In short
Podcast Episode Summary: Ken Jennings on Why Facts Still Matter on “Jeopardy!”
Podcast Overview
- Host: Tyler Foggatt
- Guest: Ken Jennings, former contestant and current host of "Jeopardy!"
- Event: Live conversation at The New Yorker Festival (October 25, 2023)
Episode Themes
- Ken Jennings discusses his journey with "Jeopardy!", his historic winning streak, game strategies, and the legacy of Alex Trebek.
---
Key Highlights
Ken Jennings Background
- Winning Streak: Won 74 consecutive games on "Jeopardy!" and earned over $5 million.
- Cultural Impact: Described in media as “America's hardest working nerd” and a “throwback to the days of ordinary TV.”
- Current Role: Succeeded Alex Trebek as host of "Jeopardy!" and participated in the “Greatest of All Time” tournament.
Insights on Hosting "Jeopardy!"
- Hosting Dynamics: Jennings feels he plays "Jeopardy!" at speed, engaging with contestants while managing the flow of the game.
- Adapting Strategies: Contestants study the host's speech patterns, a practice Jennings also uses to enhance pacing during the game.
- Maintaining Fairness: The aim is to present clues clearly, ensuring contestants have a fair shot at answers.
Contestant Experience
- Pressure and Strategy: Jennings emphasizes the high-pressure environment contestants face, often leading to intense emotional experiences.
- Game Strategies Evolution: Strategies have shifted over time, especially with the focus on hunting for Daily Doubles to secure wins early.
Cultural Relevance of "Jeopardy!"
- Facts vs. Politics: Jennings discusses the importance of factual knowledge in a time when facts are often politicized. "Jeopardy!" remains a platform for objective knowledge.
- Inclusivity: Changes in audition processes have led to a more diverse contestant pool, improving representation on the show.
Relationship with Alex Trebek
- Admiration: Jennings shares fond memories of Trebek, describing him as a stern, yet caring mentor.
- Legacy: Trebek believed in the idea that players, not the host, should be the stars of "Jeopardy!", which Jennings aims to uphold.
---
Key Takeaways
- Nostalgia for Common Culture: Jennings reflects on a time when cultural literacy was more uniform across society, now seeing "Jeopardy!" as a remnant of that era.
- Preparing for Competition: The modern approach to preparing for "Jeopardy!" has become more sophisticated and strategic, akin to professional sports.
- Public Engagement: The episode emphasizes how "Jeopardy!" successfully navigates cultural and political landscapes, fostering an environment where facts matter in a divisive world.
---
Conclusion The conversation with Ken Jennings provides a deeper look into the mechanics and emotional undercurrents of "Jeopardy!", along with reflections on its role in American culture. Jennings' enthusiasm for the game and the importance of facts serves as a hopeful reminder in today's political climate.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Hi, everyone. I'm thrilled to be on stage this morning with the unbelievably impressive Ken Jennings. There are many adjectives I could use, but impressive is what I went with. That works for anybody. You can get a war criminal up here and say, wow, it's really... It's really impressive what he pulled off.
0:25That's, of course, Jeopardy! legend Ken Jennings. Ken grew up watching the syndicated version of Jeopardy! hosted by Alex Trebek. But when that show debuted in 1984, Ken was actually living in South Korea. His dad was an international lawyer who moved the family to Seoul when Ken was in first grade. And so Ken was watching Jeopardy! on the only English-language TV channel available to him, which was the Armed Forces Korea Network. In 2004, when Ken was living in the States again and working as a software engineer, he fulfilled his lifelong dream of competing on Jeopardy! and he was historically good.
1:00He won a record 74 games in a row, earning more than$2.5 million. And for many years, he was America's highest-earning game show contestant, with various Jeopardy tournaments and other quiz shows bringing his total earnings to a whopping$5 ,796 ,214. The New York Times described Ken back in 2004 as a throwback to the days when ordinary people got on television for doing well, not something shameless. He's been described by other publications as America's hardest working nerd and the seabiscuit of geekdom. In 2020, he won the greatest of all time tournament on Jeopardy, cementing his status as the GOAT.
1:37And then, of course, he succeeded Alex Trebek as the host of Jeopardy just a few years ago. I got the chance to speak with Ken live on stage at this year's New Yorker Festival. And we're sharing the conversation today so that listeners can get a peek behind the curtain of one of the all-time great game shows, Jeopardy. I'm Tyler Foggett, and this is The Political Scene.
2:05Thank you so much, Tyler. What a pleasure. This is very exciting for me. I could not be more excited, personally. It's like if you read The New Yorker, and then suddenly you're on stage at the festival, it's a little bit analogous to watching Jeopardy and then suddenly going on the show. Like, The New Yorker has kind of risen up to surround me, like Tron. as I always dreamed it would. So as one fan wrote online several months ago, how lucky are we that the perfect host for the show also just so happens to be the greatest to ever play the game?
2:42That is a lovely sentiment, but I think you can hear how improbable it is. Like what are the odds that someone would be good at playing Jeopardy but could also host it? And I think the answer is it's kind of analogous to quarterbacks becoming sportscasters. Not all of them can do it, but the ones that can, they're not good at first, and I was not, but they know the game well enough to kind of keep their head above water until they figure out the broadcasting part of it. And then some of them are pretty good. How does it help you? Does it ever get in the way? Does it ever get in the way? I mean, the main thing about hosting Jeopardy is it moves so fast.
3:19You're not really putting on any kind of persona. I really kind of feel like I'm just playing Jeopardy at speed with the players every night. I just don't have a buzzer. So I'm very into the game. I'm excited. I want to know what's going to happen next. I'm still trying to do all the things, all the things that Alex was so perfect at. Read every clue perfectly because you're kind of narrating a whole audio book every night. And set the stakes for the home audience so they have a little bit of play-by-play and color commentary. You're also the umpire. You're making difficult rulings, even though you're backed up by the judges.
3:52So all of that stuff is going on. But basically, I just kind of feel like I'm enjoying the game like I did when I was in my playing days. Now, that sounds like an ex-quarterback. Well, when I was still on the Yankees, shut up, A-Rod.
4:11So in terms of reading the clues, we'll talk more about this later. But obviously, a big part of Jeopardy is buzzing in. Like that's kind of the thing that determines who wins a game a lot of the time. And you and a lot of other contestants used to study Alex Trebek's speech patterns. And I would assume that people are now studying your speech patterns so that they know exactly when to, you know, use their signaling device. And so, I mean, do you have like a pressure to speak consistently? Because I'm like such a bad person, I would just like intentionally like introduce pauses to mess people up and stuff.
4:45I would not be able to help myself. I wouldn't say like when you say studying Alex Trebek's cadence, it makes it sound like I'm some kind of like Professor Henry Higgins weirdo with a gramophone or something. Yeah. But that's kind of true. Like just having listened to Alex read clues for decades, I feel like I did have a sixth sense of here's what happens. The host starts reading a clue. The players are reading ahead because they can see the screen like you can at home. You can read faster than the host can read out loud. So you're trying to get to the response before the host does. Do you take that second?
5:16Is it right? Does it make sense? Do you feel confident enough about it to buzz? And if you decide you're going to, then you're just laser-focused on the end of the sentence. Last few syllables beat buzz, because you can't buzz early, as some of you may know. Has anybody here ever been on Jeopardy? I bet there's a few. Front row. Any others? Congratulations. As you may know, you can't buzz as soon as you know it. You have to wait for the host to finish reading the clue, then at that point your buzzer is activated, and then you can buzz in. If you buzz in too early, you actually lock yourself out for a fraction of a second.
5:50I think people at home are often like, hey, Gary's buzzer is broken. No, it's just the adrenaline is making the players kind of buzz a little bit on the fast side. I was more of a, listen, I know Alex is reading so well that I'll just kind of time it to when I see the lights come on at home. Like when I see somebody buzzing at home. That's probably a pretty good proxy for the right millisecond to buzz. And it turned out it worked. And today I think people are doing the same thing about my voice. So I do try to think about that. I read consistently. There's a lot of things that the reader of the clue can do to help the players get to the right answer.
6:24And that is what Jeopardy wants. We are never trying to confuse anybody, even though the clues are difficult. The show only works if the players have a fair shot at answering every clue. And that's what we are just hoping for. You do want a few triple stumpers though, right? We're not against the occasional clue that nobody knows. It's a little moment to breathe in the game. It makes the audience feel smart. Do you guys love it when you know something that they don't know? It's the best feeling in the world. I recently had it watching. Sorry, Erwin. Yeah, I really just asked to do this event so that I could tell everyone about this moment I had.
7:00But it was, yeah, I was watching Jeopardy and there was like an influencer category. and it was the hardest question, and this photo of Alex Earle appears on the screen, and I'm at home thinking, that's obviously Alex Earle, and no one got it. And unfortunately, it was the kind of thing where I think my husband actually thought less of me for being able to get that answer. In Quiz Bowl, we used to say there's no shame. Like, a right answer is a right answer. It doesn't matter how much you know about Love Island or whatever, like, that's... Do you guys talk about how lowbrow you want to get on a show where half the questions are about Shakespeare?
7:35Like, how do you balance that? The writing of Jeopardy is basically the whole enterprise of the show. Like, Jeopardy is the writer's show. And one of the things that goes into building the boards is balancing them. You know, categories are written by a big staff of writers, but they have colors. You know, this one's an academic, you know, blue for academic or whatever they are. This one's a wordplay category. This one's pop culture. And there is kind of a formula of, oh, we haven't had TV yet this week, and we need a second pop culture category this board. Are there ever specific questions about, is this person Jeopardy worthy?
8:14I think not so much. I think anybody can be a Jeopardy clue. Maybe you don't want Mr. Beast three times a week. But if the people know it, that's what Jeopardy should be. How involved are you in choosing the clues and shaping the questions? We have an award-winning writing staff, eight or 10 writers, similar army of researchers, like New Yorker style, fact-checking every clue, double-sourcing every fact and every clue. They do not need me kibitzing. But that said, over the years, Alex would occasionally have an idea, like, what if we did this category? Or, you know, I just saw this fact at a museum.
8:48Couldn't this be a final jeopardy? And I do the same thing. Like, if I see something in the wild, there was something just yesterday, but I can't tell you. It might be on the show. The first time it happened, I was in the Old North Church in Boston, and there was a plaque for where Gerald Ford raised the third lantern. And I was like, for the bicentennial, I was like, oh, this could be a final jeopardy. You know, Gerald Ford in this building raised the third lantern in 1976. And the writers agreed, and they put it on the show, and then nobody got it right. So I just felt guilty. So I'm wondering, like, going back to when you were a contestant, at what point did you realized that you were the best Jeopardy player or at least one of the best Jeopardy players of all time?
9:31Like, was it game 15? Was it game 40? Was it like years after your streak was over and no one had even come close to beating it that you were like, oh, I really cooked? Okay, let me make two things clear. One is that there's a lot of luck in a game of Jeopardy and there are maybe, I think I went back and looked once just for the math. And there's about a dozen games in my run where if one clue goes another way, I actually lose that game, including my first game. Like I'm one clue away from being a zero game Jeopardy champion. But like for whatever reason, a few breaks went my way. And so the implication of that is that on any given night, you know, it's unclear who the best Jeopardy player was.
10:18Like I would come back for tournaments and get beaten time and time again by the pride of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Brad Rutter, amazing Jeopardy player who just really had my number during tournaments. And also, I never thought that I was... My goal coming in was just not to be negative at the end of Double Jeopardy because you know how people just disappear from the stage during final. So that was really my only expectation. To this day, I think it's weird that it happened. Well, we actually have a clip of that first Final Jeopardy, which I would love to watch if you're down. I love looking at my weird, eyebrowless, younger self.
10:57That's exactly what we're going to do. Please roll the first Jeopardy clip.
11:18And she's still going strong. Jerry Harvey, we start with you. What did you put down? Which athlete did you think of? Marion Jones, you are correct. And you add a dollar. You go to 7 ,401. Let's go to Julia Lazarus. Did she come up with Marion Jones? She's shaking her head. Why? She was going for somebody else, and I can't figure out who. Gail? I can't figure out who either. But somebody named Gail. Every girl named Gail watching the program today is going to be very happy. You lost$37.99. That drops you down to$14 ,801. Let's go to Ken Jennings. And even$20 ,000 going into final. Who is Jones?
11:54And we will accept that in terms of female athletes. There aren't that many. And you've got$17 ,101 more for a$37 ,201 total. And you become the Jeopardy! champion.
12:13I was like weirdly nervous watching that even though I knew the outcome I think it's the music it's the music yeah how do you feel watching that uh I always think when I see clips of me on Jeopardy I always think boy that guy's dressed very badly um and there I always think about how close it came you know Alex pauses for a second and looks over at the judges and that's when I realize, you realize this very fast, oh, what if Marion Jones is right, but they don't take Jones because there was some other track and field star named Jones that I'm not thinking of. And I suddenly realized I'm going to lose this just because I didn't write Marion.
12:50And then I just remember the wave of euphoria because like one win is enough because you're like, oh, I did it. I went through this gauntlet and I'm a Jeopardy champion. And they can't take that away from you. And for the rest of the run, I was like, well, that's enough. I'm already a Jeopardy champion, everything else is kind of gravy at that point. So you mentioned kind of cringing at the way that you used to dress on the show. But I have to say that's like the charm of Jeopardy. I mean, it's Jeopardy, not like America's Next Top Model. And it's kind of amazing that you have this show that is so exciting to watch.
13:23And yet the contestants are teachers and librarians and grad students and software engineers. Like those are some of the most common professions, I think of people on the show. And so, you know, my question is, is it possible for someone to be too nerdy to come on Jeopardy? Like, I know that there's a, you know, an initial test that you have to take to qualify. And then after that, there's an in-person component. And so I'm wondering, like, what actually happens in that audition process after you pass the Jeopardy test? We do assign everybody a nerdiness quotient or NQ that, no, this is a little bit above my pay grade.
14:00I mean, obviously I got on, so the mark of whatever telegenic-ness is, is not super high. But I think in the past, one of the reasons why we have that in-person portion is just to see, to try to get a sense of who will excel once they're on TV. You know, you've taken a very hard written test to get on the show. Weirdly, that is not a perfect Venn diagram circle with being good TV, you know, like being able to answer very hard trivia questions, not actually a good proxy for who's great on TV. So we just want people who can kind of walk and chew gum at the same time, who will be able to keep up with the game and hopefully not kind of go deer in the headlights.
14:38For a while, maybe there was a sense of, you know, this person might actually be not a good fit for Jeopardy, even though their test scores are very good. And now I think there's much more of a sense of, let's just put the best people on. Because as you say, the charm of Jeopardy is, it's kind of a throwback to regular people being on TV without any sense that they've been glammed up that much or because reality shows are not like that anymore. Even though there's more real people on TV than ever before, they're not themselves. That's for sure. So, I mean, a part of the process is figuring out who will be able to kind of swing it on TV.
15:20You don't really know until the person is actually on the show, right? Like even if there's a practice round or something that's not the same as... And there is. Yeah. And so, I mean, has anyone ever like freaked out? Yeah, it's extremely intense to be on Jeopardy. We think of it as calming, almost ritualized entertainment. This is the thing that's on at seven o 'clock and it always goes and sounds exactly like this. And if I went back in time, this is exactly how it would be in 2005 or 1985. But in fact, when you're there, it's extremely tense. It feels like a blood sport because you've never been on TV before in almost every case.
15:59So people are kind of nervous and it feels surreal. You're a little bit out of your body. And then the game just moves so fast and it's so high pressure and everybody else is so smart. It is an intimidating thing and people are going through big feelings out there, even though they look calm every night. So please like spare your most charitable thoughts for the Jeopardy contestants every night who are really putting themselves out there and who are probably really going through some stuff while you're watching. It's a big ask. And so we do occasionally see, I have seen tears. I have seen borderline panic attacks.
16:33It's intense out there. You don't see that part on TV though. So do you like stop and then let the person come back after their panic attack or does the round restart? Like, how do you deal with that? Like if a contestant can no longer function during the recording? interestingly, whatever those moments are, they almost always happen off camera. They happen during the break. Like the gate, the pull of the Jeopardy game or the propulsion of the game of Jeopardy is so strong for people who know the show well, as I assume many of you do, that you can drop people into it and they can kind of go on autopilot.
17:03And then during the commercial, that's when they're like, what just happened? I'm up by 3000 or I'm down by 6000 or that's when they kind of have the alien abduction is over and they're like, but we've all grown up on Jeopardy and so people can kind of do it and it's just an amazing thing to watch. This is the political scene from The New Yorker. More of my conversation with Ken Jennings after the break.
17:34Right now we are living through some of the most tumultuous political times our country has ever known. I'm David Remnick, and each week on the New Yorker Radio Hour, I'll try to make sense of what's happening alongside politicians and thinkers like Cory Booker, Nancy Pelosi, Liz Cheney, Tim Waltz, Ketanji Brown-Jackson, Newt Gingrich, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Charlemagne Tha God, and so many more. That's all on the New Yorker Radio Hour, wherever you listen to podcasts.
18:10You mentioned in Brainiac, your book published in 2006, I should also mention that Ken is a New York Times bestselling author of many books. You mentioned in the book that there was, at least at that time, there was a long backlog of men who would qualify for the show through their test, but hadn't been on yet. But there were fewer women. Like you noticed that women were getting faster callback times, ostensibly because there were fewer women trying to get on the show. is this still the case and are there other patterns you've noticed like whether it's gender or like a certain kind of like do you have too many attorneys like that's always true i think uh it's actually gotten a lot better the the big sea change for jeopardy and this kind of predates my time is you know when i tried out for the show i had to i had to wait you had to wait for jeopardy to come to your town go to the mall do a little questionnaire and then be invited back Or in my case, a friend and I drove down to L.A.
19:05just to show up at the Radisson and try out for Jeopardy. And this self-select, as you can imagine, for a certain kind of very confident trivia kind of person. And so what you get is like too many, like proportionally, you get too many white men trying out for Jeopardy because that's the kind of person who watches Jeopardy and thinks, eh, you know. Like, you know, when you pull like how many men think they could take a point from Serena Williams, you know. You can get 35 % of men to be like, eh, when in fact the real answer is no. So I think because of how that worked, you would get people who assumed they were good at trivia, and then you got more men than women trying out because just the kind of the imposter syndrome of, you know, all the things that come with our culture about, you know, performing as a woman in a high-pressure environment like that.
19:58And when we moved the test to online, just lowered some barriers to entry. Like that turned out to be great. It did not solve the problem. But we now have women trying out at a greater percentage, people of color trying out at a greater percentage than before. It hasn't like solved the problem we have of like wanting Jeopardy to look more like America, but it went a long way. It's also easier to study for Jeopardy now, right? It's a whole different era. Like when I was on the show, like those three people you see, they're just kind of like people who did it as a lark. Like we like Jeopardy. Our friends say that we should go on.
20:30But these are just normal people. And today, increasingly, we're in a moneyball era of Jeopardy where people do train for years to be on the show. I know people who have essentially built simulators at home the way a pilot might. People who have their own buzzer lineups, people who write their own software to barrage them with Jeopardy clues. People who do study the math, the game theory of the wagering. It's been professionalized. And of course, the strategies have changed. Yeah, I want to ask you a lot more about the strategies. So the strategy of hunting for the Daily Doubles, that's something that we often associate with Holtzauer, who used it so successfully.
21:06But I feel like the first time that I noticed it happening was in the game that you and Brad Rutter played against Watson, the IBM supercomputer, which seemed to be on the prowl for the Daily Doubles. And then you guys kind of had to do the same thing in order to compete with it. I mean, do you trace some of those strategies back to the Watson game? When IBM programmed Watson, they interviewed a lot of Jeopardy contestants with ideas on strategy and so forth. And I think a lot of those ideas actually came from humans to Watson back to humans, just like AI is taking human work today and then using it to put humans out of work.
21:44And I think that came from, I mean, people have been jumping around the board since the 80s. That was a player named Chuck Forrest. The Forrest Bounce. The Forrest Bounce. And it wasn't to look for daily doubles. It was to keep your opponents a little off balance. Like if they're still thinking about opera and you hop to nine letter words, maybe they're going to forget that they're looking for a nine letter word. And then there were players like Arthur Chu who specifically were looking for Daily Devils. And that's the game changer there. Just probability wise, you want to put the game away as early as possible because I think historically players are about 50 % conversion on Final Jeopardy.
22:18And that's just a lot of uncertainty. You don't want a 50 % chance of winning at that point. If you can lock up the game before Final Jeopardy, you do it. And historically, daily double conversion is much higher. I'm sure for some players, it's upwards of 80%, in fact. So that's why you see players just laser focused on those daily doubles and then making what seem to be like crazy cartoonishly big wagers because they know that's the moment to try to put the game away. And occasionally you'll see a big risk go awry, but it's just like poker. It's still the right way to play. So when you were competing on the show, you played a pretty normal chill game.
22:53Thank you. Yeah, it didn't seem like you were employing some crazy strategy. It seemed like you were just trying to answer as many clues correctly as you could. But you've had to change your strategy over time when you've gone up against players like Holtzauer. So what is it like playing that more aggressive style? Does it feel comfortable? No, I still find it very uncomfortable. At the time, when I was first on, it was not a choice. Everyone played that way. You know, like, oh boy, let's take around the house for 200, Alex. And they would march consecutively through a category. If I know Jeopardy viewers, many of you miss those peaceful, reassuring days of orderly movement down the board.
Read the full transcript
23:33Well, also there are clues in the earlier questions that help you understand the harder ones. Like it makes sense to go that way. The show aesthetically prefers people to go down the board. And the contestant producers will still say, you know, there's advantages there. you may want to get a better sense of the vibes of a category before you move to the harder stuff. But players know that really what counterbalances all that is whoever finds the Daily Doubles first is more likely to win. It's like controlling Australia in risk or something. So that's why you have players actually making heat maps of where on the board the Daily Doubles tend to be historically over time.
24:08They are placed by humans, so it's not a random effect. for whatever reason, there are certain, not just rows, but columns that are more likely to have the daily doubles than others. And good players have done the research on that. Have you thought about randomizing them? The problem with randomizing is there's a kind of clue that is a daily double. You know, like aesthetically, when we're looking for a daily double, there's a sense of what's a clue here that the players benefit by having a few extra seconds, that the audience benefits by having a few extra seconds. There's a bit of deduction maybe involved or combining multiple pieces of information, some bit of mental work to do.
24:47That's a good daily double. If it's something where you just look at it and you're like, oh, that's easy. That's Mahler. Everybody knows that. You know, whatever, a simple linkage of fact, that's not a good daily double. And so for whatever reason, that tends to be in a certain part of the board. No, I love the daily doubles. I feel like it's kind of the only time on television where you can see someone's brain working in real time. The other day, someone, I needed a wager, and it was kind of a tense situation. And the person was like, do you guys edit this out? Can I think for a while? And I was like, no, we need a wager.
25:22I'm wondering if you can speak to the kind of intelligence that Jeopardy selects for or suggests. I mean, you're obviously someone who has incredibly deep knowledge, And this is clear from the books you've written and just, you know, the fact that you have a demonstrated curiosity about so many things. But when you read about how people prepare for Jeopardy and especially like the concept of Pavlov's, like the idea that if you see British university mentioned in a clue, it's most likely going to be Cambridge or Oxford. And like you can just study for the game that way. And sometimes it's a lock, you know, like Norwegian composer is always Edvard Grieg.
25:59You know, there's some of these where you just need to know that. Yeah, and so if part of the game is just kind of learning those associations, then it does make me wonder whether really deep knowledge is a requisite for success. It's not like the contestants might know what year this war happened in, but would they be able to write an essay on the war? They would not. In general, Jeopardy is a game for generalists. And to me, that's kind of the beauty of it, because we live in an age of specialists. You know, people get in these very deep career silos or even like avocational silos. You know, people really are like, well, I like this kind of jazz, but not that kind.
26:39Or, you know, I follow the American League, but not the National League. You know, even our hobbies are very specialized and kind of isolating in a way. Jeopardy! is from a different time when we had this idea that cultural literacy united people. And so you would know a little about everything. And there's a couple effects of that. One is that shallow knowledge performs pretty well on Jeopardy. I mean, for whatever, and I don't want to say, like, these are not Rain Man-style savants that just learned a series of facts. Like, these are, in general, curious, engaged people who know that stuff because it interests them.
27:12In fact, the reason why they're generalists is because everything interests them. Like, in the same way that you don't have to study the lyrics of a song you like or the roster of the team you like, If you're interested in everything, facts just stick in your head. I guess the other corollary of that is that it's kind of a hopeful thing, I think. It makes me kind of miss a time when we were united by a broader culture. Not that necessarily we need to go back to a monoculture of three networks. There were certainly some downsides to that. Representation-wise, it was terrible. But there was a sense of what people knew and what your co-workers would know and what your friends would know just about the world.
27:53And as we get into kind of lower information voter times, honestly, I'm nostalgic for a time when you kind of assumed that we were all held together by this common culture. And Jeopardy! maybe is the last, like kind of the last bulwark of it. But we're proud of that. I mean, how do you ensure that during a time when facts themselves are becoming so politicized? I mean, you're probably not going to have a Jeopardy! clue that's like the winner of the presidential election in 2020. But I mean, are you on the lookout for I mean, is it just a matter of accepting both? What is the Gulf of Mexico and what is the Gulf of America as the right answer to a clue?
28:33Or like, how do you kind of ensure that politics doesn't get in the way of like our last apolitical, you know, beloved cultural institution? I mean, this has never come up before for decades and decades of Jeopardy, Republican and Democratic administrations. The show is weirdly universally popular. It's popular in red states and blue states, young people and old people. Somehow, I think it just kind of got grandfathered in before the culture wars reached like Kulterkampf levels. And so this is the first time we're actually having to think about that. You know, we would have to accept Gulf of America, I think.
29:12That's, you know, our rule is like, do media outlets use this word? and that's now an alternative answer. I don't think that player would endear themselves to the home audience with their Gulf of America response. But certainly Jeopardy is still a place where facts do matter. And if we ask a question about the moon landing, we would not accept, what is that didn't happen? Or if it's a question about mRNA vaccines, you can't just buzz in and say, what are Bill Gates microchips? Facts do matter on Jeopardy. But it's a hopeful sign to me that it is still this broadly watched show where for 30 minutes a night, nationwide, people do kind of accept these are questions that have correct and incorrect answers.
29:57And maybe I'm deluding myself, but it seems like a sign that we could get back to that society at some point.
30:11so on the subject of politics um in 2004 after your incredible win streak you mentioned that chuck schumer and harry reed both called you and tried to get you to run for orrin hatch's senate seat in utah can you tell us a little more about that i mean that's kind of the story right there I mean, as you might remember, then and now Utah politics, the Democratic candidate was always a sacrificial lamb of some kind. I like to see this as a sign of, if not personal merit, at least jeopardy, great cultural bona fides. But really, it's probably more a story about the thin Democratic bench in the state of Utah in 2004.
30:52Like, maybe this guy will get some national headlines, some fundraising, some help for down-ballot races if there's a celebrity on the ballot. So I'm a little cynical about that, but I did not think about it for very long. My wife's here. She will know that I thought about this for about 10 minutes before I said, no, you know, I've already kind of done enough interesting things to my family. I'm not going to ruin my family's lives by going into politics. What were your plans for your kind of like post-Jeopardy life? Because obviously it took many years for you to then return to the show in a more formal capacity.
31:25And I think I read that you kept your job as a software engineer. For years, yeah. For years. even though in your book you mentioned that you were a mediocre software engineer. At best. I don't believe that. No, it's true. I wish I could show you my code. I had been a computer science major in college. I'd actually been an English major, and at some point, you know, that's what I loved. I loved to write. But somebody told me the joke, which some of you might have heard, which is, what's the difference between an English major and a large pepperoni pizza? Anybody know this one? The pizza can feed a family of four.
32:03And at that point, I made sure I had a computer double major. And so I graduated right at the height of that first kind of dot-com boom. A lot of my friends had dropped out of school to join startups, so I got a job very easily. But it turned out I was not a very good or happy computer programmer. So here I am, like, in my mid to late 20s, having this very early midlife crisis, basically, of what have I done? And I had gotten married in my mid-20s. So I'd come home from work every day, just a little bit glum about what a crappy programmer I was, and just tell my wife, hey, I think I'm going to apply to law school, or I'm going to take the foreign service exam.
32:40She will often remind me all these weird ideas I had. And honestly, I'm going to go on a game show was not one of them. That was kind of an unlooked-for thing. But the thing to remember is I always thought it was going to go away. Like I never, it's funny now, 20-odd years later, to be like, well, he's the host of Jeopardy. There's clearly a narrative arc here. But at the time, I was just waiting. we were just waiting for it to end. Like, boy, what a crazy summer we're having. Dad's still on Jeopardy.
33:06At some point, somebody asked us, are you going to get, do you think you're going to get recognized on the street? And I just laughed. I was like, no. Can you imagine recognizing somebody on the street because they were on Jeopardy? Today, it doesn't seem weird. Of course, I would recognize Amy Schneider or James Holtzauer. But at the time, no, you would not recognize somebody because they were on Jeopardy. My idea was maybe at Costco because that person could see your name and your face. So my wife and I had this bet. The over under was 10. I would get recognized 10 times at Costco. But that's just a sign that we thought the whole thing was going to go away and then we'd have a normal life.
33:42And then it just kept not happening. Yeah, my favorite fact about that period is that when your run was airing, you became so famous and known as Ken Jennings that even your son, who was two at the time, started calling you Ken Jennings. Does he just call you dad now? He called me daddy before, he calls me dad now, but that summer when Johnny Gilbert was saying Ken Jennings, he just started calling me Ken Jennings. Always the whole thing, like Charlie Brown. It's unclear why.
34:17In a minute, Ken's relationship with his predecessor, the legendary Alex Trebek, This is The Political Scene from The New Yorker. We'll be right back.
34:38Hi, I'm David Remnick, editor of The New Yorker. At this year's Academy Awards, Timothee Chalamet and Tiana Taylor aren't the only major nominees. The New Yorker will be there too with two nominated short films, which you can watch at newyorker.com slash video. Two People Exchanging Saliva was executive produced by Julianne Moore and Isabelle Huppert, and it's set in a dystopian Paris where kissing is illegal. Our animated short film Retirement Plan follows a man as he dreams about all the things he's going to do when he's done working. You can enjoy both of those films and our full library of acclaimed short films at newyorker.com slash video.
35:33I'm wondering if you can talk a bit about your relationship with Alex Trebek. I know that when you were competing on the show, you weren't able to really talk to him much at all because of all the FCC rules. There's still regulations. I mean, left over from the scandals of the 50s. So going on a game show today is still very strict. Like, contestants kind of get sequestered like a jury. If one person has to pee, everybody gets a bathroom break. Just to eliminate any possible optics of, like, oh, the show is skewed in favor of Marcy, or that must be where they gave Dan the answers, or whatever.
36:03It just can't happen. Like, there would be congressional hearings and jail sentences if a game show were rigged today. And so as a result, you never hang out with the host. Like, we would see Alex at the top of the show the same time the home viewer saw him. and occasionally I would run into him over the years but like the whole time you're just kind of seeing him I don't know if you, you know, we kind of have this idea after we lost Alex we kind of thought of him as you know, America's grandpa or smart uncle or something, and Canada's for crying out loud but at the time, some of you may remember more accurately, he had a little bit of a brittle quality on stage, like he liked to be stern sometimes he was perceived as smug when he corrected people, he had the very good accent in every language, which I do not have I'm so jealous of all of Alex's hosting toolbox.
36:48He was so good. But the whole time I'm a contestant, I'm like, does this guy like me? Or is he like kind of fed up? Because he would always just be a little like, you know, a little disapproving. That kind of Alex Trebek, well, I don't know about this persona. And on my last show when I lost, he actually came back out after the game. He was in his shirt sleeves, which you never see Alex out of a jacket. It was like, ugh. I can't even imagine that. It's like seeing your parents naked. You can't imagine. You don't want to see Alex in a... He looks good, though. But he was moved. He was like, Ken, we're going to miss you around here.
37:27And I was like, I didn't know. All this time, Alex didn't dislike me. I was genuinely touched by that. So it was mostly just admiration of his hosting ability. And the only reason I can kind of keep my head above water hosting today is because I saw him do it for so many years, including up close. Just phenomenal. Like he was made for it. Did he ever talk to you about potentially hosting the show in the future? Yeah. Sometimes he would joke about it. Because over the years, people would ask me, hey, when Alex retires, do you? And I would say, no, it's not going to happen. Every broadcaster wants this job.
38:02After he got sick, I was consulting on the show at the time. And I talked to him a few times about it, including, although we didn't know this, the weekend he passed away, I was supposed to come in and rehearse and it got canceled because he had passed away that the night before. And nobody knew it was like, we knew he was going to start another round of chemo. So I had been enlisted to guest host a little bit, but we were all sure he would come back. He had rallied so many times. And I talked to him on the, on the phone and his voice was not the same, but he still sounded like Alex. And, and one of the things I remember him saying, he like thanked me.
38:35He was like, boy, Ken, thanks for filling in. Like this is, and I was, I was like, I was going to ball. I was like, Alex, Alex, no, we should be thanking you. Are you kidding? Like 37 years? He always believed the host was not the star of Jeopardy. That was typical game show practice. And Alex said, no, no, no, no, no. The players are the star. The clues are the star. The focus of Jeopardy should never be on the host. And he was 100 % right. And I don't know if any other host would have got to that conclusion just because that's not the way show business works. Less of me, please. But he was right.
39:07I mean, there are theories that he kind of had you in mind for a while to host. We actually have a clip of an interview segment from 2014 when you return to the show to compete in a tournament. If we can roll the Trebek clip. Now, because of the 74 games you have won and all the other games in which you have participated, do you think there's the advantage of being an intimidating factor for these others? I hope not, because, I mean, everybody here is so good. I mean, it's a very different, I notice a huge difference coming back to play tournaments, because everybody's so good. But, you know, I do, I've been behind this podium a lot, and I feel really at home here, so I get that.
39:45How would you feel over, well, no, we won't talk about it. We won't talk about it. I mean, that seems pretty pointed, right? At the time, I thought that was weird. I don't, it was so clear to me for years that you would never get an ex-contestant to host Jeopardy! With all the lack of charisma that a Jeopardy! contestant brings with them, why would you do that? And I still, I'm a little bit surprised. It's a very unconventional thing. I guess the question is, can you take a great broadcaster and teach them Jeopardy? Can you take a Jeopardy! contestant and teach them the broadcasting angle? They both seem like a bit of an uphill climb, I guess.
40:25And so it was a difficult task when Alex passed away. But I feel very lucky. Like, I feel like the good little boy that won the chocolate factory somehow. Like, all the other guest hosts got sucked up into the chocolate pipes or whatever. And Dr. Oz or Aaron Rodgers are still up there somewhere.
40:47It was just always my favorite thing. Jeopardy was my favorite thing as a kid. And it meant so much to me. Like, a safe space where smart people knew stuff. And it was clear that that was a thing. Like, you could be this kind of grown-up. and so to like now be on my favorite show, I just learned the word pro-noia. Do you know this word pro-noia, Tyler? Never heard of it. It's the opposite of paranoia. Pro-noia is the conspiracy theory belief that the universe is conspiring on your behalf. And boy, what an irritating thing to hear someone say that. Boy, why does everything keep working out for me?
41:24But I just feel so lucky. Like I get to work at my favorite place and host my favorite show. And I take it seriously because I think Jeopardy does still mean that to the nerds of tomorrow. So I'm getting a lot of audience questions, as you would imagine. So the first one mentions the amazing Jeopardy moment where you answered with, what is a hoe? The clue being, what was it, this term for a long-handed gardening tool can also be a moral pleasure seeker? That's exactly it. Wow. I did my research. I didn't want to be caught off guard. Closet Jeopardy super fan. Ken. What's a ho? No. Whoa. Whoa. Whoa.
42:11They teach you that in school in Utah, huh? Al, what's a rake? A rake is right. But this question asks, do you think that Jeopardy clues are written to elicit wrong answers that are really funny? or will the contestants embarrass themselves with no help? I was so sure that that was a trap. Like, because who would see this long-handled garden instrument as also a pleasure seeker and not say, hey, what if someone says ho here? But apparently they did not. Like, our two current head writers, Billy and Michelle, were both on staff when that happened. And I now see the Jeopardy ethos is not to try to trap people.
42:50And the players think it is. Like, the players are like, oh, because Jeopardy clues are difficult. They're dense. They're kind of in their own weird little kind of dialect that's not quite English, full of red herrings and misdirection and little references. So it is its own complicated thing. But there are never traps. You know, we know that the game works when we elicit correct responses the most direct way possible. So no, there are no traps on Jeopardy. That said, I still feel like they owe me 200 bucks or whatever that was. What's the weirdest strategy you've seen someone use on the show?
43:26There's a Jeopardy rule that you can continue to respond until the host rules against you. And that was just to avoid awkward situations of, I don't know, somebody being asked to repeat something and changing it. Or we don't have a, the first thing out of your mouth is the response rule. We have a, you can tweak your answer until you get a quick no from Kent. But that does mean it, it does incentivize people who just like can game the system, you know? They can say, what is Mesopotamia? And if I don't look happy about it, they can just start yelling, Assyria, Sumeria, Babylonia. And I've seen people try to work that a little bit.
44:03I don't recommend it. You don't want to annoy the host. Do you see anyone? I mean, now I'm just like, I have like a cheater mentality. So I'm starting to think of strategies that people should use. And you can tell me if any of them would ever work. Has anyone ever tried like mumbling their answer so that they can't be penalized for incorrect pronunciation? I feel like mumbling is too risky. You'd be more likely to know it and then get ruled against because we are kind of strict about Jeopardy pronunciation. The metric is not, do I think this person was saying loves, labor is lost? Like I actually have to hear every apostrophe S in loves, labor is lost.
44:37Like if somebody were to say, loves, labor is lost or loves, labor lost, I would have to rule against them. It's gotta be a plausible pronunciation of the right spelling. Or in final Jeopardy, a plausible spelling of the right pronunciation. Or I'm supposed to rule against them. and I feel mean, but I do. So we have like 30 seconds left, but I'm wondering if you want to do a very quick lightning round where all the answers are subjective. I love a lightning round. Okay. So a category that you'd like to see on Jeopardy more often. What is 80s pro wrestling? A category that should be eliminated permanently.
45:09What is tool time, the long handled garden instrument? The best quiz show that isn't Jeopardy. What if he wants to be a millionaire? Yeah. The best board game. Yeah. What is risk, actually? Big risk. Good answer. Most intimidating Jeopardy contestant who you played against. Who is James Holtzauer? Or what is Watson? Look, if there's one thing about Watson, he would have been a terrible Jeopardy host. So you definitely have to. I believe this too. Thank you. Thank you so much, Ken, for being here with us. This was so fun. Thank you, Tyler.
46:19Thank you.
46:49identity, culture, science, it's all fair game. If you're done with the hot takes and hungry for real talk, come join the conversation wherever you get your podcasts.
From the publisher
The “Jeopardy!” host and former contestant Ken Jennings joins Tyler Foggatt to talk about America’s favorite game show. The wide-ranging conversation took place before a live audience onstage at the annual New Yorker Festival, on October 25th. Jennings discussed his historic seventy-four-game winning streak, how contestants’ game strategies have changed over the years, his relationship with the former longtime host Alex Trebek, and why a political career was not for him.
Related reading:
- “Ken Jennings Has Some Questions About Death,” by Sarah Larson
- “The Rare Authority of Alex Trebek,” by Doreen St. Félix
- “The Hidden Depths of Alex Trebek’s Banter with ‘Jeopardy!’ Contestants,” by Beth Blum
Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts.
The Political Scene draws on the reporting and analysis found in The New Yorker for lively conversations about the big questions in American politics. Join the magazine’s writers and editors as they put into context the latest news—about elections, the economy, the White House, the Supreme Court, and much more. New episodes are available three times a week.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices