Trump’s Recklessness Will ‘Haunt Us for a Generation’

21 Mar 2026 · 37 min · 21 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Opinions - Episode: Trump’s Recklessness Will ‘Haunt Us for a Generation’

Podcast Title: The Opinions Episode Title: Trump’s Recklessness Will ‘Haunt Us for a Generation’ Hosts: Michelle Cottle, Jamelle Bouie, David French Producers: Derek Arthur, Vishakha Darbha Air Date: [Insert Date]

---

Overview

In this episode, the discussion revolves around President Trump's understanding of American power, voters, and enemies. The hosts argue that Trump's lack of foresight and reckless approach to foreign policy, especially concerning Iran, could have long-lasting repercussions for the United States and its global relationships.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Trump's Approach to Foreign Policy
  2. Current Situation in Iran:
  3. Ongoing conflict between the U.S., Israel, and Iran with no clear end in sight.
  4. Trump’s method of handling foreign alliances and military interventions is questioned.
  • Response from Allies:
  • Trump's actions have led to a cold reception from European allies, highlighting the deterioration of relationships due to his earlier actions during his presidency.
  • The hosts note that Trump’s past bullying of allies has resulted in reluctance to cooperate on military matters.
  1. Misunderstanding of American Power
  2. Childish Perspective:
  3. Trump's view of military might is described as simplistic and naive, focusing on immediate displays of strength rather than strategic long-term planning.
  • Consequences of Recklessness:
  • The unpredictability of Trump's leadership style raises concerns about the effectiveness of military strategies.
  • The hosts express skepticism about whether the White House acknowledges the limits of U.S. power and influence.
  1. Long-term Implications
  2. Impact on Global Alliances:
  3. The podcast highlights the potential long-lasting damage to relationships with NATO allies and the broader international community, suggesting a shift in global power dynamics.
  • Future Political Landscape:
  • Discussion on how Trump's actions may lead to a generation of distrust and instability in global politics.
  1. Domestic Politics and the SAVE Act
  2. Overview of the SAVE Act:
  3. Trump’s obsession with the Save America Act (SAVE), aimed at addressing voter fraud, is critiqued for being based on unfounded fears and could disenfranchise millions.
  • Political Motivation:
  • The act is seen as a strategy to bolster Republican electoral chances, despite evidence indicating voter fraud is not a significant issue.
  • Republican Party Dynamics:
  • Discussion on how Republican lawmakers may be reluctant to oppose Trump’s agenda, prioritizing his demands over broader electoral strategy.
  1. Voter Disenfranchisement Concerns
  2. Costs of Implementation:
  3. The complexities and potential barriers introduced by the SAVE Act could disproportionately affect working-class voters, harming Republican prospects in the upcoming elections.
  • Shifting Voter Demographics:
  • The hosts highlight trends showing that college-educated voters, who are likely more organized in their voter registration, may not align with Republican strategies.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Misalignment: Trump's lack of understanding of both domestic and foreign political landscapes may lead to irreversible consequences for the U.S. and its relations with allies.
  • Long-term Damage: Current actions could redefine international alliances for generations, emphasizing the fragility of the global rules-based order.
  • Voter Legislation Impact: The SAVE Act's implications could backfire on Republicans, alienating voters and undermining electoral chances in a pivotal midterm election year.

---

Conclusion The episode underscores a critical analysis of President Trump’s foreign and domestic policies, revealing concerns about the lasting effects of his leadership style on both international relations and the integrity of American democracy. The hosts urge listeners to consider the broader implications of current political decisions and the potential for long-term ramifications.

---

For thoughts or questions, contact

theopinions@nytimes.com

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Trump's Approach to Allies

1:04 to 1:51

Discussion on Trump's foreign policy and its impact on U.S. allies.

“I'm just like, all right and just going.”

Escalation of the War

1:51 to 3:00

Analysis of the ongoing war with Iran and the response from allies.

“And from best I can tell, no clear direction of where this is going.”

Trump's Leadership Style

3:00 to 5:20

Examination of Trump's leadership and decision-making during the crisis.

“them hat in hand for help, they say, no, thanks, not going to do it.”

Misunderstanding the Enemy

5:20 to 7:42

Exploration of Trump's lack of understanding of ideological opponents.

“And so we just saw this whole exchange, this big escalation in the war where there was an Israeli strike on Iranian natural gas fields.”

Childish View of Power

7:42 to 8:02

A critique of Trump's naive view of American military power.

“I mean, do we think anything is sinking in over there?”

Impact on Global Alliances

8:02 to 14:00

Discussion on the long-term effects of Trump's presidency on NATO and alliances.

“It's always been so striking to me that, you know, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has these press conferences where he doesn't at all talk in strategic terms about the conflict.”

Understanding Trump's Impact on Global Trust

14:00 to 14:40

Explore how Trump's presidency affects global perceptions and alliances.

“of Trump-like figures before you could reincorporate a consistent America into your defense planning.”

The Fragility of the Global Rules-Based Order

14:40 to 15:18

Discuss the fragile state of international relations and the role of the U.S.

“Like there's just no there's no reason to.”

Biden's Foreign Policy and Its Consequences

15:18 to 16:15

Evaluate Biden's foreign policy actions and their implications for global norms.

“It would be like this tape and bailing wire and everything, but it was holding together enough to do the number one thing it was designed to do, which is to prevent great power conflict.”

Exploring Trump's SAVE Act

16:15 to 17:38

Examine Trump's SAVE Act and its implications for American voting rights.

“You know, President Biden took a blind eye to Israel's sort of horribly destructive war in Gaza.”
Show all 21 chapters

Debunking the Voter Fraud Myth

17:38 to 19:35

Analyze claims of voter fraud and the realities behind them.

“In this case, I'm talking specifically about the SAVE Act.”

The Realities of Voter ID Laws

19:35 to 21:56

Discuss the complexities of voter ID laws and their impact on voters.

“as Speaker Mike Johnson portrays, an organized effort to defraud Americans of their votes by hundreds of thousands of millions of people going to illicitly and illegally vote.”

The Political Implications of the SAVE Act

21:56 to 24:39

Explore the motivations and consequences of the SAVE Act in politics.

“But there's a specific list that is not just show up with your driver's license.”

Voter Concerns vs. Political Priorities

24:39 to 28:00

Understand the disconnect between voter priorities and political focus.

“I have a very maximalist view of voting and voter participation.”

Voter Desires vs. Activist Agendas

28:00 to 29:55

Explore the disconnect between what voters want and activist priorities.

“I mean, do we really think that this is what is driving the majority of the American public crazy?”

Impact of Economic Issues on Elections

29:55 to 31:55

Understand how economic conditions like gas prices influence voter behavior and election outcomes.

“much less all of this weird conspiracy mongering and clinging to 2020, which is just beyond ill.”

Republican Lawmakers' Dilemma

31:55 to 32:19

Discuss the puzzling relationship between Republican lawmakers and Trump amidst challenging political conditions.

“You have lots of infrequent voters who are just angry and not going to come out to vote.”

Transition to Recommendations

32:19 to 32:29

Shift from political discussion to personal recommendations segment.

“Jamal, what do you got for show and tell this week?”

Movie Recommendation: Teenage Mutant Turtles

32:29 to 33:33

A nostalgic look at the 1990 Teenage Mutant Turtles film and its surprisingly dark themes.

“And I recently showed them a movie that I liked a lot when I was their age.”

Reconsidering McDonald's Double Cheeseburger

33:33 to 34:46

A case for the underrated McDonald's double cheeseburger as a satisfying meal.

“So I'm going to go in a completely different direction here to anything I've ever recommended before.”

Musical Recommendation: Lucinda Williams

34:46 to 35:58

Encouragement to revisit Lucinda Williams' classic album and her upcoming concert.

“Also, shout out to the Taco Bell bean and cheese and rice burrito grilled.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00David French:We gave Times employees a preview of Crossplay from New York Times Games, and here's what they had to say. I can finally play with other people.

0:08Jamelle Bouie:I'm pretty competitive. It's fun to beat friends and co-workers.

0:11David French:I have a J for 10 points.

0:14Jamelle Bouie:I'm guessing tanga is not a word. Let's see. Tanga is a word. Oh.

0:19David French:As in English as a second language speaker, I like to learn new words.

0:23Michelle Cottle:Crossplay, the first two-player word game from New York Times Games. Download it for free today.

0:31David French:This is The Opinions, a show that brings you a mix of voices from New York Times opinion. You've heard the news. Here's what to make of it.

0:50David French:I'm Michelle Cottle. I cover national politics for New York Times Opinion. And this week, I am back with my favorite band of political unpackers, columnists David French and Jamel Bowie. Guys, how's it going? It's going all right.

1:06Michelle Cottle:It's going. It's going, Michelle.

1:08David French:OK, this is not inspiring. I'm just like, all right and just going. We'll unpack that later, maybe. But we're going to get down to business and first up, talk about the war in Iran and President Trump's approach to our allies. And Jamel is going to explain to us what he thinks Trump is really focused on these days. Hint, it's not the war or even White House renovations. As always, got a note that we're taping this on Thursday. So the specific shape of the chaos will change probably before you all hear us. And with that, let's get down to business. We are moving into the fourth week of America and Israel's war with Iran.

1:58David French:There is no end in sight. And from best I can tell, no clear direction of where this is going. Each day we're seeing new attacks on Iran. Oil prices have spiked. Trump decided he'd fix that by relaxing sanctions on Russia. And surprise, our allies are not super excited to send ships to protect the Strait of Hormuz to help with a war they were not consulted on. So scale of one to 10, guys, how shocked should Trump be that he is getting the cold shoulder from Europe on a lot of this? And where do you think the dynamic is headed? Jamel, you go first.

2:38Jamelle Bouie:I don't think Trump should be shocked at all. He spent the first year of his presidency doing everything he could to degrade America's relationship with its European allies in particular, undermine the NATO alliance, threaten territorial acquisition against a NATO member, just all kinds of destructive things. And so, no, you shouldn't be surprised that when you bully people and then you come to them hat in hand for help, they say, no, thanks, not going to do it. And this is the other part of it, right? That it's a testament to how little this war was planned out and how little forethought there seems to have been, that the same administration, which has taken a hammer to America's clean energy development, to its renewable energy development, that is actively hostile to it.

3:31Jamelle Bouie:In fact, our wonderful newspaper published a story this week about how the administration wants to spend up to a billion dollars to keep a wind energy company from producing, from building new wind energy infrastructure, and instead wants to divert that to fossil fuel production. So you have this administration that is ideologically anti-renewable energy. And then it's like, oh, also, I'm going to start a war with the one country that could unilaterally cause a energy crisis through the denial of fossil fuels. Brilliant work. Genius stuff.

4:08David French:Strategery at its finest. David?

4:11Michelle Cottle:I mean, look, this is a war that Trump started that our NATO allies were not consulted on. They had been relentlessly scorned. As of today on Thursday, Michelle, we have received reporting that Denmark was actually preparing for a potential invasion of Greenland. That under the guise of exercises, they had sent troops and the troops had explosives to blow up airfields in case America tried to invade. I mean, this is the environment in which we launched another war. And then there's a lot of reporting that says that General Cain warned Trump that the strait would close. And he pushed through these warnings in a way that was essentially he denied to himself the potential crisis could exist.

4:58Michelle Cottle:And now that it is, he's lashing out in a million different directions. And this is the first time in my life that we have had a war leader where legitimately you wonder, and I don't even wonder that much, is he really mainly motivated by self-interest here or is he mainly motivated by the national interest? And everything about Trump that we know says this is a dude that's mainly motivated by self-interest and also that he's extraordinarily mercurial. And so we just saw this whole exchange, this big escalation in the war where there was an Israeli strike on Iranian natural gas fields. Then there was an Iranian strike on Qatar's natural gas fields.

5:42Michelle Cottle:And by the way, these are two of the most important facilities for the production of this vital resource in the whole world. And Trump comes out and says, well, Israel struck Iran and then Iran struck Qatar and I didn't want any of this. And then within moments after that, you get reporting saying, what are you talking about? Israel says they did consult that this was a strike approved by the United States. and that Trump just doesn't like the blowback from the Gulf states as a result of all of this. And so you really get the sense that Trump, the commander-in-chief, is flying by the seat of his pants.

6:23Michelle Cottle:The military is executing the missions it's being assigned to execute with extreme competence. It's just that if you have a flawed strategy to begin with, if you have mercurial leadership at the top, even the best military execution will often just be wasted.

6:41David French:Well, it certainly seems like we're running into with this administration, or perhaps it's just this president, that eternal tension between short-term goals and long-term goals. And he doesn't really seem to have long-term goals on anything. So his approach to this seems to be, well, it's great. I can blow this up. And look how tough we are here. And this speaks, I think, Jamel's brought this up before. He's got all these toys to play with. And he's got all this military might. And we can worry about where this leaves us in broader picture terms for later, which, you know, I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

7:21David French:It's the Middle East, right? It always turns out well in the long term. But so what are we learning about his just view of American power? And also, do we think the White House maybe is learning anything about the gap between how the president views that power and how things actually play out? I mean, do we think anything is sinking in over there?

7:46Jamelle Bouie:I'm skeptical. I mean, it's clear to me that the president has a view of American power that's very childish. That's very sort of we have lots of weapons. We have lots of things that can blow things up. And that's all we really need. He seems to have also this view that American influence, both American influence and American military and other forms of power, economic power, are inexhaustible resources that you can just call on again and again and again and do what you want. And that isn't true. That is very much not the case. But there's no indication that anyone in the White House, or at least anyone the president will listen to, I'll say that, is capable of explaining to Trump, getting him to understand that they may have already reached up against the limits of what the country can simply do, given the situation, given our deteriorating relationships with our allies.

8:43Jamelle Bouie:given everything. It's always been so striking to me that, you know, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has these press conferences where he doesn't at all talk in strategic terms about the conflict. It's all kind of, we're going to rain down death upon the enemy. And then why can't you clap harder, clap harder, which I'll say beyond being, I think, evidence of someone who maybe doesn't even understand the difference between strategy and tactics, like setting that aside, there's something actually quite disturbing about the fact that high level American officials are talking about war as if it were a video game.

9:23David French:Which I hear is not impressing military veterans about this. Like they're embarrassed by the idea that this is being treated like call of duty. Before, David, before you jump back in, I have a question for both of you, which is that I I keep I keep hearing that the Trump administration is surprised that this didn't go like Venezuela. That can't be true. Right. Someone tell me that they they understood the difference between Venezuela and Iran.

9:53Michelle Cottle:So it can be true, Michelle. It can be true because here's what I Donald Trump, I think, has trouble understanding the true believer. Yeah. In other words, the person who actually really, truly believes what they say. Because he doesn't believe in anything. Well, he's not a true believer. And guess what? He's he has gotten where he's gotten by steamrolling over a lot of people and exposing a lot of people to not be true believers. So think about how many people in the Republican Party have bent the knee to Trump in spite of all of the depredations, all of the corruption, all of the departures from previous conservative orthodoxy.

10:33I mean, heck, his own vice president compared him to Hitler at one point, right?

10:38Michelle Cottle:Marco Rubio, his favorite, arguably his favorite member of the cabinet right now, was virulently against Trump. And so he's seen this happen so many times where people who have postured themselves as true people of true conviction have just yielded. And that now he's taking on, as opposed to a strongman regime in South America, which has some ideological components, of course, but it's still ultimately a strongman regime. And then you go to Iran, which is an Islamic revolutionary regime, that one of the ways it cemented itself in Iran was by fighting a war with Iraq in such total disregard of the lives of its own citizens, confronting American power, and we can hit them, and we can hit them, and we can hit them, and the true believers are still going to believe.

11:27Michelle Cottle:And that is something that everyone who's fought in the war on terror really understands. We really get it. We know it in our DNA that we're dealing with an enemy that really believes. And then Trump here is confronting this. And I feel like it's just kind of doesn't compute to him. And you see it in some of this temper tantrum that he's pitching, you know, over. Why are they closing the straight? We won. Like, what are they doing?

11:55David French:Don't they know? Don't they know we won? He's making the very

11:59Michelle Cottle:fundamental mistake that so many war leaders make, which is totally misunderstanding the mind of the enemy. Yeah.

12:06Jamelle Bouie:I think the observation that Trump does not understand people who actually believe things is so true. It's maybe, I mean, there are many things wrong with him, but in terms of just political strategy and his ability to operate in the political world, I think this is the big one. And it leaves him ill-equipped with domestic opposition, for one, but it also leaves him ill-equipped on the foreign stage. He thinks everyone is as pliable with treats as he is. And they just aren't.

12:40David French:Oh, okay. So in terms of repercussions, I've always had the sense he just has no grasp that things could later come back to bite him or have an enduring impact beyond like, you know, that went boom. So he started this war, caught the American people and all of our allies completely off guard. Only Israel seemed to be in the loop. So how is this sitting with our NATO allies? And are we going to see a sort of permanent-ish shift with global alliances going forward?

13:15Michelle Cottle:You know, I'm so glad you brought up that word, permanent-ish, which should be a word if it's not. But I think this is really important for people to understand is that he is breaking things you can't fix just within the next election. And one of the things he's breaking is our relationship with our NATO allies. Because think of it from this standpoint. If you're a defense planner, defense planners plan on the 20 to 25 to sometimes 30, 40 year time horizons. And so if you're planning, can you count on the United States of America? if you know, even if Trump loses, you're one election away from another Trump-like figure.

13:56Michelle Cottle:You would need a generation of rejection of Trump-like figures before you could reincorporate a consistent America into your defense planning. Because the one thing you know, it's not in the United States, it's not just Trump. It's Trump and the 77, 78 million people who voted for him. And that is the message that has been sent. It's the message that's being absorbed and it's going to haunt us for a generation. Jamal?

14:24Jamelle Bouie:I think that's exactly right. As long as there's a possibility that like suing voters in Wisconsin could deliver the country to a guy like Trump, you'd have to be delusional if you're another country to trust us for anything but the immediate short term. Right. Like there's just no there's no reason to.

14:43David French:So, David, you wrote that the global rules-based order is done. Was Trump's kind of transactional approach the final blow, or was it already moving in that direction before he entered the room?

14:58Michelle Cottle:I mean, let me put it this way. We've had a global rules-based order that's always been teetering from the moment it was created. So it's always been relatively fragile, in part because, you know, you had the five powers of the Security Council, Russia, China, France, Great Britain, and the United States. So long as the most powerful of those five, the United States, was largely in agreement, never perfectly, but largely in agreement with the rules-based order, it could kind of stick together. It would be like this tape and bailing wire and everything, but it was holding together enough to do the number one thing it was designed to do, which is to prevent great power conflict.

15:39Michelle Cottle:But if you take the most powerful of those five countries and you remove them from the category of largely siding with the rules-based order like a Britain and France and turn them into something much more like an independent autonomous actor like Russia and China, then you fracture it. And we're already entering into a moment of real peril as a result.

16:02Jamelle Bouie:Just I know we want to move on to the next topic, but just to add to this and actually to be a little bit, a little tiny bit exculpatory for Trump with regards to the rules based order. You know, President Biden took a blind eye to Israel's sort of horribly destructive war in Gaza. As evidence mounted that the Israeli military was sort of wantonly bombing civilians in Gaza, Biden continued to provide arms. And that, as much as anything, has really convinced people that the notion that there are rules that nations must follow is one on the decline. That the U.S. would turn a blind eye to really awful behavior.

16:50Jamelle Bouie:As is often the case with Trump, it is taking existing trends and then just like running, you know, dashing down the track. So hypocrisy in American behavior, both its own behavior and its approach to its allies, has now been embraced in a kind of nihilistic, might makes right way. But like you can see the continuities there. All right.

17:16David French:So we've spread the blame a little. That seems fair. Okay. So, you know, Trump's approach to the war seems all over the place and hopelessly muddled. But when it comes to what he wants back here with things that directly affect his fortunes, like the midterm elections, it's pretty clear exactly what he wants and how he wants to achieve it. In this case, I'm talking specifically about the SAVE Act. Jamel, you've been writing about this. You want to just start us off by laying out what the SAVE Act is and why the president is so fixated on it.

Read the full transcript

17:53Jamelle Bouie:Sure. So it's the Save America Act. So the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility America Act is Trump's sort of current obsession. Was it two weeks ago that he said he would not sign any new bills unless this was passed into law? And what the Save Act ostensibly is meant to do is protect the integrity of American elections from voter fraud and non-citizen voting. Now, this raises kind of a natural question, well, how serious of a problem are voter fraud and non-citizen voting? In part because the provisions of the SAVE Act, and in particular, a pretty strict requirement to prove your citizenship in person, registering to vote, could potentially disenfranchise tens of millions of Americans.

18:36Jamelle Bouie:So if that's the risk, disenfranchising tens of millions of Americans, keeping them from exercising their right to vote, their constitutional right to vote, which although is not explicitly written out of the Constitution, I think it's heavily implied by the Constitution's amendments. How big is this problem? It turns out that this problem doesn't exist. It's a fake problem. I'll put it this way. The Heritage Foundation conservative think tank, very conservative think tank, has a database that purports to show all the examples of voter fraud over the course of several decades across all 50 states.

19:12Jamelle Bouie:And what the Heritage Foundation finds is that it happens, but effectively, it's not an actual problem. And the times when it does happen, most often than not, it's a mistake. It's someone who thought that they could register to vote and they registered to vote. So it's most often just kind of like simple administrative mistakes, not malicious activity. and certainly not as the president portrays, as Speaker Mike Johnson portrays, an organized effort to defraud Americans of their votes by hundreds of thousands of millions of people going to illicitly and illegally vote. So for Trump to say back, and he has said this, this is a means to reduce the electorate so that Republicans have an easier time to win.

19:53Jamelle Bouie:I'm not sure that's how it actually work out in practice, but that's the intent. And I do think it's just vitally important to say that there is simply no world in which it is justifiable to deprive, potentially deprive tens of millions of Americans of the right to vote in order to prevent a non-existent problem. It's like going to someone in Rhode Island and saying, you know, do you want to spend a million dollars on volcano insurance?

20:22Michelle Cottle:Why are you against volcano insurance, Jamal?

20:25Jamelle Bouie:Aren't you worried about volcanoes? Do you want molten rock to destroy your home? A sensible person would pay for the volcano insurance. Jamel is pro-lava.

20:37Michelle Cottle:That's right. He is pro-lava. So here's one thing that is, there's a couple of things that are driving me crazy about this debate. Number one. Just a couple? Go ahead. Just a couple. Well, it was just the two top two things. Number one, this is not, when somebody describes this as a voter ID bill, They are being deceptive. You know, first, let me just say, I have zero objection to a normal voter ID requirement. In other words, you have a driver's license, you walk in, you show your driver's license or your state ID to show that I am the person I claim to be. I've done that for years and years and years, voting in Tennessee, show my ID, no big deal.

21:17Michelle Cottle:This is not a pure voter ID bill. It is not. It is saying that when you're registering, you're going to have to prove citizenship. Now, how do you prove citizenship? Well, there's a list of approved ways to demonstrate citizenship in the bill that includes things like a passport, which a lot of Americans don't have, or it includes a birth certificate, which tons of married women, for example, don't have a birth certificate that matches their current last name. And, you know, your driver's license in most states, even your real ID driver's license isn't going to be enough. Now, there are a few states, there's a handful of states where the driver's license is also effective as proof of citizenship.

22:02Michelle Cottle:But there's a specific list that is not just show up with your driver's license. And so this is something that is adding layers. It is adding hurdles that I think the vast majority of Americans aren't even aware of because it's been presented to them as a voter ID bill. And they've got a driver's license in their pocket and they don't think a thing about it. They don't realize that there is this extra requirement for registration different from what they've experienced before and that millions of them do not currently have access to the necessary documents. and to get access is going to cost money and it's going to cost time.

22:46Michelle Cottle:The second thing that's really interesting, and Jamel, in your latest piece, you touched on this. Have Republicans thought this through? Because - That's what I want to know. You know, if you look at the numbers in 2024, Kamala Harris won college-educated voters by more than 10 points. Trump won non-college voters by more than 10 points. And there were more non-college voters than college voters. Okay, fast forward to right now. Who do you think has their citizenship documents squared away more? College voters or non-college? It's college voters by a mile.

23:27David French:Well, one of the things that would be interesting to see how it panned out is I think mail-in voters would have to start submitting copies of their identification. Now, if you're me and you have a printer at home that you can easily copy your driver's license with, that's not a problem. I think that Republicans are working on the – and to clarify, most Republican lawmakers are not that keen on doing things that would throttle mail-in voting. This is Trump's personal obsession. He's still bitter about 2020, the blue shift, all that stuff. But I think Republicans, to some degree, aren't factoring in the fact that used to they were seen as the party who had the most reliable voters.

24:11David French:voters, you know, but if you have switched to being the party that has to rely on voting to be easy enough that non-regular voters are going to put you over the top, you should really be doing a gut check on what it means to just all of these things are geared at making it less convenient for people to vote. And I'm not sure that's going to pan out how they think it's going to.

24:39Jamelle Bouie:I'm sort of tied. I have a very maximalist view of voting and voter participation. I think it should be as easy as possible. Like if we're not going to have universal voting, of which I think I have been persuaded of, would be desirable, where you just kind of, you kind of have to go out and vote. You don't have to necessarily cast a ballot for a candidate, but like you, as a civic ritual, we all go out and vote. But short of universal voting, I think it should be as easy as possible. You want to mail in a ballot? Go for it. You want to vote 10 days, two weeks before the election? Go for it. It doesn't matter to me.

25:15Jamelle Bouie:If the trade would be an ID requirement with IDs being readily available, that you can easily go obtain an ID to prove your identification, and then you can vote, it's amazingly easy, the barriers are incredibly low, I would take that trade in a heartbeat. But if what you want to do is disenfranchise a bunch of working class white voters who are the bedrock of your coalition, I'm also not necessarily going to stop you. I'm going to say you shouldn't do it for ethical and moral reasons. But if you if you insist on it, you know.

26:00David French:All right. So the Safe America Act is not supposed it's not expected to pass the Senate. So what is the point of spending so much time in political capital trying to push it through? You know, not to be put into a final point of it, but especially when it seems like there are better uses of this president's attention and time, Jamil? I mean, I'd say this is Trump's obsession, right?

26:27Jamelle Bouie:As you noted, Michelle, he is still incredibly bitter about the 2020 election. He still complains about not winning the popular vote in the 2016 election. It's sort of it's a like a fundamental injury to his ego that he has lost an election and he blames everything but but himself. And so it's it's his personal obsession. And the Republican Party as it exists, it's just not, it has built itself around satisfying this guy's ego demands. And so I have no doubt that Republicans with their right minds, not all of them, but Republicans with their right minds understand the points you've been making about the basic counterproductiveness of this legislation.

27:10Jamelle Bouie:But also the muscle of opposing the president on one of his priorities is just something they've never exercised. And so they're going to go through this. They're going to waste floor time on the Senate. When you're right, there are better things they could be doing. There is a whole war that they're fighting. They might want to eat up floor time talking about that, debating that, dealing with legislation with that. But the president wants it and he's pouting and holding his breath and stomping his feet. And so they are going to humor him. I love a good tantrum.

27:47David French:David, it seems like it could be not so hot for their political fortunes in a year when voters seem to want to talk about other things and they're concerned that their leaders aren't focusing enough on ways to make their life better. I mean, do we really think that this is what is driving the majority of the American public crazy?

28:10Michelle Cottle:You raise a really good point, and that is that we've been having this pattern in American politics where the vast bulk of voters are saying, hey, guys, I want prosperity and stability. This is what we want, prosperity and stability. And every two years they come forward and they vote for prosperity and stability according to their best assessment of the time and then sort of recede back and get back in their lives. In the meantime, the activist base never recedes back anywhere, and it just keeps hammering away at its pet issues. In this case, the president of the United States and his MAGA activist base have this same pet issue.

28:50Michelle Cottle:And so they are hammering away at this when they're about to experience a general election electorate that's going to come forward and say, where is my peace? Where is my prosperity? Where is my stability? and I think they're going to experience a tremendous electoral consequence.

29:07David French:And I feel like, you know, I live in D.C. I feel like I should just go down and stand on the Capitol steps waiting for the Republican lawmakers to come through and just start screaming, he's not on the ballot. He's not going to pay for this. But you guys are really risking getting your butts thumped this year because he can get away with things even when he is on the ballot that this team cannot. His team does not do that well when they are answering for what he has been doing. And it just everything we're looking at with the midterms suggests that they are in trouble and he's not making it better.

29:53David French:I mean, a war in Iran is definitely not what people signed up for. much less all of this weird conspiracy mongering and clinging to 2020, which is just beyond ill. And instead, like they're clogging up some housing bill that the bipartisan housing bill that they were very interested in waving around as an achievement. No, that's that's just sitting there stuck because he can't quite get past his pet obsession. It just boggles the mind that so much important stuff is going to get left to wither because he is just he can't let go. Man can't let go.

30:38Jamelle Bouie:It's astonishing. The generic ballot right now for Republicans is devastating, right? Like Democrats are up plus eight, plus nine in the generic ballot. But even if the Iran war were not causing a global energy spike, the cost of energy going up, it would be an anchor on the president and the Republican Party. But the fact that, you know, I drive an electric car, so I'm a little bit, you know, gas prices, don't think about them too much these days. But I do notice them. And I've noticed gas go up like 50 cents in a couple of weeks, right? Like diesel has gone up to like$5 a gallon. And if anything, people were voting for, it was cheaper gas.

31:22David French:Well, rural America is going to feel it much more than, say, me or David, because we're in urban areas. We have public transportation. But that's...

31:32Jamelle Bouie:He's literally taking money out of people's pockets with decisions he's making. And this is going to trickle down to Republican lawmakers. People are not going to respond well to this. And that's on top of the fact that Democratic energy around the election is sky high. So you're going to have lots of Democrats motivated to vote. You have lots of Republicans discouraged. You have lots of infrequent voters who are just angry and not going to come out to vote. And it could be a total collapse. And I do not understand. I just cannot get into the psychology of a Republican lawmaker who looks at the objective political conditions of this year and says to themselves, I'm going to hug the president even closer.

32:14Jamelle Bouie:It makes no sense.

32:16David French:I think let's leave the doom and gloom there and the predictions and move on to everyone's favorite piece of this, which is recommendations. Jamal, what do you got for show and tell this week?

32:32Jamelle Bouie:I watch a lot of movies with my kids. That's how it goes. And I recently showed them a movie that I liked a lot when I was their age. And it is the 1990 Teenage Mutant Turtles film directed by Steve Barron. But more more relevantly for our purposes, the production company is Golden Harvest, which is a Hong Kong production company, did a lot of martial arts films. And so, you know, I have fond memories of this from when I was a little kid and I'm watching this again with my kids. And I'm like, OK, first of all, this movie much darker than I remember being. It's kind of like it's it's actually like quite the Ninja Turtles is dark.

33:06Jamelle Bouie:The first Ninja Turtles movie is quite gritty. And then the fight choreography is excellent. It's exceptionally well made. The suits, the puppets are by the Henson Company, so they look great. So, yeah, I don't know.

33:20David French:I've never seen that.

33:21Jamelle Bouie:It's fun for kids, but also it's a legitimately good movie. The sequels are terrible. The kids will lap up any slap we'll give to them. But the first movie is quite good.

33:32Michelle Cottle:Okay. David? So I'm going to go in a completely different direction here to anything I've ever recommended before. I'm going to go food. All right. And I'm going to ask Americans to reconsider the McDonald's double cheeseburger.

33:50David French:What? No, no.

33:52Michelle Cottle:Yes, yes, yes, yes. Okay, so when you travel as much as I do, and you begin to reacquaint yourself with what are the sort of good fast foods to eat that are the sort of like the perfect size of meal and stick-to-itiveness. And I just want to say, I think too many Americans sleep on the McDonald's double cheeseburger. It is the perfectly sized sandwich. It is perfectly flavorful. And then when matched with, of course, the medium fry, it really is the most efficient, high quality lunch food that like consistently reliable, always good. I just, I want to present it to the listener. If you have written off McDonald's, give the McDonald's double cheeseburger another try.

34:45David French:Okay, I'll back you on the fries, but that's as far as I can go.

34:48Jamelle Bouie:Also, shout out to the Taco Bell bean and cheese and rice burrito grilled. Yeah, okay. I can do me some T-Bell. If you order from a kiosk, you can get any kind of modification you want. So you have to request it grilled, and it's terrific.

35:01David French:Okay, okay. Well, I'm going in the direction of music. for reasons that I can't even remember why, I have of late just been revisiting Lucinda Williams. Basically, Car Wheels on a Gravel Road, 1998, complete masterpiece, can't recommend highly enough. But the nice thing about talking to my phone is I can just say, play me Lucinda Williams, and it'll just go through all of the catalog, whatever I want. And then by chance, I discovered that she is going to be in D.C. for a concert or two in May. I've rounded up a bunch of women. We're going to crash this. It's going to be fantastic. But it's been a while.

35:45David French:I want to recommend just going back, listening to her greats, and remembering a time when, you know, we were all more naive and optimistic. Love it. And with that, we're going to land this plane. Guys, thank you so much. I couldn't make sense of all this without you. Let's do it again.

36:06Jamelle Bouie:Thanks, Michelle. Always happy to chat.

36:38David French:Transcription by CastingWords Eric Arthur, Vishak Adarba, Victoria Chamberlain, and Jillian Weinberger. It's edited by Jillian Weinberger, Jasmine Romero, and Kari Pitkin. Mixing by Afim Shapiro. Original music by Isaac Jones, Sonia Herrero, Pat McCusker, Carol Saburo, Afim Shapiro, and Amin Sahota. The Fact Check team is Kate Sinclair, Mary Marge Locker, and Michelle Harris. The head of operations is Shannon Busta. Audience support by Christina Samulewski. The director of opinion shows is Annie Rose Strasser.

37:38You

From the publisher

President Trump has his own ideas about American power, American voters, and American enemies. On “The Opinions,” the writer Michelle Cottle and the columnists Jamelle Bouie and David French argue that unfortunately Trump misunderstands all three.

This episode of “The Opinions” was produced by Derek Arthur and Vishakha Darbha. It was edited by Jillian Weinberger and Kaari Pitkin. Mixing by Efim Shapiro. Video editing by Arpita Aneja. The postproduction manager is Mike Puretz. Original music by Pat McCusker and Carole Sabouraud. Fact-checking by Mary Marge Locker and Michelle Harris. Audience strategy by Shannon Busta and Kristina Samulewski. The director of Opinion Video is Jonah M. Kessel. The deputy director of Opinion Shows is Alison Bruzek. The director of Opinion Shows is Annie-Rose Strasser.

Thoughts? Questions? Email us at theopinions@nytimes.com


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from The Opinions

All 147 episodes
Trump’s Recklessness Will ‘Haunt Us for a Generation’The Opinions · 37 min
Listen in VO