In short
President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in Washington, D.C. and his move to take control of the D.C. metro police, framed as “political theater” rather than a response to a real public safety emergency.
Guests
Michelle Cottle (NYT Opinion national politics columnist); David French (NYT Opinion columnist); Jamel Bowie (NYT Opinion columnist).
Key claims
violent crime in D.C. is at a 30-year low, and the Guard is concentrated near federal landmarks rather than where crime is most concentrated; the action is likely legally ambiguous but could be justified under D.C.-specific authorities and Posse Comitatus-related DOJ views; conflating disorder with crime leads to militarized solutions and ignores housing/social-service drivers; Trump’s rhetoric demonizes D.C. (a historically majority-Black city) and can erode trust needed for effective policing.
Notable examples
“Big Balls” incident prompting the crackdown; Baltimore’s murder-rate drop via smarter policing and social investment; Trump’s prior troop deployments (border, Los Angeles).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOGun Violence Awareness
0:00 to 0:25
Discussing the importance of conversations around gun violence.
“Gun injuries are the leading cause of death for children and teens in the United States.”
Last Roundtable of the Summer
0:45 to 1:41
Hosts discuss their feelings and the current state of affairs.
“I'm Michelle Cottle, and I cover national politics for New York Times Opinion.”
Trump's National Guard Deployment
1:41 to 2:16
Discussion on Trump's controversial deployment of the National Guard.
“Trump claims he's doing this because of a public safety emergency here in the district, though, in fact, violent crime is at a 30-year low.”
Crime Rates and Political Theater
2:16 to 4:20
Analyzing the state of crime in D.C. compared to Trump's claims.
“By the time this reaches your ears, Trump may have indeed saved Washington from what he has called our bloodshed, bedlam, and squalor.”
Legal Implications of Trump’s Actions
4:20 to 6:13
Exploring the legality of the president's use of the National Guard.
“So the probably part is that, look, the president has more authority over the National Guard in Washington, D.C.”
Demonization of D.C.
6:13 to 7:48
Discussion on how D.C. is portrayed and targeted politically.
“So what we're dealing with here is a very carefully chosen city for this intervention.”
Public Perception of Trump's Actions
7:48 to 8:29
Hosts review public opinion on the deployment and its implications.
“You know, plenty of people were like, oh, that's great.”
Deeper Issues Beyond Crime
8:29 to 10:40
Differentiating crime from social issues like homelessness in D.C.
“And when the president does things like this, it creates the impression that there is disorder, that the president is responsible for it.”
Reform Needs and Political Theater
10:40 to 14:00
Discussion on the need for real reform versus political theater.
“I don't think we should say D.C.'s fine, but what we should say is D.C.”
Understanding Crime and Disorder
14:00 to 14:59
Explore the distinction between crime and disorder, and its implications.
“Or do you mean like working class black people walking around, right?”
Show all 21 chapters
Youth Crime and Pandemic Effects
15:00 to 16:48
Discuss the impact of the pandemic on youth crime rates in D.C.
“when they're in the presence of disorder.”
Trump's Rhetoric and Crime
16:49 to 18:44
Analyze how Trump's rhetoric affects crime perception and law enforcement.
“and federal governments have been struggling to get it under control since.”
Military in Domestic Affairs
18:45 to 21:07
Examine the implications of military involvement in civilian law enforcement.
“And he is raring to blur the lines between law enforcement and the military, ostensibly in the name of public safety and order.”
Civil-Military Relations
21:08 to 22:25
Assess the relationship between civilian leadership and military effectiveness.
“the obligation is you don't follow unlawful orders.”
Preparedness for Crises
22:26 to 24:25
Discuss the importance of government readiness for various crises.
“Like this is not a country, right, where we have to worry about a rogue general deciding that they could do a better job leading the country than someone else.”
Challenges of Military Deployment
24:26 to 26:29
Identify challenges posed by military deployment to domestic law enforcement.
“and that book, you know, speaks not just of Katrina, but of hurricanes in the 60s, hurricanes that began in the 20th century that were arguably as destructive.”
Public Perception of Trump's Actions
26:30 to 28:00
Reflect on how public perception influences responses to Trump's overreach.
“we should be jumping up and down and saying, this is not their mission.”
FBI's Shift in Focus
28:00 to 28:36
The discussion reveals how the FBI's priorities have shifted, impacting their ability to address serious threats.
“And then it turned a bunch of FBI agents towards immigration enforcement.”
Trump's Political Strategy
28:37 to 30:02
An analysis of Trump's approach to popularity and electoral politics, focusing on his appeal to MAGA supporters.
“I would love to think that Americans are getting fed up with Trump's overreach on this.”
The Risks of Authoritarianism
30:03 to 31:32
Exploration of the risks associated with Trump's interpretation of political support and the consequences of authoritarian tendencies.
“Yeah, I tend to think that that's just not a good strategy.”
Democratic Strategies for Success
31:33 to 32:28
A call for Democrats to be aggressive and proactive in their messaging and electoral strategy to counteract Trump.
“You know, what happens when the guy who thinks, imagines himself a dictator realizes no one likes him?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00David French:Gun injuries are the leading cause of death for children and teens in the United States. Some people avoid talking about gun violence because they don't think they can make a difference. But every conversation matters. When it comes to gun violence, we agree on more than we think. And having productive conversations about gun violence can help protect children and teens. Learn how to have the conversation at AgreedToAgree.org. Brought to you by the Ad Council. This is The Opinions, a show that brings you a mix of voices from New York Times opinion. You've heard the news. Here's what to make of it.
0:45David French:I'm Michelle Cottle, and I cover national politics for New York Times Opinion. And I am here today with my fantastic colleagues, columnists David French and Jamel Bowie. Guys, welcome. Hi, Michelle. Hello, hello. All right, so this, sadly, is our last roundtable of the summer. Before we all scooch off to exotic locales or at least a little bit of beach reading, how are we all feeling?
1:10Jamelle Bouie:You know, other than the bad things happening in the world, I feel pretty good.
1:15Michelle Cottle:There's a way in my family that we talk about that when someone says, how are you doing? The answer is personally, great. Politically, uh.
1:23David French:You know what? I'm going to steal that. I like that. Personally, rocking. Well, before we vanish, this week, we're going to talk about President Trump's deployment of the National Guard in my backyard and his taking control of Washington, D.C.'s metro police force. Trump claims he's doing this because of a public safety emergency here in the district, though, in fact, violent crime is at a 30-year low. But I have lived here for more than 30 years. I am well aware of Washington's long-term crime issues. And you know what's not going to help? Cheap political theater. So there's a lot to get into here.
2:06David French:But first, the requisite timestamp. We're recording this on Wednesday morning. So all this news is still fresh. People are trying to figure things out. The situation is fluid. So who knows? By the time this reaches your ears, Trump may have indeed saved Washington from what he has called our bloodshed, bedlam, and squalor. So let's get to it. First, I want first reactions to this. Jamel, kick us off.
2:32Jamelle Bouie:My first reaction, I guess, comes in three parts. The first part, as you pointed out, there is no public safety emergency in Washington, D.C. Crime is, as you said, at a 30-year low. At least violent crime is. Violent crime is a 30-year low. I think actually it's worth emphasizing about that is that most of these troops are deployed to areas surrounding the White House, National Mall, downtown, so on and so forth. But when you actually, if you were to make like a heat map of criminal activity in Washington, D.C., you would find that it is not in those places, right? That if you're going to do this, you would put soldiers in other places.
3:09Jamelle Bouie:And this gets to, I think, a reality about crime that's important to understand. Most violent crime especially happens in specific discrete geographic areas among specific individuals, right? It is not the case either in DC or New York or wherever that you are particularly likely to be the victim of like random violent crime. What is the case is that people in networks where there are people who do violent crime are more likely than not to be victims of violent crime. And so when you begin to like actually understand like the social geography of crime, as well as the physical geography of crime.
3:42Jamelle Bouie:All this makes even less sense as a measure. Second part, I think this is a sign of the president's weakness. I think that a president who is capable of doing anything like ordinary negotiation, compromise, deliberation, would not be leaning on this or leaning on emergency powers in general. But the third thing is that the fact that the president, I think, is actually quite weak in a lot of ways should not diminish the fact that this is quite dangerous and that he has announced his intention to do this kind of thing in other cities, which is, I think a pretty profound violation of basic ideas about power in the United States that go back to even before the founding.
4:20David French:David, is this even legal?
4:22Michelle Cottle:Yeah, that's a great question. The answer is probably, we'll see. So the probably part is that, look, the president has more authority over the National Guard in Washington, D.C. than anywhere else, more inherent automatic authority. The Guard is under his direct control, whereas in the States, The Guard is under the control of the governors unless the Guard is federalized. Here, you don't have to really go through that step. Also, there's been sort of a longstanding DOJ position that the Guard can be used more for law enforcement purposes in D.C. than it can, say, in other places without violating the Posse Comitatus Act, which is this post-Reconstruction law prohibiting the use of federal troops for law enforcement.
5:04Michelle Cottle:However, a lot of these things are just theories. A lot of this is untested because presidents have historically been really reluctant to call out the troops. Now we've seen him do this at the border. We've seen him do this in Los Angeles. And the legal authorities for doing all of this are, in many cases, pretty ambiguous. So the concepts are not fully tested in court, but if he can do it anywhere in America, he can do it in D.C. So I think the legal attack on this is probably going to fail. More interesting question also is the federalization, putting under federal control the D.C. Police Department.
5:44Michelle Cottle:Again, D.C. is not a normal city. This is one that is, there's a Home Rule Act, but ultimately, ultimately Congress is responsible for D.C. And so there's much more leeway and flexibility in taking control of this local police department, but that's not supposed to happen. After 30 days, there has to be congressional authorization. Now, of course, Jamel and Michelle, this Congress will absolutely stand up to this president. No, of course not. So how much will that really matter in the real world? So what we're dealing with here is a very carefully chosen city for this intervention.
6:19Jamelle Bouie:Can I just add real quick in terms of the D.C. being carefully chosen? And it's also a city for which the president's reliance on tropes about crime and dystopian crime and all these things, I think, is not only more effective, but like there might be a more willing audience for it. For the simple reason that D.C. has been known for a long time as being a majority black city. It's not quite majority black anymore. I think it's like just under half. But it has this identity. And that identity, I think, is very much a part of the president's demonization of D.C., demonization of D.C. as kind of a John Carpenter-esque hellscape, demonization of the residents of D.C.
7:01Jamelle Bouie:as essentially incapable of self-government. Like, it plugs into longstanding tropes about the ability of Black Americans to exist in mainstream society, to put it in the most sterile way I possibly can.
7:17David French:Yeah, I mean, nothing melts Trump's butter quite like the chance to militarize things, but he is hardly the first Republican to play politics with the city. I mean, the district has been a favorite target for years. Nixon liked to hate on D.C. And I do think you're right about, and I like the way you put it, the most sterile way you can put it, but there's also just his tendency to demonize all things Washington. I think at this point, you know, you can look at how people responded to tens of thousands of federal government employees having their jobs threatened or taken away. You know, plenty of people were like, oh, that's great.
7:56David French:They deserve it. Deep state, blah, blah, blah. They pretend that Washington, D.C. is some kind of, you know, hellscape, as you put it, that needs to have somebody come in and just bulldoze it, which makes the rest of the country a little bit more likely to be like, meh, whatever.
8:16Jamelle Bouie:I'll say what is interesting is there hasn't been much polling, but the one poll I've seen on this has 47 % of Americans disapproving of this action. And it's like 34 or 35 % saying that they're okay with it. So I think, you know, thinking about the political aspect of this and to go back to our conversation earlier in the summer about L.A., I think I argued then that the public doesn't like disorder. And when the president does things like this, it creates the impression that there is disorder, that the president is responsible for it. And I think that that dynamic might assert itself here as well.
8:51David French:Yeah, David, you can also address the kind of broader view of this. But I think one of the issues is that D.C. has long had a problem in terms of how it deals with crime. And when you have a couple of high-profile issues that Trump can take, like, I think this was all provoked, right? Because a member of the administration got his butt kicked at 3 a.m. by a group of people in a fairly popular area in a part of D.C. considered safer than others, right?
9:26Jamelle Bouie:Can we say big balls on here?
9:28David French:Okay. I was waiting for someone to breach that wall. An administration official, a young man whose nickname is Big Balls, was jumped and Trump completely freaked out. So now here we are with, I think the National Guard has been dispatched on the National Mall because that's where the problem is. I mean, I live in a very safe neighborhood. I keep waiting for them to come secure my street from like the porch pirate who occasionally will steal my Amazon packages. But anyway, I digress here. Yeah.
10:00Michelle Cottle:Here's one thing, one caution I would add. Yes, crime in D.C. is at a 30-year low, violent crime in D.C. is at a 30-year low, but it's still a pretty violent city relative to other U.S. cities. And there's also a lot of people, especially if you are not used to and have not seen the improvement in D.C., especially since the pandemic, that sometimes if you come from other cities, that what you'll sort of see in that kind of low-level disorder category in D.C. can be pretty shocking to people who are not used to it. And so I think one mistake that people can make here is to sort of say, you know, look, he's doing this and D.C.'s fine.
10:39Michelle Cottle:D.C.'s fine. I don't think we should say D.C.'s fine, but what we should say is D.C. is improving substantially. And this is not the way you achieve further improvements. And this is, I think, a consistent pattern in dealing with Trump. Often people will look at an institution or a place that he's attacking. and there's this instinct to rally completely to its defense. Well, sometimes these institutions do have problems. They do need reform. It's just not his reform. And what happened to our friend Big Balls was terrible. That was terrible. That should not happen. That's awful. But then to say about that incident that that is then the pretext, that's the instigating incident for bringing in the guard, You know, what this reminds me of is that it's not so much that Trump is tough on crime, it's really that he really wants to be tough on his enemies.
11:36Michelle Cottle:And that is a different thing than being tough on crime. Because being tough on crime requires a lot more intelligent thought. It's a lot harder than calling in this National Guard and plopping them on the mall.
11:48David French:Jamel, that speaks to your point about him not being able to actually govern or... Right.
11:54Jamelle Bouie:I have many thoughts. I think that to David's point about the real problems that DC has and questions of public disorder, I think part of the problem is one ought to make a conceptual separation between public disorder and crime. A homelessness problem isn't a crime problem. It's a housing cost problem. It's a private problem. It's a social services problem. But it's not a crime problem. It may, in some acute circumstances, produce criminal activity, but it's not primarily a crime problem. And what I push against is the conflation of all these things into crime for two reasons. One, that makes it harder to solve.
12:36Jamelle Bouie:Even if you were inclined to give the president the benefit of the doubt here, once you take the view that this is a question of like bedlam and lawlessness, then that leans toward these sorts of militaristic responses versus things that are much more attuned to the actual problems at hand. It's worth noting that D.C.'s neighbor, Baltimore, they've sliced their murder rate in half. And that was in part a product of better and smarter policing. And it was in part a product of like really investing in social services and doing the kind of hard work it takes to identify the communities and the people.
13:11Jamelle Bouie:And I say communities, I mean like the blocks, right? Like neighborhoods. And the people, the individuals who are, you might describe as criminogenic, right? Like more likely to spread crime. And kind of addressing those people and those places in a specific and targeted way. And so I think when you conflate disorder, however you want to, whatever you want to include in that. And I'll say something that, it seems like some of the people include in that just sort of like the ambient noise of cities. I'm just like lots of humanity together. And I think that's also why I'm often kind of like.
13:42David French:Trump doesn't want to live in a real city. He wants to live in Mar-a-Lago where everything is painted gold.
13:47Jamelle Bouie:I'm often kind of like, let's figure out what we're talking. Like when you say disorder, do you mean visible homelessness? Do you mean seeing a drug needle on the street a problem? Or do you mean homelessness a problem, visible homelessness as well? Or do you mean like working class black people walking around, right? Like what do you mean here? And I think it's important to maybe to force people to specify what they mean when discussing this, but also recognizing that Congress and the administration has been quite hostile to providing D.C. with the kind of resources it needs to, like, address these problems.
14:23Jamelle Bouie:So it's all theater for the sake of a president who, as David says, wants to punish his enemies and a president who, like, imagines himself as a strong man doing strong man things.
14:36Michelle Cottle:Well, and I'm glad you brought up Baltimore because the Baltimore story is a remarkable story. And it does not involve the U.S. Army. Right. It is a year-on-year crime drop that's the stuff of dreams almost. It's really amazing. And Jamel, I think that you raise a very good point. There is a difference between crime and disorder, although I think people experience disorder when people experience it is often very deeply unsettling.
14:59Jamelle Bouie:Yeah.
14:59Michelle Cottle:And they often feel like that crime is about to happen when they're in the presence of disorder. And I think that's a very good point taken. But I think that it's very important to get the word out and to get the message out to American people that A, blue cities are taking crime very seriously and B, they're actually achieving results, that good things are happening in these cities because Trump thrives off the sense that nobody is doing anything until I came aboard.
15:30David French:So just like Jamel has his hobby horses, One of my hobby horses is the long tail of the pandemic and how people just thought it was going to snap me all over. So I know in D.C. in particular, the pandemic was devastating for the youth population. And one of the things that Trump has complained about is the youth crime rate in the city. Well, what happened is the pandemic wound up with all these kids on the street, out of school, nowhere to go, lots of trouble to get into. and it took a while for the city to catch up and figure out what to do about that. And so you've seen, I think, the problem spiked in 2023, and we've been watching it go back down as they try to address what is a very real, very complicated problem that people just, you know, didn't realize was going to last as long as it did post-pandemic.
16:28Michelle Cottle:and when, Michelle, did the massive, massive crime spike, murder spike in particular occur in the United States during Trump's first term in 2020 when he was president. And so the murder rate absolutely spiked in Trump's last year of his presidency. And big cities and American state and local and federal governments have been struggling to get it under control since. But if you look at the arc, It's moving in very strongly positive ways. And that started during the Biden administration. He inherited an absolute crime disaster from Trump 1.0. So the sort of idea that Trump is the guy who can fix crime, the last American crime disaster occurred under Trump.
17:17Jamelle Bouie:The thing that I have a sense that we want to move on, but the last thing I'll say about this, I think this is a very good point, is that in addition to militarization being like not particularly helpful when it comes to dealing with problems of crime and disorder, it's also the case that Trump's entire rhetoric of cities, opposing them as, again, these housecapes, these dystopian places, these inherently dangerous places, I think can contribute to attitudes among law enforcement that make dealing with crime more difficult. Like part of what you need in dealing with violent crime are relationships between the communities that are affected and law enforcement.
17:56Jamelle Bouie:There has to be a degree of trust between these people. Otherwise, if there is no trust, you're not going to go to a detective and say, hey, this happened and I know it involved this person. If the president of the United States is spreading paranoia and distrust about these cities and these communities, then I think, you know, I feel like I sound like a 90s-style conservative here. I think that that kind of rhetoric has a downstream effect on the culture of the country. And in this specific case, in the culture of law enforcement, which already isn't great, right? Like, well-known fact, culture of American law enforcement could be better.
18:39Jamelle Bouie:And this doesn't help.
18:40David French:So we cannot say that we weren't warned that this would happen. I mean, by Trump himself, he's long been open about his desire to deploy the military against Americans, you know, whether to suppress protest, fight crime, whatever has annoyed him that morning. And he is raring to blur the lines between law enforcement and the military, ostensibly in the name of public safety and order. But looking at this even beyond the sea, where he's trying, what are the risks of where he's going?
Read the full transcript
19:14Michelle Cottle:Look, between this LA deployment and this Washington deployment, what he's doing is introducing to the American people really sort of a kind of a slow rollout, although not all that slow, of the idea that, yeah, we could see American troops in American city streets is a thing you're going to see. This is something that is a part of the fabric of American life. This is, you know, rather than a giant invocation, the Insurrection Act and immediate descent of thousands and thousands of troops into many American cities, which would trigger massive protests and response, what you're dealing with is a deployment to LA, a small deployment to Washington, D.C., a few more to the border.
19:55Michelle Cottle:You're leaking it into the American body politic in a way that, from a purely kind of Machiavellian sense, is kind of shrewd. So look, that's the most obvious. He's normalizing troop deployments. That's one thing that's happening. Number two, and this is something I think that needs to be discussed a bit more, is he's pulling the military into his partisan orbit. And by that, I don't mean that the military is, right now the military itself is being corrupted. What I'm saying is that he is using his commander in chief authority to make the military an instrument of his political ambitions. And you could have the highest ethics in the military, But their compulsion and their requirement that they follow these orders so long as they're lawful means that as a practical matter, they become his instrument.
20:47Michelle Cottle:And I'm going to tell you, that is terrible for the military.
20:51David French:Because they're one of the last institutions that the public has faith in, right?
20:55Michelle Cottle:Exactly, exactly. and if a Republican president sort of dragoons them into his political project, then the military, even if it is following lawful orders, even if unwise or, you know, the obligation is you don't follow unlawful orders. You don't get to judge their wisdom. You don't get to say, well, that's a stupid decision to take that hill. I'm not going to do that, right? And so that is going to pull and the perception of the millions of American people will be, here are Trump's troops. And I cannot emphasize how dangerous that is for the American military over the long term. And so there's just so many different ways this is dangerous, this is counterproductive, this is ineffective.
21:40David French:So Jamel, at what point does Trump constantly pressure testing or even circumventing the law come back and bite him, do you think?
21:48Jamelle Bouie:Oh, I don't.
21:49David French:You tend to be more optimistic about these things than I do.
21:52Jamelle Bouie:I mean, it's not so much optimistic. Like, I start from the premise that Donald Trump is ultimately subject to some level of political gravity and that there are things that the public likes and dislikes that affect that. I think in this case, to David's point about the danger this poses to the military and to civilian-military relations, which, you know, people – I think people who either have experienced the military or have studied in an academic way, the American military, will note that the U.S. has a surprisingly long and pretty good history when it comes to stable and productive relationships between civilian and military leadership.
22:35Jamelle Bouie:Like this is not a country, right, where we have to worry about a rogue general deciding that they could do a better job leading the country than someone else. There's like a bargain that's been struck between civilian and military leaders in which, you know, everyone stays in their respective lanes. And this unsettles the bargain and makes it more likely that we see the kinds of things that we've seen in other countries. But that's not the point I want to make. The point I want to make is that you are deploying American soldiers on a mission that isn't really what they're trained for whatsoever.
23:05Jamelle Bouie:and may in fact end up reducing morale, right? Like people don't sign up to go police, you know, a city that they might be from, right? Especially when we're talking National Guard. They're not signing up to police their friends and neighbors or people who are like their friends and neighbors, not signing up to point guns at people who might've been classmates, right? And so that degrades, I think, morale among soldiers. and if we do face an actual emergency that requires the use of military force, we will be facing it with a military that has seen its morale and perhaps its readiness degraded as a result of these actions.
23:48Jamelle Bouie:I think this is actually a story you can tell about the entire administration across multiple areas. The White House has been on this systematic effort to dismantle the nation's readiness to deal with all manner of crises. And it's really only a stroke of luck thus far that we haven't run into something truly catastrophic. And I'll say even then, we've had big natural disasters, storms, flooding, that have demonstrated the importance of having a competent and professional federal bureaucracy and federal service that can respond to these things. I'm reading right now the historian Andy Horowitz's book, Katrina, A History, 1915 to 2015.
24:29Jamelle Bouie:and that book, you know, speaks not just of Katrina, but of hurricanes in the 60s, hurricanes that began in the 20th century that were arguably as destructive. If the United States faces something like that, right, in the next couple of years, will we be ready to respond, right? If there was a terrorist attack on American soil, will we be ready to respond? You know, politics aside, the danger is that, like, you have to, the country has to be governed. Like, that's the thing that has to happen. Like the presidency is a real job. I know the president imagines it as basically sort of like he gets to be America's favorite television character.
25:04Jamelle Bouie:But like in reality, this is a real job. And these agencies are real responsibilities. He just, as of our recording, he is nominating for head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics just some hack. No, I mean, no. Complete hack. Yeah. I was about to say no offense because I'm trying to be polite. No, no. Offense intended. You intend offense. That's fine. Like a total hack. A guy who has his PhD, one citation, who's done nothing to really mark himself as qualified for what is a genuinely important position in government in maintaining the integrity of the American economy. It's like, yeah, if things go perfectly well, this is still a terrible decision, but maybe you can weather it.
25:45But as soon as there's like a little something that goes wrong, you've just made a house of cards that will collapse.
25:52Jamelle Bouie:And that's the danger of all of this.
25:54Michelle Cottle:And there's another thing here. Look, so far, as a percentage of the military, we're talking about a pretty small percentage of soldiers who are being put into this domestic law enforcement role. But I will tell you, a military is designed to confront and defeat battlefield enemies. And the more you turn a military into a domestic law enforcement agency, as many dictators do, as many authoritarians do, that doesn't tend to do very much good for the battlefield effectiveness of that military. If you care about American national security, we should be jumping up and down and saying, this is not their mission.
26:35Michelle Cottle:Their mission needs to be laser focused on the possibility of conflict in Europe, the possibility of conflict in Taiwan. Korea is always volatile. That requires intense focus. We still have some anti-ISIS fighting to do. This requires intense focus, training, planning, not diversions into American streets for political theater.
26:57David French:I mean, this is one of the things that's made this particularly dispiriting so far is that nobody seems to even know what the goal is here. The National Guard has been dispatched, but the local authorities don't know what they're going to do. They're not going to be making arrests. They're there to protect federal assets. but how are they supposed to be working with local police? It does not give me a great, you know, sense of optimism that I should take this seriously as a legitimate effort to help the district.
27:28Michelle Cottle:You know, and I got to love the double game that people in MAGA play. Yeah, Trump is deploying the troops. And then you go, this is dangerous. And they go, stop clutching your pearls. They're not going to be arresting anybody. It's like, wait, what is it? Yeah. Where are they on all this? I assume they love it, right? MAGA? Oh, for sure. Oh, for sure. Yeah, yeah. As soon as he does it, they're all rallying to Trump's defense. Yeah, of course. Of course.
27:51David French:That's what a real man would do.
27:53Jamelle Bouie:It's just like a point about like on this readiness question on like responsibilities and such. Earlier in the year, the administration basically did layoffs of the FBI. And then it turned a bunch of FBI agents towards immigration enforcement. And now it's turning FBI agents towards domestic law enforcement. But there are still terror threats. There's still human trafficking. There's still things that the FBI has to attend to as a federal law enforcement agency. And so not to be like the FBI is so great, but like are there threats? Are there literal criminal conspiracies that are not being addressed because the FBI is being told to help arrest a bunch of like abuelas or being told to sort of like stand on U Street, right?
28:36Okay.
28:37David French:I would love to think that Americans are getting fed up with Trump's overreach on this. But I mean, honestly, much of the country seems to be going through some jacked up testosterone at a who's your daddy phase. So they're ultimately just going to be like, nah, whatever. This, you know, it's just Trump being Trump. One of you tell me I'm wrong. Just please tell me I'm wrong on this.
28:59Michelle Cottle:I think Trump has figured out something that is quite unsettling, which is that he does not think or care necessarily if what he does is popular so long as he believes he's more popular than the Democrats. And so a lot of this polling that shows that 60 % of Americans disapprove of this and 55 % disapprove of that, I can tell you in MAGA circles, they're not looking at that at all. They're looking at polling that says the Republican Party is more popular than the Democratic Party. Now, I think that some of that polling is deceptive because a lot of the disaffection against the Democrats is coming from a left that is very upset with Democrats and is never going to vote Republican.
29:44Michelle Cottle:And so I think Republicans might be feeling their oats a bit too much. But this is part of the calculus. It's not, hey, we need to be popular. It's just that we need to be more popular than those guys. And I think that is where he's pinning his political hopes and where MAGA pins its political
30:02Jamelle Bouie:hopes. Yeah, I tend to think that that's just not a good strategy. If you stopped paying attention on election night last year, you would have gotten the impression that Donald Trump won a commanding majority of the American public. But if you just tuned in and kept following the count for another month and a half, what you would have seen is that, in fact, he got little less than half of the voting public in that election. It was almost a split decision, if you want to use those terms. And under those conditions, your political capital, such that it is, is actually a pretty valuable resource.
30:44Jamelle Bouie:You don't actually have as much of it as you think. I think MAGA seems to think of the election as like an enabling act for Trump authoritarianism. But in point of fact, what it was is a small but critical number of Americans said, we want to go back to 2019. That's it. That was the election, right? That was the whole thing. And if I were in Trump's position, I would be very jealous of maintaining my approval to accomplish my goals, but also really to prevent the bottom from falling out. And I actually think that this is the most poorly constructed car you can imagine. And if there's any bump in the road, the literal bottom falls out.
31:27Jamelle Bouie:Wheels start careening off of a car and the president's approval collapses. You know, what happens when the guy who thinks, imagines himself a dictator realizes no one likes him? It doesn't seem great. But, you know, I do think that that's, there's a real risk there. Even all this gerrymandering stuff, we're not going to talk about it, but like, yeah, okay, gerrymander, whatever.
31:52David French:Yeah, don't get me started on that.
31:53Jamelle Bouie:If the bottom falls out in the national environment next year is D plus seven, D plus eight, then you've just guaranteed yourself like a catastrophic wave election against you. And you lose all those germinated seeds.
32:04David French:So if we're looking at that framework, Jamil, is there anything that you see the Democrats should be doing to increase those bumps and the car falling apart?
32:11Jamelle Bouie:You know, this is last little conversation of ours this summer. I'll just repeat something I've been saying all summer.
32:16David French:Oh, please.
32:17Jamelle Bouie:You just got to be aggressive. Capture attention. Don't be afraid of creating waves, even if there's like some backlash to you. I think the one thing Trump understands correctly is that it's more important to get your message out than to deal with the backlash, the immediate backlash to you. So just like, just gotta be ready to get into the fight, the tussle. Take some punches. Okay. You know, throw some punches, be willing to take punches. And if you get a cut lip or a black guy, but you've given the other guy a black guy, you're in good shape.
32:48David French:All right, we're gonna give you the last word on that. Guys, it's goodbye for now. The crazy is going to be here when we get back.
32:56Jamelle Bouie:We got a gubernatorial election in Virginia. Excited to talk about that.
32:59David French:Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And don't forget New Jersey. We got New Jersey, too. Yeah, we got an election in Virginia. All right. All right. Point taken. Okay, guys. Thanks so very much. Have a good one.
33:11Jamelle Bouie:Thank you, Michelle. Thank you.
33:48David French:Transcription by CastingWords
34:13David French:Thank you.
34:20David French:This audio is Annie Rose Strasser.
From the publisher
President Trump deployed the National Guard in Washington, D.C., and is threatening to do so in other American cities. On this episode of “The Opinions,” the Opinion national politics writer Michelle Cottle is joined by the columnists Jamelle Bouie and David French to debate what Trump is really talking about when he talks about crime and the risks of using the military as a police force.
Thoughts? Email us at theopinions@nytimes.com.
This episode of “The Opinions” was produced by Vishakha Darbha. It was edited by Alison Bruzek. The rest of the show's production team includes Derek Arthur, Kaari Pitkin, Kristina Samulewski and Jillian Weinberger. Mixing by Carole Sabouraud. Original music by Pat McCusker, Isaac Jones and Carole Sabouraud. Fact-checking by Mary Marge Locker. Audience strategy by Shannon Busta and Kristina Samulewski. The director of Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
