Sources: CIA Carried Out Drone Strike On Port In Venezuela

25:03attacks, the green light for Israel to attack if they see ballistic missiles coming back in or at least the capability to bring them back in. The Chinese drills surrounding Taiwan or around Taiwan right now, President Trump kind of dismissed them. A lot of people are looking around saying, this is pretty ominous time, given the calendar and what Xi Jinping may be looking at. How do you view them? So what sparked this is in mid-December, the United States agreed to an$11 billion sales deal to Taiwan for weapons, weapons that we see being used in Ukraine to defeat Russia, high-Mars missiles, things like javelin, stuff like that.

25:46And China didn't like that at all. I'm not surprised. So in the last 48 hours, they've had one of the biggest live fire exercises with missiles to practice a total blockade of Taiwan, including its two deep water ports. And it's meant to intimidate Taiwan, to send a message to the whole region, to the United States, that if we want to take Taiwan, we can do it. And most importantly, it's a message to China's domestic audience. And I think why President Trump correctly downplays it is because this looks, we've all seen this play before. It's like when Nancy Pelosi flew to Taiwan and they had the same thing.

26:28What happened after she left, Beijing went berserk and did another sort of thing. But what drove that in part was all the domestic sort of China's internal tweets demanding like blood. And this is what happens when you have state-controlled media who whips the population a little too much into nationalistic frenzies. They can have what we call famously the CNN effect, where policymakers have to respond to outrage that constituents or others have in order to sort of maintain stability. So in some ways, what we're seeing today, it looks serious, but it's a CNN effect. Yeah. I mean, good network.

27:09Yeah, I've heard it. Appreciate your time. Thank you. Thanks, Phil. Well, once again, his book is called New Rules of War. It's an excellent book. Definitely go check it out. Next on The Lead, I'll speak with the Kentucky Congressman who says President Trump's tariffs are to blame for the financial hit on popular Jim Beam bourbon. We'll ask him next.

27:32Are you stuck staring at your W-2? Are tax refund worries holding you back? You probably have FOMU, the fear of messing up. The fix? Using TurboTax on Intuit Credit Karma. They find every credit and deduction to help you get every refund dollar you deserve. Or your money back. It's time to overcome your fear of messing up and get your taxes done right. Start filing today in the Credit Karma app. See a nation's enduring love for baseball when Shohei Otani and Japan's biggest Major League stars return home to play in front of their fans for the first time. Homecoming, the Tokyo Series, now streaming on the CNN app.

28:17Our money laid goes way beyond dry January. The beginning of 2026 also means the start of a year-long work stoppage at Jim Beam's flagship bourbon distillery in Claremont, Kentucky. The company announced last week the pause is to make, quote, enhancements to the distillery, but emphasized the visitor center will remain open. It also comes in the wake of an October report that shows exports of U.S. distilled spirits were down by 9 % in the second quarter of the year, including a huge 85 % drop in exports to Canada, all attributed to trade tensions caused by President Trump's tariffs. We're joined by Democratic Congressman Morgan McGarvey of Kentucky.

28:53Congressman, really appreciate your time. When Jim B. made the announcement last week, you blamed President Trump's tariffs. Why? Why? Yeah, because we don't need some think tank to tell us what this means in Kentucky. We saw when Trump was president the first time what happened. He put tariffs all over the world, including on allies, no strategy, no thought behind it. And of course, they retaliated. What was hit? Something that's uniquely American, and that's bourbon. We knew this was going to happen. And of course, we were telling people, this is what's going to happen if he does this. Then it happened.

29:23He put these tariffs on. He put them on our allies. He slapped them everywhere with no thought, no strategy. they retaliated. And like you just said, I mean, bourbon sales were down 85 percent in Canada from last year in the last quarter. That is something that's crippling to the signature industry in our state. The company has two other distilleries. A union representative told the AP, the effective workers, we're going to be reassigned, not laid off. When you talk to company officials or when you talk to folks in the industry, are they telling you something behind the scenes that this is tariff related?

29:58look i mean the bourbon industry is one you don't in kentucky you know somebody who works in the bourbon industry if you live there and so this is something that impacts all of us i've talked to people in the industry i've talked to people who work there i can tell you that these are good union jobs and the company really is doing everything it can to keep all of its full-time employees there and i stress the full-time employees right there are other people who work in the bourbon industry and we're worried about those jobs as well but the full-time employees they're going to stay. But I mean, this is hurting.

30:26This is causing anxiety, especially now around the holidays. People are going, OK, what's going to happen? Am I going to have my job in January? Am I going to have my job in February or March? What are Trump's trade policies going to continue to do this industry? And it's something, again, it impacts everybody, whether you're growing corn in Kentucky that goes into bourbon, whether you're putting bourbon in the barrels, whether you're driving it to the stores. This is something that impacts everybody in my state. We're waiting for the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on the legality of the tariffs. You can talk to Republicans and Democrats, Republicans probably less so on the record, about their frustration or concerns, a lot of the concerns you've heard as well.

31:01Do you think there's a role for Congress if the Supreme Court overturns these tariffs in some kind of solution? Yeah, Congress should play a role in this. And this has been a bipartisan statement. I mean, you see even the senators from my state talking about this and Congress's role in trade. I mean, look, let's just talk about tariffs broadly. Tariffs are neither good nor bad. Tariffs are a tool. A hammer is neither good nor bad. It's great for fixing your house. It's not so great for fixing your iPhone. How you use a tool matters. And Congress should have a say in how we use these really important tools of trade because of the impact, not just that they have on the American economy and the American worker.

31:36When we take this down to the level, this is paychecks in people's pockets. This is what is putting food on the table. When people are looking at these trade policies and how they're shutting down an industry like the bourbon industry, what industry is next? And what are we doing to make sure that people feel safe and secure? Yeah, important point of clarity, the two Republican senators from Kentucky are very on the record about their concerns about tariffs. Kentucky Congressman Morgan McGarvey, really appreciate your time, sir. Thanks so much. Thanks so much. Happy New Year. Likewise. Well, my next guest told us what they think are the biggest political headlines in 2025 that could dominate 2026.

32:11We'll see what's on their list next.

32:19In our politics lead, Trump's return to power, the longest government shutdown on record, and a string of electoral victories by Democrats. Those are just some of the big 2025 political headlines. So what exactly can we expect in the new year? Here in studio, political experts who will tell us all the answers, no hedging, and guaranteed accuracy. Starting with you, Karen. All right. You say the Epstein Files is one of the biggest political events of the year. And you say it's not going away in 2026. Why? The survivors themselves have made it clear they are not going anywhere. And I believe them.

32:51And they are looking for avenues to continue to tell their stories. And they've said they were going to get together and create their own list, a client list, if you will. Now, Marjorie Taylor Greene has an interesting opportunity on the 5th of January when she resigns. She had said at the press conference in September that she would read a list of names if they got her one. So I would argue if she has said list and reads it on the floor of the United States House, that would be quite a blockbuster. I think the story doesn't go away, but for a slightly different reason. Not to say your reason is wrong, but that it's non-falsifiable at this point.

33:27It's like there's never going to be enough information that satisfies the people who are demanding answers. The lack of any new information is proof that the conspiracy goes even deeper for these people. And it's just going to have a half-life. And now that Dan Bongino is going back to the podcasting universe, he can finally get to the truth now that he's left the FBI. I feel your excitement. It's palpable coming out of you. What do you think? Do you think it has an effect on the midterms? I think the economy always has the effect on the midterms. As for this, I don't think it has much play in it.

33:56I mean, the victims will have a time to speak out to do all these things. I think the view that it was going to harm Trump in any particular way, it's just not there at this point anymore. But I do think it just lingers in the conspiracy mind. And then the fact that you have Don, you know, getting out there. I'm sure he'll do his best to feed it. But I just don't see where it moves the needles with voters on it, at least Republican voters. Although, remember, Bongino had a comment where he talked about how at the FBI he had to tell the truth, not when he was at his show. Yeah, he was getting paid to tell the truth.

34:23Right, exactly. As opposed to whatever. Now he's getting paid to do more conspiracy theories. Exactly. Jonah, when you look back at Doge, all the federal layoffs, economic uncertainty from the tariffs, Justice Department targeting the president's rivals, Which of any of these really kind of stand out to you? Yeah, so I kind of put them all in one big Uber category, and then you can talk about this, break them down in importance, which is that I think Trump took his eye off the ball about what got him elected. Put immigration aside. I think immigration definitely is one of his issues, and he's had much more success with it than I would have predicted.

35:00But the people, the reason he won those seven swing states that everyone talks, that he constantly talks about, those voters were not all in on the MAGA agenda. They were nostalgic for the economy of 2019, the pre-COVID economy. And they were basically affordability voters for the most part. And Trump then began to talk about retribution and doing all that kind of stuff and thinking that basically anyone who voted for him was all in on the MAGA agenda. And now we've seen independents, a lot of Hispanic voters swing wildly back to Democrats, which is why Democrats did so well in the off-year elections, and those are portentous about the midterms.

35:37Is there concern, Brian, do you think, inside the White House, about the ability to get those voters back? Listen, I think they realize they have a challenge in front of them. You have six months, really. Polling has shown throughout the years that voters make up their decision about the economy in June to July of an election year. That's six months away. And they have an uphill battle. I mean, the one big, beautiful bill where President Trump accomplished most of his policy goals during the campaign, it just hasn't been sold in the right way. They feel it hasn't been sold in the right way. They feel next year when some of those tax returns come back, when there's more money in the pockets of these individuals, that may have the impact that they're looking for.

36:11But it's a tight window. Six months is a tight window to sort of change the view of the consumers at this point. But I think we have to remember that those voters that y 'all are talking about also have said, maybe I agree with what he was trying to do, but I don't like the way he's doing it. And that is not going to change. So if that kind of continues for people and if the economy, I agree the economy is going to be the biggest issue. They're not feeling that the benefit, because let's be honest, the pre-COVID economy is not coming back. Our economy doesn't work the same way anymore. And nobody seems to want to.

36:39You had a pretty substantial growth quarter just now. But not in the same ways that we did pre-COVID. Anyway, point being, I do think you're going to see, the question is going to be, will independents and moderate Republicans, how many will be willing to flip? And will there be a point where Republicans actually feel the rub? I think they're already feeling this on the health care issues between their constituents and what Trump wants them to do. And we're seeing that on these health care subsidy questions where you have states and districts where they have constituents who are saying, I can't afford my health care, but they're being told don't vote to extend the subsidy.

37:14So how's that going to play, I think? Joni, you need an interesting point where you mentioned immigration and it was just kind of like immigration. Yeah, no, he did all that. MESSAGING ON IMMIGRATION, YOU DON'T HEAR ABOUT IT MUCH. I KNOW IT FRUSTRATES THE WHITE HOUSE, IT SAYS, LOOK, WE DID ALL THE THINGS. AND DOING ALL THE THINGS MEANS PEOPLE DON'T REALLY NOTICE IT AS MUCH ANYMORE. IS THAT A PROBLEM? I THINK THE MESSAGING WITH IMMIGRATION IS ALWAYS A CHALLENGE. I COME FROM CALIFORNIA WHERE THERE WAS A POPULAR BALLOT INITIATIVE THAT CUT SERVICE TO ILLEGAL ALIENS. AND REPUBLICANS SUPPORTED IT. PETE WILSON SUPPORTED IT.

37:44AND IT DECIMATED THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN CALIFORNIA FOR TWO DECADES. So messaging matters. And I think the advantage that the Democrats had back then was they were able to convince the electorate that the Republicans were also going after U.S. citizens, U.S. Mexican-Americans. That's the problem they have now is that messaging is now getting blurred and it's no longer a target of illegal immigration. It's now a target of legal residents, of legal aliens, you know, of citizens who are probably going to get that target. And that will have a long-term negative effect on the party. So I was in college in California when that happened.

38:13And it wasn't just a messaging. It actually happened. And guess what? not just a messaging issue here, it's happening here in the United States. And that has been one of the main issues where people have said when they're seeing their neighbors or they're hearing about children being left at playgrounds because the nannies were taken in an ice sweep. But that is not what people voted for. So it's more than a messaging. They actually have to, like, where are the hardened criminals that they told us they were going to get? Are drugs off our streets? Are guns ALREADY MYSTERIOUSLY GONE. NO. SOME OF THOSE ISSUES ARE STILL THE PROBLEM.

38:47AND EVEN RIGHT HERE IN D.C., GOD BLESS THE NATIONAL GUARD, BUT THEY'RE NOT IN THE WORST CRIME AREAS FIGHTING CRIME. PART OF THE PROBLEM IS DEPORTING THESE ILLEGAL ALIENS THAT ARE COMMITTING CRIMES IS DIFFICULT. TRUMP HAS SHOWN THAT THE COURTS HAVE MADE IT EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. WE HAVE A RESIDENT OUT OF MARYLAND WHO IS AN ILLEGAL ALIEN WHO IS TRAFFICKED AT PEOPLE AND

39:12It's partly a messaging thing, partly a policy thing. The visible immigrants that are going for it are people who are showing up to their immigration court dates and all that kind of stuff. They're going after the legible ones. By definition, the violent criminal guys are much harder to get. And so the messaging looks, the optics, which reveal a reality, is it's a much harsher policy than what a lot of people thought they were voting for. Yeah, there's no question about that. And people are definitely paying attention to it. I feel good. I feel like everything you said, I put a pin in it. Everything was right, 100%, which is always the case.

39:44Of course. Thank you guys very much. Appreciate it. The new era of politics in New York is starting Thursday, January 1st, 2026. We're going to go there next.

39:59The first day of 2026 will usher in one of the biggest political events of the year. On Thursday, January 1st, self-described Democratic Socialists, Zoran Mamdani, will be sworn in as New York City's first Muslim mayor. CNN's Gloria Pasmino is in New York with new details about how the ceremony will play out. Gloria? That's right, Phil. And, you know, inaugurations are all about sort of setting the tone for the incoming administration. We expect a lot of speeches, perhaps some performances. And we've learned about two guests who will be at the inauguration that I think will help sort of set the tone and send the message of the incoming Mamdani administration.

40:40Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who campaigned alongside Mamdani during the race for mayor, will be there to introduce him. And Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who Mamdani has credited with inspiring him to run for public office, will administer the oath of office. This is going to be a big celebration down at City Hall Park. More than 4 ,000 people are expected to pack into the plaza, plus likely several thousand more who have been invited to join in a watch party that will be set up along Broadway right outside the gates of City Hall. Now, Mamdani will officially take office at the stroke of midnight.

41:22He will do so in a private ceremony where State Attorney General Letitia James will administer the oath of office along with Mamdani's family. And then the following afternoon, they will have this grand celebration. He will take office, becoming New York City's 112th mayor, making history as the first Muslim, the first immigrant, and one of the youngest in more than a century. Phil?

41:50Welcome to Lead. I'm Phil Mattingly. In for Jake Tapper. This hour, new details on the first known U.S. attack inside Venezuela. Sources tell CNN that the CIA carried out a drone strike on a port facility earlier this month. The strike could significantly escalate tensions between the White House and the Venezuelan president. The U.S. has been pressuring to step down. One of the reporters who broke this news joins me live in just moments. Plus, new data out today shows most states are experiencing high or even very high flu activity, and those levels continuing to rise. Flu hospitalizations alone just doubling in the last week.

42:27What you can do to lower your risk as the virus sweeps through the U.S. And the next round of the college football playoff kicks off tomorrow. Go Buckeyes. But there are already calls for major changes ahead of next season. Among the loudest critics, Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, who found himself in the middle of major drama around LSU's program last month. He'll join me live. That's ahead.

42:53The lead tonight, the fallout from a CNN-exclusive report. sources telling CNN the CIA carried out a drone strike on a port in Venezuela earlier this month, marking the first known U.S. attack on Venezuelan soil. It's the latest escalation in President Trump's controversial campaign to counter drug traffickers, which has included more than 30 strikes on suspected drug boats in the Caribbean and Pacific. The most recent U.S. airstrike just yesterday killed two people, according to U.S. Southern Command. I'm joined now by CNN's Elena Treen and Zach Cohen. Zach, let's start with you. You broke the story alongside Natasha Bertrand and Jim Sciuto, your colleagues.

43:29Our colleagues, I guess you could say. Where did the strike hit, and how has the Venezuelan government reacted? Yeah, Phil, we know the CIA conducted this drone strike targeting a port facility in a remote location on the Venezuelan coast. And our sources say that and make very clear that this was conducted inside Venezuelan territory, which is, in and of itself, is a significant escalation. You might remember the U.S. military, not the CIA, has been blowing up those alleged drug boats in international waters in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific, but they have not come anywhere close to Venezuelan soil.

44:01That is what differentiates this CIA strike from what we've seen to date so far from the military. And we're told also by our sources that this facility was believed to be operated and used by a gang, a Venezuelan gang that's been designated by the Trump administration as a terrorist organization to essentially load drugs onto ships and send them on their way to transport those drugs around the world. Our sources make clear that nobody was killed in this strike. That's because nobody was physically at the facility at the time that it happened. But it's been characterized to us as a success because the facility itself was destroyed.

44:37And, you know, the boats that were there at the time also were destroyed, too. But one source making clear as well that this was largely a symbolic strike. There's several different ports and locations inside Venezuela that drug traffickers can use to distribute their products. So the tangible and literal impact of this strike really remains unclear at this stage. But interestingly, we only know that this information or really first came to light because Donald Trump is the one who disclosed it during that radio interview a few days ago. He was pressed on the strike details again by our Kevin Liptak at the White House.

45:12It's still very vague as far as the specifics go, but we do know that this was a CIA operation, really the first involvement by the CIA to date so far. It is helpful for your big scoops when the president is the one who tips you off to them, first in a radio interview, and then you mentioned Kevin Liptak, our colleague, who's in the pool covering President Trump down in Mar-a-Lago, asked the president about this yesterday, right before you guys penned down all the details on this first. Listen to what he said. Was the facility taken out by the U.S. military was another entity like the CIA. Well, I don't want to say that.

45:45I know exactly who it was, but I don't want to say who it was. But, you know, it was along the shore. Elena, how this has all played out. Again, the president mentioning it first in a radio interview yesterday to our colleague Kevin Liptak. Inside the White House, what are they saying about kind of the public nature of it? And what happens next? Well, there's a few things. One is, I mean, I loved that question and answer with Kevin and the president because, of course, then hours later we get this great reporting from Zach and our other colleagues who say that it was a CIA operation, so they answered that question in the end anyway.

46:19But he was being very tight-lipped about this, and this has actually been the case from the get-go ever since we actually learned that the president kind of blurted this out on that Friday radio interview where he said that they had, in his words, knocked out one of these facilities. They would refuse really to give any details, and they've been very careful about this. Now, of course, we know it's because this was a covert CIA operation, one, of course, that is not normally really publicized or talked about. I also think there's probably a good chance, and Zach, you can back me up on this, that if the president hadn't actually said this publicly himself or kind of gave a bit of a kind of hint at what had happened, we may not even know about it.

46:56And really, it was kind of unclear. It still is a bit unclear about how much Venezuela actually knew about this themselves before Trump came out and said it. But I think there are a couple of things to also point out. One is that I think the differentiation, making the clear difference between that this was a CIA operation, not a U.S. military one. There are a couple implications there. One is that, again, if it's CIA, it's more likely to be covert. We know that the president kind of gave them essentially carte blanche to operate with these covert actions, both in Venezuela and throughout Latin America earlier this year.

47:27But if it was a U.S. military strike, the implications would be even bigger. Because I'd remind you, the president has been threatening for weeks now, if not months, to engage in land strikes inside Venezuela. And he said that he would alert Congress to doing so. It's very much unclear if that actually happened here. This is a different operation. But it's a huge escalation regardless and great reporting from our team. And for Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, who has blamed the CIA for numerous other unconfirmed strikes and operations in his country, says that they've been trying to overthrow him basically the entire time he's been in power.

47:59Nothing from him on this latest revelation about a CIA operation that actually happened. Yeah, the lack of Venezuelan response with any clarity or detail, plus the lack of any other White House officials saying anything given their penchant for posting actual real-time videos of everything else they're doing. It's such a fascinating dynamic right now. Great reporting. I can confirm Zach was nodding, backing you up. Wait a second. Back me up on this. As always, guys, really appreciate it. Thanks so much. We'll see you in a national security and legal analyst. Kerry Cordero and retired U.S. Army Major Mike Lyons are with me now.

48:31Now, Major Lyons, to start with you, you say this isn't an act of war because it was done by the CIA. Explain that for people who maybe don't understand. So two different guidelines determine whether something is done by the military or the CIA. And it's Title 10, force on force would be military, state to state operation. If the military is used, that would likely then be considered an act of war. Congress gets notified, War Powers Act, and that whole process kicked in. This was done under Title 50, different statues of the U.S. code, done covert operations by the United States that the president has to notify interagency, the group of eight, and likely it's kept under wraps very, very secretly.

49:12The president has much more of a wider discrepancy about what he targets in this regard. But these are done for national security reasons. So that was very specifically done by the CIA to keep it under wraps and to keep it out of that Title 10 and that act of war concept. Kerry, the legal basis, the legal underpinning for kind of everything that's been going on in this space over the course of the last several months. The administration continues to compare this war on drug traffickers to the war on al Qaeda. Lay out the legal differences between these two groups and these two circumstances. Right.

49:47So it really does seem as both the boat strikes have continued and with this new reporting on this strike, that the administration is really following the playbook for the war on terror in the post 9-11 era. One significant difference is that after the attacks of September 11th, the Congress passed an authorization for the use of military force. So all of the subsequent actions by the U.S. military were under a congressional authorization. In this case, with respect to the boat strikes, the president has been relying under U.S. domestic law on his Article 2 authority, just under the Constitution, because there has been no congressional authorization for the use of force on the military side.

50:37And then with respect to this new reporting on the strike that is reported to have taken place under covert action, that would be under intelligence authorities, which there is a statutory framework and what it requires is that the president makes a finding, authorizes the CIA to conduct those activities, and then the intelligence committees in Congress are supposed to be notified. Major Vlans, we mentioned earlier there was another strike on a boat in the Pacific just yesterday, according to U.S. Southern Command. You kind of put everything together, the continued strikes, the oil tanker seizures, the now land strike in a covert operation.

51:15Are you surprised there hasn't been a response or any type of retaliation from the Maduro regime? A lot of it is because they can't. I think a lot of this is deterrence. It's performative on our side, but they're only really capable of doing something asymmetrical. I'll just put that out there. I'm not sure they have any way to respond. And we're going after these drug cartels. When we hit a target in the Pacific, that's flying past Venezuela. That target likely came from Colombia, came from another country. So that's likely something that the president is notifying Congress on and has got to keep much more of an open access to.

51:51So again, this is just showing our strength here within the Caribbean and making sure that we continue to send this message. This is not the last time we'll likely strike a port that's alongside the land inside of Venezuela, and you'll likely see a lot more. Yeah, it certainly seems to be the A lot of questions still outstanding there. Kerry Cordero, retired major Mike Lyons. Really appreciate you guys. Thank you. Thanks. Well, cases of the flu are rapidly spreading across the U.S. And new data out today shows where the virus is most rampant right now. We're breaking down the numbers and the best ways to protect your family.

52:26That's next.

52:34We have sad news from the Kennedy family tonight. Now, Tatiana Schlossberg, granddaughter of President John F. Kennedy, died today. She was only 35 and an environmental journalist. Schlossberg disclosed her terminal leukemia diagnosis last month in a very powerful essay in The New Yorker. She was the second daughter of former U.S. Ambassador Caroline Kennedy and designer Edwin Schlossberg and is survived by her husband George Moran and their two children. Also tonight, alarming new numbers in the health lead. The CDC estimates 7.5 million flu cases so far this year. That's nearly 3 million more than the week before.

53:09Those estimates are through December 20th, well before Christmas get-togethers. I want to bring in Dr. Ashish Jha. He's Dean of Brown University School of Public Health and White House COVID Response Coordinator under President Biden. Dr. Jha, 7.5 million cases so far this flu season. What do you attribute to the surge? Yeah, first of all, Phil, thanks for having me back. A couple things are going on. We have, you know, flu is always made up of several different subtypes of viruses. We have one this year that's a bit unusual. It's called H3N2 for those keeping track at home. And it is associated with just more severe illness.

53:45And we're seeing a lot more people get infected. And we're seeing a lot more people get seriously ill this year than we have in many past flu seasons. The D.C. Public Health Lab talked to CNN a bit about how the CDC gets the estimates. I want people to take a listen. The swabs and samples that are collected in a doctor's office or a hospital would, each week, they send us representative samples, positive samples. Not only do we do testing on our own, but our results get directly transmitted electronically. As soon as we result out our results, they go directly to, transmit it directly to the Centers for Disease Control.

54:22And then they use that information to add it to the national trends. So Dr. Shah, cases are showing up positive for a new flu variant. People have probably seen some videos on this. It's called subclad K. If you got a flu shot, would your vaccination work for the new variant? That's a great question. It's a question I get asked all the time. It depends a little bit about what you mean by work. It's probably not going to do a great job of protecting you against infection against the new variant, but it will do a good job of preventing you from getting seriously ill. So this year, that mismatch means that the effectiveness against infection is probably only about 30, 40 percent.

55:01Look, you still get about a third a lower chance of getting infected. But where the benefit of the vaccine is clear isn't preventing ER visits, hospitalizations, and obviously the thing we care most about, which is deaths. Right. The CDC says states with the highest flu activity are Colorado, Louisiana, New Jersey, New York, and South Carolina. Say you traveled to one of those areas. We learned a lot about how to quarantine from the COVID days. Would you recommend people keep their distance if they've been to one of those states? How should they be thinking about things? Yeah, I don't think you need to quarantine yourself or cut yourself off from other people if you've been traveling there.

55:36Flu is pretty widespread everywhere. Those are the states where the activity level is the highest. To me, the recommendation is if you start developing symptoms, if you have a fever, you have a cough, your sore throat, stay away from other people until you get better. That's, by the way, generally good advice. You don't want to be spreading germs to others. So it's not so much about avoiding people if you've been traveling to high endemic areas. To me, the most important thing is if you have symptoms, stay home and stay away from people who are vulnerable, particularly. Yeah, it's great advice, as always, from you, Dr.

56:06Ashishat. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Thanks, Phil. Well, new video shows China's military carrying out its war game exercises around Taiwan. We'll go to the region next for a closer look at this aggressive show of military might.

56:25In our world, lead a massive show of military might happening right now in the Pacific. China is carrying out so-called war games around Taiwan for a second day, a move Taiwan is calling, quote, military intimidation. CNN's Will Ripley is in the region. And Will, what's the latest? Phil, China is escalating pressure on Taiwan with large-scale military drills paired with a surge of propaganda. The People's Liberation Army releasing this AI-generated video showing drones attacking Taiwan, robot dogs firing weapons, and humanoid soldiers fighting in city streets as Beijing launches what it calls Justice Mission 2025.

57:03China says these exercises test its ability to blockade Taiwan and seize key ports. The PLA says its Army, Navy, Air Force, and Rocket Force are all involved. Beijing declared live fire drills in at least five zones around the island, with maritime authorities listing seven zones in total. Taiwan's defense ministry says China fired 27 rockets in two waves, landing north and southwest of Taiwan, some closer than before compared to past drills. In just 24 hours, Taiwan says 130 Chinese warplanes and 22 warships operated nearby, the second largest single-day deployment on record. Taiwan responded by scrambling fighters and increasing patrols.

57:44In Taipei, defiance. One teacher told CNN the drills are meant to intimidate. Another resident insisted Taiwan is already a country with its own president, constitution, and legislature. But in Beijing, residents echoed the Communist Party line, calling Taiwan an internal affair and framing the drills as part of unification. Chinese leader Xi Jinping has vowed to unify with Taiwan by force if necessary. U.S. military leaders say Xi has directed the PLA to be ready by 2027, warning that Beijing is moving closer and closer to that goal. When asked about the drills, President Trump downplayed the risk, saying nothing worries him and insisting he does not believe China will invade.

58:21The timing is notable. The drills come just days after Washington approved the record$11.1 billion arms sale to Taiwan, fiercely condemned by Beijing. Phil. Will Ripley with the latest. Thanks so much. Well, LSU's poaching of Lane Kiffin is one of the biggest sports stories of the year. But after seeing how everything worked behind the scenes, the state's governor, Jeff Landry, declared, quote, the way the sport is run is a complete mess. He'll join me live next to explain why.

58:53In our sports lead, the college football playoff continues this week, and so does the scrutiny over which teams deserve to be there. Looking forward to your bowl game, Notre Dame fans. Aside from that, there's growing concern over how money is changing the sport, whether it's lucrative name, image and likeness or NIL deals for the players, revenue sharing, players using the transfer portal over and over and over again. Some believe stricter rules could fix what they see as a broken system across college sports. Republican Governor Jeff Landry of Louisiana believes central governance and oversight is the answer in a critical piece of this.

59:27He joins me now. And Governor, I'm really grateful to have you on because you wrote a column about this. And you're also coming off of a really intense coaching search where you ended up center stage for the biggest coaching get, I think, of a year where there have been a lot of coaching changes. And that experience, I think, was the genesis to some degree of the column. Explain why. Yeah, that experience took years off my life. I got to know an in-depth in the college football, the likes of which I would rather just be a college football fan. Of course, many college football fans express the same amount of frustration as I had as well.

1:00:07I mean, what you see is a calendar that is unworkable, a timeline that's unworkable for college football. And it also is destroying other college sports as well. It has the likeness of destroying many women's sports as well as the Olympic sports in college right now. College athletics is losing four billion dollars a year right now. And it's all because of this house settlement. And so college football right now is broke. And it's time for there to be central governance where we can unify the media rights, where all the conferences will survive. And there's an opportunity to save one of the greatest traditions in America.

1:00:47And that's college football. I was struck in reading the column. I actually chuckled a little bit. You had a line where you said, don't hate the player, hate the game in terms of your role here. And you took a lot of heat because you had a role, which always struck me as funny at the time. One, because if you don't understand Louisiana governors and LSU football, you don't understand your Louisiana political history on some level. But also, as an Ohio State alum, like, I would hope my governor would get involved if we needed to go get a big-time coach. So I understood it there. But your point in terms of what was the worst thing you saw or what was the most unsettling thing you saw when you were really underneath the hood?

1:01:24Well, the most unsettling thing was, was, was number one, the fact that the buyout that we had with Coach Kelly left the taxpayers footing the bill ultimately. So if, if the donors didn't step up, that meant the taxpayer had to spend$54 million according to the contract. To me, that was absurd. At the same time, we had the board of supervisors approving a ticket increase for fans out there while we were losing games. And so those things were all unsettling. Look, there are great people that work real hard to go out and watch college football. They watch it in the rain, in the snow, in the wind.

1:02:03And the price of college football should not be placed on their backs, both as a fan and as a taxpayer. There are legislative proposals. I mean, we actually overlapped for a little bit when you were on Capitol Hill and I was covering Congress. Nick Saban has been up there lobbying at times. Coaches have been up there. The president had an executive order as well. How do you kind of merge those two things together to actually get something done here? Well, listen, if there are two people that can fix college football right now, it would be President Trump and Coach Saban. Both of them understand, one, if you unify the media rights and that would allow all of the colleges to enjoy additional revenue, thereby supporting the other sports that college football supports and traditionally has supported.

1:02:51And then putting in the guardrails that Coach Saban has talked about. I mean, look, we've got agents that are charging some kids up to 40 percent on contracts. There's conflicts of interest that are not being followed because there are no guardrails. Again, we talked about the transfer portal. When it opens up, we look at the dilemma that we got in at LSU, going out there and negotiating with Coach Kiffin towards the end of the season. All of those things can be avoided so that the fan gets to enjoy college football again. But it's going to take it's going to take folks like President Trump and Coach Saban to really step up and to get Congress off of dead center.

1:03:33I have to ask. I have another policy question for you, but I have to ask this because I'm a football fanatic. Coach State or Coach Kiffin said that you two had a phone call when it was all said and done. What did you guys talk about? Oh, we talked about football and we talked about LSU. Look, I think Coach Kiffin is going to do an unbelievable job at LSU. I think he's really enjoying himself here in Baton Rouge. The fans around Louisiana certainly have rallied around Coach Kiffin. Everyone is excited. We've got a new president. We've got a new chancellor. And we've got a new head football coach.

1:04:12OK, so this is going to be a hard turn on some level. But I've got to ask because I think it's only been about nine days since President Trump announced that you were going to be his special envoy to Greenland, the semi-autonomous Danish territory that the president has said he wants to take over. Interested in kind of your qualifications for the role and how do you plan to do it while also serving as governor? Look, this is the same thing I do on a daily basis when I get to do economic trips abroad or to other places to talk about the greatness of Louisiana. This is an opportunity to talk about Louisiana and to talk about America and to talk to the Greenlanders about joining one of the most advanced, strongest economies in the world.

1:04:56Look, the president has made it a point to strengthen the Monroe Doctrine. Greenland is in the Western Hemisphere. This is a great opportunity to open up dialogue between us and Greenland and have them join one of the greatest economies going on in the globe right now, and that is America's. And just with the with the limited time we have left is your kind of communications with them. This is something that needs to be completed because the president wants it or just starting a dialogue. Look, I think I think it's something that needs to that dialogue needs to happen in a more serious manner. I got an email today inviting me to some dog sled races in Greenland.

1:05:35I look forward to doing that again. Look, But Louisiana were in that same position. We served under multiple flags over the history of Louisiana. And then we ended up under one of the greatest flags out there. And it's been good for Louisiana. And so, again, having a discussion with them about opportunities, I think, is smart and is beneficial to those living in Greenland. Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, really appreciate your time, sir. Thanks so much. Take care. Happy. Well, if your New Year's resolution is to save more money or make a big purchase, you won't want to miss our next conversation.

1:06:11I'm going to ask two experts what we can expect when it comes to inflation and prices. That's next.

1:06:22Starting on day one, we will end inflation and make America affordable again to bring down the prices of all goods. Prices will come down. You just watch. They'll come down and they'll come down fast, not only with insurance, with everything. We're going to have prices down. I think you're going to see some pretty drastic price reductions. In Armani lead, President Trump has so far fallen short of his promise to drastically bring down prices. Now, to be clear, prices on some essentials have gone down, eggs, gasoline in particular. But other essentials have seen prices soar. Electricity costs are up 7 percent.

1:06:57Well, coffee, ground beef, they've increased double digits. So what can we expect in the new year? Let's discuss with two experts, Michael Strain, Director of Economic Policy Studies at AEI, and economist Daniel Hornig, former Deputy Director of the White House National Economic Council under President Biden. First off, I'm very glad you're both here. Your project syndicate columns are like all over my office, dog-eared and highlighted. Consume everything that you write or work on, and also you put up with me during the Biden years when I would go down economic rapid holes, and I always appreciated that.

1:07:29Michael, to start with you, is there any reason to think inflation costs on essential items will improve markedly in 2026? There's some reason to believe that inflation might come down. Now, the rate of inflation decreasing is different than prices dropping in their absolute level. But we have seen some indications that the rate at which prices are going up, which is inflation, will slow in 2026. I think that we're not going to get near the Fed's 2 % target. I think inflation is stickier than a lot of economists seem to think. So looking ahead to 2026, inflation is going to be a problem. Daniel, at the risk of opening up like your full panoply of policy proposals, are there things the president could do in the near term to address price increases, to address inflation?

1:08:20I think there are a few things the president could do on inflation in particular. I mean, you think about why it is that a year ago at this time, forecasters generally thought inflation would be back to the 2 % target now. And instead, we're closer to 3%. One of the big reasons is tariffs and imported goods prices going up. I think in the first half of 2026, it's very likely that the Supreme Court could strike down some of the president's tariffs. I don't think he will, but that could be an opportunity for the president to walk back from some of the tariffs and bring the average tariff rate down, which would help on inflation.

1:08:56Another place is respecting the Federal Reserve's independence. We know that we could have real inflation problems if the Federal Reserve loses its tools to operate independently. And then finally, I think that housing is a key salient price point for so many families. that's a place where you could see the administration try to bring together state and local governments, the private sector, to do more, to get more housing supply online, which is a big part of how we actually answer the affordability challenge on the housing front. The housing issue is fascinating to me. One, because it's really hard.

1:09:28Two, because there's no singular federal solution. Also, there are structural issues that are ingrained that will take years to kind of filter out on some level. What could the White House do? What could the administration do in Q1 with this big promise that there will be a housing proposal that could have a tangible effect? So you're right to point to the challenge. I would look back to President Ronald Reagan, which I often like to do. President Reagan faced the challenge with drunk driving fatalities. He wanted states to increase their legal drinking ages. Most states were at 18. He wanted to push the age up to 21.

1:10:07And the president said, if you want highway money, get your drinking age up. President Trump could do something that dramatic. President Trump could say, if you want money for the federal government, which every state does, then you need to make some tangible progress toward relaxing the restrictions that are stopping people from building new homes. I don't expect to see him doing anything that dramatic, but I think he could pull that lever if he chose to. What do you think? I think Michael's right. Right. And I think, you know, one bright spot is we are seeing blue and red states taking some really promising steps on housing, places like California and Massachusetts, but also Texas and Florida.

1:10:47I think that another thing, in addition to reducing some of those restrictions, there is more that the federal government could do to incentivize construction of housing that is affordable for households with low and moderate incomes. I think that has to be part of the puzzle. I do think there's going to be a temptation for the administration to put forward a splashy proposal on the demand side. And that often is less likely to really contribute to answering some of the root causes of housing affordability over the longer term. So like a splashy proposal, like, I don't know, IPOing the GSEs at a 50 year mortgage is not necessarily the near term answer that you guys are thinking of right now?

1:11:24It would be splashy. They've already splashed on some level. Well, all right, before I let you guys go, Fed, the president, again, going off on the issue yesterday randomly at the end of a press conference. But we know there are really kind of two, I think, key finalists here, maybe a third if you include Governor Waller, the Kevins. Who do you think it will be? And do you think independence will be a problem regardless of who it is? Look, I think the president has a clear goal, which is lower long-term interest rates. He wants the 10-year interest rate on government debt down, the 30-year rate down.

1:11:56He wants mortgage interest rates down. And if he continues to call into question the independence of whoever his nominee is, he's going to have the opposite effect on those long-term rates. He's going to push those long-term rates up. So regardless of who he chooses, it is in his direct political and policy interest to stop calling into question the independence of the next Fed chairman. I mean, I think the question I have, is it too late on some level? Right? Like, the horses are already out of the barn in terms of his view. Whoever he picks, there's going to be an assumption in the market that's baked in that that person wouldn't have gotten the job if there hadn't been some kind of commitment, if there hadn't been some type of agreement.

1:12:42I don't think it's too late at all. And I think it will be incumbent on whoever it is of those three finalists that he picks to come forward and very clearly indicate to markets and to the public that they will make decisions based on the data. I think there probably will be some behind the scenes of explaining that person will need to do to the president to make this point that taking down short-term interest rates really rapidly the way the president wants will not help on long-term interest rates. And those long-term rates are what matters for people when they buy a home, take out a loan for their small business or buy a car.

1:13:17All right. We don't have enough time to do anything long here, which is why I'm just going to say, is AI a bubble, yes or no, in 2026? No. Not in 2026. Nice. Michael Strain, Daniel Hornick, really appreciate you guys coming in. Happy New Year. Thanks so much. Thank you. Well, turning to our Business Leaders Series, we speak with small business owners about Trump's tariffs. And today we're traveling to Omaha, Nebraska, where Hardy Coffee is based a 15-year-old coffee shop that survived the housing crisis. It survived COVID. Now it's grappling with tariffs. Joining me now is co-owner of Hardy Coffee, Autumn Pruitt.

1:13:54Autumn, really appreciate your time. Just to kind of start top line for viewers, how have tariffs affected your business this year? You know, in short, it's been an expensive year. I think that tariffs have affected a variety of different parts of our business, but coffee has been uniquely impacted. The United States just simply cannot grow nearly enough coffee to meet demand, and so importers like, roasters like us have to import coffee from other countries. And so at times, that rate has been up to 50 % this year. For us, top-line revenue is relatively similar to last year, but our margins are just so much smaller.

1:14:34And so it's not just the expense of the tariffs, but it's also the unpredictability that they have caused for our industry. That was what I wanted to ask about. In terms of planning going forward, quarter by quarter, how possible is it right now?

1:14:54I'm optimistic that in light of some recent changes with tariffs that we have a better chance of forecasting in this next year. But it's going to take time for any changes that happen at that level to actually impact our bottom line. So it's a tricky thing to know how to price and plan and to have any confidence for growth moving forward. Can I ask you specifically, they made changes to tariffs that were directly tied to coffee. I guess what it was about a month ago now. Yes. How quickly does that filter through? You see that change. It comes through the Federal Register in Washington. When do you see that?

1:15:41It'll probably be February or March for us. It depends on growing cycles, and it definitely depends on when our importers work through the inventory that they already have. In terms of customers, have you seen customer behavior change over the course of the last few months, either with the general economy or with individual concerns about tariffs? uh yeah so at hearty coffee company we have four brick and mortar locations but we also roast for about 50 wholesale accounts across the region and so we're balancing customers both b2b and direct to consumer and i would say in general customers have have understood the change in prices but they're stretched there's just been um a sense of fewer impulse buys fewer add-ons and few less frequent visits to our shops in the process.

1:16:32In terms of 2026, I know I asked you kind of broadly about trying to plan or forecast. How are you looking at 2026?

1:16:44Optimistically, but I think that that tends to be a flaw of a lot of small business owners like us. We tend to think that we can adapt to just about anything. And we do have 15 years to prove that we can, but it really does take the predictability of being able to forecast ahead instead of being reactive in so many of these policies. Yeah, you say flaw. I would counter with superpower on some level, given the 15 years up to this point. Last one before I let you go. If you could give a message to Washington policymakers, what would it be? You know, I think I would just tell them about our business.

1:17:22My husband, Luke, and I started this in 2010, and we have grown locations. We've added to our team. We have led through a pandemic. We are not asking for it to be easy, and we don't mind working hard. I think that what we would ask the government is just to not make it more difficult, and that's what tariffs have really felt like this last year. It's just been an added expense. It's been just a lack of certainty as we look ahead. I am convinced that small businesses can adapt to just about anything, but we do need that predictability to be able to do it well. That is certainly a message I think they both need to hear and should hear as often as they possibly can.

1:18:03Autumn Pruitt, I really appreciate your time. Thanks so much. Thank you for helping us get the message out. Happy New Year. Well, we are counting down to New Year's Eve, but celebrations are already underway in Scotland. We'll check in with Sinan's Max Foster for a look at some of the events that date back to the Viking times. That's next.

1:18:26In our world lead end of the year celebrations known as Hogmanay are underway in Scotland, starting last night with the River of Fire Torchlight Procession, which dates back to Viking times. Today, the festivities continued with a concert under Edinburgh Castle and Fireworks preparations. If you were wondering what you'd wear to celebrate, well, a Scottish kilt, of course. CNN's Max Foster spoke with a kilt maker about making the traditional garment fit just right.

1:19:01Howie? Max. You've got some fabric here. Yep. How much do you need for a kilt? Well, it's 7.3 meters, 8 yards. All of this? All of this is what I'm wearing in one kilt. Just explain where all the fabric goes then. All the fabric goes into the pleats. There's over 30 pleats here and it has to recreate the pattern and it's fully hand stitched. The only part of this kilt machined is the waistband. So when you're wearing it, you still get that swing and that masculine feeling, but it's not a woman's skirt, it's made for a man. So when someone flies in from another part of the world, is it acceptable for them to wear the tartan?

1:19:39Absolutely. It's all about how you feel mentally and physically in a kilt. You've got to feel confident. So you showed how much fabric was used. It's a lot of fabric. It gets heavy, but weirdly when you wear them, it doesn't feel heavy. What's the secret? You've got to adjust a little bit. The weight of the kilt is very proportioned around the body. Yeah. I want people to enjoy wearing a kilt, so it has to be comfortable and shaped to the body. And the length? The length is personal preference. Now I measure from the pelvis to the kneecap top of the kneecap And that's where Queen Victoria liked it and that's where it should be worn for formal wear.

1:20:15Why did she like that? She liked to see the men's soldiers knees This is what people will recognize the Sporan. This is Gordon Winkleman But what was the thinking behind the Sporan? Well Sporan was a pouch originally and when it became more military they were long-haired like this and were centralized and French royalty were wearing it. They were worried about a man being aroused, so the sparring got put in the middle as a kind of protection. Really? So the legend goes. So your view is that anyone, anywhere in the world, can wear a kilt? Yes. Yeah, just as long as it's a nice kilt, properly made, hopefully made in Scotland.

1:20:59I learned a lot. And that, our thanks to Max Foster. Well, have you heard? Probably. Tomorrow night, the ball will drop twice in New York's Times Square, once to ring in 2026, and then again a few minutes later to kick off celebrations for the nation's upcoming 250th birthday. You're looking at a practice run last week and a little history lesson. Cruz dropped the first New Year's Eve ball in Times Square way back in 1907. The ball did not drop during World War II when the city instituted a nightly dim out. And of course, you can watch all the big countdowns from around the world here on CNN. Anderson Cooper, Andy Cohen, once again, they will be hosting 2026 from New York starting at 8 p.m.

1:21:45Eastern tomorrow night. Watch that on CNN or stream it live on the CNN app. Happy New Year, everyone. Aaron Burnett, Out Front, starts now.

1:21:59I'm Eva Longoria, and I'm setting out to really experience France, to savor its world-celebrated cuisine and explore the country's rich history. Eva Longoria, Searching for France, premieres April 12th on CNN and next day on the CNN app. I'm CNN tech reporter Claire Duffy. This week on the podcast, Terms of Service, there's a growing category of products aimed specifically at addressing women's unique health needs. These tools and services are sometimes known as femtech, and they can provide big opportunities and benefits, but they can also come with some risks. To walk us through all of this, I spoke with Bethany Corbin.

1:22:37Bethany is an attorney and CEO of Fem Innovation, where she advises startups, clinicians and health care organizations. In my opinion, what it really does is gives us a collective language to talk about women's health care innovation and the tools that are out there so that we can take control of our health care experiences and know how to advocate for ourselves in a system that's probably not been designed to advocate for us. Listen to CNN's Terms of Service wherever you get your podcasts.