In short
Podcast Episode Summary: Pete Hegseth’s Holy War
Overview This episode of *The Political Scene* from The New Yorker delves into the implications of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's Christian nationalism within the context of the ongoing conflict with Iran. The discussion features insights from journalist Katherine Stewart, who has extensively covered the MAGA right and written about the influence of Christian nationalism on American democracy.
Key Themes and Discussions
Hegseth's Ideological Position
- Christian Nationalism: Hegseth represents a shift of Christian nationalism from the fringes to a central role in American military power. He asserts that America's rights stem from a divine source rather than government.
- War Framing: The episode questions whether Hegseth is framing the conflict with Iran as a "holy war," a stark contrast to the more secular justifications used in previous military engagements.
Historical Context
- George W. Bush Era: The episode contrasts Hegseth's rhetoric with that of former President George W. Bush, who aimed to distance America's wars from religious connotations after backlash from calling the war a "crusade."
- Modern Military Culture Shift: Under Hegseth's leadership, the U.S. military is seen as adopting a more religious and ideological framing of military actions, potentially leading to dangerous implications.
Hegseth's Background
- Rise to Power: Hegseth's trajectory includes service in Iraq and Afghanistan, aligning with Trump's views on military issues, and promoting his ideology through Fox News.
- Controversial Beliefs: He is associated with extreme religious views, including beliefs that oppose women's rights and promote a theocratic vision of governance.
Influence of Christian Nationalists
- Organizational Structures: Stewart discusses the organized networks that drive the Christian nationalist movement, highlighting how they mobilize voters and influence political outcomes.
- Rhetoric of War: The episode points to troubling reports from service members that military leaders are invoking religious prophecies to justify military actions in Iran.
Critical Analysis of Military Leadership
- Hegseth's Management Style: The panel discusses Hegseth's contempt for established military norms and the implications of his personal grievances influencing military decisions.
- Concerns from Military Officials: Observations from military officers reveal frustration with Hegseth's approach, characterized by a disregard for conventional military strategy and an embrace of ideological warfare.
Broader Implications
- Impact on U.S. Foreign Policy: The conversation covers the potentially catastrophic consequences of Hegseth's worldview on U.S. military engagements and foreign relations, emphasizing the ideological motivations that may override strategic necessities.
Key Takeaways
- Hegseth's Christian nationalism represents a dangerous ideological shift in U.S. military leadership.
- The conflation of religious beliefs with military objectives raises significant ethical and operational questions.
- The historical context of U.S. military engagements indicates a growing trend towards ideological rather than strategic motivations in warfare.
- The episode underscores the need for vigilance regarding the intersection of religion and state, especially in matters of military authority and foreign policy.
Conclusion The episode of *The Political Scene* provides a critical lens on the emerging role of Christian nationalism in American military power, represented by Pete Hegseth. Through informed discussions and expert analyses, it highlights the risks associated with merging ideological zeal with military engagement, urging listeners to consider the broader implications for democracy and governance in the U.S.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Viral Photo and Its Implications
0:00 to 1:35
Discussion on the viral photo of Marco Rubio and the shoe size dilemma.
“There's a viral photograph of Marco Rubio that really tells it all.”
Pete Hegseth at the National Prayer Breakfast
1:56 to 3:21
Overview of Pete Hegseth's speech on Christian nationalism and its implications.
“I was given the opportunity to read a passage from Scripture today.”
The Evolution of War Rhetoric
3:21 to 5:10
Comparison of George W. Bush's approach to war with current military rhetoric.
“Is the Secretary of Defense trying to cast this as something close to a holy war?”
Hegseth's Personal and Ideological Journey
5:10 to 9:07
Exploration of Pete Hegseth's background, ideology, and personal life events.
“I think you have to remember we are, after all, a place that has a rigid boundary in theory between church and state.”
The Tattoos and Their Significance
9:07 to 11:47
Discussion of Hegseth's tattoos and their implications in the context of his beliefs.
“It is actually a sort of a form of theocracy that he has embraced.”
War Crimes and Military Leadership
11:47 to 14:07
Examination of Hegseth's involvement with war crimes and military culture.
“The other tattoo reads Deus Volt, God wills it, which is also a motto from the Crusades.”
The Evolution of Pete Hegseth's Ideology
14:07 to 20:59
Explore the development of Pete Hegseth's controversial views and actions related to war and Islam.
“And maybe that case that did specifically really get Pete Heggs at the job is worth mentioning as well, Jane.”
Examining Christian Nationalism in the Military
22:22 to 28:00
Delve into the beliefs and influence of Christian nationalism within the U.S. military, focusing on Pete Hegseth.
“And for that, we're joined by the journalist Catherine Stewart.”
Military Propaganda and Biblical Prophecy
28:00 to 28:39
Explore how military commanders are using biblical prophecies to justify warfare.
“reporting that military commanders are invoking biblical end times prophecy to justify the war.”
Religious Rhetoric in Political Leadership
28:40 to 29:36
Discuss the framing of conflicts through religious rhetoric by politicians.
“You have Marco Rubio and other people calling the Ayatollahs and Iran zealots or extremists.”
Show all 19 chapters
Trump's Alignment with Christian Nationalists
29:37 to 30:24
Analyze Trump's relationship with religious right leaders and their support.
“language at times in their framing of the war.”
The Paradox of Trump’s Religious Image
30:25 to 31:42
Investigate the contradiction between Trump's personal faith and his political image.
“messages on social media, but it's really all about appealing to that sector of his base.”
Transactional Politics and the Religious Right
31:43 to 32:59
Examine the transactional nature of the religious right's support for Trump.
“Well, you know, a lot of the religious right leaders in advance, in the run-up to the 2016 election, were hoping for Ted Cruz, to be honest.”
Violence and Christian Nationalism
33:00 to 34:25
Explore how some religious movements embrace violence and reject empathy.
“and he promises to crack heads and that's okay.”
Understanding the Pentagon's Ideological Shift
34:26 to 35:09
Decode the ideological shifts in military leadership influenced by religious beliefs.
“They reject the politics of cruelty and division and conquest that this movement represents.”
The Philosophy of Power and Winning
36:15 to 37:48
Explore the philosophical changes in how power is perceived in politics.
“And I think when you just hear that, you're like, what is this guy talking about and how did he come to believe, A, in that idea and B, that everybody out there wants to hear this?”
Critique of Military Strategy and Spending
37:49 to 39:45
Critically assess the military strategy and financial implications of Trump's policies.
“that there's nothing strategic behind it.”
The Consequences of Hubris in Warfare
39:46 to 42:05
Discuss the consequences of miscalculations in military planning and execution.
“Catherine talked about the idea that there were pastors in the beginning of Donald Trump's era who rejected him for all the obvious reasons that a Christian pastor might reject Donald Trump.”
Analyzing Pete Hegseth's Influence on Warfare
42:05 to 43:34
Learn about the implications of Pete Hegseth's ideas on foreign and domestic conflict.
“days and that they would knock out the leadership.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00There's a viral photograph of Marco Rubio that really tells it all. these Florsheim shoes that Donald Trump has apparently become enamored with, that he has taken, according to the Wall Street Journal, to guessing the shoe size of his visitors and then sending them shoes, which now then you have this incredible photograph of all the cabinet members wearing their matching shoes because they're afraid not to wear them. To me, also really funny that he doesn't just even ask them what size is the proper size. They have to wear the shoe size that he's picked for them, even when it's the wrong size.
0:39So you see Marco Rubio with like an inch behind his heels of gap there. What kind of, you know, wears the wrong size shoes because the boss decreed it? I'll tell you what kind of man. Marco Rubio. Does that really screw future president to you, by the way? It's not a leadership moment. Maybe he did it on purpose to show how little, little Marco is. I'm sure he did. This is a gift with a fish hook in it. Props to the Wall Street Journal, okay? Because this is illuminating about life and, you know, what we sometimes refer to as Pyongyang on the Potomac. Thank God we can still laugh here because, boy, this was not a week full of a lot of laughs, honestly.
1:21It's been really shocking and disturbing to watch the news unfold. So, all right, from Florsheim to the serious stuff. Welcome to The Political Scene from The New Yorker, a weekly discussion about the big questions in American politics. I'm Jane Mayer, and I'm joined as ever by my colleagues Susan Glasser and Evan Osnos. Hi, Susan. Hey there. Great to be with you. Hey, Evan. Good morning, guys. Hi. All right. Well, last month in Washington at the National Prayer Breakfast, the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, took to the stage. I was given the opportunity to read a passage from Scripture today.
2:08And today we gather to recognize that our rights here in this great country come from a loving and benevolent God, not government.
2:23America was founded as a Christian nation. It remains a Christian nation in our DNA if we can keep it. And as public officials, we have a sacred duty 250 years on to glorify him. For years, Hegseth has argued that America was founded as a Christian nation, a core belief of what's known as Christian nationalism. Not long ago, that worldview mostly lived on the fringes of American politics. But now, Pete Hagseth is running the United States Department of Defense, which he calls the Department of War, the most powerful military in the world. And the United States is at war with Iran, a Muslim country.
3:09So today we're asking, what happens when a worldview like Christian nationalism moves from the political fringe into the center of American military power? Susan, Evan, this administration has offered many explanations for the war, each official selling their own version. Is the Secretary of Defense trying to cast this as something close to a holy war? You know, Jane, it's really, I think, a moment to be noted here. In the wake of 9-11, we all remember that sort of feeling of shock and horror. And when the United States went to war in Afghanistan, its mission was very specific, right? It was to sort of topple the Taliban who had given shelter to al-Qaeda, which had launched these attacks on September 11th against the United States.
4:04And it's very interesting, the difference from then to now. George W. Bush, he called it initially a crusade. You know, this was a country that was in shock and horror, fury. He said, we're going to launch a righteous crusade. The enormous blowback from that was actually taken in by that administration. And from then on, what you saw was something that's almost the exact opposite of what we're hearing right now in the nearly two weeks since we've been at war with Iran, which was Bush saying, you know, going out of his way to say this is not actually a holy war. We are not at war against an entire religion.
4:40And, you know, there were great efforts to have him go to a mosque, have him go to point out to people that Islam was not our enemy, even if terrorists who misused the name of Islam were. Do you think that was because they saw it as a peril to go up against one of the world's great religions? Or do you think it was sort of public relations? I mean, we know underneath the surface there was a lot of sort of contempt for Islam. But why do you think he took such care to back off of that language? I think you have to remember we are, after all, a place that has a rigid boundary in theory between church and state.
5:16I think there was, even for George Bush, who was, after all, by his own description, a born-again evangelical Christian, a sense that there were boundaries that one doesn't cross. And, look, there were strategic realities. He was also trying to maintain supportive countries around the world who were wary of him personally and wary of America's intentions. Frankly, Jen, I think it's one of the things that is most noticeable about the difference between then and now. Now you have people like Lindsey Graham, for instance, who has already called this a religious war. Mike Johnson has called Islam a misguided religion.
5:53But there is nobody who personifies this difference more than Pete Hegseth. I mean, it's been easy to overlook this because there's been so much going on in the last few months. But since coming in to run the Pentagon, Hegseth has been convening prayer meetings inside the building. And for Hegseth, this is in its own way a kind of natural evolution of a life that has been building towards this. You know, Susan mentioned a second ago all of the concern when George W. Bush talked about the war in the Middle East as a crusade. Well, remind yourself, Pete Hegseth wrote a book called American Crusade.
6:32crusade. He has defined himself as a kind of a warrior against an existential threat to the West, which he defines not only in terms of Muslim fundamentalism, but also a holy war here at home. That is his word. He says that he is involved in what he once called a 360 degree holy war for the righteous cause of human freedom. So in this episode, Pete Hegseth, who is he? How did he come to embrace Christian nationalism and is an ideology that was once resigned to the margins of American politics infiltrating the U.S. military. Later in the show, we're going to be joined by Catherine Stewart, who has spent years writing and reporting on the Christian nationalist movement in America and is the author of a wonderful book, Money, Lies, and God.
7:27But First, let's start with Hagseth himself. Evan, can you walk us through Pete Hagseth's early background? Yeah, there's basically sort of two big turning points in this guy's life. Just to remind you, I mean, he grew up in a small town in Minnesota. He was a kind of a high school star, basketball, football, valedictorian of his high school. Class goes on to Princeton. He doesn't talk as much about his time in the Ivy League now. But while he was there, he became a conservative figure on campus. He was the publisher of the big conservative paper. And then two things happened. One was the 9-11 attacks.
7:59He ended up joining the National Guard. He went to Iraq. He went to Afghanistan. After he came back to the United States, he took on the cause of service members who had been accused or convicted of violating the laws of war. And that became his cause celeb. It's what brought him together with Trump. Initially, he had mocked Trump like a lot of people in 2016. But eventually, he and Trump found common cause in this. Hegseth described the military as a kind of encumbered by bureaucracy and wokeness. And then the last piece happened. This is crucial. He has moved further and further into a form of Christianity that is farther and farther outside of the mainstream in the United States.
8:39He is part of what's called the communion of reformed evangelical churches. That's a term most people have probably not heard, but the CREC, as it's known, opposes women's right to vote. It believes homosexuality should be a crime. And this has become, by Pete Hegseth's own description, an enormous part of his life. He moved his family to Tennessee, where he is now, his children are in a school, and he's in a church that really revolves around this community. And correct me if I'm wrong, but it believes that Christianity should dominate all forms of civic and government life. It is actually a sort of a form of theocracy that he has embraced.
9:20Can I just say one other thing as someone who sort of delved early on into Hegseth's background? I'm always interested in when people convert to extreme religions, and I was looking at his timeline. He converted, I believe, in 2018. And if you go back and you look at his life in 2017, that was the year that he was accused of raping a woman. His personal life was in a shambles. He was, at the time he'd been married, I think, two times. He was about to get married the third time. He had children out of wedlock with two of these women, and another woman accused him of raping her. Right. And that's an accusation that he's denied, right?
10:03But continue, The charges were hard to bring. The police in Monterey, California, did not formally charge him, but he settled out of court with the woman. Her name has never come out. But it was a definition of a life in turmoil, I think, at that point. And that's when he joined this church in Kultzneck, New Jersey. I also, it strikes me that it's his life being a hot mess, but then he also acquires the grievance to go along with it. And it's that fusion, I would say, of very almost palpable anger combined with embrace of extremist ideology that has sort of brought us this public figure that now I think we're kind of seeing the full measure of in the midst of the war.
10:49It's, you know, war is the kind of crisis that clarifies in Washington. And I think many people are seeing that Pete Hegseth for the first time. The grievance is interesting, too, because he actually has a very specific grievance with the U.S. military. And it goes back to right after this period that you're talking about, after the attack on the U.S. Capitol of January 6, 2021, One, there's this concern, right, about Donald Trump wanting to use military power on his own behalf. He didn't do that, but there was a lot of concern about that. And it's at that moment that a fellow member of the Army National Guard flagged tattoos that Pete Hegseth had as evidence that he was a possible, what they call, insider threat.
11:35And this is very interesting because it's that fusion, again, of religion and state power that I think has made people so alarmed. Pete Hegseth had two tattoos. One was a Jerusalem cross, a symbol that was the coat of arms of the crusader kingdom of Jerusalem and long associated in modern times with the idea of somehow Christian warriors reclaiming the Holy Land. The other tattoo reads Deus Volt, God wills it, which is also a motto from the Crusades. It has been adopted in modern times by white supremacists here in the U.S. And again, when you listen to Pete Hegseth speak, he drips with disdain, almost fury himself.
12:22You know, he calls the operation, the war in Iran, Operation Epic Fury. But just listen to the tone of voice of this man, the leader of the Pentagon, when he speaks about the military and the rules of the past. And we are not going to be constrained by this anymore. We're not going to have this woke military. You name it, the department did it. Foolish and reckless political leaders set the wrong compass heading. And we lost our way. We became the woke department. But not anymore. This is exactly what he's talking about, is this personal grievance that has become sort of the splinter inside of him that has opened up an entire view of what needs to be purged from the culture of the military that he's now in charge of leading.
13:16He said, I joined the army to fight extremists in 2001. Twenty years later, that same army labeled me one. That is the heart or the kernel of that grievance. Well, that's right. And I think that for Donald Trump, you know, Evan, you mentioned when he came together with Trump after, you know, initially looking down on him in 2016. I mean, Donald Trump has this power of finding broken people, of attracting, figuring out, you know, somebody who's got seething anger, even if on the surface they look like a polished television host who went to Princeton, has Ivy League pedigree. There's always something there.
13:59And that's what I found in covering both the first term and the second term, that these are people who have a chip on their shoulder, an axe to grind. And I think, you know, it's, again, handing ultimate power to those folks is why we're talking about this in the context of the war. And maybe that case that did specifically really get Pete Heggs at the job is worth mentioning as well, Jane. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, he has been a champion for war criminals. That had been his cause when after the war, when he was in Fox News, he championed the cause of three service members who had been charged with war crimes.
14:36and said that they were not criminals, they were warriors, as he put it. And Trump took up this cause and commuted their sentences or gave them clemency. And the thing that's worth remembering, though, as Pete Hegseth was making this his cause, the U.S. military was on the other side of this because the brass at the military and the people who served with Pete Hegseth actually opposed what he was doing because they knew that the laws of war are the laws of decency and also what sort of separates us from barbarians. And they also know that it's what keeps our own service members safe. And so this was his own personal cause, and it was something that caught Trump's eye.
15:21I just wanted to say that as we try to describe the evolution of Pete Hegseth, that his contempt, I guess you have to call it for Islam, preceded him being called an extremist. And this goes back 10 years. You know, there was this incident that a whistleblower at one of the organizations, he was at a tiny nonprofit, and one of the organizations that he was running was beset by all kinds of management problems because he was a terrible manager and drunk much of the time. But in one drunken bout, he was in the bar described as chanting, kill all Muslims, kill all Muslims. So this was way back. This was like 2015.
16:02This has been an ongoing thing with him. Well, I think what we've come to is there's a procession of, in a sense, these kinds of signal moments in his life. First, he goes off to the Middle East. He sort of becomes self-defining as a warrior against Islam. He then has this rupture with the military, where ultimately he ends up seeing himself as somebody who is trying to bring back what the U.S. military should be. And then finally, he finds a religious context in which for him, he is now essentially a warrior, not only on behalf of Trump's ideas and the American idea, but a Christian idea. And now he finds himself in the catbird seat at a moment when the United States, for the very first time, is engaged with Israel in an attack on a Muslim nation.
16:50Yeah, let's talk about Operation Epic Fury. Okay, let's talk a little about it. For many Americans, they're just seeing, in a way, this figure for the first time, really. And, you know, it's a widely mockable, easily mockable figure. I feel like Colin Joe's portrayal of Pete Hegseth in Saturday Night Live is going to be one of the sort of enduring moments from the Trump 2.0 presidency. I mean, it's just, you know, at times when I've been watching these Pentagon briefings, it's like as if Pete Hegseth is imitating Colin Jost imitating Pete Hegseth. I mean, really, he's become in some ways the inhabitant of his own caricature.
17:32And so he, you know, he comes in this sort of Fox TV suits. They're too tight. The pants are kind of too short. I never understood that, by the way. Side note. Maybe it's to show the shoes. Well, I don't know, you know, but except. So he comes out, right, and he's like sort of stoked and he's ready for combat, except the combat is with the fake news media. And the thing that most people knew about Hegseth before the war started, right, was that he had banned basically all of the traditional media, including, interestingly, his own former network Fox News, which refused to sign the onerous and I think now the subject of a lawsuit, but the onerous code that was being demanded of reporters under Hegseth, that they would essentially forswear doing any actual reporting.
18:17So nobody, no real news organizations, including Fox News, signed up for that. So now he replaced the entire Pentagon press corps basically with kind of right wing influencers, including amazingly, there's a guy who's now accredited to the redone Pete Hegseth press corps who actually was one of the rioters on January 6th. I mean, that really just tells you a lot. So we knew that he was sort of at war with the fake news. He was at war with the, quote, woke DOD. His crusade seemed to be, frankly, to purge, quote, unquote, DEI from the Pentagon. And now here he is. He gives these briefings on this war.
18:57And to me, it's the most un-American thing I've ever seen. It's a grotesque celebration of the violence and power and killing capacity of the American military. It's a laser focused maximum authority mission delivered with overwhelming and unrelenting precision. No hesitation, no half measures. As President Trump declared yesterday, we're crushing the enemy in an overwhelming display of technical skill and military force. We will not relent until the enemy is totally and decisively defeated. Those are really what Pete Hegseth has been delivering from the podium without clarity about the mission in Iran, without clarity about the goals, without clarity about the progress, and without an effort to invest the American people in this use of their power.
19:55And I just I think these briefings that he's been doing, you know, will be studied by people for many years. Yeah, I think that's right. I mean, it strikes me as on the most basic level as such a violation of the Ten Commandments that he says that he embraces, thou shalt not kill. He really seems to be reveling in the killing and has yet to apologize or even address other than to say that they are investigating the bombing of a school in Iran that killed 175 or so people, most of whom were schoolgirls. It's hard for most people to match that with their idea of Christianity, but not for Hegseth, apparently.
20:47We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we'll be joined by Katherine Stewart, who will walk us through Pete Hegseth's Christian nationalist ideology and how it's shaping the U.S. military. The political scene will be right back.
21:08If you've been enjoying the show, please leave us a rating and review on the podcast platform of your choice. And while you're there, don't forget to hit the follow button so you never miss an episode. Thanks so much for listening. Wired has always put a microscope on the people, power, and forces shaping our world. Uncanny Valley brings that same fearless reporting straight to your feed. Is Doge finally over? Will AI actually democratize American health care? Each week, Wired journalists from across the newsroom we're going to unpack where politics, technology, and Silicon Valley collide. From conversations with tech leaders across Silicon Valley, internet fandom investigations, and government crackdowns on rigged gambling, we're taking you all over the news cycle, going straight inside the priorities, pressures, and power plays driving today's biggest decisions.
22:01Uncanny Valley tackles the questions keeping you up at night and helps make sense of the future taking shape right now. Listen to new episodes every Thursday, wherever you get your podcasts.
22:21All right, now we want to turn to the ideas behind Pete Hegseth's worldview. And for that, we're joined by the journalist Catherine Stewart. She spent years reporting on the rise of the religious right and the movement known as Christian nationalism. Catherine, welcome to the show. It's great to be here. Thanks for having me. Well, you've spent a lot of time studying Christian nationalists closely, and now one of them, Pete Hedgeth, is actually running the Pentagon. So we're in the middle of a war. Does any of this surprise you? Well, not really, although I think at a higher level, we can't imagine that Trump himself is pursuing an explicitly religious agenda.
23:06Pete Hedgeth may be a different story here. But I think it's basically meant to serve the political purpose of Trump's administration and MAGA movement more broadly. And this is actually where some of that Christian nationalist and religious messaging plays a role, right? Trump wants to shore up his base of support. A disproportionate number of his followers are supporters of Christian nationalism. So he needs a way to justify this needless and expensive and unpopular war. and religion becomes a way to justify it. Can you help us explain what we mean when we talk about Christian nationalism? This has become something that I think listeners of this show and people who follow politics are increasingly aware of, but the language itself, the terminology may still be a bit mysterious.
23:53What is Christian nationalism and how does it differ from some of the things you mentioned a moment ago about charismatic or evangelical Christianity? I think of it as a mindset and also a machine. So, you know, the mindset includes the idea that America was established to be a Christian nation, but only according to a certain interpretation of Christianity, certainly not progressive or mainland Christianity, because its proponents adhere more to a hardline form of Christianity. And the idea that that's what once made us great and we need to take it back, right? And our law should be based on a kind of reactionary interpretation of the Bible.
24:29But I think the machine of Christian nationalism movement is arguably more important because much of it functions as a giant voter turnout machine, right? Christian nationalist movement, its strength is in this deeply networked organizational infrastructure. It's a leadership-driven movement, an organization-driven movement. I think a very underappreciated feature of the movement are these pastoral networks that draw pastors into groups and conservative and conservative-leaning pastors and tell them that it's their biblical duty to turn out their congregants to vote for the issues that matter, which inevitably boil down to things like abortion, same-sex marriage, etc.
25:15And, you know, much of that movement really functions as a giant voter turnout machine. The networking organizations are also really important, like the Council for National Policy, which brings together heads of these organizations with very rich funders and keeps the movement sort of on the same page. How do you see Hegseth as fitting into this network? Well, I think it bears looking into the religious movement that Hegseth follows because he credits it with guiding his life, including his life in the military. He attends the Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship, which is linked to Doug Wilson, a very powerful pastor whose ministry is based in Moscow, Idaho, but has offshoots around the country.
26:01And Wilson has adhered to a very, very theocratic and patriarchal form of religion and vision for society. He has actually said it was a mistake for women to have the right to vote, and it's been terrible for America. and pastors affiliated with this religious denomination say that the 19th Amendment, which guarantees women the right to vote, should be repealed and replaced with something they call head of household voting, which is where the supposed head of the household, who is inevitably going to be a man, gets to decide the votes on the entire House. And Doug Wilson has actually appeared at the Pentagon.
26:41Hexeth has implemented a number of concerning activities at the Pentagon He's holding monthly worship services where Wilson and also Pete Hegseth's personal pastor, Brooke Pottinger, have delivered sermons. And then we also need to just look at Hegseth himself. He's got these crusader tattoos on his body, like the Jerusalem cross, which is also called the Crusader cross. He has actually cast some of his actions, his other actions at the Pentagon, as helping to save America as a Christian nation. And he has also put forth, the Department of Defense has put forth these videos of Bible verses overlaid with images of tanks and missiles and soldiers, a kind of conflation of religion with military aggression.
27:33And I think this is deeply concerning. It calls into question the kind of ways in which Hegseth's religion influences his military decisions and his decisions for all of America. Yeah, well, it's interesting you bring that up, of course, now that we're at war. I was really struck, as I'm sure you were, by this report that the Military Religious Freedom Foundation has already received more than 200 complaints from service members in the not quite two weeks of this conflict with Iran, reporting that military commanders are invoking biblical end times prophecy to justify the war. Now, this is really amazing to me.
Read the full transcript
28:12In one of these cases, at least one commander allegedly told troops that Donald Trump had been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon. And I've actually been haunted by that image of this burning country and this idea that some kind of a religious apocalyptic vision is animating what Hegseth or some of his commanders are telling our troops, especially because they're also framing the conflict as a war against someone else's religious zealotry, right? You have Marco Rubio and other people calling the Ayatollahs and Iran zealots or extremists. What should we make of this?
28:54Is that a high number of complaints? Do we, you know, are we reacting too much, not enough to these concerns, to commanders saying this? You know, I can't comment on the specifics of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation report because I haven't seen the original source material. The U.S. military is a very large and diverse organization. And to be fair, I think that a lot of military leaders would be against this. Although we do know that Hexeth and Trump purged a lot of generals who they saw as disloyal to them. But what we do know is that a good number of religious right leaders do see Trump in sacralized terms.
29:36We know that political leaders like Lindsey Graham and Mike Huckabee have used some religious language at times in their framing of the war. And we know that religious right leaders have been telling the rank and file of the Christian nationalist movement for years that Trump was raised up by God. That's actually what Paula White Kane said. she's one of these very political pastors who's played a role in bringing Trump together with leaders of the Christian nationalist movement and preparing him for politics. And there was video released last week where we see a number of religious leaders praying over Donald Trump, and she was right there.
30:16And Trump plays along. For example, he surrounds himself with and empowers reactionary Christian nationalist leaders. He posts religious messages on social media, but it's really all about appealing to that sector of his base. He needs the voter turnout apparatus of the Christian nationalist machine to mobilize these folks on his behalf. And I think that there's another group we could take note of, which overlaps to some degree with the previous group, but not entirely. But they are convinced that America is a Christian nation, is in a clash of civilizations with Islam. And so religious rhetoric does help to frame the war as part of that civilizational struggle and sort of keep that group on board.
31:02Can I just ask a quick follow-up on that? Because I think for us, there's this paradox of Donald Trump is probably the least religious person, you know, any of us can imagine. He doesn't really pretend, right? Like even, you know, he doesn't make a show of going to church. It's not like, you know, he even he used to mock Mike Pence, his first vice president, for being sort of, you know, holier than thou. I'm just curious how you reconcile, you know, where people like Pete Hegseth, who wear this religion on their sleeve, how they reconcile with Donald Trump being, you know, the signal fire, Donald Trump being their religious icon.
31:43Well, you know, a lot of the religious right leaders in advance, in the run-up to the 2016 election, were hoping for Ted Cruz, to be honest. You know, the way I'm an investigative reporter, the way I do a lot of my work is I go to right-wing strategy gatherings and political conferences and religious gatherings, etc. And some of those leaders really preferred Cruz because they thought he was a more reliable partner. But once it was clear that it was going to be Trump, they all rallied behind him, and they justified it often in biblical terms. They compared him with a King Cyrus figure, an imperfect ruler through whom God chose to enact his will.
32:22They would say things like, we don't need a savior. We already have a savior in Jesus Christ. We need a president who's going to give us what we want. Part of it is transactional. He did give them everything they wanted. He gave them unprecedented political access, the policies they wanted, positions of political power, etc. But there's more to it than that. This is a movement that at its core has never believed in democracy. It rejects the principles of equality and pluralism and frankly rule of law that represents the best of the American promise. And Trump breaks the rules. He breaks the norms.
32:58You know, he violates every democratic principle you can imagine. and he promises to crack heads and that's okay. He's cracking the heads of their enemies. And in this way, he's a sort of perfect representative of a movement that doesn't believe in democracy and wanted to break it. Well, you know, that brings it back so perfectly, kind of closes the circle on why Hegseth may be saying that he's going to abolish those stupid rules of engagement. The rule of law doesn't have any kind of, you know, he's not going to allow it to constrain the military strength of the Pentagon, which he calls the Department of Strength instead.
33:42Is that right? I mean, basically, being outside the law is part of the religious credo. It's true. I mean, it's also part of a kind of celebration of untrammeled, and I hate to say it, what they would call masculine violence, what the author Christian Kobes-Dumé would call the Jesus and John Wayne version of Christianity that is associated with this kind of untrammeled violence of might, right? A kind of religion of might that is unconcerned with rules and unconcerned with empathy. In fact, we've seen within the movement some leaders and thinkers talking about the sin of empathy. Empathy is somehow recast as a sin.
34:24I just need to point out that this is completely antithetical to how most Americans experience, most American Christians experience their faith. They reject the politics of cruelty and division and conquest that this movement represents. And this is why leaders of this movement have declared war on what they call woke Christianity or woke Jesus, which they see as a heresy. Wow. Well, thank you. This is so helpful, Catherine, in helping us understand and decode what's going on inside the Pentagon. Keep up the fantastic work. Thank you so much for having me. It's great to be in conversation with you.
35:05We're going to take a quick break. The political scene from The New Yorker will be back in just a moment.
35:19Hi, I'm David Remnick, editor of The New Yorker. At this year's Academy Awards, Timothee Chalamet and Tiana Taylor aren't the only major nominees. The New Yorker will be there too. With two nominated short films, which you can watch at newyorker.com slash video. Two People Exchanging Saliva was executive produced by Julianne Moore and Isabelle Huppert, and it's set in a dystopian Paris where kissing is illegal. Our animated short film Retirement Plan follows a man as he dreams about all the things he's going to do when he's done working. You can enjoy both of those films and our full library of acclaimed short films at newyorker.com slash video.
36:14So, Jesus and John Wayne, I really appreciated that conversation. What did you learn? You know what? One of the things that rises to the surface, if you tie together a lot of things we've been talking about, that when Pete Hegseth talks about his goal, he talks about what he sometimes says is maximum lethality, not tepid legality. And I think when you just hear that, you're like, what is this guy talking about and how did he come to believe, A, in that idea and B, that everybody out there wants to hear this? And what we're hearing is that actually it's the combination of his life story and his acquisition of these very extreme beliefs, which are far outside of the mainstream of Christianity, that makes that to him sensible.
37:05What does he mean? He means that it is his responsibility as a citizen and as a believer to pursue a holy war and not be bound by earthly laws, by rules that are imposed on the Pentagon by lawyers. He talks about lawyers with contempt. That's an astonishing window into the mind of the person now in charge of the American military. Especially since the concept of rule of law is embedded in, you know, when you take your oath to serve as a secretary of defense, it's an oath not to a man, but to the very concept of the Constitution, right, to the rule of law. And it strikes me that having this conversation about Christian nationalism, it's a way of decoding what can otherwise sound, frankly, a lot of what he says sounds to me often like, you know, kind of like mindless buzzwords and just sort of like machoism as a tactic that there's nothing strategic behind it.
38:05And I think in a way it's because he's masking the ideological and religious framework that does give this more than just a sort of we want to kill for the sake of killing. And in fact, rules of war and how to behave and how not to behave in war is so deeply embedded in American history, starting with General George Washington, who made a huge point of conducting the war in a humane – as humane way as possible in contrast to the British. It's also obviously embedded in our constitution that we separate religion and state. And this movement is in complete contradiction with that. Can you imagine what Thomas Jefferson would think about this?
38:50I mean, it's literally the antithetical approach, right? Like this idea of our military, which has now become the most powerful military in the world, being used as the instrument of a small sect of religious extremists, as Catherine just described it to us, is really... I mean, I think, I mean, what I also take away from this is that what we're looking at, which at the moment looks like a disastrous fiasco in the Middle East. And what we're looking at is kind of preordained by it. It's not a surprise that the Pentagon, led by Pete Hegseth, has gotten us into this mess, both because of the ideology and because of his lack of training and qualifications to be in this job and a history of hot-headed bad planning, poor management.
39:45Well, look, I mean, I think when you believe you are on a hallowed mission, you know, the kinds of ordinary things like planning for a war, anticipating reasonable consequences of your actions can seem almost immaterial. I was talking to a military longtime officer who I've known for many years yesterday, and he said, to be honest, I'm baffled by this because he said any second lieutenant could have anticipated that there was going to be a closure of the Straits of Hormuz, that Iran was going to retaliate against global oil supply. So how is it that we are flat footed? But what really struck me, guys, about what this officer was telling me is he said, honestly, the part that is most galling about this is that the idea, the moral calculus that might makes right, that that is now become essentially the operating doctrine of this administration, this kind of this morally defective view of winning.
40:43And, you know, it was amazing. Catherine talked about the idea that there were pastors in the beginning of Donald Trump's era who rejected him for all the obvious reasons that a Christian pastor might reject Donald Trump. But once they saw he was winning, then they got on the team. And I have to tell you, this is a thing that recurs to me constantly these days. You know, it's this idea that at a certain point, you can come to believe that winning is all that matters and that, in fact, to be empathetic, to care about the law, to adhere to the rules imposed upon you is a sign of weakness. And in fact, as she said, may in fact be a sin.
41:22That is a profound change in the philosophical orientation of how power is supposed to function. I mean, one of the phrases that the evangelical leaders used was to call Trump God's wrecking ball. So, you know, we're now seeing it unleashed in the Middle East. We have to also talk a little bit for a second about the amount of money that is being spent by Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump's Pentagon. We're now over$11 billion at this point. They miscalculated overall in the war plan here in a way that is, I think, truly shocking because I think we're now learning two weeks into this that the assumption that undergirded this war was that it would be over in two or three days and that they would knock out the leadership.
42:07And that not that Iranians wouldn't attempt to use this incredible leverage of their geographic position atop the strait where 20 percent of the world's energy flows, but that there wouldn't be an Iranian regime anymore. And the hubris and folly of, A, having that as your war plan and, B, not having a well-executed and thought-through backup plan, the fact that we're burning through our munitions at such an extraordinary rate that we may or may not be able to sustain a long-term conflict given the economic damage that the still intact Iranian regime, you know, it's the reversion to selling a war that's otherwise unsellable.
42:49to a swath of the base that, remember, it was Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump who sold the idea that there would be no new foreign wars. Again and again and again, that's what their core MAGA base was told. In fact, the first year of the Trump presidency, Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense was talking about essentially the enemy within and refocusing the mission of this Defense Department on going after the American enemies inside our country. And so to execute this pivot, I think that's where the religious aspect of it, for me, comes into sharper relief that they have to have something to sell to people who've been actually told, you know, we're not going to go to war.
43:31Oh, wait, never mind. So the holy war seems to be kind of the default setting for them. And I think that's what I found really helpful about putting this in the center of the frame today. Pete Hegseth is the man of the moment. And I have to say, I'm very pleased that we have been able to kind of dig into his ideas, his experience, and understand what he has and what he lacks. Because like it or not, we are all now living in a world that will be shaped substantially by this person. Well, it was great to hear from Catherine Stewart and great conversation, kind of bracing. But thanks again. This has been The Political Scene from The New Yorker.
44:11I'm Jane Mayer. We're taking a break next week, but be sure to check out Conversations in the Speed from our colleagues, David Remnick and Tyler Foggett. Our producer is Nora Ritchie. This show was mixed by Mike Kutchman. Stephen Valentino is our executive producer. We had special assistance today from Rose Kirchner and editing by Rhiannon Corby. Our theme music is by Allison Leighton-Brown. Thanks so much for listening.
From the publisher
The Washington Roundtable considers how the ideological commitments of Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of War, are at play in the conflict with Iran. Their guest, the journalist Katherine Stewart, has covered the MAGA right and is the author of “Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy.” The panel discusses how Christian nationalism has moved from the fringes of the culture to the center of American military power, with Hegseth driving the shift. “This is a movement that at its core has never believed in democracy,” Stewart says. “It rejects the principles of equality and pluralism, and, frankly, the rule of law that represents the best of the American promise.”
This week’s reading:
- “The War Trump Doesn’t Want to Talk About,” by Susan B. Glasser
- “Trump’s Inexcusable Unpreparedness for the Iranian Oil Crisis,” by John Cassidy
- “What the Selection of Iran’s New Leader Might Mean for the War,” by Robin Wright
- “War in the Age of the Online ‘Information Bomb,’ ” by Kyle Chayka
- “How Putin Views Trump’s War on Iran,” by Joshua Yaffa
- “The Limits of Iran’s Proxy Empire,” by Sudarsan Raghavan
The Political Scene draws on the reporting and analysis found in The New Yorker for lively conversations about the big questions in American politics. Join the magazine’s writers and editors as they put into context the latest news—about elections, the economy, the White House, the Supreme Court, and much more. New episodes are available three times a week.
Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices