In short
Podcast Episode Summary: MeidasTouch Podcast - "Whoa! Trump Falls into Perfect Trap to Expose his Past"
Episode Overview In this episode of The MeidasTouch Podcast, Ben Meiselas discusses a strategic legal maneuver by Congressman Ro Khanna and Congressman Thomas Massey aimed at exposing Donald Trump's past related to Jeffrey Epstein. The episode outlines how these Congressional leaders set a trap that Trump unwittingly walked into, revealing the inadequacies of the Trump administration in complying with the Epstein Transparency Act.
Key Themes and Concepts
- The Epstein Transparency Act
- Purpose: The act mandates the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release files pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein.
- Current Compliance Issues: As of the episode, less than 1% of the required documents have been released by the Trump administration.
- The Legislative Trap
- Strategic Filing: Khanna and Massey filed an amicus brief suggesting the appointment of a special master to oversee the release of Epstein files.
- Goal: To expose the DOJ's failure to comply with the transparency act and shift accountability onto the courts.
- Key Legal Arguments
- Standing: The DOJ argues that Khanna and Massey lack standing as they are not direct parties in the case.
- Accountability of the DOJ: The episode highlights the DOJ's contradictory statements—claiming they can’t enforce the act while simultaneously blaming the courts for delays.
- Implications for the Judicial System
- Judge Engelmeyer’s Role: The presiding judge in the Ghislaine Maxwell case is caught in the crossfire, potentially being blamed for the DOJ's inaction.
- Potential Outcomes: The episode speculates that Judge Engelmeyer may be compelled to act based on the pressure exerted by Khanna and Massey’s arguments.
Significant Points of Discussion
- Brilliance of the Strategy: The podcast emphasizes the cleverness of Khanna and Massey in using legal channels to force the DOJ into a corner.
- Public Awareness: How public statements and social media posts by the DOJ may be used against them in court.
- Chess Analogy: Ben describes the situation as a multi-layered chess game, highlighting the strategic foresight of the Congress members.
Conclusion
Ben Meiselas concludes that this legal strategy could potentially lead to greater transparency surrounding the Epstein files, undermining Trump's efforts to keep his past hidden. The episode calls for listeners to support the MeidasTouch network and remain engaged with the unfolding legal battles.
Call to Action Listeners are encouraged to subscribe to the MeidasTouch podcast and follow the Meiselas brothers on their various platforms for ongoing updates and discussions on political accountability and legal matters.
---
This summary provides an outline of the episode's key points and discussions, offering insights into the legal strategies at play regarding the Epstein Transparency Act and Donald Trump's past.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOTrump's Epstein Files Trap Explained
2:06 to 3:16
Explore how Trump fell into a trap regarding the Epstein files.
“Precisely what he's been trying to avoid since December 19th, when the Epstein Transparency Act required that his Department of Justice turn over all of the Epstein files.”
Congress's Move: Amicus Brief Strategy
3:16 to 4:47
Learn about the amicus brief filed by Khanna and Massey.
“Well, Judge Engelmeyer is the judge presiding over the United States versus Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case.”
DOJ's Position on Epstein Transparency Act
4:47 to 6:03
Discover the DOJ's stance on enforcing the Epstein Transparency Act.
“have standing, number one, in order to intervene in this action, right?”
Massey and Khanna's Legal Maneuvering
6:03 to 7:17
Investigate how Khanna and Massey exposed the DOJ's flaws.
“And they argued, the DOJ argues that Congress did not evince, is the word, did not evince any intent to allow the Epstein Transparency Act to be enforced in a federal court.”
Timeline of DOJ and Epstein Files
7:17 to 14:02
Review the timeline of events involving the DOJ and Epstein files.
“And that maybe buys them another year or two years.”
The Legal Maneuvering Behind Trump's Case
14:02 to 17:42
Explore the intricate legal strategies involving Trump and the Epstein documents.
“And now they're pretending like, Judge, there's no controversy anymore.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01During Lowe's Pro Savings Days, the job works in your favor. My Lowe's Pro Rewards members buy more and save more of the materials they rely on every day. Get up to 25 % off Select Molding when you spend$1 ,000 or more. And up to 25 % off Pergo Evercraft Laminate Florian. Put Pro Savings Days to work for you. Members get more at Lowe's. Valor to 327. Selection varies by location. While supplies last. Loyalty program subject to terms and conditions. Visit the Pro Desk or Lowe's.com slash terms for more details. Subject to change. LifeLock, how can I help? The IRS said I filed my return, but I haven't.
0:35One in four tax-paying Americans has paid the price of identity fraud. What do I do? My refund, though. I'm freaking out. Don't worry, I can fix this. LifeLock fixes identity theft guaranteed and gets your money back with up to$3 million in coverage. I'm so relieved. No problem. I'll be with you every step of the way. One in four was a fraud-paying American. Not anymore. Save up to 40 % your first year. Visit LifeLock.com slash podcast. Terms apply. This episode is brought to you by Welch's Fruit Snacks. Big news for your kids' lunchbox. Welch's Fruit Snacks are now made without any artificial dyes.
1:10A snack parents can feel good about and the same delicious taste kids can't get enough of. All made with no artificial dyes. Try Welch's Fruit Snacks today. Feeding the fam isn't easy, but we got you with any slamming meal deals starting at$5.99. Full meals for everyone, like a Grand Slam burrito for grandpa and a Super Slam for super mom. Get to Denny's now. Valid at participating locations for dine-in or denny's.com. Limited time offer. Additional restrictions may apply at some locations. This episode is brought to you by Cologuard. Do you know what's really scary? Not screening for colon cancer when you turn 45.
1:43The Cologuard test is non-invasive, requires no special prep or time off work, and ships right to your door. In just three simple steps, Cologuard takes the scare out of colon cancer screening. If you're 45 or older and at average risk, ask your health care provider about the Cologuard test. Cologuard is available by prescription only. Learn more or request a prescription today at Cologuard.com slash screen.
2:05Ben Meiselas:Donald Trump just walked right into a perfectly laid trap that may expose his dark past. Precisely what he's been trying to avoid since December 19th, when the Epstein Transparency Act required that his Department of Justice turn over all of the Epstein files. The Trump regime to date has only turned over less than 1 % of the Epstein files. Let's talk about the perfect trap, how Donald Trump walked right into it, and what I think a federal judge is now going to do. And a lot of people didn't see how carefully planned this trap was. And now people get it. And in the legal community, everyone's like, wow, this was a brilliant move by Democratic Congress member Ro Khanna and Republican Congress member Thomas Massey, who were the leads on the Epstein Transparency Act.
3:07Ben Meiselas:You see, they filed this document on Tuesday where they finally revealed their plan and the trap that was set. And it was brilliant. So you may recall about a week and a half, two weeks ago, Massey and Kanna filed a request to be deemed something called an amici and file an amicus brief, meaning a friend of the court brief before a federal judge, Judge Engelmeyer in the Southern District of New York. Why Judge Engelmeyer? Well, Judge Engelmeyer is the judge presiding over the United States versus Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case. She was, of course, convicted of child sex trafficking, sentenced to over 20 years, put in a maximum security facility before Trump's DOJ, moved her to the minimum security facility in Camp Bryan, Texas, and gave her VIP treatment.
4:04Ben Meiselas:So in this amicus brief that was filed a week and a half or two weeks ago by Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey, they make a recommendation to this federal judge, Judge Engelmeyer. Perhaps you appoint a special master or an independent monitor who can go into the Department of Justice files, determine how many records exist in the Epstein files, prepare reports for the court, and then produce the Epstein files forthwith because the Trump regime is in criminal violation. Now, seeing that federal Judge Engelmeyer was a little bit skeptical whether these Congress members have standing, but Judge Engelmeyer then asked Trump's DOJ the question, do you believe that these Congress members have standing, number one, in order to intervene in this action, right?
4:59Ben Meiselas:And then number two, do you believe, Trump DOJ, that federal courts like this one, like Judge Engelmeyer, that we can make rulings compelling you under the Epstein Transparency Act to produce the Epstein files, to enforce the Epstein Transparency Act? So last Friday, the Trump DOJ does this late night filing. They say Thomas Massey and Ro Khanna do not have standing. They're not parties to this action. The only parties are the DOJ, the United States and Ghislaine Maxwell. And this criminal case is well overjudged. So you can't have parties now intervening. They're not parties to the case. This is a criminal action.
5:46Ben Meiselas:But then the DOJ had to answer that second question. Can courts enforce the Epstein Transparency Act and the Department of Justice last Friday? Remember, I covered this filing. They said no. And they said there's no private cause of action in the Epstein Transparency Act. And they argued, the DOJ argues that Congress did not evince, is the word, did not evince any intent to allow the Epstein Transparency Act to be enforced in a federal court. In other words, the Epstein Transparency Act, according to the DOJ, does nothing. It recommends the files get produced, but if the DOJ and Trump don't produce anything, then there's nothing a court can do about it.
6:36Ben Meiselas:Just think about that. So Epstein, the Epstein Transparency Act, according to the DOJ, means no transparency at all. So one brilliant thing that Thomas Massey and Ro Khanna accomplished is they smoke out the DOJ's position and Trump's position all along that Trump and Bondi and Blanche ultimately agreed. Let's make this thing a law because they figured we're just going to argue down the line a year from now after we delay, delay, delay, delay. And maybe somebody brings a lawsuit. We'll keep on delaying it. And then we'll eventually argue that there is no private cause of action. Nobody can enforce the Epstein Transparency Act.
7:19Ben Meiselas:And that maybe buys them another year or two years. But in the Epstein Transparency Act enforcement mechanism that's being used by Kanna and Massey, they smoke this out right away that this is the DOJ's plan. But then yesterday, Kanna and Massey file their brief, and their brief is brilliant. And they said, whoa, whoa, whoa. We're not trying to intervene in this case as parties, Judge. Judge, simply all we want to do is make a recommendation as a Meachie. We want to file an amicus brief and we just want to make recommendations as concerned lawmakers. And let us tell you what we're concerned about.
8:04Ben Meiselas:That's all. We're just we're not trying to intervene as a party. And then this is where they strike. They say, Judge, what we want to inform you of is that the DOJ is out there in public. And they're telling everybody that you had the power to order them to turn over the Epstein files, but that you are the one who's moving too slowly, but that you have the power and it's your fault. So Massey and Kanna just waited, waited, waited, saw what the DOJ filed. Then they filed a reply and said, Judge, we hate to tell you this, but it's not just that Trump and the DOJ are involved in criminal violations of the Epstein Transparency Act.
8:53Ben Meiselas:They're blaming their crimes on you. And specifically, this is brilliant, that Massey and Kana, as Exhibit 1 to their filing yesterday, they attach a fact sheet from the Department of Justice that now has 1.9 million views on the social media platform X that the DOJ posted on December 21st, 2025. Fact sheet, the Epstein files release. And this is what the DOJ wrote. December 21st, two days after the DOJ missed the Epstein Transparency Act deadline. And remember, to date, they've only produced 1 % of documents, maybe even less. Fact sheet, the Epstein files released from the DOJ. Thanks to court seals being lifted as a result of President Trump enacting the Epstein Transparency Act, The Department of Justice is releasing thousands of pages of photos and other materials related to Jeffrey Epstein.
9:58Why is this material being released now?
10:01Ben Meiselas:It says prior to President Trump's enactment of the Epstein Transparency Act. They say Trump's enacted. Various judges had declined the Trump Department of Justice's request to unseal Epstein related material. The enactment of the new law gave the judges a legal predicate they found sufficient for granting the Trump administration standing requests before the courts to unseal the files. So do you see what the DOJ said right there? I know it's a little bit legalese, but they were saying here that the various judges, they declined to allow the Trump DOJ to produce these records. But once the Epstein Transparency Act became law that Donald Trump signed, this is what the DOJ is writing.
10:50Ben Meiselas:The judges now have a legal predicate that they found sufficient to give Trump standing before the court to unseal the files. So Massey and Kanna are saying, you see, judge, they're telling the DOJ is telling the public that because of the act, you have the legal predicate to compel them to unseal the files and now they're doing it. But judge, that's what they put in their press release to the public that now has approximately 2 million views. But what they're now saying in their briefing to you after we filed our initial Amici request is that you don't have any ability to enforce anything, judge, at all.
11:33So they're saying you have no ability to enforce in court filings, but then they're telling the public their violations of the Epstein Transparency Act are your fault, Judge. So you see what happened here? What Kana and Massey did so brilliantly is they're not arguing that they need a private cause of action. They say we don't even have to go there. And they're saying we're not arguing that we have standing as a party to intervene. Judge, we're just tipping you off because we're concerned lawmakers who were the leads of this Epstein Transparency Act. We don't want them to accuse you of the crimes that they're committing.
12:14Ben Meiselas:Now imagine you're Judge Engelmeyer, right? And you're like, holy crap, they're accusing me of doing the crimes? And then Massey and Kanna in their brief go a step further and they say, Judge, we want to remind you of the timeline as well. This was a plan. This was a setup by the DOJ of you, Judge Engelmeyer, going back. Look at the filing by the DOJ on November 26th, where they say, Judge, we need your help amending the protective orders in the Epstein-Gilane case, not just as it relates to releasing grand jury transcripts, but on November 26th, the DOJ says, for clarification, judge, we need you to amend all of your protective orders in this matter so we can release the files and comply with the act.
13:08Then remember, judge, on December 9th, you issued a ruling and saying, OK, DOJ, because you say that you need me to lift the protective orders and amend the protective orders so you can now release all of these documents relating to the Epstein Transparency Act that are part of the Epstein files. I will amend the protective orders that were part of the criminal case involving Ghislaine. So what Massey and Kana says, Judge, Trump and the DOJ invoked your jurisdiction to amend protective orders. They lied to you and represented that they were going to release the files once you amended your protective orders.
13:53You amended the protective orders. They did not release the files. And then they blamed you. And now they're saying that you have no authority. And now they're pretending like, Judge, there's no controversy anymore. Ghislaine's been convicted. Her appeal before the Supreme Court is over. So she does. This case is done. It's toast. You can't intervene. Massey and kind of said, what are you talking about? Y 'all just y 'all just requested the judge amend the protective orders. And now you're not turning over the documents. That's why I think this move is so brilliant. You go through this fact sheet and it says, how much more material can we expect to be released?
14:34This is from the DOJ fact sheet from December 21st after they violate the Epstein Transparency Act. So you get the timeline, though. November 26th, DOJ says judge amend the protective orders. December 9th, judge amends the protective orders because he's told they're going to release the files on December 19th. December 19th comes and goes. Only 1 % of the files are released. And then they do a fact sheet December 21st, 2025, the DOJ does blaming the judges. And here's what they say on this next section. How much more material can we expect to be released? The Department of Justice has hundreds of thousands of pages of material to release, including material that must comply with the court orders.
15:15These court orders can slow the Department of Justice's ability to review and redact material, but will not prevent the release of this material. While they're separately arguing to the judge now in briefs, prevent the release of the material, they're telling the public the opposite. it. So when you go through the brief that was filed by Massey and Kanna, you know, basically go to page seven, for example, and it says the government should not be permitted to represent to the public that this court has the legal predicate to compel the release of the Epstein files under the act and blame this court for the government's delay.
15:57Yet at the same time, assert now that the court must permit the records to remain hidden from the public in violation of the act because the court does not have the authority to enforce the act. So the trap that was laid again by Massey and Kanna, they saw that the Trump regime was likely going to argue no private cause of action, but Trump went to the judge before to amend the protective orders. So what Massey and Kanna did by filing this Amici was create was to remind the court to inject an adversarial nature into the proceeding and then tip off the court that behind the court's back. Trump was blaming the court.
16:45So now saying court, just take action. You have remember court, you could take action on your own because they asked you to mend the protective order. So you should be involved in it right now.
16:55Ben Meiselas:Now, that to me is a that that's on eight different levels of chess right there, in my view, thinking ahead. And now the Trump regime's arguments about no standing and the court can't enforce are like kind of mooted. And now I think there's a shot that Judge Engelmeyer, because that Trump opened the door and invoked the court's jurisdiction to try to set up the court that could now backfire in the Trump DOJ's face. And now I think Judge Engelmeyer or maybe even Judge Berman in the other case may say, you know what? Let's release these files. You invoked our jurisdiction. Let's go. Put them out there.
17:37Wow. I know I got a little legalese and dorky there, but this is some great lawyering. Everybody hit subscribe. Get to 6 million subscribers. Thanks for watching. Want to stay plugged in? Become a subscriber to our sub stack at MidasPlus.com. You'll get daily recaps from Ron Philip Kowski, add three episodes of our podcast, and more exclusive content only available at MidasPlus.com.
18:05Rinse knows that greatness takes time, but so does laundry. So Rinse will take your laundry and hand deliver it to your door expertly cleaned. And you can take the time pursuing your passions. Time once spent sorting and waiting, folding and queuing, now spent challenging and innovating and pushing your way to greatness. So pick up the Irish flute or those calligraphy pens or that daunting Beef Wellington recipe card and leave the laundry to us. Rinse. It's time to be great. At Blinds.com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you, your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right.
18:46From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows. Because at Blinds.com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you. Visit Blinds.com now for up to 45 % off with minimum purchase plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply. Finding a hoodie that lasts through the season can be tough. The American Giant Classic Full Zip Hoodie is made to last year after year. Snag the hoodie that brings comfort for life. Save 20 % off your first order at American-Giant.com with code STAPLE20 at checkout.
From the publisher
MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald Trump falling into a perfectly laid trap by Congressman Massie and Khanna to expose his dark past and he never saw it coming!
Visit https://meidasplus.com for more!
Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts:
MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast
Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af
MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial
The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast
The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan
Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen
The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show
Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats
Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54
Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown
On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman
Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered
Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
