How Will Higher-than-Expected Inflation Data Impact the Fed's Next Rate Decisions?

0:04This is The Markets. I'm Chris Hussey and today is Thursday, November 12th and we're here on the Goldman Sachs trading floor with Muhammad Qubbaj, who is co-head of North American Interest Rates Sales and Trading within FIC and Equities. And today we're going to talk about how a hot CPI print this week is impacting rates in bonds markets and how that has a carryover effect to other markets around the world. Q, thanks so much for joining us. Thanks for having me. Okay, Q, let's start with the CPI print. It came in hot this week. What did you make of the market's reaction? How do you think the Fed is going to respond?

0:40Well, you know, there's no rest for the wicked. When you look at the sources of volatility in the market, whether it's geopolitics, whether it's the Fed, whether it's AI, we felt we almost had a little bit of a respite, maybe for five minutes, and all of a sudden CPI comes to the forefront and changes the board a little bit too, and the Fed walks right back into the building. CPI affected us in three ways. First, I would say that it was an unacceptable number, 0.3, third time in a row, strong across all categories. The Fed has to reckon with that number and the market priced that accordingly. Two, it wasn't just about the CPI level, it was about the Fed reaction function.

1:22We woke up that morning, Waller had made a speech and put 50s back on the table. He basically asked a question and CPI answered. He said contingent on 0.3, 50s could be on the table. And by 50s on the table, what you mean is that we could do a hike of 50 basis points, not 25. Exactly. So it just, again, underscored a hawkishness to the Fed and opened up the distribution to 50s, which was definitely a surprise that morning before we even walked in and got the CPI number. The third thing was we spent almost a month executing a hike compression. We took out almost 50 basis points of hikes in the next one year.

2:02And some of this is a give back. So in terms of the market reaction, unwind of positioning and the hike compression, a reaction to the strength of the CPI, the third one in a row, and a re-understanding of the Fed's reaction function and opening up the distribution for 50s. All right. So it wasn't trivial. That's interesting. But you also talk about a Fed reaction function. And one of the things they have to react to is oil, I would imagine, because, you know, this was an October report. But for the month of November, oil prices are now down 15 percent. How does oil factor into the rates market?

2:37We can't basically say that the causality between oil and rates is the one for one thing. They're definitely a participant. They definitely have a feed through to CPI. And they definitely show up into basically core CPI and how the Fed takes that number so that they can adjust policy. But the sell-off wasn't just about oil when we had the big sell-off in the year. At one point, it was about corporate earnings and growth. At another point, it was a debate on the Fed reaction function uncertainty because they removed forward guidance, term premium on the back of bond supply and CapEx supply, convexity hedging or the convexity profile of the market where we saw a lot of selling and positioning.

3:22Oil coming off in the last couple of weeks definitely affects the level of rates, but you can't expect a full refund just based on the oil move. Okay, another thing that's changed since that October CPI print was the midterms. We got the midterms in early November. How does a change in Congress, if at all, have any impact on the rates markets? I think a couple of things. One is the Fed's not a political body. It should not affect the Fed path first order. It affects oil, obviously, based on the vote on the geopolitical outlook, the Iran war. Midterms affect oil. CPI affects the Fed. We've had almost triple the move based on the CPI morning print that we did in rates for the entire midterms week.

4:04So I think that's where the focus is. OK, Q, let's expand the conversation to 10-year bond yields. They have such an impact across markets. We were up at 5.3 percent not too long ago. They've come back to 5 percent. Are the conditions still in place, though, for us to eclipse the recent high? You have to look at basically what took us to the peak in rates. There were several different factors. One, we had this new reaction function from the Fed, no forward guidance, the debate on how the Fed's reaction function will evolve under a worse leadership. You had the debate on term premium. You had the debate on government issuance compounded by AI CapEx related supply.

4:48you had a positioning situation in the market, you also had convexity selling in the market. All of those things contributed to the sell-off. So I don't think that you're going to have that same set of circumstances reassert itself on the market again and push yields to the high level that we saw in October. Furthermore, you have two new breaks in the system. A Fed that is is actively hiking. A hike lands in the front end, but flattens the curve. Two, we had some sort of reflexivity that's been put onto the market in Warsh's last speech. He specifically tied the level of rates to the level of AI CapEx financing.

5:32So what happens when you do that is basically saying that you have a self-balancing system. If rates go up too much, then it can then it can slow down the AI CapEx build-out, and it will almost have a self-balancing system from that perspective. But let us remember that do I think it's going to be a rate sell-off? It can happen, again, driven by positioning or term premium or supply worries or convexity selling? No. If we have a reassertion of strong earnings, and I think that can give us some room. Yeah, a little bit of a growth-driven thing. Can I ask you to define one thing? And convexity selling, what is that?

6:09Convexity selling is a situation where as the market sells off, people have more to sell. At its core, it means as things are getting worse, your flows are going to make it even worse. That is a little technical factor. All right, let's talk about the competition between stocks, bonds, and credit, because that's always part of the equation here, I would imagine. How do you see that shaping up here? You talked about the growth equation being such a big one for where yields go from here. When we look at yields as it pertains to credit and as it pertains to equities, we have to look at it from a couple of lenses.

6:42What drives higher yields? Is it growth? Is it earnings? Then that should be good for the credit complex and should be good for the equity complex. Is it driven by term premium worries and supply absorption worries? then you have a capital markets problem, and that's where it could be negative for equities, and it could be negative for credit. That's one factor. The other factor is the amount of leverage that we're talking about. When you're looking at a bond that is a corporation that is on the lower side of the spectrum of leverage, then higher rates affects the discount factor. When you look at a bond that's on the other side of the leverage spectrum, higher rates is a funding bill.

7:32It's a funding problem. So you have to be a little bit more nuanced when you say, how do higher rates affect the equity market or credit market? It's a function of how did we get there and how levered are the companies that we're talking about? And that's basically where you get your answer. All right. A lot to digest. Let's put a bow on it. What's the trade? I like to think of it from a serenity prayer perspective. Ah, the serenity prayer. Accept the things you cannot change. It is a one-factor market. It's all about mega cap tech. Once you accept that, you realize that's the bet you're going to be making.

8:06Now, where do you have control? Where can you make some changes on the edges? One is how much of a size of a position you're going to take. It depends on how you hedge your portfolio. Two, the amount of leverage. And what's the expression you take on mega cap to see basically how much exposure you have and how much factor risk you have. So we've discussed the risk. Now let's discuss the hedges. When you look at the hedges, you basically have out-of-the-money dollar puts. You have out-of-the-money equity puts. Delta-1 is favorable in the level of rates. A combination of those, you can build a carry neutral or positive carry hedge portfolio, and you can size it up and down depending on the amount of risk and leverage you're taking on the mega cap tech.

8:52Now, you want to own the factor and you want to rent the insurance. And by owning the factor, you want to own stocks. Yes. And by renting the insurance, you want to maybe own some puts as well. Exactly. All right. What are you looking for in the weeks ahead? Three sources of volatility we mentioned in the market. Oil. Let's continue to see how the geopolitical situation unfolds. The Fed. We are going to look at FedSpeak and the FedMinutes. and basically try to read the tea leaves and to see how hawkish the Fed is right now so we can get a feeling for the size. We're confident on the direction of which way the Fed is going.

9:29It's about size and timing right now. And the third factor is the AI economy. Anything, whether it's a capital market situation or an earnings situation, anything that can continue to give us confidence or allow us to re-rate the level of risk in the market as it pertains to the AI economy. Terrific. Kira, you're always just a fountain of knowledge for us. Really appreciate you joining us. Thank you for having me. That does it for this week's episode of The Markets. I'm Chris Hussey. Thanks for listening.

10:18Muhammad Qubbaj: purchase or sell any securities or financial products. This material may contain forward-looking statements. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Neither Goldman Sachs nor any of its affiliates make any representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the statements or information contained herein, and disclaim any liability whatsoever for reliance on such information for any purpose. Each name of a third-party organization mentioned is the property of the company to which it relates, is used here strictly for informational and identification purposes only, and is not used to imply any ownership or license rights between any such company and Goldman Sachs.

10:49Muhammad Qubbaj: A transcript is provided for convenience and may differ from the original video or audio content. Goldman Sachs is not responsible for any errors in the transcript. This material should not be copied, distributed, published, or reproduced in whole or in part or disclosed by any recipient to any other person without the express written consent of Goldman Sachs. Copyright 2026, Goldman Sachs. All rights reserved.