White House Punts To DOJ On Releasing More Epstein Files

22 Jul 2025 · 1 h 24 min · 28 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode focuses on the White House and DOJ dispute over releasing more Jeffrey Epstein-related records. It argues the administration is “changing the subject” with other controversies while avoiding full transparency, even as federal judges consider unsealing grand jury testimony. It also covers related legal/political fights (Trump’s $10B libel lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal; Harvard’s challenge to frozen federal funding), plus separate news segments (Breonna Taylor case sentencing, Malcolm Jamal Warner’s death, a near-miss between a Delta regional jet and a B-52, and over-tourism protests).

Guests and backgrounds

  • Paula Reid: CNN chief legal affairs correspondent.
  • Jeff Zeleny: CNN correspondent covering the White House.
  • David Boies: attorney who represented Virginia Giuffre (Epstein accuser).
  • Susan (USA Today columnist, name not given in transcript): wrote about Trump’s handling of Epstein.
  • Elliot (former DOJ employee, name not given): former Justice Department staffer.
  • Jason Crow (Colorado): Democratic Congressman on the House Intelligence Committee.
  • William Jacobson: law professor at Cornell; Harvard Law School graduate.
  • Jason Carroll (CNN): reporter on the Breonna Taylor sentencing.

Key claims

  • Trump’s base wants more Epstein files; DOJ/White House resist full release due to confidentiality and victims’ privacy.
  • Grand jury materials are limited and full disclosure is unlikely; redaction would be required.
  • White House press questions are deflected onto DOJ/FBI; possible instructions to flag Trump’s name are raised.
  • Harvard’s funding freeze is framed as potentially pretextual/punitive.

Notable examples

  • Unsealing Epstein grand jury testimony (NY/FL judges).
  • Trump’s Wall Street Journal $10B lawsuit over a purported 2003 Epstein birthday letter.
  • Brett Hankison sentencing recommendation: one day in jail.
  • Delta regional jet hard turn to avoid a B-52 near North Dakota.
  • Malcolm Jamal Warner drowning in Costa Rica.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Trump's Distractions and Epstein Controversies

0:18 to 0:47

Explore how Trump addresses controversies and manages distractions related to Epstein.

“For 125 years, Nordstrom has been part of your story.”

Trump's Distractions and Epstein Controversies

1:52 to 3:58

Explore how Trump addresses controversies and manages distractions related to Epstein.

“We start with our politics lead in what might be called the art of the distraction.”

Congressional Efforts and Public Opinion

3:58 to 6:02

Discussion on bipartisan efforts to release Epstein-related records and public sentiment.

“In 2013, then-citizen Trump said that President Obama, quote, should not be telling the Washington Redskins to change their name.”

Justice Department and Grand Jury Testimony

6:02 to 8:10

Analysis of the implications and challenges surrounding the release of grand jury materials.

“Thanks so much for being here, everybody.”

Politics of Releasing Information

8:10 to 10:12

Discussion on the political ramifications of releasing information related to Epstein.

“They think they will be getting a client list.”

Harvard's Legal Battle with the Trump Administration

10:12 to 14:01

Examining Harvard’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over funding cuts.

“So I you know, it's kind of like ripping off a bandaid.”

Harvard's Legal Battle and Federal Funding

14:01 to 18:00

Discussion on Harvard's arguments regarding federal funding and First Amendment rights.

“Today, the judge appeared to be favorable towards Harvard, and he questioned what the relationship between cutting funding for cancer research and ending anti-Semitism on campus was.”

Epstein Files and Political Distraction

19:20 to 28:00

Analyzing the recent developments around the Epstein files and political reactions.

“about releasing grand jury transcripts on Jeffrey Epstein, and President Trump was filing his lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal for a story about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.”

Breonna Taylor Case Update

28:00 to 29:10

Learn about the ongoing legal situation regarding officers involved in Breonna Taylor's death.

“sending it saying that it sends the wrong message in terms of a message that white officers can violate the civil rights of black Americans with near total impunity.”

Tragic News About Malcolm Jamal Warner

29:10 to 31:11

Explore the sad circumstances surrounding the death of actor Malcolm Jamal Warner.

“probably best known as the character Theo from the sitcom The Cosby Show.”
Show all 28 chapters

B-52 Bomber Near Collision

31:11 to 35:59

Hear about the alarming incident involving a Delta jet and a B-52 bomber.

“And obviously he was best known as Theo on The Cosby Show.”

Protests Against Over-Tourism

35:59 to 39:53

Learn about local protests in Barcelona and Mexico City against the impacts of over-tourism.

“All right, Brian Todd, thank you so much.”

Protests Against Over-Tourism

39:56 to 40:23

Learn about local protests in Barcelona and Mexico City against the impacts of over-tourism.

“The stylist who found the perfect outfit for your big interview.”

Update on Epstein Files

40:55 to 42:00

Get insights on the White House's decisions related to the Epstein files and the Justice Department's request.

“Plus, today marks one year, one year since President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 presidential race, and now his son Hunter, well, he's got a lot to say about it.”

Trump and the Epstein Files Fallout

42:00 to 43:35

Discussion on President Trump's distancing from the Epstein case as the DOJ reviews unsealing grand jury testimony.

“as President Trump seeks some distance from the Epstein file's fallout.”

Legal Implications of Trump's Lawsuit

43:35 to 45:42

Exploration of Trump's lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and the challenges he faces in the legal process.

“who ruled so favorably in the case involving classified documents.”

White House's Response to Epstein Questions

45:42 to 47:45

Analyzing the White House's strategy in dealing with ongoing Epstein-related inquiries and press questions.

“For more on the White House reaction, let's bring in CNN's Jeff Zeleny.”

Insights from Epstein Victims' Lawyer

47:45 to 51:05

Interview with David Boies about Virginia Giuffre's lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell and the need for transparency.

“All right, Jeff Seleney, thanks so much.”

Justice for Epstein's Victims

51:05 to 53:44

Discussion on the pursuit of justice for Epstein's victims and the obstacles they face.

“Those people have not been held responsible.”

Hunter Biden on 2024 and Family Pressures

53:44 to 56:00

Hunter Biden discusses his father's candidacy and past debate performance amid family and party pressures.

“Hunter is saying in a brand new podcast interview about the Democrats who called for his dad to drop out of the 2024 race and what he's blaming for President Biden's catastrophically horrific debate performance.”

Hunter Biden's Grievances and Democratic Dynamics

56:00 to 1:01:40

Discusses Hunter Biden's public criticisms of Democrats and the implications for the Biden campaign.

“And certainly I've mentioned this to you before, the data that I was seeing, President Biden just was not consolidating the base.”

Breaking News: Sentencing of Brett Hankinson

1:01:40 to 1:03:40

Reports on the sentencing of former police officer Brett Hankinson in the Breonna Taylor case.

“Breaking news in our law and justice lead just moments ago.”

Breaking News: Sentencing of Brett Hankinson

1:03:43 to 1:04:11

Reports on the sentencing of former police officer Brett Hankinson in the Breonna Taylor case.

“For 125 years, Nordstrom has been part of your story.”

Texas Gerrymandering and Political Strategies

1:04:38 to 1:10:00

Explores Texas Republicans' redistricting efforts and implications for future elections.

“In our politics lead, the Texas state legislature returns today for a special session taking on several complex issues.”

Impact of Tariffs on Berna Technologies

1:10:00 to 1:14:26

Learn how Berna Technologies adapted to tariffs and shifted manufacturing to the U.S.

“coast to coast about the impact of President Trump's tariffs.”

Viral Concert Scandal Analysis

1:14:44 to 1:18:31

Explore the cultural implications of a CEO's resignation over a viral concert incident.

“We're back with our pop culture lead in the fallout over the concert canoodling.”

Trump's Influence on Sports Team Names

1:18:31 to 1:21:49

Understand Trump's stance on changing the name of the Washington Commanders and its implications.

“He wants the Washington Commanders to change their name back to the Washington Redskins.”

Tribute to D-Day Veteran Jake Larson

1:21:49 to 1:24:06

Reflect on the legacy of D-Day veteran Jake Larson and his impact on younger generations.

“Our thanks to Tom Foreman for that report.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00What's your story? Do you know it? Where your family came from? And who they were? We help you discover those answers. Gathered from countless records, each a part of your story. Find yours today at Ancestry. This episode is brought to you by Nordstrom. For 125 years, Nordstrom has been part of your story. The stylist who found the perfect outfit for your big interview. The first pair of walking shoes for your one-year-old. The tomato soup you shared with your sister at the cafe. These are the moments that make Nordstrom, Nordstrom. Big or small, we're here for all of it. Celebrating 125 years with new moments still add.

0:40Discover it all in Nordstrom stores and at Nordstrom.com.

0:46Trump has a lot to say about a range of topics, except for one, the lead starts right now. Showing fake clips of President Obama in handcuffs, calling for the Washington commanders to go back to the Redskins or else. Is Operation Change the Subject underway from the President of the United States? It sure feels like it as President Trump drums up new controversies, but avoids discussing his own connections to pedophile sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and the scandal around it. Plus, a pilot's apology. Hear him describe steering a passenger plane away from a B-52 bomber as those on board share details of the mid-air scare.

1:30It was such a hard U-turn to where we were going kind of straight and then went pretty sideways. And what we're learning now about the shocking drowning death of Cosby show actor Malcolm Jamal Warner while on vacation in Costa Rica.

1:50Welcome to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper. We start with our politics lead in what might be called the art of the distraction. Six months into his second term, two weeks after the Justice Department announced there was no Jeffrey Epstein client list and nothing to see here. He died by suicide, creating an uproar, especially among members of the president's MAGA base. Trump's Justice Department says it is, quote, fully committed to transparency, unquote, fully committed to transparency, except the transparency they're committing to deal to committing to deals with the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

2:22They are committing to transparency with Hillary Clinton's emails. You heard me right. Today, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said she's honoring Republican Senator Chuck Grassley's request to release more information on the FBI's handling of the Clinton case. A distraction, perhaps, because the president's base has not moved on from the Epstein drama, despite these comments today from the White House press secretary. The president is the creator and the leader of the Make America Great Again movement. It's his baby that he that he made and he knows what his supporters want. It's transparency.

2:55And he has given them that on all accounts. No question is off limits here at this White House. This after President Trump spent the weekend on Truth Social with dozens of posts unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein. We should note even today in July 2025, it is still shocking that a sitting president of the United States continues to fill his days by trolling with content that is shocking and alienating and not at all connected to his job. Most of the posts attacking Democrats with wild accusations, including this meme styled after the Brady bunch showing eight members of the Obama administration in prison attire.

3:29And it says the shady bunch. She also reposted AI-generated video of President Obama getting arrested in the Oval Office. Trump's timeline also filled with clips from right-wing outlets praising those outlets' coverage of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's latest report and criminal referrals to the Justice Department in which she accused Obama administration officials of committing treasonous acts when the spy agencies warned of a Russian attempt to influence the 2016 election. We're going to have more on that later in the show. In 2013, then-citizen Trump said that President Obama, quote, should not be telling the Washington Redskins to change their name.

4:05Our country has far bigger problems. Focus on them, not nonsense, unquote. And here we are, 2025. President Trump is now keenly focused on that nonsense. He is, in fact, requesting two professional sports teams, including the Washington Commanders and the Cleveland Guardians, change their names back. Adding on Sunday when it comes to the commanders, he, quote, may put a restriction on them if they don't change the name back. And exhorting the Cleveland Guardians, formerly the Indians, to make Indians great again. Mega. He also posted this very random, uncaptioned three-minute video of people doing various stunts.

4:42Despite what may seem like obvious efforts to change the subject, President Trump continues to keep the Epstein story front and center, whether or not he realizes it. Today, the White House removed the Wall Street Journal from the press pool covering President Trump's upcoming trip to Scotland. That's because President Trump is suing the Wall Street Journal's publisher for$10 billion for publishing a purported 2003 birthday letter to Epstein's story. Trump denied writing that letter. It's a case that if it goes to trial, it will mean many, many more news stories about Trump and Epstein in the days ahead, not to mention discovery.

5:17It's also the president's decision to seek to unseal grand jury testimony from Epstein's prosecution, which may not produce anything new for a long, long time, if at all. We're still waiting to hear whether a New York judge will consider the case after the Justice Department's late Friday filing. Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, some House Republicans have signed on to a bipartisan bill introduced by Republicans Thomas Massey of Kentucky and Democrat Ro Khanna of California to force Trump to release all federal records related to Epstein. The latest sponsor, MAGA Firebrand, Congresswoman Nancy Mace of South Carolina.

5:50Those sources tell CNN. House Speaker Mike Johnson does not plan on putting any such legislation on the House floor before the long August recess, which gives Trump some breathing room to continue his quest to shift the narrative. Our panel joins us now. Thanks so much for being here, everybody. Susan, let's start with you. Your column in USA Today is titled, Trump's on a Roll. Why isn't he smiling? Answer, Jeffrey Epstein. And you point out this Epstein story and his handling of it are overshadowing so many of his successes. The Bill Black Better Act and not Bill Black Better. I'm sorry. One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

6:27I get my I get my acronyms wrong. It used to be BBB. Then it became OBB. Yeah, I'm sorry. The reset, the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. It doesn't work like that. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act and other things that he succeeded at, the rescissions in which he took away money for public television, public radio and foreign aid. Why do you think he is letting this happen? He's not letting it happen. It is happening, and it's happening because of a muscle that he is the one who exercised it, which is the muscle of conspiracy theories that leaves in suspicion of the establishment to tell you the truth, which leaves him unable to convince his own supporters that there is nothing to see here.

7:10They've been told for years by big mega voices that there was a lot to see with Jeffrey Epstein, a client list, powerful people being protected, and his followers and others are not quite ready to just take his word that that's not true. And Elliot, as a former Justice Department employee, I was wondering what you thought of this new CBS YouGov poll, which shows 83 percent of polled Republicans, Republicans, said the Justice Department should release all the information it has on Epstein. That's far beyond the grand jury testimony, which if it released, it'll be a very small slice of the pie. But there's no way it's all going to be released, right?

7:49There's no way it's all going to be released, and there's no way that it'll be satisfying to just about anybody. Let's be clear and reset what's actually in grand jury materials. It's usually just enough to secure an indictment, and they were charged with trafficking, sex trafficking or whatever else. But this is just the two people, Epstein and Maxwell. Sure, but even still, it's not that much information in terms of what people think they're getting. They think they will be getting a client list. They would think they would be getting all smoking guns of all sorts of who was palling around with Jeffrey Epstein.

8:19And that's simply not going to be the grand jury records. Now, again, these photographs or other notes or FBI files, certainly those could be released. But that would be a gross deviation from Justice Department practice. You would be revealing information about people who haven't been charged with crimes. You might be revealing information about victims, survivors of sexual assault, all of these things. It's just a bad idea. So, one, people are going to be disappointed. And two, it just shouldn't happen. Well, yeah, I mean, obviously they should redact the names of the survivors. No, I don't think anybody disputes that.

8:49But there are very, very precious few circumstances in which the Justice Department would release the entire file on any investigative matter, let alone this one. It would give a lot of names of people that weren't charged with anything. And that's... That's the whole point of it, really. It is, but that's anathema to sort of justice in a civil society. You don't release the names of people who've been investigated but not charged with crimes, even if they're rotten people who might have done bad things. And obviously, the victims and the survivors are the most important part of this. But there is the politics of this, of course.

9:18A Democrat from California, Ro Khanna, who we just mentioned, he told Playbook, quote, he's now advising Democrats to hammer the issue ahead of the midterms by tying it to a broader critique of the Trump administration. Whose side are you on? Are you voting to protect rich and powerful men? Are you standing with America's children and the people? Well, Speaker Johnson says now, no matter what happens with this discharge petition, which means 218 members of Congress sign a petition and they force something onto the floor for a vote. Johnson says he's going to put it out, put it off until after the August recess.

9:51Is that smart, you think? It is. It is going to be put off for after the August recess, regardless with the discharge petition, just because of the timing of everything. So whether he has the vote now and it comes back up in September, they have the vote in September and it comes back up in October. I'm not sure that that really matters. In fact, that kind of drags it out even further. So I you know, it's kind of like ripping off a bandaid. Let's let's go for it. Let's take it off. Look, with Ro Khanna, he's he's doing what's good in politics, which is taking your opponent's strength and turning it against them.

10:25When you see numbers like 83, 87, I've seen other numbers in the 90s when you factor in independence of Americans who want this information out there. That is what's facing the White House and what they're staring down. That's why he doesn't have the ability to turn his base against this, because it's almost universal that people want this information out. And what has been striking to me has been the difficulty of this White House getting beyond this point of it. The Wall Street Journal gave him a gift the other day. You didn't like that story. No, I didn't like that story for a whole host of reasons.

11:00The letter that Trump did for the Epstein birthday, he denies doing it. But the reason I didn't like it is because I thought a journalist who's going to accuse somebody of that in the press better have that evidence to show the individual. And as I understand it, the Wall Street Journal couldn't even show the drawing or the note that they were reporting on. And to me, you know, I thought the Wall Street Journal jumped the gun, but it was a gift to the White House to be able to talk about something else and blame the media. Sure. And a unified MAGA for at least one minute. For a day. Yeah, for a day.

11:37The White House is now barring the Wall Street Journal from the press pool, the rotating group of reporters from this upcoming presidential trip. not because this individual Wall Street Journal reporter did anything wrong or wrote that story that Mike doesn't like, just because this reporter works for the Wall Street Journal. Yeah. One of America's leading newspapers that happens to be owned by his former pal, his pal, maybe former pal, Rupert Murdoch. You know, this is like we're no longer shocked by things we used to find shocking. before Trump, it would have been shocking to exclude a Wall Street Journal reporter, another mainstream news reporter from a pool because they didn't like some negative story that was that was written about them.

12:22So this is it's in this world of shocking things. It no longer ranks right at the top, but it is a change from what we have, how we have expected presidents to deal with the press corps that covers them. Yeah. Well, I mean, I remember when I was I stood up for Fox when I was in the White House press pool back in 2000, whatever, during the first Obama years, it doesn't seem like they have that kind of collegiality. I mean, it'd be great if the Fox people said, we're not going to cover you unless you, you know, abide by precedent with the Wall Street Journal. I guess that's not going to happen. Anyway, thanks everyone for being here.

12:51President Trump also used Truth Social to rant about his administration's case in court today against Harvard University. He called the school anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, anti-America. The price the American public is taking as Trump keeps up this fight with this elite university. Plus, right now in Louisville, Kentucky, we're waiting to learn the prison sentence for a former police officer convicted in the 2020 shooting death of Breonna Taylor. We're going to bring you that when it happens. We're back in a moment.

13:23In our Law and Justice League today, a pivotal moment in the fight between higher education and the Trump administration. Today, Harvard University took the Trump administration to court in its battle to restore more than$2 billion in federal funding to the university. The administration previously froze Harvard's money, saying it failed to address anti-Semitism on campus following the October 7th attacks. Joining us to discuss, William Jacobson, a law professor at Cornell University and a Harvard Law School graduate. Professor Jacobson, the Trump administration, as you know, terminated$2.4 billion in federal funding for Harvard, impacting more than 950 ongoing research projects towards things such as cancer prevention, Parkinson's research.

14:02Today, the judge appeared to be favorable towards Harvard, and he questioned what the relationship between cutting funding for cancer research and ending anti-Semitism on campus was. Do you think Harvard has a legitimate argument here? Well, they've got a legitimate argument. I just don't know if it's going to prevail. Well, Trump administration is arguing that in the fine print of the contracts with the grants that they have the right to terminate contracts when they no longer align with administration priorities. So the question is going to be, do they have that legal right to do it? So, yes, Harvard has arguments.

14:41They can say them with a straight face, but I don't know if they're ultimately going to prevail. Judge seems to be leaning that way from all the reports that I've seen that she is basically saying this is some sort of pretext. You're not really doing that. You're just punishing them. Violation of First Amendment sort of argument. Do you think that Harvard sacrificed its independence by accepting the federal grants in the first place? Well, they certainly did. And that's what a lot of schools don't seem to want to accept, that when you take federal money, it comes with strings attached. One of those strings is you have to comply with the civil rights laws.

15:16And if you don't, you can lose your funding. But also there's contracts that give you the grant and you have to comply with the terms of the contracts. Again, the Trump administration is claiming that the language in the contracts that maybe the schools didn't read that carefully gives them the right to terminate it. So, yes, you give up your independence when you take federal money. Everybody knows that Harvard's coming to grips with that. Even if Harvard succeeds in this case, and that's a big if, because obviously I'm sure it will be appealed if Harvard does win this first round. Could this sacrifice future federal funding, do you think?

15:57Yes, that's something that's not really talked about enough, is that all of these fights are taking place over current funding, money and contracts and grants that have already been given. And I think there's a certain sympathetic aspect that certainly I feel for universities where you take money, you build up overhead, you build up infrastructure, and then the government wants to take it away. But that's very different from future funding. And I think Harvard's of the world, the Cornell's and the Columbia's and all the other places, they may win the battle over a particular grant. But there's no judge that's going to be able to order the Trump administration to give new funding.

16:36And these schools may find when the current funding runs out, even if they manage to keep it, that they're not going to get more funding. And Trump has already announced, Trump administration's already announced no new funding for these schools. So they've got to weigh that risk against a possible short term win in court. President Trump's attacking the federal judge on Truth Social, saying, quote, quote, the Harvard case was just tried in Massachusetts before an Obama appointed judge. She is a total disaster, which I say even before hearing her ruling. When she rules against us, we will immediately appeal and win, unquote.

17:11Ultimately, this is going to end up in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, don't you think? Well, it probably will. Depends what the basis for the judge's decision is. This is the same judge, and I don't mean to disparage her. It's just an interesting historical note. This is the same judge who ruled in favor of Harvard in the affirmative action case and eventually was reversed by the Supreme Court. So I think by all press accounts of people who've been in the courtroom, she seems to be leaning their way. But I think this is not necessarily a win for Harvard. And it might end up in the Supreme Court as to the terms and conditions under which an administration can pull funding.

17:51Interesting. Professor William Jacobson at Cornell, thanks so much. Appreciate it. Always good having you. Thank you. Coming up next, the Department of Homeland Security has released new video in the case of a border agent off-duty shot in New York. What the agency is saying about what happened and the man accused of shooting that agent.

18:26for your one-year-old. The tomato soup you shared with your sister at the cafe. These are the moments that make Nordstrom, Nordstrom. Big or small, we're here for all of it. Celebrating 125 years with new moments still ahead. Discover it all in Nordstrom stores and at Nordstrom.com. Cozy season is ahead and you'll be spending way more time inside. Is your home ready? Don't worry. With Wayfair, you can upgrade your space without breaking the bank. Score up to 70 % off during their Labor Day clearance on furniture, area rugs, mattresses, and more. Plus, surprise flash deals you can't miss. Whether it's one room or the whole house, Wayfair has pieces for every style and budget.

19:08Shop Wayfair's Labor Day clearance now through September 7th at Wayfair.com. Wayfair, every style, every home. In our Law and Justice lead, as the Justice Department was asking a judge about releasing grand jury transcripts on Jeffrey Epstein, and President Trump was filing his lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal for a story about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. The director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was releasing a report of her own on the 2016 election. Gabbard claiming that right after Trump won the 2016 election, the Obama administration's national security team, quote, manufactured and politicized intelligence, unquote, that, she says, laid the groundwork for the FBI's Russia investigation.

19:49Gabbard alleges a, quote, treasonous conspiracy at the highest levels of government. Her assessment appears to conflate conclusions by the Senate Intelligence Committee that Russia interfered in the 2016 election through various information operations, conclusions by the intelligence community in general, and simultaneous assessments by the intelligence community that concluded the Russians did not hack into any votes or change the outcome of the election. In other words, there is the truth that Russia interfered, but there is no evidence at all that Russia hacked into the election. Let's bring in Democratic Congressman Jason Crowe.

20:28He's on the House Intelligence Committee. Congressman, this bipartisan Senate report that I alluded to also concluded that Russia did interfere in the 2016 election. Russia wanted Trump to win. But Gabbard said in her report referring to the Obama administration, quote, their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people. What's your reaction to the report? Well, listen, what's actually going on here is pretty clear. You have Tulsi Gabbard, who's been out of favor with President Trump since the intelligence agency issued battle damage assessments of the Iran strike that were not consistent with what Donald Trump was saying.

21:07So she's been in hot water and been trying to get back into favor. And then you have a president and President Trump who wants people to talk about anything, anything other than the Epstein investigation, which he is very, very clearly worried about the release of the Epstein files. So what's happening is Tulsi Gabbard's trying to work his way back into the good graces of Donald Trump by fabricating this conspiracy theory that try to placate Donald Trump. That's what this is all about. I should note that I have reached out to the office of the director of national intelligence and made it clear that we'd love to have Director Gabbard on the show to talk about this conclusion that she reached.

21:44The Senate Intelligence Committee, as you know, congressman spent years investigating all of this at the end. They also pinned the blame on Russia, a bipartisan conclusion led by Republicans in the majority on the committee. The chairman, Marco Rubio, is now Trump's secretary of state. If Gabbard's claims and her prosecutorial referrals have any truth, why are we hearing about it now, more than eight years after the fact, instead of during the first Trump administration? Yeah, this goes back to what's actually going on here. As you pointed out, a full and thorough bipartisan investigation that occurred during the first Trump administration by Donald Trump's secretary of state national security adviser now, Marco Rubio.

22:27And they had a whole administration to address this, and they did, actually, and the findings are pretty clear and pretty bipartisan. This is simply a distraction. They don't want people talking about the release of the Epstein files because Donald Trump is very, very worried about it. That is clear. Which, of course, begs the question, why is he so worried about it? It makes me want to know. It makes most Americans want to know. In fact, an overwhelming amount of Americans do want to actually know what's in those files. So they're trying to distract. But this is not without major risk. You know, listen, I was sent to war in Iraq because of fabricated intelligence.

23:05I was sent to war, as were many Americans. We spent$3 trillion, 20 years fighting wars that started based on fabricated intelligence. And this can end very poorly. So anytime you politicize an intelligence infrastructure like Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabbard are doing now, there are very real consequences to it. I want to ask you about your attempt yesterday to visit an immigration detention facility in Colorado, which you represent in the House. ICE denied your entry. Tell us more about that. Yeah, so I attempted to conduct an unannounced congressional oversight visit to the detention center in my district, which is something that is specifically allowed under federal law.

Read the full transcript

23:47And the reason I know that is because I actually helped pass this law, because the last time I was denied entry to this facility was six years ago under the first Trump administration. And I said, this is crazy. A member of Congress should have access to a federal facility in her or his district. So we passed a law that specifically says members of Congress have immediate access to these facilities without any notice having to be provided. The administration unlawfully denied me yesterday, which, of course, begs yet another question. Why does this administration desperately want to impede congressional oversight?

24:20What are they hiding? We know there's a lot of abuses. We know there's a lot of violations of due process. We know they don't want people to know what's going on in these facilities. What do you make the argument that your visit was unannounced, as you note, and also on a Sunday? Well, that's the whole point, actually. The whole point of these unannounced visits and why we actually crafted the law the way that we did was because we learned over the last six years that when you announce visits, they dress it up, they clean it up, there's the whole dog and pony show, you get a very different look.

24:50And remember, Congress says, hey, next week we're coming to visit you all. You get a very different look to what's going on. And that happens at military bases. that happens at VA hospitals, that happens at ICE immigration facilities. It just happens. So we actually crafted a law that said, nope, oversight is really important here. We're going to actually carve out a legal excerpt that says unannounced visits under law. That's why we did it. And of course, that seems to be why this administration also wants to violate the law by not allowing us to do that because they don't want us to see what's going on.

25:24Democratic Congressman Jason Grove, Colorado, thanks so much. Appreciate it. Also on our Law and Justice Lead, any moment, former Louisville, Kentucky police officer Brett Hankison will be sentenced for his role in the shooting death of Breonna Taylor. Hankison was convicted on one count of abusing Taylor's civil rights last year after firing several shots through her bedroom window during a police raid. This is back in 2020. None of his shots hit her. It was gunfire from other officers that killed her. Let's bring in CNN's Jason Carroll. Jason, do we know what's happening right now in the courthouse?

25:54Well, Jake, as you know, cameras are not allowed in that federal courthouse in downtown Louisville. But what we have been hearing is the judge that's overseeing this sentencing, that is Judge Rebecca Jennings. She's been hearing from witnesses on both sides. She's been hearing from those who have come forward to testify and give their support to Brent Hankinson. She's been listening to those people throughout the afternoon. She's also going to be hearing from those who are going to come forward and talk about how much Breonna Taylor meant to them. That is expected to be also this afternoon. One of those people expected to speak to the court is Breonna Taylor's mother.

26:35So that is what's been going on this afternoon. Again, we've been waiting for this sentencing, waiting to hear what type of sentence the judge will issue here. As I'm sure you've heard, the DOJ has recommended that Brett Hankinson serve just one day in jail, essentially serving no time for what he has been accused of here and what a jury found him guilty of. And as you know, a jury did find him guilty of violating Breonna Taylor's civil rights. The DOJ then coming forward and pointing out that, as you mentioned, Brett Hankinson did fire many shots that day back in March, more than 10 shots entering Breonna Taylor's apartment.

27:21But none of those shots actually struck Breonna Taylor. And it's for that reason, in part, the DOJ is recommending just one day, saying in part, Hankinson did not shoot Mrs. Taylor and is not otherwise responsible for her death, going on to say that counsel is unaware of another prosecution in which a police officer has been charged with depriving the rights of another person under the Fourth Amendment. Now, in response to that, very quickly, as you can imagine, Jake, the family just heartbroken when they heard about what the DOJ was recommending here, saying, quote, this sets a dangerous precedent when a police officer is found guilty of violating someone's constitutional rights, sending it saying that it sends the wrong message in terms of a message that white officers can violate the civil rights of black Americans with near total impunity.

28:14And so this judge overseeing this has been hearing from both sides all afternoon, waiting to see what her final decision will be. All right. Well, let me ask you, Jason, what happened to all the other officers involved? Well, there were several officers that were involved with that controversial no-knock warrant that night back on March 13th of 2020. Miles Cosgrove and Jonathan Mattingly, those were the two officers whose bullets struck Breonna Taylor. they have not faced any federal charges in connection with her death. There were some officers who were indicted with putting together that, again, that controversial no-knock warrant.

28:54Their cases are still outstanding at this point. But what is so upsetting to Breonna Taylor's family is that none of the officers involved in that no-knock warrant have been charged in any way with her death. All right, Jason Carroll, thanks so much. Some really sad news today about actor and musician Malcolm Jamal Warner, probably best known as the character Theo from the sitcom The Cosby Show. Jamal Warner drowned while on vacation in Costa Rica, his family says. What investigators are now telling us about his death? That's next.

29:36International lead, that was Malcolm Jamal Warner. He rose to fame as Theo Huxtable on The Cosby Show. And we got sad news. He passed away on Sunday. He was only 54 years old. CNN's Elizabeth Wagmeister is in Los Angeles. Elizabeth, what happened? This is so, so sad, Jake. A true accident and sudden death. Malcolm Jamal Warner drowned during a family vacation in Costa Rica yesterday. Investigators there saying that he was pulled out by a current And beachgoers went to try to resuscitate him, but it was too late. Now, so young, Malcolm Jamal Warner, just 54 years old. He has an eight-year-old daughter, Jake.

30:20It is just so tragic. I spoke to a source this morning who did confirm this sad, sad news of his passing. And I just want to highlight what a phenomenal reputation he had in the industry. I spoke to someone this morning who worked very closely with him. And, of course, they are absolutely heartbroken. They are shocked. His family is shocked. His fans around the world are shocked. But something that keeps coming up is just how wonderful he was to work with. And, Jake, I actually met him back in 2016 when he was promoting the show The People vs. O.J. Simpson. He played Al Cowlings in that, of course, who drove the white Bronco in that infamous scene.

31:06And he was just so lovely, Jake. So truly a life gone too soon. And obviously he was best known as Theo on The Cosby Show. But he went on to do other roles later in life. Not many child stars do. I know he also became a musician. What was his larger impact on the entertainment industry? You know, a huge impact on the entertainment industry, of course, starting with The Cosby Show. And that, of course, is what he will be remembered most by. The Cosby Show was a true cultural force on American culture. Remember, Jake, this was a different time. Today, everybody is watching Netflix and Hulu and watching their own shows on their own schedule.

31:52But when the Cosby Show was airing, everybody in America was watching it at the same time. You had tens of millions of viewers watching this. So everybody knows who Malcolm Jamal Warner is. Everybody felt like Theo Huxtable was their own brother. And it wasn't just those who watched it during the Cosby Show's run during 1984 to 1992. It was also future generations. I remember watching reruns of the Cosby Show on Nick at Night. So I watched this and it was part of my childhood. And you make a great point, Jake, that not many child stars are able to continue, but he did. He was a TV star most recently on a medical drama on Fox called The Resident.

32:35Yeah, he was good on that. I saw him on that. He played this very arrogant physician. Couldn't be more different from him in real life, by the way. Yeah, no, I met him once. He was a really nice guy. Elizabeth Wagmeister, thank you so much. Appreciate it. also on our national lead. The FAA is now investigating after the pilot of a Delta regional jet had to make a hard turn to avoid colliding with a U.S. Air Force B-52 bomber. The pilot apologizing to passengers in the moments after this close call, saying the bomber was sort of coming at us and that, quote, nobody told us about it. CNN's Brian Todd reports.

33:11All right, here she comes, the venerable B-52 straddle fortress. A B-52 bomber flying over the North Dakota State Fair, but around the same time, a commercial plane full of passengers is trying to land at the nearby civilian airport. For those of you on the right-hand side, you probably saw the airplane kind of sort of coming at us. The pilot is almost chillingly matter-of-fact as he talks about the harrowing close call that just occurred. It caught me by surprise. This is not normal at all. The Delta Airlines regional jet, operated by SkyWest Airlines, on Friday flying from Minneapolis to Minot, North Dakota.

33:47The B-52 flyover was advertised for 7.40 p.m. local time, which was roughly the same time the SkyWest plane was landing. The fairgrounds, just a half mile from the civilian airport. The commercial pilot said the control tower told him to turn right, but that's when he says he saw the military aircraft.

34:17Sorry about the aggressive maneuver. This audio was captured by passenger Monica Green, who said the flight was getting ready to land when she felt the plane jerk. But it was such a hard U-turn to where we were going kind of straight and then went pretty sideways. I'd be looking out the window and just see straight grass. I wouldn't be seeing the horizon anymore because we were so sideways. The video of the flyover appears to show a plane turning sharply in the distance. However, it's impossible to tell if this is the SkyWest plane. It's the latest of several incidents between military and civilian planes.

34:49In March, a collision alert sounded in a Delta jet flying out of Ronald Reagan National Airport in Washington as T-38 military jets flew over nearby Arlington National Cemetery. Those planes came within five seconds of colliding. And in January, a close call turned deadly when a military Blackhawk helicopter and an American Airlines regional jet collided near Reagan National Airport, killing 67 people. Why are we still having so many problems de-conflicting military and civilian flights? Well, there's enough blame to go around on both sides. The military could do a better job dealing with the civilian side of the equation, letting them know when they have special occurrences, when they've got missions that conflict into the civilian airspace.

35:38And on the civilian side, there is a shortage of air traffic controllers. The system is overstressed. The FAA now says it's investigating this incident. The control tower involved in Minot is not a tower operated by the FAA. It's operated by a contractor, Midwest ATC, who declined to comment on the incident to CNN. Jake? All right, Brian Todd, thank you so much. Appreciate it. The locals are pushing back about too many tourists overtaking their towns. You've likely seen the protests on your social media feeds. The message behind some of these demonstrations is next.

36:18Our world lead now in an effort to fight what's called over tourism in Barcelona, Spain. The city is shutting two of its cruise ship terminals, the closure impacting Europe's busiest cruise port. It will take effect next year and brings the number of operational terminals in Barcelona down to five. It's part of a wider effort to deal with the pressures of over-tourism in the Spanish city, where there's been an increase of local protests against mass tourism and overcrowding. Over-tourism also causing strife in Mexico City, where another protest against unaffordable housing and gentrification took place over the weekend.

36:54Many local residents say they're getting pushed out of their neighborhoods due to skyrocketing rental prices and an influx of remote workers from different countries. CNN's Valeria Leon reports from Mexico City, where officials are looking at ways to prevent locals from being displaced.

37:13In Mexico City, anger over housing costs spilled into the streets again Sunday. It was the second protest in less than a month, part of a growing movement against gentrification that's been building in the past year. Many came with signs blaming foreign money for driving up rents and pushing locals out of their own neighborhoods. They suddenly can't afford to live in the area anymore, this man tells me. They have to move farther away to places that are even more vulnerable. With housing out of reach for many Mexico City residents and a visible influx of tourists and digital nomads in some of the capital's most desirable neighborhoods, foreigners have found themselves in the eye of the storm.

37:59We demand a law to defend our roots, a law that defends housing as a common good. Protesters insisted the march was peaceful. We just want to express how we feel. We're not here to do anything wrong. We're here to prevent that. But the contemporary art museum, inside Mexico's most prestigious public university, was vandalized. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum condemned the violence. For some actions we don't agree with and we will never agree with, Sheinbaum said. A small group, just a tiny part of one of the demonstrations entered University City, broke the windows of a bookstore and burned books.

38:42But these protests reflect more than a single march. The city's housing tensions have been escalating for years. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, thousands of foreign remote workers or digital nomads have relocated to Mexico City, pushing up demand for housing in some of the city's most attractive areas. And where demand is high, prices soar. And as Mexico City prepares to co-host the 2026 World Cup, officials promise an inclusive event for all. But for many locals, the worry is that the event's global attention and investment could speed up the very changes they're protesting. Valeria León, CNN, Mexico City.

39:28And our thanks to Valeria León for that report. My next guest represented one of the most prominent victims of the now-dead pedophile sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. The mountain of evidence that the Justice Department has, likely, should a judge grant the request to release more than just the grand jury transcripts. I'll get this attorney's take next.

39:53This episode is brought to you by Nordstrom. For 125 years, Nordstrom has been part of your story. The stylist who found the perfect outfit for your big interview. The first pair of walking shoes for your one-year-old. The tomato soup you shared with your sister at the cafe. These are the moments that make Nordstrom. Nordstrom. Big or small, we're here for all of it. Celebrating 125 years with new moments still add. Discover it all in Nordstrom stores and at Nordstrom.com. Cozy season is ahead and you'll be spending way more time inside. Is your home ready? Don't worry. With Wayfair, you can upgrade your space without breaking the bank.

40:33Score up to 70 % off during their Labor Day clearance on furniture, area rugs, mattresses, and more. Plus, surprise flash deals you can't miss. Whether it's one room or the whole house, Wayfair has pieces for every style and budget. Shop Wayfair's Labor Day clearance now through September 7th at Wayfair.com. Wayfair, every style, every home. Welcome to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper. This hour, the White House is responding to questions tonight about why President Trump has not ordered the FBI to release the full Jeffrey Epstein files, just as CNN is learning new information about the president's strategy in his$10 billion lawsuit over a story in the Wall Street Journal regarding a letter that he supposedly wrote in a Jeffrey Epstein birthday book, though the president denies that.

41:20Plus, today marks one year, one year since President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 presidential race, and now his son Hunter, well, he's got a lot to say about it. And President Trump putting pressure on multiple professional sports teams, demanding that the Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians change their names back to the Washington Redskins and the Cleveland Indians. How the teams are responding and what the president says may happen if one of them doesn't follow through.

41:56The lead tonight, the gears of justice slowly grinding as President Trump seeks some distance from the Epstein file's fallout. Federal judges in New York and Florida are currently reviewing a request from the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony from Jeffrey Epstein's criminal sex trafficking case, a process that could take months, if not longer, before a decision is reached. But even if the Justice Department's request is granted, President Trump acknowledged it might not be enough to satisfy all those demanding more transparency. Posting over the weekend, quote, Quote, even if the court gave its full and unwavering approval, nothing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request.

42:34It will always be more, more, more, unquote. In actuality, of course, it is his own MAGA base demanding a lot of this. But let's talk about this with CNN chief legal affairs correspondent Paula Reid. Paula, give us an update on where the Justice Department's request stands as of right now. So the request is in and now it's up to the judges overseeing these requests to determine what happens next. But we shouldn't expect any high profile public hearings because we're talking about confidential information. Part of why this is confidential and so sensitive in this case is because some of this information involves victims and accusers.

43:12So we expect the judges will likely allow those parties to weigh in, give input as they make this decision. but it is possible that we really won't hear much about this until the judges make their final decision on whether they actually want to release any of this material. And President Trump's lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal officially has a judge. It is not Trump appointee U.S. District Court Judge Eileen Cannon, who ruled so favorably in the case involving classified documents. Who is it? So the winner of this is Darren Gales, a judge appointed by President Obama back in 2014. I want to note, though, even though, of course, we know President Trump makes a lot of who appointed a judge.

43:52This particular judge has a bipartisan resume when it comes to appointments. He previously had appointments to state judgeships from two Republican governors. Interestingly, this is not his first time handling a Trump related lawsuit. He also oversaw Trump's lawsuit against his former lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen, where Trump sought five hundred million dollars in damages, alleging that Cohen violated his attorney-client privilege. You may remember Trump eventually abandoned that right before Cohen's lawyers had a chance to question him under oath. So this judge, he knows what he's getting himself into.

44:27So you've been talking to some outside legal advisors for Trump about this libel suit. Now, look, I'm no lawyer unlike you. It just seems to me like a can of worms, like the discovery process. He's going to have to release information. He is going to be cross-examined. What are his advisors telling you? They describe it as a, quote, roll of the dice, right? They moved very quickly on Friday to file this lawsuit. And this is a really high bar for someone who's the president of the United States to succeed on a claim like this, because part of what is analyzed is your ability to respond. How big a bully pulpit do you have, right?

45:01He has the biggest in addition to the other claims that he's making. And even though this lawsuit, it has many similar claims to those made against other media outlets like ABC and CBS, his advisors are aware that you're dealing with something very different here. You're dealing with Fox News and Rupert Murdoch. And Mr. Murdoch is not someone who is known to shy away from a legal fight. And as you noted, the biggest risk here, though, is the discovery process, all the things that could come out during the course of this litigation. So we'll be watching to see, is this just a political stunt? Was the president just blowing off steam or is he truly committed to seeing this litigation through.

45:41All right, Paula Reid, thanks so much. For more on the White House reaction, let's bring in CNN's Jeff Zeleny. Jeff, reporters pelted White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt with more Epstein questions today. That's because there are so many questions that remain, so many questions that are unanswered. And the president clearly has been trying to do everything he can to change the subject. Over the weekend and early this morning, just posting a litany of things that are totally unrelated to what the White House and most normal White Houses do. However, the White House press secretary was saying the onus today is not on the president, but it's on the Department of Justice.

46:20The president has said if the Department of Justice and the FBI want to move forward with releasing any further credible evidence, they should do so. As to why they have or have not or will, you should ask the FBI about that. There are reports that President Trump or the FBI agents going through the Epstein files were told to flag President Trump's name if it came up? Is that something the president was aware of or something that he directed those agents or the Department of Justice to do? I don't believe that's something the White House was aware of. You'd have to ask the FBI. And that was a very interesting exchange there.

46:50When our Kristen Holmes asked Caroline Lovett about this, she didn't say a no. And what they're talking about is something that Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, he reported and said in letters that he was told that FBI agents were told to flag any time that Trump's name was mentioned. So her answer there was quite interesting. But look, the bottom line to all of this, conservative lawmakers on Capitol Hill, some are calling for Pam Bondi to come to testify. This just isn't going away because there are so many unanswered questions here. But unusually, the president did not have a public schedule today.

47:25He did not speak about this out loud. He does have one tomorrow. It's hard to imagine him not answering or talking even more about this. And, of course, he's been even fueling the fire by continuing to file lawsuits and other matters. So, look, it's only Monday, and it's hard to—I think the White House can escape this for the rest of the week. Yeah. All right, Jeff Seleney, thanks so much. Let's talk right now to David Boies. He represented one of Epstein's most prominent accusers, Virginia Giuffre, who accused Jeffrey Epstein and his partner and accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell of raping her when she was 16 and 17, grooming her to have sex with several powerful men, including Prince Andrew, who did agree to a settlement with Giuffre, though he denied the allegations.

48:09David, thanks for joining us. I want to ask you about the settlement that your former client, Virginia Jouffre, who died by suicide in April, the settlement she reached in her lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. Journalist Julie K. Brown notes in her book, Perversion of Justice, quote, nearly every part of the lawsuit had been sealed by the federal judge, meaning that unless someone challenged the judge's decision, nobody would ever learn the names of the prominent people involved or the scope of Epstein and Maxwell's operation, unquote. You were part of her legal team, obviously. You headed Jufres' legal team.

48:43You're obviously not legally allowed to talk about it since it's sealed. But would you be in favor of a judge unsealing that information so we can find out more about other predators who might still be out there? Yes, I would. And Virginia Jufres, during her lifetime, took the position that all of that should come forward, with the possible exception of if you have victims whose names are included, that those should be protected. But except for the very limited excision of names of victims, Virginia's position and our position has been consistently that all that should be revealed. So Virginia has passed away, unfortunately, died by suicide.

49:32Jeffrey Epstein is no longer with us as well. He died in prison. The fact that those two individuals are dead, does that change anything in terms of the unsealing of this information? Or is it is the fact that that Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell and they're still out there? Does that change it? Yeah, the fact that both Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia have passed does not really change things. The ceiling still has to be reviewed by a judge. And much of what was included has been revealed. Much has not been. But a good deal of what was sealed has been made public. but a great deal of what exists has not been made public.

50:21And when you're talking about the files, remember you're not talking just about civil files or just about files from the grand juries. You're also talking about files from the Justice Department's own investigations, both back in 2006, 2007, 2008, and more recently. So Julie Brown spoke to Virginia Giuffre and your client told her, quote, I'm not going to stop until all these girls get justice. What do you think justice looks like for all these girls? I think one thing that justice looks like is to understand the scope and the scale of what went on. Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell could not have operated on the scope and scale that they did for decades without the help and support of a great many people.

51:11Those people have not been held responsible. There are people that the Justice Department knows, that the Justice Department has declared to be co-conspirators, that the Justice Department has never gone after. And this is not a partisan issue. This is a failure of every Democratic and every Republican president. The only time that we had A real effort at justice was when Mr. Berman was the U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York. Unfortunately, he was replaced, and the prosecution really didn't go after any new people after that. But there are many, many people who participated in this sex trafficking, who contributed to sex trafficking, who made it possible, that have never been held to account.

52:08And that is, I think, a terrible failure in justice, a terrible failure of our justice system. One of the things that I think some prosecutors have been surprised by is the fact that the Ghislaine Maxwell did not cooperate with prosecutors and name names of not just the lower level co-conspirators that you're talking about. And I'm not saying they shouldn't be brought to justice. They should. But I think what people really want to know is who are the powerful men that took advantage of these young women and in some cases girls? Do you have any insight into why Ghislaine Maxwell didn't name names in exchange for a lighter sentence?

52:52I really don't. It was an amazement to me that she and her lawyers did not cooperate early. When Jeffrey Epstein died, it was clear that the next person to be investigated was going to be Ms. Maxwell. And why she did not cooperate at that time is a mystery to me. she obviously felt that she was somehow going to be able to defend herself in court how how she could have felt that given the evidence against her was something I never understood all right David boys I have many more questions but I'm going to have to say goodbye and we'll have you back thank you so much really appreciate it thank you take care what President Biden's son Hunter is saying in a brand new podcast interview about the Democrats who called for his dad to drop out of the 2024 race and what he's blaming for President Biden's catastrophically horrific debate performance.

53:57That's next.

54:04In our politics lead one year ago today, President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 presidential race. This, of course, followed his disastrous debate performance and internal Democratic pressure for him to drop out. Today, his son Hunter made headlines of his own in a more than three hour long interview on a podcast touching on a number of issues, including the 2024 campaign. He vehemently defended his father while revealing a new detail about the debate. I know exactly what happened in that debate. He flew around the world, basically, the mileage that he could have flown around the world three times.

54:42He's 81 years old. He's tired as shit. Give him Ambien to be able to sleep. He gets up on the stage and he looks like he's a deer in the headlights. Here with me now, Democratic strategist Karen Finney and Axios reporter Alex Thompson. Alex, of course, is my co-author in our book about Biden's decision to drop out of the race and hide his deterioration. It's called Original Sin. I should disclose, Hunter had some stuff to say about you and me, Alex, in this interview. But we're not going to make this panel about us because he had a lot to say about a lot of more important people than you and me.

55:12What do you make about this new detail about the Ambien being a part of this? Well, the fact that we didn't know it beforehand, even though that the doctor had been public about trying to say what Joe Biden was on, what he was taking, the fact that we did not know that the president of the United States was on Ambien. I'd also imagine it is very difficult to do the proverbial 3 a.m. phone call crisis when you are on Ambien in the middle of the night. I think it's really striking. Now, we haven't heard from the doctor. But the fact that the president's own son said that the president was on Ambien the weeks before the debate is a telling new detail about the president's abilities at the time.

55:47And he's still saying that his father should have stayed in the race and still could have won. Yeah, you know, look, I'm not going to defend or, you know, whatever Hunter said. He has a right to his own feelings. Look, I think it's pretty clear that it was going to be hard for anyone to win in 107 days, period, full stop. And certainly I've mentioned this to you before, the data that I was seeing, President Biden just was not consolidating the base. But here's what I would say about this. You know, there's this happening. There are these autopsies or reviews happening. What I hope my party is focused on is let's have a hard conversation and a hard look at what happened and how do we make sure it doesn't happen again.

56:32So some of the should he have gotten out this month or that month, I'm less concerned about that than I am about what was being done to make sure we won, period, full stop. OK, well, here's an autopsy of what went wrong from Hunter Biden, a tirade he goes against Democrats who he feels wronged his father. James Carville, who hasn't run a race in 40 years, and David Axelrod, who had one success in his political life, and that was Barack Obama. And that was because of Barack Obama, not because of David Axelrod. And David Plouffe and all of these guys, and the Pod Save America guys, who were junior speechwriters on Barack Obama's Senate staff, who have been dining out on the relationship with him for years, making millions of dollars.

57:22The Anita Dunns of the world, who's made$40,$50 million off the Democratic Party, they're all going to insert their judgment over a man who has figured out, unlike anybody else, how to get elected to the United States Senate over seven times. What do you make of it, Alex? The most striking thing is that he attacked Anita Dunn, who, by the way, helped steer his father to the Democratic nomination in 2020. Also was in the White House for the majority of those four years until basically she was driven out because of this risk with Hunter Biden. She is also set to be interviewed by the House Oversight Committee in the coming weeks.

57:58Anita didn't want him to drop out either, by the way. A hundred percent. I read it in our book. It is striking. Hunter is clearly establishing himself as the carrier of the family's grievances and is also completely obliterating the fiction from last summer that Joe Biden was doing sort of the honorable thing. Joe Biden was driven out of this race by the elites of the Democratic Party, and Joe Biden, his entire family, deeply resented. Some of the strongest words were directed at actor George Clooney, who we should note, is one of the most prolific fundraisers in the history of the Democratic Party, period, full stop, who did call for Joe Biden to drop out after the debate in a New York Times op-ed.

58:41Yeah. President Trump, President Biden. What do you have to do with anything? Why do I have to listen to you? What right do you have to step on a man who's given 52 years of his life to the service of this country and decide that you, George Clooney, are going to take out basically a full page ad in the New York Times to undermine the president? He also said that Clooney is not an actor, but a brand. I should note that Clooney has won an acting Academy Award. Yes. Anyway. Look, it was so here's the thing, though. It was it was pretty I think we were all pretty shocked to see someone of George Clooney's stature write a piece and call for a president to step down.

59:19I mean, that would be news no matter who we were talking about. Clearly, Hunter's angry. I mean, there's a lot of F-bombs in that. And, you know, look. I think, again, to me, the most important thing is and it's interesting, like with the autopsy news that's been out there. And even some of the texts going around after this interview, people are like, OK, so what happened to the money? People want some transparency around the money that was raised. How is it spent? And we still lost. I think there is a lot of empathy for Hunter and for Joe Biden. Well, for Joe Biden. Well, but for Hunter, the fact that he's defending his father.

1:00:00I'll put I'll put it that way. Can I tell you the quote that I think we're going to see the most? And it's one where Hunter Biden gives his take on illegal immigration, because that's the one that seems to have gotten the attention of Republicans and conservatives the most on social media. And the way that they are depicting it is this is the Democratic position on illegal immigration. Can we roll that clip?

1:00:27You have to talk about and realize that people are really upset about illegal immigration. F*** you. How do you think your hotel room gets cleaned? How do you think you've got food on your f***ing table? Who do you think washes your dishes? So his message for anybody who says that people are really upset about illegal immigration is F*** you. Who do you think washes your dishes? Well, this is exactly why Democrats, I'm assuming including Karen, are not exactly thrilled with Hunter Biden popping his head up and do not believe that Hunter Biden is the most effective communicator for the Democratic Party right now.

1:01:03He also, later in that interview, said, if I were president in 2028, and that just really made a lot of heads explode. He also talked, by the way, about invading El Salvador to get the undocumented people who had been deported to El Salvador. But can I just say, who cares what? I actually just don't care. I mean, again, I'm more focused on, and I think most Democrats... Somebody cares, did you give a three-hour YouTube? Yeah, and look, he's unplugged. I love when people are unplugged. Maybe he should do his own. I do. I think he should do his own autopsy. But again, given what is happening in this country, I'm more worried about how we move forward, sincerely.

1:01:39All right. Karen Finney, Alex Thompson, thanks to both of you. Breaking news in our law and justice lead just moments ago. Former Louisville, Kentucky police officer Brett Hankinson was sentenced for his role in the 2020 shooting of Breonna Taylor. CNN's Jason Carroll has the details. Jason, what is the sentence? Well, we're just now hearing that the sentence has been made. It is 33 months in prison. It's a little bit more than two and a half years. In addition to that, three years of probation, Jake. It was touch and go there for a while. It took the entire afternoon for the judge overseeing this case to arrive at this decision.

1:02:14The federal judge overseeing this heard from those in support of Hankinson, also heard from those in support of Breonna Taylor. Now, the judge, Rebecca Jennings, compared this to other officers that she has sentenced in the past. Should be noted that the probation office had recommended that Hankinson serve anywhere between 11 and 14 years. So this sentence, far less than that, again, 33 months. The defense has already said, Hankinson's attorneys have already said that they plan to appeal this judge's decision. You can see some of those who are waiting outside federal court there in downtown Louisville.

1:02:56Again, the Department of Justice, a few eyebrows raised here when they had recommended that Hankinson serve just one day for his role in violating Breonna Taylor's civil rights. Obviously, the judge did not listen to that. Hankinson will remain out on bond for the time being, unclear when he will have to turn himself in. But the final say here in terms of sentence, 33 months, three years probation. All right, Jason Carroll with the breaking news. Thanks so much. Coming up, how Republicans in Texas are moving forward with President Trump's plans for his party to stay in power in the midterms. That's next.

1:03:40This episode is brought to you by Nordstrom. For 125 years, Nordstrom has been part of your story. The stylist who found the perfect outfit for your big interview. The first pair of walking shoes for your one-year-old. The tomato soup you shared with your sister at the cafe. These are the moments that make Nordstrom, Nordstrom. Big or small, we're here for all of it. celebrating 125 years with new moments still add. Discover it all in Nordstrom stores and at Nordstrom.com. Cozy season is ahead and you'll be spending way more time inside. Is your home ready? Don't worry. With Wayfair, you can upgrade your space without breaking the bank.

1:04:20Score up to 70 % off during their Labor Day clearance on furniture, area rugs, mattresses, and more. Plus, surprise flash deals you can't miss. Whether it's one room or the whole house, Wayfair has pieces for every style and budget. Shop Wayfair's Labor Day clearance now through September 7th at Wayfair.com. Wayfair, every style, every home. In our politics lead, the Texas state legislature returns today for a special session taking on several complex issues. part of the agenda includes potentially throwing out their current congressional maps and drawing new ones in an effort to increase the number of House Republicans in the U.S.

1:04:59House of Representatives. Texas currently has 13 House Democrats, 25 Republicans. Joining us now to discuss former Republican Congressman Adam Kinzinger. You have a very unique perspective on this, Congressman, because you were screwed by Democratic redistrictors in 2021 in Illinois, and your seat was basically just taken away. And now you live in Texas, where Republicans are going, they've already redistricted a lot in a pretty crazy way to make it as Republican as it is. And now they want to do it even more. What do you make of this new Republican redistricting effort? They want to get rid of as many as five House Democrats with new seats prior to next year's midterms.

1:05:42Yeah, look, by the way, I got hit with it twice. So in 2012, they drew me out of my district and I won a member member primary. And then, you know, 2021. And it's crazy. But anyway, look, it's dumb. First off, I never even it never even crossed my mind that you could do like a mid 10 year redistricting, because as most people know, this is supposed to be every 10 years with the new census. This is actually how you break democracy and representative democracy is when you decide that you can't go to the people and make the case. You have to instead gerrymander these districts. And now every Democratic state is going to be under pressure to have a midseason gerrymandering of theirs.

1:06:23And it's this like cascade of stuff just breaking down and people losing faith in the system. Look, if Republicans are worried that they're going to lose the House in 2026, maybe go out and pass bills America wants or maybe say things Americans want to hear. That's a novel idea. But that's how you actually win a majority, not reopening stuff and drawing like thin little slivers to dilute Democratic populations. The worst gerrymandering offenders, the worst states are almost entirely Republican, except for Illinois, which is really bad. And you could argue parts of Nevada, too. But you're right.

1:07:01I mean, in California, they have an independent commission to do it to try to make it as fair as possible. But Gavin Newsom's talking about redistricting in the same way that Texas is going to do it. And former Texas Congressman Beto O 'Rourke said this is what Democrats need to do to counter Republican redistricting. Take a listen.

1:07:19I think it's time that we match fire with fire. I think Democrats in the past too often have been more concerned with being right than being in power. We have to get serious. We have to be absolutely ruthless about getting back in power. So whether it's Texas, California, New York or elsewhere, do you think redistricting is more of a risk for one party than the other? Yeah, I mean, look, I understand the perspective, and I understand even Gavin Newsom saying, well, if Texas is going to do it, then we need to redo it. Because, again, it's like you don't want to unilaterally disarm. But the thing that concerns me is that the reaction to Donald Trump and what I believe is authoritarianism on the right ends up being some version of authoritarianism on the left.

1:08:05And we need to do exactly what the right has done. that shatters a pro-democracy coalition and you end up with a very fraction, fractioned country. I think, look, I think doing things in the political system the right way is going to retro and be cool again someday. Cause I think people are sick of this. And so I do worry what the cascading effects to this are. And, uh, I don't think America is necessarily ready for it. What are they going to redistrict now every six months, every one month, every time they use AI to find another district they could make? Uh, it's, it's nuts. So meanwhile, in the Trump administration's latest tactic, seemingly trying to change the subject from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal today, the Justice Department said that they're, quote, fully committed to transparency, unquote.

1:08:49But the topic is the Hillary Clinton email investigation. I don't know if you heard that, but what what is your response? It's like reaching into the bucket of old tricks and seeing if they work again. We'll probably hear about Hunter's laptop at some point. We may hear about U.N. helicopters from the 90s because they're out of ideas. Look, I mean, America is not falling for this. You know, they'll be able to try to change the subject. But it's not even it's not like the Democrats were the ones saying release the Epstein files and the Republicans are like you're weaponizing. This was all a Republican thing until all of a sudden Donald Trump puts out two huge truth socials in complete panic that this is actually a thing.

1:09:30And then it becomes a Democratic hoax. So I'm sorry. I know they want to change the subject, and usually they've been pretty good at it. I don't think that's going to be the case in this one. Former Republican Congressman Adam Kinzinger, good to see you. Thanks so much. Our Small Business Series takes us to Indiana next in a company that creates products to help you defend yourself and your family. How have tariffs impacted their products? Are they raising prices on customers? That's next.

1:09:57We're back with our Business Leaders series where we talk to small business owners from coast to coast about the impact of President Trump's tariffs. Many are feeling uncertain, some are optimistic. Berna Technologies from Fort Wayne, Indiana, develops non-lethal self-defense tools for both civilians and law enforcement. Their products include gun alternatives called launchers and pepper sprays and body armors and personal alarms. CEO Brian Gans joins us now. Brian, thanks so much for joining us. So your company started preparing for the possibility of tariffs ahead of the 2024 election. Can you tell us what the last few months have been like for your business as you tried to transition more of your sourcing to the United States?

1:10:40Yeah, Jake, first, thank you very much for having me on. That's correct. We saw the tariffs coming and we started transitioning last year. At that time, about 32 percent of our components that go into the launchers were made in the United States. But we had dual sources for everything. And as we started to ramp up, we've achieved 92 percent of the components that go into our launchers are actually now made in the United States. We also had our ammunition factory in South Africa. and we packed that up lock, stock and barrel and we moved it to Fort Wayne. We opened up a second factory in Fort Wayne and we now produce 100 percent of our ammunition here in the United States.

1:11:27So has this I mean, obviously, that's a lot of money to put into, you know, to move move a manufacturing plant to Fort Wayne. Have you had to raise your prices? What's what's been the repercussions of all this? Well, first off, we were manufacturing overseas for a reason. It was less expensive. Right. But it was less expensive in terms of hard costs. In terms of soft costs, what we found is by manufacturing in the United States, we're, of course, significantly shortening the supply chain. We're getting stuff much quicker. Our freight rates are lower. Frankly, our quality is higher. You know, we were in the position before where you'd get a container with bad parts.

1:12:10What do you do when the supplier is 10 ,000 miles away? So we've seen soft costs that somewhat offset the higher hard costs that we had. In one case, we've raised our prices. But one of the questions that I get a lot is, you know, who's paying the tariff? And although technically the importer pays the tariff, it really depends on the negotiation between us and our supplier. So in those cases where we are bringing things in with tariffs, generally it's split between ourselves and the supplier, sometimes between ourselves, the supplier and the customer. But it's very, very rare that any one party picks up the whole tariff.

1:12:51Are you thinking about the tariffs as a long term part of our economy or a temporary short term part of our economy when you plan for future growth in your company? Well, first off, let me just say I moved to factory, so I hope it's not short term. As you pointed out, we make non-lethal guns. If our devices fail, people die. So we are very, very serious about what we do. Since we started doing this six years ago and we've developed this market, we've sold close to 700 ,000 of these weapons in the last six years, we've seen competitors start to produce products in China and bring them to the United States.

1:13:34Now, they are making products in China and selling them for less than we can make them here in the United States. So although they are inferior products, although, you know, we've tested them extensively and we're very concerned about people using them, when you're selling them for a third of what our product costs, you are getting some portion of the market. And frankly, it's madness. We were very, very pleased to see these tariffs, particularly on China, on some of these competitive products, because it's very difficult for us to compete on price when we're producing here in the U.S. All right.

1:14:11Berna Technologies is based in Fort Wayne, Indiana. It's spelled B-Y-R-N-A, if you're going to Google them and buy yourself something. B-Y-R-N-A. And you can find them online. Brian Gantz, great having you on. Thank you. Jake Tapper, thank you very much. Great to be here. My next guest has a unique take on the concert scandal that has taken over the internet and led to a CEO's resignation. Stick with us.

1:14:44We're back with our pop culture lead in the fallout over the concert canoodling. Seen around the world, astronomer CEO Andy Byron resigned from his job after he was exposed, warmly embracing the company's HR chief, Kristen Cabot, a woman who was decidedly not his wife, on the Jumbotron at a Coldplay concert. And now Coldplay's frontman is giving crowds a friendly warning about cameras used during their shows. Joining us, Kat Rosenfield. She's a culture writer for the Free Press. So, Kat, a lot of people have been laughing about this story, taking a lot of pleasure in it. Why do you think it's gone viral?

1:15:17Why do you think so many folks are talking about it? I think that you have two levels of thing happening here. One is that, of course, everybody loves a good public shaming in the social media era. And this one particularly invites that type of reaction because everybody and everything involved is something that people love to hate. You know, you have CEOs, you have HR representatives, you have Coldplay. And so there's that. There's also the fact that unfortunately the way this incident played out and the fact that it was captured on video made it infinitely memeable to the point where on the one hand you have the shaming but also you have this element of it that's kind of passed into myth.

1:16:04The physical comedy of these people sort of pulling away, turning their backs, diving out of frame is very very easy to remix and so you have people having a lot of fun with that. Do you think you touched on this when you talked about CEOs, but do you think that that is, how much do you think that is fueling this? The idea that maybe there's something populist about bringing down a CEO and his HR director, like would this have caught on as much if it were like a dentist with his secretary? Do you know what I mean? I don't know. Everybody hates a cheater, right? And so I think that probably the response in combination with the fact that the entire scene played out the way it did probably would have been the same.

1:16:49But the fact that it's a CEO, the fact that these are perceived to be wealthy people, it does make it to the people who are participating in this. I think for them, it makes it probably extra delicious. Yes. You had a different take. You wrote in Free Press, quote, when we take joy in the distress and ruination of other people, we make monsters of ourselves, unquote. Explain what you mean a little. So the thing about public shamings is they are useful tool, right? We use this tool, shame, to punish people who transgress, who violate the bounds of the social contract, who we're in community with.

1:17:25But that offers a limiting principle. You don't want to do anything too terrible to somebody who you know you're going to still have to see around town after. You're going to have to live with this person together afterward. Once you turn this from something that is community-based and is about enforcing social contracts and that nobody really enjoys doing, and you turn it into a spectator sport that is global and always on, and you can participate in it from anywhere in the world 24 hours a day, what drives the dynamic changes significantly. And you have people who are driven by bloodlust, driven by sadism, driven by a desire to perpetuate harm and who were delighting in the distress they're causing and who never have to be held accountable for that in any way because it's strangers.

1:18:12Yeah. And of course, we know that this kind of schadenfreude and shaming can have horrible effects, especially when the social media involved has to do with children. Kat Rosenfield, as always, interesting, interesting, provocative article. Thanks for coming on. Thanks for having me. President Trump's now threatening the future of a new sports stadium here in Washington, D.C. He wants the Washington Commanders to change their name back to the Washington Redskins. And he's going to use his power to force that. Those details ahead.

1:18:50And our sports lead, the White House, says President Trump is serious about blocking the Washington Commanders from being able to build a new stadium in Washington, D.C., unless the team changes their name back from the Washington Commanders to the Washington Redskins. The president was serious, and it's part of the art of the deal, part of his negotiating skills. As you know, sports is one of the many passions of this president, and he wants to see the name of that team change. The team dropped its old name in 2020 after decades of criticism from various Native American groups and activists. Here's Tom Forman.

1:19:26The commanders are being blitzed by the commander-in-chief, who is demanding the team change its name back to Redskins, insisting with no evidence our great Indian people in massive numbers want team owners to make the switch immediately. You want me to make a controversial statement? I would. I wouldn't have changed your name. This isn't the 1960s. It wasn't okay to use the N-word back then, and it's not okay to use the R-word today. To be sure, when the D.C. team's racially charged name was dropped in 2020 after years of protest, many fans were unhappy. I just spent over$700 less than probably a month ago redoing all this.

1:20:09But last season, the commanders romped to their best record in decades. Approval for the new name shot way up in a recent Washington Post poll, with most now in favor of commanders, including the team owner, who said... I think it's now being embraced by our team, by our culture, by our coaching staff. And so, you know, we're going with that. But that was before Trump said if he doesn't get his way, he might upset negotiations on a multi-billion dollar deal to move the commanders from Maryland back to the District of Columbia. It's unclear if or how he can do that. And for the moment, D.C. officials are focusing on what they can control.

1:20:51We need to complete our part so that the team can get to work, so that local businesses can get hired, so that we can start earning the tax revenue that will come when we deliver the Commander Stadium. Trump is also calling for the Cleveland Guardians baseball team to go back to their old name, Indians, which changed a few seasons back amid what Trump is characterizing as a period of runaway wokeness. Times are different now, he wrote on social media. Owners, get it done. I've got to say, if I were the owner of the team. Still, in 2013, when President Barack Obama weighed in on the D.C. team name.

1:21:32I'd think about changing it. Trump mocked him. Presidents should not be telling the Washington Redskins to change their name. Our country has far bigger problems. Focus on them, not nonsense. Tom Foreman, CNN, Washington. Our thanks to Tom Foreman for that report. Finally, from us tonight, we remember legendary D-Day veteran Jake Larson. Staff Sergeant Larson was the last survivor of a unit who stormed the beaches of Normandy in an invasion that led to Europe's liberation from the Nazis. Every one of us was prepared to give our life, to kick Cutler's ass out of Europe. And we did. We lost quite a few, but I lost friends.

1:22:22Everybody lost friends. But we were soldiers. We were prepared to give our life. Later in his life, Larson became finally known as Papa Jake on TikTok. Hey, TikTok fans, Papa Jake here. Larson began sharing his World War II stories with younger generations and gained more than a million followers. Jake Larson's family says he was cracking jokes until the very end. He was 102 years old, an American hero. May his memory be a blessing. Erin Burnett Outfront starts now.

1:23:09Cozy season is ahead, and you'll be spending way more time inside. Is your home ready? Don't worry. with Wayfair you can upgrade your space without breaking the bank score up to 70 off during their labor day clearance on furniture area rugs mattresses and more plus surprise flash deals you can't miss whether it's one room or the whole house Wayfair has pieces for every style and budget shop Wayfair's labor day clearance now through September 7th at Wayfair.com Way fair, every style, every home. Traditional home security only alerts you after a break-in. And that's too late. SimpliSafe is changing that.

1:23:46Stop. This is SimpliSafe. Police are on the way. We don't just alert. We stop crime before it starts. SimpliSafe. Plan starting around a dollar a day. Save 60 % on a new system with professional monitoring during our 20th anniversary sale at simplisafe.com slash Spotify. Outdoor deterrence requires a SimpliSafe Active Guard outdoor protection plan starting at$49.99 a month. Visit SimpliSafe.com slash licenses for alarm license information. Tennessee 2012.

From the publisher

Trump shows fake clips of President Obama in handcuffs and calls for the Washington Commanders to change their name back to the Redskins or else. Is operation change the subject underway? Trump drums up controversy while avoiding discussing his own connections to pedophile and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and the scandal around it.  
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Lead with Jake Tapper

All 322 episodes
White House Punts To DOJ On Releasing More Epstein FilesThe Lead with Jake Tapper · 1 h 24 min
Listen in VO