In short
Reflection AI’s push to build “frontier open intelligence” (open-weight, downloadable frontier models) after raising $2B, arguing open science and open models can shape the next AI infrastructure and compete with closed labs.
Guests
Yanis Antoneglou, co-founder and CTO at Reflection AI; former long-time DeepMind researcher (joined early 2012) and founding engineer; worked on DQN, AlphaGo, AlphaZero, MuZero, and RLHF for Gemini.
Key claims
Open science (publications, code, shared findings) is the only way to make progress accessible and speed intelligence/science. Open models win when capabilities are equal because they offer flexibility, transparency, security controls, and ownership. Reflection will release model weights/architecture so developers can run locally, fine-tune, and run RL/RFT. They believe transformers suffice for “AGI” defined as systems that can interact with computers and do human tasks.
Notable examples
AlphaGo (2016); Ubuntu/Linux as open-source innovation analogies; frontier open models from China (DeepSeek, Kimi); mixture-of-experts routing explanation; terminal/website/tool environments for agent training.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Vision for Open-Source AI
0:45 to 1:14
Discussion on the potential of open-source AI models and their advantages.
“I don't see why open source cannot be at the frontier.”
Introducing Yanis Antoneglou
1:14 to 1:46
Core guest introduction and his background in AI development.
“I'm Corey Knowles, editor of the Neuron, and as always, I'm joined by our trusty writer, Grant Harvey.”
Benefits of Open Source AI
1:46 to 2:14
Yanis explains why open-source models are advantageous for users.
“I guess my first question would be, so as someone who built AlphaGo, you know how powerful this technology can be.”
Yanis’ Background in AI
2:14 to 3:03
Yanis shares his extensive experience at DeepMind and AI research.
“What's the upside for our listeners who maybe don't understand much about open source?”
Innovation Through Open Source
3:03 to 4:32
Discussion on how open source can foster innovation and education.
“And also that we can speed up the, the progress of intelligence and of science as a whole.”
Building Powerful AI Models
4:32 to 6:24
Yanis discusses the goals and methods behind Reflection AI's models.
“and a lot of the innovations happen because people are curious and they want to just like take, you know, models or they want to just like take, for example, an operating system.”
Competing with Major Labs
6:24 to 7:52
Insights on how Reflection AI plans to compete with established labs.
“and our backgrounds, like both my background and my co-founder's background is so well aligned with the systems that we're building.”
Understanding Mixture of Experts
7:52 to 10:00
Explanation of mixture of experts models and their architecture differences.
“So we are like really bullish that we'll just repeat the same in the West.”
Inference and Model Parameters
10:00 to 12:55
Discussion on the efficiency and inference benefits of sparse models.
“Then you have the dense model, which that would be like what we think of as like a large language model like GPT 4 or 4.5 or something like that, where it's just, it's trying to remember everything at once.”
Releasing Model Weights for Open Source
12:55 to 14:02
Yanis explains the significance of releasing model weights for developers.
“It could be like 32B or 256B or something like that when a model is like one trillion.”
Show all 28 chapters
Customization and Ownership in AI Models
14:02 to 15:10
Learn about the importance of customization and ownership in AI model deployment.
“to do fine tuning uh if they have an environment they can just like run their own reinforcement learning, RFT, on the model to just like take specialized models out of that.”
Exploring Reinforcement Learning
15:10 to 16:23
Understand the role of reinforcement learning in training AI models.
“So for us, it's, you know, it's one of the big bets.”
Defining Environments in AI
16:23 to 17:55
Discover how different environments influence AI training and interactions.
“When we talk about environments, are we talking about code environments or almost simulating actual websites and things like that since we're talking about an agent here?”
The Role of Data and Synthetic Learning
17:55 to 19:22
Examine the relationship between data, synthetic learning, and reinforcement learning.
“quite uh similar and um it's also like you know what the terminology that like people use depends on their background.”
Perspectives on AGI and AI Architectures
19:22 to 20:46
Explore different views on AGI and the architectural paths for achieving it.
“and especially like people like Reed Sutton or Andre Kapathy feel that transformers have some inherent limitations that will stop us from going all the way to AGI.”
Sovereign AI and Open Source's Role
20:46 to 23:26
Discuss the implications of sovereign AI development in an open-source context.
“So, you know, there's kind of this concept of sovereign AI with countries having this idea to build their own AI models and ecosystems.”
Investor Confidence in Open Source AI
23:26 to 26:27
Learn what drives investor confidence in open-source AI projects.
“It makes actually what you did unique because you raised$2 billion on the idea of open source.”
Balancing Safety and Speed in Open Source
26:27 to 28:00
Understand how to balance safety with the speed of development in open-source environments.
“And especially like with, you know, in the enterprise market or the sovereign market where they need to have like on-prem solutions and they need to just like, you know, kind of like almost own the intelligence.”
Benefits of Open Source in AI
28:00 to 29:48
Explores why open-source models may be safer and more beneficial than closed models.
“More people are using it so they understand the code base and they're more incentivized.”
The Future of Open Models
29:48 to 31:54
Discusses the potential for open models to surpass closed models in terms of capabilities and usability.
“What do you think that tipping point is maybe?”
Advancements in Coding Agents
31:54 to 34:16
Shares insights into the evolution and effectiveness of coding agents over recent years.
“i think that our um mission of like open intelligence has uh really been resonated with like scientists.”
Rethinking Coding with AI
34:16 to 36:58
Explores how AI is transforming coding practices and the interaction between developers and coding agents.
“But these agents become more and more powerful.”
Applications of Open Source Models
36:58 to 39:44
Discusses potential applications of open-source models across various industries, including personal assistant roles.
“What's the best way to, you know, work with these agents?”
Local AI Models and Their Potential
39:44 to 42:00
Speculates on the future of running powerful AI models locally and the implications for personal data management.
“So let's step away from coding for a second.”
The Future of Local AI Models
42:00 to 43:00
Explore the potential of running powerful AI models locally and the limitations currently faced.
“of being able to run the most powerful models locally.”
Importance of American Open Source AI
43:00 to 44:00
Discuss the significance of having American alternatives in AI to promote transparency and counter biases.
“What does it mean to you to have American open source AI in the race and not all of it be concentrated only in China?”
Building Inclusive AI for a Global Audience
44:00 to 45:08
Learn about the approach to create AI that is accessible and customizable for different cultures.
“Do you think that it's possible to build an open source AI open American AI that also will appeal to other countries like countries in Europe or countries in Asia and how could we do that?”
Reflection's Mission and Opportunities
45:08 to 45:48
Find out about Reflection's goals and current job openings for those interested in AI development.
“make it accessible to everyone in the world and, you know, just ensure that like also people can customize it further.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Ioannis Antonoglou:We want to build the most powerful, agendic models in the world and make them open-weight and accessible to everyone. You can see that there are many frontier open models coming out of China. We are really bullish that we'll just repeat the same in the West. Open science, publications, sharing your findings, uploading your code is something that's the only way to really ensure that the progress is actually accessible by everyone. And also that we can speed up the progress of intelligence and of science as a whole. Most people will just choose the open one because it gives you more flexibility, transparency.
0:33Ioannis Antonoglou:All else being equal, open wins every day. It is insane how far we've come. I've been doing AI for almost 14 years now. And kind of thinking where the industry was when I started and where it's now the coding agent is day and night. I don't see why open source cannot be at the frontier. We built it in America, but we don't just build it for America, we build it for the world.
0:57Yannis:So a team of former Google DeepMind researchers just raised$2 billion, you heard that right, to build America's answer to DeepSeek. So today we're going to talk about the future of open source AI and why it might determine who controls the next generation of technology. Welcome, humans, to the latest episode of the Neuron Podcast. I'm Corey Knowles, editor of the Neuron, and as always, I'm joined by our trusty writer, Grant Harvey. How are you today, Grant? Doing good, Corey. I'm really excited to have this chat. I'm really pumped on this. Very bullish on open source here. Excellent. Well, today we have a special guest.
1:34Yannis:We're joined by Yanis Antoneglou, co-founder at Reflection AI. Yanis helped create AlphaGo at DeepMind, the AI that famously beat the world champion in the game of Go back in 2016. But now he's building what they're calling Frontier Open Intelligence, powerful AI models that anyone can download and use for free.
1:55Ioannis Antonoglou:Giannis, welcome to the Neuron. It's great to have you. It's great to be here. Thank you so much for the invitation.
2:01Yannis:Excellent. I guess my first question would be, so as someone who built AlphaGo, you know how powerful this technology can be. Why make it freely available? What's the upside for our listeners who maybe don't understand much about open source?
2:19Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, no, that's a really good question. And maybe I can just take a couple of minutes to say a few things about me and about my background. So I'm Yanis. I'm the co-founder and CTO, Brand Technology, at Reflection. Before Reflection, we started Reflection with Misha, my co-founder, about a year and a half ago. Before that, I was a long-time DeepMinder. I actually joined DeepMind really early in 2012. Before an acquisition, it was like a startup at the time. I was like one of the founding engineers. And then I did a lot of the deep reinforcing learning research that came out of DeepMind while I was there.
2:55Ioannis Antonoglou:I worked on DQN, AlphaGo, AlphaZero, NewZero, and also did RLHF for Gemini before I left. So I actually have like a lot of kind of like experience and a lot of, you know, I've spent most of my career doing research and just like really trying to push the boundaries of like the frontier and like, you know, just ensuring that we have like the most powerful algorithms for reinforcement learning and AI in general. And one of the things that, you know, I think that everyone who's done a lot of research can agree on is that open science, publications, sharing your findings, uploading your code is something that like, it's the only way to really ensure that the progress is actually accessible by everyone.
3:47Ioannis Antonoglou:And also that we can speed up the, the progress of intelligence and of science as a whole.
3:53Yannis:So as far as like the benefits for open source AI for the end user, what, how would you sum up those benefits for people who, you know, used to using ChatGPT, but maybe, you know, have never downloaded a model, run it on their own computer or run it over the cloud?
4:12Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, that's a really good question. I think that the most important thing to note about open models is that they're especially useful to people who want to build to them or they want to just like do more research or they want to just like, you know, tinker with like the model and just like try and build their own solutions. and a lot of the innovations happen because people are curious and they want to just like take, you know, models or they want to just like take, for example, an operating system. So in the past, we had like the Ubuntu and the Linux operating system and people just like, you know, try and fix bugs and just like make it more reliable and like more secure.
4:52Ioannis Antonoglou:At the same time, they'll just like try to contribute and at the same time, it could be used as an educational tool for like the next generation of computer scientists to learn how to program operating systems and how they work and do their assignments or just find better solutions to existing problems. So open weights and open source is the way to ensure that innovation happens at scale and at the same time, you have the new generation of scientists actually really understanding how these systems work and being able to contribute to the next iteration and generation of systems. That's awesome.
5:33Yannis:And then, so I guess specifically with what you're doing at Reflection, one, what are you building specifically? And two, how do you plan to compete with the big labs with what you're doing?
5:47Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, that's straight to the point, I guess. So what we're building is that we want to build the most powerful agenda models in the world and make them open-weight and accessible to everyone. So these are systems that can use tools, they can code, they can use MCPs, which is an obstruction over software, so they can actually take action, so complete tasks end-to-end. This is kind of like what we're building, and this is why reinforcement learning and our backgrounds, like both my background and my co-founder's background is so well aligned with the systems that we're building. Now, the question is how can we compete to the big labs?
6:36Ioannis Antonoglou:And I think that building models require a lot of resources and a lot of talent. Reflection is one of the few places that, given the round that we raised, we've actually managed to get a lot of resources. And we also attracted some of the best talent in the world. So actually people who've done their thinking models, both in DeepMind and OpenAI, like led the efforts there. They've actually joined Reflection. We have like people who were like one of the leads in pre-training at Gemini who kind of lead our pre-training here. So we have people who beat the most impactful like models and systems at like the big labs.
7:18Ioannis Antonoglou:We've actually come together with us to just ensure that this technology becomes available and accessible to people. they really believe and they really share our dream and vision of open weight models. At the same time, you can see that there are many frontier open models coming out of China. And the Chinese labs, they don't have the same resources that maybe the closed labs have, but at the same time, that hasn't stopped them from building some really, really powerful models like DeepSeek or Kimi. So we are like really bullish that we'll just repeat the same in the West.
7:59Yannis:I love that. I love the attitude with it. And I think you're spot on. Like the truth is some of those teams aren't that big when you look at some of those. And it's not even about size as long as the tech is there. And I understand you guys are a mixture of expert model, correct?
8:19Ioannis Antonoglou:Yes.
8:20Yannis:Could you kind of break that down a little bit? So maybe, you know, some of our readers who are maybe, they use ChatGPT, but they're not coders. Kind of explain how that works.
8:29Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, that's, yeah, this kind of like, this is a really kind of technical difference between what we mean by dense models and what we mean by MOEs and how MOEs, you know, might sound like much larger models, but like at the same time, they're like quite efficient when it comes to inference. so at the heart of it you can actually think of a mixture of experts model as like many many many models kind of like uh put right next to each other and then there's like what we call a router which is uh really a system that selects one of the models to route each um each uh forward pass so when i have a dense model like every uh that i guess like attention is the idea of like uh looking at every token and try to predict based on like this, based on every token in the past, try to predict like the next token.
9:24Ioannis Antonoglou:And there's like an everything to everything kind of like connection. So like this is like the fully connected dense models. In the mixture of experts, you have like many of these models, like one right next to the next, one right next to the other. and a system that selects during inference, during runtime, which one of the model to route its path to.
9:49Yannis:So for people who don't know, so we've covered mixture of experts, which, correct me if this is wrong, but essentially, it's like a lot of tiny models that are highly specialized, like the experts, in a specific field of interest. Then you have the dense model, which that would be like what we think of as like a large language model like GPT 4 or 4.5 or something like that, where it's just, it's trying to remember everything at once. Is that correct?
10:14Ioannis Antonoglou:No, no, no. That's not correct, actually. Like, because, you know, GPT-4, GPT-4.5 could also, like, be a mixture of expert models. It's more of the architecture. So the architecture is that as if you just, like, took and you trained, you trained many small LLMs and then you just kind of, like, put them together and then just, like, trained a system that can route between them. And then this way, kind of like the actual models, like many, many experts contributing to the final output. And, you know, you actually like do that, like you don't do it. You don't have like actual full models. You just like have them interspersed, right?
10:55Ioannis Antonoglou:Like as in, you have like layers of like experts and they kind of like contribute to the same final output.
11:03Yannis:So the model kind of knows, okay, so I need this one, this one, and this one for this instance or something like that, right?
11:10Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah. So it's kind of like, I think it's like a path that a model can take to kind of like use different experts along the way to just kind of like produce the final output. Okay.
11:30Yannis:Let me give you a, because this is super fascinating. I love learning this. So let's say for sake of argument, I have a prompt. And my prompt is, you know, write, this is like a classic one Corey does, write about how to make spaghetti, but from the point of view of a quantum physicist, the path that it would take would then be like, okay, recipes and cooking, but then also quantum physics and then like pulling in all of these things as they're needed. Is that kind of how it would work?
11:59Ioannis Antonoglou:no it's actually like more at the level of the token that i'll just like do that so it's kind of like uh the mix of experts i guess like the experts is the idea that uh each expert will just like learn something or the data and then you've just but like it's not at the level of uh of that abstraction it's like more of at the lower level of abstraction i'll just like learn something and And then by just like mixing these experts, you just like, yeah, by mixing these experts, you just like get more powerful outcome. Now, the whole idea is that you can really have like more weights. You can have like more parameters during training that you can actually use to feed your data.
12:40Ioannis Antonoglou:But during inference, there's like only a number of active parameters that you care about. So like you don't have to run inference across like massive model of like trillion parameters, right? because the active number of parameters is what really matters for inference. And this tends to be much smaller. It could be like 32B or 256B or something like that when a model is like one trillion. So the super sparse experts is when you have many, many, many, many, many, many experts where each one of them has a significantly smaller number of parameters. So inference is much faster. and at the same time you have like a lot of capacity in your model.
13:22Okay.
13:23Yannis:I like that. I'm glad that we ironed that out because sometimes it's easy to think of it in like a higher level of abstraction, but you're saying this is happening like at the weight level. Yes, exactly. Yeah, gotcha. Okay. Well, I mean, speaking of weights, you're releasing the model weights for the open source models that you're creating. um walk us through what you're releasing and why that's meaningful develop for developers
13:50Ioannis Antonoglou:yeah so we'll actually release the model architecture we'll just like release the weights uh what that means is that people can take the model they can uh you know run it in their own hardware wherever they want uh they can actually if they have data they can use this data to do fine tuning uh if they have an environment they can just like run their own reinforcement learning, RFT, on the model to just like take specialized models out of that. So you have like full ownership of how you run the model, where you run the model, what you do with the model, like in terms of customization. So this is kind of like important for people who want to have like, you know, they care about safety, they care about security, they care about customization, and they ultimately care about like ownership.
14:34Ioannis Antonoglou:But what also this allows you to do, especially, and this is especially important for like researchers, is to try new algorithms. So, like, you can try to take this model, do two different reinforcement learning algorithms, for example, and then just, like, see which one behaves best. And then just, like, do that with a model that's, like, a frontier model.
14:53Yannis:That's really interesting. I understand reinforcement learning has played a big role in training as well along the way. Is that correct?
15:02Ioannis Antonoglou:Yes. I mean, reinforcement learning is, we are, like, you know, true believers in reinforcement learning. I think many of the team have like a strong reinforcement learning background, including myself. So for us, it's, you know, it's one of the big bets.
15:17Yannis:Is there anything else, you know, architecturally under the hood you'd be down to share? I'm curious to learn a little more about what you're working on.
15:28Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, I mean, I guess like, you know, if the final architecture is something that like you have to wait and see, like when the model lands. Fair enough. I cannot truly, you know, kind of like share anything at this point. At the same time, what we're building is a frontier genetic model. So think of a system that can do multi-step reasoning. So really interact with tools and environments, just complete the task end to end. So that means that it needs to understand long context. It needs to be able to self-correct. that are like certain capabilities that are like really important in order to have, you know, agentic intelligence.
16:11Ioannis Antonoglou:And there are many, many things that go into like training these models from, you know, instruction following and pre-training and the data mixtures, but also a lot of reinforcement learning and what environments you use to really kind of train this model.
16:27Yannis:When we talk about environments, are we talking about code environments or almost simulating actual websites and things like that since we're talking about an agent here?
16:39Ioannis Antonoglou:An environment can be anything. It can be something simple like a coding environment. It can be an actual website or something that you want to simulate. but like fundamentally what it is is you can think of like environment even like in the more reinforcement learning kind of like terminology as a system where like your model can interact with so it can take actions like in our case actions are like tool use you can actually use certain tools it can or mcps and when it calls these tools or mcps it actually gets a new observation, like a new state of the world. And this way, you know, it can interact with the world so that it can complete the task.
Read the full transcript
17:25Ioannis Antonoglou:So a world, for example, can be a terminal, right? Like you can have like a bash and then you type commands into the bash and then you just get the output of these commands. And then the whole point is just like for the model to just solve the task that you asked it to solve.
17:42Yannis:right yeah i've also and you know i guess it's kind of the same but i've also heard that environments can be data or data can be environments is that accurate or is that
17:52Ioannis Antonoglou:completely off base um i mean i i think it's like data and environments are kind of like quite uh similar and um it's also like you know what the terminology that like people use depends on their background. So like, you know, synthetic data, for example, like when people say synthetic data, and that like the model can learn through synthetic data, what that means is that the model generates data, and then it can actually like, you know, you do some form of filtering, and then you can learn on the data that you've selected based on the filtering. And, you know, this is kind of like exactly how reinforcement learning works.
18:32Ioannis Antonoglou:Like the whole idea of reinforcement learning is like trial and error as in the model tries something and then based on the outcome of like what you tried it either wants to just like do more of it or less of it and so like synthetic data and reinforcement learning like inherently they're like really kind of almost the same thing at some level of abstraction and what reinforcement learning tries to do is to just like be much more efficient in the way that it learns from this data it learns from this experience. So would you say that you fall in the camp
19:01Yannis:where you are more leaning towards Transformers as the path and scaling them up? Or are you deeply like, no, we need a new architecture at kind of like the Richard Sutton, Andre Carpathi kind of path? Where do you land in that?
19:16Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, so we actually, we believe in the Transformers. And I understand why people, and especially like people like Reed Sutton or Andre Kapathy feel that transformers have some inherent limitations that will stop us from going all the way to AGI. I feel like ultimately it also boils down to what or how you define AGI. And to us, it is a system that can interact with a computer and it can actually do things that people can do on this computer. And it's not something that might... It might not be something that... you know, for other people, it's like a super scientist or like, you know, something that kind of like understands everything.
19:59Ioannis Antonoglou:And we have like a more maybe kind of like pragmatic kind of definition of like what AGI is. So in order to just like build a system like that, I think that you can really go a long way with transformers. You might get to a point where like you need to tweak your architecture or just like make adjustments to it. But, you know, it's not – I don't think that, like, we need to kind of, like, scratch everything and go back to square one. Yeah, totally valid.
20:29Yannis:Yeah, I think that's really interesting. And it's kind of funny how problematic the lack of a consistent AGI definition has made conversation in the AI space along the way. It's interesting you'd call that out.
20:47Yannis:So, you know, there's kind of this concept of sovereign AI with countries having this idea to build their own AI models and ecosystems. What do you think that looks like in an open source context? Do you think that enables it or?
21:04Ioannis Antonoglou:I mean, that's a really good question. And I want to say that the previous generation of technology was built on top of the protocols, like the internet protocols that were developed in the US. And in a way, the US really shaped the infrastructure and the way that the internet operates at a global scale. even the fact that English is the language of the internet or the fact that the protocols have been defined by American companies and the biggest internet companies are actually out of the US so just being the place that defines the infrastructure layer of a new technology is extremely important and the only way to do that is by actually providing the open source solutions to that, like the internet is actually built on top of open source the most important packages like the protocols everything is open source and this is I think I'd like inherently important for any new technology and I think that AI infrastructure layer will be built on top of open models and currently like all the frontier open models are actually coming out of China which is kind of like you know really good for them you know I think I'd like they have the opportunity to kind of like really shape the AI infrastructure but at the same time you know like here in the US we should also proactively be doing something about that and just building open models that can be an alternative to the technology coming out of China and this is not what's happening there are no powerful advanced scale frontier open weight models coming out of the US and reflection is building them we want to just put them out there, make them accessible to everyone and ensure that, you know, there's like a solid AI infrastructure alternative, you know, that has been built in this country.
23:05Yannis:That's really interesting because you're right. All of that is coming out of China right now. And they're good models. You know, when you take a minute and you look at Quinn, you look at what can be done with Kimmy, those are really good models. But none of that's coming out of here. Most American companies that are doing anything seem to be focusing on really small models right now. It makes actually what you did unique because you raised$2 billion on the idea of open source. And that was something that was kind of unheard of a couple months ago, I think. I mean, this was coming seven months after you raised like at a$545 million valuation, right?
23:48Yannis:So what convinced investors to double down on you and open source? Yeah, I mean, I guess the thing that's really important in order to be able to build these
23:59Ioannis Antonoglou:models is to kind of have the know-how and help the people. So the reason why our investors really believed in us is because they saw that we had attracted really, really good talent from the top labs and they saw that we could actually attract more of them and ensure that we don't just like bring the people in but like they we have them like um you know they can work really nicely and productively together and um they really believe in the mission right like this is uh the the you you know the air market is crazy you know people get like uh crazy offers from like other places and uh what it boils down to is like whether people feel inspired by the mission and the vision of what they're building and you know we as reflection have a really strong and powerful message and vision.
24:50Ioannis Antonoglou:And that has really attracted some of the best people. And, you know, I think that like we will continue to attract the best people. And this is kind of like the thing that you need. You need the resources and the people to really make use of those resources.
25:04Yannis:I mean, I guess the question behind the question I was wondering is, do you think that the mentality of open source and how competitive it could be has changed in the industry. Like, do you think that, I guess more broadly, do you think that there is a chance that open source could even surpass the big labs, like, especially if you're financed enough to compete with them?
25:30Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, I mean, I guess like you're touching upon like the question of, you know, how do you make money to just like keep kind of like pushing to the frontier? Sure. And I don't see why open source cannot like be at the frontier. if something, there is an opportunity here to leapfrog to the frontier by just putting these models out there and working with other research groups in the world that can provide insight or they can just provide ideas that help you move faster. So usually open science and open research leads to faster progress. That's something that has happened over the centuries. That's why there are conferences.
26:12Ioannis Antonoglou:That's why there are like journals. That's why there's like peer review, right? That's an idea. Because like that's how you progress science. And this is not what's happening with the closed models. Now, at the same time, I think that there are like ways to commercialize open models. And especially like with, you know, in the enterprise market or the sovereign market where they need to have like on-prem solutions and they need to just like, you know, kind of like almost own the intelligence. So we have many partners. I'm not going to share our go-to-market plans here, but we have some really solid ways to commercialize the open models that will ensure that we continue to capitalize and have access to the resources that we need so that we can stay and shape the frontier.
27:04Yannis:Interesting. How do you balance, with regard to open source development, how do you balance safety with speed? I know there's a couple of interesting things to juggle along the way in open source. And I'm curious, like, what's your approach there?
27:24Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, I mean, of course, like, we take safety extremely seriously. we have like a team similarly to other labs that is looking into safety kind of like red teaming adversarial attacks like they really battle tests our models at the same time again it goes back to working with the community and just by just putting the models out there we also like want to encourage other research groups to just like think more about like safety and exactly what safety looks like at the frontier and like models that are really powerful. So, you know, I think that even if you look at the operating systems, right, like by having an open source operating system, like eventually you get like safer operating systems because like people just like try and solve the bugs and just like contribute to the source code rather than having them like closed.
28:16Ioannis Antonoglou:So we really believe...
28:17Yannis:More people are using it so they understand the code base and they're more incentivized.
28:20Ioannis Antonoglou:More people are using it. They like bugs just like surface like faster. there are like more contributors who try to just like fix the bugs so it's kind of like really just um you know try to fundamentally fundamentally we think that like people are good people like most people are good people there are like bad actors out there they're always like bad actors but like at a high level like you know most people are like good people who want to ensure that like these models are safe and we want to just like uh you know work with them to ensure that uh you know our models are like safer than other models yeah i agree with
28:55Yannis:your thesis like i i do think that it makes it safer and i think that there are maybe perhaps more risks from the big labs keeping their technology closed i just think that's it's good that they're publishing stuff but i mean i've always felt like there's there's really a double-edged sword to it almost in terms of either approach and it's a but i tend to be i i definitely lean open source. I think the ideas of what's possible when you put a more malleable model out into the world just gets so much more broad. And with that in mind, Giannis, what do you think needs to happen for open models to one day become the obvious choice over closed models for maybe a majority.
29:49Yannis:What do you think that tipping point is maybe?
29:53Ioannis Antonoglou:So, I mean, I think it really boils down to capabilities, right? Like you want models that are like really capable. And again, I really think that I don't see a reason why the open models cannot be the most capable models. You know, the most capable Chinese models are actually open. So I don't see why we can, we cannot have like, you know, frontier models, open models here in the US. And of course, there are other things, right? If you had two models, one closed and one open that are equally capable, I think most people would just choose the open one because it gives you more flexibility, transparency.
30:29Ioannis Antonoglou:You can just make it more secure or safe by just ensuring where it runs, how it uses your resources, what kind of resources you give it access to. So I think capabilities, extremely important, but all else being equal, open wins every day.
30:52Yannis:Yeah, it seems like what I'm hearing is that your company's thesis is that open source can eventually open or even surpass cloud from the speed that comes with open source when everyone's building on it and contributing to it per the open science idea that you shared earlier. Do you think that that's accurate? and if so, is it just a matter of scale at this point, of just scaling up the open science and getting it out there to as many people as possible?
31:20Ioannis Antonoglou:So yeah, I mean, I think it's like ultimately what you need, you know, just like build a frontier model. It's two things. One is talent and the other one is like resources. And, you know, in terms of like resources, you need to have like, you know, the do you need to have like the money you need to actually like stay at the the to have like access all the resources that you need in terms of talent you need um to just like have a an inspiring um kind of like mission like something that like people really want to work uh on and uh i think that our um mission of like open intelligence has uh really been resonated with like scientists.
32:01Ioannis Antonoglou:And this is why I think we have been so successful at like attracting some of the best talent in the industry. Yeah, I agree.
32:11Yannis:Well, you yourself are an engineer. So you're building tools. I assume you're building AI tools with coding AI tools, right? Yeah. Yeah. Okay. What do you look for in a coding agent that you use personally? And what's your favorite right now and why?
32:27Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, I mean, I guess like, one thing that I mean, first of all, I want to just like, you know, pause here and just like say that coding agents have had like the progress that we've seen in terms of capabilities over the past two years has been incredible. I think like every six months, you just like, you know, use your best kind of like coding agent tool and you just like get a completely, you're like, you're mind blown. I think like maybe we've grown like too uh i think that maybe now we're like too desensitized like you know a new world comes out it does like incredible things and you're like yeah but like does it go on its own not not yet totally i couldn't agree more covering the news on this every day couldn't agree more but uh it is uh it is insane like how far we've come like you know i've been i've been doing ai for like almost 14 years now and kind of like thinking where the industry was when I started and like where it's now like the coding agent is like on day and night.
33:33Ioannis Antonoglou:At the same time, I really, I mean, I like cloud code. I think that like it's a really, really good piece of technology. I think that like Anthropic has done really good work there, just like building that. So, you know, good news to them. um i've also like uh i've used cash flow in the past and that's that's also like something that i i found useful to me i feel like we're getting to the point we're not quite there yet but i feel like we'll just get there in the next like few months where uh the the like the programmer spends more time kind of like designing and just like architecting and less time about like really kind of writing the code.
34:16Ioannis Antonoglou:I mean, even today, you still need to just go into the weeds and just write the code. But these agents become more and more powerful. So I feel like we're not that far away from actually just being the conductors of an agent orchestra that writes the code. And that's what I want to see in the next year.
34:34Yannis:Boyd, when you just think about the difference in the last year, it's come a long way. And there are a lot of new players. it's become a competitive part of the industry even.
34:46Ioannis Antonoglou:Yes, yes. Like there are like many, many players out there. And I think this is because like there's almost like a discovery that we need to do. Once you have like these powerful agents, what does coding look like in this new world, right? Yeah.
35:10Ioannis Antonoglou:we need to kind of like almost like rethink how we just like code and what coding looks like and then you need you can just like think of different ways and different paths of doing that and they're like yeah many kind of like different companies trying to just like almost do slightly different things at the same time you know most converge to coding agents as like the solution like in some way, in some form. So I don't know, I think it's too early to just like say exactly what coding will look like in even like three years from now. Oh yeah.
35:49Yannis:I guess how will your personal interests and how you use coding, you know, maybe it's still, this is still like totally blue ocean and you don't know yet, kind of guide how you build at Reflection AI. you mean i mean in the sense of yeah like how how how will like i guess if if without giving away the secret sauce because i know yeah i don't want i don't want to have to put you on the spot to give away any secrets but but as far as what you think is missing or or how you like to code how will that focus what you decide to build and what you're building right now yeah i mean for us again
36:30Ioannis Antonoglou:And like, it's all about having agents that you can really trust that like when you ask them to do something, they'll just like go and do it. And they'll just like self-correct. Like even now, you just have like these agents, they will try to do something. They will just like trip over. They'll just like go into circles. Like, you know, they might kind of like waste tokens on like dead ends. They're just like not as efficient. so you know having like stronger agents is like definitely like the the thing that's needed for any uh for any future i think like in terms of but you know you know we know exactly what you need to do there like we just need to make these agents like more reliable and like uh and better now there's like uh what i'm trying to say is that like there's a another question imagine that you had access to extremely powerful agents what is the best way for you to interact with them what's the best way what's the best ui for you to just like uh coordinate them and to delegate tasks to them and just keep track of like what they've done and what they haven't done like what is the best way to run your team of uh agents and i think i've seen you know different ways of like approaching the problem but like uh i think it's early days like uh once we there's like a lot of discovery on the kind of like user AI interaction interface.
37:48Ioannis Antonoglou:What's the best way to, you know, work with these agents?
37:53Yannis:Totally, yeah. And I've seen a bunch of different combinations, and I don't know if we're 100 % there yet. I mean, I like the terminal experience a lot, actually. I was intimidated by it for a while, but I've come to really, really love the terminal first. But I think there's also, you know, There's also a time and a place for the IDE version. And maybe there's a higher level abstraction too where you're almost like watching them build the UI in real time or building the infrastructure in real time. And it's like visualized in some way. I don't know. I mean, that's a higher level than maybe you meant.
38:29Ioannis Antonoglou:Exactly. I feel like this is... Yeah, I feel like this... Once we have the really powerful agents, we need to rethink what's the best way to just like, you know, guide them and, you know, see what they're doing.
38:44Yannis:As far as like the actual sizes of the models that you're going to build, are you thinking of building things all over the spectrum? Are you just going straight at the frontier level? Or will you make stuff that people could run even locally on their own computer?
38:59Ioannis Antonoglou:We want to build a family of models. it's also important that every time you just decide to release a model it needs to go through a whole process so we need to just be we haven't really finalized exactly what models will just drop all the models will just release in the next year but it's going to be different sizes so not just one big one
39:28Yannis:nice That's cool. Something I could run on my computer and code with, perhaps. Yeah. Maybe. Maybe. We'll see. We're both open source nerds and tend to chase whatever's new and download it and see what we can run. We're always tinkering. So let's step away from coding for a second. For someone in, let's say, marketing, sales, finance, what's the first thing you think agents will be doing for them from an open source model? Like what's that killer use case that open models can handle that maybe isn't smart with closed labs?
40:13Ioannis Antonoglou:That's a good question, actually. I think that at some level of abstraction, both open and closed models will just be able to do about the same tasks. They'll just be able to solve the same problems.
40:30Ioannis Antonoglou:Now, I think that there are many solutions, many products. Coding, I understand the industry because I do a lot of coding myself, so it's much easier. But for other industries like marketing, to be honest, I'm not an expert. So I'm not quite sure exactly what the right cases are there. Well, I'll give you an example.
40:57Yannis:And you can tell me if you think this is directly correct. The thing that I think is missing from both a capability standpoint, and you probably wouldn't want to do this with a closed model, is the personal assistant that was promised where it's just like, it actually knows everything about you. And I've heard a lot of discussions about like, oh, you don't want to leave this platform or that platform because you have all of your memories in there and that memory is this big lock-in. But I could see having a closed model on my computer, like if I'm working even in a job perspective, I could see like having something that knows a lot about me and all the projects I'm working on and having that all stored locally, but being able to interface with all of the different applications that I use on that device.
41:46Yannis:Do you think that that is likely with where we're going? Like where you could actually be able to store things, store all of that context and information locally?
41:56Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, I mean, I guess like we are not there in terms of like computation of being able to run the most powerful models locally. Like, you know, you cannot, even if you had access to it, you cannot run GPT 5.1 or like, like locally. You just, you cannot do it, right? Or like, you know, the Gemini 3, you cannot just like run it locally. So there is like a limitation in terms of computation.
42:27Ioannis Antonoglou:But besides that, I feel like once we are in a place where you can just like run really powerful models locally, I don't see a reason why you wouldn't be able to have all the data in one place, right? Now, at the same time, we also see that smaller models become better and better and better. So there are definitely cases where I can see a smaller model that can be run locally doing a lot of this work. Yeah. Okay.
42:53Yannis:Yeah. I have one last question here before we let you go. I know we're getting tight on time. And we touched on this a little earlier, but I'd like to dig in a bit deeper. What does it mean to you to have American open source AI in the race and not all of it be concentrated only in China? Yeah, I mean, I think that, like, it is important that, like, there are alternatives out there.
43:26Ioannis Antonoglou:there is a question of transparency and what's happening with the Chinese models, how they've been trained there are things that have come out that they censor certain things so they might have certain cultural biases encoded in them and I think that having an American alternative that is more transparent, it encodes different values it's going to be a net positive for the world and for America
44:01Yannis:Do you think that it's possible to build an open source AI open American AI that also will appeal to other countries like countries in Europe or countries in Asia and how could we do that?
44:16Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, absolutely I think it's not going to be just we build it in America but we don't just build it for America we build it for the world and the way to do that is just like be transparent with like, you know, how you build the model, you know, give it out. There is an understanding that like many of the, many of the kind of like values that like this model encodes kind of like shared across other countries, not just like America. So, and at the same time, by just like releasing the model, the model can always be fine-tuned and ensure that like other countries can use it like with, they can further train it on their own data and a lot of like their cultural nuances of like this particular country will also like be understood by the model.
45:04Ioannis Antonoglou:So absolutely, we're building a model that we want to just make it accessible to everyone in the world and, you know, just ensure that like also people can customize it further. Excellent.
45:20Yannis:Well, Giannis, thank you so much for joining us today. It's been great to have you on. Where can, I suppose people want to learn more about what you're doing at Reflection and keep up because there's going to be a model coming sometime.
45:33Ioannis Antonoglou:Yeah, I mean, of course you can always go to our website. We have many job openings, so really hiring across the board to just bring incredible engineers and scientists to work with us on building the most powerful open-weight models in the world. So that's www.reflection.ai you can we have like a Twitter presence X presence where we just like post a lot of like updates on what's happening in the company so yeah
46:06Yannis:cool cool well go check them out they're doing some really neat work over there everyone we hope you enjoyed today's show if you haven't already please take a moment to like and subscribe so we can continue to bring conversations like this to you every week join more than 600 and some odd thousand readers who pick up the neuron every single morning to get their latest AI news. But that's all for today. So until next time, farewell humans.
From the publisher
A team of former Google DeepMind researchers just raised $2B to build America's answer to DeepSeek. In this episode, we sit down with Ioannis Antonoglou (Yannis), co-founder and CTO of Reflection AI, who helped create AlphaGo—the AI that beat the world champion in the game of Go back in 2016.
Yannis breaks down what Reflection is building, why they're releasing frontier-level AI models as open-weight, and how mixture-of-experts architecture lets massive models run efficiently. We dig into reinforcement learning, the US vs. China open source gap, sovereign AI, coding agents, and why open science might be the fastest path to the most powerful AI on the planet.
Reflection AI: https://www.reflection.ai
Reflection AI raises $2B at $8B valuation (TechCrunch): https://techcrunch.com/2025/10/09/reflection-raises-2b-to-be-americas-open-frontier-ai-lab-challenging-deepseek/
Previous Neuron coverage of DeepSeek: https://www.theneuron.ai/newsletter/deepseek-returns https://www.theneuron.ai/newsletter/10-wild-deepseek-demos
Subscribe to The Neuron newsletter: https://theneuron.ai
