In short
“Micro-looting” and moral codes—why people justify small theft from big corporations (e.g., Whole Foods/Amazon/Bezos) when they believe the rich don’t follow rules, and whether such acts are meaningful versus real political action like unionization or regulation.
Guests
Nadja Spiegelman (NYT Opinion culture editor; host). Hassan Piker (political commentator). Gia Tolentino (New Yorker writer).
Guest backgrounds
Piker argues from a labor/collective-power lens; Tolentino focuses on culture, direct action tactics, and how narratives shape what feels acceptable.
Key claims
Individual “micro-looting” is atomized and largely ineffective as direct action; it can reflect anger and lost organizing capacity. Structural theft (wage theft, corporate tax avoidance, structural violence) is normalized and less punished than individual theft. Effective change requires collective action (especially unions) and regulatory/bottom-up pressure.
Notable examples
stealing lemons from Whole Foods during mutual aid; 2020 protest looting (Gucci/Chanel in Soho); Boston Tea Party; Luigi Mangione/UnitedHealthcare CEO murder reactions; CEO pay growth (21x to 281x) and “zero tax” corporate profits claim; “get a job there, unionize” as the “real yes.”
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOMicro-Looting Concept Introduction
0:48 to 1:40
Nadja introduces the concept of micro-looting as a response to big corporations.
“Hey, I'm Nadja Spiegelman, and I'm a culture editor for New York Times opinion.”
Exploring Personal Morality
1:40 to 4:22
Discussion on personal ethics around sharing passwords and pirating.
“I want to start with a little exercise just about our own morals.”
The Ethics of Stealing
4:22 to 6:15
Delving into the morality of stealing from corporations like Whole Foods.
“my now family friend who lived nearby and she wanted to go to Whole Foods.”
The Political Nature of Theft
6:15 to 8:31
Examining theft as a form of protest against wealth inequality.
“these self-checkout machines, Whole Foods will eventually raise the prices?”
Valorizing Thieves in Culture
8:31 to 11:11
Discussion on societal attitudes towards theft and its justification.
“My friends and I have started calling this micro-looting because it has a, like, slight political valence to the theft as opposed to just the thrill of getting away with something.”
Direct Action vs. Individual Theft
11:11 to 13:54
Contrasting the impact of individual actions like micro-looting against collective action.
“I was reading a Pew Research poll about Americans' morality, and it basically was just like, well, we didn't even ask about the obviously immoral things like theft.”
The Erosion of Collective Action
14:03 to 17:43
Explore the decline of collective engagement and its implications.
“We've lost the rooms in which these things are planned, you know?”
The Nature of Theft and Violence
17:43 to 21:14
Discuss the societal views on theft from the wealthy versus the poor.
“to get a little bit of it back through stealing from Whole Foods or whatever, right?”
Murder as Political Protest?
21:14 to 25:30
Analyze the moral implications of murder as a form of protest.
“But it's scary to be in a society where people feel that murder is morally justified.”
Failings of Political Systems
25:30 to 28:01
Examine the failures of the Democratic Party and trust in government.
“Are they feckless because they're just bad at politics?”
Show all 18 chapters
Protests and Government Response
28:01 to 28:39
Exploring the impact of government actions on public protests and participation.
“And that was the perfect opportunity to show Americans that your voices do matter.”
Redistribution and Civic Action
28:41 to 29:50
Discussing how wealth distribution affects people's ability to engage in civic action.
“However, while this system of global capital seems like a giant that is impossible to tackle, it's also very fragile.”
The Importance of Good Governance
29:53 to 30:23
Highlighting the role of effective governance in inspiring public confidence.
“And the thing with Zoran is that he does instill confidence in governance all of a sudden.”
Moral Dilemmas in Society
30:24 to 30:50
Discussing the challenges of living ethically in an unethical world.
“So a lot of what we've been talking about is taking what little power we have and trying to make it bigger, trying to take back some of the power for ourselves.”
Legal vs. Moral Actions
30:52 to 31:46
Examining the conflict between socially acceptable actions and personal ethics.
“One thing that should be legal that isn't.”
The Complexity of Everyday Choices
31:47 to 32:26
Reflecting on the everyday decisions that challenge our moral beliefs.
“Yeah, maybe like things like blowing up a pipeline.”
Public Resource Management
32:27 to 33:08
Debating issues surrounding public resources and social policies.
“I mean, it's like splashed all over the subway ads.”
Smash or Pass: Social Ethics
33:09 to 33:59
Engaging in a light-hearted discussion about ethical dilemmas in society.
“I also think private schools should be mostly illegal.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00When you use the trusted investing and savings app Betterment to help grow your money automatically, you have more time for new niche hobbies like collecting miniatures. The joy that brings helps you sleep better at night and even motivates you to always use your PM moisturizer. Now you've got a dewy glow and a sense of balance to match. Not worrying where your money is growing. That's the Betterment Effect. Get started today at Betterment.com. Investing involves risk. Performance not guaranteed. This is The Opinions, a show that brings you a mix of voices from New York Times opinion. You've heard the news.
0:39Here's what to make of it.
0:48Hey, I'm Nadja Spiegelman, and I'm a culture editor for New York Times opinion. I'm proposing a new term, micro-looting. What I started doing is I started going into the grocery store. or I would pick up the thing that I wanted, and then I would go. You're paying for that, right? No, babe. It's a human right. People are taking small things from big corporations. And they're feeling justified.
1:11Jia Tolentino:Like, look, everyone's shoplifting from Whole Foods when you're shopping there. You're not going to steal from a deli like that. But Whole Foods, fuck Whole Foods. Fuck Bezos, fuck Amazon, all that. Like, we should be rioting, but we're tired, so I'm going to take these bagels. But is it a slippery slope? And what's going on with our moral code? To find out, I'm talking to political commentator Hassan Piker and New Yorker writer Gia Tolentino.
1:39Thank you both so much for being here with me today to talk about this. Hi, Gia. Hi. Hi, Hassan. Hi. I want to start with a little exercise just about our own morals. Would you share your Netflix password? I do. I also do. Well, I... With anyone. For the longest time, I actually had someone else's Netflix password. That was my primary access to Netflix. And now you share your own? Yeah. Would you get around a paywall on an article you're trying to read? Do it every day on my stream. Every day.
2:14Jia Tolentino:I support it when people do it for my own work. I say, go off. Use the Wayback Machine. Would you pirate music from an indie band? Is it 2005 and I'm using LimeWire? Because yes. I feel like every millennial has at some point done this. I feel like fundamentally Spotify is kind of like deleterious to the musician livelihood. And I use that. But then I go to the shows. Yeah, no, I'm pro piracy all the way. Like across the board, would you pirate a car? Yes. You know, if you could. What would it mean to pirate a car? It was just a classic thing back in the day. The government funded anti-piracy initiatives would be like, would you steal a car?
2:54I'm like, yeah, sure. If I could get away with it, if it was as easy as, you know, pirating IP, I would do it. Would you dine and dash from your local diner? Never.
3:08Jia Tolentino:Never. Except 35%. Mikes, come on. No, I wouldn't do that. If I saw somebody doing that, I'd probably pay for their meal. Yeah. Would you steal a book from the library? Never. No. Would you steal from the Louvre? Yes. I would not be logistically capable of executing such a fact, but would I cheer on every news story of people that I see doing it? Absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah, I think it's cool. We got to get back to cool crimes like that. Like, you know, bank robberies, right? Stealing priceless artifacts. Things of that nature. I feel like that's way cooler than the 7 ,000th new cryptocurrency scheme that people are engaging in.
3:56Would you steal from Whole Foods?
3:58Jia Tolentino:Yes. And I have under very specific circumstances. I think that stealing from a big buck store, I'll just state my platform. It's neither very significant as a moral wrong, nor is it significant in any way as protest or direct action. but I did steal from Whole Foods on several occasions. Like I've been involved in like a neighborhood mutual aid group since 2021. And so every week I would go get groceries for Miss Nancy, my now family friend who lived nearby and she wanted to go to Whole Foods. She wanted food from Whole Foods. So I was like, okay, great. And so I'd be getting Miss Nancy all her groceries.
4:33Jia Tolentino:And then I would finish and I'd be like, oh my God, four lemons. I forgot four lemons. And on several occasions, I was like, I'm just going to go back, grab those four lemons and get the hell out. You should go to prison. I know. You think they're going to ban me? They should throw you in jail. But I didn't feel bad about it at all. And was part of it because of how you feel about Whole Foods as a corporation? Yeah, it already felt like a bit of a compromise. Like at the time, I was like, I had not been to Whole Foods. I had a bit more sort of consumer discipline about where I was spending my money then.
5:04Jia Tolentino:And I already felt like I was in the hole even by shopping there. And it certainly felt in a utilitarian sense. I was like, this is not a big deal. Well, I'm pro stealing from big corporations because, you know, they they steal quite a bit more from their own workers. However, one thing that might even help your ethical dilemma is the fact that the automated process that they design, these companies know will increase shrink. Right. So it's it's actually factored in the lemons that you stole are factored into the box. bottom line of these megacorporations regardless. And they still end up having increased profit margins because they no longer have to pay for the cashiers that they used to hire as opposed to this automated system, knowing full well that people are still going to be able to steal, still steal a lot more efficiently, as a matter of fact, through the automated process.
6:02Jia Tolentino:Totally. Well, I also I was looking things like and shrinkage is roughly equal internally as externally. Like they expect it from their employees that they are sort of disenfranchising constantly. But what about the argument that if everyone just starts stealing wantonly from these self-checkout machines, Whole Foods will eventually raise the prices? Yeah, they, chaos, full chaos. Let's go. I mean, look, I'm in favor. I'm in favor of fast and free buses and also government owned storefronts. And, you know, two of those policies, the mayor of this beautiful cities is currently working on. Would you encourage stealing in the same way from a Mumdani-run city-owned grocery store with other prices?
6:45And why? I would not. Because I feel like that's taxpayer-funded and the prices are union labor and the prices are also adjusted regardless.
6:55Jia Tolentino:I think that hypothetical is interesting, right? Because if you look at it from a categorical imperative type thing, what if everybody did this? You know, the converse is like, oh, what if every major grocery chain stole from workers and consumers. And that is basically true, right? Like, it's interesting. Like, I think it speaks to the thing where a kind of harm committed by the individual strangely continually draws more ire than the same harm being committed by a structure. And so, I mean, and so I kind of am inclined towards this. It's like, everyone try it, see what happens. Well, I, by the way, ironically enough, I don't personally do it.
7:32I never do it. When I was younger, I stole some Pokemon cards from a friend and my father punished me. And it was such a harrowing experience that I've like, I literally can't even steal like a candy bar. When we were in college, a lot of my friends used to love doing that, you know, getting drunk, going to the gas station, five finger discount. I would never participate in it. And I still can't to this day participate in it. I'm just saying that I personally don't really care If someone needs the food, they should absolutely steal it. Yeah. There's one thing that's like stealing when you're a teenager and you want the adrenaline rush.
8:09And part of it is about testing the rules and getting away with something. But I feel like what I'm seeing on TikTok and social media is people saying that they're stealing from Whole Foods, not just for the thrill of it, but out of a feeling of anger and moral justification because the rich don't play by the rules. So why should I? And Jeff Bezos has too much money. He's a billionaire. So why should I have to pay for organic avocados? My friends and I have started calling this micro-looting because it has a, like, slight political valence to the theft as opposed to just the thrill of getting away with something.
8:40Have you noticed this around you online? Have you noticed more people talking about stealing in this way?
8:45Jia Tolentino:I mean, I have not seen people talking about micro-looting or such, you know, whatever action that this is online. line, but I think, I mean, it kind of speaks to an attenuation of the tactical language of direct action. You know what I mean? Like, it's like, it doesn't work for me as a form of direct action because it's concealed, right? Like, any successful direct action history has to be ostentatious, has to make itself known as ideally collective, and this is sort of necessarily individual and hidden. But I'm like, oh, great. Let's think of ways to, like, let's take this energy and let's move it into some other thing.
9:26Jia Tolentino:Like, I think it's great that the valence of property is kind of on the table as something to be toyed with in terms of direct action. I feel like we've forgotten there is a long and storied history of sabotage and sort of engagement with property destruction even, which is abhorrent to people. I mean, you remember in 2020, the like Gucci Chanel stuff in Soho when that was looted, that looms so much larger in many sort of Bloomberg liberals' imaginations as profoundly more violent in some ways than the original action being protested, right? And I find that really interesting. Yeah. I mean, I was thinking about the Boston Tea Party as part of like, that's a political destruction of property.
10:08And yet, But right now, it feels like I agree with you. The looting around the 2020 protests was such a huge talking point. It made people so uncomfortable. And I'm curious why, like, what do you think the root of that is?
10:22Jia Tolentino:I was thinking, you know, that thieves are actually quite highly valorized in narrative. Aladdin, famously. Robin Hood. But like Robin Hood, right? Yeah, Jean Valjean. Like it's we we understand it's it's well within the collective consciousness that stealing for need or purpose. You know, it's it's something that that we we understand and feel quite friendly towards. And I think if someone were, let's say, walking out of Whole Foods with an Ikea bag of whatever and giving it to the people, you know, sheltering underneath the scaffolding at the jail going up in Brooklyn next door. Or, you know, like, I think most people would agree that that, you know, if someone were to be stealing with a purpose, we love that in America.
11:08Jia Tolentino:We do. We can love it again. We just have to do it with a purpose. I was reading a Pew Research poll about Americans' morality, and it basically was just like, well, we didn't even ask about the obviously immoral things like theft. We only asked about, like, having an affair. and I was like but I feel like part of what I'm seeing around me is that people feel like the laws are immoral the rich don't play by the rules it is we live in a society where there are billionaires where the top 1 % holds 32 % of the net worth and the bottom 50 % holds 2.5 % so at some point if the laws don't feel moral do you start to question your own sense of having to abide by them, of course.
11:52Yeah. I wanted to work off a point that you were making. This was also something that was addressed in a previous New York Times podcast that I did with Ross Douthat, where I brought up the concept of adventurism. In the Marxist tradition, adventurism is the action that is oftentimes decentralized. Oftentimes anarchists will say this is the propaganda of the deed. The action itself, no matter how violent or how disruptive it is, is justifiable because the disruption is the point. I believe in the power of organized labor and labor militancy and building these structures of power so that we can actually make more effective change, more longstanding change.
12:37So concepts such as micro-looting indicate that there is an energy there, just like you said. And yet many Americans, I think, are totally oblivious to this political language. They lack the political education. They lack the class consciousness to recognize their position in society and lack the capacity, unfortunately, to engage in some kind of organized disruption that would be infinitely more effective.
13:07Jia Tolentino:I think what you were saying about people lack the language and the organizing structure to engage in. Like the, you know, the obvious thing to do if you want to chip into the Whole Foods slash Amazon megastructure of exploitation is to unionize, like to work at a Whole Foods and form a union. And I think the first one was formed recently in Philly, I think. But, you know, I mean, this is, it's like microluting. It feels akin to like a posting about something. Like it is, it's a kind And as an atomized individual action, it's useless. It's much harder to get a job and accept$17.50 an hour and then to organize your colleagues, a process that takes years and is often unsuccessful.
13:50Jia Tolentino:I mean, that's really, you know, the thing about actual collective direct action. It's so much harder. And it often doesn't profit you whatsoever, such as, you know, me getting an extra$10 by grabbing my extra loaf of bread from Miss Nancy. Like, it's like, I do think there's, we are also lazy as humans. We're also selfish. We also, like, we've lost not we've lost not only the language and the union density and the structure to engage in things like this, but we have also lost the sort of muscle that is built up to be able to engage in these sort of things. We've lost the rooms in which these things are planned, you know?
14:25Jia Tolentino:Yeah. And the confidence. I think we've lost the confidence within ourselves because there is not a lot of action like this. And in the absence of that, we lack the willpower because we don't even know what that would look like. And actual, I mean, you know, the climate protests in Europe tend to be more militant, right, than the ones that are here. And they are, you know, blocking roadways. Like, these things that are even objectively completely nonviolent forms of obstruction and interference that don't even involve property destruction, but merely the interruption of the capital flow of the workday, like, are criminalized to shocking degrees to me, even in Europe, you know.
15:07Jia Tolentino:And I guess I'm saying like maybe we are getting the lack of courage is maybe a rational response to the kind of the way these actions are treated in the popular consciousness as well as by the criminal justice system. But they shouldn't be. I want to get back a little bit to the anger underneath this. In 1965, CEOs were paid 21 times the average worker. In 2024, CEOs were paid 281 times the average worker. I feel like some of this is coming from a feeling of like the rules are the social contract is broken. And then there's also the slippery slope of what happens if we completely break the social contract and no one plays by the rules anymore.
15:48And I wonder where you two see the interplay of those two ideas. Well, the rules are already designed in a way where if you steal from the poor, you become rich. If you steal from the wealthy, you go to prison. So there's only one direction where you can do unlimited theft and erode the social contract for the 99%. There's an invisibility baked into the system that allows the wealthy to engage in this sort of behavior. Because, I mean, it's a cliche at this point, but like wage theft is the most consequential amount of theft that takes place in the United States of America. A similar invisibility exists in structural violence as opposed to individual acts of violence as well.
16:37If it's a police officer engaging someone violently, the automatic assumption from the average person is, oh, that's probably a criminal. They probably deserved it. But if there's any circumstance where someone else is fighting back against police, like in a normal protest environment, for example, ultimately, most people assume that that is chaotic. It's a chaotic situation and that it is born out of the escalations from the protesters themselves, even if, as regular citizens, we're infinitely closer to those exercising their First Amendment rights than those with the power stamping out people exercising their free speech rights.
17:18We never look at systemic forms of violence and we don't look at systemic forms of theft in the same way that we do as individuals breaking that social contract.
17:28Jia Tolentino:I think there is, you know, in my ideal world, like what we are talking about, the one kind of theft being inescapable and hegemonic and, you know, completely oppressive, and then people trying to get a little bit of it back through stealing from Whole Foods or whatever, right? The ideal world is not one in which this continues and this increases to somehow even it out, right? The ideal world is one in which the theft from above is broken by regulatory means and or bottom-up means like unionization, right? Yeah. You were just talking about wanting, not being like we should encourage wanton theft across the board, but we should try and fight against the theft that comes from the top.
18:15It feels difficult right now in a moment when, to like hope for regulatory change when that would come from the government, let's say. And a lot of the billionaires like Bezos and Cook and Elon Musk are given a seat at the table in terms of the government itself when billionaires themselves, they pay much lower tax rates than most Americans. My producer was just giving me this fact that she saw today. 88 corporations that made$105 billion in profits in 2025, including Tesla, Southwest, United, Life Nation, Disney. They made$105 billion in profits and they collectively paid income taxes of zero dollars.
19:04Jia Tolentino:Right. I mean, it's a far more consequential withdrawal of resources and trust from the public sphere to do that, to talk about any individual thing that any person has ever done, right? Like, it's like, and I think, I mean, the 1%, the top 1 % of Americans, 20 % of their income is withdrawn from, is withheld from reporting every year, like, as just a standing statistic. And that's not even a corporate structure. That's not even, I mean, that's just ordinary rich people, you know? So, OK, to go back, you were talking about sort of what you do see as effective political protest. And recently, a employee upset, fired Kimberly Clark Warehouse as a protest.
19:47Is that an effective form of political protest or is that purely violent?
19:52Jia Tolentino:No, I found it. No, that you got to be tactical. I mean, I feel like Mike Davis wrote about this. It's like it's not the action. It's the context in which it exists. And do I think that some sort of fire could hypothetically be framed within a collective action that is tactically useful? Yes. Does a disgruntled guy burning down the warehouse do it for me in terms of effective political action? Not at all. But I do. Sabotage has played a formative role in labor unions. In everything. Yeah, in labor unions as well. But if it's conducted unilaterally, then it's entirely different. That's an individual action.
20:30Jia Tolentino:And if he could have gotten away with it without being caught, I bet he I mean, I didn't follow this case very closely, but it seemed like, yeah, like anything done by an individual on an emotional, you know, on a kind of primarily emotional whim. It's that's not that's not the point. That's not the point. But then when you feel this much anger and it doesn't feel like there's hope for it to be changed in a regulatory way, I think that's when you get to things like Luigi Mangione killing the CEO of UnitedHealthcare and there being an outpouring of glee for murder online because it feels like finally someone can actually do something about health care.
21:09I think 40 % of Gen Zers felt that that murder was morally justified. But it's scary to be in a society where people feel that murder is morally justified. And I'm curious how we thread that line. Yeah. Engels wrote about the concept of social murder. And Brian Thompson, as the UnitedHealthcare CEO, was engaging in a tremendous amount of social murder. the systematized forms of violence, the structural violence of poverty, the for-profit paywalled system of healthcare in this country. And the consequences of that are tremendous amounts of pain, tremendous amounts of violence, tremendous amounts of deaths.
21:58And that was a fascinating story for me because Americans are very draconian about crime and punishment. They're very black and white on this issue. And yet, because of the pervasive pain that the private healthcare system had created for the average American, I saw so many people immediately understand why this death had taken place. Even before they knew who the shooter was or what the motive was, we had universalize this pain so much so that virtually every American has a similar experience, a shared experience where they have a loved one that spent their last days, instead of spending them with their family, spending it on the phone, talking to their healthcare provider to maybe get a little bit of economic respite so they don't carry on medical debt for their next generation, for their next of kin.
Read the full transcript
23:04That's a harrowing process for a lot of people. And for them, that is murder. For them, that is torture. And that is the reason why I think the reaction to Luigi Mangione, especially by younger generations, was not so negative.
23:22Jia Tolentino:I think also it's worth saying, you know, it's not so much, there are not that many healthcare CEOs. There are not that many industries that are as universally understood as merchants of social murder, as of structural violence upon people. And it was as if the language appeared lit up within people that had never articulated it out loud. Like there are so few industries, maybe that is singularly the one that touches everyone, that harms nearly everyone. Like even when Charlie Kirk was murdered, like I kept seeing reactions online, like leftists are celebrating. And I was like, All my friends were just like, yikes, this is going to get so bad, you know?
24:02Jia Tolentino:And I don't think we've turned into a culture where murder is sanctioned. I think that we have turned into a culture where private health care is so profoundly immoral that people had a very particular reaction to Brian Thompson's murder, right? Like, I don't actually think necessarily that we have come to a place where targeted assassination is seen like, you know? I wonder with something like murder, like the murder of a health care CEO, is it just a release valve for anger or is it actually effective political action? Has anything shifted in terms of health care in this country because of that?
24:40Jia Tolentino:I felt enormously frustrated in the weeks following that, that every single like I was I assumed I don't know why I thought that Democrats would immediately take this up as pushing a sort of unified message towards universal health care. I don't know why I expected that. I don't know why I was disappointed that it didn't happen. Elizabeth Warren did it to her credit. Sure. But you know what I mean? I thought it would be I don't know. And I don't know why I expected that. But I do not think that it was effective political action. I do think it was an effective act of political consciousness raising.
25:17Jia Tolentino:But I don't think that's I don't think that's action at all. I do think it was served up for someone to just spike that ball over the other side. And I was and that did not happen at all. But I think and I find that kind of one of the most egregious missed opportunities that we have seen in recent political history. I go back and forth on this. I think that Democrats are failing. Are they feckless because they're just bad at politics? Or is it something more indecent? And that their fecklessness is simply cover for their ulterior motives, which is participating in this grand design. They're funded by the same corporate lobbyists that Republicans are funded by, especially when it comes to private health care providers.
26:07And they have a vested interest in the continuation of private health care. There is consensus in American politics when it comes to the continuation of the private health care system that the system must be private. This also touches on something that I wanted to address that you said you you were saying that, like, Americans are not used to murder. Right. Like Americans are not on board with murder. I kind of wanted to push back on that at the moment because I do think we are a profoundly violent culture. In some ways, Charlie Kirk's assassination was not unique. School shootings are happening all the time.
26:47And we have actually decided almost collectively that it's just another another byproduct of American existence. I mean, I know part of the issue is that Americans have lost a lot of trust in their government. I have this other statistic here that in 1964, 77 percent of Americans trusted the government. In 2025, 17 percent of Americans trust the government. And yet it feels like there is some political action that feels hopeful, like Mamdani's policies for New York. Is this kind of change achievable through the mechanism of politics? Does it line up with Mamdani's politics? Absolutely. I think that this global design of capital that we have seems like a behemoth that is impossible to defeat.
27:32And that obviously discourages a lot of people from taking action. One of the immediate reflections is the fact that we don't really have a democratic process any longer and people don't even have that confidence in the democratic process because the wishes of the masses are rarely ever represented by our elected representatives. There are many different instances where this has become reality. There was an election cycle that just took place only two years ago where there was a genocide that was happening alongside that. And that was the perfect opportunity to show Americans that your voices do matter.
28:09Right. And yet the Democratic Party chose not to lean into that real immobilization. 3 ,500 college campus protesters were arrested in the process. And now we write think pieces about why there aren't any college campus protesters. Where are the anti-war protesters over and over again? Well, it's like, we did it. The government succeeded in undermining the people's right to protest and the confidence that they have by refusing to listen to their demands. So they succeeded in that regard. However, while this system of global capital seems like a giant that is impossible to tackle, it's also very fragile.
28:49Jia Tolentino:Part of this too is like, part of the way that this feels weighted on both sides to me is that if the material conditions of an average person's life are ameliorated by a redistribution of wealth, then the conditions become more possible to take time and take risks and organize, right? Like, I think one of the reasons, obviously, that these things that people don't have time to attend multiple weekday meetings, weeknight meetings, you know, organizing something in their community is because they have to work too long. They have to pick up their kids. They pay so much for child care. There's no there's no margin for anything.
29:23Jia Tolentino:And I think, you know, when you're talking about Mamdani, when there is a political program that is about improving, about giving people margin for individual pro-social, you know, civic action, then like, you know, a whole realm of possibilities and energy and ability and interest will begin to regrow. That won't be redirected into like, okay, here's my seven minutes of downtime. I'm going to use it scrolling or whatever. You know, not that I would know anything about that myself. Not that any of us have used our seven minutes of down to scroll. And the thing with Zoran is that he does instill confidence in governance all of a sudden.
30:02People for the first time ever see someone actually making that positive change. And it brings more confidence and it creates an environment where people can demand more Zorans. That's why I always say I want to let a thousand Zorans bloom all around the country, you know. Because there are people like Zoran out there. And they're just waiting to be elected and waiting to come into a position of power and show the rest of the country that, no, you can actually do things. You can do good governance. Yeah, I love that. So a lot of what we've been talking about is taking what little power we have and trying to make it bigger, trying to take back some of the power for ourselves.
30:43And so I just wanted to end by asking you what's one thing that you think should be OK but currently isn't OK? Hmm. I mean, IP theft, stealing movies, things like that.
30:55Jia Tolentino:Okay. One thing that should be legal that isn't. It's interesting because I have to regularly explain this stuff to a small child, which is, and have so thoroughly explained to her that some things are against the rules, but they're okay. And depending on who you are. And some things are not against the rules, but they're not okay. Like there are so many perfectly legal things I do regularly that I find mildly immoral, right? Like getting iced coffee in a plastic cup. Like I find that to be a profoundly selfish, immoral, collectively destructive action. You know, I think a lot of like the I have taken so many planes for so many pleasure reasons for, you know, I have acted in so many selfish ways that are not only that are not only legal, but they're sanctioned and they're unbelievably valorized culturally.
31:46Jia Tolentino:And I think, yeah, I guess I don't really think of any laws. Yeah, maybe like things like blowing up a pipeline. Let's say that. I really relate to what you're saying, Chiav. Like, it is so hard to live ethically in an unethical society. And also there are so many moral compromises I make every day. I do so many immoral things every day. I'm constantly acting in ways that don't align with my belief system and constantly having to justify that from like ordering in food when it's raining out. Like, there's just like so many moments when I'm like, my comfort is more important than someone bringing me food through the rain.
32:18And it doesn't feel good. But it is part of living. I mean, I don't know one's making me do that, but it is part of the way in which we live in our society.
32:27Jia Tolentino:And it's so incentivized. I mean, it's like splashed all over the subway ads. It's just like, ladies, be selfish tonight. You know, like it's it's wild. Yeah. What is one thing that shouldn't be OK, but currently is? So many things. Extraction of surplus labor value. Great. You went really silly with it. I appreciate that. Exploitation. Yeah. Anything above Mao. I think New York should charge people to park on the street, which I mean, I park on the street, but I think that's just a huge that's a huge public. That is an access to a large amount of public money that we should be taking. Like everyone who does street parking.
33:06Jia Tolentino:You're going to get assassinated. I know, but I think it's true. Someone's going to fight you. I think it's true. I also think private schools should be mostly illegal. Oh, I agree with that. That's a great one. Yes. you are going to piss off all the drivers of New York City driving their kids to private school it's a huge problem because we have talked about so many different things let's give a smash or pass yes or no style summary steal from Whole Foods burn down your employer's warehouse no
33:44my lawyers are telling me to answer in the negative. Murder the CEO of a healthcare company? Also no. No. So we have a yes on steel from Whole Foods. Micro-looting.
33:58Jia Tolentino:But the real yes is get a job there, spend three years being a salt and organize the union. Which I think is a true better answer than justify your wheel of brie for yourself. But that's fine too. Gia, Hassan, thank you so much for being here. This has been such an interesting conversation. It's been a real pleasure to talk with you both. Thank you, Nadja. Thank you for having me.
34:28These episodes will also be playing on our YouTube channel. If you want to see the beautiful loft where we recorded this, find us on YouTube at New York Times Opinion.
34:57If you like this show, follow it on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple.
35:06The Opinions is produced by Derek Arthur, Vishakha Darba, Victoria Chamberlain, and Jillian Weinberger. It's edited by Jillian Weinberger, Jasmine Romero, and Kari Pitkin. Mixing by Carol Saburo Original music by Isaac Jones, Sonia Herrero, Pat McCusker, Carol Saburo, Efim Shapiro, and Amin Sahota.
35:31Jia Tolentino:The Fact Check team is Kate Sinclair, Mary Marge Locker, and Michelle Harris. The head of operations is Shannon Busta. audience support by Christina Samulewski the director of opinion shows is Annie Rose Strasser
From the publisher
When does shoplifting become an act of political protest? The Opinion culture editor Nadja Spiegelman is calling this microlooting, and it describes the phenomenon of people stealing small things from big corporations like Whole Foods. The New Yorker writer Jia Tolentino and the political commentator Hasan Piker join Spiegelman for a lively discussion on what’s behind this trend and where it might lead.
Thoughts? Email us at theopinions@nytimes.com.
This episode of “The Opinions” was produced by Vishakha Darbha. It was edited by Kaari Pitkin and Jasmine Romero. Mixing by Carole Sabouruad. Video editing by Steph Khoury. The postproduction manager is Mike Puretz. Original music by Pat McCusker, Isaac Jones and Carole Sabouraud. Fact-checking by Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Audience strategy by Shannon Busta and Kristina Samulewski. The director of Opinion Video is Jonah M. Kessel. The deputy director of Opinion Shows is Alison Bruzek. The director of Opinion Shows is Annie-Rose Strasser.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
