In short
Hungary’s 2026 election that toppled Viktor Orbán and what it signals for global far-right politics and the U.S. (including whether Donald Trump could be next). The episode argues corruption plus “kitchen-table” impacts can break autocrats’ grip, and highlights memes and investigative revelations as catalysts.
Guests
Kim Lane Shepley, Princeton professor and Hungary/Orban/democratic-backsliding expert; hosts Susan Glasser, Jane Mayer, Evan Osnos (New Yorker).
Key claims
Orbán’s “illiberal democracy” relied on dismantling accountability, enabling corruption. The opposition linked corruption to daily suffering (e.g., hospital shortages like no toilet paper) and ran a “system change”/anti-fear campaign. Zebras became a corruption symbol after investigative journalists exposed an Orban-linked palatial estate with zebras. Russia’s disinformation team was allegedly exposed and backfired. Orbán’s ties to Putin and a U.S. far-right network (Danube Institute/Heritage/Project 2025) are portrayed as influential.
Notable examples
zebra memes/costumes; taped calls between Orbán and Putin; tapes involving Hungary’s foreign minister and Russia about EU sanctions; Heroes Square rallies; turnout near 80%; vote-value rule (rural votes worth more) and Magyar’s two-year rural organizing.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOTrump Pope Memes and Political Insights
0:36 to 2:24
A light-hearted conversation about Trump memes transitions into a discussion on political implications.
“But I kind of like the one of Jesus holding up his fingers and the caption says, this is my eye doctor asking me how many fingers I see.”
Viktor Orbán's Defeat: A Political Analysis
2:24 to 4:36
Discussion on the implications of Orbán's electoral defeat for global politics and the U.S.
“It is a question raised by some of his activities over the past few days, which is, to be a populist, don't you need to be popular?”
Understanding the Fall of Orbán Through Memes
4:52 to 6:20
Kim Lane Shepley explains how the zebra meme became a symbol of Orbán's corruption.
“And when the topic came up of Orban's fall, there was this spontaneous cheer in the crowd.”
Zebras, Corruption, and Political Dynamics
6:20 to 10:26
Exploring the significance of corruption in Orbán's regime and its impact on the election.
“One is obviously, as we're all talking about, the corruption issue is the Achilles heel of autocrats.”
Influence of Russia and the U.S. in Hungary
10:26 to 14:01
Examining the roles of Russian disinformation and U.S. political alliances in Hungary's elections.
“And it just encapsulated in one symbol just how bad things had gotten.”
Orban's Influence on Trump's Campaign
14:01 to 14:59
Exploring the connections between Viktor Orban and Donald Trump's political strategies.
“So then you start to get above the water level where the stuff is visible.”
Understanding Hungary's Right-Wing Networks
15:00 to 16:18
Analyzing the networks and organizations supporting right-wing politics in Hungary.
“Everyone was focused on the Vance visit.”
Hungary's Anti-Ukrainian Sentiment
16:19 to 18:24
Discussion on Hungary's complex relationship with Ukraine and its implications.
“It's a much, there's a much bigger operation in Hungary called the Matiesz Korvinas Collegium, which is the Hungarian version.”
The Future of Hungary's Right-Wing Network
18:25 to 19:35
Examining the sustainability of Hungary's right-wing institutions post-Orban.
“He will not gum up the works on foreign policy.”
Corruption's Role in Hungarian Elections
19:36 to 22:20
Insights into how corruption influenced the recent Hungarian elections.
“And I'm trying to understand how much does corruption succeed in picking the lock on a base of voters who we might think is locked into a candidate?”
Show all 21 chapters
Patriotism and Political Identity in Hungary
22:46 to 28:00
Exploring the role of nationalism in Hungarian politics through Peter Magyar's campaign.
“And while you're there, don't forget to hit the follow button so you never miss an episode.”
Analyzing Hungary's Blue Wave Election
28:00 to 29:04
Learn how Peter Magyar's campaign flipped traditionally Orban-supporting counties.
“And Orban thought the opposition would never be able to win in the countryside because, you know, in all of these systems, it's less educated and more rural people who defend the autocrats.”
Lessons for American Politics
29:05 to 29:52
Discover how Hungary's election insights apply to the U.S. political landscape.
“disproportionate representation for Red America because of the Electoral College and because of the way the Senate is organized.”
The Power of High Voter Turnout
29:53 to 30:48
Understand the significance of the nearly 80% turnout in Hungary's elections.
“the only bit we didn't touch on, and I'm curious, Kim, what you make of this, is that the turnout in this election was extraordinary.”
The Anti-Fear Campaign Strategy
30:49 to 32:08
Explore how Peter Magyar's rallies inspired hope and participation among voters.
“If they weren't, they were fired from public service.”
The Joyful Rallies and Their Impact
32:09 to 33:48
Learn how fun and excitement in rallies motivated voters to reclaim their future.
“I mean, and all of these very visible Hungarian, you know, performers going back decades, but also the new ones.”
Reflecting on an Inspiring Election
33:49 to 34:01
Discuss the implications of Hungary's election as a hopeful moment in politics.
Corruption and Its Political Stakes
34:21 to 36:55
Delve into how corruption influences political narratives in the U.S. and abroad.
“Evan, you are always looking for an upbeat conversation.”
The Challenge of Corruption in American Politics
36:56 to 39:53
Understand the difficulties in addressing perceived corruption across political parties.
“I'm curious, Susan, you know, one of the things that she said that was very interesting was this idea that Magyar went out into places that that he never might have assumed he could win.”
Visceral Political Messaging
39:54 to 41:29
Learn about the importance of relatable political language and imagery.
“If they're going to try to run on corruption against Trump, they need to look like they have clean hands.”
Reflections on Viktor Orbán's Fall
42:04 to 42:14
Discussion about the current political landscape following Orbán's departure.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This spring, the Chicago Independent Venue League presents Civil Fest 2026, a celebration of live music and community events across Chicago's independent stages. From April 16th through 25th, experience concerts and special events at venues like Metro, Salt Shed, Talia Hall, Old Town School of Folk Music, The Auditorium, Ramova Theater, Beat Kitchen, Chop Shop, and dozens more. From intimate clubs to legendary rooms, all spotlighting the artists and spaces that define our city. Learn more at civlchicago.com. Civil Fest 2026. Your city, your venues, your festival. What is your favorite Trump Pope meme?
0:46Oh my God, they are so good. But I kind of like the one of Jesus holding up his fingers and the caption says, this is my eye doctor asking me how many fingers I see. That was pretty good. I was going to say, I happen to like the one of all the doctors in the pit dressed in their white robes and red sash. That has a nice touch about it.
1:09Kim Lane Scheppele:Well, you know, it's backfired for Donald Trump a bit when no less than Sarah Palin is tweeting a picture of Jesus saying, it's time to put down the phone. Wow. Yeah. You've lost Sarah Palin, folks. Well, I feel like this episode, it's a successor to last week's episode. That's true. You're right. Because last week we talked about J.D. Vance's question mark. Will he manage to miraculously do what others have failed to do and solve the 47-year impasse between the United States and Iran in his peace talks in Pakistan? Question mark. Will he manage to rescue the Hungarian would-be autocrat Viktor Orban from what appeared to be almost certain defeat by his intervention?
1:59Kim Lane Scheppele:Question mark. Answer to both. No. So consider this J.D. Vance Part 2.
2:11Kim Lane Scheppele:Welcome to The Political Scene from The New Yorker, a weekly discussion about the big questions in American politics. I'm Susan Glasser, and I'm joined by my colleagues Jane Mayer and Evan Osnos. Hey, Jane. Hey, Susan. Hey, Evan. Great to be with you. Good morning, guys. All right. So what is J.D. Vance Part 2? It is a question raised by some of his activities over the past few days, which is, to be a populist, don't you need to be popular? A simple insight. Our subject this week is an election that even Steve Bannon called a warning flare for November for Republicans and Donald Trump here in the United States.
2:57Kim Lane Scheppele:Last Sunday, after 16 years in power, many of them as the focus of a lot of excitement from the American far right, Hungarian autocrat Viktor Orban lost his bid for re-election in Hungary. His opponent, Peter Magyar, won a landslide supermajority in an election that saw historic levels, nearly 80 percent turnout. This was the highest since the fall of communism. The key many people believe in this election was the corruption of a ruling elite after 16 years in power. We will talk today with an expert who has lived in Hungary, who's written about Hungary, and more importantly, who can help us unpack how did this happen, what are the implications for the global far-right movement, and especially what might it take to defeat a would-be strongman here in the United States.
3:57Kim Lane Scheppele:And, you know, maybe after years of the J.D. Vance's and Donald Trump's of the world focusing on what's going on in Budapest, it's going to be the moment where the American center tries to focus on what the lessons of this small country in Central Europe just might be for the United States of America this fall. Evan, you are in Europe right now. Tell us a little bit like, I mean, this was kind of a seismic moment for many Europeans who had come to believe that Hungary and Orban was almost like a plant from within. You know, somebody supported by Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin right in the midst of the EU gumming things up.
4:41Yeah, it was really kind of amazing to be here when this news has unfolded. I was at an event in Amsterdam just the day after the results were announced. And when the topic came up of Orban's fall, there was this spontaneous cheer in the crowd. It was really noticeable. I'm over here speaking in a bunch of places to a lot of people about upheaval in the world. And I think that the fall of Orban has felt for a lot of people, they would say to me, that it feels like the first moment of, frankly, joy that they have felt about politics in a very long time. Because I think he has felt to people here that he is the icon of the revival of blood and soil politics, which is such a present memory for people.
5:29It has been such a terrifying prospect, the idea of far right parties in France and Germany and Italy, which have been coming back. And frankly, everybody is asking the same question we are, which is what does this mean for those movements? And what does it mean in the United States for Donald Trump? What are the lessons here that this might hold for us in America? So everybody over here, I can tell you, is asking a lot of questions about what's happening where you guys are in Washington. And I'm curious how it's been reverberating over the course of the last few days.
5:58Kim Lane Scheppele:Yeah, Jane, we're here in D.C. and phrases like corrupt oligarchy, the strong man who wants to create a quote unquote golden age but leaves his people struggling with no jobs and high inflation, that kind of resonates, doesn't it? Absolutely. I mean, everybody's trying to read into this what they can and learn from it. I mean, and I think a few things come to mind that I've been seeing that have at least caught my eye in it. One is obviously, as we're all talking about, the corruption issue is the Achilles heel of autocrats. And it's not actually a bug in the system. It's the model. You dismantle accountability, you're going to have corruption.
6:36And that's what we've seen. But one of the things that's interesting to me anyway is the way it worked as an issue in Hungary was that the opposition to Orban connected it to the daily lives of ordinary people. They had to close the circle and say, this is why your schools are terrible. This is why you can't get decent health care. You have to bring it home to ordinary people. And so that was one lesson. And the other thing, I think just the reason for the kind of the joy is that there's such a sense of futility that you can't oppose these kinds of dictator-like figures, strongmen. They've corrupted so much of the system.
7:18And I think the lesson a lot of people are taking from this is, oh, resistance is not futile. You can topple these people. And I think that's the upbeat part of this. All right.
7:30Kim Lane Scheppele:Well, that's a perfect introduction to our guest today and a conversation not only about what Viktor Orban's fall means for Europe and the far-right movements he's inspired for so long, but also what does it mean about campaigns here in the United States of America this fall? Our guest today is Kim Lane Shepley. She's a professor at Princeton University, an expert on Hungary, on Orban, democratic backsliding. she's going to help us unpack what actually happened in Hungary this week. Kim, welcome to the show. I'm so thrilled. Kim, thank you so much for joining us today. Obviously, there's a lot to unpack in this election.
8:14Kim Lane Scheppele:You've watched the development of what Viktor Orban called illiberal democracy taking place over the last 16 years. But I want to start with a question about something related to his downfall. And the word here is zebras. I want you to tell me about the zebras and why it is that this might be something that has relevance far beyond Hungary's borders. Yeah, I'm so glad you asked about this. The zebra meme has become one of the agents of Orban's downfall. And that's because Orban is massively corrupt. And in Hungary, it was a little more hidden than it has been, for example, here in the U.S. But Orban has perfected the art of putting public money into private pockets.
9:05A lot of that wasn't so apparent to the general public, but one of the things that broke was a story, because there's still a few intrepid investigative journalists, despite the fact that Orban has just squashed the media. And some investigative journalists discovered this palatial estate that was being built outside of Budapest. The property was allegedly owned by Orban's father because one of the things he does is most of the assets are not held by him, but they're held by his relatives, his childhood friends, and so on. They put up a ladder, looked over the wall of this palatial estate that was being built and saw a flock.
9:43I have to figure out what the collective noun is for zebras, right? But a gaggle of zebras.
9:47Kim Lane Scheppele:Let's call them a flock of zebras. Why not? I tried. Under a gaggle of zebras that were either on Orban's father estate or on the adjacent estate owned by his childhood best friend. And it's like, who owns zebras in Hungary, right? It was the sign of corruption and excess. And as these pictures came out, the opposition, and this is something crucial if we're thinking about this here, it's important to have a sense of humor. And it's important to lean into memes. And the zebra became the symbol of all of Orban's corruption. And so people had zebra costumes and zebra pins and zebra posters and all kinds of zebra memes were floating around the Hungarian Internet.
10:26And it just encapsulated in one symbol just how bad things had gotten. So zebras were crucial to this election. Who knew?
10:36Kim Lane Scheppele:That's right. All right. Quick follow-up question. Did it matter that J.D. Vance and Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin were coming in on the side, let's just say, of the zebra man? Yeah, so the Russia influence and the U.S. influence were kind of different, okay? So Putin's influence was less visible. As Orban was failing, it became clear that the opposition was running 10 points ahead, 15 points ahead for the last six months, you know, so this was not a surprise. As Orban got desperate, he literally called in the disinformation team from Russia that had rigged the Moldovan election. It was the same people.
11:16Another one of these fabulous investigative journalists figured this out and publicized the fact that the Russian disinfo team had come in. Suddenly, the Hungarian internet is just flooded with disinformation, with all kinds of Russian bots. But because it was exposed, it was like the zebras. The Russian bots started getting circulated by the opposition saying, here's a bot, there's a bot, here's another But, you know, and so it got it got disabled. OK, so that was actually I'm not sure the Russians had the influence Orbán wanted. But there was another thing that came out during the campaign that was really crucial.
11:53Tapes came out of Viktor Orbán talking to Vladimir Putin and saying, you are the lion. We are the mouse. You know, all we can do is just help you. And it became abundantly clear that Hungary. I mean, if you hadn't realized. We've got a full zoo here, right?
12:08Kim Lane Scheppele:We've got the lion, the mouse, the zebra. I know. There's so many memes floating around. All the animals, right. A whole menagerie of right-wing politics. It's exactly true. But, you know, if you'd followed what Hungary was doing in the EU these last years, Hungary was running interference for Russia with regard to Ukraine. They were blocking aid to Ukraine. They were blocking sanctions on Russians. Now what we had in the run-up to the election was the smoking gun evidence that Orban was talking on the phone to Putin and offering his assistance. But even more incriminating, because more specific, were repeated conversations between the Hungarian foreign minister and the Russian foreign minister.
12:47Again, on tape, it all came out in the run-up to the election, where the Hungarian foreign minister gets a call from the Russian foreign minister. Russian foreign minister says, you know, Peter, can you please get these people, you know, Russians off the EU sanctions list? And Ciaro says, like, I'm on it. And then the Hungarians do it. So it was just clear that this was a direct, you know, taking orders relationship. So that's the Russian piece. The American piece, okay. So this is where, you know, the Trump team and the Orbán team have been joined at the hip for a long time. Orbán has an English language think tank.
13:23It's called the Danube Institute. A lot of the Trump people pass through there. They get courses in sort of how to make an autocracy at home, you know. And so there is this influence that goes all the way down through the two groups. Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation, Heritage and Danube have this formal relationship. You could see it in Project 2025 that the initial steps of the Trump takeover were exactly copying what Victor Orban had done after 2010. So I knew it just from reading Project 2025 before I knew about the formal connection. You could just see it. The influence is so clear.
14:01So there's that connection. So then you start to get above the water level where the stuff is visible. Trump's repeated praise of Orban. Orban made trips to Mar-a-Lago in the run-up to the U.S. presidential campaign. He was received at the White House earlier this year. And of course, Marco Rubio was sent to Hungary after the Munich Security Conference. And J.D. Vance shows up in the closer. Okay, what Orban really wanted from Trump and what Orban thought he got from Trump in that first Washington meeting was a guarantee like the one that Trump had given to Mille in Argentina. You know, if my guy is elected, we're going to bail you out of all your economic trouble.
14:40And Trump had apparently said that. Then Trump took it back. And Trump was, you know, waffling on this. The night before the election, Trump issues a truth or whatever that thing is on his social media platform, basically saying, you know, if my guy Victor Orban wins, we will bail them out. It was too late. Yeah, that was something that mostly got missed, I think, in the U.S. press. Everyone was focused on the Vance visit. Okay, so if Trump thought Orban was going to win, he would have gone himself and claimed victory, right? He sends Vance because he knows that Orban's going to lose. And he sends, shall we say, his least charismatic spokesperson in the run-up to the election.
15:19The polls in Hungary after the Vance visit showed that Orban's popularity dropped after the Vance visit. Oh, that's wild. I mean, but isn't there a real connection between Vance and Orban and basically this whole right movement that underneath the surface seems very cozy with Russia? I mean, and you see it flowing, as you said, through Project 2025, through the Heritage Foundation, which produced Project 2025, that Vance really represents. He really is kind of their ally, even more than Trump in some ways, isn't he? Yeah, I think that's true. Now, I think they all have slightly different agendas, right?
15:59So it's not as tight a network as you would imagine. I mean, it's not like what I was saying where Orban's literally taking orders, you know, from Putin. It's not that kind of relationship. But Russia has always seen its future in undermining the European Union, you know, which sits on its border, which is a real contender. And the way it's done that is it supported right-wing parties. So yes, it's the Danube Institute. It's a much, there's a much bigger operation in Hungary called the Matiesz Korvinas Collegium, which is the Hungarian version. Orbán has devoted about 1 % of Hungarian GDP to holding up this MCC, as it's called.
16:36And Danube Institute is a subsidiary. There's also a Brussels think tank. There's a university in Vienna. There's something called the Center for Fundamental Rights, which is the group that hosts CPAC when it comes to Hungary every year. So there's this whole network of organizations that the Hungarians have built up. and that these are all training grounds for far-right leaders across Europe. I mean, we've seen that Hungary really single-handedly trying to stop funding from NATO for Ukraine in its effort to defend itself against Russia. Is that going to change now? So the answer is yes and no.
17:10Okay. So the yes answer is that if Peter Mbadyar is casting the Hungarian vote in the European Council, then he's already indicated that he's going to remove the Hungarian veto on funds for Ukraine. That said, you know, Orban has over 16 years whipped up a huge anti-Ukrainian sentiment inside Hungary. And the reason is that there's this Hungarian minority in Western Ukraine. And as the Ukrainians were trying to exclude the Russians from participation in public life, The way they did that was by attacking minority languages in Ukraine. So they abolished the bilingual schools. They made Ukrainian the official language so that no longer was the government speaking in any language other than Ukrainian.
17:55That was aimed at the Russians in the East. It also hit the Hungarians in the West. And Orban kept building this thing up saying, you know, our compatriots are being discriminated against. They can't speak their language. They can't educate their kids in their own schools and so on. And so that anti-Ukrainian sentiment is not going to go away in Hungary. So Modyar can't come out and give a giant, pardon the expression, bear hug to Ukraine. He will allow the EU to do it. And I think his whole campaign was return to Europe. And so he will be very pro-European. He will not gum up the works on foreign policy.
18:33So he will enable the EU to support Ukraine. That's the good news. The bad news is that this right-wing network that we've talked about, the Matthias Corvinas Collegium and all of its think tanks that are spread out around Europe, that organization, as the election approached, Orban made those organizations financially independent. The state gave them a huge block of money, which invested in those organizations. So Peter Mordyar can't just cut their budgets. The budgets are insulated. So that right-wing network is going to go on propagating this Russian disinformation stuff and also all this right-wingery that has been undermining liberal government in Europe.
19:16So what you may see is this now supporting Mr. Fizzo in Slovakia, right, or Babish in Czech Republic. So the veto against European support for Ukraine may now come from another source, also funded through that network, right? So the network survives, the government falls. Kim, I'm curious how you think, if you put yourself in the minds of the Hungarian voter for a moment, we started this conversation talking about corruption. And I'm trying to understand how much does corruption succeed in picking the lock on a base of voters who we might think is locked into a candidate? Is it able to, you know, breach that boundary and get somebody to reexamine a candidate who they might have decided they were completely devoted to?
20:04Yeah, I think corruption was huge in this election. But, you know, what was so good about Peter Mondiar's campaign was that he didn't campaign on a list of issues. Here we have corruption. Here we have the decline in public services. Here we have, you know, the Russians are back. You know, remember communism. I mean, he had all those issues. but what he was so clever at doing was saying the reason why public services are underfunded is because all the money is going to Orban's families. The reason why inflation was as high as it was was because the economy has been so tilted in favor of Orban's oligarchs.
20:42He put it together with the pain people were experiencing in their daily lives and that was the genius of it because here he's going around campaigning on kitchen table issues. But he was also, this is where I'm sorry, I have to do a small Hungarian lesson. The word he was using to describe the Orban government, like we'd say Orban government, right? In Hungarian, that would be the Orban Kormán. That would be the normal kind of government. He was talking about the Orban Renser. And Renser means like a system. It's an order. It's an unbreakable block. and it's the word they use to refer to the communist governments.
21:20And so in 1989-90, the new government came in and said, what we're doing is a rencer valkash, which is a change of system, right? So he's advertising this as an 89-90 moment to get rid of the Russians, to get rid of corruption, to get rid of all that dysfunction and all the stagnant economy that the Soviet Union produced. He's saying, here we've got it all over again, right? So it was corruption linked. He linked all those issues in a big message, right? So that if you didn't care about corruption, you might care about, if zebras weren't your thing, you might care about the fact that your local hospital had no toilet paper.
21:59There was a whole toilet paper thing that went on also. None of the Hungarian hospitals had toilet paper. So that was a big issue, right? In the countryside, it really matters that everybody, and that was even true when I lived there, you always have to bring toilet paper to your friends in the hospital because they don't have any. And he would just latch onto those little tiny, you know, these daily life issues. But he linked them together. That was why it worked.
22:23Kim Lane Scheppele:We're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, more on how to run against a corrupt autocracy. The political scene from The New Yorker will be right back.
22:45Kim Lane Scheppele:If you've been enjoying the show, please leave us a rating and a review on the podcast platform of your choice. And while you're there, don't forget to hit the follow button so you never miss an episode. Thank you so much for listening. Wired has always put a microscope on the people, power, and forces shaping our world. Uncanny Valley brings that same fearless reporting straight to your feed. Is Doge finally over? will AI actually democratize American healthcare? Each week, Wired journalists from across the newsroom are gonna unpack where politics, technology, and Silicon Valley collide. From conversations with tech leaders across Silicon Valley, internet fandom investigations, and government crackdowns on rigged gambling, we're taking you all over the news cycle, going straight inside the priorities, pressures, and power plays driving today's biggest decisions.
23:37Uncanny Valley tackles the questions keeping you up at night, and helps make sense of the future taking shape right now. Listen to new episodes every Thursday, wherever you get your podcasts.
Read the full transcript
23:57Kim Lane Scheppele:You hear the cry of Russians go home in Hungarian, the kids on the metro. To me, that was this idea that resonates here in the U.S. right now, too, of a kind of a patriotism that's not the kind of empty sloganeering of the, you know, Evan referred to the blood and soil echoes of Orban, but a different kind of patriotism. Peter Magyar, his name literally means basically it would be like an American candidate being like, you know, like Joe America, right? Magyar means Hungarian in Hungarian. Exactly. So tell us a little bit on the role of patriotism. This was a kind of a centrist or even a center-right campaign.
24:39Kim Lane Scheppele:It wasn't an ideological thing as much as a kind of different form of nationalism, right, that they channeled. Yeah, so Peter Madya, I remember, comes out of Orbán's machine. You know, he was a cog in the machine. He worked in Brussels on behalf of Orbán. Then he came back and he worked his way through various state companies. People in Hungary really didn't know who he was until he kind of suddenly appears on the horizon. There was a small scandal that actually brought him into the public eye. His ex-wife, from whom he'd had an acrimonious semi-public divorce, was a woman named Judith Varga, who had been Orbán's justice minister.
25:15Think Pam Bondi, but Hungarian, okay. But he also comes out with tape recordings he'd made during the acrimonious divorce from his wife, the justice minister, detailing Orbán's corruption because she complained about it over the dinner table as they were divorcing. So he goes on the last remaining, they don't have a television channel, the opposition has a YouTube channel, goes on the YouTube channel called Partisan, gives this interview explaining where the bodies are buried and saying, I'm from inside the system. I know how bad this was. And that launches his political career. He goes around speaking in villages.
25:52People show up to hear all about the corruption. He knows all this stuff. Finally, he comes out with the receipts. And so when he starts to become a politician, he then runs, he cobbles together at parties, a bit like Macron, right, who runs on his own and then suddenly realizes he needs a party. This party that holds up Mardyar, nobody knows who they are. I don't think he knows who they are. It's really a one-man band with a social movement behind him, which the point is he comes out of, he's a center-right candidate in terms of, he talks about policy positions on immigration or social welfare programs or whatever.
26:26He's kind of solidly behind the Orban program on that kind of stuff. He didn't run his campaign on that kind of stuff. This was not a left-right campaign. This was a democracy autocracy campaign, right? This was a campaign that says, because you, the people, have lost your voice in Hungarian politics, because all these elections were rigged as they were, 2014, 18, 22, the fix was in that the opposition could not have won those elections. Because the system is rigged, you know, we have to build a big tent. And he didn't take positions on issues that would alienate the left, which had to come around behind him.
27:04He didn't take positions that would alienate the center right, because that's ultimately where he's probably going to govern from. Everything was about system change, undoing the dictatorship, and so on. So I think it's, you know, we all tend to think of these things in very ideological terms. You know, I keep asking people, you know, is Putin left or right? No, he's just a dictator, right? I mean, there's some of these dictators actually don't fit on the left-right spectrum very easily. And so that's where Peter Maudier situated himself. And I think that's why he was able to cobble together the support.
27:38If I can say one other thing, because I think, you know, as we head into the U.S. midterms and we see the White House trying frantically to adjust, to rig the rules, which is how Orban kept winning, Peter Maudier understood how the rules were rigged. and the key, it's a very big complicated system, which I won't begin to explain now, but the crucial point is that a vote in the countryside was worth three times as much as a vote in the cities. Okay. And Orban thought the opposition would never be able to win in the countryside because, you know, in all of these systems, it's less educated and more rural people who defend the autocrats.
28:15And Peter Magyar spent two years out in every single Hungarian village drumming up support, exposing the corruption, saying it's directly connected to what's happened to your cost of living, and making a big splash that way. And as a result, the map of Hungary, it was just a blue wave. Every county, all these villages that had never voted for anything other than Orban's party going back 20 years, had flipped, and they flipped big. Maldir got like 70 % of the vote in some of these counties that had never been anything other than Orban supporters. So it's another lesson where you have to analyze how you win through a rigged system and figure out how you locate your campaign actually to attract the votes you need to get through the rigged system.
29:04Well, that certainly sounds resonant with the United States where we have disproportionate representation for Red America because of the Electoral College and because of the way the Senate is organized. And so it seems, tell me if you think this is what the lesson would be, it seems to be suggesting don't run on culture war issues, reach out to Red America, and explain why corruption at the top affects their lives. Is that the lesson? Yeah, that's exactly the lesson. Avoid left-right. Lean into democracy dictatorship. leadership, lean into corruption and the way that it impoverishes ordinary people.
29:46I just think it's extraordinary how vivid the lessons are here. And I think one thing, the only bit we didn't touch on, and I'm curious, Kim, what you make of this, is that the turnout in this election was extraordinary. And I think that's important because this is a moment when a lot of people, frankly, at home in the United States think, I want to put my fingers in my ears. I don't want to think about politics. I want to stay home and let it work itself out in whatever way it's going to. But that's not what the Hungarians did in this case. They managed to somehow rise above the cynicism and the malaise of it.
30:21Is that right? Yeah, exactly. The turnout was almost 80%, which is just massive, right? And actually not all the votes have been counted into the system yet. There's a little bit of adjustment that's going to happen this weekend. But yeah, 80 % turnout. So why did that happen? And I think this is actually a good thing to bring up. Peter Madhya ran on an anti-fear campaign. Orban had, as he consolidated power, made it very dangerous for people to speak up against him. and he was intimidating his critics. He was firing them. If they weren't, they were fired from public service. They were fired from their university jobs.
30:59They were, you know, he just held so many levers of power. Peter Mordier said, you know, and he always traveled, by the way, with zero security. You know, just jumping into crowds. I mean, you can just imagine, because, you know, I mean, even I've gotten death threats from the Hungarian government, right? I mean, if you're a critic, you just, and the last time I went there, I should say, I was met at the plane by six uniformed police. So, you know, I mean, they really literally go after every single one of their critics, no matter, you know, foreign critics as well, right? And so what was happening was that basically the opposition, people knew the system was rotten.
31:35They felt they couldn't say it. And Peter Mondaire would go and he would attract these crowds and he would say, I am the anti-fear candidate. You should not have to fear if you live in this country. And so the rallies kept getting bigger and bigger. And the rallies weren't preachy. They were fun, right? And then they got young people involved. And so all these rallies, if you saw there was a rock concert in his honor on the Friday before the Sunday election, there were hundreds of thousands of people in a square that's called the Hushikdara. It's called Heroes Square, okay? And it was just fun.
32:12I mean, and all of these very visible Hungarian, you know, performers going back decades, but also the new ones.
32:27Basically, it was the anti-fear, we're going to have fun campaign. And that meant that the turnout, especially for young people, I mean, young people had been leaving the country. I can't tell you how many Hungarian friends of mine went back for the election. and say that maybe they're going to move back. Maybe they're going to help build back what's going to happen next. And so that's the turnout, right? Because people realized that this is the anti-fear campaign. And if Peter Modjar can go into all those crowds with no security and have these rallies that are fun and exciting, and they felt like freedom again.
33:02Amazing.
33:03Kim Lane Scheppele:They felt like freedom again. That is - That's what got the rally going. You know, I looked at the faces of those young people filming themselves on the metro in Budapest after the election results. And they were all young people. They were going up the escalator. They were going down the escalator, filming each other. And that's why I was saying they got their country back. These were the young people. They got their future back. It was really, I know we're often accused of being pretty downbeat on this podcast, but Kim, I have to tell you, this has been really a pretty inspiring and enriching conversation.
33:39Kim Lane Scheppele:It doesn't mean that there's, you know, a handy template, but still, it's a moment. It's an important moment. And I can't think of anyone better to have guided us through the complexities of this story today than you. So really appreciate this. Thank you. We should make America fun again.
34:00Kim Lane Scheppele:The political scene from The New Yorker will be back in just a moment.
34:21All right.
34:24Kim Lane Scheppele:Evan, you are always looking for an upbeat conversation. Have we delivered one today? And what is your takeaway from this really, I think, provocative election year story? You know, there is so much of what Kim knows about Hungary in its depth. I mean, she really has a sense of how the political mood, the specific players, but also the broader dynamics fit together. And those broader dynamics for anybody interested in American politics are enormously important. Look, I think one of the things that is glaringly clear is that if you can connect corruption to the frustration in people's lives, what we in our politics call affordability, then all of a sudden these issues that can seem kind of remote, abstract, maybe even esoteric like crypto fortunes and how much are the children of powerful families earning in our politics.
35:24All of a sudden, those things can become politically salient and very powerful. And that was one of the dominant takeaways for me was the incredible potency of making corruption clear.
35:36Kim Lane Scheppele:Jane, all hail the investigative reporters. This is part of the story in Hungary. And by the way, in other countries around the world, I think about the late Alexei Navalny, who really essentially pioneered a form of investigative journalism as activism in Russia and in particular exposing the corruption of what he called the Party of Crooks and Thieves, the United Russia Party in the Philippines, Maria Reza, eventually winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. So where's our zebra? Well, I mean, in that, I really was thinking about that because the thing is the kind of corruption we have, it's record-breaking for this country.
36:18It's just off the charts what we're dealing with. But a lot of it is kind of vague-seeming. Things like Bitcoin are vague and the oil industry totally dominating energy policy. Again, it's like hard to see. It's not a zebra. So you kind of need to find something that is visceral like that. And I think, you know, we can we could make our nominations for what it would be. But I think that the lesson is look for something that is simple and easy to understand that's about corruption and bring it home. I mean, and if the Democrats take over the House, for instance, after the midterms, as many people think they will, they need to be thinking about this.
37:03I'm curious, Susan, you know, one of the things that she said that was very interesting was this idea that Magyar went out into places that that he never might have assumed he could win. This was kind of the Orban stronghold. He would go out into rural areas and he put in the time. He spent two years traveling around the countryside, visiting rural places and eventually managing to get peel off a number of those votes. How do you think about that in the American context? To me, it suggests that it took a lot of organization, a lot of effort. You had to get out beyond your own people. Don't preach just to your choir.
37:39Get out there and talk to people who are not already in your base, basically. Well, I mean, a couple of observations.
37:46Kim Lane Scheppele:One, this might also be an example of where we've overstated the possibility of Hungary being a kind of a template for the United States. Not only are we a global superpower with a vast continental reach, we're talking about a small Central European country that's largely, although not entirely, ethnically homogenous and of under 10 million people versus a gigantic continental superpower with, you know, 350 million people. So I do worry a little bit about overstating this because of the, you know, the much smaller, more homogenous nature of Hungary. The fact that you can travel around the country for two years and actually hit a lot of those counties.
38:25Kim Lane Scheppele:It's just simply not possible to personally barnstorm your way to the presidency in this country right now. I'm not sure. I don't know. I mean, Susan— I mean, it's physically not possible. No, it's physically not possible. And we have such extreme polarization, Jane, in our states that, again, you know, it's a very entrenched system at this point. We're talking about six states only and really only three states that have decided our last three elections, our presidential elections at the national level. We also have had turnover of power. So one thing that I think is interesting from the point of view of drawing analogies, right, is that this took 16 years for the people of Hungary to find clearly a very uncommonly talented champion, Peter Magyar, to lead them.
39:13Kim Lane Scheppele:But 16 years is a hell of a long time for that kind of one-party governance to entrench itself. A smart critic could argue that that kind of hollowing out has been happening in this country since neoliberalism took over, 40 years worth in some ways. And I think the argument could be made and that it will have to be made at the grassroots level all over the country basically. I have to say one of the things that as somebody who writes a lot about corruption, one of the things that makes it a difficult issue in this country is that the public tends to think that both parties are equally corrupt and that all people in power are corrupt.
39:52And I think this – one of the lessons that I would also take from this is the Democrats need to clean their own house. If they're going to try to run on corruption against Trump, they need to look like they have clean hands. And I think that's important. Yeah.
40:10Kim Lane Scheppele:And I want to ask you about that because you are, you know, you you've been literally, I think, on the front lines reporting wise about all this, looking at the kind of super rich class and how it does or doesn't intersect with our politics. What do you take away? Yeah, I'm mindful this week of something that people have been talking about, which is perhaps I think it's an old Russian concept, which is that there is always a tension between the television and the refrigerator. Our friend Andy Higgins used this in a great piece in The Times. So the idea of the television is the propagandistic message.
40:46That's what you're hearing from your politicians. But then you go to the refrigerator and you open it and you've got nothing in there. And that it's what is the gap between those two. And when the gap gets too vast, that's when you get the opportunity for a political rupture. And in a way, you know, we've talked on this one about zebras and lions and mice, but it may come down to something as practical. I mean, I thought Kim's point about talking about the lack of toilet paper in the hospitals, you know, that is something that is so visceral and everybody can understand it, even if they're left, right, whatever, young, old.
41:22And so as Democrats, especially look for political language and the iconography of inspiration. I think one of the lessons here is go practical. You know, frankly, there's a reason why I write about machines, why I write about things like super yachts, because it can take what is abstract as Bitcoin and make it as visceral and as real as, you know, suede and steel. And I think there's value in that.
41:47Kim Lane Scheppele:That's fantastic. I mean, what a really important conversation today and a reminder that things can change quickly in politics. Viktor Orban won a landslide election victory just in 2022 when he promised a quote unquote golden age for the Hungarian economy. Here we are just a few years later, no golden age, terrible economy and no more Viktor Orban. Dot, dot, dot. OK. Gone the way of the zebra. Dot, dot.
42:26Kim Lane Scheppele:This has been the political scene from The New Yorker. I'm Susan Glasser. We had research assistance today from Alex D 'Elia. Our producer is Nora Ritchie. Mixing by Mike Kutchman. Stephen Valentino is our executive producer. And our theme music is by Alison Leighton-Brown. Thank you so much for listening.
42:58From PRX.
From the publisher
The Washington Roundtable discusses how the anti-corruption candidate Péter Magyar brought down Hungary's autocratic Prime Minister, Viktor Orbán, and what implications that victory holds for the far-right movements around the world that Orbán helped embolden. The panel is joined by Kim Lane Scheppele, a Princeton professor who has lived in Hungary and studied its democratic backsliding. Together, they unpack how Magyar’s campaign succeeded by connecting Orbán’s corruption to the everyday struggles of Hungarians, and how that approach might inform Democratic strategy in the 2028 Presidential election.
This week’s reading:
- “America’s Orange Jesus,” by Susan B. Glasser
- “The Hungarian Election Shows That Even Strongmen Can Lose,” by Andrew Marantz
- “TMZ Gets Political,” by Paula Mejía
- “Who Is the U.S. Negotiating with in Iran?,” by Sudarsan Raghavan
- “ ‘The Peace President’ Gets Belligerent with Iran and the Pope,” by Robin Wright
- “How Much Has the War in Iran Depleted the U.S. Missile Supply?,” by Garrett M. Graff
- “How Project Maven Put A.I. Into the Kill Chain,” by Gideon Lewis-Kraus
- “The Extremes of Israeli Public Opinion,” by Isaac Chotiner
The Political Scene draws on the reporting and analysis found in The New Yorker for lively conversations about the big questions in American politics. Join the magazine’s writers and editors as they put into context the latest news—about elections, the economy, the White House, the Supreme Court, and much more. New episodes are available three times a week.
Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts.
