Why Is Trump Targeting Venezuela?

3 Dec 2025 · 40 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: Why Is Trump Targeting Venezuela?

Podcast Overview Podcast Title: The Political Scene | The New Yorker Hosts: David Remnick, Tyler Foggatt, and New Yorker Staff Writers Episode Title: Why Is Trump Targeting Venezuela?

Guest

Jon Lee Anderson, Staff Writer for The New Yorker Release Date: [Date not specified in transcript]

Episode Description In this episode, Jon Lee Anderson discusses the Trump Administration’s military strikes against alleged Venezuelan drug boats in the Caribbean. The conversation covers the intelligence and legality of these operations, the potential political motivations behind them, and the broader implications for U.S.-Latin America relations.

Key Themes and Discussions

Nature of the Military Strikes

  • Performative Gunboat Diplomacy: Anderson likens the strikes to a theatrical display rather than a strategic military operation, suggesting that Trump uses dramatic rhetoric to create suspense and engagement.
  • Questionable Intelligence: There’s skepticism about the intelligence justifying the military operations, with many strikes being reported without clear evidence of drug trafficking.
  • Extrajudicial Killings: Concerns are raised regarding the legality of the strikes, particularly an alleged order from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to leave no survivors, which could constitute a war crime.

Political Context

  • Framing as a Drug War: The Trump Administration is portrayed as framing the situation in Venezuela as a drug war, which aligns with broader ambitions to exert dominance in the hemisphere and destabilize the Maduro regime.
  • Isolation of Maduro: Maduro’s regime is increasingly isolated, making Venezuela a "low-hanging fruit" for U.S. intervention. The political turbulence within Venezuela provides the U.S. with a potential opportunity to influence regime change.

U.S. Drug Policy

  • Focus on Fentanyl Crisis: Trump links military action to the fentanyl crisis in the U.S., claiming the strikes will save American lives. However, Anderson points out that the roots of the crisis are more complex and involve various international actors, including China and Mexican cartels.
  • Ineffectiveness of Current Tactics: Anderson argues that the current military approach is ineffective and will likely lead to more enemies rather than allies in the region.

Legal and Ethical Concerns

  • Congressional Investigation: Following allegations regarding Hegseth’s orders, Congress is set to investigate the legality of the strikes, highlighting potential violations of both U.S. and international law.
  • Historical Precedents: The discussion reflects on historical U.S. interventions and the lessons that may have been ignored, emphasizing the need for a more nuanced approach that avoids repeating past mistakes.

Regional Impact

  • Reactions from Latin American Countries: Other Latin American nations may view U.S. actions in Venezuela with apprehension, recalling historical interventions and the potential for similar actions against their own governments.
  • Consequences of Military Escalation: There are concerns regarding how further military actions could lead to destabilization in Venezuela and potentially broader conflict in the region.

Key Takeaways

  • Trump’s Approach: The episode critiques Trump’s aggressive and theatrical approach to foreign policy, particularly concerning Venezuela, framing it as more about personal ego than strategic interests.
  • Complexity of Drug Trade: The episode stresses that attacking small boats purportedly involved in drug trafficking does little to address the larger issues in the drug trade and fails to confront the systemic problems contributing to drug abuse in the U.S.
  • Need for Diplomacy: Anderson suggests that previous administrations have employed diplomatic measures and sanctions which may be more effective than military strikes.

Suggested Readings

  • "Can Trump’s Peace Initiative Stop the Congo’s Thirty-Year War?" by Jon Lee Anderson
  • "The Dishonorable Strikes on Venezuelan Boats" by Ruth Marcus
  • "The Legal Consequences of Pete Hegseth’s ‘Kill Them All’ Order" by Isaac Chotiner
  • "The Undermining of the C.D.C." by Dhruv Khullar
  • "In the Line of Fire" by Benjamin Wallace-Wells

Closing Remarks The episode provides an insightful look into the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America, the implications of military action against Venezuela, and the ethical considerations that must be addressed. The discussion encapsulates the multifaceted nature of political decisions and their potential global ramifications.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:06Hey, John Lee. Hi, Tyler. How are you? I'm good. Thanks so much for being here. A real pleasure. So just to start out, you know, you've reported on conflict zones, revolutionary movements, strongmen, extensively on Latin America, and a lot on U.S. intervention across the globe. And so when you look at U.S. policy toward Venezuela today, specifically what we've been seeing with the Trump administration referring to vessels as narco-terrorist targets and striking small boats, is this best described as a drug war, a political pressure campaign, or is it just like a return to old-school gunboat diplomacy?

0:47Like, what is actually, like, the operating logic in the White House right now, in your view? I would choose the latter. Performative gunboat diplomacy. You know, if you take together the sort of rhetorical vilification campaign by Trump and his coterie towards Venezuelans, first as, you know, criminal migrants, beginning in his campaign this time around, to assigning roles to Nicolas Maduro, the president of Venezuela, as a cartel chief. putting a putting a narco terrorist label on him and giving him a you know 50 million dollar bounty it's rhetorical it's performative this is black ops at its most baroque you know you have a president who tweets constantly you have a defense secretary who calls himself the secretary of war and you see back and forth statements by trump about what he might or might not do to the Venezuelans.

1:45So it's all about creating a drama, creating suspense. In that sense, it's great theater. Here we are all watching and waiting, and the entire world is asking, what's going to happen? And I think Trump loves this kind of thing because he's the master of ceremonies. And ultimately, it'll be what he decides will be the curtain raiser. But the only actionable part of this so far very, you know, grandiloquent rhetorical exercise of bellicosity by Trump towards Venezuela is these rather horrific, gruesome killings of men on boats in the Caribbean, these small, really fishing boats and launches, mostly, which may or may not be carrying drugs.

2:28And then the videos of the action of the killing of these people displayed for the world as some kind of exercise in showing who's boss. And there we are. That's as far as we've gotten, Tyler. That's John Lee Anderson, who's been covering global conflicts for The New Yorker for more than 20 years. For the past three months, the U.S. has been conducting strikes on boats in the Caribbean that it says are carrying members of Venezuelan drug cartels. The administration cast this operation as a legal effort to combat drug trafficking and eliminate narco-terrorists who threaten U.S. national security.

3:09But experts have questioned whether the strikes violate U.S. and international law. This weekend, Congress announced plans to launch an investigation into Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth after a Washington Post report alleged that he ordered that no survivors be left during a September strike. I wanted to talk with John Lee about the legality of these boat strikes, Trump's larger war on drug trafficking in the region, and how effective it's been, and whether this escalation of military action has less to do with drugs and more to do with the Trump administration's attempts to put political pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.

3:43This is The Political Scene. I'm Tyler Foggett, and I'm a senior editor at The New Yorker.

3:53Can you give us more information on what has happened up until this point? I mean, we're all talking right now about this recent Washington Post story that the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, ordered basically everyone aboard an alleged drug boat to be killed. You know, kill them all was the quote. And even before that, and, you know, I think in early September, we were starting to get stories about these boat strikes. And so I guess I'm just wondering if you can talk a little bit about how many people have been killed so far and what we know about these boats. I mean, I think you were just talking about how it's kind of maybe unclear if there's even drugs on these boats, or at least if there is drugs on the boats, then that's not like intelligence that's been, you know, declassified.

4:35This isn't like JFK giving us information, you know, during the Cuban Missile Crisis or something. It's just it seems like we're all kind of in this black hole of information right now. Exactly. Yeah. Well, since I think it's September 2nd, there have been now 15 or 16 strikes, whether they're by missiles or aircraft or drones, we don't even know. But against various launches and boats, a couple of what they call semi-submersibles in the Pacific, which are these sort of handmade submarines that go just below the water. But most of them are these open boats without boards like you might see anywhere, you know, 20, 30 foot long boats.

5:16And then we see them being blown up just after they appear on the screen. And Pete Heggseth, or sometimes Donald Trump, shares the information that X number of men were killed on this boat. Narco-terrorists, no proof provided as to what was being carried on board or anything else or how they got the intelligence, or for that matter, how they were killed. We see the explosions. uh president trump has a number of times you know alleged that with every vote that they blow up 25 000 americans lives will be saved and the campaign itself has been anchored in the idea that america is stopping fentanyl through these strikes from coming into the united states and we all know that there's a fentanyl crisis that's killed hundreds of thousands of americans now we also know from lots of good reporting and the government's own communiques that the fentanyl's precursors are made in China, smuggled in Mexico, where various gangland cartels put them together and smuggled them across in the United States.

6:19Cocaine originates, for the most part, in Colombia, and it finds its way north and to Europe via a variety of countries and means. So yes, Some comes in launches. But these launches, by the way, these boats that are, and about 83 people, I think, have been killed, they say. We don't know for sure. By and large, these would appear to be men who are hired hands, stevedores, fishermen, guys who live in port areas and probably agreed to go along on a run to, say, Venezuela coast to Trinidad, a nearby island, or Aruba or somewhere else where the drugs would be offloaded. and another group would take them further on.

7:01You know what I mean? It's that sort of thing. We're not talking, you know, you don't go very far at sea in a 30-foot open dory with a couple of outboards on the back. So these are, assuming they are all drug boats, which again, we're not sure, these are men at the very lowest end of the business. These are hired hands. These are not narco capos or cartel leaders themselves. These are hired hands who are getting a few hundred dollars or a few thousand dollars for the risk they take in moving cargo from one place to the other. But they're just the first leg in a long leg that ultimately gets these drugs to their destination.

7:40So it's not really about a drug war. This is a kind of mashup, which seems to be a good way to describe, I think, much of Trump's behavior in the world. It's a mashup of interests, people lobbying him to do this or that. This idea that Venezuela is a pariah state that's sort of low-hanging fruit, this country that ascribes to a notional socialism that's mouthy and anti-American, where the Chinese have been able to do business and some of the Russians too, which has been a fly in the ointment in the region for the past 25 years. All of that sort of true. But in the past, administrations, including Trump, number one, usually resorted to diplomacy in order to try to get the regime to change.

8:33They use sanctions. I mean, yeah, it's like now we, you know, act like sanctions are, you know, the most, you know, normal, non-aggressive thing. But like, yeah, I mean, I just feel like it's there's been this crazy escalation. And I guess I'm wondering if you were anticipating that escalation with Trump's second term or if this is something that even given everything you've seen from Trump and just like these kinds of conflicts, if even you were surprised by what we're seeing now. I'm surprised by the killing of people on boats because it seems to be extrajudicial killing. This is probably the fact that we even qualify it.

9:08It's this, I'm not a legal scholar, but this is clearly illegal behavior. We don't execute drug mules when they're found in Miami airport with condoms stuffed with cocaine in their belly or in cars once they've crossed the border, stuffed with marijuana or cocaine or even fentanyl. We don't shoot them at the side of the road, which is effectively what we are now doing in the high seas. So this part of it could not have been expected, I don't think. But I did think that this Trump regime would up the ante against Venezuela, and for that matter, the other socialist regimes in the region, Nicaragua and Cuba particularly.

9:50And the story I did before last, last summer, was in fact on Cuba and Trump's policy towards it. And one of the things I was trying to ascertain was to what degree the Trump crowd wanted to use Venezuela as a sort of fall guy, as the first step in a series of actions that would ultimately try and take out Cuba 60 years on from its revolution. And the fact that we now had a, not just a Florida-based president with those, you know, Cuban-Americans around him, but a lot of Cuban-Americans in his regime, not least Marco Rubio and a couple of other people. You know, he's very close to that crowd in Florida.

10:36And it does seem that Marco Rubio is the man who lobbied the most for an aggressive policy towards Venezuela. And ultimately, most believe that the idea is, you know, there's a saying in Spanish, la vía Havana via Caracas, which is the way to Havana is through Caracas. And the thing is, Venezuela is low-hanging fruit in the sense that Maduro has lost a lot of friends. And in the last election in the country a year ago, which by all accounts was gerrymandered by him and he won in unfair circumstances, caused even some Ursaal allies to back off, like Lula's regime in Brazil, to back off and to chastise him for it.

11:22So Maduro is more isolated than he's ever been. Over the past 10 years, we've seen an outflow of between a third and half the population, something like 8 million people out of a population of, I think it's 24 billion, throughout the hemisphere and to the United States. They are a noisome presence in the region. And so everybody would like to see the Venezuelan issue crisis go away. My feeling, Tyler, is that bottom line, and again, this is sort of, it's a gut read, is that Trump basically, you know, oil is certainly part of it, right? The fact that Venezuela is known to have the world's largest, depending on who you talk to, oil reserves in the world.

12:04So there's money to be made, you know. And so I think there's that as a kind of main incentive. And there's also, I think, this idea that Trump wants to, we saw from the moment he gave his inaugural speech this time, which is that he wants to be boss man in this hemisphere. You know, Xi's got East Asia, Putin's got the stands and that periphery he wants, including that country Ukraine, right, that used to be his. And Trump wants this hemisphere. What are the Danes doing up there in Greenland? And who are the Canadians anyway? And as for the canal, why did Carter give it away? Those Democrats gave it away.

12:44This is my hemisphere. This is my near beyond. I'm going to impose my will on it. And he has done ever since he got in. Bullying first Petro, the president of Colombia, by sending deportees, using the deportation policy as a way to get leaders to bend to his will. He, you know, he used different bullying tactics in various countries and, of course, reserved the most performative for Maduro in Venezuela. And that's what we're seeing now. And I mean, it seems to me that Trump has gone just way too far here. I mean, it's not even a controversial thing to say, but it seems like even Republicans are upset about this particular strike on September 2nd.

13:25And now there's this congressional investigation. Would you be able to talk a little bit about that strike and why it has become a flashpoint in this conversation and how it's complicated Trump's larger strategy? I mean, it seems like, you know, you're mentioning that he has all these Republican allies who want him to take a hard line toward Venezuela. But I guess I just wonder if this is going to be something that sort of jeopardizes that approach. I think it has the potential to jeopardize that approach. You're right. And I think the guy out on a limb here is Pete Hegseth, who, by all accounts, has alienated a lot of people in the security establishment through his own misbehavior, really, and his posturing.

14:06And the story is that in the first of these strikes, a number of men were killed and a number were seen to be alive in the water or hanging onto wreckage. and that Hegseth told the military to finish them off, that he wanted no survivors. And a second strike came and did kill them. Now, that's my understanding of this current revelation and ongoing controversy, which, if it's true, is really shocking. The last time I think any of us heard about an equivalent kind of behavior, you have to go back almost to World War II. The Japanese or the Germans, machine gunning survivors, you know, of a ship they wrecked in the Pacific or somewhere like that, U-boat behavior.

14:55It's a hallmark example of a war crime. But the idea that our country might be doing this sort of thing, this goes against every law of history. First of all, naval law. If even if it's your enemy, if there's someone in distress at sea, you must help them. This is required. To my knowledge, by the way, going on beyond that particular incident, which frankly, look, I know that Trump says that Hegseth told him that's not true. I didn't order that. However he said it, whether he said kill them all or whether he said I don't want survivors, it wouldn't surprise me coming from this particular person.

15:31I think this person is unbalanced and should not be in that job. And I do think that quite beyond killing survivors after you've struck their ship or their boat in the water being a war crime, the whole panoply of shooting these boats in the water is most certainly some kind of war crime. Apparently, there was one survivor, I don't know whether it was the fourth or fifth or sixth boat that was struck, and everybody was killed except one, and I think he was an Ecuadorian. I don't know the circumstances of how he was plucked out of the water and returned to his homeland, but guess what? he was set free by his government.

16:14Now, President Noboa of Ecuador, I happen to know him, is very law and order. He has openly asked Trump to reopen a military base that a predecessor closed down there to help him fight the country's drug cartels and all the rest of it. Well, if President Noboa, who's seen as a law and order freak, goes to the extent of freeing One of the survivors of the American military strikes, it tells you something. And it may tell you that these men should not be getting killed. Now, the question is, let's say, even if it turns out that Hegseth did order these men killed, and that that would be a war crime, would Trump protect him based on his behavior thus far?

16:59Pardoning other criminals and ignoring calls to see people out of their jobs after egregious behavior? not least his own. I can't see it happening. I think you'll probably double down in the belief, not least, that by owning up to any kind of weakness, that it would just be the slippery slope for him. Yeah, that's certainly the behavior we've seen so far. So I think you're probably right about that. Let's take a quick break. And then when we come back, I want to talk more about drug cartels and this concept of narco-terrorism. This is The Political Scene from The New Yorker.

17:45Wired has always put a microscope on the people, power, and forces shaping our world. Uncanny Valley brings that same fearless reporting straight to your feed. Is Doge finally over? Will AI actually democratize American health care? Each week, Wired journalists from across the newsroom are going to unpack where politics, technology, and Silicon Valley collide. From conversations with tech leaders across Silicon Valley, internet fandom investigations and government crackdowns on rigged gambling, we're taking you all over the news cycle going straight inside the priorities, pressures and power plays driving today's biggest decisions.

18:23Uncanny Valley tackles the questions keeping you up at night and helps make sense of the future taking shape right now. Listen to new episodes every Thursday, wherever you get your podcasts.

18:45So we talked a little bit about this earlier, but I feel like we've seen Trump use his kind of crusade against the drug cartels to justify a bunch of different policies, whether it be the tariffs, you know, kind of invoking the fentanyl trade, which he then used also to, you know, put tariffs on countries like Canada. and, you know, of course, a lot of his immigration policies, you know, this idea that drugs are coming, you know, across the border. And like if Trump actually wanted to take down the cartels and curb the drug trade, what is the way to do that? You know, you mentioned earlier that even putting aside the enormous ethical and legal concerns that striking these boats full of, you know, civilians who are kind of at the lowest end of the totem pole, like that that probably isn't the best way to go about trying to curb the drug trade in Venezuela.

19:37If Trump were acting in good faith, what would that look like, in your opinion? Look, fentanyl is the biggie, right? If fentanyl comes across the border, there are obviously wholesalers. It's not just a retail industry. There's obviously people operating within the United States, Americans and perhaps others, who are physically in the United States who control that industry. Now, I'm unaware of any busts of those sorts of people. Are you? We hear about El Chapo, Chapo's son, and Juan Orlando Hernandez, who, curiously, Trump just decided to free the former president of Honduras, who had been sentenced to 45 years for cocaine distribution in this country.

20:22So who are they? It's something, by the way, that all my Latin American friends ask. It's a refrain in Latin American countries that are besieged by U.S. drug policy. They say, what happens to the drugs when they go to the U.S.? You're the guys who buy them. You're the people who use them. Where are your cartel leaders? Maybe they aren't cartel leaders. Maybe they are, you know, like we've seen in Breaking Bad, you know, some guy that owns a fast food chicken chain. We don't know. But it seems to me that the U.S. itself has been remiss in investigating within its own territory in terms of who controls the illegal drug trade in the United States.

21:05Right. So clearly, then, you know, the next there's another component, which is obviously dealing with our neighbors who are the receptacles or the transshipment points for some of these drugs, for a lot of these drugs, whether it's fentanyl or cocaine. And there you have a kind of mixed bag of American policies that have mostly failed since the drug war was announced by President Nixon in 1970, and therefore begs the question of how to change it, how to make it effective. I think the way Trump is going about it is certainly not effective because bullying tactics, I mean, we know this from history.

21:47It may work in the short term, but it's not going to work in the long term, and it's going to create a lot more enemies than friends. So our DEA, Drug Enforcement Administration, operates in our near beyond, that is to say, let's say, Mexico, Trinidad, Haiti, Colombia, much as our vice cops do in American cities. How is that? Well, Hollywood doesn't have it very far from the truth, actually. They tend to work with one group against another. They get down and dirty, and they do the same in these other countries, unfortunately. I have a friend who investigates, he's an investigative reporter, just a great investigative reporter, Josh Goodman in Miami.

22:28And he goes to all these trials. And I don't know, a few months ago, I called him, I said, what's going on? Because it seemed to me I'd read about the sixth, for the sixth or seventh time, the trial of a DEA agent who was involved in the drug trade himself. And I said, so what's going on with the DEA? And he said, hey, what you see is what you get. It's dirty, man. You know, and this is not some conspiracy theorist. It's a problem with an agency that has almost no oversight and is able to operate internationally. And ultimately, in order to do its work, it partners with people in the underworld to take out other people in the underworld.

23:12And the money that is running through these economies is so vast that inevitably a portion of those agents are paid off, are bought off, just as they are in Mexico, just as they are in Colombia. So it's a problem. Again, one other anecdote to show just how difficult and complex these problems are. President Juan Manuel Santos of Colombia, who did the FARC, the peace deal with the FARC guerrillas 10 years ago. I went to see President Santos just before he left office. And in our conversation, I congratulated him for this peace deal he'd done. He'd managed to get 15 ,000 armed men and women out of the jungle and reduce the scale of violence in his country hugely.

23:57And he said, yeah, but I'm worried about the growth of the cocaine trade in my country. And this was private. This is 10 years ago. I can say it now. But he said, I think he said it had grown the production nine times during the eight years he was president. So he left office knowing that, yes, he'd reduced guerrilla violence somewhat, but the drug trade was more powerful than ever. And that was in spite of a 10-year or 15-year,$10 billion U.S.-funded Plan Colombia program that had run in the country. And yet under their noses, somehow or other, the drug trade just escalated and escalated and escalated.

24:41So when you hear Trump or Hexas or whoever, Rubio, calling Nicolas Maduro a narco-guerilla, a narco-terrorist, it's just not true. You could have said the same thing about President Santos. So, Nicolas Maduro might know of a minister or a governor or even a general or more who he believes is involved in the drug trade, but how does he move against them? You know, what are the power plays he has to do to pull that off without getting killed or overthrown? It's a mixed bag. Every country has its own quotient of difficulties in dealing with it. Look at the wonderful Claudia Scheinbaum, the president of Mexico.

25:21I'm sure she knows some officials within her government who are involved, but it may not be just a simple matter of moving against them. We're talking about political economies and sovereignties that are vitiated and compromised by illegal drug networks and the underworld itself. And I think you could probably say the same about the United States. We just don't see it as well. I wonder if we can go back to Honduras really quickly. I mean, would you consider Juan Orlando Hernandez a narco president or like how does he fit into all of this? Because I think a lot of people are kind of confused by the fact that while Trump is going, you know, hard against the drug trade and, you know, striking boats in Venezuela, that he would pardon someone who was in prison for drug trafficking offenses.

26:11I mean, the New York Times piece about it was just the lead. It's like it's worth reading. He once boasted that he would stuff the drugs up the gringo's noses. He accepted a one million dollar bribe from El Chapo to allow cocaine shipments to pass through Honduras. A man was killed in prison to protect him. He orchestrated a vast trafficking conspiracy that prosecutors said raked in millions for cartels while keeping Honduras one of Central America's poorest, most violent and most corrupt countries. Yeah. Yeah. So I did a story on Juan Orlando Hernandez four years ago in the magazine while he was still president.

26:45Interesting. He wouldn't talk to me then. But when he was in prison, he began reaching out to tell his side of the story. And I gather he managed to tell it to Roger Stone and a couple of other people who, as we know, are friends of Trump. And then apparently they lobbied Trump to free him, which he has done. Now, without knowing for sure whether Juan Orlando Hernandez, as was being said five years ago, was a drug trafficker, what logic there is to freeing him, I have not grasped, other than what some of his defenders are saying, which is that he was railroaded by the American system, which means the Southern District of New York, right?

27:26That notorious temple of nefarious activity, I guess. That judiciary, the Biden judiciary, the maniac lefty communist who run that part of the judiciary in New York. And it was the lefty friends of the American Democrats that railroaded him because it made them look good and got rid of an ally. Well, it's true that when Trump was in office the first time, he was quite friendly with Juan Orlando Hernandez. And Juan Orlando Hernandez made a lot of noises that he was very friendly and happy with Donald Trump. And he also signed on to Donald Trump's request to make Honduras a partner in the expulsion of migrants from the United States.

Read the full transcript

28:14Well, quite a few of whom came from Honduras, which is a very poor country, the poorest after Haiti in the Western Hemisphere. But there was a lot of news percolating about his narco activities, even at the time. And yes, it wasn't until Donald Trump left office that procedures were taken against him and he was ultimately tried, convicted and sentenced to prison. And that's come full circle since then. And in a sense, maybe it has the same kind of logic as Trump turning all of the people who violently, you know, assaulted the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, freeing them from prison, and now going after the prosecutors who went after them and saw them into prison.

28:53So maybe it's as simple as that. It's kind of deterministic historical revisionism happening before our eyes, but in a very cartoonish way. Yeah, I mean, I guess it's just his willingness to kind of forgive those actions, even if, you know, they kind of had a personal relationship that was friendly. I feel like it does really just kind of drive home the hypocrisy of what we're seeing in terms of the administration's actions toward Venezuela. More with John Lee Anderson after the break. This is the political scene from The New Yorker.

29:35Right now, we are living through some of the most tumultuous political times our country has ever known. I'm David Remnick, and each week on the New Yorker Radio Hour, I'll try to make sense of what's happening, alongside politicians and thinkers like Cory Booker, Nancy Pelosi, Liz Cheney, Tim Waltz, Ketanji Brown-Jackson, Newt Gingrich, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Charlemagne Tha God, and so many more. That's all in the New Yorker Radio Hour, wherever you listen to podcasts.

30:12Going back to Venezuela now, you know, Maduro has framed these boat strikes and the increased military presence around Venezuela as part of a larger U.S. attempt led by Trump to overthrow him. Is that possible? I mean, do you think that that is probably the intended goal here? And is that what this could all be building toward? It seems so. I mean, at least, look, at the very least, it's what they call a psyops operation aimed at making Maduro and his people nervous as hell, right? I mean, I would be if I was sitting in Miraflores Palace and they had the world's biggest anti-aircraft carrier was sitting off my shores.

30:48and there were senior officials being quoted every day in the Washington Post and the New York Times to the effect that the real policy is to get rid of Maduro. So they've been leaking this since the first boat strikes and since the flotilla began pitching up off Venezuela's shores. So while Trump does his kind of like, oh, I don't know, well, let's see, land strikes might be next. We'll see, but I'm also talking to him and it's this kind of watch me, you're not going to figure this out kind of policy, which with the military component is the one thing that no previous American administration has attempted so openly over such a period of time.

31:32In other words, if nothing else has worked, let's try this. Now, I suppose option, the first and most desirable option is not having to use Tomahawk missiles or anything, but just Maduro getting frightened and saying, okay, I'm going to leave. Give me safe passage to Turkey or wherever. And along with the coterie of the people that are seen as the worst characters. And then they can whisk Maria Corina Machado out of the embassy where she is hiding, you know, the woman who was given the Nobel Peace Prize this year and who has been aiding, you know, advocating a military intervention ever since, and whisk her into the metaphor as presidential palace, then everything will be hunky-dory.

32:19Reminds me of Dick Cheney and the idea that it was a cakewalk in Iraq, frankly. This idea that the Venezuelans won't fight, the majority really wanted her to be president, everybody's tired of Maduro and his gang of thieves. Well, I think, you know, there's truth in both of those statements, but the problem with anything like this is that the virus mutate once you let it out of the petri dish, as we've seen before in so many ways. Now, that's option one. No guns. Maduro just decides to go. That would be wonderful. And Trump could go around with the bounce in his step saying, look, I did that. I won.

32:57We got rid of the worst dictator in the regime. Now we're going to go after Cuba. Whatever. Option two is probably land strikes, which, frankly, Trump has been saying he's going to do for some time. Yeah, we've done the ocean. We've really knocked down the drug trafficking in the ocean. Now we're going to go after the land bases. Now, what are the land bases? My guess is they have a range of targets, which include places where drug traffickers use trails on the Colombian-Venezuelan border, some of them controlled by guerrillas, some controlled by right-wing paramilitaries, and possibly some military outposts around Venezuela where they will claim that drugs are, you know, transhipped through them, part of the drug group.

33:44And it would be a way to probe the defenses or the equilibrium within Venezuela and see whether or not this would cause one, Maduro to leave. Okay, okay, I'm going, or a coup against him. Now, if it's the latter, who's going to take over? How can you guarantee it's going to be someone you like? Option three is you really go for it. And you don't just do a series of, like, say, 20 airstrikes or drone strikes on inert objects, not too many victims. But you also land some special foursome teams to engage with, you know, people you call narco-terrorists, whoever they are. Now, there's a risk there.

34:27But let's see. Look, past administrations of the United States have gotten it wrong, sometimes even with the best of intentions in wars that they have engaged in over the past quarter century. This regime in the United States is a far different kettle of fish. There's no adults in the room here. There was one adult in the room as the commander of Southcombe, that is to say, Southern Command, the American general who was supposed to be in charge of this whole area of operations. What did he do? After several of these boat strikes, he resigned his commission, and he has not spoken, to my knowledge, about why.

35:09But symbolically, at least, it seems that this was a man, by all accounts, people who know him, is an honorable American military officer who saw that this was something he did not want to be associated with. Was it because he knew about people being killed in that first boat strike on Pete Hexeth's orders? Or was it just simply that he saw the whole thing as a criminal enterprise? We don't know. But I think it tells you something, The man who should have been the commander of this entire area of operations quit, you know, took early retirement just at the moment when he was at the apogee of his career.

35:48I think we're looking at something and it's staring us in the face. I guess I'm wondering what, you know, if the U.S. were to continue escalating in this way, what do you think the response from other Latin American countries and just the rest of the world would look like? Like, have we seen evidence of certain countries aligning themselves with or against Maduro and even some countries signaling a willingness to join cause with the U.S. if there's further military escalation? I mean, look, one of the concerns I have is that for the people who are doing this, the timing may seem to them to be right.

36:26And, you know, the regime has been, I'm speaking of the Maduro regime here, has been a pariah now for some years. and even its staunchest defenders either have backed off or are not in a position themselves to help it. So it's on its own, by and large. The problem is Latin Americans with any sense of history or national pride will be looking at this with huge misgivings because they know that what happened in Venezuela could happen to them too. They remember, even if Americans don't, what they know their history and about gunboat diplomacy. And the number of times American Marines were sent into Haiti, Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, and on and on and on.

37:12Not to mention the CIA interventions of the 60s and the 70s. So nobody will cry for Maduro. But Venezuela will not be a problem. It will easily go away. And Americans have not shown themselves to be particularly good at the after war, at putting the money into rebuilding societies after they have, you know, unmoored them. So where do we think that it will be any different this time, and particularly with the Trump government? It won't be any different. It'll be worse, probably. Now, you know, look, everything I just said could be turned on its head tomorrow if Maduro leaves and Maria Corina Machado comes into the presidency and it'll be a cakewalk and they'll be dancing in the streets.

37:57Well, you know, I would love to think that the world was a storybook like that. But the fact of the matter is Venezuela is a piece of work. It is a piece of work. You have the FARC, the Colombian guerrillas next door, but there's another group of guerrillas, the ELN, Ejército de Liberación Nacional, who've been fighting since the early 60s, who didn't used to be part of the drug trade, but now are, and have moved into some of the areas the FARC used to have vacated. And then there's another group who, because the peace deal didn't work that well in Colombia, went back to war. So there's several groups.

38:32Now, to my knowledge, those groups overlap the border. and in some cases operate within Venezuela. And they work in tandem with different factions within that regime, which is a military regime, which has also had 25 years to build up a kind of anti-imperialist ideology. I remember Chavez telling me how this was one of his big priorities, was to make a military that understood our history and that would be proud to fight against imperial invaders. And he also, I'll never forget that, especially in light of what's happening today with his successor, he said, I'm never going to be taken like Noriega was.

39:15And I think Maduro, for all his bravado and bluster, probably sees himself as an heroic figure who would rather go down with a ship than skedaddling off somewhere to cower until he's sold out or turned over to the Americans eventually, you know. So it's a messy proposition to invade a country like Venezuela or to bring about democratic change through the threat or the use of violence, I think. This is a very dangerous proposition and one that could have any number of consequences. And so on that basis alone, I think this is one of the most absurd scenarios that I've seen come out of this crowd in Washington yet.

40:03But like I say, my gut tells me that it's all of a piece and all of it has to do with Trump's ego. Venezuela is the country he wants to see bend at the knee to him, just as he wants sanctuary cities to do the same. he'll use bluster and force and violence if necessary the threat of it to pretty much do whatever he wants everywhere i think it's not too complex well thank you so much i really appreciate you taking the time today to walk us through sort of everything that's happening in the in the region thank you tyler appreciate it john lee anderson is a staff writer for the new yorker you can read his latest piece, Can Trump's Peace Initiative Stop the Congo's 30-Year War?

40:51at newyorker.com. This has been The Political Scene from The New Yorker. I'm Tyler Foggett. This episode was produced by John LeMay, with mixing by Mike Kutchman, and engineering by Pran Bandy. Our executive producer is Stephen Valentino. Our theme music is by Alison Leighton Brown. Thanks so much for listening. We'll be back next Wednesday.

41:26The New Yorker

41:46is illegal. Our animated short film retirement plan follows a man as he dreams about all the things he's going to do when he's done working. You can enjoy both of those films and our full library of acclaimed short films at newyorker.com slash video.

From the publisher

The New Yorker staff writer Jon Lee Anderson joins Tyler Foggatt to talk about the Trump Administration’s military strikes on alleged Venezuelan drug boats in the Caribbean. They discuss the questionable intelligence and rationale behind the operation, the legal concerns raised by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s alleged order to leave no survivors in a September strike, and whether the attacks feels more performative than strategic. They also explore how Trump’s framing of the issue as a drug war intersects with his broader ambitions—from pressuring the Venezuelan President, Nicolás Maduro, to reasserting American dominance in the hemisphere—and how other Latin American countries may respond to further military action in the region.

This week’s reading:

The Political Scene draws on the reporting and analysis found in The New Yorker for lively conversations about the big questions in American politics. Join the magazine’s writers and editors as they put into context the latest news—about elections, the economy, the White House, the Supreme Court, and much more. New episodes are available three times a week.

Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts. 

Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

More from The Political Scene | The New Yorker

All 169 episodes
Why Is Trump Targeting Venezuela?The Political Scene | The New Yorker · 40 min
Listen in VO