In short
The episode centers on President Trump’s reaction to a Democratic video urging U.S. troops to refuse illegal orders, which Trump called “seditious behavior punishable by death” and reposted with “hang them”/George Washington language. The host argues this threatens violence against six Democrats who are former military or intelligence officials.
Guest
Rep. Maggie Goodlander (D-NH-2), a Navy Reserve intelligence officer for over a decade and former naval officer; she says the video simply states Uniform Code of Military Justice obligations to obey lawful orders only, and warns Trump is testing constitutional boundaries. She cites Mark Esper’s account that Trump asked about shooting peaceful protesters in 2020. She also frames the issue as “moral and legal clarity,” not personal safety.
The episode then pivots to the “Epstein files” law signed by Trump, with DOJ required to release documents within 30 days; guests discuss likely redactions, prior partial releases, and how FOIA processing works. It also covers USAID funding cuts and ISIS resurgence in Mozambique, plus affordability concerns in a Pennsylvania swing district and a jobs-report/unemployment mismatch.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOTrump's Unhinged Threat
0:42 to 2:30
Discussion on Trump's violent rhetoric towards Democratic lawmakers.
“Quote, seditious behavior punishable by death.”
Concerns Over Military Orders
2:30 to 5:10
Examining the implications of Trump's comments on military orders and citizen protests.
“Lives Matter protesters were outside the White House in 2020, the president asked privately his military advisors if U.S.”
Congresswoman Goodlander's Response
5:10 to 8:30
Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander discusses the legal implications of Trump's threats.
“White House this week, that MBS ordered the murder of a Washington Post columnist.”
The Nature of Lawful Orders
8:30 to 10:50
Exploration of what constitutes lawful orders in the military and past incidents.
“When Secretary Hegseth appeared before the House Armed Services Committee, I asked him a very simple question.”
Stochastic Terrorism Explained
10:50 to 12:30
Understanding how Trump's rhetoric could incite violence against lawmakers.
“Finding a source you can trust for weather forecasts should be easy, right?”
Trump's Recent Remarks and Reactions
12:30 to 14:00
Analyzing Trump's recent statements and their impact on public safety and discourse.
“Let's discuss all of this with Chad Mazzell.”
Discussion on Epstein Files and DOJ Transparency
14:01 to 18:40
Learn about the ongoing investigations related to Jeffrey Epstein and the DOJ's transparency regarding the released files.
“There were tens of thousands of documents over the course of DOJ without a single piece of legislation being released.”
Investigating the Location and State of Epstein Files
19:15 to 23:05
Discover where the Epstein documents are located and the investigative processes surrounding them.
“That's the amount of time the Justice Department has before they have to release the documents related to Jeffrey Epstein.”
Impact of Reduced USAID on Mozambique
23:05 to 28:00
Explore the consequences of cutting USAID funding in Mozambique and the rise of ISIS in the region.
“Former FBI Deputy Director Andy McCabe, thanks so much.”
The Impact of Aid Cuts on Mozambique
28:00 to 29:58
Learn how U.S. aid reductions are exacerbating ISIS recruitment in Mozambique.
“Their anger about that help suddenly disappearing and then us asking questions clear.”
Show all 30 chapters
Dick Cheney's Legacy and Funeral
29:58 to 31:15
Explore the reflections on Dick Cheney's impact and the political divide at his funeral.
“The State Department did not answer our questions about the resurgence of ISIS in Mozambique after USAID shut down.”
The Divide Within the Republican Party
31:15 to 33:54
Discuss the current dynamics and divisions within the Republican Party post-Cheney.
“Here now to discuss CNN's John King, former Republican Congressman Adam Kinzinger, and CNN political commentator Karen Finney.”
Reflections on Political Norms
33:54 to 35:51
Examine the erosion of political norms and the call for civility in politics.
“we have a party that looks more like it used to, but I'm not holding my breath, to be honest with you.”
Voter Sentiment in Pennsylvania's Swing District
35:51 to 37:54
Hear from voters about their economic struggles and perceptions of the current administration.
“He was asked by CNN's Jeff Zeleny about this bitter divide right now and if we can overcome it.”
Economic Uncertainty and Job Reports
37:54 to 41:26
Analyze the mixed messages from the latest jobs report and its implications.
“And we're back in our politics lead, a new destination for John King's great series all over the map.”
September Jobs Report Overview
42:11 to 44:36
Analyzing the September jobs report, its implications, and market reactions.
“Yeah, Jake, the long-awaited September jobs report did come in better than expected.”
Vice President Vance's Economic Message
44:36 to 46:30
Discussing Vice President Vance's response to economic concerns and public sentiment.
“All right, Vanessa Gerkevich, thanks so much.”
White House Reaction to Economic Polls
46:30 to 47:58
Exploring how the White House is addressing public dissatisfaction with the economy.
“Yeah because Jake obviously some Some people don't like this video.”
Investigating Mortgage Fraud Tied to Trump
47:58 to 49:56
Details on the Justice Department's investigation into mortgage fraud involving Trump appointees.
“And tonight's Kaitlyn's going to have one of those six Democrats on her show, Senator Mark Kelly.”
Upcoming Meeting: Trump and Mayor-Elect
49:56 to 50:30
Anticipating the meeting between President Trump and New York City's mayor-elect.
“that there's something that the Justice Department is still looking into.”
Epstein Bill Signed Into Law
50:30 to 56:00
Discussing the implications of the newly signed Epstein bill and survivor reactions.
“Letting everyone know through a lengthy truth social post, but there were no cameras, no fanfare, no one to witness a moment that Epstein survivors have fought tirelessly for for decades.”
Accountability and Ongoing Advocacy
56:00 to 56:55
Discussion on the importance of accountability in advocacy efforts.
“every page and demand accountability and I hope you'll be here with us to make that happen.”
Allegations Against Sean Diddy Combs
56:55 to 1:00:23
Coverage of disturbing allegations against music producer Sean Diddy Combs.
“this time from a man claiming sexual assault.”
Veteran's Legal Battle Against Texas
1:00:23 to 1:05:44
Leroy Torres discusses his ongoing legal battle for veterans' rights in Texas.
“To just do that in his shirt and to attack me like he had.”
Political Landscape and Mayor-Elect Meeting
1:05:44 to 1:10:00
Discussion on the implications of the upcoming meeting between the NYC Mayor-elect and Trump.
“Leroy Torres, Brian Lawler, thanks to you.”
Congressional Ethics and Stock Trading
1:10:00 to 1:12:28
Discussion on the ethics of Congress members trading stocks and the implications of insider information.
“for retiring in a way that guaranteed his chief of staff would be the only one on the ballot.”
Introduction to UFO Documentary
1:12:28 to 1:13:46
Introduction to a documentary on UFOs and government secrecy about UAPs.
“If you believe in UFOs or if you wonder whether there is life beyond Earth, a new documentary very assertively declares that the U.S.”
Secrets of UAPs Explained
1:13:46 to 1:16:05
Insights from a documentary about UAPs and their implications for national security.
“I think there's this assumption that presidents can walk in the Oval Office on day one and say, all right, take me to Roswell, show me the alien bodies.”
The Cold War of UAP Technology
1:16:05 to 1:19:09
Discussion on the race to reverse-engineer alien technology and its implications.
“The stakes are far, far greater than the atomic race.”
Celebrity Auction for Veterans
1:19:09 to 1:21:19
Promotion of a celebrity auction to support homes for wounded veterans.
“And it's important that we actually win this race and lead in this new era.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00The right window treatments change everything. Your sleep, your privacy, the way every room looks and feels. At Blinds.com, we've spent 30 years making it surprisingly simple to get exactly what your home needs. We've covered over 25 million windows and have 50 ,000 five-star reviews to prove we deliver. Whether you DIY it or want a pro to handle everything from measure to install, we have you covered. Real design professionals. Free samples. Zero pressure. Right now, get up to 50 % off with minimum purchase. Plus, get a free professional measure at Blinds.com. Rules and restrictions apply.
0:34Welcome to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper. An explosive and unhinged presidential threat tops our politics lead today. Quote, seditious behavior punishable by death. That's President Trump's message on Truth Social this morning. In response to six Democratic lawmakers, all of them former military or intelligence officials, who appeared in a video reminding U.S. service members that they are not obligated to carry out illegal orders. Listen to part of the video. Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders. You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders. We need you to stand up for our laws, our Constitution, and who we are as Americans.
1:20Don't give up. Don't give up. Don't give up. Don't give up the ship. President Trump wrote, their words cannot be allowed to stand seditious behavior from traitors, lock them up, unquote. He also reposted, hang them, George Washington would. Again, just to remind you, this is the president of the United States at a time of dangerous political violence in this country, suggesting that six Democrats be killed for saying that troops shouldn't break any laws. So what were these Democratic lawmakers concerned about? Well, as of today, they would be justifiably concerned about a commander in chief saying they should be executed for comments that do not even vaguely meet the definition of sedition.
2:10But beyond that, the lawmakers were primarily concerned about U.S. troops being dispatched to American cities and the possibility of troops being told to use violence against American citizens peacefully protesting. They were concerned about the deployment of the military to polling stations. Remember, five years ago, when Black Lives Matter protesters were outside the White House in 2020, the president asked privately his military advisors if U.S. troops could shoot those protesters. That's according to then Secretary of Defense Mark Esper. I was just dumbstruck by it. And he was speaking to General Mark Milley when he asked that question of, you know, can't you just shoot him, just shoot him in the legs or something.
2:56And I was, you know, shocked by it to hear this from the president of the United States saying that we shoot our fellow Americans in the streets of the nation's capital. Now, that was back when President Trump had a cabinet that included people who were willing to tell him no, such no longer seems to be the case. And if you were hoping for congressional guardrails of any sort, well, if wishes were horses, rides would be free. Today, the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, defended Trump's posts, calling for his congressional colleagues to be executed. He called the Democrats' video wildly inappropriate.
3:29And here is what the White House press secretary had to say. Just to be clear, does the president want to execute members of Congress. No. Let's be clear about what the president is responding to, because many in this room want to talk about the president's response, but not what brought the president to responding in this way. We have 1.3 active duty service members in this country, and if they hear this radical message from sitting members of Congress, that could inspire chaos and it could incite violence. There is a disciplinary track in the U.S. military for service members who disobey orders and they can ultimately be charged with insubordination, there is a mechanism for this.
4:12If Caroline Levitt is worried about messages that could incite chaos and inspire violence, well, that call is coming from inside the House, the White House. Now, this outburst comes after quite a week for President Trump, whose poll numbers are sinking lower while the world girds for the release of the Epstein files that he and his administration fought so hard to keep us all from seeing. When one woman reporter asked the president about those files a few days ago, he said to her, quote, quiet piggy. To another woman reporter, he insulted her as a bad person and a bad reporter. She happens to be a good person and a good reporter.
4:49He also would not criticize neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes when asked. And he seemed to support the notion of conservative voices platforming Nick Fuentes without any pushback or criticism. He also got mad at the press for asking about the fact that U.S. intelligence agencies assessed that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, whom the president welcomed with open arms into the White House this week, that MBS ordered the murder of a Washington Post columnist. And then the president criticized the murdered columnist, almost suggesting that he had it coming. All of this just in the last six days. And folks, it's only Thursday.
5:30Joining us now, House Armed Services Committee member and Democrat from New Hampshire, 2nd Congressional District, Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander. Congresswoman, you're one of the six Democrats in that video. I want your reaction to what the White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt said in this briefing. Take a listen. Maggie Goodlander was a naval officer and notably she was also she is also the wife of Joe Biden's national security, former advisor, Jake Sullivan. And so these members knew what they were doing. That is a very, very dangerous message, and it perhaps is punishable by law. What's your response, Congresswoman?
6:09Well, Jake, thanks for having me. Look, I never thought that simply and clearly stating federal law would ever cause the president of the United States, the commander-in-chief, to threaten violence against me and members of Congress. Look, our message is clear to our service members, and I think it's a really important one. in this moment. Our laws are clear. We all take an oath to the same Constitution. And it is our responsibility as the ones who write the laws to be clear about what they say. The Uniform Code of Military Justice is crystal clear on this point. It is the obligation of every service member to obey lawful orders and lawful orders only.
6:48And that's our simple and clear message. And it's an important one because there are legitimate concerns that this president is going to issue and has issued unlawful orders to American troops who are operating on American soil. That's just not who we are as a country. And these kinds of threats of violence are not who we are as a country. So can you give an example of an unlawful order that you think he has issued? Well, Jake, I think you cited one at the very beginning of this show. We know if we take a look at the track record of the first Trump administration, What we saw, you know, and I served under three presidents of different parties, including under President Trump, under six separate secretaries of defense.
7:32Secretary of Defense Mark Esper was asked to carry out a set of orders that he thought did not comply with the law, was not prepared to support the invocation of the Insurrection Act. He was not prepared to carry out an order to send American troops on peaceful protesters. And look, this is a basic set of judgments, and it's a core American and constitutional principle. Public trust is essential to public safety and to our national security. And the public and our service members who have been put in an impossible situation right now need to know that Congress has got their back. It's what I would want to hear if I were still serving in the Navy.
8:12And that is our simple and clear message. So you served as an intelligence officer in the Navy Reserve for more than a decade. Did you ever get an order that you thought was illegal? Jake, I did not. And look, we are in a new terrain here. We see a president of the United States and a secretary of defense who are testing the boundaries of the basic and core principles of our Constitution. When Secretary Hegseth appeared before the House Armed Services Committee, I asked him a very simple question. a question that has only one right answer. I asked him if he would obey a decision of the United States Supreme Court.
8:50He refused to commit to doing so. This is stunning. This is downright dangerous. And that is the brave new world that we're all living through. But our commitment to our service members and to our constitution is clear. And that is, we will not give up the ship. At this point, I think we're all familiar with the term stochastic terrorism. But just in case people out there don't know, it's when somebody in power or with a megaphone starts criticizing somebody else and there is violence committed against that person. And it can't be directly tied to the calls for violence or criticism, but it is related.
9:29Senate Democratic Leader Schumer says that he has called Capitol Police to give extra protection to Democrats after Trump's remarks. Are you worried about your safety? Jake, it's hard not to be when the President of the United States threatens you with violence, but the bottom line is this is not about me. This is not about any other member of Congress. This is about our commitment to the Constitution, and it's about a clear statement of federal law. This is a moment for moral clarity and for legal clarity, and that is what we're doing here. Our service members need to know that we've got their back.
10:04We've got their back as they uphold their oath, their sacred obligation to our Constitution, and as they uphold their basic obligation to comply with federal law. And the federal law is clear. Lawful orders are to be obeyed, and only lawful orders are to be obeyed. Freshman Congresswoman and Naval Reservist Maggie Goodlender, thank you so much. Appreciate your time, Congresswoman. Coming up next, the man who was Attorney General Pambani's top advisor up until a few weeks ago, what he can tell us about the Epstein files and how much the Justice Department might reveal, plus the talk across America about Trump's economic policies, what a hairdresser in a swing district in Pennsylvania is telling her clients to do to help them stretch a dollar.
10:52Finding a source you can trust for weather forecasts should be easy, right? This is CNN meteorologist Derek Van Dam, thrilled to introduce the new CNN weather app. Check your daily forecast to plan your day, the weekly forecast to see what's on the way, and prepare for any major storm with our robust real-time video coverage. The app is stunning. And if you're a weather nerd like me, you'll love our in-depth stories and the photo of the day. Download the CNN weather app on iOS today. Let's have I got news for your ears. The podcast. I am your host, Michael Ian Black. Shall we see what's in the news?
11:30Oh, yes. Sitting in for Michael Ian Black this week, it's me, Jim Biederman, on today's show. We talk about the reflecting pool disaster, the Iranian negotiations, and probably the most important story of the week. All you can eat shrimp. It's such a great week. Have I got news for your ears? Check us out on Apple, Amazon Music, wherever you get your podcasts. Even better, you can watch the podcast on Spotify. In our law and justice lead today, President Trump signed into law that legislation that forces the release of the Epstein files. It happened last night, no cameras, no signing ceremony, just a truth social post afterwards where the president attempted to take credit for the overwhelming votes in Congress.
12:07When, of course, in reality, the president and his administration seemed to fight the release tooth and nail until it became clear that he was going to lose this big vote in Congress. So now what? Well, yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Justice Department would follow the law, and that law requires the files to be released within 30 days of Trump's signature. There are, of course, questions of whether the Justice Department will use the recent Trump-ordered criminal investigations into Democrats as a possible excuse to keep at least some of the files under wrap because of an ongoing investigation.
12:37Let's discuss all of this with Chad Mazzell. He was the Justice Department chief under Attorney General Pam Bondi and chief of staff, and he left last month to return to his family in Tampa. Chad, thanks so much for coming here. So what exactly, I know it's speculation, obviously, but what exactly do you think the Justice Department will release in the next 30 days beyond the survivors names? How much do you think will be redacted? Jake, this is why I love the bill, right? It requires the release of all information. And then in addition to that, it says any redactions have to be justified and explained.
13:11Any classified information needs to be summarized. And ultimately, they want a list of every single political person, government official, foreign dignitary who appears in this list. This is going to be the most comprehensive list. And I think that that's important because, as President Trump pointed out, early in February, Pam Bonney released hundreds of pages of Epstein's files. Then in September, an additional 30 ,000 pages released. Just last week, we had an additional 20 ,000 pages released. Now, it's never enough, it seems like. This is finally going to put an end to that. Well, let's talk about that, because as you note, at the end of February, the Trump administration gave a bunch of files to a number of MAGA influencers.
13:50Experts say that all of those files had already been released. What was that about? So a number of files were released. That was just part of phase one. There were tens of thousands of documents over the course of DOJ without a single piece of legislation being released. But one thing, Jake, that I think is important to reiterate, Donald Trump has been consistent from day one, whether it was a cabinet meeting months ago to his latest True Social post. He has said the Epstein files is a distraction. And this is a man who knows distraction, right? He lived through the Russia hoax. He lived through the Ukraine hoax.
14:24He lived through the good people on both sides hoax. Whereas the greatest hoax his predecessor had to deal with was that Joe Biden was competent. He wants to return to the real issues that are facing America, securing the border, enforcing our immigration laws, reducing inflation, reducing violent crime, securing unprecedented investment into the United States. That is what he wants to focus on. He's been very consistent with that. And that is what Republicans ought to start doing right now. I don't want to dive down the rabbit hole of Russiagate and Ukraine and both sides. But there are a lot of people, including myself, would say those are not hoaxes and they're much more complicated than you just depicted.
15:02But let's focus on Epstein files, because the same month of February, Attorney General Bondi said this. The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen? It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump. So can you clear that up? Because ultimately, the Justice Department said there is no Epstein client list. But right there in that clip, she seemed to suggest it was sitting on her desk. First, Jake, she's addressed this. She addressed this at a cabinet meeting with President Trump right there. If you continue to play the whole clip, she's talking about a number of files, not just a purported client list, when she was referring to her, the Epstein files were on her desk.
15:53The MLK files, she continues to say, were on her desk. The JFK files were on her desk. She released all the files that she'd been given from the FBI. And then you saw the letter that she issued getting more information. Again, we continue to go through that, produce tens of thousands of pages to Congress, which Congress then released to the public. The Epstein estate produced 20 ,000 additional pages. We've had a total of 50 ,000 pages released. Still, people are calling for more. By the way, Joe Biden released zero pages of Epstein. So DOJ already has been more transparent than any DOJ in the past, even though this guy has been around for two decades.
16:27And now with this new legislation, they're going to be even more transparent. Yeah, look, I'm not going to defend any president not releasing the list. I think that because Ghislaine Maxwell was prosecuted and appealing, there was a legal argument that you couldn't release files because her appeal was still pending. But I'm glad as many files are out and I'm excited for the more that I don't even know how many files we're talking about. How many files, you said the Epstein files were on our desk. Obviously, there are too many files to be on one person's desk. How many files are we actually talking about here that are going to be released?
17:00Jake, I don't know the exact number. I know it is a lot of information. The exact number of files, the exact number of pages, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, it's a lot. One other thing I want to ask about the Epstein files is that in July, as you know, the Justice Department said, issued a memo saying there was basically nothing left to investigate in those files. But now, obviously, the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York is investigating what President Trump has ordered him to investigate, Bill Clinton and Larry Summers and any other Democrats' possible ties to Epstein.
17:38So there is an investigation, even after the Justice Department said there's no need for any more investigations. Yesterday, the Attorney General was asked what changed. Here's what she had to say. information that has come for information um there's information that new information additional information and again we will continue to follow the law to investigate any leads there are a lot of people out there who think like the new information she's talking about is just the information that the president wants democrats investigated what is the new information Jake, I'm not entirely clear what the new information is.
18:16I think any sort of information that may have been there, it came after my tenure. I do know that the Epstein estate, again, turned over 20 ,000 emails. There may be additional information associated with that. I'm not quite sure, but what I will say is that Jay Clayton, SDNY, he's a man I know personally of utmost integrity. He's going to get to the bottom of it. All right, Chad Bizzell, thank you so much. Really appreciate your time. Thanks, Jake. On the Epstein Files, exactly what does the Justice Department have? And is there a paper trail if someone were to tamper with the data? Would we know?
18:50A former deputy FBI director will join us next.
18:56I wrote a little song to remind you, Choice Hotels gets you more of the experiences you value. The Cambria Hotel's got it all. A rooftop bar, have a ball. Bring a date, your squad, or even your mom. Book direct at choiceotales.com. And we're back with our law and justice lead. 30 days, 30 days. That's the amount of time the Justice Department has before they have to release the documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. Let's dig deeper in what we can expect to see with the former FBI Deputy Director Andy McCabe. So Andy, just so people can visualize this, where are these files even located? And what do they look like?
19:34I mean, I think a lot of people out there probably like visualize like the end scene of Raiders of the Lost Ark was a government warehouse and just box after box. That's what it looked like when I started. Right. Back in the mid 90s. But all of that has changed. Obviously, all the files are electronic now. And so they can be accessed from any FBI office. The FBI entity that's responsible for maintaining those records and more critically processing FOIA requests from the public and from journalists is actually out at a special facility in Western Virginia. And so the folks that work there work incredibly hard.
20:06They do this every day, taking out files, reviewing what can be released, redacting things that shouldn't be released and going through that process. It's hard to imagine just how many federal investigators and prosecutors have already gone through these files. I mean, Epstein has been a bad actor for decades. He was first arrested. I think the I think the first police raid on his house was like 2004. Is it possible anything would be missing? and would we even know? Highly unlikely in my view. Now, those early investigations done by, you know, West Palm Police and the Sheriff's Office and then ultimately handed over to the U.S.
20:44Attorney's Office, a lot of questions and issues with the way decisions were made around those cases. But, you know, in 2017, the Southern District of New York took over this case and they would have had access to everything the government had. They also had the opportunity to conduct their own investigations, serve subpoenas, talk to witnesses, identify victims, that sort of thing. They had the benefit of great journalists like Julie K. Brown, whose pieces ran in the Miami Herald. They did that work and came away determining only two people could be charged, Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
21:20So the idea that that thorough a review and all that work was done so recently and that all of a sudden now we're going to come up with new evidence seems far-fetched to me. Is it not possible that the reason they concluded that is because the defendants hypothetically would be very, very wealthy, powerful men and the key witnesses would be young women with troubled histories whom Maxwell and Epstein preyed upon. And a lot of times, like it's tough to prosecute a pimp because the witnesses are all hookers i mean that's like what people in like da's office think and so is it is it possible there's like this anachronistic kind of thinking of we can't go after magnate x because it's just the word of these three girls who the defense attorneys will destroy on cross there's some credible allegations that that sort of thinking may have infected the early investigation and been factored in by prosecutors in the southern district of florida when they ultimately determined to give what is thought by many people to have been a sweetheart deal to Jeffrey Epstein.
22:29The victims would have been much younger at that time. And if they were experiencing trouble in their lives, that would have undermined their credibility on the stand. That would have been a very ripe thing in that moment. But the Southern District's work in 2017 comes at a very different time. I don't think that prosecutors in the Southern District would have been turned off by the idea of going after high-profile, high-net-worth people with very good attorneys. and they would have had the advantage of working with victims who were much older and had likely passed through those troubled phases and were in a better position to testify.
23:04All right. Former FBI Deputy Director Andy McCabe, thanks so much. Coming up, following the money, what happened in all those countries where the Trump administration suddenly yanked USAID funds? Well, in one South African nation, terrorism. See what a CNN reporter uncovered there. But first, breaking news. Intense rains right now in central Texas. This is in the same region where flooding killed some 120 people over the July 4th weekend, including all those children at Camp Mystic. We're going to be monitoring the situation. We'll be right back.
23:37Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same premium wireless for$15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do at MintMobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three-month plan, equivalent to$15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. Default terms at MintMobile.com. In our world, lead an update to a story that got lots of attention earlier this year.
24:13Those Doge-inspired cuts that gutted the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID. CNN's Nick Payton Walsh recently visited the southeastern African nation of Mozambique, where the vacuum left by that aid being cut off is being filled by ISIS with bloody, horrifying results. It looks like a place where nothing should go wrong. But ISIS are seeing a resurgence across Africa, home to two-thirds of their global violence this year, rising fast here in northern Mozambique. We land in the flashpoint of Masimba Dupraya, seven weeks after ISIS started their worst offensive since they occupied the town in 2021.
24:58The government's grip is so shaky, they've let Rwandan forces in to be the real muscle on streets where ISIS seemed to rule the night. So USAID's contribution to Mozambique amounted to about 3 % of its GDP. And that USAID money helped the economy here, development, schools, really enabled the government to try and promote its hold on the place. And so now that money has suddenly vanished, well, they're reeling here and ISIS are back. The little video we have of ISIS's recent onslaught is terrifying. Outgunning Mozambican forces, slaughtering captives. But in October, they tried something new, less savage and confident.
Read the full transcript
25:49They walked unopposed, armed, in stolen uniforms, straight into this mosque in Masimba's coastal fishing community to deliver a manifesto. The crowd didn't flee, but instead filmed. When ISIS arrived, asked for the keys and walked in wearing their boots, the imam had presumed they were soldiers. What did you think on that night when these guys came in?
26:29It is extraordinary after all these years of ices have spread across the Middle East to stand in, startling to stand in a place where they had freedom of movement just a couple of days ago. 93 ,000 people around this area fled in just six weeks after ISIS's attacks began on September the 7th. Rafael takes us directly to the home of his brother-in-law, now abandoned. They were not rich and also took US aid.
27:18I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry.
27:29Eight men killed by ISIS. Seven of them beheaded, some in front of their families. and you just, for looking around, I mean there's nobody here. It's startling. This used to be a vibrant area, Christian area. The money USAID spent here urgently tried to curb the spread of ISIS. They gave$50 ,000 here to help motorcycle taxi drivers vulnerable to recruitment by ISIS improve their working conditions with paperwork, vests and helmets. Their anger about that help suddenly disappearing and then us asking questions clear. Emotions are incredibly high here. I mean, it's all about people's livelihoods, really, and a lot of anger.
28:18The man who ran the project describes how it is the only way to stop ISIS.
28:31I've been doing so many times, not me personally. I've recruited so many people who have been in society. I think President Trump has to have a heart. Fishermen, the main workforce here, but also a source of ISIS recruits. We visit a USAID project aimed too at giving them a better livelihood, now shut. 10 ,000 new arrivals in this camp alone were met with a steep drop in food aid.
29:20But Mozambique could be rich. Around the town of Parma, shielded by these fortifications, it's clear that while the Trump administration is stripping away aid here, It's also investing fast and hard, a$4.7 billion loan in March, in vast liquid natural gas facilities. A contradiction where wealth is held up by a wave of ISIS savagery, which surged after the U.S. aid meant to calm it vanished. Nick Payton-Walsh, CNN, Masimba Dupraya, Mozambique. Asked for comment, the U.S. State Department told CNN, that it still provided life-saving food aid to Mozambique this year and reviewed global aid constantly to, quote, ensure it meets the needs of the receiving country and the priorities of the United States, unquote.
30:11The State Department did not answer our questions about the resurgence of ISIS in Mozambique after USAID shut down. But they did say the US was, quote, the most generous nation in the world and was enhancing the, quote, efficiency and strategic impact of its aid, calling on other nations to do more. Former Vice President Dick Cheney once called President Trump a coward and said he did not want him at his funeral. Cheney got the last word. Our panel weighs in with some thoughts of their own.
30:45You did not know Dick Cheney unless you understood his greatest concerns and ambitions were for his country. Though he was inspired to service by President Kennedy, Dick Cheney became a Republican. For him, a choice between defense of the Constitution and defense of your political party was no choice at all. Today, the nation paid respects to the 46th Vice President Dick Cheney, who died earlier this month at the age of 84. Former President George W. Bush and his daughter there, former Congresswoman Liz Cheney, gathered along with former President Joe Biden and all four living former vice presidents, Kamala Harris, Mike Pence, Al Gore, and Dan Quayle, to honor Cheney's life of public service.
31:29Here now to discuss CNN's John King, former Republican Congressman Adam Kinzinger, and CNN political commentator Karen Finney. And John, you were at the funeral this morning. Two very notable figures were not there, President Trump and Vice President Vance. Pretty striking. It was striking. It was, I was saying, it was like being in a time machine or having time travel to be in a place where mostly Republicans, but also Democrats, were kind of saying, oh, remember when Washington was like this, where we could disagree, but do it agreeably? Think about Dick Cheney's life. Gerald Ford's chief of staff, then a loyal Reagan revolution foot soldier in the Congress.
32:06George H.W. Bush's defense secretary, George W. Bush's vice president, rode the wave of so many transitions in the Republican Party, successfully thrived in those changes. Trump was a bridge too far. You're sitting there today thinking that this proud, principled conservative, his last vote for president, Jake, was for a Democrat. Yeah. She was sitting there. So both Cheney and Liz Cheney endorsed Kamala Harris over Trump in the last election. In a 2022 campaign ad for his daughter Liz's failed re-election bid in Wyoming, Vice President Cheney made it very clear what he thought of President Trump.
32:39Take a listen. There has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He is a coward. A real man wouldn't lie to his supporters. He lost his election and he lost big. I know it, he knows it, and deep down, I think most Republicans know it. Congressman Kinzinger, you were at the cathedral today as well for the service. President Trump has a lock on the Republican Party. Liz Cheney lost her re-election bid because she stood up to Trump. Vice President Vance made a disparaging comment about Vice President Cheney just the other day, after he died. It's Trump's party.
33:20Yeah, it is. It's not a surprise. I mean, just the classlessness you see come out of the White House is constant. For me, it was amazing to be in there, to see people on the left, on the right, in the center, people you'd never expect to see at a Dick Cheney thing, right? All there together, celebrating the fact that this man was honorable. And then I come out and read the story about, you know, calling for the execution of Congress people. And to me, it was just such a different, such a contrast. And so to know J.D. Vance said, no Trump would say that they own the Republican Party. My hope is in five or 10 years, we have a party that looks more like it used to, but I'm not holding my breath, to be honest with you.
34:00You know, that was something I was thinking, watching it, that that's actually what normal is supposed to look like. What we're every single day into the Trump presidency, I feel like we have to keep reminding ourselves. No, that's not normal. It's not normal for a president to say things like that or to post things like that on social media. It should be that when someone passes, people can come together, honor their service to this country, whether you agreed with them or not. Obviously, there's a lot of things I did not agree with Dick Cheney about. I thought his grandchildren were just lovely and it was heartwarming.
34:31And you feel for a family when something like that happens. And yet, I was actually surprised we didn't hear something horrible from Donald Trump about him today. But yet, there's still a few more hours left in the day. So, I mean, the other thing is that, look, I mean, we shouldn't gloss over. I mean, they were bitter partisan vites during the Bush years when he was vice president. And the stakes were big. War and peace, you know, Social Security, tax cuts, a lot of things. But at the end of the day, there was this understanding, even if you really went after your, I mean, like we shouldn't gloss over the fact that these were, this was, it was a bitter and divided time.
35:11It's just, you still could see the humanity in the other person. Dick Cheney was very soft spoken, spoken a quiet voice, but it was always clear what he was trying to tell you. If he had a point to make, he would make it. And I think that, you know, give the Iraq war, the Iraq war divided this country, especially the execution of it. You know, should we have gone to war was one big debate, but then the execution of it was clearly troublesome. And that made Barack Obama president. It completely changed our politics. However, even the people who disagree with Cheney profoundly talk about the respect, and they understood, they disagreed with him, but his commitment to service, his commitment to country was just irrefutable.
35:48So that respect is what's missing and lost. former Vice President Mike Pence, another notable Republican who's at odds with Donald Trump. He was asked by CNN's Jeff Zeleny about this bitter divide right now and if we can overcome it. Here's what he had to say. Oh, I'm confident it can. Look, our politics are more divided than any time in my lifetime. But I'm not convinced the American people are as divided as our politics. What do you think? I agree that it can. And actually, long, I'm very optimistic on kind of America. That we can overcome it. Yeah, long. In the short and medium term, it's really difficult.
36:31I mean, look, the incentive structure is to the extremes, right? If you're a Republican, you cannot win a primary without being crazier than the other person you're running against. But I do think through this kind of last Trump term over the next three years, my hope and expectation is that's going to start to get fatiguing to people. The question is what replaces it? Does kind of old school Republicanism come back? I wish I could say I was optimistic. Or is it somebody else that tries to pick up the Trump mantle, even though Trump is uniquely capable of doing what he does? What do you think, Karen?
36:59Well, I think it's one of the things, again, why it's important to say this is not normal, because I do think about young politicians who are seeing and learning from Trump and thinking, oh, that's how it's done. And no, actually, that's not how it should be done. What we saw today is more like, and again, you're right, bitter fights. Democrats call them Darth Vader. I don't want to gloss over that either. But at the end of the day, I certainly still thought that the Bush education department thought it was important that kids learn how to read. I don't know what Donald Trump believes, if that's important or not.
37:29And like the Bush administration, you know, basically solves, in essence, HIV in Africa. That's right. This administration destroys that for no reason. While the guy that's going to be the first trillionaire in the country runs around with a chainsaw and giggles because he cuts USAID. Karen Finney and Adam Kinzinger, thanks so much to both you. John King, stay right here. John's going to come right back with his visit to one of the most competitive districts in the nation in my home, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Hear what voters there in the Lehigh Valley told him about affordability and President Trump next.
38:05And we're back in our politics lead, a new destination for John King's great series all over the map. He went to a critical swing district in Pennsylvania. Here's how affordability is impacting voters there.
38:21Bethlehem is blue collar full of people living paycheck to paycheck full of people who come to Janique Jones for help my business assists people in repairing their credit managing their finances and basically being financially organized so if you're busy times are tough absolutely completely And you're busy right now? Super busy. What kind of stories are you hearing? My husband lost all of his overtime. My kids' daycare went up. Can't afford the cost of food. Using credit cards for everyday expenses. No money left after their bills are paid. Pretty much just a whole bunch of financial mess. We changed presidents at the beginning of the year.
39:04We did. And the guy who moved into the White House said that he was going to fix it. Several times he said it would be easy. Absolutely. Has he fixed it? Absolutely not. I'm definitely waiting for him to fix it. Jones is a three-time Trump voter, but, she says, he has simply failed to keep his promise to lower the cost of living. I'm very let down by that. Very, very let down because I feel like it's only gotten worse. This is Gentleman's Barbershop. Customers gripe a lot about rising costs. Ashley Ruiz tries to help. I'll tell the client, hey, if you get it cut a little shorter, the haircut will have a longer lifeline.
39:41because I want them to feel like they're getting a service that will last longer so their money goes further. She gets it because she does the tough math at home. Rent, food, child care. They are a lot higher. So I try to make wiser decisions in hope that things will get better. Owner Ronald Corrales is another three-time Trump voter. When clients or co-workers grumble about costs, Corrales urges patience. Well, hopefully soon, you know, like it. But it hasn't happened yet. Not really. We don't really see it at the moment. Like I said, I think we have to give him some time. You hear there, give him some more time from a three-time Trump voter.
40:25We met many Trump voters who say, let's try to be patient, but they all also say costs have not gone down, as the president promised. And, Jake, you know this area well. A freshman Republican won that district. Because Trump carried Pennsylvania last time, carried Northampton County where Bethlehem is. He pulled along the new freshman Republican. Democrats think the same reason that happened, affordability, will be their calling card next year when they try to take that seat back. And he barely won, like 4 ,000 votes or something like that. John King, thanks so much. And welcome to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper.
40:57For this hour, how can the U.S. have a stronger-than-expected jobs report, and yet the unemployment rate went up? This mixed bag is creating a flood of economic uncertainty and your own retirement accounts may be a reflection of all the whiplash. Plus, the Justice Department opening yet another mortgage fraud investigation. This one involving Democratic Senator Adam Schiff of California. Also a CNN exclusive. CNN spoke with a man accusing Sean Diddy Combs of sexual assault. He filed a lawsuit and now law enforcement is picking up the case. And is there really non-human life on Earth? What a film director learned about layers of secrecy at the highest levels of the U.S.
41:38government. Our lead tonight, the newest jobs report has Wall Street, economists, and Americans scratching their heads. The big headline, the U.S. adding 119 ,000 jobs. More than expected, but unemployment is on the rise, with data revisions to prior months making the picture for the whole year even murkier. The market's tumbling today. Dow, Nasdaq, S &P 500 all closing in the red, even after yesterday's rally sparked by an AI giant promising forecast. CNN's Vanessa Yarkiewicz is here to help us all make sense of this. Vanessa? Yeah, Jake, the long-awaited September jobs report did come in better than expected.
42:20Analysts were expecting 50 ,000 jobs added in the month of September. what we got was 119 ,000 jobs. That was better than expected. But if you look at the monthly job gains averaged out over the entire year, we're looking at the weakest jobs growth this year since the pandemic and then again since the Great Recession. And that's really led by weaker job growth that we saw over the summer than we had initially seen in those earlier reports, particularly the month of July and August were both revised down. And we actually now see job losses in the month of August. If you look at this bar chart, you can see on your screen that there are now two months of jobs losses, June and the month of August.
43:07And we were just looking at some of those sectors where we saw gains in the month of September. 87 % of job gains were seen in health care and leisure and hospitality. So if you were looking for jobs in those sectors, you had a better chance than in others like manufacturing and transportation and warehousing, which lost jobs. Also, the unemployment rate, as you mentioned, Jake, analysts were expecting it to hold steady at 4.3 percent. It ticked up to 4.4 percent. But that's also because of labor force participation, more people entering the workforce looking for jobs. The market really had a tough time digesting this jobs report.
43:47You saw the Dow earlier today up 700 points and then the Dow finishing the day down almost 400 points. So that is a large, more than 1 ,000 point swing. In terms of where investors are right now, where their heads are right now, they believe maybe that this jobs report indicated a better chance of the Federal Reserve cutting rates at their next meeting in December, but not by much, Jake. 40 percent of investors now believe that a rate cut is coming, versus 30 % yesterday. So most believe that the Federal Reserve is going to hold steady on rates because, Jake, this is the last piece of data that the Federal Reserve has to look at before they have to make their decision.
44:28And we've heard from Federal Reserve officials, Jake, that they really want more data before they start to make significant decisions on further rate cuts, Jake. All right, Vanessa Gerkevich, thanks so much. Meanwhile, Vice President Vance appeared with a new message for Americans who have economic worries, speaking at a Breitbart event earlier today. I guess my message to the American people who are still feeling like things are unaffordable, who are still feeling like things are rough out there is, look, we get it and we hear you. Even though we've made incredible progress, we understand that there's a lot more work to do.
45:01And the thing that I'd ask for the American people is a little bit of patience. This is at the same time as a new Fox News poll, which has just 4 % of the American people saying that economic conditions are excellent. 42 % say conditions are poor. 62 % of voters say the responsibility for these conditions lie with President Trump, not with Joe Biden. Let's get to CNN's Kaitlin Collins at the White House. Kaitlin, how are officials feeling about this jobs report? Well, Jake, obviously they're looking at this, and publicly they've been touting what they believe are the good parts of this and what they say are good economic indicators.
45:39But obviously, they're also looking at the numbers that you just showed there and seeing that it is not being reflected by the American people, by and large. It's not just one outlier poll. It's multiple polls that have shown this, Jake. And the numbers that you just showed there, there's also a number, another number in that Fox News poll. And the question was specifically if people felt that they had been helped or hurt by the Trump administration's economic policies. And look at these numbers. Helped only 15 percent said that they believed that it was actually helping them. you see those much larger numbers.
46:0846 % say that they have been hurt by it, and almost 40 % say that they really felt no difference. And of course, for a president who campaigned almost every single day on the campaign trail, Jake, on the campaign trail to bring down prices and to work on affordability for voters when it comes to their energy bills and everything, that is obviously a pretty damning number there for them, given how long they've been in office. And so that is something, the messaging in terms of what you just heard from the vice president is kind of what we've been hearing from officials more and more that instead of denying that this is this is the way that American people are feeling they're trying to say that they are working on it and are trying to get there.
46:44And Caitlin at the end of the briefing today you tried to call out Caroline Levitt the press secretary for misquoting the video of the democratic lawmakers that has Trump so mad and having him saying such inappropriate things about executing these six democratic lawmakers. Yeah because Jake obviously some Some people don't like this video. There's been a ton of furious backlash, not just from here at the White House, but also on Capitol Hill as well. But instead of just saying they don't like the video or believed it was inappropriate, the president obviously went further and was arguing it was punishable by death and saying that it was seditious in describing what these lawmakers are saying in this video.
47:20And obviously, Jake, anyone who has seen this video, who has watched it, these are former veterans, former people in the intelligence community, including Senator Alyssa Slotkin. they are directly quoted as saying that people and military service members do not have to follow illegal orders, that they have to abide by the Constitution, that they should not follow illegal orders in that. And so obviously the White House can criticize it and dispute it, but they were misquoting it inside the briefing room earlier. That is not what the Democrats in that video said, which is what led to those wild statements by the president this morning saying that they are punishable by death.
47:55Yeah, really entirely inappropriate. Kaitlyn Collins at the White House, thanks so much. And tonight's Kaitlyn's going to have one of those six Democrats on her show, Senator Mark Kelly. That's on The Source with Kaitlyn Collins tonight at 9 Eastern, only on CNN. Turning to our Law and Justice lead, the Justice Department is investigating possible issues with the mortgage fraud investigation into California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff, which is run by two Trump administration political appointees. Let's bring in CNN's Kaitlyn Polans. Kaitlyn, walk us through what's happening here. Well, Jake, this is an investigation now around whether people associated with the Trump administration have others that are impersonating federal agents or whether there are people that are out there impersonating federal agents or holding themselves out as federal agents when they are not.
48:44What we've learned about this so far largely comes from a witness who had received a subpoena from prosecutors in Maryland and who had went to the courthouse today in Maryland, spoke to prosecutors and agents saying that she had been contacted by someone over the summer who had said he was working with some of these top Trump appointees who had been leading probes of mortgage fraud that Donald Trump has really wanted. Where this goes, we just don't know yet, Jake. This is one witness who is speaking publicly on the record saying that she is talking about her past interactions with someone she believed was a federal agent.
49:23But this is a really interesting twist in this ongoing saga of these investigations Donald Trump wants, including the one out of Maryland around Adam Schiff. whether it could be undermined by this situation and how far there is a connection to the people in the Trump administration, like Ed Martin, like Bill Pulte, the federal housing finance director, whether there's some sort of connection there or these people that are saying they were federal agents being connected to those people. It is a big question right now that there's something that the Justice Department is still looking into. All right, Caitlin Poliance, thanks so much.
50:02All eyes will be on a major meeting at the White House tomorrow, President Trump and New York City's new mayor-elect, Zoran Mamdani. Will this be a protective sit-down or more about theatrics? We're going to try to gauge it. But first, the attention President Trump is not putting on actions to release the Epstein files. I'm going to talk about the release with an Epstein survivor. That's next.
50:27In our Law and Justice League, President Trump signed the Epstein bill into law last night, Letting everyone know through a lengthy truth social post, but there were no cameras, no fanfare, no one to witness a moment that Epstein survivors have fought tirelessly for for decades. And one of the survivors, Danielle Benski, joins me now. Danny, first, given this week and how momentous it was and how emotional it was, I can't even imagine the roller coaster that it's been like. How are you doing? Thank you for asking. Yeah, it is a roller coaster is right. It was I came in on Sunday. We've done a lot of media and that day at the Capitol was amazing.
51:11But it was also we were literally running from one meeting to the next after the press conference, straight into the lunch with the Democratic Women's Caucus and then basically straight into the vigil where we got that information. And so there was, you know, the emotional highs and lows is something that we don't see often because a lot of these meetings are happening behind closed doors. But survivors are telling their stories over and over again to be able to really have everybody understand that these are human stories. We've said that so many times that it's not political. It's not about politics.
51:45Right. Absolutely. But the only way that I think we can really get that point across is by having these really hard conversations. So we're being asked to share, you know, in these very small meetings. And yeah, tell me about the worst thing that ever happened to you, right? I mean, like, that's what it is. It's like you're the last thing you want to talk about. You are being called upon to talk about and hear everyone else's stories, too. I remember just this week when we were at the Capitol, we had one meeting where we were there with the Roberts, with Virginia Giuffre's family. and you're really listening to her story.
52:21And it's just such a cry for accountability. And so to sit there and really listen to what the family has endured after what she had endured is just, yeah, it's heavy. It's also heartbreaking. So last week the House Oversight Committee released about 20 ,000 emails and such from the Epstein estate that they had subpoenaed. And the Justice Department, now that President Trump has signed this into law, has 30 days to release its Epstein files. And if there's stuff that they redact, they have to, other than the survivors' names, which we all want it redacted, they have to explain it. If it's a national security reason, explain.
53:00If somebody's a perpetrator or whatever, and you're not giving his name, you have to explain why, et cetera, et cetera. How concerned are you that we're still not going to get what you guys deserve, which as the names of the perpetrators so that they at the very least they can be shamed if not prosecuted. I think we've all been sort of waiting for the other shoe to drop instead of this like huge, joyous, momentous moment last night. We were all kind of like this feels too easy because of the whiplash we've already experienced where a week ago we were a hoax and now he's signing this. And so I think a lot of us have a lot of fear around this topic, right?
53:39And I think that we're worried about it getting tangled up in litigation. We're worried about certain materials going missing. We're not really sure what to expect at this point, but at least if the files are released we can sit and move through them with our lawyers and we know what we know, right? We know our memories and we have each other now and I think that that is something that was really born out of this experience that really holds a lot of weight and it's something that I know that the president came out with this rant yesterday about this being a Democratic hoax, and we've been so painfully honest about this being so personal, and to still have this be politicized, I think first it's a really big missed opportunity on his part where he could have displayed some empathy, and he could have said, like, you know, a great day for the survivors, or any sort of recognition, and instead completely decides to keep this divisive.
54:37But I think that we're missing out on the survivor voice being, I mean, we have moved through this now for five administrations, right? Three decades. Maria Farmer, 1996, right? And we've been fighting this fight. We've been passing the torch. And we're stronger together now. And that's the coolest part about this, is that it really started with a few people, and then it became more and more, until really it feels like this is an empowering story for American democracy, right? Because it's not just the Epstein-Maxwell case. It became all survivors. And then after it became all survivors, it became even more, right?
55:13Like we ended up doing this call to action. We had the PSA release. And all of a sudden, everybody I knew, everybody our friends knew, everybody started calling their congresspeople and their senators. And it felt like this is so big. Like, you know, and instead of celebrating that right now and really saying, like, we did something that felt impossible. Nobody thought it would go through the House. Nobody thought it would get through the Senate. Certainly nobody thought the president would sign it. That is huge. It's a law. And instead of that being the focus, we're still calling it a Democratic hoax.
55:46And so now it's almost like using the whole piece that we've worked so hard for over five administrations against us. Well, it's not a partisan thing. It's not Democrat or Republican. and it's not a hoax and we're going to continue to cover it and we're going to continue to see every page and demand accountability and I hope you'll be here with us to make that happen. Thank you so much. Dani, it's great having you here. It's really nice to meet you and you should feel proud of what you and your sisters accomplished. Thank you so much for saying that. It is a bunch of previously vulnerable women that society was ignoring and you were heard and you made Congress didn't want to touch this with a 10-foot pole, change their mind, act as though they were with you the whole time.
56:38Some were. Some of them were. I would like to say that we have had some amazing champions from the very beginning. But not 427 of them or whatever the vote was. That's true. All right. Danny Benski, thank you so much. It's good to meet you. It's good to see you. Please come back. Thank you so much. Because we're going to keep covering this. It's not over. It's not over. Coming up next, that's CNN exclusive bombshell claims against Sean Diddy Combs, this time from a man claiming sexual assault. Here are the claims from that music producer himself.
57:08And our pop culture lead in a warning off the top here. The details in this CNN exclusive are disturbing. Elizabeth Wagmeister spoke with the man at the center of a brand new investigation into Sean Diddy Combs. Jonathan Hay is the accuser's name. He claims that Sean Didacombe sexually assaulted him in 2020. He laid out his case in a civil lawsuit, and now the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department is investigating. And again, a warning, this interview includes graphic details that may be distressing to some viewers.
57:40Violated me like I've never been violated. Jonathan Hay. In his first TV interview since the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department opened a new investigation into allegations that Sean Diddy Combs forced Hay to perform oral sex on him. Someone is listening and I feel like I'm so close to justice. Finally. Hay, a music publicist and producer, says his first incident with Combs came in 2020 when they collaborated on new music honoring Biggie, the late rapper Notorious B.I.G. This is Hay, modeling Biggie's actual clothes, a photo he says he gave to the police. Taken on the day, he says he found himself alone with combs.
58:23He took a phone call, sat down. I could hear, like, sex noises. He was really, like, masturbating. This goes on for a few minutes. I just, like, want the whole thing, you know, to be over. The next thing you know, he ejaculates into one of Biggie's shirts. So it was a shirt that I mean, it was like, rest in peace, big. Hay, in this police report, says that he kept the incident to himself, but it began to eat at him and eventually told Biggie's son, CJ Wallace, who was collaborating with him on the new music. I finally got that off my chest after almost a year. But Hay told police that the dynamic of the partnership changed.
59:05In March 2021, Hay went for what he thought was an interview for Combs' Revolt TV. Instead, he says he was taken to a house where Combs entered the room. Chaos erupted, and he was screaming at me. He was in a rage, and that's when he violated me. Hay told police Combs stuck his penis inside of his mouth. Hay says he pulled away, but Combs pulled his head back and allegedly did it again, approximately three to four times. What was going through your mind in that moment? shock, like blur. I didn't know if I was going to die at that point. It's the first time in my life where I felt suicidal. Combs' attorneys told CNN, Mr.
59:50Combs categorically denies as false and defamatory all claims that he sexually abused anyone. In July, Hay filed a civil suit against Combs and Wallace, Biggie's son. Wallace is now suing for defamation, claiming Hay became irate at the decision to not release the remainder of the songs that Hay had produced and retaliated. His attorney adding the allegations will be shown to be complete fantasy. CJ knows what's happened. He was there. Combs is now serving four years in federal prison. Hay hopes that his case will add to that. Biggie was like supposedly his best friend. To just do that in his shirt and to attack me like he had.
1:00:31He doesn't need to be out on the streets. Elizabeth Wagmeister, CNN, Los Angeles. this. And our thanks to Elizabeth Wagmeister for that important report. A U.S. military veteran who took on the state of Texas and won now finds himself back in court over$2.5 million. It's a story that we have followed for years here on The Lead. The latest chapter is next.
1:01:01In our national lead, a case that we have followed for years here on The Lead landed back in court today. In 2023, a Texas jury awarded veteran and former Texas state trooper Leroy Torres nearly two and a half million dollars because of his claims that he'd essentially been forced out of his job due to health problems he developed after being exposed to burn pits while serving in Iraq. Burn pits, as you may know, were used by the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan to destroy hazardous chemicals. They caused innumerable health problems for so many service members. Now, Torres claimed that rather than accommodating him because of his service, the Texas Department of Public Safety just suddenly fired him.
1:01:43He sued the state of Texas and he won. But this month, the state of Texas appealed that decision. So this year's long legal fight continues. Joining us now is Leroy Torres and his attorney, Brian Lawler. And Leroy, you first brought this case forward in 2017. What's your reaction to this legal battle continuing here in 2025.
1:02:05You know, Jake, thanks again for having me this afternoon. You know, I thought this would be over in 2023. And here we are, fast forward two years later, almost going into year nine with this legal battle. So it's been a difficult journey, not only having to deal with my physical ailments, but having to deal with this moral injury from the state not accommodating me with a position that I had requested. And one thing that has been difficult is that I see the Texas office often, they declare itself the strongest state for veterans. But yet today, the state continues its legal fight against a disabled veteran.
1:02:47And today, it's just not about me, but it's about thousands of citizen soldiers who answer the call to serve in uniform part-time, who are making a difference in the community every day and that this should be a service that is honored and not undermined. Yeah. Dressing yourself in the American flag and saying that you salute veterans doesn't mean anything if this is how you treat veterans. Let me note that we did reach out to the Texas Department of Public Safety for comment. They declined. Brian, what exactly is the state doing now? What are they challenging specifically? Jake, the state is saying that the trial victory, that the unanimous jury verdict that we got back in September of 2023 is wrong on a multitude of levels.
1:03:37First, that we advanced our theory on Leroy's behalf under the wrong part of the statute, under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. They claim that when we gave up one of our claims, but we advanced another one, we gave up the wrong one. So that's the majority of their argument, and that we didn't afford them what's called affirmative defense, where the jury could have said, oh, they had a legitimate reason for doing that. But we did. We offered them that affirmative defense under the correct theory of liability, and that is the state failed to accommodate Leroy's injuries and then re-employ him into a proper position.
1:04:16claiming that we basically just have a discrimination claim, and since we abandoned that and we don't have the failure to accommodate claim, we have no case. They're also challenging that we didn't properly put evidence of our attorney's fees which were awarded, and that even if Leroy were awarded damages, he should have been awarded damages at a much lower paying position that he was performing as a temporary accommodation, but he's actually entitled to a much higher position, and that's what the jury agreed with. Yeah, you know, it just sounds like a lot of technical mumbo, legal mumbo-jumbo just to deny justice.
1:04:53Leroy, if there is a less than favorable outcome in this case, ultimately, how significant do you think the implications will be for veterans and veteran employment protections? Well, Jake, I believe that this is an opportunity for Texas to honor and uphold you, Sarah, and to set a national standard for how employers treat their veterans across the board, you know, who come home with a service-related illness or an injury and make sure that they're accommodated. So instead of dragging this case out, like my state has been doing, it sends a dangerous message that employers can't ignore or can't delay and deny the very protections that veterans earned throughout their service.
1:05:37So that puts every veteran, not only in Texas at risk, not just me, but countless others. Leroy Torres, Brian Lawler, thanks to you. Stay in touch. We want to keep on top of this case and follow it wherever it goes. Hopefully it will land with justice as we thought it had in 2023. Just in the time-lapse video of some wild weather, this is a massive dust storm. It's actually known as a haboob, and it swept over parts of West Texas today. Meanwhile, the political storm that we could see at the White House tomorrow. That's next.
1:06:12And our politics lead New York City Mayor-elect Zoran Mamdani is heading to Washington, D.C. tomorrow to meet with President Trump. Trump confirmed the meeting on Truth Social where he falsely called Mamdani a communist. Mamdani is, in fact, a democratic socialist. They are different ideologies. Mamdani has made clear that affordability is top of his agenda tomorrow. My team reached out to the White House to set up this meeting because I will work with anyone to make life more affordable for the more than eight and a half million people who call this city home. Former Republican Congressman Adam Kinzinger is back with me and we're joined by Alex Boris, a Democratic New York State Assemblyman who is now running for Congress in what is the district?
1:06:52New York what? 12th district. New York 12th. So it's Jerry Nadler's district. That's a dogfight that race. It is. We got nine in the race and a good conversation happening. All right. How do you see this meeting going? Entertaining. Mom, Donnie and Trump. It'll be entertaining. By the way, I have to say real quick, because, you know, yes, Mom, Donnie is a Democratic socialist. Donald Trump takes a 10 percent stake in about every company now that exports anything. That's by definition a socialist policy. I'm just going to say that. But this will be an interesting meeting. Donald Trump loves when you're in it.
1:07:22He has to win you over. So I would not be surprised to see just this like joyful meeting right between the two and then I'll probably stab him in the back later It could devolve, but I'm you know I think it's really smart of the mayor like to reach out at least and open a dialogue and see how it goes And then we can all watch and talk about it tomorrow. It's gonna be crazy So Alex the two obviously have been fiercely attacking each other for months. They are foils for each other Here's what they both said after the mayoral election was over Look at the result of yesterday's election in New York where their party installed a communist as the mayor.
1:07:59We're going to see how that works out. So Donald Trump, since I know you're watching, I have four words for you. Turn the volume up.
1:08:16Can I just say something as an old man? What does that mean, turn the volume up? You're a young person. Do you have any idea what that means? You're young-ish. I probably shouldn't be sharing that. We should probably give that to ourselves. That's just a millennial secret code. Obviously, both of them are talking about affordability in very different ways. Do you think there is actually anything that they could come to terms on? Absolutely. You know, in normal times, this wouldn't be news. The new mayor-elect of New York City meeting with the president. but let's remember Zoran launched his campaign with a video interviewing people who had voted for Trump in New York City and what they kept saying in the video was affordability, affordability, affordability.
1:08:56That's how Zoran chose his theme and launched it. So there's a lot for them to come together on that isn't just campaign talk. It's been core of how he's been running. They are, I mean, I don't want to say that they're similar. They're not, but they are both very media savvy and they're in very different ways and both are very good at communicating with their voters. And they also bring their own voters, right? Donald Trump basically brought his own voters into the GOP and took it over. Mamdani basically brought his voters in. I mean, I remember hearing his name the first time being like, well, he's not gonna get any traction, and he did.
1:09:27And so that's the thing that they share in common is they have their own ideas. They're not really trying to fit into this, like, here's what you have to be to be a Republican or here's what you have to be to be a Democrat. And I honestly think that model is kind of the new currency for getting elected in the future because people can sniff whether or not you're fake or real. They seem real. Donald Trump seems real, and so does Mom Donnie, and I think that's the key. So I know you want to be in the House for some reason. I know Adam was trying to talk you out of it. The House continues to, right now, the trade censures.
1:09:59Recently, there was a censure against Congressman Garcia of Chicago for retiring in a way that guaranteed his chief of staff would be the only one on the ballot. Kind of sleazy. Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Republican of South Carolina, she's pushing to censure a fellow Republican. Congressman Corey Mills of Florida, accused of all sorts of stuff. The House voted to send the issue to the chamber's ethics committee. Are you ready for this censure palooza that you want to join? Well, I think the easy thing is don't commit ethics violations. You know, I think we should be consistent on being against corruption.
1:10:33We should be consistent on being pro-democracy. say you shouldn't be handing your seat to your handpicked successor, and you probably shouldn't be committing campaign finance violations. There's also this big push to stop members of Congress from trading stocks while they're in Congress because of all the insider information they get where they're able to - explain this to me because you've actually been - is it just real? It's like a legitimate thing? You learn things before the rest of the world does? It depends where you're - I mean, like, I think if you're a speaker, yes, probably because you know what agenda items are coming up, for instance.
1:11:08I don't think you have as much of an insight as probably people out there think. We're kind of pulling the strings. But yeah, I mean, you get some. So I know, for instance, if we're going to pull up a bill to repeal Obamacare, like we did 800 times, then you might want to bet against whatever is affected by that. I think you see some of that. But I don't think, you know what scares me, Jake, is the betting markets. Because you can go and bet. If I was in Congress, I could bet on myself voting yes or no on any bill, and they don't know who I am. So I could vote no if the odds are bad and then put$1 ,000 on it and make$20 ,000 because I know I'm going to vote.
1:11:45That is what's going to be abused, I guarantee you. And that's a story for the future, by the way. And what do you think about that? We're seeing it in the sports markets where it's influencing individual pitches. You saw pitchers now being reprimanded for it. It's way worse when it's votes or it's launching of campaigns. I mean, there was a betting market on my district before I launched and before everyone launched. If you know who's about to announce, there's quick money you can make there. This is something Congress needs to get ahead of. Do you support banning members of Congress from trading stocks?
1:12:13A hundred percent. A hundred percent. You don't need to have that much of a head start to make a bunch of profit on a trade. So even if you're just briefed on the votes of the day before it's announced publicly, that could change the stock market. And now that I'm out, yes. Thanks to both of you. Really appreciate it. We're not alone. If you believe in UFOs or if you wonder whether there is life beyond Earth, a new documentary very assertively declares that the U.S. government has proof of both. We're going to talk to the director of this documentary next.
1:12:47In our out of this world lead, unidentified anomalous phenomenon, what we used to call UFOs, are real. They are spying on and interfering with nuclear and military activity. They have crashed on Earth, and their non-human bodies have been recovered. And the U.S. government has been covering it all up for decades. Those are the arguments featured in The Age of Disclosure, which is a serious contender in the Oscar race for Best Documentary. It debuts this Friday in some theaters and on Amazon Prime. And it features a bipartisan group of 34 senior members of the U.S. government, military, and intelligence communities, all of whom go on the record, claiming to have direct knowledge of UAPs, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena.
1:13:32In a clip that is exclusive to the lead we're going to show you right now, then-Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair, now Secretary of State Marco Rubio, explains how deep these layers of secrecy can go. I think there's this assumption that presidents can walk in the Oval Office on day one and say, all right, take me to Roswell, show me the alien bodies. I want to see the video of the autopsy. I want to see the whole thing, open it up. I think that really is a naive understanding of how our government works. Even presidents have often been operating on a need-to-know basis. That's certainly true from a historic standpoint.
1:14:12The rationale, the justification was, the president shouldn't know about these things because that way the president always has deniability. All they need is a nod in this direction or in that direction. But that begins to ramp out of control. Frankly, I don't even know the president would know who to ask. You could go to the director of the CIA, nowadays the director of national intelligence, and ask them. And even that person may not know because those people rotate. But the people, three layers underneath them that are there for 30 years, to them. It's like I've seen these people come and go.
1:14:41I have no obligation to tell them it exists. It just never percolates up. Joining us down to discuss is Dan Farah. He's the director of the Age of Disclosure. So first of all, let me say I saw it last night and it is riveting and fascinating. Congratulations. This is a subject that we've covered on the show, but you really, this is above and beyond. Thank you. The secretary of state, then a senator, goes on the record there to provide a window into how deeply hidden this knowledge really may be. Yeah, that Rubio clip sums up how significant the cover-up is. Every one of the 34 intelligence, military, and government officials I interview told me that not only is the public kept in the dark, but Congress is kept in the dark, and all sitting presidents have been kept in the dark.
1:15:27So in the documentary, a number of officials go on the record to reveal a UAP crash retrieval program where technologies and even, quote, non-human biologics have been recovered. Officials say there is a secret war between the US, China, and Russia to try and reverse engineer some of these alien technologies from these crashed UAPs. How big are the national security implications here? They couldn't be bigger. So this race, this secret Cold War race that our nation is in with adversarial nations to reverse engineer technology of non-human origin. The stakes are far, far greater than the atomic race.
1:16:09One of the interview subjects refers to it as the Manhattan Project on steroids. This technology could be used to cause significant destruction, but it could also be used to revolutionize the way we live. So there's a lot of pros and cons to this race. One pretty shocking revelation is how these beings, whatever they are, have allegedly interacted and spied on nuclear and military sites. Here's a quick clip from the documentary. We've had repeated instances of something operating in the airspace over restricted nuclear facilities, and it's not ours. They have both deactivated and activated nuclear weapons with both the United States and Russia.
1:16:51These are otherworldly things that are performing maneuvers that haven't been seen. The UAP activity surrounding nuclear weapons is not a historic issue. It's an ongoing issue. And there are individual testaments from people talking about UAPs that they saw hovering over nuclear missile silos. It's terrifying. There's been reoccurring activity over our nuclear weapon sites in this country and other countries, and over our most classified military bases all over the world. world. And obviously, that's concerning because even if you are someone who can't wrap your head around the fact that this is non-human intelligent life and we don't know what their intentions are, the alternative is it's an adversarial nation penetrating our most secure airspace.
1:17:39Those are your choices. Right. But I mean, as Rubio has said in your documentary and has said publicly as well, the Russians and the Chinese are not centuries ahead of us when it comes to this technology. No. Secretary Rubio makes it clear in the film, as do others, that we do not know where these UAP come from. But there is absolutely no reason to believe they are from the United States or another nation state. So it's called the age of disclosure, because you're basically saying we are at the very beginning now of this new age where this is accepted, no longer mocked, no longer stigmatized. So where are we going to be, do you think, in five years, 10 years, 20 years on this issue?
1:18:22I think that the officials speaking up in this film are kicking off an era where the U.S. government's going to step up and officially make it known that we're not alone in the universe and that the U.S. intends to lead the way on this. I think you're going to see a lot of legislation start to get full support in the House and Senate to drive us towards legal disclosure of what can be shared comfortably with the public. I think we're entering an era of unprecedented transparency and disclosure. And I think it has to happen now, as the film reveals, because the stakes couldn't be higher. We are in a very significant, high-stakes Cold War race with China and Russia, most notably China.
1:19:06and we know their intentions are not great. Yeah. And it's important that we actually win this race and lead in this new era. And you note that Senator Harry Reid, the late Senator Harry Reid, was very visionary, a real trailblazer on this issue in Washington, D.C. And right now, Schumer, the Democrat, and Rounds, the Republican, are pushing for more disclosure and they've been headed off at every turn. The Age of Disclosure, out this Friday, select theaters worldwide on Amazon Prime Video. Dan Farah, congratulations and thanks for being here. Thank you. Thanks for having me. So, as of right now, there are only 24 hours and a minute and a half left before we start closing the eBay celebrity auction that I am co-hosting with George Clooney and Winona Judd.
1:19:51All of the proceeds of this auction, this is our ninth annual auction, it's the ninth one, help to build specially adapted mortgage-free homes for severely wounded veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. And I have seen how these homes change lives. And it's amazing. So you can go right now, ebay.com slash HFOT, Homes for Our Troops. You can bid on Zoom calls with celebrities, lunch dates, premieres to special shows, movies, autographed collectibles. In the events space alone, you can see the premiere of a future Jake Gyllenhaal production. And you get to meet and greet that handsome devil. You can play 18 holes of golf at the Bel Air Country Club.
1:20:34with none other than Jason Bateman and Will Arnett. You could win VIP tickets to see the Dave Matthews Band next summer and get a signed poster from them, too. How about some VIP club tickets to see the San Francisco 49ers versus the Tennessee Titans next month? Or if hockey's your thing, a VIP ticket trip to see the Boston Bruins take on the Detroit Red Wings. It comes with an autographed puck also from 400 goal scorer David Pasternak. It's also NFL tickets to see the Eagles against the commanders in January. Whoopi Goldberg's autographed to the Andrew Pink Heels. Bottom line, there's a lot more than 100 items to bid on.
1:21:12The auction closes tomorrow night at 7. Find out more, ebay.com slash HFOT. Homes for our troops. Aaron Burnett out front starts now.
1:21:26Hey, I'm Anderson Cooper. On my podcast, All There Is, we explore grief and loss in all its complexities. Everything that he did and why, I realized how much he had to take on that I just wasn't really aware of. It does make me wish that I could just go back and be a little bit more understanding at that time. Her name is Michaela Schifrin. She's 31 and is considered the greatest alpine skier of all time. Her mom, Eileen, is an integral part of her team, and her dad, Jeff Schifrin, was too. He was an anesthesiologist who first put Michaela on skis when she was three. What was he like? This is maybe kind of weird, but like he was really handsome.
1:22:06Since he passed away, I've actually become him. I've totally become the scheduling person in our family. Talking grief, building community. That's what the podcast is all about. This is all there is. Listen and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
From the publisher
How can the United States have a stronger than expected jobs report while the unemployment rate went up? Plus, the Justice Department opens up yet another mortgage fraud investigation, this one involving Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
