U.S. Officials Rush To Finalize Details Of Alaska Talks

12 Aug 2025 · 1 h 24 min · 33 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

U.S. and Russian leaders’ Alaska summit (Trump–Putin) and whether it will end the Ukraine war; D.C. police federalization and National Guard deployment; Texas redistricting standoff; legal fight over unsealing Maxwell grand jury materials; Gaza journalist killings; drone security rules; plus a Pennsylvania steel-plant explosion update.

Guests (backgrounds)

Jill Dougherty, former CNN Moscow bureau chief; former U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul (quoted/mentioned); Fred Pleitkin, CNN reporter in Moscow; Jim Schultz, former Trump White House attorney; Elliot Williams, former federal prosecutor; Brooke Pinto, D.C. City Council member (Ward 2) and chair of public safety committee; Greg Abbott, Texas governor; plus CNN reporters Jake Tapper, Kristen Holmes, Brian Todd, Jeff Zeleny, Nader Bashir, Pete Mantine, Jeff Zeleny (hosts/reporters).

Key claims

  • Trump says he won’t “make” the deal, but will judge quickly whether one is possible; Zelensky won’t be invited (yet) and land swaps are discussed amid fears of concessions.
  • Russia/Alaska venue is framed as logical due to proximity and heritage; Zelensky says concessions won’t stop killers.
  • D.C. crime is portrayed as “out of control,” but local officials cite falling violent crime and argue the move is disruptive.
  • Abbott says Texas Democrats are violating constitutional duties by denying quorum; Democrats demand flood relief first.
  • Judge Paul Engelmeyer rejects unsealing Maxwell grand jury materials, calling them not significant public interest.

Notable examples

Alaska’s 55-mile distance from Russia; Zelensky’s “concessions do not persuade a killer” post; NHL/Ovechkin’s OV Hockey Cup as a U.S.-Russia thaw symbol; D.C. council pushback by Matt Fruman and Charles Allen; Texas Democrats’ quorum denial; Gaza: Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif killed near Al-Shifa hospital; drone “no-fly zone” demonstrations; Pennsylvania steel plant explosion with at least one dead and one missing.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Details of the Upcoming Summit

1:12 to 2:21

Discussion on the upcoming summit between Trump and Putin, including its significance.

“officials rush to finalize the details of this crucial face-to-face to end that war.”

Concerns Over Potential Concessions

2:21 to 4:21

Exploration of the implications of the summit for Ukraine and potential concessions to Russia.

“officials are scrambling to finalize details for President Trump's crucial summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin set for the end of this week.”

Analysis of Trump's Mindset

4:21 to 6:41

Analysis of Trump's mindset and strategies regarding the summit with Putin.

“Kristen, Trump also seemed to acknowledge some frustration with Vladimir Putin.”

Impact of Russian Nationalism

6:41 to 8:16

Discussion on the implications of Russian nationalism and the historical context involving Alaska.

“Let's get to more of Trump's reasoning on why Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky was not invited.”

Zelensky's Position and Land Disputes

8:16 to 12:07

Debate on Zelensky's position and the complexities surrounding land disputes in the conflict.

“But I think, you know, everything here is, let's say, with this issue is played out in various levels.”

Hockey as a Bridge Between Nations

12:07 to 14:00

Exploration of how hockey players hope to improve U.S.-Russia relations amid tensions.

“This is people who are going to be trapped, if that happens, behind the lines.”

US-Russia Summit Dynamics

14:00 to 15:41

Discussion on the differing goals between the US and Russia at the upcoming summit.

“reluctant to agree to an immediate ceasefire President Trump wants.”

Texas Democrats Standoff

15:43 to 16:01

Overview of Texas Democrats' standoff over redistricting efforts.

“The Texas State House forced to adjourn again today as State House Democrats remain out of the state in their efforts to block Republicans redistricting efforts.”

Governor Abbott on Redistricting

16:05 to 17:25

Governor Abbott discusses the implications of redistricting in Texas.

“But today, the leader of the state House Democratic Caucus said his party will keep denying a quorum to be called unless Governor Abbott prioritizes flood relief legislation over redistricting.”

Democrats and Quorum Denial

17:26 to 21:57

Governor Abbott addresses the Democrats' strategy to deny a quorum in Texas.

“One is the first four items on the agenda right now deal with flood relief.”
Show all 33 chapters

Lawsuit Against Democrats

21:58 to 24:46

Discussion on the lawsuit filed by Governor Abbott against Democratic leaders.

“What gives you the right to override the will of his voters who elected him?”

Future of Redistricting in Texas

24:46 to 27:02

Analysis of the potential consequences of redistricting efforts in Texas.

“And then in March, of course, would be the primaries in Texas.”

Legal Experts Discuss Judge's Ruling on Grand Jury Materials

28:28 to 31:17

Legal experts evaluate the implications of a judge's rejection of unsealing grand jury materials.

“a federal judge earlier today rejected the Trump Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury materials from the sex trafficking case against Ghislaine Maxwell.”

Victims' Perspectives on Grand Jury Secrecy

31:21 to 32:56

Discussion on the impact of grand jury secrecy on victims and potential disclosure of information.

“What options do the victims have at this point if they would like to see more information released publicly?”

Coverage of Journalist Deaths in Gaza

33:02 to 37:15

Details on the deaths of journalists in Gaza and the surrounding controversy.

“from investigators after an explosion rocked the steel plant in pennsylvania search and rescue crews are digging through the rubble, looking for at least one missing person.”

New Drone Technology for Security

37:16 to 40:53

Exploration of drone security measures being developed for upcoming major events.

“There's a new push for more security preparations as the U.S.”

Trump Takes Control of D.C. Police

43:49 to 45:49

Discussion on Trump placing D.C. police under federal control and local leaders' reactions.

“President Trump has taken control of the Washington, D.C.”

Local Leaders' Response to Federal Control

45:50 to 48:09

D.C. officials express their concerns about Trump's actions regarding police control.

“is, quote, shaped by his COVID-era experience during his first term.”

Fact-checking Trump's Crime Narrative

48:10 to 48:58

Analyzing the validity of Trump's claims about crime in D.C. versus official statistics.

“We saw it earlier this year in Los Angeles, sending the National Guard there.”

D.C. Council's Legislative Responses

48:59 to 52:38

Brooke Pinto discusses recent legislation aimed at addressing crime and safety concerns in D.C.

“as dangerous as President Trump portrays it?”

Homelessness and Crime in D.C.

52:39 to 54:48

Discussion on homelessness issues in D.C. and the council's strategies to address them.

“making sure that we have laws that provide for the safety and well-being of district residents.”

Upcoming Trump-Putin Summit

54:49 to 55:03

Preview of the Trump-Putin summit and key questions surrounding it.

“Coming up, so many unanswered questions about the upcoming Trump-Putin summit on Friday in Alaska.”

Zelensky's Exclusion from Summit Talks

55:04 to 56:00

Discussion on the implications of Zelensky being left out of the Trump-Putin summit.

“Well, we're going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin, and at the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made.”

Zelensky's Position Before Alaska Talks

56:00 to 58:55

Learn about Ukraine's stance on negotiations and land issues ahead of talks.

“Yeah, I mean, President Trump held out the possibility he would call Zelensky after his meeting with Putin, maybe even arrange later for the three men to meet in some capacity.”

Expert Analysis on Zelensky's Dilemma

58:55 to 1:01:04

Explore expert opinions on Zelensky's strategic concerns amidst U.S. negotiations.

“Let's get some analysis from our experts now.”

Implications of U.S. Involvement in Ukraine

1:01:04 to 1:04:46

Discuss the U.S. role in Ukraine's security and the negotiations with Russia.

“I'm not confident that Putin is even going to concede anything at all.”

Texas Redistricting Controversy

1:05:34 to 1:10:00

Delve into the political tensions in Texas over redistricting and its implications.

“Today, Texas State House Democrats intentionally skipped yet another day of this special legislative session in Austin, Texas, in an effort to stop Republicans from redrawing congressional maps.”

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett on Voter Suppression

1:10:00 to 1:11:43

Learn about systemic voter suppression tactics affecting people of color.

“We may lose the battle, but we will absolutely win this war.”

Explosion at Pennsylvania Steel Plant

1:11:43 to 1:11:54

Get an update on a tragic explosion and ongoing rescue efforts.

“Emergency workers are digging through the rubble looking for at least one person who remains missing after a horrific explosion at a Pennsylvania steel plant earlier today.”

Details on the Explosion Incident

1:11:54 to 1:13:18

Hear about the aftermath and investigations surrounding the steel plant explosion.

“We're going to go live to the scene for an update next.”

Impact of Tariffs on Small Businesses

1:13:18 to 1:15:56

Discover how tariffs are affecting a startup born from the COVID pandemic.

“But we're also learning a little bit more about the individual who died here today.”

Sour House's Sourdough Tools

1:15:56 to 1:18:11

Learn about the unique tools designed for sourdough bakers and their challenges.

“Eric, where do you manufacture your products and how are tariffs impacting your sales?”

Efforts to Save Florida's Manatees

1:18:11 to 1:19:20

Understand the ongoing legal battles and environmental challenges facing manatees.

“These are custom-designed tools for the home baker.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00When you're 7-Eleven's hottest fire chicken sandwich, people think you're intense. Well, yeah, I'm hot! Oh, yeah, intense. Want to see if you can handle the heat? Then try me. With pickles or spicy mayo and jalapenos. Oh, and it's all just$4.99. That's a deal almost as hot as I am. Almost? Sweet? No. Spicy? See for yourself. $4.99 and only at 7-Eleven. Followed through 825-46. Participating stores only while supplies last visit. Store for full terms. This podcast is supported by Anthropic, the public benefit corporation behind Claude. Everyone's got a hard question about AI. Your job, your kids, where it's going.

0:43Anthropic was built to surface those questions and share what it finds along the way, because there's hope in hard questions. Ask yours at claude.ai slash Spotify and keep thinking. That's claude.ai slash Spotify.

1:03President Trump says it's not his job to make a deal during his summit with Vladimir Putin on Friday. The lead starts right now. The president previewing his Friday summit with Putin in Alaska as U.S. officials rush to finalize the details of this crucial face-to-face to end that war. But Trump is also acknowledging that the meeting might not actually end with any kind of agreement. So is there a risk that this summit will enhance Putin's stature and not bring any peace? Plus, local officials in Washington, D.C., pushing back this afternoon after President Trump deployed National Guard troops in the nation's capital and announced he's putting the D.C.

1:45Police Department under federal control. So what happens next? Do locals have any recourse at all? We'll talk to a member of D.C.'s city council ahead. And Texas Democrats once again block the Republican redistricting effort by refusing to show up at the state capitol as the standoff enters its second week. But with just over one week left in this special session, what happens if Democrats just weigh it out? Well, Texas's Republican Governor Greg Abbott is going to join us live in just minutes.

2:19Welcome to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper. We're going to start with a huge week in our world lead as U.S. officials are scrambling to finalize details for President Trump's crucial summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin set for the end of this week. The summit is going to be in Alaska on Friday. It's a meeting that President Trump hopes will move the needle on Putin's ruthless war against Ukraine. But the details as of now are sparse. As of now, no venue's been announced. The details of the discussion are not clear. There's no formal White House invite for the leader of the country being invaded.

2:48Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky. Here's the president earlier today. I'm going to meet with President Putin and we're going to see what he has in mind. And if it's a fair deal, I'll reveal it to the European Union leaders and to the NATO leaders and also to President Zelensky. I think out of respect, I'll call him first and then I'll call them after. And I may say, lots of luck, keep fighting. or I may say we can make a deal. Of some significance is the relationship of Alaska to Russia. Alaska, which the United States purchased from Russia in 1867, mainland Alaska and Russia are only 55 miles apart and some Russian nationalists believe that Alaska should still be part of Russia.

3:40A Kremlin official says the summit's location is, quote, quote, quite logical, while Russia's investment envoy, Karel Dmitriev, celebrated the venue, highlighting Alaska's Russian heritage. All of this has Zelensky and European leaders concerned that perhaps this summit will lead to significant concessions made to Putin. Trump repeated his belief today that there would be some land swapping between Russia and Ukraine, adding it will include, quote, some bad stuff for both countries. President Zelensky posted today, They quote, concessions do not persuade a killer, but truly strong protection of life stops the killers.

4:18Let's get right to CNN's Kristen Holmes at the White House for us. Kristen, Trump also seemed to acknowledge some frustration with Vladimir Putin. Yeah, Jake, that's right. I mean, it was interesting to see him kind of walk through his thinking around this meeting. And he's clearly coming into it in a different headspace than he was the last time the two men sat down. He now acknowledges, at least to some extent, that Putin has strung him along. He says, no, that Putin is the reason that there has been no end to this crisis. And he acknowledged that he's not sure what's going to come out of this sit-down.

4:50Take a listen. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States, This is really a feel-out meeting, a little bit. And President Putin invited me to get involved. He wants to get involved. I think, I believe he wants to get it over with. Now, I've said that a few times. And I've been disappointed, because I'd have, like, a great call with him, and then missiles would be lobbed into Kiev or some other place. Yeah, and this is something you said over and over again in recent weeks, that President Putin is all talk, that he'll promise him something and then do something completely different.

5:22The other part of this is the sound that you played, which I thought was pretty critical in all of this, which is that he's clearly trying to get some kind of European buy-in. I mean, we had seen for the first part of his administration, before that NATO summit and even during the campaign that he had really been blasting European countries. Now he's saying he's going to call them right afterwards to discuss whether or not a deal is possible. And as you noted, a saying that he himself understands that it's not his deal to make, that had been a concern of some Ukrainians and some officials across the globe that would just have two superpowers deciding how they were going to carve up Ukraine.

5:58He seems to acknowledge here that that is not something that he's going to do out of this meeting. And, Kristen, the vice president, J.D. Vance, made some relevant comments of his own this weekend. He did, and this is something we heard from President Trump and from Vance on the campaign, and as well as in the last several months. Vance has really painted himself as an isolationist, although he would take harm with that term. He does not like that term. And what he said here was that he believes that America is done with giving money to Ukraine, to funding the Ukraine war business, and that while they do want peace, that Americans were sick of sending their money, their tax dollars, to this particular conflict.

6:38Interesting. Kristen Holmes at the White House, thanks so much. Joining us now, the former CNN Moscow Bureau Chief, Jill Dougherty. Jill, so good to see you. Thanks for being here. Let's get to more of Trump's reasoning on why Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky was not invited. Take a listen. He wasn't a part of it. I would say he could go, but he's gone to a lot of meetings. You know, he's been there for three and a half years. Nothing happened. And what is the definition? I mean, you want somebody that's been doing this for three and a half years? I mean, that must be music to Putin's ears.

7:08Oh, no question. I mean, he has been. Zelensky's been defending his country for three and a half years. But this is really, you know, I was watching the Russian media today. They are crowing about this. You know, note, President Trump was saying Putin wants a deal, wants to get this over with. He's back to that. He was critical of Zelensky. They're talking about Alaska and kind of trolling. You know, it used to be ours. Maybe we'll get it back. You know, so far it looks pretty good for Putin. Former U.S. ambassador to Russia during the Obama years, Michael McFaul posted on Twitter, her ex-quote, Trump has chosen to host Putin in a part of the former Russian empire.

7:53I wonder if he knows that Russian nationalists claim that losing Alaska, like Ukraine, was a raw deal for Moscow that needs to be corrected. You called it trolling, but I also wonder what the pro-nationalists, pro-Russian nationalists are doing. But I also wonder, do you think that this is actually something that Putin would seriously bring up, whether or not Alaska? I don't think so. I mean, it's obvious they're never going to get it back. But I think, you know, everything here is, let's say, with this issue is played out in various levels. So you have Putin playing a role, Medvedev, remember him, Mr.

8:30Troller, you know, president. Then you have the media, then you have the war correspondents, and everybody kind of chimes in. So various messages can get out. And I think that nationalists, they are serious. They would like to get it back. They think it's theirs. In fact, there's even a rumor, which is not true, that it was given, it was kind of in effect given for 100 years. 100 years have expired and we can get it back. How pervasive is this belief in Russia that Alaska is rightfully Russian? Well, even if you listen to Kirill Dimitrov, who's kind of the financial guy, the representative. I mean, he's talking about Russian churches, Russian culture.

9:14And that really is true. So to this day, from 1867 to today, there is some Russian culture. But this, you know, the irony here is that it was sold, literally sold and legally sold. And what we're talking about in Ukraine is Russia invading Ukraine and taking territory. And on that topic, European leaders believe that Putin's plan would give Moscow full control of Ukraine's entire eastern Donbass region, currently under partial Russian control. Trump said that the land swamping might be bad for both countries. Zelensky is adamant he won't concede any land. What do you think is going to happen? Well, it's very complicated in that sense because we do not know.

10:04There's no clarity at all on exactly which lands would be, if the Ukrainians accept this, would be held by Russia and not. And this trading, I don't see any possibility for trading. So right now, you have Putin going at this straight ahead with the maximalist demands that he's been making since he invaded. And then you have, obviously, Zelensky saying, according to the Constitution, we cannot give up our land. So they're going to have to find some type of agreement. And interestingly, I think, it surprised me a little bit. Trump today said, I'm not going to make any decisions here. I'm just kind of, in a sense, like an intermediary.

10:49I will listen to Putin, and I'll know in two minutes if it's a good deal, and then I'll give it to Zelensky. So he is defining what a good deal is. Even if he says, I don't have any role, he will define, and then he will give it to Zelensky. Just to set the table for Friday, is it not true that in all likelihood, this war was going to end with Ukraine having to give up some land to Russia? Whether Kamala Harris was the president or Donald Trump, if there was going to be some sort of peace deal, wasn't that inevitable? You know, that is, in a sense, there are some people who would say, yes, that is true.

11:31But, you know, land isn't just land. Land is people. Right. And there are Ukrainians living in those lands that potentially could be given to Russia. And if you know your history, you know the horror of being in places that have been occupied by the Russians. Right. And also the freedoms that they're going to have to give up. Exactly. Ukraine has more Western democratic traditions than Russia, obviously. So it's easy to sit here and say, well, you know, it's just territory and it's land and it's like a monopoly game. But when you're talking with Ukrainians, this is really their lives. This is people who are going to be trapped, if that happens, behind the lines.

12:13Yeah. Jill Dearty, thank you so much. Really, really interesting. as U.S. and Russian leaders face this momentous test. Some of the most famous Russians who work in North America, namely hockey players, NHL players, think that they can help thaw the U.S. and Russia's historically icy relationships. CNN's Fred Pleikin reports now from Moscow, where hockey's biggest stars are looking ahead to the Trump-Putin summit on Friday.

12:42It's game on at the OV Hockey Cup outside Moscow, headlined by Washington Capitals superstar Alexander Ovechkin and many other Russian NHL players. The match aims to boost youth hockey, but the great aide tells me he hopes hockey can also help thaw U.S.-Russia relations. Yeah, both countries love hockey, So I hope it's going to connect well and we'll see. Last season, Ovechkin became the NHL's all-time leading goal scorer, drawing praise from both U.S. President Donald Trump and Russia's leader Vladimir Putin. The Russians even floating a possible friendly match with American and Russian players to help jumpstart relations.

13:29Do you think hockey can help bring America and Russia closer together? People love hockey here and people love hockey in the U.S. I hope it's a big meeting next week between Trump and Putin and I hope they have a good meeting and everything is done. But there's a long way to go. With Trump and Putin set to meet in Alaska on Friday, the fighting in Ukraine remains as brutal as ever.

13:57Russia saying its forces are making gains, reluctant to agree to an immediate ceasefire President Trump wants. It's also now clear that Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky will not have a seat at the table, President Trump saying he'll judge whether a peace agreement is possible. At the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made. How will you know that? Because that's what I do. I make deals.

14:27But with Trump's threat of punishing sanctions looming, many Russians hope the two leaders reach an agreement and diplomacy will prevail. Like it did during and after the Cold War, when the first Russian players around defenseman Vyacheslav Fetisov won the NHL Stanley Cup and brought it to Moscow's Red Square. I was first who came to National Hockey League. It was 1989. It still was Cold War. Still, there was hate between people. But as soon as we start playing, we start to understand each other. We start to become friends. Now, the stakes are high once again, as President Trump gets ready to face off with Russia's leader in the Arctic North.

15:13You know, Jake, that's one of the interesting things about the vibe here in Russia, whereas President Trump obviously is saying that for him, The singular focus of the summit is going to be to end the fighting in Ukraine. For the Russians, it's about more than that. It's about a reset of U.S.-Russian relations, a possible one, obviously meaning possible sanctions relief, cooperation in sports, but then, of course, first and foremost, also cooperation in business, possibly even in the Arctic, as far as rare earths are concerned. Jake. All right, Fred Pleitkin in Moscow, thanks so much. The Texas State House forced to adjourn again today as State House Democrats remain out of the state in their efforts to block Republicans redistricting efforts.

15:54Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott is going to join me live next to discuss what he's going to do next. Stay with us.

16:04in our politics lead texas state house democrats once again stayed out of their own state today delaying the unusual mid-decade republican redistricting effort in that state we're now in week two of this standoff over the new congressional maps for u.s house seats that could give republicans at least five additional seats in next year's midterm elections thus staving off any potential midterm losses for trump and the gop texas republican governor Greg Abbott today said that law enforcement officers are scouring the state of Texas to try and arrest any state House Democrats who are avoiding their business in Austin.

16:41But today, the leader of the state House Democratic Caucus said his party will keep denying a quorum to be called unless Governor Abbott prioritizes flood relief legislation over redistricting. If Governor Abbott says we will take care of the people of the state of Texas first, If he makes that commitment today, we'll be back. Texas Governor Greg Abbott joins us now. So, Governor, four items related to flood relief are on the agenda. When you call the next special session, would you consider removing redistricting from the agenda in order to pass this very, very starkly needed relief for Texans?

17:24So a couple of things. One is the first four items on the agenda right now deal with flood relief. Second is during the regular session, there are about 200 pieces of legislation that get passed every single month. I'm asking for only 18 items to be passed during this 30-day special session. They know full well that they have every capability of addressing all these pieces of legislation. And what these Democrats have done, they have turned their back on the people of the state of Texas. For one, it is gutless for Democrats to cut and run. That's anti-Texan. Ever since the time of the Alamo, Texans have stood and fought their ground.

18:06Here, Democrats are fleeing like a bunch of chickens. Second, they can address both the redistricting map as well as all these other issues that are so important to their fellow Texans. Know this, and that is average Texans who are watching this show, they have to show up to work. If they don't show up to work, they could get fired. These Democrats think they are above that. These Democrats think, well, they can take the day off. They can take the month off. They can jet set across the country, ignoring their duty. By the Constitution, they are required to meet and consider and act on every bill that becomes before them.

18:44They're failing to fulfill their constitutional duty. Yeah, they are, just to explain for our viewers who are not Texans, as the minority party with a very small minority, they argue that their only way to stop this redistricting effort is to deny Republicans in the statehouse a quorum. So that's why they do that's why they're doing what they're doing, just to provide their explanation. The Texas Tribune reports that in June you told Texas Republican delegation in Congress that you were reluctant to add redistricting to the legislative agenda in Austin. The Tribune says that President Trump then called you to discuss redistricting and you agreed to put it on the special session agenda.

19:29Would you have gone forward with redistricting if President Trump had not personally gotten involved and asked you to do this? To be clear, Jake, this is something that I've been interested in for a long time. First of all, I've been involved in redistricting litigation for more than 20 years now. Second, one thing that spurred all of this is a federal court decision that came out last year. By the way, a case that was filed by Democrats, the federal court decision that came out last year said that Texas is no longer required to have coalition districts. And as a result, we had drawn maps of coalition districts in it.

20:06Now we wanted to remove those coalition districts and draw them in ways that, in fact, turned out to provide more seats for Hispanics. For example, four of the districts are predominantly Hispanic. It just coincides. It's going to be Hispanic Republicans elected to those seats. One thing that's happened in the state of Texas is the Hispanic community, a lot of it, have decided they're no longer with the Democrats who believe in open border policies, who believe in going against our law enforcement, who believe that men should play in women's sports. And they instead align with Republicans. What we want to do is to draw districts that give those Hispanics and African-Americans in the state of Texas the ability to elect their candidate of choice.

20:51Well, that's not really, I mean, you're doing this to give Trump and Republicans in the House of Representatives five additional seats, right? I mean, that's the motivation is to stave off any midterm election losses. Again, to be clear, Jake, the reason why we're doing this is because of that court decision. Texas is now authorized under law that changed that was different than in 2021 when we last did redistricting. Under new law, as well as new facts that surfaced in the aftermath of the Trump election, showing that many regions of the state that historically had voted Democrat that were highly Hispanic now chose to vote Republican and vote for Trump as well as other Republican candidates.

21:34Districts where the electorate voted heavily for Trump, they were trapped in a Democrat congressional district. They have every right to vote for a member of Congress who is a Republican. We will give them that ability. The law is pretty clear that state legislators in Texas denying the majority party a quorum can be fined and can even be arrested. But now you and your administration are taking the unusual step of asking for Democratic leader Gene Wu, who we played a clip from a little while ago, to be actually removed from office. What gives you the right to override the will of his voters who elected him?

22:16So I think the will of the people who elected him are not being met right now. The people who elected him as well as the other Democrats who've run from their duty, they didn't elect them to run off to Illinois. They elected them to go to Austin, Texas, and cast votes as required by the Constitution. What I have the authority to do as governor is to require these members of the legislature to follow the Constitution, which is very clear on its face where it says that these legislators must act on bills before them. They're refusing to perform their constitutional duty. And that's exactly why I filed that lawsuit in the Texas Supreme Court.

22:57And the Texas Supreme Court has required Gene Wu to respond to that. And the Texas Supreme Court is considering that right now. And what I'm seeking to do in that case is to have Gene Wu removed from office for failing to perform his constitutional requirement. So you had a your state had a congresswoman, Kay Granger, who tragically developed dementia. And then in the middle of her, I guess, second year in office in her in her final term, she and her family just checked her into a dimension center in Texas. And nobody represented that congressional district for like six to eight months or something.

23:36And I don't recall you saying anything then. Well, I have the authority to apply the Texas Constitution to these members of the Texas House of Representatives. With regard to members of Congress, that's going to be up to the congressional delegation and to the federal laws of which the state would have no control over. What I do have control over, Jake, is what we're dealing with right now. And that is, I called a special session, I put items on the agenda, and by Texas law, those runaway Democrats are required to act on that agenda. They're failing to do their duty, so there's a violation of state law that allows me to seek the removal of those who've abdicated their responsibility.

24:18Let's play this out. If they do not get removed by this court, this process is going to continue. I'm going to call special session after special session after special session. They could remain in hiding for literally years, tying the hands of the state of Texas from performing essential government needs. That cannot be allowed. And that's exactly why I should prevail in my lawsuit to have this Democrat removed from office because they are denying Texas the ability to conduct business. I mean, not entirely, though, right, because, I mean, there are filing deadlines for candidates in September and November.

24:51And then in March, of course, would be the primaries in Texas. So they really I mean, I'm not I'm not advocating this, but they really only need to wait you out until the fall. Yeah. Sorry, Jake. That's that's not the case, because I can call a special session at any time to have these districts redrawn. And even if we get to and beyond the filing deadline, we are still going to redraw these maps. We before we've done this, what we can do again, and that is have two different elections, one for all the other candidates on the ballot. One for members of Congress. And that's exactly what we'll do this time.

Read the full transcript

25:28If they think all they have to do is wait it out until November, December, they're wrong. I'm going to do this for the next two years and they're going to have to basically take up residency in Illinois. They might as well start voting in Illinois. Well, let me ask you just this final question, sir, as a bigger picture item, which is what's unusual about this is that you're attempting to do it in 2025, as opposed to waiting till the end of the decade as normally is when the redistricting takes place. You've explained the Supreme Court decision that led you to do this. But what's going on, obviously, is not happening in Texas.

25:59It's not happening in a vacuum. We have Democrats in California and New York and other states saying, well, if Governor Abbott does this in Texas, we're going to add five Democratic seats. Are you not worried at all about a redistricting, gerrymandering arms race going on? And theoretically, is it not just better for voters to be picking their politicians instead of politicians to be picking their voters through gerrymandering? Well, to be clear, listen, all those big blue states, they've already gerrymandered. Look at the map of Illinois. Look at the map of California, New York and Massachusetts and so many other blue states.

26:41They gerrymandered a long time ago. They got nothing left with regard to what they can do. And know this, if California tries to jerrymander five more districts, listen, Texas has the ability to eliminate 10 Democrats in our state. We can play that game more than they can because they have fewer Republican districts in their states. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, don't be a stranger. Thanks for popping by. Really appreciate it. Thank you. Today, a federal judge rejected the Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury materials in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It's the judge's strong words for the Trump administration and their request.

27:20That's next.

27:27When you're 7-Eleven's hottest fire chicken sandwich, people think you're intense. Well, yeah, I'm hot! Oh, yeah, intense. Want to see if you can handle the heat? Then try me. With pickles or spicy mayo and jalapenos. Oh, and it's all just$4.99. That's a deal almost as hot as I am. Almost. Sweet? No. Spicy? See for yourself. $4.99 and only at 7-Eleven. Valid through 825-46. Participating stores only while supplies last. Visit store for full terms. This podcast is supported by Anthropic, the public benefit corporation behind Claude. Everyone's got a hard question about AI. Your job, your kids, where it's going.

28:09Anthropic was built to surface those questions and share what it finds along the way because there's hope in hard questions. Ask yours at claude.ai slash Spotify and keep thinking. That's claude.ai slash Spotify.

28:27In our law and justice lead, a federal judge earlier today rejected the Trump Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury materials from the sex trafficking case against Ghislaine Maxwell. In a scathing opinion, Judge Paul Engelmeyer writes, Quote, contrary to the government's depiction, the Maxwell grand jury testimony is not a matter of significant historical or public interest. Far from it, unquote. Let's bring in some legal experts to discuss. Former Trump White House attorney Jim Schultz, former federal prosecutor Elliot Williams. Elliot, the Justice Department would have had to clear a really high bar to allow the public release of grand jury materials.

29:04Was this opinion from the judge and the tenor of it, because it was pretty scathing, was it a surprise at all to you? It was not a surprise. this is probably the least surprising judicial opinion any of us have read, Jay. You know, let's be clear. Our laws in America are quite vague in this wiggle room. Often the laws governing grand jury secrecy are not vague. They are quite clear. There are very limited circumstances under which grand jury materials are ever released publicly. And let's be clear, this just ain't it. And the judge said that quite clearly today. This is just not, the fact that the internet is clamoring to hear this information does not hit that high bar of releasing grand jury materials.

29:43And Jim, Judge Engelmeyer alluded to the unfamiliarity that Justice Department officials to him seemed to have with the very materials they were asking to unseal, given that so many of the details in the documents they were asking to be released were already public knowledge. He writes, quote, a member of the public appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge might conclude that the government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at transparency, but at diversion, aimed not at full disclosure, but at the illusion of such, unquote. How do you think that is going to sit with those who have been demanding more about the case?

30:23A judge is basically saying this was all just kind of a red herring anyway. Yeah, I mean, they clearly asked for information. They you know, the Justice Department was under no illusion that they weren't going to get it when they filed this. As Elliott said, it's a huge bar to get over to get over the hump to try to get these things released. And I think the focus here, I keep bringing it back to it has to be about the survivors. Right. And that's the most important issue of the day is how does this impact survivors? Grand jury secrecy is definitely there to protect witnesses and protect those folks that need the most protecting so that people will feel like they can come forward and testify.

31:05So, yeah, the judge smacked them down pretty hard on this, but I don't think it should come as any surprise. Elliot, the judge mentions in his opinion that a number of the survivors and the victims of Epstein and Maxwell wrote letters in favor of the materials being unsealed. But he says that those victims seem to be of the mistaken belief that the grand jury documents would reveal new information. What options do the victims have at this point if they would like to see more information released publicly? Well, there can certainly be more information released publicly, just not grand jury materials.

31:38There is there is information probably in the possession of the Justice Department, Jake, that is not protected by law in the way that grand jury materials is. Now, that's up to the attorney general and the deputy attorney general and others. Quite frankly, the U.S. Attorney's Office, the prosecutor of the case, whom I would note, did not have a say in this motion to unseal materials. But they can decide which of their files, if any, they can disclose. But to be clear, grand jury materials are just not the type of materials that would ever be released in a case like this. And, Jim, the judge overseeing the request for grand jury documents and materials in Epstein's case has not yet ruled on the motion.

32:14That's the Epstein case. But does this opinion today on Maxwell's case have any influence on what might be decided there? I think it does. If again, it's the same burden that they have to get that they have to sustain in order to get these documents. I've just lost some audio. Unless there's something. OK, I'm sorry. Keep going, Jim. unless there's some compelling reason they're just not going to get it so i i i don't think i i don't see a difference in that case i think it's a distinction without a difference this judge was very clear that there was no information going to lead to any additional charges i think you're you're likely to see the same thing in the in the in the epstein case so i i think we end up in the same place all right jim schultz elliot williams thanks to both of you we're getting new details from investigators after an explosion rocked the steel plant in pennsylvania search and rescue crews are digging through the rubble, looking for at least one missing person.

33:14We're going to have a live update from the scene ahead.

33:20Our role in now, the Israeli government and the Israeli military are facing a fierce international storm of criticism after intentionally targeting and killing five journalists in Gaza, journalists affiliated with the Al Jazeera News Network. The Committee to Protect Journalists says that 186 journalists have been killed in Gaza since the start of the war, 178 of them Palestinians killed by Israel, the committee says. Now, Israel insists it has unequivocal proof that correspondent Anas al-Sharif led a Hamas cell that was responsible for rocket attacks on Israeli citizens and IDF troops. Here's CNN's Nada Bashir.

34:06On Monday, mourners gathered in Gaza, carrying the bodies of Palestinian journalists killed in a targeted Israeli strike late Sunday night. Among them, journalists from the international news network Al Jazeera, including prominent Palestinian journalist Anas Al Sharif. Al Sharif had become a much respected household name in the Arabic speaking world and beyond, delivering live news coverage around the clock from across the Gaza Strip, risking his life on a daily basis to continue his work, documenting the daily horrors inflicted on the people of Gaza. Al-Sharif was in a tent with other journalists marked with a press sign near the entrance of the now-destroyed Al-Shifa hospital when he was killed by an Israeli strike, according to the hospital's director.

34:56Al-Jazeera also confirmed the deaths of their staffers Mohammed al-Krika, Ibrahim al-Zahir, Mohammed Nufal and Mu'min Alawa. The news outlet issued a statement describing the attack as a desperate attempt to silence voices ahead of the occupation of Gaza. The Israeli military had previously accused Al-Sharif of leading a Hamas cell. The military claimed Al-Sharif joined Hamas in 2013 and accused him of leading a Hamas cell that advanced rocket attacks against Israel. The IDF said they had unequivocal proof of al-Sharif's link to Hamas, posting an undated photo, apparently showing him with slain Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, and publicising images of documents that include personnel lists, terrorist training courses, phone directories and salary payments.

35:46CNN cannot independently verify the documents. Previously, al-Sharif had vehemently denied the allegation that he was affiliated with Hamas, In a statement shared on social media, the reporter said, I am a journalist with no political affiliations. My only mission is to report the truth from the ground as it is, without bias. The UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression had also previously denounced the, quote, unfounded accusations by the Israeli military, describing Israel's claims as a blatant attempt to endanger his life and silence his reporting on the genocide in Gaza. The UN official also cited growing evidence that journalists in Gaza have been targeted and killed by the Israeli army on the basis of unsubstantiated claims that they were Hamas terrorists.

36:38According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, at least 186 journalists have been killed since the beginning of the war in Gaza. In the minutes before he was killed, El Sharif, who was also a father, separated from his two children for months while reporting, shared this message on social media. If this madness does not end, Gaza will be reduced to ruins. Its people's voices silenced, their faces erased. And history will remember you as silent witnesses to a genocide you chose not to stop. Nader Bashir, CNN, London. And our thanks to Nader Bashir for that report. There's a new push for more security preparations as the U.S.

37:20prepares to host the World Cup next year and the Olympics in 2028. Next, CNN's Pete Mantine gets a look at new drone technology that could help stop bad actors.

37:35In our national lead, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy recently announced new rules that could clear the way for drone deliveries across the United States, even beyond an operator's line of sight. But as drone technology grows, so do security concerns, especially with the World Cup and the Olympics in the United States on the horizon. CNN aviation correspondent Pete Monteen shows us now the systems being tested to stop a drone threat before it can hit its target. You're good to go. You can launch. Copy. This is what it looks like when drones are flying where they shouldn't and are about to be taken over.

38:13This demonstration by Israeli company Defend Solutions comes as drones are taking off as a tool of war. They are a threat for airports, they are a threat for critical infrastructure. CEO Zohar Halachmi says even off-the-shelf drones can now be easily outfitted to drop grenades or carry explosives, like during the Ukrainian attack on Russian air bases in June. It is the latest concern of lawmakers on Capitol Hill, as they're calling for greater coordination from federal agencies to protect large events like the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles. With minimal skill, bad actors can use these drones to launch attacks or create chaos.

38:54Potential for a coordinated drone attack on an airport, seaport, or mass gathering is a credible and growing threat. Here, Defense System uses an antenna to detect radio signals emitted by drones from the moment they take off, feeding information back to a command center in real time. You essentially just create your own no-drone zone. Correct. It's a no-fly zone. First, a demonstration of a lone, unfriendly drone flying into our airspace. The system detects the drone, then with the push of a button, takes control, sending the drone to land in a predetermined spot. So this is our unfriendly drone here?

39:31Next, a demonstration of multiple hostile drones in the air at one time. what's called a drone swarm. It looks like they're all coming towards us now. Once again, the system pulls the drones into its metaphorical tractor beam, setting them down in a safe zone and providing the location of the drone operator, whose controls have gone dark. The pilot has no idea that we're doing this. Defense says this is based on the science of attacking computer viruses, filtering out good and legal drone users from malicious ones. Even the Federal Aviation Administration has tried this system, and similar technology from other companies during a series of tests this spring.

40:09I can assure you that government's focused on making sure that we get the technology right and we get the security right. The cost to buy this system? Hundreds of thousands of dollars or more. Defend calls it a small price to pay to protect against a growing threat in our skies. Why not just shoot it down? Because it's really dangerous. What you would like to do is to take that in the safest and controlled way as possible. drones are such a new threat that there's another problem rules and laws are struggling to keep up now and members of congress say the federal government has limited authority to disable malicious drones leaving what they call a glaring gap in our national preparedness major sports leagues like the nfl and major league baseball are pushing congress to give them more authority over drones and in june a maryland man pled guilty to flying his drone near an nfl playoff game when he knew he shouldn't have.

41:02Jake, that was sort of a fluke. But the real thing here is this, that the CEO of Defense showed me you can buy a lot of this stuff to make a malicious drone, even on Amazon. It's a scary Wild West out there. I am grateful, but I am still amazed, you and I were talking about this, that nothing bad has happened, significantly bad has happened with this technology. And in terms of members of Congress, I mean, they're still using AOL dial-up members of Congress. They don't know what's going on with drone technology. Pete Muntean, Thanks so much. President Trump says he's taken over D.C. to fight crime in the nation's capital.

41:32How will local leaders respond? Well, I'll ask one of them next.

41:58Almost as hot as I am. Almost. Sweet? No. Spicy? See for yourself. $4.99 and only at 7-Eleven. Valid through 825-26. Participating stores only while supplies last. Visit the store for full terms. This podcast is supported by Anthropic, the public benefit corporation behind Claude. Everyone's got a hard question about AI. Your job, your kids, where it's going. Anthropic was built to surface those questions and share what it finds along the way. because there's hope in hard questions. Ask yours at claude.ai slash Spotify and keep thinking. That's claude.ai slash Spotify.

42:43Welcome to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper. This hour, President Trump making good on his threat to take over D.C., announcing that he's placing the local police department under federal control and deploying National Guard troops in the nation's capital. But is this all legal? Are city leaders going to fight back? We're going to talk to a member of D.C. City Council in moments. Plus, President Trump says Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky could attend the Putin summit on Friday in Alaska, but he says he doesn't think it would make a difference in reaching any sort of peace deal. So will Zelensky get an invite?

43:16And when are we going to learn more details about the summit? Also, investigators are trying to figure out what caused an explosion at a Pennsylvania steel plant earlier today. At least one person was killed, 10 others injured. And emergency workers are searching the rubble for one person who is as of now unaccounted for. We're going to go live to the scene ahead. And an update to a story we've been following for months here on The Lead. The fight to save the dying manatee population that inhabits Florida's Indian River Lagoon. A federal judge ordered the state to take action in May. Has any progress been made?

43:52And The Lead tonight. President Trump has taken control of the Washington, D.C. police force. Today, the president declared a public safety emergency in the nation's capital and said he is activating 800 National Guard troops and threatening to bring in the U.S. military, all to address crime, which President Trump says is out of control in Washington, D.C. Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged out maniacs and homeless people. and we're not going to let it happen anymore. We're not going to take it. Citing a study from the Rochester Institute of Technology, the White House today said that D.C.

44:33has the fourth highest homicide rate in the country or did in 2024. We should know while President Trump is clearly upset about crime in D.C., he did not appear to be upset earlier this year when he pardoned about 1 ,250 January 6th convicts, many of whom had beaten police officers. CNN's Jeff Zeleny is at the White House. But first, let's turn to CNN's Brian Todd, who's outside the D.C. police headquarters. Brian, what are D.C. officials saying about all this?

45:02Well, Jake, according to sources who spoke to CNN, neither Mayor Muriel Bowser nor the police chief, Pamela Smith, were aware that this announcement was going to be made until it was made by the president this morning. They, of course, had gotten hints at this, that the president had threatened to do this, that he threatened to deploy the National Guard and to take over the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department in the days before the announcement, but they did not get wind of the actual announcement until it was actually happening. Mayor Muriel Bowser was still fairly reserved in her criticism of this move during a news conference this afternoon.

45:34She did point out that the chief of the police force here in D.C. at the spot where I'm standing, Pamela Smith, is still the police chief and that the 3 ,100 police officers in this city still work under her. Mayor Bowser did say that she believes President Trump's view of D.C. is, quote, shaped by his COVID-era experience during his first term. Now, Bowser acknowledged that just past the pandemic, just post-pandemic, they did have a spike in crime in D.C. Crime rates were spiking around the year 2023, but have since gone down considerably, according to the Metropolitan Police. But the closest thing that Mayor Bowser came to an actual direct jab at the president was right near the end of her news conference, when she talked about possible worst-case scenarios.

46:18Take a listen. I'm going to work every day to make sure it's not a complete disaster. If we lose communities who won't call the police, that could be a disaster. What would be a disaster if communities won't talk to the police, if a crime has been committed and could help solve that crime?

46:41And we're also getting the first real pushback today from the D.C. City Council. who, like the mayor, was silent about this pretty much for days until today. We have this from Councilmember Matt Fruman. He said this is a sad day for the District of Columbia and a sad day for the United States of America. In his words, quote, any attempt to place the military on our streets and displace the leadership of our increasingly successful police department would not be constructive. Also, Councilmember Charles Allen said this is an extreme, outrageous and dangerous move for the city and for the safety of its residents.

47:12Jake? Jeff Zeleny, why is the president focusing on this today? Well, Jake, this has been something that President Trump has long focused on. Crime has been really part of his public life throughout his years in New York City, certainly running for president and now serving as president. And frankly, it was the largest exercise of presidential power that we have seen. Nothing has changed in terms of crime. In fact, it has been going down. But a few things have changed. One of them, of course, are the challenges that are mounting for this president. The economic reports have not been good. There's a new inflation report coming out tomorrow.

47:48Obviously, Jeffrey Epstein has been hanging over the administration as a challenge. The Russia meeting that's coming up on Friday also is not guaranteed to go well. So this is something that the president likes to talk about. He painted a dystopian but also somewhat a deceptive view of life in the nation's capital. But again, this is something that he has often referred and a return back to this well again and again. We saw it earlier this year in Los Angeles, sending the National Guard there. But Washington, D.C., of course, is not a state. So because of the 1973 home rule, the president is allowed to federalize the police force.

48:24So that's what he did, declaring it an emergency. But Jake, he's also declared some other emergencies and used that authority. It's unclear if this actually is an emergency. There's no doubt there is a high crime here in Washington and in other major cities as well. But the stats show it's actually falling, not going up. Yeah. And Brian, earlier this year, the acting U.S. attorney, Ed Martin, was claiming that President Trump's leadership meant that violent crime was down in Washington, D.C. As Jeff says, obviously, you know, major cities in the United States, there's there's a lot of crime, a lot of violent crime.

48:59But give us a fact check here. Is D.C. as dangerous as President Trump portrays it? It really does not appear by any measure to be as dangerous as the president portrays it. He really has portrayed this city ever since that former Doge member was attacked a week ago Sunday. The president has portrayed this as a city under siege. I think that almost any resident and anybody you talk to would disagree with that. Crime is down considerably, according to the police department. And just the stats that they cite overall. assault with a dangerous weapon down 20 % from a year ago, robberies down 29 % from a year ago, the big stat that they cite violent crime down 26 % from a year ago, both the mayor and the police saying that violent crime is at 30-year lows in this city, Jake, and you get a sense from residents here this is not the city under siege that the president portrays it.

49:49All right, Brian Todd and Jeff Selenie, thanks. Let's bring in D.C. City Council member Brooke Pinto. She represents Ward 2, which includes Georgetown and the National Mall. She also chairs the council's committee on public safety. So you heard the police's stats, which show the crime is down. That doesn't mean it's not still high, but it's down. The White House put out a fact sheet that says, quote, yes, D.C. crime is out of control, and they have a bunch of statistics from the, I think it's the Rochester Institute of Technology. One of those statistics says last year, D.C.'s homicide rate was 27.3 per 100 ,000 residents.

50:24that's the fourth highest in the country. So this is, I mean, this is a conversation that does require some nuance. The crime rate could be going down, but still be way too high, right? Right. And look, nothing is more important to me than the safety and well-being of district residents and visitors who come here as the nation's capital. And that's why in 2023, when we had these crime surges, as the chair of the Council's Committee on Judiciary and Public safety, I put together a hundred piece intervention piece of legislation called Secure DC. And we came together as a council with the mayor, the attorney general to drive down crime that has since that time, since 2023, violent crime has decreased by nearly half.

51:10So there is more work to do, certainly. And that's what we're committed to doing locally. So Janine Pirro, who is now the U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C. She argues that D.C.'s laws are weak and allow even those who have been convicted of serious crimes to avoid major repercussions. Take a listen. The D.C. Council has given the judges the ability to give probation on shootings. And so then it's up to them. All of these things, the Youth Rehabilitation, Incarceration Reduction Act, and now they want to seal records. So if we work hard and we get a conviction, they want to wipe it out. She also complained about if a crime is committed by somebody who's 14, 15, 16, or 17 with a gun, you can't try them as the way she would like to, I presumably as an adult.

51:59What do you think of the specific criticisms of some of the D.C. laws? So I am in agreement that there were a lot of gaps in our system. And that's what my bill, Secure DC, was really about, was filling some of those gaps. So we gave more discretion to judges to hold violent offenders pre-trial. We increased penalties for carjacking and for gun-related offenses. We changed the composition of the sentencing commission to make sure that it was more balanced. The council just passed my latest bill, Peace DC, in June, to build on that success and fill some more of those gaps. So as a lawmaker, I am always open-minded to looking at our legal landscape and filling those holes and making sure that we have laws that provide for the safety and well-being of district residents.

52:43Well, address, if you would, what she specifically called out in terms of not being able to try. If a 16-year-old commits a crime with a gun, that young man still gets tried as a juvenile. She wants to change that, presumably. Do you disagree? Well, I believe that whatever age you are that you commit a crime, whether you're a juvenile or an adult, there should be accountability. We have a different system for juvenile prosecutions in D.C. that's handled through our D.C. elected attorney general, and then our adult prosecutions are handled through the U.S. Attorney's Office. So both of those prosecutorial routes should lead to accountability.

53:20Now, the U.S. Attorney does have the discretion to bring some cases against juveniles as adults, and that is exercised with somewhat regularity. So these claims that this can never happen is not true. There's a Washington Post-Char School poll conducted between April and May of this year showing that D.C. residents are not pleased with Mayor Bowser's handling of two key issues brought up today. On reducing crime, only 38 % of the citizens of this city believe Mayor Bowser is doing an excellent or good job. 58 % say bad job. It's worse on homelessness. 27 % say she's doing an excellent or good job compared to 67 % who say she's not.

54:00Do you disagree with the majority of the citizens of the District of Columbia? Well, I believe that crime and homelessness are two of the most pressing challenges that we face here in D.C. and we have made tremendous progress by working together over these last several years. I talked about some of the progress we've made with violent crime. When it comes to homelessness, we started a new model in Ward 2 where I represent of transitional housing to get people moved off the street into transitional housing while they await permanent housing. I believe that every person has the right to live indoors.

54:33We should not have people living outside in Washington, D.C. Even if they want to? Even if they want to, but there is a process to get people placed indoors with dignity. It does not mean we just say no homeless people can be here. All right, Disney Councilmember Brooke Pinto, always good to have you here. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Coming up, so many unanswered questions about the upcoming Trump-Putin summit on Friday in Alaska. First of all, where in Alaska is it going to be held? How long is it going to last? Will Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine be included? We're going to go live to Ukraine next.

55:09Well, we're going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin, and at the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made. How will you know that? Because that's what I do. I make deals. That's what he does. He makes deals. And our world lead officials are rushing to finalize the logistics of Friday's Trump-Putin summit in Alaska. As of now, only limited details have been announced, including the city, the venue where the two world leaders will meet, and more. Our officials are also working out what topics are going to be allowed to be discussed.

55:38Although President Trump hopes to yield significant progress towards ending the war in Ukraine, he is going to do that without Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky present for that conversation. At least that's the plan as of now. Nick Payton-Walsh is in Kharkiv in eastern Ukraine. And Nick, Ukrainian President Zelensky says Russia is definitely not preparing for any sort of ceasefire. What has been his response to being left out of the summit? Yeah, I mean, President Trump held out the possibility he would call Zelensky after his meeting with Putin, maybe even arrange later for the three men to meet in some capacity.

56:16But Zelensky from the start has been very clear that nothing can occur without Ukraine, about Ukraine, without Ukraine. And today kind of went on the informational offensive, saying that the information they're getting, their intelligence, suggests, in fact, Russia's not preparing for peace. Instead, it's actually preparing more offensive operations. Indeed, there have been some alarming reports by open source analysts suggesting that in some parts in the east, Russia has made significant progress in just the last week, causing alarm bells to ring. Look, Zlensky's also had quite a lot of support from European allies who've demanded the same unconditional immediate ceasefire that the US originally proposed with Ukraine months ago, and that being the starting point for negotiations, and also, too, a European statement has insisted that the current contact line is essentially frozen as the starting point for negotiations.

57:07Could there be swaps? It's something, really, that Trump has talked about in terms of territory going back and forth between Russia. Always hard to know, indeed, what Russia could potentially give back to Ukraine of Ukraine. but also to Germany's leader, Friedrich Merz, now arranging a call for Wednesday between himself, European leaders, and President Trump, presumably to shore up Europe's position ahead of the Alaska meeting, Jake. So you just talked about this land swap idea that the president, President Trump, talked about. Has Ukraine weighed in on that? Yeah, look, I mean, this has always been an absolute no for Ukraine, The concept of giving voluntarily land that Russia has not occupied by force to Russia as part of a deal.

57:52That seems to have emerged during US special envoy Stephen Wyckoff's visit to Moscow. Different permutations emerging. Some suggestion potentially that there hasn't been a full understanding of Russia's position, which appears to be very maximalist still, essentially wanting all of Ukraine. In fact, President Trump suggested he was one of the people who still thought that Russia wanted all of Ukraine when he spoke today. So a lot still riding on that. But the idea we've been seeing ourselves today, traveling around the very areas of the Donetsk region, Kramatorsk, Slovyansk, towns that are full of Ukrainian soldiers and civilians, bustling a normal life there.

58:30Yes, air raid sirens on very often, massive damage done. But tens of thousands of people there who think it's frankly surreal that two men in Alaska on Friday from America and Russia might decide whether they all have to pack up and leave and hand over their homes to Moscow. Very far-fetched to Ukraine's government. Almost absurd when you stand in those areas yourself, Jake. All right, Nick Payton-Walsh, who's in eastern Ukraine for us, thank you so much. Stay safe. Let's get some analysis from our experts now. Jeff, let me start with you, Jeff Edmonds. How do you think Zelensky feels right now?

59:02I mean, he's been trying to hold his cards close to his vest, I suppose, but it does seem as though he would be worried. That's right. He's playing a careful game. here in the sense that he wants to keep U.S. support. So he doesn't want to upset President Trump in the same way you had the fallout with the Oval Office. But at the same time, I mean, he has the president of Ukraine and responsible for Ukraine and its sovereignty and needs to do what he has to do to protect Ukraine. And so I think it probably does feel rather surreal that he wouldn't be in the conversation. And I want you to take a listen, Rebecca, to what J.D.

59:34Vance, Vice President Vance, said just yesterday. I think the president and I certainly think that America, we're done with the funding of the Ukraine war business. We want to bring about a peaceful settlement to this thing. We want to stop the killing. But Americans, I think, are sick of continuing to send their money, their tax dollars to this particular conflict. But if the Europeans want to step up and actually buy the weapons from American producers, we're OK with that. But we're not going to fund it ourselves anymore. That's rough stuff. I mean, there's a lot of, like, blaming Ukraine subtextually in that.

1:00:10What do you think? Well, it's interesting because Vice President Vance used to oppose even selling American weapons to Europeans who would give the weapons to Ukraine. So it's nice to see him now take President Trump's position, which is that the United States still has a strong interest in seeing a strong... A little silver linings from you there. A little silver lining. I will also say there was recent polling done by the Vandenberg coalition just last week that 87 percent of Trump voters still understand that Russia poses a threat to the United States. So I'm not sure which piece of the coalition the vice president specifically talking about.

1:00:41But Americans understand that Ukraine security is related to NATO security. NATO security is related to American security. You want to have good trade deals with Europeans. You have to have a strong and peaceful Europe. And that means a strong and secure Ukraine. So, you know, I think that Ukraine is in a better position than we were a few months ago. And it's hard for Zelensky, I think, to be quiet, but it would be good for him to kind of just let this play out a little bit. I'm not confident that Putin is even going to concede anything at all. So it's good just to let this kind of summit play out.

1:01:09Yeah. And what is there that would suggest that Putin is going to concede anything? I mean, he, by all accounts, like he's winning in some areas. Right. And it doesn't seem like President Trump and Vice President Vance particularly like Zelensky or support him in this venture. I mean, what's in it for Putin to concede anything? There really isn't anything for it. The most important thing I think to consider is that this is not about land. I think a lot of people presume that it is. It's about the demilitarization, the denazification of Ukraine. It's really about Ukraine's sovereignty. And if it's not about land, you're not going to get to peace through a land deal.

1:01:48I think that's the most important thing. And then second, you know, to Zelensky's point, Ukraine has a vote in these negotiations. And if this isn't something they're going to go along with, even if they don't have U.S. support, that doesn't mean they're just going to capitulate. You know, it's interesting. I was talking earlier with Jill Dougherty, a former CNN Moscow bureau chief. After Zelensky seized, I'm sorry, after Putin seized Crimea in 2014, they, I mean, it was a fake election, but they did have this plebiscite, right? They did have this, OK, we're going to have the citizens of Crimea vote on this.

1:02:18And it was a joke and it wasn't real and it was illegitimate. But there was at least the pretense of that. There's no pretense even here. They're just talking about giving land, like not like, well, let's see if the people of Donbass want to be part of Russia. No. And there's also a question about how much control Russian military, the military campaign has even succeeded. So we know that there is now Russian control over Crimea, but the rest of the territory is still an active war zone. And so this idea that you can sort of swap land that may be more taken and held by Russia versus Ukraine. I mean, we don't have any kind of facts on that point either.

1:02:48So, you know, I think that we haven't even gotten to a ceasefire yet. President Trump has been clear sequentially he wants a ceasefire. And then we can get into details about how we get to sort of even a frozen conflict, make sure Ukraine can stop further Russian aggression. Ukraine has agreed to a ceasefire and has since March. It's just been Russia that continues this assault against Ukraine. Is it not true that, let's say that Vice President Kamala Harris had won and she was doing a peace deal right now or trying to end the war, that no matter what, there was going to be some sort of land concession that Ukraine was going to have to make?

1:03:22I understand that you're saying this is bigger than geography. But in order to bring about peace, Ukraine was going to have to concede some land, Democratic or Republican president. Do you agree with that? I think so, especially at this point. It's become pretty clear that the Ukrainian military cannot retake all of the land that Russia has taken. So if there was a case where Putin actually was interested in leaving the current government in Kiev in place, allowing Ukraine to defend itself, and was content with the land, which he wouldn't be, then you would obviously have some kind of demarcation there, and Ukrainians would have to cede something.

1:03:58I just don't think that's a reality in this. All right. Jeff Edmonds and Rebecca Heinrichs, thanks to both of you. And noting, I will be in Alaska on Friday to anchor CNN's special coverage of the Trump-Putin summit. So looking forward to that 35-hour flight. Last hour, I spoke to Texas' Republican Governor Greg Abbott about his party's push for redistricting in the state. He accused state Democrats of failing to do their constitutional duty. So I'm going to talk to a Texas Democratic Congresswoman, Jasmine Crockett, next.

1:04:337-Eleven's hottest fire chicken sandwich. People think you're intense. Well, yeah, I'm hot! Oh, yeah, intense. Want to see if you can handle the heat? Then try me. With pickles or spicy mayo and jalapenos. Oh, and it's all just$4.99. That's a deal almost as hot as I am. Almost? Sweets? No. Spicy? See for yourself. $4.99 and only at 7-Eleven. Followed through 825-26. Participating stores only while supplies last. Visit store for full terms. This podcast is supported by Anthropic, the public benefit corporation behind Claude. Everyone's got a hard question about AI. Your job, your kids, where it's going.

1:05:15Anthropic was built to surface those questions and share what it finds along the way, because there's hope in hard questions. Ask yours at Claude.ai slash Spotify and keep thinking. That's Claude.ai slash Spotify.

1:05:34Today, Texas State House Democrats intentionally skipped yet another day of this special legislative session in Austin, Texas, in an effort to stop Republicans from redrawing congressional maps. These new maps could add five new House Republican seats. Last hour, I spoke with the Texas Governor, Greg Abbott, who slammed Democrats for taking this standoff into week two. What these Democrats have done, they have turned their back on the people of the state of Texas. For one, it is gutless for Democrats to cut and run. That's anti-Texan. Ever since the time of the Alamo, Texans have stood and fought their ground.

1:06:13Here Democrats are fleeing like a bunch of chickens. Average Texans who are watching this show, they have to show up to work. If they don't show up to work, they could get fired. These Democrats think they are above that. With me now, Democratic Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett of Texas. And Congresswoman, just to remind our viewers, you were a member of the Texas State House back in 2021. You're in the U.S. House now, but you were a state legislator. And you were part of the crew that fled the state in an attempt to block voting restrictions in Texas. What do you make of Governor Abbott's argument that that is not what Texans do?

1:06:49It's gutless. It's cut and run. You're fleeing like chickens. You need to show up to do your job the way most Texans do, etc. What's your response? The only weakling in this equation is the governor himself. It's not Texans that elected the governor to the governor's mansion that asked him to do this. It is the criminal that is currently serving in the White House that begs for him to do this. So let me tell you something. I can guarantee you that Gene Wu's district has not called in and said that he is not representing them or their voices. In fact, it's just the opposite. And I know that my governor may not have practiced law too recently, but I would like to inform him if he cares to know that our Texas Constitution specifically provides for being able to break form that is in our Constitution.

1:07:41So as far as I'm concerned, these folks that decided that they were going to break quorum are more Texan and more American than the governor and the president himself. There is some critical items on the special session agenda flood relief for Texas Hill Country, where more than 100 people died over the Fourth of July weekend. What's your response to those Republicans who are blaming Democrats for holding up this relief by not showing up and allowing a quorum? Yeah, so first of all, those Republicans should show up and do their job every single day. They're the ones that knew that this area had flooded before, yet there were not provisions in place.

1:08:22In fact, one of the representatives for that area voted against a bill that would have allowed for additional monies for infrastructure in that area. The local electives in that area decided to reject money from the Biden-Harris campaign. I can tell you one thing about Democrats is that we show up for everybody. Once we are elected, then we understand what it is to govern and we don't pick winners and losers based upon your political affiliation. Unfortunately, the local electeds fail those people. And unfortunately, their state electeds fail those people. But I will also say that it wasn't flood relief that they brought to the floor quickly.

1:08:59It was absolutely focused on bringing together a bill that would decimate people's voices, black and brown voices, which make up a majority of the state. That is what they decided to do. They had an opportunity. They did not force forward with a bill on flood relief. Instead, what they pushed forward with was redistricting at the will of the attorney general who said this was about race and Donald Trump. The Economist magazine looking at this gerrymandering arms race that appears to be on the brink of breaking out in the sense that if if Texas does it, the Democrats in California and other states say they're going to do it.

1:09:40The Economist says Democrats are likely to lose the redistricting war if both sides abandon principle. A draw is possible, but Republicans face fewer obstacles. Is this gerrymandering arms race really worth it if Democrats still are going to end up on the losing side of the numbers? Governor Abbott said to me today that if California adds five Democratic seats to offset the five Republican seats that might come from this redistricting, he'll just add five more Republican seats. He said it will be 10. Yeah, so here's my attitude. We may lose the battle, but we will absolutely win this war. That is what I'm saying.

1:10:19Right now, when it comes to our base, they want to see a fight. They don't want to see us just lay down and say, OK, well, the Republicans want to do whatever they want to do. They want to minimize voices. They want to systemically get rid of those black electives. Because when I look at the numbers and to be clear, Florida is already in this thing. We know that Texas is in this thing. We know that they're putting pressure on Indiana as well as Missouri. So here's the deal. They have already decided that the only way that they can win because they have failed policies is by making sure that they can cheat their way.

1:10:54And while they're cheating their way, the only way that they can do that is while they also at the same time violate the Constitution as well as the Voting Rights Act and make sure that it's people of color. We're talking about them going after Clyburn in South Carolina. We're talking about them going after Andre Carson in Indiana. We're talking about them going after Reverend Cleaver in Missouri. We're talking about them going after Amelia Sykes in Ohio. We're talking about them coming for three of the four black representatives that we currently have in the state of Texas. So don't tell me this isn't about race when they are clear about who it is that will lose the most when it comes to having their say-so on the federal level.

1:11:31They are absolutely systemically making sure that they roll back all that was fought for, bled for, and died for as relates to those that came before us. Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, Democrat of Texas, thank you so much. Appreciate your time. Thanks, Jake. Emergency workers are digging through the rubble looking for at least one person who remains missing after a horrific explosion at a Pennsylvania steel plant earlier today. We're going to go live to the scene for an update next.

1:12:02Internationally, at least one person has been killed. One is missing and 10 others have been injured after an explosion at a Pennsylvania steel plant earlier today. Officials at the Clarendon Coke Works plant say the plant is now stable. They're trying to figure out what happened, what caused the explosion. CNN's Gabe Cohen is on the scene of that blast in Clarendon, Pennsylvania, just outside Pittsburgh. Gabe, do they have any idea how this might have happened? Jake, really, at this point, they don't. And we heard an executive from U.S. Steel a little bit earlier tell media that as far as they knew, the area where this blast happened, the area of this steel mill, was in good working condition as of this morning.

1:12:42And so investigators are here on the scene and they're going to try to figure out exactly what went wrong here. And this has been a very active search and rescue scene throughout the day. Just a little while ago, officials said that there is still that one person who's unaccounted for somewhere inside that facility in the blast zone. They believe they know where that worker is, although they said they're not exactly sure and they're still working to be able to pull them out. We have seen a lot of first responder vehicles, ambulances going inside and out. So very much an active scene here, Jake.

1:13:13We know that five of the 10 injured people have been released from the hospital at this point. That is good news late this afternoon. But we're also learning a little bit more about the individual who died here today. I just spoke over the phone with his sister who confirmed that it was Timothy Quinn, her brother, a 39-year-old worker here, a father of three, who she described as someone who lit up the room, said he loved his three children. He was the caretaker for his mother. She described him as her best friend, a great person. And she was quite frustrated by the lack of communication that it took hours for her to learn that it was her brother who was killed here.

1:13:54She actually came to the scene searching for answers a few hours ago and spoke with some of the local affiliates here. Here's a bit of what she said. My dad worked at the steel mill for 42 years, and he would be disgusted in what the situation is right now. Accidents happen, but families, that's brothers and sisters, it's a stronger union. They need communication with these families.

1:14:21So, Jake, obviously you can hear the frustration there, and we will see what this investigation turns up in the days and weeks ahead. But as I said, still very much an active scene as those first responders work to find that last person who's unaccounted for. Gabe, should local residents be worried at all about toxic fumes or anything that's been released into the atmosphere? Yeah, so we did hear officials from Allegheny County earlier say that they had told all residents who live within one mile of this facility that they needed to close their windows and their doors and make sure that their HVAC systems were not pulling in any outside air because they were worried about the potential for toxic air essentially from this explosion getting into people's homes.

1:15:06Although they said at this point, there's no evidence that's happening. Gabe Cohen, thanks so much. Our small business series takes us to North Carolina next, where a startup born from the COVID pandemic is struggling under the weight of Trump's tariffs. Are they having to raise prices on their customers? That story's next.

1:15:26New today in our Money Lead, multiple reports say that President Trump has signed an executive order to extend the tariff truce with China by an additional 90 days. which brings us to our Business Leaders series, where we talk to small business owners coast to coast to see how Trump's tariffs are affecting them. Sour House is a startup that was born from the sourdough starter craze during the COVID pandemic. They started selling tools specifically for sourdough bakers. Co-founder Eric Fabian joins me now from Asheville, North Carolina. Eric, where do you manufacture your products and how are tariffs impacting your sales?

1:16:04Sure. Hi. Yeah, my name is Eric Fabian. I'm the CEO of Sour House. We make tools for sourdough homebakers. We design them here in the United States and we manufacture them in China. We sell them through our website, sourhouse.co and at retailers around the world. And the tariffs have been a significant impact on us. We started this idea five years ago now during COVID and with an idea I had for a device that would just help people keep their starter, their sourdough starter warm so they could bake better bread. And since then, we've started creating jars, like easy to clean jars for your starter bowls, different kinds of things.

1:16:47And we've been successful at it. You know, we make it our mission to help people bake more bread and to inspire them to bake more bread. And, you know, we've seen now people recommend our tools and cookbooks and, you know, folks like actress Kristen Bell, you know, you see on Instagram. She has our jars in our kitchen. And we've been real proud that we've been able to, you know, positively impact the lives of hundreds of thousands of bakers with our tools and with the educational content that we share. This all kind of came to a really difficult stop in the spring when the tariffs came into play.

1:17:23You have one of the devices next to you, do you? You can hold up to show people? Yes, this is a Goldie. It's designed for you put your jar of starter inside. It warms it up to 75 to 82 degrees where sourdough starter is very active. And, you know, sourdough bakers, they all have this jar of starter in their house somewhere. And so it's like a pet and they need to care for it. And it would just help them care for it better. And where are those manufactured? So we manufacture all the Sour House products in China. My co-founder, Jennifer Yoko Olson, is an industrial designer. We work to design all of our ideas here.

1:18:04And we create things from the ground up. These are not things that we're sourcing on Alibaba and kind of repackaging for the American market. These are custom-designed tools for the home baker. Yeah. And the tariffs have significantly raised the prices of those items? Yeah, we currently are subject to the 30 percent reciprocal tariff. But in total, we pay about 50 percent tariff on our products. And, you know, along with the tariffs going up and down, our prices go up and down. I think the biggest concern for us right now is honestly, though, the distraction of just like, you know, thinking about Trump and tariffs and all this stuff rather than focusing on helping our bakers bake better bread.

1:18:51So we'd really like to get back to it. And I think there's just a lot of, you know, uncertainty about the future. We don't know what the tariffs will be next year, but we want to give clarity on our pricing to both our direct consumers that come to our website and purchase from us, as well as our retailers who buy from us wholesale. Sourdough Bakers, you can find Sour House tools online. Eric Fabian, thank you so much for your time today. Appreciate it. Thank you. An update next on a story we've been following for months now in the fight to save Florida's manatees.

1:19:30In our Earth Matters series, an update to efforts to save the dying manatee population that inhabits Florida's Indian River Lagoon. CNN's Randy Kaye traveled to the manatees' home to understand the ongoing legal battle between wildlife advocates and the government of the state of Florida. A battle those advocates thought they had won until the state pushed back recently. We caution that some of the images we're going to bring you may be hard to watch. I think it's very disheartening. We shouldn't have the government fighting us on cleaning up the environment and saving wildlife. Katrina Shaddix and the wildlife protection group Bear Warriors United once again battling the state of Florida over protecting manatees.

1:20:11We recently saw firsthand where the manatees are starving to death in Florida's Indian River Lagoon, which stretches from Palm Beach County to Daytona Beach. The lagoon is where manatees come for the warm water, but in recent years, the northern end of the lagoon has been a death trap for them. All these homes along the lagoon that are on septic tanks are slowly leaking literally tons of nitrogen and phosphorus into the system. Marine biologist Peter Borelli says those pollutants are being released by septic tanks and water treatment facilities along the lagoon and are fueling algae growth in the water, which is causing the manatees' main food source, seagrass, to die.

1:20:49So this algae is reducing light down to the seagrasses, essentially smothering them and killing them. Between December 2020 and April 2022, more than 1 ,200 manatees died of starvation in this area. Now, Florida's Department of Environmental Protection is appealing a ruling a federal judge issued in the spring that the department violated the Federal Endangered Species Act. As a result, the judge temporarily halted the approval of any new septic tank permits along the lagoon. That ruling followed a 2022 lawsuit in which Bear Warriors United sued Florida's Department of Environmental Protection to help protect the manatees.

1:21:29They suffered immensely and for a very long time. There was lax leadership from the state of Florida over decades that allowed this problem to get worse and worse. The judge found a definitive causal link between Florida's Department of Environmental Protection wastewater regulations and the ongoing risk to manatees. Then, in May, he agreed to what was essentially a wish list from Bear Warriors United, things they wanted the state to fix, on behalf of the manatees. In addition to halting septic tank permits, Florida was required to submit a plan to monitor manatees' health and set up a supplemental feeding program for manatees in this lagoon.

1:22:06In its latest court filing, Florida's Department of Environmental Protection says it's not them, but Florida's Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission that is responsible for wildlife issues, arguing the judge is insisting the wrong agency make the required changes. The FDEP is beating a dead horse. It's already been decided by a judge, you know, a federal court judge. We reached out to both the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, but neither provided a response to our questions. We're not going to stop until we convince the government to save the manatees from extinction.

1:22:42Are you hopeful the manatee population will come back here? Now that we won this lawsuit, we think we have a really good chance of working with the state to make sure the manatees don't go extinct on our watch. Randy Kay, CNN, Palm Beach County, Florida. And our thanks to Randy Kay for that report. You can follow me on Facebook, Instagram, ThreadsX, and on the TikTok at Jake Tapper. You can follow the show on X at The Lead CNN. If you ever miss an episode of The Lead, you can listen to the show once you get your podcasts. Aaron Burnett out front starts right now.

1:23:15Hey, it's Mike Rowe, and it just occurred to me that ZipRecruiter has been sponsoring my podcast the way I heard it for the last 10 years. Consequently, I've agreed to sing their jingle at the end of this commercial in four-part harmony all by myself. Why would I do that? Because years ago, when the Mike Rowe Works Foundation was expanding and I was desperate to hire a few uniquely qualified individuals, I posted a job for free on ZipRecruiter, and I found the people I was looking for in less than 24 hours. It's that simple. Ever since, I've been telling my audience that ZipRecruiter got me the most qualified, most interested people.

1:23:50And now, I'm telling you. Post a job for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash zip, and watch what happens. That's ZipRecruiter.com slash zip. And now, here's their official jingle in four-part harmony. Build your team, build it sooner Meet your match at ZipRecruiter Try it free Go inside the sports moments that brought us together and made history From the underdogs to the rivalries and the miracles It sends chills down your spine, it's what sport was all about The new CNN original series, Decades in Sports Now streaming on the CNN app

From the publisher

President Trump previews his Friday summit with Putin in Alaska, as United States officials rush to finalize the details of this crucial face-to-face to end that war. Plus, local officials in Washington DC pushing back after Trump announced he is deploying National Guard troops in the nation’s Capitol.  
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Lead with Jake Tapper

All 322 episodes
U.S. Officials Rush To Finalize Details Of Alaska TalksThe Lead with Jake Tapper · 1 h 24 min
Listen in VO