Trump: U.S. Seized Oil Tanker Off Coast Of Venezuela

26:14The right window treatments change everything. Your sleep, your privacy, the way every room looks and feels. At Blinds.com, we've spent 30 years making it surprisingly simple to get exactly what your home needs. We've covered over 25 million windows and have 50 ,000 five-star reviews to prove we deliver. Whether you DIY it or want a pro to handle everything from measure to install, we have you covered. Real design professionals. Free samples. Zero pressure. Right now, get up to 50 % off with minimum purchase. Plus, get a free professional measure at Blinds.com. Rules and restrictions apply. We're back with that breaking news story in our world lead.

26:48The United States seizing a tanker, an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela. The attorney general of the United States, Pam Bondi, just released video of the seizure, saying that the U.S. executed a warrant for this vessel used to transport sanctioned oil from Venezuela and Iran and supported foreign terrorist organizations. Let's bring in Republican Congressman John Rose of Tennessee. We have a lot to get to, sir. First, your reaction to the tanker being seized and the timing coming amid these tensions with Venezuela. Well, I think we've seen from the Trump administration and from President Trump a resolve to control illegal activity, illicit activity all around the globe, including most particularly from Venezuela and Central and South America.

27:31And I think we see consistency in the president's policies here being acted out. Let's turn to the president's speech last night about affordability. That's sort of how it was built. What is the Republican message about the economy and affordability? And do you think President Trump is delivering that message successfully to voters? Well, I think so. I think more importantly, though, the president's policies and the policies that Republicans have put in place as promised during the 2024 election was to reverse the disastrous policies from the last four years of the radical progressive policies of the Biden administration and the Democratic Congress that had created the worst inflation in my adult lifetime.

28:16And so it takes time to turn that ship around, but we see great progress. You know, I just filled up back in Tennessee this past weekend for$2.23 a gallon, lowest prices that we've seen at the pump since President Trump was president the last time. Gas prices across the country under$3 a gallon for all Americans. And so that will begin to cascade through the economy, reducing the cost of everything from food to, you know, the night out on the town. And so we've got to take the time to stay the course. It took four years to dig this hole. It's going to take some time to dig out. But we see real tangible progress.

28:55We're going to see even more on January 1st when the tax cuts from the Working Americans Tax Cuts Act take full effect. And we see no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax for Social Security benefits. And the benefits of the Trump policy is taking full effect. So I hear you when you say it takes time to turn a ship around. etc. The message of it's only just starting. But when President Trump talked about the economy last night, he said a lot of things that were just not true. He said food prices are coming down. As of September, grocery prices are up 2.7 percent year over year, up 1.4 percent since January when Trump took office.

29:34On inflation, Trump said he inherited the worst inflation in U.S. history. In reality, he inherited 3 percent inflation, which is what it is now. It is true that under Biden, inflation peaked at 9.1 percent, but that was back in June 2022. That's not what President Trump inherited. It's one thing to try to make a case for what his administration is doing and that it's going to take some time. But shouldn't someone privately sit him down and say, please don't tell voters that prices are down because that's not what they're experiencing at the grocery store? Well, I think we do see prices for many things actually coming down.

30:10But we know that from history, the problem with inflation is once you set it off, which the Biden policies did, we saw over 20 percent cumulative inflation during the Biden years. Once you start that inflationary spiral, it continues and it takes time to reverse it. We saw that from the Carter inflation of the 1970s and 80s. It took, in that case, years before we were able to completely tame inflation. And it's going to take time again. And so that's why you don't go down this road. That's why the Biden policies were so abhorrent to the future success of our economy. And I think that's what the president is talking about.

30:47You know, the Democrats created this runaway inflation of the last four years or so. And it takes time to put that genie back in the bottle and it creates a lot of suffering. And it will be the case that some prices will never go back down to the pre Biden level prices. And I think that's what the president is talking about. And so when you have a party that actually implemented the policies that led to the inflation to begin with, it's a little rich for them to be leading the charge. It's as if the arsonist is saying, I'll help put out the fire. Yeah, I've heard you made that comment last time you were here.

31:23And I understand it as a political point. But President Trump's out there saying that the affordability issue is a hoax. I don't think it's a hoax. Do you? Well, I think the hoax is trying to frame the issue as somehow Republicans are responsible for what was clearly created by bad progressive Democratic policies. Tariffs are part of the reason for inflation. The tariffs are part of the reason for inflation when it comes to a lot of objects, a lot of items. Sure. I think if you point to the very near term, you would say, okay, there's some evidence that tariffs are being passed on, but very little actually.

32:02certainly not of the magnitude of the tariffs. And so the president is walking and chewing gum at the same time. We're taking on the bad trade policies of the Biden administration. You know, for four years, President Biden did not open a single market to farmers' products here in the United States. Agricultural products were shut out of so many markets because of the bad trade policies of the Biden administration. And so President Trump is trying to open markets and using tariffs as a tool to get that done. That does create some modest inflationary pressures, but mostly that's been being absorbed by either the exporters or by middlemen here in this country.

32:41I'll just leave you with this food for thought from a Fox News poll. It's like two to one in terms of who voters blame for the current economy, like 62 percent, say it's Trump's economy, maybe like 32 percent Biden's. But Republican Congressman John Rose, We thank you for your time, and we always appreciate you coming on the show. My next guest is Off and Floated. As a 2028 presidential candidate, he just suggested the U.S. should follow Australia's lead and ban social media for children and adolescents. Rahm Emanuel will be here.

33:15I'm Dr. Sanjay Gupta, host of the Chasing Life podcast. We're talking to Dr. Alexander Moskop. He's author of the book called The End of Migraines, and he's the founder and director of the New York Headache Center. He's going to tell us why headaches hurt, what's really happening in your head, and what you can do about it. What is the first thing you sort of recommend, then, in terms of lifestyle? So sleep deprivation is number one, and people are busy not getting enough sleep. That's probably part of the reason headaches have gone up, just because we're getting less and less sleep. You're right.

33:49Diet is a very important factor as well. Lowering your carbs can definitely help. Three out of four migraine sufferers suffer from reactive hypoglycemia, which means you eat something sweet or carbs, sugar goes up and then plummets. Listen to Chasing Life, streaming now wherever you get your podcasts. And our tech lead, Australia, is now the first country in the world to ban social media for kids under the age of 16. The ban includes some of the most popular apps, such as Instagram, TikTok, Facebook. And now many are wondering whether we could see other countries, including the United States, following suit.

34:29Just a short while ago, in an exclusive interview for CNN's streaming app, I spoke with South Australia Premier Peter Malinowskis, whose draft law inspired the nationwide ban in Australia, along with Jonathan Haidt, whose book The Anxious Generation was instrumental in leading to the ban. Here's just part of our conversation. What we're saying is you're under 16, if you're a 12-year-old, your mental abilities, your development of your brain isn't yet at a point to be able to handle the service. So they're going to get there eventually. But what's the harm in a 14-year-old not getting social media?

35:05I mean, what's the worst thing that's going to happen here? I mean, kids start texting each other or calling each other instead. or meeting up at an oval to play some sport or going to dance classes more actively, sitting around talking to their parents, playing with their brothers and sisters. I mean, brothers and sisters in their own families are sitting around in their lounge room all staring at a screen. Now they might not be. I mean, what's the worst possible outcome of that? Let's discuss with the former Chicago mayor, CNN senior political and global affairs commentator Rahm Emanuel, who is the first possible 2028 presidential candidate possible to come out and talk about this ban.

35:47You've come out and said that the United States should follow Australia's lead and consider our own kind of ban on this. What would that look like? Well, I mean, we would develop it ourselves, but you take any one of these social media apps, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, they have an algorithm that is more powerful than what the adult in a child's life can do. And I think, you know, as we've done on tobacco products, as we've done on telephones in classrooms, as we've done on designated drivers when it comes to drinking and driving, we have done a series of things to help parents protect kids, and they have been effective.

36:26There is no doubt, when you look at all the research, that these social media apps are leading to mental, emotional strain on children's, not only anxiety, but isolation, sense of alienation, and a huge amount of emotional drain. And we're either going to help a parent step in and fight Facebook, or we're going to leave a parent all alone, try to take on the most powerful companies in the world in human history. And it's basically, I really do think this, Jake, it's down to either we put faith in the adults or we put faith in the algorithm. So it's that choice. Jonathan Haidt in his book makes a persuasive case on the subject.

37:04He told me earlier today about the harm these social media platforms have caused kids. Take a listen. The social media companies, they are deluged with lawsuits and stories of children who died or who had horrible eating disorders and almost died. There are thousands and thousands of parents who are suing these companies because their kids are dead or disfigured. these companies are able to affect children on a scale that no previous consumer product ever did what kind of accountability do you think these platforms should face well look jake i mean let me just say this you're a father of uh young kids my kids now have gotten through the wind share of adolescents no parent in your uh kids classmates nobody says i wish my with spending more time on the screen on social media.

37:56Every one of you are battling the same battle. And the U.S. government that has power that's equal to these companies is sitting on the sidelines. This cuts across party lines, educational lines, racial lines, all types of lines, brings people together. And I do think we should hold these companies accountable. The first step in that accountability is 16 and younger, keep your hands off the kids. They're not your profit margin. They're our future. And we're going to step in and stop this. And I'll say this is, you know, my dad was a pediatrician. I used to do rounds with him. I was going to do early childhood education.

38:29And as mayor, we had the most restrictive laws on tobacco to kids. And we saw our smoking among teens drop to low single numbers because we stepped in. Now, we know the consequences. There's been study after study. The question is, are we going to do something about it? Now, one thing last year, the Senate took action, not the same thing, but around the area of restriction as it relates to social media. It passed 97 to 3. You tell me the last time you saw something of significance pass the Senate 97 to 3. They can't even agree on health care. So to me, this actually could be a place of working together.

39:08Releasing the Epstein files, I think, was 100 to nothing. But I take your point. Rahm Emanuel, thank you so much. We'll have you back soon to talk more about this. The dramatic new video this hour, the U.S. seizing a tanker off the coast of Venezuela. We're going to talk more about that and more. Stay with us.

39:26Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same premium wireless for$15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do at mintmobile.com slash switch.

39:58You know, they always have a hoax. The new word is affordability. So they look at the camera and they say, this election is all about affordability. Back to our politics lead, President Trump's economic speech in Pennsylvania turned into a winding rant. My panel joins me now. Charlie Dent, so you represented in Congress, you're a Republican, you represented in Congress an area near where President Trump was speaking last night. I don't know how much of his speech you heard, but he didn't, as that clip illustrates, he didn't really seem to take the issue of affordability all that seriously. No, he did what I thought he knew.

40:40He moved into grievance politics, going after Omar, s-hole countries, and just a lot of ad hominem personal attacks, which I don't really think helped him. He has to sound more empathetic on the plight of many people who can't afford their rents, their mortgages, their groceries, their cars. His message was, you don't need $37. You can have$2. That's what he said. Well, a little bit tone deaf. I don't think that really speaks to most people. I don't know people buying$37. But I don't know. It just seems like there's a fair amount of disconnection from what real people are facing. He's not helping himself at all.

41:13And he's and he didn't help himself in a key swing area of the Commonwealth where there are two competitive seats. Arshi, is President Trump helping Democrats cut ads for next year with how he says these things? Well, let me just say first start by saying that there's a lot of time before the election. Yes. First and foremost. But yes, I think absolutely. Because actually, ironically, it's very similar to what the Biden campaign was focused on in terms of just talking about what they had done, but not really focusing on what people were feeling. Trump did that really well in the election. But I think now he has he's become insulated and focused on other things.

41:49So I think affordability is a key issue that the policy isn't matching up. And I think American families are really, you know, they're faring badly under this under these policies. Congressman, what would you tell him to say when he goes out on the stump or when he's asked about affordability? Well, I think he has to stand up and tell people what he proposes to do, what he plans to do. But first acknowledge the problem, but then tell them whatever his plans are. And, Frank, the challenge he has, though, when he initiates tariffs, well, he's doing something that flies in the face of a good economic message because he's raising costs.

42:25Maybe he should be talking about tax cuts. But he's got to talk about a proactive agenda that actually does lower costs. He hasn't done that. Demanding that the Fed raise interest rates, one could argue, is, I mean, lower interest rates might add inflationary pressure. Right. Any$2 ,000 eBay checks, you know what, that could be inflationary. So he's got to get policies in place that actually do lower costs. And I think that's been a problem for the president. But his policies have created the opposite impact. Well, in terms of tariffs. Tariffs. And also you look at health care, not only the reconciliation bill, but also the most recent on the ACA tax subsidies.

43:01So President Trump talked about an issue close to home earlier today in the Oval Office. Obviously, right now there is this question about who is going to buy Warner Brothers Discovery. CNN is part of that. Netflix wants just Warner Brothers Studios and HBO Max Streamer. And the news cable channels would just be our own company called Discovery Global. the Paramount wants all of it. And President Trump kind of made it clear today that he wants Paramount to win. This is what he had to say. What changes do you want to see at CNN under new ownership? I'm not involved in that. I will be probably involved, maybe involved in the decision.

43:42It depends. I think any deal should it should be guaranteed and certain that CNN is part of it or sold separately. So he went on to slam CNN's management and our coverage of him. And I mean, I just, I've never seen a president weigh in on a news media ownership like this before. What's your response? My response is it's not appropriate for the president of the United States to be putting his thumb on the scale on a business deal like this. This should be evaluated by the FTC professionally and somewhat dispassionately. But it just makes people question, you know, what interest does he have? It seems that he wants to get involved with editorial content here at CNN.

44:23And frankly, it's not just here. I mean, you know, there's a golden share in the Nippon U.S. Steel deal, the 10 percent stake in Intel. And I don't think as a Republican that we should be this involved in the marketplace. There's a reason why, you know, Netflix made a big offer and it was apparently better than when the Paramount offered. So why not let the market decide this? I remember howls when President Obama's White House just criticized Fox News. Forget trying to influence who bought them or who owned them or their programming. No, it's stunning. And I think he is using every lever of power to really try to shape coverage of this administration.

45:00And I think he's been successful in some respects. The Jimmy Kimmel, I think, episode was good because there was some pushback. But I think unless there's a real kind of uprising on this to say that freedom of press is a core fundamental U.S. principle, then I think that's dangerous to our democracy. Freedom of the press. I've heard of that. First Amendment. Thanks, everyone. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, is coming up next. We're going to get his reaction to the big news today. The U.S. seizing a tanker near Venezuela, plus the looming deadline for Congress to strike some sort of deal when it comes to health care and those Obamacare premiums expiring.

45:36We'll be right back.

45:50phone case and make it personal. A photo, a name, an inside joke. The kind of gift that actually fits the person. That's what 30 million customers have been coming back to Zazzle for over 20 years to find. Right now, save 25 % on your first order at Zazzle.com. That's Zazzle.com. Make it z-amazing. Welcome to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper. This hour, two healthcare votes are set to fail tomorrow as the deadline to save Americans from skyrocketing premiums ticks even closer. Is there any hope for some sort of bipartisan deal before the end of the year? I'm going to ask the top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer in just moments.

46:28Plus, last night a Democrat pulled off a win in a Georgia district that Trump won by double digits. So how did he do it? And what message should Democrats take away from this race as they head into the midterms? I'm going to ask Eric Gisler, fresh off his election victory. And dramatic video shows the effects of record-breaking rain in the northwestern United States. Evacuation alerts are now in effect because of the surging river levels. And moments ago, the governor of Washington signed an emergency declaration expecting things will get worse.

47:05The lead tonight, only 21 days left until those Obamacare subsidies expire and health insurance premiums skyrocket for millions of Americans. As of now, Congress is failing to agree on any sort of bipartisan compromise, acting solely along party lines. Senate Democrats want a three-year extension for those Obamacare tax credits. Most Senate Republicans do not want any extension, period. Their current alternative, the Republicans, is to put some money into eligible Americans' health savings accounts. Both proposals are expected to fail in the Senate tomorrow. Now, that's just the Senate side. Right now, there does appear to be more division among House Republicans on how they want Speaker Johnson to move forward there.

47:49All to say, Congress is running out of time to address rising health care costs. CNN's Manu Raju is on Capitol Hill with more on all of this. Manu? Yeah, House Republicans in particular are trying to figure out their way forward at this key moment. The Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, under pressure, particularly from a number of members from swing districts, districts that were central to winning the Republican majority in the last cycle and will be central in this coming cycle as well. Some of them want an extension of those Affordable Care Act subsidies, some for two years and some for even for a year and the like.

48:24But they're facing resistance from not just the Speaker, but also some conservative members of the House Republican Conference who say that they do not want to provide any more money to prop up the Affordable Care Act, a law that they have derided and tried to repeal for years. We have spent many, many hours trying to find a way out of the conundrum that we're in. With regard to those extensions, there's a lot of people who are very concerned about Obamacare and the fact that the subsidies were created by Democrats for COVID-era limited use and they want to be extended. We just can't get Republican votes on that for lots of reasons, not enough of them.

49:04My district specifically, we're not big on Obamacare, right? So, like, I'm voting, I'm representing my district. But even then, so we understand that, you know, the health insurance cartel is pretty wild up here. So we obviously have to fix it. Now, but tonight, Jake, a new challenge to the speaker's position. A moderate Republican, Brian Fitzpatrick, who's one of three Republicans from a district that Kamala Harris won, began an effort to try to force a floor vote to extend those Affordable Care Act subsidies for two years with some changes along with it as well. In order to succeed, he would need all Democrats to sign on to this plan, as well as a handful of Republicans.

49:41It's unlikely to succeed, Jake, which just shows you the pressure the Speaker is under, particularly from those more moderate members who want action on this issue. Manu, correct me if I'm wrong. I'm trying to understand this. Republicans are criticizing Democrats because they say that money is just going to pay insurance companies. So they want to put money into people's health savings accounts for people to use. Won't they just use it to send it to insurance companies, too? Yeah, under the bill that's going to be considered in the United States Senate tomorrow, the Republican panel that has been offered by Senator Mike Crapo and Senator Bill Cassidy, part of that plan would expand the use of those health savings accounts so people can provide, can purchase those plans, either bronze plans or catastrophic insurance plans that are not currently available to them now.

50:27They say they'd be able to have greater access to different plans as part of this overall proposal if it were to become law. But certainly, Jake, that is the criticism coming from Democrats, as the president has said that he does not want this money going to the insurance companies. But Democrats say, well, ultimately, it would be. Yeah. All right. Manu Raju on Capitol Hill, thanks so much. That's also where we find Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, who joins us now. Senator, thanks so much for joining us. Leader Schumer, I should say. Good evening, Jake. It appears that there is a bipartisan way forward, theoretically.

51:02Your Democratic colleague, Senator Peter Welsh of Vermont, laid some ways out, some ideas out today. Take a listen. Some Republicans have proposed putting a cap on the income. That's something we'd be open to. Or a very small copay at the bottom end. That's realistic. So if we were talking about that and the Republicans could deliver votes, I think you'd get an outcome. Is that something you'd be willing to agree to? Well, the key line there is Peter Welch said, if the Republicans can deliver votes, they can't. Nope. They are busy fighting with each other with 100 different proposals. And none of their proposals extend the ACA credits by a day, let alone a month, a year, etc.

51:51And so the only real way for the Republicans to avoid the calamity, the health care calamity that will occur on January 1st, is for 13 of them to vote for the bill we have on the floor. It's clean, it's a three-year extension, and it would prevent these dramatic increases of$500,$100 ,000 a month going to health care. The Republicans are adamant. John Thune got on the floor and said, we will not extend the ACA. So let me just play devil's advocate for a second, sir, if you'll permit me. What if, in addition to the bill that you're putting on, which is just a three-year extension of the Obamacare subsidies, what if you also put legislation that had some of those compromises that Republicans say they would find appealing, a cap, a means test on it, or an additional co-pay, maybe some other reforms to Obamacare, and you extended it for one year?

52:43Wouldn't that be worth trying? The Republicans won't vote for it. The vast majority of Republicans in the Senate and in the House want no extension of ACA, not one year, not one month, not one day. Furthermore, they want to add to anything they do, they said they're going to do this, anti-abortion riders, which would even go further to take away a woman's right to choose. They're all fighting with each other. There are 100 different proposals. None of them gather much Republican support. Occasionally, some of the more moderate Republicans throw out something because they're under such pressure.

53:21But their only answer, their only real answer to this is to support our bill. What do you hear from the White House? Do you think President Trump should be involved in these talks? Well, President Trump, he doesn't get it, as we saw in his speech last night. He is for no ACA extension. He says, let's start over and do a new bill. That's not going to solve the problem. I don't know what new bill he'd do. He doesn't even have a foggiest idea of any specifics. But at the same time, he wouldn't avoid the crisis. And, you know, this is a guy who says that there is no, that increase in cost is a myth, that the huge prices people are paying for everything is not real.

54:04And he doesn't get it. President Trump is in a bubble. He doesn't have to shop for groceries. He doesn't have to pay electric bills. He doesn't have to pay health care. So he says, you know, that this is a farce. This is a joke. It's amazing. I've never seen a president so far removed from the needs of the American people than he is. A short time ago, the U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi released video of the United States seizing an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela. What's your reaction to that? Well, look, I am really worried here because I don't, you know, who knows how far these guys are going to go.

54:40I met yesterday with both Secretary Hegseth and Secretary Rubio, and I said, what's the bottom line? How far are you going to go? Americans are worried they're going to escalate, escalate, escalate, and get us involved in an endless war, which is nobody wants. And they couldn't delineate their plan as to how far to go. They couldn't delineate. You see a different thing done every day. And Americans are worried. We need real answers from the president to the American people. What's the plan here? What's the ultimate plan? And where are the barriers? Do you disagree with President Trump's ultimate goal of regime change in Venezuela?

55:19Look, the bottom line is President Trump throws out so many different things in so many different ways, you don't even know what the heck he's talking about. You know, obviously if Maduro would just flee on his own, everyone would like that. But we don't know what the heck he's up to when he talks about that. So it's very, very, you cannot say I endorse this, I endorse that. When Trump is all over the lot, not very specific and very worrisome at how far he might escalate. There have been some bipartisan calls for Secretary of Defense Hegseth to release that full video of the follow-up strike on the alleged drug vote on September 2nd.

55:54Just a short time ago on CNN, Congressman Jake Ackenschloss suggested that the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, told Republican lawmakers to walk back their public calls for the release of that video. Take a listen. I think Secretary of State Rubio talked the Republicans down in Congress, is my understanding of what happened, which is a shame. I think he spoke to the Gang of Eight. I think he spoke to senior defense and intelligence Republicans in Congress and Democrats. He, by far, has the most credibility in Congress on national security matters. And I think Secretary Rubio put his reputation on the line to tell them to walk back their public commentary.

56:30You were in that Gang of Eight meeting. You're a member of the Gang of Eight. Did Secretary Rubio suggest that people should stop calling for the release of the full video? I didn't hear him say that, but let me say this. I'm not walking anything back. I directly confronted face-to-face Secretary Hegseth. I said every member of Congress should be able to see those videos, the unedited videos. I said the American people are entitled to see those unedited videos. You've already released videos that show you're looking good in certain places here and there, which he didn't look very good at, in my opinion.

57:01So he should be releasing those videos, and it is still bipartisan. Roger Wicker, who's the chairman, Republican chairman, conservative Republican, head of the Armed Services Committee, has joined with Senator Jack Reed, the ranking Democrat on the committee, to demand that these unedited videos be released. That's the right thing to do. The question is this, Jake. What the hell is Hegseth hiding? Why is he so afraid to release these videos? What if he says he's done nothing wrong? He should say America should see him. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York. Thank you so much, sir.

57:36Appreciate your time. Thank you very much, Jake. That was the Democratic pitch. Next, we're going to get a Republican response from a senator who led a hearing today on problems with the American health care system and ways to fix it. Does he see any room for compromise? Plus, the new proposal that may force tourists coming to the United States to turn over their social media history. Stay with us.

58:01We continue with our politics lead and the debate over health care and the calls to extend the tax credits for people buying insurance through Obamacare, the Affordable Care Act. We just heard from the Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer. We're joined now by Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. First of all, Senator, I'm not sure if you heard from Senator Schumer, but I asked about the compromises that might be possible, a one-year extension of the Obamacare premiums with some of the things that Republicans have asked for, including means testing, reforms, a copay. He said Republicans would never sign off on any of that, and that Republicans are working on 100 different proposals, but none of them extend the Obamacare subsidies.

58:43Is that true? Well, first of all, the Obamacare subsidies will continue. What we are talking about are the temporary COVID enhanced subsidies that Democrats voted for, that Democrats scheduled to expire at the end of this year. Republicans had nothing to do with that. This is all what Democrats did. We're not talking about anything that's going to impact people on employer-sponsored health care, Medicare, Medicaid, VA. We're talking about the supposedly 24 million people on the exchanges, the vast majority of those will just revert to the original Obamacare subsidies. If you don't like that, blame Obamacare, blame Democrats.

59:21We're talking about about 1.6 million Americans who got a subsidy above 4 % of poverty line. I would be happy to work with Democrat colleagues to do something with them temporarily in exchange for doing real reforms that might actually restrain the growth in health care. But if your premiums are going up, it's not because the enhanced subsidies are going away. It's because the faulty design of Obamacare driving them. They've caused premiums to skyrocket. But again, we're talking about a very small percentage of American people. I would like to help them. They were lured into retirement. A lot of them are close enough.

59:56They're not quite a Medicare agent, but they mean they're facing premiums in excess of$30 ,000 because of Obamacare. I would love to fix Obamacare, but we just simply have Democrats in denial. All they want to do is throw a couple hundred billion dollars to mask, to paint over the failure of Obamacare. So as you know better than I, the issue of health insurance premiums rising, skyrocketing really, is far beyond just people that use the Obamacare premiums. It affects every American. My understanding about the main reason why that is happening is kind of like a vicious circle, that premiums go up so healthy people quit, drop out, and don't have health insurance.

1:00:39And that means that the people who are left are sicker and older people, and then premiums continue going up because the pool isn't there to dilute the market. And then it just keeps going and going and going. What can be done about that? First of all, the same number of Americans that have health care through the various, you know, Medicare, Medicaid, employer-sponsored plans, VA, remains pretty stable. So what has happened with the implementation of Obamacare is we've seen a dramatic consolidation of the entire healthcare industry. The insurers, the providers, hospital associations. So we have far less competition.

1:01:13We don't have consumerism. We've pretty well driven out the benefits of free market competition, which guarantees three things. Lowest cost, best quality, best possible level of customer service. We don't have that in healthcare. and Obamacare has taken us in the wrong direction. So again, Obamacare is faulty design on the individual market, making those small percentage of Americans bear the full cost of covering people with pre-existing conditions. I held a hearing Maine covered people with pre-existing conditions perfectly before Obamacare destroyed their high-risk pool. So there's a way to fix this.

1:01:48Obamacare is not the way. Obamacare made the problem far worse. There was a time when the United States government broke up AT &T as a monopoly because do you think that that should be done for some of these consolidated health organizations because their consolidation, as you say, has reduced competition and increased prices? Yes, I think we have to do that, Jake. There's not one incentive in our current system driving costs down. Every incentive, because everybody's getting a cut. Let's say if you're a realtor, you'd rather get your 7 % commission on a million-dollar house as opposed to a$100 ,000 house.

1:02:23Same dynamics occurring in health care. So there's no incentive, and you add to that the consolidation of these industries, these basic monopolies. And then also, they realize that consumers aren't participating. We have to pay our insurance, we have to pay our taxes, but we could care less because nobody knows what anything costs. The doctors don't, the nurses don't, the patients don't, just the bean counters. So it's a completely broken system. We need to bring free market competition consumers back, which is really what the Republicans are trying to do. We're trying to fund HSA accounts. We're trying to bring consumerism back so we have consumers worried about what a doctor visit costs, what a procedure costs.

1:03:02Have insurance for the high-cost surgeries, that type of thing. That's what insurance is meant to be, not first-dollar coverage. But we've shifted to this third-party payer system. It's a disaster. We need to return to, again, patients paying more for things. You do that by funding HSA accounts and just getting rid of the faulty design of Obamacare. Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, and thanks so much, sir. Appreciate it. Have a Merry Christmas. What President Trump said just hours ago about this network and its future and why his comments are so unprecedented. Stay with us.

1:03:37In our money lead, in the midst of Netflix and Paramount sparring over the multi-billion dollar purchase of Warner Brothers Discovery, CNN's parent company, President Trump has been breaking with longstanding precedent on the role of a president when it comes to private commercial transactions, and is making his position on the acquisition very clear, saying he's very focused on the fate of this news network, and he will involve himself in the purchase. I'm not involved in that. I will be probably involved, maybe involved in the decision. It depends. You have some good companies bidding on it.

1:04:17I think the people that have run CNN for the last long period of time are a disgrace. This week, Paramount launched a hostile bid for all of Warner Brothers Discovery after WBD agreed to a deal with Netflix to sell just its TV and movie studio along with the HBO Max streaming service to Netflix last week. In that scenario, CNN and other WBD cable channels, we would be spun off into a new company called Discovery Global. President Trump is making it very clear he does not want that to happen. He wants this channel sold under new management, he says, so that CNN's leadership can be fired, so that CNN's editorial content can be changed.

1:05:01He called the news and analysis that we provide here poison. So I think any deal should it should be guaranteed and certain that CNN is part of it or sold separately. But I don't think the people that are running that company right now and running CNN, which is a very dishonest group of people. I don't think that should be allowed to continue. I think CNN should be sold along with everything else. Let's discuss with the founder of the Status Newsletter, which covers the media, Oliver Darcy. we should note that Oliver used to work at CNN before he became a big deal, striking out on his own. Oliver, these comments, extremely unprecedented, perhaps not surprising, coming from President Trump, given his long dislike for any journalism that holds him accountable.

1:05:49But what did you make of it? He made it so clear that the fate of CNN is what's driving his view and his potential involvement of this potential transaction when it comes to who buys Warner Brothers Discovery. Yeah, Jake, I think we should be very clear. What viewers just saw does not represent who we are as Americans. We celebrate the free press in this country. We celebrate the fact that reporters can ask pesky questions of those in power. What people saw right now in the Oval Office was a thin-skinned, aspiring autocrat who wants to seize control of the media. And he wants an obedient press.

1:06:26And I think it's important to point out that that has, you know, Republicans and Democrats have occupied that office for a long time. But we've generally agreed that the press should be free. It's in the First Amendment. And that is not the president that we have today. And I think we should also point out that he's able or he thinks he's able to get away with this kind of conduct because big tech moguls, media moguls have been willing to play ball with him over the last year. They've basically bowed before him. They've bent the knee repeatedly, whether it's Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook, whether it's Sherry Redstone, who settled that 60 Minutes lawsuit, her own company said was meritless.

1:07:06They've played ball with him. And so from his perspective, he probably thinks, why not? I'll just go for more and more because, as you know, his appetite is instatiable. So we should also note that the buyer that he seems to be in favor of here, Paramount, their hostile bid for WBD includes funding from the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia, as well as an investment from President Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner. And just in case people forgot, this is the same Saudi Arabia and the same leader, MBS, who ordered the murder and butchering of a journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, that they didn't like, according to the CIA.

1:07:50Is it appropriate at all for foreign governments, especially ones so hostile to a free press, to even partially own an American news network? You would think it would not be. You would think that the country that orders the butchering of an American journalist only a few years ago should probably not be a part owner of CNN. And those other countries don't have great records when it comes, obviously, to press freedom. David Ellison, the boss over at Paramount, though, apparently has no problem with this. You know, I asked his spokesperson yesterday about this. Is there any exchange? Right. They're not going to have board seats.

1:08:27But do these countries want something? I'm assuming they're not giving$24 billion collectively out of the goodness of their hearts. And I did not hear a response back. And I think it's also notable that David Ellison this week said on CNBC that he has had conversations about CNN with Donald Trump. But Paramount will not say what those conversations are about. They're just trying to ignore the whole thing. You know, for someone who wants to own a news network and he's making a very aggressive bid to to own this company that we're speaking on right now, the Airwaves. He's not really behaving like a good steward of a news organization.

1:09:02He's actually behaving like someone a news organization would ask tough questions to and probe for corrupt behavior. Yeah, I mean, my personal experience, I don't think I've ever covered a president that particularly liked me or my coverage. I've just never seen anything like this. Oliver Darcy, thanks so much as always. Thank you, Jake. The White House responding today about a report into President Trump's mortgage documents from the past. One of the reporters from that story joins me live next.

1:09:35Our money lead today, the Justice Department has launched four mortgage fraud probes against President Trump's perceived political enemies. Congressman Eric Swall, a Democrat of California. Senator Adam Schiff, a Democrat of California. New York Attorney General Letitia James and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. They're all in varying stages of fending off charges, those four, amid allegations that they've claimed multiple primary residences on their mortgages. You can only claim one primary residence. But now a ProPublica investigation into President Trump's own mortgage documents history finds that he once did the same.

1:10:12Donald Trump, as a private citizen, signed a mortgage for a Palm Beach home in 1993. pledging that it would be his principal residence, ProPublica reports. Weeks later, he got another mortgage on a separate house in Palm Beach, quote, attesting that it too would be his principal residence. In reality, Trump, then a New Yorker, does not appear to have ever lived in either home, unquote. Justin Elliott's one of the reporters that is bringing us this ProPublica story. He joins me now. So Justin, in the report, you cite a quote from the time Trump purchased these homes from his realtor, who told the Miami Herald, quote, his plans for the homes are to dress them up to the nines and lease them out annually, unquote.

1:10:52What documents did you find that show that that he used these homes as rental properties and not as a primary residence? Yeah, well, you know, we have his mortgage documents from the Palm Beach clerk, but we also found rental listings from the local newspapers in the 90s renting these properties. I actually called up one of the real estate agents on their listings from back then. She's still active in the area. And she told me, confirmed these were rented from day one. Trump never lived in them. To be clear, I think this is really a story not about Donald Trump committing mortgage fraud. It's a story about Donald Trump committing what Donald Trump describes as mortgage fraud, because the experts told us that actually determining criminal fraud is a lot more complicated than just looking at these documents.

1:11:36But Trump absolutely did the same thing that he has, that Lisa Cook did, for example. And that is what Trump has described as evidence of criminal mortgage fraud. So the White House denies that these mortgages qualify as fraud. A spokesman told ProPublica, quote, President Trump's two mortgages you are referencing are from the same lender. There was no defraudation. It is illogical to believe that the same lender would agree to defraud itself, unquote. And the Trump organization told CNN something similar this week, adding that each mortgage expressly states that the lender may waive any occupancy requirement, unquote.

1:12:10Are there any major differences between this example, these properties in the 90s that belonged to Donald Trump, and the allegations that are being brought against Schiff, James, Swalwell, and Cook that could make their cases criminal while exempting President Trump from the same charges? Let's put it that way. Yeah, it's a good question. I mean, And so each of these cases has their own unique fact pattern. I mean, with Tish James, I think there's a vacation home element to it. But the Trump example that we dug up is really most parallel to what Lisa Cook, the Fed governor, did. Trump himself, when he fired Lisa Cook, you know, that's now being contested, I believe, up to the Supreme Court.

1:12:55But he wrote a letter that he posted on Truth Social that we quoted in the story in which he says, look, you, Lisa Cook, signed one of these principal residence mortgages and then a few weeks later signed a second one. And it's impossible that you could have lived in both of these homes and therefore you're fired. That is precisely what Donald Trump did in Palm Beach in the mid 1990s with these two properties that are next to Mar-a-Lago. And as you noted, the White House is not contesting that he signed both of these mortgage documents that we posted. They're just pointing out that and they're correctly that this was the same lender.

1:13:29What what experts told us is that, indeed, often there is other paperwork that the lender might have that would cast a situation in different light that's not public. But the Trump administration has not given the benefit of that doubt to the people that they've thrown the book at, fired, indicted. And so, again, our point here is not necessarily that Trump definitely committed fraud. I think it's likely that he didn't, but he absolutely committed fraud by his own definition of it. And using that definition, your team found in September that three of Trump's cabinet officials have done similar things with their mortgages.

1:14:02Labor Secretary Lori Chavez de Reimer, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, they all deny wrongdoing as well. How common a practice is it for people to claim multiple primary residences to get a better mortgage deal? You know, we've been told it's relatively common. And sometimes, frankly, there's innocent explanations for it. Like if you buy one house, get a mortgage, and then maybe a few years later, you get a job in a different city, get a second mortgage. And if you keep the original one, now suddenly there's two pieces of paper out there that say you have a principal residence in two different properties.

1:14:38So lawyers told us, you know, clearly that is not fraud. And this is quite rarely prosecuted. the examples that we've been able to find of actual successful mortgage prosecutions involve like really quite elaborate fraud schemes where there's clear evidence that the borrower is trying to go out of their way to deceive the lender to get a better rate. We haven't seen that in the case of President Trump, his cabinet members, or as far as I've seen any of the Democrats that they've gone after for mortgage fraud. It's possible that there is real fraud going on here in any of these cases. But what Trump and his federal housing chief, Bill Pulte, have been doing is just saying that if you have two of these mortgages out there in the world that say principal residence on them, then you are committing mortgage fraud.

1:15:27And that's exactly what Trump did. Interesting. Justin Elliott of ProPublica, thanks so much for talking to us. Appreciate it. Last night, a Democrat in Georgia flipped a seat in a district that President Trump won by double digits last year. Eric Gisler is going to join me live next to explain how he did it and what he thinks Democrats could learn from his victory, if anything.

1:15:49Our politics lead. Two more instances of Democrats flipping elected offices long held by Republicans. Yesterday in Miami, Florida, Eileen Higgins won the runoff for mayor, defeating a candidate who had been endorsed by Donald Trump. Even though the race for Miami mayor is officially nonpartisan, Higgins, A former county commissioner is a Democrat, and her victory ends a nearly 30-year Republican hold on the Miami mayor's office. In a Georgia special election yesterday, my next guest narrowly won a seat in the state legislature, a seat that Republicans have held since 2019 in a district that President Trump won by double digits last year.

1:16:27Democrat Eric Gisler joins us now. Congratulations, Eric. So you ran for the same seat last year. You got 39 percent of the vote then. Why did you win this time? Well, I think we live in a different world now than last year. Last year, we were all hopeful that maybe we wouldn't have a convicted fellow in the White House. But we do, and we see what he's doing. And I think in this district, a lot of people who kind of held their nose and voted for him last year are realizing that they're not getting what they thought they were voting for. And they're a little more open to a different message now.

1:17:02What issues did you highlight during your campaign? What was your message? Yeah, so number one was affordability. Everybody around here has seen prices increase when it comes to housing, energy, food, health care, everything. Right. And it's something that the party in power in Atlanta doesn't really seem to be that concerned with. number two is i framed it as health care access uh and i frame it that way because number one there's insurance coverage there are about 1.2 million georgians right now that do not have any kind of health care uh health insurance coverage um and with the aca subsidies expiring that's going to shoot up to about two million come january because about 800 000 people are going to be priced right out of the market um so that's one issue with health care the other is here in georgia but we never expanded Medicaid.

1:17:54So in the last 15 years, we've had a dozen rural hospitals close their doors. And with the big billionaire bills they passed over the summer, we're looking at probably another four closing their doors pretty soon. So there are a lot of places here in the state of Georgia, especially more rural areas where you might have the best health coverage possible, but you can't access a doctor. So your win continues a trend of democratic victories in elections this year and Democratic overperformances, for sure, even in seats that they lost, they still did better than expected. What can other Democrats learn from your experience, do you think?

1:18:32Because obviously affordability was not an issue that helped Democrats in 2024. A lot of people really rejected the Biden-Harris team. And President Trump was able to say that he was going to bring prices down. Yeah, he was able to say that. And I think a lot of people voted for him despite his other flaws because of that. But what they've received instead is higher prices because of chaotic tariff policy. We've had over a million layoffs from what I've seen recently and then just flat out attacks on constitutional rights. Right. So a lot of people who, again, I think held their nose and voted for him last year are not getting what they thought they were voting for.

1:19:16And so they're open to another message. For me, that really means, I prefer not to frame things in left, right, red, blue, whatever. Increasingly, I think people are seeing with their eyes and ears what's really happening. And the messages that are going to resonate are the ones that are based on objective fact, sound reason, and quite frankly, math. Eric Gisler, thank you so much and congratulations. My panel joins me now. So another Democratic overperformance. And you and I have been around for a long time. You not so much. But you and I have been around for a long time. It does feel like there's something in the air building against Republicans, don't you think?

1:20:04Of course. Democrats are angry, energized, and enthused. We're seeing Democrats, we saw in November this year, they turned out at midterm levels in an off-year election. they're just turning out at a much greater rate because they're so angry. And, you know, we used to say all politics is local. Well, that's not true anymore. Now all local politics is national. And you can just hear that what's happening in Georgia and in Miami. I mean, not that the Miami Democrat won. She won by 20 points. And we saw that in a lot of other competitive areas of the country where Democrats weren't just winning.

1:20:36They were winning by big double-digit margins in Bucks County, Pennsylvania. We saw that in Lehigh and Northampton counties in competitive races and competitive areas. Democrats are winning by 20 points. Yeah, just to give an example of, because you and I are such Philly nerds, Bucks County, for people who don't know, that's a county that Trump won last year. And the Trump-supporting sheriff in Bucks County not only lost, he was soundly defeated. Soundly. And the incumbent Republican DA and four open judicial races all went to the Democrats by the margins. But also where this race just took place in Georgia, it was an area that Trump won by 12 points last year.

1:21:20That's a massive swing in just a month or a year, right? From Trump winning in the district by 12. Huge. And should be an area of concern for Republicans. But also in Miami, like when Mondani won in New York, people were like, of course. It's New York. It's New York. Right. But Miami is not New York. And in fact, Miami is in Florida where some would call Trump country, right? And the mayor broke a 30-year streak. That is something, when something like that happens, something is in the water. So the Georgia Republican insurance commissioner, he summed up the race in the election saying, quote, our donors aren't motivated and our voters aren't either.

1:22:01So I'm sure that there are Democrats out there confident that they are going to figure out a way to, that your party is going to figure out a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. But how can you capitalize? How can your party capitalize on what is going out there? And what are you worried about also? Well, worry, I think it's a little too early to start worrying. We cannot get comfortable. We cannot make assumptions like Republicans made in the last midterms that there was going to be this red wave and then it didn't manifest the way they thought. We should not assume that voters are going to just show up because the Republicans are in power is the first thing.

1:22:35We have to earn their votes. Affordability is really important. I will say when we look at 2024, it wasn't just that the voters didn't buy the Biden-Harris and then the Harris-Waltz agenda for the economy. It was that the campaign wasn't really acknowledging voters suffering. And when you look at Donald Trump right now, he's not acknowledging that voters feel like prices are too high and wages are too low. And if Democrats can seize on that, they'll have a good 2026. The Trump administration just announced plans to revise its requirements for foreigners to come into the United States. Even if you're just a tourist, a key part of it is everyone's going to have to provide their social media histories from the last five years to just enter the United States.

1:23:16Charlie, what's your take on this? Is this going to, I mean, I can understand in some ways how it could be a good thing, but just for a tourism visa? Who's going to look at all these social media posts for five years? I mean, it doesn't, they're trying to obviously deny admission into this country. I suspect most people are just going to scrub their social media accounts for the last five years so they don't have to deal with this. But I don't know how we would enforce this prior to a visit. So I really can't explain the thinking behind it. It doesn't seem like anybody's going to be able to implement this policy.

1:23:50Speaking of social media, I mean, Australia has taken a major step by banning social media for people under 16 years old. It's one of the most sweeping efforts ever we've ever seen like that. And we saw Rahm Emanuel, who is a possible 2028 presidential candidate, Democrat, the first one out of the gate, and I don't even think of anybody else has followed him, saying the United States should look for similar legislation. What do you think? Is that politically a good message? Well, I think parents are worried about their kids. Children are being infiltrated by social media. And so if you don't ban it, there definitely needs to be some regulations when you look at drug use, when you look at suicide, self-esteem issues, and just the amount of what's happening to our brain when we're just swiping, swiping, swiping and not having actual conversations with human beings.

1:24:38So politically, I think if you try and ban social media, the reality is people that are 16 and under can't vote, but their parents can, and so they might like it, actually. Last word. I think Rob's on to something, and the Australians have put forward a proposal that we ought to take very seriously. I think it would not do a lot of our children under the age of 16 any harm if they spent less time on these devices and other computers. As we do. Maybe we should have some bans for adults, too. For adults, too. Exactly. Thanks to both of you. Appreciate it. The governor of Washington state has just signed an emergency declaration due to the flooding in the state.

1:25:11Water levels could still rise over the next few days. That story's next.

1:25:20Our last lead started in our national lead where new video shows the extent of the flooding currently happening in Washington state right now. Governor Bob Ferguson has activated the Washington National Guard. He says 300 service members will be ready to respond to requests for help by tomorrow. The governor is also asking for expedited help from the federal government. Water levels are expected to keep rising over the next few days. And our worldly new information released about the Louvre heist revealed that the thieves escaped with only 30 seconds to spare. The parliamentary probe found that only one of two cameras covering the break-in point was working, and the security staff didn't even have enough screens to monitor the footage.

1:25:59Investigators also told senators that when the alarm finally sounded, police were initially dispatched to the wrong location. And our national lead, President Obama surprised a group of schoolchildren in Chicago yesterday when he crashed their holiday party, the former president's in Chicago this week, reviewing progress on his presidential library, but took a break to hand out gifts and read to the students, wearing, of course, a red Santa cap. You can follow me on Facebook, Instagram threads, Blue Sky X, and on the TikTok at Jake Tapper. You can follow the show on X and Instagram at The Lead CNN.

1:26:29If you ever miss an episode of The Lead, you can watch the show on the CNN app. Aaron Burnett out front starts right now. Take it away, Aaron. Thank you.