair has pieces for every style and budget. Shop Wayfair's Labor Day clearance now through September 7th at Wayfair.com. Wayfair, every style, every home. Our world lead now. Now, French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte are suing right-wing podcaster and conspiracy theorist Candace Owens. The defamation lawsuit filed today in Delaware claims that Owens has engaged in a, quote, relentless and unjustified smear campaign against the couple.

1:04:42The complaint goes on to allege that Owens spread outrageous conspiracy theories that France's first lady could be a man, that the Macron's are related in committing incest and that the Macron's, the couple, is being controlled by the CIA. Obviously, those are deranged claims. In response to the filing, Owens posted a screenshot of a news story about the lawsuit on her Instagram page and wrote, I will be coming for this wig today. Stay tuned. Owens has, of course, a history of all sorts of deranged conspiracy theories and vile anti-Semitic rhetoric. She was temporarily suspended from YouTube for anti-LGBTQ comments.

1:05:26Joining us now to discuss is Tom Clare, the lawyer for the Macrons, Emmanuel and Brigitte. And we should note that if people recognize you, they might remember you from the Dominion case suing Fox News for defamation, which resulted in a$787.5 million settlement from Fox, but who's counting? So the lawsuit claims that this has been a year-long campaign by Candace Owens. Why are the Macron suing now? Like, what changed? Why sue now? Well, this was really a last resort. We have been tempted to engage with her for the last year, putting evidence in front of her, request after request after request, that she just simply do the right thing.

1:06:04This is not a legal thing. Do the right thing. Tell the truth. Stop spreading these lies. And each time we've done that, she mocked the Macron's. She mocked our efforts to set the record straight. She refused to retract what she had said. She started a merch campaign. She's selling T-shirts, mocking and celebrating her defamation of them. And enough is enough. It was time to hold her accountable for this campaign. So your lawsuit alleges, quote, every time the Macrons leave their home, they do so knowing that countless people have heard and many believe these vile fabrications. It is invasive, dehumanizing, and deeply unjust.

1:06:42Some people out there might think, really? The first couple of France can't leave their home in France? without worrying that people believe the deranged nonsense from this American podcaster? Yeah, what people don't really understand, and a lot of people can go on TV and talk about the president, talk about the first lady, you know, pundits can get on and talk about them. But what people forget is, is this, these are human beings. These are a married couple. They have a social life. They have a private life together. They have the same feelings and the same hurt from these sorts of defamatory statements as anybody would.

1:07:15And it does have a material impact on them. It is It's incredibly upsetting to have this said year after year. And this sort of falsehood is a cancer. And it metastasizes into, obviously, the media, but it also metastasizes into other circles that they're running in. They get asked about it, of course, even in the circles that they run in. They get asked about these campaigns, and they shouldn't have to go through that. It's pretty horrible. I mean, she also engages in Holocaust denial and all sorts of anti-Semitism. She just posted a video reacting to the lawsuit. She calls it a, quote, obvious and desperate public relations strategy.

1:07:49What's your response? Well, first of all, I'd like to thank her for that reaction to the lawsuit. She's only helping us with our claim for punitive damages by expressing no remorse and obviously doubling down on these falsehoods. But I don't think she's going to feel the same way about this being a public relations stunt after her deposition and after she has to sit for trial. So you're alleging that Candace Owen made these allegations despite knowing that they were false. I don't know that she knows they're false. I mean, she says a lot of crazy, just completely insane, hateful stuff about Jews, about the Holocaust.

1:08:22Like, I don't know what she knows to be true or not. She says a lot of lies. How do you know that she's lying as opposed to a deeply disturbed individual? It could be both, of course. It's one of the reasons why our complaint is 219 pages long. We wanted to lay out exactly that. We wanted to explain to the court and we wanted to explain to the people that will see our lawsuit how we can prove that she knows it's false. We allege that there's evidence that she knew it was false when she started this campaign over a year ago. She started relying on things she knew was discredited. But then over the past year, when we have put this information directly in front of her, even if you want to give her a pass for the early crazy stuff that she said, after we put facts and information in front of her, black and white, multiple times.

1:09:05Like what? Like the first lady's birth certificate? Like what kind of facts? Yeah, we have laid out extensive evidence in our complaint demonstrating that she was born a woman, she's always been a woman, and the allegations of CIA control conspiracy and the incest and all the other things are demonstrably false. Putting aside the fact that they're all inherently implausible, what you said at the outset is obviously really important. In our system, if you're making an inherently implausible allegation, the standard is higher. You have to come forward with better evidence if you're going to say it.

1:09:38She has none of it. All she's done is mocked them and ridiculed them and repeated it. There are a bunch of these hate mongers out there that have been saying the same thing about Michelle Obama, the former first lady of the United States. Do you think she should sue? Well, I haven't looked at her claim, but I believe that everybody has a right to their reputation. And I think our Constitution makes that very clear. Defamation is not protected by the First Amendment. And if it's impacting Michelle Obama or anybody else, they have a right to access our court system and have a trial. In our system, that's the way we determine truth or falsity.

1:10:09We do it in court. We do it with rules. We do it with legal standards, and it's a place where evidence matters. And that's why we've taken Candace to court where we can actually have a trial on the truth. You're asking for punitive damages. How much money do you want, and do you want her to apologize? Well, we'd love an apology, of course. The court can't order her to apologize, and based on her conduct, especially today, we don't expect her to do anything other than double down. We'll put forward our damage claim at trial, but if she continues to double down between now and the time of trial, it'll be a substantial award.

1:10:40Well, can you give me an idea? Are we talking about, I mean, the last time you were involved in something, the settlement was$787.5 million. That was Fox News for their many, many lies about Dominion Software, Fox News. But are you looking for that kind of settlement? She doesn't have$787.5 million. Well, you look at what happened with Alex Jones, and there are signi - juries understand. Juries understand that there is an inherently large value to somebody's reputation. And if you're going to say these vile things and if you're going to repeat them to a significant audience, as she has, she has over five million followers.

1:11:14And her lies have metastasized into actual publications. So we see other publications that pick up on it and they report on it. And when you ask them, when we reached out to them and say, what's your basis for this? They point back to her. What are the other publications? They're detailed in the complaint. We've seen Newsweek and New York Post and others have pointed to her as the source of their reporting on this. But they're asserting it as if it's true based on what Candace Owens is saying? They repeat what Candace has said, and they cite her as a source. And so when they fall back on her, but she is at the epicenter of this campaign.

1:11:45That's why we picked her. That's why we're going for her is because she is the one whose lies are metastasizing and they're spreading. And she, under our system of defamation, is liable for all those republications. Are you not worried at all that the fact is that this is a disturbed individual, Candace Owens, who loves attention, loves the fact that we're talking about her on CNN? And she doesn't, whatever happened to her as a child, like she doesn't care that the attention's negative. She just likes it. Yeah. And you're bringing her more. Yeah. I mean, it obviously goes into the mix. And we did not do this as our first choice.

1:12:17But, Jake, if that mindset allowed the Macron's to sit back, that's how disinformation takes root. That's how disinformation wins, is you've got to take that first step and you've got to take a principled step. And I applaud the Macron's for their courage in taking this on. All right, Tom Clare, thanks so much for being here. CNN has learned that the company trying to buy CBS News and its parent company, Paramount Global, is making a series of promises to help get that very lucrative merger approved. Let's go right to CNN chief media analyst Brian Stelter. Brian, Skydance Media is the name of the company.

1:12:48They're negotiating with Trump's FCC. What kind of pledges is Skydance making? Yeah, the new filings say that Skydance does not have any DEI programs in place currently, and it promises not to add any if this merger is approved. Plus, once in charge of Paramount, the new owners will hire an ombudsman at CBS, and that person will evaluate complaints of bias. The company is promising to carefully consider any such complaints. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, a Trump appointee who once wore, who once showed his loyalty to Trump by wearing a gold lapel pin of Trump's head, he sent around today's Skydance letters to associates.

1:13:21That might be a signal that he's pleased by the comments and willing to move forward with an approval of this merger. When I asked Carr if the filing changes anything or if he will comment on what he expects to complete this very lengthy merger review, he did not respond. But the lone Democrat on the FCC weighed in today, Anna Gomez, is her name. She recently said that companies are coming to the FCC to, quote, negotiate their capitulation. As for these letters, she said today that the new Paramount owners are quoting the FCC, are granting the FCC, quote, never before seen controls over newsroom decisions and editorial content.

1:13:54She's expressing concern about that kind of chilling effect in the air at CBS. But the bottom line, Jake, is we don't know if and when the Trump administration will bless this merger. They're certainly getting a lot from Skydance, CBS and Paramount. Brian Stelter, thanks so much. Next to CNN exclusive, brand new comments from public officials in Kerr County, Texas, revealing some of them may have slept through the emergency notifications about the fatal flood. We're going to have a live report from the special legislative session in Texas. Stay with us.

1:14:26We have major new developments for you on the local response to the deadly July 4th flooding in Kirk County, Texas. Let's bring in Shimon Prokopez, who's in Austin, Texas, for us. And Shimon, you just attended a Texas legislature meeting today. You caught up with some officials. What are they saying about the response that day? Look, Jake, the big thing here is the local response. How were the local leaders reacting to the worst moments of this storm as the buildup was occurring in the 1 a.m. hour, in the 2 a.m. hour? Things were starting to happen. Where were the local leaders and what were they doing?

1:15:05And one of the key questions that we've been trying to answer is what was the emergency operations coordinator doing in those hours? And finally today, just a short time ago, Jake, I caught up with the sheriff of Kirk County, Larry Latham, to ask him what was happening in those hours. Take a listen to what he said. The deputy sheriff who's the emergency operations coordinator for Kirk County. Deb Thomas, yes. What was happening on that day? Was he working? Well, you've got to remember this happened when it started anywhere from 1, 2, 3 in the morning. I'm sure he was home asleep at that time. He was home asleep at that time?

1:15:50Yes, I'm sure. Yeah, I was too. You were too? Are you at all concerned that he was home sleeping while all this was happening? I was home sleeping also. But it's his job kind of to anticipate as the emergency coordinator and to get briefed. Well, as you know, I'll say again, all of us, whether it was him or me, And you know what? It was anticipated one to three inches of rain at the time. You know, that's the best answer I can give you. And Shimon, I know you also asked about the Texas Department of Emergency Management's response. What did the sheriff have to say about that? Yeah, one of the things that I was trying to find out is what kind of briefings was he part of?

1:16:29Was he getting any kind of briefing? And he was not part of any of those briefings. Important to note here, Jake, is that the Texas Department of Emergency Management was sounding the alarms. They were moving resources in. They were doing everything they could to notify folks that they were concerned over the weather. But some of his answers on what exactly was going on behind the scenes in the days leading up to this storm are actually kind of surprising. Take a listen. And the Emergency Operations Center wasn't up and running. No, people don't realize, you know, we're a rural area. We don't have a 24-hour service, you know what I mean, or anything open like that.

1:17:10You know, so when these incidents happen, that's when we start getting the phone calls like I did and I came out. And then we kind of set that up and then we kind of built from there. Okay. And did you get any briefings or anything from him about the weather or what Tietam was concerned about? No, I didn't. You didn't. There were these emails that went out showing, oh, they wanted people to get on phone calls. I don't know if they look familiar at all. You've never got those. No, sir. And no one asked you on that day or the day before to get on any phone calls? No. Tidham was moving resources in.

1:17:43Were you aware of those resources? No, I was not. You were not aware. Not aware for the county at all? No, no, sir. And Jake, he's the county sheriff of this county, of Kerrville. He's in charge of that area around Kerrville and Ingram, where we saw the highest death toll. And the fact that he is not part of any briefings leading up to this, the fact that he is not aware of some of the resources that the Texas Department of Emergency Management is moving in, you know, is certainly something that is quite concerning. But again, in fairness to them, they keep saying, look, we didn't think that this was going to be as bad as it was, but they also were not on many of the calls.

1:18:32Now, this is the third or fourth official that I have spoken to in this area that has told me they were not aware about these briefings. They were not aware that these resources were being moved in. One other important point I want to make, Jake, is that the head of the Texas Department of Emergency Management was here testifying for three hours. And he said that the emergency managers are the county judges and the mayors. And it's very clear by all accounts right now that none of them took any kind of action. But here's the thing. What he's saying is that they have to do better. And what he's saying is that because there is no minimum qualifications in those positions as county judges and mayors to be the county emergency managers, he's saying, quote, we're better than that.

1:19:20All right, Shmunt Brokopez in Austin, Texas, searching for answers. Thank you so much. Our small business series takes us to Oregon next, and a company that helps ensure weddings and corporate events look as magnificent as possible. So how have tariffs affected their business? Are they being forced to raise prices on customers? That's next. Thank you. Number 366. And 134 is giving two gifts tonight. Donor number 134 times two. And we're back with our Business Leaders series where we hear from small business owners coast to coast about the impact of Trump's tariffs. Green Light Creative is an event lighting business operating in Portland, Oregon for the last 16 years.

1:19:59It's a small company. It services corporate events, weddings, fundraisers and more. Owner Wayne Thomas joins us now. Wayne, how have the tariffs impacted your business, if at all? there are several ways they have most directly is that we're seeing a big change in the willingness of our corporate clientele things like sales meetings and product activations and that first of all they're having a sort of decision paralysis at least if not canceling outright and some of these are we're going to call annual events semi-annual events and in some cases for a lot of my colleagues are even seeing their monthly events go away it was not just me it's a it's really the events world writ large.

1:20:38That's the biggest problem. Also, the equipment that we use is all Chinese. It's all imported by American wholesalers. And we've seen one wholesaler that we use raise their prices now five times since the end of February. So this is a big deal. Yeah. And well, they'll say, you know, that priceless we sent you back two weeks ago, throw that out. This is the new one. And so the unsureness of it all, I think, is the biggest pump for us, not to mention that if we want to do capital improvement, it's just going to cost more. And Duane, the event industry contains a lot of moving parts, obviously. How does it impact the industry at large when one section of it has to raise prices?

1:21:21Most of us do. I'll give you an example. Florists, a lot of their stems are coming from Mexico and the Netherlands. So that's a big hit there. Then you can talk about caterers who need to import. You can talk about event rental companies who may have to bring in a whole new series of a special chair for a large event or something. And all of a sudden what they've quoted on it is one thing and what it's costing them is another. So all the budget line items for our in clients going up, they might just go, well, we're going to have to cut somewhere. Lighting tends to be one of the first things to go, we've found out over the years.

1:21:55And we're finding that to be true already. We're kind of on the short into the bargaining stick. Have you noticed this behavior change in not just your corporate clients, but other customers like regular folks just for weddings or whatever? Weddings, we, you know, these things book a year out. So we're very fortunate that we're diversified a little bit. So our summer looks okay. What we're seeing is a slowdown on inquiries for next year already. I could tell you, though, that we really thought the fundraising world was going to get left untouched. And what we failed to understand when we first were going, well, fundraisers will need to fundraise more than ever now.

1:22:35Well, we forgot. A lot of what pays for the production of these big galas is corporate sponsorship. And myself and our colleagues are all telling us the same thing. We're seeing these things drop off and thus either they're going virtual, which is not helpful at all for most vendors, or they're really scaling down the scale of the event. The business is Green Light Creative based in Portland, Oregon. So if you're in that neck of the woods, check them out. Dwayne Thomas, thanks so much for your time. Thanks for your time as well. Appreciate it. Coming up, an update in the case surrounding the tragic ketamine death of Friends star Matthew Perry.

1:23:22in our law and justice slash pop culture lead one of the doctors accused of providing ketamine to actor matthew perry before his death has pleaded guilty the friends star tragically died in 2023 due to acute effects of ketamine and a subsequent drowning according to the los angeles county Medical Examiner's Office. Dr. Salvador Placencia faces a maximum sentence of 40 years in prison for the distribution of ketamine. His sentencing hearing is scheduled for December 3rd. Aaron Burnett out front starts now. I'll see you tomorrow.

1:24:00Cozy season is ahead and you'll be spending way more time inside. Is your home ready? Don't worry. With Wayfair, you can upgrade your space without breaking the bank. Score up to 70 % off during their Labor Day clearance on furniture, area rugs, mattresses, and more. Plus, surprise flash deals you can't miss. Whether it's one room or the whole house, Wayfair has pieces for every style and budget. Shop Wayfair's Labor Day clearance now through September 7th at Wayfair.com. Wayfair, every style, every home. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. Well, now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back.

1:24:39So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three months,$90 for six months, or$180 for 12-month plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy. See terms.